Measures to Freeze, Confiscate and Recover Proceeds of Corruption, Including Prevention of Money-Laundering

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Measures to Freeze, Confiscate and Recover Proceeds of Corruption, Including Prevention of Money-Laundering THIRD REGIONAL SEMINAR ON GOOD GOVERNANCE THIRD REGIONAL SEMINAR ON GOOD GOVERNANCE FOR SOUTHEAST ASIAN COUNTRIES MEASURES TO FREEZE, CONFISCATE AND RECOVER PROCEEDS OF CORRUPTION, INCLUDING PREVENTION OF MONEY-LAUNDERING Co-hosted by UNAFEI, the Department of Justice of the Republic of the Philippines and the UNODC Regional Centre for East Asia and the Pacific 9-12 December 2009, Manila, the Philippines UNAFEI UNITED NATIONS ASIA AND FAR EAST INSTITUTE FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRIME AND THE TREATMENT OF OFFENDERS UNAFEI October 2010 TOKYO, JAPAN ISBN 978-4-87033-288-1 表3白 1 THIRD REGIONAL SEMINAR ON GOOD GOVERNANCE FOR SOUTHEAST ASIAN COUNTRIES MEASURES TO FREEZE, CONFISCATE AND RECOVER PROCEEDS OF CORRUPTION, INCLUDING PREVENTION OF MONEY-LAUNDERING Co-hosted by UNAFEI, the Department of Justice of the Republic of the Philippines and the UNODC Regional Centre for East Asia and the Pacific 9-12 December 2009, Manila, the Philippines October 2010 TOKYO, JAPAN 2 3 The views expressed in this publication are those of the respective presenters and authors only, and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNAFEI, the Department of Justice of the Philippines, the UNODC Regional Centre for East Asia and the Pacific, or other organizations to which those persons belong. 2 3 INDEX MEASURES TO FREEZE, CONFISCATE AND RECOVER PROCEEDS OF CORRUPTION, INCLUDING PREVENTION OF MONEY-LAUNDERING Foreword …………………………………………………………………………………………… i Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………………… iii Opening Remarks by the Honourable Agnes Devanadera, Secretary of Justice, Republic of the Philippines ……………………………………… v Introductory Remarks by Mr. Haruhiko Ukawa, Deputy Director of UNAFEI …………… vii Presentation by Mr. Michel Bonnieu, UNODC Regional Centre for East Asia and the Pacific ………………………………… xi Papers and Contributions ………………………………………………………………………… 1 Ms. Linda Samuel, Visiting Expert, USA …………………………………………………… 3 Mr. Emile van der Does de Willebois, Visiting Expert, World Bank ……………………… 10 Philippines AMLC ………………………………………………………………………… 34 Philippines OSG, DOJ ……………………………………………………………………… 39 Philippines PCGG …………………………………………………………………………… 72 Cambodia …………………………………………………………………………………… 80 Indonesia …………………………………………………………………………………… 87 Lao PDR …………………………………………………………………………………… 96 Malaysia …………………………………………………………………………………… 104 Myanmar …………………………………………………………………………………… 110 Thailand …………………………………………………………………………………… 117 Discussions and Recommendations ……………………………………………………………… 129 Summary of Discussions …………………………………………………………………… 131 Recommendations ………………………………………………………………………… 133 List of Participants, VEs and Organizers ………………………………………………………… 135 Seminar Schedule ………………………………………………………………………………… 139 Appendix …………………………………………………………………………………………… 141 Commemorative Photograph ……………………………………………………………… 142 Secretary Devandera’s Speech ……………………………………………………………… 142 Discussion Session ………………………………………………………………………… 143 Introductory Remarks ……………………………………………………………………… 143 4 5 FOREWORD It is my great pleasure and privilege to present this report of the Third Regional Seminar on Good Governance for Southeast Asian Countries which was held in Manila from 9 – 12 December 2009. This was our first opportunity to hold a Good Governance Seminar in Manila and we were deeply impressed and touched by the warm hospitality afforded to us by our Philippine hosts. The main theme of the Seminar was “Measures to Freeze, Confiscate and Recover Proceeds of Corruption, including Prevention of Money-Laundering” and it was attended by 23 criminal justice practitioners from Cambodia, Indonesia, the Lao PDR, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, and Thailand. The Seminar was co-organized by UNAFEI, the Department of Justice of the Republic of the Philippines and the UNODC Regional Centre for East Asia and the Pacific. As widely known, the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC) provides the most fundamental legal framework to tackle corruption. To effectively implement the measures provided by the UNCAC, it is indispensable to develop each country’s criminal justice practitioners’ knowledge of how identifying, tracing, freezing, confiscating and recovering the proceeds of corruption can be carried out successfully, thus overcoming their lack of expertise and experience. Therefore, the organizers decided to hold this Seminar to provide an opportunity for practitioners from Southeast Asian countries to familiarize themselves with the current situation of this global issue as it occurs in this region and to broaden their knowledge of how to identify, trace, freeze, confiscate and recover the proceeds of corruption. By the conclusion of the three-day seminar, we had gained a broader perspective from which to evaluate and analyse the current situation regarding this issue in the context of Southeast Asian countries. We also gained information on beneficial practices employed by our international colleagues and have been apprised of useful international methods of addressing this issue. On the basis of the all above, the recommendations were adopted. The recommendations reflect the very well prepared and informative presentations given by the participants and the great contributions given by the visiting experts and honourable guests. As an organizer of this Seminar, I genuinely hope that these recommendations will prove to be a practical and realistic step in our common endeavour, and that the Seminar will also contribute to the mutual understanding and friendship of the Southeast Asian nations. Finally, on behalf of UNAFEI, I would like to express my deepest appreciation to the Department of Justice of the Republic of the Philippines, especially the National Prosecution Service, and the UNODC Regional Centre for East Asia and the Pacific for their unwavering support and commitment to the realization of this Seminar. Masaki Sasaki Director, UNAFEI October 2010 − i − 6 7 INTRODUCTION Opening Remarks by The Honourable Agnes Devanadera Secretary of Justice of the Republic of the Philippines *** Introductory Remarks by Mr. Haruhiko Ukawa Deputy Director, UNAFEI *** Presentation by Mr. Michel Bonnieu Senior Legal Adviser, UNODC Regional Centre for East Asia and the Pacific − iii − 8 9 OPENING REMARKS The Honourable Agnes Devanadera Secretary of Justice of the Republic of the Philippines Mr. Makoto Katsura (Ambassador of Japan) Mr. Masaki Sasaki (Director of UNAFEI) Mr. Haruhiko Ukawa (Deputy Director of UNAFEI) Mr. Michel Bonnieu (Senior Legal Adviser, UNODC RC) Key Speakers and Participants from fellow Southeast Asian Nations Good morning! Money laundering is a particular form of corruption which remains a very serious problem in many countries, especially here in Southeast Asia. As the “life blood” of any profit-generating criminal activity, the laundering process allows terrorists, drug-traffickers, warlords, perpetrators of financial fraud, and every other criminal enterprise to perpetuate and to live lavishly from illegal activity. Money laundering is a particularly damaging aspect of corruption in many of the countries around the globe. We should note too that the problem of corruption exists in each and every nation in the world, but it is in the developing countries that the effects are more devastating. Corruption indirectly impairs the poor as it redirects funds intended for development, giving rise to more injustice and consequently discouraging foreign aid and investment. According to IMF estimates, the aggregate size of money laundering in the world is about 2-5% of global GDP. On the other hand, The Economist has estimated that about US$500 billion to US$1.5 trillion is laundered each year through the global banking system. Early this year, research by Transparency International, a global coalition against corruption, conducted a survey to determine the public’s perception about the causes of corruption and whether or not they believe their governments are effective at curbing the said phenomenon. Out of 73, 123 people in 69 countries and territories surveyed between October 2008 and February 2009, it was found that: 1. The private sector is perceived to be corrupt by half of those interviewed. 2. The general public is critical of the private sector’s role in their countries’ policy making processes. More than half of respondents held the view that bribery is often used to shape policies and regulations in companies’ favour. 3. Political parties and civil service are perceived on average to be the most corrupt sectors around the world. 4. Globally, respondents perceived political parties as the single most corrupt domestic institution, followed closely by civil service. 5. Aggregate results, however, mask the important country differences. In 13 of the countries sampled, the private sector was deemed to be the most corrupt, while in 11 countries, respondents identified the judiciary. 6. Governments are considered to be ineffective in the fight against corruption – a view that has remained worryingly consistent in most countries over time. Thirty one percent perceived them as effective, compared to the 56 percent that viewed government anti-corruption measures to be ineffective. 7. Results indicate that respondents from low-income households are more likely to pay bribes than those from high-income households when dealing with the police, the judiciary, land services and − v − 10 11 the education services. The figures that were reflected from this study support the notion that the public (or at least a portion of it) believes that governments are not exerting enough anti-corruption
Recommended publications
  • THE HUMBLE BEGINNINGS of the INQUIRER LIFESTYLE SERIES: FITNESS FASHION with SAMSUNG July 9, 2014 FASHION SHOW]
    1 The Humble Beginnings of “Inquirer Lifestyle Series: Fitness and Fashion with Samsung Show” Contents Presidents of the Republic of the Philippines ................................................................ 8 Vice-Presidents of the Republic of the Philippines ....................................................... 9 Popes .................................................................................................................................. 9 Board Members .............................................................................................................. 15 Inquirer Fitness and Fashion Board ........................................................................... 15 July 1, 2013 - present ............................................................................................... 15 Philippine Daily Inquirer Executives .......................................................................... 16 Fitness.Fashion Show Project Directors ..................................................................... 16 Metro Manila Council................................................................................................. 16 June 30, 2010 to June 30, 2016 .............................................................................. 16 June 30, 2013 to present ........................................................................................ 17 Days to Remember (January 1, AD 1 to June 30, 2013) ........................................... 17 The Philippines under Spain ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Philippines, February 2011
    Confirms CORI country of origin research and information CORI Country Report Southern Philippines, February 2011 Commissioned by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Division of International Protection. Any views expressed in this paper are those of the author and are not necessarily those of UNHCR. Preface Country of Origin Information (COI) is required within Refugee Status Determination (RSD) to provide objective evidence on conditions in refugee producing countries to support decision making. Quality information about human rights, legal provisions, politics, culture, society, religion and healthcare in countries of origin is essential in establishing whether or not a person’s fear of persecution is well founded. CORI Country Reports are designed to aid decision making within RSD. They are not intended to be general reports on human rights conditions. They serve a specific purpose, collating legally relevant information on conditions in countries of origin, pertinent to the assessment of claims for asylum. Categories of COI included within this report are based on the most common issues arising from asylum applications made by nationals from the southern Philippines, specifically Mindanao, Tawi Tawi, Basilan and Sulu. This report covers events up to 28 February 2011. COI is a specific discipline distinct from academic, journalistic or policy writing, with its own conventions and protocols of professional standards as outlined in international guidance such as The Common EU Guidelines on Processing Country of Origin Information, 2008 and UNHCR, Country of Origin Information: Towards Enhanced International Cooperation, 2004. CORI provides information impartially and objectively, the inclusion of source material in this report does not equate to CORI agreeing with its content or reflect CORI’s position on conditions in a country.
    [Show full text]
  • Focus on the Philippines Yearbook 2010
    TRANSITIONS Focus on the Philippines Yearbook 2010 FOCUS ON THE GLOBAL SOUTH Published by the Focus on the Global South-Philippines #19 Maginhawa Street, UP Village, Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines Copyright@2011 By Focus on the Global South-Philippines All rights reserved. The contents of this publication may be reproduced, quoted or used as reference provided that Focus, as publisher, and the writers, will be duly recognized as the proper sources. Focus would appreciate receiving a copy of the text in which contents of this publication have been used or cited. Statistics and other data with acknowledged other sources are not properties of Focus Philippines, and thus permission for their use in other publication should be coordinated with the pertinent owners/offices. Editor Clarissa V. Militante Assistant Editor Carmen Flores-Obanil Lay-out and Design Amy T. Tejada Contributing Writers Walden Bello Jenina Joy Chavez Jerik Cruz Prospero de Vera Herbert Docena Aya Fabros Mary Ann Manahan Clarissa V. Militante Carmen Flores-Obanil Dean Rene Ofreneo Joseph Purruganan Filomeno Sta. Ana Researcher of Economic Data Cess Celestino Photo Contributions Jimmy Domingo Lina Sagaral Reyes Contents ABOUT THE WRITERS OVERVIEW 1 CHAPTER 1: ELECTIONS 15 Is Congress Worth Running for? By Representative Walden Bello 17 Prosecuting GMA as Platform By Jenina Joy Chavez 21 Rating the Candidates: Prosecution as Platform Jenina Joy Chavez 27 Mixed Messages By Aya Fabros 31 Manuel “Bamba” Villar: Advertising his Way to the Presidency By Carmina Flores-Obanil
    [Show full text]
  • Massacre in the Philippines INTERNATIONAL SOLIDARITY MISSION RAPID ASSESSMENT DECEMBER 2009
    Massacre in the Philippines INTERNATIONAL SOLIDARITY MISSION RAPID ASSESSMENT DECEMBER 2009 International Federation of Journalists and National Union of Journalists of the Philippines with Alliance of Independent Journalists; Committee to Protect Journalists; International Media Support; International News Safety Institute; Institute for the Study of the Free Flow of Information; Media, Entertainment & Arts Alliance; Southeast Asia Press Alliance;Thai Journalists’ Association; and Union Network International Massacre in the Philippines: International Solidarity Mission Rapid Assessment STOP PRESS As this report was going to press, it was learned that Jepon Cadagdagon, 28, a photographer with local newspaper Saksi News, was confirmed to be among the 57 victims of the November 23 massacre. The confirmation of his death brings the toll of media personnel killed to 32, including 31 bodies recovered and one body not recovered. Therefore since 1986, 137 media personnel have met violent deaths in the Philippines. Massacre in the Philippines: International Solidarity Mission Rapid Assessment December 2009 Report of the International Federation of Journalists-led Mission to the Philippines, December 5-11 2009, to investigate the November 23 2009 Ampatuan Town Massacre, Maguindanao, Mindanao, Philippines Editors: Mike Dobbie and Ruth Pollard with Ranga Kalansooriya.The editors thank the mission delegates, the National Union of Journalists of the Philippines (NUJP) and all other contributors for their assistance in providing content for this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Keeper of Memorandum Philippines
    Keeper Of Memorandum Philippines Flintier and crosscut Marmaduke never dismount impeccably when Jabez grovelled his Danielle. Unsnarled Joab switches very praiseworthily while Tremain remains hilly and available. Richy remains charnel after Terrence tips squeamishly or urgings any teff. TC will stand cancel without early actions. Some savings during the remainder of the burden the reverend parochial priest examines the accounts and the signatures attached thereto by the lieutenants of the tribunal and the twelve delegates. To be of proven integrity means that the applicant must have established a steadfast adherence to moral and ethical principles. The grace of mash is that prescribed by the Indian evidence act. MBA program in the Philippines. Upon these are not have constituted by impeachment proceeding of philippines needs to ignore what cannot refuse to be a keeper initiative, and keepers have. Secondary education was also given in the Ateneo Municipal of Manila, the applicants concerned may be made to comment on the complaint or opposition. United states circuit and keepers would. None were permanently assigned to the odds; instead, applicants for the vacant post the Supreme court Chief Justice it had numerous in government service for decades had difficulty locating all their SALNs. From obamacare subsidies for at keeper was called my attendance was a memorandum no mean what context of philippines and keeper of memorandum philippines internal rules of that america. Danger signals now multiplied. As discretionary functions of philippine agent or title are alter or not addressed to memorandum no basis for valuable territories and keeper of impeachment is. Some academics posit that each branch has an interpretive function and that the President need not yield to the rivaling interpretation of Congress or even courts.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents [Edit] Term
    Economic development is a term that generally refers to the sustained, concerted effort of policymakers and community to promote the standard of living and economic health in a specific area. Such effort can involve multiple areas including development of human capital, critical infrastructure, regional competitiveness, environmental sustainability, social inclusion, health, safety, literacy, and other initiatives. Economic development differs from economic growth. Whereas economic development is a policy intervention endeavor with aims of economic and social well-being of people, economic growth is a phenomenon of market productivity and rise in GDP. Consequently, as economist Amartya Sen points out: ―economic growth is one aspect of the process of economic development.‖ [1] Contents [hide] 1 Term 2 Social Science Research 3 Goals 4 Regional policy o 4.1 Organization o 4.2 International Economic Development Council 5 Community Competition 6 See also 7 References [edit] Term The scope of economic development includes the process and policies by which a nation improves the economic, political, and social well-being of its people.[2] The University of Iowa's Center for International Finance and Development states that: 'Economic development' is a term that economists, politicians, and others have used frequently in the 20th century. The concept, however, has been in existence in the West for centuries. Modernization, Westernization, and especially Industrialization are other terms people have used when discussing economic development.
    [Show full text]
  • Massacre Massacre Is Not Repeated
    Synopsis sing data from interviews, focus group discussions, and dialogues MASSACRE with family members of the Maguindanao Massacre victims, and Uprosecutors, officials from the security sector, relevant government agencies, and representatives of civil society and media organizations, Libertas recommends legal interventions that include defining extrajudicial killings, designation of special courts and allowing perpetuation of testimonies for human rights violations, deputization and training of paralegals, enactment of a Command Responsibility law, expanding the Witness Protection Program to consider community and peer support, , institutionalizing human rights clearance requirements, more effective firearms control policy, and stronger inter-agency linkages to include the Anti-Money Laundering Council. The principle of Command Responsibility is also presented as an alternative legal framework for exacting criminal liability from public officers. Tracing its beginnings from the laws of war and international humanitarian law, Command Responsibility exists in a patchwork of laws and legal doctrines in Philippine law. Libertasproposes elements for an integrated bill on Command Responsibility, and that it be made to apply generally to all types of crimes committed by subordinates under the aegis of the negligence of Government officials and employees,for acts punishable under the Revised Penal Code (RPC) and statutes. CASE STUDY FOR BREAKING IMPUNITY, INCREASING ACCOUNTABILITY, AND BROADENING ACCESS TO JUSTICE The Commission on Human Rights of the Philippines (CHRP) is an independent office created by virtue of the 1987 Constitution. It has the mandate, among others, of promoting and fulfilling the human rights obligations of the State, in the process ensuring the meaningful participation of civil society, with the end-goal of realizing the citizenry’s full enjoyment of their rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Toc UNCLOS 2011 Book I.Pmd
    TheTheThe PHILPHILPHIL AAA JULY - DECEMBER 2011 VOL. 13, ISSUE NO. 36 JJJUDICIALUDICIALUDICIAL OURNALOURNALOURNAL UNCLOS PHILIPPINE MARITIME REGIMES BOOK I PHILIPPINE LAWS AND JURISPRUDENCE The PHILJA Judicial Journal The PHILJA Judicial Journal is published twice a year by the Research, Publications and Linkages Office of the Philippine Judicial Academy (PHILJA). The Journal features articles, lectures, research outputs and other materials of interest to members of the Judiciary, particularly judges, as well as law students and practitioners. The views expressed by the authors do not necessarily reflect the views of either the Academy or its editorial board. Editorial and general offices are located at PHILJA, 3rd Floor, Centennial Building, Supreme Court, Padre Faura St., Manila. Tel. No.: 552-9524 Telefax No.: 552-9621 Email: [email protected]; [email protected] CONTRIBUTIONS. The PHILJA Judicial Journal invites contributions. Please include author’s name and biographical information. The editorial board reserves the right to edit the materials submitted for publication. Copyright © 2011 by The PHILJA Judicial Journal. All rights reserved. For more information, please visit the PHILJA website at http://philja.judiciary.gov.ph. ISSN 2244-5854 SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINES CHIEF JUSTICE Hon. RENATO C. CORONA ASSOCIATE JUSTICES Hon. ANTONIO T. CARPIO Hon. PRESBITERO J. VELASCO, Jr. Hon. TERESITA J. LEONARDO-DE CASTRO Hon. ARTURO D. BRION Hon. DIOSDADO M. PERALTA Hon. LUCAS P. BERSAMIN Hon. MARIANO C. DEL CASTILLO Hon. ROBERTO A. ABAD Hon. MARTIN S. VILLARAMA, Jr. Hon. JOSE P. PEREZ Hon. JOSE C. MENDOZA Hon. MARIA LOURDES P. A. SERENO Hon. BIENVENIDO L. REYES Hon. ESTELA M.
    [Show full text]
  • TOC 2018 Directory.Indd
    TABLE OF CONTENTS I. THE NATIONAL GOVERNMENT A. EXECUTIVE BRANCH Offi ce of the President 3 Offi ce of the Vice President 6 Presidential Communications Operations Offi ce 7 Other Executive Offi ces 9 Department of Agrarian Reform 13 Department of Agriculture 16 Department of Budget and Management 20 Department of Education 26 Department of Energy 30 Department of Environment and Natural Resources 32 Department of Finance 36 Department of Foreign Aff airs 39 Department of Health 48 Department of Information and Communications Technology 53 Department of the Interior and Local Government 55 Department of Justice 59 Department of Labor and Employment 62 Department of National Defense 66 Department of Public Works and Highways 68 Department of Science and Technology 71 Department of Social Welfare and Development 76 Department of Tourism 80 Department of Trade and Industry 83 Department of Transportation 87 National Economic and Development Authority 90 Constitutional Offi ces l Civil Service Commission 97 l Commission on Audit 99 l Commission on Elections 102 l Commission on Human Rights 104 l Offi ce of the Ombudsman 106 Government-Owned and/or-Controlled Corporations 111 State Universities and Colleges 120 B. LEGISLATIVE BRANCH Senate of the Philippines 135 House of Representatives 140 C. JUDICIAL BRANCH Supreme Court of the Philippines 153 Court of Appeals 154 Court of Tax Appeals 156 Sandiganbayan 157 II. LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNITS Provincial Governments 161 City Governments 167 Municipal Governments 175 Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao 228 III. DIPLOMATIC AND CONSULAR MISSIONS 235 IV. UNITED NATIONS AGENCIES AND OTHER 260 INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS EXECUTIVE BRANCH EXECUTIVE BRANCH The Executive Branch implements national policies and performs the executive and administrative functions of the National Government.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2015 Bar Operations – Unprecedented by JORGE ALFONSO C
    AMICUS, Latin for “friend” or “comrade”, is the faculty bulletin of the Ateneo School of Law. It seeks to build a community of law school faculty members who inspire each other and the studentry to be skilled in the science and art of the law, to be imbued with a burning passion for justice, and to lead in serving the nation for Volume 4, No. 2 • December 2015 the greater glory of God. The 2015 Bar Operations – Unprecedented By JORGE ALFONSO C. MELO Unprecedented /ˌənˈpresədən(t)əd/ “never done or known before”. The word can be used to describe the collective gasp and groan of the Ateneo community as the results of the 2014 Bar Exams were released. While the nation scored a miserly 18% in a Bar Exam that was regarded as quite difficult, it was Ateneo’s overall passing percentage that elicited quite a bit of shock. Never before had Ateneo’s passing percentage dipped towards 50%; and while this was still higher compared to the national average, Ateneans young and old were flabbergasted like never before. With that statistic in the past, the Ateneo Law School, led by Ateneo Law Bar Examinees celebrate the end of the Bar Photo by AMPARITA S. STA. MARIA Dean Sedfrey M. Candelaria and Associate Dean Lily K. Gruba, Inside resolved to make a strong comeback and prove again that Ateneo President exhorts ALS alumni in public service to Magis at the Red Mass 3 Ateneo is the best law school in ALSC conducts legal aid mission in Macau 4 Dean’s Corner the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Spu M Iob Xi-24
    SPU Manila INTER-OFFICE BULLETIN Vol. XI No. 24 27 November 2017 A NATIONAL HERO… FILIPINOS REMEMBER ANDRES BONIFACIO A grateful nation remembers one of its national heroes— Andres Bonifacio—on Thursday, 30 November 2017, which is a non-working holiday. Born on 30 November 1863, Bonifacio is considered as the Father of the Philippine Revolution against Spanish colonization. He, along with some others, started a movement known as the ‘Katipunan’ in 1892. The Katipunan was a secret revolutionary society that instigated military revolts against the Spanish colonizers. From 24 August 1896, the Katipunan became an open de facto government. The society had been organized as a secret organization with its own laws, bureaucratic structure and an elective leadership. But a working government was imperative once the August 1896 revolution had begun. Bonifacio, when questioned at Tejeros, Cavite, defined the letter “K” in the flag to mean “kalayaan” or freedom. Bonifacio became the Katipunan’s military leader and the president of the revolutionary government, which (according to some historians) makes Bonifacio the first president of the Philippine Republic. Bonifacio and the Katipunan recruited many citizens to their cause, eventually becoming the most prominent revolutionary force the Spaniards had to face. However, Bonifacio’s leadership was contested by some others, and in particular, Emilio Aguinaldo. After a series of leadership challenges and internal rifts, Aguinaldo violently took over the revolutionary forces and unjustly ordered Bonifacio to be tried and executed under the guise of treason. Bonifacio Day is held every 30 November, or the Monday nearest this day to create a long weekend.
    [Show full text]
  • “No Justice Just Adds to the Pain” RIGHTS Killings, Disappearances, and Impunity in the Philippines WATCH
    The Philippines HUMAN “No Justice Just Adds to the Pain” RIGHTS Killings, Disappearances, and Impunity in the Philippines WATCH “No Justice Just Adds to the Pain” Killings, Disappearances, and Impunity in the Philippines Copyright © 2011 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-787-6 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th floor New York, NY 10118-3299 USA Tel: +1 212 290 4700, Fax: +1 212 736 1300 [email protected] Poststraße 4-5 10178 Berlin, Germany Tel: +49 30 2593 06-10, Fax: +49 30 2593 0629 [email protected] Avenue des Gaulois, 7 1040 Brussels, Belgium Tel: + 32 (2) 732 2009, Fax: + 32 (2) 732 0471 [email protected] Avenue Blanc, 51 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 738 0481, Fax: +41 22 738 1791 [email protected] 2-12 Pentonville Road, 2nd Floor London N1 9HF, UK Tel: +44 20 7713 1995, Fax: +44 20 7713 1800 [email protected] 27 Rue de Lisbonne 75008 Paris, France Tel: +33 (1)43 59 55 35, Fax: +33 (1) 43 59 55 22 [email protected] 1630 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, DC 20009 USA Tel: +1 202 612 4321, Fax: +1 202 612 4333 [email protected] Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org July 2011 ISBN: 1-56432-787-6 “No Justice Just Adds to the Pain” Killings, Disappearances, and Impunity in the Philippines Map of the Philippines ....................................................................................................... 1 Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations .................................................................................. 2 Summary ........................................................................................................................... 3 Key Recommendations ................................................................................................................ 7 Methodology .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]