Voltdb Achieves 3M Ops/Second Scaling Linearly on Telecom Benchmark

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Voltdb Achieves 3M Ops/Second Scaling Linearly on Telecom Benchmark BENCHMARKS VoltDB Achieves 3M ops/second Scaling Linearly on Telecom Benchmark Executive Overview VoltDB is trusted globally by telecommunications software solution providers as the in-memory database of choice to power their mission-critical applications deployed at over 100 operators around the world. VoltDB was chosen for its performance and features to solve not only the current challenges, but also to support the rapid evolution of systems in the industry. Here is our benchmark that shows how the performance of VoltDB meets or exceeds the requirements of telecom systems. We showcase VoltDB’s high performance, low latency and linear scaling that are necessary to power revolutions in the industry such as 5G. In this benchmark, we tested VoltDB v8.3 in the cloud and observed the performance scale linearly with the number of servers and achieve over 3 million operations/sec- ond with latency consistently in single digits. VoltDB and the 5G Landscape The advent of 5G brings several key challenges to telecom software solution providers. In addition to the new hardware standards, this network evolution necessitates a transformation of the supporting IT functions of OSS and BSS as well. The opportunity to create additional revenues through new service creation generates pressure on the OSS and BSS functions to be agile and scalable to enable new use cases under ever-increasing load. This pressure on the systems, elevates the role of the supporting database from simply storing data to serving as an active real-time decisioning system. Simply put, VoltDB is a Telco-grade database that exactly meets the requirements of an active real-time decision- ing system such as one that might be needed to support 5G. VoltDB is an in-memory relational database built with scalability, programmability, and consistency as the central and uncompromisable guarantees. Applications built on VoltDB, whether in Telecom, Finance, or Retail, can be characterized as being horizontally scalable, amenable to evo- lution of complexity, and reliable in consistency and uptime. In theory, solutions can be cobbled together from multiple open source tools for streaming, cluster management, da- tabase storage and in-memory caching, but in reality, these solutions fall short. They often add additional latency to get between systems, have a high operational cost to manage multiple software stacks on a large number of servers, and create a client-side programming burden to detect and manage consistency and correctness. In addition to being a high performance database, VoltDB provides the core architectural elements necessary to pow- er mission-critical real-time telecom apps: • Strict ACID compliance • Materialized views, stored procedures, and User Defined Functions • In-built High availability, Disaster recovery, and multi-site cross-datacenter replication BENCHMARKS • Cloud/Container ready • Import and Export streams There is simply no room to compromise when it comes to embedding the right database to power 5G apps. Having a proven enterprise-class database with not just the features and functionality, but also the 24x7 support and experi- enced professional services is essential to 5G success. The Benchmark Online Charging System The online charging function is an ideal candidate to understand the challenges that 5G poses at the systems level. Solutions must handle not only the load of connections from the billions of new connected devices, but also the complexity of enforcing different policies for the increasing diversity of devices. Online charging in 5G networks, hence, must scale both with load and functional complexity without compromising on consistency or performance. Why we need ACID System architectures for these applications take different approaches to tackle the confluence of these challenges. Most employ key-value stores for their purported benefit of unlimited scalability, but are forced to implement trans- actions using custom mechanisms thereby resulting in complicated systems that do not realize the original promises of simplicity and scaling. Even the fastest key-value store will require additional client-server communications and be- spoke locking and consistency checks, all of which will increase latencies and burden the network. The problems with using traditional databases under scale, on the other hand, are sufficiently well known. Among the databases in the market today, we believe VoltDB occupies the unique position that solves the challenges of scalability and complexity while still providing the guarantees of ACID transactions at the highest consistency level, strict serializable [1]. Implementation Details We tested VoltDB database instances built from clusters of 3, 9, 18, and 27 nodes provisioned on Google Cloud Platform. The workload simulates a simplified online charging application. After preloading data, the benchmarking application was run for a duration of 10 minutes. Performance statistics of transactions per second (TPS) and 99th percentile latency were gathered for the duration of the run (each VoltDB transaction is a single application “opera- tion” and the terms are interchangeable). The charted data from these statistics demonstrates the linear scalability of VoltDB in handling increasing workload while maintaining predictable and low latency. Application: The application consists primarily of a Java client, and a VoltDB database. Stored procedures that implement each operation’s processing logic are coded in a combination of Java and SQL to run on the database. The benchmark application manages the balances of the subscribers while allowing them to purchase new services and add addition- al quotas such as minutes, data, messages, etc. The client relies on the database to run complex transactions with multiple SQL statements and conditional logic with full ACID guarantees. Schema Being a relational database, the data in VoltDB is organized into tables as shown below. Each table is either parti- tioned, where the rows are distributed among sites (sites_per_node * node_count), or is replicated, where each node has a full copy of the table. Tables such as the Product table which are not updated frequently are ideal candidates to be kept as a replicated table. The Product table is, however, part of the main workload since it is looked up to obtain 2 BENCHMARKS UPDATE OCTOBER 2018 BENCHMARKS the price of the product that the user is trying to purchase. The User, Usage and Balance tables are created as parti- tioned tables, allowing very high concurrency access for both read and write access. Product User Usage Balance Replicated Partitioned Partitioned Partitioned productid bigint userid bigint userid bigint userid bigint unit_cost bigint user_blob productid bigint balance varchar(8000) Allocated_units bigint bigint Data: The workload is run on a stable data set that is scaled with the size of the cluster. The size of the starting data set for different clusters follows the following ratios: Users — 500k records per core Usage — 62.5k records per core Balance — 500k records per core The number of products is constant at 100. Workload: The workload consists of running two operations in parallel — Allocate quota, and Add user/balance. The operations are implemented in Java+SQL involve executing multiple SQL statements with conditional logic that provide the ben- efit of reducing the network trips and achieving more work in each logical transaction. After the starting data set has been loaded, the two operations in the workload are called in parallel at the same frequency to achieve the target throughput. Both operations are complex, involving decisions that must be made by joining data from multiple tables. By implementing each operation as a VoltDB stored procedure, the entire opera- tion either succeeds or fails as a complete transaction, returning a status to the client application: • Allocate quota — Accesses 4 tables. Allocates quota to a subscriber only after verifying that there is sufficient balance in their account and deducts the balance after a successful allocation. • Add user/balance — Accesses 2 tables. Adds a new subscriber to the system or increase the balance of a user. Metrics The benchmark application is run on different node configurations to demonstrate the scalability of VoltDB for running highly transactional workloads. Data points of latency and throughput were captured at each of the node configurations and graphed to represent the scalability curve. The data points were captured after a run duration of 10 minutes. This wait period helps ensure that the system reaches a steady state of moderate CPU utilization between 55% and 60% and a rough RAM utilization of 33% per machine. Environment The benchmark was run on Google Cloud instances. The node configurations are: n1-standard-4 4 vCPUs 15GB n1-standard-16 16 vCPUs 60GB 3 BENCHMARKS UPDATE OCTOBER 2018 BENCHMARKS Benchmark Results & Analysis To provide the backdrop for the benchmark results, we’d like to state that the SLAs for the most demanding 5G ap- plications, based on the conversations with our telecom customers, are predictable latencies of under 5 ms, and the ability to process 2 to 6 million rows per second, with the ability to scale linearly. The benchmarking results can be viewed in the context of these stringent SLAs. Performance on 4 Core Virtual Machines 800000 20 600000 15 400000 10 ops/s Latency 200000 5 0 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Nodes ops/s latency in ms Figure 1: Throughput and Latency of VoltDB with 4 partitions running on 4 core machines This graph demonstrates near-linear scaling of throughput with the node count. The largest cluster tested contained 27 nodes. The highest throughput observed was 740,703 ops/sec. The above chart also demonstrates that the 99th percentile latency for every cluster size tested meets the desired SLA of 5 milliseconds (except for 27 nodes, where the latency was slightly higher than 5ms). Considering that the 5G grade telecom SLAs are the most stringent across any industry or use case, along with the complexity of the Charging application, VoltDB handily beating both the throughput and latency SLAs is a truly remarkable achievement.
Recommended publications
  • Big Data Velocity in Plain English
    Big Data Velocity in Plain English John Ryan Data Warehouse Solution Architect Table of Contents The Requirement . 1 What’s the Problem? . .. 2 Components Needed . 3 Data Capture . 3 Transformation . 3 Storage and Analytics . 4 The Traditional Solution . 6 The NewSQL Based Solution . 7 NewSQL Advantage . 9 Thank You. 10 About the Author . 10 ii The Requirement The assumed requirement is the ability to capture, transform and analyse data at potentially massive velocity in real time. This involves capturing data from millions of customers or electronic sensors, and transforming and storing the results for real time analysis on dashboards. The solution must minimise latency — the delay between a real world event and it’s impact upon a dashboard, to under a second. Typical applications include: • Monitoring Machine Sensors: Using embedded sensors in industrial machines or vehicles — typically referred to as The Internet of Things (IoT) . For example Progressive Insurance use real time speed and vehicle braking data to help classify accident risk and deliver appropriate discounts. Similar technology is used by logistics giant FedEx which uses SenseAware technology to provide near real-time parcel tracking. • Fraud Detection: To assess the risk of credit card fraud prior to authorising or declining the transaction. This can be based upon a simple report of a lost or stolen card, or more likely, an analysis of aggregate spending behaviour, aligned with machine learning techniques. • Clickstream Analysis: Producing real time analysis of user web site clicks to dynamically deliver pages, recommended products or services, or deliver individually targeted advertising. Big Data: Velocity in Plain English eBook 1 What’s the Problem? The primary challenge for real time systems architects is the potentially massive throughput required which could exceed a million transactions per second.
    [Show full text]
  • Oracle Vs. Nosql Vs. Newsql Comparing Database Technology
    Oracle vs. NoSQL vs. NewSQL Comparing Database Technology John Ryan Data Warehouse Solution Architect, UBS Table of Contents The World has Changed . 1 What’s Changed? . 2 What’s the Problem? . .. 3 Performance vs. Availability and Durability . 3 Consistecy vs. Availability . 4 Flexibility vs . Scalability . 5 ACID vs. Eventual Consistency . 6 The OLTP Database Reimagined . 7 Achieving the Impossible! . .. 8 NewSQL Database Technology . 9 VoltDB . 10 MemSQL . 11 Which Applications Need NewSQL Technology? . 12 Conclusion . 13 About the Author . 13 ii The World has Changed The world has changed massively in the past 20 years. Back in the year 2000, a few million users connected to the web using a 56k modem attached to a PC, and Amazon only sold books. Now billions of people are using to their smartphone or tablet 24x7 to buy just about everything, and they’re interacting with Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. The pace has been unstoppable . Expectations have also changed. If a web page doesn’t refresh within seconds we’re quickly frustrated, and go elsewhere. If a web site is down, we fear it’s the end of civilisation as we know it. If a major site is down, it makes global headlines. Instant gratification takes too long! — Ladawn Clare-Panton Aside: If you’re not a seasoned Database Architect, you may want to start with my previous articles on Scalability and Database Architecture. Oracle vs. NoSQL vs. NewSQL eBook 1 What’s Changed? The above leads to a few observations: • Scalability — With potentially explosive traffic growth, IT systems need to quickly grow to meet exponential numbers of transactions • High Availability — IT systems must run 24x7, and be resilient to failure.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Overview
    Technical Overview This white paper is for technical readers, and explains: { The reasons why traditional databases are difficult and expensive to scale { The “scale-out” VoltDB architecture and what makes it different { VoltDB application design considerations High Performance RDBMS for Fast Data Applications Requiring Smart Streaming with Transactions Overview Traditional databases (DBMS) have been around since the 70ies, they offer proven standard SQL, ad hoc query and reporting, along with a rich ecosystem of standards-based tooling. However, these legacy DBMSs are hard to scale and offer a rigid general purpose architecture that is not suitable for modern apps. The NoSQL category of tools was born from the need to solve the scaling problems associated with legacy SQL. Along with scale, NoSQL also offers greater availability and flexibility. However, NoSQL sacrifices: data consistency, transactional (ACID) guarantees, and ad-hoc querying capabilities, while significantly increasing app complexity. VoltDB is a leader in the NewSQL category of databases that were engineered to offer the best of both worlds. VoltDB combines ACID transactions, SQL capabilities, HA clusters and DR of traditional DBMSs with linear scale-out, virtualization and cloud nativeness of NoSQL. Moreover it allows for capabilities that weren’t present in either, such as in-database Machine Learning driven smart decisions on an large event stream for Smart Streaming. This allows VoltDB to be the system-of-record for data-intensive applications, while offering an integrated
    [Show full text]
  • Release Notes
    Release Notes Product VoltDB Version 11.1 VoltDB Operator 1.4.0 VoltDB Helm Chart 1.4.0 Release Date September 14, 2021 This document provides information about known issues and limitations to the current release of VoltDB. If you encounter any problems not listed below, please be sure to report them to [email protected]. Thank you. Upgrading From Older Versions The process for upgrading from the recent versions of VoltDB is as follows: 1. Shutdown the database, creating a final snapshot (using voltadmin shutdown --save). 2. Upgrade the VoltDB software. 3. Restart the database (using voltdb start). For Kubernetes, see the section on "Upgrading the VoltDB Software and Helm Charts" in the VoltDB Kubernetes Administrator's Guide. For DR clusters, see the section on "Upgrading VoltDB Software" in the VoltDB Administra- tor's Guide for special considerations related to DR upgrades. If you are upgrading from versions before V6.8, see the section on "Upgrading Older Versions of VoltDB Manually" in the same manual. Finally, for all customers upgrading from earlier versions of VoltDB, please be sure to read the upgrade notes for your current and subsequent releases, including V6, V7, V8, and V10. Changes Since the Last Release Users of previous versions of VoltDB should take note of the following changes that might impact their existing applications. 1. Release V11.1 (September 14, 2021) 1.1. New Java client API, Client2 (BETA) VoltDB V11.1 includes the Beta release of a new Java client library. Client2 provides a modern, robust and extensible interface to VoltDB for client applications written in Java.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of SQL Benchmark for Distributed In-Memory Database Management Systems
    IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, VOL.18 No.10, October 2018 59 Evaluation of SQL benchmark for distributed in-memory Database Management Systems Oleg Borisenko† and David Badalyan†† Ivannikov Institute for System Programming of the RAS, Moscow, Russia Summary Requirements for modern DBMS in terms of speed are growing every day. As an alternative to traditional relational DBMS 2. Overview distributed, in-memory DBMS are proposed. In this paper, we investigate capabilities of Apache Ignite and VoltDB from the This chapter discusses the features of Apache Ignite and point of view of relational operations and compare them to VoltDB. Both DBMS support data replication in distributed PostgreSQL using our implementation of TPC-H like workload. mode. However, the paper will consider only the case of Key words: data distribution without replication. Apache Ignite, VoltDB, PostgreSQL, In-memory Computing, distributed systems. 2.1 Apache Ignite 1. Introduction Apache Ignite is a distributed in-memory DBMS [3] [4] written in the Java programming language. It is a caching Today, most applications have to handle large amounts of and data processing platform designed for managing large data. Architects of complex systems face a problem of amounts of data using large number of compute nodes. choosing a DBMS corresponding to reliability, scalability Despite original key-value nature of the system, the and usability requirements. Traditionally used RDBMS developers declare ACID compliance and full support for have several advantages, such as integrity control, data the SQL:1999 standard. consistency, matureness. However, the centralized data H2 Database is used as a subsystem to process SQL queries.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Voltdb
    Using VoltDB Abstract This book explains how to use VoltDB to design, build, and run high performance appli- cations. V4.3 Using VoltDB V4.3 Copyright © 2008-2014 VoltDB, Inc. The text and illustrations in this document are licensed under the terms of the GNU Affero General Public License Version 3 as published by the Free Software Foundation. See the GNU Affero General Public License (http://www.gnu.org/licenses/) for more details. Many of the core VoltDB database features described herein are part of the VoltDB Community Edition, which is licensed under the GNU Affero Public License 3 as published by the Free Software Foundation. Other features are specific to the VoltDB Enterprise Edition, which is distributed by VoltDB, Inc. under a commercial license. Your rights to access and use VoltDB features described herein are defined by the license you received when you acquired the software. This document was generated on May 11, 2014. Table of Contents Preface ............................................................................................................................ xi 1. Overview ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. What is VoltDB? .................................................................................................. 1 1.2. Who Should Use VoltDB ...................................................................................... 1 1.3. How VoltDB Works ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSACTIONS Voltdb’S Unique and Powerful Transaction System Makes Writing Simple, Fast and Reliable Real-Time Analytics and Decisioning Applications Easy
    TRANSACTIONS VoltDB’s unique and powerful transaction system makes writing simple, fast and reliable real-time analytics and decisioning applications easy. VoltDB supports complex multi-SQL- statement ACID transactions. The transactional system in VoltDB supports serializable isolation, complete multistatement atomicity and roll-back, and strong durability guarantees. Java and SQL lower the learning curve Transactions in VoltDB use Java to implement business logic and SQL for data access. Create applications on top of arbitrarily complex stored procedures, knowing that each stored procedure is strictly isolated and fully ACID. Move computation closer to your data VoltDB eliminates unnecessary application-to-database network round-trips to increase throughput and reduce latencies. By moving computation closer to your data, this streamlined architecture enables new application designs that can capitalize on high- velocity data ingestion: decisioning on incoming data as it arrives, executing business logic against each unit of ingestion. VoltDB executes hundreds of thousands to millions of transactions per second on clustered commodity hardware. Partition data using a single, user-defined key VoltDB distributes your data across a cluster of commodity servers. Data is distributed across partitions by a user-selected key — for example, a customer ID, a product SKU, or an advertising campaign identifier. Each partition independently executes single-key transactions. Single-key workloads scale linearly as new nodes are added to the cluster. At the same time, VoltDB supports hundreds to thousands of multi-key transactions per second — transactions that require all partitions. This allows scaling highvelocity ingestion workloads, which are single-key by nature, while simultaneously supporting global cross-key transactions for dashboarding and multi-key analytics.
    [Show full text]
  • Voltdb.Com 209 Burlington Rd #203, Bedford, MA 01730, USA Tel: (978) 528 4660 Voltdb Email: [email protected]
    InBrief Philip Howard – Research Director, Information Management www.VoltDB.com 209 Burlington Rd #203, Bedford, MA 01730, USA Tel: (978) 528 4660 VoltDB Email: [email protected] The company CREATIVITY SCALE VoltDB was founded in the first decade of this century by Michael Stonebraker and others. The eponymous database the company offers was based originally on H-Store, a research project that emerged in 2007 and which was available as an open source project. By 2012 VoltDB had come to market with a commercial version of the product and the H-Store closed down “ in 2016. VoltDB is the logical VoltDB has its headquarters in choice for a cloud- Bedford, Massachusetts and also EXECUTION TECHNOLOGY deployable, transactional has offices in the UK and China. It database that can flexibly has a direct sales force but also The image in this Mutable Quadrant is derived from 13 high level handle high-volume data leverages partners that OEM its metrics, the more the image covers a section the better. Execution metrics relate to the company, Technology to the streams for service providers technology. While the product is product, Creativity to both technical and business innovation and to monitor and leverage Scale covers the potential business and market impact. in real time. suitable for a wide range of use Openet ” cases, roughly three quarters of the company’s customers are within How does it work? the telecommunications sector (Nokia, VoltDB uses a shared-nothing architecture to Vodaphone and Deutsche Telecom are examples), achieve database parallelism, with both data with financial services (Barclays) its second largest and processing distributed across all the CPU user base.
    [Show full text]
  • How Voltdb Does Transactions
    TECHNICAL NOTE How VoltDB does Transactions Note to readers: Some content about read-only transaction coordination in this document is out of date due to changes made in v6.4 as a result of Jepsen testing. Updates are forthcoming. A few years ago (VoltDB version 3.0) we made substantial changes to the transaction management system at the heart of VoltDB. There are several older posts and articles describing the original system but I was surprised to find that we never explained at length how the current transaction system is constructed. Well, no time like the present. Hammock Time: starting with a thought experiment Start with some DRAM and a single CPU. How do we structure a program to run commands to create, query and update structured data at the highest possible throughput? How do you run the maximum number of commands in a unit of time against in-memory data? One solution is to fill a queue with the commands you want to run. Then, run a loop that reads a command off the queue and runs that command to completion. It is easy to see that you can fully saturate a single core running commands in this model. Except for the few nanoseconds it requires to poll() a command from the command queue and offer() a response to a response queue, the CPU is spending 100% of its cycles running the desired work. In VoltDB’s case, the end-user’s commands are execution plans for ad hoc SQL statements, execution plans for distributed SQL fragments (more on this in a second), and stored procedure invocations.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking Main Memory OLTP Recovery
    Rethinking Main Memory OLTP Recovery Nirmesh Malviya #1, Ariel Weisberg .2, Samuel Madden #3, Michael Stonebraker #4 # MIT CSAIL * VoltDB Inc. [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Abstract-Fine-grained, record-oriented write-ahead logging, procedure's name) along with the query parameters; doing so as exemplified by systems like ARIES, has been the gold standard also keeps the log entries small. Such a command log captures for relational database recovery. In this paper, we show that updates performed on the database implicitly in the commands in modern high-throughput transaction processing systems, this (or transactions) themselves, with only one log record entry per is no longer the optimal way to recover a database system. In particular, as transaction throughputs get higher, ARIEs-style command. After a crash, if we can bring up the database using logging starts to represent a non-trivial fraction of the overall a pre-crash transactionally-consistent snapshot (which may or transaction execution time. may not reflect all of the committed transactions from before We propose a lighter weight, coarse-grained command logging the crash), the database can recover by simply re-executing the technique which only records the transactions that were executed transactions stored in the command log in serial order instead on the database. It then does recovery by starting from a trans­ actionally consistent checkpoint and replaying the commands of replaying individual writes as in ARIES-style physiological in the log as if they were new transactions. By avoiding the logging. overhead of fine-grained logging of before and after images (both Compared to physiological logging, command logging oper­ CPU complexity as well as substantial associated 110), command ates at a much coarser granularity, and this leads to important logging can yield significantly higher throughput at run-time.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to Voltdb
    Welcome to VoltDB A Tutorial Welcome to VoltDB: A Tutorial Copyright © 2013-2018 VoltDB, Inc. Table of Contents Preface ............................................................................................................................. iv How to Use This Tutorial ............................................................................................ iv 1. Creating the Database ...................................................................................................... 1 Starting the Database and Loading the Schema ................................................................ 1 Using SQL Queries ..................................................................................................... 2 2. Loading and Managing Data ............................................................................................. 3 Restarting the Database ................................................................................................ 3 Loading the Data ........................................................................................................ 4 Querying the Database ................................................................................................. 4 3. Partitioning ..................................................................................................................... 7 Partitioned Tables ....................................................................................................... 7 Replicated Tables .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Voltdb for Telco Technical Overview
    TECHNICAL OVERVIEW VoltDB for Telco Technical Overview The operational complexity of many databases, from legacy RDBMSs to open source options, can be daunting. Full-time DBA support isn’t an option for many small-medium companies, and can represent a significant seven-figure sum for larger ones. Architectural complexity, scale out vs. scale up issues, HA and cross-datacenter replication, data consistency, cloud-readiness, capacity for virtualization, even old-school locking and latching present issues more familiar to a distributed systems expert than to an app developer or DBA. More importantly, the operational complexity will inevitably bubble up to affect end users. Many NoSQL offerings, which offer a more flexible approach to scale out, flexible schema and data types, fail on support for scalable transaction support when working with shared, finite resources: credit balances or trade verification, authentication and authorization in telco and finserv, precise billing in ad tech and telco, and in-game personalization in online gaming, to name a few use cases. Telcos and CSPs build value on operational applications: • Operations Support Systems (OSS) that support management functions such as network inventory, service provisioning, and network configuration and fault management; • Business Support Systems (BSS) that provide applications to support customer-facing activities such as billing, order management, CRM, and call center automation; and, • Real-time applications that enable providers to act instantly to create new services and applications, improve quality of service, meet SLAs, and fulfill customer expectations. Telco software solutions are frequently in a service provider’s call path. Software providers require latencies for physical transactions to be sub 20ms, so performance and scalability are major requirements.
    [Show full text]