DOCSLIB.ORG

6 X 10.5 Long Title.P65

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
6 X 10.5 Long Title.P65 Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-84944-9 - The Cambridge Companion to Greek Lyric Edited by Felix Budelmann Index More information INDEX Abdera 43, 47, 228 reception, ancient 313, 324, 327, 328, 333 address / addressee 16, 45, 66–71, 75–9, reception, modern 344 83, 98–9, 102, 105, 107, 114–20, Alcman 25, 30, 35, 44, 48, 63–5, 118, 122, 153, 158, 175, 186, 193, 201–2, 190–4, 300, 301, 302 217, 219, 247, 254, 324, 326, dialect 124–8 328, 329, 331, 360, fr. 1 PMGF (Partheneion 1) 44, 63–5, 79, 361, 383 190–3 Aegina 42, 46, 49, 53, 257, 259 fr. 3 PMGF 63–4 Aelian 221 fr. 59a PMGF 193 Aeolic 122, 123–8, 134–6, 140, 142, 255, 275, reception, ancient 324 322, 324 reception, modern 344 Aeschylus 55, 228, 231, 260, Aldine editions 338 265, 289 Alexandria (see also scholarship, Hellenistic Aesop see fable poetry)298–316 Agathon 277, 280 Alkmanes 173 agônes, musical and poetic 43, 178, 190, 202, allegory 116, 209, 213, 230, 271, 327, 223–4, 292–3, 320 339, 341 Alcaeus 23, 24, 34–5, 37, 38, 41, 47, 83, 84, allusion see intertextuality 118, 123, 134–6, 150, 204–14, 270–1, ambiguity 61, 63, 68, 116–17, 255, 269, 324 300, 302 Ammianus Marcellinus 221 erotic poetry 69–71, 209 Amorgos 46 fr. 10 V 209 Anacreon 25, 34–5, 37, 41, 47, 50, 51, 59, 68, fr. 42V 66 82, 123, 199, 227–39, 300, 301, 302 fr. 45 V 67 fr. 347 PMG 36 fr. 71 V 270 fr. 348 PMG 83 fr. 72 V 135 fr. 353 PMG 232 fr. 119 V 271 fr. 356 PMG 117 fr. 129 V 211–13 fr. 357 PMG 35, 67 fr. 130 V 69, 211 fr. 358 PMG 67, 221, 229–31, 234–5 fr. 141 V 213 fr. 360 PMG 67, 90 fr. 249 V 275 fr. 388 PMG 68 fr. 283 V 66 fr. 395 PMG 90 fr. 344 V 271 fr. 417 PMG 67 fr. 351 V 271 reception, ancient 235–9, 311, 320, 323, 333 fr. 368 V 117 reception, modern 337, 342–6, 347, 353 fr. 384 V 204–6 Anacreontea 235, 236–9, 342–6, 347, 353 fr. 393 V 271 ‘Anacreontic’ vases 235–6 fr. 439 V 270 Antiphon 242 449 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-84944-9 - The Cambridge Companion to Greek Lyric Edited by Felix Budelmann Index More information index Aphrodite 45, 63, 67, 68, 69, 70, 77, 79, 88, audience 22, 26, 34, 60–2, 64, 72, 74, 93, 91, 93, 199 94, 98, 114–20, 155, 162, 165, 166, Apollonius of Rhodes 304 171–8, 182–5, 209, 265, 297, 310, Apollo (see also Homeric Hymn to Apollo)21, 325, 373–7 26, 27, 28, 29, 40, 62, 65, 72, 79, 90, 93, Augustus 328 100, 106, 190, 261, 315, 331 aulos 12–13, 62, 144–5, 168, 169, 170, 171, Archilochus 23, 33, 35, 37, 38, 46, 59, 68–9, 190, 223, 242, 283, 315 73, 79, 81, 83, 84, 93, 106, 120, 136–9, authorship (see also poets, constructed 152–60, 207, 209, 255–6, 300, 302 biographies)9, 164, 184–5, fr. 1 W 73, 97 236–9, 275 fr. 4 W 116–17 fr. 5 W 138 Bacchylides 25, 26, 29, 32, 43, 53, 62–3, fr. 21 W 47 119–20, 127, 142, 191, 240–7, 256, fr. 42 W 151 300, 302 fr. 43 W 154 2 M 31 fr. 105 W 116 3 M 78 fr. 114 W 154 5 M 63 fr. 119 W 154 13 M 257–61 fr. 120 W 21 17 M 62–3 fr. 122 W 152 fr 4 M 52, 55 fr. 126 W 155 fr. 20CM32 fr. 128 W 80 reception, ancient 313, 324 fr. 130 W 80 reception, modern 344 fr. 168 W 139 barbitos 144–5, 204, 221, 222, 235–6 fr. 172–81 W 158–9 Beaudelaire, Charles 362–3, 384–5 fr. 188 W² 155 Bellay, Joachim du 379, 383 fr. 196 W² (‘Cologne Epode’) 156–8 Bergk, Theodor 359–60 fr. 201 W 155 Boeotia 128 fr. 215 W 149 Boileau, Nicolas 341 and Lycambes / Neoboule 66, 68, 153, 156–9 Burns, Robert 373 ‘New’ Archilochus (P. Oxy. 4708) 179 Byron, George Gordon 354, 360, 381–3 reception, ancient 308–9, 311, 324 Argos 48, 49, 52, 111, 114–20, 285 Callimachus 46, 256, 298, 299–300, 302, Arion 41–2, 44, 79, 93, 124, 189, 195, 208 307–10, 311, 315, 327–8 Aristides Quintilianus 268 epinikia 307–8 Aristarchus 302–3 Iambi 308–9 aristocrats see class Callinus 23, 38, 106, 120, 171, 181, 190 Aristophanes (comic poet) 11, 26, 31, 32, 33, fr. 1 W 185–6 48, 50–1, 125, 214, 265 canon 3, 4, 265, 270, 274, 279, 302–3, Aristophanes (scholar) 248, 299, 300–2, 315 310–13, 319, 323–4, 337, 350, 365, 368 Aristotle 4–5, 74, 111, 149, 150, 151, 204, capping 230, 274–5 207, 213–14, 249, 271, 279, 287, 348, carmina popularia see popular song 377–8 Catullus 149, 320, 322–3, 333, 344, 347 Aristoxenus 265, 279, 280, 281 Ceos 43, 46, 54, 241 Artemis 27, 83, 190, 232, 331 Chalcis 115, 198 Athena 62 charis 61–2, 64, 65, 76, 83 Athenaeus 25, 34, 176, 227, 271, 274, 313 Chassériau, Théodore 356 Athens 29, 40, 41, 42, 43, 46, 53, 106, Chios 104–5, 176 111, 122, 172–3, 175–8, 181, 189, chorêgos 43, 241–7, 292 227, 233, 235–6, 241–7, 284, 285, chorus (see also performance)11, 23, 290–3, 297 26, 28, 43, 60–5, 78, 85, 87, 88, Attica / Attic (see also Athens)122, 123, 104–5, 118, 190–5, 216, 219, 175–8, 187, 222 241–7, 254 450 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-84944-9 - The Cambridge Companion to Greek Lyric Edited by Felix Budelmann Index More information index Christianity 338–9, 379–80 drinking (see also symposion)34–5, 91, 175, Cicero 227, 246–7, 336, 378 177, 227–39, 343, 345 Cinesias 277, 280, 282 drinking song see skolion class 12, 33, 34, 39–56, 78, 83–8, 162–7, 174–8, 210, 213, 243–7, 263–7, 272–3, 290–2 education 59, 85–8, 175, 216, 218, 219, 298, Cleisthenes 111 310–13 Coleridge, Samuel Taylor 353–5, 360 elegy 23–4, 45, 66–71, 83, 168–88, colometry 131–2, 301–2 196, 266 colonisation (see also foundation poetry)42, dialect 120–3, 174 45–50, 172, 195 and epic 6, 123, 171, 172, 174, Colophon 49, 171, 172, 190 185–7 comedy (see also drama)42, 118, 151, 165–6, and epigram 169–70, 179–82 279, 280, 297 function 182–5 Corinna 65, 128 funerary 168–9, 179 Corinth 31, 41, 55, 124, 181, 189, 241 Hellenistic 307–8, 309–10 Cowley, Abraham 345, 380 included or not in ‘Greek lyric’ 2–3 Crete 54, 284, 285 Latin 188, 325 Critias 40, 51–2, 152–3, 177–8, 228, 243 martial 23, 38, 171, 174, 186 fr. 4 W 177 meaning of the label 168–9 cult / ritual (see also hero-cult)24–30, 46, metre 138, 168–9, 177 52–4, 63–5, 75–9, 103, 151, 160, 162–3, mode of performance 12–13, 23, 170 166, 190, 192, 193, 212, 232, 315–16, narrative (see also Simonides, Plataea elegy) 331–2 23, 170, 172, 178–9 Cyrene 48, 49, 62, 126, 261 Eleusis 151 Eliot, T. S. 384–5 dance (see also chorus)23, 27, 28, 83, 85–8, elite see class 194, 219 enkômion 11, 31–2, 52, 66–7, 252, daphnêphorikon 26, 54, 55, 65 277, 306 David, Jacques-Louis 356 Ennius 320 deixis 28, 115–20, 216, 326 envy 60–2 Delos 43, 53, 104–5 Ephesus 171 Delphi (see also Pindar Pyth.)123, 178, epic (see also Homer and Greek lyric vs. 256, 316 hexameter poetry)6, 14–15, 72, Demeter 150, 151, 316 80–3, 95–108, 115, 127, 158, desire see erôs 163–4, 171, 172, 178, 185–7, dêute 35, 67, 235 198, 207 dialect 99, 100–3, 120–8, 163, 231 epigram (see also Simonides)45, 49, 169–70, Dicaearchus 274 179–82, 237, 303, 321, 323 Dionysius Chalcus 46, 117, 177 epinikion 22, 30, 31–2, 33, 42–3, 49–50, 53, Dionysius of Halicarnassus 250, 312, 347 60–2, 76, 199, 245–9, 253–6, 257–61, Dionysus 21, 27, 28, 29, 67, 83, 84, 298, 300 89–94, 111–12, 151, 231, 232, 233, Hellenistic 307–8, 311, 312 238, 334 mode of performance 245 dirge see thrênos survival of Pindar’s 247–9, 378 dithyramb 21–9, 50–1, 53, 55, 62–3, 111, epithalamion see wedding song 242–4, 248, 252, 277–82, 300, epodes (iambos) 24, 93, 137, 154, 156–9 314, 315 Eratosthenes 300 Donne, John 374 Erinna 304, 357 Dorian / Doric 53, 122, 124–8, 174, 189, 199 erôs / love poetry (see also gender)35–7, drama / dramatic (see also comedy and 58–71, 172, 174, 178, 193, 199–200, tragedy)6, 70, 93–4, 111–12, 165, 209, 214–26, 229–31, 235, 236–9, 197, 230, 240, 242–4, 252, 288–93, 305–6, 343, 346–9, 355–64, 367–8, 297, 329 369, 373–4 451 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-84944-9 - The Cambridge Companion to Greek Lyric Edited by Felix Budelmann Index More information index Estienne, Henri 343–5, 347 transformative effects 90–4 Euenus 176–7 use and history of the label 2–5, 275 Eumelus 124, 126 variety and characteristics 5–7, 100–3, 111, Euripides 169, 277, 280 114–20, 350 exhortation 38, 82, 106, 171, 174, 183, vs.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dionysus, Wine, and Tragic Poetry: a Metatheatrical Reading of P.Koln VI 242A=Trgf II F646a Anton Bierl
    BIERL, ANTON, Dionysus, Wine, and Tragic Poetry: A Metatheatrical Reading of a New Dramatic Papyrus , Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 31:4 (1990:Winter) p.353 Dionysus, Wine, and Tragic Poetry: A Metatheatrical Reading of P.Koln VI 242A=TrGF II F646a Anton Bierl EW DRAMATIC PAPYRUS1 confronts interpreters with many ~puzzling questions. In this paper I shall try to solve some of these by applying a new perspective to the text. I believe that this fragment is connected with a specific literary feature of drama especially prominent in the bnal decades of the bfth century B.C., viz. theatrical self-consciousness and the use of Dionysus, the god of Athenian drama, as a basic symbol for this tendency. 2 The History of the Papyrus Among the most important papyri brought to light by Anton Fackelmann is an anthology of Greek prose and poetry, which includes 19 verses of a dramatic text in catalectic anapestic tetrameters. Dr Fackelmann entrusted the publication of this papyrus to Barbel Kramer of the University of Cologne. Her editio princeps appeared in 1979 as P. Fackelmann 5. 3 Two years later the verses were edited a second time by Richard Kannicht and Bruno Snell and integrated into the Fragmenta Adespota in 1 This papyrus has already been treated by the author in Dionysos und die griechische Trag odie. Politische und 'metatheatralische' Aspekte im Text (Tiibingen 1991: hereafter 'Bieri') 248-53. The interpretation offered here is an expansion of my earlier provisional comments in the Appendix, presenting fragments of tragedy dealing with Dionysus. 2 See C.
    [Show full text]
  • De Theognide Megarensi. Nietzsche on Theognis of Megara. a Bilingual Edition
    FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE De Theognide Megarensi Nietzsche on Theognis of Megara – A Bilingual Edition – Translated by R. M. Kerr THE NIETZSCHE CHANNEL Friedrich Nietzsche De Theognide Megarensi Nietzsche on Theognis of Megara A bilingual edition Translated by R. M. Kerr ☙ editio electronica ❧ _________________________________________ THE N E T ! " # H E # H A N N E $ % MM&' Copyright © Proprietas interpretatoris Roberti Martini Kerrii anno 2015 Omnia proprietatis iura reservantur et vindicantur. Imitatio prohibita sine auctoris permissione. Non licet pecuniam expetere pro aliquo, quod partem horum verborum continet; liber pro omnibus semper gratuitus erat et manet. Sic rerum summa novatur semper, et inter se mortales mutua vivunt. augescunt aliae gentes, aliae invuntur, inque brevi spatio mutantur saecla animantum et quasi cursores vitai lampada tradiunt. - Lucretius - - de Rerum Natura, II 5-! - PR"#$CE %e &or' presente( here is a trans)ation o* #rie(rich Nietzsche-s aledi!tionsarbeit ./schoo) e0it-thesis12 *or the "andesschule #$orta in 3chu)p*orta .3axony-$nhalt) presente( on 3epte4ber th 15678 It has hitherto )arge)y gone unnotice(, especial)y in anglophone Nietzsche stu(- ies8 $t the ti4e though, the &or' he)pe( to estab)ish the reputation o* the then twenty year o)( Nietzsche and consi(erab)y *aci)itate( his )ater acade4ic career8 9y a)) accounts, it &as a consi(erab)e achie:e4ent, especial)y consi(ering &hen it &as &ri;en: it entai)e( an e0pert 'no&)e(ge, not =ust o* c)assical-phi)o)ogical )iterature, but also o* co(ico)ogy8 %e recent =u(ge4ent by >"+3"+ .2017<!!2< “It is a piece that, ha( Nietzsche ne:er &ri;en another &or(, &ou)( ha:e assure( his p)ace, albeit @uite a s4a)) one, in the history o* Ger4an phi)o)ogyB su4s the 4atter up quite e)o@uently8 +ietzsche )ater continue( his %eognis stu(ies, the sub=ect o* his Crst scho)ar)y artic)e, as a stu(ent at Leip,ig, in 156 D to so4e e0tent a su44ary o* the present &or' D a critical re:ie& in 156!, as &e)) as @uotes in se:eral )e;ers *ro4 1567 on.
    [Show full text]
  • A. W. Schlegel and the Nineteenth-Century Damnatio of Euripides Ernst Behler
    BEHLER, ERNST, A. W. Schlegel and the Nineteenth-Century "Damnatio" of Euripides , Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 27:4 (1986:Winter) p.335 A. W. Schlegel and the Nineteenth-Century Damnatio of Euripides Ernst Behler N HIS 1802-04 Berlin lectures on aesthetics, August Wilhelm Schle­ I gel claimed that his younger brother Friedrich (in his essay On the Study of Greek Poetry U795]), had been the first in the modern age to discern the "immeasurable gulf" separating Euripides from Aeschylus and Sophocles, thereby reviving an attitude the Greeks themselves had assumed towards the poet. The elder Schlegel noted that certain contemporaries of Euripides felt the "deep decline" both in his tragic art and in the music of the time: Aristophanes, with his unrelenting satire, had been assigned by God as Euripides' "eternal scourge"; 1 Plato, in reproaching the poets for fostering the passionate state of mind through excessive emotionalism, actually pointed to Euripides (SK I 40). Schlegel believed that his younger brother's observation of the profound difference between Euripides and the two other Greek tragedians was an important intuition that required detailed critical and comparative analysis for sufficient development (SK II 359). By appropriating this task as his own, August Wilhelm Schlegel inaugurated a phenomenon that we may describe as the nineteenth-century damnatio of Euripides. The condemnation of Euripides by these early German romantics was no extravagant and isolated moment in their critical activity: it constituted a central event in the progressive formation of a new literary theory. Their pronouncements must be seen in the context of a larger movement, towards the end of the eighteenth century, that transformed the critical scene in Europe: the fall of the classicist doctrine and the rise of the new literary theory of romanticism.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Was Protagoras? • Born in Abdêra, an Ionian Pólis in Thrace
    Recovering the wisdom of Protagoras from a reinterpretation of the Prometheia trilogy Prometheus (c.1933) by Paul Manship (1885-1966) By: Marty Sulek, Ph.D. Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy For: Workshop In Multidisciplinary Philanthropic Studies February 10, 2015 Composed for inclusion in a Festschrift in honour of Dr. Laurence Lampert, a Canadian philosopher and leading scholar in the field of Nietzsche studies, and a professor emeritus of Philosophy at IUPUI. Adult Content Warning • Nudity • Sex • Violence • And other inappropriate Prometheus Chained by Vulcan (1623) themes… by Dirck van Baburen (1595-1624) Nietzsche on Protagoras & the Sophists “The Greek culture of the Sophists had developed out of all the Greek instincts; it belongs to the culture of the Periclean age as necessarily as Plato does not: it has its predecessors in Heraclitus, in Democritus, in the scientific types of the old philosophy; it finds expression in, e.g., the high culture of Thucydides. And – it has ultimately shown itself to be right: every advance in epistemological and moral knowledge has reinstated the Sophists – Our contemporary way of thinking is to a great extent Heraclitean, Democritean, and Protagorean: it suffices to say it is Protagorean, because Protagoras represented a synthesis of Heraclitus and Democritus.” Nietzsche, The Will to Power, 2.428 Reappraisals of the authorship & dating of the Prometheia trilogy • Traditionally thought to have been composed by Aeschylus (c.525-c.456 BCE). • More recent scholarship has demonstrated the play to have been written by a later, lesser author sometime in the 430s. • This new dating raises many questions as to what contemporary events the trilogy may be referring.
    [Show full text]
  • Athenaeus' Reading of the Aulos Revolution ( Deipnosophistae 14.616E–617F)
    The Journal of Hellenic Studies http://journals.cambridge.org/JHS Additional services for The Journal of Hellenic Studies: Email alerts: Click here Subscriptions: Click here Commercial reprints: Click here Terms of use : Click here New music and its myths: Athenaeus' reading of the Aulos revolution ( Deipnosophistae 14.616e–617f) Pauline A. Leven The Journal of Hellenic Studies / Volume 130 / November 2010, pp 35 - 48 DOI: 10.1017/S0075426910000030, Published online: 19 November 2010 Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0075426910000030 How to cite this article: Pauline A. Leven (2010). New music and its myths: Athenaeus' reading of the Aulos revolution ( Deipnosophistae 14.616e– 617f). The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 130, pp 35-48 doi:10.1017/S0075426910000030 Request Permissions : Click here Downloaded from http://journals.cambridge.org/JHS, IP address: 147.91.1.45 on 23 Sep 2013 Journal of Hellenic Studies 130 (2010) 35−47 DOI: 10.1017/S0075426910000030 NEW MUSIC AND ITS MYTHS: ATHENAEUS’ READING OF THE AULOS REVOLUTION (DEIPNOSOPHISTAE 14.616E−617F) PAULINE A. LEVEN Yale University* Abstract: Scholarship on the late fifth-century BC New Music Revolution has mostly relied on the evidence provided by Athenaeus, the pseudo-Plutarch De musica and a few other late sources. To this date, however, very little has been done to understand Athenaeus’ own role in shaping our understanding of the musical culture of that period. This article argues that the historical context provided by Athenaeus in the section of the Deipnosophistae that cites passages of Melanippides, Telestes and Pratinas on the mythology of the aulos (14.616e−617f) is not a credible reflection of the contemporary aesthetics and strategies of the authors and their works.
    [Show full text]
  • Harrison on Theognis Studies in Theognis, Together with a Text of the Poems
    The Classical Review http://journals.cambridge.org/CAR Additional services for The Classical Review: Email alerts: Click here Subscriptions: Click here Commercial reprints: Click here Terms of use : Click here Harrison on Theognis Studies in Theognis, together with a Text of the Poems. By E. Harrison, B.A., Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge. Cambridge: University Press, 1902. Pp. xii, 336. 10s. 6d. net. Herbert Weir Smyth The Classical Review / Volume 17 / Issue 07 / October 1903, pp 352 - 356 DOI: 10.1017/S0009840X00208512, Published online: 27 October 2009 Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0009840X00208512 How to cite this article: Herbert Weir Smyth (1903). Review of Ennis B. Edmonds, and Michelle A. Gonzalez 'Caribbean Religious History: An Introduction' The Classical Review, 17, pp 352-356 doi:10.1017/S0009840X00208512 Request Permissions : Click here Downloaded from http://journals.cambridge.org/CAR, IP address: 128.122.253.212 on 08 May 2015 352 THE CLASSICAL REVIEW. REVIEWS. HARBISON ON THEOGNIS. Studies in Tlieognis, together with a Text in almost any order as in their present of the Poems. By E. HARRISON, B.A., position. Welcker first suggested the Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge. theory of 'catchwords.' In 1867 Cambridge: University Press, 1902. Nietzsche dealt with this method of Pp. xii, 336. 10s. 6d. net. explanation and with the repetitions. In 1869 Fritzsche toyed with the problem of WITH all divergencies of detail criti- catchwords, which he accepted as correct in cism of Theognis during the nineteenth the main; in 1877 K. Miiller came to the century has been well-nigh unanimous on conclusion that similarity of mere words in two points : many of the poems found in adjoining poems constituted the principle of the MSS.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shadow of Aristophanes: Hellenistic Poetry’S Reception of Comic Poetics*
    Author manuscript: Published in M.A. Harder, R.F. Regtuit & G.C. Wakker (eds.) (2018) Drama and Performance in Hellenistic Poetry . Hellenistica Groningana 23. Leuven (Peeters): 225-271. THE SHADOW OF ARISTOPHANES: HELLENISTIC POETRY’S RECEPTION OF COMIC POETICS* Thomas J. Nelson The influence of Attic drama on Hellenistic poetry has been a topic of little consistent focus in recent scholarship. Most scholars are content merely to note individual cases of parallels with Attic comedy or tragedy, or lament the loss of many dramas which would doubtless prove illuminating intertexts were they to have survived.1 What emerges is thus a rather piecemeal picture of Hellenistic poetry’s engagement with earlier dramatic texts. There are, of course, some notable exceptions, such as explorations of the underlying tragic elements in Apollonius’ Argonautica and Callimachus’ Hecale ,2 as well as the analysis of comedy’s influence on individual Hellenistic poems. 3 Yet the full extent of Hellenistic poetry’s debt to Attic drama remains largely unexplored terrain.4 This lack of scholarly attention may in part reflect the common belief that Hellenistic poets display a largely negative attitude to drama, 5 but it must also stem from the traditional emphasis on Hellenistic poetry as a written artefact, detached from any immediate context of performance – apparently a far cry from the socially embedded performance-culture of fifth century Athens. As many contributions to this volume demonstrate, however, this fifth-third century dichotomy is too simplistic, and the belief that classical drama was relatively unimportant for Hellenistic poets should be reconsidered given the continuing prominence of drama in the third and second centuries BCE.
    [Show full text]
  • Sona Grigoryan Supervisor: Aziz Al-Azmeh
    Doctoral Dissertation POETICS OF AMBIVALENCE IN AL-MA‘ARRĪ’S LUZŪMĪYĀT AND THE QUESTION OF FREETHINKING by Sona Grigoryan Supervisor: Aziz Al-Azmeh Submitted to the Medieval Studies Department, Central European University, Budapest In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Medieval Studies CEU eTD Collection Budapest 2018 TABLE OF CONTENT Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................................. iv List of Abbreviations................................................................................................................................. v Some Matters of Usage ............................................................................................................................ vi INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1. Al-Ma‘arrī-an Intriguing Figure ........................................................................................................ 1 2. The Aim and Focus of the Thesis ....................................................................................................... 4 3. Working Material ............................................................................................................................ 13 CHAPTER 1. AL-MA‘ARRĪ AND HIS CONTEXT ............................................................................... 15 1.1. Historical Setting
    [Show full text]
  • Greek Religious Thought from Homer to the Age of Alexander
    'The Library of Greek Thought GREEK RELIGIOUS THOUGHT FROM HOMER TO THE AGE OF ALEXANDER Edited by ERNEST BARKER, M.A., D.Litt., LL.D. Principal of King's College, University of London tl<s } prop Lt=. GREEK RELIGIOUS THOUGHT FROM HOMER TO THE AGE OF ALEXANDER BY F. M. CORNFORD, M.A. Fellow and Lecturer of Trinity College, Cambridge MCMXXIII LONDON AND TORONTO J. M. DENT & SONS LTD. NEW YORK: E. P. DUTTON tf CO. HOTTO (E f- k> ) loUr\ P. DOTTO/U TALKS ) f^op Lt=. 7 yt All rights reserved f PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN TO WALTER DE LA MARE INTRODUCTION The purpose of this book is to let the English reader see for himself what the Greeks, from Homer to Aristotle, thought about the world, the gods and their relations to man, the nature and destiny of the soul, and the significance of human life. The form of presentation is prescribed by the plan of the series. The book is to be a compilation of extracts from the Greek authors, selected, so far as possible, without prejudice and translated with such honesty as a translation may have. This plan has the merit of isolating the actual thought of the Greeks in this period from all the constructions put upon it by later ages, except in so far as the choice of extracts must be governed by some scheme in the compiler's mind, which is itself determined by the limits of his knowledge and by other personal factors. In the book itself it is clearly his business to reduce the influence of these factors to the lowest point; but in the introduction it is no less his business to forewarn the reader against some of the consequences.
    [Show full text]
  • Illinois Classical Studies
    23 Later Euripidean Music ERIC CSAPO In memory of Desmond Conacher, a much-loved teacher, colleague, andfriend. I. The Scholarship In the last two decades of the twentieth century several important general books marked a resurgence of interest in Greek music: Barker 1984 and 1989, Comotti 1989a (an expanded English translation of a work in Italian written in 1979), M. L. West 1992, W. D. Anderson 1994, Neubecker 1994 (second edition of a work of 1977), and Landels 1999. These volumes provide good general guides to the subject, with particular strengths in ancient theory and practice, the history of musical genres, technical innovations, the reconstruction and use of ancient instruments, ancient musical notation, documents, metrics, and reconstructions of ancient scales, modes, and genera. They are too broadly focussed to give much attention to tragedy. Euripidean music receives no more than three pages in any of these works (a little more is usually allocated to specific discussion of the musical fragment of Orestes). Fewer books were devoted to music in drama. Even stretching back another decade, we have: one general book on tragic music, Pintacuda 1978, two books by Scott on "musical design" in Aeschylus (1984) and in Sophocles (1996), and two books devoted to Aristophanes' music, Pintacuda 1982 and L. P. E. Parker 1997. Pintacuda 1978 offers three chapters on basic background, and one chapter for each of the poets. The chapter on Euripides (shared with a fairly standard account of the New Musicians), contains less than four pages of general discussion of Euripides' relationship to the New Music (164-68), which is followed by fifty pages of blow-by-blow description of the musical numbers in each play—a mildly caffeinated catalogue-style already familiar from Webster 1970b: 110-92 and revisited by Scott.
    [Show full text]
  • Aristotle-Rhetoric.Pdf
    Rhetoric Aristotle (Translated by W. Rhys Roberts) Book I 1 Rhetoric is the counterpart of Dialectic. Both alike are con- cerned with such things as come, more or less, within the general ken of all men and belong to no definite science. Accordingly all men make use, more or less, of both; for to a certain extent all men attempt to discuss statements and to maintain them, to defend themselves and to attack others. Ordinary people do this either at random or through practice and from acquired habit. Both ways being possible, the subject can plainly be handled systematically, for it is possible to inquire the reason why some speakers succeed through practice and others spontaneously; and every one will at once agree that such an inquiry is the function of an art. Now, the framers of the current treatises on rhetoric have cons- tructed but a small portion of that art. The modes of persuasion are the only true constituents of the art: everything else is me- rely accessory. These writers, however, say nothing about en- thymemes, which are the substance of rhetorical persuasion, but deal mainly with non-essentials. The arousing of prejudice, pity, anger, and similar emotions has nothing to do with the essential facts, but is merely a personal appeal to the man who is judging the case. Consequently if the rules for trials which are now laid down some states-especially in well-governed states-were applied everywhere, such people would have nothing to say. All men, no doubt, think that the laws should prescribe such rules, but some, as in the court of Areopagus, give practical effect to their thoughts 4 Aristotle and forbid talk about non-essentials.
    [Show full text]
  • Initiation Into Literature
    Initiation into Literature Emile Faguet This page copyright © 2003 Blackmask Online. http://www.blackmask.com PREFACE. CHAPTER I. ANCIENT INDIA CHAPTER II. HEBRAIC LITERATURE CHAPTER III. THE GREEKS CHAPTER IV. THE LATINS CHAPTER V. THE MIDDLE AGES: FRANCE CHAPTER VI. THE MIDDLE AGES: ENGLAND CHAPTER VII. THE MIDDLE AGES: GERMANY CHAPTER VIII. THE MIDDLE AGES: ITALY CHAPTER IX. THE MIDDLE AGES: SPAIN AND PORTUGAL CHAPTER X. THE SIXTEENTH AND SEVENTEENTH CENTURIES: FRANCE CHAPTER XI. THE SIXTEENTH AND SEVENTEENTH CENTURIES: ENGLAND CHAPTER XII. THE SIXTEENTH AND SEVENTEENTH CENTURIES: GERMANY CHAPTER XIII. THE SIXTEENTH AND SEVENTEENTH CENTURIES: ITALY CHAPTER XIV. THE SIXTEENTH AND SEVENTEENTH CENTURIES: SPAIN AND PORTUGAL CHAPTER XV. THE EIGHTEENTH AND NINETEENTH CENTURIES: FRANCE CHAPTER XVI. THE EIGHTEENTH AND NINETEENTH CENTURIES: ENGLAND CHAPTER XVII. THE EIGHTEENTH AND NINETEENTH CENTURIES: GERMANY CHAPTER XVIII. THE EIGHTEENTH AND NINETEENTH CENTURIES: ITALY CHAPTER XIX. THE EIGHTEENTH AND NINETEENTH CENTURIES: SPAIN CHAPTER XX. RUSSIAN LITERATURE CHAPTER XXI. POLISH LITERATURE Produced by Ted Garvin, Marlo Dianne, Charles Franks and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team INITIATION INTO LITERATURE BY EMILE FAGUET TRANSLATED FROM THE FRENCH BY SIR HOME GORDON, BART. The Translator begs to acknowledge with appreciation the courtesy of the Author in graciously consenting to make some valuable additions, at his request, specially for the English version. PREFACE. This volume, as indicated by the title, is designed to show the way to the beginner, to satisfy and more especially to excite his initial curiosity. It affords an adequate idea of the march of facts and of ideas. The reader is led, somewhat rapidly, from the remote origins to the most recent efforts of the human mind.
    [Show full text]