To View Our 2019 Annual Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

To View Our 2019 Annual Report For the Innocent & Wrongfully Imprisoned Wrongfully & theInnocent For YEAR IN REVIEW 2o19 ARIZONA JUSTICE PROJECT MISSION: To seek justice for the innocent and the wrongfully imprisoned—the marginalized and forgotten of Arizona’s criminal justice system. 2 - 2019 YEAR IN REVIEW CONTENT Message From the President 4 Message From the Executive Director 5 Case Work & Freedom 6 Identify and Prevent Wrongful Convictions 10 Education, Training, Community Engagement 12 AJP Partners 16 Honor Roll of Donors 18 2018-2019 Fiscal Year Budget 21 2019 YEAR IN REVIEW - 3 Message From the President As 2019 draws to a close, I find myself enjoying the rare opportunity to pause and reflect on the work of the Arizona Justice Project. For the last three months, my wife and I have been away from Phoenix on a sabbatical from daily practice with Osborn Maledon, my law firm. While out of town, I have turned off everything related to the practice of law, except for the Project. Instead, I have had the luxury of time and distance to hear and see daily what our lawyers, staff, volunteers and clients have been up to. I wish I could convey in these few words how impressive it is to see innocence and justice reform at work. Here is a collage of some of what I’ve seen. Every day this Project answers the unending stream of communications from inmates, their families and supporters. Legal calls to Arizona’s prisons are a daily occurrence. Visits to our wide-spread State prisons happen every week, on top of the many court filings, records requests, hearings, and the constant need to collaborate with defense Larry Hammond lawyers, public defense offices, and prosecutors. All of this is accomplished by our half President dozen staff members, by the students and professional staff in the Post-Conviction Clinic, and by lawyer volunteers across the State. All of this is made possible because the endless fund development work—essential to our survival. And then, in the middle of all that, breathtaking moments of success emerge. This year’s most memorable moment might be the day Veronica Torres became a free person. There is not space enough for me to tell her full story, but I cannot reflect on the Project’s 22- year history without focusing on this woman’s case. She was prosecuted for a crime committed when she was 14, by a prosecutor that was blindly committed to seeking to forever end her life as a free person before it had barely begun. The Project became involved in her case—believe it or not—20 years ago. I have often said that on her behalf we “lost in every court an Arizona inmate could lose in.” State and Federal. Along the way, this young woman survived and grew to become a model of maturity within the prison system. She found ways to contribute to others from within the walls. I invite you all to read her story. Low and behold, the last few days have brought us another truly memorable moment: the Governor’s grant of clemency to Doyle Williams. Doyle, too, has been a client for 20 years, and he also has endured numerous disappointments. I am intensely proud of both Doyle and Veronica, but I am equally as proud of the lawyers, law students, law professors, and Project staff who clung with them throughout their ordeals. Pretty easy to love this Project in 2019. Thank you all. Larry A. Hammond President, Arizona Justice Project 4 - 2019 YEAR IN REVIEW Message From the Executive Director As I reflect on the work of the Arizona Justice Project in 2019, I think of a variety of successes, which seemed nearly impossible at the beginning of the year, that are coming to fruition thanks to the efforts of the incredible people committed to seeking justice. We end the year representing nine individuals whose cases are in legal proceedings on claims of wrongful conviction or manifest injustice with help from pro bono lawyers from seven different law firms in Arizona. This work truly takes a village and we could not do it without these dedicated lawyers. We end the year with a broader and stronger community of support than ever before. I am honored to share each workday with an incredibly devoted staff, to collaborate with the ASU Post-Conviction Clinic, to receive support and guidance from our Board of Directors, to work alongside gifted law students, to work with investigators and Lindsay Herf experts uncovering the truth, to partner with private foundations dedicated to making a difference in Arizona, and to connect with countless individuals in the community Executive Director supporting our efforts to bring our clients home. Finally, we end the year with two clients returning home. First, Doyle Williams. Since 1969, Doyle has been incarcerated for a homicide that he has maintained he did not commit. With the case file and evidence long gone, Doyle’s only avenue to freedom became the very slim chance of executive clemency, a two–phase hearing process with the ultimate decision resting with the Governor. Doyle is the shining example of how one can survive fifty years in prison and do so with dignity. Doyle avoided prison politics and gangs, stayed far away from drugs, bridged relationships with men of other races to maintain peace on the yard, mentored countless young men, had zero disciplinary infractions, and led a bible study practice for decades. On November 27, 2019, the Governor granted Doyle a commutation of sentence. Additionally, Veronica Torres, who entered the system at age 14, walked free on September 24, 2019. It is hard to imagine what it would be like at age 14 to enter prison and not know if you would ever get home again. It is hard to imagine what we, as a society, would expect from a person facing this reality. But I do know that Veronica Torres is unlike any other. Her accomplishments are nothing short of inspiring and she can teach us all a bit about compassion and the importance of lifting up those around us. We end the year grateful for our freedom, for all who partner with us and support these efforts, and for our clients—who make it all worthwhile. Sincerely, Lindsay Herf Executive Director, Arizona Justice Project 2019 YEAR IN REVIEW - 5 CASE WORK & FREEDOM Bringing Clients Home The work of the Arizona Justice Project is an uphill challenge. To overturn a conviction or correct an excessive sentence, the burden is high and the evidence must be strong. The inspiration for us to keep fighting comes from our clients, who suffered an injustice that should never have occurred. Veronica Torres Veronica “Vero” Torres Nevertheless, she persisted. Vero’s list of was taken into custody at accomplishments while incarcerated goes on age 14 and charged with and on, as does the list of women whom Vero murder based on a drive-by impacted with her humility, love, encouragement, shooting which occurred in and support. Vero positively affects everyone she 1994 while she was riding comes into contact with and constantly provides in a car with five other encouragement to lift up those around her. teenage girls. Vero and the AJP connected in 2002 and with the help of volunteer After a 2014 legislative fix reinstating parole eligibility attorneys, the AJP represented Vero on post-conviction for juveniles, Vero had her first parole hearing in May of relief claims related to sentencing. Unfortunately, the 2019. The Board voted 3-0 in favor of Vero’s release and post-conviction appeals were unsuccessful. Vero, on September 24, 2019, Vero came home. There is so still a young woman, faced uncertainty as to whether much good this woman can offer the world and we can’t she would ever have a chance to return home. wait to stand by her side in this next chapter of life. Doyle Williams Doyle first wrote to the AJP documents. Unfortunately, every bit of evidence on May 10, 1999, for help had been destroyed, witnesses were no longer with his case. By that time, around, and records were incomplete. Doyle had already been in prison for thirty years. It soon became clear that the only avenue to freedom Back in October of 1969, would be the very slim chance of executive clemency. Doyle and another man, Mr. In fact, Doyle had twice previously applied for executive Chambers, were arrested clemency, received unanimous recommendations and charged with the murder of a man they worked from the Board of Executive Clemency, only to be for. Mr. Chambers, admitting his guilt in the murder, dismissed by the then Governors of Arizona. pled guilty and was sentenced to 10-12 years in prison. He was released after serving 3 years. Doyle This year, Doyle and the AJP team tried again. maintained that he did not kill the victim. Doyle went In June, we had a successful clemency hearing to trial and was convicted and sentenced to “life.” where the Board voted unanimously to recommend Doyle to the Governor for clemency. After serving From 1999 to 2010, AJP law students and volunteer 50 years in prison, Governor Ducey issued a attorneys worked to track down evidence, locate proclamation granting commutation of sentence on witnesses, dig up police records, and court November 27, 2019, making him parole eligible. 6 - 2019 YEAR IN REVIEW CASE WORK & FREEDOM 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 BOARD OF EXECUTIVE CLEMENCY LITIGATION DNA TESTING FACT INVESTIGATION AMICUS BRIEFS REVIEW PROCEDURAL ISSUES AND FACTS PRE-SCREEN Litigation Update Over this past year, the AJP has reviewed and investigated dozens of cases and ends the year with nine cases pending in state or federal judicial proceedings and having represented four clients before the Arizona Board of Executive Clemency.
Recommended publications
  • Brendan Dassey's Legal Team Asks United States Supreme Court to Hear
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: February 20, 2018 MEDIA CONTACT: Laura Nirider at 312-503-8576 or [email protected] Steven Drizin at 312-503-8576 or [email protected] BRENDAN DASSEY’S LEGAL TEAM ASKS UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT TO HEAR BRENDAN’S CASE Former United States Solicitor General Seth Waxman joins Dassey’s Supreme Court team WASHINGTON DC -- Today, Brendan Dassey’s legal team filed a petition for a writ of certiorari before the United States Supreme Court, asking the high Court to agree to hear Brendan’s appeal. If the Court accepts the case, it will mark the first time the Court has agreed to hear a juvenile confession case of this type in nearly forty years. Lending formidable experience and firepower to the legal team, former Solicitor General of the United States Seth Waxman has joined Brendan’s longtime lawyers – Steven Drizin and Laura Nirider of Northwestern Pritzker School of Law’s Center on Wrongful Convictions of Youth and Robert Dvorak of Halling & Cayo S.C. – to represent Brendan before the United States Supreme Court. Waxman, who served as U.S. Solicitor General from 1997 to 2001 and is now co-chair of the Appellate and Supreme Court Litigation practice group at WilmerHale, has argued eighty cases before the United States Supreme Court. As a committed champion of pro bono work, Waxman donates over 300 hours every year to representing indigent clients at no cost. Today’s petition explains that Brendan’s case raises crucial issues that extend far beyond his case alone and that have divided state and federal courts for decades.
    [Show full text]
  • NORTHWESTERN LAW REPORTER the Makings of an Entrepreneurial Mindset
    NOTEWORTHY Five Kellogg Courses Available to Law Students This Fall Starting in Fall 2017, JD and LLM students at Northwestern Law program were employed within nine months of graduation. will have the opportunity to take a suite of five core Kellogg courses “The new course offerings bolster our commitment to preparing taught by full-time Kellogg professors, devoted solely to law stu- strong business-minded lawyers,” says Dean Daniel B. Rodriguez, dents. The courses are identical to the ones that every Kellogg MBA dean of Northwestern Law. “We are preparing our graduates to be is required to take and will go a long way in strengthening the law T-shaped lawyers — lawyers with deep-rooted foundational legal students’ understanding of modern business practices. The courses are: Accounting for Decision Making; Business Analytics; Business Strategy; Finance 1; and Leadership in “We are preparing our graduates to be T-shaped Organizations. Each of the five classes will consist of 65 students, bringing the total of offered seats to more than 300. lawyers — lawyers with deep-rooted foundational legal These courses will deepen the partnership between Kellogg and knowledge, who also possess broad cross-disciplinary Northwestern Law and strengthen the Law School’s interdisciplinary approach to preparing students to thrive in today’s complex global perspectives and understanding in relevant areas.” and technological economy. The Center for Practice Engagement — DEAN DANIEL B. RODRIGUEZ and Innovation, led by Professor James Lupo, affirmed through its ongoing dialogue with employers that clients increasingly expect their lawyers to have a strong understanding of business, making this knowledge, who also possess broad cross-disciplinary perspectives curricular innovation a practical step for training modern lawyers.
    [Show full text]
  • Gerald Gault, Meet Brendan Dassey
    ©m Grdaopohmic iSttso | c1k 23rf the authorities believed that Gerald had done something Gerald Gault, Meet wrong and were free to act accordingly. Two and a half years later, in 1967, the U.S. Supreme Brendan Dassey: Court ordered Gerald’s release in an opinion written by Justice Abe Fortas that was nothing less than a reckoning Preventing Juvenile False and Coerced for the nation’s juvenile court system. Blinded by “nei - Confessions in the 21st Century ther sentiment nor folklore,” Justice Fortas laid bare the gulf between juvenile court’s rhetoric — characterized by speeches about “kindly” judges, informality, and the therapeutic treatment and rehabilitation of youthful offenders — and its reality. Juvenile courts, according to n 1964, 15-year-old Gerald Gault was taken into cus - the justice, too often operated as “kangaroo courts” tody by the sheriff of Gila County, a rural jurisdic - prone to inaccurate fact-finding, unchecked abuses of tion about 80 miles east of Phoenix, after a neighbor discretion, and arbitrary punishments. His prescription Iaccused him of making prank telephone calls of the was a healthy dose of due process, including most promi - “irritatingly offensive, adolescent, sex variety.” Over the nently the right to counsel. To Justice Fortas, only a child course of the following week, Gerald appeared twice in aided by a lawyer’s “guiding hand” could both “ascertain the chambers of a juvenile court judge, accompanied by a defense” and “prepare and submit it.” his mother, older brother, and two probation officers. Gault revolutionized juvenile court process by not Though the hearings were not transcribed, later testimo - only requiring counsel for kids, but also granting them ny indicated that the judge questioned Gerald both times other basic ingredients of due process: the right to notice about whether he had in fact made the calls.
    [Show full text]
  • STEVEN ANDREW DRIZIN 428 Elder Lane Winnetka, IL 60093 (847) 446-6778 (H) (312) 503-8576 (W) (312) 503-8977 (FAX) [email protected]
    CURRICULUM VITAE STEVEN ANDREW DRIZIN 428 Elder Lane Winnetka, IL 60093 (847) 446-6778 (h) (312) 503-8576 (w) (312) 503-8977 (FAX) [email protected] EDUCATION NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW Chicago, Illinois Juris Doctor, May 1986 HONORS: Dean's List, Semesters 1, 2, 6; Editor-in-Chief, Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 1985-1986. HAVERFORD COLLEGE Haverford, Pennsylvania Bachelor of Arts in Political Science, 1983 HONORS: Graduated with Honors in Political Science PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY BLUHM LEGAL CLINIC August 1991- present NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW Co-Director, Center on Wrongful Convictions, January 1, 2019- Assistant Dean, Legal Clinic, September 2013-September 2017 Assistant Director, Legal Clinic, January 1, 2001-September 2013 Co-Founder, Center on Wrongful Convictions of Youth January 2008 Legal Director, Center on Wrongful Convictions, March 2005-August 2013 Clinical Professor of Law, January 1, 2004-Present Supervising Attorney, Children and Family Justice Center, June 1993 – March 2005 Lecturer in Criminal Law to First Year Students, 2000-2003 Adjunct Faculty Member, Pretrial Litigation/ Professional Responsibility, 1993-1996 SACHNOFF & WEAVER LTD. Chicago, Illinois Litigation Associate, September 1986-October 1988 September 1989-August 1991 1 Practice in commercial litigation, including federal and state civil procedure, securities fraud, fraudulent conveyance, bankruptcy, Section 1983, prisoner's rights, and breach of contract actions. JUDICIAL CLERKSHIP LAW CLERK TO THE HONORABLE ILANA D. ROVNER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION, 1988-1989. AWARDS The Haverford Award, an award by Haverford College to alums who reflect Haverford's concern with the uses to which they put their knowledge, humanity, initiative, and individuality (2018).
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE Laura H. Nirider
    CURRICULUM VITAE Laura H. Nirider 375 E. Chicago Ave., 8th Floor Chicago, Illinois 60611 (312) 503-2204 (office) (312) 503-8977 (fax) [email protected] PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY PRITZKER SCHOOL OF LAW, BLUHM LEGAL CLINIC Co-Director, Center on Wrongful Convictions, 2019-Present Director, Center on Wrongful Convictions of Youth, 2009-2018 Clinical Professor of Law, 2020-present Clinical Associate Professor, 2018-2020 Clinical Assistant Professor, 2013-2018 Clinical Fellow, 2009-2013 My responsibilities include directing the Center’s research, mission and work; producing and promoting interdisciplinary scholarship around Fifth Amendment doctrine and the problem of false confessions; representing wrongfully convicted adults and children; and co-teaching a clinical course on wrongful convictions. My research, courtroom work, and classroom work focus on police interrogations and confessions. I maintain an ongoing caseload of federal and state appellate and post-conviction cases involving individuals who were convicted as children or adolescents. The majority of my clients’ cases involve confessions. In addition to my direct representation work, I conduct research and publish scholarship around Fifth Amendment doctrine and interrogative practice; I consult on and write amicus curiae briefs in cases involving interrogations and juvenile justice across the country, including before the United States Supreme Court; I speak regularly before a wide range of professional and popular audiences about wrongful convictions and false confessions; and I undertake collaborative efforts with law enforcement in support of interrogation reform. I also regularly appear as an expert on interrogations in print, film, audio, and digital media outlets that range from Netflix’s Making a Murderer to the New York Times.
    [Show full text]
  • PROGRAMA DEL CICLO INTERNACIONAL DE SEMINARIOS: CONDENAS ERRÓENAS CONFESIÓN FALSA Gísli Guðjónsson (Reino Unido-Islandia)
    Diplomado en Sistema Procesal Penal PROGRAMA DEL CICLO INTERNACIONAL DE SEMINARIOS: CONDENAS ERRÓENAS Organizan: ASOCIACIÓN DE PENSAMIENTO PENAL CHILE DERECHO UC – DIPLOMADO SISTEMA PROCESAL PENAL EDITORIAL TIRANT LO BLANCH ▪ JORNADA 1 Sábado 20 de marzo – 12 horas CONFESIÓN FALSA Moderadora: Paula Vial Expositores: Gísli Guðjónsson (Reino Unido-Islandia) Laura Nirider (EEUU) ▪ JORNADA 2: Jueves 25 de marzo – 18 horas ERROR PERICIAL Moderadora: Susana Gatica Expositores: Audrey Mcginn (Innocence Project EEUU) Marina Gascón Abellán (España), Paula Vial Reynal (Chile) ▪ JORNADA 3 Jueves 08 de abril – 18 horas IDENTIFICACIÓN ERRÓNEA Moderadora: Grace Méndez Diplomado en Sistema Procesal Penal Expositores: Mauricio Duce (Chile) Maria Paz Bahamondez (DPP Proyecto Inocentes, Chile) ▪ JORNADA 4 Jueves 15 de abril – 18 horas MALA CONDUCTA DE AGENTE DEL ESTADO (policías, fiscales y defensores) Moderador: José Henriquez Expositores: Juan Ortiz (Perú) Indiana Guereño (Argentina) Jonathan Ramirez (Chile) *** EXPOSITORES: GISLI GUDJONSSON Gísli Hannes Guðjónsson, CBE (Nacido el 26 de octubre de 1947) es un académico, educador, psicólogo forense y ex detective islandés-británico. Es profesor emérito en el Instituto de Psiquiatría del King's College de Londres y profesor en el Departamento de Psicología de la Universidad de Reykjavik. Gísli es una autoridad de renombre internacional sobre sugerencia y confesiones falsas y es uno de los principales expertos mundiales en síndrome de memoria falsa. Diplomado en Sistema Procesal Penal El testimonio pericial de Gísli fue la base para que las condenas de los Seis de Birmingham y Guildford Four fueran anuladas. Creó la escala de sugerencia de Gudjonsson para medir cuán susceptible es alguien a la coerción durante un interrogatorio.
    [Show full text]
  • Petition for Executive Clemency October 2
    PARDON DOCKET NO. __________ Before The WISCONSIN PARDON ADVISORY BOARD October 2, 2019 ADVISING THE HONORABLE GOVERNOR TONY EVERS _____________________ In the Matter of BRENDAN RAY DASSEY _____________________ PETITION FOR EXECUTIVE CLEMENCY Counsel for Petitioner: Laura H. Nirider Robert J. Dvorak Steven A. Drizin Halling & Cayo, S.C. Center on Wrongful Convictions 320 E. Buffalo Street, Suite 700 Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law Milwaukee, WI 53202 357 East Chicago Avenue (414) 271-3400 Chicago, IL 60611 [email protected] (312) 503-8576 [email protected] [email protected] Seth P. Waxman Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP 1875 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington, DC 20006 (202) 663-6000 [email protected] 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Procedural History ........................................................................................................................... 4 Basis for Granting Clemency ............................................................................................................ 5 I. This Board can have no confidence in the evidence against Brendan Dassey. ............... 5 II. This Board can have no confidence in the process leading to Brendan Dassey’s conviction. ......................................................................................................................... 15 III. This Board can have
    [Show full text]
  • Brendan Dassey Petition for Executive Clemency
    PARDON DOCKET NO. __________ Before The WISCONSIN PARDON ADVISORY BOARD October 2, 2019 ADVISING THE HONORABLE GOVERNOR TONY EVERS _____________________ In the Matter of BRENDAN RAY DASSEY _____________________ PETITION FOR EXECUTIVE CLEMENCY Counsel for Petitioner: Laura H. Nirider Robert J. Dvorak Steven A. Drizin Halling & Cayo, S.C. Center on Wrongful Convictions 320 E. Buffalo Street, Suite 700 Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law Milwaukee, WI 53202 357 East Chicago Avenue (414) 271-3400 Chicago, IL 60611 [email protected] (312) 503-8576 [email protected] [email protected] Seth P. Waxman Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP 1875 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington, DC 20006 (202) 663-6000 [email protected] 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Procedural History ........................................................................................................................... 4 Basis for Granting Clemency ............................................................................................................ 5 I. This Board can have no confidence in the evidence against Brendan Dassey. ............... 5 II. This Board can have no confidence in the process leading to Brendan Dassey’s conviction. ......................................................................................................................... 15 III. This Board can have
    [Show full text]
  • IAFMHS Newsletter 2019 4(4)
    INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FORENSIC MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES NEWSLETTER VOLUME 4 | ISSUE 4 FALL 2019 Photo by Let Ideas Compete Fall Edition Features Letter from the Editor Editor’s Welcome 1 Dear members of the IAFMHS community, Welcome to the fall installment of the IAFMHS newsletter. This issue IAFMHS President Update 2 Anne Crocker features an update from our new IAFMHS President, Anne Crocker, as well as a report from the Forensic Mental Health Nursing Group on forensic Forensic Mental Health Nursing 4 nursing practice and research in Canada. Nina Lildal-Schrøder shares her Forensic Nursing Practice & Research in Canada research on forensic professionals’ experiences in discussing patient Cindy Peternelj-Taylor, Irene J. Boldt, & Mary-Lou Martin sexuality in our Research Update and Ezequiel Mercurio, who was one of Research Update 5 the winners of the IAFMHS Conference Bursary Award, gives us an Discussing Sexuality with Patients: Staffs Attitudes introduction to the state of forensic psychiatry in Argentina. Our and Beliefs wonderful Student Section once again has contributed several Nina Lildal-Schrøder interesting pieces, including the 2019-2020 Student Board Welcome, the International Forensic Mental Health 7 second installment of the newsletter’s 3-part series exploring PhD Services Highlights: Argentina programs around the world, and a Student Spotlight on Laura Nirider, the Ezequiel Mercurio co-director of the Center on Wrongful Convictions who represented Student Section Brendan Dassey, whose case was profiled in the Netflix show Making a 2019-2020 Student Board Welcome 9 Murderer. We hope you enjoy all of these fascinating pieces! Maria Aparcero-Suero We are also getting excited for our 20th annual conference, which will Deciding on a PhD: Should I Stay, or Should 10 take place in Kraków, Poland.
    [Show full text]
  • Brendan Dassey: a True Story of a False Confession
    Brendan Dassey: A True Story of a False Confession Additional Written Materials for Continuing Legal Education Page 1: Reducing Risks: An Executive’s Guide to Effective Juvenile Interview and Interrogation Page 45: The Truth About Juvenile False Confessions Electronic recording n Care with Miranda n Presence of a 1 friendly adult n Length of questioning n Time of questioning n Avoid use of deception electronic recording n Avoid promises of leniency and threats of harm n Questioning style n electronic recording n Care with Miranda warnings n Presence of a friendly adult n Length of questioning n Time of questioning n Avoid use of deception Electronic recording n Avoid promises of leniency and Reducingn n Risks: n threats of harm Questioning style ElectronicAn Executive’s recording Care with Miranda warnings n presence of a friendlyGuide to Effective adult n Length of Juvenile Interview n n n questioning Time of questioning Avoid anduse Interrogation of Avoid promises of leniency and threats of harm n questioning style Electronic recording n Care with Miranda warnings n presence of a friendly n Length of questioning n Time of questioning n Avoid use of deception n Care with Miranda warnings n Electronic recording n Avoid promises of leniency and threats of harm n Questioning style n Electronic recording n Length of questioning n and Presence of a friendly adult n Length of questioning n Time of questioning n Avoid use of deception n Avoid promises of leniency and threats of harm n questioning style n Electronic recording n Avoid use of
    [Show full text]