Court of Criminal Appeals 57 votes

Opinions demonstrate well-reasoned, clearly-written disposition of the case Excellent 40.4% 23 Very Good 22.8% 13 Satisfactory 7.0% 4 Needs Improvement 24.6% 14 No Opinion 5.3% 3 Interaction with counsel during oral argument is attentive and constructive Excellent 36.8% 21 Very Good 15.8% 9 Satisfactory 5.3% 3 Needs Improvement 24.6% 14 No Opinion 17.5% 10 Determines legal issues impartially and based on thorough and proper application of the law to the record Excellent 38.6% 22 Very Good 22.8% 13 Satisfactory 5.3% 3 Needs Improvement 28.1% 16 No Opinion 5.3% 3 Works hard and is prepared Excellent 45.6% 26 Very Good 19.3% 11 Satisfactory 3.5% 2 Needs Improvement 26.3% 15 No Opinion 5.3% 3 Overall rating Excellent 43.9% 25 Very Good 21.1% 12 Satisfactory 3.5% 2 Needs Improvement 26.3% 15 No Opinion 5.3% 3

Michael E. Keasler 58 votes

Opinions demonstrate well-reasoned, clearly-written disposition of the case Excellent 43.1% 25 Very Good 17.2% 10 Satisfactory 5.2% 3 Needs Improvement 24.1% 14 No Opinion 10.3% 6 Interaction with counsel during oral argument is attentive and constructive Excellent 36.2% 21 Very Good 17.2% 10 Satisfactory 8.6% 5 Needs Improvement 22.4% 13 No Opinion 15.5% 9 Determines legal issues impartially and based on thorough and proper application of the law to the record Excellent 36.2% 21 Very Good 20.7% 12 Satisfactory 6.9% 4 Needs Improvement 24.1% 14 No Opinion 12.1% 7 Works hard and is prepared Excellent 39.7% 23 Very Good 17.2% 10 Satisfactory 8.6% 5 Needs Improvement 20.7% 12 No Opinion 13.8% 8 Overall rating Excellent 39.7% 23 Very Good 19.0% 11 Satisfactory 6.9% 4 Needs Improvement 24.1% 14 No Opinion 10.3% 6

Mary Lou Keel 121 votes

Opinions demonstrate well-reasoned, clearly-written disposition of the case Excellent 44.6% 54 Very Good 17.4% 21 Satisfactory 8.3% 10 Needs Improvement 17.4% 21 No Opinion 12.4% 15 Interaction with counsel during oral argument is attentive and constructive Excellent 34.7% 42 Very Good 15.7% 19 Satisfactory 11.6% 14 Needs Improvement 14.0% 17 No Opinion 24.0% 29 Determines legal issues impartially and based on thorough and proper application of the law to the record Excellent 39.7% 48 Very Good 18.2% 22 Satisfactory 8.3% 10 Needs Improvement 18.2% 22 No Opinion 15.7% 19 Works hard and is prepared Excellent 47.1% 57 Very Good 17.4% 21 Satisfactory 8.3% 10 Needs Improvement 14.9% 18 No Opinion 12.4% 15 Overall rating Excellent 43.0% 52 Very Good 20.7% 25 Satisfactory 7.4% 9 Needs Improvement 17.4% 21 No Opinion 11.6% 14

Sharon Keller 137 votes

Opinions demonstrate well-reasoned, clearly-written disposition of the case Excellent 25.5% 35 Very Good 10.9% 15 Satisfactory 5.1% 7 Needs Improvement 49.6% 68 No Opinion 8.8% 12 Interaction with counsel during oral argument is attentive and constructive Excellent 21.9% 30 Very Good 11.7% 16 Satisfactory 5.8% 8 Needs Improvement 42.3% 58 No Opinion 18.2% 25 Determines legal issues impartially and based on thorough and proper application of the law to the record Excellent 24.1% 33 Very Good 10.9% 15 Satisfactory 2.9% 4 Needs Improvement 53.3% 73 No Opinion 8.8% 12 Works hard and is prepared Excellent 23.4% 32 Very Good 13.1% 18 Satisfactory 8.0% 11 Needs Improvement 40.1% 55 No Opinion 15.3% 21 Overall rating Excellent 24.8% 34 Very Good 10.2% 14 Satisfactory 2.9% 4 Needs Improvement 53.3% 73 No Opinion 8.8% 12

David Newell 81 votes

Opinions demonstrate well-reasoned, clearly-written disposition of the case Excellent 60.5% 49 Very Good 14.8% 12 Satisfactory 9.9% 8 Needs Improvement 11.1% 9 No Opinion 3.7% 3 Interaction with counsel during oral argument is attentive and constructive Excellent 54.3% 44 Very Good 17.3% 14 Satisfactory 3.7% 3 Needs Improvement 11.1% 9 No Opinion 13.6% 11 Determines legal issues impartially and based on thorough and proper application of the law to the record Excellent 60.5% 49 Very Good 12.3% 10 Satisfactory 9.9% 8 Needs Improvement 13.6% 11 No Opinion 3.7% 3 Works hard and is prepared Excellent 67.9% 55 Very Good 11.1% 9 Satisfactory 6.2% 5 Needs Improvement 9.9% 8 No Opinion 4.9% 4 Overall rating Excellent 60.5% 49 Very Good 14.8% 12 Satisfactory 8.6% 7 Needs Improvement 12.3% 10 No Opinion 3.7% 3

Bert Richardson 38 votes

Opinions demonstrate well-reasoned, clearly-written disposition of the case Excellent 42.1% 16 Very Good 7.9% 3 Satisfactory 13.2% 5 Needs Improvement 18.4% 7 No Opinion 18.4% 7 Interaction with counsel during oral argument is attentive and constructive Excellent 39.5% 15 Very Good 7.9% 3 Satisfactory 15.8% 6 Needs Improvement 15.8% 6 No Opinion 21.1% 8 Determines legal issues impartially and based on thorough and proper application of the law to the record Excellent 42.1% 16 Very Good 10.5% 4 Satisfactory 13.2% 5 Needs Improvement 15.8% 6 No Opinion 18.4% 7 Works hard and is prepared Excellent 42.1% 16 Very Good 7.9% 3 Satisfactory 15.8% 6 Needs Improvement 15.8% 6 No Opinion 18.4% 7 Overall rating Excellent 42.1% 16 Very Good 10.5% 4 Satisfactory 10.5% 4 Needs Improvement 18.4% 7 No Opinion 18.4% 7

Michelle Slaughter 82 votes

Opinions demonstrate well-reasoned, clearly-written disposition of the case Excellent 36.6% 30 Very Good 18.3% 15 Satisfactory 9.8% 8 Needs Improvement 22.0% 18 No Opinion 13.4% 11 Interaction with counsel during oral argument is attentive and constructive Excellent 39.0% 32 Very Good 12.2% 10 Satisfactory 9.8% 8 Needs Improvement 18.3% 15 No Opinion 20.7% 17 Determines legal issues impartially and based on thorough and proper application of the law to the record Excellent 40.2% 33 Very Good 15.9% 13 Satisfactory 8.5% 7 Needs Improvement 22.0% 18 No Opinion 13.4% 11 Works hard and is prepared Excellent 42.7% 35 Very Good 14.6% 12 Satisfactory 9.8% 8 Needs Improvement 19.5% 16 No Opinion 13.4% 11 Overall rating Excellent 42.7% 35 Very Good 14.6% 12 Satisfactory 12.2% 10 Needs Improvement 19.5% 16 No Opinion 11.0% 9

Scott Walker 36 votes

Opinions demonstrate well-reasoned, clearly-written disposition of the case Excellent 25.0% 9 Very Good 19.4% 7 Satisfactory 16.7% 6 Needs Improvement 22.2% 8 No Opinion 16.7% 6 Interaction with counsel during oral argument is attentive and constructive Excellent 22.2% 8 Very Good 25.0% 9 Satisfactory 11.1% 4 Needs Improvement 22.2% 8 No Opinion 19.4% 7 Determines legal issues impartially and based on thorough and proper application of the law to the record Excellent 25.0% 9 Very Good 22.2% 8 Satisfactory 8.3% 3 Needs Improvement 27.8% 10 No Opinion 16.7% 6 Works hard and is prepared Excellent 22.2% 8 Very Good 22.2% 8 Satisfactory 13.9% 5 Needs Improvement 27.8% 10 No Opinion 13.9% 5 Overall rating Excellent 25.0% 9 Very Good 19.4% 7 Satisfactory 13.9% 5 Needs Improvement 27.8% 10 No Opinion 13.9% 5

Kevin Yeary 40 votes

Opinions demonstrate well-reasoned, clearly-written disposition of the case Excellent 40.0% 16 Very Good 17.5% 7 Satisfactory 10.0% 4 Needs Improvement 25.0% 10 No Opinion 7.5% 3 Interaction with counsel during oral argument is attentive and constructive Excellent 45.0% 18 Very Good 10.0% 4 Satisfactory 12.5% 5 Needs Improvement 22.5% 9 No Opinion 10.0% 4 Determines legal issues impartially and based on thorough and proper application of the law to the record Excellent 42.5% 17 Very Good 12.5% 5 Satisfactory 12.5% 5 Needs Improvement 27.5% 11 No Opinion 5.0% 2 Works hard and is prepared Excellent 45.0% 18 Very Good 15.0% 6 Satisfactory 10.0% 4 Needs Improvement 17.5% 7 No Opinion 12.5% 5 Overall rating Excellent 42.5% 17 Very Good 17.5% 7 Satisfactory 10.0% 4 Needs Improvement 25.0% 10 No Opinion 5.0% 2