Cyclone Recovery Samoa Evaluation Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cyclone Recovery Samoa Evaluation Report This report has been prepared on behalf of, and for exclusive use of the New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFAT) and the Australian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT), as required for ongoing planning related to TCCRP and TCRP. Its preparation follows consultation between stakeholders and the New Zealand and Australian Aid Programs. The report is subject to, and issued in connection with, the provisions of the agreement between Kurrajong Hill Pty Ltd and MFAT. Kurrajong Hill Pty Ltd accepts no responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of or reliance upon this report by any third party or any use outside the purpose for which it was prepared. The evaluation team comprised Dr Fiona Kotvojs (Team Leader), Ms Anne Lockley (Evaluation Specialist), Ms Pisaina Leilua-Lei Sam (Samoa Economic Evaluation Specialist) and Ms Mardi Trompf (Procurement Specialist and Evaluation Mentee). We recognise the extensive contribution of so many people to this evaluation. The contribution of the Evaluation Steering Committee (MFAT, DFAT and GoS through MoF) was enormous. In particular, we would like to thank Tuanui Felauai (Lagi) of MFAT for her professionalism in managing and supporting this assignment. Each of those we interviewed provided valuable information, our thanks to the many representatives of donors, the Central Bank and financial institutions; all the Chief Executive Officers/Heads of the Government Ministries and Public Bodies we interviewed including those from Agriculture, Foreign Affairs and Trade, Health, Works and Infrastructure, Tourism, Women, Community and Social Development, Commerce, Industry and Labour, Environment and Fire Emergency Services; the The views expressed in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New Zealand Government, the New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade or any other party. Nor do these entities accept any liability for claims arising from the report’s content or reliance on it. DRAFT TCRRP and TCRP Evaluation Report Tourism Sector, Education Steering Committees, and Civil Society organisations. To each of those from the private sector who gave of their time for interviews and workshops; thank you. This includes tourism operators, builders and suppliers, and the business and community organisations. The input provided those who attended the sense making workshop and who provided comment on the aide-memoire and drafts of each appendix or sections of the report, thank you for your honesty and openness. The final result was only possible because of you. Our team would like to thank GoS, MFAT and DFAT for the opportunity to undertake this assignment. It was enjoyable and interesting. We trust that the final report will assist future support to recovery after natural disasters. Our team comprises Dr Fiona Kotvojs, Ms Anne Lockley, Ms Pisaina Leilua-Lei Sam and Ms Mardi Trompf. Dr Fiona Kotvojs is an evaluator who specialises in international development assistance programmes. She has over 25 years’ experience in designing and implementing quantitative and qualitative evaluations. Fiona is a principal at Kurrajong Hill. Ms Anne Lockley specialises in gender, social inclusion and evaluation, with over 20 years’ experience in working in these areas across the Pacific and South-East Asia. She has particular expertise in humanitarian responses and recovery. Ms Pisaina Leilua-Lei Sam is an expert in the public economic policy and practice, development, corporate governance, monitoring and evaluation and practice in the Pacific and Samoa with more than 25 years’ experience in these areas. Ms Mardi Trompf is a procurement and costing specialist. She brings this expertise to her evaluation practice. 3 DRAFT TCRRP and TCRP Evaluation Report Table of Contents Abstract 6 Executive Summary 7 Background 7 Overarching findings 7 Background 11 THE ACTIVITY 11 EVALUATION PURPOSE AND DESIGN 12 Purpose 12 Scope 12 Design 12 Overarching Findings 14 Objective 1: The effectiveness of TCRRP and the TCRP 14 Objective 2: Programme impact 17 Objective 3: Programme efficiency 19 Incorporation of recovery principle: value for money 19 Management 20 Private sector involvement 25 Objective 4: Sustainability 26 Sustainability of improved capacity acquired from the programmes 26 Incorporation of recovery principle: Build back better 26 Maintenance 28 Objective 5: Relevance of the TCRRP and TCRP 29 Alignment with Government of Samoa, NZ MFAT and DFAT development policy 29 Objective 6: Lessons learned and recommendations 30 Application of previous lessons 36 Application of lessons to Cyclone Gita in 2018 36 4 DRAFT TCRRP and TCRP Evaluation Report Evaluation Conclusions 38 Appendices 40 APPENDIX ONE: TERMS OF REFERENCE 41 APPENDIX TWO: PROGRESS, ACHIEVEMENTS, AND RESULTS FRAMEWORK 52 (1) General recovery and rehabilitation 52 (2) The Tourism Cyclone Recovery Programme 59 (3) TCRP Results Framework 62 APPENDIX THREE: SECTORAL STUDY TOURISM 63 BACKGROUND 63 METHODOLOGY 65 FINDINGS 66 APPENDIX FOUR: SECTORAL STUDY EDUCATION 85 BACKGROUND 85 METHODOLOGY 86 FINDINGS 86 APPENDIX FIVE: SECTORAL STUDY HEALTH 100 BACKGROUND 100 METHODOLOGY 101 FINDINGS 102 APPENDIX SIX: PROCUREMENT SYSTEMS ANALYSIS 116 BACKGROUND 116 METHODOLOGY 116 FINDINGS 117 Conclusions 124 RECOMMENDATIONS 125 APPENDIX SEVEN: COST UTILITY ANALYSIS 130 REFERENCES 133 Abbreviations and acronyms 136 5 DRAFT TCRRP and TCRP Evaluation Report 1 Abstract Tropical Cyclone Evan passed over Samoa on 13-14 December 2012 and caused widespread damage. New Zealand and Australia provided support to both the response and recovery phase. Samoa’s recovery priorities were defined in their recovery framework. This formed the base for assistance in the recovery phase provided through the Tropical Cyclone Evan Recovery and Rehabilitation Programme (TCRRP), which was implemented as budget support, and the Tourism Cyclone Recovery Programme (TCRP) which was implemented as a program. This evaluation identifies the relevance and effectiveness of TCRP and TCRRP and whether they built awareness and capacity in relation to disasters. Applying a utilisation focused approach, three sector studies were completed (education, health and tourism) to inform the findings. For each of these sector studies, data was collected from a breadth of sources and analysed using content analysis. A cost-utility analysis was also undertaken for TCRP. The evaluation found TCRRP and TCRP to be highly relevant to the post-disaster needs assessment, donor strategies, and in general, to sectoral plans. In both education and health, the infrastructure would not have occurred without external assistance. Most expected TCRRP and TCRP outcomes were achieved. However, ‘soft’ outcomes specified in Samoa’s recovery framework were not well resourced and often not achieved. Gender and disability inclusion were also poorly addressed. Through TRCP and TCRRP, the quality of buildings have improved. However, the longer term impact of support is mixed because (i) some facilities are no longer used or not used as intended and (ii) there is a lack of proactive and curative maintenance. 6 DRAFT TCRRP and TCRP Evaluation Report 2 Executive Summary Background Tropical Cyclone Evan passed over Samoa on 13-14 December 2012. It is considered the worst tropical cyclone to hit Samoa since 1991, and caused widespread damage to public services, buildings, roads, agriculture, and communications infrastructure. The Government of Samoa (GoS) implemented an immediate response, declared a state of emergency, and called for international assistance. A multi-agency damage and loss assessment coordinated by the Ministry of Finance (MoF) was finalised in March 2013. This provided the basis for the prioritisation of activities under the Tropical Cyclone Evan Recovery and Rehabilitation Programme (TCRRP). TCRRP’s goal was that Samoa recovers from Tropical Cyclone Evan, reduces vulnerability and enhances resilience to withstand future shocks. A number of bi- and multilateral donors contributed to this programme including the New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MFAT) and the Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT). DFAT support was primarily to the health and education sectors, and MFAT’s to the tourism sector under the Tourism Cyclone Recovery Programme (TCRP). This scope of this evaluation is limited to the recovery and rehabilitation period (May 2013 to end 2015). This summary focuses on the key points and priority recommendations. Overarching findings Relevance: The evaluation found the TCRRP and TCRP to be highly relevant to the post- disaster needs assessment, donor strategies, and in general, to sectoral plans. In both education and health, the infrastructure would not have been built or rebuilt without external assistance. Effectiveness: At both a sectoral and programme level, most expected TCRRP and TCRP outcomes specified in the monitoring and evaluation framework during the implementation period were achieved. However, there is a common pattern that ‘soft’ outcomes such as investments in public health and primary health care, disaster resilience (including building national awareness and capacity on areas of disaster risk reduction, management, preparedness and responsiveness), and psycho-social support, were not as well-resourced or achieved as those related to infrastructure. Recommendation: During recovery and rehabilitation, GoS and donors ensure appropriate attention to ‘soft’ priorities for which existing in country capacity
Recommended publications
  • Pacific Study (Focusing on Fiji, Tonga and Vanuatu
    1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 Hazard exposure 1.1. Pacific island countries (PICs) are vulnerable to a broad range of natural disasters stemming from hydro-meteorological (such as cyclones, droughts, landslide and floods) and geo-physical hazards (volcanic eruptions, earthquakes and tsunamis). In any given year, it is likely that Fiji, Tonga and Vanuatu are either hit by, or recovering from, a major natural disaster. 1.2. The impact of natural disasters is estimated by the Pacific Catastrophe Risk Assessment and Financing Initiative as equivalent to an annualized loss of 6.6% of GDP in Vanuatu, and 4.3% in Tonga. For Fiji, the average asset losses due to tropical cyclones and floods are estimated at more than 5%. 1.3. In 2014, Tropical Cyclone (TC) Ian caused damage equivalent to 11% to Tonga's GDP. It was followed in 2018 by damage close to 38% of GDP from TC Gita. In 2015, category five TC Pam displaced 25% of Vanuatu's population and provoked damage estimated at 64% of GDP. In Fiji, Tropical Cyclone Winston affected 62% of the population and wrought damage amounting to 31% of GDP, only some three and a half years after the passage of Tropical Cyclone Evan. 1.4. Vanuatu and Tonga rank number one and two in global indices of natural disaster risk. Seismic hazard is an ever-present danger for both, together with secondary risks arising from tsunamis and landslides. Some 240 earthquakes, ranging in magnitude between 3.3 and 7.1 on the Richter Scale, struck Vanuatu and its surrounding region in the first ten months of 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • ADRA Samoa Photo Courtesy of Su’A Julia Wallork
    Volunteers for ADRA Samoa Photo courtesy of Su’a Julia Wallork. ADRA Samoa SU’A JULIA WALLWORK Su’a Julia Wallwork is the country director for ADRA Samoa. She is a member of the Executive Committee of the South Pacific Division of the Seventh Day Adventist Church, since 2015. Wallwork grew up in the Seventh Day Adventist Church, but in her adult life, strayed for 35 years. Her parents never stopped praying for her, and she believes God answered their prayers, and that is why she is blessed to be where she is today – in the Master’s Service. The Adventist Development and relief Agency (ADRA) Samoa, located in Apia, the capital of Samoa,1 has its office on the compound of the Seventh Day Adventist Church headquarters for Samoa and Tokelau. Samoa became an Independent nation in 1962, after being governed by Germany, Great Britain, and New Zealand. It is an archipelago consisting of the islands of Savaii, Upolu, Apolima, and Manono. The country director is Su’a Julia Wallwork, who has managed the agency since 2009. Because it is mainly project-funded, its staff will vary according to current projects. During the period 2016-2019 it had 31 staff members while at the beginning of 2020 it had 14 ADRA staff. Although the Adventist Church had engaged with local communities through various outreach programs, ADRA only began activities in Samoa after the cyclones Ofa in 1990 and Val in 1991. After ADRA provided clothing, rope, tarpaulins, and AUD$10,000 worth of food and emergency supplies, it began to become known by the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Samoa Socio-Economic Atlas 2011
    SAMOA SOCIO-ECONOMIC ATLAS 2011 Copyright (c) Samoa Bureau of Statistics (SBS) 2011 CONTACTS Telephone: (685) 62000/21373 Samoa Socio Economic ATLAS 2011 Facsimile: (685) 24675 Email: [email protected] by Website: www.sbs.gov.ws Postal Address: Samoa Bureau of Statistics The Census-Surveys and Demography Division of Samoa Bureau of Statistics (SBS) PO BOX 1151 Apia Samoa National University of Samoa Library CIP entry Samoa socio economic ATLAS 2011 / by The Census-Surveys and Demography Division of Samoa Bureau of Statistics (SBS). -- Apia, Samoa : Samoa Bureau of Statistics, Government of Samoa, 2011. 76 p. : ill. ; 29 cm. Disclaimer: This publication is a product of the Division of Census-Surveys & Demography, ISBN 978 982 9003 66 9 Samoa Bureau of Statistics. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions 1. Census districts – Samoa – maps. 2. Election districts – Samoa – expressed in this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of any funding or census. 3. Election districts – Samoa – statistics. 4. Samoa – census. technical agencies involved in the census. The boundaries and other information I. Census-Surveys and Demography Division of SBS. shown on the maps are only imaginary census boundaries but do not imply any legal status of traditional village and district boundaries. Sam 912.9614 Sam DDC 22. Published by The Samoa Bureau of Statistics, Govt. of Samoa, Apia, Samoa, 2015. Overview Map SAMOA 1 Table of Contents Map 3.4: Tertiary level qualification (Post-secondary certificate, diploma, Overview Map ................................................................................................... 1 degree/higher) by district, 2011 ................................................................... 26 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 3 Map 3.5: Population 15 years and over with knowledge in traditional tattooing by district, 2011 ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Disaster Waste Management in Tonga the 8Th Pacific Islands Leaders Meeting (PALM 8) Was Held in Iwaki City, Fukushima from May 18 to 19, 2018
    Tonga Forest waste Disaster Waste Management and the 3R + Return Initiative Recent household A Cyclone Hits! waste Disaster Waste Management in Tonga The 8th Pacific Islands Leaders Meeting (PALM 8) was held in Iwaki City, Fukushima from May 18 to 19, 2018. The Leaders confirmed the importance of waste management and 3R policies, and noted the value of the Japanese Technical Coopera- tion Project for Promotion of Regional Initiative on Solid Waste Management in Pacific Island Countries (J-PRISM). Here, we report the efforts being undertaken through J-PRISM. New access road [Project Introduction] Japanese Technical Cooperation Project for Promotion of Regional Initiative on Solid Waste Management in Pacific Island Countries Phase 2 (J-PRISM 2) Tonga (February 2017-February 2022) Capital: Nuku'alofa This project is carried out across the Pacific region. It is centered on four themes, namely (1) Currency: Pa'anga monitoring of the “Pacific Regional Waste and Pollution Management Strategy;” (2) fostering Population: Approx. 106,000 (as of 2015) waste management experts in the region; (3) preparing disaster waste management guide- Bulky waste Official Language(s): Tongan, English lines; and (4) the 3R + Return initiative for exporting valuable resources within the region. Thorough keeping of waste records! Nuku'alofa Pacific Region The Pacific Islands are (Target countries of J-PRISM) a disaster-prone region Tongatapu Palau Federated States of Micronesia Marshall Islands The owner of a piece Shinnosuke Oda, Papua New Guinea of roadside land an- Kokusai Kogyo swered the call made Solomon Islands Oda works as an expert for improving by the president of Samoa waste management in Tonga.
    [Show full text]
  • Title Layout
    Disaster Risk Assessment and Recovery Utilizing Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in the Pacific Islands. The World Bank UAV4Resilience Project - Update Malcolm Archbold Consultant, World Bank 27 November 2019 Pacific Islands GIS & RS Conference 2019 Introduction Pacific Island nations are some of the most vulnerable to natural disasters • Cyclone Waka – 2001 – Tonga • Cyclone Heta – 2003 – Tonga, Niue, American Samoa • Cyclone Lin – 2008 – Fiji • Cyclone Wilma – 2010 – Solomon Islands, Tonga • Cyclone Ian – 2013 – Fiji, Tonga • Cyclone Pam – 2014 – Vanuatu • Cyclone Winston – 2016 – Fiji • Cyclone Gita – 2018 - Tonga Cyclone Ian, Vanuatu, Jan 2014 The World Bank UAV4Resilence Project • Assess the utility of UAVs in Disaster Management for the SW Pacific • Identify the potential cost-benefits of UAVs for disaster assessment • Develop Standard Operating Procedures for in country operations UAV4Resilence Project UAV Challenge Project – October 2017 Cyclone Gita – Feb 2018 – Tonga Cyclone Gita – 2018 – Tonga Cyclone Gita – 2018 – Tonga Cyclone Gita – 2018 – Tonga Cyclone Gita – 2018 – Tonga OpenAerialMap.org UAV Training and Capacity Building • Commence in May 2019 • Objectives: • Assist in procurement, training and capacity building • Involve Govt Disaster Management organisations and associated Govt Depts/Ministries • Facilitate cooperation and communication between Govt Depts and local Civil Aviation and Air Traffic Control authorities. DroneFlyer Course (2 days) Day 1 Day 2 • Civil Aviation PRAS/drone rules • Review of Day 1 • Airspace • Semi
    [Show full text]
  • Shelter and Settlements Risk Profile NATURAL DISASTERS from 1980
    Shelter and Settlements Risk Profile ShelterCluster.org Coordinating Humanitarian Shelter HISTORIC EVENTS (ReliefWeb) Dec 2012 1. Tropical Cyclone Evan KEY DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS Tropical Cyclone Evan (TC Evan) − a Category 4 cyclone, wind Full Name: Republic Of The Fiji Islands speeds of 210 km/h (130 mph), impacted Northern Vanua Population: 862,333 (UN, 2012) Levu and Western Viti Levu on 17 December 2012,is Annual Growth Rate: 0.5% considered one of the worst to ever hit Fiji in recent history. Capital: Suva Approximately 60% of the total population were affected in Population In Urban Areas: 52.90% the post-disaster period. The Northern division recorded the Area: 18,376 Sq Km(7,095 Sq.mile) highest percentage of affected population (52%) as a Major Languages: English, Fijian, Hindi proportion of their total population, followed by the Western Division (38%) and the Central and Eastern divisions (23%). Major Religions: Christianity, Hinduism, Islam March 2. Fiji: Floods Life Expectancy: (UN) 67 Years (M)/72 Years (W) 2012 Monetary Unit: 1 Fijian Dollar = 100 Cents Severe flooding in the areas of Ra, Tavua, Ba, Lautoka, Nadi, Main Exports: Sugar, Clothing, Gold, Processed Nadroga, Sigatoka, and Rewa in January 2012 The Fish, Timber Government of Fiji estimated that damage from the 2012 GNI Per Capita: US $3,720 (WB) 5,390 (FS) floods was at approximately F$71 million. This suggests that Human Development Index: 0.6881 Fiji experienced damage of F$146 million in 2012 alone. Rainfall In Capital (Mm): 3040 Jan 3. Fiji: Floods Temperature In Capital City ° C: 22.2/28.7 2012 Average Family Size: 5 March 4.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 CENSUS Brief No.1
    P O BOX 1151 TELEPHONE: (685)62000/21373 LEVEL 1 & 2 FMFM II, Matagialalua FAX No: (685)24675 GOVERNMENT BUILDING Email: [email protected] APIA Website: www.sbs.gov.ws SAMOA 2016 CENSUS Brief No.1 Revised version Population Snapshot and Household Highlights 30th October 2017 1 | P a g e Foreword This publication is the first of a series of Census 2016 Brief reports to be published from the dataset version 1, of the Population and Housing Census, 2016. It provides a snapshot of the information collected from the Population Questionnaire and some highlights of the Housing Questionnaire. It also provides the final count of the population of Samoa in November 7th 2016 by statistical regions, political districts and villages. Over the past censuses, the Samoa Bureau of Statistics has compiled a standard analytical report that users and mainly students find it complex and too technical for their purposes. We have changed our approach in the 2016 census by compiling smaller reports (Census Brief reports) to be released on a quarterly basis with emphasis on different areas of Samoa’s development as well as demands from users. In doing that, we look forward to working more collaboratively with our stakeholders and technical partners in compiling relevant, focused and more user friendly statistical brief reports for planning, policy-making and program interventions. At the same time, the Bureau is giving the public the opportunity to select their own data of interest from the census database for printing rather than the Bureau printing numerous tabulations which mostly remain unused.
    [Show full text]
  • J-PRISM Progress Report
    Japanese Technical Cooperation Project for Promotion of Regional Initiative on Solid Waste Management in Pacific Island Countries J‐PRISM Progress Report May 2013 1 Japanese Technical Cooperation Project for Promotion of Regional Initiative on Solid Waste Management in Pacific Island Countries Table of Contents Regional Activities Update ........................................................................................................................ 3 Federated States of Micronesia* .............................................................................................................. 6 Fiji* ........................................................................................................................................................... 10 Kiribati* ................................................................................................................................................... 21 Marshall Islands* .................................................................................................................................... 25 Palau* ...................................................................................................................................................... 28 Papua New Guinea* ................................................................................................................................ 31 Samoa* .................................................................................................................................................... 34 Solomon
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Community-Led Localisation Summit 12 - 13 February 2020: Summit Report
    Pacific Community-Led Localisation Summit 12 - 13 February 2020: Summit Report Disaster READY Plan International Australia Consortium Citations: 1. Government of Fiji, Fiji National Disaster Management Act, 1998 2. Pacific island governments, Framework for Resilient Development in the Pacific, 2016 3. Humanitarian Advisory Group & Pacific Islands Association of Non-Government Organisations, Measuring Localisation: Framework and Tools, December 2019 4. International Council of Voluntary Agencies, www.icvanetwork.org In Memory of Our Friend and Colleague David Hesaie. 1 Table of Contents Acronyms ............................................................................................................................. 3 Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. 5 Program Context: About the Australian Humanitarian Partnership and Disaster READY ...... 9 Localisation Summit Background, Design, and Process ........................................................ 10 Summit Proceedings – Day 1 ............................................................................................... 12 Keynote Address: Siale Ilolahia, Executive Director of the Pacific Islands Association of Non- Governmental Organisations ....................................................................................................... 12 Disaster READY Progress ............................................................................................................. 15 The
    [Show full text]
  • The Cost of Disaster on Your Business
    eepim o K pe KOST BLO DISASTA LO n bIsnIs BISNIS BLO IU P I PS O. ORG PEN Iu save tu ril kost blo disasta lo bisnis blo iu? Hemia nao .FJ/STAYO samfala tru samting wea evri bisnis onas lo Pasifik sud save. 80% lo kampanis wea no rikava from disasta insaed wan manis, bae go aot lo bisnis.2 IU SAVE TU DAT... Diswan hem estimeit kost blo SAEKLON WINSTON FIJI 2016 dameij an los blo praevet sekta lo Fiji taem Saeklon Winston 1 aot lo evri 4 bisnisis no 3 FJ 1.5 BILLION kasem olketa lo 2016. save savaev afta evri biki 1 disasta happen. (US$ 722,698,500) Onli wanfa we fo meksua Totol pesenol inkam los blo staf an emploiis afta Saeklon bisnis blo iu hem savaev from INKAM LOS FROM SAEKLON WINSTON Winston lo 2016, bikos olketa no disasta o advesiti: go waka insaed 14,450,129 deis. FJ 351.45 MILLION Diswan no onli soum impakt wea disasta garem lo wok prodaktiviti fo bisnis bat bikos olketa no (US$ 169,328,258) go baek lo waka kwuik taem fo komiuniti blo olketa.4 Totol ikonomik valiu blo ifekts wea Tropikol Saeklon Pam kosim SAEKLON PAM. VANUATU.2015 lo Vanuatu lo 2015.5 VT 48.6 BILLION Krietim wanfala bisnis plan an mekem hem waka. (US$ 449.4 MILLION) Sapos iu no garem BCP iet o no save gud abaotim, daon loudim BCP templet an krieitim wanfala fo iu seleva, iusim na Negativ grouth rate lo Vanuatu tuelfala step gaed wea save tekem iu tuelf Daonten Lo afta Tropikol Saeklon Pam hem minit nomoa fo komplitim insaed.
    [Show full text]
  • Consolidated Annual Report 2019
    EGIS Eau / PECG Nuku’alofa Urban Development Sector Project Project Implementation Assistance Consultants ADB GRANT-0264 TON and GRANT-0265 TON CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL REPORT 2019 January 2020 Page i Consolidated Annual Report, Year-7, 2019 EGIS Eau / PECG Quality Information Project title Nuku’alofa Urban Development Sector Project Document title Consolidated Annual Report, Year 7, 2019 Date January 2020 Author(s) PMU & PIAC Reference n° EUR 11521M Quality control Version Date Written by: Check by: V1 31/01/2020 Jacinta FINAU/Sevenitini TOUMOUA John GILDEA Recipients: Name Company Sent on: Balwyn FA’OTUSIA Ministry of Finance – EA 31/01/2020 Rosamond BING Ministry of Lands & Natural Resources 31/01/2020 Tukua TONGA PUMA/NSPAO - IA 31/01/2020 ‘Atunaisa FETOKAI PUMA/NSPAO - IA 31/01/2020 Malakai SIKA Waste Authority Limited 31/01/2020 Sione FINAU Tonga Water Board 31/01/2020 With copy to: Masayuki TACHIRI ADB, Suva 31/01/2020 Grace KING ADB, Suva 31/01/2020 Lavenia URUVARU ADB, Suva 31/01/2020 Taniela FALETAU ADB, Suva 31/01/2020 Tatafu MOEAKI ADB Representative 31/01/2020 Madeline SCOTT DFAT 31/01/2020 Kilisitina BEST DFAT 31/01/2020 Quddus FIELEA TWB 31/01/2020 John GILDEA PIAC 31/01/2020 Laurent DENIAU PIAC 31/01/2020 Pisila ‘OTUNUKU Ministry of Finance – EA 31/01/2020 Elizabeth BAKER Ministry of Finance – EA 31/01/2020 Nuku’alo fa Urban Development Sector Project Page ii Consolidated Annual Report, Year-7, 2019 EGIS Eau / PECG Table of Contents Chapter A. Introduction and Basic Data .................................... 3 A.1 Introduction .............................................................................................. 3 Chapter B.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-20 National Budget Statement
    Government of Tonga Budget Statement for year ending 30th June 2020 2019/20 1. FOREWORD _________________________________________________________________________ 3 2. INTRODUCTION _____________________________________________________________________ 5 3. MACROECONOMIC OUTCOMES AND OUTLOOK ______________________________________ 6 3.1 Global and Regional Highlights ________________________________________________________________________ 6 3.2 Domestic Economy and Outlook ________________________________________________________________________ 6 3.3 Fiscal Policy and Measures ____________________________________________________________________________ 8 3.3.1 Fiscal policy/anchors and position _________________________________________________________ 8 3.3.2 Summary of Overall Budget in GFS Format _________________________________________________ 9 3.3.3 Debt Position ________________________________________________________________________ 10 3.4 Monetary Policy Actions _____________________________________________________________________________ 10 3.5 Risks _____________________________________________________________________________________________ 11 4. GOVERNMENT PRIORITY AGENDA 2019-2022 ________________________________________ 12 5. BUDGET ESTIMATE AT A GLANCE 2019/20 ___________________________________________ 14 5.1 SUMMARY OF GOVERNMENT BUDGET BY PRIORITY AREAS ____________________________________ 14 5.2 DETAILED BUDGET ALLOCATION BY PRIORITY AREAS ________________________________________ 15 5.3 RECOVERY FROM TROPICAL CYCLONES GITA
    [Show full text]