Parliamentary Debates House of Commons Official Report General Committees

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Parliamentary Debates House of Commons Official Report General Committees PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT GENERAL COMMITTEES Public Bill Committee HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE BILL Twenty-first Sitting Tuesday 22 March 2011 (Morning) CONTENTS Written evidence reported to the House. CLAUSE 69, as amended, under consideration when the Committee adjourned till this day at Four o’clock. PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS LONDON – THE STATIONERY OFFICE LIMITED £5·00 PBC (Bill 132) 2010 - 2011 Members who wish to have copies of the Official Report of Proceedings in General Committees sent to them are requested to give notice to that effect at the Vote Office. No proofs can be supplied. Corrigenda slips may be published with Bound Volume editions. Corrigenda that Members suggest should be clearly marked in a copy of the report—not telephoned—and must be received in the Editor’s Room, House of Commons, not later than Saturday 26 March 2011 STRICT ADHERENCE TO THIS ARRANGEMENT WILL GREATLY FACILITATE THE PROMPT PUBLICATION OF THE BOUND VOLUMES OF PROCEEDINGS IN GENERAL COMMITTEES © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2011 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through The National Archives website at www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/information-management/our-services/parliamentary-licence-information.htm Enquiries to The National Archives, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: [email protected] 891 Public Bill Committee22 MARCH 2011 Health and Social Care Bill 892 The Committee consisted of the following Members: Chairs: MR JIM HOOD,MR MIKE HANCOCK,†MR ROGER GALE,DR WILLIAM MCCREA † Abrahams, Debbie (Oldham East and Saddleworth) † Morris, Grahame M. (Easington) (Lab) (Lab) † Poulter, Dr Daniel (Central Suffolk and North † Barron, Mr Kevin (Rother Valley) (Lab) Ipswich) (Con) † Blenkinsop, Tom (Middlesbrough South and East † Pugh, John (Southport) (LD) Cleveland) (Lab) † Shannon, Jim (Strangford) (DUP) † Brine, Mr Steve (Winchester) (Con) † Smith, Owen (Pontypridd) (Lab) † Burns, Mr Simon (Minister of State, Department of † Soubry, Anna (Broxtowe) (Con) Health) † Sturdy, Julian (York Outer) (Con) † Burstow, Paul (Minister of State, Department of † Thornberry, Emily (Islington South and Finsbury) Health) (Lab) † Byles, Dan (North Warwickshire) (Con) † Turner, Karl (Kingston upon Hull East) (Lab) † Crabb, Stephen (Preseli Pembrokeshire) (Con) † Twigg, Derek (Halton) (Lab) † de Bois, Nick (Enfield North) (Con) † Wilson, Phil (Sedgefield) (Lab) † James, Margot (Stourbridge) (Con) † Kendall, Liz (Leicester West) (Lab) Chris Stanton, Mark Etherton, Committee Clerks † Lefroy, Jeremy (Stafford) (Con) † Morgan, Nicky (Loughborough) (Con) † attended the Committee 893 Public Bill CommitteeHOUSE OF COMMONS Health and Social Care Bill 894 I raise that because back in 1983, only 55% of people Public Bill Committee were happy with the NHS. Why are we having such an upheaval, and why is there this major clause? We have Tuesday 22 March 2011 had a lot of debate about Monitor, pricing, accountability and competition, but there has not been much focus outside on the issue of designation, which has just as (Morning) great an impact on the future of the national health service in terms of competition and the greater involvement of private providers. [MR ROGER GALE in the Chair] We would be grateful if the Minister explained designation to us as part of his response, as I am sure he Health and Social Care Bill is about to. Funnily enough, some people who are much more knowledgeable about the national health service Written evidence to be reported than I are having difficulty completely understanding to the House what designation means. We will explore that in our HS 108 Alzheimer’s Society debate this morning, but, fundamentally, we disagree with the clause’s provisions. HS 109 Tunstall The amendments seek to express our opposition to HS 110 John Kapp the notion of designated services. As we will no doubt HS 111 Wish discuss the wider concerns in the stand part debate, HS 112 million+ amendments 474 and 475 are specifically targeted to remove the most damaging principle of this clause: the principle that, unless an application is made otherwise, Clause 69 services are assumed to be non-designated. In effect, the amendments seek to mitigate the damage that such a DESIGNATION OF SERVICES designation regime will cause. Amendment 474 would alter the Bill so that all 10.30 am services were classed as designated in the first instance. Derek Twigg (Halton) (Lab): I beg to move The onus would then be on the commissioners to apply amendment 474, in clause 69, page 73, line 21, leave out to undesignate a service. We believe that it should be for from first ‘the’ to end of line 21 and insert ‘non-designation commissioners to prove that competition will be of of the service for the purposes of this Part. benefit to a service, not the other way round. Manufacturing ‘(1A) In the absence of an application under subsection (1) it is competition for a service should not be the default assumed that all health services are designated.’. position. I will repeat that point time and again during this debate. The Chair: With this it will be convenient to discuss People have been commissioning services for years on the following: amendment 476, in clause 69, page 73, leave the basis that they are essential, so why should that out line 23. suddenly change as a result of this provision? That represents an important structural difference between Amendment 475, in clause 69, page 73, line 24, after us and the Government. I stress that we are opposed, second ‘is,’ insert ‘not’. although we are trying to help the Government. Our approach in government was to give targeted support Derek Twigg: I welcome you to the Chair, Mr Gale. for limited competition in specific areas where there was Having previously served under you, I know that you clear evidence that it could bring demonstrable benefits are very fair and a very good Chair. I am sure that you to patients within a managed system. Strategic decisions will put us right if we step out of line in any way. I look were taken based on merit and patient need. I am forward to serving under your chairmanship. struggling to find any sign of how strategic decisions I want to start with a bit of good news from this will be made—not only under this clause, but throughout morning because there is not much in this Bill. As I was the Bill. walking in, it struck me that it was light; when the Bill We are interested to hear what the Minister has to started, it was dark. Now that there is a lot of light on say. We will explore the issue further in the clause stand the Bill, we have seen the real dangers of it, which have part debate. In contrast, I would also be interested to become more and more apparent. hear how the Minister believes allowing a range of Interestingly, in the context of these changes—the non-designated services to be shut down by providers, principle of designation—I noticed in The Daily Telegraph or stopped as a result of a provider’s failing without this morning that John Appleby from the King’s Fund being helped, could be presented as having a specific or has highlighted figures demonstrable benefit to patients. Again, the issue is “showing that two-thirds of people are now either very or quite about promoting competition, not promoting the interests happy with the state-run health care, the largest proportion since of patients. That is a theme that we will continue to the in-depth British Social Attitudes study began in 1983.” come back to during the debate on designation. The article goes on to say that, in an article in the There are many services that, if removed, would have British Medical Journal, Professor Appleby wrote: a significant adverse impact on the health of patients. It “The NHS must have been doing something right to earn this is clear from the conversations that all Members regularly extra satisfaction—something even Conservative supporters have have with their constituents that the vast majority of noticed, and something probably not unadjacent to the large rise services are important to the local population; as I said in funding since 2000.” before, if they were not, the commissioners would not 895 Public Bill Committee22 MARCH 2011 Health and Social Care Bill 896 commission them in the first instance. That all comes I intend to glue this debate down to the amendments, back to the point that we will debate later, which is that and I do not expect a ramble round the shires in the provision’s purpose is to allow failure to become between. easier, to cut services and to open them up to competition; it is not to promote the best interests of patients. Mr Burns: Mr Gale, may I surprise you by saying that As it stands, the clause will ensure that the smallest I would like to begin on a consensual note? I am in total possible number of services will be designated. Does the agreement with the hon. Member for Halton about it Minister have any idea about that number? being a pleasure to have you temporarily chairing our proceedings. I know that your wisdom will prevail, as it already has done with your announcement of the ground The Minister of State, Department of Health (Mr Simon rules on the stand part debate. I had assumed, because Burns) indicated dissent. the hon. Gentleman asked me to explain designation, that that would take place at the beginning of my Derek Twigg: I am sure that the Minister does not comments on the amendments. want to get into how regional and consortia boundaries will impact on such decisions.
Recommended publications
  • Liberal Thinkers
    REPOrt – liBERAL thiNKERS Was such ‘pre-membering’ public Liberal Thinkers adoration, politics or ego? While Bounous conceded that there may Conference fringe meeting, 5 October 2014, with Alan have been an element of personal Beith, John Pugh, Liz Barker and Mark Pack; chair: Malcolm vanity, for example in the cor- ner stone of the Council House, Bruce the timing of the monuments was Report by Douglas Oliver much more suggestive of politically motivated public demonstration. The clock tower in the Jewellery he Liberal Democrat His- twentieth century: Foreign Sec- Quarter was timed in relation to tory Group met on the retary Edward Grey and the man his resignation from government TSunday night of the Octo- often credited with designing the and renewed his links to small busi- ber Federal Conference to dis- modern welfare state, Sir William nessmen. ‘Old Joe’, the tower at the cuss ‘Liberal Thinkers’ in an event Beveridge. Beith recalled that when university of which Chamberlain scheduled to tie in with the pam- he arrived in the area in the early was a principal sponsor, served to phlet of the same name released for 1970s, Beveridge’s ‘first-principles’ distract from the Boer War but also the first time in Glasgow. approach and reflective poise was reminded the community of his Musing upon his long involve- still widely remembered by locals commitment to promoting educa- ment with the party, the discus- in their mutual corner of north-east tion. There are more – and more In his book sion’s chair Malcolm Bruce – the England. Beveridge was known in prominent – monuments to Cham- outgoing MP for Gordon, appear- the area for his sometimes philo- berlain than to John Bright or Tory of essays, ing at his last autumn conference sophical village hall discursives; hero Colonel Burnaby, each popu- as a Westminster representative and whilst he did occasionally lar in his time.
    [Show full text]
  • Reports to Conference Autumn 2017
    REPORTS TO CONFERENCE AUTUMN 2017 Table of Contents Federal Conference Committee ........................................................................ 2 Federal Policy Committee ................................................................................. 5 Federal Board .................................................................................................. 10 Federal Communications and Elections Committee (FCEC) ................... 12 Federal People Development Committee (FPDC) ................................... 16 Federal Finance and Resources Committee (FFRC) ................................ 17 Federal International Relations Committee (FIRC) ................................. 19 Federal Audit and Scrutiny Committee (FASC) ....................................... 21 Federal Party Accounts ................................................................................... 22 The Liberal Democrats Limited ....................................................................... 48 Parliamentary Party Report (Commons) ......................................................... 50 Parliamentary Party Report (Lords) ................................................................ 54 Parliamentary Party Report (Europe) ............................................................. 57 Campaign for Gender Balance ........................................................................ 60 Federal Appeals Panel ..................................................................................... 62 1 Federal Conference Committee
    [Show full text]
  • Autumn Conference Conference Daily Wednesday September 21St 2011
    autumn conference conference daily wednesday september 2st 20 Information from the Conference Committee for Wednesday 2st September and report back on the business of Tuesday 20th. Please read in conjunction with the Conference Agenda. 21st September – International Day of Peace Page No Report back for Tuesday 20th September 3 Wednesday 21st September 09.00–09.30 F42 Party business Interim Peer Election Regulations 3 F43 Party business Federal Committee Election Regulations 3 09.30–0.5 F44 Policy motion The Arab Awakening 3 0.5–0.35 F45 Speech The Rt Hon Michael Moore MP 0.35–.20 F46 Q&A session International Issues .20–.40 F47 Speech Kirsty Williams AM .40–2.40 Topical issue The Progress of the NHS Reform Bill 4 4.30–5.45 F49 Party business Party Awards 4 F50 Appeal F5 Speech The Rt Hon Nick Clegg MP 5.45 Close of business (approx.) Please note that timings are approximate only. Some items of business may occur earlier than indicated. Conference representatives wishing to speak in any of the debates are requested to fill in and submit a speaker’s card as soon as possible. left luggage registration A left luggage facility will be available on Wednesday 2st September from 08.00–7.00, Correction at House of Sport, Broad Street (across the road Registration will close at 12.00, from The ICC – see map in the Directory). not at 5.00 as shown in the Directory. All luggage is left at owners risk; any luggage not collected by 7.00 may be destroyed.
    [Show full text]
  • {PDF EPUB} Smalltalk with Style by John Pugh Smalltalk with Style [Suzanne Skublics, Edward J
    Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} Smalltalk With Style by John Pugh Smalltalk With Style [Suzanne Skublics, Edward J. Klimas, David A. Thomas, John Pugh] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Smalltalk With StyleCited by: 27Author: Edward J. Klimas, Suzanne Skublics, David A. ThomasReviews: 7Publish Year: 2002Images of SmallTalk With Style by John Pugh bing.com/imagesSee allSee all images[PDF]III - Inriarmod- files.lille.inria.fr/FreeBooks/WithStyle/SmalltalkWithStyle.pdfsome capacity. I have learned much about Smalltalk from each ofthem. By reading this book, you will too. Smalltalk with Style is a valuable contribution to the Smalltalk literature and a "mustread" for both beginning and experienced Smalltalk programmers. John Pugh ix • 81%; Ships From: Multiple Locations Shipping: Standard Comments: Buy with confidence. Excellent Customer Service & Return policy. Ships Fast. 24*7 Customer Service. Inside Smalltalk (Volume 1) [Lalonde, Wilf R., Pugh, John R.] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Inside Smalltalk (Volume 1)Cited by: 66Author: Wilf R. LaLonde4.6/5(3)Publish Year: 1990[PDF]Smalltalk Volume 1 Issue 1 - MacQueenwww.macqueen.us/smalltalkReport/ST/91_95/SMAL0101.PDFJohn Pugh PaulWhite ... Brock and on “Smalltalk with Style” from Ed Klimas and Suzanne Skublics. Our authors and columnists are willing to stand up and be counted, expressing their own personal, sometimes controversial, opinions. To make this forum truly effective, we encourage ... Buy a cheap copy of Inside SmallTalk book by John R. Pugh. A two-volume guide to object-oriented programming that presents the Smalltalk system as a powerful and efficient prototyping and development environment. Free Shipping on all orders over $10.
    [Show full text]
  • Autumn Conference
    Autumn Conference Bournemouth 19th – 23rd September 2009 Conference Directory A fresh start for Britain Choosing a different, better future All the big health debates under one roof THE HEALTH HOTEL Supported by: )%/7,$21)<*5)),)%/7,7)67-1+%(9-')%1(0%66%+) %785(%; 72")(1)6(%;)37)0&)5%-1175%1') Monday 21 September 8;12:3%;/%7)5 5)+8/,2//%1( < 85/);220 "-11-1+7,)&%77/)*25,)%576%1(&5%-16250%1%0& < 5%1.620)220 %7-)176%*)7; %1)/)'7-2135-25-7; %1(5%-(/); < 921220 "-//3%7-)176&)6%*)-17,)-&)5%/)02'5%76=,%1(6 %1(5%-(/); < 85/);220 Specialised Healthcare Alliance 5)(-7581',72)%/7,581',%521)66%5.)5 < %;9-):8-7) 927)*25,)%/7, 250%1%0& < 5)+21:)//220 !""# 250%1%0& %1()&%7) Supported by: < 85&)'.8-7)-+,'/-**)%55-277 )%/7,27)/)')37-21:-7,%1%((5)66&;250%1%0& Supported by: < 25',)67)58-7)-+,'/-**)%55-277(invitation only) Tuesday 22 September 1)-17,5)) %'./-1+'%1')5-6%1)/)'7-21-668) %1(5%-(/); < 5)+21:)//220 )5621%/-6-1+'%5) 7,)',2-')6:)*%')250%1%0& < 85/);220 ,))%/7,'%5)-1(8'%7-21,%//)1+) 5)+8/,2//%1( < 5%1.620)220 )0)17-%()'%() %'85)&; 5)+8/,2//%1( < %;9-):8-7) 520",-7),%//727,)72:1,%//<no longer a national health service? 2,18+, < 5)+21:)//220 %6,*25,)%/7, 3%;-1+7,)35-')*2548%/-7; %1(5%-(/); < 5%1.620)220 Health Hotel non-fringe members: 25025)-1*250%7-216))%77%',)(352+5%00)259-6-7 www.healthhotel.org.uk *;285)48-5)7,-6%(9)57-6)0)17-15%-//)/%5+)35-1725%8(-23/)%6)'217%'7 Introduction Contents Welcome to the Conference Directory for Features: the Liberal Democrat autumn 2009 federal Welcome to Bournemouth 3 conference.
    [Show full text]
  • Liverpool Liberal Democrats Revised Edition – June 2018 This Booklet Is Dedicated to the Memory of Jones the Vote
    a study of Liberal fortitude A personal perspective Councillor Richard Kemp CBE Leader Liverpool Liberal Democrats Revised Edition – June 2018 This booklet is dedicated to the memory of Jones the Vote. Sir Trevor Jones took the Liberal Group on Liverpool Council from two members to control. He did it by inventing and applying ‘community politics’. The techniques that he invented have elected thousands of councillors and are the basis of what we do today. Trevor Jones lives on while we Focus; Good Morning or street letter! 2 Liverpool – a study of Liberal fortitude Foreword Wherever I go and meet Liberal That story has not ended. This year Democrats who have held on in bad Liverpool provided one of the best times and advanced in good times City results for us with a trebling of I am always conscious that in the the Mayoral vote and a doubling of the background there is an individual or a number of councillors. They stand once small group of people who have the more on the threshold of strong electoral leadership and vision to pull people success applying new techniques to the behind them. These people show: decades old community campaigning at which they have become so adept. • An absolute belief in the principles of liberalism; and Liverpool can write this story because they have been at it for so long but • An absolute belief that it is essential in every successful group there are in their community that those beliefs the likes of Cyril Carr, Trevor Jones, be put into practice. David Alton, Mike Storey and Richard I sensed that again when I visited Kemp.
    [Show full text]
  • Board Templates
    LGA General Assembly 5 July 2016 LGA Vice-Presidents 2016-17 Purpose of report To invite the General Assembly to note the appointments of Vice Presidents for 2016/17, under Article 7.2 of the LGA Constitution. Summary This report sets out those Members of the House of Commons, House of Lords and European Parliament that the LGA Political Groups have invited to be Vice-Presidents for 2016-17. Recommendation That the General Assembly notes the appointment of the MPs, Peers, and MEPs listed below as Vice Presidents for 2016/2017. Contact officer: Lee Bruce Position: Public Affairs Manager Phone no: 020 7664 3097 E-mail: [email protected] LGA General Assembly 5 July 2016 LGA Vice-Presidents 2016-2017 1. Set out below are the Vice President appointments for 2016/17: Conservative 1. Margot James MP (Stourbridge) 2. Charles Walker MP (Broxbourne) 3. Heather Wheeler MP (South Derbyshire) 4. Stewart Jackson MP (Peterborough) 5. Andrea Jenkyns MP (Morley and Outwood) 6. Sarah Wollaston MP (Totnes) 7. Bob Blackman MP (Harrow East) 8. Baroness Eaton 9. Lord True 10. Lord Whitby of Harborne 11. Julie Girling MEP 12. Andrew Lewer MEP Labour 1. Clive Betts MP (Sheffield South East) 2. Catherine McKinnell (Newcastle North) 3. Steve Reed MP (Croydon North) 4. Catherine West MP (Hornsey and Wood Green) 5. Wes Streeting MP (Ilford North) 6. Lord Beecham 7. Baroness Smith of Basildon 8. Lord Smith of Leigh 9. Lord Whitty 10. Lord Kennedy of Southwark 11. Richard Howitt MEP (East of England) 12. Derek Vaughan MEP (Wales) Liberal Democrats 1.
    [Show full text]
  • General Medical Council Regulating Doctors Ensuring Good Medical Practice
    GMC000486-0001 Memorandum 26875339 General Medical Council Regulating doctors Ensuring good medical practice To: Peter Rubin From: Laura Nelson [ ....... -~g.~-~.-~.- ........ Copy: Archy Kirkwood [ .T_T_T_]~:~_~_~. :~ _T.T_T_TJ Date: 16 September 2009 GMC dinner at the 2009 Liberal Democrat Party conference Contents Logistics Page 1 Objectives Page 2 Opening remarks Page 2 Attendees Page 4 Biographies Page 4 Liberal Democrat health pblicy Page 9 To note: Dying matters fringe Page 9 Logistics Travel 1. You are booked on the 16:35 from London Waterloo which arrives in Bournemouth at 18:22. The taxi rank is located outside the station. 2. A car had been booked for the return journey to London for you and iCodeAi It will pick you both up at the Royal Bath at 22:00. ’ .......... -" GMC dinner Date: Monday 21 September 2009 Time: 19:30 Venue: Terrace Suite, De Vere Royal Bath Hotel, Bath Road, Bournemouth GMC000486-0002 Timings 18:30 GMC representatives arrive at the Royal Bath Hotel 19:20-19:40 Guests arrive for dinner 19:45 Sit down for dinner. Welcome and introductory remarks from Peter Rubin. 21:30 Dinner ends to enable guests to attend the Health Hotel reception (which begins at 21:30) and other evening events. Objectives 3. The dinners provide an opportunity for GMC staff to meet with a small group of interested politicians in a relaxed environment. Our objectives for the dinner are to: a. introduce you to political stakeholders as the new chair of the GMC b. increase awareness and understanding of the GMC’s statutory roles c.
    [Show full text]
  • Irish Sea Airspace Change Proposal Appendices
    IRISH SEA AIRSPACE CHANGE PROPOSAL APPENDICES Appendix A: Cabinet Office Code of Practice on Consultation ..........................................2 Appendix B: Stakeholder List ............................................................................................3 Appendix C: Overview of Structure and Operation of UK Airspace...................................4 Appendix D: A Brief Outline of Air Traffic Control Principles ............................................6 Appendix E: Track data illustrating RAMOX step ..............................................................9 Appendix F: Traffic data ..................................................................................................10 Appendix G: Track data for Leeds departures.................................................................12 Appendix H: Track data for Belfast TMA Departures.......................................................19 Irish Sea Airspace Change Proposal Appendix - Page 1 of 20 Appendix A: Cabinet Office Code of Practice on Consultation Text from Cabinet Office Code of Practice on Consultation The seven consultation criteria are: 1. When to consult Formal consultation should take place at a stage when there is scope to influence the policy outcome. 2. Duration of consultation exercises Consultations should normally last for at least 12 weeks with consideration given to longer timescales where feasible and sensible. 3. Clarity of scope and impact Consultation documents should be clear about the consultation process, what is being proposed,
    [Show full text]
  • Make Provision Regarding the Sale of Green Belt Land; and for Connected Purposes
    Sale of Green Belt Land Bill 1 A BILL TO Make provision regarding the sale of green belt land; and for connected purposes. E IT ENACTED by the Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present BParliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:— 1 Offence of selling, or marketing for sale, green belt land (1) It shall be an offence to sell, or market for sale, green belt land on the basis that planning permission for new development has been, or can be reasonably expected to be, granted if such permission has not been granted, or it was not reasonable to expect planning permission to be granted at the time the land 5 was sold, or marketed for sale. (2) In subsection (1), a reasonable expectation that planning permission may be granted must be based, either wholly or in part, on information in the local development plan for the area in which the land is situated. (3) A person or company guilty of an offence under subsection (1) shall be liable, 10 on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding the statuary maximum. (4) In this Act— “company” has the meaning given in section 735 of the Companies Act 1985 (c. 6); “development” has the meaning given in section 55 of the Town and 15 Country Planning Act 1990 (c. 8); “green belt land” shall be construed in accordance with section 87(1)(e) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990; “local development plan” has the meaning given in section 62 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 (c.
    [Show full text]
  • The Liberal Democrats
    Reports to Autumn Conference 2011 Birmingham Contents Page Federal Conference Committee……………………..…………………………………………………………….2 Federal Policy Committee…………………………………………………………………..…………………………5 Federal Executive………………………………………………………………………………………………………..10 Federal Finance and Administration Committee………………………………..……………………….18 Federal Party Accounts………………………………………. ……p1-30 (inserted between 24 & 25) The Liberal Democrats (Trustees) Ltd………………………………………………………………………….25 Parliamentary Party (Commons)……………………………………………..………………………………….26 Parliamentary Party (Lords)……………………………………………………..…………………………………29 Parliamentary Party (Europe)…………………………………………………..…………………………………33 Campaign for Gender Balance…………………………………………………..………………………………..36 Diversity Engagement Group……………………………………………………..………………………….……38 1 Federal Conference Committee The Federal Conference Committee (FCC) is responsible for organising the two Federal conferences each year. This includes choosing the agenda from amongst the policy and business motions submitted by conference reps, local, regional and state parties, specified associated organisations and Federal committees, and also taking decisions on topics such as venues, registration rates and other administrative and organisational matters. It works within a budget set by the FFAC. The FCC has 21 voting members: the Party President; the Chief Whip (or substitute); three state party reps; two reps from the FE and two from the FPC; and twelve members directly elected by conference reps. It elects its own chair (currently Andrew Wiseman), who must be one of the directly elected reps. A tremendous amount of hard work goes into organising conference, both by the staff and volunteers. Much of this goes on behind the scenes unseen by those attending conference. I would like to express my thanks to everyone that is involved in the organisation of conference. Amendments to Motions As always, every item on the agenda is still open to amendment. The deadline for submitting amendments – and also emergency motions and questions to reports – is 1.00pm on Monday 5th September.
    [Show full text]
  • Menzies Campbell
    Published and promoted by Paul Burstow, on behalf of Menzies Campbell, both at 10 Storey's Gate, London, Number1 for Delga SW1P 3AY Danny Alexander MP, Norman Baker MP, John Barrett MP, Tom Brake MP, Colin Breed MP, Jeremy Browne MP, Malcolm Bruce MP, Paul Burstow MP, Vince Cable MP, Alistair Carmichael MP, Nick Clegg MP, Edward Davey MP, Don Foster MP, Julia Goldsworthy MP, Nick Harvey MP, Paul Keetch MP, Norman Lamb MP, David Laws MP, As a liberal to my core, there is Michael Moore MP, John Pugh MP, Alan Reid MP, Dan Rogerson MP, nothing about which I feel more Adrian Sanders MP, Robert Smith MP, Jo Swinson MP, Matthew Taylor MP, passionate than the cause of Sarah Teather MP, John Thurso MP, Jenny Willott MP, Chris Davies MEP, individual freedom and civil Andrew Duff MEP, Fiona Hall MEP, liberties. A liberal society Sajjad Karim MEP, Baroness Ludford MEP, Baroness Nicholson of protects and promotes the cause Winterbourne MEP, Diana Wallis MEP, Graham Watson MEP, Lord of individual dignity and Addington, Lord Ashdown, Lord freedom. When those freedoms Avebury, Baroness Barker, Lord Carlile of Berriew, Lord Chidgey, Lord are curtailed by the arbitrary Dholakia, Lord Dykes, Lord Ezra, Baroness Falkner, Lord Fearn, Lord and unjustified powers of the Goodhart, Lord Holme of Cheltenham, Lord Hooson, Lord Jacobs, Lord Jones state, the crucial balance of Cheltenham, Lord Kirkwood, Lord between the rights of every one Lester of Herne Hill, Baroness Linklater of Butterstone, Lord Mackie of Benshie, of us and the state will become Lord McNally, Earl of Glasgow, Earl of Mar and Kellie, Lord Phillips of dangerously unbalanced.
    [Show full text]