Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Transportation Committee August 2, 2018, at 10:00 a.m. SACOG Board Room, 1415 L Street, Suite 300, Sacramento, CA
The Transportation Committee may take up any agenda item at any time, regardless of the order listed. Public comment will be taken on the item at the time that it is taken up by the committee. We ask that members of the public complete a request to speak form, submit it to the clerk of the committee, and keep their remarks brief. If several persons wish to address the committee on a single item, the chair may impose a time limit on individual remarks at the beginning of the discussion. Action may be taken on any item on this agenda.
Roll Call: Directors Crews, Holmes, Peters, Sander, Saylor, Schenirer, Slowey, Vasquez, Veerkamp, Vice Chair Joiner, Vice Chair Suen, Chair Cabaldon, and Ex-Officio Member Benipal
Public Communications: Any person wishing to address the committee on any item not on the agenda may do so at this time. After ten minutes of testimony, any additional testimony will be heard following the action items.
Note: Time durations are estimates only.
Action: 1. Approve Minutes from the June 7, 2018, Transportation Committee Meeting (Jessica Lee) (Est. time 0 minutes) 2. Award Contract for the 2018 Triennial Performance Audit (Caroline Payne) (Est. time: 3 minutes) 3. Approve Fiscal Year 2018-2019 State of Good Repair Project List (Caroline Payne) (Est. time: 3 minutes) 4. Approve Vendor for Commuter Club and 511 Website Development, Maintenance and Hosting (Sabrina Bradbury) (Est. time: 5 minutes) 5. Update Sacramento Emergency Clean Air and Transportation System Guidelines to Promote Low Carbon Transportation (Matt Carpenter) (Est. time: 10 minutes) 6. Public Hearing: 2019-2022 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program, Amendment #2 to the 2016 Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy, and Air Quality Conformity Analysis (Jose Luis Caceres) (Est. time: 5 minutes)
Information: 7. Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy Update: Project Status (Clint Holtzen) (Est. time: 5 minutes) 8. 2020 Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy Update: Background on Equity and Economic Inclusion (Monica Hernandez) (Est. time: 5 minutes) 9. Upcoming Opportunities for Technical Assistance: Civic Lab Commercial Corridors and Rural Main Streets (Raef Porter/Greg Chew) (Est. time: 5 minutes)
Receive and File: Transportation Committee Page | 2
10. Report on Inter-Regional Travel in the Sacramento Region (Bruce Griesenbeck) (Est. time: 0 minutes)
Other Matters
Adjournment
Next committee meeting: September 6, 2018, at 10:00 a.m.
This agenda and attachments are available on SACOG’s website at www.sacog.org. SACOG is accessible to the disabled. As required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and the Federal Rules and Regulations adopted in implementation thereof, a person who requires a modification or accommodation, auxiliary aids or services in order to participate in a public meeting, including receiving this agenda and attachments in an alternative format, should contact SACOG by phone at 916-321-9000, e-mail ([email protected]) or in person as soon as possible and preferably at least 72 hours prior to the meeting. Parking is available at 15th and K Streets. Transportation Committee Meeting Date: 8/2/2018 Agenda Item No.: 2018-August-1.
Subject: Approve Minutes from the June 7, 2018, Transportation Committee Meeting (Est. time: 1 minute)
Ac on Prepared by: Jessica Lee Approved by: Ma Carpenter A achments: Yes
1. Issue: Should the Transportation Committee approve the June 7, 2018, meeting minutes?
2. Recommendation: Approve the minutes of the meeting as submitted.
3. Background/Analysis: The Transportation Committee met on June 7, 2018.
4. Discussion/Analysis: The minutes of the June 7, 2018, meeting are attached for approval.
5. Fiscal Impact/Grant Information: There is no fiscal impact to SACOG's operating budget.
ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment: Draft Action Minutes SACRAMENTO AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE
DRAFT ACTION MINUTES The SACOG Transportation Committee met on June 7, 2018, in the Board Room on the Third Floor of the Meridian Plaza Building, located at 1415 L Street, Sacramento, CA, at 10:00 a.m.
CALL TO ORDER: Vice Chair Suen called the meeting to order at 10:13 a.m.
ROLL CALL: Present: Directors Crews, Peters, Saylor, Miller (for Slowey), Bradford (for Vasquez), Veerkamp, Vice Chair Joiner, Vice Chair Suen, and Ex-Officio Member Graham (for Benipal) Absent: Directors Holmes, Sander, and Schenirer, and Chair Cabaldon
Public Comment: David Schwegel, an advocate of Precision Civil Engineering, spoke in support of investing into robust transportation systems to help increase Sacramento region’s food and agricultural exports.
1. Minutes of the May 3, 2018, Meeting
Upon motion by Veerkamp, seconded by Director Crews, the Transportation Committee unanimously approved the minutes as submitted.
Directors Miller (for Slowey) and Bradford (for Vasquez) abstained from voting.
2. 2018 Federal Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage Development Program
Upon motion by Director Crews, seconded by Vice Chair Joiner, the Transportation Committee unanimously recommends that the board authorize SACOG staff support to project sponsors seeking federal BUILD funding as long as the projects are consistent with the Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (MTP/SCS).
3. Approve Guidelines and Release Request for Grant Applications for Transportation Demand Management Grant Programs
Upon motion by Director Veerkamp, seconded by Director Saylor, the Transportation Committee unanimously recommends that the board approve the guidelines and authorize the release of the Request for Grant Applications for three TDM grant programs.
Director Peters was not present for this vote. Transportation Committee Minutes June 7, 2018
4. Release a Request for Proposals for Developing Business Plans for Transportation Management Associations
Upon motion by Director Veerkamp, seconded by Director Saylor, the Transportation Committee unanimously recommends that the board (1) approve the release of an RFP for a consultant to develop business plans for TMAs; and (2) authorize the chief executive officer to negotiate and execute a contract with the selected consultant.
Brenda Anderson, a private citizen, requested that the committee reconsider spending funds on hiring a consultant but to instead direct funds to assisting at risk youth.
5. Regional Active Transportation Program Policy Framework
Upon motion by Director Saylor, seconded by Director Peters, the Transportation Committee unanimously recommends that the board: (1) approve the 2019 policy framework for the six-county Regional Active Transportation Program (ATP); (2) authorize staff to submit the Regional ATP policy framework to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) for approval; (3) upon action of the CTC on the Regional ATP policy framework, delegate authority to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) to issue the final Regional ATP Guidelines and Call for Projects; and (4) in the event that substantive or controversial changes are requested by the CTC, delegate authority to the CEO, after consultation with the Chairs and Vice Chairs of the SACOG board and Transportation Committee, to address the CTC requests and issue the final Regional ATP Guidelines and Call for Projects.
Brenda Anderson, a private citizen, spoke in support of including at risk youth in the proposal.
6. Loan to City of Placerville
Upon motion by Director Bradford (for Vasquez), seconded by Director Joiner, the Transportation Committee unanimously recommends (Director Veerkamp recused) that the board approve a loan of $1,000,000 of SACOG Managed Funds to the City of Placerville, with the principal and interest to be repaid by August 1, 2019.
7. Fiscal Year (FY) 2018-2019 Regional Program of Projects for the Federal Transit Administration’s (FTA) Section 5311 Funds
Upon motion by Director Crews, seconded by Director Veerkamp, the Transportation Committee unanimously recommends that the board approve by resolution the FY 2018- 2019 FTA Section 5311 Program of Projects. Page 2 of 3
Transportation Committee Minutes June 7, 2018
8. 2020 MTP/SCS: Draft Land Use Pattern, Proposed Transportation Projects, and Plan Performance Analysis Approach
The Transportation Committee received and reviewed this report, presented by Clint Holtzen, SACOG staff.
9. Approach for 2020 Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy Public Workshops
The Transportation Committee received and reviewed this report, presented by Monica Hernandez, SACOG staff.
10. Green Region Policy Framework
The Transportation Committee received and reviewed this report, presented by Raef Porter, SACOG staff.
11. White Paper on Future Housing Product Type Demand and Preference
The Transportation Committee received and reviewed this report, presented by Sharon Sprowls (for Greg Chew), SACOG staff.
12. Programming Federal Transit Administration Fiscal Year 2018 Apportionments for Section 5307 and 5339
The Transportation Committee received and reviewed this report, presented by Barbara VaughanBechtold, SACOG staff.
Other Matters:
James Corless, SACOG CEO, announced the following events to the committee: (1) the Blueprint Workshop at the June 20 SACOG Board of Directors Meeting workshop; and, (2) the Graduation ceremony before the June 20 SACOG Board of Directors Meeting.
The meeting was adjourned at 11:53 a.m.
Page 3 of 3 Transportation Committee Meeting Date: 8/2/2018 Agenda Item No.: 2018-August-2.
Subject: Award Contract for the 2018 Triennial Performance Audit (Est. time: 3 minutes)
Ac on Prepared by: Caroline Payne Approved by: Ma Carpenter A achments: Yes
1. Issue: Should SACOG enter into a contract for conducting Transportation Development Act (TDA) Triennial Performance Audits in the four-county region?
2. Recommendation: That the Transportation Committee recommend that the board authorize the Chief Executive Officer to execute a contract for an amount not to exceed $238,500 with Michael Baker International for the 2018 TDA Triennial Performance Audit Services.
3. Background/Analysis: The TDA requires that performance audits be completed every three years for any transit agency receiving TDA funds as well as the Regional Transportation Planning Agency. The performance audits are used to evaluate efficiency, effectiveness, and economy of operation of each entity to be audited. SACOG administers TDA triennial performance audits for SACOG as the RTPA for Sacramento, Sutter, Yolo, and Yuba Counties, and for the transit operators in the four-county region: Sacramento Regional Transit District, Paratransit, Inc., Unitrans, Davis Community Transit, Yolo County Transportation District, South and East County Transit, Folsom Stage Line, Yuba-Sutter Transit, and Elk Grove’s e- tran.
4. Discussion/Analysis: A Request for Proposals (RFP) for three audit services was issued on April 19, 2018, with proposals due on May 18. Three firms submitted proposals to conduct the audits. SACOG staff evaluated the three proposals based on the scoring criteria established in the RFP. Michael Baker International scored the highest, presenting a comprehensive approach to the audits.
SACOG staff recommends awarding the TDA Triennial Performance Audit service contract to Michael Baker International for fiscal years 2015-2016, 2016-2017, and 2017-2018. The attachment shows the recommended firm and the contract amounts for each of the audit services.
5. Fiscal Impact/Grant Information: Expenses for completing the triennial performance audits are included in the FY 2018- 2019 SACOG operating budget. Costs for the audits are not to exceed $238,500.
6. This staff report aligns with the following SACOG Work Plan Goals: 10. Strengthen Internal Functions and Protocols ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment: TDA Performance Audit Cost Attachment
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT TRIENNIAL PERFORMANCE AUDIT COST
Contract TDA Triennial Performance Audit Services Recommended Firm Amount Michael Baker Audit Services #1 International (formerly $31,861 SACOG PMC) Audit Services #2 Michael Baker Sacramento Regional Transit District and International (formerly $100,027 Paratransit, Inc. PMC) Audit Services #3 Unitrans, Davis Community Transit, Yolo Michael Baker County Transportation District, South and International (formerly $105,135 East County Transit, Folsom Stage Line, PMC) Yuba-Sutter Transit Agency, and e-tran. Total Cost $237,023
Sacramento Area Council of Governments Transportation Committee Meeting Date: 8/2/2018 Agenda Item No.: 2018-August-3.
Subject: Approve Fiscal Year 2018-2019 State of Good Repair Project List (Est. time: 3 minutes)
Ac on Prepared by: Caroline Payne Approved by: Ma Carpenter A achments: Yes
1. Issue: Should the board approve the four county transit project list to submit to Caltrans for funding from the State of Good Repair (SGR) Program?
2. Recommendation: That the Transportation Committee recommend that the board approve by resolution the four-county transit project list for SACOG to submit to Caltrans for SGR funding and authorize the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) to execute all required documents.
3. Background/Analysis: Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), established a new SGR Program to provide approximately $105 million annually to transit operators in California for eligible transit maintenance, rehabilitation and capital projects. The SGR Program allocates SB 1 funds through the State Transit Assistance formula, with half allocated by population and half by transit operator revenues per Public Utilities Code Sections 99313 and 99314.
4. Discussion/Analysis: Under Caltrans’ program guidelines, SACOG is responsible for programming $3,472,987 in SGR regional funds to the transit operators in the four-county region (Sacramento, Sutter, Yolo, and Yuba). Caltrans requires that SACOG provide Caltrans with the list of Fiscal Year 2018-2019 projects proposed to be funded with both Section 99313 and 99314 SGR funds by September 1, 2018. SACOG staff has compiled a list of eligible projects submitted by the transit operators shown in Attachment A. Attachment B is the required board resolution authorizing the list of SGR projects to be funded under each code section. Certifications of Assurances and the over letter for regional project list to be submitted to Caltrans in addition to the resolution are attached.
5. Fiscal Impact/Grant Information: SGR is derived from gasoline sales tax receipts and is allocated by formula to eligible transit operators. There is no impact to SACOG's operating budget.
6. This staff report aligns with the following SACOG Work Plan Goals: 7. Deliver Key High-Profile Transportation Projects ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment A: SACOG Regional Project List for SB 1 SGR Attachment B: Resolution Attachment C: STA SGR Program Certifications and Assurances Attachment D: SACOG Cover Letter Re: SGR Program FY 18/19 Attachment E: Authorization Form Attachment A
SACOG REGIONAL PROJECT LIST FOR SB 1-STATE OF GOOD REPAIR (SGR)
AGENCY PROJECT TITLE 2018-19 SGR 2018-19 SGR TOTAL SGR COSTS-99313 COSTS-99314 City of Elk Grove Purchase Two cutaway $227,221 $18,308 $245,529 buses for e-van service City of Folsom Preventive maintenance $104,306 $6,820 $111,126 of light rail vehicles within Folsom city limits Davis-Unitrans Bus stop Improvements N/A $32,086 $32,086 Sacramento Preventive maintenance $1,492,446 $813,358 $2,305,804 Regional Transit for bus and rail County of Replacement of 3 $37,282 $11,500 $48,782 Sacramento Starcraft buses Yolo County Replace 13 40’ CNG $290,764 $45,166 $335,930 Transportation buses on fixed routes District (YCTD) Yuba-Sutter Replace Fixed route $227,851 $15,035 $242886 Transit Authority Buses (YSTA) SACOG Regional Rolling stock $150,844 N/A $150,844 rehabilitation TOTAL $2,530,714 $942,273 $3,472,987
Sacramento Area Council of Governments SACRAMENTO AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS RESOLUTION NO. XX – 2018
AUTHORIZATION FOR THE EXECUTION OF THE CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES AND AUTHORIZED AGENT FORMS FOR THE SENATE BILL 1-STATE OF GOOD REPAIR PROGRAM
WHEREAS, on April 28, 2017 Senate Bill (SB) 1, also known as the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017, was signed into law.
WHEREAS, SB 1 will provide approximately $105 million annually to transit operators in California under the State of Good Repair Program (SGR) for eligible transit maintenance, rehabilitation and capital projects; and
WHEREAS, these funds will be allocated under the State Transit Assistance (STA) Program formula to the Regional Transportation Planning Agencies per PUC Sections 99313 and 99314; and
WHEREAS, SACOG as the project sponsor and Regional Transportation Planning Agency for the four-county region (Sacramento, Yolo, Yuba, and Sutter) is responsible for receiving and allocating the SGR funds for transit projects; and
WHEREAS, SACOG must assume responsibility and accountability for the use and expenditure of SGR Program funds and must comply with all relevant federal and state laws, regulation, policies and procedures; and
WHEREAS, the California Department of Transportation as the administrator of the Program has requested that each potential recipient submit a project list and Authorized Agent Form, as well as Certifications and Assurances; and
WHEREAS, SACOG wishes to delegate authorization to execute these documents and any amendments thereto to James Corless, Chief Executive Officer.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the SACOG that the fund recipient agrees to comply with all conditions and requirements set forth in the Certification and Assurances and the Authorized Agent documents and applicable Resolution xx-2018 August 16, 2018
statutes, regulations and guidelines for all SB 1 SGR Program funded transit projects.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that James Corless, Chief Executive Officer be authorized to execute all required documents of the SB 1 SGR Program and any Amendments thereto with the California Department of Transportation.
PASSED AND ADOPTED, this 16th day of August 2018 by the following vote of the Board of Directors:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Jay Schenirer James Corless Chair Chief Executive Officer
Agency Name Page 1
State Transit Assistance State of Good Repair Program
Recipient Certifications and Assurances
Recipient: Name .
Effective Date: Date Month, 20xx .
In order to receive State of Good Repair Program (SGR) funds from the California Department of Transportation (Department), recipients must agree to following terms and conditions:
A. General
(1) The recipient agrees to abide by the State of Good Repair Guidelines as may be updated from time to time.
(2) The potential recipient must submit to the Department a State of Good Repair Program Project List annually, listing all projects proposed to be funded by the SGR program. The project list should include the estimated SGR share assigned to each project along with the total estimated cost of each project..
(3) The recipient must submit a signed Authorized Agent form designating the representative who can submit documents on behalf of the recipient and a copy of the board resolution authorizing the agent.
B. Project Administration
(1) The recipient certifies that required environmental documentation will be completed prior to expending SGR funds. The recipient assures that each project approved for SGR funding comply with Public Resources Code § 21100 and § 21150.
(2) The recipient certifies that SGR funds will be used for transit purposes and SGR funded projects will be completed and remain in operation for the estimated useful lives of the assets or improvements.
(3) The recipient certifies that it has the legal, financial, and technical capacity to deliver the projects, including the safety and security aspects of each project.
Agency Name Page 2 (4) The recipient certifies that there is no pending litigation, dispute, or negative audit findings related to any SGR project at the time an SGR project is submitted in the annual list.
(5) Recipient agrees to notify the Department immediately if litigation is filed or disputes arise after submission of the annual project list and to notify the Department of any negative audit findings related to any project using SGR funds.
(6) The recipient must maintain satisfactory continuing control over the use of project equipment and/or facilities and will adequately maintain project equipment and/or facilities for the estimated useful life of each project.
(7) Any and all interest the recipient earns on SGR funds must be reported to the Department and may only be used on approved SGR projects or returned to the Department.
(8) The recipient must notify the Department of any proposed changes to an approved project list by submitting an amended project list.
(9) Funds will be expended in a timely manner.
C. Reporting
(1) Per Public Utilities Code § 99312.1 (e) and (f), the recipient must submit the following SGR reports:
a. Annual Expenditure Reports within six months of the close of the fiscal year (by December 31 st ) of each year.
b. The annual audit required under the Transportation Development Act (TDA), to verify receipt and appropriate expenditure of SGR funds. A copy of the audit report must be submitted to the Department within six months of the close of each fiscal year in which SGR funds have been received or expended.
D. Cost Principles
(1) The recipient agrees to comply with Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments.
(2) The recipient agrees, and will assure that its contractors and subcontractors will be obligated to agree, that (a) Contract Cost Principles and Procedures, 48 CFR, Federal Acquisition Regulations System, Chapter 1, Part 31, et seq., shall be used to determine the allowability of individual project cost items and (b) those parties shall Agency Name Page 3 comply with Federal administrative procedures in accordance with 2 CFR, Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments.
(3) Any project cost for which the recipient has received payment that are determined by subsequent audit to be unallowable under 2 CFR, Part 200, are subject to repayment by the recipient to the State of California (State). Should the recipient fail to reimburse moneys due to the State within thirty (30) days of demand, or within such other period as may be agreed in writing between the Parties hereto, the State is authorized to intercept and withhold future payments due the recipient from the State or any third-party source, including but not limited to, the State Treasurer and the State Controller.
E. Record Retention
(1) The recipient agrees, and will assure that its contractors and subcontractors shall establish and maintain an accounting system and records that properly accumulate and segregate incurred project costs and matching funds by line item for the project. The accounting system of the recipient, its contractors and all subcontractors shall conform to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), enable the determination of incurred costs at interim points of completion, and provide support for reimbursement payment vouchers or invoices. All accounting records and other supporting papers of the recipient, its contractors and subcontractors connected with SGR funding shall be maintained for a minimum of three (3) years from the date of final payment and shall be held open to inspection, copying, and audit by representatives of the State and the California State Auditor. Copies thereof will be furnished by the recipient, its contractors, and subcontractors upon receipt of any request made by the State or its agents. In conducting an audit of the costs claimed, the State will rely to the maximum extent possible on any prior audit of the recipient pursuant to the provisions of federal and State law. In the absence of such an audit, any acceptable audit work performed by the recipient’s external and internal auditors may be relied upon and used by the State when planning and conducting additional audits.
(2) For the purpose of determining compliance with Title 21, California Code of Regulations, Section 2500 et seq., when applicable, and other matters connected with the performance of the recipient’s contracts with third parties pursuant to Government Code § 8546.7, the recipient, its contractors and subcontractors and the Department shall each maintain and make available for inspection all books, documents, papers, accounting records, and other evidence pertaining to the performance of such contracts, including, but not limited to, the costs of administering those various contracts. All of the above referenced parties shall make such materials available at their respective offices at all reasonable times during the entire project period and for three (3) years from the date of final payment. The State, the California State Auditor, or any duly authorized representative of the State, shall each have access to any books, records, and documents that are pertinent to a Agency Name Page 4 project for audits, examinations, excerpts, and transactions, and the recipient shall furnish copies thereof if requested.
(3) The recipient, its contractors and subcontractors will permit access to all records of employment, employment advertisements, employment application forms, and other pertinent data and records by the State Fair Employment Practices and Housing Commission, or any other agency of the State of California designated by the State, for the purpose of any investigation to ascertain compliance with this document.
F. Special Situations
(1) Recipient acknowledges that if a project list is not submitted timely, the recipient forfeits its apportionment for that fiscal year.
(2) Recipients with delinquent expenditure reports may risk future eligibility for future SGR funding.
(3) Recipient acknowledges that the Department shall have the right to perform an audit and/or request detailed project information of the recipient’s SGR funded projects at the Department’s discretion from SGR award through 3 years after the completion and final billing of any SGR funded project.. Recipient agrees to provide any requested project information.
I certify all of these conditions will be met.
AGENCY NAME
BY: AUTHORIZING OFFICER, Title Unit/Department
Agency Name Page 5
ATTACHMENT I (INSERT Agency Board Resolution approving this document)
Sacramento Area 1415 L Street, tel: 916.321.9000 Council of Suite 300 fax: 916.321.9551 Sacramento, CA tdd: 916.321.9550 Governments 95814 www.sacog.org
August 16, 2018
State of Good Repair Program California Department of Transportation Division of Rail and Mass Transportation, MS 39 P.O. Box 942874 Sacramento, CA 94274-0001
RE: Regional State of Good Repair Project list for Fiscal Year 2018/2019 Funding
The Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) hereby submits our board-approved
documents for the State of Good Repair (SGR) Funding for fiscal year 2018/2019 as required by Caltrans. Enclosed please find SACOG’s:
1. Recipient Certifications and Assurances Auburn 2. Signed Board resolution Citrus Heights 3. List of regional projects Colfax
Davis Sincerely, El Dorado County Elk Grove Folsom Galt Isleton James Corless Live Oak Chief Executive Officer Lincoln
Loomis JC:cp
Marysville
Placer County
Placerville
Rancho Cordova
Rocklin
Roseville
Sacramento
Sacramento County
Sutter County
West Sacramento
Wheatland
Winters
Woodland
Yolo County Yuba City Yuba County STATE OF CALIFORNIA • DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Division of Rail and Mass Transportation State Transit Assistance State of Good Repair Program Authorized Agent Form
Authorized Agent
The following individual(s) are hereby authorized to execute for and on behalf of the named Regional Entity/Transit Operator, and to take any actions necessary for the purpose of obtaining State Transit Assistance State of Good Repair funds provided by the California Department of Transportation, Division of Rail and Mass Transportation. This form is valid at the beginning of Fiscal Year 2017-2018 until the end of the State of Good Repair Program. If there is a change in the authorized agent, the project sponsor must submit a new form. This form is required even when the authorized agent is the executive authority himself.
James Corless-Chief Executive Officer ______OR (Name and Title of Authorized Agent)
Matt Carpenter-Director Transportation______OR (Name and Title of Authorized Agent)
______. (Name and Title of Authorized Agent)
AS THE Chief Executive Officer OR Director of Transportation (Chief Executive Officer / Director / President / Secretary)
OF THE Sacramento Area Council of Governments-SACOG (Name of County/City Organization)
James Corless Chief Executive Officer (Print Name) (Title)
______(Signature)
Approved this Sixteenth day of August, 2018
FY 17-18 SB 1 STA State of Good Repair
Transportation Committee Meeting Date: 8/2/2018 Agenda Item No.: 2018-August-4.
Subject: Approve Vendor for Commuter Club and 511 Website Development, Maintenance and Hosting (Est. time: 3 minutes)
Ac on Prepared by: Sabrina Bradbury Approved by: Ma Carpenter A achments: No
1. Issue: Should SACOG approve a new contract for the Commuter Club and 511 websites vendor?
2. Recommendation: That the Transportation Committee recommend that the Board authorize the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) to negotiate and execute a new contract for website support for the Commuter Club and 511 websites.
3. Background/Analysis: The Commuter Club website is a regional database tool utilized by SACOG, Transportation Management Organizations (TMOs), and Employer Transportation Coordinators as a way to administer transportation subsidies, emergency ride home vouchers, carpool/vanpool matching services. Additionally, the popular May is Bike Month campaign utilizes the Commuter Club web infrastructure. The Sac Region 511 website offers live traffic information from our local jurisdictions and Caltrans integrated into a Google trip planner. There is also general information for other modes of transportation on the Sac Region 511 website.
4. Discussion/Analysis: The Sac Region 511 and Commuter Club websites offer similar but different services to the public. One features an Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) traffic map that shows a live data feed of incidents sourced from multiple agencies’ traffic and information technology departments, as well as general travel information. The other website is a database of users interested in carpooling or using services provided by SACOG’s Transportation Demand Management program and its TMO partners. The current Commuter Club vendor’s contract will expire in November 2018. The Sac Region 511 website is a free WordPress site that has our 511 ITS map embedded into it. When contracts expire, SACOG’s policy is to open up contracts through a competitive request for proposals (RFP) process. SACOG staff wrote the scope of work in the RFP to take advantage of the opportunity to combine these two separate websites into a one-stop location for people to plan their trips, earn incentives for non-drive alone modes of travel, find ride matches, and participate in campaigns like May is Bike Month. The RFP was for a one-year contract not to exceed $100,000, with an option to extend the contract for an additional three years. Through the RFP process, three proposals were received.
Staff reached out to TMOs to form a proposal review panel of active administrative users of the website. The panel included representatives from SACOG, North Natomas TMA, Power Inn Alliance TMA, Sacramento TMA, and South Natomas TMA. Upon reviewing proposals, the panel recommended that a new vendor, Ride Amigos, be awarded the new contract. The Ride Amigos proposal showed not only an understanding of the tasks and ability to innovate in trip planning and ridematching tools, but also extensive experience with running similar tools in regions throughout California and across the country. Ride Amigos will bring out-of-the-box user and administrative features that have proven to be effective in other regions, which brings cost savings of at least $30,000 annually. Since this vendor has many clients that are using their platform, SACOG and partners will benefit when one client makes an update that gets pushed out system-wide to all clients.
In the coming years we are likely to see Google, WAZE, Moovel, Uber, Lyft, or some other entity develop a Mobility as a Service platform that allows users to select from a plethora of transportation options and pay for those services from the same app/account. This contract will bridge a gap in service between what exists now and what will exist in the future. Currently, there is no vendor offering a free platform for trip planning that includes ridematching and incentives for using non-drive alone modes. The Ride Amigos database will also include data collection features and reports that will better quantify the impacts of TDM programs in the region.
5. Fiscal Impact/Grant Information: Because the proposed contract with Ride Amigos will not exceed $85,000 annually, it will provide a $30,000 savings from what was spent to operate and maintain the Commuter Club website in prior years.
6. This staff report aligns with the following SACOG Work Plan Goals: 5. Establish the Sacramento Region as an Innovator and Test-Bed for New Ideas Transportation Committee Meeting Date: 8/2/2018 Agenda Item No.: 2018-August-5.
Subject: Update Sacramento Emergency Clean Air and Transportation Guidelines to Promote Low Carbon Transportation (Est. time: 10 minutes)
Ac on Prepared by: Ma Carpenter Approved by: Ma Carpenter A achments: Yes
1. Issue: Should the board approve the proposed modifications to the Sacramento Emergency Clean Air Transportation (SECAT) program guidelines?
2. Recommendation: That the Transportation Committee recommend that the board adopt modified SECAT program guidelines for use by the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD) in the ongoing administration of the program.
3. Background/Analysis: The SECAT Program was initially set up to help the Sacramento Federal Nonattainment Area (SFNA) meet regional federal ozone targets. Over the years it has been in place, SECAT has been successful in promoting clean diesel technology and helping regional fleets comply with state requirements. The SECAT program helped the SFNA attain the federal ozone standard.
4. Discussion/Analysis: Staff continuously evaluates the policy framework, implementation procedures, and overall effectiveness of the SECAT Program in order to ensure that the SFNA achieves the highest air quality emission benefits possible. Attainment of the federal ozone standard in the SFNA provides an opportunity to evolve the SECAT program. The proposed modifications to the program guidelines will allow applicants to better leverage substantial state and federal grant funding opportunities for low carbon transportation, and focus on community air quality benefits.
The California Air Resources Board (CARB) is now using funds from the state Cap & Trade programs and other related state programs (e.g., the Carl Moyer program) to assist with the purchase of low-carbon transportation vehicles, such as electric school buses, transit buses, and public works vehicles. In addition, CARB also provides financial assistance to purchase ultra-low emission natural gas vehicles. The proposed modifications to the SECAT Guidelines leverage the available state funding from CARB by broadening SECAT eligibility and promoting investments in these low carbon transportation options.
Highlights of the proposed modifications to the SECAT program guidelines:
Make ineligible the purchase of conventional diesel replacement vehicles. All replacement vehicles must be zero-emission vehicles or have an engine certified to CARB Optional Low NOx Standards and be legal for sale in California.
Add funding for Low Carbon Transportation Infrastructure. The SECAT Program can fund infrastructure services to support deployment of low carbon transportation fuels including electricity, hydrogen, natural gas, and other fuels. Program funding will be consistent with the Carl Moyer Program guidelines and Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality (CMAQ) funding requirements. Reserve funding for applicants from all six SACOG counties in the SFNA. The modified guidelines ensure that applicants from across the region will have an opportunity to pursue zero and near-zero emission vehicles. For each application period, the funding available for each county will be set at a population pro-rata amount. Also, no applicant can receive more than 50% of a county’s available SECAT funding. Streamline qualification procedures. Applications will now be evaluated to determine if each vehicle meets minimum operation criteria in the SFNA. Vehicles will receive full funding if staff determines the vehicle meets these minimums. The vehicle being replaced must be registered in the SFNA to receive funding, and would continue to be required to be salvaged. Eliminate minimum annual usage requirements. Participants will be required to demonstrate that they have been operating in the SFNA for the past two years, but will no longer need to meet annual usage requirements. Contracts will still require usage in the SFNA for five years. Incorporate Federal Buy America Waiver Requirements. All replacement vehicles and other projects must comply with federal Buy America steel requirements under the CMAQ guidelines.
5. Fiscal Impact/Grant Information: There is no fiscal impact to SACOG’s operating budget because the program is now administered by the SMAQMD.
There is approximately $12 million available for successful applicants. The modified SECAT program guidelines are fully compliant with relevant federal and state requirements, including those for the revenue source (CMAQ) that is used for program allocations. 6. This staff report aligns with the following SACOG Work Plan Goals: 7. Deliver Key High-Profile Transportation Projects ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment A: 2018 SECAT Guidelines
August 2018
Sacramento Emergency Clean Air Transportation Program Guidelines
Prepared by t he Sac Metro Air District in partnership with the Sacramento Area Council of Governments 2 SECAT Program Guidelines
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary 3
Introduction / Background 4
General Program Policies and Guidelines 8
Dealership and Salvage Yard Policies and Procedures 16
Fleet Modernization Program Policies and Guidelines 18
August 2018
3 SECAT Program Guidelines
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Sacramento Emergency Clean Air Transportation (SECAT) Program is a partnership between the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (District or SMAQMD) and the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG). The program’s goal is to promote zero and near-zero emission on- road heavy-duty vehicles operating in the SACOG region.
In 2000, the SECAT Program received $66 million to reduce emissions released from heavy-duty vehicles in the SFNA by providing incentives to offset the costs of purchasing lower-emission technologies and an additional $4 million used by SACOG to help replace old diesel transit buses – totaling $70 million in funding from the state Traffic Congestion Relief Fund ($50 million) and the federal Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) funding program ($20 million). This program was originally created by California Assembly Bill (AB) 2511 to help assure that the Sacramento Federal Nonattainment Area (SFNA) would meet its commitments under the State Implementation Plan (SIP) for air quality attainment.
In 2008, the SECAT Program received an additional $3.2 million in federal CMAQ funds with additional allocations on a yearly basis, which will be primarily used for projects that benefit the Sacramento region through improved air quality. Projects will need to demonstrate reductions in oxides of nitrogen (NOx) emissions, but the program will also result in additional greenhouse gas reductions to meet regional, state, and federal targets.
The SMAQMD now has program and fiscal control of the SECAT program under oversight from SACOG. Agreements funded by SACOG under previous guidelines are now fully administered by the SMAQMD with most covered by the provisions of these guidelines as outlined in the memorandum of agreement between the agencies. Funding will now be allocated to the six counties in the SACOG region based on the population of each county.
The SECAT Program will now encourage the displacement of conventional trucks and buses with zero and near-zero emission heavy-duty vehicles. This will allow regional fleets to better leverage state and federal grants and promote the technology in the region. As part of other efforts with the SMAQMD and SACOG, these vehicles will play a key role in meeting regional commitments to greenhouse gas and community air protection goals.
August 2018
4 SECAT Program Guidelines
2.0 INTRODUCTION / BACKGROUND
2.1 Purpose of the SECAT Program
Although air quality in the Sacramento Federal Nonattainment Region (SFNA) for ozone has improved significantly over the last 10 years, we continue to experience violations of state and federal ozone standards. Most of the pollution is created by mobile sources, including heavy-duty vehicles. Over 30% of NOx emissions from mobile sources come from heavy-duty vehicles.
In 1994, the five air districts within the SFNA adopted a federally mandated State Implementation Plan (SIP), which required the region to decrease emissions from heavy-duty vehicles as one part of a larger strategy to attain the federal one-hour ozone standards by 2005 as mandated by the federal Clean Air Act. In 1997, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) adopted a new 8-hour ozone standard. The regional air districts approved a new 8-hour SIP in 2008, which will include requirements to reduce heavy- duty vehicle emissions. Currently, the SFNA has been classified as “severe” for the federal 8-hour ozone standard with an attainment date of 2019.
Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) is the designated planning organization for the region responsible for ensuring that transportation projects and plans do not impede the region’s clean air goals. SACOG evaluates all projects included in the Federal Metropolitan Transportation Plan and the Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program to ensure consistency with air quality objectives and the SIP.
As part of the region's overall effort to meet clean air standards and achieve conformity with transportation plans, SACOG also partners with the air districts to promote clean-fuel vehicles and develop mobile source control measures.
One such measure is the development and implementation of the Sacramento Emergency Clean Air Transportation (SECAT) Program. The SECAT Program was created as part of the SIP effort to provide incentives to help on-road heavy-duty truck owners purchase technologies to reduce emissions in the SFNA in order to meet federal air quality standards. Although no longer part of the SIP, SECAT now continues as a regional effort to promote clean vehicle technology in the SACOG region by funding zero and near-zero emission heavy-duty vehicles.
This document sets out the policies and guidelines of the SECAT Program. The SECAT Program now focuses on zero emission heavy-duty vehicle purchases and replacement of existing vehicles with near-zero emission combustion vehicles to help truck owners and fleet managers reduce emissions according to federal Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) guidelines.
The following policies and guidelines in this document include minimum qualifications for a vehicle to enter the SECAT Program, the responsibilities of vehicle owners, vehicle dealerships, engine dealerships, and salvage yards, and information on how funding amounts are determined.
2.2 SECAT Program Funding
The $70 million allocated under the 2000 SECAT Program has been fully allocated. In 2017, SECAT received $15 million in the 2018-20 MTIP using funding under the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ). Applications for new projects will be accepted once funding becomes available.
August 2018
5 SECAT Program Guidelines
The SMAQMD now has fiscal control of the SECAT Program and will reimburse participants directly and manage funding through the State of California and United States Department of Transportation.
2.3 Revisions and Updates to the SECAT Program
For the August 2018 Guidelines, the following changes are being implemented to enhance the SECAT Program effectiveness:
1. Conventional diesel replacement vehicles are ineligible. All replacement vehicles must have an engine certified to the California Air Resources Board (CARB) Optional Low NOx Standards, be listed as a hybrid vehicle eligible under the state Hybrid and Zero-Emission Truck and Bus Voucher Incentive Project (HVIP), or have zero tailpipe emissions. Vehicles must meet all other applicable requirements. 2. Streamline qualification procedures. Applications will now be evaluated to determine if each vehicle meets minimum operation in the SACOG region. Vehicles will receive full funding if staff determines the vehicle meets these minimums. 3. Eliminate annual usage requirements. Participants no longer need to meet minimum annual usage requirements. 4. Incorporate Federal Buy America Waiver Requirements. All replacement vehicles and other projects must comply with federal Buy America steel requirements under the CMAQ guidelines. Vehicles with a final point of assembly in the United States of America comply with this requirement under waiver.
2.4 Counties in the SACOG Region
The SACOG Region consists of six counties. Funding will be awarded to vehicles registered in the Counties of El Dorado, Placer, Sacramento, Sutter, Yolo, and Yuba.
2.5 Who We Are
The SECAT Program is a partnership between the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) and the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD). The goal of the program is to reduce harmful emissions from on-road heavy-duty vehicles in the region. The Transportation Committee of the SACOG Board of Directors plays a major role in developing and reviewing SECAT Program changes, and in making recommendations to the SACOG Board of Directors for adoption.
2.5.1 The Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG)
SACOG is a legislatively created association of Sacramento Valley governments formed from the six surrounding counties - El Dorado, Placer, Sacramento, Sutter, Yolo and Yuba - and its 22 member cities. The SACOG directors are chosen from the elected boards of its member governments. SACOG's primary charge is to provide regional transportation planning and allocate funding for transportation projects. It also provides a forum for the study and resolution of regional issues. In this role, SACOG prepares the region's long-range transportation plan, keeps a region wide database for its own and local agency use, helps counties and cities use federal transportation funds in a timely way, and assists in planning for transit, bicycle networks, clean air and airport land uses.
August 2018
6 SECAT Program Guidelines
2.5.2 The Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD)
SMAQMD is also a legislatively created agency, and is the local agency primarily responsible for implementing the federal and state Clean Air Acts. In that capacity, it works cooperatively to coordinate the efforts of local, state and federal government agencies, the business community, and private citizens to achieve and maintain healthy air quality for Sacramento County. SMAQMD cannot achieve healthy air for Sacramento alone; however, with its regulatory efforts and its lead role in development of innovative programs, it can encourage the cooperative inter-agency and public efforts that are required to improve air quality. The SMAQMD's 14-member Board of Directors is composed of all five Sacramento County Supervisors, four members of the Sacramento City Council, one member representing each of the Cities of Citrus Heights, Elk Grove, Folsom and Rancho Cordova, and one member representing the Cities of Galt and Isleton. The Board reviews and approves all rules, programs, policies and budgets.
SMAQMD represents the other air districts in the SACOG region in implementing the SECAT Program, and each air district has played an important role in our ongoing efforts to improve air quality in the region.
2.5.3 How to Contact Us / Application Mailing Address
SMAQMD staff is available to answer any questions regarding the SECAT Program. For more information on the SECAT Program or to request an application, go to the website or contact one of the following staff members listed below (subject to change):
Website: WWW.4SECAT.COM
Program Staff: Kristian Damkier (916) 874-4892 [email protected] Heather Taylor (916) 874-4889 [email protected] Pat Robinson (916) 874-6276 [email protected] Kevin Robison (916) 875-0325 [email protected]
Program Supervisors: Mike Neuenburg (916) 874-1676 [email protected] (Contract/Applications) Cindy Mahon (916) 874-6390 [email protected] (Inspections/Audits)
Program Manager: Jaime Lemus (916) 874-2911 [email protected]
Mailing Address for Applications: SECAT Program, Application for Funding Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD 777 12th St., 3rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95814-1908
August 2018
7 SECAT Program Guidelines
Applicants are encouraged to work with local participating truck and engine dealerships to submit applications. Participating dealerships have been trained to help truck owners understand all of the program requirements to help them complete applications and receive for funding under the SECAT Program.
All applications must be returned signed and dated in their original format in either blue or black ink. Any application that is not signed or dated will be returned. Faxes WILL NOT be accepted.
August 2018
8 SECAT Program Guidelines
3.0 GENERAL PROGRAM POLICIES AND GUIDELINES
3.1 General Eligibility
3.1.1 Who is eligible to participate?
Any individual, company, or public agency located in the SACOG region may apply to receive SECAT grant funds.
3.1.2 Who is not eligible to participate?
Any applicant applying for funds for purchases that are already required by any local, state, or federal rule or regulation – including, but not limited to, the Energy Policy Act (EPACT), existing regulations, agency memoranda of agreement or understanding, state mobile source Air Toxic Control Measures, or other legally binding requirements. A more detailed discussion of which vehicles are eligible is located in Section 3.9.
3.1.3 What type of vehicle is eligible?
Projects must reduce emissions from on-road heavy-duty vehicles operating in the SACOG region. On- road motor vehicles are defined as “self-propelled motor vehicles that are manufactured for or designed primarily for use on public roads.” All vehicles must be over 14,000 pounds Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (GVWR).
3.1.4 What technologies are eligible to participate?
This program is designed to promote zero and near-zero emission heavy-duty vehicles in the region. These technologies include battery electric school buses, hydrogen fuel cell transit buses, vehicles certified to the Optional Low NOx standards, or other advanced technology vehicles.
3.1.5 Restrictions on emissions averaging, banking and trading.
Low-emission engines, vehicles or technologies funded under the SECAT Program cannot be used to generate emission credits in any emissions averaging, banking or trading program.
3.2 Application Instructions & Evaluation Procedures
3.2.1 Application Instructions
Please follow all of the application instructions. Any incomplete or incorrect applications will be returned to the applicant.
• Fill out and sign the most recent SMAQMD mobile source incentive program application as available at http://www.airquality.org/ . The application can be also be downloaded from the SECAT website (www.4secat.com ) or can be ordered by calling one of the program staff or sending a request via e-mail. Staff contact information is in section 2.5.3.
August 2018
9 SECAT Program Guidelines
• Applicants are required to disclose the full legal name of their business entity at the time of application. This information will be checked against the California Secretary of State records (or the applicable state for interstate businesses) for corporations and other legal entities and the local County records offices to confirm fictitious business names, holding companies, and other legal entities.
• Fill in a “Vehicle Information Form” for each vehicle that you are proposing to replace or purchase.
• Submit additional documentation as required under the specific program guidelines. Each specific program may require different paperwork. Contact project staff if there are any questions with regard to additional documentation.
• The application will be reviewed to determine that all the required information has been provided and that all program requirements have been met. If the application is not complete or does not meet the program requirements, it will be returned with a request for additional information or an explanation as to why the application was not approved. The SECAT Program reserves the right to request additional information and can deny the application if such requested information is not provided.
Application Procedure Overview (in general):
1. Applicant submits a complete SECAT Application including all supplementary documentation to SMAQMD for evaluation 2. Applications will be assigned to a Project Manager for review 3. If funding is available, SMAQMD will use its best efforts to contact applicants in a timely fashion to confirm approval or discuss problems with the application 4. Applicants will then be contacted by an Inspector to perform a visual and operational inspection of the old vehicle to verify eligibility 5. Following approval, funding agreements will be circulated to the applicant for signatures (an executed copy of the executed agreement will be returned to the applicant) 6. After the applicant receives a fully executed funding agreement, the applicant may purchase the low emission technology, if applicable, and subsequently invoice the SECAT Program for reimbursement 7. Applicant will be contacted by an Inspector to perform a visual and operational inspection of either the new vehicle or low emission technology to verify eligibility (if applicable) 8. Fleet Modernization Only: The old vehicle will also be inspected again by an Inspector prior to its delivery to an approved auction facility or salvage yard to verify that it still meets program requirements (if applicable) 9. Upon receipt of all signed invoices, inspections, and tax information, the Project Manager will submit payment for the amount authorized in the funding agreement 10. Applicant will then be responsible for meeting all requirements in the funding agreement for the term of the agreement including operation, audit, and recordkeeping requirements, if applicable.
August 2018
10 SECAT Program Guidelines
3.2.2 Evaluation Procedures
SMAQMD staff will determine when to begin accepting applications for funding based on the availability of funding and other resources needed to run the program. No later than 30 days before opening an application period, the SMAQMD will post notice of how much funding will be available and whether funding will be reserved for specific project vehicle types, technologies, ownership categories, or other criteria. This will be done to best leverage local funding with other sources to help advance low carbon transportation in the region. Funding may be reserved for projects that help the SMAQMD meet its goals under AB 617 and regional climate change emission reduction programs.
Completed applications will be evaluated according to the methodology used in the most current Carl Moyer Program Guidelines to determine if it meets the minimum requirements for the applicable program option. All applications will generally be reviewed and approved on a first-come, first served basis according to the availability of funding and the criteria for each application period, although SMAQMD reserves the right to accelerate approval of particular applications if it determines that early approval will benefit air quality goals.
3.2.3 Applicant Compliance Checks
All applicants will be subject to verification of compliance with all local and state air quality rules, including compliance with air district rules and regulations based on the applicant’s business address. Applicants will be required to resolve all outstanding Notices of Violation or other citations with all agencies to receive incentive funding. Potential applicants are advised to check for violations with CARB and/or their local air district prior to applying for funding.
Vehicles must demonstrate compliance with the ARB Truck & Bus Regulation by submitting their Reporting Status Certificate from the Truck Regulations Upload and Compliance Reporting System (TRUCRS) database. All SECAT applicants must be registered in TRUCRS even if registration is not required for compliance.
In addition, the SECAT Program may reject applications from applicants that have previously received incentive funding from SECAT or any other incentive program if they are not in compliance with their contracted performance requirements. Applicants may also be required to reimburse the SMAQMD or SECAT any deficient balance prior to receiving additional incentive funding.
August 2018
11 SECAT Program Guidelines
3.2.4 Funding Reserve Procedures
The SECAT Program now reserves funding based on the population of each county in the SACOG Region. This is done to ensure that each region has an equal opportunity to pursue zero and near-zero emission vehicles. The regional breakdown is shown below:
County 2018 Est. Population 1 % of SACOG El Dorado 188,399 8% Placer 389,532 16% Sacramento 1,529,501 61% Sutter 97,238 4% Yolo 221,270 9% Yuba 74,727 3%
For each application period, SMAQMD staff will allocate available funding to each county based on the population rations listed above. This allocation will be rounded to provide an even amount of vehicles in each county as much as possible. For example, if the application period has $1,000,000 in total funding, Yolo County would be reserved $90,000 based on population, however staff would likely reserve $100,000 to ensure at least one zero emission vehicle could be funded in that county. After an open application period of at least 180 days, staff may reallocate zero emission vehicle funding to other counties based on actual application demand to spend the remaining funding.
The SECAT program uses the registration address for the vehicle to determine the county in which it is eligible for funding. Applicants will need to show that the old vehicles are registered in the county in which they applied for funding to receive funding. Applications for zero emission vehicles will use the applicant’s physical address to determine the county.
Staff expects a high level of demand for funding for zero emission vehicles in all counties, so initial funding will be reserved exclusively for zero emission vehicles. All zero emission vehicles will be eligible for funding in each county to allow for local demand. The SMAQMD would like to encourage as much participation as soon as possible to maximize the amount of state cap & trade match funding available to regional fleets. SMAQMD staff will work with the regional air districts and other interested parties to ensure that local needs are met with SECAT funding.
The SMAQMD does not anticipate funding near-zero combustion technology unless the SECAT Program is given additional funding. If there is not significant demand for zero emission vehicle technology or additional funding is allocated to SECAT under these guidelines, staff may open up the program to fund combustion vehicles using the same county population formula.
No applicant can receive more than 50% of a county’s funding. If the SECAT program receives additional funding or moves funding from one category to another category, the 50% restriction will apply to the adjusted funding category total. Staff may waive this requirement if needed to meet CMAQ requirements.
1 Estimated January 1, 2018 Populations from California Department of Finance E-1 Estimates – May 2018
August 2018
12 SECAT Program Guidelines
3.3 Participant Requirements & Reimbursement Procedures
Following application approval, each participant will be required to enter into a funding agreement with the SMAQMD. Each participant is required to read and understand the funding agreement. If the participant does not fully understand the agreement terms, conditions, and requirements, it is the participant’s responsibility to seek guidance from staff or from a contract law attorney. Although dealership representatives help provide assistance with the application process, they are not authorized to interpret or provide guidance on the agreement terms, conditions, and requirements to participants. All questions and clarifications should be directed to SMAQMD staff for further explanations.
The following is a brief summary of the SECAT requirements.
3.3.1 Grant Agreement Requirements
• Participation in the SECAT Program requires a minimum three (3) year commitment to register and operate the replacement vehicle in the SACOG region. Funding for the project will be issued at the beginning of this commitment. Throughout the contract period, the participant will be required to meet its performance requirements. Projects that fail to meet the agreed performance requirements may be required to refund some or all of the funds issued under the SECAT Program. The participant should contact SMAQMD immediately if it knows or has reason to know that the performance requirements will not be met. The start date for performance will be the date the funds are released to the participant, unless an alternative start date is specified in the funding agreement. Some projects may have a minimum operational usage commitment depending on special circumstances.
• Any emission reduction credits resulting from participating in the SECAT Program will be retired in the interest of air quality improvement. The participant will be required to waive any right to claim emission reduction credits which may accrue at any time as a result of the project. The applicant will also agree not to apply to SMAQMD, any other Air Quality Management District, Air Pollution Control District, or any other public or private entity for any credits based on reductions generated as a result of participating in the SECAT Program. All vehicles funded under the SECAT program cannot be used to comply with the Phase-In Option of the ARB Truck & Bus Regulations until the contract is completed or terminated.
• Participants are required to maintain liability and replacement value insurance coverage for the vehicle(s) participating in the SECAT Program. Self-insurance can satisfy these requirements, but must be approved by SMAQMD prior to execution of the agreement. Additionally, SMAQMD must be listed as a Loss Payee and Additional Insured on the Participant’s insurance policy. Participant will be required to maintain the following levels of insurance:
o $1,000,000 General Business Liability (commonly referred to as Umbrella) coverage o $1,000,000 General Liability per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage o $1,000,000 Automobile Liability per accident for bodily injury and property damage o Comprehensive and Collision coverage sufficient to replace the vehicle(s) and emission control system(s) funded by SECAT
August 2018
13 SECAT Program Guidelines
• Participants will be required to document actual usage for each year of the agreement term. Participants will be required to return annual usage reports at least once a year. Projects that fail to submit usage reports may be required to refund some or all of the funds issued under the SECAT Program.
• All participants must keep a driver’s log with actual mileage, fuel consumption records, and any other records identified in the contract pertaining to maintenance, down time, and miles traveled. SMAQMD may waive the usage log requirements if the applicant installs a SMAQMD approved Electronic Monitoring Unit. A log must be kept of the maintenance and down time throughout the contract period.
• SMAQMD at its option may require the installation of an Electronic Monitoring Unit capable of tracking the operation of the vehicle and transmitting the data to SMAQMD. If eligible units are identified, the SECAT Program may increase the funding available to the project to include the cost of the system as part of the total incentive amount as long as the total project cost plus the cost of the Electronic Monitoring Unit does not exceed cost effectiveness limits.
• The participant is required to inform SMAQMD of any changes in business name, address, phone number, or contact person within 10 business days of the change. Furthermore, the participant is required to inform the SMAQMD prior to any sale of funded equipment or change in ownership that would require a contract amendment. The participant will also be required to inform the SMAQMD of any problems or issues resulting in the failure to meet the performance requirements as soon as possible.
3.3.2 Reimbursement Procedures
The SECAT Program operates on a reimbursement basis. Participants must pay the full cost of the project up front before requesting reimbursement from SECAT. A reimbursement invoice will only be issued after an agreement has been executed, the vehicle or engine is replaced, and adequate dealership invoices for the purchase of the vehicle or equipment have been submitted to SMAQMD. The participant must submit a W-9 Data Form along with their signed funding agreements before the project can be funded. Invoices must include a copy of the final purchase order marked as final detailing the actual purchase price of the vehicle or emission control technology and cannot be processed until after inspection of the funded technology.
When combined with other grants, incentives, vouchers, or other direct public investments, the SECAT funding may be reduced to ensure that the program does not pay more than the full purchase price of each vehicle. Accordingly, staff may reduce the final reimbursement amount based on this review.
Participants must also submit a copy of either the final DMV Application for Registration of New Vehicle (REG 397) for new vehicles or the final DMV Report of Sale–Used Vehicle (REG 51) for used vehicles completed and signed by the dealer showing the lien holder information as reported for the sale. Payment will not be delivered to the participant until the final signed forms are received by the SMAQMD. Private party transactions not involving a dealer will require either a copy of the final vehicle title (if financed) or actual vehicle title (non-financed) to verify lien holder declarations prior to payment delivery. Participants who do not submit all requested invoice paperwork in a timely manner may have their agreements terminated resulting in no reimbursement for the replacement vehicle.
August 2018
14 SECAT Program Guidelines
Reimbursement may take 60-90 days from the time the reimbursement invoice is received by project staff. Reimbursement checks will only be issued to the sole proprietor or other legal entity under agreement with the program. The SECAT Program is funded using federal CMAQ funding which requires processing and reimbursement by the California Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. Prompt submittal of all required documentation is the best way to speed processing of the reimbursement check.
Any funds issued through the SECAT Program may only be used to purchase the vehicle or equipment identified in the participant’s contract. If any funds are used for vehicles or equipment that is not identified in the contract, the participant will be required to refund all incentive amounts. If a program participant wishes to change the vehicle or equipment to be funded, he or she may request a contract amendment. Any contract amendment must be approved in writing and the vehicle or equipment must meet all of the SECAT eligibility requirements.
3.4 Audit Procedures
At any time during the agreement term, SACOG or SMAQMD (or both) may conduct an audit of the participant’s operations, including all paperwork documenting actual operation, to verify that the applicant is complying with all contract terms. Any audits will be conducted at a reasonable time and with reasonable notice to the participant.
3.5 Vehicle Dealerships
Local vehicle, engine, auction, and salvage yard dealerships play a vital role in the operation and success of the SECAT Program. The SECAT Program no longer approves specific dealerships, but interested Dealerships are encouraged to be trained by the staff of the SECAT Program. This will assist applicants in filling out the application, making sure all program requirements have been met, and advising applicants on the SECAT Program performance requirements as required in Section 5.
The SECAT Program allows Dealerships to deliver the truck to the Participant while the vehicle title is processed. This arrangement requires Dealerships to properly register the replacement vehicle with the correct lien holder and participant information. Final payment is made directly to the vehicle owner, so dealerships are encouraged to complete the vehicle transaction as soon as possible.
3.6 Community Air Protection
SACOG and the SMAQMD are committed to the goals of Community Air Protection under AB 617, SB 535, and AB 1550. CMAQ does not require that SECAT funds be spent in areas identified under these community programs, however SMAQMD does encourage applicants in those regions to apply for funding. Promoting zero and near-zero emission technologies in disadvantaged communities, low income communities, and communities experiencing high levels of local air pollutants. SECAT is designed to provide assistance to fleets in disadvantaged communities by combining state grants to help promote the technology.
August 2018
15 SECAT Program Guidelines
3.7 Program Documentation
All forms used under the SECAT Program (i.e. applications, agreements, invoices) are subject to change at any time. Potential applicants or other interested parties may contact the SECAT Program to request sample copies of any forms at any time.
3.8 SECAT Interaction with ARB Rules & Regulations
The SECAT Program requires that applicants demonstrate that the purchase of the equipment on their application is not required for compliance with ARB Rules and Regulations. Applicants must submit a Reporting Status Certificate showing they registered their fleet with the ARB under the Truck & Bus Regulation (TBR) to prove compliance with the regulation. Applicants will be verified with the ARB and the local air district based on the physical address of the applicant for any outstanding air quality violations. All SECAT applicants must register their entire California fleet with the ARB prior to applying for funding, regardless of their compliance status.
All vehicles funded under the SECAT Program cannot be used for compliance with the Phase-In Option under the TBR and must be registered as operating under a funding agreement. Replacement vehicles will be eligible for compliance when the full performance obligations are met. Vehicles funded under the SECAT Program may be used towards Model Year Compliance options.
Applicants may also be subject to other rules, including but not limited to the Transit Bus Fleet Rule, Solid Waste Collection Vehicle Rule, or the Public Fleet Vehicle ATCM. Staff will evaluate each application to determine whether the proposed project is surplus to these regulations.
3.9 SECAT Guideline Revision Process
SECAT Program Guidelines may be periodically updated by the Chief Executive Officer of SACOG and the Executive Director of SMAQMD to make minor administrative changes, in consultation with the agencies’ Legal Counsels, to fully implement the intent of the program. Material changes to the Guidelines must be approved by the SACOG and SMAQMD Boards of Directors.
August 2018
16 SECAT Program Guidelines
4.0 DEALERSHIP AND SALVAGE YARD POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
4.1 General Information
Vehicle dealers and salvage yards are an important part of the SECAT Program. New vehicle dealers are responsible for providing zero and near-zero emission trucks meeting the needs of program participants. The salvage yards are responsible for ensuring proper destruction of the old vehicle. District reserves the right to specify the approved salvage yard for disposal. Because of their importance, the SECAT Program has special guidelines for both designed to preserve the integrity of the program and provide maximum emission reductions.
4.2 Vehicle Dealership Requirements
Vehicle dealerships are a key partner in the SECAT Program because they help market, qualify, and facilitate Fleet Modernization projects. Representatives of the dealership will often meet with potential applicants and provide information about SECAT and the process. They are also suppliers of new vehicles and engine technology and have the most knowledge about what is appropriate for each applicant. Because of this responsibility, the SECAT Program works closely with many dealerships to ensure that they are eligible to market their equipment and services to applicants.
Participants are not required to purchase technology from a specific Vehicle Dealership, but working with a Vehicle Dealership may benefit applicants. Also, if a participant does not use an Approved Vehicle Dealership, the SECAT Program will not deliver the incentive funds until SMAQMD has received the vehicle title (or a copy from the Finance/Lease Company) listing SMAQMD as a lien holder. Vehicle Dealerships are also allowed to handle the paperwork and are trained to handle any potential issues with the application process.
4.3 Auction Facility and Salvage Yard Requirements
Approved Auction Facilities and Salvage Yards under the SECAT Program are responsible for destroying the old vehicle in an environmentally responsible manner to permanently remove the vehicle from operation. Because of the special requirements, Approved Auction Facilities and Salvage Yards must be under a Master Agreement with the SECAT Program. All vehicles funded under the SECAT Program must be destroyed by an Approved Auction Facility or Salvage Yard, unless SMAQMD approves an alternative disposal method that ensures emission reductions.
To become an Approved Auction Facility or Salvage Yard, they must meet the following requirements:
• Owner possesses a current, valid auto dismantler’s license issued by the California Department of Motor Vehicles. • Owner possesses a current, valid Hazardous Material Generator and Storage Permit issued by the California Environmental Protection Agency. • Owner has a current, approved State of California Storm Water Pollution Control Plan. • Owner has had a valid California business license for a minimum of the last two years. • A minimum of one (1) employee has been trained by the District regarding the SECAT Program. • Owner agrees to allow the District to inspect vehicles covered under this agreement during normal business hours.
August 2018
17 SECAT Program Guidelines
Approved Auction Facilities and Salvage Yards must agree to:
• Complete the vehicle destruction within 45 days of the date the salvage yard received the vehicle. Destruction must comply with the SECAT Program Policies and Guidelines and include: (1) cutting a non-symmetrical, jagged-edged hole in the engine block that is at least three inches in diameter, (2) making an additional cut from the engine hole down through the flange where the oil pan attaches, and (3) cutting the frame rails completely through in half between the cab and rear axle.
• Surrender the certificate of title to the DMV by submitting a Report of Vehicle to be Dismantled and register the vehicle as non-repairable – where the Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) can no longer be registered or titled. All forms required by DMV to render the vehicle as non-repairable must be filed by the owner or salvage operator. A DMV receipt, such as a DMV reconciliation report, or non-repairable certificate verifying the vehicle can no longer be registered or titled must be made available to District staff at the time of the salvage inspection.
4.4 Program Disclaimer
The SECAT Program does not review the operations or reach any conclusions regarding the quality of the product or service of Vehicle Dealerships and Approved Auction Facilities or Salvage Yards. The participant is solely responsible for the quality and performance of the low emission vehicle and/or engine technology funded under the SECAT Program and may not hold the SECAT Program liable for any issues encountered with Vehicle Dealerships and Approved Auction Facilities or Salvage Yards.
August 2018
18 SECAT Program Guidelines
5.0 FLEET MODERNIZATION PROGRAM POLICIES AND GUIDELINES
The following are the policies and guidelines specific to the Fleet Modernization option under the SECAT Program.
The Fleet Modernization Program provides incentives to reduce emissions by replacing older vehicles with newer, lower-emission vehicles. In place since 2002, this program has been the most popular option to reduce emissions for owners operating older, higher polluting vehicles. With the help of participating engine dealerships, vehicle dealerships, auction facilities, and salvage yards, more than 1,000 old vehicles have been replaced with newer, lower-emission vehicles. A list of participating dealerships can be found on the SECAT website at www.4secat.com.
All applicants must meet the requirements and follow all of the policies and guidelines in order to be approved for funding under the SECAT Program. Vehicle dealerships are specifically trained on the provisions of the SECAT Program and can help participants throughout the application process. Please contact program staff or participating vehicle dealerships with any questions during the application process.
5.1 Participant Requirements
The following is a summary of the requirements that must be met prior to approval of a submitted application. If any information is missing or an applicant does not qualify for the program, the application will be mailed back to the applicant. For clean combustion vehicle purchases, the old vehicle must meet one of the requirements between items one through five, and meet both items six and seven below:
1. Any heavy-duty vehicle (GVWR greater than 14,001 lbs.) equipped with a 2009 or older engine that operates on a fuel other than diesel fuel 2. Any heavier heavy-duty vehicle (GVWR over 26,000 lbs.) equipped with a diesel particulate filter (if diesel-fueled) with a 2009 or older model year engine 3. All lighter heavy-duty vehicles (GVWR between 14,001-26,000 lbs.) with a 1999-2009 model year engine (if diesel-fueled) 4. Registered Limited Mileage Agricultural Trucks (AG) with any engine if part of a 2-for-1 project 5. Heavy-duty vehicles compliant with other ARB regulations (e.g. Public Fleets, Solid Waste Collection Vehicles, Transit Fleet Rules) with a 2009 or older model year engine 6. Old vehicle must still be operating on at least a part-time or seasonal basis defined as being registered with the DMV for on-road operation at an address located within the SACOG region at least 3 months per 12-month period 7. Old vehicle must be turned for disposal in the same condition that it was in at the time of the pre- inspection (see Section 5.4)
To encourage the adoption of zero emission technology, participants purchasing zero emission vehicles do not need to identify an old vehicle to qualify for funding nor do they need to destroy an old vehicle. This also allows fleets to retain their existing vehicles as a backup in case the new technology has unexpected downtime or occasional long range use.
August 2018
19 SECAT Program Guidelines
5.2 Application Requirements
The following items must accompany the completed original application at time of submittal. FAXED OR COPIED APPLICATIONS ARE NOT ACCEPTED.
• Signed and dated application • Signed and dated W-9 Form • Copy of the Applicant’s Driver’s License or other Photo ID Card • Copy of old vehicle title showing no lien holders • Vehicle Registration Information Record from the DMV showing vehicle registration history for the previous 24 months or last 8 vehicle registration transactions • Usage verification for previous 24 months (i.e. maintenance records, fuel receipts, mileage log books, job invoices, etc.) o Fuel records must include a vehicle identifier o If verification is not provided, applicant may opt into tracking mileage for 3 to 12 months based on estimated historic mileage on a case-by-case basis as approved by a project manager – FUNDS ARE NOT AVAILABLE UNTIL AFTER THE TRACKING PERIOD • Proof of vehicle insurance for previous 24 months • Replacement vehicle specifications and cost quote including the following information: o Replacement vehicle GVWR o Emission Family Number or engine information sufficient to determine emissions
5.3 Application Evaluation
SMAQMD will use its best efforts to evaluate applications in a timely manner. Staff may request additional information of the applicant and can deny the application if the requested information is not provided. Incomplete and illegible applications will be returned to the applicant or the vendor. If the applicant does not respond within 30 days, the application will be automatically terminated and the application process will have to be reinitiated in order for the project to be reconsidered.
The SECAT Program now evaluates applications based on two main criteria. All old vehicles must show registration within the SACOG region for at least 24 months prior to the application date. Vehicles with a pattern of seasonal registrations will qualify if the vehicle is registered for at least 3 months in each previous 12 months with each 12-month period having similar months of registration data. Staff will determine the location using the address on the vehicle registration documentation. Applications will also be evaluated to determine if the vehicle meets the minimum annual mileage requirements or equivalent as approved by the SMAQMD depending on the vocation of the vehicle for funding as shown in Section 5.6. This evaluation is done based on the historic usage documents submitted with the application, inspection records, and other documents requested by staff.
Staff will also review all documentation submitted with the application and inspection reports to determine if the vehicle meets all the eligibility requirements outlined in these guidelines. Applicants are required to ensure that all contact information listed in their application is current in case staff needs to contact the applicant about missing or incomplete information. Applicants may be given an opportunity to provide additional documentation to assist the evaluation.
August 2018
20 SECAT Program Guidelines
After evaluating the application, staff will conduct a Pre-Inspection of the old vehicle. The old vehicle will be inspected to determine the condition of the vehicle. The vehicles will be reinspected immediately prior to salvaging, and if the condition of the vehicle has changed, SMAQMD may withhold payment until the vehicle is restored to the condition documented during the Pre-Inspection (see Section 5.4).
5.4 Old Vehicle Disposal Requirements
Projects purchasing zero emission vehicles are not subject to the requirements of Section 5.4. All other projects are subject to this section.
5.4.1 Requirements for Turning in Old Vehicle
The applicant must agree NOT to remove or replace the tires, rims, seats, fifth wheel, engine parts, hood, fenders, fuel tanks, horn, exhaust pipes, mirrors, grill, cab air shield, or any other accessory or item on the vehicles between the Pre-Inspection and the date of the Pre-Salvage inspection. Truck bodies must either be fully transferred to the replacement vehicle or turned in with the old vehicle to the Approved Auction Facility or Salvage Yard.
At the time of the Pre-Salvage inspection and when the vehicle is turned over to the SECAT Approved Salvage Yard for salvage, the vehicle must be in operational condition, all tires must be road worthy and the vehicle must be able to pass a California Highway Patrol Inspection (see sections 27452 and 27465 of the California Vehicle Code listed below).
These items, at minimum, cannot be removed or replaced after the Pre-inspection:
• Hood • Fuel tanks • Tire rims • Horns • Chrome exhaust pipes • Mirrors • Grill • Seats • Air shield on top of cab • 5th wheel • Any parts that would hinder vehicle operation
The SECAT Program staff may approve special requests for retaining equipment such as tool boxes or specialty parts required for current work on a case-by-case basis and will only consider approving requests received in writing prior to purchasing the replacement vehicle. All vehicles must be delivered for destruction in the same operating condition as observed at Pre-Inspection.
California Vehicle Code
Section 27452 The required thickness of rubber shall extend evenly around the entire periphery of the tire. The entire solid tire shall be securely attached to the channel base and shall be without flat spots or bumpy rubber.
August 2018
21 SECAT Program Guidelines
Section 27465 (a) No dealer or person holding a retail seller’s permit shall sell, offer for sale, expose for sale, or install on a vehicle axle for use on a highway, a pneumatic tire when the tire has less than the tread depth specified in subdivision (b). This subdivision does not apply to any person who installs on a vehicle, as part of an emergency service rendered to a disabled vehicle upon a highway, a spare tire with the disabled vehicle was equipped (b) No person shall use on a highway a pneumatic tire on a vehicle axle when the tire has less than the following tread depth, except when temporarily installed on a disable vehicle as specified in subdivision (a): (1) One thirty-second (1/32) of an inch of tread depth in any two adjacent grooves at any location of the tire, except as provided in paragraphs (2) and (3). (2) Four thirty-second (4/32) of an inch tread depth at all points in all major grooves on a tire on the steering axle of any motor vehicle specified in Section 34500, and two thirty-second (2/32) of an inch tread depth at all points in all major grooves on all other tires on the axles of these vehicles.
5.4.2 Old Vehicle Disposal Procedure
The SECAT Program has changed the method in which old trucks are destroyed and disposed for funding purposes. The Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD and Sacramento Area Council of Governments will now use Auction Yards to auction the old trucks and retain the scrap value of the equipment. In limited cases, the SECAT Program may authorize the participant to retain the scrap value of their equipment, but most participants will release their interest in the scrap value in exchange for receiving an incentive. This section describes the new process.
When the replacement truck is delivered and ready for inspection, the SECAT Participant will contact their Project Manager to request only the inspection of the replacement truck. The Participant will no longer deliver the old truck to the truck dealership. Once the replacement truck is inspected and approved for payment, an inspector will contact the Participant to confirm which auction facility or salvage yard will be used.
For trucks that require a body transfer, the Participant must wait to request a Post Inspection until the body is fully transferred to the replacement vehicle. If desired, the Participant or their designee can contact us to confirm if the replacement vehicle GVWR and Engine Family Number meet the contract requirements. Once the replacement vehicle is inspected and approved, an inspector will contact the Participant at a later date to coordinate the disposal of the old vehicle.
Inspectors will attempt to contact the Participant to coordinate the inspections using the email address and phone number provided in the application. Please contact the appropriate Project Manager if the contact information needs to be changed.
In all cases, the Participant remains the legal owner of the old vehicle until it is delivered to an approved auction facility or salvage yard at the direction of a Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD inspector. The SECAT Program will retain all proceeds from the sale of the destroyed old vehicle as a condition of receiving funding under the program.
Inspectors will coordinate with approved entities to ensure that the old vehicles are destroyed according to the SECAT Program guidelines and that all proper paperwork is correctly filed.
August 2018
22 SECAT Program Guidelines
5.5 Replacement Vehicle Requirements
The applicant must submit a vehicle information form and ensure that the replacement truck meets the following requirements:
• All replacement vehicles are required to comply with heavy-duty vehicle emission standards as defined below: o Replacement vehicles equipped with a heavy-duty engine certified to the CARB Optional Low NOx Standards or either 0.10, 0.05, or 0.02 g/bhp-hr NOx under the FTP STD according to the most recent CARB Executive Order; or o Replacement vehicles eligible for funding under the Hybrid and Zero-Emission Truck and Bus Voucher Incentive Project; or o All vehicles with zero tailpipe emissions including battery-electric and fuel cell powertrains
• System Modifications: Modifications to the following are not allowed: engine performance characteristics (including changes in horsepower), emission characteristics, engine emission components (not including repairs with like original equipment manufacturer replacement parts) or any other modifications that cause the engine’s emission control system to be modified.
• Truck Weight Requirements: Replacement vehicles must have a Gross Vehicle Weight Rating over 14,000 pounds.
• Truck Axle and Body Configuration Requirements: The replacement vehicle may have a different axle and/or body configuration than the old vehicle as long as the replacement vehicle will have the same usage as the old vehicle through the contract term.
• SECAT Program Decals: Two SECAT Program decals will be placed on each side of the new vehicle by District staff. These decals must be easily viewed by the public and remain on the vehicle during the life of the contract.
• Replacement Vehicle Delivery Deadline: Participants are required to purchase and begin operating the replacement vehicle within 180 days of contract execution. Upon execution, participants must order the vehicle within 45 days to ensure compliance with this requirement. Proof of vehicle order, including build sheets and purchase orders, must be submitted to show a good faith effort to meet the deadline. Delays outside the participant’s control (e.g. production delays, factory issues) will generally be approved as long as the vehicle was ordered as soon as possible after contract execution.
• Vehicle Lease Option: Applicants may choose to lease the replacement vehicle instead of a traditional cash or loan purchase. All leases must be from an approved Leasing Company under agreement with the SMAQMD. Vehicle leases must have a term greater than or equal to the total length of the SECAT agreement. Applicants are required to submit the lease documents to the SMAQMD for approval. The SECAT Program will not pay more than the total cost of the lease including all other sources of funding. Applicants are required to meet the full contracted usage even if the vehicle is released after the lease expires.
August 2018
23 SECAT Program Guidelines
• Pictures of the new vehicle: District staff or a participating dealership will take pictures of the new vehicle prior to delivery to the applicant. Pictures taken by the participating dealership must be submitted in digital format, and must show:
o Front, rear, right and left sides of vehicle – hood down o Vehicle Identification Number – tag inside cab and on vehicle frame (if available) o Vehicle Model year – tag inside cab o Manufacturer Gross Vehicular Weight Rating o Combined Gross Weight (DMV Sticker) – (if applicable) o Odometer and hour meter reading o Vehicle and engine date of manufacture o Vehicle license plate (if applicable) o Engine – right and left sides o Engine model year – tag on engine o Engine emission family number – tag on engine o Engine serial number – tag on engine o Engine horsepower – tag on engine o Emission certification – tag on engine o Electronic Monitoring Unit (if applicable) o Emission control device o Emission control device serial number (if applicable) o Additional modifications/body o SECAT Program decals applied to the vehicle body o Drayage Truck Registry label (if applicable) o Other identification labels (if applicable)
5.6 Funding Amounts
The SECAT Program will reimburse the participant for eligible costs under Fleet Modernization according to the following table:
Minimum Annual Vehicle Type Emission & Fuel Funding Amount Mileage All Vehicle with GVWR Exempt Zero Emission Vehicle $100,000 over 14,001 lbs. Low NOx Propane or HVIP All Vehicles with GVWR $20,000 20,000 miles per year* Approved Diesel Hybrid over 26,000 lbs. Low NOx Natural Gas $60,000 Low NOx Propane or HVIP All Vehicles with GVWR $20,000 10,000 miles per year* Approved Diesel Hybrid 14,001 – 26,000 lbs. Low NOx Natural Gas $60,000 Low NOx Propane or HVIP $20,000 All School Buses 5,000 miles per year* Approved Diesel Hybrid Low NOx Natural Gas $60,000
* Or Mileage Equivalent
August 2018
24 SECAT Program Guidelines
Actual reimbursement may be lower in cases where the SECAT award would exceed the participant’s total cost including other funding programs including, but not limited to, the HVIP. Staff will review each invoice to determine maximum funding which may be lower than the above listed amounts.
5.7 Legal Ownership of the Replacement Vehicle
The participant must own and operate the replacement vehicle or engine. The participant may obtain financing to assist in the purchase. The SECAT Program requires that the SMAQMD be added as a lien holder on the title of the replacement vehicle throughout the term of the agreement. If the participant is not financing or leasing the replacement vehicle, then they must provide proof by submitting the replacement vehicle title via DMV and invoice documents listing the lien holder(s) on the replacement vehicle.
SMAQMD should be listed on the vehicle title as follows:
SMAQMD 777 12 th Street, 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95814
If the participant uses either a Finance Company or Leasing Company to provide their cost share to purchase the replacement vehicle, the Finance/Leasing Company must agree to list SMAQMD as a lien holder on the vehicle title. A copy of the replacement vehicle title must be provided to the SMAQMD. Invoice documents listing the lien holder(s), along with a copy of the DMV paperwork submitted by the dealer showing the Registered and Legal Owner(s) of the vehicle will allow the SECAT Program to begin processing the reimbursement request providing program requirements are met. The SECAT Program will allow most types of vehicle financing and leasing, however, specific parties should contact the SMAQMD to determine if their program is eligible. A Memorandum of Understanding between the Finance/Leasing Company and the SMAQMD is available to define the relationship between the two parties.
When a vehicle is co-funded with SECAT and a Finance Company or Leasing Company, the lien must be listed as follows:
“Name of Finance/Leasing Company” & SMAQMD “Finance/Leasing Company Address” “Finance/Leasing Company City, State ZIP”
The lien must be written out so the “& SMAQMD” characters are visible as lien holders on the paper title. This may require the Finance/Leasing Company’s name be truncated or initials to allow room for the additional lien holders to be listed. An ampersand (&) or “and” must be used to indicate that all parties need to release the lien on the vehicle for all transactions.
5.8 Certificate of Existing Vehicle Acceptance and Salvage
Projects purchasing zero emission vehicles are not subject to the requirements of Section 5.8. All other projects are subject to this section.
The old vehicle must be turned in to a District-approved auction facility or salvage yard within 30 days of a successful Post Inspection of the new vehicle. The old vehicle must be in the same operating condition
August 2018
25 SECAT Program Guidelines
as it was during the first inspection (see section 5.4). If the truck is stripped, parts are taken off, or the tires are found not to be road worthy, the applicant will be in breach of the contract and will either be required to reinstall all missing or defective parts to the participating salvage yards or repay the total incentive amount. The “Old Truck Delivery to Dismantler Certification” document that verifies the existing (old) truck has been picked up by an approved auction yard or salvage yard must be signed by authorized personnel at the time the (old) vehicle is turned in. The signed certificate must be either hand-delivered or mailed to the District before payment for the replacement vehicle will be released.
The auction yard or salvage yard has 45 days to destroy the truck by (1) cutting a non-symmetrical, jagged- edged hole in the engine block that is at least three inches in diameter, (2) making an additional cut from the engine hole down through the flange where the oil pan attaches, and (3) cutting the frame rails completely through in half between the cab and rear axle. District staff or a certified auction yard or salvage yard must take pictures of the destroyed vehicle within 60 days of delivery. The vehicle title must be registered with DMV as a non-repairable vehicle so that the VIN number can no longer be registered or titled for operation in California. A Non-Repairable Vehicle Notice or a Report of Vehicle to be Dismantled must be filed by the owner, auction yard, or salvage yard. A DMV receipt, such as a DMV reconciliation report, or non-repairable certificate verifying the vehicle can no longer be registered or titled must be made available to District staff at the time of the salvage inspection.
Pictures of the vehicle must include the following:
• Front angle of vehicle • Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) • License plate • Engine • Engine serial number on tag or stamped on block • Hole in engine • Frame rails cut into two pieces
5.9 Performance Requirements and Contractual Obligations of the Participant
All participants in the Fleet Modernization Program will be required to agree to the following terms. These requirements are in addition to the requirements in the general guidelines. If these provisions conflict with the general requirements, these requirements will control.
• The participant must agree to operate the replacement vehicle for three (3) years in the SACOG region in a manner consistent with the old vehicle. • The participant cannot sell or otherwise encumber the replacement vehicle without written authorization from the SECAT Program. • The replacement vehicle may operate outside the SACOG region and outside the State of California; however, the participant is responsible for maximizing SACOG region usage as much as feasible. • If staff determines that the vehicle has not been operated in the SACOG region or has been inoperable for any year under the agreement, the SMAQMD may terminate the agreement and demand reimbursement of funds.
August 2018
26 SECAT Program Guidelines
• Vehicles may be transferred to another party if the new owner is willing to assume the funding agreement and operate the vehicle in a similar manner. Participants may also buy out their contract with a pro-rated reimbursement. • If there is a significant event for the participant – including, but not limited to bankruptcy, sale of business, or contact information change – the participant must notify the SECAT Program. • If the replacement vehicle is involved in an accident, the applicant will need to report the accident to program staff within 10 business days. The applicant will be required to provide a police report of the accident, a letter from the insurance company regarding the accident, and any additional information requested by SMAQMD. Down time due to an accident will be credited toward the performance requirements as long as the information is reported as requested and the participant repairs the vehicle as soon as possible. The participant will be required to repair the vehicle and return it to operation if possible. If the vehicle is totaled, SMAQMD may demand repayment of a pro-rated portion of the incentive funds. • If the applicant chooses the option to reduce annual mileage on existing school buses in their fleet in addition to scrapping school buses, their performance requirements will include both a maximum annual mileage for school buses identified in their application as able to accept a
limited annual mileage equal to the annual mileage of the scrap school buses and a minimum annual mileage for the replacement school buses equal to the historic annual mileage of the proposed limited mileage school buses subject to the maximum annual mileage requirement described in this paragraph
August 2018
Transportation Committee Meeting Date: 8/2/2018 Agenda Item No.: 2018-August-6.
Subject: Public Hearing: 2019-2022 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program, Amendment #2 to the 2016 Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy, and Air Quality Conformity Analysis (Est. time: 5 minutes)
Ac on Prepared by: Jose Luis Caceres Approved by: Ma Carpenter A achments: Yes
1. Issue: What comments does the public have on the Draft 2019-2022 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (MTIP), Draft Amendment #2 to the 2016 Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (2016 MTP/SCS), and accompanying Draft Air Quality Conformity Analysis?
2. Recommendation: That the Transportation Committee hold a public hearing at its August 2, 2018, meeting to receive comments.
3. Background/Analysis: The Draft 2019-2022 MTIP is an important document for our region. It contains over 500 projects spread across the six-county region totaling $2.3 billion. Without the MTIP, agencies would be unable to encumber federal transportation funds, which would result in delays to critical transportation projects. The Draft 2019-2022 MTIP adds, deletes, marks completed, and revises multiple projects from the current 2017-2020 MTIP. These changes also count as a revision to the 2016 MTP/SCS and, therefore, federal rules require that SACOG amend the 2016 MTP/SCS transportation project list and make a conformity determination that relies on a new emissions analysis. In developing the 2019-2022 MTIP, SACOG staff contacted sponsors directly and reviewed their projects for accuracy, clarity, financial constraint, air quality conformity, and consistency with the 2016 MTP/SCS. Attached is the MTIP Development Schedule (Attachment A). 4. Discussion/Analysis: The MTIP public review period opened July 10, and will close August 16, 2018. The drafts of the MTIP, Amendment #2 to the 2016 MTP/SCS, and Air Quality Conformity Analysis are available online under “Notices” at www.sacog.org, and attached (Attachments B and C).
After holding this public hearing and receiving any comments, staff will return to the Transportation Committee and board in September to request approval.
5. Fiscal Impact/Grant Information: There is no fiscal impact.
6. This staff report aligns with the following SACOG Work Plan Goals: 7. Deliver Key High-Profile Transportation Projects ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment A: MTIP Development Schedule Attachment B: 2019-22 MTIP, Ammendment #2 to the 2016 MTP/SCS Attachment C: Air Quality Conformity Analysis 2019-22 MTIP Contents A Guide to the Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program
Contents Page Number Introduction ...... 2 The 2019-22 MTIP: Features and Highlights ...... 2 Investment Decisions: 2016 MTP/SCS and the MTIP ...... 3 2016 MTP/SCS Consistency ...... 3 MTIP Four Year Cycle ...... 3 MTIP Development & Public Participation Process...... 4 Development Schedule 2019-22 MTIP, 2016 MTP/SCS Amendment #2, and Draft Conformity Analysis 5 Relationship of the MTIP to Other Federal and State Transportation Programs ...... 6 Fund Sources Programmed in the MTIP ...... 7 Air Quality Conformity ...... 8 Grouped Project Listings in the MTIP ...... 9 Revisions to the MTIP – Administrative Modifications and Amendments ...... 9 Project Selection in the MTIP ...... 9 Financial Constraint ...... 10 Targets for Encumbering Transportation Funds ...... 11 Title VI Compliance ...... 12 System Preservation, Operation, and Maintenance Costs ...... 13 Performance Based Planning ...... 14 How to Read the Project Listings ...... 18 Endnotes and Electronic References...... 19
Appendices Resolution ...... A-1 Public Notice ...... A-2 Financial Summary...... A-3 Understanding Grouped and Individually Listed Project Reports ...... A-4 Summary of Project Listing (Individual and Grouped) ...... A-5 Detailed Project Listing (Individual and Grouped) ...... A-6 Projects from Previous MTIP (2017-20) that have been Completed ...... A-7 Amendment #2 to the 2016 Metropolitan Transportation Plan/ Sustainable Communities Strategy ...... A-8 Glossary of Commonly Used Terms and Acronyms ...... A-9 Map of the Sacramento Metropolitan Planning Area ...... A-10 Public Comments and Responses ...... A-11
1 A Guide to the Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program
Introduction The federally required Transportation Improvement Program (TIP or FTIP), called the Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (MTIP) 1 in the Sacramento Region, is a comprehensive listing of transportation projects that receive federal funds, require a federal action, or are regionally significant. The Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG),2 as the federally designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the six-county Sacramento Region, prepares and adopts the MTIP every two years. The MTIP covers a four-year period and must be financially constrained by year, meaning that the amount of dollars committed to the projects (also referred to as “programmed”) must not exceed the amount of dollars estimated to be available. The MTIP must include a financial plan that demonstrates that programmed projects can be implemented. Adoption of the MTIP must be accompanied by an evaluation and determination of air quality conformity. 3 Federal regulations also require an opportunity for public comment prior to MTIP approval. Transit, highway, local roadway, bicycle and pedestrian investments are included in the MTIP. Apart from some improvements to the region’s airports and the Port of Sacramento, all regionally significant transportation projects or projects requiring federal action are part of the MTIP. All projects included in the MTIP must be consistent with the long range regional transportation plan. The current plan for the SACOG region is the 2016 Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (2016 MTP/SCS).4
The 2019-22 MTIP: Features and Highlights Below are some features and highlights of the 2019-22 MTIP: ° Addresses the federal requirements as identified in the Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act) , enacted December 4, 2015. Approximately every four to six years, the U.S. Congress adopts and the President signs a transportation act—an authorization to spend tax dollars on highways, streets, roads, transit and other transportation related projects. ° Covers four years of programming: federal fiscal years (FFY) 2019 through 2022. ° Includes approximately 535 projects total (121 individually listed transportation projects and 414 grouped projects in 27 grouped project listing categories). ° Programs $2.3 billion of the $6.6 billion of reasonably available federal, state, and local funding during the four years of the MTIP.
2 Investment Decisions: 2016 MTP/SCS and the MTIP The 2016 MTP/SCS, which was approved by SACOG in February 2016, guides and prioritizes all SACOG’s programming decisions. It is the Sacramento Region’s comprehensive roadmap to guide transportation investment over the next 20 years. The 2016 MTP/SCS invests $46.6 billion (in year of expenditure dollars) and proactively links transportation, land use and air quality. Additionally, the 2016 MTP/SCS gives individuals more options for how to get around, with investments in walking, biking, and transit as well as roadway improvements. It focuses on six principles: 1. Smart Land Use 2. Environmental Quality and Sustainability 3. Financial Stewardship 4. Economic Vitality 5. Access and Mobility 6. Equity and Choice
The 2016 MTP/SCS identifies investment in transit at $13.8 billion, $3.6 billion in bicycle and pedestrian projects, $7.7 billion in strategic investments in road and highway, and $16.3 billion in road maintenance and rehabilitation. The 2016 MTP/SCS identifies investment of $2.3 billion in programs and planning, such as rideshare matching, 511, Spare the Air campaigns, and Community Design grants to support local smart growth efforts. The 2016 MTP/SCS builds on the Blueprint Preferred Growth Scenario (Blueprint), which envisions more housing and transportation choices and promotes integrated land uses and quality design for the Sacramento Region in 2050. The $46.6 billion planned in the 2016 MTP/SCS provides the infrastructure needed to support the Blueprint influenced land uses in local jurisdictions across the six-county region. The Blueprint encourages more livable communities by doing the following: ° Providing a variety of transportation choices ° Offering housing choices and opportunities ° Taking advantage of compact development ° Using existing assets; providing mixed land uses ° Preserving open space, farmland, natural beauty, through natural resources conservation ° Encouraging distinctive, attractive communities with quality design
2016 MTP/SCS Consistency Projects in the 2019-22 MTIP are required by federal regulations to be consistent with the 2016 MTP/SCS. For this reason, the adoption of the 2019-22 MTIP is accompanied by Amendment #2 to the 2016 MTP/SCS. Only projects consistent with the 2016 MTP/SCS are included in the 2019-22 MTIP. SACOG reviews projects for consistency with the 2016 MTP/SCS as they are amended into the MTIP. Consistency also includes the requirement that project costs in the MTIP do not exceed those in the funding constrained investment plan of the 2016 MTP/SCS.
MTIP Four Year Cycle Four years of programming are contained in the 2019-22 MTIP, federal fiscal years (FFYs) 2019 through 2022. In addition, prior year and estimated funding for projects in future years (beyond the four years that comprise the 2019-22 MTIP) are included for information.
3 MTIP Development & Public Participation Process SACOG is committed to a public involvement process that is transparent, proactive and provides comprehensive information, timely public notice, full public access to key decisions, and opportunities for continuing involvement. SACOG follows all the steps outlined below in the development of its 2019-22 MTIP.
Interagency Coordination and Review SACOG develops the MTIP in cooperation with the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency (PCTPA) and the El Dorado County Transportation Commission (EDCTC), the Regional Transportation Planning Agencies (RTPAs) for Placer and El Dorado counties respectively. This process is defined in the Memoranda of Understanding executed by SACOG, PCTPA, EDCTC, and the Secretary of Housing, Business, and Transportation for the State of California. Preparation of the MTIP and its subsequent amendments are made in coordination with the Regional Planning Partnership (Partnership) and the Transit Coordinating Committee (TCC). Their constituent members include: individual cities and counties, transit operators, PCTPA, EDCTC, Native American tribes, Caltrans, five local air districts, transportation advocates, federal agencies, and other state agencies. The Partnership and the Transit Coordinating Committee provide forums for the region’s transportation industry to contribute to the policy-making and programming activities of SACOG and to facilitate coordination within the region. Also, the Partnership and the TCC play a role in the selection of funding for projects that get programmed in the MTIP. Most of the projects in the 2019-22 MTIP have been carried over from the prior 2017-20 MTIP. To decide which projects to carryover, SACOG asked project sponsors to indicate which of their projects in the 2017- 20 MTIP had been completed, deleted, or delayed and to update the projects that needed to be carried over. New projects must be identified in the 2016 MTP/SCS and must contain work during the 2019-22 MTIP timeframe. In addition to reviewing consistency with the 2016 MTP/SCS, SACOG reviews projects for financial constraint, accuracy, clarity, and also models projects to determine that they will not affect the region’s air quality conformity. This preliminary list of projects is then circulated for interagency review.
Public Review Following interagency review, the MTIP circulates for 30 days of public review and comment, consistent with procedures identified in SACOG’s Public Participation Plan (PPP).5 Notices are posted and sent to an extensive list, including transportation agencies; other state, federal and tribal agencies; and transportation interests with the objective of continuing the consultation process for transportation planning and investments in the Sacramento region. The document is made available online. SACOG also hosts a public hearing. After the close of the public comment period, comments and SACOG’s response to comments are compiled (Appendix 11). This review process is defined in detail within the SACOG PPP. The Public notice of public involvement activities and time established for public review and comments on the MTIP will satisfy Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Program of Projects (POP) requirements, as defined in FTA Circular 9030.1E.
Adoption and Final Approval After the written comment period, the MTIP is presented to SACOG’s Transportation Committee, where a public hearing is conducted. After its review, the Committee decides whether to forward the document to the Board for adoption. After Board adoption, it is sent to the Caltrans Office of Federal Programs for inclusion into the California Federal Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (FSTIP). After review and approval by Caltrans, the FSTIP is forwarded to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) for their review and approval. Approval by FHWA/FTA constitutes the final approval of the MTIP.
4 Development Schedule 2019-22 MTIP, 2016 MTP/SCS Amendment #2, and Draft Conformity Analysis
January 26, 2018 Call for Updates to MTIP Project List
March 23, 2018 Deadline for submittals
March 24 – June 25 SACOG review of submittals, determination of financial constraint, determination of regional significance, identification of grouped project listings, air quality modeling, and air quality conformity analysis.
SACOG also incorporates CTC Staff recommendation to MTIP.
June 28 – July 6 Interagency Review of Draft MTIP, Draft 2016 MTP/SCS Amendment #2, and Draft Conformity Analysis
July 10 – August 16 Public Comment Period
July 18 Transit Coordinating Committee Presentation
August 2 Transportation Committee: Public Hearing
August 22 Regional Planning Partnership Presentation
September 6 Transportation Committee: Board Recommendation
September 20 Board Adoption of MTIP
October 1 Final MTIP due to Caltrans
October 10-31 Statewide FSTIP Public Comment Period
November 16 Caltrans submits FSTIP (which includes SACOG MTIP) to FHWA and FTA
December 17 Final MTIP & Air Quality Conformity Determination approval by Federal DOT
5 Relationship of the MTIP to Other Federal and State Transportation Programs
FSTIP Just as each metropolitan region is required to develop a federal TIP, each state is required to develop a Federal Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (FSTIP) 6 pursuant to federal regulations. The FSTIP includes all projects with federal funds, those that require a federal action, and regionally significant transportation projects throughout the state. In California, regional TIPs are included in the FSTIP without modification once approved by the relevant Metropolitan Planning Organization and Caltrans. Next the FSTIP receives final approval when FHWA and FTA make their required financial constraint and air quality findings. Projects must be in the FSTIP before funding authorities, such as FTA, FHWA, or Caltrans, can “obligate” funds (i.e., commit funds to contract) and therefore, before sponsors can actually spend any of these monies.
STIP The California Transportation Commission (CTC) 7 is required to biennially adopt a State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) 8. The STIP is a comprehensive listing of all major projects to be funded from specified state funding revenues, including certain federal funds that flow directly to the state. As a result, the projects that are included in the STIP are included in the regional TIPs and the FSTIP as well. (“STIP” is also used to refer to the fund types programmed in the STIP.) The STIP consists of elements developed at the state level by Caltrans and at the regional level by Regional Transportation Planning Agencies (RTPAs).
ITIP Caltrans proposes an element of the STIP known as the Interregional Transportation Improvement Program, or ITIP. The ITIP comprises a portion of STIP funding intended to address transportation infrastructure needs that cross metropolitan boundaries and link the state’s transportation system. For example, intercity rail and interregional highways are included in the ITIP. (“ITIP” is also used to refer to the fund type programmed in the ITP.)
RTIP The regions propose an element of the STIP known as the Regional Transportation Improvement Program, or RTIP. The RTIP comprises a portion of the STIP funding to address transportation infrastructure needs within a region. As the RTPAs in the region, SACOG, PCTPA and EDCTC approve RTIPs for the Sacramento region. The RTIPs are then forwarded to the CTC for approval. The CTC works with the regional agency if modifications are needed to the submitted program of projects.
6 Fund Sources Programmed in the MTIP The 2019-22 MTIP programs transportation funding from a wide variety of sources. All of these fund sources have eligibility criteria that a project must meet in order to be considered for the fund source. Most projects have more than one source of funding. Several of the major funding sources are:
Federal Transit Administration Programs ° Section 5307 Urbanized Area Formula ° Section 5309a Fixed Guideway Capital Investment Grants ° Section 5309b New and Small Starts (Capital Investment Grants) ° Section 5309c Bus and Bus Related Grants ° Section 5310 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities ° Section 5311 Formula Grants for Rural Areas ° Section 5337 State of Good Repair Grants ° Section 5339 Bus and Bus Facilities Formula Grants
Federal Highway Administration Programs ° Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBGP/RSTP), previously Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP) ° Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program (CMAQ) ° Highway Bridge Program (HBP) 9 ° Active Transportation Program (ATP) 10 ° Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) ° Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) ° Various safety programs ° High Priority Projects and other earmarks
7 State, Regional, and Local Programs If state or local funds are used to match federal dollars, or if they are attached to projects that require federal approval, or if the project is considered to be regionally significant, then the associated state and local funds must be reported in the MTIP. Otherwise, state and local funds do not have to be programmed in the MTIP. State and local fund sources can include the following: ° State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), comprising the Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) and the Interregional Transportation Improvement Program (ITIP) 11 ° Road Repair and Accountability Act (SB 1), approved in April 2017 ° Proposition 1A and 1B Bonds, approved by voters in 2006, which include Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA), Trade Corridors Improvement Fund (TCIF), and Public Transportation Modernization, Improvement, and Service Enhancement Account (PTMISEA) funds and other bond programs ° Transportation Development Act (TDA) & State Transit Assistance (STA) funds ° Proceeds from Measure A, the Sacramento County half-cent transportation sales tax ° Transportation Impact Fees ° Gas Tax ° Various other funds programmed to regionally significant, locally funded projects
Air Quality Conformity Under federal law and regulations, SACOG must analyze the MTIP to determine if it conforms to the Sacramento Region’s approved federal air quality plans, known as the State Implementation Plan (SIP) 12 . SACOG models motor vehicle emissions, considering all projects in the MTIP and 2016 MTP/SCS. The emissions must not exceed the Motor Vehicle Emissions Budget (MVEB) identified in the SIP and approved by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)13 . In instances where EPA has not approved a budget, SACOG evaluates emissions output using an interim test. In addition, the MTIP must provide for the timely implementation of strategies to reduce emissions that are in the SIP, called Transportation Control Measures (TCMs). Air quality conformity (conformity) is a method to ensure that federal funding and approval go to those transportation activities that are consistent with air quality goals. Conformity applies to transportation plans, TIPs, and projects funded or approved by FHWA or FTA in areas that do not meet or previously have not met air quality standards for ozone, carbon monoxide, particulate matter types, or nitrogen oxides. These areas are known as “nonattainment areas” or “maintenance areas,” respectively. A conformity determination demonstrates that the total emissions projected for a plan or program are within the emissions limits (budgets) established by the SIP, and that TCMs are implemented in a timely fashion. SACOG analyzes the projects in the MTIP and 2016 MTP/SCS, using a prescribed computer model and process, and makes a finding that those projects, if completed, would not contribute to air pollution that exceeds the amount specified in the region’s clean air plan.
Transportation Control Measure (TCM) Implementation SACOG’s TCMs are recorded in Appendix D of the 2009 Sacramento Regional 8-Hour Ozone Attainment and Reasonable Further Progress Plan.14 The MTIP and 2016 MTP/SCS provide for the timely completion or implementation of the TCMs. In addition, SACOG must document that nothing in the MTIP or 2016 MTP/SCS interferes with the implementation of any TCM in the applicable implementation plan, and priority is given to TCMs. Documentation of the timely implementation of these measures is contained in the Air Quality Conformity Analysis that accompanies the 2019-22 MTIP.
8 Grouped Project Listings in the MTIP Federal regulations 23 CFR 450.218(j) allows MPOs to group together projects that are not considered to be of appropriate scale for individual listing. Such projects may be grouped by function, work type or geographical area and must be consistent with the classifications under 23 CFR 771.117(c) and (d) and/or 40 CFR part 93. SACOG groups projects in accordance with the Grouped Project Listing Guidelines as developed by Caltrans in 2010.15 The grouped project listings are consistent with the “Exempt Project” classification contained in the EPA Transportation Conformity Regulation (40 CFR part 93).
Revisions to the MTIP – Administrative Modifications and Amendments Because of the fluctuating nature of transportation projects nearing implementation, circumstances dictate that changes be made to the MTIP following its adoption. Federal regulations in SAFETEA-LU allow for two types of revisions to the MTIP, Administrative Modifications and Amendments. SACOG processes Amendments regularly, about two to four per year, while Administrative Modifications occur more often, about 12 per year. Amendments take longer to process, as long as four to six months. In contrast, Administrative Modifications usually take one or two weeks, or may take as little as a day.
Types of Revisions Consistent with the policies above, SACOG has further defined Administrative Modifications and Amendments by a classification system which consists of five “Types” of revisions, each with specific action, review, public participation, and approval. The information on this classification system can be found in SACOG’s PPP. The PPP is the official document that delineates the various types MTIP revisions. The five MTIP Revision Types are: 1. Administrative Modification 2. Amendment Due to Funding Changes 3. Amendment of Exempt/Non-Regionally Significant Projects 4. Amendment Requiring a Conformity Determination 5. Amendment Requiring a Conformity Determination and a New Regional Emissions Analysis
Administrative Modification Criteria and Delegated Authority In June 2011, FHWA, FTA, and Caltrans agreed on revised administrative modification/amendment procedures. In August 2011, Caltrans delegated authority to SACOG to approve Administrative Modifications to the MTIP and FSTIP. No further approval is required for administrative modifications. The Administrative Modification Procedures 16 and Delegated Authority are posted online at https://www.sacog.org/metropolitan-transportation-improvement-program .
Project Selection in the MTIP
Project Selection as Interpreted by Federal Regulations The federal regulations (23 CFR 450.330) require that SACOG describe how it chooses which programmed projects will be delivered, or “selected” from the MTIP. SACOG, treats the entire MTIP as a list of programmed projects that may be delivered. Projects may be delivered from any year of the MTIP. Each year SACOG adopts a Delivery Plan that lays out how projects will be delivered from the years of the MTIP. No further selection action is necessary. “Project selection,” as termed in federal regulations, does not apply to how projects are selected to receive transportation funds.
9 SACOG’s Project Selection Criteria Once a project is programmed for a federal funding amount in a certain federal fiscal year, no further selection action is necessary for the implementing agency to proceed with the listed project once the programmed federal fiscal year has begun. Per federal regulations, all projects in the first year of the MTIP constitute an “agreed to” list of projects for project selection purposes and no further project selection action is required for the implementing agency to proceed with projects. For years 2, 3, and 4, SACOG, Caltrans, FHWA, FTA, and transit operators also agree that those projects constitute an “agreed to” list, and thus, no further project selection action is necessary.
Expedited Project Selection Procedures All federal funds may be delivered within the four-year period of the 2019-22 MTIP without necessitating an amendment to the MTIP. Federal regulations allow for the movement of projects (advancing and delaying) within the four-year period of the MTIP and FSTIP subject to procedures agreed to by partnering agencies, including the State and transit operators within the region. SACOG, as the MPO for the six-county Sacramento Region, has a process in place that is consistent with the Expedited Project Selection Procedures (EPSP) outlined in 23 CFR 450.330. This process is documented online at http://www.sacog.org/metropolitan-transportation-improvement-program . SACOG also acknowledges that any advancement or delay of projects within the four-year element of the MTIP through the EPSP will not invalidate the financial constraint of the MTIP.
Financial Constraint The MTIP must be financially constrained, meaning that the amount of funding programmed must not exceed the amount of funding estimated to be reasonably available. This constraint requirement applies to each of the four program years. In developing the 2019-22 MTIP, SACOG has taken into consideration the transportation funding revenues expected to be available during the four years of the MTIP (FFY 2019 through 2022), and has found the 2019-22 MTIP to be financially constrained by program and by year. The MTIP shall include a project, or an identified phase of a project, only if full funding can reasonably be anticipated to be available for the project within the time period contemplated for completion of the project. Because the SACOG region is an air quality non-attainment area, only projects with committed or identified funding may be programmed in the first two years of the MTIP. The last two years of programming must be reasonably available. 17 Fiscal constraint requirements encompass both the operation and maintenance of capital projects in the MTIP and the estimated costs of maintaining and operating the transportation system as a whole. The framework of both SACOG’s 2016 MTP/SCS and the 2019-22 MTIP meet this requirement. The 2019-22 MTIP is mostly a compilation of previously programmed projects, reflecting previous programming actions by SACOG, PCTPA, or EDCTC. The 2019-22 MTIP includes projects approved and funded by transportation agency partners. The 2019-22 MTIP also includes available state funds, including Senate Bill 1, Proposition 1B, and State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) funds, utilizing the latest fund estimates released by the State. SACOG continuously monitors developments in funding programs and the funding needs of transportation projects, as reflected by the MTIP project listing. Any significant changes will be reviewed by SACOG and its transportation partners; and, if needed, SACOG will take appropriate actions, such as a MTIP Amendment, to maintain the financial constraint state of the MTIP.
10 Measure B Explanation The 2019-22 MTIP does not contain “Measure B,” a new future fund source anticipated in the 2016 MTP/SCS. Instead, all of the funding included in the 2019-22 MTIP is based on the continuation of existing revenue sources. In contrast, the region’s long-range transportation plan, the 2016 MTP/SCS, envisions a new stream of funding from an additional ½ cent sales tax measure, or an equivalent amount from an unspecified source. “Measure B,” as it has been termed, would help fund road and transit maintenance and operations within Sacramento County. Since no Measure B funding is programmed to projects within the financially constrained MTIP, the MTIP does not rely on the approval of Measure B to pay for projects. Consequently, Measure B is not listed as a fund source in the Appendix 3, Financial Summary, neither in the first two years nor the last two years.
Targets for Encumbering Transportation Funds Delivering transportation projects within the estimated cost, scope and schedule has been one of the key issues in state transportation policy for many years. Most notably, SB 45—Kopp (Chapter 622, Statutes 1997) and AB 1012—Torlakson (Chapter 783, Statutes of 1999) established penalties for not delivering projects funded with STIP, STBGP/RSTP, or CMAQ funds within certain prescribed deadlines. SB 45 and AB 1012 give regions, counties, and sponsors incentives to deliver projects more quickly by creating negative consequences—projects stand to lose their funding if not delivered according to schedule. Under AB 1012, regions must obligate STBGP/RSTP and CMAQ funds apportioned to them within three years, or the state will redirect the funding to other projects. SB 45 established a complex series of project delivery deadlines for projects in the STIP. If these deadlines are not met, the funds are redirected to other projects, in some cases, outside of the SACOG Region. The SACOG region has maintained an excellent project delivery record. This outstanding delivery record is due to the hard work of project sponsors, Caltrans Local Assistance and the regional delivery policies developed by SACOG. SACOG constantly monitors this process in an effort to maintain its delivery record and to ensure that the maximum amount of federal funds continue to flow into the region. This monitoring includes responding to increased scrutiny for federal and state funding deadlines, the current economic environment, and anticipating future federal and state policies regarding the availability of transportation funding. ° Federal Requirements (FAST Act) – STBGP/RSTP and CMAQ funds (among other programs) must be obligated within 4 years of apportionment. The state loses those funds not obligated to FHWA. ° State Requirements (AB 1012) – STBGP/RSTP and CMAQ funds must be obligated within 3 years of apportionment. The region loses those funds not obligated to the state.
11 Title VI Compliance It is SACOG’s policy to comply with state and federal laws and regulations including Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) 18 and other federal discrimination laws and regulations, as well as the Unruh Civil Rights Act of 1959 19 , the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) 20 , and other California State discrimination laws and regulations. SACOG does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, sex, creed, religion, national origin, age, marital status, ancestry, medical condition, disability, sexual orientation or gender identity in conducting its business. SACOG prohibits discrimination by its employees, contractors and consultants. 21 Investments made in the MTIP must be consistent with Title VI and must support “Environmental Justice.” Title VI prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, income, and national origin in programs and activities receiving federal financial assistance. Similarly, Environmental Justice is defined by EPA as “the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people, regardless of race, color, sex, national origin, or income, with respect to the development, implementation and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies.” Public outreach to and involvement of individuals in low income and minority communities covered under Title VI, are critical to regional planning and programming decisions. The fundamental principles of environmental justice include: ° Avoiding, minimizing or mitigating disproportionately high and adverse health or environmental effects on minority and low-income populations; ° Ensuring full and fair participation by all potentially affected communities in the transportation decision-making process; and ° Preventing the denial, reduction or significant delay in the receipt of benefits by minority populations and low-income communities.
Environmental Justice in the Development of the MTIP The decision process by which projects are selected for inclusion into SACOG’s MTIP considers Title VI and environmental justice requirements. Projects selected for inclusion in the MTIP are consistent with the 2016 MTP/SCS as required by federal law. As part of the development of the 2016 MTP/SCS, SACOG conducted a rigorous Environmental Justice and Title VI Analysis.22 SACOG engaged in a rigorous outreach process. Key outreach efforts included: ° Eight public workshops on policy choices related to the MTP/SCS ° Multiple meetings of the MTP/SCS Cross-Sectoral Sounding Board, a focus group that included a number of representatives from equity, agriculture, air quality, public health, tribal governments, affordable housing, and human service groups, and minority, low-income, senior, youth, disabled and recent immigrant population.
Environmental Justice in the Federal Funding Selection Process Additionally, as part of the SACOG process for selecting projects to receive federal funds, applicants must formally describe in writing their agency’s efforts to address and account for environmental justice at a project level. Specifically, applicants must describe the kind of outreach to the community and to other stakeholders that they have or plan to undertake. Applicants must identify if low-income or minority members of the community are given an opportunity to fully participate in the outreach. Finally, applicants must evaluate the benefits and burdens of the project with regard to low income and minority members of the community.
12 System Preservation, Operation, and Maintenance Costs As mentioned above, the MTIP must be financially constrained, meaning that the amount of funding programmed must not exceed the amount of funding estimated to be reasonably available. Included in this is the requirement that the MTIP demonstrate that the region’s federally supported facilities are being adequately operated and maintained. The frameworks of both SACOG’s current 2016 MTP/SCS and 2019- 22 MTIP take into account the expenditures and costs of system preservation, operations, and maintenance.
Past Spending on Local Street Pavement Fiscal constraint encompasses not only operation and maintenance of capital projects in the MTIP but also the estimated costs of maintaining and operating the total transportation system as well. The frameworks of both SACOG’s current 2016 MTP/SCS and 2019-22 MTIP take into account these operating and maintenance costs.
Local governments in the SACOG region spend an average of about $270 million per year on road maintenance and reconstruction for the region’s more than 20,000 lane miles of city and county roads. Routine maintenance accounts for about 63% ($170 million/year) of these expenditures with the remaining 37% ($100 million) going toward major reconstruction projects. The level of investment in maintenance and reconstruction fluctuates from year to year, but has grown at an average rate of 8% per year since 2000.23
The California Statewide Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment is a biannual report that details the conditions of the streets and roads in the state 24 . The Assessment is the result of work by a coalition of transportation and local government groups including the California State Association of Counties, League of California Cities, County Engineers Association of California, Los Angeles County, California Regional Transportation Planning Agencies, and the California Rural Counties Task Force. The assessment ranks road conditions using a Pavement Condition Index (PCI) with values of zero (failed condition) to 100 (good to excellent condition). The latest update in 2016 ranks the average condition of the state’s local streets and roads in the “at risk” category with a score of 65. The table below, PCI and Needs by County, shows the PCI scores, number of lane miles, and total 10-year maintenance and rehabilitation need as identified in the Assessment for the six counties in the SACOG region. The total need for the region equates to roughly $570 million annually over the next 10 years. Compared to current expenditures, that leaves a nearly $300-million-dollar annual gap in funding available for road maintenance and rehabilitation.
Pavement Index Score (PCI) and Needs by County (need in millions of 2016 dollars) County 2016 PCI Lane Miles 10-Year Need El Dorado 62 2,806 $ 631 Placer 68 4,203 $ 798 Sacramento 62 11,285 $ 2,813 Sutter 70 2,041 $ 346 Yolo 55 2,457 $ 696 Yuba 60 1,504 $ 374 Region 24,296 $ 5,658
Unfortunately, the scarce resources available for road maintenance and rehabilitation are not keeping pace with escalating costs. Preventive maintenance is important for controlling long-term costs, but the only funds available for maintenance are the local shares of the gas tax, sales tax funds, and local general funds.
Currently, maintenance and rehabilitation consume about 70% of the typical local road budget, leaving only 30% for local improvements and new construction. Generally, federal and state funds are not available to assist with routine maintenance. However, for more extensive work, such as rehabilitation and reconstruction,
13 SACOG taps federal and state funds to help local governments bring these roads back to a good state of repair.
The current 2016 MTP/SCS prioritizes preservation of the existing transportation system when making investment decisions with revenues that can be used for maintenance and rehabilitation purposes. Since 1998, the region has diverted approximately 15% of state and federal funds to road rehabilitation instead of road improvements. The 2016 MTP/SCS calls for an additional ½ cent sales tax or equivalent funding source in Sacramento County, which would help pay for additional road maintenance.
Performance Based Planning SACOG’s 2016 MTP/SCS planning process was heavily focused on performance, with multiple indicators in the categories of land use, transportation, environment, and environmental justice. SACOG is currently developing the 2020 MTP/SCS, which will build on this work and further address new requirements in the use of performance measures. The planning work done to address safety in is documented in the 2016 MTP- SCS, Appendix C2, Safety and Security. 25
The Rules
The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) is the federal transportation funding act signed into law in 2012. MAP-21 established a performance- and outcome-based program known as “Performance Based Planning,” with the objective to invest in projects that will make progress toward the achievement of the national goals for the transportation. The most recent federal transportation act, Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act of 2016 (FAST Act), carries forward the Performance Based Planning. Beginning in 2018, state departments of transportation (like Caltrans) and metropolitan planning organizations (like SACOG) will be required to implement the federal performance measures. In response, FHWA worked with state and regional agencies to identify performance measures that meet the requirements.
In California, Caltrans is directly responsible for submitting performance targets and periodic progress reports to federal agencies on an annual basis. Metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs), such as SACOG, are required to establish targets for the same performance measures on all public roads in the MPO planning area within 180 days after the state establishes each target. SACOG may elect to support the statewide targets, establish numerical targets specific to their region, or use a combination of both approaches. Furthermore, SACOG must incorporate these short-range targets into its planning processes, including the MTP-SCS and MTIP.
The federal performance measures are grouped into three groupings under the rubric of “Performance Management” (PM):
• PM 1: Safety • PM 2: Transportation Asset Management • PM 3: System Reliability, Freight, Congestion, and Air Quality
PM 1 Safety targets were set by Caltrans on August 31, 2017, allowing until February 27, 2018, for MPOs to submit targets in this area. SACOG’s approach in this area is described in detail below and will be incorporated directly into the 2020 MTP/SCS and MTIP. PM 2 and PM 3 targets are expected to be adopted by Caltrans in May 2018 and by MPOs in November 2018. Given the timing, SACOG will not address PM 2 and PM 3 in the 2019 MTIP adoption. Once the targets are established, SACOG will incorporate them into subsequent MTP and MTIP cycles.
14 PM 1: Safety
FHWA issued the Safety Performance Management Final Rule (Safety PM) as an implementation of the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP), effective April 15, 2016. The Safety PM identified the core federal safety goal as, “to achieve a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads.” The Safety PM, the Caltrans Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP), and the Strategic Management Plan (SMP), guided the development of the Safety PM. In cooperation with the Office of Traffic Safety (OTS), Caltrans adopted five aspirational Safety Performance Management Targets. These safety performance measures apply to all public roads regardless of ownership or functional classification.
The Performance Measure and the Target Based on the 5-Year Rolling Average Performance Target Data Source 5- Yr. Rolling Average Percent Reduction (2018) (2018) Number of Fatalities FARS 3590.8 -7.69% Rate of Fatalities (per 100M FARS & 1.029 -7.69% VMT) HPMS Number of Serious Injuries SWITRS 12,823.4 -1.5% Rate of Serious Injuries (per SWITRS & 3.831 -1.5% 100M VMT) HPMS Number of Non-Motorized FARS & 4271.1 -10% Fatalities and Non-Motorized SWITRS Severe Injuries Note: The targets highlighted in gray are set by Caltrans in coordination with OTS.
SACOG has elected to support the state targets for PM 1 rather than establishing region-specific numerical targets. SACOG will highlight funding and programs in the MTP/SCS and MTIP that help the state achieve the statewide targets, and will track regional safety performance over time using the state’s methodology.
Safety is integral to the SACOG planning and programming process. Specifically, SACOG begins most transportation planning efforts with a preliminary analysis of the challenges facing the transportation system within the project area. This ongoing effort continually identifies new issues and feeds them into the planning process. For instance, SACOG or a sponsor in the SACOG region may initiate a corridor study or project study report that provides details on the types of challenges and system deficiencies found in a portion of the region. Within such a report, the sponsor will set out a goal to improve overall transportation safety along the corridor. Data analyses focus on identifying intersections, accident information, or existing design features that can benefit from the safety enhancements. This is then followed by more detailed investigation of the types of strategies that can be used to reduce the number and severity of accidents.
Cumulatively, these planning studies suggest strategies and recommend capital projects for the long-range MTP/SCS and the MTIP. For example, SACOG’s Unmet Transit Needs process provides the general public opportunities to raise any safety and security issues on public transit.
How the 2019 MTIP Contributes to Achieving the PM 1 Performance Targets
Many of the projects programmed in the MTIP improve safety. For some, safety is the primary aim, and for others, safety may be a component. For example, in El Dorado County, near Placerville, Caltrans District 3 is delivering the US 50 - Camino Operational / Safety Improvements project (CAL18190), which will install median barrier, widen shoulders, and construct an undercrossing for access to local roads under the US 50 freeway. This is primarily a safety project. Another project, Complete Streets Rehabilitation - Bell Ave. (SAC24719), in the City of Sacramento, is mixture of road rehabilitation, sidewalk infill, new bicycle lanes, new two-way left turn lanes, and transit bus pullouts. This project makes a variety of improvements to Bell
15 Avenue, not least of which is to improve the safety of the corridor for a range of users—people driving, walking, biking, and taking transit.
SACOG programs four primary funding programs that improve safety. Some of these funds are dedicated entirely to safety, and so must fund projects that are primarily safety-oriented, while other funds are eligible for safety, and so may fund a mixture of project improvements, including safety. 1. Active Transportation Program (ATP) 2. Highway Bridge Program (HBP) 3. Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) 4. State Highway Operations and Protection Program (SHOPP)
ATP The ATP funds bicycle and/or pedestrian projects. Since people are more vulnerable while walking or biking as compared to traveling in a vehicle, any project that helps them do so is likely to yield safety benefits. The ATP further emphasizes safety by allotting points for projects applications that promise to reduce the rate or number of pedestrian and bicyclist fatalities and injuries. 26
HBP The HBP is a safety program that provides federal-aid to local agencies to replace and rehabilitate deficient locally owned public highway bridges. The intent of the HBP is to remove structural deficiencies from existing local highway bridges to keep the traveling public safe. 27
HSIP The HSIP directly addresses safety. The program’s stated purpose is to “achieve a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads, including non-State-owned public roads and roads on tribal land.” Successful project applications promise to reduce fatalities and injuries. The program is designed to focus local efforts on locations/corridors with the greatest safety needs and countermeasures with lower costs. 28
SHOPP The SHOPP is the State Highway System’s “fix-it-first” program that funds the repair and preservation, emergency repairs, safety improvements, and some highway operational improvements on the State Highway System (SHS). All projects funded by the SHOPP are limited to capital improvements that do not add capacity (no new highway lanes) to the SHS, though some new auxiliary lanes are eligible for SHOPP funding. Each project in the 2018 SHOPP contains a primary project performance measure. This performance measure represents the primary purpose of the project. Performance measures range from lane- miles of distressed pavement restored for roadway projects to collisions reduced for safety projects. Caltrans reports these performance measures in the project listing. 29
Safety Programs in the MTIP % of Total Program-Specific % of the 4- Number % of Total Project Project Funding in the 4- Year of Number of Fund Funding Funding Year Element Element Projects Projects ATP $112,171,051 2% $39,786,000 2% 18 5% HBP $530,541,549 10% $161,901,131 6% 67 20% HSIP $97,605,759 2% $42,041,990 2% 27 8% SHOPP $2,199,334,000 42% $1,224,531,000 48% 76 23% Total Safety $2,939,652,359 56% $1,468,260,121 58% 188 57% All Funds $5,284,789,480 100% $2,550,354,355 100% 330 100%
16
As shown in the table above, of the 330 projects that have some amount of funding programmed in the four years of the MTIP, 188 of them, or 57 percent, are funded by one of the four major safety related programs. 57 Percent of These projects have a combined total cost $2.9 billion, with program- specific funding totaling $1.5 billion. One example project is the MTIP Projects above-mentioned US 50 - Camino Operational / Safety Improvements project (CAL18190) for $51,270,000. The MTIP are funded by programs $48,000,000 of SHOPP Collision Reduction funds, $3,124,500 HSIP funds, and $145,500 Local Transportation funds to improve safety safety-related at this location. Of the remaining 142 projects in the MTIP, a significant number of those programs. make improvements to safety, but use other funding sources not dedicated to safety. In the case of Complete Streets Rehabilitation - Bell Ave. (SAC24719), it uses $5,759,968 of Regional Surface Transportation Program/Surface Transportation Block Grant Program funds programmed in part through SACOG’s 2014 Regional/Local Program.
17
How to Read the Project Listings The project listing provides a detailed description for each individual project in the 2019-22 MTIP. There is only one official project listing, listed in Appendix 6, called the Detailed Project Listing (Individual and Grouped). Nearly every project that is exempt from regional air quality conformity analysis is rolled into a “Grouped Project Listing,” also known as a lump sum. Both lists contain the following information for each project: Data Label Definition
SACOG ID (MTIP #) A unique number used to identify projects in the MTIP. Lead Agency Agency in charge of administering a project. Project Title Name or title of the project. Project Description Brief description of the project and project location. Completion Year The calendar year the project is to be “completed,” that is, open to the public. County The county in which the project is located. EA Number It is a Caltrans project reference number for federally funded projects. Exempt Category Air quality related categories for projects exempt from air quality conformity analysis. Fiscal Year The federal fiscal year of revenue/funding. If it says < 19 , then there are revenues for FFY’s prior to 2019. If it says >22, then there are revenues projected after FFY 2022 (sometimes referred to as “Outer Years”.) Revenue Source The funding source. Phase s (3) The stage of the project for which the specified funds have been programmed. Phases include: 1. Engineering, which includes preliminary engineering, environmental, and final design; 2. Right of way engineering and acquisition, and utility relocation; 3. Construction engineering, construction support, and construction. Total Cost Total project funding, including prior and later-year funds. FFY 2019, ‘20, etc. Federal Fiscal year. The Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) in the MTIP is from October 1 to September 30 of the following calendar year. The 2019-22 MTIP covers the four- year period of FFY 2019, FFY 2020, FFY 2021, and FFY 2022.
18 Endnotes and Electronic References
1The MTIP is available online at http://www.sacog.org/metropolitan-transportation-improvement-program 2 Information about SACOG is available online at http://www.sacog.org 3 Air Quality Conformity information is available online at http://www.sacog.org/air-quality 4 The MTP/SCS 2035 is available online at http://www.sacog.org/metropolitan-transportation-plansustainable- communities-strategy 5 The PPP is available online at http://www.sacog.org/public-participation-plan 6 The FSTIP is available online at http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/transprog/oftmp.htm 7 Information about the CTC is available online at http://www.catc.ca.gov/ 8 The STIP is available online at http://www.catc.ca.gov/programs/stip.htm 9 Although still referred to as the Highway Bridge Program (HBP) in California, the federal HBP no longer exists. Instead, California continues to fund bridge rehabilitation and replacement using other federal funding sources. These funds are still described as “HBP” in the MTIP.
10 The ATP is a state managed fund made up of federal Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) funds, federal Recreational Trails Funds, and includes state funding previously part known as Safe Routes To School and the Bicycle Transportation Account.
11 Although a state fund, the RTIP and ITIP generally contain significant amounts of federal funding, usually Surface Transportation Program funds and National Highway System funds.
12 The SIP is available online at http://www.arb.ca.gov/planning/sip/sip.htm 13 Information about the EPA is available online at http://www.epa.gov/ 14 The 2009 Sacramento Regional 8-Hour Ozone Attainment and Reasonable Further Progress Plan is available online at http://www.arb.ca.gov/planning/sip/planarea/sacsip/sacplanozone2009.pdf 15 The Grouped Project Listing Guidelines are available online at http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/transprog/federal/fedfiles/res_publications/grouped_pjt_listings.pdf 16 Administrative Modification Procedures are posted online at http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/transprog/federal/proc_guide.htm . 17 These rules come from 23 CFR 450.216 - Development and content of the statewide transportation improvement program. https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/23/450.216
18 Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 is available online at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/civilrights/programs/tvi.htm 19 The Unruh Civil Rights Act is available online at http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV§ionNum=51 . 20 Information on the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) is available online at http://www.dfeh.ca.gov/Publications_FEHADescr.htm 21 SACOG’s June 7, 2012, Non-Discrimination Statement is available online at http://www.sacog.org/sites/main/files/file-attachments/3-link_sacog_2015_compliance_report_title_vi.pdf 22 Appendix C-5 Environmental Justice and Title VI Analysis Methodology, 2016 MTP/SCS, SACOG, February, 2016. http://www.sacog.org/sites/main/files/file-attachments/appendix_c- 5_environmental_justice_and_title_vi_analysis_methodology.pdf
19
23 Data obtained from 2000-2012 California State Controller Local Streets and Roads Reports 24 California Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment ( http://www.savecaliforniastreets.org/ ) 25 2016 MTP, Appendix C2, Safety and Security, February 2016 https://www.sacog.org/sites/main/files/file-attachments/appendix_c-2_safety_and_security.pdf 26 2019 Active Transportation Program Medium Infrastructure Scoring Rubric, June 2018. http://www.catc.ca.gov/programs/atp/2019/docs/061118_Cycle_4_ATP_Scoring_Rubric_Medium.pdf 27 Chapter 6 Highway Bridge Program, January 2018. http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/lam/prog_g/g06hbrr.pdf 28 Chapter 9 Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Guidelines, 2016. http://dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/HSIP/2016/HSIP-Guidelines.pdf 29 2018 State Highway Operation and Protection Program, March 2018. http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/transprog/SHOPP/2018_shopp/2018-shopp-adopted-by-ctc.pdf
20 Attachment B
To view Item 6, Attachment B: 2019-22 MTIP, Amendment #2 to the 2016 MTP/SCS, visit: https://www.sacog.org/sites/main/files/file- attachments/draft_2019-2020_mtip.pdf
CONFORMITY ANALYSIS
TO BE ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 2018
DEVELOPED AS PART OF THE SACRAMENTO AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS’:
2016 METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN AND SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY AMENDMENT #2
AND
ADOPTION OF THE 2019-22 METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
UPDATED 7/17/18
SACOG STAFF
Renée DeVere-Oki, Program Manager for Regional Air Quality Planning
Shengyi Gao, Data and Modeling Analyst
Clint Holtzen, Project Manager- MTP/SCS Amendment #2
José Luis Cáceres, Project Manager-2019/22 MTIP
Hilda Iorga, Analyst- 2019/22 MTIP
Bruce Griesenbeck, Data Modeling Manager
Matt Carpenter, Director of Transportation Services
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary 1 Conformity Requirements 1 Conformity Tests 2 Findings of the Conformity Analysis 2 Conformity Determination for the 2016 Metropolitan Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy Amendment #2 and the 2019-22 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program 4 Overview of the Physical Environment 4 Introduction 5 Background 5 Conformity Approach 6 Financial Constraint 6 Inclusion of all Federal and Regionally Significant Projects 7 Latest Planning Assumptions 7 Land Use Assumptions 7 Transportation System 9 Latest Emissions Model 9 Modeling Documentation 10 Air Quality Emissions Analysis 11 Years of Analysis 11 Analysis Techniques 11 Emission Calculations 12 Emissions Budget Test for Ozone (ROG and NOx) 13 Emission Forecasts for the Sutter Buttes Ozone Nonattainment Area 13 Emissions Budget Test for PM10 13 Interim Baseline Test for the Sacramento PM2.5 Nonattainment Area 14 Emissions Budget Test for the Yuba City-Marysville PM2.5 Nonattainment Area 14 Implementation of Transportation Control Measures 14 Public Participation Process 14 Resolution of Approval for the 2016 MTP/SCS Amendment #2 and the 2019-22 MTIP 15 Conclusion 15
iii
APPENDICES
Appendix A: Conformity Checklist
Appendix B: Transportation Project Listing
Non-Exempt Project Listing
Exempt Project Listing
Eastern Solano County Project Listing
Appendix C: Conformity Analysis Documentation
Figure 1-Air Quality Conformity Geographies by Nonattainment Area
Table 1-SACOG Air Quality Conformity Emissions Analysis
Table 2-Population and Employment Assumptions, and VMT Estimates
Table 3-Emission Estimates for Ozone Conformity Analysis
Table 4- Ozone Conformity Analysis
Table 5a-PM10 Emissions Estimates and Conformity Test
Table 5b-Paved Dust Calculation
Table 5c-Road Construction Dust Emission Rates
Table 5d-Road Construction Dust Seasonal (Winter)
Table 6A- PM2.5 Emissions Estimates and Conformity Test
Table 6B- PM2.5 Conformity Analysis for Yuba City Marysville Area
Table 7-Air Quality Conformity Assumptions
Appendix D: Timely Implementation Documentation for Transportation Control Measures
Appendix E: Charge of the RPP
Appendix F: Resolution of Adoption and Public Notice
Resolution of Adoption
Public Notice
Appendix G: Response to Public Comments
iv
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) is the designated Metropolitan Planning Agency for the Sacramento Region and is responsible for all regional transportation planning activities in Sacramento, Sutter, Yolo, and Yuba Counties, and in El Dorado and Placer Counties outside of the Tahoe Basin. For purposes of conformity, SACOG is responsible for the analysis of transportation activities in that area and in eastern Solano County. Presented in this report is the Conformity Analysis for the 2016 Metropolitan Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy Amendment #2 (2016 MTP/SCS #2) and the 2019-22 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (MTIP).
The conformity demonstration requirement is described in the Clean Air Act Section 176(c) (42 U.S.C. 7506(c)) and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) transportation conformity regulations (40 CFR 93 Subpart A). Transportation conformity ("conformity") is a way to ensure that Federal funding and approval goes to those transportation activities that are consistent with air quality goals set for ozone, particulate matter, or nitrogen dioxide. The analysis presented in this report demonstrates that the 2016 MTP/SCS #2 and the MTIP meet the criteria specified in these regulations.
CONFORMITY REQUIREMENTS
Conformity must be demonstrated in “all nonattainment and maintenance areas for transportation- related pollutants for which the area is designated nonattainment or has a maintenance plan” (40 CFR 93.102). The following are the designations within the Sacramento region:
2008 8-Hour Ozone (including the ROG and NOx precursors) Severe-15 Nonattainment Area: o The Sacramento Metropolitan Area (Sacramento, Yolo and portions of El Dorado, Placer, Sutter, Solano Counties) and o The Sutter Buttes Area (Sutter County). The 2008 ozone standards classify the Sutter Buttes Area as an unclassified/attainment area for ozone, effective July 20, 2013. 2015 8-Hour Ozone (including the ROG and NOx precursors) Moderate Nonattainment Area: o The Sacramento Metropolitan Area (Sacramento, Yolo and portions of El Dorado, Placer, Sutter, Solano Counties). o The Sutter Buttes Area (Sutter County). The 2015 ozone standards classify the Sutter Buttes Area as a marginal nonattainment area for ozone, effective June 4, 2018.
Particulate Matter (PM10) Maintenance Area (Sacramento County)
2006 Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Nonattainment Area and Maintenance Area: o Nonattainment Areas - Sacramento Area (Sacramento and portions of Yolo, Solano, Placer and El Dorado Counties) o Maintenance Area -Yuba City-Marysville Area (Sutter and a portion of Yuba County)
Under a determination of conformity, the following criteria are applied:
1. The latest planning assumptions and emission models are used. 2. The transportation plan and program pass an emissions budget test using a budget that has been found adequate or been approved by EPA or an interim emissions test where budgets have not been established.
1
3. The transportation plan and program provide for the timely implementation of transportation control measures (TCMs). 4. Interagency and public consultation is part of the process.
SACOG follows the interagency review process described in SACOG’s Public Participation Plan. The dedicated interagency forum for this process is the bi-monthly Regional Planning Partnership meeting. Upon reaching a determination finding that is approved by SACOG’s Board, the conformity analysis is submitted to Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) for final approval.
The Conformity Checklist developed by FHWA contains items required for completing a determination. This list is included for reference in Appendix A.
CONFORMITY TESTS
Federal conformity regulations describe two types of tests; an emissions budget test and an interim emissions test. To run an emissions budget test, a region must have budgets in place that have been found adequate for transportation conformity purposes, or are contained in an approved air quality implementation plan. Predicted emissions for the 2016 MTP/SCS #2 and the MTIP and must be less than or equal to these budgets. The second test, an interim emissions test is used when approved or adequate budgets are not in place and the region is in nonattainment. Predicted emissions for the 2016 MTP/SCS #2 and MTIP must be less than or equal to emissions predicted in the baseline scenario. Applicable air quality implementation plans and conformity tests are further described within the text.
FINDINGS OF THE CONFORMITY ANALYSIS
A regional emissions analysis was conducted for the years 2022, 2023, 2024, 2026, 2027, and 2036 for each applicable pollutant. See Appendix C, Table 1, for the analysis years for each pollutant. Each analysis utilized the latest planning assumptions and emissions models. The conclusions of the SACOG analysis are:
Ozone: The Analysis determined that the implementation of the 2016 MTP/SCS #2 and the 2019-22 MTIP would result in less total regional on-road vehicle-related emissions (ROG and NOx) than the emissions budget found adequate by the EPA in the 2009 Sacramento Regional 8-Hour Ozone Attainment and Reasonable Further Progress Plan, 2013 SIP Revisions. This analysis has used these budgets for demonstration of the 2008 and 2015 standards; and the 1997 standard as necessary.
PM10: The Analysis determined that the implementation of the 2016 MTP/SCS #2 and the 2019- 22 MTIP would result in less total regional on-road vehicle-related emissions than the emissions budget found adequate by the EPA in the 2010 PM10 Implementation/Maintenance Plan and Re-designation Request for Sacramento County.
PM2.5: The Analysis determined that the total regional on-road vehicle-related emissions associated with implementation of the 2016 MTP/SCS #2 and the 2019-22 MTIP for the analysis years are projected to be less than or equal to the emissions for the Baseline scenario, satisfying the test established in Interim Transportation Conformity Guidance for 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS Nonattainment Areas in the Sacramento area. The Analysis also found that
2
implementation of the 2016 MTP/SCS #2 and the 2019-20 MTIP would result in less total regional on-road vehicle-related emissions than the emissions budgets found adequate by the EPA in the 2014 Yuba City-Marysville PM2.5 Maintenance Plan and Re-designation Request. TCMs: The implementation of the 2016 MTP/SCS #2 and the 2019-22 MTIP will not impede the timely implementation of the TCMs identified in the 2009 8-Hour Ozone Attainment and Reasonable Further Progress Plan, 2013 revisions. Consultation for this analysis was conducted in accordance with SACOG’s Public Participation Plan. Both the 2016 MTP/SCS #2 and the 2019-22 MTIP have been financially constrained consistent with 40 CFR 93.108 and with 23 CFR Part 450.
3
CONFORMITY DETERMINATION FOR THE 2016 METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN AND SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY AMENDMENT #2 AND THE 2019-22 METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
OVERVIEW OF THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
The Sacramento Valley Air Basin is a basin bounded by the Sierra Nevada Mountain Range to the east and the Coastal Mountain Ranges to the west and spans from Shasta County in the north to Sacramento County in the South. Topography in the Sacramento Valley is generally flat, with elevations anywhere from slightly below sea level near the Sacramento/San Joaquin Delta to over 2,150 feet above sea level at the Sutter Buttes. Hot dry summers and mild rainy winters characterize the Mediterranean climate of the Sacramento Valley Air Basin (SVAB). During the year the temperature may range from 20 to 115 degrees Fahrenheit with summer highs usually in the 90s and winter lows occasionally below freezing. Average annual rainfall is about 20 inches with about 75 percent occurring during the rainy season generally from November through March. The prevailing winds are moderate in strength and vary from moist clean breezes from the south to dry land flows from the north.
The mountains surrounding the SVAB create a barrier to airflow, which can trap air pollutants when certain meteorological conditions exist. The highest frequency of air stagnation occurs in the autumn and early winter when large high-pressure cells lie over the Sacramento Valley. The lack of surface wind during these periods and the reduced vertical flow caused by less surface heating reduces the influx of outside air and allows air pollutants to become concentrated in a stable volume of air. The surface concentrations of particulate matter pollutants are highest when these conditions are combined with smoke or when temperature inversions trap cool air, fog and pollutants near the ground.
The ozone season (May through October) in the Sacramento Valley is characterized by stagnant morning air or light winds, with the delta sea breeze arriving in the afternoon out of the southwest. In addition, longer daylight hours provide a plentiful amount of sunlight to fuel photochemical reactions between reactive organic gases (ROG) and oxides of nitrogen (NOx), which result in ozone formation. Likewise, PM2.5, peak concentrations typically occur during the winter season (November – February) when temperature inversion and low wind speeds trap and concentrate PM2.5 emissions, cooler temperature and high humidity increase the secondary formation of particulates.
As an air basin, air quality in the Sacramento region is impacted not only by pollutants generated within the region, but also by pollutants generated in the San Francisco Bay Area and the San Joaquin Valley, which are carried into the Sacramento region by Delta breezes. The effect of pollutants transported from the San Francisco Bay Area or from the San Joaquin Valley on air quality in the Sacramento region can vary from substantial to inconsequential on any given day, largely determined by accompanying meteorological conditions. Thus, the success of the Sacramento region in attaining better air quality is partially contingent on the achievement of better air quality in nearby areas that affect Sacramento’s air quality.
4
INTRODUCTION
The Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) is the designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the Sacramento Region and is responsible for all regional transportation planning activities in Sacramento, Sutter, Yolo, and Yuba Counties, and El Dorado and Placer Counties outside of the Tahoe Basin. Presented in this report is the Conformity Analysis for the 2016 MTP/SCS #2 and the 2019-22 MTIP. Transportation conformity ("conformity") is a way to ensure that Federal funding and approval goes to those transportation activities that are consistent with air quality goals set for ozone, carbon monoxide, particulate matter, or nitrogen dioxide. The SVAB is composed of the six counties listed above and the portion of Solano County which is located to the east of the crest of the Coastal Mountain Range. Solano County is located within the jurisdiction of the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for the purpose of transportation planning activities; because the eastern portion of the county is in the SVAB it is included in SACOG’s conformity analysis.
SACOG performed an air quality conformity determination on the 2016 MTP/SCS #2 and the 2019-22 MTIP for the following stated designation areas:
8-Hour Ozone (including the ROG and NOx precursors) Severe-15 Nonattainment Area: o The Sacramento Metropolitan Area (Sacramento, Yolo and portions of El Dorado, Placer, Sutter, Solano Counties) and o The Sutter Buttes Area (Sutter County). The 2008 ozone standards classify the Sutter Buttes Area as an unclassified/attainment area for ozone, effective July 20, 2013. 2015 8-Hour Ozone (including the ROG and NOx precursors) Moderate Nonattainment Area: o The Sacramento Metropolitan Area (Sacramento, Yolo and portions of El Dorado, Placer, Sutter, Solano Counties). o The Sutter Buttes Area (Sutter County). The 2015 ozone standards classify the Sutter Buttes Area as a marginal nonattainment area for ozone, effective June 4, 2018.
Particulate Matter (PM10) maintenance area (Sacramento County) Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) o Nonattainment area of Sacramento Area (Sacramento and portions of Yolo, Solano, Placer, and El Dorado Counties) o Maintenance area of Yuba City-Marysville Area (Sutter and a portion of Yuba Counties)
The SACOG Board of Directors is scheduled to act on this conformity determination at its September 20, 2018, meeting. For this conformity determination, the conformity analysis performed for the MTIP is consistent with the analysis performed for the 2016 MTP/SCS #2. The following emissions analysis demonstrates that the 2016 MTP/SCS #2 and the 2019-22 MTIP meet the emissions conformity tests based on the Transportation Conformity requirements found in the Federal Clean Air Act, Section 176(c) (42 U.S.C. 7506(c)), and Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 93, Subpart A for the federally-designated nonattainment areas as noted in the following section.
BACKGROUND
Federal regulations require that the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) prepare air quality conformity determinations for its transportation plans and programs. The purpose of the
5
conformity determination is to ensure that SACOG’s plans and programs "conform" to all applicable federal air quality requirements. Based on guidance found in the Federal Clean Air Act, Section 176(c) (42 U.S.C. 7506(c)), and Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 93, Subpart A, conformity determinations must be based upon the most recent estimates of on-road vehicle-based emissions. The emissions estimates must also be based upon the most recent population, employment, travel and congestion forecasts from SACOG, acting as the federally-designated MPO for the Sacramento region (see Appendix C, Table 2).
SACOG has an emissions conformity procedure based on the modeling requirements contained in the Federal Clean Air Act, Section 176(c) (42 U.S.C. 7506(c)), and Title 40, CFR, Part 93, Subpart A. As part of this procedure, SACOG prepares a series of forecasting model runs for the Sacramento air quality planning areas using the Sacramento Activity-Based Travel Simulation Model (SACSIM) travel demand model. This model uses estimates of population, employment and travel patterns for 2012, as the "base year," and future estimates of these same parameters for a series of future years. The future years are designated as "milestone" or "horizon" years for certain types of pollutant emissions, under EPA regulations. The SACSIM travel demand model is used to estimate daily vehicle miles traveled (VMT) in five-mile-per-hour increments for each model run. The total number of trips for each model run is also generated. The daily VMT from each generated model run are then used as inputs to the vehicle-emissions forecasting model, EMFAC 2014; SACOG includes VMT data as provided by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission to account for projects in the eastern portion of Solano County. The EMFAC 2014 model forecasts emissions based on the travel-related forecasts from both models.
CONFORMITY APPROACH
The last conformity determination for the Sacramento Ozone Nonattainment Area, CO Maintenance Area, PM10 Maintenance Area, and PM2.5, Maintenance Area and Nonattainment Area was adopted by the SACOG Board of Directors on March 15, 2018. The full conformity finding was approved by FHWA/FTA on April 4, 2018. (93.114).
The conformity tests for the Sacramento Ozone Nonattainment, PM10 maintenance, and PM2.5 Maintenance Area and Nonattainment Areas consist of a quantitative emissions analysis; a budget test for ozone, PM10, and the Yuba City-Marysville PM2.5 maintenance area, and an interim Baseline test for PM2.5 nonattainment areas without an approved plan or adequate budgets. Details can be found within Appendix C.
The conformity determination for the Sutter Buttes Ozone Nonattainment Area does not require a quantitative regional emissions analysis because the transportation projects and planning assumptions for both the Build and No-Build scenarios for all potential analysis years are exactly the same. [93.119 (g) (2)].
FINANCIAL CONSTRAINT
SACOG is required to demonstrate that the 2016 MTP/SCS #2 and MTIP, and amendments thereof, are financially constrained. Specifically, SACOG must show that it is reasonable to assume that funds will be available to pay for the projects included in the program and plan. Approximately $35 billion has been identified that will come to the region to pay for transportation investments between 2016
6
and 2036. A summary of how these funds will be spent is shown in Chapter 4 of the 2016 MTP/SCS; included in this chapter is a discussion describing how the 2016 MTP/SCS meets the test of financial constraint. Detailed revenue estimates by five year increments are shown in Appendix B-1 of the 2016 MTP/SCS. Also listed are the assumptions behind the revenue estimates. Identified within the MTIP is additional documentation showing constraint of the program over the next four years (93.108).
INCLUSION OF ALL FEDERAL AND REGIONALLY SIGNIFICANT PROJECTS
The 2016 MTP/SCS #2 and the 2019-22 MTIP include all federal and regionally significant projects expected to occur in the nonattainment and maintenance areas as identified in the introduction above (93.106).
Appendix B details the scope of projects included in the 2016 MTP/SCS #2 and the 2019-22 MTIP to allow adequate representation in the travel model to determine the interaction between regionally significant facilities, route options, travel times, transit ridership, and land use. It includes the following project list break-outs:
Non-exempt Project Listing: All planned projects determined to be regionally significant and not exempt from regional conformity analysis requirements. Regionally significant projects are projects that are located on a principal arterial or a functionally equivalent transit facility; on a highway or transit facility that is part of the regional modeling network; or other road or transit project that are considered regionally significant through Interagency Consultation. Exempt Project Listing: All planned projects that are exempt from regional conformity analysis requirements (40 CFR 93.126-128). Projects are assigned specific exempt categories upon amendment into the MTIP; exempt projects in the MTP/SCS are all categorized as “MTP Exempt”. Eastern Solano County Project Listing: The exempt and non-exempt/regionally significant projects located outside of SACOG’s metropolitan planning area in eastern Solano County, as provided by Metropolitan Transportation Commission.
LATEST PLANNING ASSUMPTIONS
The emission estimates developed for this conformity determination were based on the latest revised population and employment projections for the Sacramento and Yuba/Sutter areas that were approved by the SACOG Board of Directors in February 2016 as part of the 2016 MTP/SCS adoption. Modest refinements to the projections were applied to methodology as part of this update. The planning assumptions list was approved by SACOG’s Regional Planning Partnership at the December 6, 2017 meeting. The finalized list of the assumptions used in developing this conformity determination can be found in Appendix C, Table 8. (93.110 a, b).
LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS
The land use development scenarios used for the 2016 MTP/SCS #2, the 2019-22 MTIP, and this conformity determination are consistent with the previously developed future transportation system alternatives. The 2036 land use allocation was developed in cooperation with local jurisdictions. A regional growth forecast was adopted by the SACOG Board of Directors in June 2010 for the
7
purposes of developing the 2012 MTP/SCS. The long-term growth trends for the region have not changed since the last growth projections, although the projected growth is expected to occur over a shorter period of time as development returns to pre-recession levels. Given this information, the MTP/SCS used the same regional growth forecast numbers for employment, population and housing projections and extended the horizon year from 2035 to 2036.
The SACOG Board of Directors adopted these projections as part of the 2016 MTP/SCS in February 2016. This forecast consists of a projected economic growth rate that was tied to a demographic forecast, which was then tied to a forecast of the number of new housing units that will be needed throughout the region through 2036. The forecast closely aligns with Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) projections, and coordinates with the California Department of Housing and Community Development and the California Department of Finance forecasts. Given the near-term time frame of 2020, new existing development information up to 2012, and updated data regarding regional recovery from the 2008 economic recession for employment and dwelling units, SACOG made some adjustments to the 2012 MTP/SCS growth projections for use in the 2016 update. A number of variables were considered during this process, including vacancy rates, growth rates, household formation behavior, and the health of the home building industry. SACOG revised the 2020 growth forecast based on new data from the 2010 Census and 2014 Department of Finance, as well as additional information about the market from organizations like the Building Industry Association (BIA).
SACOG validated the 2016 MTP/SCS projections through an unbiased peer review by six locally- based experts who track and/or project growth in the region, including: Stephen Levy, Director and Senior Economist at the Center for Continuing Study of the California Economy; Dr. Jeffrey Michael, Director at the Center for Business and Policy Research at the University of the Pacific; Greg Paquin, President of The Gregory Group; Walter Schwarm, Demographer at DOF; Ryan Sharp, Senior Vice President at Economic Planning Systems; and Dr. Sanjay Varshney, Vice President and Wealth Advisor at Wells Fargo Bank and former Dean of the School of Business Administration at Sacramento State University (SACOG, 2015).
Growth rates and patterns within an area are influenced by various local, regional and national forces that reflect ongoing social, economic and technological changes. Ultimately, the amount and location of population growth and economic development that occurs within a specific area is determined by market forces, and regulated by city and county governments through zoning, land use plans and policies, and decisions regarding development applications. Local government and other regional, state and federal agencies also make decisions regarding the provision of infrastructure (e.g. transportation facilities, water facilities, sewage facilities) and protection of natural resources that may influence growth rates and the location of future development.
The 28 SACOG jurisdictions are at various stages of updating or augmenting their local land use plans. Since the adoption of the Blueprint Vision by the SACOG Board of Directors in December 2004, a number of jurisdictions in the region have been voluntarily implementing the Blueprint smart growth principles into their planning processes. The general plan and specific plan development activities occurring in the region by the local jurisdictions are reflected in the 2036 land use forecast that accompanies the population, housing and employment forecasts for the 2016 MTP/SCS. The 2016 MTP/SCS land use assumptions reflect the growth pattern that is most likely to occur, based on the best information available (93.122). A discussion of the land use allocation at the jurisdictional level is included in Chapter 3 of the 2016 MTP/SCS (93.122 b 1 iii2).
8
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
As part of the 2016 MTP/SCS update and subsequent amendments, all financial, highway, and transit system characteristics were reviewed and updated. The background for assessing performance of the 2016 MTP/SCS was somewhat different and more complicated than the 2012 MTP/SCS, as well, starting with the base year against which the forecast horizon years are evaluated. For this MTP/SCS, the base year is 2012, which is a recession year. For the last MTP/SCS, the base year was 2008, which was the last year before the recession took hold of the economy in this region. Because 2012 was a recession year, overall employment and household incomes were down, relative to 2008, and the amount of travel was also down. The horizon year forecasts prepared for this MTP/SCS assumed the region’s economy returned to a more normal level of employment.
Transportation plans often focus on improving mobility through investment in transportation infrastructure and services. Measures of mobility, such as the percent of travel using a particular travel mode or mode share, travel time, and travel delay provide valuable information about how well current and planned transportation systems function. Through the course of the entire MTP/SCS planning process and SACOG’s ongoing Congestion Management Process (CMP), the performance focus has been on the following critical indicators:
• vehicle miles traveled (VMT) on the region’s roadways;
• the level of congestion and delay for all modes, but especially roadway congestion;
• transit ridership and the share of trips made by transit modes; and
• travel by non-motorized travel modes (bike and walk) and the share of trips made by those modes.
A major part of the performance outcomes of this MTP/ SCS relates to a heightened emphasis on maintenance of the transportation system. This emphasis resulted in a critical look at investments which expand the transportation system. To the extent that some system expansion investments can be delayed, greater investment can be made in maintenance of the system. From the perspective of plan performance, the challenge is to make this change in emphasis in investments without sacrificing the high performance achieved in prior plans.
LATEST EMISSIONS MODEL
One of the critical inputs into determining emissions associated with the 2016 MTP/SCS #2 is the selection of which emissions factors to use. EMFAC 2014 was used in this conformity analysis, which began on December 6, 2017 when the Regional Planning Partnership approved the conformity planning assumptions, as shown in Appendix C. EMFAC 2014 was approved by EPA on December 14, 2015 and can be used for transportation conformity in California.
The EPA/USDOT January 18, 2001, guidance on latest planning assumptions and EPA's July 2004 final rule, indicate that new vehicle registration data must be used when it is available prior to the start of new conformity analyses and that states should update the data at least every five years. The State of California reaffirmed their commitment to keeping the latest planning assumptions included in EMFAC updated on a three-year cycle. On January 31, 2006, California Air Resources Board (CARB) submitted a letter to the EPA and to the California Division of the FHWA indicating the State's
9
intention to update future revisions to EMFAC on a three-year basis. These EMFAC updates would reflect, among other new information, updated vehicle fleet data. In California, MPOs and air districts have not been able to update vehicle fleet data embedded into EMFAC.
MODELING DOCUMENTATION
SACOG’s traffic model uses land use inputs (socioeconomic data) by parcel for trip generation. These socioeconomic data are expressed in terms of households and employment, and a representative population file which is consistent with the land use data and reflects the demographic forecasts adopted by the SACOG Board for use in development of the long range transportation plan.
SACOG uses the SACSIM travel demand model. The model consists of four sub-models to account for different types of travel in the region: an activity-based sub-model which accounts for all household trips generated within the region, except airport passenger trips; a commercial vehicle sub-model which accounts for all travel by commercial vehicles, including trips by large trucks; an airport passenger ground-access model, which accounts for travel by air passengers to the Sacramento International Airport; and an external travel sub-model, which accounts for all travel within the region by travelers with origins or destinations outside the region, or travelers through the region. The travel demand estimates from the four sub-models are combined to represent total weekday travel demand in the SACOG region.
The highway, transit, and bike and walk systems in the SACOG region are represented in detailed link-and-node computer networks. Link types include freeway, freeway ramp, expressway, arterial, and collector. Current and future-year road networks were developed for the 2016 MTP/SCS #2. The model uses equilibrium, a capacity sensitive assignment methodology, and the data from the model for the emission estimates to differentiate between peak and off-peak volumes and speeds. In addition, the model is reasonably sensitive to changes in time and other factors affecting travel choices. The results from model validation/calibration were analyzed for reasonableness and compared to historical trends.
The travel demand model estimates travel demand and traffic volumes for the A.M. three-hour peak period, P.M. three-hour peak period, a five-hour midday period, and a thirteen-hour late evening/early morning period. Daily forecasts are calculated by summing the four time periods.
SACOG completed the development of the SACSIM travel demand model and its validation to a new base year of 2012. The model was validated by comparing its estimates of peak, off-peak and daily traffic levels to available peak, off-peak and daily traffic counts. The model validation meets standard criteria for replicating total traffic volumes on various road types and for percent error on links. The validation also meets standard criteria for percent error relative to traffic counts. The model has been extensively tested and validated by SACOG staff.
The conformity regulation (93.122 b 3) states that Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS) estimates of VMT shall be considered the primary measure of VMT within a non-attainment area for the classes of roadways included in HPMS. The regulation also allows locally-developed count- based programs. SACOG uses both HPMS estimates and a database of local traffic counts. HPMS estimates of VMT by county are used to validate model estimates of VMT. Locally developed traffic counts are used to validate traffic assignments by functional class of roadway and for regional screenlines, as well as to evaluate assignment error levels for different facility types.
10
Estimates of regional transportation-related emissions, that are used to support conformity determinations, must be made in accordance with the procedures laid out in the Federal Clean Air Act, Section 176(c) (42 U.S.C. 7506(c)), and Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 93, Subpart A. SACOG’s SACSIM Travel Demand model, which was used to develop transportation-related emissions for the Sacramento nonattainment areas, currently meets all the modeling requirements as set forth in the Federal Clean Air Act, Section 176(c) (42 U.S.C. 7506(c)), and Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 93, Subpart A.
AIR QUALITY EMISSIONS ANALYSIS
In order for SACOG to make a conformity determination on the 2016 MTP/SCS #2 and the 2019-22 MTIP, a quantitative emissions analysis must be performed for the Sacramento air quality planning areas. SACOG has completed a quantitative emissions analysis for the nonattainment and maintenance areas as shown below and in Appendix C. SACOG prepares estimates of emissions for the Sacramento air quality planning areas for the analysis years described below. Estimates of emissions are prepared in accordance with the conformity regulations found in the Federal Clean Air Act, Section 176(c) (42 U.S.C. 7506(c)), and Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 93, Subpart A.
YEARS OF ANALYSIS
The analysis years of 2022, 2023, 2024, 2026, 2027, and 2036 were chosen for the Sacramento air quality planning areas for the following reasons: 2022 is a budget year for PM10; 2023 is the attainment year for ozone under the 2015 NAAQS which goes into effect August 2, 2018; 2024 is a budget year for PM2.5 for the Yuba City-Marysville Maintenance Area; 2026 is an attainment year for ozone under the 2008 NAAQS, which went into effect May 21, 2012; and 2027 represents a horizon year that is less than ten years apart from the last year of the plan under section 93.106 (a) (1). The year 2036 is used because it represents the last year of the transportation plan’s forecast period and, therefore, is required to be an emission analysis year, as specified under section 93.106 (a)(iv) of the conformity regulation.
ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES
The analysis techniques that were used for generating Reactive Organic Gases (ROG), Nitrogen Oxides (NOx), and Carbon Monoxide (CO) emission for the conformity submittal are documented in the following section. Specifically, SACOG employed its SACSIM travel demand model for the Sacramento Ozone Nonattainment Area to generate trips and daily VMT for each alternative scenario. The outputs from the SACSIM model were then inputted into EMFAC 2014 to generate emissions. Emission projections for Ozone were made for the years 2023, 2026, and 2036.
For the PM10 analysis, SACOG utilized a combination of analysis methods. The direct exhaust for PM10 came from EMFAC 2014 vehicle emissions model. The paved road dust component of PM10 was analyzed using the AP-42 methodology denoted in EPA's Official Release of the January 2011 AP-42 Method for Estimating Re-Entrained Road Dust from Paved Roads; the road dust calculations have been updated to reflect this methodology. Specifically, the emission factor equation and k value (particle size multiplier) have been updated accordingly while CARB default assumptions for roadway silt loading by roadway class, average vehicle weight, and rainfall correction factor remain
11
unchanged. Emissions are estimated for all roadways classes including freeways, arterials, collectors, local, and rural roads.
Section 93.122(e) of the Transportation Conformity regulation requires that PM10 from construction related fugitive dust be included in the regional analysis, if it is identified as a contributor to the nonattainment problem in the PM10 implementation plan. The road construction dust component of
PM10 was analyzed using the CARB’s methodology outlined for estimating fugitive dust particulate matter due to construction activities while building roads. The emission estimates are based on the methodology in which miles of new road built are converted to acres disturbed, which is then multiplied by a generic project duration and an emission rate. Emission factors are unchanged from the previous estimates at 0.11tons PM10/acre-month of activity. The emission factor includes the effects of typical control measures, such as watering, which is assumed to reduce emissions by about 50%.
The activity data used in the calculation of all PM10 components (direct emissions, paved dust and construction dust) came from SACOG’s travel demand model. Emission projections of PM10 were made for the years 2022, 2027, and 2036. The methodology employed the EMFAC 2014 vehicle emissions model.
SACOG performed a PM2.5 analysis for the nonattainment area. Specifically, SACOG employed its SACSIM travel demand model for the nonattainment area to generate trips and daily VMT, and the outputs from the SACSIM model were then inputted into EMFAC 2014 to generate emissions. Emission projections of PM2.5 using the baseline test approach were made for the years 2024, 2027, and 2036. The baseline year for nonattainment area is 2008 and hence, all emissions for future years were compared against the 2008 PM2.5 emissions.
SACOG also performed a PM2.5 analysis for the Yuba City-Marysville PM2.5 Maintenance Area employing its SACSIM travel demand model for the Yuba City-Marysville Maintenance Area to generate trips and daily VMT, and the outputs from the SACSIM model were then inputted into EMFAC 2014 to generate emissions. Emission projections of PM2.5 using the budget test approach were made for the years 2024, 2027, and 2036.
Geography, test type, and analysis years can be found in Appendix C, Table 1 and Figure 1. Additionally, details specific to Solano County can also be found there.
EMISSION CALCULATIONS
Once the analysis years have been selected, SACOG uses its SACSIM travel demand model to generate daily VMT and total trips for each analysis year in question using population and employment assumptions, as shown in Appendix C, Table 2. The outputs from the transportation model are then inputted into a PC-based version of EMFAC 2014, which is used to generate emissions. Note that Table 2 reports VMT for the entire SACOG modeling region, including eastern Solano County; because different subareas within the region are used for each emission factor, the VMT used as inputs to EMFAC 2014 vary for specific emissions calculations.
12
EMISSIONS BUDGET TEST FOR OZONE (ROG AND NOX)
Under the emissions budget test, all future year ROG and NOx emissions associated with the 2016 MTP/SCS #2 and the 2017-22 MTIP must be equal to or less than the budgets found to be adequate from the 2009 Sacramento Regional 8-Hour Ozone Attainment and Reasonable Further Progress Plan, 2013 SIP Revisions for the Sacramento Ozone Nonattainment Area. The emissions budget for 2018 from the 2013 revision were approved by the EPA on January 29, 2015 and became effective March 2nd, 2015. The years 2023 and 2026 were added to reflect EPA action regarding the final implementation rule for the 2015 and 2008 NAAQS.
Appendix C, Tables 3 and 4, show that ROG and NOx emissions associated with this analysis are less than the budgets contained in the state implementation plan for the Sacramento Ozone Nonattainment Area for all future years.
EMISSION FORECASTS FOR THE SUTTER BUTTES OZONE NONATTAINMENT AREA
A regional emission analysis under Section 93.122 of the Conformity Regulations is not required for the Sutter Buttes Ozone Nonattainment area because the transportation projects and planning assumptions for the area would be the same for all analysis years. This is because there are no existing or planned transportation facilities within the Sutter Buttes Ozone Nonattainment Area. The Sutter Buttes Ozone Nonattainment Area is comprised solely of the top of a mountain in Sutter County, and is located entirely on private property with no public access. The air quality monitor placed atop the Buttes registers the area as exceeding Federal ozone standards even though there are no sources of pollutant emissions within the Area itself.
The conformity determination requirement for the Sutter Buttes Ozone Nonattainment Area has been met without any further emissions analysis because the planning analysis years [93.122(g)(2)], and the emissions predicted in the Build scenario are not greater than the emissions predicted in the No- Build scenario for all analysis years [93.119(a)].
EMISSIONS BUDGET TEST FOR PM10
Under the emissions budget test, all future year PM10 emissions associated with the 2016 MTP/SCS #2 and the 2016/22 MTIP must be equal to or less than the budgets established in the 2010 PM10 Implementation/Maintenance Plan and Redesignation Request for Sacramento County for the Sacramento PM10 Maintenance Area. The emissions budgets in the Maintenance Plan for 2022 was approved by EPA on September 26, 2013 and became effective October 28, 2013.
Appendix C, Table 6a, shows that PM10 emissions associated with this analysis are less than the budgets contained in the Maintenance Plan for the Sacramento PM10 Nonattainment Area for all future years. Table 6b, 6c and 6d shows the calculations for paved road dust and road construction dust component, which goes into the final PM10 emission analysis.
13
INTERIM BASELINE TEST FOR THE SACRAMENTO PM2.5 NONATTAINMENT AREA
In the Interim Baseline test, all future year emissions associated with the 2016 MTP/SCS #2 and the 2019-22 MTIP Build scenario must be less than or equal to emissions from the transportation system based on the Baseline scenario, to demonstrate conformity.
The motor vehicle activity forecasts for the 2016 MTP/SCS #2 and the 2019-22 MTIP for the Baseline year and Build scenarios in the Sacramento area across the various horizon years are shown in Appendix C, Table 1. These forecasts are converted to motor vehicle emission estimates by SACOG using EMFAC 2014.
Appendix C, Table 6A, presents the results of the Interim Baseline test for the PM2.5 emissions and the NOx precursor. The analyses indicate that the motor vehicle emissions are lower under the build scenario when compared to the Baseline scenario.
EMISSIONS BUDGET TEST FOR THE YUBA CITY-MARYSVILLE PM2.5 NONATTAINMENT AREA
Under the emissions budget test, all future year PM2.5 emissions associated with the 2016 MTP/SCS #2 and the 2019-22 MTIP must be equal to or less than the budgets identified in the 2014 Yuba City- Marysville PM2.5 Maintenance Plan and Redesignation Request for the Yuba City-Marysville Nonattainment Area. The emissions budget in the Maintenance Plan for 2024 was found adequate by EPA in a letter issued August 12, 2014.
Appendix C, Table 6B, shows that PM2.5 emissions associated with this analysis are less than the budgets identified in the maintenance plan for the Yuba City-Marysville Nonattainment Area for all future years.
IMPLEMENTATION OF TRANSPORTATION CONTROL MEASURES
The 2016 MTP/SCS #2 and the 2019-22 MTIP provide for both priority and timely completion/implementation of the transportation control measures (TCMs) in the applicable air quality plans. Appendix D of the 2009 Sacramento Regional 8-Hour Ozone Attainment and Reasonable Further Progress Plan included 43 TCMs for the SVAB; 2018 finalizes completion of these TCMs. The Sacramento Regional 2008 NAAQS 8-Hour Ozone Attainment and Reasonable Further Progress Plan continued one of the TCMs through 2024.Timely implementation documentation on these measures is contained in Appendix D of this document. (§93.113).
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS
Review of this document is part of the conformity consultation process as required under Sections 93.105 (a) (2), 93.105 (c) (1), and 93.105 (e) and is consistent with the public involvement procedures under 23 CFR 450 (93.112). This draft air quality conformity analysis was circulated for thirty days to give all affected parties an opportunity to comment. The SACOG Board of Directors is scheduled to act on this conformity determination at its September 20, 2018, meeting. Any comments received by
14
SACOG during the comment period will be included, along with staff’s responses, with the final conformity submittal package as part of Appendix G.
SACOG follows the procedures outlined in its Public Participation Plan for amendments and adoptions to our plans and programs which require a conformity analysis. SACOG’s Public Participation Plan (PPP), updated August 2013 outlines the techniques employed by SACOG to help facilitate public participation during the development of the 2016 MTP/SCS, and any amendments, and solicitation of projects for the MTIP. The outreach process is included in Chapter 2 of the 2016 MTP/SCS. SACOG's Public Participation Plan provides for early and continuing participation in our long-range transportation plans, our project-selection or programming process (i.e., Federal TIP), and the air-quality "conformity" determination and environmental reviews associated with these plans and programs.
The Regional Planning Partnership (RPP), a committee established by the SACOG Board of Directors to review all conformity determinations and assumptions (see Appendix E), was asked to review and approve a set of assumptions for use in future conformity determinations. The Partnership approved the assumptions used in this conformity determination on December 6, 2017 (see Appendix C, Table 8).
RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL FOR THE 2016 MTP/SCS AMENDMENT #2 AND THE 2019-22 MTIP
A copy of the resolution of adoption finding that the 2016 MTP/SCS #2 and the 2019-22 MTIP meet federal conformity requirements is included as Appendix F. The SACOG Board is scheduled to act on this conformity submittal at its September 20, 2018 meeting.
CONCLUSION
The results of the emissions analysis show that the 2016 MTP/SCS #2 and the 2019-22 MTIP meet the emissions conformity tests based on the Transportation Conformity requirements found in the Federal Clean Air Act, Section 176(c) (42 U.S.C. 7506(c)), and Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 93, Subpart A for the Sacramento ozone, PM10, and PM2.5 areas; the Yuba City-Marysville PM2.5 area; and the Sutter Buttes Ozone Nonattainment Area.
15
APPENDIX A—CONFORMITY CHECKLIST
Conformity Analysis Documentation
FHWA Checklist for MPO TIPs/RTPs Checklist Developed June 27, 2005
40 CFR Criteria Page Comments §93.102 Document the applicable pollutants and precursors for which EPA 5 See “Introduction”, designates the area as nonattainment or maintenance. Describe the Appendix C Figure 1 nonattainment or maintenance area and its boundaries. §93.104 Document the date that the MPO officially adopted, accepted or 5, 6 See “Introduction” and (b, c) approved the TIP/RTP and made a conformity determination. “Conformity Include a copy of the MPO resolution. Include the date of the last Approach”. See prior conformity finding. Appendix F for Resolution. §93.104 If the conformity determination is being made to meet the NA (e) timelines included in this section, document when the new motor vehicle emissions budget was approved or found adequate. §93.106 Describe the regionally significant additions or modifications to the 7 See “Inclusion of all (a)(2)ii existing transportation network that are expected to be open to Federal and Regionally traffic in each analysis year. Document that the design concept and Significant Projects”, scope of projects allows adequate model representation to Appendix B, determine intersections with regionally significant facilities, route options, travel times, transit ridership and land use. §93.108 Document that the TIP/RTP is financially constrained (23 CFR 450). 6 See “Financial Constraint” §93.109 Document that the TIP/RTP complies with any applicable 5, 11 See “Introduction” and (a, b) conformity requirements of air quality implementation plans (SIPs) “Air Quality Emissions and court orders. Analysis” §93.109 Provide either a table or text description that details, for each 11 See “Air Quality (c‐k) pollutant and precursor, whether the interim emissions tests Emissions Analysis”, and/or the budget test apply for conformity. Indicate which Appendix C Table 1 emissions budgets have been found adequate by EPA, and which budgets are currently applicable for what analysis years. §93.110 Document the use of latest planning assumptions (source and year) 7, 9 See “Latest Planning (a, b) at the “time the conformity analysis begins,” including current and Assumptions”, “Latest future population, employment, travel and congestion. Document Emissions Model” and the use of the most recent available vehicle registration data. Appendix C Table 8. Document the date upon which the conformity analysis was begun. USDOT/E Document the use of planning assumptions less than five years old. 7, 9 See “Latest Planning PA If unable, include written justification for the use of older data. Assumptions” and guidance (1/18/02) “Latest Emissions Model” §93.110 Document any changes in transit operating policies and assumed 9, 14 See “Transportation (c,d,e,f) ridership levels since the previous conformity determination. System”, Document the use of the latest transit fares and road and bridge “Implementation of tolls. Document the use of the latest information on the Transportation Control effectiveness of TCMs and other SIP measures that have been Measures”, Appendix implemented. Document the key assumptions and show that they D, and Table 8 were agreed to through Interagency and public consultation. §93.111 Document the use of the latest emissions model approved by EPA. 9 See “Latest Emissions
Model”. §93.112 Document fulfillment of the interagency and public consultation 14 See “Public requirements outlined in a specific implementation plan according Participation Process”, to §51.390 or, if a SIP revision has not been completed, according to Appendix G §93.105 and 23 CFR 450. Include documentation of consultation on conformity tests and methodologies as well as responses to written comments. §93.113 Document timely implementation of all TCMs in approved SIPs. 15 See “Implementation Document that implementation is consistent with schedules in the of Transportation applicable SIP and document whether anything interferes with Control Measures”, timely implementation. Document any delayed TCMs in the Appendix D applicable SIP and describe the measures being taken to overcome obstacles to implementation. §93.114 Document that the conformity analyses performed for the TIP is 5 See “Introduction” consistent with the analysis performed for the Plan, in accordance with 23 CFR 450.324(f)(2). §93.118 For areas with SIP budgets: Document that emissions from the See Appendix C Tables (a, c, e) transportation network for each applicable pollutant and 1‐5 precursor, including projects in any associated donut area that are in the Statewide TIP and regionally significant non‐Federal projects, are consistent with any adequate or approved motor vehicle emissions budget for all pollutants and precursors in applicable SIPs. §93.118 Document for which years consistency with motor vehicle 11 See “Air Quality (b) emissions budgets must be shown. Emissions Analysis”, Appendix C Table 2 §93.118 Document the use of the appropriate analysis years in the regional 11 See “Air Quality (d) emissions analysis for areas with SIP budgets, and the analysis Emissions Analysis” results for these years. Document any interpolation performed to and Appendix C meet tests for years in which specific analysis is not required. Tables 1‐6 1 For areas without applicable SIP budgets: Document that emissions 11 See “Air Quality §93.119 from the transportation network for each applicable pollutant and Emissions Analysis” precursor, including projects in any associated donut area that are and Appendix C in the Statewide TIP and regionally significant non‐Federal projects, Tables 1, 2, and 6 are consistent with the requirements of the “Action/Baseline”, “Action/1990” and/or “Action/2002” interim emissions tests as applicable. §93.119 Document the use of the appropriate analysis years in the regional 11 See “Analysis (g) emissions analysis for areas without applicable SIP budgets. Techniques”, and Appendix C Table 2 §93.119 Document how the baseline and action scenarios are defined for 6, 10 See “Conformity (h,i) each analysis year. Approach” and “Modeling Documentation” §93.122 Document that all regionally significant federal and non‐Federal See Appendix B, Table (a)(1) projects in the nonattainment/maintenance area are explicitly 2 modeled in the regional emissions analysis. For each project, identify by which analysis it will be open to traffic. Document that VMT for non‐regionally significant Federal projects is accounted for in the regional emissions analysis §93.122 Document that only emission reduction credits from TCMs on 14 See “Implementation (a)(2, 3) schedule have been included, or that partial credit has been taken of Transportation
1 Note that some areas are required to complete both interim emissions tests
for partially implemented TCMs. Document that the regional Control Measures”, emissions analysis only includes emissions credit for projects, and Appendix D programs, or activities that require regulatory action if: the regulatory action has been adopted; the project, program, activity or a written commitment is included in the SIP; EPA has approved an opt‐in to the program, EPA has promulgated the program, or the Clean Air Act requires the program (indicate applicable date). Discuss the implementation status of these programs and the associated emissions credit for each analysis year. §93.122 For nonregulatory measures that are not included in the STIP, NA (a)(4,5,6) include written commitments from appropriate agencies. Document that assumptions for measures outside the transportation system (e.g. fuels measures) are the same for baseline and action scenarios. Document that factors such as ambient temperature are consistent with those used in the SIP unless modified through interagency consultation. §93.122 Document that a network‐based travel model is in use that is 10 See “Modeling (b)(1)(i)2 validated against observed counts for a base year no more than 10 Documentation” years before the date of the conformity determination. Document that the model results have been analyzed for reasonableness and compared to historical trends and explain any significant differences between past trends and forecasts (for per capita vehicle‐trips, VMT, trip lengths mode shares, time of day, etc.). §93.122 Document the land use, population, employment, and other 5 See “Background” and (b)(1)(ii)2 network‐based travel model assumptions. Appendix C Table 2 §93.122 Document how land use development scenarios are consistent 7 See “Land Use (b)(1)(iii)2 with future transportation system alternatives, and the reasonable Assumptions” distribution of employment and residences for each alternative. §93.122 Document use of capacity sensitive assignment methodology and 10 See “Modeling (b)(1)(iv)2 emissions estimates based on a methodology that differentiates Documentation” between peak and off‐peak volumes and speeds, and bases speeds on final assigned volumes. §93.122 Document the use of zone‐to‐zone travel impedances to distribute 10 See “Modeling (b)(1)(v)2 trips in reasonable agreement with the travel times estimated from Documentation” final assigned traffic volumes. Where transit is a significant factor, document that zone‐to‐zone travel impedances used to distribute trips are used to model mode split. §93.122 Document how travel models are reasonably sensitive to changes 10 See “Modeling (b)(1)(vi)2 in time, cost, and other factors affecting travel choices. Documentation” §93.122 Document that reasonable methods were used to estimate traffic 10 See “Modeling (b)(2)2 speeds and delays in a manner sensitive to the estimated volume of Documentation” travel on each roadway segment represented in the travel model. §93.122 Document the use of HPMS, or a locally developed count‐based 10 See “Modeling (b)(3)2 program or procedures that have been chosen through the Documentation” consultation process, to reconcile and calibrate the network‐based travel model estimates of VMT. §93.122 In areas not subject to §93.122(b), document the continued use of NA (d) modeling techniques or the use of appropriate alternative techniques to estimate vehicle miles traveled §93.122 Document, in areas where a SIP identifies construction‐related See Appendix C Tables
2 40 CFR 93.122(b) refers only to serious, severe and extreme ozone areas and serious CO areas above 200,000 population
(e, f) PM10 or PM 2.5 as significant pollutants, the inclusion of PM10 5 and 6 and/or PM 2.5 construction emissions in the conformity analysis. §93.122 If appropriate, document that the conformity determination relies NA (g) on a previous regional emissions analysis and is consistent with that analysis. §93.126, Document all projects in the TIP/RTP that are exempt from See Appendix B §93.127, conformity requirements or exempt from the regional emissions §93.128 analysis. Indicate the reason for the exemption (Table 2, Table 3, traffic signal synchronization) and that the interagency consultation process found these projects to have no potentially adverse emissions impacts.
Disclaimers This checklist is intended solely as an informational guideline to be used in reviewing Transportation Plans and Transportation Improvement Programs for adequacy of their conformity documentation. It is in no way intended to replace or supercede the Transportation Conformity regulations of 40 CFR Parts 51 and 93, the Statewide and Metropolitan Planning Regulations of 23 CFR Part 450 or any other EPA, FHWA or FTA guidance pertaining to transportation conformity or statewide and metropolitan planning. This checklist is not intended for use in documenting transportation conformity for individual transportation projects in nonattainment or maintenance areas. 40 CFR Parts 51 and 93 contain additional criteria for project‐level conformity determinations. Document #46711 APPENDIX B—TRANSPORTATION PROJECT LISTING
Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 1 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year
Operating Assistance for R ural Operating Assistance for rural transit services on the western slope of C AL20797 ELD Caltrans D3 T rans it S ervices E l Dorado C ounty. Outside the S acramento Urbanized Area. $6,777,064 2024 P rogrammed Near P lacerville, on S R 193 at 1.1 miles north of the S outh F ork American R iver Bridge (PM 22.8/22.9); also at 2.5 miles north of the S outh Fork American R iver Bridge (PM 24.2/24.3) - R estore C AL20747 ELD Caltrans D3 S R 193 S lope S tabilization embankment slope slip-outs [C TIPS ID 107-0000-1086] $9,545,000 2020 P rogrammed On S R 49, from S outhview C t. in P lacerville (south of US 50) to G old Hill R d (Approximately 5 miles north of US 50), where feasible C onstruct C AL20634 ELD Caltrans D3 S R 49 - C onstruct Class II Bike Lane C lass II Bike Lane $2,880,000 2036 Planned In Auburn, from 0.3 mile south of Lincoln Way/Borland Avenue to Lincoln Way/Borland Avenue (PM 2.2/2.4) - R ealign curves [C TIPS ID C AL20728 ELD Caltrans D3 S R 49 R ealignment 107-0000-1063] $5,321,000 2021 P rogrammed
In E l Dorado C ounty, near Placerville, at S outh Fork American R iver S R 49 S outh F ork American R iver Bridge #25-0021 - R eplace bridge (PM 24.0) [C TIPS S TIP ID 107-0000- C AL20476 ELD Caltrans D3 Bridge Replacement 0878, C TIPS S HOPP ID 107-0000-0907; E FIS ID 0300000078] $22,317,000 2019 P rogrammed In E l Dorado C ounty, on S tate R outes 49 and 193 at various locations - R emove dead or dying trees [C TIPS ID 107-0000-1087]. Toll C redits C AL20748 ELD Caltrans D3 S R 49/193 Tree R emoval for E NG, R OW, C ON $5,882,000 2019 P rogrammed Near Pollock Pines, S R 50, at S awmill Undercrossing #25-0041 (PM R 27.9/R29.8); also at S ly Park R oad (PM R 30.17/R31.3) - R eplace bridge, restore culverts and add highway lighting [C TIPS ID 107-0000- C AL20717 ELD Caltrans D3 S R 50 Bridge R ehab at S awmill UC 1029] $11,494,000 2021 P rogrammed
On US 50, near Pollock Pines, east of S ly Park R oad (PM 33.8/34.0) - Permanently restore roadway by mitigating the progression of recurring C AL20796 ELD Caltrans D3 US 50 - Fresh Pond S lipout roadway slipout (C TIPS ID 107-0000-1164) $18,410,000 2021 P rogrammed
In E l Dorado C ounty, US 50, from the S acramento C ounty Line to east of S tateline Avenue (PM 0.0/80.4) - Upgrade new Transportation Management System elements. Intelligent Transportation S ystem (ITS ) C AL20718 ELD Caltrans D3 US 50 Advance Warning and ITS [C TIPS ID 107-0000-1028]. Toll C redits for ENG $13,000,000 2021 P rogrammed
O n US 50 in C ameron P ark at C ameron P ark D rive - Improve s ight C AL20734 ELD Caltrans D3 US 50 Cameron Park S afety distance and upgrade curb ramps (PM 6.5) [C TIPS ID 107-0000-1075] $2,422,000 2020 P rogrammed In and near P lacerville, US 50, from west of E l Dorado R oad to 0.1 mile east of Braeburn Lane (PM R 13.7/22.5) - R ehabilitate deteriorated culverts and provide access for wildlife crossing the route [C TIPS ID C AL20782 ELD Caltrans D3 US 50 C ulvert Rehab 107-0000-1123] $8,230,000 2023 P rogrammed Near C ameron Park and S hingle S prings, US 50, from east of S ilva Valley Parkway to west of El Dorado Road (R2.7/R13.8) - Rehabilitate C AL20781 ELD Caltrans D3 US 50 C ulvert Rehab culverts [C TIPS ID 107-0000-1122] $6,760,000 2024 P rogrammed
In E l Dorado C ounty, US 50, from the S acramento C ounty Line to east of S tateline Avenue (PM 0.0/80.4) - Upgrade guard rail to current C AL20716 ELD Caltrans D3 US 50 Guard R ail Upgrade standards [C TIPS ID 107-0000-1027]. Toll C redits for ENG $4,506,000 2021 P rogrammed F rom Missouri F lat R oad in P lacerville to E cho S ummit, Install IT S (P M C AL20644 ELD Caltrans D3 US 50 ITS 15.055/67.295) $2,600,000 2036 Planned Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 2 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year On US 50, near P lacerville, from 0.8 mile east of Bridal Veil F alls R oad to S tra wberry L odg e D rive - C ons truc t tra c tion s a nd tra ps [S tormwa ter Mitigation] (PM 38.0/58.0) [EFIS ID 0300020539; C TIPS ID 120-0000- 0072] [Total Project Cost $6,205,000 in 17/18 FY ]. Toll C redits for C AL20515 ELD Caltrans D3 US 50 Traction S and Traps E NG, R OW, C ON $6,397,000 2019 P rogrammed E LD19423 ELD C ity of P lacerville Broadway Bike Lanes Add bike lanes: Main S treet to S chnell S chool R oad $300,000 2036 Planned In E l Dorado C ounty, in the C ity of Placerville, along Broadway from the inters ec tion a t Ma in S treet ea s twa rd to a pproxima tely 1500 B roa dwa y: E LD19501 ELD C ity of P lacerville Broadway S idewalks C onstruct sidewalk. HS IP7-03-010 $755,000 2019 P rogrammed
E LD19388 ELD C ity of P lacerville Broadway Traffic S ignals Install traffic signals on Broadway at Mosquito R oad and Blairs Lane. $1,032,650 2036 Planned E LD19436 ELD C ity of P lacerville Bush C ourt/Roddan C ourt Bush C ourt/Roddan C ourt $705,482 2022 Planned C lay S t. over Hangtown C reek, 150' north of Main S t.: R eplace 1 lane bridge with 2 lane bridge. (T oll C redits for R OW & C ON). T oll C redits E LD19257 ELD C ity of P lacerville C lay S t. / Hangtown C reek Bridge for ROW, CON $4,308,864 2021 P rogrammed E LD19421 ELD C ity of P lacerville Clay S treet Realignment Main S treet/Cedar Ravine/Clay S treet Intersection Project $3,372,877 Planned Gateway Drive/Broadway E LD19450 ELD C ity of P lacerville R oundabout Build roundabout at Gateway Drive and Broadway. $1,286,000 2036 Planned Install bicycle lanes and route signage on Main S treet from S pring E LD19442 ELD C ity of P lacerville Main S treet Bicycle Improvements S treet to C la y S treet. $7,500 2027 Planned
Mallard Lane/Green Valley Road Install bicycle lanes on Mallard Lane from the C ity limit to G reen Valley E LD19443 ELD C ity of P lacerville Bike Lanes R oad, and on G reen Valley R oad from Mallard Lane to P lacerville Drive. $150,000 2027 Planned Install bike lanes on Middletown R oad from C anal S treet to C old E LD19447 ELD C ity of P lacerville Middletown R oad Bike Lanes S prings R oad. $300,000 2027 Planned
In the C ity of P lacerville along P lacerville Drive from west of the US 50 undercrossing to Green Valley road: C onstruct bicycle facilities and sidewalks; on the west side of G reen Valley R oad from P lacerville Drive to Mallard Lane: construct sidewalk. (Both C lass II bike lanes and C lass IV bikeways will be evaluated during the preliminary engineering P lacerville Drive Bicycle and phase.) (C MAQ E mission R eductions in kg/day: R OG 0.08, NOx 0.04, E LD19509 ELD C ity of P lacerville P edestrian F acilities PM10 0.02, PM2.5 0.02). Toll C redits for ENG, R OW, C ON $11,100,000 2022 P rogrammed Install bike lanes on P lacerville Drive from G reen Valley R oad to F orni E LD19455 ELD C ity of P lacerville P lacerville Drive Bike Lanes R oad / US 50. $150,000 2027 Planned E LD19415 ELD C ity of P lacerville S chnell S chool R oad T raffic S ignal Install traffic signal at S chnell S chool R oad. $550,000 2022 Planned Install bike lanes on Upper Broadway from S chnell S chool R oad to E LD19465 ELD C ity of P lacerville Upper Broadway Bike Lanes P oint View Drive. $300,000 2027 Planned
In Placerville, along Broadway between S chnell S chool R d. and J acquier R d./Point View Dr.: C onstruct a C lass II bike lane along eastbound Broadway and C lass III bike route along westbound Broadway, with minor signing and striping to connect to the E l Dorado T rail at each end, and strategically located sidewalks, additional pedestrian improvements, and select transit facilities. (E mission Benefits in kg/day: 0.02 R OG, 0.01 NOx. Toll C redits for PE & R OW) (The project will prepare and process a single C E for NE PA which will cover the overall project which now includes the bike and pedestrian E LD19373 ELD C ity of P lacerville Upper Broadway Bike Lanes improvements). T oll C redits for E NG , C ON $4,807,000 2019 P rogrammed Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 3 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year US 50 Broadway E astbound E xit (#47) - S ignalization and ramp Lengthen eastbound exit ramp of US 50 at Broadway (#47) and install E LD19417 ELD C ity of P lacerville lengthening traffic signal. $2,000,000 2036 Planned Bass Lake Road Frontage Perform roadway operational improvements on Bass Lake R oad E LD19331 ELD E l Dorado C ounty Improvements constructed by S ilver S prings development. (C IP66115) $1,576,000 2036 Planned
Bassi R d, over Granite C reek, 0.3 mi N/W of Lotus R d. R eplace this Bassi Rd/Granite Creek Bridge structurally deficient 1-lane bridge with a new 2-lane bridge. (Toll credits E LD19337 ELD E l Dorado C ounty Replacement for P E , R /W, & C ON.) (C IP 77128). Toll C redits for E NG, R OW, C ON $4,325,000 2020 P rogrammed Various locations in E l Dorado C ounty: Implement Bridge Preventive Bridge Preventive Maintenance Maintenance Program. For locations, see Caltrans Local Assistance E LD19356 ELD E l Dorado C ounty P rogram HBP website for backup list of bridges. $2,479,389 2022 P rogrammed Bucks Bar R d over north fork of C osumnes R iver, 1.2 miles north of Bucks Bar R d/North Fork C osumnes Mount Aukum R d: R eplace existing 1 lane bridge with new 2 lane E LD19321 ELD E l Dorado C ounty River Bridge Replacement bridge, including approaches. (C IP77116) $8,556,940 2021 P rogrammed
E LD19424 ELD E l Dorado C ounty Cameron Park Drive Bike Lanes Install bike lanes on entire length of C ameron Park Drive. (C IP72307) $162,000 2017 Planned Install bike lanes on C arson R oad from J acquier R oad to Larsen Drive E LD19425 ELD E l Dorado C ounty C arson R oad Bike Lanes (on climbing shoulder). $787,500 2027 Planned Cedar Ravine Rd Over Weber Creek Cedar Ravine Rd over Weber Creek, 2.8 miles north of Pleasant Valley E LD19512 ELD E l Dorado C ounty Bridge R ehabilitation R d. R ehabilitate and widen 1 lane bridge to 2 lane bridge. $3,247,501 2023 P rogrammed Clear Creek Rd/Clear Creek (0.25 mi Clear Creek Rd over Clear Creek, 0.25 mi east of S ly Park Rd.: Replace E of S ly P ark R d) B ridge 1-lane bridge with a new 2-lane bridge. (Toll C redits for PE , R OW, & E LD19350 ELD E l Dorado C ounty Replacement C ON.) (C IP77139). Toll C redits for ENG, R OW, C ON $4,494,000 2020 P rogrammed Clear Creek Rd/Clear Creek (1.82 mi Clear Creek Rd over Clear Creek, 1.82 miles east of S ly Park Rd.: E of S ly P ark R d) B ridge R eplace 1-lane bridge with a new 2 lane bridge. Toll credits for PE , E LD19351 ELD E l Dorado C ounty Replacement R OW, & C ON. (C IP 77138). Toll C redits for E NG, R OW, C ON $4,022,500 2020 P rogrammed E LD19426 ELD E l Dorado C ounty C oach Lane Bike Lanes Install bike lanes on entire length of C oach Lane. $131,250 2027 Planned Install bicycle route signs and markings on entire length of C ommerce E LD19427 ELD E l Dorado C ounty Commerce Way Bike Route Way. $1,000 2027 Planned Phase 1: Install bike lanes on C ountry C lub Drive from Bass Lake R oad E LD19429 ELD E l Dorado C ounty C ountry C lub Drive Bike Lanes to Cambridge R oad $350,000 2027 Planned E LD19430 ELD E l Dorado C ounty Durock R oad Bike Lanes Install bike lanes on entire length of Durock R oad. $350,000 2027 Planned Install electric vehicle (E V) charging infrastructure to support new vehicles (purchased in E LD19382) at their respective C ounty facilities. E l Dorado C ounty Fleet (E mission Benefits in kg/day: 0.14 R OG, 0.15 NOx. 0.06 PM10, 0.06 E LD19385 ELD E l Dorado C ounty E lec trific a tion - E V Infra s truc ture PM2.5) $56,478 2019 P rogrammed
Pay for the incremental cost difference between a plug-in electric (PEV) or plug-in electric gasoline hybrid vehicle and its gasoline-powered version for the E l Dorado C ounty Fleet new vehicle purchases. (E LD19385 is the installation of electric vehicle (E V) charging E l Dorado C ounty Fleet infrastructure to support the new vehicles). (E mission Benefits in E LD19382 ELD E l Dorado C ounty E lectrification/Hybrid kg/day: 0.14 R OG, 0.15 NOx. 0.06 PM10, 0.06 PM2.5) $225,912 2019 P rogrammed E l Dorado Hills Boulevard, from G overnor P lace to Brittany P lace: Upgrade an existing C lass 1 trail and construct a new C lass 1 Trail. E l Dorado Hills Boulevard C lass 1 (E mission Benefits in kg/day: 0.08 R OG, 0.04 NOx, 0.02 PM10, 0.02 E LD19505 ELD E l Dorado C ounty T rail P M2.5). Toll C redits for E NG, R OW, C ON $1,135,869 2019 P rogrammed Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 4 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year
R oadway overlay, ADA ramp improvements, C lass II bike lanes, and E l Dorado Hills Boulevard Overlay bicycle and pedestrian loop detection improvements at all intersections E LD19510 ELD E l Dorado C ounty P roject from S aratoga Way/P ark D rive to B rittany P lace.. T oll C redits for E NG $5,397,285 2020 P rogrammed
E LD19432 ELD E l Dorado C ounty E l D orado T rail C onstruct a C lass I bike path from Los Trampas Drive to Halcon R oad. $500,000 2027 Planned C onstruct a multi-use bike and ped over-crossing structure with a 12 to 14 foot wide concrete deck on the E l Dorado Trail over Missouri Flat R oad. (E mission benefits in kg/day: 0.07 R OG, 0.04 NOx, 0.02 E l Dorado T rail - Missouri F lat R oad PM10)(C IP #97015) (Toll C redits for PE , R OW). Toll C redits for ENG, E LD19380 ELD E l Dorado C ounty Bike/Pedestrian Overcrossing ROW $5,203,000 2022 P rogrammed
E l Dorado T rail E xt. - Missouri F lat C onstruct a bicycle/pedestrian overcrossing as part of the E l Dorado E LD19394 ELD E l Dorado C ounty R d Bike/Pedestrian Overcrossing T rail at Missouri F lat R oad (C IP 97015) $2,705,000 2017 Planned
E l Dorado T rail, from Missouri F lat R d to E l Dorado R d: C onstruct C lass I multi-use bike/ped path, approximately 2.54 miles. Improvements include: 10-foot wide paved path, signage, roadway crossing at Forni/Blanchard R ds, and unpaved nature trail adjacent to the bike path. E l Dorado T rail E xt. - Missouri F lat (T oll credits for P E & R OW) (E mission Benefits in kg/day: 0.05 R OG , E LD19371 ELD E l Dorado C ounty R d to El Dorado R d 0.03 NOx, 0.01 PM 10). Toll C redits for ENG, R OW $4,394,000 2021 P rogrammed Install bicycle route signs and markings on entire length of E nterprise E LD19433 ELD E l Dorado C ounty Enterprise Drive Bike Route D rive. $1,000 2027 Planned Fallen Leaf R oad over Glen Alpine C reek, 100 north of Glen Alpine R d. R ehabilitate and widen functionally obsolete 1 lane bridge to 2 lane F allen Leaf R d Over G len Alpine bridge. Toll C redits programmed for PE , R /W, and C ON.. Toll C redits E LD19513 ELD E l Dorado C ounty C reek - R ehabilitate Bridge for E NG, R OW, C ON $3,897,750 2023 P rogrammed French Creek Rd over French Creek, 6 miles south of Mother Lode Dr. French Creek Rd over French Creek - R ehabilitate and widen to standard lanes and shoulders (no added E LD19514 ELD E l Dorado C ounty R ehabilitate Bridge capacity).. T oll C redits for E NG , R OW, C ON $3,187,500 2023 P rogrammed Garden Valley R d over J ohntown C reek, 3.5 miles northeast of S R 193. Garden Valley R d Over J ohntown R ehabilitate and widen existing 2 lane bridge (no added capacity).. Toll E LD19515 ELD E l Dorado C ounty C reek - R ehabilitate Bridge C redits for E NG , R O W, C O N $3,387,500 2023 P rogrammed Install bicycle route signs and markings on G old Hill R oad from S tate E LD19434 ELD E l Dorado C ounty G old Hill R oad Bike R oute R oute 49 to Lotus R oad. $4,000 2027 Planned
Green Valley R d/Indian C reek Bridge Green Valley R d, over Indian C reek, 0.9 miles north of Greenstone R d. E LD19335 ELD E l Dorado C ounty Replacement R eplace existing 2 lane bridge with 2 lane bridge. (C IP77127) $3,785,200 2021 P rogrammed Green Valley R d over Mound S prings C reek, 0.8 miles west of Missouri Green Valley R d/Mound S prings Flat Rd. R eplace functionally obsolete 2 lane bridge with 2 lane bridge. E LD19353 ELD E l Dorado C ounty C reek Bridge R ehabilitation No added lane capacity. (C IP77136) $3,992,400 2021 P rogrammed Green Valley Road/Deer Valley E LD19390 ELD E l Dorado C ounty Intersection Improvements Green Valley Road/Deer Valley Intersection Improvements (CIP76114) $1,209,000 2017 Planned
Greenstone Rd over S late Creek, 0.5 miles north of Mother Lode Rd.: Greenstone Rd/Slate Creek Bridge R eplace existing 2 lane bridge with new 2 lane bridge. T oll credits for E LD19354 ELD E l Dorado C ounty Replacement P E , R OW, & C ON. (C IP 77137). Toll C redits for E NG, R OW, C ON $3,567,500 2021 P rogrammed Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 5 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year Greenwood Rd over Georgetown Creek, 0.9 miles south of S R 193. Greenwood Rd Over Georgetown R ehabilitate and widen 1 lane bridge to 2 lane bridge.. Toll C redits for E LD19516 ELD E l Dorado C ounty C reek - R ehabilitate Bridge E NG, R OW, C ON $3,272,500 2023 P rogrammed G rizzly F lat R d Over S teely F ork G rizzly F lat R oad over S teely F ork C osumnes R iver, 7 miles east of Mt. C osumnes R iver - Bridge Aukum R d. R eplace 2 lane with 2 lane bridge.. Toll C redits for E NG, E LD19517 ELD E l Dorado C ounty Replacement ROW, CON $4,318,750 2030 P rogrammed Hanks E xchange R d over S quaw Hollow C reek, 0.4 miles south of P leasant Valley R d.: R eplace existing 1-lane bridge with new 2-lane Hanks E xchange R d/Squaw Hollow bridge. T oll credits for P E , R OW, & C ON. (C IP 77135). T oll C redits for E LD19352 ELD E l Dorado C ounty Creek Bridge Replacement E NG, R OW, C ON $4,006,000 2020 P rogrammed Hazel Valley R d, over E .I.D C anal, 0.8 miles southeast of S R 50: R eplace functionally obsolete 1 lane bridge with a new 2 lane bridge. Hazel Valley R d/E ID C anal Bridge T oll credits programmed for P E , R OW, & C ON. (C IP 77125). T oll E LD19342 ELD E l Dorado C ounty Replacement C redits for E NG , R O W, C O N $3,637,000 2020 P rogrammed Minor ITS Improvement: Deployment of various ITS improvements along U.S . 50 and regionally significant corridors in the C ounty. Intellig ent T ra ns porta tion S ys tem Includes: implementation of ITS projects listed and prioritized in E l E LD19240 ELD E l Dorado C ounty (ITS ) Improvements (P hase 2) Dorado C ounty. (S ee E LD19239 for Phase 1) $5,000,000 2022 Planned
Identification of various Intelligent Transportation S ystem (ITS ) improvements along US 50 and regionally significant corridors in the C ounty; projects may include upgrading all controllers, building the communications infrastructure, adding C C TVs, adding DMS , connecting E LD19239 ELD E l Dorado C ounty ITS Improvements - Phase 1 all the signals. (S ee E LD19240/CIP#GP168 for Phase 2) C IP31202 $5,833,200 2027 Planned E LD19438 ELD E l Dorado C ounty J acquier R oad Bike Lanes P lacerville C ity limit to C arson R oad $175,000 2027 Planned E LD19439 ELD E l Dorado C ounty Latrobe R oad Bike Lanes Investment Boulevard to Deer Creek/SPTC $525,000 2027 Planned E LD19440 ELD E l Dorado C ounty Lotus R oad Bike Lanes P hase 1: G old Hill R oad to S R 49 $525,000 2027 Planned C lass II bike lanes from the top of Prospectors R oad to Black Oak Mine E LD19444 ELD E l Dorado C ounty Marshall Road Bike Lanes R oad $525,000 2027 Planned Class III Bike Route on Marshall Road from Black Oak Mine Road to S R E LD19445 ELD E l Dorado C ounty Marshall R oad Bike R oute 193 $20,000 2027 Planned E LD19446 ELD E l Dorado C ounty Meder Road Bike Lanes P has e 1: C ameron P ark D rive to P aloran C ourt $175,000 2027 Planned
Upgrade and install pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure at various Merrychase and C ountry C lub Drive locations on Merrychase and C ounty C lub Drive in C ameron Park. (Toll Bicycle and Pedestrian C redits for C ON) (E mission Benefits in kg/day: 0.04 R OG, 0.03 NOx, E LD19503 ELD E l Dorado C ounty Improvements 0.01 PM10, 0.01 PM 2.5). Toll C redits for ENG, R OW, C ON $897,000 2020 P rogrammed R oadway S afety Improvements: C onstruction/reconstruction of metal Metal Beam G uardrail Installation - beam guardrail at various locations throughout the C ounty. Federally E LD19333 ELD E l Dorado C ounty Various Locations funded (HS IP & R S TP) programs. (C IP OP005) $672,000 2036 Planned
E LD19448 ELD E l Dorado C ounty Missouri F lat R oad Bike Lanes Phase 1: C ampus Drive to existing C lass II on the south side of US 50 $350,000 2027 Planned
E LD19449 ELD E l Dorado C ounty Missouri F lat R oad Bike Lanes Phase 2: Golden Center Drive near Wal-Mart to Pleasant Valley Road $175,000 2027 Planned Mosquito R d, over S outh Fork American R iver, 5.7 miles north of US 50: R eplace existing structurally deficient 1 lane bridge with new 2 lane bridge. (T oll credits programmed for P E , R O W, & C O N. C IP 77126.) Mosquito R d/South Fork American High C os t P roject agreement required.. T oll C redits for E NG , R O W, E LD19340 ELD E l Dorado C ounty River Bridge Replacement CON $73,814,000 2020 P rogrammed Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 6 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year Mother Lode Dr, Greenstone to Pleasant Valley: Add two-way left-turn Mother Lode Dr Turn Lane, lane and widen road to accommodate the turn lane. No curb, gutter or E LD19238 ELD E l Dorado C ounty Greenstone to Pleasant Valley sidewalk. C IP #G P 155 $3,893,000 2036 Planned E LD19451 ELD E l Dorado C ounty Mother Lode Drive Bike Lanes Phase 1: Missouri Flat Road to Lindberg Ave $175,000 2027 Planned Mt Murphy R d, over S outh Fork American R iver, 0.1 mile east of S R 49. R eplace existing 1 lane truss bridge with new 2 lane bridge. Toll credits Mt. Murphy R d/South Fork American programmed for P E , R O W, and C O N. (C IP 77129). T oll C redits for E LD19339 ELD E l Dorado C ounty River Bridge Replacement E NG, R OW, C ON $19,310,000 2020 P rogrammed
C onstruct 1,233-feet of C lass I bike path within the E l Dorado Hills C S D property from the west end of the New York Creek Trail East - Phase 1 project to S tephen Harris Park. Improvements include an 8-foot wide C lass I bike path with 2-foot wide shoulders and a 12-foot wide prefabricated bridge over New Y ork C reek. (T oll C redits for P E , R O W, and C ON. E mission Benefits in kg/day: 0.02 R OG , 0.01 NOx). T oll E LD19375 ELD E l Dorado C ounty New York Creek Trail East - Phase 2 C redits for E NG , R O W, C O N $1,443,000 2019 P rogrammed Newtown R d/South Fork Weber Newtown R d., Over S Fork Weber C r., 0.7Mi W Of S nows R d. R eplace E LD19322 ELD E l Dorado C ounty Creek - Bridge Rehab existing 2 lane bridge. C IP77122 $5,719,000 2021 P rogrammed Oak Hill R d over S quaw Hollow C reek, 0.6 miles south of P leasant Valley R d: R eplace existing 2 lane bridge with new 2 lane bridge. T oll Oak Hill R d/S quaw Hollow C reek credits for P E , R OW, & C ON. (C IP 77134). Toll C redits for E NG, R OW, E LD19355 ELD E l Dorado C ounty Bridge Replacement CON $3,987,000 2020 P rogrammed
Old Bass Lake Rd – EDH to Bass Phase 1: E DH to Bass Lake C onnection. Between gates, using existing E LD19452 ELD E l Dorado C ounty Lake C onnection roadway as Class I path from Tong Road to Old Bass Lake Road. $200,000 2027 Planned E LD19453 ELD E l Dorado C ounty Palmer Drive Bike Lanes Add bike lanes along full length of P almer Drive $87,500 2027 Planned
E LD19454 ELD E l Dorado C ounty P almer Drive Bike P ath C onnection F rom Wild C haparral D rive to P almer D rive $200,000 2027 Planned At various locations throughout El Dorado C ounty: Installation of high friction surface treatment, new thermoplastic striping with enhanced wet Pavement Marking S afety night visibility, R aised Pavement Markers (R PMs), and advance E LD19507 ELD E l Dorado C ounty Improvements warning signs. (H8-03-005). Toll C redits for C ON $2,784,600 2019 P rogrammed Perry Creek Rd over Perry Creek, 0.2 miles east of Mt. Aukum Rd. P erry C reek R d O ver P erry C reek - R ehabilitate bridge from 1 lane to 2 lanes.. T oll C redits for E NG , R OW, E LD19518 ELD E l Dorado C ounty R ehabilitate Bridge CON $3,330,000 2023 P rogrammed P leasant Valley R d Widening - Big Widen Pleasant Valley R d from Big C ut Rd to C edar R avine R d to E LD19249 ELD E l Dorado C ounty C ut to C edar R avine accommodate seven left-turn pockets. C IP#GP174 $2,291,000 2036 Planned
Widen P leasant Valley R d from P earl P l (east of S R 49) to Big C ut R d P leasant Valley R d Widening - P earl in Diamond S prings to accommodate three left-turn pockets, 0.5 miles E LD19248 ELD E l Dorado C ounty to B ig C ut of 2-way left-turn lane, and shoulder widening. C IP#GP173 $2,710,000 2036 Planned E LD19458 ELD E l Dorado C ounty Pleasant Valley Road Bike Lanes Big C ut R oad to S ly Park R oad $1,575,000 2027 Planned E LD19457 ELD E l Dorado C ounty Pleasant Valley Road Bike Lanes Phase 2: Missouri Flat R oad to Mother Lode Drive $525,000 2027 Planned E LD19456 ELD E l Dorado C ounty Pleasant Valley Road Bike Lanes P hase 1: Big C ut R oad to Missouri F lat R oad $350,000 2027 Planned Widen Ponderosa R d from N. S hingle R d to Meder R d to accommodate Ponderosa R d Widening - N. four left-turn pockets and 0.3 miles of dual left-turn lane; shoulder repair E LD19250 ELD E l Dorado C ounty S hingle to Meder and widening. C IP#GP175 $2,798,000 2036 Planned E LD19459 ELD E l Dorado C ounty Ponderosa R oad Bike Lanes US 50 to Meder R oad $131,250 2027 Planned Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 7 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year Prospectors Road Class III Bike E LD19460 ELD E l Dorado C ounty R oute C lass III bike route on the entire length of Prospectors R oad $12,500 2027 Planned
C lass II Bike Lanes included in extension of S aratoga Way from Finders S aratoga Way Extension – Class II Way to C ounty Line. (alternatively construct a C lass I bike path prior to E LD19462 ELD E l Dorado C ounty Bike Lanes construction of extension of S aratoga Way to Iron Point R oad) $75,000 2027 Planned Improvements to the intersection at S ilva Valley Parkway and Harvard Way to enhance traffic flow and reduce congestion. Improvements include right-turn pocket, increased left-turn pocket, additional thru-lane, bike lane and bike detector, ped/bike sensors, optimize signal. S ilva Valley Parkway at Harvard Way (E mission Benefits in kg/day: 0.03 R OG , 0.02 NOx.). T oll C redits for E LD19504 ELD E l Dorado C ounty Intersection Improvements E NG, C ON $613,000 2019 P rogrammed S ilva Valley P kwy/Golden E agle Ln - S ignalize intersection at S ilva Valley P kwy and G olden E agle Ln (S ilva E LD19255 ELD E l Dorado C ounty S ignalization Valley E lem S chool). C IP #G P 182 $768,000 2036 Planned S ilver F ork R d over S outh F ork American R iver , 0.1 miles s outheas t of US 50: R ehabilitate existing 2 lane bridge. No added lane capacity. S ilver F ork R d/S outh F ork American 11/2/2010: Toll credits programmed for PE , R /W, & C ON. (C IP 77124). E LD19338 ELD E l Dorado C ounty River Bridge Rehab T oll C redits for E NG , R OW, C ON $2,626,000 2020 P rogrammed S ly P ark R d., Over C lear C reek, 1.1 Miles E ast of P leasant Valley R d. S ly P ark R d/C lear C reek - B ridge R eplace the existing functionally obsolete 2 lane bridge with a new 2 E LD19325 ELD E l Dorado C ounty Replacement lane bridge. C IP77115 $5,843,142 2019 P rogrammed C lass I Bike P ath from Missouri F lat R oad to Mother Lode Drive in E l E LD19463 ELD E l Dorado C ounty S P T C /E l Dorado T rail D orado $2,400,000 2027 Planned S tate R oute 49 Widening from P leasant Valley R oad to Missouri F lat E LD19495 ELD E l Dorado C ounty S tate R oute 49 S houlder Widening R oad $7,879,000 Planned
S tudy to identify and analyze alternatives to improve access and reduce accidents at US 50 and C amino R d. E DC TC is lead agency on study. US 50 C amino Area P arallel This project is E DC DOT's contribution to the study. Preferred alternative E LD19210 ELD E l Dorado C ounty C a pa c ity/S a fety S tudy to be implemented in project CAL18190. C IP71319 $2,000,000 2036 Planned R econstruct eastbound diagonal on-ramp and eastbound loop off-ramp for the ultimate configuration; add a lane to northbound E l Dorado Hills Blvd under the overpass (eliminates merge lane and improves traffic flow from the eastbound loop off-ramp); eastbound diagonal on-ramp US 50/E l Dorado Hills Blvd will be metered and have an HOV bypass. Project split from E LD19345 ELD E l Dorado C ounty Interchange E astbound R amps E LD15630(C IP71323). $5,904,400 2027 Planned C onstruct ped/bike overcrossing over US 50 just east of E l Dorado Hills Blvd Interchange; includes a C lass 3 mixed-use path; C onstruction and R OW acquisition for 10-ft wide sidewalk and adjacent retaining walls, US 50/E l Dorado Hills Blvd barriers, railings and landscape replacement included with E LD19173 ELD E l Dorado C ounty P edes trian O vercros s ing C IP71323/ELD15630. (C IP71340) $6,783,000 2036 Planned
Phase 1B2 is the second phase of the C lass 1 bike path and pedestrian facility between Missouri F lat R oad and P lacerville Drive. T he P hase 1B2 project will construct the bike and pedestrian facility portion US 50/Missouri Flat Rd Interchange - between Weber Creek Bridge and Placerville Drive overcrossing, and E LD19392 ELD E l Dorado C ounty Phase 1B2 will include additional safety enhancements. (C IP 71359) $1,452,300 2017 Planned Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 8 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year R ealign approx. 1/4 mile of Durock R d to S unset Ln and signalize new intersection. Durock R d will be two through lanes with turn pockets at the intersection and center turn lane. PE for this phase included in US 50/Ponderosa R d Interchange - E LD19180/CIP7133. C oordinates with E LD19170/CIP71339 and E LD19244 ELD E l Dorado C ounty Durock R d R ealignment E LD19180/CIP71333. (C IP71338) $7,152,000 2027 Planned
R ealign approx. 1/4 mile of N. S hingle R d about 600 ft north at Ponderosa R d; realign WB off-ramp to align with Wild C haparral Dr; and signalize the new intersection. R ealigned N. S hingle R d will be two through lanes with turn pockets at the intersection. PE for this phase included in C IP71333/ELD19180. C oordinates with US 50/Ponderosa R d Interchange - C IP71338/ELD19244, C IP71333/ELD19180 and E LD19170 ELD E l Dorado C ounty N. S hingle R d R ealignment C IP#GP150/ELD19219. (C IP71339) $5,020,000 2027 Planned
Operating assistance for rural transit services within E l Dorado C ounty. E l Dorado C ounty Operating Assistance for R ural Outside the S acramento Urbanized Area.FFY 2015: $635,227FFY E LD19376 ELD T rans it T rans it S ervice 2016: $635,227FFY 2017: $635,227FFY 2018: $635,227 $6,777,064 2020 P rogrammed E l Dorado C ounty Develop a regional fueling station near the S acramento/El Dorado E LD19461 ELD T rans it R egional F ueling S tation C ounty Line. $20,310,000 2036 Planned E l Dorado C ounty, VAR 56136 ELD C a ltra ns D is tric t 3 AVI/AVL For Emergency Vehicles AVI/AVL For Emergency Vehicles $400,000 2036 Planned E l Dorado C ounty, VAR 56143 ELD C a ltra ns D is tric t 3 C ommunications Plan C ommunications Plan $100,000 2022 Planned E l Dorado C ounty, C ontinued S ignal C oordination VAR 56145 ELD C a ltra ns D is tric t 3 Improvements 2010-2020 C ontinued S ignal C oordination Improvements $50,000 2022 Planned E l Dorado C ounty, C ontinued S ignal C oordination VAR 56144 ELD C a ltra ns D is tric t 3 Improvements 2020-2030 C ontinued S ignal C oordination Improvements $50,000 2036 Planned E l Dorado C ounty, VAR 56146 ELD C a ltra ns D is tric t 3 C ritic a l Inters ec tion Improvements C ritic a l Inters ec tion Improvements $5,000,000 2022 Planned E l Dorado C ounty, VAR 56147 ELD C a ltra ns D is tric t 3 E l Dorado C ounty Integration Project E l Dorado C ounty Integration Project $400,000 2022 Planned Highway Advisory R adio Deployment E l Dorado C ounty, a nd W ea ther S ta tions – integ ra te Highway Advisory R adio Deployment and Weather S tations – integrate VAR 56155 ELD C a ltra ns D is tric t 3 with C a ltra ns with C a ltra ns $6,500,000 2022 Planned Install Animal Vehicle C ollision E l Dorado C ounty, Avoidance S ystems-Hwy 49 and US VAR 56156 ELD C a ltra ns D is tric t 3 50 Install Animal Vehicle C ollision Avoidance S ystems-Hwy 49 and US 50 $150,000 2036 Planned E l Dorado C ounty, Install bicycle loop detection at all VAR 56157 ELD C a ltra ns D is tric t 3 major inters ections Install bicycle loop detection at all major intersections $6,000 2036 Planned E l Dorado C ounty, VAR 56158 ELD C a ltra ns D is tric t 3 Install C ommunication Phase II Install C ommunication Phase II $200,000 2022 Planned E l Dorado C ounty, Install Downhill S peed Warning VAR 56159 ELD C a ltra ns D is tric t 3 S ystem on U.S . 50 Near C amino Install Downhill S peed Warning S ystem on U.S . 50 Near C amino $100,000 2036 Planned E l Dorado C ounty, Install Ice Detection and Warning VAR 56160 ELD C a ltra ns D is tric t 3 Systems Install Ice Detection and Warning S ystems $200,000 2036 Planned
E l Dorado C ounty, Install R ock/Mudslide and Avalanche VAR 56161 ELD C a ltra ns D is tric t 3 Detection and Warning S ystem Install R ock/Mudslide and Avalanche Detection and Warning S ystem $200,000 2036 Planned E l Dorado C ounty, VAR 56162 ELD C a ltra ns D is tric t 3 Installation of C C T V Installation of C C T V $390,000 2036 Planned Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 9 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year E l Dorado C ounty, VAR 56163 ELD C a ltra ns D is tric t 3 Landslide S ensor Integration Project Landslide S ensor Integration Project $60,000 2022 Planned E l Dorado C ounty, L ong-T erm P riority C orridor VAR 56164 ELD C a ltra ns D is tric t 3 Deployment of ITS L ong-T erm P riority C orridor D eployment of IT S $900,000 2036 Planned E l Dorado C ounty, Long-T erm R egional IT S P lan VAR 56165 ELD C a ltra ns D is tric t 3 Update Long-Term R egional ITS Plan Update $200,000 2036 Planned E l Dorado C ounty, VAR 56166 ELD C a ltra ns D is tric t 3 Lower US 50 Freeway Management Lower US 50 Freeway Management $500,000 2022 Planned E l Dorado C ounty, Medium-T erm R egional IT S P lan VAR 56167 ELD C a ltra ns D is tric t 3 Update Medium-Term R egional ITS Plan Update $200,000 2036 Planned E l Dorado C ounty, P lacerville S ignal S ystem VAR 56168 ELD C a ltra ns D is tric t 3 Technology Advances P lacerville S ignal S ystem T echnology Advances $800,000 2022 Planned E l Dorado C ounty, Portable Traffic Management VAR 56169 ELD C a ltra ns D is tric t 3 Devices Portable Traffic Management Devices $350,000 2036 Planned E l Dorado C ounty, P riority C orridor D eployment of IT S VAR 56170 ELD C a ltra ns D is tric t 3 Latrobe R oad/E l Dorado Hills Priority C orridor Deployment of ITS Latrobe R oad/El Dorado Hills $900,000 2022 Planned Procure and deploy Portable E l Dorado C ounty, Dynamic Message S igns (DMS ) and Procure and deploy Portable Dynamic Message S igns (DMS ) and VAR 56171 ELD C a ltra ns D is tric t 3 T railblazers T railblazers $90,000 2022 Planned E l Dorado C ounty, VAR 56172 ELD C a ltra ns D is tric t 3 R emote Traffic C ontrol Workstation R emote Traffic C ontrol Workstation $8,000 2036 Planned E l Dorado C ounty, T ra ffic C ontrol S ys tem (T C S ) VAR 56176 ELD C a ltra ns D is tric t 3 Upgrade T raffic C ontrol S ys tem (T C S ) Upgrade $30,000 2022 Planned E l Dorado C ounty, VAR 56177 ELD C a ltra ns D is tric t 3 T raffic C ontrol S ys tem P rocurement T raffic C ontrol S ys tem P rocurement $250,000 2022 Planned
E l Dorado C ounty, T raveler Information Dissemination VAR 56178 ELD C a ltra ns D is tric t 3 Devices at Key Locations T raveler Information Dissemination Devices at K ey Locations $300,000 2022 Planned E l Dorado C ounty, VAR 56179 ELD C a ltra ns D is tric t 3 US 50 S urveillance US 50 S urveillance $1,100,000 2022 Planned E l Dorado C ounty, VAR 56180 ELD C a ltra ns D is tric t 3 US 50 T raveler Information US 50 T raveler Information $1,500,000 2022 Planned E l Dorado C ounty, VAR 56181 ELD C a ltra ns D is tric t 3 US 50 Winter Traffic Management US 50 Winter Traffic Management $250,000 2022 Planned E l Dorado C ounty, VAR 56141 ELD C a ltra ns D is tric t 3 Web Page Development Web Page Development $100,000 2022 Planned E l Dorado C ounty, C a ltra ns D is tric t 3, VAR 56175 ELD SACOG S T A R N E T Integ ra tion S T A R N E T Integ ra tion $40,000 2022 Planned
E l Dorado C ounty, VAR 56137 ELD E l Dorado Hills C S D Bass Lake Road Bike Lanes Class II Bike Lanes from Green Valley Road to US 50 $1,500,000 2027 Planned Bike P ath P arallel to US 50 on the E l Dorado C ounty, north side -E DH to Bass Lake P hase 2: E DH to Bass Lake C onnection F rom S ilva Valley R oad to E l VAR 56142 ELD E l Dorado Hills C S D C onnection Dorado Hills Village C enter S hopping C enter $300,000 2027 Planned
E l Dorado C ounty, E l Dorado Hills Boulevard Bike VAR 56148 ELD E l Dorado Hills C S D Lanes P has e 1: S aratoga Way to G overnor D rive/S t. Andrews $297,500 2027 Planned Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 10 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year Phase 2: Utilizing an existing golf cart undercrossing of S errano E l Dorado C ounty, Parkway, extend the bike path from the current terminus at S errano VAR 56149 ELD E l Dorado Hills C S D E l Dorado Hills Boulevard Bike P ath Parkway to Raley’s Center $200,000 2027 Planned
E l Dorado C ounty, E l Dorado Hills Boulevard Bike P ath S ign and stripe existing C lass I Paths in two locations: 1) from Harvard VAR 56150 ELD E l Dorado Hills C S D (phase 1) Way to S t. Andrews 2) from G overnors D rive to B rittney Way $10,000 2027 Planned
E l Dorado C ounty, E l Dorado Hills to Bass Lake C lass III Bike R oute on Tong R oad, C lass III Bike R oute on Old Bass VAR 56151 ELD E l Dorado Hills C S D C onnection (phase 1) Lake Road. $25,000 2027 Planned C lass II Bike Lanes from F rancisco Dr. to P leasant G rove Middle E l Dorado C ounty, S chool/Pleasant Grove Middle S chool to Lock and Lock to Francisco VAR 56153 ELD E l Dorado Hills C S D Green Valley Road Bike Lanes D r. $550,000 2027 Planned
E l Dorado C ounty, VAR 56154 ELD E l Dorado Hills C S D Harvard Way Bike Path F rom C lermont R oad to E l do Hills Boulevard $200,000 2027 Planned
E l Dorado C ounty, VAR 56173 ELD E l Dorado Hills C S D S ilva Valley R oad Bike Lanes From the new connection with White R ock R oad to Green Valley R oad $700,000 2027 Planned
E l Dorado C ounty, VAR 56174 ELD E l Dorado Hills C S D S P T C /E l Dorado T rail C lass I Bike Path from Latrobe R oad to C ounty Line $2,800,000 2027 Planned
E ldorado National F orest, Ice House R oad, for 17.5 miles: R ehabilitate VAR 56198 ELD FHWA Ice House R oad R ehab road. (C A F LAP E D C R 147(2)) (T oll C redits). T oll C redits for C ON $5,000,000 2020 P rogrammed E l Dorado C ounty Transit Authority: Purchase two minivans for expansion of enhanced demand response service in the E l Dorado urbanized area. These expansion vehicles will be use gasoline (GA) E l Dorado C ounty Transit Authority - fuel. (Funds are S acramento Urbanized Area FTA 5307 funds for PM E LD19467 ELD RT Bus E xpansion from FY 12/13.) $91,376 2019 P rogrammed C omplete S treets improvements in va rious loc a tions on the S ta te Complete Streets Improvements to Highway S ystem (S HS ) in E l Dorado, Placer, S acramento, S utter, Y uba C AL20571 MUL T I Caltrans D3 the S H S and Y olo C ounties. $50,000,000 2036 Planned In S acramento, Butte, E l Dorado, Nevada, Placer and Y olo C ounties, on R outes 5, 50, 70, 80, 89, 99 and 267 at various locations. Upgrade C AL20655 MUL T I Caltrans D3 HAR Update at 25 locations in 11 cou Highway Advisory R adios $3,130,000 2036 Planned
C AL20650 MUL T I Caltrans D3 I-5 Install Vehicle Detection S tations In S acramento and Y olo C ounties on I-5 at 9 locations $1,000,000 2036 Planned In S acramento, from Y olo C ounty line to 0.2 mile west of Watt Avenue C AL20653 MUL T I Caltrans D3 Installation of fiber optics communicatOvercrossing. Install fiber optic cable $9,500,000 2036 Planned Installation of Ramp Meters: Various Locations in Placer, S acramento, C AL20609 MUL T I Caltrans D3 Ramp Meters and Y olo C ounties. $4,800,000 2022 Planned In S acramento, E l Dorado, Nevada, Placer and Y olo C ounties, on R outes 5, 28, 50, 51, 80, 89, 99 and 267 at various locations. R epair C AL20656 MUL T I Caltrans D3 Roadway Weather Information S tationand upgrade roadway information systems $2,730,000 2024 Planned In S acramento and Placer C ounties, on R outes 51, 65 and 99 at various C AL20652 MUL T I Caltrans D3 S ac/Yolo R amp Meters locations. Install ramp meters. $28,530,000 Planned
C AL20615 MUL T I Caltrans D3 S HO P P - B ridge P res ervation Various bridge preservation projects throughout the six-county region. $860,000,000 Planned C AL20616 MUL T I Caltrans D3 S HOP P - C ollision R eduction S HOP P - C ollision R eduction $505,000,000 Planned Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 11 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year C AL20617 MUL T I Caltrans D3 S HOPP - E mergency R esponse S HOPP - E mergency R esponse $10,000,000 Planned C AL20584 MUL T I Caltrans D3 S HOP P - F acilities S HOP P - F acilities $20,000,000 Planned C AL20618 MUL T I Caltrans D3 S HOPP - Mandates S HOPP - Mandates $9,500,000 Planned C AL20622 MUL T I Caltrans D3 SHOPP - Minor SHOPP - Minor $200,000,000 Planned C AL20619 MUL T I Caltrans D3 S HOP P - Mobility S HOP P - Mobility $105,500,000 Planned C AL20620 MUL T I Caltrans D3 S HOPP - Roadside Preservation S HOPP - Roadside Preservation $15,000,000 Planned C AL20621 MUL T I Caltrans D3 S HOPP - Roadway Preservation S HOPP - Roadway Preservation $570,000,000 Planned Operational Improvements: traffic monitoring stations, closed circuit S ystem Management/Traffic television, highway advisory radio, changeable message signs, and Operations S ystem on U.S . 50 other system management infrastructure in E l Dorado and S acramento C AL20614 MUL T I Caltrans D3 between I-80 and C edar Grove C ounties. $4,000,000 2022 Planned S ystem Management/Traffic Operational Improvements: traffic monitoring stations, closed circuit Operations S ystem on I-5 between television, highway advisory radio, changeable message signs, and the S an J oaquin C ounty Line and other system management infrastructure in Placer, S acramento and C AL20611 MUL T I Caltrans D3 S R 113 Y olo C ounties. $5,000,000 2022 Planned Operational Improvements: traffic monitoring stations, closed circuit S ystem Management/Traffic television, highway advisory radio, changeable message signs, and Operations S ystem On I-80 between other system management infrastructure in Placer, S acramento and C AL20610 MUL T I Caltrans D3 S R 113 and Bell R oad and on R t-51 Y olo C ounties. $5,000,000 2022 Planned S ystem Management/Traffic Operational Improvements: traffic monitoring stations, closed circuit Operations S ystem on S R 99 television, highway advisory radio, changeable message signs, and between the S an J oaquin C ounty other system management infrastructure in S acramento and S utter C AL20613 MUL T I Caltrans D3 Line and S R 20 C ounties. $5,000,000 2022 Planned In S acramento, Butte, C olusa, E l Dorado, Glenn, Nevada, Placer, S ierra, S utter, Y olo and Y uba C ounties on R outes 5, 50 and 80 at C AL20654 MUL T I Caltrans D3 Upgrade C MS panels to LE D various locations. Upgrade C hangeable Message S ign (C MS ) $5,320,000 2024 Planned
S egment B3: Widen Grant Line R oad from 2 to 4 lanes (thoroughfare), from Bradshaw R oad to Bond R oad. C omplete project development efforts, as needed, to identify and implement improvements along the corridor segment in the near-term, as needed. Improvements may include intersection improvements and frontage improvements that benefit travel for automobiles and commercial vehicles. The project listing also allows for other near-term planned project development activities to advance, including environmental clearance, so the corridor C a pita l S outhea s t C apital S outhE ast Connector – segment can eventually become a four lane facility in a manner that is TBD MUL T I C onnector J PA S egment B3 consistent with the Project Design Guidelines for the corridor. $23,600,000 Planned
S egment C: Widen Grant Line R oad from 2 to 4 lanes (thoroughfare), from Bond R oad to C alvine R oad. C omplete project development efforts, as needed, to identify and implement improvements along the corridor segment in the near-term, as needed. Improvements may include intersection improvements and frontage improvements that benefit travel for automobiles and commercial vehicles. The project listing also allows for other near-term planned project development activities to advance, including environmental clearance, so the corridor C a pita l S outhea s t C apital S outhE ast Connector – segment can eventually become a four lane facility in a manner that is TBD MUL T I C onnector J PA S egment C consistent with the Project Design Guidelines for the corridor. $34,800,000 Planned Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 12 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year S egment D1: C onstruct 4 lanes (E xpressway), from C alvine R oad to S R 16 (J ackson Hwy). Complete project development efforts, as needed, to identify and implement improvements along the corridor segment in the near-term, as needed. Improvements may include intersection improvements and frontage improvements that benefit travel for automobiles and commercial vehicles. T he project listing also allows for other near-term planned project development activities to advance, including environmental clearance, so the corridor segment can C a pita l S outhea s t C apital S outhE ast Connector – eventually become a four lane facility in a manner that is consistent with TBD MUL T I C onnector J PA S egment D1 the Project Design Guidelines for the corridor. $47,200,000 Planned R egional Lump Multiple Lead R egional Bicycle and P edestrian Lump sum for bicycle and pedestrian projects throughout the region S um 2 MUL T I Agencies Improvements 2015-2036. $2,100,000,000 Planned R egional Lump Multiple Lead R egional Planning, Programs, and Lump sum for programs, planning, and project analysis throughout the S um 4 MUL T I Agencies P roject Analys is region 2011-2036. $1,650,000,000 Planned R egional Lump Multiple Lead R oad and Highway Maintenance and Lump sum for road and highway maintenance and rehabilitation S um 3 MUL T I Agencies R ehabilitation throughout the region 2011-2036. $8,640,000,000 Planned R egional Lump Multiple Lead S um 1 MUL T I Agencies Transit Operations Transit operations and maintenance 2015-2036 $5,910,000,000 Planned R egional Lump Multiple Lead Lump-sum for transit vehicle (light rail, bus, demand response, and S um 5 MUL T I Agencies Transit Vehicle Replacements s huttles ). $1,200,000,000 Planned
Near Lincoln, on McC ourtney R oad between R iosa R oad and K ilaga S prings R oad at the C oon C reek C onservation (C 4) R anch - Advance C oon C reek C onservation R anch mitigation construction (4 acres) for future S HOPP projects expected to C AL20768 PLA Caltrans D3 H a bita t Mitig a tion (S R 65) impact wetland, riparian and other waters [C TIPS ID 107-0000-1113] $2,639,000 2030 P rogrammed In Placer and Nevada counties, I-80, at various locations (PM 28.7/R63.5) - R ehabilitate or replace bridges at six locations [#19-0038, #19-0112, #19-0113, #19-0114, #17-0023, #19-0118] [C TIPS ID 107- C AL20719 PLA Caltrans D3 I-80 Bridge R ehab 0000-1033].. Toll C redits for ENG $48,385,000 2025 P rogrammed
In and near C olfax, I-80, from west of Illinoistown Overcrossing to east of C ape Horn Undercrossing (PM 31.5/36.0) - Drainage system C AL20721 PLA Caltrans D3 I-80 C olfax C ulvert R ehabilitation rehabilitation [C TIPS ID 107-0000-1034]. Toll C redits for ENG $4,730,000 2021 P rogrammed Near Weimar, I-80, from west of Applegate Road to west of Weimar C ross R oad (PM 25.9/28.5) - Drainage system rehabilitation [C TIPS ID C AL20720 PLA Caltrans D3 I-80 C ulvert Rehab 107-0000-1032]. Toll C redits for ENG $4,540,000 2020 P rogrammed In and near C olfax on I-80, from 0.3 mile south of Weimar overhead to 0.3 mile south of Illinoistown overcrossing - R ehabilitate culvert (P M 28.5/31.5) [EFIS ID 0300020597; C TIPS ID 107-0000-0959]. Toll C AL20521 PLA Caltrans D3 I-80 C ulvert R ehabilitation C redits for E NG , R O W, C O N $2,115,000 2019 P rogrammed Near Magra, from S ecret T own O vercros s ing to the G old R un S afety I-80 Near Magra Rehab Drainage R oadside R est Area (Pla-80-38.3/41.5) - R ehabilitate drainage systems C AL20770 PLA Caltrans D3 S ys tems [C TIPS ID 107-0000-1119] $5,386,000 2023 P rogrammed In and near various cities, at various locations, from 0.3 mile west of Douglas Blvd. to 0.2 mile east of Hampshire R ocks Undercrossing (PM 1.6/R66.5) - Upgrade guardrail to current standards [C TIPS ID 107- C AL20783 PLA Caltrans D3 Placer C ounty MBGR Upgrade 0000-1126] $3,750,000 2022 P rogrammed C AL20635 PLA Caltrans D3 S R 193 P avement R ehabilitation R ehabilitate S R 193 roadway from S ierra C ollege to Newcastle. $6,500,000 2036 Planned Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 13 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year
E xtend the existing S R 267 S B truck-climbing lane; shoulder widening C AL20638 PLA Caltrans D3 S R 267 S B Truck C limbing Lane from Northstar Dr to Brockway S ummit (PM 3.76/PM 6.67) $15,000,000 2027 Planned
C AL20628 PLA Caltrans D3 S R 49 C lass II Bike Lane On S R 49, construct Class II bicycle lane from Bell R d to Dry C reek R d. $480,000 2036 Planned On S R 49, construct Class II bicycle lane from Lincoln Way to Luther C AL20651 PLA Caltrans D3 S R 49 C lass II Bike Lane R d. $960,000 2036 Planned In Auburn, S R 49, from 0.1 mile south of R outes 49/80 separation to 0.1 mile north of Dry Creek Road - Rehabilitate Pavement (PM 3.1/7.5) [C TIPS ID 107-0000-0992] [EFIS ID 0300020616]. Toll C redits for C AL20541 PLA Caltrans D3 S R 49 Pavement Rehab E NG, R OW, C ON $39,055,000 2022 P rogrammed Install signal at S hale R idge R d., coordinate to the north on Dry C reek C AL20573 PLA Caltrans D3 S R 49 S ignal C oordination R d. and to the south on Bell R d. (PM 6.38/7.427) $2,000,000 2027 Planned
In P lacer C ounty on S R 65, at G alleria Blvd. - Install ramp meters [C TIPS ID 107-0000-1064] (Toll C redits for PE , R OW, C ON) [EA 0F352, PPNO 6913A] [second child project of parent EA 0F350; first child is E A C AL20729 PLA Caltrans D3 S R 65 G alleria Blvd. R amp Meters 0F351, PPNO 6913]. Toll C redits for ENG, R OW, C ON $4,950,000 2020 P rogrammed In Placer C ounty, on S R 89, from 0.2 mile south of Goose Meadows C ampground to 0.5 mile south of Montreal R oad (PM 17.2/18.3): Place slope mesh drapery (201.150 S HOPP Roadway Protective Betterments C AL20756 PLA Caltrans D3 S R 89 S lope Mesh Drapery 18/19 F Y Minor A). T oll C redits for C ON $1,442,000 2021 P rogrammed At the existing Auburn Multi Modal S tation: Obtain right-of-way and Auburn Multi Modal S tation - R ail install rail platform extension . (E mission Benefits in kg/day: 0.93 R OG , PLA25353 PLA C ity of Auburn P la tform E xtens ion 1.18 NOx, 0.43 PM10) $1,416,480 2020 P rogrammed In Auburn, along Nevada S t from Placer S t to Fulweiler Ave: C lass 2 bike lane and adjacent sidewalks to allow for continuous pedestrian and bicycle access from Old Town Auburn to the Auburn S tation and E V Nevada S treet Pedestrian & Bicycle C ain Middle S chool. (E mission reductions in kg/day: R OG 0.03, NOx PLA25471 PLA C ity of Auburn F acilities 0.02) $3,992,414 2019 P rogrammed
I-80/SR 174 Interchange PLA25591 PLA C ity of C olfax Improvements (C onstruction funds) R econstruct I-80/SR 174 Interchange $15,000,000 2036 Planned In C olfax: R ising S un R oad from Ben Taylor R oad to W. Grass Valley S treet; R esurface up to 1,400-feet including engineering design, base R ising S un R oad Pavement repairs, mill and fill of road (up to 35,000-sf); and construction PLA25674 PLA C ity of C olfax R es urfacing P roject management and inspection. $224,998 2019 P rogrammed In C olfax: At the intersection of S . Auburn S t. and Westbound Interstate 80 on/off-ramps; construct a four-leg, one-lane roundabout. (E mission benefits in kg/day: R OG 0.05, NOx 0.05, PM2.5 0.01). Toll C redits for PLA25676 PLA C ity of C olfax S . Auburn S t. & I-80 R oundabout ENG $2,600,000 2019 P rogrammed
In Lincoln: C onstruction of multi-use bridge across Auburn R avine: Auburn R avine Bike/Ped Bridge Preliminary E ngineering, E nvironmental Documentation, Permitting, and PLA25022 PLA C ity of Lincoln Phase 1 C onstruction of bicycle and pedestrian bridge crossing Auburn R avine. $987,193 2017 Planned At various locations in Lincoln: Install crosswalk enhancements at PLA25662 PLA C ity of Lincoln C rosswalk S afety E nhancements unsignalized locations. (H8-03-008) $285,000 2019 P rogrammed Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 14 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year In Lincoln; from Moore R oad to Venture Drive on J oiner Parkway. P roject will cons is t of AC overlay, s lurry s eal, bas e repairs , AD A ramps PLA25668 PLA C ity of Lincoln J oiner P arkway R epaving P roject and striping. $3,071,654 2022 P rogrammed Lincoln Boulevard for a half mile and sections of First S treet, Third S treet, F ifth S treet, S ixth S treet a nd S eventh S treet: c ons truc t streetscape improvements, including improved sidewalks and 0.3 miles of NE V/Bike Lanes. (E mission Benefits in kg/day: 0.08 R OG, 0.05 NOx, Lincoln Boulevard S treetscape 0.02 PM2.5, 0.02 PM10) (Toll credits for PE & C ON). Toll C redits for PLA25645 PLA C ity of Lincoln Improvements Project Phase 3 E NG, C ON $3,019,534 2019 P rogrammed McBean Park Dr. over Auburn R avine, east of E ast Ave.: R ehabilitate PLA25540 PLA C ity of Lincoln McBean P ark Bridge R ehabilitation existing 2 lane bridge. No added lane capacity. $14,472,000 2020 P rogrammed On 1st (First) S treet between Lincoln Boulevard and R S treet: R ehabilitate and resurface roadway. Various drainage, ADA, and striping improvements will also be constructed as part of the project. PLA25646 PLA C ity of Lincoln S treet Resurfacing (T oll credits for C ON). T oll C redits for C ON $1,671,954 2019 P rogrammed
In the C ity of R ocklin: Wildcat Blvd. (C ity Limits with Lincoln to W. S tanford R anch R d.), P ark Dr. (C ity Limits with R oseville to C rest Dr.), S ierra C ollege Blvd. (R ocklin R d. to S outhside R anch R d.), S ierra 2019 P avement R ehabilitation - C ollege Blvd (C ity Limit with Loomis to C ity Limit with C ounty of P lacer): PLA25678 PLA C ity of R ocklin Various R oads R ehabilitate roadways.. T oll C redits for E NG , C ON $900,463 2020 P rogrammed Bridge P reventive Maintenance P rogram, various locations in C ity of Bridge Preventive Maintenance R ocklin. S ee C altrans Local Assistance HBP web site for backup list of PLA25566 PLA C ity of R ocklin P rogram bridges. $572,058 2019 P rogrammed
At R ocklin R d/Pacific S t., replace existing traffic signal intersection with P acific S t at R ocklin R oad a two lane roundabout. (E mission Benefits kg/day: R OG 0.26; NOx PLA25635 PLA C ity of R ocklin R oundabout 0.21; PM2.5 0.01).. Toll C redits for ENG, R OW, C ON $5,682,637 2020 P rogrammed PLA17820 PLA C ity of R ocklin P acific S treet On Pacific S treet: C onstruct downtown improvements. $8,000,000 2022 Planned R eplace 4 commuter buses. (Transportation Development Credits/Toll PLA25666 PLA C ity of R oseville Commuter Fleet Replacement C redits for C O N). T oll C redits for C O N $2,000,000 2020 P rogrammed
In R oseville, improve access to C ivic C enter transit transfer facility by constructing transit/bicycle/pedestrian related improvements, including pedestrian bridge and C lass I trail improvements. (E mission benefits in PLA25465 PLA C ity of R oseville Downtown Pedestrian Bridge kg/day: R OG 0.18, NOx 0.11, PM2.5 0.04) $4,873,000 2020 P rogrammed In R oseville, along Dry C reek, C irby C reek and Linda C reek, construct class 1 bike trail. (E mission Benefits in kg/day: 0.09 R OG , 0.07 NOx, PLA19910 PLA C ity of R oseville D ry C reek G reenway T rail 0.03 PM2.5) $11,790,629 2022 P rogrammed R os eville, Harding B lvd @ D ry C reek, I-80 to R oyer P ark: C ons truct class 1 bikeway in 2 phases. Phase 1 from I-80 to Harding Blvd completed in 2004 (PLA20870). Phase 2 construction is separated into 3 segments: S egment 3 is located from Folsom R oad to Lincoln I-80 To R oyer Park Bikeway Phase 2 S treet/Royer Park. (E mission benefits in kg/day: 0.25 R OG, 0.2 NOx PLA25386 PLA C ity of R oseville - S egment 3 0.09 PM10) $870,909 2019 P rogrammed Oak Ridge Dr, over Linda Creek, 0.2 mi N of Cirby Way. Replace the existing functionally obsolete 2 lane bridge with a new 2 lane bridge. Oak R idge Dr/Linda C reek Bridge 11/8/2010: (Toll C redits programmed for PE , R OW, and & C ON.). Toll PLA25508 PLA C ity of R oseville Replacement C redits for E NG , R O W, C O N $4,200,000 2019 P rogrammed Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 15 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year
In R oseville, Miners R avine T rail, from Lincoln S treet to R oyer P ark along the Dry C reek corridor: E xtend class 1 trail, including relocation and safety upgrades to existing Ice House Bridge. From transit stop at Downtown R oseville Library to existing class 1 trail in R oyer P ark: provide bicycle and pedestrian improvements including replacement of T aylor S treet Bridge. (E mission benefits in kg/day: R OG 0.05, NOx Oak S treet Extension of Miners 0.04, PM2.5 0.01) (FTA 5307 to be used on Taylor S treet bridge and PLA25469 PLA C ity of R oseville R avine T rail bike/ped improvements leading to transit stop at library.) $7,480,077 2020 P rogrammed
In R oseville; R oadway resurfacing on the following streets: Blue Oaks Blvd from Fiddyment to C rocker R anch, Pleasant Grove from Fiddyment to Michner, Woodcreek Oaks from J unction to Canevari, Foothills from C irby to Denio Loop, Vernon S t from C irby to Douglas, R iverside Ave from C ity Limit to Darling, Orlando from R iverside to C irby, C irby from S unrise to R ocky R idge, Folsom from Vernon to Douglas, Lincoln from F olsom to Oak, E states Dr (all), Harding from Lead Hill to S . end, S tanford R anch from Hwy 65 to C ity Limits, R oseville P kwy from S ecret R oseville 2018 Arterial R esurfacing R avine to Alexandria, E ureka from Douglas to S ierra C ollege & S ierra PLA25672 PLA C ity of R oseville P roject C ollege from Olympus to S ecret ravine.. T oll C redits for C ON $5,033,559 2020 P rogrammed Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program (BPMP) for various bridges in Roseville Bridge Preventive the C ity of R oseville. S ee C altrans Local Assistance HBP website for PLA25572 PLA C ity of R oseville Maintenance Program backup list of projects. $817,000 2019 P rogrammed
Washington Bl/All America C ity Bl In R oseville, at the intersection of Washington Blvd/All America C ity PLA25673 PLA C ity of R oseville R oundabout Blvd., design and construct a 2-lane roundabout.. Toll C redits for C ON $2,438,000 2020 P rogrammed
PLA25626 PLA PCTPA At-G rade R ailroad C ros s ings At-Grade R ailroad C rossings, including quiet zones throughout County $500,000,000 2036 Planned
C onstruct various bicycle facilities according to implement the R egional PLA25588 PLA PCTPA Bicycle F acilities Bicycle Master Plan and Local Bicycle Master Plans as amended. $40,000,000 Planned Lump-sum for bus vehicles for fiscal years 2019-2036; does not account PLA25632 PLA PCTPA Bus R eplacement for expansion of service. Placer C ounty operators only. $63,153,000 Planned E nhance pedestrian/bicycle and landscaping along approximately 40 Complete Street & S afe Routes to miles of roadway and construct S afe R outes to S chool improvements to PLA25587 PLA PCTPA S chool Improvements implement local plans. $52,000,000 Planned E lectric Vehicle C harging and Develop and construct an electric vehicle charging and alternative fuels PLA25586 PLA PCTPA Alternative Fuels Infrastructure infras tructure. $20,000,000 Planned
Along S R 49 from I-80 to Dry C reek R oad In the C ity of Auburn and C ounty of Placer construct sidewalks and ADA curb ramps at various locations (E missions Benefit in kg/day: R OG 0.06, NOx 0.04, PM2.5 PLA25670 PLA PCTPA Highway 49 S idewalk G ap C losure 0.01). T oll C redits for P E and R OW.. T oll C redits for E NG , R OW $13,800,000 2023 P rogrammed Annual operating & maintenance (O&M) costs ($5,704,000) specifically Placer C ounty - Bus R apid Transit for a three route BR T system for Fiscal years 2019-2036) for a TBD PLA25585 PLA PCTPA O&M tra ns it opera tor. $142,600,001 Planned Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 16 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year Provide educational and outreach efforts regarding alternative transportation modes to employers, residents, and the school community through the Placer C ounty C ongestion Management P rogram (C MP ). C MP activities will be coordinated with the C ity of R oseville and S AC OG 's R egional R ideshare / TDM P rogram. (E mission Placer C ounty C ongestion Benefits kg/day: R OG 11.44; NOx 11.59; PM2.5 5.54). Toll C redits for PLA25468 PLA PCTPA Management Program CON $1,256,813 2022 P rogrammed In Placer C ounty: provide motorist assistance and towing of disabled vehicles during am and pm commute periods on I-80 (R iverside Ave to Placer County Freeway S ervice S R 49) and S R 65 (I-80 to T welve Bridges Dr). (E mission Benefits in PLA25543 PLA PCTPA P a trol kg/day: R OG 5.62; NOx 2.25; PM2.5 0.34) $2,703,927 2022 P rogrammed Planning, Programming, Monitoring PLA25413 PLA PCTPA 2011-2018 P C T P A plan, program, monitor (P P M) for R T P A related activities. $1,125,000 2023 P rogrammed Planning, Programming, Monitoring PLA25679 PLA PCTPA 2019-2023 P C T P A plan, program, monitor (P P M) for R T P A related activities. $840,000 2023 P rogrammed Lump-sum annual Operating & Maintenance costs for fiscal years 2019- PLA25631 PLA PCTPA Transit Operating & Maintenance 2036; does not account for expansion of service $224,910,000 Planned
Auburn Folsom R d over Miners R avine, 1.1 miles north of Douglas Auburn Folsom R d Over Miners Blvd. R ehabilitate 2 lane bridge, remove older portion of bridge and PLA25691 PLA Placer C ounty R avine - R ehabilitate Bridge widen to standard lanes and shoulders - no added lane capacity. $2,410,000 2023 P rogrammed T he project will replace the existing traffic signal and all-way stop c ontrol a t the B ell R oa d / Inters ta te 80 interc ha ng e with two roundabouts. P E Only. T otal P roject C ost is $7.5 million. (E mission Benefits in kg/day: R OG 0.25, NOx 0.19, PM2.5 0.01).. Toll C redits for PLA25671 PLA Placer C ounty Bell R oad at I-80 R oundabouts ENG $7,500,000 2026 P rogrammed
Bowman R d, over UP R ailroad, BNS F R ailyards & AMT R AK , 0.1 miles north of 19C -61: R ehabilitate the existing bridge without adding PLA25448 PLA Placer C ounty Bowman R d Bridge additional lanes. (T oll credits for C ON). T oll C redits for C ON $3,637,018 2020 P rogrammed Bowman R d, over UP R ailroad, BNS F R R and AMTR AK , 0.1 miles south of 19C -62: R ehabilitate the existing bridge without adding PLA25447 PLA Placer C ounty Bowman R d Bridge additional lanes. (T oll credits for C ON). T oll C redits for C ON $3,248,002 2019 P rogrammed
Brewer Rd., over Pleasant Grove Creek, 4.2 miles north of Baseline R d.: R eplace 2-lane bridge with a new 2-lane bridge. (Toll C redits for PLA25518 PLA Placer C ounty Brewer Rd. Bridge Replacement P E , R OW, & C ON.). Toll C redits for E NG, R OW, C ON $5,672,000 2020 P rogrammed
In various location ins Placer C ounty, perform preventive maintenance PLA25458 PLA Placer C ounty Bridge Preventive Maintenance on bridges. S ee C altrans Local Assistance HBP website for locations. $1,356,000 2020 P rogrammed
C ascade R d over McK inney C reek, 0.2 miles northwest of McK inney Cascade Rd Over McKinney Creek - R ubicon S P. R eplace an existing 2 lane timber bridge with a new 2 lane PLA25695 PLA Placer C ounty Bridge Replacement bridge - no added lane capacity.. Toll C redits for E NG, R OW, C ON $3,317,500 2023 P rogrammed R eplace one C NG bus with one new cleaner C NG Bus for Placer PLA25583 PLA Placer C ounty C NG Bus C ounty Transit. (E missions Benefits in kg/day: NOx 0.75.) $530,000 2019 P rogrammed Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 17 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year P edestrian P athway along C ook R iolo R d from existing sidewalk at C reekview R anch Middle S chool North (E mission Benefits in kg/day: R OG 0.02, NOx 0.01) [T oll C redits for R OW, C ON]. T oll C redits for PLA25565 PLA Placer C ounty C ook R iolo R oad Pathway ROW, CON $2,943,451 2018 P rogrammed C rosby Harold R d. Over Doty C reek, 0.9 mi N of Wise R d.: R eplace an existing 1 lane bridge with a new 2 lane bridge. (T oll C redits for P E , PLA25536 PLA Placer C ounty C rosby Harold R d. Bridge R OW, C ON). Toll C redits for E NG, R OW, C ON $5,000,000 2020 P rogrammed
At various locations in Placer C ounty: Install crosswalk enhancements PLA25663 PLA Placer C ounty C rosswalk S afety E nhancements to existing unprotected crosswalks. (H8-03-010). T oll C redits for C ON $249,700 2019 P rogrammed Dalby R d over Y ankee S lough, just west of Dowd R d. R eplace an Dalby R d Over Y ankee S lough - existing 2 lane bridge with a new 2 lane bridge - no added lane PLA25697 PLA Placer C ounty Bridge Replacement capacity.. T oll C redits for E NG , R OW, C ON $2,245,000 2023 P rogrammed Dowd R d over C oon C reek, 0.4 miles north of Wise R d.: R eplace Dowd R d Bridge R eplacement at existing 2 lane bridge with a new 2 lane bridge. (T oll C redits PLA25449 PLA Placer C ounty C oon C reek programmed for R O W & C O N). T oll C redits for R O W, C O N $8,452,000 2020 P rogrammed Dowd R d, over Markham R avine, 0.5 miles south Nicolaus R d: R eplace Dowd R d Bridge R eplacement at existing 2 lane structurally deficient bridge with a new 2 lane bridge. PLA25474 PLA Placer C ounty Markham Ravine (T oll credits for C ON.). T oll C redits for C ON $6,050,000 2019 P rogrammed Dry Creek Rd over Rock Creek, 0.35 miles west of Placer Hills Rd. Dry Creek Rd Over Rock Creek - R ehabilitation of existing 2 lane bridge, widen for standard lanes and PLA25699 PLA Placer C ounty R ehabilitate Bridge shoulders (no added capacity). $1,849,001 2023 P rogrammed On Foresthill R oad (PM 3.65 to 4.15), approx. 1/2 mile to 1 mile northeast of Lake C lementine R oad, reconstruct the roadway to stabilize F oresthill R oad Hilfiker Wall settlement occurring behind a large mechanically stabilized earth PLA25700 PLA Placer C ounty S tabilization retaining wall.. T oll C redits for E NG , R OW, C ON $500,000 2019 P rogrammed Gladding R d over C oon C reek, south of R iosa R d. R ehab existing 1 Gladding R d Over C oon C reek - lane bridge with a new 2 lane bridge, no added lane capacity.. Toll PLA25696 PLA Placer C ounty R ehabilitate Bridge C redits for E NG , R O W, C O N $4,109,500 2023 P rogrammed Gladding R d over Doty C reek, 0.9 miles north of Wise R d. R ehab Gladding R d Over Doty C reek - existing 2 lane bridge with a new 2 lane bridge - no added lane PLA25698 PLA Placer C ounty R ehabilitate Bridge capacity.. T oll C redits for E NG , R OW, C ON $4,918,000 2023 P rogrammed Gold Hill R d. over Auburn R avine, 0.65 mi north of S R 193: R eplace existing 2 lane bridge with a new 2 lane bridge. (T oll credits for P E , PLA25541 PLA Placer C ounty G old Hill R d. Bridge R eplacement R OW, C ON). Toll C redits for E NG, R OW, C ON $6,672,600 2020 P rogrammed Haines R d, over Wise C anal, 0.45 miles North of Bell R d: R eplace existing 2 lane bridge with a new 2 lane bridge. (T oll C redits for P E , PLA25475 PLA Placer C ounty Haines R d Bridge R eplacement R OW, & C ON). Toll C redits for E NG, R OW, C ON $5,900,000 2020 P rogrammed Haines R d., over S outh Fork of Dry C reek, south of Dry C reek R d.: R eplace existing 2-lane bridge with a new 2-lane bridge. (T oll credits for PLA25661 PLA Placer C ounty Haines R d. Bridge R eplacement P E , R OW, C ON). Toll C redits for E NG, R OW, C ON $1,717,000 2022 P rogrammed
C omplete a 10' wide paved C lass I multipurpose trail connecting Northstar Village roundabout to the southerly border of Army C orps PLA25549 PLA Placer C ounty Martis Valley T rail property. (E mission Benefits in kg/day: R OG 0.01; NOx 0.01) $4,514,886 2020 P rogrammed McKinney Creek Rd over McKinney Creek, 0.1 miles northwest of McK inney R ubicon S P. R eplace the existing 2 lane bridge with a new 2 McK inney C reek R d Over McK inney lane bridge - no added lane capacity.. Toll C redits for E NG, R OW, PLA25694 PLA Placer C ounty Creek - Replace Bridge CON $3,317,500 2023 P rogrammed Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 18 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year Mt. Vernon R d over North R avine, 2 miles west of Auburn. R ehabilitate Mt. Vernon R d Over North R avine - existing 2 lane bridge with wider lanes and shoulders - no added lane PLA25693 PLA Placer C ounty R ehabilitate Bridge capacity. $2,393,500 2023 P rogrammed New Airport Rd over Wise C anal, northeast of Hwy 49. R ehabilitate New Airport R d O ver Wis e C anal - existing 2 lane bridge with wider lanes and shoulders - no added PLA25692 PLA Placer C ounty R ehabilitate Bridge capacity. $3,449,500 2023 P rogrammed At 19 intersections throughout southwest Placer C ounty: Installation of lighting, upgraded pavement markings, and flashing beacon improvements. HS IP 7-03-009 (T oll C redits for C ON). T oll C redits for PLA25650 PLA Placer C ounty S afety Improvements CON $777,400 2019 P rogrammed Various corridors throughout Placer C ounty: C onduct a R oadway S afety S igning Audit and upgrade signs. (HS IP6-03-011) (Toll C redits for PLA25568 PLA Placer C ounty S ignage Upgrades C ON). T oll C redits for C ON $2,228,914 2019 P rogrammed
PLA25630 PLA Placer C ounty S R 49 S ignalizations/ Improvements S ignalizations and Improvements along S R 49 in Auburn/North Auburn. $13,000,000 2022 Planned Wise Rd, over Doty Creek, 0.5 miles east of Garden Bar: Replace existing 1-lane functionally obsolete bridge with a new 2-lane bridge.. PLA25513 PLA Placer C ounty Wise Rd Bridge Replacement T oll C redits for C ON $4,876,390 2020 P rogrammed B ridge No. 19C 0002, Y ankee J im's R d over North F ork American R iver, 1.5MI W of S hirttail C yn R d, R eplace structurally deficient 1 lane bridge Y ankee J im's R d Bridge at North with a new 2 lane bridge. (Toll credits programmed for PE , R OW & PLA25505 PLA Placer C ounty F ork American R iver C ON.). Toll C redits for E NG, R OW, C ON $14,999,400 2020 P rogrammed Placer C ounty TAR T operations (lump sum) on S R 89 and S R 267 corridors within PC T10505 PLA T rans it TAR T Operations Placer C ounty/SAC OG region. $22,000,000 Planned Asphalt overlay and reconstruction repair of various streets in the Loomis Downtown C ore Area covered under the C apital Improvement PLA25579 PLA Town of Loomis 2017 C IP R oad Maintenance Project Program S chedule for 2017. $821,886 2019 P rogrammed Taylor R d. complete streets improvements from Horseshoe Bar R oad to PLA15940 PLA Town of Loomis Taylor Road Complete Streets K ing R oad. $425,000 2022 Planned
In Loomis: Taylor R oad from Horseshoe Bar R oad to King R oad: Town C enter Implementation Plan construct new bike lanes and sidewalks and streetscape improvements. PLA25644 PLA Town of Loomis Improvements Phase 4 (E mission Benefits in kg/day: 0.03 R OG, 0.02 NOx, 0.01 PM2.5, 0.01) $1,079,124 2020 P rogrammed Western Placer C onsolidated C apital costs for C T S A Article 4.5 & complementary ADA dial-a-ride Transportation services for designated C TS A operating in Placer C ounty, including PLA25594 PLA S ervice Agency Placer C ounty - C TS A C apital vehicles, miscellaneous capital items & facilities expansion. $55,490,317 Planned Western Placer Annual operation & maintenance (O&M) costs for Article 4.5 C ommunity C onsolidated T ransit S ervices & complimentary T ransit S ervices & complimentary Transportation ADA dial-a-ride services for designated C TS A of Placer C ounty PLA25593 PLA S ervice Agency Placer C ounty - C TS A O&M servicing P lacer C ounty & C ities $28,233,907 Planned C altrans District 3 T raffic Upgrade C altrans District 3 TMC to manage US 50, I-80 and other ITS C AL20625 SAC Caltrans D3 Management Center (TMC) Deployments $1,500,000 2022 Planned
Near the City of S acramento, at the Elkhorn S afety Roadside Rest Area E lkhorn S R R A Water and Waste (S R R A) (PM 33.7) - Upgrade potable water and wastewater systems C AL20697 SAC Caltrans D3 Water Rehab [C TIPS ID 107-0000-1039]. Toll C redits for ENG $4,614,000 2020 P rogrammed Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 19 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year In the C ity of S acramento, at Hornet Drive eastbound off-ramp (PM Hornet D rive O ff-R amp R 3.5) - Widen ramp, add signal and right-turn lane [C TIPS ID 107-0000- C AL20706 SAC Caltrans D3 Improvements 1042]. Toll C redits for ENG $2,720,000 2020 P rogrammed In the city of S acramento, at West End Viaduct #24-0069R /L (PM I-5 at West End Viaduct (S HOPP 23.6/24.3) - Improve to standard truck capacity (S HOPP Long Lead) C AL20771 SAC Caltrans D3 Long Lead) [C TIPS ID 107-0000-1116]. Toll C redits for ENG $156,800,000 2025 P rogrammed Near E lk G rove, from E lk G rove B oulevard O vercros s ing to 0.4 mile south of Laguna Boulevard Overcrossing (PM 10.8/11.6) - E xtend E lk Grove Boulevard onramp merge lane in the northbound direction [C TIPS ID 107-0000-1150] (Toll C redits). Toll C redits for ENG, R OW, C AL20777 SAC Caltrans D3 I-5 E lk Grove Aux Lane CON $1,240,000 2023 P rogrammed In S acramento, on I-5, from 1.1 miles south of E lk Grove Boulevard to R oute 50 - Install fiber optic cable (PM 9.7/22.7) [C TIPS ID 107-0000- C AL20693 SAC Caltrans D3 I-5 F iber Optics 1004]. Toll C redits for ENG, R OW $10,580,000 2023 P rogrammed In the C ity of S acramento, on I-5, from south of Broadway to 0.12 mile south of R S treet (PM 22.0/22.9) - Highway planting rehabilitation C AL20792 SAC Caltrans D3 I-5 Highway Planting R ehab [C TIPS ID 107-0000-1125] $3,770,000 2023 P rogrammed C AL20645 SAC Caltrans D3 I-5 ITS - Fiber Optic - 5 In S acramento County on I-5 from Pocket R oad to J ct I-80 $2,800,000 2036 Planned In the city of S acramento (S ac-5-22.1/26.7), from 0.5 mile south of S R 50 to I-80 at S outh C onnector Undercrossing #24-0267 (PM 22.42) and at American R iver Viaduct #24-0068R /L (PM 24.82) - Improve to I-5 P ermit Load Mobility standard truck capacity [C TIPS ID 107-0000-1115]. Toll C redits for C AL20774 SAC Caltrans D3 Improvement ENG $247,230,000 2026 P rogrammed C AL20658 SAC Caltrans D3 I-5 Rehabilitate Pavement In S acramento, from I-5 to Watt Avenue OC (Br #24-34) $156,678,000 2036 Planned
In C itrus Heights, I-80, from east of E lkhorn Blvd. / Greenback Lane to west of R iverside Ave. (PM 15.2/17.0) - Upgrade weigh-in-motion (WIM) station and widen the westbound auxiliary lane to the Antelope Truck C AL20707 SAC Caltrans D3 I-80 Antelope Truck S cales S cales [C TIPS ID 107-0000-1046]. Toll C redits for ENG $5,540,000 2020 P rogrammed Near the C ity of S acramento, on I-80, from 0.2 mile east of Longview Drive to 0.4 mile east of Madison Avenue (PM M9.6/12.9) - Pavement C AL20764 SAC Caltrans D3 I-80 Pavement Rehab rehabilitation [C TIPS ID 107-0000-1104] $18,230,000 2023 P rogrammed
In and near the C ity of S acramento, I-80, from west of West El C amino I-80 R ehab C onnection R amp Avenue to east of R oute 244 (PM M1.2/R11.3) - Pavement rehabilitation C AL20702 SAC Caltrans D3 Pavement at Various Locations [C TIPS ID 107-0000-1045]. Toll C redits for ENG $14,305,000 2020 P rogrammed In and near C itrus Heights, from 0.4 mile north of the I-80/SR 244 S eparation to the Placer C ounty line (PM R 11.4/18.0) - Pave areas behind the gore and at narrow and miscellaneous locations, place vegetation control, and construct maintenance vehicle pullouts to reduce maintenance and improve highway worker safety [C TIPS ID 107- C AL20787 SAC Caltrans D3 I-80 R oadside S afety 0000-1130] $4,270,000 2023 P rogrammed Upgrade video wall at Regional Transportation Management Center C AL20646 SAC Caltrans D3 IT S - R T MC Video Wall Upgrade (R TMC ). $1,000,000 2022 Planned In and near R io Vista, at the S acramento R iver Bridge #23-0024 (PM 0.0/0.4); also in S olano C ounty, from PM 26.3 to 26.4 - R ehabilitate movable bridge electrical and mechanical systems and upgrade ADA C AL20788 SAC Caltrans D3 R io Vista Bridge Operation Overhaul facilities [C TIPS ID 107-0000-1135] $22,860,000 2023 P rogrammed Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 20 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year In and near the C ity of S acramento, from Del Paso Park S eparation to 0.4 mile north of I-80/SR 244 S eparation (PM M9.1/R11.4); also on S R 51 from PM 8.3 to 8.6, and on S R 244 from PM 0.0 to 0.9 - Pave areas behind the gore and at narrow and miscellaneous locations, place vegetation control, and construct maintenance vehicle pullouts to R oadside S afety on Various R outes reduce maintenance and improve highway worker safety [C TIPS ID 107- C AL20786 SAC Caltrans D3 Near Sacramento 0000-1131] $5,580,000 2022 P rogrammed I-5, Florin R oad OC (Br #24-0264) and on I-80 Del Paso OH Bridges R /L (Br #24-0193R /L) - Perform deck maintenance and rehab of three C AL20669 SAC Caltrans D3 S AC 05/80 Bridge Deck R ehab and Rbridges $10,230,000 2022 Planned In the C ity of S acramento, at various locations and routes at the I-5/SR 99 interchange connector ramps and the eastbound S R 51/SR 160 interchange connector ramp - Install connector ramp meters [C TIPS ID C AL20773 SAC Caltrans D3 S ac R amp Meters on Various R outes 107-0000-1120] $5,040,000 2022 P rogrammed In S acramento, from F lorin R oad O C (B r #24-264) to American R iver Bridge (#24-68) - Preserve and extend life of existing pavement and C AL20659 SAC Caltrans D3 S ac Roadway Rehabilitation improve ride quality $92,000,000 2024 Planned In S acramento C ounty on R outes 5, 80 and 99 at various locations (PM 0.1/34.6); also in Y olo C ounty on R oute 80 (PM 0.0/R11.7) - Upgrade guard rail to current standards [C TIPS ID 107-0000-1036]. Toll C redits C AL20696 SAC Caltrans D3 S ac/Yol Upgrade MBGR for E NG $3,605,000 2020 P rogrammed
In and near the C ity of S acramento, on I-80, from west of R io Linda Blvd. Undercrossing #24-0203 to east of Winters S t. Undercrossing #24- 0205 (PM M6.5/M8.8); also on S R 51 from south of S R 51/244/I-80 S eparation #24-0291L to north of S R 51/244/I-80 C onnector #24-0293R S acramento Bridge R ail Upgrade - (PM 8.2/8.6): Upgrade bridge rails at four (4) structures and widen for C AL20789 SAC Caltrans D3 Various Locations standard shoulders [C TIPS ID 107-0000-1127] $29,210,000 2024 P rogrammed In the C ity of S acramento, on S R 160, at S acramento R iver Bridge #24- 0053 and North S acramento Undercrossing #24-0111L; also in S an J oaquin C ounty, at Mokelumne R iver Bridge #29-0197R /L - S eismic S a c ra mento S eis mic R etrofit on retrofit (PM 20.9) [C TIPS ID 107-0000-0908] (Toll C redits). Toll C redits C AL20471 SAC Caltrans D3 V arious B ridges for E NG, R OW, C ON $38,681,000 2021 P rogrammed
In the C ity of S acramento, at S outhbound R oute 99/5 C onnector Overcrossing #24-0241F (PM R 32.1); also on R oute 80 at Longview S ac-Var S eismic R etrofit T wo R amp Overcrossing #24-0281K (PM M9.15) - S eismic retrofit two C AL20699 SAC Caltrans D3 S truc tures structures [C TIPS ID 107-0000-1043]. Toll C redits for ENG $3,689,000 2022 P rogrammed
In S acramento and S olano counties, near R io Vista, at S acramento R iver Bridge #23-0024 - C lean and repaint steel surfaces (PM 0.0/0.4) [EFIS ID 0313000139; C TIPS ID 107-0000-0961] [Total Project Cost C AL20507 SAC Caltrans D3 S R 12 Bridge R ehab Near R io Vista $22,705,000 in 16/17 FY ] (Toll C redits for PE ) $37,057,000 2020 P rogrammed
S R 12 R oadway Operational and S afety Improvements: R io Vista to S an J oaquin C ounty line. Improvements will be coordinated with S an C AL20427 SAC Caltrans D3 S R 12 Operational Improvements J oaquin and S olano counties and anticipated corridor improvements. $10,000,000 2022 Planned S R 12/160 Intersection Near R io Vista, at the S R 12/160 intersection (PM 0.4/1.0) - Intersection C AL20759 SAC Caltrans D3 Improvements improvements [C TIPS ID 107-0000-1097] $4,474,000 2021 P rogrammed Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 21 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year S R 160 from American R iver Bridge #24-01R /L to J unction S R 51 - Grind PC C pavement C AL20657 SAC Caltrans D3 S R 160 S lab replacement $11,500,000 2024 Planned In the C ity of S a c ra mento, on S R 50, from I-5 to W a tt A venue (P M S R 50 Pavement Rehab (G13 L0.6/R5.3) - R oadway rehabilitation (G13 C ontingency) [C TIPS ID 107- C AL20761 SAC Caltrans D3 C ontingency) 0000-1103] $278,300,000 2025 P rogrammed
In the C ity of S acramento at the American R iver Bridge #24-0003, from north of B S treet Underpass to north of E xposition Boulevard S R 51 Bridge Deck Replacement Overcrossing (PM 2.0/3.5) - Widen and replace bridge deck (G13 C AL20691 SAC Caltrans D3 (G13 C ontingency Project) C ontingency Project) [C TIPS ID 107-0000-1048]. Toll C redits for ENG $163,940,000 2024 P rogrammed
In the C ity of S acramento, S R 51 (C apital C ity Freeway, Business 80), from 0.1 mile south of B S t. Underpass to 0.4 mile north of Arden Way (PM 1.6/4.4) - Pave areas behind the gore and at narrow and miscellaneous locations, place vegetation control, and construct maintenance vehicle pullouts to reduce maintenance and improve C AL20785 SAC Caltrans D3 S R 51 R oadside S afety highway worker safety [C TIPS ID 107-0000-1129] $5,990,000 2023 P rogrammed
S R 99 Bridge R ehab at 21st Avenue In the C ity of S acramento, S R 99, at 21st Avenue Undercrossing #24- C AL20766 SAC Caltrans D3 UC 0154 (PM 21.9/23.6) - R eplace bridge deck [C TIPS ID 107-0000-1107] $5,843,000 2021 P rogrammed In and near the cities of E lk Grove and S acramento, on S R 99, from Grant Line R oad to S R 50 (PM 10.0/R24.3); also on S R 51 from US 50 to 0.1 mile s outh of the F ort S utter V ia duc t (P M 0.0/0.1) - Ins ta ll fiber C AL20762 SAC Caltrans D3 S R 99 F iber Optics optic cable [C TIPS ID 107-0000-1106] $12,150,000 2023 P rogrammed Interchange Improvements: Mack R oad, Florin R oad, 47th Ave., 12th C AL20602 SAC Caltrans D3 S R 99 Interchange Improvements Ave. $40,000,000 2027 Planned In Galt, from the S an J oaquin C ounty Line to S immerhorn R oad (PM 0.2/1.6); also in the cities of Elk Grove and S acramento, S R 99, from 0.7 mile south of E lk Grove Blvd to Martin Luther K ing J r Blvd (PM 11.9/21.5) - Pavement rehabilitation [C TIPS ID 107-0000-1047]. Toll C AL20703 SAC Caltrans D3 S R 99 R HMA Overlay C redits for E NG $45,012,000 2020 P rogrammed
In and near E lk Grove, from 0.3 mile south of Dillard R oad OC to south of Grant Line R oad [replace C osumnes R iver Bridge #24-0020R /L and C osumnes R iver Overflow Bridge #24-0021R /L; upgrade bridge rails at Dillard R oad OC #24-0163; construct new McC onnell OH #24-0048L) - B ridge s eis mic retrofit, bridge s cour retrofit, bridge rail replacement and S R 99 S eismic R etrofit and Bridge bridge replacement (PM 7.1/9.4) [C TIPS ID 107-0000-0904]. Toll C AL20470 SAC Caltrans D3 R ail Upgrade (G13 C ontingency) C redits for E NG $139,000,000 2024 P rogrammed In S acramento C ounty, on S R 99, at S outh Lagoon C reek Bridge #24- 0028L (PM 4.9), Lagoon C reek Bridge #24-0045L (PM 5.0) and North Lagoon C reek Bridge #24-0027L (PM 5.1); also on S R 160 (PM 44.5) at American R iver Bridge #24-0001L - S cour mitigation and bridge S R 99/160 S cour Mitigation for Four replacement [EFIS ID 0313000136; C TIPS ID 107-0000-0963]. Toll C AL20508 SAC Caltrans D3 (4) Bridges C redits for E NG $26,792,000 2021 P rogrammed Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 22 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year
S R 51, from J S treet to Arden Way: E xtend bus/carpool lanes, widen the American R iver Bridge to 10 lanes (4 lanes NB and S B plus bus/carpool lane in both directions) and add new C lass IV bike path adjacent to NB lanes, new S B auxiliary lane from E xposition Blvd to E S ta te R oute 51 (C a pita l C ity) S t, NB transition lane from E lvas UP to E xposition Blvd, S B transition C orridor Improvements : J S t to lane from E xposition Blvd slip off-ramp to loop on-ramp, replace B S t C AL20689 SAC Caltrans D3 Arden UP, A S t OC , and E lvas UP, and widen Tribute R d UC . $436,900,000 2026 P rogrammed S ystem Management/Traffic Operational Improvements: traffic monitoring stations, closed circuit Operations S ystem on S R 51 television, highway advisory radio, changeable message signs, and C AL20598 SAC Caltrans D3 between U.S . 50 and I-80 other system management infrastructure. $3,000,000 2018 Planned 110 locations throughout S acramento C ounty. Travel time detection and C AL20574 SAC Caltrans D3 T raveler Information S ys tem notific a tion s ys tems . $1,939,200 2022 Planned In the C ity of S acramento, from R oute 5 to R oute 51 (PM L0.3/L2.4); also on R oute 51 from R oute 50 to east of Arden Way (PM 0.0/4.2) - Upgrade MBGR in S acramento Upgrade guard rail to current standards.. Toll C redits for E NG, R OW, C AL20698 SAC Caltrans D3 C ounty CON $4,370,000 2019 P rogrammed In the C ity of S a c ra mento, U S 50 (S R 50), from the S a c ra mento R iver Viaduct (Pioneer Bridge) to 4th S treet (PM L0.0/L0.5); also on I-5, from 0.2 mile south of Broadway to S S treet (PM 22.15/22.91) - C lean and paint steel bridge girders within I-5/US 50 interchange [C TIPS ID 107- C AL20790 SAC Caltrans D3 US 50 / I-5 P aint B ridge G irders 0000-1134] $21,030,000 2023 P rogrammed In and near R ancho C ordova, on US 50, from Bradshaw R oad to Mather Field R oad (PM R 7.7/R9.5) - Operational improvements that US 50 Auxiliary Lanes, Bradshaw to construct auxiliary lanes in both westbound and eastbound directions C AL20379 SAC Caltrans D3 Ma ther [C TIPS ID 107-00001132] $9,498,000 2022 P rogrammed
In S acramento, on S R 50, from Y olo C ounty line to 0.2 mile west of Watt Avenue Overcrossing [PM L0.0/R5.1] - Install fiber optic cable C AL20551 SAC Caltrans D3 US 50 F iber Optics [C TIPS ID 107-0000-1005]. Toll C redits for ENG, R OW, C ON $9,500,000 2019 P rogrammed In S acramento, US 50, from S tockton Blvd. to Folsom Blvd. (PM R 0.5/R3.2) - C onstruct textured pavement in narrow areas, pave partial slopes, relocate and reconstruct irrigation system, and install plantings and mulch to reduce maintenance and improve highway worker safety C AL20784 SAC Caltrans D3 US 50 R oadside S afety [C TIPS ID 107-0000-1133] $5,220,000 2022 P rogrammed
Near the C ity of S acramento, I-5, at 0.3 mile north of Airport Boulevard Weigh-in-Motion (WIM) S tation on I- (P M 33.1) - R ehabilitate weigh-in-motion (WIM) station (C T IP S ID 107- C AL20704 SAC Caltrans D3 5 0000-1038). Toll C redits for ENG, R OW, C ON $2,941,000 2019 P rogrammed
Building C onstruction: new layover and servicing facility in S acramento C altrans Division of S acramento Layover and area for S an J oaquin & C apitol C orridor trains ets . P roject will be C AL20435 SAC R ail Maintenance F acility coordinated with S acramento S tation R ail R ealignment. $110,000,000 2017 Planned construction; ADA, Pedestrian, Bicycle and Transit Improvements, C ity of C itrus Antelope Road Complete Streets - traffic signal upgrades, LE D street light conversion, full road S AC 24920 SAC H eig hts Phase 2 reconstruction, hardscape and landscape. $8,448,000 2027 Planned construction; ADA, Pedestrian, Bicycle and Transit Improvements, C ity of C itrus Antelope Road Complete Streets - traffic signal upgrades, LE D street light conversion, full road S AC 24921 SAC H eig hts Phase 3 reconstruction, hardscape and landscape. $10,500,000 2027 Planned Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 23 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year
C ity of C itrus Auburn Blvd C omplete S treets - construction; ADA, Ped, Bicycle, and Transit Improvements, new street S AC 24922 SAC H eig hts Phase 2 light installations, hardscape, landscape, full road reconstruction. $9,800,000 2022 Planned Design, R OW acquisition and construction; utility undergrounding, ADA, Pedestrian, Bicycle and Transit Improvements, traffic signal upgrades, C ity of C itrus Auburn Blvd C omplete S treets - LE D street light conversion, full road reconstruction, hardscape and S AC 24923 SAC H eig hts Phase 3 landscape. $32,000,000 2027 Planned Design and construction; ADA, Pedestrian, Bicycle and Transit C ity of C itrus Auburn Blvd C omplete S treets - Improvements, traffic signal upgrades, LE D street light conversion, full S AC 24924 SAC H eig hts Phase 4 road reconstruction, hardscape and landscape. $20,000,000 2036 Planned Design, R OW, and construction; utility undergrounding, ADA, Pedestrian, Bicycle and Transit Improvements, traffic signal upgrades, C ity of C itrus Auburn Blvd C omplete S treets - LE D street light conversion, full road reconstruction, hardscape and S AC 24925 SAC H eig hts Phase 5 landscape. $28,000,000 2036 Planned R ebuild and revitalize Auburn Blvd. from the northern city limits, including Whyte Ave intersection in C ity of R oseville, to as far south as Auburn Blvd. C omplete S treets - R usch Park by upgrading infrastructure to support mixed land uses and C ity of C itrus Phase 2 (R usch Park to Whyte improving bicycle and pedestrian safety. (E mission Benefits in kg/day: S AC 24732 SAC H eig hts Avenue intersection) 0.03 R OG, 0.02 NOx, 0.01 PM10) $25,018,242 2025 P rogrammed C ity of C itrus E lectric G reenway (C lass I Multi-Use In Citrus Heights: Between Arcade Creek Park Preserve and Wachtel S AC 25064 SAC H eig hts T rail) Way; C onstruct a 2.9 mile long C lass I Multi-Use T rail. $7,015,000 2022 P rogrammed C ity of C itrus Fair Oaks Blvd Complete Streets Design and construction; ADA, Pedestrian and Bicycle improvements, S AC 24929 SAC H eig hts Phase 1 LE D street light conversion, road resurfacing. $2,700,000 2022 Planned Design and construction; ADA and Pedestrian improvements including C ity of C itrus Fair Oaks Blvd Complete Streets sidewalk infill, Bicycle improvements, LE D street light conversion, road S AC 24930 SAC H eig hts Phase 2 res urfacing. $3,200,000 2027 Planned Design and construction; ADA and Pedestrian improvements including C ity of C itrus Fair Oaks Blvd Complete Streets sidewalk infill, Bicycle improvements, LE D street light conversion, road S AC 24931 SAC H eig hts Phase 3 res urfacing. $8,500,000 2036 Planned construction; ADA, Pedestrian, Bicycle and Transit Improvements, C ity of C itrus traffic signal modifications, full road reconstruction, LE D street light S AC 24919 SAC H eig hts Greenback Lane Complete Streets conversion. $4,200,000 2022 Planned
At various signalized intersections in the C ity of C itrus Heights: Upgrade all existing 8" and combination vehicle signal indications to 12" indications. R etrofit all pedestrian signal heads to "count-down". Install C ity of C itrus a pedestrian median fence on three legs of the intersection of S AC 25053 SAC H eig hts Inters ec tion S a fety Greenback Ln/Auburn Blvd. (H8-03-004) $540,000 2019 P rogrammed
In C itrus Heights: Mariposa Ave. between Northeast Circle and Madison C ity of C itrus Mariposa S afe R outes to S chool Ave: C onstruct C lass II bike lanes, infill sidewalk, street lights, S AC 25065 SAC H eig hts (P hase IV) pedestrian safety improvements, and signal improvements. $2,603,000 2022 P rogrammed Design and construction; ADA and Pedestrian improvements including C ity of C itrus Oak Avenue Complete Streets sidewalk infill, Bicycle improvements, installation of new LE D street S AC 24932 SAC H eig hts Phase 1 lights, road resurfacing. $3,800,000 2022 Planned Design and construction; ADA and Pedestrian improvements including C ity of C itrus Oak Avenue Complete Streets sidewalk infill, Bicycle improvements, installation of new LE D street S AC 24933 SAC H eig hts Phase 2 lights, road resurfacing. $3,500,000 2022 Planned Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 24 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year
Design, R OW and construction; ADA, Pedestrian and Bicycle C ity of C itrus Old Auburn R oad C omplete S treets improvements (major sw infill for accessibility), traffic signal upgrades, S AC 24927 SAC H eig hts Phase 1 installation of new LE D street lights, full road reconstruction. $15,000,000 2027 Planned
Design and construction ; ADA, Pedestrian and Bicycle improvements C ity of C itrus Old Auburn R oad C omplete S treets (major sw infill for accessibility), traffic signal upgrades, installation of S AC 24928 SAC H eig hts Phase 2 new LE D street lights, full road reconstruction. $12,000,000 2022 Planned Design, R OW and construction; utility undergrounding, ADA, Pedestrian, Bicycle and Transit Improvements, traffic signal upgrades, C ity of C itrus LE D street light conversion, full road reconstruction, hardscape and S AC 24926 SAC H eig hts S an J uan Ave Complete Streets landscape. $22,000,000 2027 Planned Design and construction; ADA compliant Pedestrian and Bicycle C ity of C itrus S aybrook/Mis ty C reek I-80 bridge/overpass connecting west side at S aybrook with east side at S AC 24934 SAC H eig hts Pedestrian/bicycle overpass Misty Creek. $15,000,000 2036 Planned construction; ADA, Pedestrian, Bicycle and Transit Improvements, C ity of C itrus S unrise Blvd Complete Streets - traffic signal upgrades, LE D street light conversion, full road S AC 24917 SAC H eig hts Phase 2 reconstruction, hardscape and landscape. $7,500,000 2022 Planned
construction; ADA, Pedestrian, Bicycle and Transit Improvements on C ity of C itrus S unrise Blvd Complete Streets - east side of road including installation of new sw/c&g, LE D street light S AC 24918 SAC H eig hts Phase 3 conversion, full road reconstruction, hardscape and landscape. $5,002,000 2036 Planned In E lk Grove, on segments of Waterman R d from Bond to Elk Grove Blvd, on Waterman R oad from K ent S treet to Grant Line R oad, and on E lk G rove F lorin R oad from E lk G rove Blvd to Valley Oak, minor S AC 25011 SAC C ity of E lk G rove Arterial R oads R ehabilitation P roject shoulder improvements and C lass II bike lanes. $3,443,000 2019 P rogrammed S AC 24791 SAC C ity of E lk G rove Bond R d./Bader R d. Intersection Install a traffic signal at the Bond R d./Bader R d. intersection $295,000 2017 Planned Bruceville R d. and Poppy Install a traffic signal at the Bruceville R d. and Poppy R idge/Quail R un S AC 24792 SAC C ity of E lk G rove R idge/Quail R un Intersection inters ec tion. $338,100 2017 Planned Various bridges in the C ity of E lk Grove: perform preventive maintenance. S ee C altrans Local Assistance HBP website for backup lis t of projec ts : Elk Grove Bridge Preventive http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/hbrr99/HBP_MPO.html#S AC O S AC 24685 SAC C ity of E lk G rove Maintenance Program G $548,233 2017 P rogrammed
In E lk Grove: On E lk Grove Florin R oad, between Valley Oak Lane and E ast S tockton Blvd, eliminate sidewalk gaps and improve ADA access, bus stop access, bicycle and pedestrian crossings, and overall safety in the corridor. Provide walking and biking education for three school E lk G rove F lorin R oad S idewalk Infill communities: Florence Markofer Elementary, J oseph Kerr Middle S AC 25074 SAC C ity of E lk G rove SRTS S chool, and E lk Grove High S chool. $1,101,000 2022 P rogrammed Widen Grant Line R oad, between Bond R oad and C alvine R oad, to S AC 24795 SAC C ity of E lk G rove Grant Line Two-Way-Left -Turn-Lane provide a two-way left turn lane. $12,200,000 2022 Planned Transit Capital/Operations: Purchase fareboxes that integrate with other transit operators. Purchase software and hardware for an automated dispatch, vehicle locator system and other intelligent transportation S AC 24312 SAC C ity of E lk G rove Intellig ent T ra ns porta tion S ys tems systems. $2,400,000 2027 Planned Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 25 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year
In E lk G rove, at intersections along E lk G rove-F lorin R oad, Big Horn Blvd., F ranklin Blvd, Bruceville R d., West S tockton Blvd, E lk G rove Blvd., and Grant Line R d.: Install new traffic signal controllers and interconnect cable. Provide integration of the new signal controllers into the C ity's exis ting T ra ns porta tion Ma na g ement C enter (T MC ). R eloc a te T MC to C ity H a ll from its c urrent loc a tion a t the C orpora tion Y a rd. C losed circuit television cameras will be installed at key intersections to ITS Master Plan - Phase 4 help monitor, coordinate, and maintain traffic flow. (E mission Benefits in S AC 24706 SAC C ity of E lk G rove Implementa tion kg/day: 0.36 R OG, 0.24 NOx, 0.01 PM 2.5.) $2,873,519 2018 P rogrammed In E lk G rove, Laguna C reek T rail, from Lewis S tein R d. to Bruceville R d undercrossing. Laguna C reek Trail, from south of C enter Pkwy to Big Horn Blvd.; Laguna C reek Trail at Center Parkway; S idewalk on west side of Bruceville, from Big Horn Boulevard to south of C enter Parkway Laguna C reek T rail and Bruceville and on a section north of Laguna Blvd. (E mission Benefits in kg/day: S AC 25019 SAC C ity of E lk G rove R d S idewalks R OG 0.08, NOx $2,309,000 2020 P rogrammed
In Elk Grove: across the Lower Laguna Creek Open S pace Preserve from E lk S pring Way to Laguna C reek near Fieldale Dr.; C onstruct Lower Laguna C reek Open S pace C lass I Bikeway/multi-use trail and 60,000 square foot educational area S AC 24759 SAC C ity of E lk G rove P res erve T rail with 8’ wide decomposed granite paths and interpretive sign stations. $2,370,252 2019 P rogrammed
In E lk Grove, E lk Grove Boulevard, from S chool S t. to Waterman R d.: S treet frontage improvements, including: expanded decorative sidewalks & landscape strips, corner bulb-outs, landscaped median islands at intersections/pedestrian crossings, crosswalks, bike lanes/routes, signs and striping, bus shelters, related frontage improvement features and potential utility undergrounding. Project may include bike and bus improvements at the C ity proposed R ailroad Avenue Plaza. The Plaza improvements would be along E lk Grove Boulevard near R ailroad Avenue, just east of the UPR R R ailroad Tracks Old Town Elk Grove S treetscape in Old T own E lk G rove. (E mission Benefits in kg/day: .0.04 R OG , 0.03 S AC 24169 SAC C ity of E lk G rove Phase 2 NOx, 0.01 PM10, 0.01 PM2.5). $5,957,000 2024 P rogrammed S heldon/Waterman R d. Intersection In E lk Grove; C onstruct a roundabout intersection at S heldon R d. and S AC 24798 SAC C ity of E lk G rove Improvements Waterman R d. $2,800,000 2017 Planned Waterman Road Complete Streets In E lk Grove, Waterman R d., from Bond R d. to S heldon R d.: pavement S AC 24720 SAC C ity of E lk G rove R ec ons truc tion reconstruction with new class II bike lanes. $3,275,726 2018 P rogrammed In E lk Grove, Whitelock Parkway and S R 99, C onstruct new Whitelock P arkway/S R 99 Interchange with new pedestrian bridge over S R 99 to E lk Grove S AC 24098 SAC C ity of E lk G rove Interchange P roject R egional Park and High S chool. $72,200,000 2037 P rogrammed
In Folsom, at Folsom Blvd. and Humbug-Willow C reek Parkway, construct a bicycle and pedestrian overcrossing of Folsom Blvd. S AC 24400 SAC C ity of Folsom F olsom Blvd. Bike/Ped Overcrossing Includes connections to existing trails on both sides of Folsom Blvd. $2,500,000 Planned In Folsom, along the Folsom Lake Trail corridor from the Folsom Lake C rossing Bike/Pedestrian overcrossing to Green Valley R oad, construct S AC 24324 SAC C ity of Folsom F olsom Lake T rail approx 2-miles of class 1 bike trail. $2,500,000 2017 Planned Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 26 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year On F olsom/Placerville R ail T rail parallel to Bidwell S t. between the existing Humbug-Willow C reek Trail and S cholar Way, and from Broadstone Pkwy. to Iron Point Rd.: C onstruct approximately 1.3 miles of C lass I multi-use trail. (E missions Benefits in kg/day: 0.04 R OG , 0.03 S AC 25020 SAC C ity of Folsom F olsom/Placerville R ail T rail NOx, 0.01 PM10, 0.01 PM2.5) $1,184,036 2020 P rogrammed Greenback Lane Bridge Greenback Lane, over the American River, 0.2 miles east of Folsom- S AC 24506 SAC C ity of Folsom R ehabilitation Auburn R d.: S tructural rehabilitation of the 2 lane bridge. $8,644,000 Planned C ity of Folsom, From the terminus of the class I trail from behind the L a ke N a toma Inn to the S c ott S treet/R iley S treet Inters ec tion: C ons truc t upg ra des to the exis ting S c ott S t./R iley S t. a t-g ra de s ig na liz ed intersection. E xtend a class I trail (cycle-track) along a portion of Leidesdorf S t. from Gold Lakes Dr. to just past the driveway entrance to the Lake Natoma Inn. Also make minor pavement striping improvements along Gold Lakes Dr. to connect the class I trail from the Lake Natoma C rossing Bridge to Leidesdorf S t. (E mission Benefits in S AC 24641 SAC C ity of Folsom Lake Natoma Trail – Gap Closure kg/day: 0.01 R OG, 0.01 NOx) $1,590,625 2019 P rogrammed In Isleton: General Plan update to bring together strategic plan, housing S AC 25068 SAC C ity of Is leton G eneral P lan R evisions element, and previous general plan. $110,000 2019 P rogrammed Historic District P arking lot paving Pave existing parking lot, add shade trees, landscaping and parking lot S AC 24946 SAC C ity of Is leton and landscaping lighting $125,000 2022 Planned Main S treet Landscaping & S AC 24945 SAC C ity of Is leton Beautification S treet Trees, curb-gutter & sidewalk repairs $180,000 2022 Planned
S AC 24947 SAC C ity of Is leton Ma in S treet S ola r s treet lig hts Ins tall S olar P owered S treet L ights as part of C ity's G reen P rogram $150,000 2022 Planned Remove & replace existing street surface & subgrade due to S AC 24944 SAC C ity of Is leton S treet Repairs degradation $1,000,000 2022 Planned
In R ancho C ordova: C ontinue ADA Transition Plan project delivery including reconstructing curb ramps, repairing sidewalks, installing new C ity of R ancho curb ramps and new sidewalks, sidewalk bus pad modifications, S AC 24316 SAC C ordova ADA T ransition P lan removal of walkway barriers and traffic s ignal retrofits . $2,300,000 Planned Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program (BPMP) various bridges in the C ity of R ancho C ity of R ancho C ordova. S ee C altrans Local Assistance HBP website S AC 25083 SAC C ordova Bridge Preventive Maintenance for backup list of projects. $244,874 2023 P rogrammed C oloma R oad from Ananda Lane to Dolecetto Drive, and C hase Drive from Daniel Way to C oloma R oad: Install new sidewalks along C oloma R d. at the intersection of C hase Dr.; install new C hevron signage, C ity of R ancho pedestrian protection railing and improved lane delineation on C oloma S AC 25055 SAC C ordova Chase/Coloma S afety Improvements R d.(H8-03-011) $308,100 2019 P rogrammed
S AC 24996 SAC C ity of R ancho C ordoC lass I Bike T rails Add new C lass I bike trails consistent with the C ity Bike Master P lan $5,000,000 Planned C ity of R ancho C omplete S treets R eha bilita tion - R ehabilitate S unrise Blvd. from Folsom Blvd. to Douglas R d. And S AC 24824 SAC C ordova S unrise Blvd construct bicycle and pedestrian improvements. $5,495,000 2018 Planned Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 27 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year In R ancho C ordova: On C oloma R oad, Dolecetto Drive, E llenbrook Drive, and Malaga Way in the C ordova Park neighborhood, construct 7900 feet of curbs, gutters and sidewalks to close gaps in existing pedestrian network, and install curb ramps and crosswalks. A bulbout, R ectangular R apid Flashing Beacons (R R FB), crosswalks, signage, C ity of R ancho pedestrian lighting and shade trees will also be added along C oloma S AC 25075 SAC C ordova C ordova Park S afe R outes to S chool R oad. $2,346,000 2020 P rogrammed In R ancho C ordova, on Folsom Blvd., from Bradshaw R d. to Horn R d.: S treetscape improvements, including sidewalk gap closure, new C ity of R ancho Folsom Blvd Complete Streets bifurcated sidewalks (on south side of Folsom Blvd.), and landscaped S AC 25008 SAC C ordova Phase 5 (Bradshaw to Horn) medians. $4,100,000 2019 P rogrammed
Amenities including, but not limited to, way finding signs, bike repair S AC 24993 SAC C ity of R ancho C ordoF olsom S outh C anal Bike T rail Ameni stations, shade strictures, striping, and other amenities as appropriate $300,000 Planned C ity of R ancho Grade S eparate R T Gold Line At R ail C rossing Project: at Zinfandel Drive plan and C onstruct a R ail S AC 24247 SAC C ordova Z infandel Drive Grade S eparation for R T s Gold line. $25,000,000 Planned C ity of R ancho S AC 24201 SAC C ordova K ilgore R d. R oadway enhancements from International Dr. to White R ock R d. $693,000 2036 Planned Pedestrian Improvements: Throughout Rancho C ordova, construct new pedestrian facilities based on Pedestrian Master Plan. C ontinue C ity of R ancho P edestrian F acilities and S idewalk S idewalk Gap project delivery. Includes: grade separations at key S AC 24317 SAC C ordova G ap program locations. $12,200,000 Planned Bicycle and pedestrian overcrossing of Folsom Boulevard connecting the Mather F ield/Mills S AC R T Light R ail S tation to the Bicycle and pedestrian overcrossing of Folsom Boulevard connecting the new F olsom Lake C ollege campus to the Mather F ield/Mills S AC R T Light R a il S ta tion to the new S AC 24997 SAC C ity of R ancho C ordoPedestrian Overcrossing at Folsom La $4,000,000 Planned
Bicycle and pedestrian overcrossing of U.S . 50 connecting Olsen Drive C ity of R ancho to Prospect Park Drive as defined in The Promenade: C onnecting and S AC 24180 SAC C ordova Pedestrian Promenade R evitalizing R ancho C ordova Planning S tudy (reference S AC 24157). $8,500,000 2022 Planned C ity of R ancho Replace contracted shuttle fleet with city owned or leased fleet, S AC 24239 SAC C ordova Purchase or Lease 23 S huttles including three back-up vehicles (23 shuttles total) $5,750,000 2022 Planned
C ity of R ancho R ancho C ordova - S afe R outes to In R ancho C ordova: develop a safe and connected network that will S AC 25077 SAC C ordova S chool P lan promote walking and bicycling to school and enhance public health. $277,000 2019 P rogrammed P rojects includes a rais ed barrier to protect t cyclis ts from traffic, painted S AC 24995 SAC C ity of R ancho C ordoR od Beaudry C ycle Track Improveme bike lane or other identifier $250,000 Planned On R od Beaudry Dr. between Goethe Park R d. and Folsom Blvd.; Folsom Blvd. between R od Beaudry Dr. and R outier R d., and R outier C ity of R ancho R od Beaudry/Routier Bikeway R d. between Folsom Blvd. and Old Placerville R d.: C onstruct cycle S AC 25002 SAC C ordova P roject tracks and intersection improvements. $2,054,000 2019 P rogrammed P rojects includes a rais ed barrier to protect t cyclis ts from traffic, painted S AC 24994 SAC C ity of R ancho C ordoR outier R oad C ycle T rack Improveme bike lane or other identifier $500,000 Planned Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 28 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year
On Zinfandel Dr., from westbound US 50 off-ramp to White R ock R d. widen southbound travel lanes from 2 to 3 lanes. On the eastbound US 50 off-ramp at Zinfandel, from Zinfandel Dr. intersection to US 50, widen from 4 to 6 lanes. On westbound US 50 off-ramp at Zinfandel, from Zinfandel Dr. intersection to US 50, widen from 3 to 4 lanes. On Gold C enter Dr. at Zinfandel Dr intersection, widen by 6 feet for 300 feet. On Zinfandel Dr., from White R ock Dr to the WB US 50 off-ramp, add bicycle lanes. at the WB US 50 off ramp, E B 50 on ramp/on ramp and Gold C enter Dr at the Zinfandel Dr intersections: build pedestrian refuge islands. On the NB to WB US 50 on-ramp, reduce from 2 lanes to 1 C ity of R ancho lane to accommodate pedestrian refuge island and reduce crossing S AC 24703 SAC C ordova Zinfandel C omplex Improvements width. Adding overhead signage. $9,177,017 2020 P rogrammed
C onstruct intersection and pedestrian improvements on Zinfandel Drive between White R ock R oad and Folsom Blvd, including modifications at US 50/Zinfandel to improve safety and ease congestion along the C ity of R ancho Zinfandel C omplex Improvements - corridor, including bridge widenings, ramp and intersection S AC 24828 SAC C ordova Phase2 reconstruction and reconstruction of intersections. $45,968,000 2036 Planned
O n 16th S treet from S S treet to N S treet, pedes tria n improvements including bulb-outs, landscaping and trees, banners, pavement S AC 24623 SAC C ity of S a c ra mento 16th S treet S treets c a pe treatments, bike racks, and street furniture, and street lights. $2,680,000 2024 P rogrammed North 16th S t./Lincoln Highway, from H S t. to R ichards Blvd.: S treetscape improvements, including restriping travel lanes to 11 feet, 16th S treet S treets c a pe - H s t. to on street parking on both sides, curbs, six foot separated sidewalk, and S AC 25017 SAC C ity of S a c ra mento R ichards Blvd. pedestrian lighting. $4,001,000 2022 P rogrammed Auburn Blvd. over Arcade C reek, at Winding Way: R eplace existing five S AC 24693 SAC C ity of S a c ra mento Auburn Blvd. Bridge R eplacement lane bridge with a new five lane bridge $8,174,952 2022 P rogrammed
Bridge Preventive Maintenance Various Locations in the C ity of S acramento: rehabilitate bridges. For S AC 24633 SAC C ity of S a c ra mento P rogram locations and detail, see C altrans Local Assistance HBP website. $1,566,198 2020 P rogrammed
E nvironmental clearance/PE for R iverfront Reconnection. C onstruct Bridging I-5/Riverfront Reconnection connection over I-5 between approximately C apitol Ave. to "O" S t. S AC 22530 SAC C ity of S a c ra mento Phase 3 (T15998100) Phase 1 constructed under S AC 24705 $9,432,709 2024 P rogrammed Bell Ave. from Bollenbacher Ave. to Astoria S t.,: rehabilitate pavement, fill in sidewalk gaps, add new bicycle lanes, add two-way left turn lanes, C omplete S treets R eha bilita tion - and add bus pullouts. (Toll C redits for PE and C ON). Toll C redits for S AC 24719 SAC C ity of S a c ra mento Bell Ave. E NG, C ON $5,759,968 2021 P rogrammed Fruitridge R d., from 65th S t. to Power Inn R d.,: rehabilitate sidewalks up to standard, and add bicycle lanes, actuated crosswalks, and new C omplete S treets R eha bilita tion - crosswalks. (Toll C redits for PE and C ON). T15036300. Toll C redits for S AC 24722 SAC C ity of S a c ra mento Fruitridge R d. E NG, C ON $3,100,000 2020 P rogrammed Three corridors: On Freeport Bl from Meadowview R d to Florin R d, on R io Linda Bl from North Ave to Claire Ave, and on Meadowview from A mhers t to 24th S t.: Ins ta ll s treet lig hting . (T oll C redits ) H S IP 7-03-014. S AC 25026 SAC C ity of S a c ra mento C orridor S treet L ighting T oll C redits for C ON $1,568,500 2019 P rogrammed Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 29 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year
C ity of S acramento: Woolley Way from Albatross to DW Babcock S chool; C ormorant Way from DW Babcock S chool to Babcock Park: C onstruct sidewalks, install a signalized intersection with accessibility compliant crosswalks at the intersection of Albatross Way and E l D W Babcock S chool Access C amino Avenue., curb ramps, and other access improvements for S AC 25000 SAC C ity of S a c ra mento Improvements students who attend D.W. Babcock S chool. $1,124,700 2020 P rogrammed
Along unused rail corridor near Freeport Blvd from S utterville R oad to south of Meadowview/Pocket R oad (4.5 miles): Build rails]to]trails S AC 24999 SAC C ity of S a c ra mento Del R io T rail project. (E mission Benefits in kg/day: 0.06 R OG, 0.04 NOx, 0.02 PM 10) $16,949,000 2024 P rogrammed In S acramento, extend pedestrian/bicycle riverfront promenade from R S t to P ioneer Bridge. R elocation and reconstruction of main rail line. Pedestrian/bicycle paths, benches, lighting, interpretative signs, rail S AC 24499 SAC C ity of S a c ra mento D ocks R iverfront P romenade crossings, and on-street bicycle lanes. $12,518,290 2022 Planned
In Downtown S acramento, area bounded by Alhambra Boulevard, Interstate 5, D S treet, and Broadway. This project includes replacing existing obsolete end of life signal controllers, upgrading outdated serial communications systems with modern IP fiber cable based systems, Downtown C ontroller and installing new fiber cables in existing conduits, installing fiber switches, S AC 25013 SAC C ity of S a c ra mento C ommunications Upgrade and replacing some cabinets and C C TVs. $4,436,562 2020 P rogrammed R oadway Operational Improvements: Unspecified funding for future operational improvements to accommodate increased bus and rail S AC 24557 SAC C ity of S a c ra mento Downtown S acramento Circulation traffic, auto, trucks, in downtown S acramento. $100,000,000 Planned Downtown S acramento, bounded by Broadway extending into the Oak Park neighborhood, S acramento R iver, American R iver, and Alhambra Downtown S acramento Blvd.: S tudy the cost and priority of the $100 million in improvements S AC 24497 SAC C ity of S a c ra mento Transportation S tudy planned in the MTP2035. $1,300,000 2019 P rogrammed Various downtown corridors bounded by I-5, Broadway, Alhambra Blvd., and C S t., including the intersections of North 16th S t/Sproule S t-Basler S t and North 16th S t/North B S t: Install pedestrian countdown signal heads; replace 8" with 12" vehicle signal heads; install emergency vehicle preemption equipment. (T oll credits) (HS IP 7-03-013). T oll S AC 25025 SAC C ity of S a c ra mento Downtown S ignal Improvements C redits for C O N $3,142,600 2019 P rogrammed
Folsom Blvd. from Power Inn R oad to Watt Avenue; streetscape project including pedestrian and bicycle improvements, a raised landscaped Folsom Blvd Operations and median, landscaped planters, improvements to signal operations, S AC 24402 SAC C ity of S a c ra mento Maintenance frontage landscaping, and enhanced connections to transit facilities. $19,500,000 2022 Planned
S AC 24535 SAC C ity of S a c ra mento F olsom Blvd. S treets c a pe P rojec t: F ols om B lvd from P ower Inn. to 65th S t. $18,500,000 2036 Planned F olsom Blvd., from 65th S t. to 350’ east of the Union P acific R ailroad underpass: rehabilitate roadway. C omplete streets features include new bicycle lanes and new sidewalks to fill in missing sections. A new signalized pedestrian signal will be constructed at the E lvas Ave Folsom Blvd. Complete Streets intersection.(E mission Benefits in kg/day: 0.13 R OG, 0.1 NOx, 0.06 S AC 24636 SAC C ity of S a c ra mento R ehabilitation PM10) - T15135100 $2,045,345 2019 P rogrammed Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 30 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year On Franklin Blvd. between C osumnes R iver Blvd. and the southern city limit near Francesca S t.: C onstruct one-way C lass IV bikeways. (E mission Benefits in kg/day: 0.02 R OG, 0.01 NOx, 0.01 PM10. 0.01 S AC 25021 SAC C ity of S a c ra mento F ranklin C ycle T rack PM2.5) $1,100,000 2020 P rogrammed
I S treet Bridge, over S acramento R iver and complex of bridge approach structures. R eplace existing 2 lane bridge with a 2 lane bridge on a new alignment. Project includes bridge approaches 22C 0154, 24C 0006, S AC 24683 SAC C ity of S a c ra mento I S t. Bridge Replacement 24C 0364L, 24C 0364R , 24C 0351J . $86,620,900 2020 P rogrammed S ix locations throughout the C ity of S acramento: Install advanced dilemma zone loops for the high speed approaches at six existing signalized intersections. (T oll C redits for all phases) HS IP 7-03-012. S AC 25024 SAC C ity of S a c ra mento Intersection Dilemma Zone Loops T oll C redits for C ON $415,300 2020 P rogrammed
S AC 24886 SAC C ity of S a c ra mento K S treet S treets c a ping S treetscape improvements along K S treet $2,000,000 2017 Planned Bikeway F acilities: 0.6 mile in C ity of S acramento Mangen P ark from 24th S t. to F reeport B lvd. B ike tra il s outh in E xec utive A irport rig ht-of- S AC 23440 SAC C ity of S a c ra mento Mangan Park way. $800,000 2022 Planned Meadowview R d., from 24th S t. to C oral Gables C t.: C onstruct bicycle and pedestrian improvements including, landscaping raised medians, wider sidewalks separated with landscaping, enhanced crosswalks, Meadowview Rd. S treetscape Phase gateway monuments, and traffic signal modifications. (T oll C redits for S AC 25010 SAC C ity of S a c ra mento 1 C ON). T oll C redits for C ON $2,796,000 2020 P rogrammed
Meadowview R d. from the light rail station to I-5 and along 24th S t from Meadowview R d. to Florin R d. including medians, sidewalk treatments, Meadowview Rd. S treetscape and crosswalks. Planning and environmental review for entire segment. S AC 24742 SAC C ity of S a c ra mento P roject - P has e 2 Phase 1 construction in S AC 25010. $3,119,395 2020 P rogrammed
In S a c ra mento, on N . 12th S treet from A meric a n R iver to H S treet, including S unbeam S treet and one block of R ichards Blvd.: C onvert westernmost travel lane between R ichards and H S treet into two-way cycle track and improve connection from T wo R ivers Bike T rail to R ichards Blvd. Install streetscape and safety improvements, including intersection improvements, traffic control devices, striping, signage, pedestrian islands, dedicated turn lanes, on-street parking, and related S AC 24998 SAC C ity of S a c ra mento N orth 12th C omplete S treet P ha s e 2 streetscape, landscape, and adjacent improvements. $4,467,000 2021 P rogrammed
North 12th S t. between North B S t. and R ichards Blvd., construct six to eight feet sidewalks, drainage, and adding wrought iron fencing to S AC 24743 SAC C ity of S a c ra mento N orth 12th S t. S treets c a pe P rojec t separate pedestrians from light rail tracks. T15136200 $1,355,473 2019 P rogrammed Northern S acramento C ity near the Northwood E lementary S chool and S wanston Light Rail S tation: C onstruct curbs, gutters, sidewalks, Northwood S chool and Transit crosswalks, and curb ramps on Frienza Ave, C lay S t., Lexington S t., S AC 25063 SAC C ity of S a c ra mento Access Improvements and E l C amino Ave.. T oll C redits for E NG $2,541,000 2021 P rogrammed Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 31 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year
At various locations in S acramento: R eplace pedestrian signal heads with countdown signal heads, install 12" vehicle heads, install Pedestrian and S ignal S afety emergency vehicle preemption equipment, and replace median island S AC 25056 SAC C ity of S a c ra mento Improvements signals with mast arm signals. (H8-03-012). T oll C redits for C ON $5,292,800 2022 P rogrammed
At 11 locations throughout the C ity of S acramento: Install pedestrian Pedestrian S afety Improvements refuge islands and R ectangular R apid Flashing Beacons at uncontrolled S AC 25023 SAC C ity of S a c ra mento (Ped Islands and R R FBs) crosswalks on collector roadways. HS IP7-03-011 $511,200 2020 P rogrammed
Inters ec tions of 65th S t E xpwy a t 21s t A ve, 65th S t E xpwy a t F ruitridg e R d, Arden Way at Heritage Ln, Arden Way at Challenge Way, Howe A ve a t S wa rthmore D r, H owe A ve a t U nivers ity A ve, a nd S toc kton B lvd at Fruitridge R d.: R eplace pedestal mounted signals with mast arm S AC 25057 SAC C ity of S a c ra mento Pedestrian S ignal Improvements signals. (H8-03-013). Toll C redits for C ON $1,880,100 2022 P rogrammed Florin R oad between Greenhaven Drive and Luther Drive.: C onvert from pedes ta l mounted to ma s t a rms a t 7 inters ec tions ; Ins ta ll advanced detection at Florin R d/24th S t, and Florin R d/Freeport Blvd; Install communications fiber; Install C ountdown Ped Heads; and P edestrian S ignal S afety R eplace 8" with 12" LE D 3 S ection Heads.(H8-03-014). Toll C redits for S AC 25058 SAC C ity of S a c ra mento Improvements CON $2,555,400 2022 P rogrammed Various intersections in the Natomas and S outh S acramento Area: P edestrian S ignal S afety R eplace pedestrian signal heads with countdown pedestrian heads. (H8- S AC 25059 SAC C ity of S a c ra mento Improvements 03-015). Toll C redits for C ON $247,700 2020 P rogrammed
At 9 locations throughout the C ity of S acramento: Install 8 Pedestrian Hybrid Beacons and 1 Pedestrian S ignal(HAWK ) at uncontrolled S AC 25027 SAC C ity of S a c ra mento P edestrian S ignals crosswalks. (T oll C redits) HS IP 7-03-015. T oll C redits for C ON $1,751,300 2020 P rogrammed
R io Linda & Main Intersection Intersection Improvements: at Rio Linda Blvd. and Main Ave. Includes: S AC 24538 SAC C ity of S a c ra mento Improvements traffic signal installation and intersection re-configuration. $4,500,000 2017 Planned R io Linda Blvd., Over Magpie C reek, 0.92 miles north of F AI 880: R eplace the existing 2 lane bridge without adding additional through S AC 24517 SAC C ity of S a c ra mento R io Linda Blvd. Bridge R ehab lanes. Project includes turn lane. $7,146,749 2019 P rogrammed
Adjacent to I-5, south of Pocket Road/Meadowview R oad and Freeport Boulevard, build C lass I bike trail connecting the Freeport S hores Bike S outh S acramento Parkway Trail - T rail to the existing North Delta S hores Bike T rail. (E mission Benefits in S AC 24745 SAC C ity of S a c ra mento West kg/day: 0.12 R OG, 0.07 NOx, 0.02 PM 2.5, 0.02 PM10) $914,000 2019 P rogrammed Multi-Use C rossing: S acramento, S utter's Landing Bridge, between American R iver Pkwy. and S utter Landing Park. C onstruct bike/ped S AC 23890 SAC C ity of S a c ra mento S utter's Landing Bridge B ridge over American R iver. $30,000,000 2018 Planned
Five signalized locations throughout the C ity of S acramento: Install mast arm traffic signals to replace traffic signal heads mounted on S AC 25028 SAC C ity of S a c ra mento T raffic S ignal R eplacement pedestals in median. (T oll credits) HS IP 7-03-016. T oll C redits for C ON $1,346,500 2020 P rogrammed Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 32 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year On the American R iver Parkway, construct a new C lass I Western segment between S utter's Landing and the C alifornia S tate University of S acramento (C S US ) campus. PE for Phase 2 and 3 was completed as S AC 24755 SAC C ity of S a c ra mento T wo R ivers T rail P hase 3 part of S AC 24486. $672,800 2022 Planned S tudy and design bike/ped connections between the Northern Bicycle Trail and S utter's Landing Park (Phase 2 and 3). Build Phase 2, construct the eastern segment of the multi-use path, connecting the American River Parkway at H S t. in East Sacramento to the trail at S utter’s Landing Park in Midtown. Additional study future bicycle trial connections across the American R iver, C rossing the C apitol C ity Freeway, and extending east along the American R iver towards C alifornia S tate University at S acramento. Phase 3 construction scope shown in S AC 24755. (E mission Benefits in kg/day: 0.02 R OG, 0.02 S AC 24486 SAC C ity of S a c ra mento T wo R ivers T rail P hase II NOx, 0.02 PM10) K15125000. Toll C redits for ENG $6,398,422 2020 P rogrammed At RT’s Bus Maintenance Facility #1 (BMF1): R eplace and upgrade BMF 1 C NG F acility E quipment aging compressor equipment, the flow devices for the C NG dispensers, R E G18037 SAC RT Replacement the HMI fueling control monitors and the control systems. $1,824,450 2021 P rogrammed
R eplace up to eleven C NG powered paratransit vehicles to provide C NG P aratransit Vehicle services to elderly and disabled passengers. (E mission Benefits in R E G18025 SAC RT Replacement kg/day: 0.07 R OG, 1.45 NOx, 0.03 PM10.). Toll C redits for C ON $1,571,200 2019 P rogrammed
This project will first deploy an E nhanced E mployee Protection Warning S ystem (E E PWS ) that will alert both the train operator of an upcoming work zone and the workers in that zone of the approaching train. This system consists of two elements. The first element is vehicle mounted equipment; the second component is a wearable warning device used E nhanced E mployee Protection by tra c k workers . It will a ls o develop a nd demons tra te a s ta te of the a rt R E G18042 SAC RT Warning S ystem dis patcher work crew/lone worker s oftware s ys tem. $1,103,400 2020 P rogrammed Along Fulton Ave., from Arden Wy. to Auburn Blvd.: Design and install 8 to 11 bus shelters, including easements. (E mission Benefits in kg/day: R E G17952 SAC RT Fulton Ave. Bus S helters R OG 0.13, NOx 0.13, PM10 0.05) $181,935 2019 P rogrammed Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 33 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year
This project will redefine a Minimum Operable S egment (MOS ) 2 and a MOS 3. R E G17935 includes the Final Design and C onstruction for the project (excluding MOS -1).This phase of the Green Line to the Airport (DNA) Light R ail P roject will consist of two discreet, yet connected efforts. For the segment of the Green Line near and adjacent to the S acramento Intermodal Transfer Center (S ITF), the effort will entail the preparation of Draft EIS (and E IR ), its circulation for public review and comment, addressing the comments and will culminate with a Final E IS (and E IR ). The segment of the project adjacent to the S ITF will be coordinated with on-going S acramento S treetcar planning, environmental review, and design development. For the remainder of the 13-mile corridor, the effort will entail the preparation of a Draft E IS (and E IR ) only and its circulation for public review and comments. An MOS will also be identified for this segment. T he effort will also evaluate low-floor LR T vehicles and their integration into the R T system, evaluate LRT vehicle maintenance locations for the Green Line, evaluate downtown S acramento rail/traffic effects of the proposed service, prepare the necessary technical information and for a New S tarts evaluation under MAP-21, and involve the community and stakeholders in an outreach program for both efforts. Advanced conceptual engineering and preliminary engineering in key areas with potential for environmental impacts that may require mitigation R E G17943 SAC RT G reen Line (DNA) Light R ail - Overall strategies for the EIS will be completed. $13,546,336 2020 P rogrammed S R T D mid-life overhaul of light rail vehicles. (F F Y 2007 funds will rehabilitate 6 to 8 vehicles.) (FTA 5307 funds are unused funds from R E G15880 SAC RT LR V Mid-Life Overhaul FFY 2005) $9,946,412 2019 P rogrammed
Purchase replacement and some expansion vehicles and communication equipment to be used by Paratransit, Inc to provide complementary ADA paratransit service on behalf of R T. These vehicles will be fueled by gasoline or alternative fuel technologies. Bus Paratransit Vehicle Replacement purchase may include spare parts and major components in addition to R E G18010 SAC RT FY 17/18 to FY 19/20 maintenance equipment necessary to support bus maintenance. $7,297,205 2020 P rogrammed
R E G17946 SAC RT R etrofit 21 UT DC Light R ail Vehicles R etrofit 21 UT DC light rail vehicles purchased from Valley T ransit. $33,662,676 2019 P rogrammed A D A opera tions for tra ns it s ervic es within the R T D is tric t P a ra tra ns it R E G18033 SAC RT R T ADA Operations Area. S acramento Urbanized Area. $28,803,666 2022 P rogrammed S iemens Light R ail Vehicle (LR V) R E G18032 SAC RT Replacement R eplace half (13 of 26) S iemens Light R ail Vehicles. $78,004,500 2030 P rogrammed The project will maintain current bus service levels for key routes serving low-income, transit dependent residents connecting them to R E G18040 SAC RT S R TD J AR C Operating Assistance work, education and services. $4,215,484 2019 P rogrammed Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 34 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year
In S acramento: purchase/lease building in McC lellan Park to be converted to a new bus maintenance facility. Phase 1 Plans for this facility include two fueling stations, one land bus wash, and a revenue collection center. Also includes site work for parking and building modifications to support 125 buses. Phase 2 increases the facility capacity to support up to 250 buses and accommodate approximately S R T D S atellite Bus Maintenance 500 employees and the fueling stations will increase to four transit R E G17300 SAC RT F acility #2 fueling stations and one public fueling station. $81,010,860 2028 P rogrammed
Aesthetic improvements to S acramento R egional T ransit utility buildings located along Folsom Boulevard and the S acramento R egional Transit R E G18021 SAC RT Utility Buildings R OW Improvements light rail G old Line within the C ity of R ancho C ordova. $225,000 2019 P rogrammed
47th Ave., between the C ity of S acramento/Sacramento C ounty border 47th Ave Pedestrian and Bicycle and light rail tracks (western limit) to S tockton Boulevard (eastern limit): S AC 25062 SAC S acramento C ounty Improvement C onstruct continuous 2-mile C lass II bicycle and pedestrian facility. $4,235,000 2020 P rogrammed Facilities Plan: In S acramento C ounty, various locations, construct ADA compliant improvements in accordance with the county DOTs ADA S AC 21530 SAC S acramento C ounty ADA T ransition P lan T ransition P lan. $15,000,000 Planned
Alta Mesa R d over Laguna C reek, 0.4 mi north of S R 104: R eplace S AC 24618 SAC S acramento C ounty Alta Mesa Rd Bridge Replacement existing structurally deficient 2-lane bridge with a new 2-lane bridge. $9,765,975 2021 P rogrammed
On Auburn Blvd., beginning 200' west of Annadale Ln., continuing eastward to Winding Wy.: C onstruct sidewalk infill, C lass II bike lanes, and install a pedestrian Hawk type signal, located near the intersection S AC 25029 SAC S acramento C ounty Bike and Ped S afety Improvements of Auburn Blvd. and Annadale Ln. HS IP7-03-017 $2,049,756 2019 P rogrammed Bikeway F acilities: In various S acramento C ounty locations. Includes: S AC 19840 SAC S acramento C ounty Bike/Ped Improvements 2010 Bikeway Master P lan Implementation. $50,000,000 Planned Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program (BPMP) various bridges in S acramento C ounty. S ee C altrans Local Assistance HBP website for S AC 25084 SAC S acramento C ounty Bridge Preventive Maintenance backup list of projects. $2,643,330 2023 P rogrammed S afety E nhancement: in S acramento C ounty, various locations. Includes: streetscaping, lighting, and other safety enhancements to S AC 22030 SAC S acramento C ounty C ommercial C orridor E nhancements enhance bicycle and pedestrian use. $50,000,000 Planned Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 35 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year
In S acramento C ounty: Florin R oad between S outh Watt Avenue and Bradshaw R oad: R ehabilitate Florin R oad by overlaying the roadway with rubberized asphalt concrete (R AC ), adding a safety edge, and re- striping the roadway to enhance safety. Martin Luther K ing J r. Boulevard between 47th Avenue and S tate R oute 99 Bridge: R ehabilitate Martin Luther K ing J r. Boulevard by overlaying the roadway with R AC , installing C lass II bike lanes and bicycle detection at signalized intersections, repairing damaged sidewalks, installing ADA improvements including new curb ramps, and re-striping the roadway to enhance safety. Micron Avenue between Mayhew R oad and Bradshaw R oad: R ehabilitate Micron Avenue by repairing damaged pavement, C omplete S treets R ehab - Florin R d, overlaying the roadway with R AC , installing new C lass II bike lanes, Martin Luther K ing J r. Blvd, Micron repairing damaged sidewalks, installing ADA improvements including S AC 25078 SAC S acramento C ounty Ave new curb ramps, and re-striping the roadway to enhance safety. $3,393,000 2020 P rogrammed
1. E astern Avenue: from Marconi Avenue to Whitney Avenue, E l C amino Avenue: from Fulton Avenue to Watt Avenue, Marconi Avenue: from Watt Avenue to E astern Avenue; R ehabilitate with rubberized asphalt concrete, install new C lass II bike lanes, repair damaged sidewalks, install ADA improvements, upgrade traffic signals, and re- stripe the roadway for safety.2. Gerber R oad: from Power Inn R oad to French R oad; R ehabilitate with rubberized asphalt concrete, install new C lass II bike lanes and bicycle detection at signalized intersections, repair damaged sidewalks, install ADA improvements, and re-stripe the roadway for s afety.3. K iefer B oulevard: from Hunts man D rive to Bradshaw R oad; R ehabilitate with rubberized asphalt concrete, install new C lass II bike lanes, repair damaged sidewalks, install ADA improvements, and re-stripe the roadway for safety.4. Goethe R oad: from Mayhew R oad to Branch C enter R oad; R ehabilitate with rubberized asphalt concrete, install new C lass II bike lanes, repair damaged sidewalks, install ADA improvements, and re-stripe the roadway for safety.5. Antelope North R oad: from Poker Lane to Olive Drive:;R ehabilitate roadway with rubberized asphalt concrete (R AC ), add a safety edge, install ADA improvements, and re-stripe to enhance S AC 25031 SAC S acramento C ounty C omplete S treets R eha bilita tion s a fety. $11,831,500 2018 P rogrammed Folsom Blvd. from Butterfield Wy. to Bradshaw R d.,: R ehabilitate C omplete S treets R eha bilita tion - F olsom Blvd. and fill a sidewalk gap, fill bicycle lane gaps and upgrade S AC 24726 SAC S acramento C ounty F olsom Blvd. the existing bicycle lanes. $443,465 2019 P rogrammed Dillard R d. Bridge S cour Dillard R d., over C osumnes river, 0.2 miles south of S .R . 16: Install S AC 24520 SAC S acramento C ounty C ountermeasures scour countermeasures on scour critical bridge. $1,278,751 2020 P rogrammed Fair Oaks Blvd. between Howe Ave. and Munroe S t.,: Develop Fair F air Oaks Blvd. Bicycle and Oaks Master Plan, Design and construct two traffic signals within the S AC 24749 SAC S acramento C ounty P edestrian Mobility P roject project limits. $1,600,011 2019 P rogrammed Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 36 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year
In S acramento C ounty and C ommunity of C armichael: on Fair Oaks Boulevard from 500 feet north of Marconi Avenue to 400 feet south of Landis Avenue; construct roadway and pedestrian improvements including rehabilitation of the roadway, landscaping and streetscape, medians, ADA compliant improvements, transit access, bike and pedestrian facilities, traffic signal modifications at S tanley Avenue, and Fair Oaks Boulevard Improvements, a new signal at Robertson Avenue. (E mission Benefits in kg/day: 0.05 S AC 24748 SAC S acramento C ounty Phase 3 R OG, 0.04 NOx, 0.02 PM 10, 0.02 PM 2.5) $9,493,971 2019 P rogrammed FFY 2017-2023 Operating Assistance for S acramento C ounty Operating assistance for rural transit services within S acramento S AC 25041 SAC S acramento C ounty R ural T rans it P rogram C ounty. Outside the S acramento Urbanized Area. $4,760,000 2024 P rogrammed F lorin C reek T rail and on F lorin Mall Dr.,: provide bicycle parking racks, F lorin C reek T rail/S OF A Bike & way finding signage, and ADA street crossing improvements. (E mission S AC 24750 SAC S acramento C ounty Pedestrian Improvements Benefits in kg/day: 0.01 R OG) $1,280,922 2019 P rogrammed Florin R d between Franklin Blvd and Power Inn R d (excluding the segment at the S R -99 interchange): Install bicycle lanes, upgrade traffic signals to accommodate bicycles at all intersections, construct ADA improvements, install roadway lighting for a segment of F lorin R d. S AC 25060 SAC S acramento C ounty Florin R oad S afety Improvements (H8-03-016) $3,637,400 2020 P rogrammed
In S acramento C ounty: On Folsom Boulevard between Mayhew R oad and Bradshaw R oad; C onstruct safe and unobstructed sidewalks, pedestrian safety lighting, functional landscaping, accessible curb ramps and pedestrian signal improvements. E xisting utility poles will be relocated at the expense of the utility providers to provide space for Folsom Boulevard Complete Street these much needed safety improvements to encourage active modes of S AC 25072 SAC S acramento C ounty Improvements, Phase 1 travel along this important corridor. $5,001,000 2021 P rogrammed Along the north side of Folsom Blvd. to the west of Butterfield Way adjacent to the Butterfield LR T S tation, and along the north side of C ottage Way between Fulton Ave. and Watt Ave. (E mission Benefits in S AC 25005 SAC S acramento C ounty F olsom C ottage S idewalk Infill kg/day: 1.27 R OG, 0.77 NOx, 0.13 PM 10) $1,685,000 2019 P rogrammed F ranklin Blvd over Mokelumne R iver overflow, 1.8 miles north S an J oaquin C ounty line: R eplace the existing structurally deficient 2 lane S AC 24518 SAC S acramento C ounty Franklin Blvd Bridge R eplacement bridge with a new 2 lane bridge. $11,716,001 2019 P rogrammed On Hazel Ave. between C entral Ave. and E lm Ave.: C onstruct a C lass II bike lane, sidewalk infill, a signalized mid]block crossing, and transit stop improvements in accordance with the S acramento C ounty Bus Hazel Avenue S idewalk S top Transition Plan. (E mission Benefits in kg/day: 0.07 R OG, 0.05 S AC 25001 SAC S acramento C ounty Improvements NOx, 0.02 PM10, 0.02 PM2.5) $1,409,000 2020 P rogrammed In S acramento C ounty: On Howe Avenue from C ottage Way to E l C amino Avenue, construct 0.6 miles of C lass 2 bike lanes, 850 lineal feet of new sidewalk, 675 feet of separated lighted pedestrian walkway, a road diet from 4 to 2 lanes, the modification of two intersections and Howe Avenue Bicycle and traffic signals for bike lanes, accessibility, bike detection, and safety S AC 25076 SAC S acramento C ounty Pedestrian Improvements enhancements. $2,152,000 2021 P rogrammed
In S acramento C ounty, conduct studies, and environmental work for a S AC 22290 SAC S acramento C ounty I-80 Bicycle / Pedestrian C rossing bicycle/pedestrian crossing of I-80 west of Madison Avenue. $550,000 2022 Planned Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 37 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year
Ione Rd, over Buckeye Creek, 0.2 mi S of Meiss Rd. Replace the Ione Rd/Buckeye Creek Bridge existing structurally deficient 2 lane bridge with a new 2 lane bridge. S AC 24604 SAC S acramento C ounty Replacement (T oll credits for P E , R OW, C ON.). T oll C redits for E NG , R OW, C ON $2,359,000 2019 P rogrammed
Ione R d, over Willow C reek, 0.5 mi S C arbondale R d. R eplace the Ione R d/Willow C reek Bridge existing structurally deficient 2 lane bridge with a new 2 lane bridge. S AC 24606 SAC S acramento C ounty Replacement (T oll credits for P E , R OW & C ON). T oll C redits for E NG , R OW, C ON $2,642,000 2019 P rogrammed Kiefer Blvd over Deer Creek, 0.7 Mi NW S tate Rte 16. Replace the existing functionally obsolete one lane structure with a new two lane S AC 24769 SAC S acramento C ounty Kiefer Blvd over Deer Creek bridge.. T oll C redits for E NG , C ON $1,820,000 2024 P rogrammed
S AC 15200 SAC S acramento C ounty Left Turn Lanes In S acramento C ounty, various locations, installation of left turn lanes. $705,000 2018 Planned
McK enzie R d, over Laguna C reek, 0.9 mi S of Arno R d. R eplace the McK enzie R d/Laguna C reek Bridge existing structurally deficient 2 lane bridge with a new 2 lane bridge. S AC 24605 SAC S acramento C ounty Replacement (T oll credits for P E ,R /W & C ON.). T oll C redits for E NG , R OW, C ON $5,202,500 2020 P rogrammed Michigan Bar R d, over C osumnes R iver, 1.2 mi north of S R 16. R eplace the existing one lane structurally deficient bridge with a new one lane Michigan Bar R d/Cosumnes R iver bridge. (T oll credits for P E , R OW, & C ON). T oll C redits for E NG , R OW, S AC 24609 SAC S acramento C ounty Bridge Replacement CON $13,783,000 2020 P rogrammed New Hope R d over Grizzley S lough, 0.5 mi north of S an J oaquin/Sacramento C ounty Line: replace existing structurally deficient S AC 24620 SAC S acramento C ounty New Hope Rd Bridge Replacement 2-lane bridge with a new 2-lane bridge. $5,683,403 2020 P rogrammed Florin R d. out to Power Inn R d. to the west and Florin Perkins R d/French R d. to the east.,: Augment phase 1 of the streetscape by installing continuous separated sidewalks, bicycle lanes, improved transit facilities, median channelization, and improved street lighting. Old Florin Town S treetscape Phase (C MAQ E mission R eductions in kg/day: 0.02 R OG, 0.02 NOx 13, 0.01 S AC 24753 SAC S acramento C ounty 2 PM10) $4,516,947 2019 P rogrammed Power Inn R oad from E lsie Avenue to about 400 feet north of Power Inn R d Bike & Ped S afety Macfadden Drive: Install curb, gutter, sidewalk infill and curb ramps; S AC 25061 SAC S acramento C ounty Improvements widen substandard bike lanes.(H8-03-017) $3,505,400 2020 P rogrammed
In S acramento C ounty, on Power Inn R oad from approximately 450 feet Power Inn R oad S idewalk south of Loucreta Drive to Florin R oad: C onstruct continuous sidewalks S AC 25022 SAC S acramento C ounty Improvements and bike lanes. At Florin R d. and Power Inn R d.: Modify intersection. $2,374,000 2020 P rogrammed R io Linda Blvd over North C hannel of Dry C reek, 0.8 mi south of S AC 24617 SAC S acramento C ounty R io Linda Blvd Bridge R eplacement E lkhorn Blvd: R eplace 2-lane bridge with new 2-lane bridge. $2,189,592 2019 P rogrammed
On Hurley Way, between Fulton Ave. and Morse Ave.: Install sidewalk infill, curb, gutter, storm inlets, curb ramps and pedestrian lighting; S AC 25004 SAC S acramento C ounty Thomas E dison E lementary S R TS conduct educational walking and biking programs. $1,454,000 2019 P rogrammed Twin C ities R d, over S nodgrass S lough: R eplace the existing 2 lane S AC 24522 SAC S acramento C ounty T win C ities R d Bridge R eplacement structurally deficient structure with a new 2 lane structure. $18,114,002 2020 P rogrammed Tyler Is Br R d over Georgiana S lough, 1.5 Mi E of Isleton. R eplace the existing 2 lane bridge with a new 2 lane bridge (Toll C redits for PE and S AC 24772 SAC S acramento C ounty T yler R d O ver G eorgiana S lough C ON).. T oll C redits for E NG , C ON $13,618,000 2020 P rogrammed Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 38 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year
At 39 signalized intersections on portions of Winding Way, Walnut Ave., Marconi Ave., E l C amino Ave., E lkhorn Blvd., and Hazel Ave.: Provide enhanced signal coordination and monitoring by upgrading the signal control equipment to allow for traffic responsive signal coordination. S AC 25030 SAC S acramento C ounty Upgrade S ignal C ontrols (T oll credits) HS IP 7-03-018. T oll C redits for C ON $1,536,500 2019 P rogrammed In Walnut Grove, Walnut Grove crossing, over S acramento R iver: S AC 24687 SAC S acramento C ounty Walnut Grove Bridge R ehab R ehabilitate existing bridge. No added lane capacity. $2,769,375 2021 P rogrammed Winding Way over C hicago C reek, 0.1 mi west of C hicago Ave: R eplace existing functionally obsolete 2-lane bridge with a new 2-lane S AC 24619 SAC S acramento C ounty Winding Way Bridge R eplacement bridge. $3,763,100 2020 P rogrammed
C omplete project analysis efforts, as needed, to identify and implement operational improvements to improve safety and traffic flow along the corridor in the near-term. Improvements to study may include intersection improvements, access management strategies, and traffic signalization enhancements that benefit travel for automobiles and commercial vehicles. T he project listing also allows other project development activities to advance so the corridor segment can J ackson Hwy. (S R 16) from eventually become a four lane facility in a manner that is consistent S acramento C ounty E xcels ior to G rant L ine R oad: P roject with the C ity and C ounty's design guidelines. R ancho C ordova would and C ity of R ancho Development and Operational contribute to portions of work between S unrise and Grant Line within the S AC 24222 SAC C ordova Improvements city's limits. $5,000,000 2027 Planned S acramento R egional T ransit Install new in cab surveillance cameras in R T 's light rail fleet to comply S AC 24976 SAC District LRV Cab Cameras with CPUC General Offer 172 $305,482 2017 Planned S acramento This project would make ADA improvements at the 12th & I S treet Light R egional T ransit 12th & I S treet L ig ht R a il S ta tion R ail S tation. S cope includes constructing a new platform and realigning S AC 24860 SAC District ADA Improvements the tra c k. $11,222,078 2027 Planned S acramento R egional T ransit P assenger Amenities: C omplete facility modifications, as required, in R E G17962 SAC District ADA Transition Plan Improvements order to make all R T facilities accessible. $3,281,885 2036 Planned S acramento R egional T ransit S AC 24858 SAC District A rtwork a t L ig ht R a il S ta tions T his project is to maintain existing artwork at light rail stations $70,000 2036 Planned S acramento R egional T ransit Passenger counters for 97 LR Vs to facilitate NTD reporting. 8 counters S AC 24869 SAC District Automatic Passenger C ounters per L R V . $1,052,070 2027 Planned S acramento C onduct study determining amenities to be provided at each stop, R egional T ransit Bicycle/Pedestrian Improvements design choices, maintenance of waiting areas, safe, attractive access to S AC 24810 SAC District S tudy stops. $300,000 2017 Planned S acramento R egional T ransit Inspection and repair of Bridge structure elements as found in the S AC 24978 SAC District Biennial Bridge Inspection R epairs periodic inspection. $1,295,843 2036 Planned S acramento R egional T ransit S AC 24979 SAC District Building Access S ystem Upgrade Upgrade card based building access system $111,507 2017 Planned Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 39 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year S acramento R egional T ransit Bus Maintenance F acility #1 S AC 24874 SAC District R ehabilitation R ehabilitate the District's existing Bus Maintenance F acility. $10,000,000 2017 Planned R eplace radio communication equipment as needed. These funds will S acramento be used to purchase hand held radios, vehicle radios, rail car radios, R egional T ransit C ommunication E quipment MDC s, radio batteries, and equipment that is used to charge these S AC 24777 SAC District Replacement radios . $1,455,000 2036 Planned S acramento C onstruct secondary data center @ R T's Light Rail Facility (Academy R egional T ransit Data C enter R edundancy & Way) as a backup in the event of a failure at the primary data center at S AC 24778 SAC District R eliability E quipment 1225 R S t $53,709 2017 Planned
Technology Upgrade: Upgrade the Data Warehouse that is currently used by R T staff for enterprise reporting, data analysis, and application S acramento data storage and presentation services. Once upgraded, the new data R egional T ransit warehouse will provide significant new functionality and performance for R E G17812 SAC District Data Warehouse Upgrade R T staff for analysis, reporting, and business intelligence. $175,000 2024 Planned S acramento R egional T ransit E nhance Public Web Based Technology Upgrade: Portal for R eal E state for acquisitions and asset R E G17983 SAC District S ervices (Phase II) management. $108,363 2036 Planned S acramento R egional T ransit S AC 24779 SAC District ERP System Disaster Response Upgrade R T 's E nterpris e Mgmt S ys tem $245,000 2017 Planned S acramento R egional T ransit FIBE R Infrastructure Management Technology Upgrade: Develop a FIBE R Infrastructure Management R E G17980 SAC District Application Application. $120,000 2024 Planned S acramento R egional T ransit G eneral F acilities Maintenance & T ransit C apital/Operations: Implement general facility improvements R E G17816 SAC District Improvements and maintain facilities throughout the district as needed. $12,724,439 2036 Planned S acramento R egional T ransit S AC 24780 SAC District Handheld S mart Card R eader Purchase hand held smart card readers $116,000 2017 Planned S acramento Technology Upgrade: Implement a document archival system that R egional T ransit Implement Document Archival converts financial and engineering documents to an electronic and/or R E G17991 SAC District S ys tem microfilm format. $224,000 2017 Planned S acramento R egional T ransit Integ ra ted C ontra c t A dmin S ys tem Technology Upgrade: R eplace the Integrated C ontract Administration R E G17832 SAC District (ICAS ) Replacement S ystem (IC AS ). $160,150 2017 Planned Minor ITS Improvement: S upport the Intelligent Transportation S ystems S acramento S trategic Deployment Plan for the S acramento R egion being R egional T ransit coordinated by the S acramento Area C ouncil of Governments R E G17833 SAC District Intellig ent T ra ns porta tion S ys tems (S AC OG). $9,048,000 2036 Planned T his project is to replace existing High intensity Discharge (metal halide S acramento or high pressure sodium) pole lights with LE D lighting at light rail R egional T ransit stations, park-and-ride lots, light rail Metro yard, and bus and S AC 24781 SAC District LE D Lighting R etrofit administrative parking lots. $1,880,000 2017 Planned Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 40 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year
This project is to improve the Light Rail C ontrol C enter. S cope includes S acramento physical upgrades, probably new control center, computers displays, R egional T ransit Light Rail C ontrol C enter Upgrade and external interfaces to Passenger Information S igns + R R S AC 24862 SAC District (LRCC) interlocking S C ADA, and communications system upgrades $4,500,000 2027 Planned S acramento R egional T ransit Transit Capital/Operations: Purchase and install, as needed, a variety of R E G17999 SAC District Light Rail C rossing E nhancements components in the grade crossing mechanisms. $1,826,624 2036 Planned S acramento R egional T ransit Light R ail Digital Messaging control Develop new central management software system for RT's digital Light S AC 24782 SAC District S ys tem R ail public messaging systems $103,250 2017 Planned S acramento R egional T ransit Light R ail S tation P edestrian Pedestrian Improvements: At the Fruitridge, Cosumnes River College, R E G17966 SAC District Improvements and C ity C ollege light rail stations, improve pedestrian access. $8,852,113 2024 Planned S acramento R egional T ransit Light R ail S tation S helter R E G18008 SAC District Improvement P rogram Passenger Amenities: Add and improve light rail station shelters. $1,136,000 2027 Planned S acramento R egional T ransit Light R ail Vehicle S pecification Develop procurement specifications for the light rail vehicles prior to S AC 24859 SAC District Development planned replacements and purchases for light rail extensions. $86,261 2018 Planned P assenger Amenities: Light rail stations. Includes: parking lot/sidewalk S acramento repairs, mini high shelters, slurry seal, restriping, curb replacement, R egional T ransit planter construction, landscape replanting, drainage improvements, and R E G17930 SAC District Major LR T S tation E nhancements fencing repairs. $31,768,589 2036 Planned S acramento R egional T ransit Modify, reconfigure and expand the Metro light rail yard (or other S AC 24783 SAC District Metro Light R ail Y ard E xpansion terminal yards). Add storage yard tracks at Academy Way site $10,521,000 2024 Planned S acramento R egional T ransit Metro W es t L R Ma intena nc e F a c ility Transit Capital/Operations: R enovate building at 2531 Land Avenue for R E G18005 SAC District (S pecialty S teel) use as a light rail body shop. $1,026,660 2017 Planned S acramento R egional T ransit Network Backup and Data Archive Technology Upgrade: Upgrade/replace R T's data backup and archive R E G17975 SAC District Upgrade system. $104,320 2017 Planned S acramento R egional T ransit Technology Upgrade: Upgrade R T's network security infrastructure by R E G17967 SAC District Network F irewall Upgrade retiring and replacing the aging and obsolete network firewall. $32,030 2024 Planned S acramento R egional T ransit New Transit Oriented Development- S AC 24811 SAC District Related Professional S ervices Assistance and approvals in developing TOD projects on R T property $225,000 2036 Planned S acramento R egional T ransit Transit Capital/Operations: construct soundwalls at various locations R E G17959 SAC District Noise Attenuation S oundwalls along the light rail system. $1,722,245 2036 Planned S acramento R egional T ransit Operations C omputer S ystems C omputer Upgrades and replacements for various R T operating/support S AC 24784 SAC District Upgrades departments $205,000 2017 Planned S acramento R egional T ransit S AC 24866 SAC District Planning/Studies "planning studies" to be conducted by R T Planning $500,000 2036 Planned Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 41 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year
T he S acramento P olice Department will begin implementation of a program to replace their entire inventory of Mobile Data C omputers that are installed in their marked patrol vehicle fleet. T his work, called the "NextGen Project", will replace the outdated and discontinued S acramento computers in the patrol cars that are used for all types of emergency R egional T ransit P olice Vehicle Mobile Data call dispatching, information gathering and dissemination, criminal S AC 24785 SAC District C omputer Terminals R eplacement history and records checks, and officer safety information. $135,296 2024 Planned S acramento R egional T ransit Professional Development Efforts for S AC 24867 SAC District Planning S taff "Professional development efforts" to be completed by R T Planning $200,000 2036 Planned S acramento R egional T ransit R T road/curb repair on its right of way adjacent to locations where S AC 24855 SAC District R oad/Curb R epair C ity/County of S acramento road/curb repair. $6,208,872 2036 Planned S acramento R egional T ransit R T Projects funded by future Prop Various R T Transit S ecurity Projects Funded by Future Proposition 1B S AC 24786 SAC District 1B Transit S ecurity Funds Transit S ecurity Funds $3,769,521 2022 Planned Provide experience for students pursuing a career in transit planning S acramento field: compiling statistical data, outreach, data analysis and validation, R egional T ransit S acramento Regional Transit preparation of reports, conducting customer surveys and passenger S AC 24868 SAC District Internship Program counting (annual program). $750,000 2036 Planned S acramento R egional T ransit Technology Upgrade: E nhance security throughout the R T' system. R E G17917 SAC District S ecurity S ystem E nhancement Includes: fiber and DVR . $4,913,283 2024 Planned S acramento Technology Upgrade: Place new equipment and clustering software in R egional T ransit order to build a highly available and extremely resilient server R E G17970 SAC District S erver C lus tering infras tructure. $25,878 2024 Planned S acramento R egional T ransit Technology Upgrade: Triennial server replacement program to retire R E G17864 SAC District S erver Replacement and replace aging and obsolete servers. $66,999 2024 Planned S acramento R egional T ransit Purchase a variety of equipment as needed for vehicle and shop S AC 24871 SAC District S hop E quipment - Bus maintenance. $2,585,000 2036 Planned S acramento R egional T ransit Technology Upgrade: Upgrade the Union S witch and S ignal controllers R E G17867 SAC District S ignal Improvements to the new design being built with the AMTR AK project. $240,000 2018 Planned P avement R ehabilitation: S acramento R egional T ransit District. S acramento Includes: repairing paving as needed in the R T system that is R egional T ransit deteriorated and needs to be repaired/replaced to maintain a state of R E G17907 SAC District S R T D P aving R es toration P rogram good repair. $3,000,000 2036 Planned
S acramento Transit Capital/Operations: At the S unrise interlocking, add a turnout to R egional T ransit the east end of the tail track. This would turn the tail track into a siding R E G17995 SAC District S unrise S iding (S ide Track S witch) providing two ways for trains to enter and exit the siding. $227,023 2036 Planned S acramento Technology Upgrade: Design, procure, and install S C ADA equipment R egional T ransit S upervis ory C ontrol & D ata into traction power substations to control and monitor traction power R E G17868 SAC District Acquisition S ystem (S C ADA) distribution systems. $2,167,264 2024 Planned Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 42 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year S acramento R egional T ransit S urveillance and S ecurity F acilities S AC 24787 SAC District E nhancement New facility for surveillance systems monitoring $252,000 2017 Planned
R T 's next light rail vehicle (LR V) procurement, likely associated with the G reen Line to the Airport project, will include low-floor vehicles. T his study will include technical evaluation associated with type of vehicle to be specified (light rail vehicle, E uropean tram, etc.) and the physical design requirements of the new and existing light rail stations. The evaluation of existing stations will need to detail the level of effort (design and construction) needed to accommodate low-floor vehicles. Preliminary cost estimates (by station) and schedule of design and S acramento S ystem wide Impacts of Low-Floor construction activities will also be developed. R ecommendations for R egional T ransit Light R ail Vehicles E nvironmental maintaining light rail operations while the station construction activities S AC 24863 SAC District C learance and Design are under way will also be developed. $565,558 2017 Planned T ransit C apital/Operations: Make improvements to the F olsom line S acramento T raction P ower (T P S ) system that will improve service availability during R egional T ransit peak service on the Folsom corridor and improved contingency R E G17960 SAC District T raction P ower Upgrades operation. $890,193 2017 Planned S acramento R egional T ransit R E G18002 SAC District Transit Master Plan Update S ervice Plan: Update the R T Transit Master Plan. $524,468 2022 Planned S acramento R egional T ransit S AC 24789 SAC District Update Data Backup S ystems New hardware/software for E R P and security systems backup $104,320 2017 Planned S acramento Technology Upgrade: Upgrade rail interlocking status and control R egional T ransit Upgrading R ail Interlockings functions to provide modem connection to C entral Train R E G17990 SAC District (R emote Indication) Tracking/Operations C entral C ontrol. $406,546 2024 Planned S acramento R egional T ransit Passenger Amenities: Procure and install Wayfinding signage to light R E G17979 SAC District Wayfinding S ignage rail stations. $88,849 2017 Planned S acramento R egional T ransit Wayside S ignal R econfiguration Technology Upgrade: Detailed analysis and design modification to the R E G18000 SAC District Phase 2 existing wayside signaling system. $361,211 2024 Planned R OW Acquisition and C onstruction: R ailroad C rossing. North of S R 99 / C AL20429 S UT Caltrans D3 Lomo R ailroad C rossing Live Oak Blvd. intersection. $10,000,000 2022 Planned S R 20 / SR 99 Interchange R OW R OW Acquisition: for urban interchange at existing S R 20 / SR 99 C AL15780 S UT Caltrans D3 Acquisition inters ec tion $25,000,000 2027 Planned In S utter C ounty on S R 20 at Meridian, from S acramento R iver Bridge to S utter Bypass Bridge (PM R 0.0/4.2) - Maintenance asphalt overlay [HM1 - Pavement Preservation Fed-Funded]. Toll C redits for E NG, C AL20752 S UT Caltrans D3 S R 20 at Meridian - Asphalt Overlay ROW, CON $6,186,000 2019 P rogrammed C AL20569 S UT Caltrans D3 S R 99 C lass II Bike Lane On S R 99, construct bike lane from Bogue R oad to S R 20 J ct. $1,440,000 2036 Planned In the C ity of Live Oak, on S R 99, at Elm S treet and Pennington R oad - S R 99 C ity of L ive O a k S a fety Intersection safety improvements (PM 40.0/40.5) [C TIPS ID 107-0000- C AL20731 S UT Caltrans D3 Improvements 1067] $6,310,000 2021 P rogrammed In Live Oak, on S R 99, from 0.1 mile north of C oleman Avenue to 0.2 mile north of R amsdell Drive (P M 39.4/41.0) - R oadway rehabilitation C AL20763 S UT Caltrans D3 S R 99 Live Oak R ehab [C TIPS ID 107-0000-1105] $20,050,000 2021 P rogrammed Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 43 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year C AL20608 S UT Caltrans D3 S R 99 Operational Improvements Operational Improvements: Bogue R d. to Pease R d. $3,000,000 2018 Planned C AL20607 S UT Caltrans D3 S R 99 Passing Lanes Passing Lanes: Y uba C ity to Butte C ounty Line. $20,000,000 2027 Planned
Near Y uba C ity on S R 20, from east end of S utter Bypass to Lytle R oad - R ehabilitate roadway, widen shoulders and replace Wadsworth C anal Bridge #18-0003 (PM 5.0/11.3) [EFIS ID 0300020608; C TIPS ID 107- C AL20522 S UT Caltrans D3 S utter Bypass R ehab and Widening 0000-0968]. Toll C redits for ENG, R OW, C ON $30,765,000 2021 P rogrammed Pavement Rehabilitation: in Live Oak from N S t. to S amuel S t. Includes: S UT17011 S UT C ity of Live Oak A pric ot S t. resurface existing pavement. $360,000 2022 Planned Pavement Rehabilitation: from L S t. to K S t. Includes: curb, gutter, S UT17009 S UT C ity of Live Oak Archer Ave. sidewalks, and drainage improvements. (Phase II) $486,000 2027 Planned Pavement Rehabilitation: from K S t. to C ity Limit. Includes: curb, gutter, S UT17025 S UT C ity of Live Oak Archer Ave. sidewalks, and drainage improvements. (Phase III) $480,000 2027 Planned R oad R econstruction: from S R 99 to Planning Area Limits Includes S UT18915 S UT C ity of Live Oak Bishop Ave. drainage, curb, gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. $1,047,000 2027 Planned R oad R econstruction: from Pennington R d. to E lm S t. Includes: S UT17007 S UT C ity of Live Oak Broadway S t. sidewalk, bike lanes, drainage improvements. $810,000 2027 Planned R oa d R ec ons truc tion from A pric ot S t. to the E lm S t./S R 99 inters ec tion. Includes: drainage improvements, curb, gutter and sidewalk and bike S UT18916 S UT C ity of Live Oak Broadway S t. and E lm S t. lanes $581,000 2027 Planned Pavement Rehabilitation: from Pennington R d. to E lm S t. Includes: S UT17023 S UT C ity of Live Oak C enter S t. drainage improvements. $800,000 2036 Planned C onstruct New C lass I Bikeways off-street and along various new and S UT18907 S UT C ity of Live Oak C lass I Bikeways exis ting C ity s treets $3,405,000 2036 Planned R oad R econstruction: from S R 99 to S innard Ave. Includes drainage, S UT18918 S UT C ity of Live Oak C oleman R d. curb, gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. $2,110,000 2027 Planned R oad R econstruction: from Broadway to N S t. Includes: curb, gutter, S UT17020 S UT C ity of Live Oak E lm S t. sidewalks, bike lanes, and drainage improvements. $567,000 2036 Planned In L ive O a k: E lm S treet from L a rkin R oa d to L S treet; rec ons truc t, ins ta ll S UT17024 S UT C ity of Live Oak E lm S treet R ec ons truc tion curb, gutter, sidewalks, drainage improvements. $580,000 2022 Planned R oad R econstruction: from Broadway to N S treet. Includes: curb and S UT17021 S UT C ity of Live Oak F ir S t. g utter, a nd new s idewa lk from C a lifornia S t. to N S treet. $486,000 2036 Planned R oad R econstruction: from Broadway to N S t. Includes: curb, gutter, S UT17022 S UT C ity of Live Oak G um S t. sidewalks, and drainage improvements. $425,000 2036 Planned R oad R econstruction: from Hwy. 99 to Larkin R d. Includes: curb, gutter, S UT17018 S UT C ity of Live Oak Ivy S t. sidewalks, and drainage improvements. $480,000 2036 Planned In L ive O a k; K ola S treet from S ta te R oute 99 to L a rkin R oa d; reconstruct street, install curb, gutters, sidewalks, drainage improvements, new cross walk striping and pedestrian crossing warning S UT17001 S UT C ity of Live Oak K ola S treet S idewalks lights. $391,100 2022 Planned In L ive O a k: L S treet from E lm S t. to A s h S treet, rec ons truc t, ins ta ll S UT18921 S UT C ity of Live Oak L S treet R ec ons truc tion curb, gutter, sidewalks, drainage improvements. $1,013,000 2036 Planned
In L ive O a k: L S treet from P enning ton R oa d to E lm S treet, rec ons truc t, S UT17005 S UT C ity of Live Oak L S treet R ec ons truc tion install curb, gutter, sidewalks, drainage improvements. $242,300 2022 Planned In Live Oak on Larkin Road from Nevada S treet to Riviera Road reconstruct road and install drainage, curb and gutter, sidewalk, and S UT16984 S UT C ity of Live Oak Larkin Road bike lanes. $9,350,000 2022 Planned Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 44 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year In Live Oak on Larkin R oad from current City Limit to Paseo Ave. reconstruct road and install drainage, curb and gutter, sidewalk, and S UT18880 S UT C ity of Live Oak Larkin Road bike lanes. $4,510,000 2027 Planned In Live Oak on Larkin R oad from current C ity Limit to R iviera R d.. reconstruct road and install drainage, curb and gutter, sidewalk, and S UT18881 S UT C ity of Live Oak Larkin Road bike lanes. $3,040,000 2027 Planned In Live Oak on Larkin R oad from Apricot S t. to current City Limit. reconstruct road and install drainage, curb and gutter, sidewalk, and S UT18882 S UT C ity of Live Oak Larkin Road bike lanes. $2,450,000 2036 Planned In Live Oak on Larkin R oad from R oad 3 to current City Limit. reconstruct road and install drainage, curb and gutter, sidewalk, and S UT18879 S UT C ity of Live Oak Larkin Road bike lanes. $1,251,000 2027 Planned In Live Oak on Larkin R oad from Archer Ave. to the E lm S t./SR 99 intersection. reconstruct road and install drainage, curb and gutter, S UT18922 S UT C ity of Live Oak Larkin R oad and E lm S treet sidewalk, and bike lanes. $581,000 2022 Planned C onstruct New C lass I Bikeway along O S t. from Pennington R d. to S UT18887 S UT C ity of Live Oak Live Oak C ommunity T rail Kola S t. (Phase 3) $520,000 2022 Planned C onstruct New C lass I Bikeway along the abandon S acramento Northern R ailroad right-of-way from E lm S t. to the Pennington R d./O S t. S UT18917 S UT C ity of Live Oak Live Oak C ommunity T rail Intx. (Phase 2) $885,000 2027 Planned West of S R 99 in the C ity of Live Oak, along the abandoned S acramento Northern R ailroad corridor, from K ola S t. to E ppers on Wy. (approx. 1/4 mi): C onstruct class 1 pedestrian/bicycle trail with Live Oak C ommunity T rail S egment landscaping and benches. (E mission benefits in kg/day: 0.01 R OG, 0.01 S UT18838 S UT C ity of Live Oak 4 NOx) $555,000 2019 P rogrammed
R oad R econstruction: from the current existing city boundary to R iviera S UT16987 S UT C ity of Live Oak Luther R d. R d. Includes: drainage, curb and gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. $5,887,000 2036 Planned R oad R econstruction: from Fir S t. to Apricot S t. Includes drainage, curb S UT18885 S UT C ity of Live Oak N S t. and gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. $1,418,000 2036 Planned
R oad R econstruction: from K ola S t. to E pperson Way. Includes: curb, S UT17017 S UT C ity of Live Oak N S t. gutters, sidewalks, drainage improvements, and bike lanes. $1,256,000 2027 Planned R oad R econstruction: from Pennington R oad to Fir S t. Includes S UT18883 S UT C ity of Live Oak N S t. drainage, curb and gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. $623,000 2022 Planned R oad R econstruction: from Hwy. 99 to Larkin R d. Includes: curb, gutter, S UT17019 S UT C ity of Live Oak Nevada S t. sidewalk, and drainage improvements. $600,000 2036 Planned R oad R econstruction: from Pennington R oad to Apricot S t. Includes S UT18890 S UT C ity of Live Oak P S t. drainage, curb and gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. $1,870,000 2036 Planned R oad R econstruction: from Park S t. to Pennington R oad Includes S UT18889 S UT C ity of Live Oak P S t. drainage, curb and gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. $567,000 2022 Planned R econstruct roadway from Hwy. 99 to Township R oad, realign west 0.5 mi. Includes: drainage improvements, curb, gutter, sidewalk, and bike S UT18891 S UT C ity of Live Oak Paseo Ave. lanes. $11,150,000 2036 Planned R oad R econstruction: from Township R d. to Luther R d. Includes: S UT16985 S UT C ity of Live Oak Pennington R d. drainage, curb and gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. $3,973,000 2036 Planned R oad R econstruction from K S t. to S innard Ave. Includes: curb and gutter, sidewalk, drainage improvements, bike lanes and underground S UT18892 S UT C ity of Live Oak Pennington R d. utilities. $1,800,000 2036 Planned Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 45 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year
R oad R econstruction from Larkin R d. to K S t. Includes: curb and gutter, S UT16992 S UT C ity of Live Oak Pennington R d. sidewalk, drainage improvements, bike lanes and underground utilities. $1,500,000 2027 Planned R oad R econstruction from C onnecticut Ave. to Luther R d. Includes: S UT17010 S UT C ity of Live Oak Pennington R d. drainage, curb and gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. $1,370,000 2027 Planned R oad R econstruction: from S innard Ave. to S heldon Ave. Includes: S UT16997 S UT C ity of Live Oak Pennington R d. drainage, curb, gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. $1,079,000 2036 Planned R oad R econstruction from Hwy. 99 to Larkin R d. Includes: curb and gutter, sidewalk, drainage improvements, bike lanes and underground S UT17012 S UT C ity of Live Oak Pennington R d. utilities. $1,000,000 2022 Planned R oad R econstruction from P S t. to C onnecticut Ave. Includes: drainage, S UT17008 S UT C ity of Live Oak Pennington R d. curb and gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. $415,000 2022 Planned Pennington R d. C omplete S treets Pennington R d., from C onnecticut Ave. to Broadway: reconstruct S UT18858 S UT C ity of Live Oak R ehabilitation roadway and restripe existing bicycle lanes. $1,094,776 2019 P rogrammed R oad R econstruction: from Township R d. to Hwy. 99. Includes: S UT16990 S UT C ity of Live Oak R iviera R d. drainage, curb and gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. (Phase II) $7,332,000 2036 Planned
In Live Oak, R iviera R oad from S R 99 to Larkin R oad reconstruct road S UT16983 S UT C ity of Live Oak R iviera R oad and install drainage, curb and gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. $4,518,000 2027 Planned R oad R econstruction: from Fir S t. to Pennington R d. Includes: drainage, S UT16991 S UT C ity of Live Oak S innard Ave. curb and gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. $542,700 2036 Planned R oad R econstruction: from Pennington R oad to R iviera R oad. Includes S UT16989 S UT C ity of Live Oak Township R d. drainage, curb, gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. $9,436,000 2036 Planned Along Franklin R d., east of S tate R oute 99 between S outh Palora Ave. and Gray Ave.: C onstruct sidewalks and curb ramps on north and south Franklin Ave. Pedestrian sides of the R d. (C MAQ E missions R eductions in kg/day: R OG 0.10, S UT18928 S UT C ity of Y uba C ity Improvements NOx 0.06, PM10 0.02, PM2.5 0.02) $465,500 2020 P rogrammed Bike Lane F acilities: F rom F ranklin Ave. to S econd S t provide bicycle S UT10540 S UT C ity of Y uba C ity Garden Hwy. facilities. Includes: on-street improvements . $1,100,000 2022 Planned
In Y uba C ity: From Hooper R oad to Harter Parkway on the north side of J efferson Avenue and on Harter Parkway from Butte House R oad to S pirit Way, extend the existing 4.6-mile-long S utter Bicycle P ath from Harter Parkway and S utter Bike Path Hooper R oad to Harter Parkway and build a C lass I shared use path on S UT18932 S UT C ity of Y uba C ity Gap C losure H a rter P a rkwa y from B utte H ous e R oa d to S ta te R oute 20. $2,241,000 2024 P rogrammed
Improve the S ta te R oute 20 c orridor in Y uba C ity, from S ta te R oute 99 to the Feather R iver Bridge. Improvements include enhancements to S UT18930 S UT C ity of Y uba C ity S R 20 C orridor Improvement P roject development and complete streets improvements. $482,000 2022 P rogrammed Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program, Various locations.: S ee Bridge Preventive Maintenance http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/hbrr99/HBP_MPO.html#S AC O S UT18850 S UT S utter C ounty P rogram G web site for backup list of locations. $1,046,028 2023 P rogrammed On Fortna R oad Over S utter C ounty E xtension C anal, 0.5 miles west of Township R oad. R eplace 2 land bridge with new 2 lane bridge. (Toll Bridge R eplacement On Fortna R oad C redits programmed for P E , R O W, C O N). T oll C redits for E NG , R O W, S UT18926 S UT S utter C ounty Over S utter C o E xtension C anal CON $1,475,600 2020 P rogrammed Howsley Rd Over Pleasant Grove Creek Canal at Natomas Rd. Bridge R eplacement On Howsley R d R eplace 2 lane bridge with 2 lane bridge. No added capacity.. Toll S UT18925 S UT S utter C ounty Over Pleasant Grove Creek Canal C redits for R O W $7,956,444 2021 P rogrammed Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 46 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year K ent Road over S utter Butte C anal, 0.2 Mi S outh of McDonald Ave.: K ent R oa d B ridg e a t S utter B utte R eplace two lane bridge with two lane bridge. (T oll credits for P E , R OW S UT18875 S UT S utter C ounty Canal. & C ON.). Toll C redits for E NG, R OW, C ON $2,760,000 2020 P rogrammed Larkin R d. over S outh Birch S utter-Butte C anal, 0.2 miles north of E ncinal R d.: R eplace the existing 2-lane bridge with a new 2-lane S UT18856 S UT S utter C ounty Larkin R d. Bridge R eplacement bridge. $1,158,000 2020 P rogrammed Nicolaus Ave., over Coon Creek, 1 mile west of Pleasant Grove Rd.: S UT18855 S UT S utter C ounty Nicolaus Ave. Bridge Replacement R eplace the existing 2-lane bridge with a new 2-lane bridge $1,422,000 2020 P rogrammed Nuestro Rd over S nake River, 0.7 miles east of East Butte Rd. Replace Nuestro Rd Over S nake River - existing 2 lane bridge with new 2 lane bridge.. T oll C redits for E NG , S UT18935 S UT S utter C ounty Bridge Replacement ROW, CON $1,513,100 2023 P rogrammed Various locations in S utter C ounty: Install stripping, pavement markers, and raised pavement reflectors. (HS IP6-03-020) (Toll C redits for C ON). S UT18868 S UT S utter C ounty Reflective S afety Improvements T oll C redits for C ON $897,300 2019 P rogrammed S anders R d Over S utter C o S anders R d over S utter C ounty E xtension C anal, 1.2 miles west of E xtension C anal - Bridge Broadway. R eplace existing 2 lane bridge with new 2 lane bridge.. Toll S UT18934 S UT S utter C ounty Replacement C redits for E NG , R O W, C O N $1,511,600 2023 P rogrammed
Intersection improvements to add turn lanes, address drainage issues and sound attenuation as needed along both sides of S tate R oute 99 at S UT18830 S UT S utter C ounty S R 99 Intersection Improvements Bogue R d, Lincoln R d, R ichland R d and Franklin R d. $3,800,000 2022 Planned Tisdale R d., over Westside C anal, 100 E C ranmore R d.: R eplace the existing structurally deficient 2 lane bridge with a new 2 lane bridge, T isdale R d, Over Westside C anal- (T oll C redits programmed for P E , R /W, & C O N.). T oll C redits for E NG , S UT18873 S UT S utter C ounty S utter C ounty ROW, CON $2,221,250 2020 P rogrammed In E l Dorado, Butte, Placer, S acramento, S utter and Y olo C ounties, on US 50, S R 65, S R 70, I-80, S R 89 and S R 99, at various locations - D3 C rash C ushion and S and Barrel Upgrade crash cushions and sand barrel arrays to make more durable C AL20780 VAR Caltrans D3 Upgrades [C TIPS ID 107-0000-1124] $3,360,000 2022 P rogrammed In S utter, Glenn, C olusa, Y uba, Placer, Y olo and S acramento counties at various locations - Advance mitigation credit purchases for future S HOPP construction projects expected to impact sensitive species D 3 H a bita t Mitig a tion a t V a rious [C TIPS ID 107-0000-1114; C TIPS primary location S ut-99-0.0/42.4] C AL20767 VAR Caltrans D3 Locations [C TIPS ID 107-0000-1114] $1,510,000 2020 P rogrammed In various counties on various routes at various locations within C altrans District 3 - R epair and install permanent Automatic Vehicle C lassification (AVC ) truck data collection stations [C T IP S ID 107-0000- C AL20713 VAR Caltrans D3 D is tric t 3 A V C U pg ra des 1051]. Toll C redits for ENG $13,570,000 2020 P rogrammed In various counties on various routes at various locations within District 3 (listed under PLA-80-Var in 2018 S HOPP) - Upgrade E xtinguishable Message S igns (E MS ) to LE D [C TIPS ID 107-0000-1035]. Toll C redits C AL20722 VAR Caltrans D3 D is tric t 3 L E D U pg ra des for E NG $2,530,000 2021 P rogrammed Near Woodland, at County R oad 96 OC #22-0155 (PM R 14.27), C ounty R oad 95 OC #22-0156 (PM R 15.85) and Zamora OC #22-0157 (PM R 17.62); also in C olusa C ounty, in and near Williams, at E S treet OC #15-0067 (PM R 17.98) and Lurline Avenue OC #15-0075 (PM R 22.74) - I-5 Vertical Clearance Improvements E stablish standard vertical clearance [C TIPS ID 107-0000-1118]. Toll C AL20775 VAR Caltrans D3 in Y olo and C olusa C ounties C redits for E NG $22,490,000 2024 P rogrammed Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 47 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year In and near the cities of S acramento and C itrus Heights, I-80, from east of the Y olo C ounty Line to the Placer C ounty Line (PM M0.1/18.0); also in P lacer C ounty in the C ity of R oseville, I-80, from the S acramento C ounty Line to east of the S acramento C ounty Line (PM 0.0/0.7) - Install I-80 F iber Optics at Various fiber optic communication lines [C TIPS ID 107-0000-1044]. Toll C redits C AL20708 VAR Caltrans D3 Locations for E NG $16,750,000 2021 P rogrammed
In various counties on various routes at various locations within District 3 (Primary Location: I-80) - R epair or replace damaged inductive loop C AL20758 VAR Caltrans D3 Loop Detectors vehicle detection elements [C TIPS ID 107-0000-1099] $1,629,000 2020 P rogrammed
In Placer, S acramento and Y olo C ounties on I-5, I-80, S R 99 and S R 113 at various locations: R eplace obsolete Microwave Vehicle C AL20760 VAR Caltrans D3 P la/S ac/Y ol R epair F ield E lements Detection S ystem (MVDS ) elements [C TIPS ID 107-0000-1098] $2,344,000 2020 P rogrammed
In and near the cities of S acramento, R ancho C ordova and Folsom, US 50, from Y olo C ounty line to Folsom Blvd. (L0.0/17.5); also in Y olo C ounty, in West S acramento, from I-80 to S acramento C ounty line (PM 0.0/3.156), and on I-80 from E nterprise Blvd. to US 50 (PM 9.2/R9.552) - S ac/Y ol C ounties T MS F ield Install Transportation Management S ystem (TMS ) field elements C AL20791 VAR Caltrans D3 Elements [C TIPS ID 107-0000-1128] $46,660,000 2023 P rogrammed S ACOG Region Emergency Repair Lump S um - E mergency R epair (excluding Federal E mergency R elief C AL17380 VAR Caltrans D3 P rogram Program funds)for non-capacity increasing projects only. $400,000 2023 P rogrammed
In S acramento, Y olo, Placer and Glenn C ounties on R outes 5, 16, 45, 49, 50, 65, 80, 99, 113 and 174 at various locations - Install traffic operations elements such as queue warning systems, flashing beacons S afety Improvements in Various and lighting, and modify existing signals to new standards [C TIPS C AL20778 VAR Caltrans D3 C ounties, R outes and Locations Identifier S ac-Var; C TIPS ID 107-0000-1149] $4,115,000 2020 P rogrammed
In Y uba, S acramento, Placer, E l Dorado and Butte counties on Various R outes at Various Locations - Upgrade pedestrian facilities [E FIS ID Upgrade P edestrian F acilities at 0312000071; C TIPS ID 107-0000-0974] [Total Project Cost $3,482,000 C AL20516 VAR Caltrans D3 Various Locations in 17/18 F Y ]. T oll C redits for E NG , R OW, C ON $3,482,000 2019 P rogrammed In and near R ancho C ordova and Folsom, from S unrise Blvd. to the county line (PM 12.5/23.1); also in E l Dorado C ounty near E l Dorado US 50 in S acramento and E l Dorado Hills, from the county line to S ilva Valley P arkway (P M 0.0/1.7) - Install C AL20772 VAR Caltrans D3 C ounties ITS fiber optic cable [C TIPS ID 107-0000-1121] $7,021,000 2022 P rogrammed
In S acramento and Placer C ounties, on R outes 50, 80 and 99 at various US 50/I-80/SR 99 High Friction locations - Improve pavement friction and wet weather conditions C AL20730 VAR Caltrans D3 S urface Treatment [C TIPS 107-0000-1066]. Toll C redits for ENG, R OW, C ON $1,710,000 2019 P rogrammed
In Y olo, Placer and S acramento C ounties, on I-80, S R 65 and S R 99, at Yol/Pla/Sac Ramp Meters at Various various locations (I-80-2.4/R11.3 used in C TIPS ) - Install ramp meters C AL20695 VAR Caltrans D3 Locations [C TIPS ID 107-0000-1008]. Toll C redits for ENG, R OW, C ON $12,454,000 2019 P rogrammed Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 48 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year In Y olo, S acramento and E l Dorado counties, in and near the cities of West S acramento, S acramento, R ancho C ordova, Folsom and P lacerville, on US 50, from I-80 to S R 89, at various locations (P M 0.0/70.6) - Upgrade guardrail to make standard [C TIPS ID 107-0000- C AL20779 VAR Caltrans D3 Y ol/S a c /E D U S 5 0 MB G R U pg ra de 1111] $3,436,000 2022 P rogrammed
C onduct necessary planning, state and federal programming, and monitoring activities, including updates to the MTP, revisions to the MTIP and S TIP, ensuring timely delivery of projects using state and federal funds, coordination with FHWA, FTA, C altrans, C TC , transit Planning Programming and operators, and local project sponsors. Ongoing. (S ee VAR 56008, VAR 56197 VAR SACOG Monitoring (R S TP) Phase 3 VAR 56101) (T oll C redits). T oll C redits for C ON $641,267 2020 P rogrammed For S AC OG staff to plan, program and monitor (non-construction) for PPM S acramento, S utter, Y olo, Y uba the counties of S acramento, S utter, Y olo, and Y uba. (Previous phases: VAR 56196 VAR SACOG C ounties S AC 21710, S UT10450, Y OL17010, Y UB15630) $5,892,000 2022 P rogrammed In the S AC OG R egion: develop regional standards for evaluating bicycle/pedestrian projects, procure automated bicycle/pedestrian counters, and develop a smartphone application for collecting user’s R egional Bicycle and P edestrian bicycle/pedestrian travel data (T oll C redits for C ON). (C ycleS ac). T oll VAR 56125 VAR SACOG Data C ollection C redits for C O N $559,510 2020 P rogrammed
Implement bike share system in three cities (Davis, S acramento, and S acramento Regional Bike S hare West S acramento). (T oll C redits for C ON) (E mission Benefits in kg/day: VAR 56194 VAR SACOG Implementa tion 0.25 R OG, 0.5 NOx, 2.98 PM 10, 2.98 PM 2.5). Toll C redits for C ON $3,400,000 2019 P rogrammed For transit in the 4-county S AC OG R egion (S acramento, S utter, Y olo, and Y uba): Purchase replacement and expansion transit vehicles for VAR 56200 VAR SACOG Transit Vehicle Purchase operation. $18,148,000 2024 P rogrammed
TDM is a general term for strategies that result in more efficient use of trans portation res ources . S AC O G 's T D M program promotes alternative mode use in the S AC OG region (rideshare, carpooling, vanpooling, public transit, bicycling, walking, and telecommuting. Outreach is done through partners (TMAs, and public agencies working with employers). Provide funding for 12 Transportation Management Organizations (TMOs) in region through grants. (E mission Benefits: R OG 0.54 and Transportation Demand NOx 0.5 kg/day) (This is a continuation of Phase 2, VAR 56025). Toll VAR 56184 VAR SACOG Management (TDM) Phase 3 C redits for C O N $7,152,837 2019 P rogrammed
P has e 3 of S acramento E mergency C lean Air T rans portation P rogram (S E C AT), Heavy-Duty NOx control strategies. (Phase 1 S AC 22090, Phase 2 VAR 56037 ) (E mission Benefits in kg/day: 236 NOx, 21 PM10, 9 R OG. And in kg/day for each $3m increment: 835 NOx, 109 R OG) VAR 56195 VAR S MAQMD S E C AT P rogram P has e 3 (T oll C redits). T oll C redits for C ON $11,175,428 2025 P rogrammed
S acramento Federal Non-attainment Area: S pare The Air Voluntary D riving C urtailment P rogram. [C ontinued from S AC 21080, L arger MT P VAR 56006 VAR S MAQMD S pare the Air Phase 2 project is VAR 56022] (E mission Benefits in kg/day: R OG 0.2, NOx 0.2) $8,807,521 2020 P rogrammed Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 49 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year
S acramento Federal Non-attainment Area: S pare The Air Voluntary Driving C urtailment Program. [C ontinued from S AC 21080 and VAR 56201 VAR S MAQMD S pare the Air Phase 3 VAR 56006] (E mission Benefits in kg/day: R OG 0.2, NOx 0.2) $3,058,808 2024 P rogrammed Purchase seven heavy-duty, high floor, clean diesel commuter buses Y S T10445 VAR Y uba S utter Transit Commuter Bus Fleet Replacement (40' - 45') to replace seven buses. $4,375,000 2019 P rogrammed Demand Response Fleet Purchase ten low-floor, demand response buses to replace ten high- Y S T10446 VAR Y uba S utter Transit Replacement floor buses. Vehicle fuel type will likely be gasoline (G A). $1,500,000 2019 P rogrammed
Demand Response Fleet Purchase seven demand response replacement buses to replace six Y S T10453 VAR Y uba S utter Transit Replacement demand response buses. Fuel type will likely be gasoline (GA) $1,050,000 2022 P rogrammed Fixed Route Fleet Replacement & Purchase 11 heavy-duty, low-floor, clean diesel, local fixed route buses Y S T10444 VAR Y uba S utter Transit Minor F leet E xpansion (30' - 35') to replace 11 local fixed route buses. $5,500,000 2020 P rogrammed
Y S T10449 VAR Y uba S utter Transit Operating Assistance for FY 2019 Y uba-S utter Transit Operating Assistance for FY 2019 $7,540,000 2019 P rogrammed
Y S T10450 VAR Y uba S utter Transit Operating Assistance for FY 2020 Y uba-S utter Transit Operating Assistance for FY 2020 $7,920,000 2020 P rogrammed
Y S T10451 VAR Y uba S utter Transit Operating Assistance for FY 2021 Y uba-S utter Transit Operating Assistance for FY 2021 $8,320,000 2021 P rogrammed
Y S T10452 VAR Y uba S utter Transit Operating Assistance for FY 2022 Y uba-S utter Transit Operating Assistance for FY 2022 $8,740,000 2022 P rogrammed
Near Capay, S R 16, from Capay Canal Bridge to County Road 85 (PM 25.2/25.5); also in E sparto, S R 16, from Orleans S treet to C ounty R oad 21A (PM 27.5/28.3) - Improve pedestrian safety and operations for C AL20710 YOL Caltrans D3 E sparto Pedestrian Improvements bicycles and motorists [C TIPS ID 107-0000-1052]. Toll C redits for ENG $3,300,000 2020 P rogrammed In and near Woodland, I-5, from the S acramento C ounty Line to the C olusa C ounty Line (PM 0.4/R28.9) - Improvements to reduce maintenance worker exposure [includes roadside paving, paving areas beyond gore, and access gates and roads, vehicle pullouts] [C TIPS ID C AL20709 YOL Caltrans D3 I-5 R oadside S afety 107-0000-1049]. Toll C redits for ENG $3,030,000 2020 P rogrammed In West S acramento, I-80, at the S acramento R iver Bridge and I-80 S acramento R iver B O H (B ryte Overhead #22-0026L/R (PM R 11.3) - R ehabilitate bridge [C TIPS ID 107- C AL20712 YOL Caltrans D3 Bend) 0000-1053]. Toll C redits for ENG $39,497,000 2022 P rogrammed
In and near West S acramento, on I-80, from east of Mace Blvd. to S acramento R iver Bridge (PM 4.3/R11.4); also on US 50, from I-80 to J efferson Blvd. Overcrossing (PM 0.0/2.5) - R ehabilitate pavement by placing continuous reinforced concrete, rehabilitate bridge decks, I-80/US 50 R oadway Preservation in median widening at three locations, upgrade bridge railings and C AL20794 YOL Caltrans D3 Y olo C ounty (S HOPP Long Lead) construct an auxiliary lane (S HOPP Long Lead) $343,305,000 2031 P rogrammed Near Winters, on S R 505, at Putah C reek Bridge #22-0072L/R, from S olano C ounty line to 0.4 mile south of S R 128 (PM 0.0/0.2); also in S olano C ounty from 0.3 mile south to the Y olo C ounty line (PM R 10.3/R10.6) - S eismic retrofit of two parallel bridges [C TIPS ID 107- C AL20793 YOL Caltrans D3 Putah Creek S eismic Restoration 0000-1112] $19,904,000 2024 P rogrammed Where R OW permits, construct Class II bike lane on S R 128 from C AL20626 YOL Caltrans D3 S R 128 C lass II Bike Lane Valley Oak Dr. to E . Main S t., Winters (PM 7.755 to 9.359) $2,730,000 2022 Planned Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 50 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year S R 16 & C R 85B Intersection C AL20627 YOL Caltrans D3 modification Install intersection controls at S R 16 and C ounty R oad 85B $2,000,000 2022 Planned S R 16 from C olusa C o Line to C ache C reek Indian C asino - C old in- C AL20664 YOL Caltrans D3 S R 16 C IR with HIMA Overlay place recycle with Hot Mix Asphalt Overlay $23,400,000 2036 Planned Near Esparto, west of Cache C reek Bridge #22-0019 (PM 4.0) - Install rock fall barrier to stabilize slope and minimize rock fall onto the C AL20776 YOL Caltrans D3 S R 16 R umsey S lide traveled way [C TIPS ID 107-0000-1148] $3,205,000 2020 P rogrammed
Near C adenasso, from 0.4 mile west of C ounty R oad 79 to 0.4 mile east of C ounty R oad 79; also from E sparto to 0.2 mile west of R oute 505 - S houlder widening, curve correction, left-turn channelization, S R 16 S afety Improvement Project - signalization and two-way left-turn lanes (PM 20.5/31.6 [C TIPS ID C AL20528 YOL Caltrans D3 Phase 2 10700000983]; Phase 1 of project is 03-0C 471 / CAL18743 $37,299,000 2021 P rogrammed In West S acramento, on S R 275, at the Tower Bridge (S acramento R iver Bridge #22-0021) - R eplace existing fender system (PM 13.1) S R 275 Tower Bridge Fender [EFIS ID 0313000137; C TIPS ID 107-0000-0971]. Toll C redits for ENG, C AL20510 YOL Caltrans D3 Replacement ROW, CON $14,916,000 2020 P rogrammed S R 45 from J unction 113 in K nights Landing to C olusa C o Line - C old in- C AL20663 YOL Caltrans D3 S R 45 C IR with HIMA Overlay place recycle with Hot Mix Asphalt Overlay $15,200,000 2036 Planned Near Wes t S acramento, on S R 84, from 3.7 miles north of C larks burg Road to Levee Access Road (PM 13.3/15.7) - Permanent restoration of S R 84 Restore Pavement and Levee damaged pavement and supporting levee embankment [C TIPS ID 107- C AL20765 YOL Caltrans D3 E mbankment 0000-1102] $70,040,000 2023 P rogrammed Near Woodland, at Wye Line R oad OC #22-0158 (PM 4.49), C ounty R oad 6 OC #22-0138 (PM R 25.57) and C ounty Line R oad OC #22-0139 S tandard Vehicle C learance on I-5 in (R 28.92) - E stablish standard vertical clearance [C TIPS ID 107-0000- C AL20769 YOL Caltrans D3 Y olo C ounty 1117]. Toll C redits for ENG $18,315,000 2024 P rogrammed In and near Woodland, I-5, from E ast Main S treet to C ounty R oad 13 at Y olo C ounty I-5 C urb R amp various locations (P M R 6.5/R 17.6) - Upgrade ADA facilities [C T IP S ID C AL20711 YOL Caltrans D3 Upgrades 107-0000-1050]. Toll C redits for ENG $860,000 2020 P rogrammed Approx. 8 miles south of West S acramento, from S olano C o Line to 4 miles north of Babel S lough R oad - C old in-place recycle with Hot Mix C AL20662 YOL Caltrans D3 Y olo S R 84 Overlay Asphalt Overlay $21,250,000 2036 Planned In Davis, on 1) Fourteenth S treet between F S treet and Oak Ave; and 2) Villanova Drive between Anderson R oad and S ycamore Lane, construct bike/ped safety improvements along 14 S t. and Villanova Dr., including 14th S treet / V illanova C orridor S afe R outes to S chool infrastructure improvements for North Davis Y OL19382 YOL C ity of Davis Improvements E lementary S chool. $1,131,000 2019 P rogrammed
In Davis, citywide, implement a bicycle and pedestrian wayfinding system and install permanent and temporary automated bicycle and Bicycle and Pedestrian Wayfinding & pedestrian counters at strategic locations. (E mission Benefits in kg/day: Y OL19332 YOL C ity of Davis Data C ollection P rogram 0.61 R OG, 0.35 NOx, 0.14 PM10, 0.14 PM2.5) $207,000 2019 P rogrammed Add Turn Lanes: C ovell Blvd. / Hwy. 113. Includes: turn lanes for Y OL17130 YOL C ity of Davis C ovell Blvd. access-egress to Hwy. 113 including the overcrossing structure. $15,000,000 2027 Planned Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 51 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year In Davis, at downtown Amtrak Depot, improve entrance and parking lot, provide additional parking, construct bike/ped crossing of the railroad tracks, and improve service by increasing the frequency of bus service to the facility. This improved bus service will require the purchase of an additional one to two heavy-duty buses. (Buses would be purchased Downtown Multimodal Parking with E armarks C A-E 2007–BUS P-0060 for $200,640 and C A-2008- Y OL19210 YOL C ity of Davis S truc ture BUS P-0060 for $217,380) $15,370,000 2030 Planned R econstruct the north side of R ichards Blvd. interchange to remove the loop on and off ramps and replace with new ramp in diamond Y OL17140 YOL C ity of Davis I-80/Richards Interchange configuration. Includes traffic signal installation. $6,600,000 2022 Planned Y OL17160 YOL C ity of Davis Lake Blvd. / C ovell Blvd. T raffic S ignalization: at Lake Blvd/C ovell Blvd. $250,000 2022 Planned Design and construct S afe R outes to S chool infrastructure improvements for Montgomery E lementary S chool and a bicycle/pedestrian bridge from the disadvantaged Olive Drive P ole Line R oad / Olive Drive neighborhood to the two-way multi-use path on the Pole Line R oad C onnection / Montgomery WBAR overcrossing, reducing route distance from 2.6 to 1.2 miles and Y OL19393 YOL C ity of Davis Improvements improving safety. $4,493,000 2019 P rogrammed
In Davis, citywide. operate S afe R outes to S chool Program through 2018. Work includes continuing outreach, marketing, education, printing maps, supporting school site coordinators, and continuation of "Active4.me" scanning system (captures every trip and can instantly notify a parent that their student arrived on campus). Work also may Y OL19337 YOL C ity of Davis S afe R outes to S chool include improving signage near schools. $626,461 2018 P rogrammed
S treetscape improvements plan for primary retail streets downtown to enhance pedestrian spaces, better accommodate bicycles, and strengthen linkages between parking areas and downtown destinations. S tudy and design of Downtown core The improvements plan shall include but not be limited to directional Y OL19357 YOL C ity of Davis streetscape improvements signage, street trees, street furniture and lighting. $200,000 2022 Planned
Access and circulation plan to improve connectivity and safety for all S tudy and design of R ichards modes of travel consistent with complete streets. The plan shall include Boulevard / Olive Drive area access but not be limited to the I-80 / Richards interchange, R ichards / Olive Y OL19358 YOL C ity of Davis and circulation improvements intersection, and "gateway" enhancements. $200,000 2022 Planned E xplore the feasibility of access to the Nishi property including motor vehicles, delivery vehicles, transit buses, emergency vehicles, bicycles, S tudy and preliminary design of and pedestrians. The study and preliminary design shall include but not acces s alternatives for Nis hi property be limited to access to/from the UC Davis campus and West Olive Y OL19359 YOL C ity of Davis to U C D a vis D rive. $150,000 2022 Planned C ity of W es t Y OL19345 YOL S acramento C itywide Bike Lane G ap C losure In West S acramento, throughout the C ity: 10.3 miles of new bike lanes. $592,000 2019 P rogrammed C ity of W es t C larksburg Branch Line Trail and Y OL19376 YOL S acramento Bridge-Phase2 C onstruction of Bike T rail from R iver C ity High S chool to C ity Limits $1,000,000 2024 Planned C ity of W es t C old Ironing-Port of West C onstruct cold ironing infrastructure as required by the C alifornia Air Y OL19350 YOL S acramento S acramento R es ources B oard (C AR B ) $2,000,000 2022 Planned C ity of W es t C onstruct Bike Trail under I S treet Bridge and new C S treet Bridge then Y OL19377 YOL S acramento I S treet to Indian Heritage Bike Trail continue atop levee to Indian Heritage C enter $2,000,000 2027 Planned Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 52 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year
This project includes the construction of a new port entrance, including the installation of a new rail crossing near Beacon and Industrial Boulevards. T his project will increase the efficiency and safety of travel to, from and within the Port, and is required prior to the construction of a C ity of W es t new area project. This project will improve transportation operations, Y OL19361 YOL S acramento P ort of W es t S a c ra mento E ntra nc e and is likely to lead to significant positive economic benefits. $2,400,000 2027 Planned S ervice Plan: S tudy rail relocation and reconfiguration through West S acramento. The intent of the study will be to seek implementing a C ity of W es t R ail relocation & reconfiguration proposed solution and leveraging public and private funding for Y OL19288 YOL S acramento study implementation. $1,000,000 2017 Planned
Dredge remainder of 35 miles of 43 mile ship channel an additional 5' to 35' in depth. This 15% increase in channel depth will allow larger ships and thus will increase allowable ship capacity by 40% (from 25,000 tons C ity of W es t S acramento River Deep Water S hip to 35,000 tons). S hip channel boundaries are from C ollinsville (just Y OL19223 YOL S acramento C hannel Deepening above S uisun Bay) up to West S acramento. $157,464,000 2036 Planned
S ycamore Park, from Westmore Oaks S chool over US 50 connecting with J oey Lopes Park (phase 2) and from Westmore Oaks E lementary S chool to the intersection of Park Blvd. and S tone Blvd (phase 3): C ity of W es t S ycamore Park Phase 2 and 3 C onstruct a 1,500 foot concrete overpass. (E mission Benefits in kg/day: Y OL19386 YOL S acramento Bicycle and Pedestrian Overpass 0.02 R OG, 0.01 NOx, 0.01 PM2.5, 0.01 PM10) $7,868,010 2025 P rogrammed C ity of W es t C onstruction of Bike Trail from Tony Lopes Park to S tone Boulevard. Y OL19378 YOL S acramento S ycamore Trail-Phase 2 Includes Bike/Ped Bridge over US Hwy 50. $10,000,000 2022 Planned C ity of W es t Y OL19349 YOL S acramento S ycamore Trail-Phase 3 C onstruction of Bike Trail from S acramento Avenue to Westfield S chool $5,000,000 2022 Planned C ity of W es t U.S . 50: Install ramp meters and modify ramp design at S outh R iver R d Y OL15680 YOL S acramento U.S . 50/S outh R iver R oad interchange. $23,625,000 2030 Planned
S egment A – HS IP, R S TP, Local Funds – This portion of West Capitol Ave from Harbor Blvd to J efferson Blvd and J efferson Blvd from West C apitol Ave to P ark Blvd will rehabilitate existing pavement, reduce travel lanes from 6 to 4 lanes, add separated/buffered bike lanes, add new C lass II bike lanes, lighting and a new waterline. S egment B – HS IP, Local Funds – This portion of West Capitol Ave from Harbor Blvd to I-80 underpass will install separated/buffered sidewalks, enhanced crosswalks, mid-block crossings, lighting and repair deteriorating pavement. S egment C – S B1, Local Funds – West Capitol Avenue from Enterprise Ave to Houston Ave is to rehabilitate 5,300 linear feet of deteriorating pavement, widen from 2 to 4 lanes from S utter Ave to I-80 overpass (1,600 linear feet) and widen from 3 to 4 lanes from east of I- 80 off ramp to west of Northrop Drive (2,700 linear feet), install drainage improvements, sidewalks, access ramps, bike lanes, street lighting and West Capitol Ave & J efferson Blvd cross walks for safer pedestrian crossings. (PE Only. See YOL19396, C ity of W es t R eha bilita tion & C omplete S treets & Phase 2 - West Capitol Avenue R ehabilitation - C omplete S treets and Y OL19383 YOL S acramento S afety PE & Phase 1 S afety for Design, R ight of Way, and C onstruction phases.) $3,522,989 2019 P rogrammed Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 53 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year In West S acramento on West Capitol Avenue from Westacre R oad to S ycamore Avenue, construction of streetscape improvements, including wider sidewalks, flatter road cross-section, reconfigure lanes, C ity of W es t West Capitol Avenue S treetscape roundabout, utility relocation, new lighting, and substantial planting and Y OL19284 YOL S acramento Improvements - Phase 3 hardscape treatments. $12,420,000 2027 Planned In West S acramento on West Capitol Avenue from S ycamore Avenue to Harbor Boulevard, construction of streetscape improvements, including wider sidewalks, flatter road cross-section, reconfigure lanes, C ity of W es t West Capitol Avenue S treetscape utility relocation, new lighting, and substantial planting and hardscape Y OL19285 YOL S acramento Improvements - Phase 4 trea tments . $12,720,000 2027 Planned F easibility S tudy for realignment of freight rail out of the cities of Davis, C ity of W es t Woodland and West Sacramento to area east of Davis to create S a c ra mento. C ity of enhanced freight operations, remove safety issues in cities, to Woodland, C ity of encourage redevelopment of communities and to improved regional VAR 56182 YOL Davis, Y olo C ounty Y olo R egional F reight R ail P roject flood control $500,000 2022 Planned
In the C ity of W oodla nd a long E a s t Ma in S treet, from E a s t S treet to ea s t of Pioneer Avenue. C onstruct sidewalks, 10-foot off-street bike path and associated landscape and irrigation, class II bike lanes and bus turnouts. Project will also construct safety improvements to include medians, updated freeway and local street signage and lane striping changes to improve traffic flow near the freeway entrances/exits. (Toll Y OL19305 YOL C ity of Woodland E a s t Ma in S t. Improvements credits for P E ). T oll C redits for E NG $3,416,000 2020 P rogrammed Interchange R econstruction: on I-5 at County R d. 102 including Y OL19286 YOL C ity of Woodland I-5 / CR 102 Interchange (Phase 2) overcrossing of I-5. $7,000,000 2022 Planned In Woodland, within the limits of the I5/CR 102 Interchange project: C onstruct landscaping and irrigation associated with the I-5 / CR 102 I-5 / CR 102 Interchange Interchange P roject (S AC O G ID # Y O L 17300) (T oll C redits for C O N.). Y OL19290 YOL C ity of Woodland Landscaping T oll C redits for C ON $2,063,579 2019 P rogrammed R oadway Operational Improvements: from Ashley Ave. to Cottonwood Y OL17420 YOL C ity of Woodland Ma in S t. S t., construct south side improvements $360,000 2022 Planned West Main S t., between West S t. and C R 98: C onstruct full road West Main S treet Bicycle/Pedestrian vehicle, bicycle, and sidewalk safety improvements. (E mission Benefits Y OL19384 YOL C ity of Woodland Mobility and S afety Improvements in kg/day: 0.05 R OG, 0.03 NOx, 0.01 PM10, 0.01 PM2.5) $6,258,500 2019 P rogrammed On UC Davis C ampus, La R ue Ave. (formerly C alifornia S t.) over Putah C reek: R eplace functionally obsolete 2 lane bridge with 2 lane bridge Y OL19293 YOL UC Davis La Rue Ave. Bridge Replacement including bike lanes and pedestrian access. $7,337,327 2020 P rogrammed
Operation, maintenance, administration, and program development for the provision of fixed route transit service within the C ity of Davis. Program development includes training and direct educational expenses for employee development (pursuant to 2 C FR Part 200.472) in the areas of safety, security, and business administration. Davis UNI10466 YOL Unitrans Operating Assistance Urbanized Area. FFY 2017 to FFY 2022 $30,688,566 2022 P rogrammed Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 54 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year
For Davis C ommunity Transit, replace four paratransit vehicles plus related equipment (radios, fareboxes, etc). These vehicles will use gasoline (GA) fuel.For Unitrans, purchase six standard 40-foot buses and three double-deck buses between FY 2017 and FY 2020 to replace existing buses when they have surpassed their useful lives plus related equipment (radios, fare boxes, security equipment, etc). (C MAQ E mission R eductions in kg/day: R OG 0.17, NOx 0.51, PM10 0.01, PM2.5 0.01) The 40-foot buses will use C NG fuel, and the double-deck UNI10469 YOL Unitrans R olling S tock R eplacement buses will use biodiesel. $10,951,219 2022 P rogrammed Implement various bus stop improvements, accessibility, and passenger amenities, including but not limited to installation, replacement, and Unitrans Bus S top Access and repair of bus shelters/benches, passenger information displays, and UNI10465 YOL Unitrans Passenger Amenities passenger safety/security equipment. $550,000 2022 P rogrammed
P erform repair and rehabilitation activities to maintain the Unitrans Maintenance Facility in a state of good repair, and replace operating equipment in the Maintenance Facility that has surpass their useful lives. The focus during the quadrennial period of this MTIP is to Unitrans Maintenance F acility complete the installation of electric charging infrastructure to facilitate UNI10471 YOL Unitrans Improvements the introduction of electric propulsion buses into the Unitrans fleet. $7,400,000 2022 P rogrammed Unitrans Miscellaneous C apital Office, shop, operating equipment, facility, security enhancements, and UNI10467 YOL Unitrans Improvements for Ops non-revenue vehicles for existing facilities. $525,000 2022 P rogrammed Bridge R ehabilitation on C ounty Y OL19352 YOL Y olo C ounty R oad 19 over S lough S 3 R ehabilitate or replace functionally obsolete Bridge $400,000 2024 Planned Bridge R ehabilitation on C ounty Y OL19353 YOL Y olo C ounty R oad 85 over Goodnow S lough R ehabilitate or replace functionally obsolete Bridge $400,000 2027 Planned Bridge R eplacement on C ounty Y OL19374 YOL Y olo C ounty R oad 25 over C ottonwood S lough R eplacement of structurally deficient Bridge $815,000 2022 Planned Bridge R eplacement on C ounty Y OL19355 YOL Y olo C ounty R oad49 over Hamilton C reek R eplacement of functionally obsolete Bridge $400,000 2024 Planned Pavement Rehabilitation: from C ounty R d. 27 to C ounty R oad 25A. Y OL19249 YOL Y olo C ounty C ounty R d. 99 Includes: bike lanes. $2,000,000 2022 Planned Widen C ounty R oad 102 between Davis and Woodland. Project may be implemented in phases as funding allows. Turn pockets and center Y OL19371 YOL Y olo C ounty C ounty R oad 102 Widening medians are highest priority. $12,600,000 2027 Planned R oadway S afety Improvements: from C ounty R oad 89 to C ounty R oad 102. Includes: pavement rehabilitation, paved shoulders & clear Y OL19370 YOL Y olo C ounty C ounty R oad 27 recovery zone. $38,000,000 2027 Planned
C R 27 from 1 mile west of CR 92D to C R 93, C R 94 to C R 95 and from C R 97 to C R 98: R eha bilita te fa rm to ma rket truc k route utiliz ing c ement- Y OL19389 YOL Y olo C ounty C R 27 R ehabilitation treated full-depth reclamation process to recycle the road in place. $3,843,000 2019 P rogrammed C R 29 Over Dry S lough, 0.77 mi west of CR 98: R eplace 2-lane bridge with a new 2-lane bridge. (T oll credits for P E , R OW, C ON.). T oll C redits Y OL19318 YOL Y olo C ounty CR 29 Bridge Replacement for E NG, R OW, C ON $3,078,291 2021 P rogrammed C R 29 Over C hickahominy S lough, 2.53 miles west of CR 88. R eplace C R 29 Over C hickahominy S lough - existing 1 lane bridge with a 2 lane bridge - no added capacity.. Toll Y OL19395 YOL Y olo C ounty Bridge Replacement C redits for E NG , R O W, C O N $2,700,000 2023 P rogrammed Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 55 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year C R 40 over C ache C reek, 0.12 miles south of S R 16. R eplace existing 1 CR 40 Over Cache Creek - Bridge lane bridge with a new 1 lane bridge - no added capacity.. Toll C redits Y OL19394 YOL Y olo C ounty Replacement for E NG , C O N $2,627,150 2023 P rogrammed CR 41, over Cache Creek, 500' east of S R 16: Replace existing deficient 2 lane bridge with new 2 lane bridge: (Toll credits for PE , Y OL18235 YOL Y olo C ounty CR 41 Bridge Replacement R OW, & C ON.). Toll C redits for E NG, R OW, C ON $5,694,000 2022 P rogrammed C R 49, Over Hamilton C reek, 0/11 mi north of CR 50: R eplace the existing 2-lane functionally obsolete bridge with a new 2-lane bridge. Y OL19390 YOL Y olo C ounty C R 49 O ver Hamilton C r B ridge (T oll C redits for P E , R OW, C ON). T oll C redits for E NG , R OW, C ON $1,903,500 2021 P rogrammed C R 95 over Dry S lough, 0.06 mi north of C R 31: R eplace 2-lane bridge with a new 2-lane bridge. (T oll credits for P E , R OW, C ON.). T oll C redits Y OL19319 YOL Y olo C ounty CR 95 Bridge Replacement for E NG, R OW, C ON $1,858,500 2021 P rogrammed C R 96, over Dry S lough, 0.45 Mi North of CR 31: R eplace two lane CR 96 Bridge Replacement, Dry bridge with two lane bridge. (T oll C redits for P E , R OW, & C ON.). T oll Y OL19347 YOL Y olo C ounty S lough C redits for E NG , R O W, C O N $2,474,344 2021 P rogrammed C ounty R oad 96, over Union S chool S lough, 1.38 Mi S outh of C R 27: C R 96 Bridge R eplacement, Union R eplace two lane bridge with two lane bridge. (T oll C redits for P E , Y OL19346 YOL Y olo C ounty S chool S lough R OW, & C ON). Toll C redits for E NG, R OW, C ON $1,741,779 2021 P rogrammed C ounty R oad (C R ) 98, from 1300 feet south of C R 29 to the S olano C ounty line. R ehabilitate, widen shoulders, add multi-use path and/or C R 98 S afety and Bicycle bicycle lanes, and consider roundabouts or left turn lanes at CR 31, Y OL19333 YOL Y olo C ounty Improvement - Phase 2 R ussell Blvd., and Hutchison Dr. $15,600,000 2025 P rogrammed Old R iver R oad (south of C ounty R oad 124) and S outh R iver R oad Old R iver R d. & S outh R iver R oad (south of Freeport Bridge).: Upgrade existing guardrails and end Y OL19391 YOL Y olo C ounty S afety Improvements treatments. (H8-03-018). Toll C redits for C ON $1,200,000 2020 P rogrammed
Various locations throughout the C ounty, a systemic application: Perform R oadway S triping Audit to determine MUTC D compliance, install upgraded centerlines and edge-lines using thermoplastic striping Y OL19388 YOL Y olo C ounty R oadway S triping with reflective beads. (T oll credits) HS IP 7-03-021. T oll C redits for C ON $2,763,600 2022 P rogrammed Y olo C ounty Transportation E ngineering, E nvironmental and C onstruction of a new satellite facility Y C T18253 YOL District New S atellite F acility for bus parking, maintenance and dispatch. $10,000,000 2022 Planned Operating Assistance (FTA 5307 Woodland S mall Urban) FY 17/18, Operating assistance for continuation of service on routes 45/45X, 210, Y C T18272 YOL Y olobus/YC TD FY 18/19 211, 212, 214, 215, 216, 217, 242, and 243. FY 17/18 and FY 18/19. $1,985,084 2019 P rogrammed Preventative Maintenance for local Woodland transit services, including Woodland Preventative Maintenance E xpress service to/from S acramento. Funding is for Y C TD operating Y C T18271 YOL Y olobus/YC TD FY 17/18 and FY 18/19 years 17/18 and 18/19. $531,720 2019 P rogrammed In Downtown Woodland: C onstruct new transit center and modify routes to pulse concept, requiring new bus route corridor in north part of Woodland Transit Center and Bus Woodland and other areas. (Toll C redits for PE , R OW, C ON). Toll Y C T18255 YOL Y olobus/YC TD S helter Improvements C redits for E NG , R O W, C O N $4,975,000 2020 P rogrammed
Y C TD ADA Operating Assistance ADA Operations for transit services within the Y C T D as well as service (FTA 5307 Large Urban) FY 17/18, to / from S acramento. S acramento Urbanized Area and Woodland Y C T18274 YOL Y olobus/YC TD FY 18/19 Urbanized Area. FFY 2018, $260,450; FFY 2019, $260,450. $2,421,366 2019 P rogrammed Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 56 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year
The project includes the design, engineering, environmental, and construction of a solar electricity system and electric vehicle charging infrastructure. The solar electricity system would be built on top of vehicle parking spaces which would then provide shade end energy for the many Y olobus and Y olobus S pecial vehicles. The system would include installation of solar panels covering over 60,000 square feet, Y C T D F acility E lectrification and chargers, inverters and any needed utility improvements/upgrades. Will Y C T18263 YOL Y olobus/YC TD S olar Upgrades (Phase 2) aid in stabilizing future fuel/energy costs for Y C TD operations. $15,000,000 2023 P rogrammed YCTD Preventative Maintenance Preventative Maintenance for transit services within the YCTD as well (FTA 5307 Large Urban) FY 17/18, as service to / from S acramento. S acramento Urbanized Area and Y C T18273 YOL Y olobus/YC TD FY 18/19 Woodland Urbanized Area. FFY 2018 ad FFY 2019. $3,360,000 2019 P rogrammed Operating Assistance for continuation of service on R oute 42. This service provides transit service to low income individuals who work non- traditional schedules, including evenings, weekends, and holidays. This amount includes $150,000 per year of funds for operations in FY Y C TD R oute 42 Operating 16/17/18 transferred to the 5307 account from Davis S mall Urban Y C T18267 YOL Y olobus/YC TD Assistance (5307 S mall Urban) (Davis UZA) funds. $7,173,625 2020 P rogrammed Operating assistance for rural transit services within the Y C TD. Outside Y C TD R ural Operating Assistance the S acramento Urbanized Area and the Woodland Urbanized Area. Y C T18275 YOL Y olobus/YC TD (FTA 5311) FFY 2018: $130,879 and FFY 2019 $130,879. $1,261,758 2019 P rogrammed Creation of new shuttle service between West Sacramento Transit C enter and Downtown S acramento to address evening peak downtown traffic. E xisting routes 40,41,42 and 240 would terminate at West Y C T18256 YOL Y olobus/YC TD Y olobus Downtown S huttle S acramento Transit Center during peak traffic events. $800,000 2020 P rogrammed R epair, replace shop equipment, and perform maintenance for Y olobus Y olobus Maintenance F acility maintenance shop. (FTA 5309(c) funds are S tate of Good R epair Y C T18165 YOL Y olobus/YC TD Improvements & E quipment funding) $650,000 2025 P rogrammed
F eather R iver B ridge S cour In Marysville, at F eather R iver Bridge #18-009 - S cour mitigation and C AL20509 YUB Caltrans D3 Mitigation retrofit piers (PM 0.10) [C TIPS ID 107-0000-0969]. Toll C redits for ENG $36,568,000 2023 P rogrammed Near Marysville, on S R 20, from 0.1 mile east of Loma R ica R oad to 0.2 Loma R ica R d./S pring Valley R d. mile west of S pring Valley R oad - R ehabilitate roadway (P M 8.0/10.2) C AL20523 YUB Caltrans D3 R ehab R oadway [C TIPS ID 107-0000-0972]. Toll C redits for ENG $17,420,000 2021 P rogrammed Underpass Improvements: widen the UPR R Underpass. Phase I and P hase II Widen 17th street UPR R underpass to 4 lanes with sidewalks and C AL20585 YUB Caltrans D3 Marysville UP R R Underpass shoulders, provide standard vertical clearance. $10,000,000 2022 Planned In and near Marysville, on S R 20, from S utter C ounty Line to Levee R oa d; a ls o on S R 70 from E S treet B ridg e to 24th S treet (Y ub-20- S R 20 & S R 70 ADA Infrastructure 0.5/2.0; Y ub-70-14.1/15.2) - Upgrade pedestrian infrastructure [C TIPS C AL20526 YUB Caltrans D3 Upgrade ID 107-0000-0982]. Toll C redits for ENG, R OW, C ON $7,047,000 2019 P rogrammed On S R 20 in Marysville between 17th S treet and 22nd S treet, extend C AL20629 YUB Caltrans D3 S R 20 Acceleration Lane acceleration lanes; construct median refuge (PM R 2.610/R2.940) $1,000,000 2022 Planned In Y uba C ounty on S R 20 in and near the C ity of Marysville, from Buchanan S treet to 0.2 mile east of Levee Road (PM R2.0/R3.4): S R 20 In and Near Marysville Maintenance asphalt overlay [HM1 - Pavement Preservation Fed- C AL20753 YUB Caltrans D3 Asphalt Overlay Funded]. Toll C redits for E NG, R OW, C ON $1,666,000 2019 P rogrammed C AL20431 YUB Caltrans D3 S R 20 Passing Lanes Passing Lanes: Loma R ica R d. to K ibbe R d. (PM 7.9/9.4) $2,500,000 2027 Planned Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 57 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year Near Marys ville, from Marys ville R oad to Y uba R iver (P arks B ar) B ridge (#16-11) - R ehabilitate roadway (PM 13.3/R17.8) [C TIPS ID 03-0002- C AL20694 YUB Caltrans D3 S R 20 R oadway R ehabilitation 0593] $62,610,000 2022 P rogrammed R oadway S afety Improvements: Parks Bar R d. to Hammonton- S martville R d. Includes: standard shoulders, vertical and horizontal C AL20432 YUB Caltrans D3 S R 20 S afety Improvements curve improvements, and E B & WB left-turn lanes. $6,500,000 2022 Planned R oadway S afety Improvements: Marysville R d. to S icard S t. Includes: standard shoulders, vertical and horizontal curve improvements, and C AL20437 YUB Caltrans D3 S R 20 S afety Improvements E B & WB left-turn lanes. (PM 13.27/19.98) $5,500,000 2027 Planned Near S martsville, from the Y uba R iver Bridge to east of S martsville S R 20 S houlder Widening R oad - R ealign and widen roadway (PM R 18.0/20.3) [C TIPS ID 107- C AL20514 YUB Caltrans D3 (Timbuctoo) 0000-0973]. Toll C redits for ENG $67,321,000 2022 P rogrammed In Y uba C ounty on S R 20, near Lake Wildwood, from 0.4 mile east of McGanney Lane to Y uba/Nevada county line; also in Nevada C ounty, from Y uba/Nevada county line to Mooney Flat Road - S houlder S R 20 S martsville S afety widening and curve improvements (PM 20.1/21.6) (Toll C redits) [C TIPS C AL20475 YUB Caltrans D3 E nhancements ID 107-0000-0912]. Toll C redits for ENG, R OW, C ON $28,780,000 2020 P rogrammed Near Linda and Marysville, S R 70, from 0.3 mile south of F eather R iver Blvd. to Y uba R iver Bridge (PM R 11.0/13.6) - Install concrete median barrier [remove existing barrier and oleanders; pave median and install new concrete barrier; correct drainage at S B off-ramp to North B eale C AL20714 YUB Caltrans D3 S R 70 Median B arrier R oad] [C TIPS ID 107-0000-1054]. Toll C redits for ENG $6,690,000 2020 P rogrammed C AL18815 YUB Caltrans D3 S R 70 Passing Lanes P assing Lanes: Marysville to Butte C ounty line. $30,000,000 2022 Planned In and near Marysville, S R 70, from 14th S treet to Cemetery Road (PM 14.9/15.6) - R oadway rehabilitation [C TIPS ID 107-0000-1055]. Toll C AL20715 YUB Caltrans D3 S R 70 Roadway Rehab C redits for E NG $104,500,000 2023 P rogrammed Near Marysville, from Laurellen R oad to S outh Honcut Creek Bridge (#16-0020) - Widen shoulders and improve clear recovery zone (PM C AL20679 YUB Caltrans D3 S R 70 S afety Improvements 16.2/25.8) [C TIPS ID 107-0000-1056]. Toll C redits for ENG $104,640,000 2022 P rogrammed Near Marysville, on S R 70, from 0.1 mile north of Binney J unction Underpass to 0.3 mile north of Laurellen R oad, at S immerly S lough S R 70 S immerly S lough Bridge Bridge #16-0019 - R eplace bridge (PM 15.5/16.5) [C TIPS ID 107- C AL20472 YUB Caltrans D3 Replacement 00000909. Toll C redits for ENG $82,900,000 2022 P rogrammed Near Marys ville, from Marys ville R oad to Y uba R iver (P arks B ar) bridge. C AL20660 YUB Caltrans D3 Y uba S R 20 S houlder Widening Rehabilitate Roadway. $42,600,000 2036 Planned Throughout Marysville, with concentration downtown and near schools: Install 26 bicycle racks on public sidewalks, 7.23 miles of bicycle lanes, 5.74 miles of bicycle routes, four high visibility crosswalks, two Marysville Bicycle and P edestrian R ectangular R apid Flash Beacons, two speed feedback signs, a raised Y UB16063 YUB C ity of Marysville Improvement intersection, and 1,193 feet of sidewalk. $583,000 2020 P rogrammed 5th S t., from S R 70 to J S t., inc luding the Medic a l A rts D is tric t: R ehabilitate road. On S econd S t. (2nd S t.) from Hwy 70 to J S t., Marysville Medical Arts District including the Medical Arts District: E xtend and realign (PS R only). PE , Y UB16054 YUB C ity of Marysville Transportation Development R OW, and C ON programmed separately as [ ]. $2,791,000 2025 P rogrammed Pavement Rehabilitation: 25th S t. from S ampson to C ovillaud, S icard S t. from E a s t 16th S t. to E a s t 19th S t., F reema n S t. from E a s t 18th S t. to E a s t 19th S t. a nd E a s t 19th S t. from C ovilla ud to R a mirez . (P rojec t Y UB15981 YUB C ity of Marysville Pavement Rehab. IV) $700,000 2022 Planned P avement R ehabilitation: R ideout Wy. from C ovillaud to R amirez S t., G reeley from E a s t 19th S t. to E a s t 22nd S t. a nd B oulton from E a s t 19th Y UB15982 YUB C ity of Marysville Pavement Rehab. S t. to E a s t 22nd S t. (P rojec t V ) $700,000 2022 Planned Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 58 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year T raffic S ignalization: Upgrade the 4 existing traffic signals (in Marysville) Y UB15979 YUB C ity of Marysville Upgrade S ignals tha t a re not on the S ta te H wy. S ys tem. $1,200,000 2022 Planned Y UB16053 YUB C ity of W hea tla nd C S treet Resurfacing R epair base failures, resurface and replace ped ramps. $202,000 2018 Planned Purchase pavement management software, perform condition assessments of all roads, input data, prepare decision tree, prepare budget scenarios, hold public outreach workshops and present results Y UB16045 YUB C ity of W hea tla nd Pavement Management System to C ity C ouncil. $28,000 2017 Planned Pedestrian S afety E nhancements at C onstruct ADA compliant sidewalks, detectable warning surfaces and Y UB16051 YUB C ity of W hea tla nd R ailroad G rade C ros s ings extend rail crossings, and modify railroad warning devices. $980,000 2022 Planned Y UB16046 YUB C ity of W hea tla nd Wheatland R d. R ehab Pavement rehab and ADA pedestrian compliance. $400,000 2017 Planned
In Y uba C ounty, in Olivehurst, along S eventh (7th) Avenue between the railroad tracks (400 feet east of Arboga R oad) & Olivehurst Avenue: C onstruct curb, gutter, sidewalk, bicycle lanes, curb ramps, striping, 7th Ave. Bicycle Path and Pedestrian traffic control devices, raised crosswalk, curb extensions, pedestrian Y UB16055 YUB Y uba C ounty R oute Improvements refuge islands, rapid flash beacons, and improved pedestrian lighting. $1,032,000 2019 P rogrammed Various bridges in Y uba C ounty: conduct preventive maintenance. S ee the C altrans website for a detailed list of locations: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/hbrr99/HBP_MPO.html#S AC O Y UB16021 YUB Y uba C ounty Bridge Preventive Maintenance G $68,000 2019 P rogrammed In Y uba C ounty, Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program (BPMP), Bridge Preventive Maintenance Various locations. S ee C altrans Local Assistance HBP web site for Y UB16066 YUB Y uba C ounty P rogram backup list of bridges. $332,420 2022 P rogrammed Y UB15893 YUB Y uba C ounty Broadway S t. T raffic S ignalization: at Broadway S t / Links P kwy $270,000 2022 Planned Y UB15896 YUB Y uba C ounty C amp Far West Rd. Pavement Rehabilitation: from S penceville R d. to end of pavement. $1,000,000 2017 Planned Y UB15910 YUB Y uba C ounty C ountry C lub Ave. T raffic S ignalization: 4-way signal at F eather R iver Blvd. $267,000 2022 Planned Y UB15912 YUB Y uba C ounty C ountry C lub Ave. T raffic S ignalization: 3-way signal at Links P kwy. $215,000 2027 Planned In Olivehurst, E leventh Ave., from Olivehurst Ave. to Powerline R d: C onstruct Class III bicycle routes, three new crosswalk, lighting and flashing beacons. The project also provides pedestrian and bicycle E leventh Avenue Bicycle Lane and skills training, walk- and bike-to-school events, incentives, materials for Y UB16064 YUB Y uba C ounty Pedestrian R oute Improvements parents, and enhanced enforcement. $1,701,000 2022 P rogrammed Y UB15897 YUB Y uba C ounty E lla Ave. / Arboga R d. T raffic S ignalization: at E lla Ave/Arboga R d. $215,000 2022 Planned Y UB15901 YUB Y uba C ounty E lla Ave. / Feather R iver Blvd. T raffic S ignalization: at E lla Ave/Feather R iver Blvd. $267,000 2027 Planned Y UB15899 YUB Y uba C ounty E lla Ave. / Links P kwy. T raffic S ignalization: at E lla Ave/Link P kwy. $267,000 2022 Planned E llis R d over S immerly S lough, 1.0 miles east of S R 70. R eplace E llis R d Over S immerly S lough - existing 2 lane bridge with a 2 lane bridge.. T oll C redits for E NG , R OW, Y UB16072 YUB Y uba C ounty Bridge Replacement CON $1,609,625 2023 P rogrammed Y UB15905 YUB Y uba C ounty E rle R d. / Goldfields P kwy. T raffic S ignalization: 3-way traffic signal. $215,000 2018 Planned F eather R iver Blvd T raffic S ignal at Y UB15928 YUB Y uba C ounty R iver Oaks Blvd C onstruct new traffic signal at Feather R iver Blvd and R iver Oaks Blvd. $300,000 2018 Planned Y UB15904 YUB Y uba C ounty Feather R iver Blvd. / Anderson R d. T raffic S ignalization: at F eather R iver Blvd/Anderson S t. $267,000 2022 Planned F eather R iver B lvd. / B roadway Y UB15894 YUB Y uba C ounty S treet T raffic S ignalization: at F eather R iver Blvd/Broadway S t. $270,000 2022 Planned On Feather R iver Blvd between C R 512 and Algodon R d: Improve Feather River Blvd. S afety horizontal alignments. (HS IP 6-03-023) (T oll C redits for C ON). T oll Y UB16036 YUB Y uba C ounty Improvements C redits for C O N $1,276,078 2017 P rogrammed Install new traffic signal at the intersection of North Beale R oad and Y UB15881 YUB Y uba C ounty G oldfields P arkway T raffic S ignal G oldfields P arkway $300,000 2022 Planned Hammonton-S martsville R d. / Y UB15939 YUB Y uba C ounty G oldfields P kwy. T raffic S ignalization: at Hammonton-S martsville R d/Goldfields P kwy. $300,000 2027 Planned Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 59 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year Hammonton-S martsville R d. / Griffith Y UB15940 YUB Y uba C ounty Ave. T raffic S ignalization: at Hammonton-S martsville R d/Griffith Ave. $300,000 2027 Planned Hammonton-S martville R d. / Dantoni Y UB15938 YUB Y uba C ounty R d. T raffic S ignalization: at Hammonton-S martsville R d/Dantoni Ave. $300,000 2027 Planned Y UB15867 YUB Y uba C ounty Highway 70 Widen: overpass at McGowan Pkwy. Includes: new traffic signals. $4,200,000 2022 Planned Iowa C ity R d. over J ack S lough, 0.35 miles east of Fruitland R d.: R eplace existing 2 lane bridge with a new 2 lane bridge. (T oll credits for Y UB16032 YUB Y uba C ounty Iowa C ity R d. Bridge R eplacement P E , R OW, C ON). Toll C redits for E NG, R OW, C ON $1,980,000 2020 P rogrammed Y UB15906 YUB Y uba C ounty Links Pkwy. / Anderson R d. Traffic S ignalization: at Links Pkwy/Anderson R d. $267,000 2027 Planned R oadway Operational Improvements: Widen and construct turn pockets Y UB15945 YUB Y uba C ounty Loma Rica Rd. at various locations. Includes: shoulder widening. $2,650,000 2022 Planned Y UB15946 YUB Y uba C ounty Loma Rica Rd. T raffic S ignalization: at Hwy. 20 / Loma R ica R d. $300,000 2022 Planned Los Verjeles Rd. Bridge Los Verjeles R d., over S outh Honcut Cr., at Butte C ounty Line: R eplace Y UB16031 YUB Y uba C ounty Replacement existing 2 lane bridge with a new 2 lane bridge. $3,251,000 2020 P rogrammed
R oadway Operational Improvements: C onstruct turn pockets and widen Y UB15949 YUB Y uba C ounty Marysville R d. shoulders at various intersections from Hwy. 20 to Willow G len R d. $3,955,000 2017 Planned McGowan Parkway and Arboga Install new Traffic S ignal at the intersection of McGowan Parkway and Y UB15871 YUB Y uba C ounty R oad T raffic S ignalization Arboga R oad. $250,000 2018 Planned In Olivehurst, along McGowan Parkway between S R 70 and Olive Ave.: C onstruct sidewalks, C lass II bicycle lanes, ADA-compliant ramps, McGowan Parkway Bicycle Lane and striping, traffic control devices, storm drain, and new crosswalks. Project Y UB16065 YUB Y uba C ounty Pedestrian R oute Improvements includes a locally funded continuous left-turn lane. $1,559,000 2021 P rogrammed R ail C rossing Project: Upgrade the existing at grade intersection at the Y UB15868 YUB Y uba C ounty McG owan P kwy. / UP R R UPRR tracks. $810,000 2022 Planned
Y UB15886 YUB Y uba C ounty N. Beale R d. / Griffith R d. T raffic S ignalization: at the intersection of North Beale R d. / Griffith R d. $215,000 2022 Planned North Beale R d.,from Hammonton S martsville R d. to Linda Ave.: North Beale Rd. Complete Streets construct bicycle lanes, curb and gutter, sidewalks, drainage facilities, Y UB16041 YUB Y uba C ounty Phase 2 lighting and other improvements. (PE was done on Y UB16008) $3,233,138 2021 P rogrammed C ons truc t c omplete s treets improvements for a 9400 ft s tretc h on N orth Beale R d. from Linda Avenue. to Griffith Ave. in the community of Linda. The project will construct curbs, gutters, sidewalks, ADA compliant corner ramps, transit stop enhancements, intersection improvements North Beale Rd. Complete Streets and several other streetscape features. (PE is programmed on Y UB16029 YUB Y uba C ounty R evitalization P hase 3 Y UB16008) $11,450,000 2018 Planned Traffic S ignalization: at the intersection of McGowan Pkwy. and Y UB15892 YUB Y uba C ounty Olivehurst Ave. / McGowan Pkwy. Olivehurst Ave. $215,000 2017 Planned Y UB15913 YUB Y uba C ounty Plumas Arboga R d. R ail C rossing P roject: Upgrade at the Union P acific R ailroad. $815,000 2022 Planned Y UB15915 YUB Y uba C ounty Plumas Arboga R d. Traffic S ignalization: at Plumas Arboga R d. / Arboga R d. $267,000 2022 Planned Y UB15917 YUB Y uba C ounty Plumas Arboga R d. T raffic S ignalization: at P lumas Arboga R d. / Feather R iver Blvd. $267,000 2027 Planned Y UB15918 YUB Y uba C ounty Plumas Arboga R d. T raffic S ignalization: at P lumas Arboga R d. / Links P kwy. $267,000 2022 Planned
Rices Crossing Rd, Over Oregon House Creek, 0.04 MI S /E Marysville R d., replace structurally deficient 2 lane bridge with a new 2 lane bridge. Y UB16034 YUB Y uba C ounty R ices C rossing R d. Bridge (T oll C redits for P E , R /W, & C ON.). T oll C redits for E NG , R OW, C ON $1,118,000 2020 P rogrammed Y UB15925 YUB Y uba C ounty R iver Oaks Blvd. T raffic S ignalization: at R iver Oaks Blvd. / Broadway S t. $270,000 2022 Planned S pring Valley R d. over Little Dry C reek, 0.3 miles west of Marysville R d.: S pring Valley R d. Bridge R eplace existing 2 lane bridge with a new 2 lane bridge. (T oll credits for Y UB16033 YUB Y uba C ounty Replacement P E , R OW, C ON). Toll C redits for E NG, R OW, C ON $1,777,000 2021 P rogrammed Appendix B: E xempt Project Listing 60 of 60
Count Completion Project ID Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost Status y Year Four road segments: Loma Rica Road, Marysville Road, La Porte Road, and Willow Glen R oad.: Upgrade traffic markings using "audible" thermoplastic striping with cookies to provide better visibility and tactile Y UB16062 YUB Y uba C ounty S triping S afety Improvements feedback. (H8-03-019). Toll C redits for C ON $1,480,000 2020 P rogrammed Waldo R d, over Dry C reek. R eplace the existing one lane truss bridge Waldo R d/D ry C reek B ridge with a new two lane bridge. (T oll credits for P E , R OW, & C ON.). T oll Y UB16023 YUB Y uba C ounty Replacement C redits for E NG , R O W, C O N $2,939,000 2020 P rogrammed Woodruff Ln, from Union Pacific R R tracks to J ack S lough R oad, and R amirez R d, from Fruitland R d to the Butte C ounty line: R ehabilitate Y UB16058 YUB Y uba C ounty Woodruff Ln and R amirez R d R ehab and reconstruct pavement for farm to market routes. $1,115,000 2019 P rogrammed R oadway S afety Improvements: Widen shoulders on each side of road Y UB15956 YUB Y uba C ounty Woodruff Ln. from Hwy. 70 to Hwy. 20. $2,300,000 2022 Planned Y UB15967 YUB Y uba C ounty Woodruff Ln. Pavement Rehabilitation: from Hwy. 70 to J ack S lough R d. $600,000 2017 Planned S outhea s t In E lk Grove: Grant Line R d from Bradshaw R d to Bond R d; Widen from S AC 25048 SAC C onnector J PA C apital S outhE ast Connector - B3 2 to 4 lanes (thoroughfare). PE Only. $2,000,000 2036 P rogrammed S outhea s t In E lk Grove: Grant Line R d from Bond R d to C alvine R d; Widen from 2 S AC 25049 SAC C onnector J PA C apital S outhE ast Connector - C to 4 la nes . $2,000,000 2037 P rogrammed Appendix B: Non-Exempt Project Listing 1 of 28
Milestone Year Project ID County Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost 2022 2023 2024 2026 2027 2036 Status for Conformity US 50 - Camino Operational / Road to 0.4 mile east of Upper Carson Road (PM 21.9/24.5) - Install XXXXXX CAL18190 ELD Caltrans D3 Safety Improvements median barrier, widen shoulders, constructyg acceleration/deceleration $51,270,000 2021 Programmed sides to extend Coleman Street from Bedford Avenue to Spring X ELD19418 ELD City of Placerville Coleman Street Extension Street $1,762,000 2036 Planned
XX ELD19419 ELD City of Placerville Combellack Road Extension Road Extension: Combellack Road $3,466,000 2027 Planned Phase II - Construct an additional 50-car parking lot with lighting Mosquito Rd./ Clay St. Park & landscaping, install public restrooms, and install the El Dorado Trail XXXXXX ELD16070 ELD City of Placerville Bus facility.gg (Toll Credits for PE and CON). Toll Credits for ENG, CON $1,440,000 2019 Programmed Springs Rd: Replace existing functionally obsolete 2-lane bridge with XXXXXX ELD19185 ELD City of Placerville Placerville Dr Bridge Widening a new 4-lane bridge. $4,935,550 2022 Programmed Widen Placerville Drive from Cold Springs Road to US 50 to Placerville Drive Widening - Cold accommodate 4 lanes of traffic, a dual left turn lane, sidewalks, and X ELD19408 ELD City of Placerville Springs Road to US 50 bike lanes on both sides.yy $6,515,000 2036 Planned Placerville Drive Widening - Fair accommodate 4 lanes of traffic, a dual left turn lane, sidewalks, and X ELD19409 ELD City of Placerville Lane to Ray Lawyer Drivegybike lanes on both sides.yy pg $3,169,000 2036 Planned Lawyer Drive to Cold Springs Road to accommodate 4 lanes of traffic, a dual left turn lane, X ELD19410 ELD City of Placerville Road sidewalks,yy and bike lanes on both sides. $10,352,000 2036 Planned road to City collector street standards from Forni Road southeast to X ELD19412 ELD City of Placerville Ray Lawyer Drive Extension East the City Limit() (US 50 to Main Street) y $8,122,000 2036 Planned sidewalk, curb and X ELD19387 ELD City of Placerville Wiltse Road gutter both sides. A new bridge over Hangtown Creek $4,728,000 2036 Planned Road to 2-lane divided road with 4-foot shoulders and El Dorado Bass Lake Road Improvements - bicycle/pedestrian paths. Includes an 8-foot median, sidewalk and X ELD19224 ELD County Phase 1A bike lane from Hollow Oak Road to US 50; median improvements $7,437,000 2036 Planned Widen Bass Lake Road from US 50 to Silver Springs Pkwy to El Dorado Bass Lake Road Improvements - accommodate 4 lanes of traffic (divided), curb, gutter, and sidewalk. X ELD19225 ELD County Phase 1B (See ELD19224 for Phase 1A) (CIP GP166) $15,385,000 2036 Planned El Dorado Cameron Park Drive Widening - lanes: 2 northbound through lanes (with right and left turn pockets) X ELD19243 ELD County Durock to Coach and 3 southbound through lanes (with dual right turn lanes at Robin $7,338,000 2036 Planned
El Dorado Cameron Park Drive Widening - Widen Cameron Park Drive to 4 lanes (divided) from Palmer Drive X ELD15930 ELD County Palmer Drive to Meder Road to Meder Road Includes a curb, gutter,y and sidewalk. (CIP GP144) $12,520,000 2036 Planned Country Club Drive Extension - Road to Silver Dove Road. Roadway includes 6-foot paved El Dorado Bass Lake Road to Silver Dove shoulders and new intersection at Bass Lake Road. (Curb, gutter X ELD19227 ELD County Road and sidewalk may be included.) CIP#GP124 $1,121,000 2036 Planned Construct new 2-lane extension of Country Club Drive from Silver Dove Road to the west end of Bass Lake Hills Specific Plan Country Club Drive Extension - boundary for future connection to Silva Valley Parkway. Project X El Dorado Silver Dove to west end Bass includes 6-foot paved shoulders. (Curb, gutter and sidewalk may be ELD19228 ELD County Lake Hills included). CIP#GP125 $5,413,000 2036 Planned Appendix B: Non-Exempt Project Listing 2 of 28 Milestone Year Project ID County Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost 2022 2023 2024 2026 2027 2036 Status for Conformity
Realign Country Club Drive from Bass Lake Road to the east end of Country Club Drive Realignment - Bass Lake Hills Specific Plan boundary. Includes constructing a 2- X El Dorado Bass Lake Road to east end Bass lane road with 6-foot paved shoulders. (Curb, gutter and sidewalk ELD19229 ELD County Lake Hills may begy included.) CIP#GP126 $5,043,000 2036 Planned El Dorado Diamond Springs Pkwy - Phase Lime Kiln Rd; Improvements include: two 12-ft lanes and 8-ft XXXXXX ELD19348 ELD County 1A (SR-49 Realignment) shoulders, signal modification at Pleasant Valleyy Rd/SR-49 $14,781,000 2019 Programmed east of Golden Center Dr to a new T-intersection with SR-49 south of Bradley Dr; includes planning, environmental clearance, grading XXXXXX El Dorado Diamond Springs Pkwy - Phase and right of way for the ultimate 4-lane road, required improvements ELD15990 ELD County 1B to SR-49gg and three new signals. See ELD19348/CIP72375 for $28,223,366 2021 Programmed El Dorado Work includes widening the roadway to accommodate a two-way left X ELD19393 ELD County Durock Road Widening turn pocketgg (CIP GP171) $7,210,000 2036 Planned Brittany Way intersection and approach roadways to result in a new El Dorado El Dorado Hills Boulevard / 4-way intersection with extensions and signal installation. Northern X ELD19168 ELD County Francisco Drive - Realignment portion of El Dorado Hills Boulevard (at this intersection) will become $9,452,000 2036 Planned El Dorado Hills Boulevard Widen El Dorado Hills Boulevard from Lassen Lane to Park Drive El Dorado Widening - Lassen Lane to Park from 4 to 5 lanes (divided) by adding a third southbound lane. X ELD15960 ELD County Drive Project includes curb, gutter and sidewalk. CIP#GP183 $1,096,000 2036 Planned
El Dorado Green Valley Rd Widening - Widen Green Valley Rd from Francisco Dr to Salmon Falls Rd to 4- X ELD19253 ELD County Francisco to Salmon Falls lanes divided with curb, gutter and sidewalk. CIP#GP178 $1,898,000 2036 Planned Widen Green Valley Road from Deer Valley Road to Lotus Road to El Dorado Green Valley Road Widening - two 12-foot lanes with paved shoulders. Project includes adding six X ELD19233 ELD County Deer Valley Road to Lotus Road left-turn pockets. CIP#GP179 $4,784,000 2036 Planned Construct new 2-lane arterial with median extension of Headington El Dorado Headington Rd Ext - Missouri Flat Rd from Missouri Flat Rd to El Dorado Rd. Does not include curb, X ELD19245 ELD County to El Dorado gutter or sidewalk. (CIP71375)y( ) $10,417,000 2036 Planned Investment Blvd from 2-lanes undivided to 4-lanes divided with curb, El Dorado Latrobe Rd Widening - Golden gutter, and Class II bike lanes; modify signal at Investment Blvd. X ELD19236 ELD County Foothill to Investment CIP72350 $3,516,000 2036 Planned
El Dorado Widen: 6 lanes (divided with 4-foot shoulders) from White Rock Rd. X ELD19237 ELD County Latrobe Rd. to Carson Creek (Suncast Ln.) (CIP GP154) $8,987,000 2036 Planned White Rock Rd west of Four Seasons/Stonebriar intersection; Initial El Dorado Latrobe Rd/White Rock Rd work to perform route alignment study and prepare PSR; X ELD19232 ELD County Connector (New Road) Subsequent work will include environmental, design and $19,445,000 2035 Planned
El Dorado Missouri Flat Rd - Turn Lane, El Add two-way left-turn lane on Missouri Flat Rd from El Dorado Rd to X ELD19194 ELD County Dorado to Headington Headington Rd. No curb, gutter or sidewalk. CIP#GP163 $1,202,000 2036 Planned El Dorado Missouri Flat Rd Widening, X ELD19396 ELD County Headington to Prospector's Plaza Add 1 lane in each direction with a raised median (CIP GP 165) $1,299,000 2036 Planned
El Dorado Mother Lode Dr/Pleasant Valley Reconfigure existing "Y" all-way stop to a signalized "T" intersection X ELD19241 ELD County Rd - Signalization including turn pockets and shoulder improvements. CIP73307 $7,782,300 2036 Planned Appendix B: Non-Exempt Project Listing 3 of 28 Milestone Year Project ID County Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost 2022 2023 2024 2026 2027 2036 Status for Conformity Widen Pleasant Valley Rd from El Dorado Rd to SR 49 to El Dorado Pleasant Valley Rd Widening - El accommodate 0.25 mile two-way left-turn lane at west end and X ELD16000 ELD County Dorado to SR 49 widen shoulders. CIP#GP160gy $1,099,000 2036 Planned El Dorado terminus near Finders Wy to Sacramento County Line; includes X ELD16010 ELD County Saratoga Wy Ext - Phase 1 median, 6-ft shoulders, right-turn pocket onto Finders Way, asphalt $11,541,350 2036 Planned Widen: 4 lanes from the Sacramento/El Dorado County line to El El Dorado Dorado Hills Blvd. Includes: full curb, gutter, and sidewalk. (See XXXXXX ELD19234 ELD County Saratoga Wy. (Phase 2) ELD16010ppgy for Phase 1) (CIP GP147) $4,640,000 2022 Planned El Dorado Silver Springs Parkway to Bass lane standard divided roadway with shoulders. It is planned to X ELD19431 ELD County Lake Road realign Bass Lake Road south of Green Valley Road through the $6,373,773 2036 Planned State Route 49 Passing Lanes from SR193 (in Cool) to the northern XX ELD19494 ELD El Dorado County State Route 49 Passing Lanes County Liney $3,482,000 2027 Planned El Dorado U.S. 50 / Bass Lake Rd. (Phase Cambridge Rd. interchanges. Includes: additional ramp, road X ELD19217 ELD County 2) widening. (Phase 2) (See ELD19182yg for Phase 1) (CIP GP148) $19,063,000 2036 Planned El Dorado US 50 Aux Lane WB - El Dorado the El Dorado Hills Blvd/Latrobe Rd Interchange to the future Empire X ELD19273 ELD County Hills to Empire Ranch Ranch Rd Interchange located in the City of Folsom; (City of Folsom $3,688,300 2036 Planned
El Dorado US 50 Auxiliary Lane Eastbound - Construct eastbound auxiliary lane on US50 between Cambridge Rd X ELD19219 ELD County Cambridge to Ponderosa and Ponderosa Rd interchanges. CIPGP150. $14,550,000 2036 Planned El Dorado US 50 Mainline Widening at El Silva Valley Pkwy and Empire Ranch Rd future new interchanges; X ELD19215 ELD County Dorado Hills requires coordinationgp with Silva Valley p I/C (ELD15610/CIP71328), y El $2,161,000 2036 Planned determine complete improvements needed; Phase 1 may include El Dorado US 50/Bass Lake Rd Interchange ramp widening, road widening, signals, and WB auxiliary lane X ELD19182 ELD County - Phase 1 between Bass Lake and Silva Valley interchanges; Phase 1 $16,532,000 2036 Planned
El Dorado US 50/El Dorado Rd Interchange - Interchange Improvements: includes signalization and widening of XX ELD19178 ELD County Phase 1 existing ramps.gp (See ELD19272 pfor Phase 2). CIP71347 $3,538,500 2027 Planned El Dorado US 50/El Dorado Rd Interchange - and right turn lanes and additional through traffic lanes in all X ELD19272 ELD County Phase 2 approachesgp to the interchange. (See ELD19178/CIP71347 y for y $5,870,000 2036 Planned El Dorado US 50/Ponderosa Rd/So. Shingle alternatives and select preferred alternative; widening existing US 50 X ELD19180 ELD County Rd Interchange Improvements overcrossinggp to accommodate 5 lanes, and realignment y of WB y loop $16,307,000 2035 Planned alternatives and select preferred alternative; widening existing US 50 El Dorado US 50/Ponderosa Rd/So. Shingle overcrossing to accommodate 5 lanes, and realignment of WB loop X ELD19180 ELD County Rd Interchange Improvements on-ramp,pyyg ramp widenings, and widening of Ponderosa Rd, Mother $16,407,000 2035 Programmed El Dorado US 50/Silva Valley Pkwy of eastbound diagonal and westbound loop on-ramps to US 50. X ELD19291 ELD County Interchange - Phase 2 (See ELD15610/CIP71328 for Phase 1). CIP71345g $12,070,000 2036 Planned Southeast Latrobe Rd; widen from 2 to 4 lanes (Thoroughfare). (To be X ELD19468 ELD Connector JPA Capital SouthEast Connector - E1 constructed with Capital SouthEast Connector – D3, SAC24250.) $3,450,000 2036 Programmed
Bus/Carpool Lanes in both directions from Richards Blvd. (in Davis) X I-80 / U.S. 50 Bus/Carpool Lanes to the I-5/US 50 Interchange. Inc. new bike bridge across the Yolo CAL18812 MULTI Caltrans D3 in both directions Causeway. $300,000,000 2036 Planned SR 20 10th St. Bridge Widen Bridge: six (6) lanes on 10th St. Bridge in Sutter and Yuba X CAL20430 MULTI Caltrans D3 Improvements Counties. SUT 20 PM 17.041 to YUB 20 PM 0.044 $60,000,000 2036 Planned Capital Capital SouthEast Connector - SouthEast Segment D3 - Prairie City Road to Segment D3: Construct 4 lanes (Expressway), from Prairie City XXXXXX VAR56131 MULTI Connector JPA Sacramento/El Dorado County Road to the Sacramento County Line. $48,000,000 2022 Planned Appendix B: Non-Exempt Project Listing 4 of 28 Milestone Year Project ID County Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost 2022 2023 2024 2026 2027 2036 Status for Conformity Capital Capital SouthEast Connector - Partial Construction of Segment D2: Construct 4 lanes XX VAR56133 MULTI SouthEast Segment D2 - From Douglas (Expressway), from Douglas Road to White Rock Road. $24,847,500 2027 Planned Multiple Lead Downtown/Riverfront Streetcar An extension of the Phase 1 Downtown/Riverfront streetcar in X YCT18199 MULTI Agencies Extension Downtown Sacramento and West Sacramento. $272,700,000 2036 Planned
XXXXXX PLA25161 PLA City of Lincoln 12th St. Widen: 4 lanes from East Ave. to Harrison Ave. $48,700 2017 Planned Widen East Joiner Parkway from 2 to 4 lanes from Del Webb Blvd. XXXXXX PLA18790 PLA City of Lincoln East Joiner Parkway to Twelve Bridges. $1,104,290 2018 Planned East Joiner Parkway In Lincoln: Widen East Joiner Parkway overcrossing from 4 to 6 XXXX PLA25687 PLA City of Lincoln Overcrossing lanes from Ferrari Ranch Road to Sterling Parkway $10,000,000 2024 Programmed East Joiner Parkway Widening In Lincoln: Widen East Joiner Parkway from 2 to 4 lanes from XXXXXX PLA25688 PLA City of Lincoln Phase 1 Twelve Bridges Drive to Rocklin City Limits $7,800,000 2020 Programmed East Joiner Parkway Widening In Lincoln: Widen East Joiner Parkway from 2 to 4 lanes from XXXX PLA25689 PLA City of Lincoln Phase 2 Twelve Bridgesgpp Drive to Del Webb Blvd north. $8,992,396 2024 Programmed Project is to provide for a more pedestrian, bicycle, and Lincoln Blvd Streetscape neighborhood Electric Vehicles (NEV) friendly environment along XXXXX PLA25677 PLA City of Lincoln Improvement Project Phase 4 and across the main street through the City. This will be $1,566,000 2023 Programmed
McBean Drive Widening - Phase Widen McBean Drive to four lanes from Ferrari Ranch to Oak Tree XXXXXX PLA City of Lincoln 1 Lane $7,047,977 2022 Planned McBean Drive Widening - Phase XXX PLA City of Lincoln 2 Widen McBean Drive from Oak Tree Lane to N/S Connector Loop $5,971,878 2026 Planned McBean Park Drive Widening From East Ave. to Ferrari Ranch Rd.: Replace 2-lane bridge with a 4- XXXX PLA25652 PLA City of Lincoln Over Auburn Ravine lane bridge, including the McBean Park Bridge at Auburn Ravine. $11,818,131 2024 Programmed
X PLA25595 PLA City of Lincoln Nelson Lane Extension Extend Nelson Lane south of SR-65 Bypass $25,000,000 2036 Planned In Rocklin, Dominguez Road: extend with 2 lanes from Granite Drive X PLA19260 PLA City of Rocklin Dominguez Road to Sierra College Boulevard, including new bridge over I-80. $11,000,000 2036 Planned In Rocklin: from Rocklin Rd. onto both WB and EB I-80; construct XXX PLA25345 PLA City of Rocklin Rocklin Road/I-80 Interchange roundabouts at ramp EB/WB ramp terminus. $26,150,000 2025 Planned In Rocklin, widen Sierra College Boulevard from 4 to 5 lanes from I- XXX PLA15400 PLA City of Rocklin Sierra College Blvd. Widening 80 to Aguliar Tributary. $3,800,000 2026 Planned
In Rocklin, Sierra College Boulevard from Aguilar Tributary to XXX PLA20460 PLA City of Rocklin Sierra College Blvd. Widening Nightwatch: widen from 4 to 5 lanes. $2,750,000 2026 Planned
Sunset Boulevard: Widen from 4 to 6 lanes from north bound SR 65 XXX PLA25156 PLA City of Rocklin Sunset Blvd. Widening ramp to West Stanford Ranch Road. $1,100,000 2026 Planned
X Widen Sunset Boulevard bridge at UPRR from 4 to 6 lanes from PLA17910 PLA City of Rocklin Sunset Boulevard South Whitney Blvd. to Pacific St. $2,600,000 2036 Planned
Widen Sunset Boulevard from 4 to 6 lanes from Stanford Ranch Rd. X PLA19360 PLA City of Rocklin Sunset Boulevard to Topaz. $2,600,000 2036 Planned Appendix B: Non-Exempt Project Listing 5 of 28 Milestone Year Project ID County Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost 2022 2023 2024 2026 2027 2036 Status for Conformity
West Oaks Boulevard: Construct new 4-lane extension from XX PLA25151 PLA City of Rocklin West Oaks Boulevard terminus to 4-lane portion to Whitney Ranch Parkway. $3,500,000 2027 Planned
Whitney Ranch Parkway, construct new 4-lane facility from east of XX PLA19290 PLA City of Rocklin Whitney Ranch Parkway Wildcat Blvd., to Whitney Oaks Dr. $12,428,000 2027 Planned ramp, including bridge widening over Miners Ravine, from 1-lane to Atlantic Eureka I-80 W/B On- 2-lanes plus an HOV bypass lane. (Toll Credits for CON). Toll XXXXXX PLA25647 PLA City of Roseville ramp Widening Credits for CON $8,380,000 2019 Programmed
In Roseville, Baseline Rd., from Brady Lane to Fiddyment Road: XXXXXX PLA15660 PLA City of Roseville Baseline Rd. Widening widen from 3 to 4 lanes. $6,106,889 2022 Programmed In Roseville, Baseline Road from Fiddyment Road to Sierra Vista XXXXXX PLA15100 PLA City of Roseville Baseline Road Western edge west of Watt Avenue: widen from 2g to 4 lanes. $7,852,055 2020 Programmed Foothills Boulevard, widen from 4 to 8 lanes, including Bridge over XXXXX PLA25681 PLA City of Roseville Blue Oaks Blvd Bridge Widening Industrial Ave./UPRR tracks. $23,000,000 2023 Programmed
In Roseville, Extend 2 lanes of Blue Oaks Blvd from Hayden XXXXXX Blue Oaks Blvd Extension - Parkway to Westside Dr., Including south half of a 6-lane bridge PLA25528 PLA City of Roseville Phase 1 over Kaseberg Creek. $6,000,000 2020 Programmed
Blue Oaks Blvd. Extension Phase In Roseville, Blue Oaks Blvd., from Westside Dr. to Santucci Blvd. XXXXXX PLA25539 PLA City of Roseville 2 (formerly Watt Ave.), extend 2 lanes. $6,350,000 2021 Programmed In Roseville, widen Fiddyment Road (add one S/B lane & frontage improvements.) from 5 to 6 lanes from Pleasant Grove to Baseline XXXXXX PLA25686 PLA City of Roseville Fiddyment Road Widening Road. $1,400,000 2018 Programmed
City of Roseville, Market St., from approx. 800 feet north of Baseline XXXXXX PLA25377 PLA City of Roseville Market St. Road to Pleasant Grove: Extend 2 lanes. $8,500,000 2019 Programmed Construct New Road: 4 lane divided Hwy. between Foothills Boulevard and Fiddyment Road. Includes signalized intersections at X PLA25337 PLA City of Roseville Placer Parkway Phase 2 Fiddyment Rd. $14,500,000 2036 Planned In Roseville, extend 4 lanes of Pleasant Grove from 1500 feet west XXXX PLA25527 PLA City of Roseville Pleasant Grove Blvd. Extension of Market St to Santucci Blvd (Watt Ave). $5,300,000 2024 Programmed
XX
In Roseville, from Foothills Blvd to Wood Creek Oaks, widen PLA15760 PLA City of Roseville Pleasant Grove Blvd. Widening Pleasant Grove Blvd from 4 to 6 lanes. $4,200,000 2027 Planned
In Roseville, extend 4-lane Roseville Parkway approx. 3,750' from XXXXX Washington Blvd. to Foothills Blvd., including new 4-lane bridge over PLA25682 PLA City of Roseville Roseville Parkway Extension Industrial Ave./UPRR tracks $22,500,000 2023 Programmed Appendix B: Non-Exempt Project Listing 6 of 28 Milestone Year Project ID County Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost 2022 2023 2024 2026 2027 2036 Status for Conformity In Roseville, on Roseville Parkway, widen from 6 to 8 lanes from just XXXXXX PLA25680 PLA City of Roseville Roseville Parkway Widening east of Creekside Ridge Drive to Gibson Drive (E). $11,200,000 2021 Programmed
Widen Roseville Rd. from 2 to 4 lanes Between Cirby Way and XXXX PLA15850 PLA City of Roseville Roseville Road Widening southern city limit. $2,500,000 2024 Programmed
XXXXXX City of Roseville, Santucci Blvd. (North Watt Ave.): Extend four PLA25378 PLA City of Roseville Santucci Blvd. Extension lanes from Vista Grande Blvd.to Blue Oaks Boulevard. $6,500,000 2022 Programmed
In Roseville, Santucci Boulevard South (Watt Ave.) from Baseline XXXXXX PLA25570 PLA City of Roseville Santucci Boulevard South Road north to Vista Grande Boulevard: Construct 4-lane road. $1,000,000 2021 Programmed In Roseville; from just N/O E. Roseville Parkway to City Limits, XXX PLA15911 PLA City of Roseville Taylor Rd. widen Taylor Rd. from 2 to 4 lanes. $5,042,390 2026 Planned
XXXXXX
In Roseville, from Fiddyment Rd west to Westbrook Blvd, construct PLA25538 PLA City of Roseville Vista Grande Arterial new 4-lane arterial. $2,500,000 2020 Programmed
XXXXXX In Roseville, construct 4-lane Vista Grande Blvd. approx. 2,600' west PLA25685 PLA City of Roseville Vista Grande Boulevard East from Fiddyment,g Rd. to just west of Upland Drive. ,g $2,800,000 2018 Programmed Washington Blvd/Andora widening the Andora Underpass under the UPRR tracks, between Undercrossing Improvement Sawtell Rd and just south of Pleasant Grove Blvd. and construct XXX PLA25501 PLA City of Roseville Project bicycle and pedestrian improvements adjacent to roadway. (CMAQ $32,612,000 2025 Programmed
XXXXXX Construct New Road: west of Fiddyment and north of Blue Oaks in PLA25481 PLA City of Roseville Westbrook Blvd. proposed new Creekview Specific Plan. $6,000,000 2022 Planned In Roseville, extend 4-lane Westbrook Blvd. south from existing Westbrook Blvd. to approx. 3,700' south of Pleasant Grove Blvd. XXXXXX PLA25683 PLA City of Roseville Westbrook Blvd. Extension (Scope included as part of PLA25483 in MTP.) $2,000,000 2018 Programmed
In Roseville, construct 4-lane Westbrook Blvd. from Baseline Rd. to XXXXXX approx. 1,500 north. (Scope included as part of MTP project, PLA25684 PLA City of Roseville Westbrook Blvd. South PLA25483) $2,000,000 2018 Programmed eastbound I-80, and east of Douglas Blvd. to west of Riverside Ave. I-80 Eastbound Auxiliary Lane on westbound I-80; Construct eastbound I-80 auxiliary lane, XXXXX PLA25576 PLA PCTPA and I-80 Westbound 5th Lane including two-lane off-ramp to Rocklin Rd, and construct 5th lane on $18,655,000 2023 Programmed Appendix B: Non-Exempt Project Listing 7 of 28 Milestone Year Project ID County Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost 2022 2023 2024 2026 2027 2036 Status for Conformity In Placer County: Between I80 and Pleasant Grove Boulevard; Reconfigure I-80/SR 65 interchange to add auxiliary lane on northbound SR 65 from I-80 westbound on-ramp to Galleria Boulevard/Stanford Ranch Road off-ramp, widen inside northbound SR 65 from 2 to 3 lanes from south of Galleria Boulevard/Stanford XXXXXX Ranch Road off-ramp to Pleasant Grove Boulevard off-ramp, I-80/SR 65 Interchange including widening Galleria Boulevard/Stanford Ranch Road PLA25440 PLA PCTPA Improvements Phase 1 northbound off-ramp and on-ramp, and southbound on-ramp $53,283,200 2020 Programmed
In Placer County: Between Douglas Blvd. and Rocklin Road; X Reconfigure I-80/SR 65 interchange to widen southbound to I-80/SR 65 Interchange eastbound ramp from 1 to 2 lanes, and replace existing eastbound PLA25601 PLA PCTPA Improvements Phase 2 Into Placernorthbound County: loop Between ramp with Douglas a new Blvd.3 lane and direct Rocklin flyover Road; ramp. $110,000,000 2036 Planned Reconfigure I-80/SR 65 interchange to widen southbound to eastbound ramp from 1 to 2 lanes, replace existing eastbound to northbound loop ramp with a new 3 lane direct flyover ramp X I-80/SR 65 Interchange (including full middle structure for East Roseville Viaduct), construct PLA25649 PLA PCTPA Improvements Phase 2 collector-distributor roadway parallel to eastbound I-80 between $250,000,000 2030 Programmed
In Placer County: Between Douglas Blvd. and Rocklin Road; Widen Taylor Road from 2 to 4 lanes between Roseville Parkway and X I-80/SR 65 Interchange Pacific Street, and Reconfigure I-80/SR 65 interchange to widen the PLA25602 PLA PCTPA Improvements Phase 3 southbound to westboundyg ramp from 2 to 3 lanes. ; $179,000,000 2036 Planned Reconfigure I-80/SR 65 interchange to construct one lane HOV I-80/SR 65 Interchange direct connectors from eastbound to northbound and southbound to X PLA25603 PLA PCTPA Improvements Phase 4 westboundpp()y (HOV lanes would extend to between Galleria Blvd. and $95,000,000 2036 Planned Placer County - Bus Rapid Transit serving South Placer County; including planning, engineering, X PLA25634 PLA PCTPA Capital environmental,,py studies, right-of-way acquisition, vehicles, related $82,526,000 Planned operational improvements. Phase 1: From Blue Oaks Blvd. to SR 65 Capacity & Operational Galleria Blvd., construct third lane on southbound SR 65 (Toll credits XXXXXX PLA25529 PLA PCTPA Improvements Phase 1 for PA&ED)(Emission,,py Benefits in kg/day: ROG 15.80; NOx 15.88; $12,750,000 2020 Programmed operational improvements. Phase 2: From Galleria Blvd. to Blue Oaks Blvd., widen from 4 to 7 lanes with 1 carpool lane and 1 X SR 65 Capacity & Operational general purpose lane southbound, and 1 general purpose lane PLA25637 PLA PCTPA Improvements Phase 2 northbound.,,py $32,500,000 2036 Planned operational improvements. Phase 3: From Blue Oaks Blvd. to SR 65 Capacity & Operational Lincoln Blvd., construct auxiliary lanes both northbound and X PLA25638 PLA PCTPA Improvements Phase 3 southbound. $12,000,000 2036 Planned
X Auburn Ravine Road at I-80 Auburn Ravine Road overcrossing over I-80 between Bowman Road PLA15070 PLA Placer County Overcrossing to Lincoln Way: widen overcrossing from 2 to 4 lanes. $29,000,000 2036 Planned Baseline Road Four to Six Lane Widen From 4 to 6 lanes from Watt Avenue to Fiddyment/Walerga X PLA20680 PLA Placer County Widening (East Portion) Road. $11,270,000 2036 Planned Appendix B: Non-Exempt Project Listing 8 of 28 Milestone Year Project ID County Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost 2022 2023 2024 2026 2027 2036 Status for Conformity
XXXXXX Baseline Road Widening Phase 1 Baseline Rd. from Watt Avenue to future 16th street: Widen from 2 PLA15105 PLA Placer County (West Portion) to 4 lanes. $19,200,000 2019 Programmed
Baseline Road Widening Phase 2 Baseline Road from Sutter County Line to Future 16th Street. XXX PLA25463 PLA Placer County (West Portion) Widen from 2 to 4 lanes.jy $29,000,000 2025 Programmed Creek Road - three new local connector roads; 1)Quartz Drive Connector from Route 49 to Locksley Lane, 2) Willow Creek Drive XXXXXX PLA20350 PLA Placer County Local Roads in Auburn Connector from Route 49 to 1st Street in Dewitt Center, and $3,671,000 2022 Planned
PFE Rd, from Watt Ave. to Walerga Rd: Widen from 2 to 4 lanes XXXX PLA18490 PLA Placer County PFE Rd. Widening and realign. $13,085,000 2024 Programmed
In Placer County: Between SR 65 and Foothills Boulevard; Construct phase 1 of Placer Parkway, including upgrading the SR 65/Whitney Ranch Parkway interchange to include a southbound XXXXXX slip off-ramp, southbound loop on-ramp, northbound loop on-ramp, six-lane bridge over SR 65, and four-lane roadway extension from PLA25299 PLA Placer County Placer Parkway Phase 1 SR 65 (Whitney Ranch Parkway) to Foothills Boulevard. $70,000,000 2022 Programmed
XX PLA25628 PLA Placer County SR 49 Widen from 4 lanes to 6 lanes from Luther Road to Nevada Street. $1,000,000 2027 Planned
XXXXXX Sunset Blvd, from Foothills Boulevard to Fiddyment Rd: Construct a PLA25170 PLA Placer County Sunset Blvd Phase 2 2-lane road extension [PLA15410 is Phase 1.] $6,365,000 2020 Programmed
Widen Sunset Boulevard from State Route 65 to Cincinnati Avenue XXXX from 2 to 4 lanes. Project includes widening Industrial Blvd / UPRR PLA25044 PLA Placer County Sunset Blvd. Widening overcrossing from 2 to 4 lanes. $8,675,000 2024 Programmed
Walerga Rd/Dry Creek Bridge Walerga Rd, over Dry Creek, 1.1 mi S Base Line Rd. Replace the XXXXXX PLA25506 PLA Placer County Replacement existing 2 lane bridge with a 4 lane bridge.. Toll Credits for CON $44,054,078 2020 Programmed
XXXXXX Walerga Rd: Widen and realign from 2 to 4 lanes from Baseline Rd. PLA15420 PLA Placer County Walerga Road to Placer / Sacramento County line. $13,781,700 2020 Programmed
Watt Ave./Center Joint Ave., over Dry Creek, 0.4 mi north of P.F.E. XXXXXX PLA25535 PLA Placer County Watt Ave. Bridge Replacement Rd.: Replace existing 2 lane bridge with a 4 lane bridge. $19,892,750 2019 Programmed Watt Avenue, from Baseline Rd. to Sacramento County Line: Widen XXX PLA20700 PLA Placer County Watt Avenue from 2 to 4 lanes. $13,270,800 2026 Planned Appendix B: Non-Exempt Project Listing 9 of 28 Milestone Year Project ID County Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost 2022 2023 2024 2026 2027 2036 Status for Conformity Regional Transportation Construct New Road: 4 lane divided Hwy. between Fiddyment Rd X PLA25592 PLA Authority Placer Parkway Phase 3 and Watt Avenue. Includes signalized intersections at Watt Avenue. $85,000,000 2036 Planned Bridge Widening: Widen SR51 over the American River NB and SB, Capital City Freeway (SR 51) to 4 lanes plus a bus carpool lane in both directions. New Class I X CAL20642 SAC Caltrans D3 widening over the American River bike path next to the freeway. $131,000,000 2036 Planned
X Reconstruct I-5/I-80 Interchange, including high occupancy vehicle (HOV, bus/carpool) lane connectors, and construction of HOV lanes from the I-5/I-80 Interchange to downtown Sacramento (PM I-5 and I-80 HOV Connectors and 26.7/27.0) [EFIS ID 0300000313] (Emission Benefits in kg/day 1.0 CAL18410 SAC Caltrans D3 Lanes to Downtown ROG) $300,000,000 2036 Planned
XXX Bus/Carpool Lanes: J St. to I-80 in both directions, including a new CAL20586 SAC Caltrans D3 I-5 Bus/Carpool Lanes Class I bike path over the American River $116,000,000 2026 Planned
XXXXXX I-5: Extend Southbound connector ramp from U.S. 50 connector- CAL20589 SAC Caltrans D3 I-5 Connector Ramp Extension rampIn Sacramento to the Sutterville County Rd.on I5,off-ramp from US(PM 50 20.726 to Morrison to 21.55). Creek Add $4,746,000 2022 Planned high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes (i.e., bus/carpool lanes) and soundwalls in both directions (PM 12.9/22.5) [EFIS ID 0312000165]; see 03-3C002 (CAL20467) for Phase 2 [PA&ED being done under XXXXXX 03-3C000 (CAL17840)]. (Toll Credits for PE and ROW) (Emission CAL20466 SAC Caltrans D3 I-5 HOV Lanes - Phase 1 Benefits in kg/day: 52.9 NOx, 50.4 ROG, 10.5 PM10) [CTIPS ID 107- $41,485,000 2022 Programmed In Sacramento County on I-5, from just north of Morrison Creek to 1.1 mile south of Elk Grove Blvd. - Add high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes (i.e., bus/carpool lanes) (PM 9.7/13.1) [EFIS ID XXXXXX 0318000245]; see 03-3C001 (CAL20466) for Phase 1 [PA&ED was CAL20467 SAC Caltrans D3 I-5 HOV Lanes - Phase 2 completed under 03-3C000 (CAL17840)] $15,000,000 2022 Programmed
XXXXX In and near the City of Sacramento, from Beach Lake Bridge at Morrison Creek to the American River Bridge (#24-0068) (PM 13.0/24.9) - Roadway rehabilitation [CTIPS ID 107-0000-1037]. Toll CAL20700 SAC Caltrans D3 I-5 Road Rehab Credits for ENG, ROW $267,400,000 2023 Programmed Appendix B: Non-Exempt Project Listing 10 of 28 Milestone Year Project ID County Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost 2022 2023 2024 2026 2027 2036 Status for Conformity
I-5 Transition Lane: SB, from Garden Hwy. off-ramp to the Garden X CAL20587 SAC Caltrans D3 I-5 Transition Lane Hwy. on-ramp.y,p $4,000,000 2036 Planned bridge replacements for the following locations: B Street Underpass (#24-0023), A Street Overcrossing (#24-0131) and Elvas Underpass XXX CAL20595 SAC Caltrans D3 SR 51 Auxiliary Lane (#24-0031). The projecty cost includes temporary bridge costs for the $84,200,000 2026 Planned SR 51 and SR 99 Install Ramp Install ramp meters [CTIPS ID 107-0000-1006] (Toll Credits) [EA XXXXXX CAL20502 SAC Caltrans D3 Meters at Various Locations 0F351, PPNO 6913] [child project of parent EA 0F350; second child $31,317,000 2019 Programmed
XXX SR 51: Widen structure over Arden Way to 8 lanes plus 2 bus/carpool lanes and construct a Transition Lane: NB, from SR160 CAL20594 SAC Caltrans D3 SR 51 Auxiliary Lane off ramp to Arden Way on ramp $46,000,000 2026 Planned SR 51 Bus/Carpool Lanes: J X CAL20632 SAC Caltrans D3 Street to Arden Bus/Carpool Lanes: J Street to Arden in both directions $100,000,000 2036 Planned SR 51 Transition Lane: NB, from the Elvas Underpass to Exposition X CAL20592 SAC Caltrans D3 SR 51 Transition Lane Blvd. $7,500,000 2036 Planned SR 51 Transition Lanes: NB from Marconi Ave. to Fulton Ave. and XXX CAL20596 SAC Caltrans D3 SR 51 Transition Lanes SB from Fulton Ave. to Watt Ave. $84,700,000 2026 Planned
XXX
SR 99 auxiliary lane: NB from WB Florin Rd. slip on ramp to EB 47th Ave. slip off ramp. Right-of-way acquisition required. CAL20600 SAC Caltrans D3 SR 99 Auxiliary Lane Soundwall relocationy required. $3,000,000 2026 Planned and the off-ramp to West Elkhorn Blvd, and between the WB West SR 99 / West Elkhorn Auxiliary Elkhorn to SB SR 99 loop on-ramp and the SB SR 99 to NB I-5 XXXXXX CAL20701 SAC Caltrans D3 Lanes Connector includingyg Ramp Meters for the SB on-ramps to SR 99 $7,995,000 2019 Programmed on ramp. to WB 47th Ave. slip off ramp. Right-of-way acquisition XXX CAL20601 SAC Caltrans D3 SR 99 Auxiliary Lane required. Soundwall relocation required.pp $3,000,000 2026 Planned Fruitridge Rd. slip on ramp, and from WB Fruitridge Rd. loop off XXX CAL20599 SAC Caltrans D3 SR 99 Transition Lane ramp to WB Fruitridge Rd. slip on ramp. Right-of-way acquisition $3,000,000 2026 Planned US 50 Auxiliary Lanes: EB and WB, from Sunrise Blvd. to Zinfandel X CAL20604 SAC Caltrans D3 U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lanes Dr. $5,000,000 2036 Planned
US 50 Westbound Transition Lane: from Sunrise Blvd. slip off-ramp X CAL20605 SAC Caltrans D3 U.S. 50 Transition Lane to Sunrisey Blvd. slip on-ramp. $3,000,000 2036 Planned US 50 65th St.. to Howe Ave. Avenue (PM R2.6/R3.8) - Construct westbound auxiliary lane XXXXXX CAL20705 SAC Caltrans D3 Auxiliary Lane [project proposes to add/extend US 50 auxiliary lane, which currently $3,930,000 2020 Programmed Appendix B: Non-Exempt Project Listing 11 of 28 Milestone Year Project ID County Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost 2022 2023 2024 2026 2027 2036 Status for Conformity
X
US 50 Auxiliary Lanes, Bradshaw Near Sacramento, from Bradshaw Road OC to Mather Field OC - CAL20379 SAC Caltrans D3 to Mather AddUS 50 auxiliary HOV Lanes lanes EB Construct & WB (PM High R7.8/R9.5) Occupancy [EFIS Vehicle ID 0300001101] (HOV) $3,700,000 2036 Planned lanes on US 50 [project covers PE: from I-5 to 0.8 mile east of Watt Avenue (PM L0.2/R6.1) and CON: from I-5 to 0.8 mile east of Watt Avenue (PM L2.2/R6.1)](The US 50 Multimodal Corridor XXXX US 50 HOV Lanes (I-5 to Watt Enhancement project combines the US 50 HOV Lanes project (03- CAL18838 SAC Caltrans D3,yAve.) 3F360/CAL18838) and the US 50 Rehab project (03- $118,400,000 2024 Programmed of Rancho Cordova, X VAR56138 SAC Sacramento Auxiliary Lane Auxiliary lane from Rancho Cordova Parkway to East of Folsom $3,000,000 2036 Planned
X SAC24983 SAC City of Elk Grove Big Horn Blvd. Widen to 4-lanes $12,000,000 2036 Planned In Elk Grove, Big Horn Blvd. from Bilby Rd. to Kammerer Rd.: X SAC24982 SAC City of Elk Grove Big Horn Blvd. Construct new 2-lane roadway $5,669,500 2036 Planned In Elk Grove, Big Horn Blvd. from Spoonwood Dr. to Bilby Rd.: X SAC24981 SAC City of Elk Grove Big Horn Blvd. Construct new 2-lane roadway $2,362,407 2036 Planned Big Horn Blvd. Extension - Bilby In Elk Grove, Big Horn Blvd. from Bilby Rd. to Kammerer Rd, XXXXXX SAC24773 SAC City of Elk Grove to Kammerer Construct (4-lanes) extension $8,181,000 2021 Programmed Construct New Road: 4 lanes from McMillan Rd./Future Big Horn XX SAC24972 SAC City of Elk Grove Bilby Rd. Blvd. extension to Lotz Pkwy. $3,495,600 2027 Planned
X SAC24984 SAC City of Elk Grove Bilby Rd. Widen to 4-lanes $3,500,000 2036 Planned
Construct New Road: 4 lanes from Lotz Pkwy. To West Stockton X SAC24790 SAC City of Elk Grove Bilby Rd. Blvd.,, $3,484,150 2036 Planned over east branch of Laguna Creek: Intersection improvements. Bradshaw / Sheldon Intersection Replace 2 lane bridge with new bridge with multiple lane XXXXXX SAC24072 SAC City of Elk Grove & Bridge configuration per MTIP item for intersection. $7,113,136 2019 Programmed
X SAC24073 SAC City of Elk Grove Bradshaw Rd. Widen: 4 lanes from Sheldon Rd. to Calvine Rd. $6,200,200 2036 Planned
In Elk Grove, from Whitelock Parkway to Bilby Road: Widen from 2 X SAC19010 SAC City of Elk Grove Bruceville Road Widening to 4 lanes. $3,719,000 2036 Planned
In Elk Grove, Bruceville Road from Bilby Road to Kammerer Road: X SAC24105 SAC City of Elk Grove Bruceville Road Widening Widen from 2 to 4 lanes. $2,200,000 2036 Planned
X SAC24966 SAC City of Elk Grove Elk Grove Blvd Right Turn pocket from EB Elk Grove Blvd to SB SR99 $875,000 2036 Planned Appendix B: Non-Exempt Project Listing 12 of 28 Milestone Year Project ID County Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost 2022 2023 2024 2026 2027 2036 Status for Conformity In Elk Grove, San Joaquin Rail Corridor, construct 100-space parking lot, 800 foot platform, and passenger shelter area for X CAL20370 SAC City of Elk Grove Elk Grove Intercity Rail Station intercity passenger rail station. $26,100,000 2032 Planned
X SAC24952 SAC City of Elk Grove Excelsior Rd Full 2 lane Improvement from Sheldon Rd. to Calvine Rd. $5,000,000 2036 Planned
XXXXXX Grant Line Road Widening Phase In Elk Grove, Grant Line Road; from New Waterman Road to SAC24119 SAC City of Elk Grove 2 Mosherpj Road: Widen from p 2 to 4 lanes. g $5,085,000 2019 Programmed Bruceville Rd to Big Horn to Kammerer to 99 between Cosumnes X SAC24962 SAC City of Elk Grove Hi Bus from CRC to Elk Grove River College and Elk Grove. g $37,813,160 2036 Planned Kammerer Rd Extension Bruceville Rd. to Lent Ranch Parkway: Reconstruct road at 2 lanes XXX SAC24094 SAC City of Elk Grove (Connector Segment A) with shoulders, and Kammerer Rd., from Bruceville Rd. to Interstate $50,737,000 2026 Programmed In Elk Grove, Kammerer Rd, from Lent Ranch Parkway to I/5/Hood Franklin Interchange: Widen from 2 to 4 lanes. This Project is X Kammerer Road Widening included in the Environmental Studies (NEPA and CEQA) for SAC24114 SAC City of Elk Grove (Connector Segment) SAC24094, Kammerer Road Extension. $55,100,000 2030 Programmed
In Elk Grove, Lotz Pkwy. from Whitelock Pkwy to Kammerer Rd: X SAC24987 SAC City of Elk Grove Lotz Parkway widen to 4-lanes $10,000,000 2036 Planned In Elk Grove, from Laguna Springs Drive to Whitelock Parkway: X SAC24980 SAC City of Elk Grove Lotz Parkway widen to 4-lanes., y y ppy g $3,500,000 2036 Planned Road: Construct new 4-lane roadway; and Lotz Parkway from Poppy Ridge Road to 0.5 miles south of Whitelock Pkwy at the northern XXXXXX SAC24111 SAC City of Elk Grove Lotz Parkway boundary of the Sterling Meadows development area: Construct $8,662,500 2020 Programmed
X
SAC24968 SAC City of Elk Grove State Route 99 Southbound Auxiliary Lane from Elk Grove Blvd. to Laguna Blvd. $561,000 2036 Planned
XXXXXX
SAC24097 SAC City of Elk Grove Waterman Rd. Widen: 4 lanes from Elk Grove Blvd. to Bond Rd. $4,800,000 2022 Planned
X Widen Waterman Road from Sheldon Road to Bond Road from 2 to SAC24096 SAC City of Elk Grove Waterman Road 4 lanes. $357,540 2036 Planned
X On West Stockton north of Promenade to Whitelock Pkwy, construct full 2 lane improvements and realign road to intersect with Lotz Pkwy SAC24960 SAC City of Elk Grove West Stockton Blvd south of Whitelock. Rename to Promenade. $1,583,039 2036 Planned Appendix B: Non-Exempt Project Listing 13 of 28 Milestone Year Project ID County Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost 2022 2023 2024 2026 2027 2036 Status for Conformity
In Elk Grove, from Big Horn Blvd to West Stockton Blvd: Widen to 4 X SAC20320 SAC City of Elk Grove Whitelock Parkway Widening lane roadway. $520,280 2036 Planned
X SAC24961 SAC City of Elk Grove Wilton Rd Full 2 lane improvements from Grant Line Rd. to City Limit $7,789,900 2036 Planned
In Folsom, East Natoma St from Fargo Way to Folsom Lake XX Crossing: widen from 2 to 4 lanes and construct bicycle trail SAC22060 SAC City of Folsom East Natoma Street Widening undercrossing. $3,150,000 2027 Planned
XXX Construct New Road: 4 lanes from Prairie City Rd. to Empire Ranch SAC24331 SAC City of Folsom Easton Valley Pkwy. Rd. Extension south of U.S. 50. $45,000,000 2026 Planned
X SAC24327 SAC City of Folsom Empire Ranch Rd. Road Extension: 4 lanes from U.S. 50 to White Rock Rd. $18,000,000 2036 Planned
XXX Construct New Road: 4 lanes, East-West arterial for SOI SAC24542 SAC City of Folsom Folsom Plan Area Street A development. $11,500,000 2026 Planned
XXXXXX Add Turn Lanes: Folsom-Auburn Rd. / Oak Ave. Includes: left and SAC22930 SAC City of Folsom Folsom-Auburn Rd. right turn lanes and intersection signal modifications. $2,000,000 2022 Planned On Green Valley Road, from East Natoma Street to Sophia Parkway: widen from 2 lanes to 4 lanes and provide Class II bicycle XXXXXX SAC21280 SAC City of Folsom Green Valley Road Widening paths. (Toll Credits for PE and CON.) . Toll Credits for ENG, CON $3,576,168 2020 Programmed Greenback Ln. and Folsom- Add Turn Lanes: left and right turn lanes at Folsom-Auburn Rd. and XXXXXX SAC22920 SAC City of Folsom Auburn Rd. Greenback Ln. Includes: signal improvements. $1,200,000 2022 Planned Widen: 6 lanes from Black Diamond Dr. to Prairie City and SAC21210 SAC City of Folsom Iron Point Rd. Outcropping to Broadstone Pkwy. $5,000,000 2036 X Planned
X SAC24543 SAC City of Folsom Oak Ave. Pkwy. Construct new road: 4 lanes from U.S. 50 to White Rock Rd. $14,400,000 2036 Planned
XXXXXX Widen existing Scott Road from 2 to 4 lanes between US 50 and SAC24328 SAC City of Folsom Scott Road Widening White Rock Road $16,000,000 2022 Planned Appendix B: Non-Exempt Project Listing 14 of 28 Milestone Year Project ID County Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost 2022 2023 2024 2026 2027 2036 Status for Conformity
XXXXXX In Folsom, Sibley Street from Glenn Drive to Blue Ravine Road: SAC21270 SAC City of Folsom Sibley Street widen from 2 to 4 lanes. $1,800,000 2021 Programmed US 50 at Empire Ranch Road: Construct 4 lane interchange with US 50 at Empire Ranch Road (formerly Russell Ranch Road). HPP X SAC19890 SAC City of Folsom US 50 at Empire Ranch Road #337 (Toll Credits for PE). Toll Credits for ENG $58,885,000 2035 Planned US 50 at Empire Ranch Road: Construct 4 lane interchange with US 50 at Empire Ranch Road (formerly Russell Ranch Road). HPP X SAC19890 SAC City of Folsom US 50 at Empire Ranch Road #343 (Toll Credits for PE). Toll Credits for ENG $58,885,000 2035 Programmed Ramp modifications and overpass widening for US 50/East Bidwell/Scott Road Interchange to improve access to development XX SAC24463 SAC City of Folsom US 50 at Scott Road south of US 50. $3,180,000 2027 Planned
X US 50 Auxiliary Lane Prairie City SAC24888 SAC City of Folsom to Oak Avenue EB Auxiliary lane from Prairie City Road to Oak Avenue $3,000,000 2036 Planned
US 50 Auxiliary Lane Empire X SAC24891 SAC City of Folsom Ranch to Latrobe Road EB Auxiliary lane from Empire Ranch to Latrobe Road $3,000,000 2036 Planned
X
US 50 Auxiliary Lane Oak Avenue SAC24889 SAC City of Folsom to Scott Road EB Auxiliary lane from Oak Avenue to Scott Road $3,000,000 2036 Planned
US 50 Auxiliary Lane Scott Road X SAC24890 SAC City of Folsom to Empire Ranch EB Auxiliary lane from Scott Road to Empire Ranch $3,000,000 2036 Planned Construct New Overcrossing: 4 lanes between Iron Point Road and X SAC24970 SAC City of Folsom US50 Rowberry Overcrossing Easton Valley Parkway over US50 $3,000,000 2036 Planned
X SAC24337 SAC City of Galt Carillion Extension new 4 lane road from Simmerhorn to A Street / Boessow $2,500,000 2036 Planned
XXXXXX City of Rancho New 4 lane roadway from Chrysanthy to North of Douglas Road. SAC24375 SAC Cordova Americanos Road, Phase I (Phase 1)y $2,969,000 2022 Planned Americanos and new 2 lanes from Americanos to Grant Line Rd. Includes: intersection improvements at Rancho Cordova Pkwy., XX SAC24988 SAC City of Rancho CoChrysanthy Blvd Americanos, and Grant Line Rd. $10,091,000 2027 Planned Widen Douglas Rd. from 2 to 4 lanes from Sunrise Blvd. to the West City of Rancho City Limit. Includes the addition of a new bridge over the Folsom XXXX SAC24473 SAC Cordova Douglas Rd. Widening South Canal adjacent to the existing bridge. (See SAC20240) $13,000,000 2024 Programmed Appendix B: Non-Exempt Project Listing 15 of 28 Milestone Year Project ID County Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost 2022 2023 2024 2026 2027 2036 Status for Conformity
City of Rancho Widen Douglas Road from 2 to 4 lanes from Americanos Blvd to XXXXXX SAC24629 SAC Cordova Douglas Road Phase 3 Grant Line Rd and intersection improvements at Grant Line Road. $6,488,000 2022 Planned
Construct Easton Valley Parkway as a new 4-lane road from Rancho X City of Rancho Cordova Parkway to the City Limits including intersection SAC24183 SAC Cordova Easton Valley Pkwy Phase 1 improvements at Rancho Cordova Parkway.yg ( $9,758,000 2028 Programmed City of Rancho Oro Specific Plan Boundary) to White Rock Rd. Includes: X SAC24471 SAC Cordova International Dr. intersection improvements at Rancho Cordova Parkway, and White $7,513,341 2036 Planned In Rancho Cordova, extend Kiefer Blvd from Rancho Cordova Pkwy City of Rancho to Grant Line as 4 lane road. Includes intersection improvements at X SAC24707 SAC Cordova Kiefer Blvd Extension Americanos and Grant Line. Developer will deliver project $5,621,000 2028 Programmed
XXXX City of Rancho Widen Kiefer Blvd. from 2-4 lanes from Sunrise Blvd. to Rancho SAC24374 SAC Cordova Kiefer Boulevard, Phase 2 Cordova Parkway. $3,510,000 2024 Programmed
City of Rancho Construct New Road:4 lanes from Rockingham Rd. to Zinfandel Dr. XX SAC24202 SAC Cordova Mather Blvd. Includes: widening existing roadway to 4 lanes.y $17,266,000 2027 Planned and off ramp configuration and turn pockets, and improve pedestrian XX SAC24990 SAC City of Rancho CoMather Field Rd./U.S. 50 Interchanconnectivity(g $2,000,000 2027 Planned Femoyer St). Includes: intersection improvements at Mather City of Rancho Boulevard, Mather Field Road, Femoyer Street/Air Park Dr. and XXX SAC24586 SAC Cordova Peter A. McCuen Blvd. International Dr.yy $17,571,000 2026 Planned White Rock to Villagio and a 4 lane roadway from Villagio to City of Rancho Rancho Cordova Parkway - Douglas Road, including intersection improvements at Villagio and XXX SAC22980 SAC Cordova Douglas to White Rock White Rock Road. $17,000,000 2026 Planned
City of Rancho Rancho Cordova Parkway, Rancho Cordova Parkway: Widen existing road 2-4 lanes from XXXXXX SAC24630 SAC Cordova Chrysanthy Blvd to Kiefer Road Chrysanthy Blvd to Kiefer Road $3,654,348 2022 Planned Rancho Cordova Parkway, City of Rancho Douglas Road to Chrysanthy Construct a new 4 lane road Rancho Cordova Parkway, from XXXXXX SAC24511 SAC Cordova Boulevard Douglas Road to Chrysanthy Boulevard. $3,426,000 2019 Programmed
City of Rancho Rancho Cordova Pkwy, Grant Construct New Road: 4 lanes from Grant Line Rd. to Kiefer Blvd. XXX SAC24295 SAC Cordova Line to Kiefer Includes intersection improvement at Grant Line Rd. $3,709,000 2026 Planned Rio Del Oro Parkway: New 4 lane roadway from Sunrise Boulevard to Rancho Cordova Parkway. Includes intersection improvement at X SAC24992 SAC City of Rancho CoRio Del Oro Pkwy Sunrise (CP09-2070) $3,251,000 2036 Planned
City of Rancho Widen: from Old Placerville Rd. to Folsom Blvd. including structure X SAC24221 SAC Cordova Routier Rd. over U.S. Hwy. 50. $8,743,000 2036 Planned Appendix B: Non-Exempt Project Listing 16 of 28 Milestone Year Project ID County Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost 2022 2023 2024 2026 2027 2036 Status for Conformity Widen Sunrise Boulevard: 2 to 4 lanes from Kiefer Boulevard to State Route 16 (Jackson Highway) and construct partial intersection improvements at Sunrise Boulevard and State Route 16. The project includes modifications to the bridge on Sunrise Boulevard XXXX City of Rancho Sunrise Blvd - Kiefer Blvd to over Laguna Creek. (The $5,227,000 of local agency funds is Sac SAC24468 SAC Cordova SR16 County funding. City will advance costs and enter into MOU with $12,000,000 2024 Programmed
City of Rancho Sunrise Blvd. and Jackson Hwy. Construct 6x6 intersection with two bridge sections over the creek at X SAC24349 SAC Cordova Intersection Sunrise Boulevard and Jackson Highway.yg $10,355,460 2036 Planned City of Rancho US 50 / Rancho Cordova including auxiliary lanes on U.S. 50 between Hazel Ave. and Sunrise X SAC24220 SAC Cordova Parkway Interchange Blvd. and a four lane arterial connectionpj to US 50 of Rancho y $99,162,000 2028 Programmed Sunrise Blvd. to City Limits; Sacramento project SAC24249. Environmental will be done for City of Rancho Environmental Sunrise to Grant White Rock Road Sunrise Blvd to Grant Line Road. Construction XXXX SAC24470 SAC Cordova Line will include: On existing 6-lane White Rock Rd., from Sunrise Blvd. $18,366,000 2024 Programmed Perkins. Phase I includes environmental/PE for four lane roadway City of and construction of two-lane roadway with class II bicycle lanes and XXXXX SAC24610 SAC Sacramento 14th Ave. Extension Phase 1 landscape planter/sidewalks on the south side of the roadway. Also $7,058,000 2023 Programmed
City of XXX SAC23630 SAC Sacramento 65th St. Widen: 5 lanes from Hwy. 50 to Broadway. $4,000,000 2026 Planned
City of X SAC22840 SAC Sacramento Bell Ave. Widen: 3 lanes from Norwood,y Ave. to Raley Blvd. , $20,000,000 2036 Planned four lane arterial to two lane arterial with buffered bike lanes, median City of Broadway Complete Street Phase improvements, sidewalk improvements and streetscape XXXXXX SAC25051 SAC Sacramento I enhancements. Create surface street (29th St.) from X St. to Hwy 99 $4,414,000 2022 Programmed
City of In Sacramento, from I-5 N/B off-ramp to East Commerce (north side X SAC24139 SAC Sacramento Del Paso Rd only), widen Del Paso Road. $516,000 2036 Planned City of Extend East Commerce Way from planned Natomas Crossing Drive XXXXXX SAC18580 SAC Sacramento East Commerce Way to San Juan Rd. as a 4 lane road. $4,000,000 2022 Planned
X City of In Sacramento, East Commerce Way from Club Center Drive to Del SAC18460 SAC Sacramento East Commerce Way Paso Rd, extend as a 6-lane facility. $8,142,225 2036 Planned City of In Sacramento, extend East Commerce Way from Arena Blvd. to X SAC18570 SAC Sacramento East Commerce Way Natomas Crossing Drive, as a 6 lane road. $3,329,000 2036 Planned
City of XXXXXX SAC18740 SAC Sacramento El Centro Rd. New Overcrossing: El Centro Rd. overcrossing. $11,000,000 2022 Planned
City of X SAC23680 SAC Sacramento Elder Creek Rd. Widen: 4 lanes from Florin Perkins Rd. to South Watt Ave. $7,000,000 2036 Planned
City of In Sacramento, Elkhorn Boulevard from SR 99 to east city limits: X SAC18510 SAC Sacramento Elkhorn Boulevard widen from 2 to 6 lanes. $7,073,566 2036 Planned Appendix B: Non-Exempt Project Listing 17 of 28 Milestone Year Project ID County Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost 2022 2023 2024 2026 2027 2036 Status for Conformity , Folsom Blvd./Power Inn Rd. extend northward from Brighton Ave. to connect to Folsom Blvd. City of Intersection (Ramona Ave Phase This will improve the operations of the Folsom Blvd./Power Inn XXXXXX SAC22610 SAC Sacramento I) Intersection.y, (Phase 2, SAC24654) (CMAQ ,Emission Reductions in $8,656,889 2019 Programmed Rd./12th Ave. to the Sacramento County Line: Reduce travel lanes City of from four to two lanes, add bicycle lanes, install landscaping and XXXX SAC25009 SAC Sacramento Franklin Boulevard Streetscape landscaped medians, and provide on-street parking. $8,053,000 2024 Programmed
City of Highway 99 Meister Way X SAC23810 SAC Sacramento Overcrossing New Overcrossing: Meister Wy. / Hwy. 99. $6,500,000 2036 Planned
City of X SAC18660 SAC Sacramento I-5 Add Auxiliary Lane: NB from Del Paso Rd. to Hwy. 99. $857,000 2036 Planned City of On/Off Ramp Improvement: Add 2nd on-ramp at I-5 / Hwy. 99 XXXXXX SAC18670 SAC Sacramento I-5 / Highway 99 Interchange. $216,000 2022 Planned
City of Sacramento, Richards Blvd. and I-5; reconstruct interchange (ult). XXX SAC18170 SAC Sacramento I-5 at Richards Blvd. Interchange (HPP #3784)(T15165100) $39,598,000 2025 Programmed
City of I-80 @ West El Camino Expand the West El Camino interchange on I-80 from 2 to 4 lanes X SAC18650 SAC Sacramento Interchange and modify ramps. $22,000,000 2036 Planned
City of Road Realignment: 4 lane Rd. from Power Inn Rd. to South Watt X SAC16040 SAC Sacramento Jackson Hwy. (SR 16) Ave.g $25,000,000 2036 Planned City of Natomas across the Lower American River. Includes: Auto, transit, XXX SAC24539 SAC Sacramento Lower American River Crossing bicycle, and pedestrian facilities'. Scale and features to be $150,000,000 2026 Planned
City of X SAC23430 SAC Sacramento Main Ave. Widen: 4 lanes from Norwood Ave. to Rio Linda Blvd. $7,000,000 2036 Planned
X City of SAC24536 SAC Sacramento Main Ave. Road Extension: 2 lanes from Rio Linda Blvd. to Marysville Blvd. $2,000,000 2036 Planned City of XXXXXX SAC18720 SAC Sacramento Natomas Crossing Dr. New Overcrossing: Natomas Crossing Dr. at I-5. $11,000,000 2022 Planned
City of In City of Sacramento, build new Natomas Crossing Drive as 2 lane X SAC18560 SAC Sacramento Natomas Crossing Drive road from Duckhorn Drive to El Centro Rd. $4,340,715 2036 Planned On/Off Ramp Improvement: Extend existing I-5 WB off-ramp at City of Northgate Blvd. / I-80 Interchange. Includes: auxiliary lane to WB on- XXXXXX SAC18700 SAC Sacramento Northgate Blvd. ramp. $10,000,000 2022 Planned
City of X SAC16070 SAC Sacramento Power Inn Rd. Widen: 6 lanes from Fruitridge Rd. to 14th. $25,000,000 2036 Planned Appendix B: Non-Exempt Project Listing 18 of 28 Milestone Year Project ID County Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost 2022 2023 2024 2026 2027 2036 Status for Conformity
Railyard Boulevard, between Jibboom Street and Bercut Street: construct approximately 200 feet of new roadway (one lane each XXXXXX City of direction) to provide access to Downtown Railyards. (See MTP SAC24615 SAC Sacramento Railyard Boulevard Extension Project SAC24537.) $1,000,000 2021 Programmed
City of Construct New Road: various roads in the Railyards Redevelopment XX SAC24537 SAC Sacramento Railyards Streets Area. $154,200,000 2027 Planned
X Ramona Avenue: Widen and add new frontage improvements from City of Cucamonga to Brighton. Environmental review completed under SAC24654 SAC Sacramento Ramona Avenue Phase II SAC22610. (No new travel lanes.) $3,000,000 2036 Planned
X Design and construct access improvements at 3rd & I (HPP #2788 City of Sacramento Intermodal and #3784). Feasibility Studies, preliminary design included in SAC24658 SAC Sacramento Circulation Phase 2 (3rd & I) Phase 1.pyy $2,417,165 2035 Planned City of Sacramento Intermodal Trans. Intermodal Facility Phase 2B project is a complete makeover and XX SAC24883 SAC Sacramento Facility - Phase 2b rehabilitation of theypj historic Depot to make the facility fully g usable $27,000,000 2027 Planned modal transportation center that can meet the region’s expanded City of Sacramento Intermodal transportation needs and accommodate high speed trains, X SAC24898 SAC Sacramento Transportation Facility - Phase 3 commuter rail, light rail, streetcars, transit bus lines, and intercity $225,000,000 2036 Planned
X City of New Overcrossing: for the planned Snowey Egret Wy. that will run SAC18710 SAC Sacramento Snowey Egret Wy. east-west from El Centro Rd. to Commerce Wy. crossing over I-5. $11,000,000 2036 Planned In Sacramento County :Expand the Elkhorn Blvd. interchange on City of SR 99 Elkhorn Boulevard Route 99 to accommodate the widening of Elkhorn Blvd. from 2 to 6 X SAC18690 SAC Sacramento Interchange lanes $11,909,000 2036 Planned
City of Widen: 6 lanes West El Camino Interchange. Includes: bike lanes at X SAC16130 SAC Sacramento W. El Camino Ave. I-80 / Natomas, Main Drainage Canal. $24,000,000 2036 Planned Green Line SVS Loop & K St. to Project as well as future Green Line service: (1) SVS Loop - H St. Improvements (Final Design segment of the Green Line at the Sacramento Valley Station XXXX REG18043 SAC RT & Construction) including: Relocate thegg existing/temporary LRT Station p on gH Street $60,037,572 2024 Programmed Northeast Corridor LRT, upgrade the traction power system and Northeast Corridor signaling to provide limited-stop service, make enhancements to XXXXX REG16470 SAC RT Enhancements yard track and maintenance facility, and installationyg of $40,000,000 2023 Programmed and construct light rail station . (Environmental covered by XXXXX REG18035 SAC RT Railyards Boulevard Station REG17943.) $2,367,200 2023 Programmed Appendix B: Non-Exempt Project Listing 19 of 28 Milestone Year Project ID County Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost 2022 2023 2024 2026 2027 2036 Status for Conformity ,g Phase 1 (Blue Line) at Meadowview Station further south to South Sacramento Light Rail Cosumnes River College (CRC). Includes 4.2 miles of track, 4 new XXXXXX REG15053 SAC RT (Blue Line) - Phase 2 stations, and 2700 park & ride spaces. Revenue service began $270,000,000 2019 Programmed
XXX Sacramento SAC24389 SAC County 16th St. Widen: 4 lanes from Ascot Blvd. to Sacramento/Placer County Line. $44,500,000 2026 Planned
Sacramento Construct New 4 lane road between Easton Valley Parkway and XXX SAC24839 SAC County Aerojet Rd Folsom Blvd. $10,000,000 2026 Planned
X Sacramento In Sacramento County, Antelope North Road, from Poker Ln. to SAC22020 SAC County Antelope North Road Widening Olive Ave.: Realign and widen to 4 lanes. $3,020,000 2036 Planned Widen: 4 lanes from Watt Ave. to Elverta Rd and 6 lanes from Sacramento Elverta Rd. to Roseville Rd. Project addresses: congestion, safety X SAC24264 SAC County Antelope Rd. and aesthetics, and mobility for bicycles, pedestrians and transit. $9,307,473 2036 Planned
XXX Sacramento Construct New 4 lane road between Easton Valley Parkway and SAC24840 SAC County Birkmont Drive Folsom Blvd. $10,000,000 2026 Planned
Sacramento X SAC24224 SAC County Bradshaw Rd. Widen: 6 lanes between Old Placerville Rd. and Florin. $37,500,000 2036 Planned
Sacramento Douglas Rd. - Zinfandel Dr. to Widen Douglas Road, from Zinfandel Drive to Rancho Cordova west X SAC24663 SAC County Rancho Cordova City Limit City Limits, from 2 to 4y, lanes. g $2,400,000 2036 Planned Boulevard; new 4 lane roadway with raised landscaped median, Sacramento curb, gutter and sidewalk, improvements also include installation of X SAC22410 SAC County Douglas Road Extension traffic signals at Douglas/Kiefery, g and Douglas/Excelsior Road. No $19,837,200 2036 Planned Kiefer Boulevard to Douglas Road, construct and widen from 2 to 4 Sacramento Eagles Nest Road Zinfandel Drive lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalk, raised landscaped median; X SAC22430 SAC County Widening improvements also include the installation of a box culvert and traffic $11,800,000 2036 Planned
Sacramento X SAC24529 SAC County Easton Valley Pkwy. Construct New Road: 4 lanes from Hazel Ave. to Prairie City Rd. $36,000,000 2036 Planned
Sacramento X SAC24943 SAC County Elder Creek Rd. Widen: 4 lanes from South Watt Ave. to Excelsior Rd. $2,100,000 2036 Planned
Sacramento Elk Grove-Florin Rd, over Elder Creek, 0.1 mi north of Gerber Rd.: XXXXXX SAC24380 SAC County Elk Grove-Florin Rd. Bridge Replace functionally obsolete 2 lane bridge and widen to 6 lanes. $11,097,301 2019 Programmed Appendix B: Non-Exempt Project Listing 20 of 28 Milestone Year Project ID County Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost 2022 2023 2024 2026 2027 2036 Status for Conformity
XXXXXX In Sacramento County, Elk Grove-Florin Road from North of Elder Sacramento Creek to Florin Road: widen from 2 to 4 lanes. (Existing Elder Creek SAC15170 SAC County Elk Grove-Florin Rd. Widening bridge is being replaced and widened to 6 lanes SAC24380) $7,516,000 2021 Programmed
XXX Sacramento Construct New Road: 2 lanes from Airport Blvd. / Crossfield Dr. to SAC24527 SAC County Elkhorn Blvd. Power Line Rd. Includes: landscaped medians. $8,200,000 2026 Planned
X Sacramento SAC24531 SAC County Elkhorn Blvd. Widen: 4 lanes from Sacramento City limit east to 2nd Street. $3,065,000 2036 Planned
X Sacramento In Sacramento County, Elkhorn Blvd. from Watt Ave. to Don Julio SAC15230 SAC County Elkhorn Blvd. Widening Blvd.: widen from 4 to 6 lanes. $14,284,000 2036 Planned
In Sacramento County, Elkhorn Boulevard from Rio Linda Boulevard X to SR 99: widen from 2 to 4 lanes, including bridge over Natomas Sacramento east main drain, landscaping, new RR crossing and bike/ped SAC15180 SAC County Elkhorn Boulevard Widening facilities. $14,000,000 2036 Planned
XXXXXX Widen Elverta Rd. from Dutch Haven Blvd. to Watt Ave. from 2 to 4 Sacramento Elverta Road at Dry Creek Bridge lanes. North Channel Dry Creek Bridge, between 28th St. and SAC19620 SAC County Widening Gibson Ranch Park Rd.: replace 2 lane bridge with 6 lane bridge. $16,512,612 2022 Programmed In Northern Sacramento County: Extension of Elverta Road from just south east of Sand City Drive to Don Julio Boulevard; new 6 lane roadway extension to Don Julio Boulevard with a traffic signal XX modification at the intersection of Elverta Road and Don Julio Sacramento Boulevard and a possible realignment of Antelope Road to Elverta SAC24248 SAC County Elverta Road Extension Road. $750,000 2027 Planned Appendix B: Non-Exempt Project Listing 21 of 28 Milestone Year Project ID County Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost 2022 2023 2024 2026 2027 2036 Status for Conformity
In Northern Sacramento County: Extension of Elverta Road from just southeast of Sand City Drive to Don Julio Boulevard: Construct XXXXXX new 6 lane roadway extension with a traffic signal modification at the Sacramento intersection of Elverta Road and Don Julio Boulevard and a possible SAC25079 SAC County Elverta Road Extension realignment of Antelope Road to Elverta Road. $7,500,000 2022 Programmed
X Widen Elverta Rd. from Rio Linda Blvd. to Dutch Haven Blvd. from 2 Sacramento to 4 lanes including landscaped median, ADA improvements, transit SAC19621 SAC County Elverta Road Widening access and bike/pedestrian facilities. $14,797,000 2036 Planned
In Sacramento County: Between Kiefer Boulevard/Douglas Road X Extension and Jackson Road (SR16); construct and widen to 4 Sacramento lanes with raised landscaped median and curb and gutter. SAC24263 SAC County Excelsior Road Widening Improvements also include the construction of a pit pump station. $12,000,000 2036 Planned Widen: 4 lanes from Elk Grove-Florin Rd. to Vineyard Rd. Includes: Sacramento a traffic signal modification at Bradshaw and a couple of new traffic XXX SAC24281 SAC County Florin Rd. signals at Hedge Ave. and Waterman Rd. $23,700,000 2026 Planned Sacramento SAC24941 SAC County Fruitridge Rd Widen: 4 Lanes from S. Watt Ave to Bradshaw $600,000 2036 X Planned Sacramento In Sacramento County, Gerber Road from Bradshaw Road to SAC19690 SAC County Gerber Road Widening Vineyard Road: widen from 2 to 4 lanes. $6,688,000 2036 X Planned Widen Gerber Road between Elk Grove-Florin Road and Bradshaw Road from 3 to 4 lanes. (This road is already 3 lanes (two Sacramento westbound and one eastbound)from Elk Grove-Florin Road to about XXX SAC24035 SAC County Gerber Road Widening 1/4-mile west of Bradshaw Road.) $3,854,000 2025 Programmed Sacramento Construct New 4 lane road between Easton Valley Parkway and SAC24852 SAC County Glenborough Drive Folsom Blvd. $26,000,000 2026 XXXPlanned In Sacramento County, Hazel Avenue, between Folsom Boulevard and US Highway 50: multi-modal corridor improvements, Sacramento Hazel Ave - U.S. 50 to Folsom interchange improvements; widen from 4 lanes to 6 lanes of Hazel XXX SAC24255 SAC County Blvd Avenue between Folsom Boulevard and US Highway 50. $83,402,000 2025 Programmed
Sacramento County, Hazel Avenue, from Sunset Ave. to Madison Ave.: Widen from 4 to 6 lanes. New traffic signals at Roediger Lane and Phoenix Avenue. Improve existing and projected traffic XXXXXX Sacramento congestion; enhance pedestrian and bicycle mobility in the corridor, SAC24626 SAC County Hazel Ave Widening Phase 3 address safety concerns, and improve the aesthetics of the corridor. $16,051,000 2021 Programmed In Sacramento County and City of Rancho Cordova: Between Easton Valley Parkway and Folsom Boulevard; joint project with the Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova to construct a new 6-lane expressway with XXXXXX SAC24268 SAC County Hazel Ave. Improvements special treatment. $15,000,000 2022 Programmed Sacramento Widen: 4 lanes from South Watt Ave. to Excelsior Rd. Includes: CAL15410 SAC County Jackson Hwy. (SR 16) continuous left turn lane. $60,000,000 2026 XXXPlanned Appendix B: Non-Exempt Project Listing 22 of 28 Milestone Year Project ID County Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost 2022 2023 2024 2026 2027 2036 Status for Conformity Sacramento Madison Avenue from Fair Oaks Blvd. to Hazel Ave.: Widen from 4 SAC16500 SAC County Madison Avenue Widening to 6 lanes. $29,037,000 2022 XXXXXXProgrammed Sacramento In Sacramento County, Metro Air Parkway from north of I-5 to SAC24512 SAC County Metro Air Parkway Elverta Road: Widen roadway from 2 to 4 lanes. $5,320,000 2022 XXXXXXProgrammed
In Sacramento County, I-5 @ Metro Air Parkway near Sacramento International Airport: Construct the first phase of a five-lane partial clover Type L-9 interchange for Metro Air Parkway at Interstate 5 (I- 5). Construct a three lane overcrossing facility with a median, bike lanes and a sidewalk on the west side. Metro Air Parkway will connect on the north of the interchange and terminate south of I-5 with a cul-de-sac. South Bayou Rd will realigned to provide the r/w XXXXXX for partial completion of two-quadrant partial cloverleaf interchange. Project also includes a one-lane northbound I-5 exit ramp and diagonal entrance ramp, one-lane southbound I-5 exit ramp, a two- lane southbound I-5 loop entrance ramp with auxiliary lane, street lighting, striping, signs, relocation of an existing drainage ditch on Sacramento Metro Air Parkway Interchange at the south side of the freeway, construction of drainage SAC18150 SAC County I-5 improvements with the interchange, and relocation of utilities. $26,989,000 2020 Programmed This project will include the road widening of Power Inn Rd between Florin Rd and Elder Creek Rd to accommodate two through lanes in each direction, a center two way left turn lane, a 6-foot bike lane on XXXXXX Sacramento the east side, and a 5-foot bike lane with curb, gutter, and sidewalk SAC24274 SAC County Power Inn Rd Widening on the west side. $1,662,000 2022 Planned Power Inn Road, from Florin Rd. to 52nd Ave.: Widen from three to four lanes, and from 450 feet south of Loucreta Dr. to 52nd Ave.: Install curb, gutter, sidewalk infills, ADA ramps, bike lane XXXXXX Sacramento Power Inn Rd. Improvement improvements, and landscape medians. (Scope included in SAC25035 SAC County Project MTP/SCS project SAC24274. Related ATP project is SAC25022) $4,522,000 2021 Programmed Sacramento Widen Prairie City Road from 2 to 4 lanes between US 50 and White SAC24330 SAC County Prairie City Road Widening Rock Road. $11,000,000 2022 XXXXXXPlanned Sacramento SAC19680 SAC County Roseville Rd. Widen: 4 lanes from Watt Ave. to Walerga Rd. $38,422,000 2036 X Planned Sacramento SAC23540 SAC County S. Watt Ave. Widen: 6 lanes from Elder Creek Rd. to Fruitridge Rd. $20,000,000 2036 X Planned Sacramento S. Watt Ave. / Elk Grove Florin SAC23860 SAC County Rd. Widen: 6 lanes from Fruitridge Rd. to Kiefer Blvd. $10,000,000 2036 X Planned Sacramento In Sacramento County: South Watt Avenue from: Florin Road to SAC19290 SAC County South Watt Avenue Widening Jackson Road (Route 16); widen from 2 to 4 lanes. $29,041,000 2023 XXXXXProgrammed Sacramento In Sacramento County: Sunrise Blvd. between Jackson Highway SAC19710 SAC County Sunrise Blvd. and Grant Line Road; Widen from 2 to 4 lanes $12,000,000 2025 XXXProgrammed
In Sacramento County: Between Vintage Park Drive to Florin Road; Sacramento widen existing roadway to 4 lanes and extend roadway from Gerber X SAC24285 SAC County Waterman Road Widening Road to Florin Road with an at-grade rail road crossing. $20,000,000 2036 Planned Sacramento In Sacramento County: Between Florin Rd. to Jackson Rd.; SAC24885 SAC County Waterman Road Widening construct roadway to 4 lanes $16,500,000 2036 X Planned Sacramento SAC24585 SAC County Watt Ave. Widen: 6 lanes from I-80 to Palm Ave. Don Julio Blvd. $16,250,000 2026 XXXPlanned Appendix B: Non-Exempt Project Listing 23 of 28 Milestone Year Project ID County Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost 2022 2023 2024 2026 2027 2036 Status for Conformity In Sacramento County, Watt Ave: Between Palm Ave. Don Julio Blvd. and Antelope Rd. Elkhorn Blvd. widen to 6 lanes; 3 lanes north Sacramento bound on Watt Ave and 3 lanes southbound on 34th St; smart XXX SAC15750 SAC County Watt Avenue Couplet growth st. with proposed BRT/HI Bus - exclusive lanes. $15,600,000 2026 Planned Sacramento In Sacramento County, Watt Ave.: Between Elkhorn Blvd and SAC15720 SAC County Watt Avenue Widening Antelope Rd widen from 4 to 6 lanes $9,641,800 2036 X Planned White Rock Road - Grant Line White Rock Road, from Grant Line Road to Rancho Cordova Sacramento Rd. to Rancho Cordova City easterly City limits: Widen from 2 to 4 lanes. Environmental to be XXXXX SAC24662 SAC County Limits cleared as part of SAC24470. $10,000,000 2023 Programmed In Sacramento County: Zinfandel Drive, from Douglas Rd. to 7,100 ft south of Douglas Rd.: reconstruct Zinfandel Drive as a two lane road. From 7,100 ft south of Douglas Rd. to Kiefer Blvd.: extend Zinfandel Dr. as a two lane road on a slightly different alignment XXXXXX Sacramento Zinfandel Drive Extension & than the existing dirt road. Construct concrete box culvert over creek SAC24622 SAC County Realignment just north of Kiefer Blvd. $5,848,000 2021 Programmed
Zinfandel Drive, from Southern boundary of the Villages of Zinfandel Sacramento to Douglas Road: Widen from 2 to 4 lanes with a raised landscaped X SAC20240 SAC County Zinfandel Road Widening median. (For other phases see SAC24473 and SAC24467) $1,050,000 2036 Planned Sacramento Enhance light rail capacity on the Gold Line to the city of Folsom, Regional Transit Amtrak-Folsom Limited Stop light rail system modifications that will give RT the capacity to XXXXXX SAC24977 SAC District Service provide limited stop express service. $12,000,000 2017 Planned Sacramento Regional Transit X REG17935 SAC District Green Line: MOS2 & MOS3 Extend rail from Richards Blvd. to Sacramento International Airport $698,286,782 2036 Planned Sacramento Regional Transit Develop 9-mile enhanced bus corridor on Arden Way. Include 7 artic XX SAC24817 SAC District Hi-bus on Arden Way buses $20,635,000 2027 Planned Sacramento Develop an enhanced bus corridor along 6.5 miles along Auburn Regional Transit Boulevard between Watt/I-80 and Citrus Heights. Include 5 artic XXXXXX SAC24813 SAC District Hi-bus on Auburn Blvd buses. (precursor to LRT to Citrus Heights). $14,700,000 2017 Planned Sacramento Regional Transit Develop an enhanced bus corridor along 15.5 miles Sunrise Mall to XXXX SAC24814 SAC District Hi-bus on El Camino Ave the Royal Oaks station. Include 11 artic buses $34,315,000 2024 Planned Sacramento Develop Hi Bus corridor on Florin Road with enhanced bus from JFK Regional Transit High School to Old Town Florin (8 miles), and BRT from Old Town XX SAC24815 SAC District Hi-bus on Florin Rd Florin to Bradshaw (3.5 miles). Include 9 artic buses $34,547,000 2027 Planned Sacramento Develop an enhanced bus corridor along 12 miles along Stockton Regional Transit Boulevard between Downtown Sacramento and Cosumnes River XXXXXX SAC24870 SAC District Hi-bus on Stockton Blvd College. Include 9 artic buses $27,127,000 2017 Planned Sacramento Regional Transit Develop 8-mile enhanced bus corridor on Sunrise Blvd. Include 6 X SAC24818 SAC District Hi-bus on Sunrise South artic buses $18,085,000 2036 Planned Sacramento Regional Transit Develop a 12.5 mile Hi Bus corridor on Watt Avenue between XXXXXX SAC24812 SAC District Hi-bus on Watt Ave Watt/Manlove station to Placer County Line. Include 9 artic buses $56,804,000 2017 Planned Sacramento Project is to build stations previously deferred during construction of Regional Transit the light rail system: such as Dos Rios, Horn, T St, Mineshaft, X SAC24864 SAC District New Light Rail Stations Ramona or others. $17,000,000 2036 Planned Appendix B: Non-Exempt Project Listing 24 of 28 Milestone Year Project ID County Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost 2022 2023 2024 2026 2027 2036 Status for Conformity
In Elk Grove: Modify the Grant Line Road/Bradshaw Rd intersection. Southeast Capital SouthEast Connector – This is part of the Capital SouthEast Connector Segment B2 (Grant XXXXXX SAC24700 SAC Connector JPA B2a Line Road from Waterman Rd to Bradshaw Rd widening). $8,349,000 2022 Programmed Southeast In Elk Grove: Grant Line Road; from Waterman Rd to Bradshaw SAC25081 SAC Connector JPA Capital SouthEast Connector - B2 Rd; widen from 2 to 4 lanes. $15,000,000 2026 XXXProgrammed Southeast In Rancho Cordova: Grant Line Road from Jackson Rd to White VAR56128 SAC Connector JPA Capital Southeast Connector - D2 Rock Rd: Widen from 2 lanes to a 4-lane expressway. $46,259,121 2026 XXXProgrammed In Folsom, at East Bidwell St. / White Rock Rd. Intersection: Southeast Capital SouthEast Connector - Signalize and widen the intersection. (Part of SE Connector XXXXXX SAC24250 SAC Connector JPA D3a Segment D3) $13,000,000 2022 Programmed CAL15770 SUT Caltrans D3 SR 20 Improvements Widen: SR 20 to six (6) lanes from Walton Rd. to Rocca Wy. $2,000,000 2036 X Planned Construct New Road: 2 lane collector from Samuel St. to Richard SUT18914 SUT City of Live Oak Apricot St. Ave. Includes: drainage, curb, gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. $1,716,000 2036 X Planned Widen: Add 2 travel lanes from Nevada St. (N. end) to Riviera Rd. Includes: curb, gutter, sidewalks, and drainage improvements. X SUT17014 SUT City of Live Oak Highway 99 (Phase IV) $5,661,000 2036 Planned Widen: Add 2 travel lanes from Kola St. to Nevada St. (N. end); Includes: curb, gutter, sidewalk, and drainage improvements. X SUT17013 SUT City of Live Oak Highway 99 (Phase II) $7,956,000 2036 Planned Widen: Add 2 travel lanes from Elm St. to Kola St. Includes: SUT17015 SUT City of Live Oak Highway 99 sidewalks and drainage improvements. (Phase I) $3,213,000 2036 X Planned Widen: Add 2 travel lanes from Elm St. to Coleman Rd. Includes: SUT17016 SUT City of Live Oak Highway 99 sidewalks and drainage improvements. (Phase III) $6,120,000 2036 X Planned In Live Oak, SR 99, from Ash Street to Ramsdell Drive: widen from 2 to 4 lanes and build streetscape improvements. (Toll credits for PE, ROW, and CON) (See project phases in MTP: SUT18872, XXXX Live Oak Collaborative Highway SUT17014, SUT18865, SUT18906, SUT17013, SUT17015, and SUT18865 SUT City of Live Oak 99 Streetscape Improvements SUT17016.). Toll Credits for ENG, ROW, CON $22,090,938 2024 Programmed
In Live Oak: Pennington Road from N Street to P Street, reconstruct Pennington Road Widening adding 2 new traffic lanes and center median with turn pockets, X SUT17006 SUT City of Live Oak Phase 2 drainage improvements, bike lanes and undergrounding utilities. $243,100 2036 Planned Construct New Road: 2 lane collector from SR 99 to Riviera Rd. SUT18900 SUT City of Live Oak Road E Includes: drainage, curb, gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. $3,822,000 2036 X Planned Construct New Road: 2 lane collector from Luther Rd. to Road C. SUT18902 SUT City of Live Oak Sean Drive Includes: drainage, curb, gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. $2,028,000 2036 X Planned SUT16953 SUT City of Yuba City Bridge St. Widen: 4 lanes from Western Pkwy. to Walton Ave. $14,633,100 2036 X Planned In Yuba City, Widen Bridge Street from Cooper Street to Gray SUT10250 SUT City of Yuba City Bridge Street Widening Avenue: widen to 4 lanes. $9,393,543 2021 XXXXXXProgrammed Roadway Operational Improvements: from Richland Rd. to Franklin SUT16963 SUT City of Yuba City Clark Ave. Ave. add a continuous left-turn lane and bike lanes. $6,016,405 2036 X Planned Roadway Operational Improvements: from Hwy. 20 to Franklin Rd. SUT16969 SUT City of Yuba City El Margarita Rd. add a continuous left turn lane and bike lanes. $2,689,965 2036 X Planned 5th St/Bridge St crossing over the Feather River/2nd St, between Marysville and Yuba City: Replace two-lane bridge with 4-lane bridge. (HPP# 3631) (Toll Credits for ROW and CON) (Local XXXXXX Agency funds for CON are non-participating.). Toll Credits for SUT10828 SUT City of Yuba City Feather River Bridge at 5th St ROW, CON $89,453,030 2019 Programmed Appendix B: Non-Exempt Project Listing 25 of 28 Milestone Year Project ID County Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost 2022 2023 2024 2026 2027 2036 Status for Conformity Widen Franklin Avenue from 2 to 4 lanes from Route 99 to Clark SUT10530 SUT City of Yuba City Franklin Avenue Avenue. $5,224,500 2036 X Planned SUT16971 SUT City of Yuba City George Washington Blvd. Construct New Road: 4 lanes from Pease Rd. to Hwy. 20. $13,911,100 2036 X Planned Construct New Interchange: 4 lanes at Pease Rd. / Hwy 99. SUT16974 SUT City of Yuba City Pease Rd. Includes: overcrossing and connecting ramps at Hwy 99. $57,880,554 2036 X Planned Widen: 4 lanes from Franklin Ave. to Garden Hwy. Includes: SUT16975 SUT City of Yuba City Percy Ave. landscaped medians. $6,632,500 2036 X Planned SUT16958 SUT City of Yuba City Sunsweet Blvd. Construct New Road: 2 lanes from Hwy. 99 to Gray Ave. $8,675,500 2036 X Planned SUT16966 SUT City of Yuba City Tharp Rd. Widen: 4 lanes from Hwy. 20 to Butte House Rd. $2,351,734 2036 X Planned West of Elmer Rd and east of Domain Wy, construct Tuly Parkway as two lane road, from Butte House Road to Queens Avenue. Work XXXXXX SUT18933 SUT City of Yuba City Tuly Parkway will include road and traffic signal improvements. $1,300,000 2019 Programmed Widen Walton Ave from Lincoln Rd. to Franklin Rd. from 2-3 lanes to 5 lanes including upgrades to bike lanes, sidewalks, curbs, X SUT10241 SUT City of Yuba City Walton Avenue Widening gutters, and drainage. $13,762,794 2036 Planned SUT10340 SUT Sutter County Riego Rd Widening Widen Riego Rd to 4 lanes, Route 99 to Placer Co. $3,142,000 2026 XXXPlanned On the Union Pacific mainline, from near the Sacramento and Placer County boarder to the Roseville Station area in Placer County: Construct a layover facility, install various Union Pacific Railroad Yard track improvements, required signaling, and construct the most northern eight miles of third mainline track between XXXXXX Sacramento and Roseville (largely all in Placer County), which will Capitol Corridor Sacramento to Roseville Third allow up to two additional round trips (for a total of three round trips) CAL18320 VAR JPA Main Track - Phase 1 between Sacramento and Roseville. $82,276,000 2021 Programmed
On the UP mainline, from Sacramento Valley Station approximately 9.8 miles toward the Placer County line: Construct third mainline track including all bridges and required signaling. Project improvements will permit service capacity increases for Capitol XXX Corridor in Placer County, with up to seven additional round trips Capitol Corridor Sacramento to Roseville Third added to Phase 1-CAL18320 (for a total of ten round trips) between VAR56199 VAR JPA Main Track - Phase 2 Sacramento to Roseville including track and station improvements. $195,000,000 2025 Programmed From West Sacramento to Sacramento, across the Sacramento River, construct the Broadway Bridge, a new southern crossing of the Sacramento River. Project includes: Auto, transit, bicycle and X City of West pedestrian facilities. (Local funding is split between the Cities of YOL19328 VAR Sacramento Broadway Bridge Sacramento and West Sacramento) $254,500,000 2030 Programmed In Folsom: Between Prairie City Rd and Carson Crossing Rd; Southeast Construct 4 lane (Expressway). (To be constructed with Capital XXX SAC25080 VAR Connector JPA Capital SouthEast Connector - D3 SouthEast Connector E1, ELD19468). $44,000,000 2026 Programmed Construct northbound I-5 to southbound SR 113 freeway-to-freeway CAL15881 YOL Caltrans D3 I-5 / 113 Connector - Phase 2 connection - Phase 2 $107,733,850 2030 X Programmed Widen: 4 lanes from Shasta Dr. to Denali Dr. Includes: bike lanes YOL17180 YOL City of Davis Covell Blvd. and a center median. $1,600,000 2036 X Planned In Davis: At the I-80/Richards interchange; reconstruct the north side of Richards Blvd. interchange to remove the loop on- and off-ramps and replace with new ramp in diamond configuration. Includes traffic X YOL17140 YOL City of Davis I-80/Richards Interchange signal installation. $9,610,000 2036 Programmed Appendix B: Non-Exempt Project Listing 26 of 28 Milestone Year Project ID County Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost 2022 2023 2024 2026 2027 2036 Status for Conformity In Davis, between Alhambra Dr. and Alhambra Dr. (Mace curve), widen from 2 to 4 lanes, provide bike lanes, a landscaped median, X YOL17170 YOL City of Davis Mace Blvd Curve and turn lanes. $2,300,000 2035 Planned City of West YOL15130 YOL Sacramento Harbor Blvd. Widening Harbor Blvd., West Capitol Ave. to Industrial: widen 4 to 6 lanes. $6,000,000 2036 X Planned City of West In West Sacramento, I-80 at Enterprise Boulevard: construct YOL15891 YOL Sacramento I-80 Enterprise Boulevard eastbound on-ramp. $4,800,000 2025 XXXProgrammed I-80 at Reed Ave. interchange: widen ramps at the intersection with City of West Reed Avenue, widen Reed Avenue, and limit some local street XXXXXX YOL15670 YOL Sacramento I-80/Reed Ave. Interchange access. Add ramp metering to the on-ramps. $12,350,000 2022 Planned In West Sacramento, Industrial Boulevard from the Palamidessi City of West Bridge at the Barge Canal to Harbor Boulevard: widen from 4 to 6 X YOL15160 YOL Sacramento Industrial Boulevard Widening lanes. $16,440,000 2036 Planned City of West Widen Lake Washington Blvd. from 2 to 6 lanes from Jefferson YOL15940 YOL Sacramento Lake Washington Blvd. Blvd. to the new Palamidessi Bridge at the barge canal. $4,000,000 2022 XXXXXXPlanned City of West Lake Washington Blvd.: Widen the Palamidessi Bridge over the YOL15950 YOL Sacramento Lake Washington Blvd. barge canal from 4 to 6 lanes. $10,100,000 2036 X Planned West Capitol Avenue from Enterprise Ave to Houston Ave is to rehabilitate 5,300 linear feet of deteriorating pavement, widen from 2 to 4 lanes from Sutter Ave to I-80 overpass (1,600 linear feet) and widen from 3 to 4 lanes from east of I-80 off ramp to west of Northrop Drive (2,700 linear feet), install drainage improvements, XXXXX Phase 2 - West Capitol Avenue sidewalks, access ramps, bike lanes, street lighting and cross walks City of West Rehabilitation - Complete Streets for safer pedestrian crossings.(PE work programmed separately on YOL19396 YOL Sacramento and Safety YOL19383.) $5,099,000 2023 Programmed Riverfront Street, from Mill Street extending .3 miles south, and 5th Street, from Bridge Street to 15th Street: Extend Riverfront Street as a two-lane roadway with sidewalks, lighting, wet and dry utilities and landscaping. Widen 5th Street between Mill Street and 15th Street to accommodate a cycle track (two way bike lane), XXXXXX underground overhead utilities, wet and dry utilities, and sidewalk. City of West The cycle track will extend from Bridge Street to 15th Street and YOL19385 YOL Sacramento Riverfront Street Extension intersection enhancements at 15th Street and Bridge Street. $5,334,500 2020 Programmed City of West Construct internal roadway, utilities and storm drainage network for YOL19351 YOL Sacramento Seaway Property Infrastructure Port Property Development $5,000,000 2027 XXPlanned Reconstruct and widen South River Road/ Village Pkwy to 4-lanes City of West from US50 on-ramp to Stonegate Boulevard, including restriping the X YOL15180 YOL Sacramento South River Rd. Widening 4-lane bridge from 2-lanes to 4-lanes over barge canal. $16,250,000 2030 Planned Jefferson Blvd interchange--expand the ramps and signals from 1 to City of West U.S. 50/Jefferson Blvd. 2 lanes, add ramp metering and turn lanes, and related street X YOL15900 YOL Sacramento Interchange closures. $26,450,000 2036 Planned Appendix B: Non-Exempt Project Listing 27 of 28 Milestone Year Project ID County Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost 2022 2023 2024 2026 2027 2036 Status for Conformity
This project includes the design of, procurement of right of way for and construction of Village Parkway from Stonegate Drive to Davis Road. This new street will serve the Northeast and Southeast villages of the Southport area, improve circulation in the eastern portion of the city, and relieve traffic congestion on Jefferson XXX Boulevard. This segment will provide the primary connection to the planned South River Road Bridge across the Barge Canal, thereby connecting the Stone Lock, Pioneer Bluff and redevelopment areas City of West Village Parkway Southern to the growing residential areas to the south. Flood program to YOL19360 YOL Sacramento Extension construct interim improvements from Lake Washington to Gregory. $10,500,000 2026 Planned Construct New Road: 2 lane collector from County Rd. 24A to YOL17390 YOL City of Woodland College St. County Rd. 24C $539,000 2036 X Planned Construct New Road: 2 lane collector from County Rd. 24A to YOL17380 YOL City of Woodland Coloma Wy. County Rd. 24C. $619,851 2036 X Planned YOL17550 YOL City of Woodland County Rd. 102 Widen: 4 lanes from Gibson Rd. to Heritage Pkwy. $4,000,000 2036 X Planned YOL17290 YOL City of Woodland Kentucky Ave. Widen: 4 lanes from College St. to West St. $3,537,189 2036 X Planned YOL17360 YOL City of Woodland Parkland Ave. Construct New Road: 2 lane arterial from Pioneer Ave. to East St. $9,044,751 2036 X Planned Construction of the Phase 1 of the Downtown/Riverfront Streetcar. The alignment runs from West Sacramento Civic Center/Riverfront Sacramento-West Sacramento Street to the Midtown entertainment, retail, and residential district of XXXXXX Downtown/Riverfront Streetcar Sacramento. (Project Development programmed separately under YCT18198 YOL SACOG Project (Phase 1) VAR56127, for $14,570,000.) $194,000,000 2018 Programmed Yolo County Transportation Capitol Corridor Multimodal Engineering, Environmental, and Construction of the City of Davis- XXXXXX YCT18252 YOL District Facility in Davis Amtrak Multimodal station $25,000,000 2018 Planned City of YUB16052 YUB Wheatland Olive Street Extension Obtain right of way and construct arterial roadway. $2,400,000 2036 X Planned Widen: 4 lanes from McGowan Pkwy. to Erle Rd. Includes: curb, YUB15883 YUB Yuba County Arboga Rd. gutter, sidewalk, and landscaping. $3,250,000 2026 XXXPlanned New modified 4-lane arterial from Broadway Rd to Ella Ave, including pavement, curb, gutter, sidewalk and back of curb X YUB15880 YUB Yuba County Arboga Road landscaping $6,600,000 2036 Planned Widen 2 lanes to 4 lane arterial. Includes pavement, curb, gutter, YUB15887 YUB Yuba County Broadway St. sidewalk, and landscaping. $3,200,000 2036 X Planned Widen 2 to 3 lane collector from Feather River Blvd. to Arboga Rd. YUB15895 YUB Yuba County Ella Ave. Includes: curb, gutter, sidewalk, and landscaping. $3,756,000 2036 X Planned Modify ex Interchange: South of Marysville, SR 70 at Erle Road YUB16050 YUB Yuba County Erle Rd/SR70 Intch Mod Interchange. $2,000,000 2036 X Planned YUB15927 YUB Yuba County Feather River Blvd. Widen: 4 lanes from Ella Ave. to south of Country Club Rd. $9,725,000 2036 X Planned Construct New Road: 4 lanes (of 6 lane arterial) from Orchard S.S. YUB15929 YUB Yuba County Goldfields Pkwy. to North Beale Rd. $2,100,000 2036 X Planned Construct New Road: 4 lanes from North Beale Rd. to north of YUB15930 YUB Yuba County Goldfields Pkwy. Hammonton-Smartsville Rd. $995,000 2036 X Planned Construct New Interchange: Goldfields Pkwy. at Hwy. 65 / Hwy 70 YUB15931 YUB Yuba County Goldfields Pkwy. connection. $66,000,000 2036 X Planned YUB15942 YUB Yuba County La Porte Rd. Widen and Realign: from Butte County to Willow Glen Rd. $3,200,000 2036 X Planned Construct 3-lane collector McGowan Parkway from Arboga Road to YUB15950 YUB Yuba County McGowan Parkway Union Pacific Railroad. $1,300,000 2036 X Planned Appendix B: Non-Exempt Project Listing 28 of 28 Milestone Year Project ID County Lead Agency Title Description Total Cost 2022 2023 2024 2026 2027 2036 Status for Conformity Widen Roadway from 2-lanes to 4-lanes and install curb gutter and YUB15877 YUB Yuba County North Beale Road Improvements sidewalk from Linda Ave to Griffith Rd. $2,000,000 2020 XXXXXXProgrammed YUB15908 YUB Yuba County Plumas Arboga Rd. Widen 2 to 3 lane collector from Arboga Rd. to UPRR. $2,000,000 2036 X Planned
YUB15916 YUB Yuba County Plumas Arboga Rd. Widen 2 to 3 lane collector from Feather River Blvd. to Arboga Rd. $2,500,000 2036 X Planned Construct New Road: 4 lanes from Plumas Lake Blvd. Interchange YUB15919 YUB Yuba County Plumas Lake Blvd. to Plumas Arboga Rd. Includes: a structure over the RR tracks. $2,700,000 2036 X Planned Construct new 4-lane modified arterial from Algodon Rd to Draper YUB15920 YUB Yuba County River Oaks Blvd Ranch South development. $7,500,000 2036 X Planned Road Extension: 4 lanes from Broadway St. to Draper Ranch South YUB15921 YUB Yuba County River Oaks Blvd. development. $6,300,000 2018 XXXXXXPlanned Road Extension: 2 inner lanes of 4-lane arterial from Feather River YUB15923 YUB Yuba County River Oaks Blvd. Blvd. to Lateral 16. $2,000,000 2036 X Planned South of Marysville, SR 65 at Forty Mile Road Interchange: construct SR 65 Interchange at Forty Mile interchange to accommodate traffic from the Yuba County X YUB15580 YUB Yuba County Road Motorplex. $2,070,000 2036 Planned Eastern Solano County Project List Year Modelled for Total Project Total 2017 TIP AQ Conformity (Non- Sponsor Project Name TIP ID Cost Cost Air Quality Description RTP ID Exempt Only) MTC I-80 Express Lanes - Fairfield & Vacaville Ph I&II SOL110001 $236,800,000 $2,000,000 NON-EXEMPT 17-10-0044 2030 STA Jepson: Vanden Road from Peabody to Leisure Town SOL110003 $30,455,855 $19,376,000 NON-EXEMPT 17-08-0012 2030 STA Jepson: Walters Rd Ext - Peabody Rd Widening SOL110004 $13,431,000 $0 NON-EXEMPT 17-08-0012 2030 STA Jepson: Leisure Town Road from Vanden to Commerce SOL110005 $28,202,114 $133,714 NON-EXEMPT 17-08-0012 2030 STA Jepson: Leisure Town Road (Commerce to New Ulatis) SOL110006 $20,069,250 $3,300,000 NON-EXEMPT 17-08-0012 2030 Vacaville I-505/Vaca Valley Off-Ramp and Intersection Imprv. SOL090001 $1,540,000 $0 NON-EXEMPT 17-10-0023 2040 Vacaville Vacaville Intermodal Station - Phase 2 SOL110009 $11,210,000 $0 NON-EXEMPT 17-08-0015 2030 Dixon Parkway Blvd/UPRR Grade Separation SOL050009 $15,839,000 $750,000 NON-EXEMPT - Not Regionally Significant Project 17-08-0007 Dixon Dixon SR2S Infrastructure Improvements SOL130012 $174,404 $164,404 EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities 17-08-0002 Rio Vista SR 12 crossing with updated lighting SOL130014 $230,330 $0 EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities 17-08-0004 Solano Solano County Roadway Preservation SOL170015 $617,000 $617,000 EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - Pavement resurfacing and/or 17-10-0022 County rehabilitation STA STA SR2S Infrastructure & Non-infrastructure SOL150004 $3,467,000 $3,467,000 EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities 17-08-0004 STA Solano Mobility Call Center SOL170009 $1,736,000 $1,397,000 EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - Operating assistance to transit 17-10-0027 agencies STA Solano Safe Routes to School Program SOL110019 $3,850,589 $1,563,683 EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - Transportation enhancement 17-08-0004 activities (except rehabilitation and operation STA Ingraining Walking & Rolling into School Culture SOL150001 $388,000 $0 EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - Transportation enhancement 17-08-0003 activities (except rehabilitation and operation STA SR12/Church Rd Intersection Improvements SOL150003 $4,800,000 $510,000 EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.127) - Intersection channelization projects 17-08-0005 Vacaville Allison Bicycle / Ped Improvements SOL130005 $510,600 $435,000 EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities 17-08-0005 Vacaville Transit Marketing and Public Outreach SOL130017 $215,388 $215,388 EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - Grants for training and research 17-10-0027 programs Vacaville Vacaville Transit: Operating Assistance SOL010007 $26,608,833 $7,140,000 EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - Operating assistance to transit 17-10-0027 agencies Vacaville Vacaville - Pavement Preservation SOL170012 $2,203,000 $510,000 EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - Pavement resurfacing and/or 17-10-0022 rehabilitation Vacaville Vaca Valley/I505 Multimodal Improvements SOL170013 $13,957,000 $3,050,000 EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.127) - Intersection channelization projects 17-08-0008 APPENDIX C—CONFORMITY ANALYSIS DOCUMENTATION
Table 1. SACOG Air Quality Conformity Emissions Analysis 2016 Metropolitan Transportation Plan and S ustainable C ommunities S trategy Amendment #2 (MTP/SC S #2) T he S AC OG 2019/22 Metropolitan T ransportation Improvement P rogram (MT IP ) Attainment EMISSIONS FACTOR GEOGRAPHY1 TEST TYPE2 SEASON3 2020 2022 20234 2024 20265 2027 2030 2035 2036 2040 Designation All of S acramento, Yolo C ounties; southern portion of S utter C ounty; Ozone P re-C ursors E l Dorado and Placer C ounties, Budget8 S ummer Nonattainment X X X (ROG, NOx) outside Tahoe Basin; the S utter Buttes area; portions of S olano C ounty.
PM10 S acramento C ounty Budget W inter Maintenance X X X
S acramento and S utter C ounties Interim until and portions of Placer, E l Dorado, budgets are W inter Nonattainment X X X PM2.5 S olano, Yolo, and Yuba C ounties established S utter C ounty and a portion of Budget W inter Maintenance X X X Yuba C ounty9 MPO Milestone Forecasting Years for MTP and MTIP S acramento, S utter, Yolo, and Yuba C ounties; Placer and E l SACOG6 n /a n /a X X X Dorado C ounties, outside the Tahoe Basin. 9-C ounty Bay area; includes the portion of eastern S olano C ounty MT C 7 in the S acramento Valley ozone n /a n /a X X X X non-attainment area, and for the
PM2.5 conformity area. S ource: S AC OG, J une 2018 N otes : 1 S ee F igure 1 for specific areas and geographies for each emissions factor. 2 Where mentioned "Budget" figures come from the latest adopted S tate Implementation Plan or motor vehicle emissions budget adequacy finding. 3 Indicates which season is used for setting E MFAC 2014 for estimating emissions. 4 2023 is modeled consistent with the region’s designation status through the 2015 NAAQS for ground-level ozone, effective August 3, 2018. 5 2026 is modeled consistent with the region’s designation status through the 2008 NAAQS for ground-level ozone, effective May 21, 2012. 6 These are the milestone forecast years for S AC OG's regional travel demand modeling input files (e.g. land use, population, employment and demographic files). Vehicle activity forecasts needed for interim years are generated by interpolating input files by subarea, and running the travel demand model with travel networks for the air quality conformity analysis years.
7 These are the milestone forecast years of MTC 's regional travel demand modeling input files. For ozone and PM2.5 analysis, MTC provides to S AC OG travel demand model vehicle activity files for eastern S olano C ounty for these milestone years. For ozone and PM2.5 conformity analysis years which fall between the milestone years, S AC OG staff interpolates the given vehicle activity data using average annual growth factors. 8 The "2009 S acramento R egional 8-Hour Ozone Attainment and R easonable Further Progress Plan", 2013 S tate Implementation Plan R evision budgets were approved by the E PA on J anuary 29, 2015.
9 The "2014 Y uba C ity-Marysville P M2.5 Maintenance Plan and R edesignation R equest" budgets were found adequate by E PA in a letter dated August 12, 2014; effective S eptember 9, 2014. Table 2. Population and Employment Assumptions, and VMT Estimates 2016 Metropolitan Transportation Plan and S ustainable C ommunities S trategy Amendment #2 (MTP/SC S #2) The S AC OG 2019/22 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (MTIP) 2012 2020 2022 2023 2024 2026 2027 2036 SACOG Inputs to MTP/MTIP Conformity Analysis1 P opulation 2,268,138 2,472,567 2,549,476 2,581,071 2,619,982 2,690,489 2,725,742 3,082,285 E mployment 887,920 1,033,250 1,074,545 1,095,192 1,115,840 1,157,134 1,177,781 1,327,278 SACOG-Modeled (SACSIM) Vehicle Activity (in thousands)2 S AC O G R egion V MT 57,000 61,358 63,258 63,427 64,532 66,639 66,577 74,559 (Avg. Weekday, in thousands) MTC-Modeled Vehicle Activity for Eastern Solano County (in thousands)3 E astern S olano C ounty VMT 4,700 5,765 5,897 5,964 6,030 5,200 6,228 6,702 (Avg. Weekday, in thousands) S ource: S AC OG, J une 2018 Italicized numbers are interpolated from milestone years. N otes : 1 Population and employment for the S AC OG area are from S AC OG projections prepared in 2010 for the 2036 MTP/SC S . Milestone years for population and employment projections are: 2012, 2020, 2027, and 2036. Population and employment for other analysis years are interpolated from the milestone years by subarea using annual average growth rates. Projections are shown for the entire S AC OG modeling area as shown in F igure 1.
2 Vehicle miles traveled are reported from S AC O G 's "S AC S IM" regional travel demand model for the entire S AC O G modeling area as shown in F igure 1. Vehicle activities are explicitly modeled for all analysis years, using the above population and employment data. These vehicle activity forecasts provide the inputs to E MFAC 2014 for the geographies and emissions tests shown in Table 1 and Figure 1. 3 F or P M2.5 and the ozone pre-cursors (NOX, R OG), MTC provides E astern S olano C ounty vehicle activity estimates to S AC OG for use in its conformity analysis. MTC 's milestone years are: 2020, 2030, 2035, and 2040. VMT and vehicle population for 2024, 2026, 2027, and 2036 are interpolated from the given milestone year data. Interpolation was performed by S AC OG staff, using average annual growth rates between milestone years. Table 3. Emission Estimates for Ozone Conformity Analysis 2016 Metropolitan Transportation Plan and S ustainable C ommunities S trategy Amendment #2 (MTP/SC S #2) The S AC OG 2019/22 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (MTIP)
Emissions Estimates 2023 2026 2036 Vehicle Activity Estimates for Sacramento Ozone Non-Attainment Area1 Daily VMT (in thousands) 66,381 69,188 77,191 Daily Vehicles (in thousands) 1,850 1,969 2,325 Daily Trips (in thousands) 11,441 12,112 14,152 S ource: S AC OG, J une 2018. 1 Estimates of vehicle activity from EMFAC2014, for the ozone nonattainment area shown in Figure 1. 2 S ome numbers may not appear to add up due to rounding. Table 4. Ozone Conformity Analysis 2016 Metropolitan Transportation Plan and S ustainable C ommunities S trategy Amendment #2 (MTP/SC S #2) The S AC OG 2019/22 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (MTIP)
Emissions Estimates 2023 5 2026 4 2036 3 NOx Budget (tons) 37.00 37.00 37.00 D a ily N O x E s tima te (tons )1 19.08 19.13 15.20 Local Adjustments (tons)2 Daily NOx (tons) 19.08 19.13 15.20 S urplus/Deficit (tons) 17.92 17.87 21.80
Pass Conformity Test? Pass Pass Pass
3 R OG Budget (tons) 17.00 17.00 17.00 D a ily R O G E s tima te (tons )1 14.28 13.37 9.93 Local Adjustments (tons)2 Daily R OG (tons) 14.28 13.37 9.93 S urplus/Deficit (tons) 2.72 3.63 7.07 Pass Conformity Test? Pass Pass Pass S ource: S AC OG, J une 2018, based on E MFAC 2014 output results. N otes : 1 E MF AC 2014 emission forecasts, combining MT C -forecasted vehicle activities for eastern S olano county, and S AC OG-forecasted vehicle activities for the remainder of the S acramento Valley ozone non-attainment area. S ee Table 1 and Figure 1 for more information on the geography of the ozone non-attainment area. 2 Local adjustments include on-road control measures from the S IP that are not reflected in the E MFAC 2014 baseline. For this MTIP, local adjustment is not applied. 3 From "S acramento R egional 8-Hour Ozone Attainment and R easonable Further Progress Plan, 2013 S IP R evision", approved by the E PA on J anuary 29, 2015. 4 2026 is modeled consistent with the region’s designation status through the 2008 NAAQS for ground-level ozone, effective May 21, 2012. 5 2023 is modeled consistent with the region’s designation status through the 2015 NAAQS for ground-level ozone, effective August 3,2018. Table 5a. PM10 Emissions Estimates and Conformity Analysis 2016 Metropolitan Transportation Plan and S ustainable C ommunities S trategy Amendment #2 (MTP/SC S #2) The S AC OG 2019/22 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (MTIP)
Emissions Estimates 2022 2027 2036 3 Vehicle Activity Estimates for Sacramento PM10 Area Daily VMT (in thousands) 37,309 39,104 43,603 Emissions Estimates 2 PM10 Budget (tons) 17.00 17.00 17.00 Direct Exhaust 2.21 2.27 2.46 Paved R oad Dust 6.22 6.64 7.36 Unpaved R oad Dust 2.07 2.94 3.10 R oad C onstruction Dust 1.90 2.69 2.84 1 Daily P M10 (tons ) 12.40 14.54 15.76 S urplus/Deficit (tons) 4.60 2.46 1.24 Pass Conformity Test? Pass Pass Pass 2 NOx Budget (tons) 19.00 19.00 19.00 Daily NO x (tons)1 13.61 9.09 6.81 S urplus/Deficit (tons) 5.39 9.91 12.19 Pass Conformity Test? Pass Pass Pass S ource: S AC OG, J une 2018 Notes : 1 Forecasts made using EMFAC 2014 for PM10 conformity area as shown in F igure 1. 2 2011 Budgets from the "PM10 Implementation/Maintenance Plan and R edesignation R equest for S acramento C ounty" were approved by E PA on S eptember 12, 2013 3 Estimates of vehicle miles traveled utilized VMT from EMFAC2014 for the entire PM10 geography. Table 5b. Paved Road Dust PM10 Emission Calculations for Sacramento County 2016 Metropolitan Transportation Plan and S ustainable C ommunities S trategy Amendment #1 (MTP/SC S #2) The S AC OG 2019/22 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (MTIP)
2022 Build Roadway Category E mis s ions A ttribute Freeway Major Collector Local Total B as e E F (lb P M10/V MT ) 0.000112 0.000210 0.000627 0.002214 WEEKDAY DAILY VMT (000'S)1,3 17,626 14,385 2,693 2,605 37,309 WEEKDAY ANNUAL VMT (106 miles) 6,434 5,251 983 951 13,618 Roadway Fraction 0.472 0.386 0.072 0.070 1 P M10 (tons per year) 359 550 308 1,053 2,270 Paved Dust-PM10 (TONS PER DAY)2 0.98 1.51 0.84 2.88 6.22
2027 Build Roadway Category E mis s ions A ttribute Freeway Major Collector Local Total B as e E F (lb P M10/V MT ) 0.000112 0.000210 0.000627 0.002214 WEEKDAY DAILY VMT (000'S)1,3 18,098 15,322 2,863 2,821 39,104 WEEKDAY ANNUAL VMT (106 miles) 6,606 5,592 1045 1030 14,273 Roadway Fraction 0.463 0.392 0.073 0.072 1 P M10 (tons per year) 369 586 328 1,140 2,422 Paved Dust-PM10 (TONS PER DAY)2 1.01 1.61 0.90 3.12 6.64
2036 Build Roadway Category E mis s ions A ttribute Freeway Major Collector Local Total B as e E F (lb P M10/V MT ) 0.000112 0.000210 0.000627 0.002214 WEEKDAY DAILY VMT (000'S)1,3 19,782 17,817 2,846 3,158 43,603 WEEKDAY ANNUAL VMT (106 miles) 7,220 6,503 1039 1153 15,915 Roadway Fraction 0.454 0.409 0.065 0.072 1 P M10 (tons per year) 403 682 326 1,276 2,686 Paved Dust-PM10 (TONS PER DAY)2 1.10 1.87 0.89 3.50 7.36 S ource: S AC OG, J une 2018 N otes : 1 F orecas ts made for P M10 conformity area as shown in Figure 1. 2 AP-42 methodology denoted in E PA's Official R elease of the J anuary 2011 AP-42 Method for Estimating Re-Entrained Road Dust from Paved Roads
3 E stimates of VMT obtained from S AC OG's travel demand model for the air quality conformity analysis years, for the entire PM10 geography. Table 5c. Road Construction Dust Emissions - Sacramento County 2016 Metropolitan Transportation Plan and S ustainable C ommunities S trategy Amendment #2 (MTP/SC S #2) The S AC OG 2019/22 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (MTIP)
Emissions Estimates2 2022 2027 2036
E mission Factor (tons PM10/acre-month) 0.11 0.11 0.11 Process R ate (acre-months/year)1,3 6,897 10,091 10,157 Emissions (tons PM10/year) 758.66 1,110.02 1,117.32 E missions (tons PM10/day, annual average) 2.07 2.94 3.10 S ource: S AC OG, J une 2018 1 F orecasts made for P M10 conformity area as shown in Figure 1. 2 E mission rates are from AP -42 methodology denoted in E P A's O fficial R elease of the J anuary 2011 AP-42 Method for Estimating Re-Entrained Road Dust from Paved Roads 3 E stimates of VMT obtained from S AC OG's travel demand model for the air quality conformity analysis years, for the entire P M10 geography.
Table 5d. Road Construction Dust (Seasonal) - Sacramento County - PM10 Emissions (tons/year) 2016 Metropolitan Transportation Plan and S ustainable C ommunities S trategy Amendment #2 (MTP/SC S #2) The S AC OG 2017/20 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (MTIP)
1,4 2,3 Year Annual Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Winter (Nov-Apr) Temporal Profile - Road Construction - Sacramento 6.4 6.4 8.3 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.2 8.3 8.3 7.3 (tons) (tons/day) 2022 756.2 48.3 48.3 62.6 69.4 69.4 69.4 69.4 69.4 69.4 62.6 62.6 55.1 346.4 1.90 2027 1,072.1 68.5 68.5 88.8 98.4 98.4 98.4 98.4 98.4 98.4 88.8 88.8 78.1 491.1 2.69 2036 1,131.0 72.2 72.2 93.7 103.8 103.8 103.8 103.8 103.8 103.8 93.7 93.7 82.4 518.1 2.84 S ource: S AC OG, J une 2018 N otes : 1 F orecasts made for P M10 conformity area as shown in Figure 1. 2 E mission rates from AP-42 methodology denoted in E PA's Official R elease of the J anuary 2011 AP-42 Method for Estimating Re- Entrained Road Dust from Paved Roads 3 C onstruction dust methodology denoted in C AR B's Road Construction Dust, Section 7.8, updated August 1997 4 E stimates of VMT obtained from S AC OG's travel demand model for the air quality conformity analysis years, for the entire PM10 geography. Table 6A. PM2.5 Emissions Estimates and Conformity Test--Sacramento Geography 2016 Metropolitan Transportation Plan and S ustainable C ommunities S trategy Amendment #1(MTP/SC S #2) The S AC OG 2019/22 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (MTIP)
Baseline Emissions Estimates year 2024 2027 2036 (2008)4 1 Daily VMT in PM2.5 Area (in thousands) Build 56,200 63,752 65,752 73,187 Daily Emissions (tons)2, 3 Sacramento Area
PM2.5 Build 2.5 1.6 1.6 1.7
Pass PM2.5 Conformity Test? Pass Pass Pass NOx Build 75.4 18.7 16.0 14.7 Pass NOx Conformity Test? Pass Pass Pass S ource: S AC OG, J une 2018 N otes : 1 E stimates of vehicle miles traveled utilized VMT from E MF AC 2014 for the entire P M2.5 geography (as shown in Figure 1). 2 PM2.5 estimates made using E MFAC 2014 for both PM2.5 and NOx. 3 S ome numbers may not appear to add up due to rounding. 4 Baseline year (2008) emissions for PM2.5 and NOx are used as the benchmark against which all other years are compared. Table 6B. PM2.5 Conformity Analysis for Yuba City-Marysville Area 2016 Metropolitan Transportation Plan and S ustainable C ommunities S trategy Amendment #2 (MTP/SC S # T he S AC O G 2019/22 Metropolitan T ransportation Improvement P rogram (MT IP )
Yuba City-Marysville Area Emissions Estimates 2024 2027 2036 1 Daily VMT in PM2.5 Area (in thousands) B uild 4,077 4,196 4,863 Emissions Estimates 2, 3 PM2.5 Budget (tons) 0.2 0.2 0.2
Daily P M2.5 (tons ) 0.1 0.1 0.1 S urplus/Deficit (tons) 0.1 0.1 0.1 Pass Conformity Test? Pass Pass Pass NOx Budget (tons)2, 3 3.1 3.1 3.1 Daily NOx (tons)1 1.7 1.4 1.0 S urplus/Deficit (tons) 1.4 1.7 2.1
Pass Conformity Test? Pass Pass Pass
S ource: S AC OG, J une 2018 N otes : 1 E stimates of vehicle miles traveled utilized VMT from E MF AC 2014 for the entire PM2.5 geography (as shown in Figure 1). 2 PM2.5 and NOx budgets from the 2014 Y uba C ity-Marysville PM2.5 Maintenance Plan and R edesignation R equest were found adequate by E PA in a letter dated August 12, 2014. 3 S ome numbers may not appear to add up due to rounding. Table 8
Air Quality Conformity Assumptions
Assumption 1: The SACOG Board adopted population, households, housing, and employment projections for the years 2020 and 2036 at its February 2016 meeting concurrent with the adoption of the 2016 Metropolitan Transportation Plan / Sustainable Communities Strategy (MTP/SCS). These land use projections will be used for this conformity determinations. Land use projections for all other milestone years will be interpolated using the 2020 and 2036 numbers and an interim year, plus the base year (2012) datasets. These projections meet the current definition of “latest planning assumptions.”
Assumption 2: Emissions Factor (EMFAC) 2014 will be used to develop emission estimates for the conformity determinations associated with the 2016 MTP/SCS Amendment #2 and the concurrent 2019 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (MTIP). The emission budgets used in the conformity determinations are the 8-Hour Ozone emission budgets which were found adequate by EPA on August 8, 2014, and became effective August 25, 2014, or adjusted budgets based upon plan approval. Particulate
Matter (PM10) will use budgets which were found adequate by EPA on November 23, 2011, and became effective December 8, 2011. Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) will use the Yuba City-Marysville Area budgets found adequate August 25, 2014, effective September 9, 2014; the Sacramento Area will follow interim test criteria because there is currently no approved SIP or adequate emission budget for this pollutant.
Assumption 3: SACOG will use the most recent emission control factors supplied by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) for use in any future conformity determinations. The EMFAC 2014 model is used to determine emission control factors; it uses vehicle fleet assumptions that meet the current definition of “latest planning assumptions.”
Assumption 4: SACOG will continue to incorporate emission estimates for the part of Solano County within the Sacramento federal ozone nonattainment area and federal PM2.5 nonattainment area in all future conformity determinations as agreed to under SACOG’s existing Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC).
Assumption 5: On-road control measures from the Ozone SIP that are not reflected in the EMFAC 2014 baseline will be documented.
Assumption 6: SACOG will use the assumptions on transit fares, auto operating costs, and parking costs consistent with the 2016 MTP/SCS analysis in the conformity analysis. The transit fares projections are derived from the financing portion of the 2016 MTP/SCS development. The auto operating costs projections were developed in coordination with other California MPOs for the second round of Sustainable Community Strategies. The parking costs are market-based projections using employment development patterns and densities as the main explanatory variables. APPENDIX D—TIMELY IMPLEMENTATION DOCUMENTATION FOR TRANSPORTATION CONTROL MEASURES (TCMS)
SACOG Transportation Control Measures Included in the 8‐Hour Ozone State Implementation Plan for the Sacramento Ozone Non‐Attainment Area
TCM ID Lead Agency SACOG ID Measure Title Description TCM Status Summary
Sacramento County: provide motorist assistance and towing of disabled TCM is continuously implemented through 2018. This TCM is AQ-1 STA SAC16310/ OWFreeway Service Patrol vehicles during am and pm commute periods on various highways in complete. Sacramento County and a portion of I-80 in Yolo County.
The Sacramento Emergency Clean Air & Transportation (SECAT) Program is a partnership between the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD) and the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG). The Program's goal is to reduce harmful emissions from on-road heavy-duty vehicles operating in the SAC22090 TCM is continuously implemented though 2018. This TCM is AQ-2 SACOG SECAT Sacramento region. This program was originally created by California VAR56037 complete. Assembly Bill (AB) 2511 to help assure that the Sacramento region meet its commitments under the State Implementation Plan (SIP) for air quality attainment. The goal of the program is to reduce the nitrogen oxide emissions in our air from heavy-duty vehicles to meet the 2018 federal 8-hour ozone standard.
The “Spare the Air” program is a year-round public education program with an episodic ozone reduction element during the summer ozone TCM has been continuously implemented through 2018. This VAR56022 season, plus general awareness throughout the rest of the year. It is AQ-3 SMAQMD Spare the Air TCM has been proposed for extension through 2024 as part of VAR56006 designed to inform people when air quality is unhealthy and achieve the 2008 Ozone SIP. voluntary emission reductions by encouraging them to reduce vehicle trips.
FP-1 Various Air Quality Funding Program See projects AQ-1, AQ-2 and AQ-3 above
FP-2 Various Bicycle and Pedestrian Funding Program ---
City of Sacramento: I-80 Bike/Ped Bridge at Construct bike/pedestrian bridge across I-80 at the West Canal, as well as FP-2a City of Sacramento SAC22620 TCM was completed in October 2011. the West Canal across the West Canal.
City of Folsom Bikestation and "Bikelink" On- To retrofit and install on-demand long-term bike parking at Folsom Light FP-2b City of Folsom SAC24415 Demand Long-Term Class I Bike Parking at TCM was completed in June 2011. Rail stations and new parking garage. Transit Stations Extend the existing Class I bikeway from Laguna Springs Dr cross over City of Elk Grove: Elk Grove Creek Bike/Ped W. Stockton Blvd/SR-99 and E Stockton Blvd and connect to Emerald TCM is complete. The project was open for public use effective FP-2c City of Elk Grove SAC24130 Bridge Crossing at SR 99 Park Drive. Project includes a bike/pedestrian overcrossing at State March 2014. Route 99. Replace bike racks with higher capacity (3 bicycle) bike racks on 40-45 Retrofit Yolobus bus fleet with higher FP-2d YCTD YCT18172 buses; plus a slide out double bike rack on up to two over-the-road TCM was completed in November 2008. capacity bike racks coaches. Provide ride matching services for the Sacramento metropolitan area; cooperate with local agencies in El Dorado and Placer counties on FP-3 SACOG VAR56025 SACOG Regional Rideshare Program outreach efforts; manage regional programs supporting alternatives to TCM is in progress; the program will continue through 2018. driving alone; provide funding for 12 Transportation Management Organizations (TMOs) in region through grants. SACOG Transportation Control Measures Included in the 8‐Hour Ozone State Implementation Plan for the Sacramento Ozone Non‐Attainment Area
TCM ID Lead Agency SACOG ID Measure Title Description TCM Status Summary
FP-4 Various Community Design Funding Program ---
Install a new traffic signal, complete pedestrian improvements and landscaping improvements (community design portion), complete a road City of Marysville: East 10th Street and FP-4a City of Marysville YUB15989 rehabilitation in and adjacent to the intersection and complete TCM was completed in November 2010. Ramirez Street Intersection Improvement channelization changes to the East 10th and Ramirez Intersection in Marysville.
Safe Routes to School (SR2S) Install landscaping and streetscaping on Folsom Blvd., between Rod Beaudry Dr. and Sunrise Blvd.: to provide safe bicycle and pedestrian access to transit from Bradshaw Road to Rio City of Rancho Cordova: Folsom Boulevard FP-4b City of Rancho Cordova SAC24191 Del Oro Parkway. The CMAQ and RSTP funding in 2009/10 is to TCM was completed in November 2012. Complete Streets provide complete street improvements at the east end of Folsom Blvd accommodating Kinney High School and the light rail station. Improvements include bicycle lanes and pedestrian facilities.
In Sacramento County, Freedom Park Drive, from 32nd St. to Watt Ave and Watt Ave, from Don Julio Blvd to Karl Dr on the west side of the Sacramento County: Complete Streets for FP-4c Sacramento County DOT SAC24066 roadway in the community of North Highlands. Construct pedestrian and TCM was completed in October 2012. Freedom Park Drive and North Watt Avenue streetscape improvements to serve as a gateway into adjacent McClellan Park.
City of Woodland: Lemen, North, East Streets In Woodland, Lemen Avenue and North Street at East Street: realign FP-4d City of Woodland YOL17570 TCM was completed in November 2012. Intersection Realignment Lemen Avenue to connect with North Street at East Street (Phase 1).
ITS-1 City of Sacramento SAC22890 Arden Way "Smart Corridor" Smart Corridor on Arden Way from Del Paso to Watt Ave. TCM was completed in February 2008.
This project will evaluate and implement on downtown and other major corridors, Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) elements and ITS-2 City of Sacramento SAC20762 Sacramento Traffic Operations Center TCM was completed in September 2011. infrastructure necessary to provide traffic responsive/coordinated signal timing and communications to the TrafficOperation Center.
In Sacramento County, Watt Avenue Corridor, implement phase 3 priority and mobility enhancement demonstration project. This project includes deployment of ITS components within the Watt Avenue ITS-3 Sacramento County DOT SAC22070 Watt Avenue Phase 3 Smart Corridor TCM was replaced with "ITS-3 Substitution".* corridor to improve the efficiency of transit in the corridor. The objectives of the project are to improve traffic safety, pedestrian safety, transit efficiency and the overall aesthetics of the intersection. SACOG Transportation Control Measures Included in the 8‐Hour Ozone State Implementation Plan for the Sacramento Ozone Non‐Attainment Area
TCM ID Lead Agency SACOG ID Measure Title Description TCM Status Summary
In Sacramento County, Rio Linda-Dry Creek Parkway, from Dry Creek ITS-3 Substitution Sacramento County DOT SAC22780 Dry Creek Parkway Trail, Phase 1 Road at Dry Creek Ranch to the Cherry Island Soccer Complex: TCM was completed in July 2011. Construct a 3-mile Class I shared-use bicycle/pedestrian trail.
The Sacramento Transportation Area Network, or STARNET, is an information exchange network and operations coordination framework TCM is complete. The initial project scope to enable that will be used by the operators of transportation facilities and information exchange and operational coordination between emergency responders in the Sacramento region of California. transportation facility operators and emergency responders was ITS-4 SACOG VAR11000 STARNET Implementation STARNET will enable the real-time sharing of data and live video, and completed and is available to the publia via the 511 website; refinement of joint procedures pertaining to the operation of roadways additional features to help personalize traveler information and and public transit, and public safety activities. It will also provide more improvements to the telephone system are planned to further information for travelers via the region’s 511 web site and interactive enhance the system. telephone service (dial 511).
Light Rail Grade Separation at Watt Avenue In Sacramento County, Regional Transit Light Rail tracks south of M-2 Sacramento County DOT SAC18080 TCM was completed in March 2010. and Folsom Boulevard Folsom Blvd on Watt Ave, grade separate the rail tracks over Watt Ave.
To implement the Blueprint Project’s vision and “smart growth” principles through existing and new programs, SACOG will: 1) continue to fund the regional Community Design Grant Program, 2) develop a TCM is complete. Form based codes were completed in Blueprint Implementation and Planning RP-1 SACOG form-based zoning code handbook, 3) provide evaluations of proposed September 2008; all other assistance in this TCM is continually Technical Assistance development projects for Blueprint consistency, and 4) provide technical performed by SACOG. planning assistance in the development or update of local government plans.
SACOG will develop a Rural-Urban Connections Strategy to expand on TCM is complete. A toolkit of best practices is currently and support implementation of the Blueprint growth strategy and the available; staff studied a number of rural topic areas, developed MTP. The Rural-Urban Connections Strategy will utilize state-of-the-art Develop a Rural-Urban Connections Strategy data and models, and identified opportunities and innovations RP-2 SACOG data collection, modeling, research and participation methods to develop & Best Practices Toolkit to address challenges in rural areas and analyze agricultural a toolkit of best practices to enhance land use planning practices in rural viability. Staff plans to enhance existing RUCS products as areas that are both economically viable for land owners and local resources are available. governments and environmentally sustainable.
SACOG will prepare an analysis on the impacts and viability of using TCM is complete. Staff presented a report on transportation pricing policies with the transit system and selected portions of the road pricing and on-going efforts to analyze the potential for RP-3 SACOG Research a Transportation Pricing Policy network to encourage people to drive less and use transit, walking, and transportation pricing policies in our region at the December bicycling modes more. 12, 2012 Regional Planning Partnership meeting. SACOG Transportation Control Measures Included in the 8‐Hour Ozone State Implementation Plan for the Sacramento Ozone Non‐Attainment Area
TCM ID Lead Agency SACOG ID Measure Title Description TCM Status Summary
SACOG will perform travel modeling and air emissions analysis to identify a range of alternatives for local governments to use to modify TCM is complete. Staff presented a report on parking Research a Regional Parking Regulation current parking regulations to create incentives for people to use conditions and on-going efforts to modify parking regulations RP-4 SACOG Policy available transit, walking and biking options, and neighborhood electric in our region at the December 12, 2012 Regional Planning vehicles. This study will be conducted cooperatively with key partners Partnership meeting. such as the air districts and local governments within the region.
SACOG will adopt a “Complete Streets” policy to require that applicants TCM is complete. Complete streets elements are included in the for SACOG regional funding programs demonstrate that the planning, five biennial funding programs SACOG manages: Air Quality, RP-5 SACOG Adopt a Complete Streets Policy design, construction and maintenance of roadway and transit facilities Bicycle & Pedestrian, Community Design, Transportation include the needs of all transportation users – pedestrians, bicyclists, the Demand Management, and Regional/Local funding programs. disabled, transit users, and motorists.
TCM is complete. A Complete Streets Resource Toolkit and To implement the Complete Streets policy, SACOG will review and Online Bicycle Trip Planner were both released in 2010 and are analyze the practices of local governments within the SACOG region and available through SACOG's website. In 2011, SACOG began Initiate a Complete Streets Technical around the nation to identify appropriate “Best Practices” for complete RP-6 SACOG analyzing the application of Pedestrian Level of Service (LOS), Assistance Program street design within the SACOG region. SACOG will also provide using the NCHRP's multi-modal LOS framework. SACOG will technical assistance to local governments on a case by case basis, as continue to use these frameworks to provide technical requested, to help them successfully implement this concept. assistance to local governments as requested.
SACOG will adopt a Safe Routes to Schools (SRTS) policy to promote the practice of safe bicycling and walking to and from schools TCM is complete. SACOG became a member of the Safe Implement a Safe Routes to Schools Policy throughout the MTP Plan Area to reduce traffic congestion, improve air Routes to School (SRTS) National Partnership in 2012, a SRTS RP-7 SACOG and Implement a Pilot Program quality, and enhance neighborhood safety. SACOG will also obtain policy was adopted by SACOG Board on December 6, 2012; federal funds from the Federal Highway Administration through Caltrans and a SRTS workshop was conducted on December 13, 2012. to implement at least one SRTS pilot program within the MTP Plan Area.
In Diamond Springs, on Commerce Way at State Route 49: Construct Central Transfer Facility and Park & Ride with capacity for 95 spaces. TF-1 EDCTA ELD15740 El Dorado Central Park and Ride Facility TCM was completed in December 2009. This property is adjacent to El Dorado Transit’s office and maintenance facility.
Design and construct pedestrian and landscaping improvements at the TF-2 Town of Loomis PLA19100 Improvements to Loomis Multimodal Center multimodal center including a Class I bike facility adjacent to Taylor Rd. TCM was completed in June 2012. from downtown Loomis to Sierra College Blvd.
In Sacramento, at 13th and 16th Street Light Rail Stations: Construct 13th and 16th Street Light Rail Station TF-3 SRTD REG17786 improved pedestrian access, lighting and signage. (This is the RT portion TCM was completed in October 2010. Improvements of the project; see SAC17784 for City of Sacramento project).
In Sacramento, at 13th and 16th Street Light Rail Stations: Construct 13th and 16th Street Light Rail Station TF-3 City of Sacramento SAC17784 improved pedestrian access, lighting and signage. (This is the City of TCM was completed in October 2010. Improvements Sacramento portion of the project; see REG17786 for RT project). TR-1 Various Transit Vehicle Acquisitions --- SACOG Transportation Control Measures Included in the 8‐Hour Ozone State Implementation Plan for the Sacramento Ozone Non‐Attainment Area
TCM ID Lead Agency SACOG ID Measure Title Description TCM Status Summary
TCM is complete. The buses were received and placed in TR-1a City of Auburn PLA25223 Auburn Transit Bus Replacement Replacement of 1 CNG bus for Auburn Transit. service June 2009.
Purchase 3 30' replacement fixed route buses, 3 30' expansion fixed route TCM is complete. The buses were received and placed in TR-1b City of Roseville PLA25371 Roseville Transit Bus Purchase buses, and 1 40' replacement commuter bus service September 2009.
PLA25322 TCM is complete. The buses were received and placed in TR-1c City of Roseville Roseville Transit Bus Replacement Replace five (5) cutaway buses. PLA25120 service June 2008.
Replace three diesel cutaways that are used for neighborhood ride routes TCM is complete. The buses were received and placed in TR-1d City of Elk Grove SAC24365 Replacement Neighborhood Ride Buses and paratransit service. service May 2012.
Purchase six CNG replacement buses for the City of Elk Grove's E-Tran TR-1e City of Elk Grove SAC24418 E-Tran Replacment Buses bus transit buses. The CNG buses replace six CNG and diesel buses that TCM is complete. The buses were placed in service June 2011. are beyond their useful life.
Purchase 14 Neighborhood Ride Vehicles to replace vehicles which have TCM is complete. The buses were placed in service October TR-1f SRTD REG17924 SRTD Neighborhood Ride Vehicle Replaceme surpassed their useful lives. 17 are needed, but 3 will be funded from an 2011. alternate source. RT assumes $110,000 per vehicle and a 5-year life.
Purchase three specially equipped, heavy-duty clean diesel commuter buses with a seating capacity of 45 or more to expand the current fleet of TR-1g YST YST10418 Yuba Sutter Transit Bus Expansion TCM is complete. The buses were placed in service May 2010. commuter buses from 11 to 14. These three commuter buses will be 40' to 45' in length.
TCM is complete. The buses were placed in service November TR-1h YCTD YCT18176 YCTD Bus Replacement This project will replace 4 40-ft 1993 CNG transit buses. 2009.
TR-2 Various Transit Operations ---
ELD19267 TR-2a EDCTA El Dorado Transit Operating Assistance Operating Assistance (FTA 5311 Cycle 26) TCM is complete as of April 2009. ELD19274
The City of Roseville Transit is applying for $71,514 in JARC funds in order to extend their weekday revenue hours on core fixed routes, as well as an extension of the hours on their Dial-A-Ride (DAR) services (and TR-2b City of Roseville PLA25215 Roseville Operating Assistance operate DAR on 3 current non-service holidays) to provide transportation TCM is complete as of September 2012. to employees getting off work in the evening. The additional hours will also allow employees to connect with Placer County Transit and Sacramento Regional Transit in the evening.
SAC24060 TR-2c City of Elk Grove Elk Grove Operating Assistance In Elk Grove, preventive maintenance for Elk Grove transit operations. TCM is complete as of June 2011. SAC24598 SACOG Transportation Control Measures Included in the 8‐Hour Ozone State Implementation Plan for the Sacramento Ozone Non‐Attainment Area
TCM ID Lead Agency SACOG ID Measure Title Description TCM Status Summary
SAC24061 TR-2d City of Folsom Folsom Operating Assistance In Folsom, provide operating assistance for Folsom Stage Lines. TCM is complete as of June 2011. SAC24596
Paratransit, Inc. is asking for FFY 2006 JARC funds to continue to provide much needed and currently limited transportation options between low-income residential areas, and employment & job training TR-2e Paratransit PAR10002 Paratransit Operating Assistance TCM is complete as of September 2011. centers, especially in the Point West area, in the retail areas around Arden Fair Mall, as well as other parts of Sacramento County.[Contains FFY 06 and 07 operating funds]
Expand the South County Transit/Link Highway 99 bus services between the City of Lodi in San Joaquin County, Galt, Elk Grove, and the Regional Transit Transfer Center at Florin Mall. This route provides TR-2f Sacramento County DOT SAC24173 Sacramento County Operating Assistance TCM is complete as of February 2009. connections to the South County Transit Galt and Delta routes, Elk Grove Transit (e-TRAN), Sacramento Regional Transit, Lodi Grapeline transit service, and the San Joaquin Regional Transit District.
TR-2g SRTD REG16670 Regional Transit Operating Assistance Continued operation and maintenance of bus, light rail, and paratransit ser TCM is complete as of June 2010.
TR-2h YCTD YCT18094 YCTD Operating Assistance YCTD FY 08 Operating Assistance for ADA Paratransit Service TCM is complete as of June 2009.
* In 2011, an amendment to the Sacramento Regional 8‐Hour Ozone Attainment and Reasonable Further Progress Plan was submitted to ARB. The amendment removed TCM "ITS‐3: Watt Avenue Phase 3 Smart Corridor" and replaced it with TCM "ITS‐3 Substitution: Dry Creek Parkway Trail, Phase 1", and updated the completion dates of TCMs FP‐2c, FP‐4c, FP‐4d, and TR‐2b. The revised Ozone State Implementation Plan is awaiting action from the EPA. APPENDIX E—CHARGE OF THE RPP
SACRAMENTO AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS REGIONAL PLANNING PARTNERSHIP CHARGE
PURPOSE
The purpose of this Partnership is to assist SACOG with its transportation and air quality planning and programming processes, with an emphasis on technical issues, by providing consultation with a broad range of public and private constituencies. In addition, this partnership will help meet the inter-agency consultation requirements of both the Transportation Equity Act of the 21st Century (TEA-21) and the consultation requirements of the Federal Clean Air Act. Both of these laws require that SACOG provide for early and on-going public participation in our long-range transportation plans, project-selection or programming process, and air quality conformity determinations.
Activities of the Partnership may include, but are not limited to: developing roles and responsibilities for continuing a well-defined inter-agency consultation procedure for reviewing plans, programs, and projects; developing a process for responding to significant comments of involved agencies, individuals, and organizations; selection and adoption of planning assumptions and models; developing procedures for the conduct of transportation-air quality analysis, and for making findings of conformity; information sharing and discussing ideas and proposals that are of importance to SACOG and Partnership member groups.
The Partnership may establish such subcommittees, task forces, or study groups as it deems appropriate to carry out its charge.
MEMBERSHIP
The Partnership membership will consist of representatives from the following organizations:
1. Public Works and planning directors from each jurisdiction within the Sacramento Metropolitan Planning Area.
2. County-level transportation agencies such as the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency (PCTPA), the El Dorado County Transportation Commission (EDCTC), the Yolo County Transportation District (YCTD), and the Sacramento Transportation Authority (STA).
3. Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) and Solano Transportation Authority.
4. Federal Highway Administration-California Division (FHWA), Federal Transit Administration - Region IX (FTA), Environmental Protection Agency - Region IX (EPA), Air Resources Board (ARB), Caltrans - District 3, and the California Highway Patrol - Valley Division.
5. Sacramento Regional Transit District
6. Air districts within the ozone nonattainment area.
7. Sacramento-Yolo Port District.
8. Sacramento County Division of Airports.
9. Transportation Management Associations (TMAs).
10. SACOG’s Transit Coordinating Committee.
11. SACOG’s Freight Advisory Council.
12. SACOG’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee.
13. Environmental advocacy groups. 14. Social equity, disability, and minority advocacy groups.
15. Business/Chamber of Commerce groups.
16. Indian tribes within the SACOG region.
17. Organized labor.
Requests for membership on the Partnership from agencies or organizations not listed will be subject to recommendation by the Partnership and acted upon by the SACOG Board of Directors.
OFFICERS
SACOG staff will preside over the meetings.
VOTING
Recommendations to the Work Program Committee and the SACOG Board will be by consensus. If a full consensus cannot be reached on a recommendation, minority reports will also be forwarded to the Work Program Committee and Board for their consideration.
MEETINGS
The Partnership will hold regularly scheduled meetings. Special meetings may be called, as needed. All meetings will be open to the public. Agendas will be posted in the SACOG lobby as well as on the web page, www.sacog.org.
Adopted: July 21, 1994 Revised: December 15, 1994 Revised: July 19, 2001 APPENDIX F—RESOLUTION OF ADOPTION AND PUBLIC NOTICE
SACRAMENTO AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
RESOLUTION NO. X – 2018
APPROVING THE JOINT CONFORMITY DETERMINATION ON THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN/ SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY AMENDMENT #2 (2016 MTP/SCS #2) AND THE 2019/22 METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (MTIP)
WHEREAS, SACOG, is the designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the Sacramento metropolitan planning area as defined by Section 134(c) of the Federal Highway Act, as well as for the Yuba City-Marysville urbanized area; and
WHEREAS, SACOG and the Secretary of Business, Transportation and Housing have executed memoranda of understanding (MOUs) with both the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency (PCTPA) and the El Dorado County Transportation Commission (EDCTC) which establish a framework of representation for how SACOG will carry out its federal MPO responsibilities in both El Dorado and Placer counties in cooperation and coordination with the agencies and jurisdictions in those areas within the ozone nonattainment area; and
WHEREAS, federal planning regulations require SACOG as an MPO to prepare and adopt a long range Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) for the region; and
WHEREAS, state now also requires SACOG to adopt a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS), which SACOG has combined with the MTP; and
WHEREAS, federal planning regulations require SACOG as MPO to prepare and adopt a Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (MTIP) for the region; and
WHEREAS, the 2016 MTP/SCS #2 has been prepared to comply with federal and state requirements; and
WHEREAS, the MTIP has been prepared to comply with federal and state requirements; and
WHEREAS, these documents have been developed and reviewed through the public participation process defined in SACOG’s Public Participation Plan; and
WHEREAS, the 2016 MTP/SCS #2, the MTIP, and the corresponding Conformity Analysis are consistent; and
Resolution No. X – 2018 -2- September 20, 2018
WHEREAS, the MTIP meets all applicable transportation planning requirements pursuant to 23 CFR Part 450; and
WHEREAS, the projects submitted within the MTIP must be financially constrained and the financial plan affirms that funding is available; and
WHEREAS, SACOG has integrated into its metropolitan transportation planning process, directly or by reference, the goals, objectives, performance measures, and targets described in other State transportation plans and transportation processes, as well as any plans developed under 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53 by providers of public transportation, required as part of a performance-based program; and
WHEREAS, the MTIP includes a discussion as to the effect of the programmed investments toward achieving performance targets as required in in 23 CFR 450.218(q) and 450.326(d); and
WHEREAS, the 2016 MTP/SCS #2 and the MTIP includes a new Conformity Analysis; and
WHEREAS, SACOG must demonstrate conformity pursuant to 40 CFR Part 93 for the 2016 MTP/SCS #2 and MTIP; and
WHEREAS, the 2016 MTP/SCS #2 and the MTIP do not interfere with the timely implementation of the region’s Transportation Control Measures; and
WHEREAS, the 2016 MTP/SCS #2 and the MTIP conform to the applicable State Implementation Plans for air quality; and
WHEREAS, the 2016 MTP/SCS #2, achieves greenhouse gas reduction targets established by the CARB and meets the requirements of SB 375; and
WHEREAS, the documents have been widely circulated and reviewed by SACOG advisory committees representing the technical and management staffs of SACOG’s member agencies; representatives of other governmental agencies, including state and federal; representatives of special interest groups; representatives of the private business sector; and residents of the SACOG region consistent with the public participation plan adopted by SACOG; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was conducted on August 2, 2018, to hear and consider comments on the joint Conformity Determination on the 2016 MTP/SCS #2 and MTIP.
NOW, THERFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that SACOG finds the foregoing recitals true and correct and incorporated by this reference.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that SACOG approves and adopts the joint Conformity Determination on the 2016 MTP/SCS #2 and the MTIP. Resolution No. X– 2018 -3- September 20, 2018
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that SACOG finds that the 2016 MTP/SCS #2 and the MTIP are in conformity with the requirements of the Federal Clean Air Act Amendments and applicable State Implementation Plans for air quality.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that SACOG staff is hereby directed and authorized to work with the California Department of Transportation, the Federal Highway Administration, the Federal Transit Administration, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to make whatever technical changes or corrections are needed to the content, format and organization of the documents to obtain its approval by these agencies.
PASSED AND ADOPTED, this 20th day of September 2018, by the following vote of the Board of Directors:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
______Jay Schenirer James Corless Chair Chief Executive Officer
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST FOR COMMENT ON THE ADOPTION OF THE 2019 SACOG MTIP, AMENDMENT #2 TO THE MTP/SCS, AND AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ANALYSIS
The Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) will hold a public hearing to receive comments on the draft adoption of the 2019-22 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (MTIP), Amendment #2 to the 2016 Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (2016 MTP/SCS), and Air Quality Conformity Analysis. We will hold the hearing during the Transportation Committee meeting at SACOG, 1415 L Street, Suite 300, Sacramento CA. The meeting begins at 10:00 a.m., August 2, 2018.
The MTIP is the short-range transportation program for the SACOG region, which includes the counties of Sacramento, Sutter, Yolo, Yuba, and portions of El Dorado and Placer County. The 2016 MTP/SCS is the long-range transportation plan for the SACOG region. The Air Quality Conformity Analysis is a determination on both the MTIP and MTP/SCS.
Please comment in writing to José Luis Cáceres at [email protected] or offer testimony in person during the public hearing. You can download a copy online at www.sacog.org or by calling (916) 340-6218. In addition, copies are available at the SACOG office at the above address. Comments are welcome through 5:00 p.m., August 8, 2018.
Public notice of public involvement activities and time established for public review and comments on the MTIP will satisfy the POP requirements, as defined in FTA Circular 9030.1E. APPENDIX G—RESPONSE TO PUBLIC COMMENTS
Transportation Committee Meeting Date: 8/2/2018 Agenda Item No.: 2018-August-7.
Subject: 2020 Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy Update: Project Status (Est. time: 5 minutes)
Informa on Prepared by: Clint Holtzen Approved by: Ma Carpenter A achments: Yes
1. Issue: To provide an update on work underway in the 2020 Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (MTP/SCS) update that will inform a board action in December.
2. Recommendation: None, this item is for information only.
3. Background/Analysis: At the June committee meeting, staff presented components of a Discussion Draft Scenario and outlined the analysis that will be completed in the next few months. The purpose of that analysis is to inform the board on key policy questions to consider as part of a final scenario framework in December. These issues include:
How can the MTP/SCS support major policy priorities such as advancing economic prosperity? What are the local and regional sources of revenue we should assume in the MTP/SCS?
What role should system pricing, whether by facility or regionally, play in helping to manage the system and affect overall plan performance? What is the balance of growth between infill communities, both urban and suburban, and new growth areas? What are the priorities for spending transportation dollars? How much money does the region want to direct to major project categories (maintenance and rehabilitation, road capacity, transit, active transportation, operations/ITS, or other programs)? What are the assumptions we should make about autonomous vehicles, shared-mobility options, and next-generation transit? How can the plan–specifically the land use, revenue, and investment strategies–support economic prosperity values and goals? To prepare the board to answer these questions, staff will bring information that examines the trade-offs and performance implications of land use, transportation investment, and system management strategies that address federal and state requirements as well as regional priorities for the plan. Most of this analysis will be presented to the board over the next three months and is outlined in Attachment A. Additionally, Attachment B is the illustrated version of the MTP/SCS update process that staff presented in June.
4. Discussion/Analysis: Discussion Draft Scenario The purpose of this item provides a brief update on the MTP/SCS project work currently underway, specifically the work that is outlined in Attachment A and that is leading to a board action on a final scenario framework in December. Staff is currently modeling a Discussion Draft Scenario that aims to maintain, or improve, the performance of the current MTP/SCS, and meet the new 19 percent greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction target set by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). In June, staff provided details of the land use component of this scenario.
Staff is currently creating a financial forecast for the scenario and is actively working with sponsor agencies to review and refine the transportation projects to align with the Discussion Draft land uses. Attachment C describes the various inputs and indicators SACOG will use to measure the scenario performance. This analysis will come to the board for information and discussion starting next month and continuing through this year.
In May and June, a few jurisdictions and board members raised concerns about the growth assumptions in the Discussion Draft for their specific community. We have been following up with staff to further discuss these concerns. In addition, staff is continuing to engage all member agency staff and stakeholders to collect more information that will help inform the final land use forecast for the plan update. Specifically, we are continuing to research and analyze the various hurdles to infill development, as well as potential solutions. We have also sent a survey to member agencies focused on collecting detailed information on the greenfield areas throughout the region. As we've discussed previously, there is more growth planned in the region than is expected to occur by the 2040 horizon year of the MTP/SCS. Estimating where this growth will occur is a requirement of the MTP/SCS. For Developing Communities, this is particularly challenging and is the reason we are collecting this information. We assess many market and regulatory factors to help with this process and this survey is one piece of information that we will use to assess project readiness. It does not address the other policy and market factors that we consider. Growth in every jurisdiction and every Community Type (Established, Center/Corridor, Developing, and Rural Residential) is subject to change between this Discussion Draft Scenario and the final scenario. The information we gather from this research and the analysis of the Discussion Draft will be used to inform the board of the trade-offs related to where growth occurs and, ultimately, the final scenario.
Staff is also conducting additional transportation analysis to inform the final scenario framework. This includes: working with member agency staff on assessing the timing and performance of transportation projects in the Discussion Draft Scenario, assessing the risks and opportunities related to new mobility options and disruptive technologies, and integrating the values developed by the Economic Prosperity Partnership, a collaboration between SACOG, Valley Vision, Greater Sacramento Economic Council, and the Sacramento Metro Chamber of Commerce.
Public Outreach In June, staff presented an approach to public workshops that is designed to be transparent, accessible, and flexible. The public workshops will be held in an open house format at known community gathering spaces or events. This format allows us to leverage the marketing done by the event producers, in addition to our own, to reach a larger public audience. The workshops will be held in late August and early September. A handout with confirmed dates and locations will be provided at the Committee meeting. The full board will receive all of the workshop information via email and the information will be easily accessible on the SACOG website. Information gathered from the public workshops will be presented to the board in October for information and discussion as input to the final scenario framework.
5. Fiscal Impact/Grant Information: This item does not have an impact on the agency budget. Staff time is already included in the Overall Work Program.
6. This staff report aligns with the following SACOG Work Plan Goals: 7. Deliver Key High-Profile Transportation Projects ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment A: MTP/SCS Board Calendar Attachment B: MTP/SCS Process Map Attachment C: Discussion Draft Scenario Performance Measures Attachment A 2020 MTP/SCS: Where we’re headed | Where we’ve been
Where we’re headed | Upcoming board items and major milestones for the 2020 MTP/SCS
Aug Hold public engagement workshops. Board workshop on equity and economic inclusion.
Present and discuss performance assessment of the Discussion Draft Scenario. Sep Present and discuss revenue assumptions of the Discussion Draft Scenario. Board workshop on transit. Present input gathered from public workshops.
2018 Present and discuss pricing and new mobility/disruptive technology analysis. Oct Present and discuss project performance assessment, including benefit-cost analysis and phasing analysis. Nov Board discussion on draft version of final scenario framework.
Dec Board Action on Final Scenario Framework and Revenue Assumptions.
Develop Draft Preferred Scenario. Local agency review of Draft Final Scenario land use and transportation assumptions. Elected Official info sessions on Draft Final Scenario (SB375 requirement). Jan-Jun Board Action on Final Scenario.
Final analyses to support development of draft plan and appendices.
2019 Begin development of Environmental Impact Report.
Plan and appendix writing and visualizations. Jun-Jul Board Action to release Draft MTP/SCS and Environmental Impact Report for public comment. Public review period, hearings, and response to comments.
Feb Board action on Final 2020 MTP/SCS and Environmental Impact Report. 2020
1 Attachment A
Where we’ve been | Discussion highlights from board engagement thus far
Presentation and discussion of Regional Progress Report focused on key indicators useful for understanding changes in the region’s economic growth, development, and travel over the last Jun decade. Board workshop presentations from Indianapolis and St. Paul (Mark Fisher/William Schroeer) focused on the business case for supporting transit to attract workers. Jul Board Recess
Introduction to the Regional Growth Forecast and key policy drivers shaping regional economic prosperity. Aug Presentation on older adult transportation and age-friendly communities. Early discussion of a more aggressive greenhouse gas emission reduction target. Presentation and discussion of the engagement and communication plan.
2017 Discussion on how the MTP/SCS can support rural communities and economies. Sep Board workshop on workforce and the future of work (Egon Terplan, SPUR/Chris Benner, University of California, Santa Cruz). Early discussion on project performance assessment and how is SACOG improving and expanding on the information the board has to look at and prioritize transportation projects. Oct Presentation and discussion on the draft policy themes and issues that will guide staff research and analysis for the 2020 MTP/SCS update. Presentation and discussion on draft regional growth projections.
Nov Board Action on Final Policy Framework and Growth Forecast for the 2020 MTP/SCS Update
Dec Board Recess
Jan SACOG staff continued engagement with local staff for transportation and land use project updates.
Presentation on status of housing production in region. Feb Board workshop on overcoming low housing production (Katherine Bardis, Bardis Homes and Doug Shoemaker, Mercy Housing). Presentation and discussion on next generation transit challenges and opportunities. Mar Briefing on land use forecast. California Air Resources Board adopts new 19 percent greenhouse gas reduction target for SCS. Presentation and discussion on an approach for a Discussion Draft Land Use Scenario.
Apr Hosted Regional Futures Forum event.
2018 Board workshop on university partnerships and smart mobility. Presentation on new mobility options and disruptive technology. Presentation and board workshop on market-based pricing to manage congestion. May Revenue and financial constraint briefing. Presentation of a white paper on future housing product type demand. Presentation and discussion on Discussion Draft Scenario and performance analysis approach. Jun Presentation and discussion on public workshop strategy. Board workshop on Blueprint.
Jul Board Recess
2 Attachment B
2020 MTP/SCS Update Timeline
2017 2018 2019 2020 ASONDJFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASONDJF
Sounding Sounding Board Local Agency Review and Input Sounding Board Board Review and Input Review Local Agency Review and Input and Input Local Sounding Review and Input Agency Sounding Local Agency Board Public Workshops Public Comment Review Board Review and Input Review Elected O cial Through November and Input Review and Input Info Sessions and Input
Final Scenario Discussion Draft Scenario Adopt Modeling and Analysis Release Response to Comment Adopt Adopt Transportation Policy Research Analysis to Inform Final Adopt and Plan and Finalize Plan and EIR Final Final Create Final Policy Call for Projects • Revenues Scenario Framework Scenario Draft Plan and and EIR Plan and and Scenario Framework • Pricing • Performance Outcomes Framework Vet Final DEIR Writing for Public Land Use Build Out Review • Autonomous Scorecard Scenario Vehicles • Bene t Cost Analysis Issue Exploration to • Project Performance Inform Policy Framework Assessment • Economic Prosperity • Economic Prosperity • Update Growth Projections Goals Integration • Housing Shortage • Environmental Justice • GHG Target Update Analysis • Performance-Based Approach DRAFT MAY 2018 ASONDJFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASONDJF 2017 2018 2019 2020
KEY: Board Action Major Stra Work Informing Process Major Public and Stakeholder Informing Process Attachment C
Discussion Draft Scenario Performance Summary
Land Use Inputs Transportation Inputs Performance Outcomes
•Regional growth projections •Investment priorities: •Vehicle miles traveled (VMT) per person •Jobs-Housing Ratio -Road maintenance and •Vehicle miles traveled in heavy rehabilitation •Percent of new homes and jobs traffic by Community Type: -Transit operations and •Access to job centers by different maintenance -Center and Corridor (historic modes and groups main streets, suburban corridors, -New or expanded bus, light rail, •Individual time spent driving urban corridors) other transit (micro transit) •Trips by transit, bike, and walk -Established (rural, suburban, -New or expanded roads and urban areas) •Transit cost recovered by ticket highways -Developing (new growth areas sales -Bike and pedestrian routes, trails not yet developed or partially built) •New homes and jobs located near and paths -Rural Residential (predominately high-frequency transit -Programs and planning (e.g., rural homes, not farm homes) •Jobs accessible by transit Spare the Air, Community Design, •Percent of new homes by housing 511) •Jobs, colleges, and medical type: facilities accessible to low-income -Technology, operations, and and/or high-minority areas -Rural Residential system management •Transit service to low-income -Large-Lot Single-Family •Autonomous vehicles and shared and/or high-minority areas -Small-Lot Single-Family mobility •Square miles of farmland •Available revenues: -Attached converted to development -Fuel-based •Reduction in greenhouse gas -Sales taxes emissions per capita -System pricing -Flexibility and constraints of funding programs
Transportation Committee Meeting Date: 8/2/2018 Agenda Item No.: 2018-August-8.
Subject: 2020 Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy Update: Background on Equity and Economic Inclusion (Est. time: 5 minutes)
Informa on Prepared by: Monica Hernandez Approved by: Ma Carpenter A achments: Yes
1. Issue: How does equity and economic inclusion relate to the Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (MTP/SCS)?
2. Recommendation: This item provides background information for the board workshop this month and for the MTP/SCS Update. Staff will listen to comments and questions from the board to develop a board workshop that addresses the interest of the board.
3. Background/Analysis: Since the beginning of this year, the Board of Directors has been asking staff to bring in experts to help strengthen and clarify the connection of regional prosperity to the policy choices and tradeoffs in the MTP/SCS. The issues have been explored with experts from the Brookings Institution, UC Santa Cruz, and others in the field. This month we have invited Dr. Manuel Pastor and Bob Weissbourd to lead a workshop on the importance of equity and inclusion to a strong regional economy. In April, the Brookings Metropolitan Policy Program released a report that assessed the economy of the region. Brookings measured how the region’s economy is performing using indicators in these three areas: Growth: jobs, gross metropolitan product, jobs at young firms Prosperity: productivity, standard of living, average annual wage Inclusion: median wage, relative poverty rate, employment rate According to the Brookings Institution, success in these three areas is the key to a vibrant and sustainable regional economy. This staff report is focused on the topic of inclusion because among the three topics it was the area that our region performed the poorest, and, it is an area that the MTP/SCS can impact. The Brookings assessment ranked our region 84th out of the 100 largest metropolitan areas across the country over the last ten years for overall inclusion measures. Our region has been identified as one of the most racially diverse in the nation and is on track to become more diverse in the future and at a faster pace than most of the country. Having our region rank in the bottom 20 percent for inclusion is a call to action for our region’s economic future. The region’s performance in all indicator areas has improved in the last five years; however, more work needs to be done to continue strengthening our economy.
The full Brooking report can be found on SACOG’s website at: https://www.brookings.edu/wp- content/uploads/2018/04/sacramentoregioneconomicprosperity_fullreport.pdf
4. Discussion/Analysis: The Brookings report outlines a framework for regional prosperity that focuses on the key factors that will drive future economic performance. Infrastructure is one of these key factors. Specific to inclusion and equity in the economy, there is a critical need to reduce racial disparities in educational attainment and to provide opportunities for all individuals in our diverse workforce to obtain the higher education and digital skills that employers are demanding. Transportation connects people to opportunities, including jobs, education and training, and vital services. As such, the investments and policies put forward in the MTP/SCS can play an important role in advancing inclusion and the region’s economy.
The 2016 MTP/SCS has an Equity Chapter which covers the legal requirements to conduct an environmental justice and Title VI analysis, to determine whether the MTP/SCS benefits low-income and minority communities equally, whether the plan’s transportation investments have any disproportionate negative effects on minority and/or low-income populations in the SACOG region, and whether the plan has disparate impacts on the basis of race, color, or national origin. It is important here to consider that these analyses are done by assessing the future investments on today’s population. The plan does strive to go beyond the legal requirements to understand and compare the benefits and effects of the plan for the region’s residents, including low-income and minorities. These analyses, while important, are often subject to criticism as not doing much to impact investment decision- making that intends to directly benefit low-income or minority communities.
Because of the importance of inclusion in our regional prosperity goals, we want to continue advancing our work in this area through the 2020 MTP/SCS update. Efforts to better inform and address economic inclusion include: Convening an equity-focused working group to provide guidance on methods for identifying communities of concern, feedback on outreach practices, and what indicators we measure in the MTP/SCS; Developing a focus group that met with staff from the Brookings Institution to advise on the assessment of the Sacramento region, and indicators or historical issues to be considered under the inclusion umbrella; Updating our Low-Income and High-Minority areas identified in the 2016 MTP/SCS; Researching best practices for equity analysis and performance measures; and, Looking at accessibility to education and jobs as a key performance measure for the MTP/SCS.
Staff plans to come to the board committees in September to debrief from the board workshop and discuss further how we might use the 2020 MTP/SCS to support inclusion.
5. Fiscal Impact/Grant Information: This item does not have an impact on the agency budget. Staff time is already included in the Overall Work Program.
6. This staff report aligns with the following SACOG Work Plan Goals: 4. Connect Low-Income and Disadvantaged Populations to Jobs and Opportunity ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment Attachment
SACOG August Board Meeting Workshop Speakers
Dr. Manuel Pastor is Professor of Sociology and American Studies & Ethnicity at the University of Southern California. He currently directs the Program for Environmental and Regional Equity at USC and USC's Center for the Study of Immigrant Integration. Pastor’s research has generally focused on issues of the economic, environmental and social conditions facing low-income urban communities – and the social movements seeking to change those realities. He has frequently collaborated with Dr. Chris Benner who presented to the SACOG Board in March of this year.
Pastor holds an economics Ph.D. from the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and is the inaugural holder of the Turpanjian Chair in Civil Society and Social Change at USC.
Robert Weissbourd manages RW Ventures, LLC, an economic development firm specializing in technical analysis of urban assets and markets, and in creating the products and enterprises necessary to successfully grow urban and regional economies. He was a lead developer of the Greater Chatham Initiative, TREND, Chicagoland Food and Beverage Network, the Center for Financial Services Innovation, MetroEdge and the Metropolitan Business Planning Initiative, which he co-managed with the Brookings Institution. Weissbourd has been working with Brookings Institution and local stakeholders to develop specific strategies to advance an inclusive regional economy.
Weissbourd holds a J.D. from the University of Chicago Law School and a B.A. from Yale University.
Sacramento Area Council of Governments Transportation Committee Meeting Date: 8/2/2018 Agenda Item No.: 2018-August-9.
Subject: Upcoming Opportunities for Technical Assistance: Civic Lab Commercial Corridors and Rural Main Streets (Est. time: 5 minutes)
Informa on Prepared by: Greg Chew Approved by: Ma Carpenter A achments: No
1. Issue: Much of the SACOG region has commercial corridor development that has seen declines pre- and post-recession. In order to support our regional economy and MTP/SCS implementation, SACOG is providing technical assistance to spur creative revitalization in these uniquely challenged areas.
At the August Land Use & Natural Resources Committee meeting two experts will discuss economic and community revitalization along commercial corridors and SACOG staff will share information on two land use and housing technical assistance opportunities for SACOG member cities and counties.
2. Recommendation: None, this item is for information only.
3. Background/Analysis: In June, the SACOG board directed staff to focus Civic Lab Year 2 on commercial corridor revitalization. Like the inaugural year of Civic Lab, cross-sector teams will apply with an unresolved challenge, and participate as a cohort to develop a solution that leverages new partnerships and tests new solutions. Earlier this summer, Caltrans awarded SACOG a State Transportation Planning Grant to provide technical assistance to revitalize main street commercial corridors of rural communities in the region. This new program is called the Rural Main Streets Program.
4. Discussion/Analysis: Civic Lab Year 2: Staff will facilitate a series of workshops where teams, local and national experts, and selected vendors will dive deep into what makes an area vibrant. Topics such as housing; intensification of use; building and property reuse; temporary tactical uses; and, street and building design will be explored.
Over the summer months, SACOG staff will be getting the word out to local cities and counties on the Civic Lab Year 2 program, benefits of participation, and the application process. Staff anticipates releasing applications in late August, with applications due in late September. The Civic Lab Year Two program will begin in late 2018.
Rural Main Streets Program: The Rural Main Streets Program will share some of program elements of Civic Lab Year 2, in order to expand the resources being brought to the region. Rural Main Streets will also work with local teams and focus on housing, intensification of land uses and similar topics. National experts including Michele Reeves from Civilis Consultants, Portland State University’s Urban Service Accelerator Program (USA), and the Local Government Commission are all available resources to rural communities. Rural Main Streets and Civic Lab Year 2 will hold joint workshops and seminars and site tours.
Six rural communities, which had requested technical assistance through a prior grant program in the past three years, will continue to receive technical assistance through the Main Streets Program. SACOG is also soliciting interest from our other rural jurisdiction members. The key differences between the two programs are that the SACOG board has committed to identifying funding for successful pilots that come out of Civic Lab, and that Civic Lab has the ability to be agile and adapt the curriculum based on participant evaluation and feedback.
Guest Speakers: At the August 2, Land Use & Natural Resources meeting, community revitalization consultant Michele Reeves will share some of the low and moderate cost approaches for revitalizing main streets and commercial corridors. She will be joined by Larry Kosmont, a development consultant from southern California, who will share some of his experiences.
5. Fiscal Impact/Grant Information: SACOG staff time is in the adopted budget. Pilot projects developed through Civic Lab will be seeking funding from different sources, including SACOG’s funding rounds and outside sources. The Rural Main Streets grant from Caltrans will pay for SACOG staff time and consultants and has been programmed into the adopted budget. This Caltrans grant is funded through SB 1 and contingent on the continuation of SB 1 funding.
6. This staff report aligns with the following SACOG Work Plan Goals: 3. Assist Economic Development Strategies Transportation Committee Meeting Date: 8/2/2018 Agenda Item No.: 2018-August-10.
Subject: Report on Inter-regional Travel in the Sacramento Region (Est. time: 0 minutes)
Receive and File Prepared by: Bruce Griesenbeck Approved by: Ma Carpenter A achments: Yes
1. Issue: At the May Land Use and Natural Resources Committee meeting, a request was made to bring forth information related to inter-regional travel in the Sacramento region.
2. Recommendation: None, this is for information only.
3. Background/Analysis: In the course of presenting information related to travel forecasting for the 2020 Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy update, questions came up on inter-regional travel in the Sacramento region. A request by several of the directors was made to bring back information on this topic.
4. Discussion/Analysis: The attached report provides time series data and trends related to inter-regional travel for the Sacramento region. Inter-regional travel is defined as trips with one end in the Sacramento region, and the other end outside the region. The vast majority of inter- regional trips are made to and from neighboring regions, like the San Francisco Bay Area, San Joaquin County, etc. As the recession has ended and economic activity in the Sacramento region, as well as surrounding areas, is increasing, the volumes of inter- regional trips are increasing. Also, re-location of people to the Sacramento region from other surrounding areas, especially the San Francisco Bay Area, is driving some of these changes. As part of the MTP/SCS, SACOG coordinates with its neighboring jurisdictions on assumptions for future levels of inter-regional travel. The attached data is developed as part of that coordination. Information about expectations on future growth of inter- regional travel will be brought forward this fall as part of the analysis of the MTP/SCS Discussion Draft Scenario. 5. Fiscal Impact/Grant Information: This item has no fiscal impact to the agency’s operating budget, other than already budgeted staff time.
6. This staff report aligns with the following SACOG Work Plan Goals: 1. Advance Economic Prosperity ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment: Inter-regional Travel Report in Inter-regional Travel in the Sacramento Region—July 2018 Attachment
Summary Inter-regional travel includes trips that have one end in the Sacramento region, and the other end outside the Sacramento region.
Our ability to fully understand how inter-regional travel is changing over time is limited by the available data. Four sources are presented here: . Traffic counts on roadways at the edge of the Sacramento region. . Worker flow data, showing where workers report living and working. . Capital Corridor passenger flows, showing the trips being made on this service specifically between the Bay Area (BA) and Sacramento. . Migration data, showing where people are re-locating their residences.
Traffic counts (see Table 1 and Figure 1)—traffic counts show average daily vehicle volumes at the boundaries of the Sacramento region. Because these are volumes of vehicles traveling between regions, they are a good indicator of the overall level of inter-regional travel over time. . Based on available traffic counts for the years 2000, 2005, 2008, 2012 and 2016, traffic volumes at boundary locations for the Sacramento region were tallied. . Overall volumes of traffic at the region’s boundaries dropped by about 1 percent from 2008 to 2012, indicative of the economic recession. . As the recession ended, traffic volumes at the region’s boundaries increased by about 11 percent from 2012 to 2016. o The largest increase (13 percent) was at the Yolo / Solano County line, indicating higher growth in inter-regional travel between the Sacramento region and the Bay Area counties. . Vehicle volumes between the Sacramento and San Francisco Bay Area are the largest of all of our neighboring regions, accounting for about 42 to 44 percent of all the inter-regional vehicles entering or leaving the Sacramento region1. . Vehicle volumes between the Sacramento and San Joaquin Valley are the next largest of our neighboring regions, accounting for 25 to 27 percent of the total. . Vehicle volumes to all other neighboring regions are all less than 10 percent of the total.
Worker flows (see Table 2 and Figure 2 through 5)—worker flows show one important slice of all travel: commuting (i.e. travel from home to work). . Based on the reported place of residence and place of work, inter-regional worker flows were tallied. . The most recent data available are for year 2013. Data for 2018 will be released later this summer. . Based on the available data, between 2000 and 2008, the volume of out-commuters from the Sacramento region increased more (+34%) than the volume of in-commuters (+14%). . From 2008 to 2013, the volumes of out- and in- commuters was relatively flat. o As mentioned above, 2018 worker flow data is expected to be released this summer or fall. It is expected that the 2018 data will show a substantial increase in overall commuting in and out of the Sacramento region, but that the out-commute will increase the most.
1 Note—these vehicle volumes also include “through” travel to the Sacramento region. 1 Sacramento Area Council of Governments Report in Inter-regional Travel in the Sacramento Region—July 2018 Attachment
. Over the years from 2000 to 2013, the percentage of resident workers out-commuting has stayed relatively stable, ranging from 5.8 to 7.4 percent. . The percentage of jobs within the Sacramento region held by workers residing outside the region (in-commuters) also remained relatively stable, ranging from 5.1 to 6.7 percent. . Over the same years, the “ratio” of out-commuters to in-commuters has ranged from 1.1 to 1.2—so out-commuters outnumber in-commuters by 10 to 20 percent. However, the “ratio” varies strongly by neighboring region: o Out-commuters from Sacramento to the San Francisco Bay Area outnumber in- commuters 2-to-1. o Out- and in-commuters to the San Joaquin Valley are nearly balanced, with about 10 percent more out-commuters than in-commuters. o For the remaining neighboring regions (Butte, Nevada, and Amador counties), in- commuters outnumber out-commuters by up to 2-to-1.
Capital Corridor passengers (see Figure 4) are an indicator of an important slice of inter-regional travel, using intercity rail. . Based on station-to-station ticket purchases, the shares of passengers traveling purely within the Sacramento region, those traveling purely within the San Francisco Bay Area (SF Bay Area), and those traveling inter-regionally were split out. . The majority of Capital Corridor passenger are inter-regional travelers, with the start of their trip in one region, and the end of the same trip in the other--about 70 percent of all passengers. . Over a longer timeframe, from 2002 to 2016, overall growth in passenger volumes has been much higher than growth in vehicle volumes at the Yolo/Solano county line: rail volumes have increased by about 74 percent, compared to a 23 percent increase in vehicle volumes. . Growth in Capital Corridor passengers has been more comparable to growth in vehicle traffic since 2012: rail passenger growth has been about 10 percent from 2012 to 2016, compared to about 13 percent growth in vehicle traffic for the same years. o The largest increases in passenger volumes occurred in the earlier years of the service, when the number of scheduled trains increased from 18 in 2002 to 32 by 2006. Annual average growth in passengers during this time period was about 7 percent. o The number of schedules has been 30 since 2012, and ridership increases have about 2 percent per year over that period.
Migration data (Tables 4, 5 and 6) show the annual number of persons moving to the Sacramento region from other places, as well as the annual number of persons moving to other places from the Sacramento region. Migration from nearby regions like the SF Bay Area and the San Joaquin Valley relate to inter-regional travel, because some unknown portion of those relocated persons are likely to maintain some activities in their prior home—e.g. a worker relocating residence from the SF Bay Area to the Sacramento region, but maintaining their employment in the SF Bay Area. . Changes in resident location (i.e. migration) are tracked by the Census American Community Survey (ACS). The Census Bureau periodically releases county to county and metro area to metro area data on these re-locations. The most recent release was for the 5-year period from 2011 through 2015. The figures shown estimate the annual number of movers between metro areas over that five-year period.
2 Sacramento Area Council of Governments Report in Inter-regional Travel in the Sacramento Region—July 2018 Attachment
. Domestic migration only is included in this report. Data are available on in-migration only from countries outside the United States. The focus of this report is on recent migration from nearby regions, that might affect inter-regional travel. . In total, the Sacramento-Roseville-Arden Arcade metropolitan statistical area (Sacramento MSA, including Sacramento, Yolo, Placer and El Dorado Counties) experienced a net in- migration of about 2,900 from within the United States. This was a combination of 87,500 migrating to the MSA, and 84,600 migrating from the MSA (see Table 4). . In total, the Yuba City metropolitan statistical area (Yuba City MSA, including Sutter and Yuba Counties), experienced a net out-migration of about 1,000 to other parts of the United States. This was a combination of about 9,800 migrating from the MSA, and 8,800 migrating to the MSA (see Table 4). . For the Sacramento MSA and the Yuba City MSA, a few large net in- or out- migrations to other metro areas stood out—those are listed in Tables 5 and 6. The data show an incredibly complicated array of other smaller net in- or out- migrations to other metro areas—those smaller migrations areas are not shown. . For the Sacramento MSA, the largest net in-migrations were from: o SF Bay Area (San Francisco, San Jose and Vallejo MSAs combined), with net in- migration of 6,500. . This net in-migration includes about 14,900 moving from the Sacramento MSA to the SF Bay Area, and about 21,300 moving from the SF Bay Area to the Sacramento MSA. o Southern California (Los Angeles, San Diego, and Oxnard MSAs combined), with net in-migration of 3,200. . This net in-migration includes about 7,600 moving from the Sacramento MSA to Southern California, and 10,800 moving from Southern California to the Sacramento MSA. . For the Yuba City MSA, the largest net out-migrations were to: o San Joaquin Valley, with net out-migration of about 950 (1,220 migrating out, 270 migrating in). o United States outside California, with net out-migration of about 950 (2,700 migrating out, 1,740 migrating in). o The largest net in-migrations to the Yuba City MSA were from neighboring MSAs: Sacramento (+330) and Chico (+250).
Background
This memorandum summarizes available data and trends on inter-regional travel in the Sacramento region. A few definitions: . the “Sacramento region” for purposes of this is the 6-county area (El Dorado, Placer, Sacramento, Sutter and Yuba counties). . For migration data, metropolitan statistical areas, also known as Metro Areas or MSAs were used. The Sacramento-Roseville-Arden Arcade MSA is the four-county area including Sacramento, Yolo, Placer and El Dorado counties. . The Yuba City MSA includes Yuba and Sutter counties. . “inter-regional travel” is: travel that starts in the Sacramento region, and goes to one of the other surrounding regions, and vice versa (i.e. beginning outside the Sacramento region and ending within it). 3 Sacramento Area Council of Governments Report in Inter-regional Travel in the Sacramento Region—July 2018 Attachment
Very few data sources exist that allow us to understand the complexities of inter-regional travel. The available sources summarized in this memorandum are: . Worker Flows. The Census American Community Survey (ACS), is conducted annually across the nation, and gathers information on place of residence and place of work for all surveyed workers. However, while ACS data are collected annually, reports showing specific work locations are released approximately every five-years. . Traffic Counts. Caltrans and other public agencies periodically count vehicles on roadways all around our region. Traffic counts at the boundary areas of the Sacramento region (think I-80 between Yolo and Solano County) tell us something about the number of vehicles crossing between the Sacramento region and the San Francisco Bay Area. . Capital Corridor Service Station-to-Station Flows. The Capital Corridor Joint Powers Authority tracks the numbers of passengers traveling between stations based on ticket purchases. The tallies of these data provide another piece of the puzzle to understand inter- regional travel. . Migration data. The ACS includes data on migration or relocation of households by county and metropolitan statistical areas (or “metro areas”). The relocation of households from nearby MSAs, like the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward metro area, or the San Jose- Sunnyvale-Santa Clara metro area, give hints of what may be driving some of the changes in inter-regional travel. Because the ACS surveys residents of the United States, and the migration questions are about where and when they may have relocated from, migrants out of the United States are not surveyed.
Big data (cell phone, smartphone & GPS device traces, plus passively collected location data from smartphone apps) could be very useful in getting a better understanding of inter-regional travel. SACOG is partnering with Caltrans and ARB in the “Big Data for Transportation Planning Pilot”, but the access to data and services through that pilot is several months off.
4 Sacramento Area Council of Governments Report in Inter-regional Travel in the Sacramento Region—July 2018 Attachment
Table 1. Average Daily Traffic on Gateway Roadways Average Daily Traffic Changes MPO / Neighbor 2000 2005 2008 2012 2016 '08 to '12 '12 to '16 MTC / SF Bay Area 199,100 234,600 227,800 218,075 245,875 -4% +13% SJCOG / Stockton 117,652 143,443 135,500 136,500 152,680 +1% +12% Nevada CTC / Grass Valley 42,784 46,550 43,700 43,350 47,900 -1% +10% Colusa CTC / N. Sac.Valley 34,000 40,470 39,300 39,450 42,130 +0% +7% TRPA / Tahoe 38,000 39,700 36,600 36,600 39,900 -- +9% BCAG / Chico 27,000 27,951 26,400 27,800 31,200 +5% +12% Amador CTC / Jackson 13,900 13,150 11,100 15,000 14,350 +35% -4% Total 472,436 545,864 520,400 516,775 574,035 -1% +11% Source: SACOG, July 2018. Notes: -This table adds up traffic volumes on all roadways at SACOG’s boundaries with other regions. -See Appendix A for details on individual roadways in each boundary area.
5 Sacramento Area Council of Governments Report in Inter-regional Travel in the Sacramento Region—July 2018 Attachment
Figure 1. Average Daily Traffic on Gateway Roadways
Source: SACOG, July 2018. See notes for Table 1.
6 Sacramento Area Council of Governments Report in Inter-regional Travel in the Sacramento Region—July 2018 Attachment
Table 2. Region-to-Region Worker Flows, 2000 to 2013 Living in… Working in… 2000 2008 2010 2013 '00 to 08 08 to '13 Sacramento Region Bay Area 20,978 32,710 31,809 30,898 +56% -6% Bay Area Sacramento Region 13,393 16,150 15,781 16,887 +21% +5% Sacramento Region S.Joaquin/Stanislaus County 8,319 9,570 9,349 11,581 +15% +21% S.Joaquin/Stanislaus County Sacramento Region 7,602 8,470 8,818 10,125 +11% +20% Sacramento Region Nevada County 3,113 4,225 3,912 3,714 +36% -12% Nevada County Sacramento Region 8,609 9,540 8,915 8,263 +11% -13% Sacramento Region Butte County 1,625 2,575 2,542 2,621 +58% +2% Butte County Sacramento Region 3,254 4,325 3,733 3,191 +33% -26% Sacramento Region Amador/Alpine County 1,204 1,820 1,863 1,833 +51% +1% Amador/Alpine County Sacramento Region 1,883 1,870 2,204 2,086 -1% +12% Sacramento Region All Other Surrounding Regions 14,271 15,666 25,107 16,189 +10% +3% All Other Surrounding Regions Sacramento Region 9,987 10,562 25,257 13,559 +6% +28% Sacramento Region Everwhere Else 49,510 66,566 74,582 66,836 +34% +0% Everywhere Else Sacramento Region 44,728 50,917 64,708 54,111 +14% +6% All Workers in Sacramento Region 852,362 1,020,465 1,005,414 976,209 +20% -4% All Workplaces in Sacramento Region 847,767 1,005,285 995,918 964,425 +19% -4% % of All Sacramento Workers Working Elsewhere 5.8% 6.3% 6.5% 7.4% % of All Sacramento Workplaces Held by Workers from 5.3% 5.7% 5.1% 6.5% Elsewhere Source: SACOG, July 2018. Based on data from Census (2000) and American Community Survey 5-year sample data (2008, 2010, 2013).
7 Sacramento Area Council of Governments Report in Inter-regional Travel in the Sacramento Region—July 2018 Attachment
Figure 2. Sacramento / SF Bay Area Worker Flows
Source: SACOG, July 2018. Based on Census and ACS data.
Figure 3. Sacramento / San Joaquin & Stanislaus Worker Flows
Source: SACOG, July 2018. Based on Census and ACS data.
8 Sacramento Area Council of Governments Report in Inter-regional Travel in the Sacramento Region—July 2018 Attachment
Figure 4. Sacramento / Nevada County Worker Flows
Source: SACOG, July 2018. Based on Census and ACS data.
Figure 5. Sacramento / Butte County Worker Flows
Source: SACOG, July 2018. Based on Census and ACS data.
9 Sacramento Area Council of Governments Report in Inter-regional Travel in the Sacramento Region—July 2018 Attachment Table 3. 2013 County-to-County Worker Flows Workplace
Sac. Yolo County Total Yuba Sutter Placer El Dor. El 6- orking Outside County Outside orking To Outside Region Outside To % Working Outside Region Outside Working % Residence % W El Dorado 43,253 3,852 22,379 76 859 120 70,539 8,007 78,546 10.2% 44.9% Placer 1,460 96,938 41,928 431 3,190 1,303 145,250 10,322 155,572 6.6% 37.7% Sacramento 7,386 34,975 488,069 798 28,778 785 560,791 32,904 593,695 5.5% 17.8% Sutter 44 1,337 3,203 20,361 1,881 5,645 32,471 3,877 36,348 10.7% 44.0% Yolo 270 802 21,792 290 55,349 51 78,554 8,832 87,386 10.1% 36.7% Yuba 85 2,323 2,986 4,763 538 12,014 22,709 1,953 24,662 7.9% 51.3% 6-County 52,498 140,227 580,357 26,719 90,595 19,918 910,314 65,895 976,209 6.8% 26.7% Fr. Outside Region 3,123 9,094 28,620 1,956 8,924 2,394 54,111 Total 55,621 149,321 608,977 28,675 99,519 22,312 964,425 % fr. Outside Region 5.6% 6.1% 4.7% 6.8% 9.0% 10.7% 5.6% % fr. Outside County 22.2% 35.1% 19.9% 29.0% 44.4% 46.2% 25.8% Source: SACOG, July 2018. Based on 2013 American Community Survey 5-year sample.
10 Sacramento Area Council of Governments Report in Inter-regional Travel in the Sacramento Region—July 2018 Attachment Figure 6. Monthly Capital Corridor Service Passenger Flows, 2013 - 2017
Source: SACOG, July 2018. Based on data provided by the Capital Corridor Joint Powers Authority. Notes: Flows are March monthly station-to-station passenger volumes.
11 Sacramento Area Council of Governments Report in Inter-regional Travel in the Sacramento Region—July 2018 Attachment
Table 4. 2015 Domestic Migration to and from Sacramento Region Total Total Migrating Migrating Net Metro Area Into MSA Out of MSA Migration Sacramento-Roseville-Arden Arcade MSA 87,539 84,609 +2,930 Yuba City MSA 8,792 9,801 -1,009 Source: SACOG, July 2018. Based on Census 2011-2015 ACS County to County Migration Patterns Data.
Table 5. 2015 Net Migrations to/from Sacramento MSA Migrating Net Migrating to from Migration to Sacramento Sacramento Sacramento Between Sacramento MSA and… MSA MSA MSA Top 10 Areas in Net Migration to Sacramento MSA /1/ 1 San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA MSA 12,836 9,639 +3,197 2 San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA MSA 4,925 2,709 +2,216 3 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA MSA 7,423 5,422 +2,001 4 Vallejo-Fairfield, CA MSA 3,577 2,523 +1,054 5 San Diego-Carlsbad, CA MSA 2,555 1,892 +663 6 Fresno, CA MSA 1,517 933 +584 7 Modesto, CA MSA 1,434 919 +515 8 Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA MSA 811 314 +497 9 Las Vegas-Henderson-Paradise, NV MSA 1,383 919 +464 10 Olympia-Tumwater, WA MSA 413 47 +366
Top 10 Areas in Net Migration from Sacramento MSA /1/ 276 Columbia, SC MSA 52 400 -348 277 Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, CO MSA 162 510 -348 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV 278 MSA 424 819 -395 279 Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC MSA 41 450 -409 San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles-Arroyo Grande, CA 280 MSA 568 1,130 -562 281 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA MSA 3,014 3,613 -599 282 Santa Maria-Santa Barbara, CA MSA 374 978 -604 283 Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA MSA 417 1,221 -804 284 Outside MSA within U.S. or Puerto Rico 9,404 10,365 -961 285 Reno, NV MSA 894 2,033 -1,139 Selected Subtotals: San Francisco Bay Area 21,338 14,871 +6,467 Southern California 10,789 7,628 +3,161 Other California 7,324 8,794 -1,470
/1/Between the top and bottom 10 on net migration are 265 areas with smaller net migrations. Source: SACOG, July 2018. Based on Census 2011-2015 ACS County to County Migration Patterns Data. Sac Metro Area = Sacramento, Placer, El Dorado, and Yolo Counties.
12 Sacramento Area Council of Governments Report in Inter-regional Travel in the Sacramento Region—July 2018 Attachment
Table 6. 2015 Net Migrations to/from Yuba City MSA
Migrating to Migrating from Net Migration Between Yuba City MSA and… Yuba City MSA Yuba City MSA to Yuba MSA Top 10 Areas in Net Migration to Yuba City MSA /1/ 1 Sacramento-Roseville-Arden-Arcade, CA MSA 2,415 2,086 +329 2 Chico, CA MSA 1,313 1,060 +253 3 Modesto, CA MSA 185 0 +185 4 San Diego-Carlsbad, CA MSA 194 59 +135 5 San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles-Arroyo Grande, CA MSA 159 30 +129 6 Louisville/Jefferson County, KY-IN MSA 128 0 +128 7 San Angelo, TX MSA 124 4 +120 8 San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA MSA 197 90 +107 9 Gulfport-Biloxi-Pascagoula, MS MSA 99 0 +99 10 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA MSA 101 12 +89
Top 10 Areas in Net Migration from Yuba City MSA /1/ 119 Bakersfield, CA MSA 15 82 -67 120 Santa Rosa, CA MSA 45 118 -73 121 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV MSA 64 137 -73 122 Tucson, AZ MSA 0 77 -77 123 San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA MSA 248 357 -109 124 Provo-Orem, UT MSA 6 239 -233 125 Stockton-Lodi, CA MSA 55 296 -241 126 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA MSA 116 359 -243 127 Outside MSA within U.S. or Puerto Rico 1,102 1,860 -758 128 Visalia-Porterville, CA MSA 15 840 -825 Selected Subtotals: Yuba City MSA Neighbors 3,728 3,146 +582 San Francisco Bay Area 490 565 -75 San Joaquin Valley 270 1,218 -948 Outside California/within US 1,740 2,688 -948 /1/Between the top and bottom 10 on net migration are 108 areas with smaller net migrations. Source: SACOG, July 2018. Based on Census 2011-2015 ACS County to County Migration Patterns data. Yuba City Metro Area = Yuba & Sutter Counties.
13 Sacramento Area Council of Governments Report in Inter-regional Travel in the Sacramento Region—July 2018 Attachment
Appendix A Average Daily Traffic at Gateway Locations to the SACOG Region, 2000 to 2016 Average Daily Traffic Changes Gate No. Description Location MPO / Neighbor 2000 2005 2008 2012 2016 '08 to '12 '12 to '16 1 SR-99 N Sutter-Butte CL BCAG / Chico 15,500 16,400 14,900 14,600 17,300 -2% +18% 2 SR-70 N Yuba-Butte CL BCAG / Chico 11,500 11,551 11,500 13,200 13,900 +15% +5% 3 E20/Marysville Rd NE W. of SR 49/Yuba-Nevada CL Nevada CTC / Grass Valley 1,000 1,000 1,000 550 800 -45% +45% 4 SR-20 NE Yuba-Nevada CL Nevada CTC / Grass Valley 6,600 8,300 7,800 8,200 8,000 +5% -2% 5 SR-49 NE Placer-Nevada CL Nevada CTC / Grass Valley 27,384 29,500 27,000 27,000 30,700 -- +14% 6 I-80 NE E. of Yuba Gap TRPA / Tahoe 26,000 26,500 23,500 23,500 28,700 -- +22% 7 SR 174 NE Placer-Nevada CL Nevada CTC / Grass Valley 4,800 5,000 5,300 5,000 5,200 -6% +4% 8 SR 20 NE Placer-Nevada CL Nevada CTC / Grass Valley 3,000 2,750 2,600 2,600 3,200 -- +23% 9 SR-88 S S of Omo Ranch Rd Amador CTC / Jackson 3,200 3,400 2,600 2,300 2,100 -12% -9% 10 US-50 E Btwn. Ice House Rd & Echo Lake TRPA / Tahoe 12,000 13,200 13,100 13,100 11,200 -- -15% Sacramento-Amador CL, El Dorado-Amador 13 SR 16, 49 East, 49 S CL Amador CTC / Jackson 10,700 9,750 8,500 12,700 12,250 +49% -4% 15 SR-99 S Sacramento-San Joaquin CL SJCOG / Stockton 54,752 64,143 60,000 60,000 73,100 -- +22% 16 S Lincoln Way Sacramento-San Joaquin CL SJCOG / Stockton 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 5,480 -- +37% 17 Franklin Road S Sacramento-San Joaquin CL SJCOG / Stockton 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 -- -- 18 I-5 S Sacramento-San Joaquin CL SJCOG / Stockton 44,000 57,000 53,000 54,000 55,700 +2% +3% 19 SR-160 S S. of SR-12 MTC / SF Bay Area 10,800 15,000 15,000 12,200 14,100 -19% +16% 20 CR-95A Yolo-Solano CL MTC / SF Bay Area 500 500 500 500 500 -- -- CR-104/Mace Blvd. 21 SW S. of CR-32D/Montgomery MTC / SF Bay Area 2,000 2,000 2,000 1,475 1,475 -26% -- 22a I-80 W Yolo-Solano CL MTC / SF Bay Area 116,000 130,000 125,000 119,000 136,700 -5% +15% 22b SR-113 Yolo-Solano CL MTC / SF Bay Area 35,500 39,000 39,000 40,000 42,500 +3% +6% 22c I-505 Yolo-Solano CL MTC / SF Bay Area 16,300 23,600 22,500 21,300 24,300 -5% +14% 23 SR-128 W Yolo-Solano CL MTC / SF Bay Area 2,300 2,600 2,600 2,400 2,400 -8% -- 24 Putah Creek Rd. W W. of Winters Rd. Bridge MTC / SF Bay Area 200 200 200 200 200 -- -- 25 SR-12 SE E. of SR-160 SJCOG / Stockton 13,900 17,300 17,500 17,500 17,400 -- -1% 26 SR-12 SW W. of SR-160 MTC / SF Bay Area 15,500 21,700 21,000 21,000 23,700 -- +13% 27 SR 16 Yolo-Colusa CL Colusa CTC / N.Sac.Valley 800 1,050 700 570 630 -19% +11% 28 I-5 N Yolo-Colusa CL Colusa CTC / N.Sac.Valley 27,000 31,000 30,000 30,500 33,200 +2% +9% 29 SR 45 Sutter-Colusa CL Colusa CTC / N.Sac.Valley 400 620 1,000 880 900 -12% +2% 30 SR-20 NW Sutter-Colusa CL Colusa CTC / N.Sac.Valley 5,800 7,800 7,600 7,500 7,400 -1% -1% Total 474,436 547,869 522,408 518,787 576,051 -1% +11% Source: SACOG, July 2018, based on counts from Caltrans and local public agencies.
14 Sacramento Area Council of Governments Report in Inter-regional Travel in the Sacramento Region—July 2018 Attachment
Appendix B 2013 County-to-County Worker Flow—Sacramento and Surrounding Regions. Workplace======>
ra
SF All Sol. Sac. Else Son. Nev. Yolo Yuba Napa Butte Marin Alam. Sutter Placer Amad. Alpine Stanis. El Dor. C.Csta. S.Cla S.Joaq. SACOG S.Mateo Residence Tot. MTC El Dorado 43,253 3,852 22,379 76 859 120 70,539 378 51 287 410 288 45 469 226 63 2,217 250 23 - 236 495 204 78,546 4,605 Placer 1,460 96,938 41,928 431 3,190 1,303 145,250 967 95 389 669 365 95 787 445 247 4,059 489 70 165 2,421 125 - 155,572 3,063 Sacramento 7,386 34,975 488,069 798 28,778 785 560,791 6,113 432 1,945 2,314 1,924 485 1,598 974 529 16,314 9,206 783 285 299 952 5 593,695 5,843 Sutter 44 1,337 3,203 20,361 1,881 5,645 32,471 379 18 17 160 67 - 5 26 - 672 232 - 1,525 339 11 - 36,348 1,098 Yolo 270 802 21,792 290 55,349 51 78,554 4,626 281 601 624 525 107 311 134 99 7,308 333 47 58 - 41 - 87,386 1,092 Yuba 85 2,323 2,986 4,763 538 12,014 22,709 117 - 28 35 53 - 45 34 16 328 130 18 588 419 - - 24,662 488 6-County 52,498 140,227 580,357 26,719 90,595 19,918 910,314 12,580 877 3,267 4,212 3,222 732 3,215 1,839 954 30,898 10,640 941 2,621 3,714 1,624 209 976,209 16,189
Solano 9 360 5,412 37 4,599 56 10,473 Napa - 20 348 - 268 - 636 C.Costa 59 57 1,567 10 661 - 2,354 Alam. - 119 1,004 16 312 7 1,458 SF - 76 386 23 202 - 687 Marin - 10 82 18 32 - 142 S.Clara 19 27 235 - 74 - 355 S.Mateo - - 262 - 40 12 314 Sonom. 28 19 280 - 141 - 468 MTC 115 688 9,576 104 6,329 75 16,887
S.Joaquin 156 317 7,717 75 524 77 8,866 Stanislaus 18 98 1,057 - 86 - 1,259
Butte 65 330 571 1,031 112 1,082 3,191 Nevada 100 5,617 1,494 184 57 811 8,263 Amador 312 101 1,558 - 46 - 2,017 Alpine 69 - - - - - 69
All 55,621 149,321 608,977 28,675 99,519 22,312 964,425 Else 2,288 1,943 6,647 562 1,770 349 13,559 Source: SACOG, July 2018. Based on American Community Survey, 2013 5-year sample.
15 Sacramento Area Council of Governments