DOCSLIB.ORG

The Existential Compromise in the History of the Philosophy of Death

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Existential Compromise in the History of the Philosophy of Death University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2011 The Existential Compromise in the History of the Philosophy of Death Adam Buben University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the American Studies Commons, Philosophy Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Scholar Commons Citation Buben, Adam, "The Existential Compromise in the History of the Philosophy of Death" (2011). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/3020 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Existential Compromise in the History of the Philosophy of Death by Adam J. Buben A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Philosophy College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: Charles Guignon, Ph.D. Roger Ariew, Ph.D. Andrew Burgess, Ph.D. Thomas Williams, Ph.D. Date of Approval: February 7, 2011 Keywords: Kierkegaard, Heidegger, Christianity, Platonic, Epicurean Copyright © 2011, Adam J. Buben Dedication I dedicate this dissertation in loving recollection to Hank, Kay, Lloyd, Pete, and Wendell. I would also like to mention the rest of my family—largely composed on all sides of professional educators—whose emphasis on education has influenced me greatly. Although my parents (all four of them) may have been perplexed at times by my extended philosophical pursuits (and, in my mother’s case, disappointed that I gave up on paleontology), they have always been supportive of my adventures. I must also make a special point of thanking my grandmothers, Inez and Emily, whose undeserved generosity and support have contributed greatly to my achievements. In addition, there are numerous friends and colleagues that I wish to acknowledge here for guidance, fruitful conversations, and other sorts of assistance in recent years. In no particular order, these include Niels Jørgen Cappelørn, Jessica Doyle, Jon Stewart, John Davenport, Ed Mooney, James Sellmann, Tide Pereira, Troy McVey, Gordon Marino, Cynthia Lund, Carl Hughes, Andrew Henscheid, Gerhard Schreiber, Malene Trock Hempler, Bjarne Still Laurberg, Steve Burgess, Geoff Pfeifer, Shoni Rancher, Walter Wietzke, West Gurley, Elena Ruiz-Aho, Kevin Aho, Sally Guignon, Jan Schuetz, Torsten Land Daugaard, Sinead Knox, Casey Rentmeester, David Cheely, Jared Kinggard, Jessica Williams, Eleanor Helms, Jeremy Allen, George Connell, Bill Tierney, Robert Tierney, Kris Konrad, Douglas Farrer, Tamara Marks, Barry Ryan, Tony Aumann, Erik Lindland, Arron Fehir, Molly Below, Brett Byram, Jeffrey Hinzmann, Joanne Waugh, Darlene Corcoran, Sidney Axinn, Iain Thomson, Kelly Becker, Hans Pedersen, Richard Purkarthofer, Carlos Sanchez, Bill Koch, Michael Gibbons, Brian Dunst, Nate Draluck, Haley Glover, James Crotty, Russell Goodman, John Taber, Narve Strand, Ali Elamin, Ofelia Schutte, John Lippitt, Margherita Tonon, Niall Keane, Howard Hong, Myron Penner, Laura Llevadot, Simon Podmore, Paul Muench, David Possen, Rick Anthony Furtak, Pete Olen, Andrea Pitts, Phillip Scuderi, Aaron Karp, Anthony DeSantis, Alex Levine, Katie Schenk, Michael Oakeson, Adriana Novoa, Merold Westphal, Anders Folkmann, and my students from the death class in the fall of 2010. If I have forgotten anyone, please know that it is the result of a weary mind, nervously anticipating impending deadlines, and not due to a lack of gratitude. Finally, I wish to express special thanks to two people who have contributed greatly to the success of my recent endeavors. First, to my friend and co-editor, Pat Stokes: I’ve had so much fun and learned so much working with him. You will never find a more dedicated scholar of Kierkegaard … or crazy nonsense on the internet. Second, to my wonderful girlfriend Megan Altman: I won’t even try to squeeze into a sentence or two all that her companionship has meant to me throughout this process. I hope that I can be as loving and supportive as she goes through it. Acknowledgments I am grateful to the University of South Florida for five years of ample funding and freedom on the Presidential Doctoral Fellowship. In addition to this base, my research could not have been completed without the aid of summer fellowships at the Hong Kierkegaard Library at St. Olaf College, and a Fulbright Grant for study at the Søren Kierkegaard Research Centre at the University of Copenhagen. I have also received various forms of support from the University of Guam, the University of New Mexico, the Søren Kierkegaard Society (U.S.A.), Indiana University Press, and the Danish- American Fulbright Commission. The names most glaringly absent from the list in my dedication belong to my dissertation committee, whose tireless efforts and penetrating feedback have helped to shape the document before you (although any shortcomings are my own). Professors Roger Ariew and Thomas Williams were of great help in keeping me honest in my second chapter account of the historical development of death in philosophy. Professor Andrew Burgess has been so generous with me since my time in New Mexico. In addition to guiding my study of Kierkegaard, he has been a great mentor to me on all aspects of academic life. Last but not least is my advisor Professor Charles Guignon. I have appreciated the opportunity to experience his brilliant scholarship, encouraging style, and warm sense of humor. I am honored to have been able to work with him over these last five years. Table of Contents Abstract iii Preface 1 Chapter 1: Introduction 5 Chapter 2: Bilateral Development of the Philosophy of Death 10 The Platonic Strain: Death in and after the Phaedo 12 Plato. 12 Early Christian Appropriation. 14 From Neo-Platonism to Medieval Christianity. 16 An Augustinian Reformation. 21 The Epicurean Strain: Beginning with the “Letter to Menoeceus” 29 The Epicureans. 29 The Stoics. 34 Early Modern Appropriation. 38 The Nineteenth Century Germans. 43 Death in Twentieth Century Analytic Philosophy. 59 Chapter 3: Kierkegaard and the Existential Philosophy of Death 66 Kierkegaard’s Death Project 67 Death in the Early Writings. 69 Death in the Middle Writings. 73 Death in the Late Writings. 85 Is Dying to the World Only for the Aspiring Christian? 94 Kierkegaard’s Appropriation and Criticism of the Tradition 96 Kierkegaard on Socrates and Christianity. 99 Kierkegaard Contra Epicurus. 120 Chapter 4: Heidegger and the Existential Philosophy of Death 140 Death in Being and Time 141 The Death Chapter. 142 Death and the Rest of “Division Two.” 159 Heidegger’s Appropriation and Criticism of the Tradition 165 What Heidegger Was Reading. 166 What Heidegger “Borrowed” from Kierkegaard. 172 Heidegger’s “Atheism” and the Theology of Kierkegaard. 186 i Chapter 5: The Limits and Legacy of the Existential Philosophy of Death 191 Heidegger’s Oversights 192 Misunderstanding Kierkegaard. 192 French Thought and the Death of the Other. 196 Kierkegaard on Heidegger 201 The Emptiness of Anticipatory Resoluteness. 202 A Mutual Understanding. 207 Chapter 6: Conclusion 214 References 217 ii Abstract I begin by offering an account of two key strains in the history of philosophical dealings with death. Both strains initially seek to diminish fear of death by appealing to the idea that death is simply the separation of the soul from the body. According to the Platonic strain, death should not be feared since the soul will have a prolonged existence free from the bodily prison after death. With several dramatic modifications, this is the strain that is taken up by much of the mainstream Christian tradition. According to the Epicurean strain, death should not be feared since the tiny particles that make up the soul leave the body and are dispersed at the moment of death, leaving behind no subject to experience any evil that might be associated with death. Although informed by millennia of further scientific discovery, this is the strain picked up on by contemporary atheistic, technologically advanced mankind. My primary goal is to demonstrate that philosophy has an often-overlooked alternative to viewing death in terms of this ancient dichotomy. This is the alternative championed by Søren Kierkegaard and Martin Heidegger. Although both thinkers arise from the Christian tradition, they clearly react to Epicurean insights about death in their work, thereby prescribing a peculiar way of living with death that the Christian tradition seems to have forgotten about. Despite the association of Kierkegaard and Heidegger, there is a fundamental difference between them on the subject of death. In Being and Time Heidegger seems to iii rely on the phenomenology of death that Kierkegaard provides in texts such as “At a Graveside.” It is interesting to notice, however, that this discourse, especially when seen in the light of Kierkegaard’s more obviously religious works, might only be compelling to the aspiring Christian. If so, then perhaps there is a tension in both Heidegger’s “methodologically atheistic” appropriation of Kierkegaard’s ideas about death, and Heidegger’s attempt to make these ideas compelling to the aspiring human. My secondary goal is to determine whether Heidegger takes the “existential philosophy of death” too far when he incorporates it into his early ontological project. iv Preface In order to circumvent certain specific concerns that might distract from my general account of death in the history of philosophy, I find it necessary to begin with a brief statement of my methodology. While aspects of this methodology will be reiterated throughout the dissertation, there are two issues in particular that should probably be laid out in explicit detail up front. The first is the selection of the thinkers and texts that will find a prominent place in my account.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Friedrich Nietzche on the Way of Recurrence to Oneself
    Friedrich Nietzche on the Way of Recurrence to Oneself Natalya Shelkovaia 1 Instead of a Preface1 In a very difficult period of my life, short thoughts and aphorisms about the nature of a person and the world began to come to my mind. At first, I wrote them down on sheets of paper, then I got a big notebook, which eventually grew into a big book. While composing this “Diary of Thoughts” at some point the name “The Way of Recurrence to Oneself” occurred to me. Later, when I read works by the mystics, I noticed that “recurrence to oneself” was the goal of a mystical spiritual action. And more recently, carefully reading Friedrich Nietzsche’s works and working on them, I noticed again that for Nietzsche “re- currence to oneself” has been the aim of spiritual practice: “Lonely one, you go the way to yourself!”2 Only “recurring” to oneself can one be considered, accord- ing to Nietzsche, a super-human, a new person. Although, based on the idea of eternal recurrence, rooted in antiquity and reanimated by Nietzsche, the new person is only a regenerated, primordial one. And what is interesting: those works about Nietzsche, which seemed the most appealing and close to me in spirit, were, rather, not studies of his work, not “works about Nietzsche,” but “co-thinking, co-feeling with Nietzsche.” This implies similarity between their authors’ “vital world” (Lebenswelt) and that of Nietzsche. I saw this in Lev Shestov’s article, “The Good in the Teaching of Count Tolstoy and Friedrich Nietzsche,”3 in Andrei Bely’s article “Friedrich Nietzsche,”4 in the article by Vladimir N.
    [Show full text]
  • Seven Atheisms
    SEVEN ATHEISMS Andrew Walker SEVEN ATHEISMS Exploring the varieties of atheism in John Gray’s book Seven Types of Atheism Andrew Walker Emeritus Professor of Theology, Culture and Education, King’s College London Christian Evidence Society christianevidence.org Text copyright © Andrew Walker 2019 Published by the Christian Evidence Society, London, 2019 christianevidence.com All rights reserved Editing and design: Simon Jenkins Cover photograph by PhotoDu.de / CreativeDomainPhotography.com. Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic (CC BY 2.0) license Contents Introduction 5 The seven atheisms 19th century atheism 6 Secular humanism 8 Science as religion 12 Modern politicial religion 15 God-haters 18 Atheism without progress 22 The atheism of silence 25 Conclusion 27 Index 30 Introduction John Gray’s Seven Types of Atheism (Allen Lane, 2018) is an important book for both religious and non-religious readers. John Gray, who describes himself as an atheist, is nevertheless critical of most versions of atheism. His attitude to atheism is the same as his attitude to certain types of religion. This attitude is predicated upon Gray’s conviction that human beings are intrinsically dissatisfied and unpredictable creatures who can never get along with each other for any length of time. His view is based on a reading of human nature that sails close to the wind of the Christian concept of original sin, and is out of step with most modern forms of atheism. In particular, Gray is allergic to any forms of cultural progress in human behaviour especially if they are couched in positivistic or evolutionary terms. 5 ATHEISM 1 19th century atheism Gray sets out his stall in his first chapter, ‘The New Atheism: A Nineteenth- century Orthodoxy’.
    [Show full text]
  • The Authenticity of Faith in Kierkegaard's Philosophy
    The Authenticity of Faith in Kierkegaard’s Philosophy The Authenticity of Faith in Kierkegaard’s Philosophy Edited by Tamar Aylat-Yaguri and Jon Stewart The Authenticity of Faith in Kierkegaard’s Philosophy, Edited by Tamar Aylat-Yaguri and Jon Stewart This book first published 2013 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Layout and cover design by K.Nun Design, Denmark 12 Back Chapman Street, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2XX, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2013 by Tamar Aylat-Yaguri, Jon Stewart and contributors All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-4438-4990-1, ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-4990-6 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Contributors vi Introduction vii Acknowledgements xvi List of Abbreviations xvii Chapter One Jacob Golomb: Was Kierkegaard an Authentic Believer? 1 Chapter Two Shai Frogel: Acoustical Illusion as Self-Deception 12 Chapter Three Roi Benbassat: Faith as a Struggle against Ethical Self-Deception 18 Chapter Four Edward F. Mooney: A Faith that Defies Self-Deception 27 Chapter Five Darío González: Faith and the Uncertainty of Historical Experience 38 Chapter Six Jerome (Yehuda) Gellman: Constancy of Faith? Symmetry and Asymmetry in Kierkegaard’s Leap of Faith 49 Chapter Seven Peter Šajda: Does Anti-Climacus’ Ethical-Religious Theory of Selfhood Imply a Discontinuity of the Self? 60 Chapter Eight Tamar Aylat-Yaguri: Being in Truth and Being a Jew: Kierkegaard’s View of Judaism 68 Chapter Nine Jon Stewart, Kierkegaard and Hegel on Faith and Knowledge 77 Notes 93 CONTRIBUTORS Tamar Aylat-Yaguri, Department of Philosophy, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat-Aviv, P.O.B 39040, Tel-Aviv 61390, Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • BETWEEN PHILOSOPHIES: the EMERGENCE of a NEW INTELLECTUAL PARADIGM in RUSSIA by Alyssa J. Deblasio Bachelor of Arts, Villanova
    BETWEEN PHILOSOPHIES: THE EMERGENCE OF A NEW INTELLECTUAL PARADIGM IN RUSSIA by Alyssa J. DeBlasio Bachelor of Arts, Villanova University, 2003 Master of Arts, University of Pittsburgh, 2006 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2010 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH School of Arts and Sciences This dissertation was presented by Alyssa J. DeBlasio It was defended on May 14, 2010 and approved by Tatiana Artemyeva, Professor, Herzen State Pedagogical University (St. Petersburg, Russia), Department of Theory and History of Culture Vladimir Padunov, Associate Professor, University of Pittsburgh, Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures James P. Scanlan, Emeritus Professor, The Ohio State University, Department of Philosophy Dissertation Advisor: Nancy Condee, Associate Professor, Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures ii Copyright © by Alyssa J. DeBlasio 2010 iii BETWEEN PHILOSOPHIES: THE EMERGENCE OF A NEW INTELLECTUAL PARADIGM IN RUSSIA Alyssa J. DeBlasio, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2010 This dissertation takes as its primary task the evaluation of a conflict of paradigms in Russian philosophical thought in the past decade. If until the early nineties Russian philosophers were often guilty of uncritically attributing to their domestic philosophy a set of characteristics that fell along the lines of a religious/secular binary (e.g. literary vs. analytic; continuous vs. ruptured), in recent years the same scholarship is moving away from the nineteenth-century model of philosophy as a “path” or “special mission,” as it has been called by Konstantin Aksakov, Aleksei Khomiakov, Ivan Kireevskii, and later, Nikolai Berdiaev, among others.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature of Absence and the Experience of Evil (Container by Marek Bieńczyk, Is Not by Mariusz Szczygieł, and Things I Didn’T Throw out by Marcin Wicha)
    56 (1/2020), pp. 101–117 The Polish Journal DOI: 10.19205/56.20.6 of Aesthetics Maciej Michalski* Literature of Absence and the Experience of Evil (Container by Marek Bieńczyk, Is Not by Mariusz Szczygieł, and Things I Didn’t Throw Out by Marcin Wicha) Abstract The article discusses the way in which literature can address evil, understood as the expe- rience of absence and loss. The problem concerns artistic writing in general, as was stressed by Maurice Blanchot; but it also appears particularly in a collection of texts about absence, such as Container by Marek Bieńczyk, Is Not by Mariusz Szczygieł, and Things I Didn’t Throw Out by Marcin Wicha. At the same time, they are an attempt to fill the void through literary restitution of that which is lost. Keywords Literature, Evil, Loss, Absence, Marek Bieńczyk, Mariusz Szczygieł, Marcin Wicha The relationship of literature and evil (and perhaps even their strong con- nection—as will be discussed later) raises a number of questions and doubts. It may seem that by juxtaposing these two areas and notions, we arrive at a somewhat inadequate, vividly asymmetrical juxtaposition in which evil—an ethically important category—is juxtaposed with an area of sssss * University of Gdańsk Department of Theory of Literature and Art Criticism Institute of Polish Studies Email: [email protected] 102 Maciej Michalski __________________________________________________________________________________________________ artistic, perhaps merely ludic and reckless, activity. For this very reason, we approach this issue asymmetrically—not in terms of literature and evil, but rather of literature towards evil. One can regard evil, after Gabriel Marcel, not as a problem, and therefore something to be solved, but as a mystery (Mukoid 1993, 113), or assume after Lev Shestov that one cannot ask the question about the source of evil, as “there are questions whose significance lies precisely in the fact that they do not admit of answers because answers kill them” (Shestov 1928- 1937/1966, 230).
    [Show full text]
  • Craver, Reluctant Skeptic: Siegfried Kracauer and the Crises of Weimar
    RELUCTANT SKEPTIC SPEKTRUM: Publications of the German Studies Association Series Editor: David M. Luebke, University of Oregon Published under the auspices of the German Studies Association, Spektrum offers current perspectives on culture, society, and political life in the German-speaking lands of central Europe—Austria, Switzerland, and the Federal Republic—from the late Middle Ages to the present day. Its titles and themes reflect the composi- tion of the GSA and the work of its members within and across the disciplines to which they belong—literary criticism, history, cultural studies, political science, and anthropology. Volume 1 Volume 8 The Holy Roman Empire, Reconsidered Mixed Matches: Edited by Jason Philip Coy, Benjamin Transgressive Unions in Germany from the Marschke, and David Warren Sabean Reformation to the Enlightenment Edited by David Luebke and Mary Volume 2 Lindemann Weimar Publics/Weimar Subjects: Rethinking the Political Culture of Germany in the 1920s Volume 9 Edited by Kathleen Canning, Kerstin Barndt, Kinship, Community, and Self: and Kristin McGuire Essays in Honor of David Warren Sabean Edited by Jason Coy, Benjamin Marschke, Jared Poley, and Claudia Verhoeven Volume 3 Conversion and the Politics of Religion in Volume 10 Early Modern Germany The Emperor’s Old Clothes: Edited by David M. Luebke, Jared Poley, Constitutional History and the Symbolic Daniel C. Ryan, and David Warren Sabean Language of the Holy Roman Empire Barbara Stollberg-Rilinger Volume 4 Translated by Thomas Dunlap Walls, Borders, Boundaries: Spatial and Cultural Practices in Europe Volume 11 Edited by Marc Silberman, Karen E. Till, and The Devil’s Riches: Janet Ward A Modern History of Greed Jared Poley Volume 5 After The History of Sexuality:German Volume 12 Genealogies with and Beyond Foucault The Total Work of Art: Edited by Scott Spector, Helmut Puff, and Foundations, Articulations, Inspirations Dagmar Herzog Edited by David Imhoof, Margaret Eleanor Menninger, and Anthony J.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix! Fyodor Dostoevsky and Vladimir Solovyov*
    Appendix! Fyodor Dostoevsky and Vladimir Solovyov* (In memory of Dr Nicolas M. Zernov, 1898-1980) The volume and scope of critical and commentarial literature devoted to Dostoevsky's thought in the century since his death is clear evidence of the richness and complexity encountered in his works. In the figure of Vladimir Solovyov - both in his person and his writings - we also encounter a high degree of complexity. Tracing the patterns of his thought, we find certain tensions and a number of striking incongruities. Here was - a man who was, at heart, a monarchist, but aroused the anger and suspicions of the Tsar and Holy Synod through his advocacy of theocratic government; a man who embraced so much that was characteristic of the Slavophiles, and yet was a staunch supporter of their arch-enemy, Peter the Great; a man so seemingly keen to reaffirm the worth of contemplative spirituality, but who personally resisted the decision to join a monastery, a step that he at one time regarded as 'flight' from the world. Those who knew Solovyov at first hand stressed what they regarded either as his sanctity or his eccentricity (his chudachestvo ). Accounts of the excitement generated by his university lectures on philosophy certainly show that he commanded a surprising degree of authority and respect. On the other hand, Solovyov had to contend with numerous uncharitable gibes and with accusations to the effect that he had set himself up as a 'prophet'. Perhaps his best response to adverse criticism of this kind was to deflate his *A Paper delivered at the VI Symposium of the International Dostoevsky Society, 9-16 August 1986, University of Nottingham.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Contribution to the International Kant Studies from the Late 19Th Century Until the Present Day: an Analysis of Publications in “Kant-Studien”1
    CON-TEXTOS KANTIANOS. International Journal of Philosophy N.o 4, Noviembre 2016, pp. 35-55 ISSN: 2386-7655 Doi: 10.5281/zenodo.163988 Russian Contribution to the International Kant Studies from the Late 19th Century until the Present Day: An Analysis of Publications in “Kant-Studien”1 ALEXEY SALIKOV∗ Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University of Kaliningrad, Russia; Free University of Berlin, Germany Abstract This article gives a general characteristic of the publications of the Russian philosophers in the oldest Kantian Journal “Kant-Studien”. The study embraces the entire period of the existence of this magazine, from the very beginning down to our days. In general, after compiling all materials related to Russia published in “Kant-Studien”, I became aware of get a picture of a significant presence of Russian philosophers in this periodical. This gives me a good reason to conclude that even if the impact of the Russian philosophical thought on the international Kant studies was not decisive, then, at least, it was tangible. This influence was due to the phenomenon which was later called the “Silver Age of Russian philosophy”, as well as the phenomenon of Russian emigration, arising as a result of wars and revolutions in Russia and the exodus of the Russian philosophers of the West, where one of their main initial shelters was Germany. Keywords Kant, Russian Kant Scholarship, Russian philosophical thought, Russian emigration, Kant-Studien. The history of the reception of Kant's philosophy in Russia is more than two centuries old and is well researched today. The role of the German university thought in the formation and development of the Russian understanding of Kant's philosophical system is also well 1 This article was written with support from the Russian Foundation for the Humanities (RGNF), Project No.
    [Show full text]
  • Conclusion: Post-Jansenist Meditations
    Conclusion: Post-Jansenist Meditations The tragedy of the majority of men is by no means that they are weak but that they are too strong – genuinely to be aware of God. Søren Kierkegaard, Papers, §4453 Grace Above All Else Under the joint tutelage of Paul of Tarsus and Augustine of Hippo, whose infuence can be felt throughout, the works of Pascal and Kierkegaard return constantly to an issue which preoccupied both authors throughout their lives: how should man go about seeking salvation? Through his deeds and subordination to the revealed Law, or in the refuge of divine grace, a necessary prerequisite for all good actions and thoughts? For both authors, grace is the primary requirement. Without grace we are incapable of understanding our own nature, or comprehending our tasks and duties, or escaping the clutches of despair. In Kierkegaard’s Papers we fnd this position expressed in striking terms: “grace frst and foremost, and always before us.”1 The implication is that grace always acts in advance, as if to shorten the distance between the ordinary Christian and the Christian ideal. Kierkegaard and Pascal thus make a fundamental distinction between grace and the law, a thoroughly Augustinian dichotomy: “The law imposed what it did not give. Grace gives what it imposes,2 writes Pascal. The existential fulflment of the Law by Christ coincides with the advent of a new grace which supersedes the Law. The imitation of Christ by Christians is not a matter of respecting the law, it is a consequence of grace, since grace always transcends the law.
    [Show full text]
  • The Contradictory Unity of Faith and Reason in Christian Theoretical Thought
    HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies ISSN: (Online) 2072-8050, (Print) 0259-9422 Page 1 of 9 Original Research The contradictory unity of faith and reason in Christian theoretical thought Author: This article aims to demonstrate the unity of faith and reason as irrational and rational elements 1 Sergey N. Astapov of the theoretical religious discourse on instances of Christian theoretical thought. This unity Affiliation: was represented as a dialectical contradiction, the violation of which led to the destruction of 1Institute of Philosophy and religious discourse. The contradictory unity of faith and reason was researched in European Social and Political Studies, medieval philosophy and Russian religious philosophy in the first half of the 20th century and Southern Federal University, in the theoretical systems that were considered ways of explaining the relationship between Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation faith and reason in Christian thought. This article reveals two historical types of the dynamic unity of faith and reason as well as violations of this unity: when medieval authors attempted Corresponding author: to find the most effective relationship between faith and reason for Christian theology; and Sergey Astapov, when Russian philosophers attempted to transmit theological knowledge by means of [email protected] philosophy in the secular age. The results of the dynamic unity violations in both traditions are Dates: investigated as the conceptions that had been denied by these traditions. The main conclusion Received: 24 Sept. 2018 of the article is that Christian theoretical thought maintained the contradictions between faith Accepted: 22 Mar. 2019 and reason as a search for its development. Published: 23 July 2019 Keywords: Faith; European medieval philosophy; Reason; Religious discourse; Russian How to cite this article: Astapov, S.N., 2019, ‘The religious philosophy; Theology.
    [Show full text]
  • SBL 19791115 SUPP.Pdf
    AUSTRALIAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE STUDY OF RELIGION c|o Scholars Press Book Service P.O. Box 5207 THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA PRESS Missoula, MT 59806 P.O. Box 2877 25% discount on books ordered at meeting. University, AL 35486 PAUL W. BRENNAN $3.00P (2.25) 20% discount on books ordered at meeting. Let Sleeping Snakes Lie: Central Enga Traditional Religious Belief and Ritual NAHUM N. GLATZER $19.50C (15.60) Essays in Jewish Thought T. G. H. STREHLOW $3.00P (2.00) Central Australian Religion: Personal Monototemism in a ARTHUR GREEN $27.50C (22.00) Polytotemic Community Tormented Master: A Life of Rabbi Nahman of Bratslav VICTOR C. HAYES, editor $4.95P (3.50) Australian Essays in World Religions ANDREWS UNIVERSITY PRESS Andrews University Campus Berrien Springs, MI 49104 DALE E. TWOMLEY $7.50C Parochiaid and the Courts ROBERTi. CRUISE and PETER BLITCHINGTON $2.95P Understanding Your Temperament ANIMA PUBLICATIONS 1053 Wilson Avenue Chambersburg, PA 17201 10% discount on books ordered at meeting. Anima: An Experiential Journal $8.50P (7.65) annually BARDWELL L. SMITH, editor $7.95P (7.16) Religion and Legitimation of Power in Sri Lanka BARDWELL L. SMITH, editor $7.95P (7.16) Religion and Legitimation of Power in Thailand, Laos, and Burma ROBERT McDERMOTT, editor $5.95P (5.36) Six Pillars: An Introduction to the Major Works of Sri Aurobindo HARRY M. BUCK and GLENN E. YOCUM, editors $5.95P (5.36) Structural Approaches to South India Studies SAMUEL SANDMEL $3.95P (3.56) A Little Book on Religion (for people who are not religious) THOMAS BERRY $2.00P (1.80) The New Story—Teilhard Study No.
    [Show full text]
  • HEIDEGGER's WAYS H E Id E G G E R ’S W a Ys
    Hans-Georg Gadamer translated by John W. Stanley with an introduction by Dennis J. Schmidt HEIDEGGER'S WAYS H e id e g g e r ’s w a ys Hans-Georg Gadamer Translated by John W. Stanley State University of New York Press Published by State University of New York Press, Albany © 1994 State University of New York All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. For information, address State University of New York Press, State University Plaza, Albany, N Y , 12246 Production by Marilyn P Semerad Marketing by Dana E. Yanulavich Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Gadamer, Hans Georg, 1900- [Heideggers Wege. English] Heidegger’s ways / Hans-Georg Gadamer ; translated by John W Stanley ; with an introduction by Dennis J. Schmidt. p. cm. — (SUNY series in contemporary continental philosophy) Translation of: Heideggers Wege. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-7914-1737-9 (HC : alk. paper). — ISBN 0-7914-1738-7 (PB : alk. paper) 1. Heidegger, Martin, 1889-1976. I. Title. II. Series. B3279.H49G24613 1993 193—dc20 93-24934 CIP 10 987654321 Contents Preface vii Translator’s Preface ix Introduction by Dennis J. Schmidt xv Existentialism and the Philosophy of Existence 1 Martin Heidegger—75 Years 15 The Marburg Theology 29 “What Is Metaphysics?” 45 Kant and the Hermeneutical Turn 49 The Thinker Martin Heidegger 61 The Language of Metaphysics 69 Plato 81 The Truth of the Work of Art 95 Martin Heidegger—85 Years 111 The Way in the Turn 121 The Greeks 139 VI CONTENTS 13.
    [Show full text]