Measurement of Knowledge of Farmers on Chickpea

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Measurement of Knowledge of Farmers on Chickpea cien ral S ce u an lt d u ic F r o Kebede and Amare, J Agri Sci Food Res 2018, 9:3 g o A d f R o e Journal of Agricultural Science and l s a e n a r r u c o h J Food Research Research Article Open Access Measurement of Knowledge of Farmers on Chickpea Demonstration at Adola Rede District, Guji Zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia Kebede B* and Amare G Bore Agricultural Research Center, P.O Box 21, Bore, Ethiopia *Corresponding author: Kebede B, Bore Agricultural Research Center, PO Box 21, Bore, Ethiopia, Tel: +251114707102; E-mail: [email protected] Rec date: June 18, 2018; Acc date: September 17, 2018; Pub date: September 30, 2018 Copyright: © 2018 Kebede B, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Abstract Chickpea is important as food and feed crop for farmers. The crop is also significant for generating income due to its high market demand. Guji Zone has potential of chickpea production, but the yield of chickpea is low due to absence of improved seed and lack of knowledge on chickpea production. Thus, this study was instigated to demonstrate new varieties of chickpea to local farmers aligned to measure farmers’ knowledge on chickpea production. To measure farmers’ knowledge on chickpea the issue of capacity building such as trainings, field visit, exchange visit and field days were organized to capacitate farmers’ knowledge on chickpea demonstrated varieties. 36 items test were prepared on chickpea production and administrated to 24 farmers who were participants during the demonstration of chickpea on their land. Items contains yes or no, true or false and explain types. Each correct answer was given ‘1’ score while wrong answer was awarded ‘0’ mark. Finally, 15 knowledge items test were selected based on the difficulty index which ranges from 45 to 92, discrimination index above 0.20 and point bi-serial correlation coefficient significant at 0.1%, 0.05 and 0.001% level for final knowledge test. The reliability of the knowledge test was measured by split-half method and reliability coefficient (r=0.969) which indicates that this knowledge test is quite reliable. The result of this study revealed that majority of farmers (83.33%) owned moderate level of knowledge on chickpea production. Farmers Training Center established in each Kebele should be functioned to increase farmers’ knowledge on chickpea production. Keywords: Knowledge; Reliability; Item analysis; Chickpea; yield of chickpea in Ethiopia are estimated to be 225607.53 hectares Demonstration and 444145.93 tons, respectively [8]. Despite its nutritional values, high economic importance, the national average yield of chickpea is still Introduction lower (1.97 t/ha; CSA, 2017) than its potential of up to 5 t/ha on experimental stations. Chickpea yields are limited by factors such as Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is an important pulse crops grown in pests, diseases, drought and yield improvement require compatible Ethiopia because of its multiple functions. It is a key component of the resilient varieties adapted to different agro-ecological zones [5]. The daily diet, and thus important protein source for Ethiopian households low yield of chickpea in Ethiopia was due to various production who cannot afford animal products. In Ethiopia chickpea grain is constraints including: low yield potential of landraces, lack of superior widely used in different forms as green vegetable (green immature varieties, their susceptibility to biotic and a biotic stresses and poor seed), “Kollo” (soaked and roasted) and “nifro” (boiled seeds) and cultural practices are some the serious constraints in chickpea “wot” (sauces) made up of “shiro” (powdered seeds) [1]. production [9]. Chickpea cultivation produces straw that is used as livestock feed. Production of chickpea have not been yet under production in the This straw is mainly used when there is drought and green fodder is potential areas of Guji zone [10]. In Adola Rede district of Guji Zone unavailable for livestock feeding. Recently, the studies of Megersa et al., the production of chickpea is not known by farmers. Thus, we Bereket and Abdirazak also stated that chickpea has a great economic proposed new varieties (Dalota and Habru) to the farmers by merit in Ethiopia providing a cheap source of protein for human diet demonstrating on the area of 100 m2 in 2017 and 2018 production and animal feed, and as a source of alternative cash income to the years. After adaptation of the technologies or varieties demonstration farmers and foreign currency to the country [2-5]. is needed to create awareness and publicize for further adoption of Another attractive feature of chickpea is its ability to fix atmospheric technologies. Demonstration means small area on which research nitrogen in symbiosis with rhizobia, contributing directly to grain activities are implemented on farmers’ land with active participation of protein and reducing the need for N fertilizer for subsequent crops. It farmers, development agents and other stakeholders who facilitate the thereby has great potential to improve soil N status [6]. Chickpea is knowledge transfer on the use, application of improved and often grown after wheat and tef are harvested on vertisols using appropriate technologies from researcher to the empowered farmers. residual moisture which extends the cropping season from September To implement this research activity, we gave two times training on the to December. As a result, growing chickpea allows the farmers to recommended packages of chickpea production for the selected produce extra crop on the same land [7]. farmers on demonstration of chickpea in the area. We also gave exchange visit and organized field days to capacitate the knowledge of Chickpea is a less labor-intensive crop and its production demands farmers on the chickpea production. Thus, to see the impact of these low external inputs compared to cereals. The total land coverage and trainings, exchange visit and field days this activity was initiated to J Agri Sci Food Res, an open access journal Volume 9 • Issue 3 • 1000239 Citation: Kebede B, Amare G (2018) Measurement of Knowledge of Farmers on Chickpea Demonstration at Adola Rede District, Guji Zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia. J Agri Sci Food Res 9: 239. Page 2 of 6 measure the level of knowledge of farmers on the new demonstration mark. Thus, total score secured by all individual farmers on 36 items of chickpea production. for correct answers was the knowledge score on chickpea production. The scores obtained by 24 farmers were arranged in descending order Research Methodology and divided into six groups i.e., 4 farmers in each group. The groups were named as G1, G2, G3, G4, G5 and G6. The range of score Description of study area obtained by the farmers of six groups were described in Table 1. Adola Rede district is 468 km away from the Addis Ababa to the Group number G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 South. The district is bordered by Ana Sora district in the North, Score range 34-35 33 31-32 29-30 26-28 20-25 Wadera district in the South and Odo Shakiso in the West and Girja Number of district in the East directions. The district has altitude range of 4 4 4 4 4 4 1350-2340 meter above sea level, annual mean of 1000 mm rainfall and farmers annual average of 28°C of temperature. Mixed farming, mining and forest product production were the major livelihood of Adola Rede Table 1: Chickpea knowledge range scores obtained by the farmers farmers. Adola district has diverse agro-ecologies which are suitable (N=24). for production of different crops. The rainfall pattern of the study area is bimodal for lowland and midland areas and uni-modal for highland For item analysis, the middle two groups G3 and G4 were parts. Sandy, clay and silt are the major soils of Adola Rede district. eliminated keeping four extreme groups with high and low scores. The The major crops produced in the area includes maize, tef, haricot bean, data related to the correct response for all the items in respect of these chat, coffee and the others. The black soil characteristics of the area four groups were tabulated for calculating the difficulty and make it potential for production of chickpea. discrimination indices. Selection of items for final format of the knowledge test was done based on the following criteria. Development of knowledge test Item difficulty index-P: The index of item difficulty was worked out Development of items: Items regarding chickpea production were as the percentage of the respondents answering an item correctly. The developed by Agricultural Extension Researchers of Bore Agricultural assumption in this item index of difficulty was that the difficulty is Research Center. 36 items were prepared based on uncertainty, linearly related to the level of farmer’s knowledge about chickpea simplicity and representativeness. English and English defined production. When a farmer answers an item, it was assured that the knowledge as a body of understood information possessed by an item was less difficult than his/her ability to cope with it. It was individual or by a culture [11]. Knowledge is totality of understood calculated by following formula: information possessed by an individual. A knowledge test has been defined by Bloom et al. as a test which refers to those behavior and test situation which emphasized the remembering by the recall of ideas, �� Where,�� = pi=Difficulty× 100 index1 in percentage of the ith item, ni= material or phenomena [12]. For this study knowledge was �� Number of respondents giving correct answer to ith item, Ni=Total operationalized as the amount of information owned, understood and number of respondents to whom the ith item was administered.
Recommended publications
  • Districts of Ethiopia
    Region District or Woredas Zone Remarks Afar Region Argobba Special Woreda -- Independent district/woredas Afar Region Afambo Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Asayita Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Chifra Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Dubti Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Elidar Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Kori Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Mille Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Abala Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Afdera Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Berhale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Dallol Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Erebti Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Koneba Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Megale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Amibara Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Awash Fentale Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Bure Mudaytu Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Dulecha Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Gewane Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Aura Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Ewa Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Gulina Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Teru Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Yalo Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Dalifage (formerly known as Artuma) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Dewe Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Hadele Ele (formerly known as Fursi) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Simurobi Gele'alo Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Telalak Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Amhara Region Achefer -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Angolalla Terana Asagirt -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Artuma Fursina Jile -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Banja -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Belessa --
    [Show full text]
  • Hum Ethio Manitar Opia Rian Re Espons E Fund D
    Hum anitarian Response Fund Ethiopia OCHA, 2011 OCHA, 2011 Annual Report 2011 Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011 Table of Contents Note from the Humanitarian Coordinator ................................................................................................ 2 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................. 3 1. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................ 4 1.1 2011 Humanitarian Context ........................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Map - 2011 HRF Supported Projects ............................................................................................. 6 2. Information on Contributors ................................................................................................................ 7 2.1 Donor Contributions to HRF .......................................................................................................... 7 3. Fund Overview .................................................................................................................................... 8 3.1 Summary of HRF Allocations in 2011 ............................................................................................ 8 3.1.1 HRF Allocation by Sector .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ETHIOPIA Humanitarian Access Situation Report June – July 2019
    ETHIOPIA Humanitarian Access Situation Report June – July 2019 This report is produced by OCHA Ethiopia in collaboration with humanitarian partners. It covers the period June - July 2019. The next report will be issued around September - October 2019. OVERVIEW IUS • In June - July, Ethiopia experienced an at- TIGRAY 276 Access incidents reported tempted government overthrow in Amhara, Western socio-political unrest in Sidama (SNNPR), North Gondar Wag Hamra Central Gondar and a rise in security incidents in Southwest- Zone 4 (Fantana Rasu) AFAR ern Oromia and Gambella. The quality of ac- Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) cess declined, limiting assistance to people AMHARA No. o incidents by one South Wello Metekel in need, against a backdrop of massive gov- Oromia East Gojam BENISHANGUL Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) 4 13 35 49 AsosaGUMUZ Siti ernment-led returns of IDP to areas of origin. Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) North Shewa(O) North Shewa(A) Kemashi Dire Dawa urban West Wellega East Wellega DIRE DAWA West Shewa Fafan • Hostilities between Ethiopian Defense Forc- ADDIS ABABA Kelem Wellega East Hararge Finfine Special West Hararge es (EDF) and Unidentified Armed Groups Buno Bedele East Shewa Etang Special Ilu Aba Bora Jarar OROMIA Erer (UAGs) as well as inter-ethnic, remained the GAMBELA Jimma Agnewak main access obstacle, with 197 incidents Doolo Nogob West Arsi SOMALI (out of 276), mostly in Southwestern Oromia SNNP Sidama Bale Korahe (110). The Wellegas, West Guji (Oromia), and Gedeo Shabelle Gambella, were the most insecure areas for Segen Area P. West Guji Guji aid workers. Liban Borena • In June, conflict in the Wellegas scaled up, Daawa with explosive devices attacks causing ci- Source: Access Incidents database vilian casualties in urban centres.
    [Show full text]
  • Prioritization of Shelter/NFI Needs
    Prioritization of Shelter/NFI needs Date: 31st May 2018 Shelter and NFI Needs As of 18 May 2018, the overall number of displaced people is 345,000 households. This figure is based on DTM round 10, partner’s assessments, government requests, as well as the total of HH supported since July 2017. The S/NFI updated its prioritisation in early May and SNFI Cluster partners agreed on several criteria to guide prioritisation which include: - 1) type of emergency, 2) duration of displacement, and 3) sub-standard shelter conditions including IDPS hosted in collective centres and open-air sites and 4) % of vulnerable HH at IDP sites. Thresholds for the criteria were also agreed and in the subsequent analysis the cluster identified 193 IDP hosting woredas mostly in Oromia and Somali regions, as well as Tigray, Gambella and Addis Ababa municipality. A total of 261,830 HH are in need of urgent shelter and NFI assistance. At present the Cluster has a total of 57,000 kits in stocks and pipeline. The Cluster requires urgent funding to address the needs of 204,830 HHs that are living in desperate displacement conditions across the country. This caseload is predicted to increase as the flooding continues in the coming months. Shelter and NFI Priority Activities In terms of priority activities, the SNFI Cluster is in need of ES/NFI support for 140,259 HH displaced mainly due to flood and conflict under Pillar 2, primarily in Oromia and Somali Regions. In addition, the Shelter and NFI Cluster requires immediate funding for recovery activities to support 14,000 HH (8,000 rebuild and 6,000 repair) with transitional shelter support and shelter repair activities under Pillar 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Kerchanshe Trading Plc Addis Ababa,St Gabriel Church Bayne Building, Addis Ababa/ N/S/ Lafto, Ethiopia
    SCS Global Services does hereby certify that an independent assessment has been conducted of: Kerchanshe Trading Plc Addis Ababa,St Gabriel church Bayne Building, Addis Ababa/ N/S/ Lafto, Ethiopia Scope of Certificate: Conventional Coffee At the following sites: See Annex The facilities are hereby certified to sell products as: Fair Trade Certified The assessment has been conducted by SCS Global Services (SCS) in accordance with the standards and compliance criteria listed below: Fair Trade USA Agricultural Production Standard - Version 1.1.0 Fair Trade USA ID#: 1661106 Valid from 21 July 2020 to 20 July 2023 Jim Knutzon, Vice President SCS Global Services 2000 Powell Street, Ste. 600, Emeryville, CA 94608 USA This is an addendum to certificate #1661106 and must be accompanied by this certificate to be considered valid. This addendum is not a certificate and is not valid as a stand-alone document. Kerchanshe Trading Plc Addis Ababa,St Gabriel church Bayne Building, Addis Ababa/ N/S/ Lafto, Ethiopia Fair Trade USA ID #: 1661106 Name Address Product Form Beshasha Limmu wet and dry mill Oromia Region, Jimma Conventional Coffee Zone, Gomma Woreda, Bashasha, Ethiopia Kochere wet and dry mill SNNPRS, Gedio Zone, Conventional Coffee Kochore Woreda , Kochore, Ethiopia Guji Adola wet and dry mill Oromia, Region, Guji Zone, Conventional Coffee Adola Woreda, Adola, Ethiopia Guji Uraga wet and dry mill Oromia Region, Guji Zone, Conventional Coffee Uraga Woreda, Uraga, Ethiopia Kerchanshe Export processing facility Addis Ababa, Akakai Kality Conventional Coffee Subcity, Woreda 07, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Name Size # in Group Product Form Beshasha Limmu Small 498 Conventional Coffee Kochere Small 612 Conventional Coffee Adola Small 1472 Conventional Coffee Annex Page 1 This is an addendum to certificate #1661106 and must be accompanied by this certificate to be considered valid.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Improved Pigeon Pea (Cajanus Cajan) Varieties at Adola
    Advances in Biochemistry 2021; 9(1): 1-5 http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/ab doi: 10.11648/j.ab.20210901.11 ISSN: 2329-0870 (Print); ISSN: 2329-0862 (Online) Evaluation of Improved Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan ) Varieties at Adola, Guji Zone of Oromia Teshale Jabessa *, Ketema Bekele Oromia Agricultural Research Institute (IQQO), Bore Agricultural Research Center (BOARC), Bore, Ethiopia Email address: *Corresponding author To cite this article: Teshale Jabessa, Ketema Bekele. Evaluation of Improved Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan ) Varieties at Adola, Guji Zone of Oromia. Advances in Biochemistry . Vol. 9, No. 1, 2021, pp. 1-5. doi: 10.11648/j.ab.20210901.11 Received : January 6, 2021; Accepted : January 26, 2021; Published : January 30, 2021 Abstract: A study was conducted with the objective to identify adaptable, high biomass, good quality and seed yield of Pegeon pea cultivars at Adola sub-site of Bore Agricultural research center. Four pegeon pea cultivars Tsigas, Degagsa-75, Belabas-27 and 16555 were tested in RCBD with three replications. The analysis of variation revealed that significant (P<0.05) differ in days to 90% maturity were observed among cultivars. Among tested cultivars Belabas 27 was significantly earlier (162 days) to maturity, while late matured cultivar was Degagsa (203 days). Analysis of variance showed highly significant differences (P<0.01) were observed among cultivars for number of primary branches per plant. Higher branch number was recorded for Tsigas cultivar (21.6) whereas the lowest branch number was obtained from cultivar Degagsa-75 (9.75). The cultivars were significant (P<0.05) differ for pod length. The long pod was recorded from cultivar 16555 (5 cm) while the short pod length was recorded from cultivar Belabas -27 (3.14 cm).
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia COI Compilation
    BEREICH | EVENTL. ABTEILUNG | WWW.ROTESKREUZ.AT ACCORD - Austrian Centre for Country of Origin & Asylum Research and Documentation Ethiopia: COI Compilation November 2019 This report serves the specific purpose of collating legally relevant information on conditions in countries of origin pertinent to the assessment of claims for asylum. It is not intended to be a general report on human rights conditions. The report is prepared within a specified time frame on the basis of publicly available documents as well as information provided by experts. All sources are cited and fully referenced. This report is not, and does not purport to be, either exhaustive with regard to conditions in the country surveyed, or conclusive as to the merits of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. Every effort has been made to compile information from reliable sources; users should refer to the full text of documents cited and assess the credibility, relevance and timeliness of source material with reference to the specific research concerns arising from individual applications. © Austrian Red Cross/ACCORD An electronic version of this report is available on www.ecoi.net. Austrian Red Cross/ACCORD Wiedner Hauptstraße 32 A- 1040 Vienna, Austria Phone: +43 1 58 900 – 582 E-Mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.redcross.at/accord This report was commissioned by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), Division of International Protection. UNHCR is not responsible for, nor does it endorse, its content. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of abbreviations ........................................................................................................................ 4 1 Background information ......................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Geographical information .................................................................................................... 6 1.1.1 Map of Ethiopia ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Oromia Region Administrative Map(As of 27 March 2013)
    ETHIOPIA: Oromia Region Administrative Map (as of 27 March 2013) Amhara Gundo Meskel ! Amuru Dera Kelo ! Agemsa BENISHANGUL ! Jangir Ibantu ! ! Filikilik Hidabu GUMUZ Kiremu ! ! Wara AMHARA Haro ! Obera Jarte Gosha Dire ! ! Abote ! Tsiyon Jars!o ! Ejere Limu Ayana ! Kiremu Alibo ! Jardega Hose Tulu Miki Haro ! ! Kokofe Ababo Mana Mendi ! Gebre ! Gida ! Guracha ! ! Degem AFAR ! Gelila SomHbo oro Abay ! ! Sibu Kiltu Kewo Kere ! Biriti Degem DIRE DAWA Ayana ! ! Fiche Benguwa Chomen Dobi Abuna Ali ! K! ara ! Kuyu Debre Tsige ! Toba Guduru Dedu ! Doro ! ! Achane G/Be!ret Minare Debre ! Mendida Shambu Daleti ! Libanos Weberi Abe Chulute! Jemo ! Abichuna Kombolcha West Limu Hor!o ! Meta Yaya Gota Dongoro Kombolcha Ginde Kachisi Lefo ! Muke Turi Melka Chinaksen ! Gne'a ! N!ejo Fincha!-a Kembolcha R!obi ! Adda Gulele Rafu Jarso ! ! ! Wuchale ! Nopa ! Beret Mekoda Muger ! ! Wellega Nejo ! Goro Kulubi ! ! Funyan Debeka Boji Shikute Berga Jida ! Kombolcha Kober Guto Guduru ! !Duber Water Kersa Haro Jarso ! ! Debra ! ! Bira Gudetu ! Bila Seyo Chobi Kembibit Gutu Che!lenko ! ! Welenkombi Gorfo ! ! Begi Jarso Dirmeji Gida Bila Jimma ! Ketket Mulo ! Kersa Maya Bila Gola ! ! ! Sheno ! Kobo Alem Kondole ! ! Bicho ! Deder Gursum Muklemi Hena Sibu ! Chancho Wenoda ! Mieso Doba Kurfa Maya Beg!i Deboko ! Rare Mida ! Goja Shino Inchini Sululta Aleltu Babile Jimma Mulo ! Meta Guliso Golo Sire Hunde! Deder Chele ! Tobi Lalo ! Mekenejo Bitile ! Kegn Aleltu ! Tulo ! Harawacha ! ! ! ! Rob G! obu Genete ! Ifata Jeldu Lafto Girawa ! Gawo Inango ! Sendafa Mieso Hirna
    [Show full text]
  • ETHIOPIA - National Hot Spot Map 31 May 2010
    ETHIOPIA - National Hot Spot Map 31 May 2010 R Legend Eritrea E Tigray R egion !ª D 450 ho uses burned do wn d ue to th e re ce nt International Boundary !ª !ª Ahferom Sudan Tahtay Erob fire incid ent in Keft a hum era woreda. I nhabitan ts Laelay Ahferom !ª Regional Boundary > Mereb Leke " !ª S are repo rted to be lef t out o f sh elter; UNI CEF !ª Adiyabo Adiyabo Gulomekeda W W W 7 Dalul E !Ò Laelay togethe r w ith the regiona l g ove rnm ent is Zonal Boundary North Western A Kafta Humera Maychew Eastern !ª sup portin g the victim s with provision o f wate r Measle Cas es Woreda Boundary Central and oth er imm ediate n eeds Measles co ntinues to b e re ported > Western Berahle with new four cases in Arada Zone 2 Lakes WBN BN Tsel emt !A !ª A! Sub-city,Ad dis Ababa ; and one Addi Arekay> W b Afa r Region N b Afdera Military Operation BeyedaB Ab Ala ! case in Ahfe rom woreda, Tig ray > > bb The re a re d isplaced pe ople from fo ur A Debark > > b o N W b B N Abergele Erebtoi B N W Southern keb eles of Mille and also five kebeles B N Janam ora Moegale Bidu Dabat Wag HiomraW B of Da llol woreda s (400 0 persons) a ff ected Hot Spot Areas AWD C ases N N N > N > B B W Sahl a B W > B N W Raya A zebo due to flo oding from Awash rive r an d ru n Since t he beg in nin g of th e year, Wegera B N No Data/No Humanitarian Concern > Ziquala Sekota B a total of 967 cases of AWD w ith East bb BN > Teru > off fro m Tigray highlands, respective ly.
    [Show full text]
  • Damage and Loss Assessment EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ©UNHCR/Adelina Gomez
    ©UNHCR/Anna Helge Damage and Loss Assessment EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ©UNHCR/Adelina Gomez TABLE OF CONTENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 DAMAGE AND LOSS IN AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION SECTORS 4 DAMAGE ON LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SYSTEM 5 DAMAGE AND LOSS ASSESMENT ON SOCIAL AND INFRAESTRUCTURAL 6 SECTORS • Private houses 6 • Public Infrastructure 7 • Recommendations 8 LEGAL ASSISTANCE NEEDS 10 • Access to justice 10 • Access to Land holding certificate 11 • Customary/Traditional justice system 12 • Recommendations 12 CONFLICT, PEACE BUILDING AND SOCIAL COHESION 13 POSSIBLE APPROACHES FOR CONFLICT TRANSFORMATION AND PEACE- 14 BUILDING IN THE CONTEXT OF GUJI AND GEDEO ETHNIC GROUPS • Building Trust 14 • Developing social cohesion 15 • Supporting local buy-in 15 • Recommendations 16 APPENDIX 1 18 - 2 - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Damage and Loss Assessment in West Guji Bule Hora University initiated a Damage and Loss Assessment (DaLA) in West Guji zone in collaboration with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and the West Guji Zonal Disaster Risk Management Office to assess loss and damages incurred during the intercommunal conflict between the Gedeo and Guji people in 2018, which displaced hundreds of thousands. The assessment also analyzed legal assistance needs, as well as the potential for peace-building and social cohesion. A total of 78,257HHs (508,671 individuals) with an average family size of 6.5/HH were severely exposed to multiple socio-economic crises due to the conflict. Following the Government’s initiated return process based on the alleged improved safety and security situation (assessed by the Government) in May 2019, according to the Government, the majority of the IDPs were returned to their places of habitual residence 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Administrative Region, Zone and Woreda Map of Oromia a M Tigray a Afar M H U Amhara a Uz N M
    35°0'0"E 40°0'0"E Administrative Region, Zone and Woreda Map of Oromia A m Tigray A Afar m h u Amhara a uz N m Dera u N u u G " / m r B u l t Dire Dawa " r a e 0 g G n Hareri 0 ' r u u Addis Ababa ' n i H a 0 Gambela m s Somali 0 ° b a K Oromia Ü a I ° o A Hidabu 0 u Wara o r a n SNNPR 0 h a b s o a 1 u r Abote r z 1 d Jarte a Jarso a b s a b i m J i i L i b K Jardega e r L S u G i g n o G A a e m e r b r a u / K e t m uyu D b e n i u l u o Abay B M G i Ginde e a r n L e o e D l o Chomen e M K Beret a a Abe r s Chinaksen B H e t h Yaya Abichuna Gne'a r a c Nejo Dongoro t u Kombolcha a o Gulele R W Gudetu Kondole b Jimma Genete ru J u Adda a a Boji Dirmeji a d o Jida Goro Gutu i Jarso t Gu J o Kembibit b a g B d e Berga l Kersa Bila Seyo e i l t S d D e a i l u u r b Gursum G i e M Haro Maya B b u B o Boji Chekorsa a l d Lalo Asabi g Jimma Rare Mida M Aleltu a D G e e i o u e u Kurfa Chele t r i r Mieso m s Kegn r Gobu Seyo Ifata A f o F a S Ayira Guliso e Tulo b u S e G j a e i S n Gawo Kebe h i a r a Bako F o d G a l e i r y E l i Ambo i Chiro Zuria r Wayu e e e i l d Gaji Tibe d lm a a s Diga e Toke n Jimma Horo Zuria s e Dale Wabera n a w Tuka B Haru h e N Gimbichu t Kutaye e Yubdo W B Chwaka C a Goba Koricha a Leka a Gidami Boneya Boshe D M A Dale Sadi l Gemechis J I e Sayo Nole Dulecha lu k Nole Kaba i Tikur Alem o l D Lalo Kile Wama Hagalo o b r Yama Logi Welel Akaki a a a Enchini i Dawo ' b Meko n Gena e U Anchar a Midega Tola h a G Dabo a t t M Babile o Jimma Nunu c W e H l d m i K S i s a Kersana o f Hana Arjo D n Becho A o t
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Community Radio for Integrated and Sustainable Development in Ethiopia: a Critical Review on the Holistic Approach D
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 10 December 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202012.0260.v1 The Role of Community Radio for Integrated and Sustainable Development in Ethiopia: A Critical Review on the Holistic Approach Destaw Bayable Yemer Guna Tana Integrated Field Research & Development Center, Debre Tabor University, Ethiopia Email: [email protected] Abstract Community radios play a paramount role in the development of the community. Community radio stations have been highly engaged in addressing social, economic, cultural, educational, health, environmental, sanitation, and disaster issues effectively and strategically using local languages in context. Community radios are also used to express, and share indigenous views, thoughts, ideas, problems, and perspectives of local people. The purpose of this analysis is to explore the role of community radio for integrated and sustainable development in Ethiopia. It used a systematic narrative review. Nine research works and five assessments report were selected purposively and analyzed in a quantitative approach. Currently, in Ethiopia, there are 50 community radio stations that received broadcast licenses from Ethiopian Broadcast Authority with four types of licensing and broadcasting in 29 local languages. Community radio helps the community to identify their common goals, create holistic plans, monitor the progress of their developmental activities, and guide on sustainable development. It contributes to integrated and sustainable development in a collaborative and creative process that cultivates the social, economic, and political conditions needed for the community to succeed which aimed to improve and sustain the livelihoods of the community. However, the media can’t achieve its target goal to support the development activities and bring holistic development of the community.
    [Show full text]