The Pennsylvania Death Penalty Assessment Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Defending Liberty Pursuing Justice EVALUATING FAIRNESS AND ACCURACY IN STATE DEATH PENALTY SYSTEMS: The Pennsylvania Death Penalty Assessment Report An Analysis of Pennsylvania’s Death Penalty Laws, Procedures, and Practices “A system that takes life must first give justice.” John J. Curtin, Jr., Former ABA President October 2007 AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION Defending Liberty Pursuing Justice EVALUATING FAIRNESS AND ACCURACY IN STATE DEATH PENALTY SYSTEMS: The Pennsylvania Death Penalty Assessment Report An Analysis of Pennsylvania’s Death Penalty Laws, Procedures, and Practices “A system that takes life must first give justice.” John J. Curtin, Jr., Former ABA President October 2007 AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION The materials contained herein represent the assessment solely of the ABA Death Penalty Moratorium Implementation Project and the Pennsylvania Death Penalty Assessment Team and have not been approved by the House of Delegates or the Board of Governors of the American Bar Association and, accordingly, should not be construed as representing the policy of the American Bar Association. These materials and any forms or agreements herein are intended for educational and informational purposes only. This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The contents of this report are the sole responsibility of the American Bar Association and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union. Significant portions of the research were performed on Westlaw courtesy of West Group. Copyright 2007, American Bar Association ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The American Bar Association Death Penalty Moratorium Implementation Project (the Project) is pleased to present this publication, Evaluating Fairness and Accuracy in State Death Penalty Systems: The Pennsylvania Death Penalty Assessment Report. The Project expresses its great appreciation to all those who helped to develop, draft, and produce the Pennsylvania Death Penalty Assessment Report. The efforts of the Project and the Pennsylvania Death Penalty Assessment Team were aided by many lawyers, academics, judges, and others who presented ideas, shared information, and assisted in the examination of Pennsylvania’s capital punishment system. Particular thanks must be given to Deborah Fleischaker, Banafsheh Amirzadeh, Joshua Lipman, and Seth Miller, the Project staff who spent countless hours researching, writing, editing, and compiling this report. In addition, we would like to thank the American Bar Association Section of Individual Rights and Responsibilities for their substantive, administrative, and financial contributions. In particular, we would like to thank Lauren Hume, Charles Drummon, Amelia Vukeya, and Veronica Benavides for their assistance in fact-checking and proof-reading multiple sections of the report. We would like to recognize the research contributions made by Whitney Clymer, Matthew Levine, Eric Issadore, and Jeneice Scott, all of whom were law students at the University of Villanova School of Law. Additionally, the efforts of Hogan & Hartson L.L.P. in researching and drafting portions of this report were immensely helpful. Lastly, special thanks must be given to Professor Michelle Anderson who served as Co- Chair of the Pennsylvania Death Penalty Assessment Team prior to her departure from the University of Villanova School of Law. Professor Anderson was instrumental in the creation of this report. In this publication, the Project and the Assessment Team have attempted to note as accurately as possible information relevant to Pennsylvania’s death penalty. The Project would appreciate notification of any errors or omissions in this report so that they may be corrected in any future reprints. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVEH SUMMARY........................................................................................................................... iH INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................H ..................... 1H CHAPTER ONE: ANH OVERVIEW OF PENNSYLVANIA’S DEATH PENALTY SYSTEM ............ 5H I.H DEMOGRAPHICS OF PENNSYLVANIA’S DEATH ROW..................................................................... 5H II.H STATUTORY EVOLUTION OF PENNSYLVANIA’S DEATH PENALTY SCHEME .................................. 6H III.H THE PROGRESSION OF A DEATH PENALTY CASE FROM ARREST TO EXECUTION ........................ 14H CHAPTER TWO: COLLECTION,H PRESERVATION, AND TESTING OF DNA AND OTHER TYPES OF EVIDENCE............................................................................................................................. 30H IH NTRODUCTION TO THE ISSUE................................................................................................................... 30H I.H FACTUAL DISCUSSION................................................................................................................ 32H II.H ANALYSIS .................................................................................................................................. 40H CHAPTER THREE: LAWH ENFORCEMENT IDENTIFICATIONS AND INTERROGATIONS .. 46H IH NTRODUCTION TO THE ISSUE................................................................................................................... 46H I.H FACTUAL DISCUSSION................................................................................................................ 48H II.H ANALYSIS .................................................................................................................................. 55H CHAPTER FOUR: CRIMEH LABORATORIES AND MEDICAL EXAMINER OFFICES.............. 66H I.H FACTUAL DISCUSSION................................................................................................................ 67H II.H ANALYSIS .................................................................................................................................. 75H CHAPTER FIVE: PROSECUTORIALH PROFESSIONALISM ........................................................... 80H IH NTRODUCTION TO THE ISSUE................................................................................................................... 80H I.H FACTUAL DISCUSSION................................................................................................................ 81H II.H ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................ 100H CHAPTER SIX: DEFENSEH SERVICES............................................................................................... 112H IH NTRODUCTION TO THE ISSUE................................................................................................................. 112H I.H FACTUAL DISCUSSION.............................................................................................................. 113H II.H ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................ 121H CHAPTER SEVEN: THEH DIRECT APPEAL PROCESS................................................................... 142H IH NTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 142H I.H FACTUAL DISCUSSION.............................................................................................................. 143H II.H ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................ 147H CHAPTER EIGHT: STATEH POST-CONVICTION PROCEEDINGS.............................................. 150H IH NTRODUCTION TO THE ISSUE................................................................................................................. 150H I.H FACTUAL DISCUSSION.............................................................................................................. 152H II.H ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................ 166H CHAPTER NINE: CLEMENCY............................................................................................................H 178H IH NTRODUCTION TO THE ISSUE................................................................................................................. 178H I.H FACTUAL DISCUSSION.............................................................................................................. 180H II.H ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................ 187H CHAPTER TEN: CAPITALH JURY INSTRUCTIONS........................................................................ 197H IH NTRODUCTION TO THE ISSUE................................................................................................................. 197H I.H FACTUAL DISCUSSION.............................................................................................................. 198H II.H ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................ 213H CHAPTER ELEVEN: JUDICIALH INDEPENDENCE ........................................................................ 221H I.H FACTUAL DISCUSSION.............................................................................................................. 222H II.H ANALYSIS