Copy of Grafik Obsluzhvane 160320 ENG
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Central Regions and the Sofia Agglomeration Area
Maria Shishmanova THE CENTRAL REGIONS AND THE SOFIA AGGLOMERATION AREA Abstract. The research presents central regions in Bulgaria using taxonometric method with relevant conclusions. Each municipality in central regions is particularly examined by the elaborated methodic materials. The developed agglomeration areas are situated in the central regions. Sofia agglomeration area is presented using General Spatial Plan of Sofia municipality and Municipal Development Plan (MDP) of Sofia metropolitan municipality. It is set out the vision of development and its priorities, objectives and measures. Key words: central regions, agglomeration areas, Sofia agglomeration area, General Spatial Plan, Municipal Development Plan. Introduction The Central regions comprise 45 percent of the Bulgarian territory. The agglomeration areas are formed in them. The present study examines the development of the Sofia agglomeration area – a metropolis in the central regions of Bulgaria. The agglomeration areas are formed within the range of the central regions in Bulgaria – 6 agglomeration areas with a center – a large city, 30 agglomeration areas with a center – a medium-sized town. Six of the agglomeration areas are formations with more than three municipalities, five of them are with three municipalities each, ten are with 2 municipalities and the rest 15 are autonomous municipalities with an established core. These areas represent the backbone of the economy and social and human potential of the country. They have the highest degree of competitiveness and attractiveness for investment and innovation. Eighty eight municipalities with a total population of 5885455 people1 are included within the scope of the agglomeration areas, which constitutes 77.4 percent of the population of the country. -
River Names As a Testament of Cultural Heritage
ONOMÀSTICA 5 (2019): 65–89 | RECEPCIÓ 28.10.2019 | ACCEPTACIÓ 28.11.2019 River names as a testament of cultural heritage (on hydronyms in the Iskar river basin) Anna Choleva-Dimitrova Department of Onomastics Institute for Bulgarian Language, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences [email protected] Abstract: River names are some of the oldest -onyms on record. The article examines 170 river names from the basin of the Iskar river – the largest tributary of the Danube in Bulgaria. The origin and significance of river names emerge through the application of traditional onomastic methods – onomastic (etymological) analysis and onomastic reconstruction. Comparative onomastic data from adjacent and more distant regions in Bulgaria and the Balkans are also drawn on. Conclusions about the relative antiquity of the hydronyms are drawn. Key words: river name, hydronym, Iskar river, Danube river, tributary of a river Els noms dels rius com a llegat del patrimoni cultural (Sobre hidrònims a la conca del riu Iskar) Resum: Els noms dels rius, o topònims fluvials, són uns dels noms més antics de què es té notícia. L’article examina 170 noms de rius de la conca del riu Iskar —el major afluent del Danubi a Bulgària. Tractem d’aclarir l’origen i la significació d’aquests noms a partir de l’aplicació de mètodes onomàstics tradicionals: anàlisi etimològica i reconstrucció onomàstica. També es recullen dades onomàstiques comparatives de regions de Bulgària i dels Balcans, més properes i més llunyanes. Proposem algunes conclusions sobre l’antiguitat relativa dels hidrònims. Paraules clau: nom de riu, hidrònim, riu Iskar, riu Danubi, afluent d’un riu 1 Introduction Hydronymy is one of the most important branches of onomastics. -
Navigation Map of Bulgaria Including Offroadmap by Offroad-Bulgaria.Com Version 2021 Q1
Navigation Map of Bulgaria Including OFFRoadMap by OFFRoad-Bulgaria.com Version 2021 Q2 The purpose of this map is to provide accessible, accurate and up-to-date information for your GPS devices. Despite all efforts made by the creators to achieve this goal, the roads and the data included in this digital map are intended to be used as guidance only and should not be used solely for navigation. The creators of this map make no warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of the map data. In no event will the creators of this map be liable for any damages whatsoever, including but not limited to loss of revenue or profit, lost or damaged data, and expenses, arising in any way from or consequential upon the use of, or the inability to use this digital map. Contents: - Registering your map - Usage details - OFRM Geotrade 2021 Q2 variants - Coverage >>>>> REGISTRATION <<<<< To register your OFRM Geotrade map, please visit out website www.karta.bg. Click on “Create profile” in the top right corner of the screen and create your personal account. When done, the Support page will load automatically. Click on the button “Register OFRM Geotrade” and enter the 25-symbol map serial number and GPS model to activate your map’s update subscription (if your map includes one). To obtain the 25-symbol serial number, connect your GPS device to your computer via USB cable. If you have a GPS device with preloaded OFRM map, you will find the serial number in file “serial.txt” in the root folder of your device’s base memory or in the file “gmapsupp.unl” in folder “Garmin” (or folder “Map” on the newer models of the nüvi series and the new Drive series) of your device’s base memory. -
Luftwaffe Airfields 1935-45 Bulgaria
Luftwaffe Airfields 1935-45 Luftwaffe Airfields 1935-45 Bulgaria By Henry L. deZeng IV General Map Edition: November 2014 Luftwaffe Airfields 1935-45 Copyright © by Henry L. deZeng IV (Work in Progress). (1st Draft 2014) Blanket permission is granted by the author to researchers to extract information from this publication for their personal use in accordance with the generally accepted definition of fair use laws. Otherwise, the following applies: All rights reserved. No part of this publication, an original work by the authors, may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form, or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise), without the prior written permission of the author. Any person who does any unauthorized act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. This information is provided on an "as is" basis without condition apart from making an acknowledgement of authorship. Luftwaffe Airfields 1935-45 Airfields Bulgaria Introduction Conventions 1. For the purpose of this reference work, “Bulgaria” generally means the territory belonging to the country on 6 April 1941, the date of the German invasion and occupation of Yugoslavia and Greece. The territory occupied and acquired by Bulgaria after that date is not included. 2. All spellings are as they appear in wartime German documents with the addition of alternate spellings where known. Place names in the Cyrillic alphabet as used in the Bulgarian language have been transliterated into the English equivalent as they appear on Google Earth. 3. It is strongly recommended that researchers use the search function because each airfield and place name has alternate spellings, sometimes 3 or 4. -
1 NATIONAL Ngos NETWORK for CIVIL COURT WATCH Quarterly
NATIONAL NGOs NETWORK FOR CIVIL COURT WATCH Quarterly analytical report of civil court watch of regional courts in Pleven, Levski, Cherven bryag and Gabrovo Observation period: December 2010-February 2011 Project “Justice reach to people” The project is funded by America for Bulgaria Foundation THE PROJECT IS CARRIED OUT WITH THE SUPPORT OF SUPREME JUDICIAL COUNCIL March 2011 Razgrad 1 We want to thank to: Special thanks to Team America for Bulgaria Foundation which supported the idea of the project and all the time encourage us. We thank to all participants in the civil court watch, which showed both civil activity and high professionalism in the collection of data and the shaping of the primary reports. Special thanks to all representatives of the judicial authority in four legal areas, which fully cooperated us and have provided us valuable advices for our conclusions and recommendations: Diana Petrakieva – Chairman of District Court - Gabrovo, Palmira Atanasova - Chairman of Regional Court - Levski, Daniela Dilova – Chairman of the Regional Court - Pleven, Hristo Parvanov - Chairman of Regional Court – Cherven bryag. Valuable assistance to us proved the judicial administrators and administrative secretaries, which provided suitable conditions for organizing civil court watch. Authors: Georgi Milkov – NGOs Centre in Razgrad Konstantin Petrov – NGOs Centre in Razgrad Stoyanka Nedelcheva - NGOs Centre in Razgrad Katia Bojikova - NCC "Lik", Pleven Valentina Sofronieva - NPLE "Hope 2002",Levski Paunka Tsvetkova – Chitalishte “Light", Cherven bryag Elena Nazarova – Citalishte "Aprilov-Palauzov 1861", Gabrovo Pleven: Daniel Jonkov - civil observer, Svetoslav Ivanov – civil observer Lubov Kirilova- expert, Maya Mironova-expert. Levski: Ilka Dicheva - observer, Emilia Kondova - observer, Zoya Licheva - expert, Ivelina Fzdravkova - expert. -
CULTURAL HERITAGE in MIGRATION Published Within the Project Cultural Heritage in Migration
CULTURAL HERITAGE IN MIGRATION Published within the project Cultural Heritage in Migration. Models of Consolidation and Institutionalization of the Bulgarian Communities Abroad funded by the Bulgarian National Science Fund © Nikolai Vukov, Lina Gergova, Tanya Matanova, Yana Gergova, editors, 2017 © Institute of Ethnology and Folklore Studies with Ethnographic Museum – BAS, 2017 © Paradigma Publishing House, 2017 ISBN 978-954-326-332-5 BULGARIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES INSTITUTE OF ETHNOLOGY AND FOLKLORE STUDIES WITH ETHNOGRAPHIC MUSEUM CULTURAL HERITAGE IN MIGRATION Edited by Nikolai Vukov, Lina Gergova Tanya Matanova, Yana Gergova Paradigma Sofia • 2017 CONTENTS EDITORIAL............................................................................................................................9 PART I: CULTURAL HERITAGE AS A PROCESS DISPLACEMENT – REPLACEMENT. REAL AND INTERNALIZED GEOGRAPHY IN THE PSYCHOLOGY OF MIGRATION............................................21 Slobodan Dan Paich THE RUSSIAN-LIPOVANS IN ITALY: PRESERVING CULTURAL AND RELIGIOUS HERITAGE IN MIGRATION.............................................................41 Nina Vlaskina CLASS AND RELIGION IN THE SHAPING OF TRADITION AMONG THE ISTANBUL-BASED ORTHODOX BULGARIANS...............................55 Magdalena Elchinova REPRESENTATIONS OF ‘COMPATRIOTISM’. THE SLOVAK DIASPORA POLITICS AS A TOOL FOR BUILDING AND CULTIVATING DIASPORA.............72 Natália Blahová FOLKLORE AS HERITAGE: THE EXPERIENCE OF BULGARIANS IN HUNGARY.......................................................................................................................88 -
7563/11 HGN/Tt 1 DG H 2B COUNCIL of the EUROPEAN
COUNCIL OF Brussels, 10 March 2011 THE EUROPEAN UNION 7563/11 COPEN 44 EJN 20 EUROJUST 29 NOTE from: Bulgarian Permanent Representation to Delegations Subject: Council Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA of 6 October 2006 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to confiscation orders – the Republic of Bulgaria Delegations will find enclosed the notification made by Bulgaria in relation to the abovementioned framework decision. _______________ 7563/11 HGN/tt 1 DG H 2B EN DECLARATIONS AND NOTIFICATIONS BY THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 3, ARTICLE 7(5) AND ARTICLE 19 OF COUNCIL FRAMEWORK DECISION 2006/783/JHA OF 6 OCTOBER 2006 ON THE APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION TO CONFISCATION ORDERS The Republic of Bulgaria hereby notifies the General Secretariat of the Council of the following declarations and notifications pursuant to Council Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA of 6 October 2006 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to confiscation orders and the Law on the recognition, execution and transmission of decisions on confiscation or seizure and decisions on the enforcement of financial penalties adopted by the National Assembly of the Republic of Bulgaria on 11 February 2010 (published in the State Journal of the Republic of Bulgaria No 15 of 23 February 2010), which transposes the abovementioned Framework Decision into the law of the Republic of Bulgaria. 1) Notification pursuant to Article 3 of Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA (determination of the competent authorities): (а) When the Republic of Bulgaria is the executing State: The competent authorities with regard to the recognition of confiscation or seizure orders shall be the provincial courts and Sofia City Court. -
Annex REPORT for 2019 UNDER the “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY of the REPUBLIC of BULGAR
Annex REPORT FOR 2019 UNDER THE “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA 2012 - 2020 Operational objective: A national monitoring progress report has been prepared for implementation of Measure 1.1.2. “Performing obstetric and gynaecological examinations with mobile offices in settlements with compact Roma population”. During the period 01.07—20.11.2019, a total of 2,261 prophylactic medical examinations were carried out with the four mobile gynaecological offices to uninsured persons of Roma origin and to persons with difficult access to medical facilities, as 951 women were diagnosed with diseases. The implementation of the activity for each Regional Health Inspectorate is in accordance with an order of the Minister of Health to carry out not less than 500 examinations with each mobile gynaecological office. Financial resources of BGN 12,500 were allocated for each mobile unit, totalling BGN 50,000 for the four units. During the reporting period, the mobile gynecological offices were divided into four areas: Varna (the city of Varna, the village of Kamenar, the town of Ignatievo, the village of Staro Oryahovo, the village of Sindel, the village of Dubravino, the town of Provadia, the town of Devnya, the town of Suvorovo, the village of Chernevo, the town of Valchi Dol); Silistra (Tutrakan Municipality– the town of Tutrakan, the village of Tsar Samuel, the village of Nova Cherna, the village of Staro Selo, the village of Belitsa, the village of Preslavtsi, the village of Tarnovtsi, -
1 I. ANNEXES 1 Annex 6. Map and List of Rural Municipalities in Bulgaria
I. ANNEXES 1 Annex 6. Map and list of rural municipalities in Bulgaria (according to statistical definition). 1 List of rural municipalities in Bulgaria District District District District District District /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality Blagoevgrad Vidin Lovech Plovdiv Smolyan Targovishte Bansko Belogradchik Apriltsi Brezovo Banite Antonovo Belitsa Boynitsa Letnitsa Kaloyanovo Borino Omurtag Gotse Delchev Bregovo Lukovit Karlovo Devin Opaka Garmen Gramada Teteven Krichim Dospat Popovo Kresna Dimovo Troyan Kuklen Zlatograd Haskovo Petrich Kula Ugarchin Laki Madan Ivaylovgrad Razlog Makresh Yablanitsa Maritsa Nedelino Lyubimets Sandanski Novo Selo Montana Perushtitsa Rudozem Madzharovo Satovcha Ruzhintsi Berkovitsa Parvomay Chepelare Mineralni bani Simitli Chuprene Boychinovtsi Rakovski Sofia - district Svilengrad Strumyani Vratsa Brusartsi Rodopi Anton Simeonovgrad Hadzhidimovo Borovan Varshets Sadovo Bozhurishte Stambolovo Yakoruda Byala Slatina Valchedram Sopot Botevgrad Topolovgrad Burgas Knezha Georgi Damyanovo Stamboliyski Godech Harmanli Aitos Kozloduy Lom Saedinenie Gorna Malina Shumen Kameno Krivodol Medkovets Hisarya Dolna banya Veliki Preslav Karnobat Mezdra Chiprovtsi Razgrad Dragoman Venets Malko Tarnovo Mizia Yakimovo Zavet Elin Pelin Varbitsa Nesebar Oryahovo Pazardzhik Isperih Etropole Kaolinovo Pomorie Roman Batak Kubrat Zlatitsa Kaspichan Primorsko Hayredin Belovo Loznitsa Ihtiman Nikola Kozlevo Ruen Gabrovo Bratsigovo Samuil Koprivshtitsa Novi Pazar Sozopol Dryanovo -
KNOWLEDGE – International Journal Vol.45.3 PESTICIDE RESIDUES in FEED and DAIRY PRDUCTS
KNOWLEDGE – International Journal Vol.45.3 PESTICIDE RESIDUES IN FEED AND DAIRY PRDUCTS Hristo Hristev Agricultural university of Plovdiv, Bulgaria, [email protected] Rumyana Ivanova Agricultural university of Plovdiv, Bulgaria, [email protected] Abstract: An analysis for residual amounts of organochlorine pesticides in feed, mixed sheep's milk and cheese from the Plovdiv region was made. The found presence of total fractions of DDT, Lindane, Heptachlor, Aldrin, Dieldrin, Endrin, Hexachlorobenzene, were all within the permissible limits. The highest content of DDT-total fractions was found in feed from the region of the village of Kuklen (0,8965 mg / kg), highest content of Lindan (0,0440 mg / kg) from the village of Voyvodinovo and for Endrin (0,0802 mg / kg) from the village of Graf Ignatievo. The content of forbidden pesticides increases during the spring and summer months, when the use of products for plant protection, including the forbidden ones, increases due to the active outdoor agro-ameliorative activities. In mixed sheep's milk most often we found total fractions of DDT and Lindane. The same is observed for cheese samples. The milk from the village of Tsaratsovo has the highest content of DDT – 0,7249, and for cheese - from the village of Stroevo (1,8068). Keywords: feed, milk, cheese, organochlorine pesticides ОСТАТЪЧНИ КОЛИЧЕСТВА ПЕСТИЦИДИ ВЪВ ФУРАЖИ И МЛЕЧНИ ПРОДУКТИ Христо Христев Аграрен университет, Пловдив, България, [email protected] Румяна Иванова Аграрен университет, Пловдив, България, [email protected] Резюме: Направен е анализ на фуражи, сборно овче мляко и сирена от района на Пловдивска област за остатъчни количества хлорорганични пестициди. -
Priority Public Investments for Wastewater Treatment and Landfill of Waste
Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Develonment Europe and Central Asia Region 32051 BULGARIA Public Disclosure Authorized ENVIRONMENTAL SEQUENCING STRATEGIES FOR EU ACCESSION PriorityPublic Investments for Wastewater Treatment and Landfill of Waste *t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Public Disclosure Authorized IC- - ; s - o Fk - L - -. Public Disclosure Authorized The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized May 2004 - "Wo BULGARIA ENVIRONMENTAL SEQUENCING STRATEGIES FOR EU ACCESSION Priority Public Investments for Wastewater Treatment and Landfill of Waste May 2004 Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development Europe and Central Asia Region Report No. 27770 - BUL Thefindings, interpretationsand conclusions expressed here are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Board of Executive Directors of the World Bank or the governments they represent. Coverphoto is kindly provided by the external communication office of the World Bank County Office in Bulgaria. The report is printed on 30% post consumer recycledpaper. TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ..................................................................... i Abbreviations and Acronyms ..................................................................... ii Summary ..................................................................... iiM Introduction.iii Wastewater.iv InstitutionalIssues .xvi Recommendations........... xvii Introduction ...................................................................... 1 Part I: The Strategic Settings for -
Soil Degradation and Sustainability of Small and Medium Sized Farms in the Plovdiv Region, Bulgaria
SOIL DEGRADATION AND SUSTAINABILITY OF SMALL AND MEDIUM SIZED FARMS IN THE PLOVDIV REGION, BULGARIA A. ALEXIEV**, S. BÄCKMAN* AND T. SIPILÄINEN* *Department of Economics and Management, PO Box 27, 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland **Agricultural University of Plovdiv Abstract A case study of farming systems in transition in Bulgaria, the Plovdiv region was analysed, with the aim of identifying causalities of environmental and economic performance. The thematic area was soil degradation. State, pressure and management indicators are presented to describe the problem and to identify the causalities and the driving forces. The case analysed shows a variety of circumstances and environmental problems requiring different measurements and specific indicators. Decreasing intensity of production leads to lower N- and P-losses and lower risk of pesticides residues. However, negative farm gate balances lead, in the medium term, to decreasing soil fertility. Wide areas of abandoned land lead to changes in biodiversity and landscape. The fragmentation of landholdings taking place can be problematic both from the viewpoint of biodiversity management and economic performance. A trade-off between environmental and economic performance occurs. An unfavourable price relation has also kept farmers income low. Therefore, farmers seem to be more concerned with maintaining liquidity and sufficient income for living than environmental issues. Thus, environmental protection is not a top priority when farmers make their choices, especially those concerning decisions with long-term effects. Break down of irrigation channels has also increased use of ground water for irrigation and thereby increased salinisation. Keywords: Farming systems, salinisation, transition This report is a combination of results from reporting in the CEESA project financed by EU Commission DG research.