Introduction to the Immune System
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
IFM Innate Immunity Infographic
UNDERSTANDING INNATE IMMUNITY INTRODUCTION The immune system is comprised of two arms that work together to protect the body – the innate and adaptive immune systems. INNATE ADAPTIVE γδ T Cell Dendritic B Cell Cell Macrophage Antibodies Natural Killer Lymphocites Neutrophil T Cell CD4+ CD8+ T Cell T Cell TIME 6 hours 12 hours 1 week INNATE IMMUNITY ADAPTIVE IMMUNITY Innate immunity is the body’s first The adaptive, or acquired, immune line of immunological response system is activated when the innate and reacts quickly to anything that immune system is not able to fully should not be present. address a threat, but responses are slow, taking up to a week to fully respond. Pathogen evades the innate Dendritic immune system T Cell Cell Through antigen Pathogen presentation, the dendritic cell informs T cells of the pathogen, which informs Macrophage B cells B Cell B cells create antibodies against the pathogen Macrophages engulf and destroy Antibodies label invading pathogens pathogens for destruction Scientists estimate innate immunity comprises approximately: The adaptive immune system develops of the immune memory of pathogen exposures, so that 80% system B and T cells can respond quickly to eliminate repeat invaders. IMMUNE SYSTEM AND DISEASE If the immune system consistently under-responds or over-responds, serious diseases can result. CANCER INFLAMMATION Innate system is TOO ACTIVE Innate system NOT ACTIVE ENOUGH Cancers grow and spread when tumor Certain diseases trigger the innate cells evade detection by the immune immune system to unnecessarily system. The innate immune system is respond and cause excessive inflammation. responsible for detecting cancer cells and This type of chronic inflammation is signaling to the adaptive immune system associated with autoimmune and for the destruction of the cancer cells. -
Balance Between Innate Versus Adaptive Immune System and the Risk of Dementia: a Population-Based Cohort Study Kimberly D
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Erasmus University Digital Repository Willik et al. Journal of Neuroinflammation (2019) 16:68 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-019-1454-z RESEARCH Open Access Balance between innate versus adaptive immune system and the risk of dementia: a population-based cohort study Kimberly D. van der Willik1,2†, Lana Fani1†, Dimitris Rizopoulos3, Silvan Licher1, Jesse Fest4, Sanne B. Schagen2,5, M. Kamran Ikram1,6† and M. Arfan Ikram1*† Abstract Background: Immunity has been suggested to be important in the pathogenesis of dementia. However, the contribution of innate versus adaptive immunity in the development of dementia is not clear. In this study, we aimed to investigate (1) the association between components of innate immunity (granulocytes and platelets) and adaptive immunity (lymphocytes) with risk of dementia and (2) the association between their derived ratios (granulocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio [GLR], platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio [PLR], and systemic immune-inflammation index [SII]), reflecting the balance between innate and adaptive immunity, with risk of dementia. Methods: Blood cell counts were measured repeatedly between 2002 and 2015 in dementia-free participants of the prospective population-based Rotterdam Study. Participants were followed-up for dementia until 1 January 2016. Joint models were used to determine the association between granulocyte, platelets, and lymphocyte counts, and their derived ratios with risk of dementia. Results: Of the 8313 participants (mean [standard deviation] age 61.1 [7.4] years, 56.9% women), 664 (8.0%) developed dementia during a median follow-up of 8.6 years. -
Immune Escape Mechanisms As a Guide for Cancer Immunotherapy Gregory L
Published OnlineFirst December 12, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1860 Perspectives Clinical Cancer Research Immune Escape Mechanisms as a Guide for Cancer Immunotherapy Gregory L. Beatty and Whitney L. Gladney Abstract Immunotherapy has demonstrated impressive outcomes for exploited by cancer and present strategies for applying this some patients with cancer. However, selecting patients who are knowledge to improving the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy. most likely to respond to immunotherapy remains a clinical Clin Cancer Res; 21(4); 1–6. Ó2014 AACR. challenge. Here, we discuss immune escape mechanisms Introduction fore, promote tumor outgrowth. In this process termed "cancer immunoediting," cancer clones evolve to avoid immune-medi- The immune system is a critical regulator of tumor biology with ated elimination by leukocytes that have antitumor properties the capacity to support or inhibit tumor development, growth, (6). However, some tumors may also escape elimination by invasion, and metastasis. Strategies designed to harness the recruiting immunosuppressive leukocytes, which orchestrate a immune system are the focus of several recent promising thera- microenvironment that spoils the productivity of an antitumor peutic approaches for patients with cancer. For example, adoptive immune response (7). Thus, although the immune system can be T-cell therapy has produced impressive remissions in patients harnessed, in some cases, for its antitumor potential, clinically with advanced malignancies (1). In addition, therapeutic mono- relevant tumors appear to be marked by an immune system that clonal antibodies designed to disrupt inhibitory signals received actively selects for poorly immunogenic tumor clones and/or by T cells through the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated antigen establishes a microenvironment that suppresses productive anti- 4 (CTLA-4; also known as CD152) and programmed cell death-1 tumor immunity (Fig. -
An Overview of the Role of Neutrophils in Innate Immunity, Inflammation and Host-Biomaterial Integration Gretchen S
Regenerative Biomaterials, 2017, 55–68 doi: 10.1093/rb/rbw041 Review An overview of the role of neutrophils in innate immunity, inflammation and host-biomaterial integration Gretchen S. Selders1, Allison E. Fetz1, Marko Z. Radic2 and Gary L. Bowlin1,* 1Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA and 2Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Biochemistry, University of Tennessee Health Science Center (UTHSC), Memphis, TN, USA, 858 Madison Ave, Room 201 Molecular Science Building, Memphis, TN 38163, USA *Correspondence address. Department of Biomedical Engineering, 330 Engineering Technology Building, 3806 Norriswood Ave. Memphis, TN 38152, USA. Tel: (901)678-2670; Fax: (901) 678-5281; E-mail:[email protected] Received 26 September 2016; revised 14 October 2016; accepted on 19 October 2016 Abstract Despite considerable recent progress in defining neutrophil functions and behaviors in tissue re- pair, much remains to be determined with regards to its overall role in the tissue integration of bio- materials. This article provides an overview of the neutrophil’s numerous, important roles in both inflammation and resolution, and subsequently, their role in biomaterial integration. Neutrophils function in three primary capacities: generation of oxidative bursts, release of granules and forma- tion of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs); these combined functions enable neutrophil involve- ment in inflammation, macrophage recruitment, M2 macrophage differentiation, resolution of in- flammation, angiogenesis, tumor formation and immune system activation. Neutrophils exhibit great flexibility to adjust to the prevalent microenvironmental conditions in the tissue; thus, the bio- material composition and fabrication will potentially influence neutrophil behavior following con- frontation. This review serves to highlight the neutrophil’s plasticity, reiterating that neutrophils are not just simple suicidal killers, but the true maestros of resolution and regeneration. -
Extracellular Vesicles in Innate Immune Cell Programming
biomedicines Review Extracellular Vesicles in Innate Immune Cell Programming Naveed Akbar 1,* , Daan Paget 1,2 and Robin P. Choudhury 1 1 Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK; [email protected] (D.P.); [email protected] (R.P.C.) 2 Department of Pharmacology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QT, UK * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Extracellular vesicles (EV) are a heterogeneous group of bilipid-enclosed envelopes that carry proteins, metabolites, RNA, DNA and lipids from their parent cell of origin. They mediate cellular communication to other cells in local tissue microenvironments and across organ systems. EV size, number and their biologically active cargo are often altered in response to pathological processes, including infection, cancer, cardiovascular diseases and in response to metabolic pertur- bations such as obesity and diabetes, which also have a strong inflammatory component. Here, we discuss the broad repertoire of EV produced by neutrophils, monocytes, macrophages, their pre- cursor hematopoietic stem cells and discuss their effects on the innate immune system. We seek to understand the immunomodulatory properties of EV in cellular programming, which impacts innate immune cell differentiation and function. We further explore the possibilities of using EV as immune targeting vectors, for the modulation of the innate immune response, e.g., for tissue preservation during sterile injury such as myocardial infarction or to promote tissue resolution of inflammation and potentially tissue regeneration and repair. Keywords: exosomes; transcription; neutrophil; monocyte; hematopoietic stem cell Citation: Akbar, N.; Paget, D.; Choudhury, R.P. Extracellular Vesicles in Innate Immune Cell Programming. -
Mast Cells in Infection and Immunity†
INFECTION AND IMMUNITY, Sept. 1997, p. 3501–3508 Vol. 65, No. 9 0019-9567/97/$04.0010 Copyright © 1997, American Society for Microbiology MINIREVIEW Mast Cells in Infection and Immunity† 1,2 2 SOMAN N. ABRAHAM * AND RAVI MALAVIYA Departments of Pathology and Molecular Microbiology, Washington University School of Medicine,1 and Department of Pathology, Barnes-Jewish Hospital of St. Louis,2 St. Louis, Missouri 63110 Mast cells remain one of the most enigmatic cells in the mediates binding of mast cells to parasitic helminths (46). body. These cells secrete significant amounts of numerous Parasitic helminths evoke a specific humoral immune response proinflammatory mediators which contribute to a number of in the host which involves, at least in part, the secretion of a chronic inflammatory conditions, including stress-induced in- large number of IgE antibodies (46). These antibodies become testinal ulceration, rheumatoid arthritis, interstitial cystitis, attached to mast cell surfaces because of the numerous IgE scleroderma, and Crohn’s disease (6, 14, 24, 76). Mast cells are receptors (FcεR) present on mast cell plasma membranes. also prominent in the development of anaphylaxis (14, 24, 76). Those IgE molecules that are specific for helminths then pro- Yet despite the negative effects of their secretions, mast cells mote mast cell binding to the parasite (56). Although IgE is not or mast cell-like cells have been described even among the commonly generated against bacteria, IgE specific to Helico- lowest order of animals (31). The phylogenic persistence of bacter pylori and Staphylococcus aureus has been reported in these cells through evolution strongly suggests that they are patients with peptic ulcers and atopic dermatitis, respectively beneficial in some fashion to the host. -
I M M U N O L O G Y Core Notes
II MM MM UU NN OO LL OO GG YY CCOORREE NNOOTTEESS MEDICAL IMMUNOLOGY 544 FALL 2011 Dr. George A. Gutman SCHOOL OF MEDICINE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE (Copyright) 2011 Regents of the University of California TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................... 3 CHAPTER 2 ANTIGEN/ANTIBODY INTERACTIONS ..............................................9 CHAPTER 3 ANTIBODY STRUCTURE I..................................................................17 CHAPTER 4 ANTIBODY STRUCTURE II.................................................................23 CHAPTER 5 COMPLEMENT...................................................................................... 33 CHAPTER 6 ANTIBODY GENETICS, ISOTYPES, ALLOTYPES, IDIOTYPES.....45 CHAPTER 7 CELLULAR BASIS OF ANTIBODY DIVERSITY: CLONAL SELECTION..................................................................53 CHAPTER 8 GENETIC BASIS OF ANTIBODY DIVERSITY...................................61 CHAPTER 9 IMMUNOGLOBULIN BIOSYNTHESIS ...............................................69 CHAPTER 10 BLOOD GROUPS: ABO AND Rh .........................................................77 CHAPTER 11 CELL-MEDIATED IMMUNITY AND MHC ........................................83 CHAPTER 12 CELL INTERACTIONS IN CELL MEDIATED IMMUNITY ..............91 CHAPTER 13 T-CELL/B-CELL COOPERATION IN HUMORAL IMMUNITY......105 CHAPTER 14 CELL SURFACE MARKERS OF T-CELLS, B-CELLS AND MACROPHAGES...............................................................111 -
The Relationship Between COVID-19 and Innate Immunity in Children: a Review
children Review The Relationship between COVID-19 and Innate Immunity in Children: A Review Piero Valentini 1,2,3, Giorgio Sodero 1 and Danilo Buonsenso 2,3,4,*,† 1 Istituto di Pediatria, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; [email protected] (P.V.); [email protected] (G.S.) 2 Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy 3 Global Health Research Institute, Istituto di Igiene, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy 4 Dipartimento di Scienze Biotecnologiche di Base, Cliniche Intensivologiche e Perioperatorie, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-063-015-4390 † Current address: Danilo Buonsenso, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy. Abstract: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the virus responsible for the pandemic viral pneumonia that was first identified in Wuhan, China, in December 2019, and has since rapidly spread around the world. The number of COVID-19 cases recorded in pediatric age is around 1% of the total. The immunological mechanisms that lead to a lower susceptibility or severity of pediatric patients are not entirely clear. At the same time, the immune dysregulation found in those children who developed the multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIC-S) is not yet fully understood. The aim of this review is to analyze the possible influence of children’s innate immune systems, considering the risk of contracting the virus, spreading it, and developing symptomatic disease or complications related to infection. Citation: Valentini, P.; Sodero, G.; Keywords: COVID-19; children; coronavirus; innate immunity; SARS-CoV-2; pandemic; MIC-S Buonsenso, D. -
The Innate Immune Response FUNCTIONS of the IMMUNE SYSTEM
The Innate Immune Response FUNCTIONS OF THE IMMUNE SYSTEM: • Recognize, destroy and clear a diversity of pathogens. • Initiate tissue and wound healing processes. • Recognize and clear damaged self components. Exhibit “tolerance” to innocuous material including self The Normal Immune Response The normal immune response is best understood in the context of defense against infectious pathogens, the classical definition of immunity. Innate immunity refers to defense mechanisms that have evolved to specifically recognize microbes and protect individuals against infections. Adaptive immunity consists of mechanisms that are stimulated and are capable of recognizing microbial and nonmicrobial substances. Innate immunity The first line of defense always ready to prevent and eradicate infections. Adaptive immunity Develops later, after exposure to microbes, and is even more powerful than innate immunity in combating infections. By convention, the term “immune response” refers to adaptive immunity. Innate and Adaptive immunity represent two different arms of the immune system that work together in host defense. Innate Immunity (natural/native): • Provides immediate protection from infection. • Is broadly specific to microbes and tissue damage products. • Does not change in response to reinfection (non-adaptive) • Initiates processes that lead to activation of adaptive immune responses. Adaptive Immunity (specific/acquired): • Appears to adapt to a variety of non-self components (acquired) • Is highly specific to a particular molecule “antigen” • Responses upon reinfection are faster, better and stronger (memory) • Generates proteins and cells that enhance innate immune function. http://classconnection.s3.amazonaws.com/536/flashcards/1317536/jpg/paneth_cell1332475911026.jpg INNATE IMMUNITY A major components of innate immunity are epithelial barriers that block entry of microbes. -
Mechanisms of Dysregulated Humoral and Cellular Immunity by SARS-Cov-2
pathogens Review Mechanisms of Dysregulated Humoral and Cellular Immunity by SARS-CoV-2 Nima Taefehshokr 1 , Sina Taefehshokr 2 and Bryan Heit 1,3,* 1 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Center for Human Immunology, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON N0M 2N0, Canada; [email protected] 2 Immunology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz 51368, Iran; [email protected] 3 Robarts Research Institute, London, ON N6A 5K8, Canada * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-519-661-3407 Received: 10 November 2020; Accepted: 6 December 2020; Published: 8 December 2020 Abstract: The current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, a disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), was first identified in December 2019 in China, and has led to thousands of mortalities globally each day. While the innate immune response serves as the first line of defense, viral clearance requires activation of adaptive immunity, which employs B and T cells to provide sanitizing immunity. SARS-CoV-2 has a potent arsenal of mechanisms used to counter this adaptive immune response through processes, such as T cells depletion and T cell exhaustion. These phenomena are most often observed in severe SARS-CoV-2 patients, pointing towards a link between T cell function and disease severity. Moreover, neutralizing antibody titers and memory B cell responses may be short lived in many SARS-CoV-2 patients, potentially exposing these patients to re-infection. In this review, we discuss our current understanding of B and T cells immune responses and activity in SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis. -
Ch33 WO Pt1.Pdf
33 Innate Host Resistance 1 33.1 Innate Resistance Overview 1. Identify the major components of the mammalian host immune system 2. Integrate the major immune components and their functions to explain in general terms how the immune system protects the host 2 Host Resistance Overview • Most pathogens (disease causing microbes) – must overcome surface barriers and reach underlying – overcome resistance by host • nonspecific resistance • specific immune response 3 Host Resistance Overview… • Immune system – composed of widely distributed cells, tissues, and organs – recognizes foreign substances or microbes and acts to neutralize or destroy them • Immunity – ability of host to resist a particular disease or infection • Immunology – science concerned with immune responses 4 Immunity • Nonspecific immune response – Aka nonspecific resistance, innate, or natural immunity – acts as a first line of defense – offers resistance to any microbe or foreign material – lacks immunological memory • Specific immune response – Aka acquired, adaptive, or specific immunity – resistance to a particular foreign agent – has “memory” • effectiveness increases on repeated exposure to agent 5 6 Antigens • Recognized as foreign • Invoke immune responses – presence of antigen in body ultimately results in B cell activation production of antibodies • antibodies bind to specific antigens, inactivating or eliminating them • other immune cells also become activated • Name comes from antibody generators 7 White Blood Cells of Innate and Adaptive Immunity • White blood -
Cells of the Immune System and Innate Immunity
Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology HST.176: Cellular and Molecular Immunology Course Director: Dr. Shiv Pillai Cells of the Immune System and Innate Immunity Recommended reading: Abbas et al., 4th edition, Chapters 2 and 12 Janeway and Travers, 5th edition, Chapters 1 and 10 The innate immune system is made up of molecules and cellular processes that defend the host within minutes and hours after exposure to a noxious stimulus. It is the only immune system in plants and invertebrates. Innate immune responses may initiate acute inflammation, which basically involves the accumulation and activation of phagocytes (mainly polymorphonuclear cells in man) and of vascular endothelium at sites of injury. In vertebrates, the innate and adaptive immune systems talk to each other and there is an important reciprocal interplay that operates between these systems. In these animals the cells and molecules of the innate immune system provide immediate protection and then set in motion the activation of the adaptive immune response. The adaptive immune response in turn “revs” up innate immune mechanisms of host defense. The innate immune system uses non-clonal “pattern recognition” receptors (PRRs) which cannot recognize host structures but which do recognize patterns found on microbes.These are sometimes called PAMPs for Pathogen Associated Molecular Patterns. Pathogens/ microbes The most common organisms that cause disease are viruses, bacteria, fungi, protozoa, and worms. A microbe (a small invader) or a worm that does not cause disease in most people may generally be classified as non-pathogenic. Such an organism will provoke an immune response in a normal immunocompetent host.