DOCSLIB.ORG

Kelly, Shaheerah

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kelly, Shaheerah Kelly, Shaheerah From: Kelly, Shaheerah Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 1:27 PM To: Chad Smith; Harrilene Yazzie Cc: Nystedt, John; Kelly, Shaheerah; Tressia Contreras Subject: FW: ESA Compliance for Window Rock Airport Project Attachments: FNF Construction CBP GP Application 6-15-2020.pdf; Maps for Window Rock Airport.pdf; Categorical Exclusion of Airport Projects.pdf; FNF Construction FWS Correspondence 3-19-2018.pdf Please see the message below. Thank you. From: Kelly, Shaheerah Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 12:34 PM To: Nystedt, John <[email protected]>; Sonja Detsoi <[email protected]>; Pam Kyselka <[email protected]>; Nora Talkington <[email protected]>; Leanna Begay <[email protected]> Cc: Hedwall, Shaula <[email protected]>; Tressia Contreras <[email protected]>; Kelly, Shaheerah <[email protected]> Subject: ESA Compliance for Window Rock Airport Project Good Afternoon, The Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 Office, received an application for the temporary operation of a small concrete batch plant project at the Window Rock Airport in Apache County, Arizona, located on the Navajo Nation tribal land. The EPA granted approval for Phase I of this project on April 18, 2018 for a period of 30 days. Phase I included a cement production of 8,200 cubic yards per year. The applicant, FNF Construction, Inc., is requesting approval for Phase II of this project for a period of 45 days. Phase II of this project includes a cement production of 7,000 cubic yards per year. All project activities, including equipment staging, will be limited to existing paved surfaces within the subject parcel. There will be no surface disturbance of previously undisturbed ground associated with the construction of the project. Based on a review of the information provided to us, no known species or critical habitats are known to exist within the site for the operation since it would occur on existing airport property, on existing pavement, and on graded runway safety areas. Therefore, we still believe that the project would have “No Effect” on federally listed threatened or endangered, or result in the destruction or adverse modification of any federally designated critical habitat. Attached are the following documents: 1. A copy of the application dated June 15, 2020 2. USFWS list of endangered and threatened species dated March 18, 2020 3. Maps of the boundaries of the project location at the Window Rock Airport 4. Categorical Exclusion of Airport Projects Please let me know whether you have any concerns about this by Monday, July 27, 2020. I look forward to your response. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions. 1 ************************************ Shaheerah Kelly Permits Office, Air Division (AIR-3-1) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 San Francisco, CA 94105 Phone: 415-947-4156 Fax: 415-947-3579 Email: [email protected] From: Nystedt, John <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2018 12:39 PM To: Kelly, Shaheerah <[email protected]> Cc: Pam Kyselka <[email protected]>; Chad Smith <[email protected]>; Nora Talkington <[email protected]>; Harrilene Yazzie <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] No Effect Determination for Window Rock Airport Project Kelly, Thank you for your April 16, 2018, email. This email documents our response regarding the subject project, in compliance with section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Based on the information you provided, we believe no endangered or threatened species or critical habitat will be affected by this project; nor is this project likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any proposed species or adversely modify any proposed critical habitat. No further review is required for this project at this time. Should project plans change or if new information on the distribution of listed or proposed species becomes available, this determination may need to be reconsidered. In all future communication on this project, please refer to consultation number 02EAAZ00-2015-TA-0686. In keeping with our trust responsibilities to American Indian Tribes, by copy of this email, we will notify the Navajo Nation, which may be affected by the proposed action and encourage you to invite the Bureau of Indian Affairs to participate in the review of your proposed action. Should you require further assistance or if you have any questions, please contact me as indicated below, or my supervisor, Brenda Smith, at 556-2157. Thank you for your continued efforts to conserve endangered species. .∙∙..∙∙..∙∙..∙∙...∙∙..∙∙..∙∙..∙∙..∙∙..∙∙..∙∙..∙∙..∙∙...∙∙..∙∙..∙∙..∙∙..∙∙. Fish and Wildlife Biologist/AESO Tribal Coordinator USFWS AZ Ecological Services Office ‐ Flagstaff Suboffice Southwest Forest Science Complex, 2500 S Pine Knoll Dr, Rm 232 Flagstaff, AZ 86001‐6381 (928) 556‐2160 Fax‐2121 Cell:(602) 478‐3797 http://www.fws.gov/southwest/es/arizona/ On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 2:28 PM, Kelly, Shaheerah <[email protected]> wrote: Good Afternoon John, I am working on a federal action for the Window Rock Airport. The federal action is to issue a permit to allow the operation of a small concrete batch plant that will be used to reconstruct the existing Runway 2‐20 (7,000 feet by 75 feet). Attached are the relevant maps and application documents. 2 Below is a list of species in the area that was provided to us, and also attached is the letter from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service providing these species. List of Threatened, Endangered, or Candidate Species Type Name Status Proposed Mammal Gray Wolf (Canis lupus) Experimental Population Non‐Essential Mexican Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis lucida) Birds Threatened Yellow‐Billed Cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus) Northern Mexican Gartnersnake (Thamnophis eques Reptiles Threatened megalops) Fishes Zuni Bluehead Sucker (Catostomus Dicobolus Yarrowi) Endangered Flowering Plants Zuni Fleabane (Erigeron Rhizomatus) Threatened Critical Habitats None ‐‐ Based on a review of the information provided to us, although the potential for the named species to occur in the vicinity of the proposed Project exists, no known species or critical habitats are known to exist within site for the proposed operation since it would occur on existing airport property on existing pavement and graded runway safety areas. Therefore, the proposed project would have “no effect” on federally listed threatened or endangered, or result in the destruction or adverse modification of any federally designated critical habitat. Please let me know whether you concur with this determination. I look forward to your response. Thanks. ************************************ Shaheerah Kelly Permits Office, Air Division (AIR-3) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 San Francisco, CA 94105 Phone: 415-947-4156 Fax: 415-947-3579 Email: [email protected] 3 I AJo Ast Ber 81st Ca '\ Ch c.oc. ClH Co Co Do Dul Fla Flo Fre u Gilt GIE GI< Grc Ho Ho Kin Lal L~ Me Mic No Pa! Pal PCJI Pre Sal St. Se1 Sht Sle Sp Su1 Ter Tor Tut Tue ..... ~ INTeRST... TEFICUTES Wit -@-- u.s.ROUTES -@-- STATEFICUTES WII OOPOP. ---@- IND!AN RDUT£B ,..,,,. l WII ...... ---• --- INTEAJIIATIONALBDLINDAFIY C Wh )OPOP. ------- STAlE&OUt,IOARV 0 aTn.EM&:NT COUNTY BCUNDARY Wil METflCPOUTAN AREAS 10 5 0 lD ZI 31! 4D lllllbn.., C wwo1gltol • phoenix, az Yu1 ~ f. , r This photo shows that the Window Rock Airport has utilized this plant staging area since 2003. The site is covered with recycled asphalt millings. Plant operations will remain within this previously disturbed area. EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES EVALUATION INFORMATION SUBMITTAL FOR CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION OF AIRPORT PROJECTS I. INTRODUCTION: The FAA must comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for all proposed airport development projects that require a federal action. Categorical Exclusions for various actions are defined in Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Order 1050.1 E, Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures." The FAA is seeking information from the airport sponsor to be able to determine whether the sponsor's proposed airport development project can be categorically excluded from the NEPA requirement to conduct a formal Environmental Assessment (EA) or Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Note an action on the categorically excluded list is not automatically exempted from environmental review under NEPA. FAA must determine if any extraordinary circumstances apply to the proposed project. The intent for this information is to informally document the agency's categorical exclusion determination. The need for this information is based upon the guidance in paragraphs 304 and 305 of Order 1050.1E see: http://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/orders_notices/media/ALL 1050-1Epdf. II. APPLICABILITY: Sponsors are not asked to submit information described below for equipment and vehicle purchases (i.e. Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting; snow removal equipment; security equipment such as computers, scanners, etc.); Runway/taxiway edge lighting and other electrical items such as regulators, control panels, etc.; Master Plans, Part 150 Studies, feasibility studies, and environmental disclosure documents, etc. Ill. DIRECTIONS: The airport sponsor is to submit narrative responses to the questions in Section V below and provide supporting documentation to ensure the FAA can determine that no extraordinary circumstances exist. Sponsors are to submit this information only for proposed projects where they anticipate federal funding assistance within the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Navajo Division of Transportation
    NAVAJO DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION POST OFFICE BOX 4620 TEL: 505.371.8300 WINDOW ROCK, AZ 86515 FAX: 505.371-8399 April 5, 2014 Paulson Chaco, Division Director Ben Bennett, Deputy Director [email protected] [email protected] CHINLE AGENCY FY2014 2nd QUARTERLY STATUS REPORT JANUARY-MARCH 2014 I) NDOT EXECUTIVE UPDATE 1) US 491 – On Mar 25,2014, Governor Susana Martinez announced that $78 million of funding will complete 22 miles of US 491 to improve safety and mobility by adding two additional lanes, a median separating northbound and southbound traffic, plus constructing acceleration and deceleration lanes in congested and high traffic areas. The NDOT worked with Governor Martinez, President Ben Shelly, Senator John Pinto, and the NMDOT to support improving this vital road on the Navajo Nation. 2) N27 Public Hearing – On Mar 28, 2014, NDOT and BIA reported to the Chinle and Nazlini Chapters about the proposed widening of N27 from N105 intersection to the N7 intersection to accommodate increased traffic from the new Judicial Center Complex (currently under construction), proposed Police Academy and other future developments within the area. 3) Council Delegate Dwight Witherspoon’s Legislation to amend the FET Road Fund Management Regulations (0008-14) and the FET Road Fund Management Plan (0009-14): Ft. Defiance Agency Council approves Resolution Opposing Delegate Dwight Witherspoon’s Legislation to Amend the FET Road Fund Management Regulations (0008-14) and the FET Road Fund Management Plan (0009-14) on Dec 5, 2013. NDOT provided comments on proposed legislations to Office of Legislative Services on Jan 17, 2014. NDOT has met with Delegate Witherspoon on several occasions to discuss his proposed legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • Kayenta Township Comprehensive Plan
    Kayenta Township Comprehensive Plan Background and Current Conditions Volume Kayenta Township, Navajo Nation, Arizona Background and Current Conditions Volume Kayenta Township Comprehensive Plan Prepared for Kayenta Township P.O. Box 1490 Kayenta, AZ 86033 Prepared by The Planning Center 110 South Church Avenue, Suite 6320 Tucson, Arizona With Assistance from Arrowhead Engineering 100% Diné Owned and Operated 1685 S. San Todaro Place Tucson, AZ 85713 November 30, 2011 Background and Current Conditions Volume Background and Current Conditions Volume Kayenta Township Comprehensive Plan Table of Contents Table of Contents v Acknowledgements vii Introduction and Overview 1 Opportunities and Constraints 12 Community Services and Public Facilities 40 Recreation, Parks, Trails and Open Space 60 Transportation and Circulation 75 Economic Development Framework 120 Existing Land Uses and Vacant Land 132 Demographic and Socioeconomic Profile 138 Bibliography and References 142 Appendix A: NFIP Application 144 Exhibits Exhibit 1: Regional Context 14 Exhibit 2: Local Context 15 Exhibit 3: Land Forms and Topography 16 Exhibit 4: Watercourses, Major Washes and 31 Floodplains Exhibit 5: Generalized Soil Associations 33 Exhibit 6: Generalized Vegetative Communities 34 Exhibit 7: Opportunities and Constraints 35 Exhibit 8: Land Ownership 39 Exhibit 9: Schools within the Navajo Nation Region 45 Background and Current Conditions Volume Table of Contents Page v Kayenta Township Comprehensive Plan Exhibits (Continued) Exhibit 10: Schools within KUSD 46 Exhibit
    [Show full text]
  • EPA Approval of Request for Coverage Under Concrete Batch Plants
    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105-3901 APR 1 8 2018 Ms. Tressia Contreras FNF Construction, Inc. 115 South 48th Street Tempe, Arizona 85252 Re: Approval of Request for Coverage for a Portable Concrete Batch Plant in Indian Country; Facility ID# 31; Application# 2018-004-GP Dear Ms. Contreras: This letter provides the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 9's determination in response to the Request for Coverage under the General Air Quality Permit for New or Modified Minor Source Cement Batch Plants in Indian Country (Concrete Batch Plants General Permit) that the EPA received from FNF Construction Inc. (FNF) pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA) Tribal Minor New Source Review (NSR) Program. The project for which Concrete Batch Plants General Permit coverage is sought by FNF is the construction and operation of a portable concrete batch plant (Project) located at the Window Rock Airport within the Navajo Nation tribal land in Window Rock, Apache County, Arizona. The Project is for the reconstruction of the existing Runway 2-20 (7,000 feet by 75 feet), and would include all necessary pavement markings and limited shoulder regrading and seeding. Permittee: FNF Construction, Inc., 115 South 48th Street, Tempe, Arizona 85282 Location(s): Window Rock Airport, Window Rock, Apache County, Arizona Determination The EPA has carefully reviewed FNF's Request for Coverage, as specifically defined in our Technical Support Document (TSO) for this action, and other relevant information to determine whether the Project meets the criteria to qualify for coverage under the Concrete Batch Plants General Permit.
    [Show full text]
  • Building a Stronger State- Federal Relationship Building a Stronger State-Federal Relationship Plenary Session
    Building a Stronger State- Federal Relationship Building a Stronger State-Federal Relationship Plenary Session In the recent WRP Regional Assessment, members noted: • Importance of having healthy Federal-State-Tribal relations and • A need to better understand agency alignment (areas of interest and opportunities to leverage efforts) This panel will highlight: • Western Governors Association (WGA) partnership work with other western policy organizations to promote collaborative relationships between state and federal government and tribes • Various contexts in which the state-federal relationship plays out and specific opportunities to improve the relationship. WRP will take this opportunity to reaffirm its long-standing working relationship with WGA. Building a Stronger State-Federal Relationship Plenary Session Plenary Leads: • Mr. Oramel (O.H.) Skinner Chief of Government Accountability and Special Litigation Unit, Arizona Attorney General's Office • Mr. Alan Matheson Executive Director, Utah Department of Environmental Quality • Mr. Keith Gardner Chief of Staff, New Mexico Governor’s Office JIM OGSBURY Executive Director westgov.org #WGA17 westgov.org westgov.org #WGA17 States are NOT stakeholders westgov.org #WGA17 Different Flavors westgov.org #WGA17 Agency by Agency Reforms westgov.org #WGA17 WGA Definition of Consultation Each Executive department and agency should be required to have a clear and accountable process to provide each state – through its Governor – with early, meaningful and substantive input in the development of regulatory policies that have federalism implications. This includes the development, prioritization and implementation of federal environmental statutes, policies, rules, programs, reviews, budgets and strategic planning. westgov.org #WGA17 Learn More westgov.org #WGA17 Westgov.org westgov.org #WGA17 Building a Stronger State-Federal Relationship Plenary Session Plenary Leads: • Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.0 Affected Environment
    3.0 Affected Environment 3.1 Geologic Setting 3.1.1 Geology The Navajo Nation lies entirely on the Colorado Plateau, and is composed of a variety of geologic features including canyons, mesas, barren badlands, and expansive flatlands (Foos 1999). The Colorado Plateau covers an area of approximately 130,000 square miles, covering western Colorado, northwestern New Mexico, southeastern Utah, and the northern Arizona. Land surface elevations within this area can range from 5,100 feet above sea level on the western side to over 10,000 feet within some of the mountain ranges found within the project area. The region is rich with geologic history through plateau uplift, deposition, and hydrologic erosion, giving rise to the unique features and landscape of the Southwestern United States. Specifically, the Navajo Nation lies mainly on the Navajo Section of the Colorado Plateau, with some territory on the Grand Canyon and Datil Sections (Rigby 1977). Major geological formations found on the Navajo Nation include the Chuska and Carizzo Mountains, Defiance Plateau, and the San Juan Basin in the eastern portion of the region (Figure 3-1). The Chuska Mountains and the Defiance Plateau are part of the same monocline region, separated by the Black Creek Valley. The uplift is formed from volcanic and sedimentary rocks with geologic layers ranging from the DeChelly Sandstone through the Chuska Sandstone formations with Defiance Plateau lying between 7000 to 8000 ft in elevation and the Chuska Mountains reaching over 10,000 ft in elevation (Harshbarger and Repenning 1954, Peirce et al. 1979). The San Juan Basin located near Farmington is a major coal source thanks to the prominent Fruitland Formation that borders the outlying portions of basin (Fassett 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Section 1 INTRODUCTION Window Rock Airport, Which Serves Window
    Section 1 INTRODUCTION Window Rock Airport, which serves Window Rock, the Capital of the Navajo Tribe, is located in Black Creek Valley, Apache County, Arizona. The Navajo Tribe includes some 146,000 people; the Navajo Nation encompasses some 25,000 square miles of northeast Arizona, southeast Utah, and north- west New Mexico. Several factors create a strong underlying demand for improved general aviation facilities to serve Window Rock. First, the relatively low population density of the Nation, approximately six persons per square mile, combined with the rugged geography and climate creates difficulties in delivering traditional government services. That a significant portion of the reservation is not served by improved roads compounds this prob- lem. As such, the Navajo government has come to rely on its general aviation fleet as a means of rapidly accessing the reservation from Window Rock. Similarly, Window Rock Airport serves as a staging point for air medical evacuations from outlying areas to the medical facilities at Fort Defiance and in Gallup, N.W. Albuquerque, N.M. and Phoenix, Arz. It also serves as the staging point for firefigbting aircraft under contract to the Department of Interior. A second factor creating a demand for general aviation facilities is the location of the Navajo Nation with respect to the major cities of the encompassing States. For example, Albuquerque (163 miles) and Phoenix (333 miles) are the closest major metropolitan centers to Window Rock and the only two directly accessible via the Interstate Highway System. Both cities represent major commercial and governmental centers at which the Navajo Tribe conducts business on an almost daily basis.
    [Show full text]
  • 22Nd NAVAJO NATION COUNCIL | Office of the Speaker
    nd 22 NAVAJO NATION COUNCIL | Office of the Speaker MEDIA CONTACTS FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Jared Touchin | 928.221.9253 June 30, 2013 Krista Thompson | 928.637.5603 Jolene Holgate | 928.871.7160 [email protected] 22nd Navajo Nation Council approves two legislations that will impact the newly opened Twin Arrows Navajo Casino Resort WINDOW ROCK – During a special session held on Friday, the Navajo Nation Council approved Legislation No. 0108-13, exempting the Navajo Nation Oil and Gas Company from being subject to Navajo Nation fuel excise taxes to enable the entity to finance infrastructure development near the Twin Arrows Navajo Casino Resort - specifically a gas station and a convenience store. The NNOGC will be exempt from fuel excise taxes until either the estimated $2.5 million infrastructure costs are reimbursed to NNOGC or after a seven-year period from when the convenience store begins operation, whichever occurs first. The Navajo Nation fuel excise tax, which was established in 1999, imposes an 18-cent per gallon tax on gasoline distributors or retailers on the Navajo Nation. The legislation was sponsored by Council Delegate Russell Begaye (Shiprock) and Council Delegate Leonard Tsosie (Baca/Prewitt, Casamero Lake, Counselor, Littlewater, Ojo Encino, Pueblo Pintado, Torreon, Whitehorse Lake). In addition, the Navajo Nation Council approved Legislation No. 0165-13, amending Title 17 of the Navajo Nation Code to allow the sale of alcohol on casino floors owned by the Navajo Nation Gaming Enterprise. Legislation sponsor Council Delegate Mel Begay (Coyote Canyon, Mexican Springs, Naschitti, Tohatchi, Bahastl’a’a’), asked for the Council’s support of the bill as a means to continue the growth and success of the NNGE.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 9 – Pacific Southwest
    United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 9 – Pacific Southwest www.epa.gov/caa-permitting/tribal-minor-new-source-review-permitting-region-9 Technical Support Document for Review of Request for Coverage Request for Coverage under the General Air Quality Permit for New or Modified Minor Source Concrete Batch Plants in Indian Country FNF CONSTRUCTION, INC. WINDOW ROCK AIRPORT PROJECT September 2020 Applicant: Tressia Contreras, Environmental Manager FNF Construction, Inc. 115 South 48th Street Tempe, Arizona 85281 Phone: (480) 929-6733 Email: [email protected] Source: Window Rock Airport Source Location: Beacon Road Window Rock, Arizona 86515 Latitude 35.651699° N, Longitude 109.067320° W Source ID #: 31 Application #: 2020-005-GP Docket: https://www.regulations.gov/ [Docket # EPA-R09-OAR-2020-0366] Summary Pursuant to the provisions of Clean Air Act (CAA) sections 110(a) and 301(d) and the Federal Indian Country Minor New Source Review (NSR) Program at Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) title 40, sections 49.151-161 (Tribal Minor NSR Program), the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 9 is approving a Request for Coverage under the General Air Quality Permit for New or Modified Minor Source Concrete Batch Plants in Indian Country (Concrete Batch Plants General Permit) to FNF Construction, Inc. (FNF or Applicant) for the construction and operation of a soil cement mixing plant, which is a portable concrete batch plant, at the Window Rock Airport in Window Rock, Apache County, Arizona within the Navajo Nation tribal land. The Concrete Batch Plants General Permit, the permit under which the Applicant is seeking coverage, was issued by the EPA under the Tribal Minor NSR Program on October 14, 2016, with an effective date of November 14, 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 3 AIRPORT HISTORY and LOCATION 3.1 WINDOW ROCK
    Section 3 AIRPORT HISTORY AND LOCATION **************************** 3.1 WINDOW ROCK Located in Black Creek Valley within Apache County, Arizona; Window Rock has a population of approximately 500 people. As the seat of government for the Navajo Tribe, Window Rock serves as the focal point for the entire Navajo population of 146,000 people. In addition to Tribal govern- mental offices, the Area Offices of the U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs and the U.S. Public Health Services are located in Window Rock. Window Rock is situated in the southeast quadrant of the Reservation. State Highway 264 runs east-west through the community and provides the only paved access to Gallup, New Mexico. Some 26 miles to the southeast of Window Rock, Gallup is the nearest community with any scheduled airline service. Indian Service Road 12 runs north-south through Window Rock providing access to Fort Defiance to the north and Saint Michaels to the south. The Black Creek Valley runs in a north-south direction. The slopes of the Defiance Plateau and southwestern slopes of the Cbuska Mountains bound the valley. The Valley, consisting of flat grassy plains between low cuestas and hills, has an average width of two miles and is at an elevation of between 6,700 to 6,900 feet above sea level. Window Rock is actually nestled against the southwest edge of the Chuska Mountains. A long narrow sandstone mesa, the western escarpment consists of steep slopes and vertical walled cliffs. To the west, the Defiance Plateau rises to an altitude approximately equal to Chuska Mountains (7,500 feet MSL), but does not have the steep slopes and cliffs.
    [Show full text]
  • Brewer Signs SB 1317, Allows Tribes Stake in Aviation Fund
    Brewer signs SB 1317, allows tribes stake in Aviation Fund Arlando Teller, program manager for Department of Airport Management, said the seed for Senate Bill 1317 was originally planted in 2011. Governor Jan Brewer recently signed the legislation into law on June 20, allowing tribally-owned airports a chance to compete for Arizona Aviation Fund grants. Sponsored by Senator Jack Jackson, Jr., the bill gives tribes a chance to submit proposals for infrastructure improvements at tribal airports in Arizona. (Photo by Rick Abasta) WINDOW ROCK-After registration fees imposed upon structure projects through the He explained that the seed a lengthy six-month process pilots in Arizona. fund. for SB 1317 was planted in winding its way through the There is no taxpayer dollars “The Navajo Nation has 2011. The Arizona Airports Arizona Legislature, Sen- included in the Arizona Avia- five airports in Arizona that can Association initially supported ate Bill 1317 was signed into tion Fund. benefit from this legislation. the bill but cited concerns that law by Arizona Governor Jan “This bill is a great opportu- We look forward to improving tabled the legislation. Brewer on June 20, 2013. nity for the 14 tribally-owned mobility for the northern part “They were supportive Sponsored by Senator Jack airports of Arizona to compete of the state,” Chaco said. of allowing tribal airports to Jackson, Jr., SB 1317 al- with other public airports to The Navajo Nation owns become eligible to utilize state lows tribally-owned airports improve their runways and oth- airports in the Arizona com- aviation grants but they ques- to participate in the Arizona er needs,” said Paulson Chaco, munities of Chinle, Ganado, tioned the differing regulatory Department of Transportation’s director of the Navajo Division Kayenta, Tuba City and Win- environment such as taxation Aviation Fund program.
    [Show full text]
  • FNF Construction Inc. Window Rock Airport
    EPA Form No. S900-370 EPA ICRNo.1230.27 0MB Control No. 2060-0003 Approval expires 4/30/2017 United States Environmental Protection Agency General Permitfor New or Modified Minor Sources ofAir Pollution in Indian Country http://www.epa,&ov/air/tribal/tribalnsr.html Request for Coverage underthe General Air Quality Permit for Newor Modified Minor Source Concrete Batch Plants in Indian Country Last Modified: July 1, 2016 Version 1.0 Prior to construction or modification, complete this application and submit itto your reviewing authority. A list of reviewing authorities, their areas ofcoverage, and contact information can be found in Attachment E to the General Air Quality Permit for New or Modified Minor Source Concrete Batch Plants or visit: http://www.epa.gov/air/tribal/tribalnsr.html. For assistance with this application please contact your reviewing authority. For instructions on completing this application please see the document "Instructions for Requesting Coverage under the General Air Quality Permit for New or Modified Minor Source Concrete Batch Plants in Indian Country." Section 1: Contact Information 1. Business Name: 2. Date: 5. Name of Operator or Contact at Site (if different from 6. Telephone Number of Operator or Contact at Site (if different owner): from owner): 8. Telephone Number of Owner: L\ %'0 , Cf a't - f,7 :3 '3 10. Correspondence Address: Company Name: c/o: Address: 11. Authorized Contact Person: \re..ss;·A-@. p-~F~nC, COW\ N_ame: --r,'<GS~\A- ConfrerA-S . Email: Title: C\"\VI fon W\ .Q. l'\1'AI Yn A-VlAj.eR. i FAX: Phone: t.:::- 4fse.-qd.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Navajo Nation Long Range Transportation Plan
    2016 Navajo Nation Long Range Transportation Plan Final Plan April, 2016 Navajo Nation Long Range Transportation Plan Prepared for: Navajo Nation Navajo Nation Division of Transportation April 2016 Prepared by: 4900 Lang Avenue NE Albuquerque, NM 87109 Phone: (505) 348‐4000 | Fax: (505) 348‐4055 www.wilsonco.com Contents 4.1.1 Topography ......................................................................................................... 4-1 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1-1 4.2 Natural Resources ................................................................................................... 4-1 1.1 Project Overview ..................................................................................................... 1-1 4.3 Conflicts ..................................................................................................................... 4-1 1.2 Study Area ................................................................................................................. 1-1 5.0 Existing Transportation System .............................................................................. 5-1 1.3 Public Involvement Process ................................................................................ 1-1 5.1 Roadway Infrastructure ........................................................................................ 5-3 1.3.1 Navajo Nation Government Structure ....................................................... 1-2
    [Show full text]