DOCSLIB.ORG

C 218 Liquor Licence Act Ontario

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
C 218 Liquor Licence Act Ontario Ontario: Revised Statutes 1960 c 218 Liquor Licence Act Ontario © Queen's Printer for Ontario, 1960 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/rso Bibliographic Citation Liquor Licence Act , SO 1966, c 218 Repository Citation Ontario (1960) "c 218 Liquor Licence Act," Ontario: Revised Statutes: Vol. 1960: Iss. 2, Article 93. Available at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/rso/vol1960/iss2/93 This Statutes is brought to you for free and open access by the Statutes at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Ontario: Revised Statutes by an authorized administrator of Osgoode Digital Commons. Sec. 1 (,) LIQUOR LICENCE Chap. 218 1161 CHAPTER 218 The Liquor Licence Act Interpre­ 1. In this Act, tation (a) "beer" means beer as defined In The Liquor Control ~·~S· 1960, Act; (b) "Board" means the Liquor Licence Board of On­ tario; (e) "club" means a club, (i) that is organized in the manner prescribed by the regulations, (ii) that has the special accommodation, facilities and equipment that are prescribed by the regu­ lations. (iii) that has for its objects definite purposes of a social, recreational or patriotic nature, (iv) that has not fewer than fifty members, (v) in which the members whose names and addres· ses arc entered in a list of members and whose dues arc paid in the manller prescribed by the rules or by·laws of the club may vote for all purposes of the dub, (vi) that is not operated for pecuniary gain, and (vii) that'has been organized and in active operation for not less than onc year prior to the time of application for a liccncc; (d) "dining loungc" means the p..'trt of an establishmcnt that has thc special accommodation. facilities and equipmcnt that are prescribed by the regulations where, in consideration of payment, food and the special services that are prescribed by thc regulations are regularly furnished to the public and liquor is served with meals; (e) "dining room" mC<1.IlS the p.1.rt of an establishmcnt that has the special accommodation, facilities and equipment that arc prescribed by the regulalions 1162 Chap. 218 LIQUOR LICENCE Sec. I (,) and that is used exclusively for the serving of regu­ lar meals in consideration of payment therefor as well as the sale of cigars, cigarettes, tobacco and other articles i oddental to the sale of regular meals; (f) "establishment" means a club, hotel, inn, public house, tavern, military mcss, restaurant, railway car or steamship having premises that comply with the requirements of this Act and the regulations pre­ scribing the Qualifications of premises in respect of which licences may be issued; (g) "hotel" or "inn" means an establishment in regular operation that has the special accommodation, facil­ ities and equipment that arc prescribed by the regula­ tions where. in consideration of payment. food and lodging are regularly furnished to the public and having, (i) in municipalities with a population of over 100,000, not less than fifty bedrooms, Oi) in cities with a population of less than 100,000 and in towns, not less than twenty bedrooms, and (iii) in any other part of Ontario, not less than ten bedrooms, and in every case having a sufficient number of bed· rooms to serve the needs of the community where thc establishmcnt is located; (It) "justice" means a magistrate, and whcre no magis· tratc is available, means two or more justices of the peace; (i) "last revised list of the municipality" means the voters' Jist for thc municipality as finally rcvised; U) "Iicencc" means a licencc provided for and issued under this Act; (k) "liccnsed prcmises" mcans prcmises for which a licence is issllcd undcr this Act; (I) "Iiccnsing district" means a liccnsing district con­ stituted under this Act; R.S.O. 1960, L~·q!lor c.217 (m) "liquor" means liquor as dcfmed in The Con­ trol Act; (n) "lounge" means the part of an establishment that has thc special accommodation, facilities and equip­ ment that are prescribed by the regulations where, in consideration of payment, liquor is served; Soc. I (x) LIQUOR LICENCE Chap. 218 1163 (0) "military mess" includes a canteen and an institute in a building or camp used for the accommodation of the active or reserve units of the naval, military or air forces of Canada; (p) "Minister" means the member of the Executive Council to whom for the time being is assigned the administration of lhisAct; (q) "Ontario wine" means Ontario wine as defined m R.8.0. 1960, The Liquor Control Act; c.217 (r) "public house" means an establishment or part of an establishment that has the special accommodation, facilities and equipment that arc prescribed by the regulations where, ill consideration of payment, beer is served; (5) "railway car" means a railway dining car, railway buffet car, railway club caf or a drawing-room, bed­ room orcompartment in a railway sleeping car; (I) "regulations" means the regulations made under this Act; (It) "restaurant" means .m establishment that is exclu­ sively engaged in the serving of regular meals to the public, in consideration of payment, as well as the sale of cigars, cigarettes, tobacco and other articles incidental to the sale of regular meals; (v) "steamship" means a vessel propelled through watcr by any power other than muscular power that carries passengers and plies regularly between any port in Ontario and any port in or outside Ontario; (w) "tavern" means an cstablishmcnt having separate parts thereof that have the special accommodation, facilities and equipmcnt that arc prescribed by the regulations for at least two of the following classes of licences: (i) dining lounge liccncc, (ii) diningroorn licence, (iii) lounge licence, (iv) public house liccnce; (x) "wine" means wine as dcfmed in The Liguor COl/trot Act. R.S.O. 1950, c. 211, s. I; 1960, c. 60, s. t, revised. 1164 Chap. 218 LIQUOR LICENCE Sec. 2 THE BOARD The Liquor LIcence 2. The Liquor Licence Boord of Ontario is continued and Board or Ontarlo shall consist of three members appointed by the Lieutenant Governor in Council. R.S.O. 1950, c. 211, s. 2. ChaIrman end vl<::(l_ 3. The Lieutenant Governor in Council may designate one chairman of the members of the Board as chairman and another of the members as vice-chairman. R.S.O. 1950, c. 211, s. 3. Quorum 4. Two members of the Board constitute a Quorum. R.S.O. 1950, c. 211. s. 4. Diaquall11.­ cation, 5. No member, registrar, deputy registrar, official, inspec­ membelll and ll.tal'l' tor or employee of the Board shall by himself, his partner or agent have any interest directly or indirectly in, (a) a person, company, corporation, partnership, syndi· cate or other organization engaged in the manufac· ture, sale or distribution of liquor; (b) any licensed premises; or (c) any contract of any nature in respect of any licensed. premises, or any premises upon which liquor is manu· facturcd, produced, sold or kept for sale. R.S.O. 1950,c. 211, s. 5. salarlce or Board 6. The members of the Board shall be paid such salaries as arc fixed by the Lieutenant Governor in Council. R.S.O. 1950, c. 211, s. 6. Stnrr 7. Thr: staff of the Board shall consist of a registrar, deputy registrars and such officials, inspectors and employees as the Board, with the approval of the Lieutenant Governor in Council, appoints. R.S.O. 1950, c. 211, s. 7. Salaries ohtatr 8. The registrar, deputy registrars, officers, inspectors and employees of the Board shall be paid such salaries or other remuneration as the Board, with the approval of the Lieu­ tenant Governor in Council, determines. R.S.O. 1950, c. 211, s. 8. SpoolllL ll.ervlceo:1 O. When the Board, by virtue of any power vested in it, appoints or directs any person, other than a member of the staff of the Board, to perform any service, such person shall be paid such sum for services and expcnse-s as the Board, with the approval of the Lieutenant Governor in Council, deter­ mines. R.S.O. 1950, c. 211, s. 9. Sec. 16 <aJ LIQUOR LlCBNCE Chap. 218 1165 10. The salaries or other remuneration of the members of :a'i::r.:.nt of the Board, the registrar, deputy registrars, officials, inspectors and employees and all other expenses of the Board shall be p..'lid monthly by the Liquor Control Board of Ontario. R.S.O. 1950, c. 211, s. to. 11. No member of the Board, registrar, deputy registrar, ~o~~:li~o{o official, inspector or employee of the Board is compellable to testlfy give testimony in a court of civil jurisdiction with regard to information obtained by him in the discharge of his official duty, or to produce any files, papers, information, reports, correspondence or other documents relating to the business of the Board. R.S.O. 1950, c. 211, s. 11. 12. The books and records of the Board are at all times t~:~~ or subject to examination and audit by the Provincial Auditor and such other person as the Lieutenant Governor in Council authorizes in that behalf. R.S.O. 1950, c. 211, s. 12. LICENSING DISTRICTS 13. The Lieutenant Governor in Council may designate ~ll:t'r~g~g areas in Ontario as licensing districts. R.S.O. 1950, c. 211, s. 13. PROCEEDINGS BEFORE AND INVESTIGATIONS BY THE BOARD 14. Proceedings before the Board shall be instituted by ~~~~~~g8 application and the Board may make such orders, give such directions and issue such certificates as it ucems proper or as are necessary or incidental to the exercise of its powers.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Local Option Laws in Ontario Sacred Boundaries: Local Opi'ion Laws in Ontario
    SACRED BOUNDARIES: LOCAL OPTION LAWS IN ONTARIO SACRED BOUNDARIES: LOCAL OPI'ION LAWS IN ONTARIO By. KATHY LENORE BROCK, B.A. A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts McMaster University September 1982 MASTER OF ARTS (1982) MCMASTER UNIVERSITY (Political Science) Hamilton, Ontario TITLE: Sacred Boundaries: Local Option Laws in Ontario AUTHOR: Kathy Lenore Brock, B.A. (McMaster University) SUPERVISOR: Professor T.J. Lewis NUMBER OF PAGES: vii, 162 ii Abstract The laws of Ontario operate on the principle that indivi­ duals should govern their own conduct unless it affects others adversely. The laws are created to protect individuals and their property and to ensure that citizens respect the rights of others. However, laws are protected and entrenched which defy this principle by permitting and fostering intolerance. This thesis addresses the local option laws of Ontario's liquor legislation which protect and legitimize invasion of personal liberty. These laws permit municipalities to prohi­ bit or restrict retail sale of liquor within their boundaries by vote or by COQ~cil decision. Local option has persisted t:b.roughout Ontario's history and is unlikely to be abolished despite the growing acceptance of liquor in society. To explain the longevity of these la.... ·ts, J.R. Gusfield' s approach to understanding moral crusades is used. Local option laws have become symbols of the status and influence of the so­ ber, industrious middleclass of the 1800's who founded Ontario. The right to control drinking reassures people vlho adhere to the traditional values that their views are respected in society.
    [Show full text]
  • Prohibition's Proving Ground: Automobile Culture and Dry
    PROHIBITION’S PROVING GROUND: AUTOMOBILE CULTURE AND DRY ENFORCEMENT ON THE TOLEDO-DETROIT-WINDSOR CORRIDOR, 1913-1933 Joseph Boggs A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS May 2019 Committee: Michael Brooks, Advisor Rebecca Mancuso © 2019 Joseph Boggs All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Michael Brooks, Advisor The rapid rise of an automobile culture in the 1910s and 20s provided ordinary North Americans greater mobility, freedom, privacy, and economic opportunity. Simultaneously, the United States and Canada witnessed a surge in “dry” sentiments and laws, culminating in the passage of the 18th Amendment and various provincial acts that precluded the outright sale of alcohol to the public. In turn, enforcement of prohibition legislation became more problematic due to society’s quick embracing of the automobile and bootleggers’ willingness to utilize cars for their illegal endeavors. By closely examining the Toledo-Detroit-Windsor corridor—a region known both for its motorcar culture and rum-running reputation—during the time period of 1913-1933, it is evident why prohibition failed in this area. Dry enforcers and government officials, frequently engaging in controversial policing tactics when confronting suspected motorists, could not overcome the distinct advantages that automobiles afforded to entrepreneurial bootleggers and the organized networks of criminals who exploited the transnational nature of the region. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1 CHAPTER I. AUTOMOBILITY ON THE TDW CORRIDOR ............................................... 8 CHAPTER II. MOTORING TOWARDS PROHIBITION ......................................................... 29 CHAPTER III. TEST DRIVE: DRY ENFORCEMENT IN THE EARLY YEARS .................. 48 The Beginnings of Prohibition in Windsor, 1916-1919 ...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Unfortunate Child
    UNFORTUNATE CHILD … not John A. of Kingston, for by all accounts he’d rather drink whiskey than make it, but John A. of Perth, who’d rather sell it than drink it …1 John A. McLaren (1831-1901) On Saturday December 7, 1901, 70-year-old John A. McLaren, suffered what the local newspaper called “a slight apoplectic attack”2; but despite the best efforts of local practitioner Dr. David Munro (1842-1903), assisted by “Dr. Stewart3, the Montreal specialist”, Perth’s ‘Whiskey4 King’ died of “acute spinal paralysis”5 on Wednesday, December 11th. Described by the Perth Courier as the community’s “keenest businessman and largest individual taxpayer”6, McLaren was a very wealthy man and, as his condition deteriorated over those five days in December, business associates, employees, friends, family and the merely curious converged on his Wilson Street7 home. Among these was his half-sister, Elizabeth ‘Eliza’ Cameron-McIntyre (1841-1915) of Renfrew, who arrived at his bedside on Monday evening December 9th. Eliza’s concern, however, was not primarily for John A.’s comfort in his final hours, but for what she hoped to gain by his imminent death. Two days later, as John A. breathed his last, Eliza crept into “a room at the end of the hall [and], from the top of a red box, took down a brown valise”8 containing McLaren’s most important personal papers. She broke open the lock, extracted her brother’s last will and testament and, enraged by what she read, “sent it up in smoke”.9 1 Perth Courier, December 15, 1865.
    [Show full text]
  • A KIND of PROHIBITION: Alcohol Administration in Pre-Computer Ontario, Canada 1927-1975
    A KIND OF PROHIBITION: Alcohol Administration in Pre-Computer Ontario, Canada 1927-1975 Scott N. Thompson Advisor: Dr. Gary Genosko Department of Sociology, Lakehead University Thunder Bay 2006 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Library and Bibliothèque et 1^1 Archives Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de l'édition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-31201-8 Our file Notre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-31201-8 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library permettant à la Bibliothèque et Archives and Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve,sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par télécommunication ou par l'Internet, prêter, telecommunication or on the Internet,distribuer et vendre des thèses partout dans loan, distribute and sell theses le monde, à des fins commerciales ou autres, worldwide, for commercial or non­ sur support microforme, papier, électronique commercial purposes, in microform, et/ou autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriété du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in et des droits moraux qui protège cette thèse. this thesis. Neither the thesis Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels de nor substantial extracts from it celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés ou autrement may be printed or otherwise reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Skills, Attributes and the Pursuit of the Hotel Trade in Late Nineteenth-Century Guelph
    The Keepers’ Trade: Skills, Attributes and the Pursuit of the Hotel Trade in Late Nineteenth-Century Guelph A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of Graduate Studies The University of Guelph by Shawn Day In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts April 2004 © 2004, Shawn Day Abstract Shawn L. Day University of Guelph, 2004 Advisor: Dr. Douglas McCalla This study explores the nineteenth-century commercial hotel and its associated business from the perspective of the proprietor. Five dominant themes emerge from the study. The keeper possessed business, inter-personal and political skills that contributed to the success of the enterprise. Personal skills allowed the keeper to maintain respectability, both within the trade and within the community. Hotelkeepers pursued a wealth accumulation strategy that rested primarily upon their business skills. Family participation contributed to the running of the hotel and the success of the business. Furthermore, the predominance of those of Irish ethnicity amongst keepers suggests that there were ethnic and religious dimensions to the trade. Evidence drawn largely from primary sources such as record books, invoices, receipts, business directories and census records allows for the reconstruction of the business structure and operation of two Guelph area hotels during this period. Cette étude explore l'hôtel commercial de XIXe siècle et ses affaires associées de la perspective du propriétaire. Cinq thèmes dominants émergent de l'étude. L’hôtelier a possédé les qualifications d'affaires, interpersonnelles et politiques qui ont contribué au succès ou à l'échec de l'entreprise. Les qualifications personnelles ont permis au hôtelier de maintenir la respectabilité, dans le commerce et au sein de la communauté.
    [Show full text]
  • Try to Control Yourself the Regulation of Public Drinking in Post-Prohibition Ontario, 1927-44
    Dan Malleck Try to Control Yourself The Regulation of Public Drinking in Post-Prohibition Ontario, 1927-44 Sample Material © 2012 UBC Press Contents List of Tables and Figures / ix Acknowledgments / xi Preface: The Word on the Street / xv Introduction: The Emergence of Liquor Control Bureaucracy in Ontario / 3 1 Liquor Control Bureaucracy and the Mechanisms of Governance / 17 2 The Public Life of Liquor, 1927-34 / 36 3 Idealistic Form and Realistic Function: Restructuring Public Drinking Space / 63 4 Hearing the Voices: Community Input and the Reshaping of Public Drinking Behaviour / 87 5 “As a Result of Representations Made”: The (Dys)function of Patronage in the LCBO’s Regulatory Activities / 110 6 Restructuring Recreation in the Drinking Space / 136 7 Women, Children, and the Family in the Public Drinking Space / 162 8 “Their Medley of Tongues and Eternal Jangle”: Regulating the Racial and Ethnic Outsider / 186 9 Public Drinking and the Challenges of War / 215 Sample Material © 2012 UBC Press viii Contents Conclusion / 240 Appendix: The Communities / 245 Notes / 250 Bibliography / 278 Index / 285 Sample Material © 2012 UBC Press Tables and Figures Tables 1 Organizations that wrote to oppose the Rosdol Inn application / 90 2 Gender of applicants for hotel licences, 1920s-44 / 180 3 Summary of wartime increases in beverage-alcohol taxes and duties / 218 4 Revenue from alcohol sales, 1937-45 / 219 5 Sales of spirits, wine, and beer in gallons, 1937-45 / 220 6 Ethnicity in communities, 1931 / 249 Figures 1 A neat and clean hotel beverage
    [Show full text]
  • Home. a D State
    . "'f ' .. r. : t ,, I .. , ' 1,) l r v . 1 I '1 t "' r. .. :·1 .r c- • r , r r ..,. .... d l1 (....(. ..l .L . I HOME. A D STATE Volwne 25, No. 11 WESTERVILLE, OHIO, NOVEMBER, 1924 $1.00 Per Year a great deal of sacramental 'wine and many of those churches insist on the fermented RESULTS OF FEDERAL ENFORCEMENT OF PROHIBITION wine. Take, for instance, the Jews. We are not familiar altogether with their reg­ On October the 20th Federal Prohibition Director Roy A. Haynes issued a report ulations, but we understand that during a certain period the Jewish families u;;e con­ of his work in enforcing the p~ohibition laws that is indeed creditable to his department. siderable wine in their homes, and yet it is so used as ·to be legitimately wine for sac· The report for the year ending June 30, 1924, was not complete because some of the ramental purposes. Of course in many cases this is abused, and great scandal has district attorneys' reports had not been received. Despite this fact we give the follo·w­ arisen from it. · There is a decided ,movement on the part of the better class among ing figures: For fines, forfeitures and penalties there were assessed $7,577,014. It will them to turn from fermented wine to non-fermented wine. One learned Jewish be remembered that the appropriation for enforcing federal prohibition and the anti· Rabbi has written an article contending that non-fermented wine is the orthodox wine narcotic laws both amount to only $9,000,000.
    [Show full text]
  • 468 the PRODLEX of LIQUOR LEGISLATION in CANADA. The
    468 THE PRODLEX OF LIQUOR LEGISLATION IN CANADA. The division of the field of legislation between the Provinces and the Dominion as made in sections 91 and 92 of the British North America Act is probably in no instance more disputed than in the consideration of liquor legislation. The opinions of the judicial Committee of the Privy Council indicate that it is competent for both the Provinces and the Dominion to pass legislation on this matter. As usual no clear dividing line can be worked out from these opinions. Accordingly both legislatures trespass at times upon each other's field, and will continue to do so. The case which receives the most criticism is the now notorious Russell v. The Queen.' In this case the Canada Temperance Act of 1878 was held intra vires, even though it might interfere with subjects of Provincial legislation, i.e., property and civil rights within the province, or generally all matters of a purely local and provincial concern . The ground of acceptance of this case A as enunciated last year by Lord Haldane in the Toronto Electric Com- missioners case. It is that in an emergency such as is alleged to have existed in 1878 Dominion legislation dealing with such emerg- ency shall prevail over any conflicting provincial legislation. The 1878 emergency caused by a crime wave as a result of nationwid,2 intemperance is supposed to have constituted a national peril . This reason has been much criticised of late, but it is the view adopted by one of the judges of the Supreme Court of Canada,3 when that court passed on the validity of the Act and is also contained in the preamble to the Act itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Prohibition in Ontario, 1919-1923
    PROHIBITION IN ONTARIO GERALD A. HALLOWELL PROHIBITION IN ONTARIO, 1919-1923 GERALD A. HALLOWELL mE ONTARIO HISTORICAL soom ONTARIO HISTORICAL SOCIETY RESEARCH PUBLICATION No. 2 1972 Printed by Love Printing Service Ltd. Ottawa © The Ontario Historical Society 1972 CONTENTS I 'The great and irresistible wave of moral advance ' 3 II Ballots and Boo ze 37 III 'Ontario will go dry forever' 59 IV 'The sharper the tyranny the quicker the cure' 73 V The Farmers enforce the O. T.A. 96 VI Ontario gets an ' alcoholiday ' 130 VII Decline and fall 158 © The Ontario Historical Society 1972 PREFACE After a long history of agitation by temperance workers , the movement to prohibit the consumption of intoxicating beverages reached its peak in Ontario during , and in the years immediately fol lowing , the First World War . In 1916 the provincial government , under Sir Wi lliam Hearst, enacted the Ontario Temperance Act , which forbade the sel ling of liquor for beverage purposes and the keeping, giving, or having of liquor except in a private dwelling. Intended as a wartime measure , to promote economy and Ontar io ' s fighting ability, it was to last only for the dura­ tion of the war . In October 1919 a referendum was held to determine whether the act shoul d be repeal ed or retained on a peacetime basis. The citizens of Ontario , including the recently enfranchised women , voted by a majori ty of over four hundred thousand to establish ' prohibition ' as the permanent law of the provi nce . A further refer endum in April 1921 resul ted in the termination of the private importation of liquor ordered from outside the province .
    [Show full text]
  • Wet Canteens and Worrying Mothers: Alcohol, Soldiers and Temperance Groups in the Great War
    — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Wet Canteens and Worrying Mothers: Alcohol, Soldiers and Temperance Groups in the Great War TIM COOK* The First World War proved to be a powerful stimulus for the temperance movement in Canada. Temperance advocates argued moral and economic reasons for prohibi- tion: those who failed to abstain from drink were hindering victory; prohibition was patriotic. When canteens serving beer were opened in Canadian training camps in England to limit soldiers’ drinking in local villages, temperance groups were out- raged. As prohibitionists fought to ban drink, a divisive edge was driven into the gulf between the soldiers in the trenches and the civilians on the home front. The cam- paign to ban wet canteens demonstrates that each constituency, military and civil- ian, contained distinct cultures with different perspectives on pleasure and danger. La Première Guerre mondiale a donné un puissant coup de pouce au mouvement pour la tempérance au Canada. Les défenseurs de la tempérance avançaient des raisons morales et économiques pour la prohibition : ceux qui étaient incapables de se retenir de boire nuisaient à la victoire; la prohibition était patriotique. Les groupes de tempérance s’insurgèrent lorsqu’on ouvrit des cantines servant de la bière dans les camps de formation canadiens en Angleterre afin de limiter la con- sommation d’alcool des soldats dans les villages locaux. Les prohibitionnistes se battant pour faire bannir la consommation d’alcool, cela creusa le gouffre entre les soldats dans les tranchées et les civils sur le front intérieur. La campagne pour ban- nir les cantines servant de l’alcool démontre que chaque groupe, militaire et civil, avait sa propre culture et des perspectives différentes sur le plaisir et le danger.
    [Show full text]
  • The Emergence of Ontario Microbreweries: a Socio-Historical Analysis
    The Emergence of Ontario Microbreweries: A Socio-Historical Analysis by Kevin James Roche Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment Of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts (MA) in Sociology School of Graduate Studies Laurentian University Sudbury, Ontario © Kevin James Roche, 2014 THESIS DEFENCE COMMITTEE/COMITÉ DE SOUTENANCE DE THÈSE Laurentian Université/Université Laurentienne School of Graduate Studies/École des études supérieures Title of Thesis Titre de la thèse THE EMERGENCE OF ONTARIO MICROBREWERIES: A SOCIO- HISTORICAL ANALYSIS Name of Candidate Nom du candidat Roche, Kevin James Degree Diplôme Master of Arts Department/Program Date of Defence Département/Programme Sociology Date de la soutenance June 12, 2014 APPROVED/APPROUVÉ Thesis Examiners/Examinateurs de thèse: Dr. Aurélie Lacassagne (Supervisor/Directrice de thèse) Dr. Robert Segsworth (Committee member/Membre du comité) Approved for the School of Graduate Studies Dr. François Dépelteau (Committee member/Membre du comité) Dr. David Lesbarrères M. David Lesbarrères Dr. Anna Lyn Haines Director, School of Graduate Studies (External Examiner/Examinatrice externe) Directeur, École des études supérieures ACCESSIBILITY CLAUSE AND PERMISSION TO USE I, Kevin James Roche, hereby grant to Laurentian University and/or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or for the duration of my copyright ownership. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also reserve the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.
    [Show full text]
  • The Woman Candidate for the Ontario Legislative Assembly, 1919-1929 Frederick Brent Scollie
    Document generated on 09/25/2021 11:27 a.m. Ontario History The Woman Candidate for the Ontario Legislative Assembly, 1919-1929 Frederick Brent Scollie Volume 104, Number 2, Fall 2012 Article abstract History paints a bleak picture of Ontario women's lack of electoral success URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1065435ar after 1919, the year women secured the right to provincial and municipal DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1065435ar elective office. This article examines thirteen of twenty-one women who ran unsuccessfully as candidates for the Ontario Legislative Assembly before 1943, See table of contents especially the twelve who were candidates between 1919-1929, the political success of some of their predecessors elected as school trustees as early as 1892, and the experience of these women with political parties. It tests to what Publisher(s) extent the historical record confirms political scientist Sylvia Bashevkin's analysis of women and party politics in English Canada and sociologist Thelma The Ontario Historical Society McCormack's theory of male and female dual political cultures. ISSN 0030-2953 (print) 2371-4654 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Scollie, F. B. (2012). The Woman Candidate for the Ontario Legislative Assembly, 1919-1929. Ontario History, 104(2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.7202/1065435ar Copyright © The Ontario Historical Society, 2012 This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit.
    [Show full text]