DOCSLIB.ORG

City Research Online

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
City Research Online City Research Online City, University of London Institutional Repository Citation: Fleischmann, L. (2015). The transformation of Israeli Peace Activism since the Second Intifada. (Unpublished Doctoral thesis, City University London) This is the accepted version of the paper. This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/14051/ Link to published version: Copyright: City Research Online aims to make research outputs of City, University of London available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the author(s) and/or copyright holders. URLs from City Research Online may be freely distributed and linked to. Reuse: Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. City Research Online: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/ [email protected] THE TRANSFORMATION OF ISRAELI PEACE ACTIVISM SINCE THE SECOND INTIFADA By LEONIE FLEISCHMANN A dissertation submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy City University London Department of International Politics December 2015 ©2015 Leonie Fleischmann All Rights Reserved i ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ...........................................................................................................................................x LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................. xi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................................................................. xii DECLARATION ............................................................................................................................................ xiii COPYRIGHT DECLARATION ........................................................................................................................ xiii ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................................. xiv CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Research Questions ............................................................................................................................... 6 3 Key Terms .............................................................................................................................................. 7 4 Period of Study ...................................................................................................................................... 8 5 Methodology ......................................................................................................................................... 9 5.1 Data Specification .................................................................................................................... 10 5.2 Data Collection ......................................................................................................................... 12 5.3 Data Analysis ............................................................................................................................ 14 6 Limitations ........................................................................................................................................... 15 7 Structure of the Dissertation ............................................................................................................... 15 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW AND THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK ................................................... 18 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 18 2 Social Movement Theory ..................................................................................................................... 19 2.1 Political Opportunity Structures ............................................................................................... 20 2.2 Collective Action Frames .......................................................................................................... 22 2.3 Tactical Repertoires .................................................................................................................. 23 2.4 Mobilisation Structures ............................................................................................................ 24 2.5 The Interaction between the Powers of Movement ................................................................ 26 2.6 Cycles of Contention ................................................................................................................ 26 2.7 The Connection between a Social Movement and the International Arena ............................ 28 iii 2.7.1 International Mobilising Structures .............................................................................. 28 2.7.2 International Political Opportunity Structures .............................................................. 29 2.8 The Role of Gender Dynamics in Social Movements ................................................................ 30 2.9 Understanding the Impact of a Social Movement .................................................................... 32 3 Israeli Peace Activism ........................................................................................................................... 33 4 Israeli Political Culture ......................................................................................................................... 35 5 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................ 36 CHAPTER 3: FROM INDIVIDUAL ATTEMPTS AT PEACE ACTIVISM TO THE BIRTH OF A PEACE MOVEMENT ....................................................................................................... 38 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 38 2 The First Phase: Individual Attempts at Peace Activism ...................................................................... 41 2.1 New Collective Action Frames: Ceding the Occupied Territories .......................................... 42 2.2 The Beginnings of a Repertoire of Contention ...................................................................... 43 2.3 Building Mobilising Structures ............................................................................................... 45 2.4 Political Opportunity Structures: Mixed Opportunities ......................................................... 46 3 The Second Phase: The Coming of Age of a Peace Movement in Israel .............................................. 48 3.1 Multiple Collective Action Frames ......................................................................................... 49 3.1.1 The Rise of the Liberal Zionist Component: Shalom Achshav is Founded ..................... 49 3.1.2 Pushing the Agenda: The Radical Component .............................................................. 51 3.1.3 New Ways to Frame the Situation: The Human Rights Component ............................. 53 3.1.3.1 The Refusal Movement ..................................................................................... 53 3.1.3.2 Human Rights Organisations ............................................................................. 54 3.1.4 Gendered Collective Action Frames .............................................................................. 54 3.2 Expanding and Radicalising the Repertoires of Contention of Israeli Peace Activism ........... 56 3.2.1 Demonstrations ............................................................................................................. 56 3.2.2 Non-Protest Based Tactics ............................................................................................ 57 3.2.3 Tactical Innovations ...................................................................................................... 60 3.2.3.1 Non-Violent Direct Action ................................................................................. 60 3.2.3.2 Boycott .............................................................................................................. 60 3.3 Expanding and Contracting Mobilisation Structures ............................................................. 61 iv 3.3.1 Gender Dynamics and Mobilisation Structures ............................................................ 62 3.3.2 The Influence of the International Dimension .............................................................. 63 3.3.3 The Impact of Technology and the Media .................................................................... 64 3.3.4 Coordination of the Components of the Peace Movement ......................................... 65 3.4 Political Opportunity Structures: A New Cycle of Contention ..............................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Additional Documents to the Amicus Brief Submitted to the Jerusalem District Court
    בבית המשפט המחוזי בירושלים עת"מ 36759-05-18 בשבתו כבית משפט לעניינים מנהליים בעניין שבין: 1( ארגון Human Rights Watch 2( עומר שאקר העותרים באמצעות עו"ד מיכאל ספרד ו/או אמילי שפר עומר-מן ו/או סופיה ברודסקי מרח' דוד חכמי 12, תל אביב 6777812 טל: 03-6206947/8/9, פקס 03-6206950 - נ ג ד - שר הפנים המשיב באמצעות ב"כ, מפרקליטות מחוז ירושלים, רחוב מח"ל 7, מעלות דפנה, ירושלים ת.ד. 49333 ירושלים 9149301 טל: 02-5419555, פקס: 026468053 המכון לחקר ארגונים לא ממשלתיים )עמותה רשומה 58-0465508( ידיד בית המשפט באמצעות ב"כ עו"ד מוריס הירש מרח' יד חרוצים 10, ירושלים טל: 02-566-1020 פקס: 077-511-7030 השלמת מסמכים מטעם ידיד בית המשפט בהמשך לדיון שהתקיים ביום 11 במרץ 2019, ובהתאם להחלטת כב' בית המשפט, מתכבד ידיד בית המשפט להגיש את ריכוז הציוציו של העותר מס' 2 החל מיום 25 ליוני 2018 ועד ליום 10 למרץ 2019. כפי שניתן להבחין בנקל מהתמצית המצ"ב כנספח 1, בתקופה האמורה, אל אף טענתו שהינו "פעיל זכויות אדם", בפועל ציוציו )וציוציו מחדש Retweets( התמקדו בנושאים שבהם הביע תמיכה בתנועת החרם או ביקורת כלפי מדינת ישראל ומדיניותה, אך נמנע, כמעט לחלוטין, מלגנות פגיעות בזכיות אדם של אזרחי מדינת ישראל, ובכלל זה, גינוי כלשהו ביחס למעשי רצח של אזרחים ישראלים בידי רוצחים פלסטינים. באשר לטענתו של העותר מס' 2 שחשבון הטוויטר שלו הינו, בפועל, חשבון של העותר מס' 1, הרי שגם כאן ניתן להבין בנקל שטענה זו חסרת בסיס כלשהי. ראשית, החשבון מפנה לתפקידו הקודם בארגון CCR, אליו התייחסנו בחוות הדעת המקורית מטעם ידיד בית המשפט בסעיף 51.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Schlaglicht Israel Nr. 6/21 Aktuelles Aus Israelischen Tageszeitungen
    Schlaglicht Israel Nr. 6/21 Aktuelles aus israelischen Tageszeitungen 16.-31. März Die Themen dieser Ausgabe 1. Patt der Blöcke bei Parlamentswahl .............................................................................................................................. 1 2. Pessah 2021 ..................................................................................................................................................................... 3 3. Zurück zur Normalität...................................................................................................................................................... 5 4. Medienquerschnitt ........................................................................................................................................................... 7 1. Patt der Blöcke bei Parlamentswahl nation, building a just society and safeguarding it. Mit einem erneuten Patt endete die vierte Parla- (…) If the last year and COVID-19 has taught us mentswahl innerhalb von nur zwei Jahren. Weder anything, it´s that the social safety net established das Lager des amtierenden Regierungschefs Ben- by Avoda, was the safety net that helped Israel jamin Netanyahu verfügt zusammen mit seinen overcome much of the challenges of the last year. erklärten Verbündeten über die nötige Mehrheit von The kuppot cholim community health providers, the 61 der insgesamt 120 Knesset-Sitze noch der Anti- medical establishment, the social services, and the Netanyahu-Block. Das heterogene Lager aus Rech- National Insurance
    [Show full text]
  • How a United Church Congregation Articulates Its Choices from the 41St General Council's
    “What Language Shall I Borrow?” How a United Church Congregation Articulates its Choices from the 41st General Council’s Recommendations Regarding Peacebuilding in Israel/Palestine by Donna Patricia Kerrigan A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Emmanuel College and the Toronto School of Theology In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Ministry awarded by Emmanuel College and the University of Toronto © Copyright by Donna Patricia Kerrigan 2016 “What Language Shall I Borrow?” How a United Church Congregation Articulates its Choices from the 41st General Council’s Recommendations Regarding Peacebuilding in Israel/Palestine Donna Patricia Kerrigan Doctor of Ministry Emmanuel College and the University of Toronto 2016 Abstract The thesis of this dissertation is that members of the United Church of Canada who respond to the Report on Israel/Palestine Policy select from its peacebuilding recommendations according to their attitudes to theological contextualizing. Two attitudes give rise to two different methods, which are seldom articulated but underlie choices regarding peace initiatives such as boycotting or ecumenical/multifaith cooperation. The dissertation includes five parts: an investigation of contextual theologies for peacebuilders; a history of the UCC and ecumenical partners who have struggled to assist peace in Israel/Palestine; strategies for peace-minded ministers; a case-study of one congregation choosing peace strategies; and recommendations for denominational communications and peacebuilding. This thesis poses a taxonomy for theologizing in context, moving from initial interaction with the other by translating local systems of thought into terms of the Gospel message. Contextualizers proceed either to immerse in the local culture (anthropological) or to engage with locals in mutual learning (synthesis).
    [Show full text]
  • Israel and Overseas: Israeli Election Primer 2015 (As Of, January 27, 2015) Elections • in Israel, Elections for the Knesset A
    Israel and Overseas: Israeli Election Primer 2015 (As of, January 27, 2015) Elections In Israel, elections for the Knesset are held at least every four years. As is frequently the case, the outgoing government coalition collapsed due to disagreements between the parties. As a result, the Knesset fell significantly short of seeing out its full four year term. Knesset elections in Israel will now be held on March 17, 2015, slightly over two years since the last time that this occurred. The Basics of the Israeli Electoral System All Israeli citizens above the age of 18 and currently in the country are eligible to vote. Voters simply select one political party. Votes are tallied and each party is then basically awarded the same percentage of Knesset seats as the percentage of votes that it received. So a party that wins 10% of total votes, receives 10% of the seats in the Knesset (In other words, they would win 12, out of a total of 120 seats). To discourage small parties, the law was recently amended and now the votes of any party that does not win at least 3.25% of the total (probably around 130,000 votes) are completely discarded and that party will not receive any seats. (Until recently, the “electoral threshold,” as it is known, was only 2%). For the upcoming elections, by January 29, each party must submit a numbered list of its candidates, which cannot later be altered. So a party that receives 10 seats will send to the Knesset the top 10 people listed on its pre-submitted list.
    [Show full text]
  • IDF Special Forces – Reservists – Conscientious Objectors – Peace Activists – State Protection
    Refugee Review Tribunal AUSTRALIA RRT RESEARCH RESPONSE Research Response Number: ISR35545 Country: Israel Date: 23 October 2009 Keywords: Israel – Netanya – Suicide bombings – IDF special forces – Reservists – Conscientious objectors – Peace activists – State protection This response was prepared by the Research & Information Services Section of the Refugee Review Tribunal (RRT) after researching publicly accessible information currently available to the RRT within time constraints. This response is not, and does not purport to be, conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. This research response may not, under any circumstance, be cited in a decision or any other document. Anyone wishing to use this information may only cite the primary source material contained herein. Questions 1. Please provide information on suicide bombs in 2000 to January 2002 in Netanya. 2. Deleted. 3. Please provide any information on recruitment of individuals to special army units for “chasing terrorists in neighbouring countries”, how often they would be called up, and repercussions for wanting to withdraw? 4. What evidence is there of repercussions from Israeli Jewish fanatics and Arabs or the military towards someone showing some pro-Palestinian sentiment (attending rallies, expressing sentiment, and helping Arabs get jobs)? Is there evidence there would be no state protection in the event of being harmed because of political opinions held? RESPONSE 1. Please provide information on suicide bombs in 2000 to January 2002 in Netanya. According to a 2006 journal article published in GeoJournal there were no suicide attacks in Netanya during the period of 1994-2000. No reports of suicide bombings in 2000 in Netanya were found in a search of other available sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights Defenders in Palestine and Israel to the Human Rights Council and the General Assembly to Take the Necessary Action
    2017 Geneva International Centre for Justice Postal address: P.O. Box: GICJ 598 CH-1214 Vernier, Geneva – Switzerland Email: [email protected] Tel: +41 22 788 19 71 Office: 150 Route de Ferney, CH 1211 Geneva 2 – Switzerland www.gicj.org P a g e | 1 Introduction Lisa-Marlen Gronemeier, Geneva International Centre for Justice (GICJ).-------------------------------- In his recent report (A/HRC/34/70) dated 16 March 2017, Michael Lynk – UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967 – emphasized that Palestinian, Israeli, and international human rights defenders “have experienced sophisticated interference with their vital work, and have faced toxic denunciations aimed at silencing them and discouraging their supporters”. In their tireless and intrepid work, they face attacks, arrests, detention, and threats to their lives and safety. This report sheds light on the deteriorating conditions under which human rights defenders (HRDs) in occupied Palestine and Israel carry out their indispensable and intrepid work. Israel employs repressive methods to restrict, discredit, and criminalize their work to document and counteract the severe human rights violations associated with the Israeli occupation and illegal policies and practices in the region. While the Israeli authorities have a long history of severely infringing on Palestinian HRDs’ freedom of expression, association and peaceful assembly, and the right to participate in public and political life, Israeli HRDs also operate in an increasingly hostile environment: They endure an antagonistic public atmosphere, are discredited and attacked by the Government of Israel, the Israeli military, hostile Israeli organizations and unknown individuals or groups, and are subjected to discriminatory legislation by the Knesset.
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Peace
    Profiles of Peace Forty short biographies of Israeli and Palestinian peace builders who have struggled to end the occupation and build a just future for both Palestinians and Israelis. Haidar Abdel Shafi Palestinian with a long history of working to improve the health and social conditions of Palestinians and the creation of a Palestinian state. Among his many accomplishments, Dr. Abdel Shafi has been the director of the Red Crescent Society of Gaza, was Chairman of the first Palestinian Council in Gaza, and took part in the Madrid Peace Talks in 1991. Dr. Haidar Abdel Shafi is one of the most revered persons in Palestine, whose long life has been devoted to the health and social conditions of his people and to their aspirations for a national state. Born in Gaza in 1919, he has spent most of his life there, except for study in Lebanon and the United States. He has been the director of the Red Crescent Society in Gaza and has served as Commissioner General of the Palestinian Independent Commission for Citizens Rights. His passion for an independent state of Palestine is matched by his dedication to achieve unity among all segments of the Palestinian community. Although Gaza is overwhelmingly religiously observant, he has won and kept the respect and loyalty of the people even though he himself is secular. Though nonparti- san he has often been associated with the Palestinian left, especially with the Palestinian Peoples Party (formerly the Palestinian Communist Party). A mark of his popularity is his service as Chairman of the first Palestinian Council in Gaza (1962-64) and his place on the Executive Committee of “There is no problem of the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) (1964-65).
    [Show full text]
  • The London School of Economics and Political Science the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions Movement
    The London School of Economics and Political Science The Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions Movement: Activism Across Borders for Palestinian Justice Suzanne Morrison A thesis submitted to the Department of Government of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, October 2015 1 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 75,359 words. 2 Abstract On 7 July 2005, a global call for Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) was declared to people around the world to enact boycott initiatives and pressure their respective governments to sanction Israel until it complies with international law and respects universal principles of human rights. The call was endorsed by over 170 Palestinian associations, trade unions, non-governmental organizations, charities, and other Palestinian groups. The call mentioned how broad BDS campaigns were utilized in the South African struggle against apartheid, and how these efforts served as an inspiration to those seeking justice for Palestinians.
    [Show full text]
  • Court Won't Bar Left-Wing Activists Ezra Nawi, Guy Butavia from West Bank
    4 Friday, January 29, 2016 | Haaretz in which the troops of Rank & File the Australian Mounted Division played a decisive Court won’t bar left-wing activists role, and so he’s “delighted SECOND-HAND SHOP FOR that we can pay tribute to ETHIOPIAN IMMIGRANTS: this important event by A new second-hand shop screening the classic film, Ezra Nawi, Guy Butavia from West Bank has begun serving the new ‘The Lighthorsemen.’” The immigrants in Mevasseret films will be screened at the request, saying it stemmed Zion, operated by Telfed – respective cinematheques Nir Hasson from a desire to restrict his The South African Zionist of Tel Aviv (February 8-15), A court yesterday rejected client’s political activity rath- Federation. The Telfed Jerusalem (February 9-18) the police’s request to bar two er than from the needs of the Ethiopian Community and Haifa (February 10-17). left-wing activists from the investigation. Initiative opened the shop West Bank, terming it an un- In response, police repre- last month “to provide a BRAIN UNDRAIN: A new acceptable infringement on sentative Avi Tivoni, said, “I source of low-cost clothing initiative, the Zuckerman their freedom of occupation know he’s involved in provo- and household goods, some Postdoctoral Scholars and expression. cations against IDF soldiers new,” committee chairman Program, aims to attract Ezra Nawi and Guy Bu- and confrontations with sol- Mel Cohen told Haaretz. “A postdoctoral researchers tavia, both members of the diers as part of his activity significant number of people from North America and other Ta’ayush organization, were in what he terms a human have been coming in.” Three Western countries to Israel’s arrested over two weeks rights organization.” Peleg volunteers – former South major academic centers, ago on suspicion of various said this response proved Africans Roy Scher and the Technion-Israel Institute crimes, including contact his point that the police’s Shira Lipschitz along with of Technology announced with a foreign agent.
    [Show full text]
  • The South Hebron Hills
    THE SOUTH HEBRON HILLS SOLDIERS TESTIMONIES 2010-2016 Breaking the Silence's activities are made possible through the generous support of individuals and foundations including: AECID, Bertha Foundation, Broederlijk Delen , CCFD , Dan Church Aid , Die Schwelle , the Delegation of the European Union to the State of Israel , Foundation for Middle East Peace , medico international , MISEREOR , The Moriah Fund , New Israel Fund , NGO Development Center (NDC), Open Society Foundations , OXFAM, Pro-Victimis Foundation, Rockefeller Brothers Fund , Sigrid Rausing Trust , SIVMO , Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs , Trócaire, ZIVIK and the countless private individuals who have made contributions to our work over the past year . This list represents a list of donors correct to the date of publication. The contents and opinions of this publication do not represent those of our donors or partners and are the sole responsibility of Breaking the Silence. THE SOUTH HEBRON HILLS SOLDIERS TESTIMONIES 2010-2016 ISRAELI SOLDIERS TALK ABOUT THE OCCUPIED TERRITORIES Introduction The South Hebron Hills is the southernmost part of the West Bank and includes the Palestinian towns of Yatta, Dura, Dhahiriyah, and the surrounding rural areas. The region includes approximately 122 Palestinian communities which together house close to 70,000 people, as well as roughly 8,500 settlers who live in settlements and unauthorized outposts affiliated with the Mount Hebron Regional Council.* The Palestinian population of the South Hebron Hills is primarily composed of Bedouin, as well as fellahin (farmers or agricultural laborers) cave dwellers, who lead a rural traditional lifestyle, earning their living primarily from agricultural work and sheep herding. Some are refugees who arrived in the West Bank after being expelled from Israel in 1948 and the years that followed, while others are descendants of families who have been living in the area for hundreds of years.
    [Show full text]
  • BDS: How a Controversial Non Violent Movement Has Transformed The
    8/6/2019 BDS: how a controversial non-violent movement has transformed the Israeli-Palestinian debate | News | The Guardian BDS: how a controversial nonviolent movement has transformed the sraeliPalestinian debate Israel sees the international boycott campaign as an existential threat to the Jewish state. Palestinians regard it as their last resort. By Nathan Thrall Main image: Bethlehem, June 2015. Photograph: Thomas Coex/AFP/Getty Images Tue 14 Aug 2018 06.00 BST he movement for Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions against Israel – known as BDS – has been driving the world a little bit mad. Since its founding 13 years ago, it has acquired nearly as many enemies as the Israelis and Palestinians combined. It has hindered the efforts of Arab states to fully break their own decades-old boycott in pursuit of increasingly overt cooperation with Israel. It has shamed the Palestinian Authority government in Ramallah by denouncing its security and Teconomic collaboration with Israel’s army and military administration. It has annoyed the Palestine Liberation Organization by encroaching on its position as the internationally recognised advocate and representative of Palestinians worldwide. It has infuriated the Israeli government by trying to turn it into a leper among liberals and progressives. It has exasperated what is left of the Israeli peace camp by nudging the Palestinians away from an anti-occupation struggle and towards an anti-apartheid one. It has induced such an anti-democratic counter-campaign by the Israeli government that it has made Israeli liberals fear for the future of their country. And it has caused major headaches for the Palestinians’ donor governments in Europe, which are pressured by Israel not to work with BDS-supporting organisations in the Palestinian territories, an impossible request given that nearly all major civil society groups in Gaza and the West Bank support the movement.
    [Show full text]
  • The London School of Economics and Political Science The
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by LSE Theses Online The London School of Economics and Political Science The Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions Movement: Activism Across Borders for Palestinian Justice Suzanne Morrison A thesis submitted to the Department of Government of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, October 2015 1 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 75,359 words. 2 Abstract On 7 July 2005, a global call for Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) was declared to people around the world to enact boycott initiatives and pressure their respective governments to sanction Israel until it complies with international law and respects universal principles of human rights. The call was endorsed by over 170 Palestinian associations, trade unions, non-governmental organizations, charities, and other Palestinian groups. The call mentioned how broad BDS campaigns were utilized in the South African struggle against apartheid, and how these efforts served as an inspiration to those seeking justice for Palestinians.
    [Show full text]