DOCSLIB.ORG

FY 2016 Repurposed Earmarks Report to Congress

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FY 2016 Repurposed Earmarks Report to Congress U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Report to Congress Repurposed Earmark Submissions 4th Quarter Fiscal Year 2016 The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016, directs the Secretary of the Department of Transportation to “submit consolidated reports of the information provided by the States and territories each quarter to the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations.” Background Section 125 of the Department of Transportation Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016, title I of division L, Public Law 114- 113, (hereinafter “Repurposing Provision”) provides the authority for a State or territory (hereinafter “States”) to repurpose any earmark that was designated on or before September 30, 2005, and is less than 10 percent obligated or final vouchered and closed. The repurposed funds may be obligated on a new or existing project in the State within 50 miles of the earmark designation. The project must be an eligible project under the Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBG) (23 U.S.C. 133(b)), or the Territorial and Puerto Rico Highway Program (THP) (23 U.S.C. 165). The Repurposing Provision was available to be applied in Fiscal Year 2016. The repurposed funds must be obligated on the identified projects no later than September 30, 2019. Discussion In March 2016, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) issued guidance on the Repurposing Provision. Shortly thereafter, FHWA began receiving requests from States to repurpose earmarks. During the 3rd quarter of Fiscal Year (FY) 2016, FHWA received requests to repurpose 171 projects totaling $149,790,783.88 from 11 States. During the 4th quarter, FHWA received requests to repurpose 2,074 projects totaling $1,677,138,816.77 from 43 States, District of Columbia, American Samoa, and U.S. Virgin Islands. Through the FY 2016 Repurposing Provision, the States are able to put a total of $1,826,929,600.65 of previously idle earmarked funding to use on critical highway and bridge projects. A similar provision was authorized in FY 2017. Funds repurposed under that provision will be reported in the next required report to Congress. Attachments Attached is a summary of the total number and amounts of earmarked projects that were repurposed by each State and territory during FY 2016. Also attached is a detailed list of earmarked projects that were submitted during the 4th quarter of FY 2016 for repurposing. The FHWA previously submitted a report on 3rd quarter requests for repurposing that contained information on all repurposing requests submitted to FHWA through June 30, 2016. Since the transmittal of the previous report, FHWA has completed processing those 3rd quarter requests, which has resulted in amendments to the prior list of earmarked projects. As such, the amended 3rd quarter list of earmarked projects submitted for repurposing is also attached. Each State has reviewed the list and certified that the earmarks were eligible for repurposing, the projects receiving the funding are within 50 miles of the earmark location within the State, and the funding will be obligated for eligible purposes as required in the Repurposing Provision. List of Repurposed Earmarks The lists are organized by State and shows information pertaining to the original earmark on the left and new project descriptions on the right. For each earmark that was repurposed, the lists provide the description of the original earmark, amount available for repurposing, new project description(s) on which the funds will be used, and the repurposed amount for each of the identified new project descriptions. For example, New York has an earmark for “Westchester County, NY Rehabilitation of June Road Town of North Salem” and $520,767.00 is available for repurposing. New York is repurposing that total amount available for “ADA Sidewalks and Ramps - Upper Westchester.” State Demo ID Project Description Amount Project Description Amount NY NY272 Westchester County, NY Rehabilitation of June Road Town of North Salem 520,767.00 ADA Sidewalks and Ramps ‐ Upper Westchester 520,767.00 In some cases, a State repurposed multiple earmarks and put that funding toward the same project. For example, New York has an earmark for “Reconstruct Main Street in the Town of Lewisboro” and $72,106.00 is available for repurposing. The State also has an earmark for “Improvements to Clark Pl. and Cherry Ln. Rt. 6 and 6 N in Putnam County” and $296,437.00 is available for repurposing. New York is repurposing both of those amounts for “Harlem Valley Rail Trail Extension Town of Millerton to Town of Hillsdale.” State Demo ID Project Description Amount Project Description Amount NY NY301 Reconstruct Main Street in the Town of Lewisboro 72,106.00 Harlem Valley Rail Trail Extension Town of Millerton to Town of Hillsdale 72,106.00 NY NY302 Improvements to Clark Pl. and Cherry Ln. Rt. 6 and 6 N in Putnam County 296,437.00 Harlem Valley Rail Trail Extension Town of Millerton to Town of Hillsdale 296,437.00 In some scenarios, a State repurposed one earmark and put that funding toward multiple projects. For example, New York has an earmark for “Construct Northern State Parkway and LIE access at Marcus Ave. and Lakeville Rd. and associated Park and Ride” and $1,362,006.00 is available for repurposing. New York is repurposing that amount for three different projects: $500,000.00 for “Complete Plandome Rd Culvert reconstruction project, Town of North Hempstead,” $838,142.00 for “Complete 1.7 mile segment of the Hempstead Harbor Shoreline Trail, Town of North Hempstead,” and $23,864.00 for “Ocean Pkwy Shared Use Path Phase 3 Tobay to Captree in Babylon, Islip, Oyster Bay towns.” State Demo ID Project Description Amount Project Description Amount NY NY587 Construct Northern State Parkway and LIE access at Marcus Ave. and 1,362,006.00 Complete Plandome Rd Culvert reconstruction project, Town of North 500,000.00 Lakeville Rd. and associated Park and Ride Hempstead Complete 1.7 mile segment of the Hempstead Harbor Shoreline Trail, 838,142.00 Town of North Hempstead Ocean Pkwy Shared Use Path Phase 3 Tobay to Captree in Babylon, Islip, 23,864.00 Oyster Bay towns Repurposed Earmarks FY 2016 3rd and 4th Quarter Summary State # of Earmarks Repurposed Total Amount Repurposed Alabama 31 86,766,184 Alaska 44 49,616,886 Arizona 22 30,405,489 Arkansas 39 18,064,929 California 184 197,922,100 Colorado 14 7,254,394 Connecticut 29 53,834,554 Delaware 16 16,362,418 District of Columbia 2 3,938,058 Florida 59 41,884,968 Georgia 100 96,676,929 Hawaii 11 11,338,114 Idaho 1 2,403,540 Illinois 196 53,149,172 Indiana 54 20,323,283 Iowa 28 37,524,119 Kansas 1 2,004,683 Kentucky 43 38,428,894 Louisiana 37 43,708,844 Maine 3 2,684,820 Maryland 5 9,453,924 Massachusetts 20 24,879,282 Michigan 95 53,202,441 Minnesota 27 14,921,231 Mississippi 15 9,463,413 Missouri 49 72,593,291 Montana 14 10,070,511 Nebraska 34 29,192,530 New Hampshire 15 6,710,781 New Jersey 120 103,921,634 New Mexico 39 38,662,025 New York 162 125,364,773 North Carolina 40 30,871,896 Ohio 70 44,775,398 Oklahoma 10 4,110,062 Oregon 9 3,860,011 Pennsylvania 197 128,091,091 South Carolina 20 31,371,930 South Dakota 32 29,628,257 Tennessee 102 75,528,022 Texas 18 36,183,537 Utah 15 5,802,189 Vermont 18 13,180,413 Virginia 63 60,907,567 Washington 126 46,319,394 West Virginia 2 577,222 Wyoming 8 588,364 American Samoa 5 732,062 U.S. Virgin Islands 1 1,673,972 Total 2,245 1,826,929,600.65 Repurposed Earmarks FY 2016 4th Quarter Report to Congress Summary State # of Earmarks Repurposed Total Amount Repurposed Alabama 31 86,766,184.24 Alaska 44 49,616,886.18 Arizona 22 30,405,488.67 Arkansas 39 18,064,929.00 California 184 197,922,100.33 Colorado 14 7,254,394.00 Connecticut 29 53,834,553.63 Delaware 16 16,362,417.55 District of Columbia 2 3,938,057.62 Florida 59 41,884,967.67 Georgia 100 96,676,928.50 Hawaii 11 11,338,113.87 Illinois 196 53,149,172.22 Indiana 54 20,323,283.14 Iowa 28 37,524,118.72 Kentucky 43 38,428,894.25 Louisiana 37 43,708,844.15 Maine 3 2,684,820.00 Maryland 4 5,448,024.00 Massachusetts 20 24,879,282.00 Michigan 94 52,963,484.42 Minnesota 26 14,766,939.85 Mississippi 15 9,463,413.00 Missouri 49 72,593,291.12 Montana 14 10,070,510.99 Nebraska 34 29,192,530.20 New Hampshire 15 6,710,780.66 New Jersey 79 54,344,501.15 New Mexico 39 38,662,025.11 New York 162 125,364,773.00 North Carolina 39 30,357,034.60 Ohio 70 44,775,398.16 Oklahoma 10 4,110,062.26 Oregon 9 3,860,011.01 Pennsylvania 197 128,091,090.75 South Carolina 20 31,371,930.02 South Dakota 24 22,076,545.93 Tennessee 3 1,437,424.58 Texas 18 36,183,536.97 Utah 15 5,802,188.60 Vermont 3 4,508,524.81 Virginia 63 60,907,566.99 Washington 126 46,319,394.16 Wyoming 8 588,364.48 American Samoa 5 732,062.21 U.S. Virgin Islands 1 1,673,972.00 Total 2,074 1,677,138,816.77 Repurposed Earmarks FY 2016 4th Quarter Report to Congress Alabama From To State Demo ID Project Description Amount Project Description Amount AL AL019 Construct the Decatur Southern Bypass (FY 1998) 4,100,399.00 Resurfacing on I‐65 from I‐565 to SR‐2 (US 72) 4,100,399.00 AL AL021 Dothan I‐10 Connector Alabama (FY2003) 4,966,882.78 Add lanes on SR‐12 (US‐84) from east of SR‐87 to east of CR‐507 4,966,882.78 AL AL023 Construct repairs to viaducts connecting downtown and midtown areas 455,431.40 Sign rehab, On I‐20 from I‐59 to the St.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Railway Employee Records for Colorado Volume Iii
    RAILWAY EMPLOYEE RECORDS FOR COLORADO VOLUME III By Gerald E. Sherard (2005) When Denver’s Union Station opened in 1881, it saw 88 trains a day during its gold-rush peak. When passenger trains were a popular way to travel, Union Station regularly saw sixty to eighty daily arrivals and departures and as many as a million passengers a year. Many freight trains also passed through the area. In the early 1900s, there were 2.25 million railroad workers in America. After World War II the popularity and frequency of train travel began to wane. The first railroad line to be completed in Colorado was in 1871 and was the Denver and Rio Grande Railroad line between Denver and Colorado Springs. A question we often hear is: “My father used to work for the railroad. How can I get information on Him?” Most railroad historical societies have no records on employees. Most employment records are owned today by the surviving railroad companies and the Railroad Retirement Board. For example, most such records for the Union Pacific Railroad are in storage in Hutchinson, Kansas salt mines, off limits to all but the lawyers. The Union Pacific currently declines to help with former employee genealogy requests. However, if you are looking for railroad employee records for early Colorado railroads, you may have some success. The Colorado Railroad Museum Library currently has 11,368 employee personnel records. These Colorado employee records are primarily for the following railroads which are not longer operating. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad (AT&SF) Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad employee records of employment are recorded in a bound ledger book (record number 736) and box numbers 766 and 1287 for the years 1883 through 1939 for the joint line from Denver to Pueblo.
    [Show full text]
  • Denver Union Station Awarded LEED Certification Transit Hub Awarded Green Honor for Major 2014 Renovation
    Denver Union Station awarded LEED certification Transit hub awarded green honor for major 2014 renovation DENVER - (July 25, 2016) – Denver Union Station is pleased to announce that it has been awarded LEED Certification from the U.S. Green Building Council. Denver Union Station has become downtown Denver’s hottest gathering place since it reopened in July 2014 after a $54 million renovation, with a major goal of making the multi-use transportation hub as environmentally friendly as possible. Several local Colorado companies were involved in the historic building’s rejuvenation, including Larimer Associates, McWhinney, REGen, LLC, Sage Hospitality and Urban Neighborhoods. Originally opened in 1891, Denver Union Station is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Denver Union Station was awarded LEED points for implementing a variety of green initiatives, including: • Development density & community connectivity • Building reuse - more than 90% of the historic building’s existing structural elements were reused, including the original floors, walls & roof • Providing easy access to public transportation, including RTD’s new University of Colorado A Line to Denver International Airport and B Line to Westminster • Diverting more than 50% of construction waste from landfills. • Using low-emitting paints and flooring materials in the renovation • Regionally manufactured materials were used whenever possible • Asbestos contamination in the building was remediated Denver Union Station is home the 112-room luxury independent Crawford Hotel and 12 Colorado restaurants and retailers. A sampling of their green initiatives: • Stoic & Genuine uses the Environmental Defense Fund Seafood Charts as a guideline when ordering sustainable fish and more than 90% of its oysters are ocean–farmed • Next Door Union Station sources local produce from Colorado farmers, ranchers and other purveyors and is Zero Waste, composting all food scraps from tables and excess food from its kitchen • PigTrain Coffee Co.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Fort Wright Council Meeting Wednesday, May 5, 2021 – 6:00 PM
    City of Fort Wright Council Meeting Wednesday, May 5, 2021 – 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER The Council Meeting was called to order at 6:03 PM by Councilman Adam Feinauer. Councilman Feinauer led the Pledge of Allegiance and a moment of silence. City Clerk Maura Russell called the roll. Councilman Abeln Present Councilman Feinauer Present Councilman Wall Present Councilman Weber Present Councilman Wessels Present Councilwoman Witt Present Also present for the meeting were: City Administrative Officer Jill Bailey City Attorney Tim Theissen Fire/EMS Chief Steve Schewe Police Chief Ed Butler Public Works Director Jeff Bethell City Clerk Maura Russell Treasurer/Senior Deputy Clerk Susan Ellis City Engineer Mark Brueggemann Councilman Feinauer said Mayor Dave Hatter will be late to the meeting. Councilman Abeln made a motion to appoint Councilman Feinauer as Interim Mayor for this Meeting until Mayor Hatter arrives. Councilman Weber made a second. Ms. Russell called the roll. Councilman Abeln Yes Councilman Feinauer Yes Councilman Wall Yes Councilman Weber Yes Councilman Wessels Yes Councilwoman Witt Yes MOTION CARRIED Councilman Feinauer requested an amendment to the agenda to move discussion about the Brent Spence Bridge from New Business to Citizen Comments. Mr. Theissen said no amendment was needed. Page 1 of 12 CITIZEN COMMENTS/GUESTS Representative Kim Banta – Session 2021 Legislative Update – Representative Banta said she dealt with questions regarding unemployment benefits every day. She said Senate Bill 146, bringing unemployment offices to regional locations, and Senate Bill 7, allowing the State of Kentucky to forgive taxes on benefits, were both passed. Rep. Banta also discussed the passage of a House Resolution to provide firefighters with access to mental health services and crisis intervention training.
    [Show full text]
  • Kentucky, Ohio Governors to Develop Cost-Saving Plan for Improving Brent Spence Bridge Corridor
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Kerri Richardson, Gov. Beshear’s Office 502.564.2611 502.330.6633 Rob Nichols, Gov. Kasich’s Office 330.760.7582 [email protected] Kentucky, Ohio governors to develop cost-saving plan for improving Brent Spence Bridge corridor Agreement would limit tolls, share cost to create fairness COVINGTON, KY (Jan. 28, 2015) – The governors of Kentucky and Ohio today directed their teams to create a cost-saving plan that limits tolls and moves forward with improving the Brent Spence Bridge corridor. The bi-state, bi-partisan commitment unveiled by Gov. Steve Beshear of Kentucky and Gov. John Kasich of Ohio includes: Lowering the project’s price tag through innovative solutions in design, construction and financing Splitting costs and toll revenues evenly between Ohio and Kentucky Providing a 50 percent discount in toll rates for frequent commuters The two states’ transportation agencies are working together to develop cost-saving solutions by March 30 and build a viable financial plan before year’s end. The plan is expected to include a public-private partnership to build, maintain and finance the project. The bi-state team will focus on the federally approved 2012 environmental plan for the corridor, which calls for building a new bridge downtown, revamping the existing Brent Spence Bridge and improving interstate approaches in Northern Kentucky and downtown Cincinnati. The current plan would double the number of interstate lanes across the river from eight to 16, relieving congestion that causes major safety, mobility and congestion problems for the region. “We simply cannot afford more delay, distraction and gridlock – on the interstate or in the halls of government,” Gov.
    [Show full text]
  • The Trainmaster the Oregon Rail Heritage Center Opens
    The Trainmaster The Official Publication of the Pacific Northwest Chapter October 2012 National Railway Historical Society Portland, Oregon The Oregon Rail Heritage Center Opens Photo by Arlen Sheldrake October 2012 Pacific Northwest Chapter National Railway Historical Society The Trainmaster Page 1 Photos by Trent Stetz Over 160 enthusiastic ORHF volunteers welcomed and hosted over 6,300 excited guests (with 3,622 on Saturday 22nd and 2,737 on Sunday 23rd) at the opening weekend of the Oregon Rail Heritage Center near the new Portland Streetcar Central Loop extension stop at OMSI. Oregon rail history was brought alive by the three historic steam locomotives, the 1941 Southern Pacific 4449, the 1938 Spokane, Portland and Seattle 700, and the 1905 Oregon Rail and Navigation 197 which were all on display in their new engine house accompanied on site by two diesel locomotives, a PA-1 and RSD-5, and six heritage passenger cars outside. The 4449 was steamed up with its head poked out the engine house door and gave an occasional toot to the delight of the attendees. The weekend visitors got to view the cabs of both 4449 and 700. A very extensive Lego exhibit included a model of the Portland Customs house as well as Portland Union Station. The Operation Lifesaver trailer was on hand to educate the guests. The kids enjoyed a Chuggington Station play area. Tours were given of three heritage passenger cars including the 1941 SP "James J. Gilmore" parlor/lounge round end observation, the 1954 SP "Gordon Zimmerman" Baggage Car, and the 1950 SP&S Mount Hood Sleeper-Lounge Car.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 70, No. 22/Thursday, February 3
    5720 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 22 / Thursday, February 3, 2005 / Notices 1), Federal Aviation Administration, wish to receive confirmation that the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 800 Independence Avenue, SW., FAA received your comments, include a Robert F. Kleinburd, Realty and Washington, DC 20591. self-addressed, stamped postcard. Environmental Program Manager, This notice is published pursuant to You may also submit comments Federal Highway Administration, 14 CFR 11.85 and 11.91. through the Internet to http:// Delaware Division, J. Allen Frear Issued in Washington, DC, on January 28, dms.dot.gov. You may review the public Federal Building, 300 South New Street, 2005. docket containing the petition, any Room 2101, Dover, DE 19904; Anthony F. Fazio, comments received, and any final Telephone: (302) 734–2966; or Mr. Mark Director, Office of Rulemaking. disposition in person in the Dockets Tudor, P.E., Project Manager, Delaware Office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Department of Transportation, 800 Bay Petition for Exemption Monday through Friday, except Federal Road, P.O. Box 778, Dover, DE 19903; Docket No.: FAA–2005–20139. holidays. The Dockets Office (telephone Telephone (302) 760–2275. DelDOT Petitioner: Airbus. 1–800–647–5527) is on the plaza level Public Relations Office (800) 652–5600 Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR of the NASSIF Building at the (in DE only). 25.841(a)(2)(i) and (ii) and (3). Department of Transportation at the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Description of Relief Sought: To above address. Also, you may review Federal Highway Administration permit certification of the Airbus Model public dockets on the Internet at (FHWA), in cooperation with the A380 airplane without meeting http://dms.dot.gov.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    INTRODUCTION The Transportation Element of the Centre Planning Agency (CRPA), and the County Comprehensive Plan is an Susquehanna Economic Development assessment of the transportation facilities in Association Council of Governments the County. These facilities include not just (SEDA-COG). These organizations work the road network, but all forms of alongside the Pennsylvania Department of transportation including transit, rail, airports Transportation (PENNDOT) to identify and and bike and pedestrian facilities. It is prioritize transportation improvement important to consider the transportation projects in Centre County. network as an integrated multi-modal system. The existing conditions of the TRANSPORTATION GOAL AND transportation network are described in this OBJECTIVES initial section of the Transportation Element The goal of the Transportation Element is: (Part 1). The Transportation Element will be “To provide a multi-modal transportation completed in the future after completion of system, which includes air, bicycle, the Travel Demand Model Analysis and highway, pedestrian, public transportation, Long Range Transportation Plan for Centre and rail facilities to maximize the efficient, County. safe, economical and convenient movement of people and goods while minimizing the Significant growth of residential, office and adverse impact the system will have on industrial development has occurred in the natural and cultural resources, as well as County – especially in the Centre Region people.” area where Penn State University has served as a magnet for development. This ROAD NETWORK growth is forecasted to continue. As a Pennsylvania is in a strategic position with result, the need to identify transportation important interstate roadways traversing the facilities that will accommodate this growth state and serving national and international is a key part of the comprehensive planning trade routes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transfer Newsletter Spring 2013.Cdr
    Oregon Electric Railway Historical Society Volume 18 503 Issue 2 Spring 2013 Reminder to members: Please be sure your dues In this issue: are up to date. 2013 dues were due Jan 1, 2013. Willamette Shore Trolley - Back on Track.................................1 If it has been longer than one year since you renewed, Interpretive Center Update - Greg Bonn...............................2 go to our website: oerhs.org and download an Vintage Trolley History - Richard Thompson.............................3 application by clicking: Become a Member Pacific NW Transit Update - Roy Bonn...............................8 Spotlight on Members: Charlie Philpot ................................11 Setting New Poles - Greg Bonn..............................................12 Willamette Shore Trolley ....back on track! See this issue in color on line at oerhs.org/transfer miles from Lake Oswego to Riverwood Crossing with an ultimate plan to extend to Portland. Also see the article on page 3 on the history of the cars of Vintage Trolley. Dave Rowe installing wires from Generator to Trolley. Hal Rosene at the controls of 514 on a training run emerging Gage Giest painting from the Elk Rock Tunnel on the Willamette Shore line. the front of Trolley. Wayne Jones photo The Flume car in background will be After a several-year hiatus, the Willamette Shore our emergency tow Trolley is just about ready to roll. Last minute electrical and vehicle if the Trolley mechanical details and regulatory compliance testing are breaks down on the nearing completion. With many stakeholders involved and mainline. many technical issues that had to be overcome, it has been a challenge to get the system to the 100% state. Dave Rowe and his team have been working long hours to overcome the obstacles of getting Gomaco built Vintage Trolley #514, its Doug Allen removing old stickers from side tag-along generator, track work, electrical systems, crew of Trolley training, safety compliance issues, propulsion, braking, and so many other details to a satisfactory state to begin revenue service.
    [Show full text]
  • The Comprehensive Plan Background Studies for the US 220/Future I-99
    TThhee CCoommpprreehheennssiivvee PPllaann BBaacckkggrroouunndd SSttuuddiieess ffoorr tthhee UUSS 222200//FFuuttuurree II--9999 PPllaannnniinngg AArreeaa Jersey Shore Borough, Piatt Township, Porter Township, Woodward Township Lycoming County, PA Technical Background Studies No. 1 – Community Development Profile Introduction The development of an effective comprehensive plan requires an understanding of the issues and trends that impact a community’s ability to sustain a “good quality of life” for its residents. During the early stages of plan development, coordination has been undertaken with many individuals and organizations in order to develop an understanding of what are perceived to be important issues that will impact the community and its development and growth in the future. This Community Development Profile summarizes where the community has been, where it is today, and where it may be going in the future based on known data sources. It includes past trend information (historic), current trend information (today), and projections (future), where appropriate and available from existing data sources. Key Community Development Issues Through consultation with the Planning Advisory Team (PAT) and interviews with key persons within the planning area and throughout the county, the important issues that could potentially impact the community in terms of social and economic conditions were identified. While many of the issues of importance relate to the county or region as shown in the adjacent highlight box, there were several issues noted by the I-99 Planning Advisory Team as being of particular importance within this I-99 planning area: þ Exodus of Younger Generation with Increasing Elderly Population – This is a concern because as an area ages the social fabric of the community becomes less stable.
    [Show full text]
  • New Castle County
    State of Delaware Department of Transportation Capital Transportation Program FY 2011 – FY 2016 New Castle County NewStatewide Castle - GrantsCounty & Allocations - Grants & Allocations 204 State of Delaware Department of Transportation Capital Transportation Program FY 2011 – FY 2016 Road Systems New Castle County - Road Systems 205 State of Delaware Department of Transportation Capital Transportation Program FY 2011 – FY 2016 Expressways New Castle County - Road Systems - Expressways 206 State of Delaware Department of Transportation Capital Transportation Program FY 2011 – FY 2016 Project Title Primavera # Project # Glenville Subdivision Improvements 09-00122 T200904401 Project This project involves the reconstruction of the remaining streets and sidewalks in the Glenville Subdivision as a result of DelDOTs Glenville Wetland Bank Project. The project will Description provide a connector road between Harbeson and East Netherfield. Project This project is a continuation of the Glenville Wetland Banking project that will restore the remaining subdivison streets and reconnect the Glenville Subdivision Justification Funding Program ROAD SYSTEMS EXPRESSWAYS Senatorial District(s) 9 Representative District(s) 19 New Castle County - Road Systems - Expressways 207 State of Delaware Department of Transportation Capital Transportation Program FY 2011 – FY 2016 Glenville Subdivision Improvements PROJECT AUTHORIZATION SCHEDULE IN ($000) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 PROJECT CURRENT STATE FEDERAL PHASE FUNDING SOURCE NUMBER ESTIMATE TOTAL TOTAL
    [Show full text]
  • September 1936 Volume Xx Published Quarterly by The
    SEPTEMBER 1936 VOLUME XX NUMBER 1 PUBLISHED QUARTERLY BY THE STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF WISCONSIN MMHIttllin*|MIMH«IHIIMHIHIIHIHnilllllHH«MIIHIIIIMIHMIHMIIIIMIMMUMHIIMIIHMH»MHMUMMIHItllH»HHIIMMI THE STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF WISCONSIN THE STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF WISCONSIN is a state- aided corporation whose function is the cultivation and en- couragement of the historical interests of the State. To this end it invites your cooperation; membership is open to all, whether residents of Wisconsin or elsewhere. The dues of annual mem- bers are three dollars, payable in advance; of life members, thirty dollars, payable once only. Subject to certain exceptions, mem- bers receive the publications of the Society, the cost of producing which far exceeds the membership fee. This is rendered possible by reason of the aid accorded the Society by the State. Of the work and ideals of the Society this magazine affords, it is be- lieved, a fair example. With limited means, much has already been accomplished; with ampler funds more might be achieved. So far as is known, not a penny entrusted to the Society has ever been lost or misapplied. Property may be willed to the Society in entire confidence that any trust it assumes will be scrupulously executed. »tiiitiiinimiiiMHimiiiiii»iiMiiitiintiniiimiiiiimiii»»MmiiMm«iiMiiii timii iiiiiiiiiiiimitmimiimmimiiii THE WISCONSIN MAGAZINE OF HISTORY is published quarterly by the Society, at 116 E. Main St., Evansville, Wisconsin, in September, Decem- ber, March, and June, and is distributed to its members and exchanges; others who so desire may receive it for the annual subscription of three dollars, payable in advance; single numbers may be had for seventy-five cents.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 North
    Interstate 73 FEIS: I-95 to North Carolina The feasibility study recognized that there had been some improvements to roads in the project study area; however, the improved roads were predicted to have capacity problems along some segments by the year 2025, based on traffic modeling. Future traffic projections indicated that I-73 would divert traffic from existing roadways, which would improve capacity and reduce traffic congestion.10 North Carolina completed a feasibility study in 2005 that evaluated alternatives for the proposed I­ 74 in Columbus and Brunswick Counties, North Carolina, located in the southeastern portion of the state. The study was an initial step in the planning and design and described the project, costs, and identified potential problems that required consideration. The Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) was passed by Congress and signed into law on August 10, 2005. SAFETEA-LU acknowledges the prior purpose for, and designation of, I-73 as a High Priority Corridor, along with designating it as a project of “national and regional significance” (23 U.S.C. §101(2005)). In addition, SAFETEA-LU provides earmarks for the I-73 project in South Carolina. At the state level, Concurrent Resolution H 3320 passed by the South Carolina General Assembly in 2003 states “that the members of the General Assembly express their collective belief and desire that the Department of Transportation should consider its next interstate project as one that provides the Pee Dee Region with access to the interstate system.”11 Both Congress and the South Carolina General Assembly have appropriated money to SCDOT to study the potential corridor for the proposed I-73.
    [Show full text]