DOCSLIB.ORG

Procedural Cross Coder

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Procedural Cross Coder PCC.book Page 1 W ednesday, N ovem ber 23, 2011 10:17 AM Procedural Cross Coder Essential links from ICD-9-CM volume 3 procedure codes to CPT® and HCPCS Level II codes 2013 PCC.book Page i W ednesday, N ovem ber 23, 2011 10:17 AM Contents Introduction.............................................................. i Operations on the Hemic and Lymphatic History..........................................................................i System (40–41) ................................................ 121 Format..........................................................................i Operations on the Digestive System (42–54) ....... 127 Organization.................................................................i Operations on the Urinary System (55–59) ......... 170 Crosswalking the Codes...............................................ii Operations on the Male Genital Organs Procedures and Interventions NEC (00) .................. 1 (60–64) ............................................................. 184 Operations on the Nervous System (01–05) ............ 8 Operations on the Female Genital Organs Operations on the Endocrine System (06–07) ....... 26 (65–71) ............................................................. 193 Operations on the Eye (08–16) .............................. 31 Obstetrical Procedures (72–75) ........................... 211 Other Miscellaneous Diagnositic and Operations on the Musculoskeletal Therapeutic Procedures (17.1–17.71) ................ 52 System (76–84) ................................................. 217 Operations on the Ear (18–20) .............................. 55 Operations on the Integumentary Operations on the Nose Mouth, and System (85–86) ................................................. 288 Pharynx (21–29) ................................................. 61 Miscellaneous Diagnostic and Therapeutic Operations on the Respiratory System (30–34)..... 77 Procedures (87–99)........................................... 305 Operations on the Cardiovascular Glossary ............................................................... 387 System (35–39)................................................... 87 © 2011 Optum CPT © 2011 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. i PCC.book Page i W ednesday, N ovem ber 23, 2011 10:17 AM Introduction Parallel procedural coding systems have been in place in U.S. • Each ICD-9-CM volume 3 code is linked to all applicable CPT medical reimbursement circles for decades. ICD-9-CM volume 3, codes, which are printed with their official, complete AMA established in 1975 by the federal Centers for Medicare and descriptions. Medicaid Services (CMS), is now in its fifth edition. ICD-9-CM, • Each ICD-9-CM volume 3 code is linked to all applicable volume 3 is the coding system used by hospitals to report inpatient surgical HCPCS codes. care. The American Medical Association’s (AMA) Current Procedural Terminology (CPT®), first published in 1966, is now in its fourth • All ICD-9-CM volume 3 codes are valid and of the highest edition. This coding system covers outpatient (office) services, and level of specificity. inpatient (hospital) services performed specifically by the • The ICD-9-CM volume 3, CPT, and HCPCS code sets have physician. Each system has strengths within the market it serves. been updated to include 2011 changes. Until recently, each was autonomous. Organization Today’s consolidated health care environment is creating conflicts Prior to using the OptumInsight 2012 Procedural Cross Coder, take between the two systems. Many hospitals operate outpatient the time to study the format and to understand the conventions of facilities in which CPT coding is used instead of ICD-9-CM ICD-9-CM and CPT coding. The crosswalk is organized similar to procedural coding. With the advent of ambulatory surgical centers ICD-9-CM volume 3. These codes are presented in numeric order, and physician office surgical suites, many procedures that were and the section title from ICD-9-CM appears at the top of each once performed exclusively for inpatient services now can be page. The sections are organized by anatomy, rather than surgical performed as either inpatient or outpatient services. Consequently, specialty: two coding systems are in use for the same procedures. Procedures and Interventions, NEC (00) Managers have difficulty tracking frequencies or costs when the Operations on the Nervous System (01-05) facility data contains both ICD-9-CM and CPT codes. Payers and government statisticians become mired in tracking trends when Operations on the Endocrine System (06-07) their statistics contain both code sets. The OptumInsight 2012 Operations on the Eye (08-16) Procedural Cross Coder is designed to act as a bridge to connect Other Miscellaneous Diagnostic and Therapeutic ICD-9-CM procedural codes and CPT codes. It gives coders an Procedures (17) easy-to-use reference when selecting the correct CPT procedural Operations on the Ear (18-20) code from ICD-9-CM volume 3 codes. The crosswalk translates the Operations on the Nose, Mouth, and Pharynx (21-29) selected procedural codes for services provided by the physician in either the inpatient or outpatient setting. Operations on the Respiratory System (30-34) History Operations on the Cardiovascular System (35-39) Operations on the Hemic and Lymphatic Systems (40-41) ICD-9-CM volume 3 draws heavily from procedural classifications developed in the early 1970s by an international committee Operations on the Digestive System (42-54) sponsored by the World Health Organization (WHO). Significant Operations on the Urinary System (55-59) work on surgical procedures for this project came from the United Operations on the Male Genital Organs (60-64) States, and that original work is the basis for today’s ICD-9-CM, Operations on the Female Genital Organs (65-71) volume 3. Current procedural coding evolved from a three- to Obstetrical Procedures (72-75) four-digit system necessitated by the demand for more specific clinical detail. Operations on the Musculoskeletal System (76-84) Operations on the Integumentary System (85-86) CMS maintains the volume 3 codes, which include operative, diagnostic, and therapeutic procedures. Annual code revisions Miscellaneous Diagnostic and Therapeutic Procedures (87-99) reflect the goal of a procedure coding system that can be used with The most important factor in ICD-9-CM procedure coding is equal efficiency both in hospitals and other primary care settings. understanding the rules. Format Only valid codes—those that are coded to their highest level of OptumInsight 2012 Procedural Cross Coder offers these features: specificity—are included in the crosswalk. If you are seeking information about a code that is not at its highest level of specificity, • Numeric listing of all valid ICD-9-CM volume 3 codes and you should seek your answer among all the valid codes within that their official, complete government descriptions. rubric. For instance, if you are working with the invalid code 24.3, review 24.31, 24.32, and 24.39 for the best CPT crosswalk. © 2011 Optum CPT © 2011 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. i Procedural Cross Coder 45.62 45.41 45383 Colonoscopy, flexible, proximal to splenic flexure; with ablation of tumor(s), polyp(s), or other lesion(s) not amenable to removal by hot biopsy forceps, bipolar cautery or Excision of lesion or tissue of large intestine snare technique CPT Codes 45384 Colonoscopy, flexible, proximal to splenic flexure; with removal of tumor(s), polyp(s), 44110 Excision of 1 or more lesions of small or large intestine not requiring anastomosis, or other lesion(s) by hot biopsy forceps or bipolar cautery exteriorization, or fistulization; single enterotomy 45385 Colonoscopy, flexible, proximal to splenic flexure; with removal of tumor(s), polyp(s), 44111 Excision of 1 or more lesions of small or large intestine not requiring anastomosis, or other lesion(s) by snare technique exteriorization, or fistulization; multiple enterotomies 45.49 45.42 Other destruction of lesion of large intestine Endoscopic polypectomy of large intestine CPT Codes CPT Codes 44799 Unlisted procedure, intestine 44392 Colonoscopy through stoma; with removal of tumor(s), polyp(s), or other lesion(s) by hot biopsy forceps or bipolar cautery 45.50 44393 Colonoscopy through stoma; with ablation of tumor(s), polyp(s), or other lesion(s) not Isolation of intestinal segment, not otherwise specified amenable to removal by hot biopsy forceps, bipolar cautery or snare technique 44394 Colonoscopy through stoma; with removal of tumor(s), polyp(s), or other lesion(s) by CPT Codes snare technique See code for primary procedure. 45320 Proctosigmoidoscopy, rigid; with ablation of tumor(s), polyp(s), or other lesion(s) not amenable to removal by hot biopsy forceps, bipolar cautery or snare technique (eg, 45.51 laser) Isolation of segment of small intestine 45333 Sigmoidoscopy, flexible; with removal of tumor(s), polyp(s), or other lesion(s) by hot biopsy forceps or bipolar cautery CPT Codes 45338 Sigmoidoscopy, flexible; with removal of tumor(s), polyp(s), or other lesion(s) by snare See code for primary procedure. technique 45339 Sigmoidoscopy, flexible; with ablation of tumor(s), polyp(s), or other lesion(s) not 45.52 amenable to removal by hot biopsy forceps, bipolar cautery or snare technique Isolation of segment of large intestine 45383 Colonoscopy, flexible, proximal to splenic flexure; with ablation of tumor(s), polyp(s), or other lesion(s) not amenable to removal by hot biopsy forceps, bipolar
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 Colonoscopy-Related Costs
    Digestive Health Network, Inc. List of Tables Top 10 Physician Specialties Performing Colonoscopies, Medicare Fee-for- Table 1 Service, 2015 Colonoscopy-related Costs, Medicare Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries who Table 2 Received a Screening or Diagnostic Colonoscopy, 2015 Colonoscopy-related Costs, Medicare Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries who Table 3 Received a Colonoscopy in an Ambulatory Surgical Center (ASC), Hospital Outpatient Department, or Physician Office, 2015 Proportion of Medicare Fee-for-Service Medicare Beneficiaries who Received Table 4 a Colonoscopy and were Treated in the Emergency Department within 7 Days of the procedure, 2015 Digestive Health Network, Inc. Responses to Questions Among Medicare beneficiaries, how many colonoscopies are performed in the US, by type of Q1 physician? Nearly 2 million screening and diagnostic colonoscopies were performed in 2015. Of these, over 78% were performed by a gastroenterologist. Nearly 10% were performed by a general surgeon and about 6% were performed by an internal medicine specialist. These results are shown in Table 1. Q2 What proportion of spending on colonoscopies is accounted for by physician services? In 2015, Medicare expenditures associated with colonoscopies totaled over $1.3 billion. (This excludes anesthesiology, pathology, radiology, and other costs identified in Table 2.) Approximately 31% of this amount, or $416 million was associated with professional fees. Q3 What share of Part B Medicare spending is accounted for by colonoscopies? Medicare Part B expenditures in 2015 totaled over $131 billion (data not shown). Colonoscopy costs accounted for approximately 1.03% of this total. Q4 What are the costs associated with colonoscopies for the different settings of care? Costs associated with colonoscopies in ambulatory surgical centers (ASC), hospital outpatient departments (HOPD), and physician offices are shown in Table 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Utility of the Digital Rectal Examination in the Emergency Department: a Review
    The Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 43, No. 6, pp. 1196–1204, 2012 Published by Elsevier Inc. Printed in the USA 0736-4679/$ - see front matter http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.06.015 Clinical Reviews UTILITY OF THE DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT: A REVIEW Chad Kessler, MD, MHPE*† and Stephen J. Bauer, MD† *Department of Emergency Medicine, Jesse Brown VA Medical Center and †University of Illinois-Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois Reprint Address: Chad Kessler, MD, MHPE, Department of Emergency Medicine, Jesse Brown Veterans Hospital, 820 S Damen Ave., M/C 111, Chicago, IL 60612 , Abstract—Background: The digital rectal examination abdominal pain and acute appendicitis. Stool obtained by (DRE) has been reflexively performed to evaluate common DRE doesn’t seem to increase the false-positive rate of chief complaints in the Emergency Department without FOBTs, and the DRE correlated moderately well with anal knowing its true utility in diagnosis. Objective: Medical lit- manometric measurements in determining anal sphincter erature databases were searched for the most relevant arti- tone. Published by Elsevier Inc. cles pertaining to: the utility of the DRE in evaluating abdominal pain and acute appendicitis, the false-positive , Keywords—digital rectal; utility; review; Emergency rate of fecal occult blood tests (FOBT) from stool obtained Department; evidence-based medicine by DRE or spontaneous passage, and the correlation be- tween DRE and anal manometry in determining anal tone. Discussion: Sixteen articles met our inclusion criteria; there INTRODUCTION were two for abdominal pain, five for appendicitis, six for anal tone, and three for fecal occult blood.
    [Show full text]
  • Unicompartmental Knee Replacement
    This is a repository copy of Unicompartmental Knee Replacement. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/120113/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Takahashi, T, Pandit, HG orcid.org/0000-0001-7392-8561 and Phil, D (2017) Unicompartmental Knee Replacement. Journal of Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery, 4 (2). pp. 55-60. ISSN 0021-8790 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jajs.2017.08.009 © 2017 International Society for Knowledge for Surgeons on Arthroscopy and Arthroplasty. Published by Elsevier, a division of RELX India, Pvt. Ltd. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Reuse This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND) licence. This licence only allows you to download this work and share it with others as long as you credit the authors, but you can’t change the article in any way or use it commercially. More information and the full terms of the licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Accepted Manuscript Title: Unicompartmental Knee Replacement Author: Tsuneari Takahashi PII: S2214-9635(17)30041-X DOI: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.jajs.2017.08.009 Reference: JAJS 97 To appear in: Authors: Hemant G.
    [Show full text]
  • High Resolution Anoscopy Overview
    High Resolution Anoscopy Overview Naomi Jay, RN, NP, PhD University of California San Francisco Email: [email protected] Disclosures No Disclosures Definition of HRA Examination of the anus, anal canal and perianus using a colposcope with 5% acetic acid and Lugol’s solution. Basic Principles • Office-based procedure • Adapted from gynecologic colposcopy. • Validated for anal canal. • Similar terminology and descriptors. may be unfamiliar to non-gyn providers. • Comparable to vaginal and vulvar colposcopy. • Clinicians familiar with cervical colposcopy may be surprised by the difficult transition. Anal SCJ & AnTZ • Original vs. current SCJ less relevant. • TZ features less common, therefore more difficult to appreciate. • SCJ more subtle, difficult to see in entirety requires more manipulation & acetic acid. • Larger area of metaplastic changes overlying columnar epithelium compared to endocervix. • Most lesions found in the AnTZ. Atypical Metaplasia • Atypical metaplasia may indicate the presence of HSIL. • Radiate over distal rectum from SCJ. • Thin, may wipe off. • Features to look for indicating potential lesions: • Atypical clustered glands (ACG) • Lacy metaplastic borders (LM) • Epithelial Honeycombing (EH) Lugol’s. Staining • More utility in anus compared to cervix. • Adjunctive to help define borders, distinguish between possible LSIL/HSIL. • Most HSIL will be Lugol’s negative • LSIL may be Lugol’s partial or negative • Applied focally with small cotton swabs to better define an acetowhite lesion. •NOT a short cut to determine presence or absence of lesions, acetic acid is used first and is applied frequently. Anal vs. Cervical Characteristics • Punctation & Mosaic rarely “fine” mostly “coarse”. • Mosaic pattern mostly associated with HSIL. • Atypical vessels may be HSIL or cancer • Epithelial honeycombing & lacy metaplasia unique anal descriptors.
    [Show full text]
  • Flexible Sigmoidoscopy in Asymptomatic Patients with Negative Fecal Occult Blood Tests Joy Garrison Cauffman, Phd, Jimmy H
    Flexible Sigmoidoscopy in Asymptomatic Patients with Negative Fecal Occult Blood Tests Joy Garrison Cauffman, PhD, Jimmy H. Hara, MD, Irving M. Rasgon, MD, and Virginia A. Clark, PhD Los Angeles, California Background. Although the American Cancer Society and tients with lesions were referred for colonoscopy; addi­ others haw established guidelines for colorectal cancer tional lesions were found in 14%. A total of 62 lesions screening, questions of who and how to screen still exist. were discovered, including tubular adenomas, villous Methods. A 60-crn flexible sigmoidoscopy was per­ adenomas, tubular villous adenomas (23 of the adeno­ formed on 1000 asymptomatic patients, 45 years of mas with atypia), and one adenocarcinoma. The high­ age or older, with negative fecal occult blood tests, est percentage of lesions discovered were in the sig­ who presented for routine physical examinations. Pa­ moid colon and the second highest percentage were in tients with clinically significant lesions were referred for the ascending colon. colonoscopy. The proportion of lesions that would not Conclusions. The 60-cm flexible sigmoidoscope was have been found if the 24-cm rigid or the 30-cm flexi­ able to detect more lesions than either the 24-cm or ble sigmoidoscope had been used was identified. 30-cm sigmoidoscope when used in asymptomatic pa­ Results. Using the 60-cm flexible sigmoidoscope, le­ tients, 45 years of age and over, with negative fecal oc­ sions were found in 3.6% of the patients. Eighty per­ cult blood tests. When significant lesions are discovered cent of the significant lesions were beyond the reach of by sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy should be performed.
    [Show full text]
  • Ilizarov Method for Wound Closure and Bony Union of an Open Grade IIIB
    WWW.CRCPR-ONLINE.COM Case Rep Clin Pract Rev, 2004; 5(1): xxx-xxx Case Report Received: 2003.01.10 Accepted: 2003.05.22 Ilizarov method for wound closure and bony union of Published: 2004.00.00 an open grade IIIB tibia fracture John E. Mullen, M.D., S. Robert Rozbruch, M.D., Arkady Blyakher, M.D., David L. Helfet, M.D. Limb Lengthening Service, Orthopedic Trauma Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York Summary Background: The treatment of tibia fractures with a critical sized wound is complicated. When primary closure is not possible, the classic options are rotational or free flap coverage. Soft-tissue coverage is critical to avoid infection. There are instances when flap coverage is not an option. We present an alternative technique for simultaneous bone healing and soft tissue closure using the Ilizarov method. Case report: A grade IIIB open tibia fracture was treated with an Ilizarov external fixator. Wound debridement, removal of loose bone fragments and gradual compression across the fracture site led to bony shortening and union. Soft tissue transport led to secondary wound closure. An excellent anatomic and functional outcome resulted. Conclusions: This technique of bone and soft-tissue transport may prove useful in the treatment of tibia fractures with difficult to close wounds or for patients who are not candidates for flap coverage. Key words: Ilizarov•tibia•wound Full-text PDF: http://www.crcpr-online.com/pub/vol_5/no_1/3389.pdf Word count: 1506 Tables: - Figures: 8 References: 19 Author’s address: GS. Robert Rozbruch, M.D., Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, New York 10021, phone: (212) 606-1415, fax: (212) 774-2744, e-mail: [email protected] 1 Case Report BACKGROUND Open fractures of the tibial shaft are both common and may be fraught with complications.
    [Show full text]
  • Combined Endo-Laparoscopic Surgery for Difficult Benign Colorectal Polyps
    485 Review Article (Current Strategies in Colon Cancer Management) Combined endo-laparoscopic surgery for difficult benign colorectal polyps Zhong-Hui Liu1, Li Jiang1, Fion Siu-Yin Chan1,2, Michael Ka-Wah Li3, Joe King-Man Fan1,2,3 1Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518053, China; 2Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; 3Asia-Pacific Endo-Lap Surgery Group (APELS), Hong Kong, China Contributions: (I) Conception and design: JKM Fan, MKW Li; (II) Administrative support: MKW Li; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: FSY Chan; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: ZH Liu, L Jiang; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: ZH Liu; FSY Chan; JKM Fan; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors. Correspondence to: Joe King-Man Fan, MBBS (HK), MS (HKU), FRCSEd, FACS. Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518053, China. Email: [email protected]. Abstract: Prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC) depends largely on the detection and removal of colorectal polyps. Despite the advances in endoscopic techniques, there are still a subgroup of polyps that cannot be treated purely by endoscopic approach, which comprise of about 10–15% of all the polyps. These so-called “difficult colorectal polyps” are polyps with large size, morphology, at difficult location, scarring or due to recurrence, which have historically been managed by surgical segmental resection. In treating benign difficult colorectal polyps, we have to balance the operative risks and morbidities associated with surgical segmental resection. Therefore, combined endoscopic and laparoscopic surgery (CELS) has been developed to remove this subgroup of difficult benign polyps.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 History of Laparoscopic Surgery
    Chapter 1 History of Laparoscopic Surgery Kiyokazu Nakajima, Jeffrey W. Milsom, and Bartholomäus Böhm Although laparoscopic surgery has transformed surgery only in the past two decades, its evolution is only the natural byproduct of the medical doctor’s curiosity to directly visualize and treat surgical dis- eases. The earliest known attempts to look inside the living human body date from 460 to 375 BC, from the Kos school of medicine led by Hippocrates in Greece.1,2 They described a rectal examination using a speculum remarkably similar to the instruments we use today. Similar specula were discovered in the ruins of Pompeii (70 AD) that were used to examine the vagina, the cervix, and the rectum, and obtain an inside view of the nose and ear.1 The Babylonian Talmud written in 500 AD described a lead siphon, named “Siphophert,” with a mouthpiece, which was bent inward and held a mechul (wooden drain).1,3 The apparatus was introduced into the vagina and was used to differentiate between vaginal and uterine bleeding. During these early years ambient light was used. The term “endoscopein” is attributed to Avicenna (Ibn Sina, 980–1037 AD) of Persia, although an Arabian physician, Albulassim (912–1013 AD), who placed a mirror in front of the exposed vagina, was the fi rst to use refl ected light as a source of illumination for an endoscopic examination. Giulio Caesare Aranzi in Venice (1530–1589) developed the fi rst endoscopic light in 1587. He used the Benedictine monk Don Panuce’s principle of the “camera obscura” for medical purposes – the
    [Show full text]
  • What Is a Rigid Sigmoidoscopy?
    Learning about . Rigid Sigmoidoscopy What is a rigid sigmoidoscopy? Rigid sigmoidoscopy is a procedure done to look at the rectum and lower colon. The doctor uses a special tube called a scope. The scope has a light and a small glass window at the end so the doctor can see inside. lower colon rectum anus or opening to rectum This procedure is done for many reasons. Some reasons are: • to look for the cause of rectal bleeding • a tissue sample to test called a biopsy When small growths of tissue called polyps are seen, these are removed. The procedure takes about 5 minutes but plan to be at the hospital for ½ hour. Are there any complications to this procedure? Your doctor will explain the problems that can occur before you sign a consent form. Problems are rare but include: The scope can damage the lining of the colon. The scope can cause severe bleeding by damaging the wall of the colon. You may have blood spotting if a biopsy is done or a polyp is removed. Since the doctor and nurse are with you all of the time, they can manage any problem that may occur. What do I need to do to get ready at home? 4 to 5 days before your procedure: Taking medications: Your doctor may want you to stop taking certain medications 4 to 5 days before the procedure. If you need to stop any medications, your doctor will tell you during the office visit. If you have any questions, call the doctor’s office. Buying a Fleet enema: Your bowel must be clean and empty of waste material before this procedure.
    [Show full text]
  • ICD~10~PCS Complete Code Set Procedural Coding System Sample
    ICD~10~PCS Complete Code Set Procedural Coding System Sample Table.of.Contents Preface....................................................................................00 Mouth and Throat ............................................................................. 00 Introducton...........................................................................00 Gastrointestinal System .................................................................. 00 Hepatobiliary System and Pancreas ........................................... 00 What is ICD-10-PCS? ........................................................................ 00 Endocrine System ............................................................................. 00 ICD-10-PCS Code Structure ........................................................... 00 Skin and Breast .................................................................................. 00 ICD-10-PCS Design ........................................................................... 00 Subcutaneous Tissue and Fascia ................................................. 00 ICD-10-PCS Additional Characteristics ...................................... 00 Muscles ................................................................................................. 00 ICD-10-PCS Applications ................................................................ 00 Tendons ................................................................................................ 00 Understandng.Root.Operatons..........................................00
    [Show full text]
  • Hybrid Procedure Offers a Less Invasive Alternative to Colectomy
    The better way to get better Hybrid procedure offers a less invasive alternative to colectomy Insufflation gas provides important advantage The colonoscopy-laparoscopy procedure is made possible through the combined skills of the gastroenterologist and laparoscopic surgeon, and the use of CO2 rather than ambient air for insufflation — the introduction of gas into the colon to improve visibility. CO2 is more quickly absorbed by the gastrointestinal tract and results in less bowel distension, giving the laparoscopic surgeon a better field of vision within the abdominal cavity. © Copyright Olympus. Used with permission. “Some patients who would have required a bowel resection can instead benefit from this A new, minimally invasive procedure that is a hybrid of colonoscopy and less invasive procedure. We’re laparoscopy is proving to be a safe and effective alternative to open colectomy using this combined technique (removal of part of the colon) for patients with benign colon polyps that are as a way for patients to avoid colectomy,” explains James not removable endoscopically. Yoo, M.D., a colorectal surgeon Patients who undergo this hybrid procedure experience less pain and often go at UCLA. “This procedure home after only one or two days. Scarring and wound complications are minimal involves tiny incisions for the as the laparoscopic surgeon makes only small, keyhole incisions in the abdomen laparoscopic instruments and patients stay in the hospital only rather than the long incision characteristic of a traditional colectomy. a day or two.” WWW.UCLAHEALTH.ORG 1-800-UCLA-MD1 (1-800-825-2631) Who can benefit from the procedure? Participating When a routine colonoscopy reveals polyps, they are usually removed at the Physicians time of the procedure as a precaution against their progression to cancer.
    [Show full text]
  • External Fixation
    External Fixation. Basic principles. Biomechanics Dynamization Selected constructs External Fixation Frame biomechanics The required strength of an external frame depends on the intended function of the fixator and the degree of fracture instability. With any frame, following the basic biomechanical principles helps to ensure a stable fixation.1 a b Options to increase frame stability a. Increase the distance between the two outermost Schanz screws in each fragment. c Note: Innermost Schanz screws should be at least 2 cm from the fracture line. b b. Increase the number of Schanz screws in each fragment. c. Reduce the distance between the rod and bone. d. Add a second rod or tube in the same plane, with the clamps in close contact (i.e., double-stacking). e. Use a larger diameter Schanz screw. Increasing the diameter by 1 mm more than doubles the stiffness and nearly doubles the strength. In the tibia, since sagittal bending moments are approximately d two to five times greater than those in the coronal plane, placing the frame in the sagittal plane will increase frame stability. To be mechanically effective, the stiffness of the external fixation frame should match the forces and moments at the fracture site. This sagittal-to-coronal stiffness ratio can be achieved if the Schanz screws are oriented in the AP direction.2 Note: The same factors that increase frame stability for unilateral frames apply to modular frames. e 1. F. Behrens and K. Searls. “External Fixation of the Tibia.” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 68 (1986): 246–254. 2. Ibid. Synthes External Fixation Increase load-sharing to stimulate callus formation When the external fixation frame is used as definitive treatment for a fracture, the surgeon may wish to increase load-sharing.
    [Show full text]