DOCSLIB.ORG

Polit.Bericht 17-03-22 USA TT-Analyse Eupolitik EN Editscc

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Polit.Bericht 17-03-22 USA TT-Analyse Eupolitik EN Editscc THINK TANK ANALYSIS Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V. USA DR. CÉLINE-AGATHE CARO Would Trump prefer 28 phone numbers? March 21, 2017 AN ASSESSMENT OF THE US ADMINISTRATION’S POLICY ON EUROPE BY www.kas.de/usa LEADING AMERICAN THINK TANKS Henry Kissinger’s famous question Perception of the EU about whom to call when one wants to speak to Europe arose a time when the “Consortium” US considered dialogue with the Euro- peans to be vital, particularly in ques- During the election campaign and into the tions of foreign affairs and security. beginning of his tenure, there were several Having launched his presidency under occasions when President Trump voiced crit- the motto “America First”, Donald icism of the European Union. This may be Trump has sown uncertainty as to the due in part to a general mistrust of multilat- future of the transatlantic partnership. eral organizations. Consequently, he sees the EU mainly as an ineffectual bureaucratic How does the new US administration structure—incapable of creating jobs and fgf perceive the EU? How does it envisage growth in Europe—which makes life difficult its relations with Europe in the key ar- for entrepreneurs like himself because of its eas of trade and security? Which poli- tendency towards overregulation. During a cies are think tanks close to the gov- press conference with the British Prime Min- ernment recommending, and what do ister Theresa May on January 27, 2017, he other political experts think about the referred to the EU member states as a future of the Trump administration’s “consortium”.1 policy towards Europe? This analysis attempts to provide possible answers to these questions. 1 CNN, “Entire Trump-British PM News Confer- ence”, January 27, 2017. http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2017/01/27/d 2 Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V. Trump also seems to consider the EU a su- The only person in the White House who pranational body that seeks to homogenize appears to have a positive attitude towards its individual member states by restricting the EU is Vice President Mike Pence, who USA their sovereignty, particularly on immigra- reaffirmed the traditional US position to- DR. CÉLINE-AGATHE CARO tion. Due to this belief, he has stated that wards Europe on February 20, 2017 in Brexit will prove to be a “great thing”, and Brussels. During a press conference with EU March 21, 2017 that further member states will leave the EU Council President Donald Tusk, he said that because “people, countries want their own President Trump had asked him “to express identity”.2 the strong commitment of the United States www.kas.de/usa to continued co-operation and partnership For Steve Bannon, Trump’s top advisor and with the European Union”. He went on to chief political strategist in the White House, say: “Whatever our differences, our two there is no desirable alternative to national continents share the same heritage, the sovereignty, in the United States or for the same values and above all the same pur- USA’s traditional Western European allies. pose, to promote peace and prosperity He also supports Brexit as a way for the through freedom, democracy and the rule of 6 British to regain their sovereignty, and en- law”. courages similar movements in other EU countries. As far back as 2014, he made Integration vs. solidarity positive statements about nationalist movements in Europe during a conference The Heritage Foundation shares President 3 in the Vatican. According to Reuters, Ban- Trump’s negative stance towards the EU.7 non told the German ambassador to the In a report published on January 12, 2017, United States, Dr. Peter Wittig, in mid- it argued that European integration is caus- February 2017 that he considered the EU a ing increasing restrictions of political free- “flawed construct”, and preferred bilateral dom, greater economic tensions, and a dim- ties with European countries. After the inution of the transatlantic partnership in meeting, a Reuters source confirmed that the area of security. According to the au- the Europeans had better prepare for a poli- thors, this is due to the fact that the EU in- 4 cy of “hostility towards the EU”. terferes with national sovereignty, prevents the establishment of genuine transatlantic Businessman Ted Malloch, the US govern- free trade areas, is damaging to transatlan- ment’s pick for ambassador to the EU, is tic security, distorts European immigration also a Brexit supporter, who believes that policy, and wastes taxpayers’ money. Con- the euro will fail in the not too distant fu- sequently, the Heritage Foundation rec- ture. After an interview with the BBC at the ommends that the Trump administration end of January 2017, he ruffled feathers in should re-examine its support for this su- Brussels by comparing the EU to the Soviet pranational organization and instead forge Union, among other things.5 closer relations with individual European governments. The Foundation believes that the National Security Council (NSC) should conduct a study on how the USA can better advance its long-term interests in Europe.8 onald-trump-theresa-may-entire-news- conference-sot.cnn 2 “‘Ich mag Stärke. Ich mag Ordnung’ – Donald Trump spricht exklusiv im Bild-Interview”, Bild- Zeitung, January 15, 2017. http://www.bild.de/bild- taming”. See BBC video: “Donald Trump pick for plus/politik/ausland/donald-trump/das-grosse- EU Ambassador Ted Malloch hints at destruction of bild-interview-49790140 EU”, YouTube. 3 Frances Stead Sellers, David Fahrenthold, “‘Why https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mxFUa1wzE even let ’em in?’ Understanding Bannon’s w worldview and the policies that follow”, Washing- 6 Gardiner Harris, James Kanter, “Mike Pence, in ton Post, January 31, 2017. Europe, Says Trump Supports Partnership With https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/bannon- E.U.”, New York Times, February 20, 2017 (with explained-his-worldview-well-before-it-became- video of the press statement). official-us-policy/2017/01/31/2f4102ac-e7ca- https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/20/world/euro 11e6-80c2- pe/pence-european-union-trump.html?_r=0 30e57e57e05d_story.html?utm_term=.21938f37b 7 On the links between the Heritage Foundation d51 and the Trump administration, see for instance: 4 Noah Barkin, “Exclusive - White House delivered Dr. Céline-Agathe Caro, “Welche Agenda für die EU-sceptic message before Pence visit: sources”, Trump-Regierung? Erste Projektionen aus den Reuters, February 22, 2017. amerikanischen Think Tanks für die zukünftige http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-europe-trump- Innen- und Außenpolitik der USA”, Think Tank idUKKBN1601D6 Analyse, Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, January 17, 5 “I had in a previous career a diplomatic post 2017, p. 1-2. http://www.kas.de/wf/de/33.47689/ where I helped bring down the Soviet Union. So 8 Ted Bromund PhD, Luke Coffey, Daniel Kochis, maybe there’s another union that needs a little “Recommitting the United States to European Se- 3 Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V. During a hearing in the House of Represent- governments, which must answer to voters, atives in early February, one of the Herit- maintain their independence and enter into age directors, Nile Gardiner, described the specific cooperative ventures. According to USA EU as an inward-looking and declining entity the authors, Trump’s preference for the sol- DR. CÉLINE-AGATHE CARO with a protectionist mindset and outright idarity model is a logical consequence of his hostility to economic freedom. He called up- nationalist stance, which stresses the need 12 March 21, 2017 on the representatives to turn away from for democratic legitimacy. the EU and concentrate on expanding bilat- eral relations with the UK.9 John Bolton www.kas.de/usa Dangerous break with tradition from the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), who for a while had been tapped as Several experts, especially from left-leaning a candidate for a high-ranking position in think tanks, stress that Donald Trump is the the Trump administration, took a similar first US president not to represent the tradi- stance. He also believes that it is a mistake tional, pro-European stance of his predeces- to think that Trump will actively work to dis- sors in the White House. They express con- rupt the EU—the Europeans are quite capa- cern about the fact that Trump appears to 10 ble of doing that themselves. be at best indifferent to the European Un- ion, and has not articulated the traditional The Hudson Institute is considered close mantra that a stable and united Europe ad- to the administration because of its strong vances the USA’s economic and security in- relationships with Vice President Mike Pence terests. By contrast, most US foreign policy and several Republican Members of Con- think tanks agree that the United States gress. Many Hudson experts have also dis- largely benefits from a strong EU.13 played skepticism towards the European project. At the center of their criticism is the According to Hans Kundnani from the Ger- belief that the EU diminishes national identi- man Marshall Fund (GMF), this negative ties. Furthermore, many of them regard the stance towards the EU could hamper coop- EU as an illegitimate authority. Peter Rough, eration with EU institutions. He underlines, for instance, has called on the US govern- however, that tense relations between ment to support the UK in the Brexit pro- Washington and Brussels are not entirely cess, and hopes this development will lead atypical, and this stance may provide active 11 to a “democratic renaissance” in Europe. encouragement to Euroskeptics in the EU.14 In an article he wrote jointly with his col- Trump’s election victory has already put league Michael Doran, he stressed that wind into the sails of some nationalist there are two models of integration for movements in the EU.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • June 2018 June 3Rd, 2018 19 Men and 6 Women NBC's Meet the Press
    June 2018 June 3rd, 2018 19 men and 6 women NBC's Meet the Press with Chuck Todd: 5 men and 1 woman Frm. Mayor Rudy Giuliani (M) PM Justin Trudeau (M) Joshua Johnson (M) Peggy Noonan (W) Rich Lowry (M) Ben Rhodes (M) CBS's Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan: 5 men and 2 women Gov. John Kasich (M) Rep. Will Hurd (M) Frm. Amb. Robert Gallucci (M) Dr. Jung Pak (W) David Nakamura (M) Susan Page (W) Michael Crowley (M) ABC's This Week with George Stephanopoulos: 5 men and 2 women Frm. Mayor Rudy Giuliani (M) Frm. Amb. Bill Richardson (M) Tom Bossert (M) Sue Mi Terry (W) Frm. Speaker Newt Gingrich (M) Karen Finney (W) Patrick Gaspard (M) CNN's State of the Union with Jake Tapper: *With Guest Host Dana Bash 1 man and 1 woman Rep. Kevin McCarthy (M) Minister Chrystia Freeland (W) Fox News' Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace: 3 men and 0 women Corey Lewandowski (M) Guy Benson (M) Larry Kudlow (M) June 10th, 2018 13 men and 6 women NBC's Meet the Press with Chuck Todd: No Data Available CBS's Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan: 4 men and 4 women Frm. Amb. Susan Rice (W) Dir. Larry Kudlow (M) Sen. Edward Markey (M) Evan Osnos (M) Seung Min Kim (W) Selena Zito (W) Molly Ball (W) Kenneth Starr (M) ABC's This Week with George Stephanopoulos: 1 man and 0 women Jonathan Cheng (M) CNN's State of the Union with Jake Tapper: 1 man and 2 women Dir.
    [Show full text]
  • WIIS DC Think Tank Gender Scorecard – DATASET 2018 Index/Appendix: American Enterprise Institute (AEI) Foreign and Defense
    • Nonresident Fellow, Rafik Hariri Center for the WIIS DC Think Tank Gender Scorecard – Middle East: Mona Alami (F) DATASET 2018 Index/Appendix: • Nonresident Senior Fellow, Adrienne Arsht Latin America Center: Laura Albornoz Pollmann (F) • Nonresident Senior Fellow, Rafik Hariri Center for American Enterprise Institute (AEI) the Middle East: Ali Alfoneh (M) Foreign and Defense Policy Scholars in AEI: • Associate Director for Programs, Rafik Hariri Center • Visiting Scholar: Samuel J. Abrams (M) for the Middle East: Stefanie Hausheer Ali (F) • Wilson H. Taylor Scholar in Health Care and • Nonresident Senior Fellow, Cyber Statecraft Retirement Policy: Joseph Antos (M) Initiative: Dmitri Alperovitch (M) • Resident Scholar and Director of Russian Studies: • Nonresident Fellow, Rafik Hariri Center: Dr. Hussein Leon Aron (M) Amach (M) • Visiting Fellow: John P. Bailey (M) • Nonresident Fellow, Brent Scowcroft Center on • Resident Scholar: Claude Barfield (M) International Security: Dave Anthony (M) • Resident Fellow: Michael Barone (M) • Nonresident Senior Fellow, Global Energy Center: • Visiting Scholar: Robert J. Barro (M) Ragnheiður Elín Árnadóttir (F) • Visiting Scholar: Roger Bate (M) • Visiting Fellow, Brent Scowcroft Center on • Visiting Scholar: Eric J. Belasco (M) International Security/RUSI: Lisa Aronsson (F) • Resident Scholar: Andrew G. Biggs (M) • Executive Vice Chair, Atlantic Council Board of • Visiting Fellow: Edward Blum (M) Directors and International Advisory Board; Chair, • Director of Asian Studies and Resident Fellow: Dan Atlantic Council Business Development and New Blumenthal (M) Ventures Committee; Chairman Emerita, TotalBank • Senior Fellow: Karlyn Bowman (F) (no photo) • Resident Fellow: Alex Brill (M) • Atlantic Council Representative; Director, Atlantic • President; Beth and Ravenel Curry Scholar in Free Council IN TURKEY and Istanbul Summit: Defne Enterprise: Arthur C.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Conservative Constructions of American Exceptionalism
    Journal of Contemporary Rhetoric, Vol. 1, No.2, 2011, pp. 40-54. Contemporary Conservative Constructions of American Exceptionalism Jason A. Edwards Ever since President Obama took office in 2009, there has been an underlying debate amongst politicians, pundits, and policymakers over America’s exceptionalist nature. American exceptionalism is one of the foundational myths of U.S. identity. While analyses of Barack Obama’s views on American exceptionalism are quite prominent, there has been little discussion of conservative rhetorical constructions of this impor- tant myth. In this essay, I seek to fill this gap by mapping prominent American conservatives’ rhetorical voice on American exceptionalism. Keywords: American exceptionalism, conservative rhetoric, jeremiad In April 2009, President Obama travelled to Europe to meet with European leaders in coordinating a strategy to deal with the global financial crisis and to celebrate the 60th anniversary of the NATO alliance. At a news conference in Strasbourg, France, Ed Luce of the Financial Times asked the president whether or not he believed in American ex- ceptionalism. Obama answered by stating, I believe in American exceptionalism, just as I suspect that the Brits believe in British ex- ceptionalism and the Greeks believe in Greek exceptionalism. I am enormously proud of my country and its role and history in the world . we have a core set of values that are en- shrined in our Constitution, in our body of law, in our democratic practices, in our belief in free speech and equality that, though imperfect, are exceptional. Now, the fact that I am very proud of my country and I think that we‟ve got a whole lot to offer the world does not lessen my interest in recognizing the value and wonderful qualities of other countries or recogniz- ing that we‟re not always going to be right, or that people may have good ideas, or that in order for us to work collectively, all parties, have to compromise, and that includes us.
    [Show full text]
  • Ted Malloch 1 DOCUMENT REQUESTS Please Produce The
    Ted Malloch DOCUMENT REQUESTS Please produce the documents set forth in Schedule A, provided, however, that in order to facilitate production of documents on an expedited basis, you may limit your production at this time to documents you furnished at any time after November 8, 2016 to: (a) the Special Counsel’s Office established by Department of Justice Order No. 3915-2017 (May 17, 2017); (b) the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York (“SDNY”); (c) any other federal or state regulatory and/or law enforcement agency; (d) any congressional committee; or (e) in civil or other litigation. This includes but is not limited to documents that were voluntarily provided, produced under compulsion, or seized. Instructions for producing documents appear in Schedule B, and definitions appear in Schedule C. SCHEDULE A 1) All documents relating to the following: (a) Discussions or attempts to provide or receive election information, campaign data, or campaign communications with, to, or from foreign entities or individuals in connection with the 2016 U.S. Presidential primary or general elections. This includes, but is not limited to, voter data, polling information, political ad targeting, voter registration rolls, social media data, and campaign or party e-mails. (b) Any contacts, direct or indirect, from January 1, 2015 to January 20, 2017 between or involving the Russian Federation and its officials, agents, intermediaries, and/or instrumentalities and any of the following: Donald Trump, the Trump Campaign, the Trump Organization, Paul Manafort, Rick Gates, Michael Cohen, Michael Flynn, Jeff Sessions, Jared Kushner, Thomas Bossert, Roger Stone, Jerome Corsi, George Papadopoulos, Carter Page, Konstantin Kilimnik, K.T.
    [Show full text]
  • Combating Russian Disinformation in Ukraine: Case Studies in a Market for Loyalties
    COMBATING RUSSIAN DISINFORMATION IN UKRAINE: CASE STUDIES IN A MARKET FOR LOYALTIES Monroe E. Price* & Adam P. Barry** I. INTRODUCTION This essay takes an oblique approach to the discussion of “fake news.” The approach is oblique geographically because it is not a discourse about fake news that emerges from the more frequently invoked cases centered on the United States and Western Europe, but instead relates primarily to Ukraine. It concerns the geopolitics of propaganda and associated practices of manipulation, heightened persuasion, deception, and the use of available techniques. This essay is also oblique in its approach because it deviates from the largely definitional approach – what is and what is not fake news – to the structural approach. Here, we take a leaf from the work of the (not-so) “new institutionalists,” particularly those who have studied what might be called the sociology of decision-making concerning regulations.1 This essay hypothesizes that studying modes of organizing social policy discourse ultimately can reveal or predict a great deal about the resulting policy outcomes, certainly supplementing a legal or similar analysis. Developing this form of analysis may be particularly important as societies seek to come to grips with the phenomena lumped together under the broad rubric of fake news. The process by which stakeholders assemble to determine a collective position will likely have major consequences for the * Monroe E. Price is an Adjunct Full Professor at the Annenberg School for Communication and the Joseph and Sadie Danciger Professor of Law at Cardozo School of Law. He directs the Stanhope Centre for Communications Policy Research in London, and is the Chair of the Center for Media and Communication Studies of the Central European University in Budapest.” ** Adam P.
    [Show full text]
  • How the Kremlin Weaponizes Information, Culture and Money by Peter Pomerantsev and Michael Weiss
    The Menace of Unreality: How the Kremlin Weaponizes Information, Culture and Money by Peter Pomerantsev and Michael Weiss A Special Report presented by The Interpreter, a project of the Institute of Modern Russia imrussia.org interpretermag.com The Institute of Modern Russia (IMR) is a nonprofit, nonpartisan public policy organization—a think tank based in New York. IMR’s mission is to foster democratic and economic development in Russia through research, advocacy, public events, and grant-making. We are committed to strengthening respect for human rights, the rule of law, and civil society in Russia. Our goal is to promote a principles- based approach to US-Russia relations and Russia’s integration into the community of democracies. The Interpreter is a daily online journal dedicated primarily to translating media from the Russian press and blogosphere into English and reporting on events inside Russia and in countries directly impacted by Russia’s foreign policy. Conceived as a kind of “Inopressa in reverse,” The Interpreter aspires to dismantle the language barrier that separates journalists, Russia analysts, policymakers, diplomats and interested laymen in the English-speaking world from the debates, scandals, intrigues and political developments taking place in the Russian Federation. CONTENTS Introductions ...................................................................... 4 Executive Summary ........................................................... 6 Background ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ASD-Covert-Foreign-Money.Pdf
    overt C Foreign Covert Money Financial loopholes exploited by AUGUST 2020 authoritarians to fund political interference in democracies AUTHORS: Josh Rudolph and Thomas Morley © 2020 The Alliance for Securing Democracy Please direct inquiries to The Alliance for Securing Democracy at The German Marshall Fund of the United States 1700 18th Street, NW Washington, DC 20009 T 1 202 683 2650 E [email protected] This publication can be downloaded for free at https://securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/covert-foreign-money/. The views expressed in GMF publications and commentary are the views of the authors alone. Cover and map design: Kenny Nguyen Formatting design: Rachael Worthington Alliance for Securing Democracy The Alliance for Securing Democracy (ASD), a bipartisan initiative housed at the German Marshall Fund of the United States, develops comprehensive strategies to deter, defend against, and raise the costs on authoritarian efforts to undermine and interfere in democratic institutions. ASD brings together experts on disinformation, malign finance, emerging technologies, elections integrity, economic coercion, and cybersecurity, as well as regional experts, to collaborate across traditional stovepipes and develop cross-cutting frame- works. Authors Josh Rudolph Fellow for Malign Finance Thomas Morley Research Assistant Contents Executive Summary �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 1 Introduction and Methodology ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
    [Show full text]
  • Presidential Administration Under Trump Daniel A
    Presidential Administration Under Trump Daniel A. Farber1 Anne Joseph O’Connell2 I. Introduction [I would widen the Introduction: focusing on the problem of what kind of president Donald Trump is and what the implications are. The descriptive and normative angles do not seem to have easy answers. There is a considerable literature in political science and law on positive/descriptive theories of the president. Kagan provides just one, but an important one. And there is much ink spilled on the legal dimensions. I propose that after flagging the issue, the Introduction would provide some key aspects of Trump as president, maybe even through a few bullet points conveying examples, raise key normative questions, and then lay out a roadmap for the article. One thing to address is what ways we think Trump is unique for a study of the President and for the study of Administrative Law, if at all.] [We should draft this after we have other sections done.] Though the Presidency has been a perennial topic in the legal literature, Justice Elena Kagan, in her earlier career as an academic, penned an enormously influential 2001 article about the increasingly dominant role of the President in regulation, at the expense of the autonomy of administrative agencies.3 The article’s thesis, simply stated, was that “[w]e live in an era of presidential administration.”, by 1 Sho Sato Professor of Law at the University of California, Berkeley. 2 George Johnson Professor of Law at the University of California, Berkeley. 3 Elena Kagan, Presidential Administration, 114 HARV. L. REV. 2245 (2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Mueller Testimony
    Colborn, Paul P (OLC) From: Colborn, Paul P (OLC) Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2019 9:54 AM To: Engel, Steven A. (OLC); Gannon, Curtis E. (OLC) Subject: Fwd: Discuss Mueller testimony Won't be back until 12:15 or later. Could join noon meeting late and can do 3:30. Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: "Lasseter, David F. {OLA)" <[email protected]> Date: May 14, 2019 at 9:51:28 AM EDT To: "O'Callaghan, Edward C. (OOAG}" <[email protected]>, "Rabbitt, Brian (OAG)" <[email protected]>, "Weinsheimer, Bradley (ODAG)" <[email protected]>, "Engel, Steven A. (OLC)" ,., (b) (6) per OLC , "Colborn, Paul P (OLC)" ,., (b) (6) per OLC >, "Gannon, Curtis E. (OLC)" > Cc: "Boyd, Stephen E. (OLA)" <[email protected]> Subject: Discuss Mueller testimony Good morning all. Could we gather today to discuss the potential testimony of Mr. Mueller (b) (5) I SCO is discussing the scheduling of the testimony with HJC and HPSCI but needs to be better informed on the process as they seek an agreement. Would noon or 3:30 work? Thanks, David David F. Lasseter Document ID: 0.7.23922.34583 Rabbitt, Brian (OAG) From: Rabbitt, Brian (OAG) Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2019 10:27 AM To: Engel, Steven A. (O LC); Lasseter, David F. {OLA); O'Callaghan, Edward C. (OOAG); Weinsheimer, Bradley (OOAG); Colborn, Paul P (OLC); Gannon, Curtis E. {O LC) Cc: Boyd, Stephen E. {OLA) Subject: RE: Discuss Mueller testimony 330 would be best for me. -Original Message---- From: Engel, Steven A. (OLC) < (b) (6) per OLC •> Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2019 10:04 AM To: Lasseter, David F.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate and Foreign Interests Behind White House Push to Transfer U.S
    Corporate and Foreign Interests Behind White House Push to Transfer U.S. Nuclear Technology to Saudi Arabia Prepared for Chairman Elijah E. Cummings Second Interim Staff Report Committee on Oversight and Reform U.S. House of Representatives July 2019 oversight.house.gov EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On February 19, 2019, the Committee on Oversight and Reform issued an interim staff report prepared for Chairman Elijah E. Cummings after multiple whistleblowers came forward to warn about efforts inside the White House to rush the transfer of U.S. nuclear technology to Saudi Arabia. As explained in the first interim staff report, under Section 123 of the Atomic Energy Act, the United States may not transfer nuclear technology to a foreign country without the approval of Congress in order to ensure that the agreement meets nine nonproliferation requirements to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons. These agreements, commonly known as “123 Agreements,” are typically negotiated with career experts at the National Security Council (NSC) and the Departments of State, Defense, and Energy. The “Gold Standard” for 123 Agreements is a commitment by the foreign country not to enrich or re-process nuclear fuel and not to engage in activities linked to the risk of nuclear proliferation. During the Obama Administration, Saudi Arabia refused to agree to the Gold Standard. During the Trump Administration, Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS) went further, proclaiming: “Without a doubt, if Iran developed a nuclear bomb, we will follow suit as soon as possible.” There is strong bipartisan opposition to abandoning the “Gold Standard” for Saudi Arabia in any future 123 Agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Full What Happened Collection [PDF]
    American Compass December 2020 WHAT HAPPENED THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY IN REVIEW AMERICAN COMPASS is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization, launched in May 2020 with a mission to restore an economic consensus that emphasizes the importance of family, community, and industry to the nation’s liberty and prosperity— REORIENTING POLITICAL FOCUS from growth for its own sake to widely shared economic development that sustains vital social institutions; SETTING A COURSE for a country in which families can achieve self-sufficiency, contribute productively to their communities, and prepare the next generation for the same; and HELPING POLICYMAKERS NAVIGATE the limitations that markets and government each face in promoting the general welfare and the nation’s security. www.americancompass.org [email protected] What Happened: The Trump Presidency in Review Table of Contents FOREWORD: THE WORK REMAINS President Trump told many important truths, but one also has to act by Daniel McCarthy 1 INTRODUCTION 4 TOO FEW OF THE PRESIDENT’S MEN An iconoclast’s administration will struggle to find personnel both experienced and aligned by Rachel Bovard 5 A POPULISM DEFERRED Trump’s transitional presidency lacked the vision and agenda necessary to let go of GOP orthodoxy by Julius Krein 11 THE POTPOURRI PRESIDENCY A decentralized and conflicted administration was uniquely inconsistent in its policy actions by Wells King 17 SOME LIKE IT HOT Unsustainable economic stimulus at an expansion’s peak, not tax cuts or tariffs, fueled the Trump boom by Oren Cass 23 Copyright © 2020 by American Compass, Inc. Electronic versions of these articles with hyperlinked references are available at www.americancompass.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of Prohibited Political Activity, Dr. Peter Navarro (HA-20-000279
    U.S. OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL 1730 M Street, N.W., Suite 218 Washington, D.C. 20036-4505 202-804-7000 December 7, 2020 The President The White House Washington, D.C. 20500 RE: OSC Case File No. HA-20-000279 Dear Mr. President: Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. §1215(b), I am forwarding the U.S. Office of Special Counsel’s (OSC) investigative findings regarding allegations that Dr. Peter Navarro, Assistant to the President and Director of the Office for Trade and Manufacturing Policy, engaged in prohibited political activity. As detailed in the accompanying report, OSC concluded that Dr. Navarro violated the Hatch Act on several occasions when he engaged in political activity in his official capacity. In accordance with 5 U.S.C. §1215(b), OSC provided Dr. Navarro with an opportunity to respond to the report, but he has chosen not to do so. Therefore, OSC submits this report to you for appropriate action. Respectfully, Henry J. Kerner Special Counsel Enclosure U.S. OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL Report of Prohibited Political Activity Under the Hatch Act OSC File No. HA-20-000279 (Peter Navarro) November 18, 2020 This report represents the deliberative attorney work product of the U.S. Office of Special Counsel and is considered privileged and confidential. Any release of information beyond persons specifically designated by the U.S. Office of Special Counsel to have access to its contents is prohibited. All Freedom of Information Act inquiries regarding this report should be referred to OSC’s FOIA Officer at (202) 804-7000. Report of Prohibited Political Activity OSC File No.
    [Show full text]