(Restricted Road) (40 Mph Speed Limit) Order 201

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

CITY OF BRISTOL (A4 BATH ROAD, BRISLINGTON, CITY OF BRISTOL) (SOUTH EASTERN ZONE) (RESTRICTED ROAD) (40 MPH SPEED LIMIT) ORDER 201- NOTICE is hereby given that the City Council of Bristol proposes to make an order under sections 82(2), 83(2) 84(1) and (2) of and the Part IV of Schedule 9 to the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, as amended, the effect of which will be:- 1. that no person shall drive any motor vehicle at a speed exceeding 30 miles per hour on the length of restricted road specified in Schedule 1 to this Notice; and 2. that no person shall drive any motor vehicle at a speed exceeding 40 miles per hour on the length of road specified in Schedule 2 to this Notice. The order will:- (a) supersede the provisions in operation on A4 Bath Road which exist by virtue of the City and County of Bristol (Built-up Areas) No.2 Order 1935, as varied, and (b) supersede the 50 mph speed limit in operation on A4 Bath Road which exists by virtue of the County Council of Avon (A4 Bath Road and Durley Hill, Keynsham, City of Bristol and District of Wansdyke) (40 mph Speed Limit) (50 mph Speed Limit) (Revocation of 40 mph Speed limit) Order 1994, as varied - this order will be revoked accordingly. Exemption is provided in the order for vehicles when in use for special forces purposes. Full details of the proposal are contained in the draft order, which together with maps, copies of the orders to be varied and revoked, and a Statement of the Council's Reasons for proposing to make the order, may be inspected at the undermentioned offices (callers should ask for Statutory Orders, Legal Division) between 10.00 a.m. and 4.00 p.m. on Monday to Friday and at Wick Road Public Library, Brislington during normal opening hours. Plans and Statement of Reasons are also available to view on the Bristol City Council Consultation Finder at www.opinionsuite.com/bristol. Objections to the proposal, together with the grounds on which they are made, must be sent in writing to the Head of Legal Services at the undermentioned address or by e-mail to [email protected] quoting reference CAE/RGW/P-730 by 6 th June 2011 . Please include your name and address and note that all representations received may be considered in public by the City Council and that the substance of any representation together with the name and address of the person making it could become available for public inspection. Council House S. MCNAMARA College Green Head of Legal Services P.O. Box 2156 Bristol BS99 7PH Fax. No. (0117) 922 3836 Dated: 12 th May 2011 SCHEDULE 1 Restricted Road – 30 mph speed limit A4 Bath Road - that length from 320 metres south east of Emery Road to 22 metres south east of the access road leading to Brislington House, a distance of 160 metres SCHEDULE 2 40 mph speed limit A4 Bath Road - that length from 22 metres south east of the access road leading to Brislington House to the Bristol City Council/Bath and North East Somerset Council boundary, a distance of 650 metres 2 .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

The Hysteria Surrounding Hysteria: Moral Management and the Treatment of Fe-Male Insanity in Bristol Lunatic Asylum
University of Bristol Department of Historical Studies Best undergraduate dissertations of 2013 Chloe Bushell The hysteria surrounding Hysteria: Moral management and the treatment of fe-male insanity in Bristol Lunatic Asylum The Department of Historical Studies at the University of Bristol is com- mitted to the advancement of historical knowledge and understanding, and to research of the highest order. We believe that our undergraduates are part of that endeavour. In June 2009, the Department voted to begin to publish the best of the an- nual dissertations produced by the department’s final year undergraduates (deemed to be those receiving a mark of 75 or above) in recognition of the excellent research work being undertaken by our students. This was one of the best of this year’s final year undergraduate disserta- tions. Please note: this dissertation is published in the state it was submitted for examination. Thus the author has not been able to correct errors and/or departures from departmental guidelines for the presentation of dissertations (e.g. in the formatting of its footnotes and bibliography). © The author, 2013 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted by any means without the prior permission in writing of the author, or as expressly permitted by law. All citations of this work must be properly acknowledged. 1017470 The hysteria surrounding Hysteria: Moral management and the treatment of female insanity in Bristol Lunatic Asylum Bristol Lunatic Asylum-
[Show full text]
The Patients of the Bristol Lunatic Asylum in the Nineteenth Century 1861-1900
THE PATIENTS OF THE BRISTOL LUNATIC ASYLUM IN THE NINETEENTH CENTURY 1861-1900 PAUL TOBIA A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of the West of England, Bristol for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Arts, Creative Industries and Education March 2017 Word Count 76,717 1 Abstract There is a wide and impressive historiography about the British lunatic asylums in the nineteenth century, the vast majority of which are concerned with their nature and significance. This study does not ignore such subjects but is primarily concerned with the patients of the Bristol Asylum. Who were they, what were their stories and how did they fare in the Asylum and how did that change over our period. It uses a distinct and varied methodology including a comprehensive database, compiled from the asylum records, of all the patients admitted in the nineteenth century. Using pivot tables to analyse the data we were able to produce reliable assessments of the range and nature of the patients admitted; dispelling some of the suggestions that they represented an underclass. We were also able to determine in what way the asylum changed and how the different medical superintendents altered the nature and ethos of the asylum. One of these results showed how the different superintendents had massively different diagnostic criteria. This effected the lives of the patients and illustrates the somewhat random nature of Victorian psychiatric diagnostics. The database was also the starting point for our research into the patients as individuals. Many aspects of life in the asylum can best be understood by looking at individual cases.
[Show full text]
Health and Welfare Buildings Listing Selection Guide Summary
Health and Welfare Buildings Listing Selection Guide Summary Historic England’s twenty listing selection guides help to define which historic buildings are likely to meet the relevant tests for national designation and be included on the National Heritage List for England. Listing has been in place since 1947 and operates under the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990. If a building is felt to meet the necessary standards, it is added to the List. This decision is taken by the Government’s Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS). These selection guides were originally produced by English Heritage in 2011: slightly revised versions are now being published by its successor body, Historic England. Each guide falls into two halves. The first defines the types of structures included in it, before going on to give a brisk overview of their characteristics and how these developed through time, with notice of the main architects and representative examples of buildings. The second half of the guide sets out the particular tests in terms of its architectural or historic interest a building has to meet if it is to be listed. A select bibliography gives suggestions for further reading. This selection guide looks at hospitals, asylums, workhouses, almshouses and health centres. They provide strong architectural evidence of changing attitudes to the sick and destitute, and have long been some of our most functional buildings, as well as among our largest. Their design can say much about changing social attitudes and about science’s impact on architecture too. First published by English Heritage April 2011.
[Show full text]
Bibliography
BIBlIOGRApHY PRIMARY SOURCEs ARCHIVEs AND LIBRARIEs CONsUlTED Bedfordshire Archives Berkshire Record Office Birmingham Archives Bodleian Library, Oxford Bristol Record Office Bristol University Library British Library, Additional Manuscripts Cheshire Archives Coventry City Archives Cumbria Archives, Carlisle Devon County Record Office Essex Record Office Gloucestershire Archives Hampshire Archives Herefordshire County Record Office Hertfordshire Archives and Local Studies Huntingdonshire Archives Kent History Centre © The Author(s) 2020 283 L. Smith, Private Madhouses in England, 1640–1815, Mental Health in Historical Perspective, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41640-9 284 BIBLIOGRAPHY Lancashire Archives Lichfield Joint Record Office Lincolnshire Archives Liverpool Record Office London Metropolitan Archives Magdalen College, Oxford, Archives Manchester Royal Infirmary Archives Norfolk County Record Office Nottinghamshire Archives Royal College of Physicians Archives Shakespeare Birthplace Trust Shropshire Archives Somerset Heritage Centre Staffordshire County Record Office Surrey History Centre The National Archives Warwickshire County Record Office Westminster Archives Wiltshire and Swindon History Centre York City Archives ACTs OF PARlIAMENT 1774. 14 Geo. III. Cap. XLIX. An Act for Regulating Madhouses. GOVERNMENT PUBlICATIONs British Parliamentary Papers: 1807, Vol. II, Report From Select Committee on the State of Criminal and Pauper Lunatics. 1814/15, Vol. IV, Report From the Committee on Madhouses in England. 1816, Vol. VI, First Report From the Committee on Madhouses in England. Journal of the House of Commons, 1763. Journal of the House of Lords, 1828. The English Law Reports, King’s Bench, Vols. 94, 98. REpRODUCED DOCUMENTs Jonathan Andrews and Andrew Scull (eds), ‘John Monro’s 1766 Case Book’, in Andrews and Scull, Customers and Patrons of the Mad-Trade: The Management of Lunacy in Eighteenth-Century London (Berkeley and London: University of California Press, 2003).
[Show full text]
Above All a Patient Should Never Be Terrified: an Examination of Mental Health Care and Treatment in Hampshire 1845-1914 Diane T
ABOVE ALL A PATIENT SHOULD NEVER BE TERRIFIED: AN EXAMINATION OF MENTAL HEALTH CARE AND TREATMENT IN HAMPSHIRE 1845-1914 DIANE TERESA CARPENTER ‘The thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of Portsmouth.’ September 2010 ABSTRACT ABOVE ALL A PATIENT SHOULD NEVER BE TERRIFIED: AN EXAMINATION OF MENTAL HEALTH CARE AND TREATMENT IN HAMPSHIRE 1845-1914 Challenging significant historiography this study argues that the period 1845-1914 was a time in which to have been in receipt of the care of county lunatic asylums was substantially preferable to the alternatives for the local poor and mad, suggesting wider studies might show the same for other parts of England. Case examples are provided from the close research of two pauper lunatic asylums built in Hampshire during the period. Underpinning these is a methodology which synthesises an ‘alltagsgeschichte’ deriving from the Annales School with medical and local history. The research follows a metaphorical patient-journey beginning with the pre-patient stage when policy enforced the building of county lunatic asylums, examining the concept of architecture for sanity as well as local reaction to the building programme. It has identified a novel perspective for our understanding of the loci of control responsible for translating ideology into the physical structure of the asylum. Patient assessment and the asylum admission process are critically reviewed, and the identification of the symptoms of insanity as well as contemporary beliefs about aetiology are interrogated. Medicalization of aberrant behaviour and the early attempts at classification and diagnosis are subsequently analyzed.
[Show full text]
Avon and the Evolution of Mental Health Care
Avon and the Evolution of Mental Health Care Peter Carpenter www.glensidemuseum.org.uk Key areas • Bath and the Care of Innocents and Idiots • St Peters Asylum • Madhouses and Mason Cox’s Asylum • The Burdens – Inebriacy, mental deficiency and Neurology • Glenside, Donal Early and ITO • Glenside Museum Bath Magdalen Hospital Bath Magdalen • Leper hospital – 1190 – decays 1350’s • 1486 restored - almshouse • Reformation did not close • Master told had to admit people • 1662 - Innocents The Hospital in 1829 – master’s house on left [probably old leper hospital], idiot hospital to right of church The current old hospital And the plaque found inside from its repair in 1761 Miss Charlotte White Co Foundress with sister Harriet of The Bath Idiot and Imbecile Institution and daughter of an East India Army man The First site The second site 39 Belvedere Victim of Landslide That stole its Playground. Rockhall School – the successor Downside Lodge – home for 4 – 6 Idiots from 1861 - 1919 St Peters Hospital 16 St Peter’s Hospital • Bristol Poor Act 1696 merged parishes for operating a poorhouse • 1698 The old Mint bought and St Peter’s Hospital opened. • First Physician Thomas Dover – 1700 300 inmates with one Lunatic Ward • Designated County Lunatic Asylum 1823 • 1829 Three lunatic wards – 600 in place – 58 girls sleep in 10 beds • James Cowles Prichard 1811 – 1832 – ‘A place fitter for beasts than for humans’ The part of the Bristol Workhouse called St. Peter’s Hospital, set apart for the Pauper Lunatics of the city, is without any day-room, eating-room, or kitchen, for the Females, distinct from their sleeping apartments; and the only place in which they (40 in number) can take exercise is a small passage or paved yard at one end of the Hospital.
[Show full text]
HICKS GATE Development Concept OPTIONS REPORT
HICKS GATE DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT OPTIONS REPORT MARCH 2013 2 CONTENTS 1 Introduction 4 2 Site analysis 9 3 Constraints and opportunities 18 4 Concept options 24 5 Infrastructure requirements 30 6 Viability and delivery 36 7 Summary 39 3 1. INTRODUCTION 4 Study area locations - B&NES BRISTOL 1.1 Overview Bath and North East Somerset Council (‘B&NES’) Hicks Planning Service appointed Ove Arup and Partners Gate Limited (‘Arup’) to investigate development concept options for ten locations to inform the consideration of KEYNSHAM additional housing led development. The locations are East Ensleigh West Lower slopes largely adjacent to the principal settlements within and Keynsham Keynsham at Weston associated with Bath and North East Somerset. Four locations are on the edge of Bath, two on the south edge of Bristol and four on the edge of Keynsham. Whitchurch South of K2 Uplands These Concept Option Reports are not the work of the Council and are not planning policy. They West of are assessments used to help the consideration of Twerton BATH these locations for development. By publishing these reports the Council is not agreeing to the development capacities identified in the Concept Options presented. As such the Reports have no planning status. The planning policy relating to any locations taken forward will need to be formulated in the first instance through the Core Strategy and sites will then be allocated with detailed site Odd Down requirements in the Placemaking Plan. Work on the Placemaking Plan will be done in conjunction with local community involvement and supported by further detailed site work e.g.
[Show full text]
Advocacy Or Folly: the Alleged Lunatics' Friend Society, 1845-63
Medical History, 1986, 30: 245-275. ADVOCACY OR FOLLY: THE ALLEGED LUNATICS' FRIEND SOCIETY, 1845-63 by NICHOLAS HERVEY* Some ofthe names we have seen announced suggest to us the possibility that the promoters ofthis scheme are not altogether free from motives of self-preservation ... we think they should be satisfied to take care ofthemselves, without tendering their services to all who happen to be in the same position. (The Times, 27 March 1846.) Throughout its history, the Alleged Lunatics' Friend Societyl attracted gratuitous abuse from the popular press and medicaljournals. It failed to mobilize public support and was constantly treated with disdain by those authorities responsible for the care and treatment oflunatics. Nevertheless, it made a substantial contribution to patients' rights and in many other respects was a distinguished predecessor to organizations such as the Lunacy Law Reform Association,2 the National Society for Lunacy Reform,3 and, more recently, MIND. Little has been written about the ALFS and its members, but their interest in the field of mental health was catholic, and their persective wider than has been generally acknowledged. Kathleen Jones portrayed their activities within a narrow legalistic framework, and suggested that they exaggerated the extent to which sane members ofthe public were forcibly incarcerated in defiance of the laws.4 This opinion has been echoed elsewhere, but does not represent wider aspects ofthe Society's campaign, which sought to effect changes in the way lunatics were perceived and treated. Parry-Jones did concede that the Society was "not unimportant", but he too saw it as having a circumscribed role related to civil liberties.5 The object ofthis article is to present a more detailed account ofthe Society, *Nicholas Hervey, BA, 58 Old Dover Road, Blackheath, London SE3 8SY.
[Show full text]
5Th Ed. Philadelphia, 1835. 8
News, Notes and Queries contemporaries in the recognition of widespread importance of psychological issues in clinical practice. Rush went further in stressing the importance of the study of psychology in training for general medicine, in focusing concretely on the patient as an individual, and in combining his psychological and physio- logical behaviour into a holistic pattern of functioning constituting a unitary view which in recent years is again experiencing more imperatively additional emphasis in medical education. JEROME M. SCHNECK REFER ENCES i. LATHAM, R. G. (I848). Works of Thomas Sydenham. London: Sydenham Society. 2. PAYNE, J. F. (I900). Thomas Sydenham. New York: Longmans, Green & Co. 3. RUSH, B. (I948). The Autobiography ofBenjamin Rush. Edited by G. W. Corner. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 4. GOODMAN, N. G. (I934). Benjamin Rush. Philadelphia: University of Penn- sylvania Press. 5. ABRAHAM, J. J. (I933). Lettsom. London: William Heinemann. 6. MAJOR, R. H. (I954). A History of Medicine. Springfield, Ilinois: Charles C. Thomas. 7. RUSH, B. (I812). Medical Inquiries and Observations upon the Diseases of the Mind. 5th ed. Philadelphia, 1835. 8. ZILBOORG, G. and HENRY, G. W. (I941I). A History of Medical Psychology. New York: W. W. Norton. 9. ROBACK, A. A. (I952). History of American Psychology. New York: Library Publishers. IO. CASAMAJOR, L. (I943) 3. nerv. ment. Dis., 98, 6oo. I i. BUTTERFIELD, L. H. (1946). Bull. Hist. Med., 20, 138. I2. VEITH, I. (1956). Bull. Hist. Med., 30, 233. 13. SCHNECK, J. M. (I957). Amer. 3. Psychiat., 113, 1034. 14. SHRYOCK, R. H. (I945). Amer. 3. Psychiat., 101, 429. I5. MEYER, A.
[Show full text]
Payment and Philanthropy in British Healthcare, 1918–48
2 Medicine and charity in Bristol Before the NHS, British healthcare had no national system.1 While policies could be agreed and pursued by the Ministry of Health, the British Medical Association (BMA), the Institute of Hospital Almoners or any other national body, decision-making was distinctly local. For public hospitals this meant either the poor law union or the municipal authority. In the voluntary hospital sector, it was institutional. It is therefore only through investigation at the level of the hospital itself that we can really hope to gain insight into the uncomfortable accom- modation between payment and philanthropy that emerged in the early twentieth century. As sites of charity, sites of care and sites of decision- making, these institutions were independent, although they did not operate in isolation. Context is important, and this means understand- ing the local economic, political and social context as well as the health and welfare sector within which the hospital operated. Our case study is the city of Bristol, sitting within the historic county of Gloucestershire, on the border with Somerset, in the South West of England (see figure 2.1). In the mid-eighteenth century this port city, although slightly smaller than Edinburgh and far smaller than London, had been the largest of England’s provincial towns and cities, before the rapid growth of manufacturing centres in the Midlands and the North. While the early twentieth century saw Birmingham over- take Liverpool and Manchester to become England’s second most populous
[Show full text]
Fifty Years of Brentry Hospital (1922 - 1972)
Bristol Medico-Chirurgical Journal Vol. 87 Fifty Years of Brentry Hospital (1922 - 1972) J. Jancar, M.B., B.Ch., B.A.O., F.R.C.Psych., D.P.M. Consultant Psychiatrist, Stoke Park Hospital Group. Lately Consultant Psychiatrist, Hortham-Brentry Group, Bristol. "The sands of time are sinking year by year for all of us, but the memory of the great ones in the past is a spur to further effort, an example for a truer and higher life in us all. Happy shall we be if we can pass to our successors some of the professional honour and scientific attainment which has been handed down to us from our predecessors". Long Fox of Bristol 1901 introduction but love". In 1799, The Pneumatic Medical Institution To appreciate and to understand better the history was opened in 6/7 Dowry Square, Bristol, by Dr. T. and development of Brentry Hospital, whose Golden Beddoes who was assisted by a young chemist, Hum- Jubilee we are celebrating this year, we must take a phrey Davy. The recorded observations on the release Quick glance into the distant and the more recent his- of emotion and other psychological phenomena by the tory of some of the people and events which shaped inhalation of various gases, especially nitrous oxide, the evolution of mental health in Bristol, a city which anticipated modern theories of drug abreaction in psy- has played a prominent, and sometimes an original part chotherapy by more than a century. Later, Dr. Beddoes in psychiatry. Its climate of opinion has been particu- turned his attention to preventive psychiatry by early larly favourable to new ideas and, from the 17th cen- diagnosis.
[Show full text]
John Theobald Dear Sir/Madam, I Would Like to Register My Objection
John Theobald From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: South Bristol Ring Road Categories: Green Category Dear Sir/Madam, I would like to register my objection to the plans for Whitchurch Village and the proposal to turn Whitchurch Lane into the South Bristol Ring Road. The reasons for my objection are as follows: 1. At a time when reclaiming residential neighborhoods from traffic is a concern to the public and policymakers, you are considering turning Whitchurch Lane into the South Bristol Ring Road. A major threat to the quality of life is a high volume of motor vehicle traffic associated with air and noise pollution, road deaths and injuries. This plan would see thousands of additional vehicles using Whitchurch Lane each day. It is already congested by 7:50 a.m. Monday to Friday. 2. The government may breach the Right to Life (Article 2 of the Human Rights Act) if it fails to act in relation to unlawful air pollution levels. How can you monitor, and guarantee, that the ring road will not exceed lawful air pollution levels? 3. Bridge Farm Primary School is located immediately next to Whitchurch Lane. Air pollution, labelled a public health emergency by the World Health Organisation, leads to the premature deaths of at least 40,000 people per year in the UK. It is known to be a major risk factor for childhood asthma (The Guardian, 4th July 2018). Despite scientific research supporting the link between childhood asthma and road pollution you plan to increase road traffic next to an expanding primary school. 4. The proposals are for unsustainable development within the greenbelt and an area that is prone to significant flooding.
[Show full text]