FIRST REPORT ON ILLEGAL MINING OF IRON AND MANGANESE ORES IN THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
OCTOBER, 2013
VOLUME: II
Justice M. B. Shah Commission of Enquiry for Illegal Mining of Iron Ore & Manganese I N D E X
Volume: II
Chapter Particulars Page
IV Contravention of Environmental Laws 1
V Encroachment 183
* * *
I
1
CHAPTER: IV
Contravention of Environmental Laws
[ I ]
Importance of Environment–ignored
1. Under the law, as it stands today, if Environmental Clearance is not obtained or if there is violation of its conditions, then matter is to be dealt with seriousness. EC conditions are required to be strictly complied with for the ultimate benefit of the society. Its non implementation results to health hazardous which may, on occasions, violate right to life guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Further, it affects the natural ecosystem as well as pollutes water and air and causes damages to life.
Since ancient time, in our country, we believe in maintaining environmental balance. In this reference, it is relevant to quote what it has been said in “Atharva Veda” as published in Times of India, Ahmedabad Edition, on Earth Day:–
“Prayer has been made to Mother Earth that she blesses us with the knowledge required to enjoy the treasures of the nature without disturbing the environmental balance. ” 2
Similar was the culture as stated in Chuang Tzu 17. The quotation was as under:–
“A horse or a cow has four feet. That is Nature. Put a halter around the horse’s head and put a string through the cow’s nose that is man. Therefore, it is said, “Do not let man destroy Nature. Do not let cleverness destroy destiny the natural order. ”
Secondly, Article 48A of the Constitution of India – a directive principle of the State Policy should be followed in letter and spirit. The said Article reads as under:–
“State shall endeavor to promote and improve the environment and to safeguard forests and wild– life of the country. ”
Thirdly, it is one of the duties of the citizen as well as the State to protect and improve the natural environment including forests, lakes, rivers wild– life, and to have compassion for living creatures, as provided under Article 51A(g) of the Constitution.
Every creature has reasons to exist on earth. 3
2. Effect of degradation of environment (Ref.: K. M. Chinnappa v/s. Union of India, [AIR 2003 SC 724]:––
“By destroying nature, environment, man is committing matricide, having in a way killed Mother Earth. … …
The seminal issue involved is whether the approach should be ‘dollar friendly’ or ‘eco friendly’. … …
There is no quiet place in the white man's cities. No place to hear the unfurling of leaves in spring or the rustle of in insect's wings. But perhaps it is because I am a savage and do not understand. The clatter only seems to insult the ears. And what is there in life if a man cannot hear the lonely cry of the whippoorwill or the arguments of the frogs around a pond at night? … …
Environment is polycentric and multi–facet problem affecting the human existence. The Stockholm Declaration of United Nations on Human Environment, 1972, reads its Principle No.3, inter– alia, thus: “Man has the fundamental right to freedom, equality, and adequate conditions of life. In an environment of equality that permits a life of dignity and well being and bears a solemn responsibility to protect and improve the environment for present and future generations.”
The Declaration, 'therefore, says that' in the developing countries, most of the environmental 4 problems are caused by underdevelopments. The Declaration suggests to safe actions with prudent care for ecological balance. It is necessary to avoid massive and irreversible harm to the earthly environment and strife for achieving present generation and the posterity a better life in an environment more in keeping with the needs and hopes. … …
The word “environment” is of broad spectrum which brings within its ambit “hygienic atmosphere and ecological balance.” It is, therefore, not only the duty of the State but also the duty of every citizen to maintain hygienic environment. The State, in particular has duty in that behalf and to shed its extravagant unbridled sovereign power and to forge in its policy to maintain ecological balance and hygienic environment. Article 21 protects right to life as a fundamental right. Enjoyment of life and its attainment including their right to life with human dignity encompasses within its ambit, the protection and preservation of environment, ecological balance free from pollution of air and water, sanitation without which life cannot be enjoyed. … …
Environmental law is an instrument to protect and improve the environment and to control or prevent any act or omission polluting or likely to pollute the environment. In view of the enormous challenges thrown by the industrial revolution, the legislatures throughout the world are busy in this exercise. … … 5
Since time immemorial, natural objects like rivers enjoyed a high position in the life of the society. They were considered as Goddesses having not only the purifying capacity but also self–purifying ability. Fouling of the water of a river was considered a sin and it attracted punishments of different grades which included, penance, outcasting, fine, etc. … …
When the necessity to promote the environment turned grave, doubt was expressed by some commentators whether the issue of the environment would last. They have been proved wrong, since it is clearly one of the big issues, perhaps the biggest issue of the 1990s. It is a big issue in political terms, since protection of the environment is high on most people's priorities for the 1990s. As a result political parties and Governments are falling over each other in their eagerness to appear green, even if as yet their actions rarely match their rhetoric. It is big in terms of the size of the problem faced and the solutions required; global warning, the destruction of the ozone layer, acid rain, deforestation, overpopulation and toxic waste are all global issue which require an appropriately global response. It is big in terms of the range of problems and issues air pollution, water pollution, noise pollution, waste disposal radioactivity, pesticides, countryside protection, conservation of wildlife the list is virtually endless. ” 6
[ II ]
Decisions of the Hon’ble Apex Court on the subject with regard to obtaining of EC and violation of its conditions:––
The law on the subject with regard to obtaining of EC and violation of its conditions are elaborately discussed in the First Report for the State of Odisha .
However, it is to state here that:––
(i) Sustainable development is one of the means to achieve the object and purpose of the Act as well as the protection of ‘life’ under Article 21. Acknowledgment of this principle will breath new life into our environmental jurisprudence and constitutional resolve. Sustainable development could be achieved only by strict compliance of the directions under the Act. The object and purpose of the Act – “to provide for the protection and improvement of environment” could only be achieved by ensuring the strict compliance of its provisions. The concerned authorities by exercising its powers under the Act will have to ensure the acquiescence of sustainable development. Therefore, the provisions or conditions put forward by the Act need to be strictly complied with. Thus the power 7
under the Act cannot be treated as a power simpliciter, but it is a power coupled with duty. It is the duty of the State to make sure the fulfillment of conditions or direction under the Act. Without strict compliance, right to life under Article 21 could not be guaranteed and the purpose of the Act will also be defeated. The commitment to the conditions thereof is an obligation both under Article 21 and under the Act. (Ref.: N. D. Jayal and ors. versus Union of India and ors., [AIR 2004 SC 867])
(ii) The grant of lease for mining and approving of mining plan and the scheme by the Ministry of Mines, Government of India by itself does not empower that mining operation can be commenced. It cannot be accepted that by approving Mining Plan and Scheme by Ministry of Mines, Central Government is deemed to have approved mining and it can commence forthwith on such approval. Section 13 of the MMRD Act and the Rules made in exercise of powers under the said section, deal, inter alia, with the aspect of grant of mining of lease and not commencement of mining operations. Rules made under Section 18, however, deal with commencement of mining operations and steps required to be taken for protection of environment by preventing or controlling any pollution which may be caused by mining operations. A mining 8
lease holder is also required to comply with other statutory provisions such as Environment (protection) Act, 1986, Air (Prevention and control of Pollution) Act, 1981, The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980. Mere approval of the mining plan by Government of India, Ministry of Mines would not absolve the lease holder from complying with the other provisions . (Ref.: M. C. Mehta v. Union of India & Ors. [(2004) 12 SCC 118])
(iii) On the principle of sustainable development, no mining activity can be carried out without remedial measures taking place. For this purpose, it is necessary that environment impact assessment is done and the applications dealt with before any mining activity can be permitted. (Ref.: M. C. Mehta v/s. Union of India, I.A. No.1967 in I.A. No.1785 in Writ Petition (C) No.4677 of 1985 , dated 08.05.2009) 9
[ III ]
Non–compliance of Statutory Conditions/provisions
1. To comply with the EC conditions under various Acts and Rules, it is the prime duty of the concerned officers/authorities empowered under the provisions of the Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1974; the Air (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1981; the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and the Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991 along with their amendments and Rules to enforce the provisions of environmental laws and stipulated conditions of Environmental Clearance . At the same time the Deputy Directors/ mining officers at district level should ensure that mining do not commence without compliance of the conditions.
2. It is to be stated that the relevant provisions of the aforesaid Acts and Rules made thereunder have been discussed in detail in the First Report of the Commission for the State of Odisha.
3. It is worthwhile to highlight that when any lessee desires to operate / establish any mine, he has to mandatorily obtain prior Consents under the Water and Air Acts. If any mining lease is operated or 10
established without having consents under the provisions of the Water Act, 1974; Air Act, 1981 and notification, it amounts to violation of the said provisions, attracting penal liability and individual liability for closure.
4. Further, when a party desires to establish or set up certain undertakings, establishments or processes, such party is required to have certain prior permissions including ‘Consent to Establish’ and ‘Consent to Operate’ under the aforesaid two Acts and other permissions relating to Environmental Clearance under the Environment Protection Act, Forest Clearance under Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, permissions from local authorities, such as, the Municipality, the Corporation, the Planning and Development Authority under the Town and Country Planning Act, Panchayat Body under the Panchayat Raj Act, so on and so forth, as the case may be, wherever applicable.
5. In addition, whenever the party fails to obtain the requisite Consents from the Pollution Control Board under the Air and Water Acts or violates any condition imposed thereunder or does not comply with the conditions imposed by the Board in the Order of consent to operate, then the Pollution Control Board can prohibit / issue closure 11
directions in terms of Law or even withdraw/ revoke the Order of Consent and also initiate prosecution against such lessees.
Allowing to continue and non initiation of prosecution against the violators (lessees) has caused fear free atmosphere and opened the doors for illegalities.
6. The Mines Department, being a competent authority to allow mining, is required to be satisfied that all the clearances/approvals are obtained by the lessee before operation of mining commences. The burden to ensure that the party has obtained all the necessary permissions for the purpose of carrying on or undertaking an activity, is an essential the duty of the State Government through the Department of Mines. Mines Department is required to ensure that no mining is carried out until all other permissions required under all other laws are obtained.
Further, the role of the respective District Collectors should also be examined by the Chief Secretary and action should be taken accordingly whether he has failed to exercise powers under the lease deed agreements. 12
7. Moreover, all other Authorities which are required to give individual permissions/clearances having regard to the provisions of their respective Acts and Rules under which they are set up and the kind and nature of the permissions/clearances required under those Acts and Rules, shall monitor matters arising within their own jurisdictions and are required to take action in case of failure to comply with the conditions.
Facts found from the record reveal that this has not been done by the concerned authorities. 13
[ IV ]
EIA Notification dated 27/01/1994 and Amendments.
1. At the outset, it is to be stated that various EIA Notifications, amendments made thereunder and Circulars issued by the Ministry of Environment and Forests, have already been quoted in the First Report of the Commission for the State of Odisha and therefore the same are not reiterated.
2. However, it is pertinent to state here that:––
(i) For mining of iron and manganese ores, in any new project or the expansion or modernization of any existing iron ore and manganese mining operations can not be undertaken without getting prior Environmental Clearance from MoEF under the EIA Notification dated 27/01/1994. That means, prior approval is a condition precedent and for its violation, action is required to be taken.
(ii) Even for modernization expansion of existing projects or activities, enhancement of production of likewise as stated in the EIA Notification 1994 and 2006 approval of the 14
Central Government is must. For this purpose, there should be –
(a) Environmental Impact Assessment Report;
(b) Environmental Management Plan;
(c) for Environment Impact Assessment, there should be public hearing; and
(d) Approval from MoEF for environmental clearance.
If the approval conditions are violated and approval is not obtained, the lease would liable to be closed with other consequential penalties/recoveries, etc. 15
[ V ]
Precautionary/Polluter Pays Principles
1. At the outset, it is to state here that:––
(i) the authority shall firstly implement the ‘Precautionary Principle’ so that there is no environmental damage;
(ii) the ‘Polluter Pays Principle’ should be the guideline for restoring the damage. In case of damage, polluter shall be directed to pay compensation for restoration of ecology and environment; and
(iii) the polluter should be directed to pay exemplary damages in cases of serious violations.
2. Nobody bothers to implement the laws namely “PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE” and “POLLUTER PAYS FOR THE POLLUTION”.
Polluter Pays Principle:–
Principle 16 of the Rio declaration states that:–
(i) “National authorities should endeavor to promote the internalization of environmental costs and the use of economic instruments, 16
taking into account the approach that the polluter should, in principle, bear the cost of pollution, with due regard to the public interest and without distorting international trade and investment.”
(ii) Further, “Polluter Pays Principle” means that once the activity carried out is hazardous or inherently dangerous, the person carrying on such activity is liable to make good the loss caused to any other person by his activity irrespective of the fact whether he took reasonable care while carrying on his activity or otherwise.
(iii) It is quite obvious that:–
(a) the object of the above principle was to make the polluter liable not only for the compensation to the victims but also for the cost of restoring of environmental degradation;
(b) the polluter is also liable to compensate for his act/s and to pay damages (compensation) for restoration of the environment and ecology and in both the cases, compensation should be of such 17
amount which would have deterrent effect;
(c) in addition to damages, the person guilty of causing pollution can also be held liable to pay exemplary damages so that it may be deterrent for others not to cause pollution in any manner [M. C. Mehta V. Kamla Nath , AIR 2000 SC 1997]
3. In view of the aforesaid, it is to state here that the measure of compensation must be co–related to the magnitude and capacity of the enterprise because such compensation must have a deterrent effect. The larger and more prosperous the enterprise, the greater must be the amount of compensation payable by it for the harm caused on account of an accident in the carrying on of the hazardous or inherently dangerous activity by the enterprise. (Ref.: M. C. Mehta & Anr. v/s. Union of India & Ors., [(1987) 1 SCC 395])
4. Further, in the cases where without obtaining Forest Clearance and/or Environmental Clearance, persons who were in possession of the mines, have extracted iron ore and manganese for the purpose of export and domestic consumption with greed of 18
super profits by evading applicable taxes. This has resulted in degradation of forest, pollution of water & air, Rivers and connecting rivulets. In such cases, the lessees / middlemen have earned billions of rupees at the cost of national non–renewal assets.
It has been observed that illegal and non sustainable mining is one of the most heinous unpardonable crimes of humen race to commit on mother earth.
5. Brief Summary
In view of the aforesaid Principles, it is apparent that neither the ‘Precautionary Principle’ nor the ‘ Polluter Pays Principle ’ is observed or thought over, while permitting extraction of iron ore/additional extraction in various mines in the State of Jharkhand. Nobody has bothered about it, while permitting the persons extracting the iron ore from the mines stated below.
(a) In the State of Jharkhand, in all 42 leases leases of iron and manganese ores are having the direct impact on the rivulets, nallas and tributaries which are joining to Koro, Koina and Sakaro Rivers as well as Kandi, Betlata and Katrogara Nallas . The list of the said 42 leases is enclosed herewith as Annexure: I . 19
(b) Out of 42 mining leases, 18 mining leases of Iron Ore and/or Manganese are not having Environmental Clearance. The list of the said 18 mining leases is enclosed as Annexure: II.
(i) Out of the aforesaid 18 leases, in 08 leases, iron ore was extracted , since the year 1993–94 to 2012–13. No EC has been obtained till date. The list of the said 08 mining leases is enclosed as Annexure: III .
(ii) Out of the aforesaid 18 leases, in 02 leases, manganese ore was extracted , since the year 1993–94 to 2012–13. No EC has been obtained till date . The list of the said 02 mining leases is enclosed as Annexure: IV.
(c) It is to state that out of 18 leases, from 06 leases, a quantity of 4,89,201.23 MT (as per DMG data) of iron ore has been extracted illegally without having lawful authority (since no EC was obtained). The list of such 06 mining leases is enclosed herewith as Annexure: V.
All such production is to be considered as illegal and without lawful authority. The market value for iron and manganese ores is 20
required to be recovered under Section 21(5) of the MM(DR) Act, 1957.
(d) There are 24 leases wherein much delayed environmental clearance under EIA Notification has been obtained. The list of the said 24 leases is enclosed as Annexure: VI.
(i) Out of the aforesaid 24 leases, in 19 leases (delayed EC was obtained), iron ore is extracted . The list of the said 19 leases is enclosed as Annexure: VII .
(ii) Out of the aforesaid 24 leases, in 04 leases, manganese ore is extracted . The list of the said 04 leases is enclosed as Annexure: VIII .
(e) It is to state that out of 24 leases, in 20 leases, extraction of ore (iron / manganese) have been taken place since 27.01.1994. The lessees have obtained delayed EC under EIA Notification which is taken into consideration. The quantity of (as per DMG data) 11,87,81,132.183 MT of iron ore and 1,30,448.686 MT of manganese ore have been extracted illegally without having lawful authority (either there was no EC obtained for the period or when obtained, the excess quantity of ore was extracted above the limit 21
fixed by MoEF as per EC approvals). The list of such 20 leases is enclosed as Annexure: IX .
All such production is considered as illegal and without lawful authority. The market value for iron and manganese ores is required to be recovered under Section 21(5) of the MM(DR) Act, 1957.
(f) 18 leases of iron and/or manganese ores have been running under deemed extension and carrying out production in violation of EIA Notifications, 1994 and 2006, without having EC under EIA Notifications .
Further, 22 leases of iron and/or manganese ores have been running under deemed extension and carrying out production in violation of EIA Notifications, 1994 and 2006, with having obtained delayed E.C .
So, overall 40 leases are/were working under deemed extension and doing production in violation of EIA Notifications, 1994 and 2006. The list of the said 40 leases is enclosed as Annexure: X.
As per submission dated 18.05.2011 [Para: 7 (m)] made by the Ministry of Mines, Government of India to this Commission, the 22 leases operated under deemed extension without statutory clearance under EIA notification dated 27.01.1994 and amendments therein for environmental clearance is considered as illegal. Action should be initiated to recover the value equivalent to market value as per Section 21(5) of MM(DR) Act, 1957. The said para, inter–alia , reads as under:–
“Illegal mining ” means:–
“7(m) Mining operations taken under a mining lease which validly is deemed to be extended under provisions of Rule 24A of Mineral Concession Rules, 1960, due to delay of State Government to take a decision on renewal of the mining lease in the stipulated time even after the renewal application has been filed timely, but without the necessary fresh environmental and forest clearances (on account of specific provisions of Forest (Conservation) Act, Environmental Impact Assessment Notification etc., whose provisions do not explicitly recognize deemed extension of mining lease and 23
where separate specific approvals may be necessary). ”
Therefore, totally, 26 lessees of iron and manganese ores are/were noted doing production without lawful authority, as reported in Annexures: V and IX (which includes 40 leases running under deemed extension also) in violation of EIA Notifications, 1994 and 2006.
Hence, an approximate quantity of 11,92,70,333.413 MT iron ore for an approximate value of Rs.144,03,38,95,307/– (i.e. approx. 14,403 crores) and an approximate quantity of 1,30,448.686 MT of manganese ore for an approximate value of Rs.138,08,96,398/– (i.e. approx. Rs.138 crores) is extracted illegally and without lawful authority. The said amount should be recovered from the lessees under Section 21(5) of the MM(DR) Act, 1957.
It is stated here that the illegal production estimated herein is exclusively based on violations of Environmental Clearance under EIA Notifications. Further, other factors such as consent to operate, 24
production without mining plan/scheme, FC Clearance etc. are not taken into consideration. Value of illegal production would increase, if the said factors are taken into consideration.
(g) 04 leases of iron and/or manganese ores are such where diversion permission u/s. 2 of Forest Conservation Act, 1980 was granted subject to E.C. but without EC, the lessee of the respective mine has been allowed to operate the mining in violation of the conditions stated therein. The list of the said 04 leases is enclosed as Annexure: XI.
(h) There are 02 leases of iron and/or manganese ores wherein E.C. was granted without having obtained Forest Clearance which is in violation of Circular No.J–11015/12/94–IA. II(M), dated 17.06.1996 issued by MoEF, GoI. The list of the said 02 leases is enclosed as Annexure: XII .
(i) During approval for EC by MoEF, certain conditions for protection of wildlife and conservation of habitat, etc. were stipulated in 24 leases of iron and/or manganese ores.
To what extent, such conditions have been complied with require verification by a 25
team of experts and follow up actions should be taken by MoEF. The list of 24 leases , wherein such conditions are imposed, is enclosed as Annexure: XIII.
(j) 01 lease of iron Ore is such where Environmental Clearance has been accorded without stipulating any condition for wildlife protection. The list of the said 01 lease is enclosed as Annexure: XIV.
(k) 26 leases of iron and/or manganese ores were/are running in violation of EP Act, 1986 and Rules framed thereunder because such leases have not obtained EC and made excess production (production beyond the limit fixed by MoEF) in violation of Notifications dated 27.01.1994 & 14.02.2006 and Circular dated 12.02.2002 issued by MoEF. Therefore, action is required to be taken under Section 21(5) of MM(DR) Act, 1957 and also under Section 19 of E.P. Act, 1986 in all such cases which is given in this Chapter, as Annexures: V and IX . The list of the said 26 leases is enclosed as Annexure: XV .
(l) Further, difference of year–wise total production of Iron Ore as per DMG and IBM data for the years 1993–94 to 2011–12 is 26 enclosed as Annexure: XVI. Out of 20 years from 1993–94 to 2011–12, in two years i.e. 1997–98 and 2005–06, the production of Iron Ore as per DMG data was more than that of IBM data. As per IBM data and DMG data from the years 1993–94 to 2011–12, the total production of iron ore was 326.21 Million Metric Tonnes and 295.59 Million Metric Tonnes respectively. Hence, there is the difference of 53.41 Million Metric Tonnes for the said period (Annexure: XVI) . It appears that the production of iron reported by IBM is about 24 percent more as compared to DMG production during this period. So, it seems that lessees are showing less production to DMG. Hence, royalty is required to be recovered by the State Government (DMG). Therefore, it is presumed that royalty for this under reporting production was not paid by the lessee. This ore might have been sold to the nearby illegally operated crusher holders and ultimately exported or consumed locally. The mineral value of such difference of quantity of ore comes about to Rs.86,85,22,03,984=00 .
Further, difference of lease–wise total production of iron ore as per DMG and IBM 27
data for the years 1993–94 to 2012–13 is enclosed as Annexure: XVII . It indicates that leases at Sr. Nos.1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 15, 21, 22, 24, 26 and 27 are not included in total production difference of Iron Ore, as production figures as per DMG was more than that of IBM.
6. Apart from the aforesaid facts, the District Collectors or Deputy Commissioner or equivalent who were the signatories of mining lease deed agreements and also a competent authority under Section 19 of the E.P. Act, 1986 in Jharkhand State, are directly responsible for allowing the mining leases operations after expiry of lease period wherein lessees were not having statutory approvals under all the connected Acts, Rules, guidelines, orders and others mainly under EIA notification dated 27.01.1994 and FCA.
The Deputy Directors or equivalent of Mines Department who were issuing authority of mineral dispatch permits and guardians on behalf of State for management, administration, regulation, control and others for mines under the relevant Acts, Rules, guidelines, orders and others are also equally responsible for allowing mining operations by issuing dispatch mineral permits, even if the lessees are not having approvals and entitlement under the 28
EIA Notification dated 27.01.1994 and amendments, EP Act, 1986 and Rules, FC Act, 1980 and others.
7. There is flagrant misuse of Rule 24A(6) of MCR, 1960 (as amended on 27.09.1994) during the deemed extension of lease period without obtaining the Environmental Clearance under EIA Notification dated 27.01.1994 and Amendments therein and prior approvals under FC Act, 1980 for diversion of forest land for non forestry purpose which have resulted into serious illegal mining by extracting millions of tonnes of iron and manganese ores. The lessee can’t do mining, if obligatory approvals under relevant Acts, Rules and Notifications are not obtained by him, though whatever reasons it could have been there.
The Commission has observed that during the period (mainly after 2000 to 2009) the rate of royalty per MT iron ore was very meager, hence, the lessees had gained windfall profits. During the deemed extension when unlawful mining was carried out, the loss to the State is required to be compensated by recovery of value equivalent to market rate or export rate whichever is applicable in individual cases with exemplary penalty after following due course of law. 29
[ VI ]
Summary Observations
A. In short, the Commission has observed that:–
(i) There is violation of EC conditions. EC conditions are required to be strictly complied for the benefit of the society. Its non implementation is health hazardous which may on occasion violate right to life, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Further, it affects the natural ecosystem as well as it pollutes water and air.
(ii) Without EC, 18 mines are operating and, therefore, “Precautionary Principle”, for environmental damage, eco–system and river water, is not implemented.
(iii) Nine Rivers and its tributaries are being polluted and the water is allocated to the different industries without making any proper arrangement for supplying drinking water to the villagers.
(iv) Actions, which are required to be taken under the Water Pollution Act and Air Pollution Act, 30
are not taken by the competent authority. The relevant Acts provide for prosecution and/or closure of mines. Action should be initiated without loss of time.
(v) Action should be taken for all points discussed in this chapter. (They are not repeated here).
B. From the decisions and directions issued by the Apex Court and the Notifications issued by the MoEF, in short, it can be stated that:–
1. It has been repeatedly held that the right to life is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India and it includes the right to enjoyment of pollution–free water and air for full enjoyment of life. The protection of this right is directly linked with clean environment.
Secondly, it is the duty of the State and citizens to improve the natural environment, including forests, lakes, rivers and wildlife, and to have compassion for living creatures. This would require that habitats of wildlife should not be disturbed; river/lake–water and air should not be polluted. (Articles 48A and 51A(g) of the Constitution) 31
2. Before carrying out any mining operation, Comprehensive Environmental Management Plans must be formulated to the satisfaction of, and got approved from, the Ministry of Environment & Forests in a time bound manner.
3. Development strategy should be such that it caters the needs of the present without negotiating the ability of upcoming generations to satisfy their needs. The strict observance of sustainable development will put us on a path that ensures development while protecting the environment, a path that works for all peoples and for all generations.
Development strategy should not be only for the growth of GNP, that too by finishing the natural resources like minerals, forest and others in short period.
4. The natural resources like air, water and soil minerals, forest and others should be utilized judiciously with utmost care, if the utilization results in irreversible damage to environment. There has been accelerated degradation of environment primarily on account of lack of effective enforcement of environmental 32
laws and non–compliance of the statutory norms.
Mankind is a part of nature and life depends on the uninterrupted functioning of natural systems which ensure the supply of energy and nutrients (The World Charter for Nature).
5. The regulatory authorities have to act with utmost care in ensuring compliance of safeguards, norms and standards to be observed by such entrepreneurs. When questioned, the regulatory authorities have to show that the said authorities acted in a manner enjoined upon by them. Wherever the regulatory authorities, either connive or act negligently by not taking prompt action to prevent, avoid or control the damage to environment, natural resources and peoples’ life, health and property, the principles of accountability for restoration and compensation have to be applied.
6. If illegal activity is allowed to go ahead, there may be irreparable damage to the environment and if it is stopped, there may be irreparable damage to economic interest. In case of doubt, 33
however, protection of environment would have precedence over the economic interest. Precautionary principle requires anticipatory action to be taken to prevent harm. The harm can be prevented even on a reasonable suspicion. It is not always necessary that there should be direct evidence of harm to the environment.
7. A mining lease holder is also required to comply with other statutory provisions such as Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, Air (Prevention and control of Pollution) Act, 1981, Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980. Mere approval of the mining plan by Government of India, Ministry of Mines (IBM) would not absolve the lease holder from complying with the other provisions.
8. The aforesaid measures are not required to remain only on paper but should be strictly complied with in practice at field for the protection of environment and control of pollution as a result and consequence of mining operations. 34
9. The mining activity can be permitted only on the basis of sustainable development and on compliance of stringent conditions.
10. Violation of any of the conditions and provisions of law would entail the risk of cancellation of mining lease. The mining activity shall continue only on strict compliance of the stipulated conditions.
11. Sustainable development could be achieved only by strict compliance of the directions under the Act. The object and purpose of the E.P. Act – “to provide for the protection and improvement of environment” could only be achieved by ensuring the strict compliance of its directions and provisions therein.
12. The decision–making process of MoEF shall be fair, fully informed and based on the correct principles, and free from any bias or restraint.
Notification dated 27.01.1994 specifically provides that if EC is granted on the basis of false data, false information, false recommendation or decision, EC is required to be cancelled. 35
The Supreme Court, in M. C. Mehta v. Union of India & Ors. [(2004) 12 SCC 118], has held that in such cases, EC is to be cancelled. Action should be taken for all such leases pointed out by the Commission.
13. The fullest disclosures including the potential for increased burdens on the environment consequent upon possible increase in the quantum and degree of pollution, has to be made at the outset so that public and all those concerned including authorities may decide whether the permission can at all be granted for carrying on mining activity or otherwise.
14. In cases where environmental clearance is required for a project on forest land, the forest clearance shall be obtained before the grant of the environment clearance.
15. The Apex Court has issued the guidelines so that fait accompli situations do not recur .
16. Without strict compliance, right to life under Article 21 could not be guaranteed and the purpose of the Act will also be defeated. The commitment to the conditions thereof is an obligation both under Article 21 and under the Act. 36
17. The Apex Court has made it clear that by issuance of such circulars, MoEF had not intended to legalise the commencement or continuance of mining activity without compliance of stipulations of the notification. In any case, a statutory notification cannot be set at naught by issue of circular. It will also not absolve the lessee from the violations committed in past under the then existing law.
18. The definition of ‘sustainable development’ which Brundtland gave more than 3 decades back still holds good. The phrase covers the development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of the future generation to meet their own needs.
19. The grant of permission for mining and approving mining plan and the scheme by the Ministry of Mines, Government of India (IBM) by itself does not mean that mining operation can commence.
20. The primary duty was to the community and that duty took precedence. In such cases, the obligation to the society must predominate over the obligation to the individuals. 37
21. It is also clarified that:–
(i) The Court could review the decision– making process to ensure that the decision of MoEF is fair and fully informed, based on the correct principles, and free from any bias or restraint.
(ii) The Court has declared that the National Forest Policy, 1988 which lays down far– reaching principles must necessarily govern the grant of permissions under Section 2 of the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 as the same provides the road map to ecological protection and improvement under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986. The principles/ guidelines mentioned in the National Forest Policy, 1988 should be read as part of the provisions of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 read together with the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980.
(iii) Development strategy should be such that environment is protected. Environment should be protected not only for present generation but is bequeathed to the future generation. Therefore, policy should be in such a way that development is not related only to the growth of GNP but health and life of citizens as well as non– disturbance of ecosystem. 38
C. The aforesaid facts establish disregard, nay, contempt for law and lawful authorities on the part of some among the emerging breed of entrepreneurs, taking advantage, as they do, of the country's need for industrialisation and export earnings. Pursuit of profit has absolutely drained them of any feeling for fellow human beings – for that matter, for anything else. And the law seems to have been helpless.
D. Streamline the system:–
It appears that there is system failure in implementing and ignoring the law. Such instances which have led many people in this country to believe that disregard of law pays and that the consequences of such disregard will never be visited upon them–particularly, if they are personalities with means. It appears that such strong words are also not sufficient to streamline the system failure. For this, strict actions are required to be taken against the persons who have failed to discharge their duties and non compliance of law.
Hence, action should be taken against all concerned as discussed in this Chapter by following due process of law.
* * * Annexture-I Total number of Leases of Iron and Manganese Ores adjacent or nearby perennial rivers / streams causing pollution and adversly effecting the natural habitat and other details. Total Sr. Name of Lessee FC approval Distance from River / Distance from River / Area in ECApproval NO & Lease (Yes Or No) stream (As per Google) stream (As per EC) (ha.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 1M/ s Kamaljeet 250.76 EC not NO The karo river IS flowing NOEC Singh Ahluwalia obtained along the mine lease Baraiburu boundary in the east I Tatiba Mines direction. Besides this I other seasonal nal1ah are I also flowing in the lease cu boundary. 10 2 M/s Kamaljeet 129.5 EC not No.10/163/ The karo river IS flowing NOEC Singh Ahluwalia obtained FCE along the rrune lease Baraiburu dt.28.04.199 boundary in the east Tatiba Mines 8 direction. Besides this (01.05.1998) other seasonal nallah are (2.03) also flowing in the lease boundary. 3 Shri Vijaykumar 21.19 J- Non Forest The Barabaljori o Smt. Mitra 20.07 EC not No.10 A seasonal nallah flowing in NO EC Ghose/ shri obtained 151/FCE the southem side of mining Samir kumar dt.l9.05.199 lease. Chose 7 110.0561 ~ 6 Shri Khatau 30.857 EC not Non Forest A perenial nallah flowing NO EC o Liladhar obtained area NS through the minmg Thakkar leasae. 7 Shri Nirmal 149.17 J-11015/1:J/ No. 10 Karo river is flowing at a Karo river is 2.75 krn Kumar, Pradip 201O-IA 11(10,1) 119/FEC distance of 1.2 km east east and Koina river is Kumar dt. 21.12.2012 dt.l4.07.199 and Koina at 6 km west to 7.5 km NW MLA 5 (13.96) the mine lease area. There 149.7343 are several seasonal nallah I ha. in and around the mining l lease. Total Sr. Name of Lessee FC approval Distance from River I Distance from River I I Area in EC Approval NO & Lease (Yes Or No) stream (As per Google) stream (As per EC) I (ha.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 T P Sao, 202.3;:' EC not NO There are several seasonal NOEC Ghatkuri. obtained. nallah in and around the mining lease. 9 Rungta Mines 122.02 J-l1015/5961 NO The katrogara nallah and The katrogara nalalah Ltd.Merelgara- 2007-lA.ll(M) Only 1.11 ha Betia Nallah are flowing in and Betia Nallah are Barabaljori Iron dated. forest Land the buffer zone of the mine, flowing m the buffer &, Manganese 20.082008 at adistance of 700 m south zone of th ermrie, at Ore Mining south east and 1 km west adistance of 700 m Project from the lease boundary. south-south east and 2 ..... ~ The karo Nadi is flowing at km west from the lease a distance of 9 km west of boundary. The karo I the mine lease. Nadi IS flowing at a distance of 10 km west of the mine lease. 10 Mis R Mcdill &, 110.08 EC not NO There are several seasonal NO EC Co.Pvt.Ltd. obtained nallah in and around the I mining lease. L Total Sr. Name of Lessee FC approval Distance from River / Distance from River / Area in EC Approval NO & Lease (Yes Or No) stream (As per Google) stream (As per EC) (ha.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 11 M/s.Rameshwar 259 J No.10(21)2 The karo Nadi is flowing at The karo river, the koin Jute Mill Ltd., 11015/1147/ 2000-FC(pt) a distance of 60m west of ariver and the Sarako Baraiburu 2007-IA.Il(M) dt.ll.12.200 the mine lease. In addition river are flowing in the Tatiba Iron are dated 9 (23.233) the Lirnture nallah IS buffer zone of mine at & Manganese 1504.2011 located adjucent to the adistance of 1 km, 6.2 are Mining mine boundary at adistance km and 8.2 km Project of 0.1 km. respectively from the mine lease boundary. In addition the Limture ~ nallah IS located tv adjucent to the mine boundary at adistance of 01 km. 12 Revti Raman 33.7 EC not Non Forest There are pereriial nallah NOEC Prasad and obtained area flowing all around the mine Anand Vardhan lease. Prasasd Total Sr. Name of Lessee FC approval Distance from River I Distance from River I Area in EC Approval NO & Lease (Yes Or No) stream (As per Google) stream (As per EC} [ha.] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 13 Singhbhum 141.64 EC not NO The Betlata nallah and the The Betlata nallah and Minerals Co. obtained Karo river are flowing in the the Karo nver are buffer zone of rrune at flowing In the buffer adistance of 1.3 km east zone of rnrne at and 5 km west respectively adistance of 2.5 km from the rrune lease east and 6 kID west boundary. There several respectively from the seasonal nallah flowing mine lease boundary westerly from the eastern ,J:o. boundary of the lease. eM 14 M/s.SAIL, 51295 J-11015/2:>11 No 8 The koin ariver and the The koina arrver and Dhobil Iron Ore 2009-IAJI(M) 20j1998/FC Hamsadagaar Nallah are the Hamsadagaar Mining Project ( dated. dt flowing in the buffer zone of Nallah are flowing In Manoharpur 24.01.2012 21/1Oj1998 mine at adistance of 3.00 the buffer zone of mine Block) km. at adistance of 3.25 km and 3.4 kID respectively from the mine lease boundary. Total SName of Lessee ~approval Distance from River I Distance from River I I Area in NO & Lease EC Approval (Yes Or No) stream (As per Google) stream (As per EC) (ha.) I 2 3 4 5 6 7 15 Rungta Mines 1388:> J-llOI5/1981 No.8 The karo river and the The karo river and the Ltd. 2006-IA.Il(M) 63/19991 FC koina ariver are located at a koina ariver are located Ghatkuri Iron dated dt.18.06.20 1 distance of 1.5 km and at a distance of 1.9 kill Ore Minig 15.04.2008 1 (31.319) 5.75 km respectively. and 6 kID respectively. Project andJ 11015/57/20 10-IA.II(M] dated 22.05.2013 ~ ~ 16 Mis General 15578 EC not NO There are several seasonal NOEC Produce Ltd. (70.68) obtained nallah originating from the Karampada Iron rrune lease and draining Ore Mines towards north. 17 Shri Khushal 31.97 EC not NO A season nallah passes NOEC Arjun Rathor obtained through the lease boundary 18 M/s.SAlL, Gua 13.76 EC not NO The karo river is located at NO EC Ore Mines Gua. obtained a distance of 6 kill frill the TopaiIore mine lease Total Sr. Name of Lessee FC approval Distance from River 1 Distance from River 1 Area in EC Approval NO & Lease (Yes Or No) stream (As per Google) stream (As per EC) [ha.] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 19 Singhbhum 265.88 EC not No.lO- Seasonal nallahs NO EC Minerals co. obtained 156/FCE originating from the mine Khasjamda Iron dt.13/25.11. lease draining towards NW & Manganese 1997 (18.69) Ore Mining Project (Transfer in the name of Ram Minerals Co.) ~ CI1 20 Shri Anilkumar 22.53 J 12(21)5/2002 The Betlata nallah IS The Betlata nallah J Khirval- Balaji l1015fl42/2 FCE located in the buffer zone of located III the buffer Iron Ore Mining 007-1A.ll (M) dt.03.08200 the mine at a distance of zone of the mine at a Project. dated 9 (8.242) 1.5 km west from the mine distance of 1.5 km west 13.04.2011 lease boundary. The karo from the mille lease river is out side the buffer boundary. The karo zone at a distance of 15 km rrver IS out side the from the mine lease buffer zone at a distance of 15 km from L L the mine lease Total Sr. Name of Lessee FC approval Distance from River / Distance from River / Area in EC Approval NO & Lease (Yes Or No) stream (As per Google) stream (As per EC) (ha.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 21 M/s Shah 233.89 J No.8 There are several seasonal Not mentioned Brothers 11015/24/20 127/2002 nal1ah originating from tme Karampada 1~6n 06-1A.1I(M) /FC mine lease draining Ore Mining dated dt.19.05.200 towards NW. The karo river Project 23.01.2007 5 (24.856) flowing 3.75 kID SE from the lease boundary. 22 M/ s Misri1a1 202.3 J- No.8 The karo river is located at The karo river is located Jain &. Sons. - 11015/318/2 89/2005-FC a distance of 1.5 km from at a distance of 1.8 km Karampada Iron 006-IA.1I(M) dt.27.07.200 the lease boundary m the from the lease .j::l. 0\ Ore Mining dated 7(49.195) eastern side. boundarv. Proiect 11 S.12.200S 23 M/s Devkabai 46.62 J No. 10 The karo river is flowing in The karo river is flowing Ve1ji - Ajitburu 11015/377/2 219/FCE the buffer zone of mine at a m the buffer zone of Iron and 007-IAJ1 (M) dt.O 1.01.200 distance of 1.5 km from mine at a distance of Manganese Ore dated. 3 (15.57) the lease boundary m the 4.5 km from the lease Mining Project 16.01.2009 No.1O-219/ eastern side. boundary. FCE-1 dt. 10.04.2007 (15.57) and No.10 219/FCE-1 dt.26.05.20 1 {)f1C::O/lt::\ Total Sr. Name of Lessee FC approval Distance from River / Distance from River / Area in EC Approval NO & Lease (Yes Or No) srream (As per Google) stream (As per EC) [ha.] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 24 Shri Chandra 57.47 EC not Non Forest There IS perenial nallah NOEC Prasasd Sharda, obtained area flowing within the lease Itarbaljori area in the nothern side of the lease boundary 25 M/s.SAIL, 879.43 J No.8 Seasonal nallahs Not Mentioned Meghahatuburu 11015/5/200 57/2004/ FC originating from the mine Iron Ore Mine 6-LA..II (M) dt. 1104.200 lease draining towards NW Project lease-II dated 5 (55.9) Railway siding & 27.12.2006 ,J:o. "'l plant (Area 3949.47 combined with 3 other lease of Sail i.e.j l] 1936.14 (2) 879.43 and (3) 8197 hal Total Sr. Name of Lessee FC approval Distance from River / Distance from River / Area in EC Approval NO & Lease (Yes Or No) stream (As per Google) stream (As per EC) [ha.] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 26 M/s.SAIL, 81.97 . J No. 8 Seasonal nallahs Not Mentioned Meghahatuburu 11015/5/200 97/2001-FC originating from the mine Iron Ore Mine 6-IA.l! (M) dt.08.12.200 lease draining towards NW Project lease-I! dated 3 No.8 Tailing dam 27.12.2006 19/2005 FC (Area 3949.47 dt combined with 11.04.2005 3 other lease (24:23) of Sail. i.e.(I) ~ 1936.14 (2) 00 879.43 and (3) 81.97 hal 27 Revti Raman 62.43 EC not Non Forest There IS aperenial nallah NOEC Prasad and obtained area passes through the lease Anand Vardhan boundary. Prasasd Total Sr. Name of Lessee FC approval Distance from River / Distance from River / Area in EC Approval NO & Lease (Yes Or No) stream (As per Google) stream (As per EC) (ha.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 28 M/s Usha 155.08 J No. The karo nver and the The karo river and the Martin Ltd. 11015/48/20 12/(21)51/04 koiria river are flowing in koina river are flowing Vijay-II Iron Ore o1-IA.II(M) /FCE the buffer zone of the mine in the buffer zone of the Mine - Ghatkuri dated dt at a distance of 1 Ian and 5 mine at a distance of 1 19.04.2005, J 12.07.2005 krn respectively. In addition km and 5 km 11015/507/ (29.4648) number of seasonal nal1a respectively. In addition 2007-IA.II(M) And originate from the hill top number of seasonal dated No.8 and drained towards the nalla originate from the 22.12.2008 88/2007 - Karo river in the east side hill top and drained FC(pt) ~ and J and Koina river in the west towards the Karo river 10 11015/306/2 dt.25.02.201 side. in the east side and 009-IA.II 1M) 1 (29.4648) Koina river in the west dated side. 17.12.2009 Total Sr. Name of Lessee FC approval Distance from River / Distance from River / Area in EC Approval NO & Lease (Yes Or Nol stream (As per Google) stream (As per EC) (ha.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 29 M/s.SAIL, 823.83 J No.08 The Hamsagar nallah IS The Hamsagar nallah is Marioharpur 11015/249/2 251/1987/F located in the buffer zone of located In the buffer Iron Ore Mine 009-IA.ll(M) C the mine at a distance of I zone of the mine at a Chiriya Dt.23.03.2011 dt.l5/12/19 km. The Koina nver IS distance of I km. The (Maclilan 87 has flowing in the buffer zone at Koiria river is flowing in Budhaburu Iron expired a distance of 3 km from the the buffer zone at a Ore Mines) (635.986) mine lease. distance of 3.1 km from Stage -I the rrune lease. The clearance karo river flowing en No.8 outside of buffer zone at o 70/2009-FC a distance of 12 km dt.09.03.20 I from the mine I boundary. 30 Shri Anindita 47.15 J- Non Forest The Betalata nalla of The Betalata nalla of Traders & 11015/82/20 area seasonal nature flow seasonal nature flow Investment Ltd. 08-IA.I1 (M) adjucent to the mine lease adjucent to the mine Parambaljori dated area at a distance of 150 m lease area at -a distance Iron and 1502.2012 . Two tributaries of Betalata of 150 m Two Manganese Ore nallah are passing through tributaries of Betalata Mining Project the mme lease area In nallah are passmg] WNW and east direction through the mine lease area in WNW and east L-L direction Total Sr. Name of Lessee FC approval Distance from River I Distance from River I Area in EC Approval NO & Lease (Yes Or No) stream (As per Google) stream (As per EC) [ha.] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 31 Mis Orissa 275.19 J No.8/76/199 The karo river and the The karo river and the Manganese and 11015/488/2 9/FC koina river are flowing in koina river are flowing Minerals Pvt. 007-IA.ll (M) dt.21.10.200 the buffer zone of the mine in the buffer zone of the Ltd. Ghatkuri dated 8 (141.447) at a distance of 70m and mine at a distance of 1 Iron Ore Mining 20.02.2009 west direction respectively. km and west direction Project andJ In addition a number of respectively. In addition 11015/12/20 seasonal nalla originate a number of seasonal 09 IA.ll (M) from the hill top and nalla originate from the dated drained towards the Karo hill top and drained CII 15.04.2010 river ill the east side m towards the Karo river .... different places m lower m the east side m elevation. different places in lower elevation. 32 M/s General 163.90 EC not NO The Koina river is flowing NO EC Produce Ltd. obtained 1.20 km west of the lease Karampada Iron boundary. Ore Mines 33 Padamkumar 41639 EC not Non Forest Image not Available NO EC Jain (Rajabera) obtained area Total Sr. Name of Lessee FC approval Distance from River / Distance from River / Area in EC Approval NO & Lease (Yes Or No) stream (As per Google) stream (As per EC) [ha.] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 34 M/s.SAIL 1936.1 J No.8 Seasonal nallahs Not Mentioned Meghatuburu 11015/5/200 69/1991- dt originating from the mine Iron Ore Mine . 6-IA.II (M) 01.08.1996 lease draining towards NW Project Iease-I dated (608.06) Mining Area 27.12.2006 And (Area 3949.47 No.8-96/97 combined with -FC 3 other lease dL01.12.199 of Sail. i.e.(l) 7 (24.0) en 1936.14 (2) And Fno.8 lIJ 879.43 and (3) 97/2001-Fc 81.97 hal dt 08.12.2003 ( 8.7) And No.8 69/1991-FC (pt) dL29.03.201 0(644.26) And F No.8 537/1998-FC (pt) dt.18.10.201 I Total Sr. Name of Lessee FC approval Distance from River I Distance from River I Area in EC Approval NO & Lease (Yes Or No) stream (As per Google) stream (As per EC) (ha.) I 2 3 4 5 6 7 35 M/s.SAIL, Gua 30.43 EC not No.10-1441 The Karo and Koina Rivers NOEC are Mines obtained FCE are flowing at adostance of Gua,Jilingburu- dt.l1.06.199 50 mand 300m respectively II 8 (8.958) 36 M/s.SAIL, Gua 210.44 EC not Yes FC dt The Karo and Koina Rivers NOEC are Mines obtained 23/11/2000 are flo~ing at adostance of Gu a,Jilingburu- No 8 50 mand 300m respectively I 75/1998/FC C1I 37 M/s.SAIL, Gua 1443.8 J-IIOI5/4::>31 No.8 The Karo and Koina Rivers The Karo river (Ikm), (..) are Mines 2008-IA. II(M) 251/1986/F are flowing at adostance of The Koina rivers (4.5 Gua,Duaruibur dt. 25.03.2013 C 50 m and 300m km) and the Sarako 1.1 Mines MLA 15/12/1987 respectively flyer (6.5 km) are 1443.756 ha. has expired reported to be located in the buffer zone of lrrrin p Total Sr. Name of Lessee FC approval Distance from River / Distance from River / Area in EC Approval NO & Lease (Yes Or No) stream (As per Google) stream (As per EC) (ha.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 38 M/s.SAIL, 609-57 J No.08 The koina rrver IS flowing The koina river and the Manoharpur 11015/247/2 70/2009/FC 7km east and one of the Koli river are flowing in Iron Ore Mine 009-IA. II(M) dt.07/03/20 Koina tributary flowing 1.5 the buffer zone of the at Chiriya dt. 10.06.2013 11 over km in the south from the a distance of 7 km and [Sukriluturburu MLA - 609.554 33.400 mine lease boundarv. 9km respectively from Iron Ore Mines) ha. ha.Stage -1 the rnrne lease clearance boundary. The No.8 Hamsadaagar Nallah is 70/2009-FC reported to flow in the dt.09.03.201 buffer vzone of mine at en ~ 1 adistance of 3.i km from the mme lease boundary. Total Sr. Name of Lessee FC approval Distance from River / Distance from River / Area in EC Approval NO & Lease (Yes Or No) stream (As per Google) stream (As per EC) (ha.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 39 M/s.SAIL. 323.83 J No.08 The Hemsadaggar (one of The karo river and the Ajitaburu Iron 11015/505/2 70/2009/FC the koina tributary) passes koel river are flowing Ore Mining 007 lA.lI(M) dt.07/03/20 throuhg the norther out side the buffer zone Project dt.3J.03.2011 11 over boundary of lease. The of the rnrne at a (Manoharupur 153.036 ha. Koiria river is flowing 3.6 distance of 10.25 krn Block) Chiria Stage -1 km NE from the mine lease. and 10.5 km clearance respectively. In addition No.8 ·the Koiria river IS 70/2009-FC flowing m the buffer en dt.09.03.20 1 zone ata distance of 3.6 en 1 km from the mine lease boundary. The Hemsadaggar Nallah is reported to flow adjucent to mine lease boundary. Total Sr. Name of Lessee FC approval Distance from River / Distance from River / Area in EC Approval NO & Lease (Yes Or No) stream (As per Goog1e) stream (As per EC) [ha.] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 40 M/s. Tata Iron 1160.4 J No.8-279/85 The Balijore nal1ah IS The Balijore nallah IS &, Steel Co.Ltd. 11015/49/20 FC within the mine lease. In within the mine lease. Noamundi Iron 03 lAIl (M) dt.23.04.199 addition. the Kundra In addition, the Kundra Mining Project dated 9 (346.49 nal1ah, Jojo n allah, nallah, JOJo nallah, 06.04.2005 and Mahadev Nal1ah are in the Mahadev Nallah are m and J No.8-279/85 buffer zone of the mme the buffer zone of the 11015/1.59/ FC (VoI.I) reported to be located at mine reported to be 2007 lA.Il (M) dt.06.11.200 adistance of 8 km, 1km. located at adistance of dated 7 (24.43) l nd 5km respectively from 8 krn, 1km. and 5km en 26.08.2008 the mine lease boundary. respectively from the 01 mme lease boundary. The Karo rrver and Baitarni nver are loacted at adistance of I I km and 7 km respectively. 41 Shri Nirmal 66.781 J-11015/32/ No. 10 Image not Available Not mentioned Kumar, Pradip 2007 lA.Il (M) 120/FCE Kumar- Bihar dated. dt.0307. 199 Iron Ore Mines 21.12.2012 6 (3 70) I Total Sr. Name ofLessee FC approval Distance from River / Distance from River / Area in EC Approval NO & Lease (Yes Or No) stream (As per Google) stream (As per Ee) [ha.] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 42 Shri I 8468 J No.8-17/95 The kande nallah is flowing The kande nallah IS Padarnkumar 11015/48/20 Fe at adistance of 250 m from flowing at adistance of Jain Thakurani 06 1AII (M) dt.29 10.199 the mine lease. ln addition 250 m from the mine Iron Ore Mining dated.24.09.2 6 (32.94) the Betalata nallah and lease. In addition the Project 008 Karo rrver flowing in the Betalata nallah and buffer zone of the mine at Karo river flowing in the a distance of 1.25 km and buffer zone of the mine 9.2 km WNW respectively. at a distance of 1.25 km and 92 km WNW respectively. en ~ 58 Annexure - II List of 18 Lessees who have not obtained EC under EIA Notification Sr Date of Expiry of Name of the Lessees and leases No. Lease Period 1 2 3 1 M/ s.SAIL, Manoharpur [ron Ore 31/05/1992 Mine Chiriy (Ankua Iron Ore Mines), Manoharpur (67.18) 2 Shri Khatau Liladhar Thakkar, 05/06/1973 Kumirt.a, Noamundi (30.84) 3 T P Sao, Ghatkuri RF, Noamundi 03/01/1993 1202.35\ 4 M/ s R Mcdill & Co. Kararnpada 06/10/1975 RF, Noarnundi (110.08) 5 Revti Raman Prasad and Anand 30/04/1996 Vardhan Prusasd, Itarbaljori. Noamundi 133.71 6 Singhbhum Minerals Co. 10/12/1996 Karampada RF, Noarrrundi 11141.64\ 7 M/s General Produce Ltd. 12/10/2006 Kararnpada Iron Ore Mines Block No. 15, Manoharpur Ifl55.781 8 Shri Khushal AIJun Rathor, 10/11/1999 Noamundi PF, Noamundi (31.97) 9 M/s.SAIL, Gua Ore Mines Gua, 08/03/2000 Topailore, Noamundi (13.76) 10 Shri Chandra Prasasd, 28/07/2003 Itarbaljori, Noamundi (57.47) 11 Revti Raman Prasad and Anand 04/01/1984 Vardhan Prasasd, Meralgadha and Noamundi Noamundi 162.431 12 Padamkurnar Jain Rajabeda, 28/02/2008 Manoharpur (41.6391 13 M/s.SAIL, Gua Ore Mines Gua, 10/01/1981 Jilingburu-Il, Noamundi (30.43) 59 Sr Date of Expiry of Name of the Lessees and leases No. Lease Period 1 2 3 14 M/s.SAIL, Gua are Mines Gua, 24/03/1983 .Jilingburu-I, Noamuridi 1210.441 15 M/s Karnaljeet Singh Ahluwalia 04/07/1989 Baraiburu Tatiba Mines, ( Cancelled vide Letter Noamundi (250.763) No 272/2010 Date 27/08/2010 matter pending in HC) 16 M/s Karnaljeet Singh Ahluwalia 04/09/1989 (Lease Baraiburu Tatiba Mines, application cancelled Noamundi ( 129.499) on 13/06/2008 and revision application filed on 11.07.2008 which was expected on 15.09.2009 by MOM - Gal 17 Smt. Mitra Ghosc / shri Samir 07/01/1993 (R~eckd kurnar Ghose, Noamundi (20.07) by State Govt on 27/07/2010 18 M/s General Produce Ltd. 11/01/1980 (Leased Karampada Iron are Mines. Cancelled on I Ghatkuri RF,Manoharpur (163.9) 15/03/1984 and as per HC order no RML filed before state " lpnf' Annexure - III List of lessees showing year wise production (as given by Director of Mining & Geology, Indian Bureau of Mines and Lessee) of Iron ore who have not obtained Environment Clearance (EC). Date of Production as per Production as per Production as per Sr Name of Lessee Expiry of Submission of DMG for Submission of IBM Submission of Lessee No & Lease Lease Period Iron (MT) for Iron (MT ) for Iron (MT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 Smt. Mitra Ghose/ 07/01/1993 1994- 05 00 1993-94 5785 1994-06 00 shri Samir kumar (Rej ected by 2005-06 11000 1994-95 8331 2006-07 14635 Ghose, State 2006-07 15000 1995-96 5482 2007-08 37070 Noamundi (20.07) Government on 2007-08 36000 1996-97 6851 2008-09 78511 27/07/2010) 2008-09 79000 1997-98 00 2009-10 1310 2009-11 00 1998-99 1775 2010-11 2607 0'1 2011-12 37000 1999-2000 6164 2011-12 00 o Total = 178000 2000-2001 5583 Total = 134133 2001-2002 4770 2002-2003 3430 2003-2004- 13162 2004-2005 12173 2005-2006 10935 2006-2010 - 00 2010-2011 2607 2011-2013 00 Total : 87048 Date of Production as per Production as per Production as per Sr Name of Lessee Expiry of Submission of DMG for Submission of IBM Submission of Lessee No & Lease Lease Period Iron (MT) for Iron (MT ) for Iron (MT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 2 Shri Khatau 05/06/19(3 1993~94 241 1993~9~~ 00 1994~95 128 Liladhar Thakkar, 1994~95 128 1995~96~ 260 1995~96 260 Kumirta,Noamundi 1995~96 260 1996~97~ 300 1996~97 300 (30.84) 1996~97 300 1997~98~ 1170 1997~98 1170 1997~98 1170 1998~99~ 1657 1998~99 1657 1998~99 1657 1999~2000~ 1014 1999~00 1014 1999~00 1014 2000~2001 925 2000~01 925 2000~01 925 200 1-2002~483 2001-02 483 2001-02 483 2002-2003 898 2002-03 898 0\ 2002-03 898 2003~2004- 3087 2003-04 3087 .... 2003-04 3087 2004-2005 ~ 4141 2004-05 4141 2004-05 4141 2005~2006- 8747 2005-06 8747 2005-06 8747 2006-2007 ~ 10339 2006-07 10339 2006-07 10339 2007-2008~ 22192 2007-08 14654 2007-08 14654 2008-2009 5929 2008-09 5929 2008~09 5929 2009~2010 - 4061 2009-10 4061 2009~ 10 4061 20 1O~20 11 13700 2010-11 13700 2010-11 13700 2011-2012~ 3870 2011-12 3870 2011-12 3870 2012-2013 00 Total = 75363 2012-13 00 Total :- 82773 Total = 75604 Date of Production as per Production as per Production as per Sr Name of Lessee Expiry of Submission of DMG for Submission of IBM Submission of Lessee No & Lease Lease Period Iron (MT) for Iron (MT J for Iron (MTJ 1 2 3 4 5 6 3 T P Sao, 03/01/1993 1993-94 14740 1993-94- 14740 Ghatkuri RF, 1994-12 00 1994-95 518 Noamundi (202,35) Total = 14740 1995-13 00 Total :- 15258 4 M/s R Mcdill & Co, 06/10/1975 1993-94 00 1993-94- 00 1994-95 1036 Karampada RF, 1994-95 1036 1994-95- 1036 1995-96 7716 Noamundi (110.08) 1995-96 7716 1995-96 7716 1996-97 2702 1996-97 2702 1996-97 2702 1997-12 00 1997-13 00 1997-13 00 Total = 11454 0\ Total = 11454 Total :- 11454 ~ 5 Singhbhum 10/12/1996 1993-94 2055.500 1994 1993-94 20"'0 Minerals Co. 13 00 1994-13 00 Karampada RF, Total = 2055.500 Total :- 2055 Noamundi (141.64) Date of Production as per Production as per Production as per Sr Name of Lessee Expiry of Submission of DMG for Submission of IBM Submission of Lessee No & Lease Lease Period Iron (MT) for Iron (MT ) for Iron (MT) I 2 3 4 5 6 6 Shri Khushal 10/11/1999 1993-94 48 1994-95 00 Arjun Rathor, 1994-95 00 1995-96 2318 Noamundi PF, 1995-96 2318 1996-97 2700 Noamundi (3 L 97) 1996-97 2700 1997-98 821 1997-98 821 1998-99 550 1998-99 550 1999-12 00 1999-13 00 Total = 6389 Total = 6437 0\ CU Date of Production as per Production as per Production as per Sr Name of Lessee Expiry of Submission of DMG for Submission of IBM Submission of Lessee No & Lease Lease Period Iron (MT) for Iron (MT ) for Iron (MT) I 2 3 4 5 6 7 Shri Chandra 28/07/2003 1993-94 489.500 1993-94 489 1994-95 647 Prasasd, 1994-95 647.00 1994-95 647 1995-96 718 ltarbaljori, 1995-96 718.00 1995-96 718 1996-97 633.500 Noamundi (57.47) 1996-97 633.500 1996-97 633 1997-98 00 1997-98 00 1997-98 00 1998 1998-99 205.500 1998-99 205.500 99 206 1999 1999-00 522.500 1999-00 522.500 2000 523 2000 2000-01 565 2000-01 565.00 2001 565 2001 2001-02 370 2001-02 370.00 2002 370 2002 2002-03 648 2002-03 648.00 2003 648 2003 2003-04 618 01 ~ 2003-04 61800 2004 618 2004-05 821 2004-05 821.00 2004-2005 - 821 2005-06 1606.450 2005-06 1606.450 2005-2006 1643 2006-07 558 2006-07 558.00 2006-2007 - 558 2007-08 00 2007-08 00 2007-2008 00 2008-09 760 2008-09 760.00 2008-2009 760 2009-10 665 2009-10 665.00 2009-2010·· 665 2010-11 5747 2010-11 5747.00 2010-2011 5747 2011-12 5248.510 2011-12 5248.510 2011-2012 5248 Total = 20333.46 Total = 20822.96 2012-2013- NIL(P) Total: 20859 Date of Production as per Production as per Production as per Sr Name of Lessee Expiry of Submission of DMG for Submission of IBM Submission of Lessee No & Lease Lease Period Iron (MT I for Iron (MT ) for Iron (MT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 Padamkumar Jain 28/02/2008 1993-94 00 1993-94 1887 1994-95 1690 Rajabeda, 1994-95 1690 1994-95 1690 1995-96 27145 Manoharpur 1995-96 27145 1995-96 27145 1996-97 11034 (41.639) 1996-97 6565 1996-97 11034 1997-98 20563 1997-98 20749.420 1997-98 00 1998-99 28699 1998-99 27874.500 1998-99 28699 1999-00 5145 1999-00 5145 1999-2000- 5145 2000-04 00 2000-04 00 2000-2005 00 2004-05 1105.560 2004-05 1105.558 2005-2006 18245 2005-06 18245.070 0'1 2005-06 18323.658 2006-2007 .: 17713 2006-07 17712.934 en 2006-07 17712.974 2007-2008- 6811 2007-08 7750.026 2007-08 7707.047 2008-2009 6914 2008-09 6914.240 2008-09 5706.976 2009-2010 - 1025 2009-10 1024.910 2009-10 1024.930 2010-2011 64375 2010-11 64375.386 2010-11 64375.386 2011-2012- 5680 2011-12 00 2011-12 5680330 2012-2013- 00 Total = 211404_126 2012-13 00 Total : 196363 Total 210805.779 Grand Total Production [a] AS Submitted by DMG :- 519919.24 MT (b ) As Submitted By IBM:- 415810 MT (e) As Submitted by Lesseess :- 459076.58 MT Annexure - IV List of lessees showing year wise production (as given by Director of Mining & Geology, Indian Bureau of Mines and Lessee) of Manganese ore who have not obtained Environment Clearance (Ee). Sr Name of Lessee Date of Expiry of Production as per Production as per No and Lease Lease Period Submission of DMG Productio Submission of Lessee for Mn (MT) n as per for Mn (MT) Submissio n of IBM for Mn (MT) I 2 3 4 5 6 1 M/ s Kamaljeet 04/07/1989 1994-95 610 1994-95 1132 0\ Singh Ahluwalia ( Cancelled vide Letter 1995-96 2140 1995-96 2160 0\ Baraiburu Tatiba No 272/2010 Date 1996-97 2051 1996-97 2051 Mines, Noamundi 27/08/2010 matter 1997-98 689.370 1997-98 689.370 (250.763) pending in HC) 1998-12 00 1998-12 00 Total = 5490.370 Total = 6032.37 Sr Name of Lessee Date of Expiry of Production as per Production as per No and Lease Lease Period Submission of DMG Productio Submission of Lessee for Mn (MT I n as per for Mn (MT) Submissio n ofIBM forMn (MT I 1 2 3 4 5 6 2 M/s Kamaljeet 04/09/1989 (Lease 1994-95 00 1994-9;:, 00 Singh Ahluwalia application cancelled 1995-96 2495 1995-96 2495 Baraiburu Tatiba on 13/06/2008 and 1996-97 2639.300 1996-97 2639.300 Mines, Noamundi revision application 1997-98 2245.960 1997-98 2245.960 ( 129.499) filed on 11.07.2008 1998-99 979.460 1998-99 979.460 0'1 which was expected on 1999-00 00 1999-00 00 ""I 15.09.2009 by MOM - 2000-01 60 2000-01 60 GOl 2001-02 57 2001-02 57 2002-03 25 2002-03 25 2003-04 195 2003-04 195 2004-05 1226 2004-05 1226 2005-07 00 2005-07 00 2007-08 139.150 2007-08 139.150 2008-09 43.200 2008-09 43.200 2009-13 00 2009-13 00 Total = 10105.07 Total = 10105.07 Grand Total Production: (a) As Submitted by DMG - 15595.44 MT (b) As Submitted by Lessess - 16137.44 MT Annexure - V List of Lessess Showing year wise illegal and unlawful production of Iron and Manganese Ores done by them without obtaining EC under EIA Notification Sr Name of the Date of Expiry of Unlawful / Illegal Unlawful/Illegal Unlawful/illegal No Lessee & leases Lease Period production estimated production estimated production estimated based on DMG Data for based on IBM Data for based on DMG Data Iron Ore (MT ) Iron Ore (MT I for Manganese Ore (MT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 Smt. Mitra Ghose/ 07/01/1993 1994-05 00 1993-94- 00 shri Samir kumar (Rejected by State 2005-06 11000 1994-95- 8331 Ghose, Government on 2006-07 15000 1995-96- 5482 0'1 Noamund: (20.07) 27/07/2010) 2007-08 36000 1996-97- 6851 00 2008-09 79000 1997-98- 00 2009-11 00 1998-99- 1775 2011-12 37000 1999-00- 6164 Total = 178000 2000-01- 5583 2001-02- 4770 2002-03- 3430 2003-04- 13162 2004-05 - 12173 2005-06- 10935 2006-10 - 00 2010-11- 2607 2011-13- 00 Total :- 81263 Sr Name of the Date of Expiry of Unlawful I Illegal Unlawful I Illegal Unlawful I Illegal No Lessee & leases Lease Period production estimated production estimated production estimated based on DMG Data for based on IBM Data for based on DMG Data Iron Ore (MT ) Iron Ore (MT) for Manganese Ore (MT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 2 Shri Khatau 05/06jl973 1993-94 00 1993-9;, 00 Liladhar Thakkar, 1994-95 128 1995-96 260 Kumirta, Noamundi 1995-96 260 1996-97 300 (30.84) 1996-97 300 1997-98 1170 1997-98 1170 1998-99 1657 1998-99 1657 1999-2000 1014 1999-00 1014 2000-01 925 2000-01 925 2001-02 483 0\ 2001-02 483 2002-03 898 \0 2002-03 898 2003-04 3087 2003-04 3087 2004-05 - 414J 2004-05 4141 2005-06 8747 2005-06 8747 2006-07 - 10339 2006-07 10339 2007-08 22192 2007-08 14654 2008-09 5929 2008-09 5929 2009-10 - 4061 2009-10 4061 2010-11 13700 2010-11 13700 2011-12 3870 2011-12 3870 2012-13 00 2012-13 00 Total :- 82773 Total = 75363 Sr Name of the Date of Expiry of Unlawful f lllegal Unlawful f Illegal Unlawful f Illegal No Lessee & leases Lease Period production estimated production estimated production estimated based on DMG Data for based on IBM Data for based on DMG Data Iron Ore (MT ) Iron Ore (MT) for Manganese Ore (MT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 3 T P Sao, 03fOlfl993 1993-94- 00 Ghatkuri RF, 1994-95 518 Noamundi (202.35) 1995-13 00 Total :- 518 4 Shri Khushal Arjun lOfllfl999 1993-95 00 Rathor, Noamundr 1995-96 2318 PF, 1996-97 2700 Noamundi (31.97) 1997-98 821 ~ 1998-99 550 o 1999-13 00 Total = 6389 Sr Name of the Date of Expiry of Unlawful I Illegal Unlawful I Illegal Unlawful I Illegal No Lessee & leases Lease Period production estimated production estimated production estimated based on DMG Data for based on IBM Data for based on DMG Data Iron Ore (MT ) Iron Ore (MT) for Manganese Ore (MT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 Shri Chandra 28/07/2003 1993-94 00 1993-94 00 " Prasasd, 1994-95 647.00 1994-95 647 Itarbaljori, 1995-96 718.00 1995-96 718 Noamundi (57.47) 1996-97 633.500 1996-97 633 1997-98 00 1997-98 00 1998-99 205.500 1998-99 206 1999-00 522500 1999-2000- 523 2000-01 565.00 2000-01 565 ~ 2001-02 370.00 2001-02 370 .... 2002-03 648.00 2002-03 648 2003-04 618.00 2003-04 618 2004-05 821.00 2004-05 - 821 2005-06 1606.450 2005-06 ]643 2006-07 558.00 2006-07 558 2007-08 00 2007-08 00 2008-09 760.00 2008-09 760 2009- 10 665.00 2009-10 665 2010-1] 5747.00 2010-]1 5747 20]1-12 5248.5 ]0 20]]-]2 5248 Total = 20333.46 2012- ]3 00 Total: 20370 Sr Name of the Date of Expiry of Unlawful/Illegal Unlawful/Illegal Unlawful/Illegal No Lessee & leases Lease Period production estimated production estimated production estimated based on DMG Data for based on IBM Data for based on DMG Data Iron Ore (MT ) Iron Ore (MT) for Manganese Ore (MT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 6 Padamkumar Jain 28/02/2008 1993-95 00 1993-95 00 Rajabeda, 1995-96 27145 1995-96 27145 Manoharpur 1996-97 6565 1996-97 11034 (41.639) 1997-98 20749.420 1997-98 00 1998-99 27874.500 1998-99 28699 1999-00 5145 1999-2000- 5145 2000-04 00 2000-2005 00 2004-05 1105.558 2005-2006 18245 ..:r 2005-06 18323.658 2006-2007 - 17713 ~ 2006-07 17712.974 2007-2008- 6811 2007-08 7707.047 2008-2009 6914 2008-09 5706976 2009-2010 - 1025 2009- 10 1024.930 2010-2011 64375 2010-11 64375.386 2011 -20 12- 5680 2011-12 5680.330 2012-2013 00 2012- 13 00 Total : 192786 Total = 209115.77 Grand Total of Unlawful and Illegal Production : (a) Iron for DMG :- 489201.23 MT (b) Iron for IBM :- 377710 MT 73 Annexure - VI List of 24 Leasses who have obtained delayed EC under EIA Notification Quantity approved (MT) Sr Name of the lease EC Approval Order No. Upper limits No and Date From -- To 1 2 3 4 I Shri Vijaykumar Ojha, J - 11015/1043/2007 0 BaciaBaljori, lA, Il(M) dt. 14/07/2008 510.72 Noarnundi (21,19) Total MLA - 21.246 Ha Manganese 2 Shri Nirrnal Kumar, J - 11015/15/2010 lA. 44000 Pradip KU111ar, Il(Mj d t. 21/12/2012 403000 (Ghatkuri RFj Tolal MLA - 149.173 Ha Noamuridi (149.173) 3 Rungta Mines ,J 11015/596/2007 lAo 0 (Meralgara) • Il(M) cit. 20/08/2008 360000 Meralgaclha, Noamuneli Total MLA - 122.017 Ha (122.021 4 Shri Rameshwar Jute ,J - 11015/1147/2007 Iron Mills, Baraiburu, IA. II(M) cit. 15/04/20 II 30000 Noaruundi (258.99) Tolal MLA·· 258,98968 2260000 Ha Manganese 300 4000 5 M/ s.SAIL, Manoharpur J - 11015/251/2009 0 Iron are Mine Chiriya IA. Il(M) dt. 24/01/2012 750000 [Dhobil Iron arc Total MLA - 513,036 Ha Mines), Budhaburu, Ankula r~F, Manoharpur (512.95) 6 Rungta Mines J - 11015/198/2006 25000 (Ghatkuri RFj, IA. Il(M) cit. 15/04/2008 1800000 Noamuridi (138.85) Total MLA - 138.848 Ha ,J - 11015/57/2010 IA. 1800000 Il(M) ell, 22/05/2013 7552000 Total MLA - 138.848 Ha Area 27.518 Ha (In Past) Area 202.349 Ha (In Past) 74 Quantity approved (MT) Sr Name of the lease EC Approval Order No. Upper limits No and Date From -- To 1 2 3 4 7 Singhbhum Minerals J - 11015/873/2007 4200 co. ( IA. II(M) elt. 05/11/2008 100000 Transfer in the narne of Total MLA - 265.88 Ha Ram Minerals Co.) Khasjarnda, Noarriundi (265.88) I 8 Shri Anilkumar Khirval, ,J ] 101:0/142/2007 39000 Banelhburu IA. II(M) elt. 13/04/2011 74000 (Noamuneli PI"), Total MLA - 19.331 Ha Noamuneli (22.53) 9 M/s Shah Brothers J - 11015/24/2006 IA. 60000 Kararnpada Iron Ore H(M) elt. 23/01/2007 100000 Mines, Kararnpada RF', Total MLA - 233.99 Ha Manoharpur (233.89) 10 M L .Ja iu Anel Sons. ,J 110]5/318/2006 0 Kararnpada RF, IA. ll(M) elt. 15/12/2008 90000 Noamuneli (202.35) Total MLA - 202.03 Ha I I M/ s Devkabai Velji J - 11015/377/2007 Iron Ghatkuri Iron Ore IA. H(M) elt. 16/01/2009 0 Mines, Ajitaburu Total MLA - 46.62 Ha 600000 Ghatkuri RF', Manganese Ncamundi (46.62) 0 4275 12 M/s.SArL, J - 11015/05/2006 0 Meghahatuburu Iron IA. II(M) elt. 27/12/2006 5000000 Ore Mine Project lease- Total MLA - 3949.47 ha ( II Railway siding & combine with 3 other plant, Karampaela RF', Lease of Sail) Manoharpur (879.43) 75 Quantity approved (MT) Sr Name of the lease EC Approval Order No. Upper limits No and Date From > To 1 2 3 4 13 M/s.SAIL. J - 11015/05/2006 0 Meghahatuburu Iron IA. ll(M) elt. 5000000 Ore Mine Project lease 27/12/2006 Total !I Tailing dam. MLA - 3949.47 ha ( Kiriburu, combine with 3 other Meghahatuburu, Lease of Sail) Kararnpada RI",Manoharpur (81.97 ) 14 M/ s Usha Martin J - 11015/48/2001 IA. 0 Ghatkuri Iron Ore !I(M) dt. 19/04/2005 650000 Mines, Total MLA - 155.078 Ha Ghatkuri RI", & Corrigendum Dt. Noamundi (155.078) 29/05/2006 J - 11015/507/2007 650000 IA. !I(M) dt. 2500000 22/12/2008 Total MLA 155.078 Ha J - 11015/306/2009 2500000 IA. !I(M) dt. 4000000 17/12/2009 Total MLA 155.078 Ha 15 M/s.SAIL, Manoharpur J - 11015/249/2009 0 Iron are Mine Chiriya IA. !I(M) dt. 4200000 (MacIilan Budhaburu 23/03/20 I I Total MLA Iron Ore Mines),Ankula 823.83 Ha RF, Manoharpur (823.83) 16 Shri Anirundal.a J - 11015/82/2008 IA. 0 Traders & Investment !I(M) dt. 15/02/2012 133380 Ltd. Parambaljodi, Total MLA - 47.15 I-Ia Noamuridi (47.15) 76 Quantity approved (MT) Sr Name of the lease EC Approval Order No. Upper limits No and Date From -To 1 2 3 4 17 M/ s Orissa Ohatkuri J - 11015/488/2007 0 Iron Ore Manganese & IA. II(M) elt. 600000 Minerals. Ghatkuri 20/02/2009 Total MLA RF, Noamundi 275.52 Ha (27519) J - 11015/12/2009 600000 IA. 11(M] ell. 15/04/2010 2000000 Total MLA - 275.52 Ha 18 M/s.SAIL, Meghataburu 0 Meghahatuburu Iron J - 11015/05/20061A. 5000000 Ore Mine Project lcase-I II(M) dt. 27/12/2006 Mining Area. Kiriburu, Total MLA - 3949.47 ha ( Karampacla RF. combine with 3 other Manoharpur (1936.14] Lease of Sail) J - ] 1015/05/2006 0 IA. !I(M) ell 27/12/2006 5000000 Total MLA - 3949.47 ha ( combine with 3 other Lease of Sail) 19 M/s SAIL, Gua Ore J - 11015/453/2008 0 Mines Qua, IA. 11(M) ell. 12500000 Duaruiburu Mines 25/03/2013 Total MLA (Ghatkuri RF) 1443.76 Ha Noamundi (1443.76) 20 M/ s SAIL, Manoharpur J - 11015/247/2009 0 Iron Ore Mines Chiriya IA. !I(M) ell. 750000 (Sukriluturburu \1"On 10/06/2013 Total MLA I Ore Mines) Ankula RF 609.57 Ha .Manoharpur (609.57) 21 M/s.SAIL, J. 11015/505/2007 0 Manoharpur Iron Ore IA. 11(M) ell. 31/03/2011 2800000 Mine Chiriya Total MLA - 323.83 Ha (Aji iaburulronOreMines ) Budhaburu AnkulaRF, Manoharpur (323.83) 77 Quantity approved (MT) Sr Name of the lease EC Approval Order No. Upper limits No and Date From -- To 1 2 3 4 22 Tata Steel Ltd. J - 11015/49/2003 4650000 Noamundi (1160.36) IA. II(M) dt. 06/04/2005 7600000 Total MLA - 1160.06 Ha J - 11015/159/2007 7600000 IA. II(M) dt. 10000000 26/08/2008 Total MLA .. 1160.06 Ha 23 Shri Nirmal Kumar, J - 11015/32/2010 62000 Pradip Kumar, IA. l1(M) dt. 343000 (Meralgaraha) 21/12/2012 Total MLA Noarnundi (66.781) 66.781 Ha 24 Padamkumar Jain J - 11015/48/2006 IA. 47000 Thakurani Noamuudi II(M) dt.24/09/2008 1300000 (84.68) Total MLA· 8'1.68 Ha Annexure - VII List of Lessess showing yearwise production (given by Director of Mining & Geology, Indian Bureau of Mines and Lessee) of Iron Ore who have obtained delayed Environmental Clearance (Ee) under EIA Notification Name of the EC lIfoEF Approval Production as per Production as per Production as per Sr Lessees & Producti Order, Date & Submission of DMG for Submission of IBM for Submission of Lessee No leases & Area on limit Area Iron Ore 111fT I Iron Ore 111fT ) for Iron Ore (IIfTI (hal IIIfTI 1 2 3 4 S 6 7 1 Rungta J - 0 1993 -97 00 1993-98 00 1994-97 00 Mines(Meralgar 11015/596/2007 360000 1997-98 295 1998-99 303 1997-98 295 a), lA. lI(M) 1998-99 303 1999-2006 00 1998-99 303 Meralgadha. dL 20/08/2008 ] 999-05 00 2006-2007 407406 ] 999-05 00 Noamundi Total MLA 2005-06 5350.910 2007-2008 150859 2005-06 5350.91 (122.02) 122.017 Ha 2006-07 407405.890 2008-2009 221165 2006-07 407405.890 2007-08 150859.450 2009-2010 88223 2007-08 150859.450 "'I 2008-09 221165.160 2010-2011 56202 2008-09 221165.160 00 2009-10 88222540 2011-2012 19393 . 2009-10 88222.540 2010-11 56201.930 2012-2013- 44177(P) 2010-11 56201.930 2011-12 19393.3] 0 Total :- 987728 2011-12 19393.310 2012- 13 54887680 Total = 949197.19 Total = 1004084.87 Name of the 1\:'10 EF A rova I I EC . Production as per Production as per Production as per Sr Lessees & 0 d ~p & Product! Submission of DMG for Submission of IBM for Submission of Lessee No leases & Area r er, ate on limit Iron Ore (MT ) Iron Ore (MT J for Iron Ore (MT) (ha) I Area (MTJ I 2 3 4 5 6 7 2 Shri ,J - Iron 1993 - 94 ~546 1993-94 ~,,45 1994-95 /659 Rameshwar 11015/1147/2007 30000 1994-95 7659 1994-95 7659 1995-96 21104 Jute Mills, IA. lJ(M) dt, 2260000 1995-96 21104 1995-98 00 1996-97 27205 Baraibu-u, 15/04/2011 Total 'Mangane 1996-97 27205 1998-99 3241 1997-98 784 Noamundi MLA - 258.98968 se 300 1997-98 784 1999-2000- 3856 1998-99 3242 1(25899) Ha 4000 1998-99 3242 2000-2001- 774 1999-00 4056 1999-00 4056 2001-2004- 00 2000-0 I 774 2000-01 774 2004-2005 - 120 2001-02 25 2001-02 25 2005-2006 360 2002-03 '01-.J0 2002-03 135 2006-2007 -2000 2003-04 50 ~ 2003-04 50 2007-2008- 234339 2004-05 120 \0 2004-05 120 2008-2009 253317 2005-06 360 2005-06 360 2009-2010 180616 2006-07 2000 2006-07 2000 2010-2011 210299 2007-08 234339 2007-08 234339 2011-2012- 18888 2008-09 253316 2008-09 253316 2012-2013 00 2009-10 180616 2009-10 180616 Total :- 921014 2010-11 210298 2010-11 210299 2011-12 18888 2011-12 18888 Total = 964971 2012 13 00 I L Total =970518 I Name of the EC MoEF Approval Production as per Production as per Production as per Sr Lessees & Producti Order, Date & Submission of DMG for Submission of IBM for Submission of Lessee No leases & Area on limit Area Iron Ore {MT I Iron Ore (MT ) for Iron Ore (MTI (hal (MT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 3 M/s.SAIL. J 0 1993 -94 00 1993-2001- 00 1994-08 00 Manoharpur 11015/251/2009 750000 1994-95 92974.450 2001-2002- 254972 2008-09 558749 Iron Ore Mine I lA. 11(M) 1995-96 68261.580 2002-2003 191424 2009-10 683969 Chir.ya (Dhabi1 dt. 24/01/2012 1996-97 155183.'100 2003-2004 210230 2010-11 229663 Iron Ore Total MLA . 1997-98 97722.100 2004-2005 - 217726 2011-12 312 Mines),Budhab 513.036Ha 1998-99 102940.600 2005-2006 307013 Total = 472693 ur-u. Ankula 1999-00 142564.900 2006-2007 821917 RF, 2000-01 336994.500 2007-2008- 964527 Manoharpur 2001-02 282810.000 20082009 558749 1512.95) 2002-03 273463.300 2009-2010 683968 00 2003-04 300328.700 2010-2011- 313846 o 2004-05 311058.700 ,2011-2012 348855 2005-06 438590.000 2012-2013- 306826(P) 2006-07 790127.200 Total: 5180053 2007-08 964527.000 2008-09 558748.980 2009-10 683968.000 2010-11 305035.000 2011-12 304945.000 Total = 6210243.41 Name of the EC MoEF Approval Production as per Production as per Production as per Sr Lessees & Producti I Order, Date & Submission of DMG for ! Submission of IBM for Submission of Lessee No leases & Area on limit Area Iron Ore (MT ) Iron Ore (MT I for Iron Ore (MT) {ha] (MT) I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 4 Rungte Mines ,J - 25000 1993-94 30454 1993-94- 29572 1994-01 00 (Ghatkun RF). 11015/198/2006 1800000 1994-95 20035 1994-95- 18224 2001-02 8341 Noamundi lA. lIiM] and 1995-96 58243 1995-96-55662 2002-03 50676 (138.85) dt. 15/04/2008 1800000 1996-97 46200 1996-98- 00 2003-04 170866.3 Total MLA 7552000 1997-98 28000 1998-99 33500 2004-05 533049 138.848 Ha 1998-99 49000 1999-2001- 00 2005-06 474121 and 1999-01 00 2001-2002- 8341 2006-07 615470.743 J - 2001-02 8341 2002-2003-50676 2007-08 883584.125 11015/57/2010 2002-03 50676 2003-2004- 170866 2008-09 1590639.145 lA. lIiM) 2003-04 170866.300 2004-2005 -533049 2009-10 1707503.355 00 dt. 22/05/2013 2004-05 533049 2005-2006- 474121 2010-11 1504869.220 .... Total ML.; - 2005-06 474121 2006-2007 -615471 2011-12 1743541.900 138.848 Ha 2006-07 615470.740 2007-2008-883584 Total= 9282661.788 2007-08 883584.125 2008-2009-1590639 2008-09 1590639.145 2009-2010-1707503 2009- 10 1707503.355 2010-2011- 1504869 2010-11 1504869.220 2011 -2012-1743542 2011-12 1743541.900 2012-2013- 1569297(P) 2012-13 1709281.990 Total :- 10988916 Total =11223875.780 I I Name of the EC MoEF Approval Production as per Production as per Production as per Sr Lessees & Producti Order, Date & Submission of DMG for Submission of IBM for Submission of Lessee No leases & Area on limit Area Iron Ore (MT J Iron Ore IMT ) for Iron Ore (MTI (hal (MTI 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Area 27.518 Ha 1994-95 00 1994-95 1811 (In Past) 1995-96 2581 I 1995-96 2581 1996·,97 00 1996-97 00 1997-98 28000 1997-98 28000 1998-99 15500 11998-99 15500 1999-01 00 1999-00 00 Total = 46081 Total = 47892 Area 202.349 Ha 1994-9::> 18224 1994-95 18224 (In Past) 1995-96 55662 1995-96 55662 1996-97 46200 1996-97 46200 1997-98 00 1997-98 00 00 to.;) 1998-99 33500 1998-99 33500 Total = 153586 1999-00 00 Total = 153586 5 Singhbhurn J 4200 1993-03 00 1993-02- 00 1994-03 00 Minerals co. 11015/873/2007 100000 2003-04 4155.577 2002-2003- 1610 2003-04 4155.577 ( Transfer in IA. 11(M) 2004-05 59590.57 2003-2004- 4156 2004-05 59590.057 the name of dt.05/11/2008 2005-06 52384.815 2004-2005 - 15378 2005-06 52384.815 Ram Minerals Total MLA - 265.88 2006-07 174.400 2005-2006- 50000 2006-07 35040.250 Co.) Ha 2007-08 00 2006-2007 - 174400 2007-08 00 Khasjamda, 2008-09 4400 2007-2008- 00 2008-09 4400 Noamundi I 2009-10 135291 2008-2009- 4400 2009-10 796291.210 (265.88) 2010-11 597186 2009-2010 - 135291 2010-11 202066.41 I 2011-12 183642.470 2010-2011- 597186 2011-12 125111.100 2012-13 0.99 2011-2012- 140927 Total 1279039.419 Total = 1036825.822 2012-2013- G75751P) Total :- 1190923 1 Name of the EC MoEF Approval Production as per Production as per Production as per Sr Lessees & Producti Order, Date & Submission of DMG for Submission of IBM for Submission of Lessee No leases & Area on limit Area Iron Ore (MT I Iron Ore (MT ) for Iron Ore IMT) (hal (MT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 IShri Anilkumar J 39000 1993-94 15461.00 1993-94 15461 1994-9" 12085 Khirval, 11015/142/2007 74000 1994-95 12085.00 1994-95- 12085 1995-96 24101 Bandhburu(No IA. Il(M) 1995-96 24101.00 1995-96 24101 1996-97 20756 amundi PF), dt. 13/04/2011 1996-97 20756.00 1996-12 00 1997-98 16178 Noamundi Total MLA 19.331 1997-98 16178.00 2012-2013- 225(P) 1998-99 688 (2253) Ha 1998-99 688.00 Total :- 51872 1999-01 00 1999-01 00 2001-02 3540 2001-02 3540.00 2002-03 00 2002-04 00 2003-04 21000 2004-05 59644.00 2004-05 38644 00 2005-09 00 2005-09 00 CU I 12009-10 5875.840 2009-10 5876 2010-11 6936760 2010-11 6937 2011-12 5022.470 2011-12 5022 2 0 12 - 13 225.450 Total = 154827 [ I I Total = 170513.52 Name of the EC MoEF Approval Production as per Production as per Production as per Sr Lessees & Producti I Order, Date & Submission of DMG for Submission of IBM for Submission of Lessee No leases & Area on limit Area Iron Ore (MT ) Iron Ore (MT ) for Iron Ore (MT) (ha) (MT) 1 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 7lM/sShah J 60000 1993-94 413 ] 993-94-382 1994-95 737 Brothers 11015/24/2006 100000 1994-95 737 1994-95-737 1995-96 ] ]31 Karampada lA. JI(M) 1995-96 )] 31 1995-98- 00 1996-97 4965 Iron Ore Mines, d t. 23/01/2007 1996-97 4965 1998-99- 23968 1997-98 21389 Karampada RF, Total MLA - 233.99 1997-98 21389 1999-2000 ]6498 1998-99 16203 Manoharpur Ha 1998-99 16203 2000-2003 00 1999-00 6095 (2:13.89) 1999-00 6095 2003-2004- 64632 2000-0 I 388] 2000-01 3881 2004-2005 - 232061 2001-02 9300.570 2001-02 9300.57 2005-2006- 1287006 2002-03 150 2002-03 150 2006-2007 - 33300 2003-04 64632 00 2003-04 64632 2007-2008 551490 2004-05 60'990 ~ 2004-05 232061 2008-2009 719576 2005-06 ]] 58] 0 2005-06 1] 5810 2009-2010 - 721199 2006-07 00 2006-07 00 201 0-20 11 986673 2007-08 99980 2007-08 99980 2011-2012- 78575 2008-09 99860 2008-09 99860 2012-2013- 94370(P) 2009-] 0 99935 2009-10 99935 Total:- 4810467 2010-] 1 99865 2010-11 99865 2011-12 78574.96 2011-12 78574.960 I Total 783498.53 2012-13 98326 Total = 1053308.53 _ I Name of the EC MoEF Approval Production as per Production as per Production as per SI Lessees & Producti Order, Date & Submission of DMG for Submission of IBM for Submission of Lessee No leases & Area on limit Area Iron Ore (MT I Iron Ore (MT I for Iron Ore (MTI (hal (MT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 M L Jain And J 0 } 993-94 00 1993-94- 22243 1994-9~ 18738 Sons. 11015/318/2006 90000 1994-95 18738 1994-95- 18738 1995-96 53947 Karampada RF, LA If(M) 1995-96 53947 1995-96- 53947 1996-97 42446 Noamundi dt. 15/12/2008 1996-97 42446 1996-97- 42446 1997-98 21414 (202.35) Total MLA - 202.03 1997-98 21416 1997-98- 00 1998-99 26403 Ha 1998-99 26403 1998-99- 26403 1999-00 38777 11999-00 38777 1999-2000- 38777 2000-01 28361 2000-01 28361 2000-2001- 28361 2001-02 1806 2001-02 1806 2001-2002- 1806 2002-03 7754 2002-03 7754 2002-2003- 7754 2003-04 117187 00 2003-04 117187 2003-2004- 117187 2004-05 35121 CIt 2004-05 35121 2004-2005 - 35121 2005-07 00 2005-07 00 2005-2007- 00 2007-08 3984.565 2007-08 3984.565 2007-2008- 3985 2008-09 34111.510 I 2008-09 293090.700 2008-2009- 293091 2009-10 89954.820 2009-10 216264.460 2009-2010 - 216265 2010-11 89910 2010-11 176123 2010-2011- 89910 2011-12 89975 2011-12 186890.240 2011-2012- 89975 Total= 699889.895 2012-13 00 2012-2013- 58995(P) ITn'" - 1 ~~o~no o~" ITn'" :_ , , Name of the EC MoEF Approval Production as per Production as per Production as per Sr Lessees & Producti Order, Date & Submission of DMG for Submission of IBM for Submission of Lessee No leases & Area on limit Area Iron Ore (MT } Iron Ore (MT } for Iron Ore (MT) (hal (MT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 M/s Devkabai J - Iron 1993-95 00 1993-98 00 1994-07 00 Velji 11015/377/2007 0 1995-96 3905.563 1998-99 2592 2007-08 317937.01 Ghatkun Iron IA. 111M) 600000 1996-97 4726.578 1999-2000 4610 2008-09 345200 Ore Mines. dt. 16/01/2009 Mangane 1997-98 00 2000-2003 00 2009-10 300900 Ajitaburu , Total MLA - 46.62 se 1998-99 959 2003-2004 7540 2010-11 440370 Ghatkuri RF, I Ha 0 1999-00 2396.334 2004-2005 1800 2011-12 0.0 Noamundi 4275 2000-03 00 2005-2007 00 Total= 1404407.01 (46.62) 2003-04 7438.200 2007-2008 317937 2004-05 1800 2008-2009 345200 2005-07 00 2009-2010 300900 00 2007-08 300787.008 2010-2011- 440370 0\ 2008-09 345200 20 I 1-2012 550045 2009-10 300900 2012-2013- 5581391P) 2010-11 404065.640 Total :- 2529133 2011-12 514640 2012-13 599213.830 Total = 2486032.153 I I Name of the EC MoEF Approval Production as per Production as per Production as per Sr Lessees & Producti Order. Date & Submission of DMG for Submission of IBM for Submission of Lessee No leases & Area on limit Area Iron Ore (MT I Iron Ore (MT ) for Iron Ore (MT) [ha] IMT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 M/sUsha J 0 1993-0~ 00 1993-06- 00 1994-05 00 Mat-tin 11015/48/2001 650000 2005-06 131777.080 2006-2007-648591 2005-06 131777.08 Ghatkuri [ron IA.II(M) 2006-07 648571.180 2007-2008- 889932 2006-07 648571.18 Ore Mines. de. 19/04/2005 2007-08 649972.180 2008-2009- 1335578 2007-08 649972.18 Ghatkuri RF. Total MLA 2008-09 995629.630 2009-2010- 1258030 2008-09 995629.63 Noamundi 155.078 Ha &. 2009-10 1258029.610 2010-2011- 1707420 2009-10 1258029.61 (155.078) Corrigendum Dt. 2010-11 1593087.050 2011-2012- 1476962 2010-11 1593087.05 00/"- ')nnr:" 2011-12 1476961.880 2012-2013- 1469682 2011-12 1476961.88 J 6,,0000 2012-13 1634013260 Total z-. 8786195 Total: 6754082.61 2500000 11015/507/2007 Total ~ 8388041.87 00 Ill. II(M) ~ de. 22/12/2008 Total MLA 155.078 Ha I J 2"00000 11015/306/2009 4000000 IA.lI(M) dt.17/12/2009 Total MLA 155.078 Ha Name of the EC MoEF Approval Production as per Production as per Production as per Sr Lessees & Producti Order, Date & Submission of DMG for Submission of IBM for Submission of Lessee No leases & AIea on limit Area Iron Ore IMT I Iron Ore [MT ) for Iron Ore (MTI [hal [MTI I 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 1 M/s.SA1L, .j - 0 1993-01 00 1994-95 13197".1 Manoharpur 11015/249/2009 4200000 :2001-2002- 4497 1995-96 113526.3 Iron Ore Mine 1A. ]JIM) 2002-2003 15509 1996-97 70294.3 Chrriya dt. 23/03/2011 2003-2004 39722 1997-98 127526.5 (Maclilan Total MLA - 823.83 2004-2005 - 97193 1998-99 9104.72 Budhaburu Ha 2005-2006 134566 1999-00 11775.25 Iron Ore 2006-2013 - 00 2000-01 18224.21 Minesj.Ankula Tota1:- 291487 2001-02 5140.17 RF, 2002-03 22155.37 Manoharpur 2003-04 56746.29 00 (823.83) 2004-05 138826.6 00 I 2005-06 192236.4 2006-12 00 L Total = 897531.21 Name of the I EC MoEF Approval Pd' Production as per Production as per Production as per Sr Lessees & ro uett Order, Date & 1". Submission of DMG for Submission of IBM for Submission of Lessee No leases & Area AI on Irrrit; Iron Ore (MT ) Iron Ore (MT I for Iron Ore (MT) (hal ea (MTI 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 12 MIs Orissa J - 0 ] 993-95 00 1993-08- 00 1994-95 00 Ghatkuri Iron 11015/488/2007 600000 1995-96 22879 2008-2009 180481 1995-96 22879 Ore Manganese IA II(M) 1996-97 30355.00 2009-2010 -1214072 1996-97 30355.880 &. Minerals. de. 20/02/2009 1997-08 00 2010-2011- 1264777 1997-08 00 Ghatkuri RF, Total MLA - 275.52 2008-09 1804826 2011-2012- 1076874 2008-09 180481.61 Noamundi '·10 2009-10 1214072.022 2012-2013-831054(P) 2009-10 1214072.03 (275.19) .J I 600000 2010-11 943732.76 Total :- 4567258 2010-111264778.201 11015/12/2009 2000000 2011-12 910486.96 2011-12 00 lA. )J(M) 2012-13 928266.92 Total = 2712566.721 de. 15/04/2010 Total = 4230275.262 00 Total MLA - 275.52l \0 Ha Name of the EC MoEF Approval Production as per Production as per Production as per Sr Lessees & Producti Order, Date & Submission of DMG for Submission of IBM for Submission of Lessee No leases & Area on limit Area Iron Ore tMT ) Iron Ore IMT ) for Iron Ore IMT} [ha] IMTI 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 13 M/s.SAIL, J 0 1993 -94 26/2333 MEGHAHATUBURU 1994-06 00 Meghahatu bur 11015/05/2006 5000000 1994-95 2828794 11993-94- 2915740 2006-07 3961721 u Iron Ore 1.'1. !liM) 199596 2940900 1994-95-3329960 2007-08 4130689 Mine Project dt. 27/12/2006 1996-97 3422495 1995-96- 3500735 2008-09 3677078 lease-I Mining Total MLA 1997-98 3553230 1996-97-3736785 2009-10 3658419 Area. Kiriburu , 3949.4711a 1998-99 3295004 1997-98- 00 2010-11 3754745 Karampada RF, (combine with 3 1999-00 2859394 1998-99-3442995 2011-12 00 Manoharpur other Lease of Sail) 2000-01 2565882 1999-2000-3122325 Total = 19182652 (1936.14) 2001-02 2904179 2000-2001-2948085 2002-03 3184766 2001-2002-3168810 \0 2003-04 3565995 2002-2003-3458925 o 2004-05 3574103 2003-2004-3817170 2005-06 3852453 2004-2005-3749085 2006-07 3961721 2005-2006-4048470 2007-08 4130689 2006-2007-4173525 2008-09 3677078 2007-2008-4466745 2009-10 3658419 2008-2009-4055490 2010-11 3754745 2009-2010-3960000 2011-12 3984023 2010-2011-4110120 2012-13 3623314 2011-2012-4286700 Total =68110517 2012-2013 - 37425609(p) Total :-103717274 Name of the I EC Production as per Production as per Production as per Sr Lessees & MoEF Approval Product!ro uctl Order, Date & Iimtt Submission of DMG for Submission of IBM for Submission of Lessee No leases & Area AI on unl Iron Ore IMT ) Iron Ore (MT J for Iron Ore (MT) (hal ea (MT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 J - 0 1993-94 2505153 KIRUBURU 1994-95 5937766 11015/05/2006 5000000 1994-95 3108972 1993-94-2~67094 1995-96 6094385 1A·1IIM) 1995-96 3153485 1994-95 3104722 1996-97 6602174 dt. 27/12/2006 1996-97 3179679 1995-96 3138913 1997-98 6871874 Total MLA 1997-98 3318644 1996-97 3174976 1998-99 6780847 3949.47 he 1998-99 3485843 1997-98 00 1999-00 6066994 (combine wi th 3 1999-00 3207600 1998-99 3485843 2000-01 5622864 other Lease of Sail) 2000-01 2955982 1999-2000-3207600 2001-02 6351038 2001-02 3446861 2000-2001-3590055 2002-03 6787938 2002-03 3603172 2001-2002-3982725 2003-04 7174897 10 2003-04 3608902 2002-2003-4170600 2004-05 7192188 .... 2004-05 3618085 2003-2004-4307265 2005-06 7552503 2005-06 3700050 2004-2005-4430115 2006-07 7917963 2006-07 3956242 2005-2006 00 2007-08 8332528 2007-08 4201839.15 2006-2007-4696425 2008-09 7632884 2008-09 3955805.510 2007-2008-4935875 2009-10 7430900 2009-10 3772481 2008-2009-4525570 2010-11 7591521 2010-11 3836776 2009-2010-4111830 2011-12 7511008 20]]-]2 3526985 2010-2011-4380210 Total =125452272 2012-13 3373449 2011-2012-3848850 Total = 69516005.66 2012-2013-3361455(PJ l'T'nta1 e- 6Qn'>01 '>3 Name of the EC Production as per Production as per Production as per Sr Lessees & MoEF Approval Producti Submission of DMG for Submission of IBM for Submission of Lessee No leases & Area Order, Date & on limit Iron Ore (MT J Iron Ore (MT I for Iron Ore (MTI (hal Area IMT) 1 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 141Tata Steel Ltd. J 4650000 1993-94 3547600 1994-95 4040434.576 Noamundi 11015/49/2003 7600000 1994-95 4066100 1995-96 4040365.953 1996-97 4020616.797 11160.36) IA !lIM) and 1995-96 4347655 )997-98 4146998.74 dt. 06/04/2005 7600000 1996-97 43 J6600 1998-99 3971803.32 Total MLA 1000000 1997-98 00 1999-00 4194820.68 1160.06 Ha o 1998-99 4487550 2000-0J 4603398.715 J 1999-2000- A6350 17 2001-02 4756607.024 11015/159/2007 2000-2001- 5114050 2002-03 4856155.84 IA. HIM) 2001-2002 4909000 2003-04 4279352.06 2004-05 5037940.955 d t. 26/08/2008 2002-2003 5085838 2005-06 5005469AJ 10 ~ Total MLA 2003-2004 4947857 2006-07 4560201.47 1160.06 Ha 2004-2005 -5445774 2007-08 4456437.44 2005-2006 5072015 2008-09 4398664.67 2006-2007 5025883 2009-10 .S439423.05 2007-2008- 5289401 2010-11 5210884.32 2008-2009- 4911345 2011-12 4066646.09 2012-13 4241483.95 2009-201 0 - 6076134 Total~85327705.06 2010-2011- 6250948 2011-2012- 4837062 2012-2013-3783709 1'T'_"'_1 _ oo~ ...a: ... a a: IT ...... ,. 0")' t'lOJ::2Q Name of the EC MoEF Approval Production as per Production as per Production as per Sr Lessees & Producti Order, Date & Submission of DMG for Submission of IBM for Submission of Lessee No leases & Area on limit Area Iron Ore (MT ) Iron Ore (MT I for Iron Ore (MT) (ha) (MTI 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 Shri Nirrnal J - 62000 1993-94 10140 1993-94 10 135 1994-9::> 00 Kumar, 11015/32/2010 343000 1994-95 00 1994-95 00 1995-96 10410 Pradip Kumar, IA. Il(M) 1995-96 10410 1995-96 10410 1996-97 7755 (Meralgaraha) d t. 21/12/2012 1996-97 7755 1996-98 00 1997-98 27959 Noamundi Total MLA - 66 781 1997-98 27959 1998-99- 16950 1998-99 16950 (66.781) Ha 1998-99 16950 1999-2000- 7000 1999-00 7000 1999-00 7000 2000-2002 00 2000-02 00 2000-02 00 2002-2003 10749 2002-03 10749.500 2002-03 10749.500 2003-2004 17329 2003-04 17328.950 2003-04 17:)28.950 2004-2005 - 7862 2004-05 7862110 \0 2004-05 7862.110 2005-2006 28664 2005-06 28759.770 (,0) 2005-06 28759.770 2006-2007 - 31613 2006-07 31612.840 2006-07 31612.840 2007-2008- 112858 2007-08 112858.260 2007-08 112858.260 2008-2009 132746 2008-09 132745.810 2008-09 132745.810 2009-2010 49436 2009-10 49436.472 2009-10 49436.472 2010-2011 43346 2010-11 43346.320 20 I 0-1 I 43346.320 2011-2012 9012 2011-12 9012 2011-12 9012 2012-2013 00 Total =513786.032 2012-13 00 Total :- 488110 Total = 523931.032 Name of the I Ee MoEF Approval Production as per Production as per Production as per Sr Lessees & Producti I Order, Date & Submission of DMG for I Submission of IBM for Submission of Lessee No leases & Area on limit Area Iron Ore (MT ) Iron Ore (MT ) for Iron Ore (MT) (ha) (MT) I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 16 Padamkumar J 47000 1993-94 00 1993-94- 18491 1994-9::3 23813 Jain 11015/48/2006 ' 1300000 1994-95 39332 1994-95- 23813 1995-96 55004.500 1996~97 33931.520 Thakurani IA. ll(M) 1995-96 39328 1995-96- 55004 1997-98 21171 34343 1996-97- 68722 Noamundi dt. 24/09/2008 1996-97 1998-99 15645.100 (84.68) Total 1\1LA - 84.68 1997-98 34102 1997-98- 00 1999-00 5653 Ha 1998-99 42243 1998-99- 15645 2000-01 18836 1999-00 5789 1999-2000- 5653 2001-02 14785 2000-01 6123 2000-2001- 18836 2002-03 12960.300 2001-02 14785 2001-2002- 14785 2003-04 442990 190 2004-05 922675.560 2002-03 31160.300 2002-2003- 13160 I 2005-06 1104360.950 \0 2003-04 442990.190 12003-2004- 44290 2006-07 1671910.170 -Iloo 2004-05 922675.560 2004-2005 - 922675 2007-08 1982055.955 2005-06 1104360.950 2005-2006- 1104360 2008-09 2013875.865 2006-07 1671910.170 2006-2007 - 1671910 2009-10 J920027.560 2007-08 1982055.955 2007-2008- 1982056 2010-11 1685441.670 2008-09 2013875.955 2008-2009- 2013876 2011-121299848.880 Total 13244986.22 2009-10 1920027.560 2009-2010 -1920028 2010-11 1685441.670 2010-2011- 1685441 2011-12 1299848.880 2011-2012- 1299849 2012-13 00 2012-2013- 00 ~ Total = 13290392.19 Total :-12878594 Name of the EC MoEF Approval Production as per Production as per Production as per Sr Lessees & Producti Order, Date & Submission of DMG for Submission of IBM for Submission of Lessee No leases & Area on limit Area Iron Ore IMT ) Iron Ore (MT ) for Iron Ore IMTI (hal IMTI I 2 3 4 5 6 7 11 Shn Nirmal j - I1Objl5j2010 44000 1993-94 1334,800 1993-94- 1335 1994-95 00 Kumar. lA -HA(M) 403000 1994-95 00 1994-95 00 1995-96 8655,880 Pradip Kumar, DT2L12.2012 1995-96 8655.880 1995-96 2655 1996-97 12283.900 Ghatkuri RF, Total MLA 149.173 1996-97 12283.900 1996-98 00 1997-98 3845.000 Noamu ndi (Ha) 1997-98 3845 1998-99 6796 1998-99 6796.400 (149.173) 1998-99 6796.400 1999-2000- 6116 1999-00 6116.200 1999-00 6116.200 2000-2001 26784 2000-01 26783.600 2000-01 26783.600 2001-2002 12093 2001-02 12093.660 2001-02 12093.660 2002-2003 3751 2002-03 375 L304 I 2002-03 375L304 2003-2004 222610 2003-04 273329.450 \0 2003-04 273329.450 2004-2005 522942 2004-05 522942.700 CIt 2004-05 522942.700 2005-2006 649191 2005-06 649190.930 2005-06 649190.930 2006-2007 637341 2006-07 637340560 2006-07 637340.560 2007-2008 476246 2007-08 476246.380 2007-08 476246.380 ,2008-2009 628841 2008-09 62884L520 2008-09 62884 L520 2009-2010 - 283268 2009-10 283267.610 2009-10 283267.610 2010-2011 298561 2010-11 29856L330 2010-11 298561.330 2011-2012- 82050 2011-12 00 2011-12 82050 2012-2013- 14430 Total ~ 3850046.424 2012-13 314224.000 Total :- 3875010 Total = 4247655.224 Name of the Ee MoEF Approval Production as per Production as per Production as per Sr Lessees & Producti Order, Date & Submission of DMG for Submission of IBM for Submission of Lessee No leases & Area on limit Area Iron Ore (MT ) Iron Ore IMT I for Iron Ore IMT) (hal IMTI I 2 3 4 5 6 7 18 M/s.SAIL. Iron 1993-94 00 1993-94 2898187 1994-08 00 Gua Ore Mines I J - 0 1994-95 2602673.760 1994-95 2592774 2008-09 12000 Gua, i 11015/453/2008 1250000 1995-96 1919543.600 1995-96- 3418991 2009-10 00 Duaruiburu 1A. 111M) 0 1996-97 2113189.500 1996-97 3893546 2010-11 40000 Mines dt. 25/03/2013 Mangane 1997-98 884366.100 1997-98 -2972266 2011-12 8000 Ghatkuri RF}. TOLal MLA se 1998-99 842552.000 1998-99 2848498 Total = 60000 Noamundi 1443.76 Ha 0 1999-00 1097493.020 1999-2000-2952573 (1443.76) 2000-0 I 1627207.600 2000-2001- 2790963 2001-02 1473966.000 2001-2002 2699358 2002-03 154481.560 2002-2003- 2602134 \0 2003-04 1442309.500 2003-2004-2546155 0\ 2004-05 1470080000 2004-2005 - 2282192 2005-06 2301692880 2005-2006 2620667 2006-07 1617383.650 2006-2007 - 2370140 2007-08 1871004.710 2007-2008- 2584090 2008-09 1117912.550 2008-2009 2584090 2009-10 1589149.750 2009-2010 - 2147645 2010-11 1637493.250 2010-2011- 2378504 2011-12 448397.000 2011-2012-543562 2012-13 00 2012-2013- 00 Total =26210896.43 Total ,- 49726335 i I Name of the EC ! MoEF Approval P d t"1 Production as per Production as per Production as per Sr Lessees & ro uc 1 " Order, Date & 1" It Submtsston of DMG for Submission of IBM for Submission of Lessee No leases & Area Area on lInl I Iron Ore (MT ) for Iron Ore (MT) (ha) (MT) Iron Ore (MT ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 19 M/s.SAIL, 0 1993-94 00 1993-01- 00 1994-9" 88957.68 Manoharpur J - 750000 1994-95 88957.680 2001-2002 175030 1995-96 56821874 Iron Ore Mine 110 15/247/2009 1995-96 56821.874 2002-2003- 203391 1996-97 72930423 Chiriva lA. ll(M] 1996-97 72930.423 2003-2004 214924 1997-98 4703.966 (Sukriluturbur dt. 10/06/2013 I 1997-98 4703.966 2004-2005 - 197838 1998-99 62987.851 , u Iron Ore Total MLA - 609.57 1998-99 62987.851 2005-2006 188334 1999-00 95156.629 Mincsj.Ank'ula Ha 1999-00 95156.629 2006-2007 - 394277 2000-01 170151.21 RF. 2000-01 170151.210 2007-2008 471375 2001-02 200034.63 Manoharpur 2001-02 200034630 2008-2009 228592 2002-03 290559.27 [609.57) 2002-03 290559.270 2009-2013- 00 2003-04 307034.79 \C 2003-04 307034.790 Total :- 2073761 2004-05 282625.37 'I 2004-05 282625.370 2005-06 269048.89 2005-06 269048.890 2006-07 400348 2006-07 400348 2007-08 471375.01 2007-08 471375.010 2008-09 228592.58 2008-09 228592.560 2009-12 00 2009-13 00 Tota1= 3001328.173 Total = 3001328.153 Grand Total Production : [a] As Submitted by DMG :- 311449386.907 MT (b) As Submitted by IBM :- 375378795 MT [c] AS Submitted by Lessess :- 277189619.25 MT Annexure - VIII i List of Lessess showing yearwise Production (given by Director of Mining & Geology, Indian Bureau of Mines and I Lessee) of Manganese Ore who have obtained Environmental Clearance (EC) under EIA Notification Name of the EC Production as MoEF Approval Production as per Production as per Sr lessess and Production per Submission Order , Date and Submission of DMG for Submission of Lessee No Lease and Area Limit of IBM for Mn Area Mn (MT) for Mn (MT) (Ha) (MT) (MT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 Shri Vijaykumar J - 0 1993 94 1531.6 1994-95 3137.200 Ojha, 11015/1043/200 510.72 ] 994-95 3137.2 1995-96 6611.200 BadaBaljori, 7 lAo ll(M) 1995-96 6611.2 1996-97 1872.000 Noamundi dt. 14/07/2008 1996-97 1872 1997-98 4548.800 (2119] Total MLA ]997-98 4548.8 1998-99 7016.000 10 Manganese 21.246 Ha 1998-99 7016 1999-00 2590.800 00 ] 999-00 2590.8 2000-01 2272.340 2000-01 2272.340 2001-02 848.750 2001-02 848.75 2002-03 3867.850 2002-03 3867.85 2003-04 1236.200 2003-04 1236.2 2004-05 2729.050 2004-05 2729.05 2005-06 639.000 2005-06 639 2006-07 522.900 2006-07 522.9 2007-08 73.350 2007-08 73.35 2008-09 510.550 2008-09 510.55 2009-10 510 2009-10 510 2010-11 510 2010-11 510 2011-12 00 2011-12 00 Total = 39495.99 2012 1300 Total = 41027.59 Name of the EC Production as MoEF Approval Production as per Production as per Sr lessess and Production per Submission Order ,Date and Submission of DMG for Submission of Lessee No Lease and Area Limit of IBM for Mn Area Mn (MT) for Mn (MT) (Ha) (MT) (MT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 2 Shn Rameshwar J - . Iron 1993 -94 ] ] 4 ] 994-0] 00 Jute Mills, 110]5/1]47/200 30000 1994 - 0] 00 200] - 02 ]79 Baraiburu, 7 IA. l1{M) 2260000 200] - 02 ]79 2002 - 03 29] Noamundi dt. ]5/04/20]] Manganese 2002 - 03 29] 2003 - 04 00 (258.99) Total MLA 300 2003 - 04 00 2004 05 288 258.98968 Ha 4000 2004 - 05 288 2005 - 08 00 2005 - 08 00 2008-09 303 2008-09 303 2009-] 0 257 2009- ]0 257 20]0-]] 00 \0 2010-] ] 00 20]]-]2 282 \0 2011-]2 282 Total = 1600 Total = 1714 Name of the EC Production as MoEF Approval Production as per Production as per Sr lessess and Production per Submission Order , Date and Submission of DMG for Submission of Lessee No Lease and Area Limit of IBM for Mn Area Mn(MT) for Mn (MTj (Haj (MT) (MT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 3 M/s Devkabai J - Iron 1993-96 00 1994-07 00 Velji 11015/377/2007 0 1996-97 7189.545 2007-08 11836.009 Ghatkuri Iron IA. II(M) dt. 600000 1997-98 7786.544 2008-09 15416 Ore Mines, 16/01/2009 Manganese 1998-99 2271115 2009-10 4900 Ajitaburu Total MLA - 46.62 0 1999-00 11838.237 2010-11 4159 Ghatkuri RF, Ha 4275 2000-01 00 2011-12 00 Noamundi 2001-02 1967.335 Total = 36311.009 (46.62) 2002-03 194 I-l 2003-04 3322 o 2004-05 1750 o 2005-07 00 2007-08 11836.009 2008-09 15416 2009-10 4900 2010-11 4159 2011-12 4273 2012-13 4266.13 Total = 81168.915 Name of the EC Production as MoEF Approval Production as per Production as per Sr lessess and Production per Submission Order , Date and Submission of DMG for Submission of Lessee No Lease and Area Limit of IBM for Mn Area Mn (MT) for Mn (MT) (Ha) (MT) (MT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 4 M/s.SAIL, J - Iron 1994-08 00 Gua Ore Mines 11015/453/2008 0 2008-09 12000 Gua, IA. II(M) dt. 12500000 2009-10 00 Duaruiburu 25/03/2013 Manganese 2010-11 40000 Mines Total MLA 0 2011-12 8000 Ghatkuri RF), 1443.76 Ha Total = 60000 Noamundi (1443.76) I-' Grand Total Production: o I-' (a) As Submitted by DMG: 183910.505 MT (b ) As Submitted by Lessee: 77406.999 MT Annexure - IX Statement showing yearwise Excess Production done by Lessees as per EC and / or in Excess of EC Sr Name of the Quantity Approved (MT) Date of Expire Unlawful/Illegal Unlawful/Illegal Unlawful/Illegal No Lessee & lease EC Approval Upper of Lease production estimated production estimated production estimated Order No. and limits based on Dl\'IG Data for based on IBM Data for based on DMG Data for Date From - Iron Iron (MT) Manganese (MT ) To IMTJ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ] IShri ,) - 0 20/01/1971 1993-94 00 Vijavkumar 11015/1043/20 510.72 1994-95 3137.2 IOjila 07 IA ]JIM( dt. 1995-96 661 L2 BactaBaljori. 14/07/2008 1996-97 1872 Noarnundi Total MLA 1997-98 4548.8 (21. ;91 21.246 Ha I 1998-99 7016 Manganese I 1999-00 25908 I I 2000-01 21713-40 2001-02 848.75 I 2002-03 3867.85 .... 2003-04 1236.2 o 2004-05 2719.05 tv 2005-06 639 2006-07 5229 2007-08 73.35 2008-13 00 Total 037965.44 2 Rungta Mines ,) - 0 21/11/1994 1994-0:;) 00 1993-06- 00 (Meralgara] , 11015/596/200 360000 2005-06 5350.910 2006-2007 - 407406 Meralgadha. 7 1A !lIM) dt, 2006-07 407405.890 2007-2008- 150859 Noamundi 20/08/2008 2007-08 150859.450 2008-2013· 00 (122.021 Total MLA 2008-13 00 Total:- 558265 122.017 Ha Total = 563616.25 Sr Name of the Quantity Approved (MT) Date of Expire Unlawful/Illegal Unlawful/Illegal Unlawful/Illegal No Lessee & lease EC Approval Upper of Lease production estimated production estimated production estimated Order No. and limits based on DMG Data for based on IBM Data for based on DMG Data for Date From - Iron Iron (MT) Manganese (MT I To (MT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 3 ShTi ,J - Iron 04/03/l986 1993 - 921 00 1993-200 r 00 1993- 01 00 Ramcsbwar 11015/1147/20 30000 1995-96 21104 2007-2008- 234339 2001-02 179 Jute Mills. 07 lA 11(M) 2260000 1996-97 27205 2008-2009 253317 2002-03 291 Baraiburu, dt. 15/04/2011 Manganes 1997-98 784 2009-2010- 180616 2003-04 00 Noamundi Total MLA- e 300 1998-99 3242 2010-2011 210299 2004-05 288 (258.99) 258_98968 Ea 4000 1999-00 4056 12011-2013- 00 2005-0800 2000-01 774 ITota1 , 878571 2008-09 303 2001-02 25 2009-10 257 2002-03 135 2010-12 00 2003-04 50 Total = 1318 2004-05 120 2005-06 360 I-l 2006-07 2000 o 2007-08 234339 CU 2008-09 25:::316 2009-10 180616 I 2010-11 210299 , 2011-13 00 Total ::0 938425 , Sr Name of the Quantity Approved (MT) Date of Expire Unlawful/Illegal Unlawful/Illegal Unlawful I Illegal No Lessee & lease EC Approval Upper of Lease production estimated production estimated production estimated Order No. and limits based on DMG Data for based on IBM Data for based on DMG Data for Date From - Iron Iron (MT) Manganese (MT ) To (MTJ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Mis. SAIL, J - 0 07/03/1978 1993 -94 00 1993-01- 00 " Manoharpur 11015/251/200 750000 1994-95 92974.450 2001-2001- 254972 iron Ore Mine 9 lA. 1995-96 68261.580 2002-2003 191424 Chiriva (Dhobil 111M) 1996-97 155183.400 2003-2004 210230 Iron Ore dt. 24/01/2012 1997-98 97722.]00 2004-2005 - 217726 Mines), Total MLA - 1998-99 102940600 2005-2006 307013 Budhaburu, 513.036 Ha 1999-00 H2564.900 2006-2007 - 8219] 7 Ankula HF, 2000-01 33699ij.500 2007-2008- 964527 Manoharpur 2001-02 282810.000 2008-2009 558749 1512.95) 2002-03 273463.300 2009-2010 - 683968 2003-04 300328.700 2010-2011 313846 2004-05 311058.700 2011-2013 00 .... 2005-06 4.38590.000 Total :- 4524372 o 2006-07 790127 .200 -Iloo 2007-08 964527.000 2008-09 558748_980 2009-10 683968.000 I 2010-11 305035,000 I 2011-12 00 Total 0 5905298.41 Sr Name of the Quantity Approved (MT) Date of Expire Unlawful/Illegal Unlawful ! lllegal Unlawful I Illegal No Lessee & lease EC Approval Upper of Lease production estimated production estimated production estimated Order No. and limits based on DMG Data for based on IBM Data for based on DMG Data for Date From - Iron Iron (MT) Manganese (MT ) To (MT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 5 Rungta Mines J - 25000 23/01/1999 1993-03 00 1993-03 00 (Ghatkun RF), 11015/198/200 1800000 2003-04 170866.300 2003-2004 170866 Ncamundi 6 1A. l1(M) cit. and 2004-05 533049 2004-2005 533049 (13885) 15/04/2008 1800000 2005-06 ..+7412] 2005-2006 474121 Total MLA 7552000 2006-07 615470.740 2006-2007 61547] 138.848 Ha 2007-08 883584.125 2007-2008 883584 and J - 2008-13 00 2008-2013 00 11015/57/2010 Totalo2677091.16S To'tal i- 2677091 IA. Tl(M) de 22/05/2013 Total MLA 138.848 Ha o""" en Area 27.518 ] 994-9 { 00 Ha (In 1997-98 28000 Past) 1998-99 15500 1999-01 00 Total = 43500 - Area 202_349 Ha (In Past) Sr Name of the Quantity Approved (MT) Date of Expire Unlawful/Illegal Unlawful I Illegal Unlawful I Illegal No Lessee & lease EC Approval Upper of Lease production estimated production estimated production estimated Order No. and limits based on DMG Data for based on IBM Data for based on DMG Data for Date From - Iron Iron (MT) Manganese (MT ) To (MT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 6 Singhbhum 4200 14/01/1992 i 993-03 00 1993-03 00 J Minerals co. I 110] 5/873/200 1O0000 2003-04 4155.577 2003-2004 4156 (Transfer in 7 1A. 111M) de 2004-05 59590.57 2004-2005 - 15378 the name of 05/11/i2008 2005-06 52384.815 2005-2006 50000 R8m Minerals Total ]\lLA - 2006-07 174.400 2006-2007 - 174400 Co.) 265.88 Ha 2007-09 00 2007-2009 00 Khasjamda, 2009-10 35291 2009-20] 0 - 35291 Noamundi 2010-11 497186 2010-2011- 497186 (265.88) 2011-12 83642470 201 ]-2012 40927 2012-13 00 2012-2013- 00 Total 732424.832 Total : 817338 .... 7 Shri Anilkumar J - 39000 30/04/2002 1993-94 00 1993-94 00 o Khirval. 11015/142/200 74000 1994-95 12085.00 1994-95- 12085 0\ Bandhburuflvo 7 IA. 111M) dt. 1995-96 2..q.l0J.OO 1995-96 24101 amundi PF), 13/04/2011 1996-97 20756.00 1996-13 00 Noamundi Total MV.. - 1997-98 16178.00 Total> 36186 (22.53) 19.331 l-la I 1998-99 68800 1999-01 00 2001-02 3540 00 I 2002-04 00 2004-03 59644.00 2005·09 00 2009-10 5875.840 2010-11 6936.760 2011- ):3 00 Total = 149804.6 Sr Name of the Quantity Approved"(MTJ Date of Expire Unlawful! Illegal Unlawful/Illegal Unlawful f Illegal No Lessee & lease EC Approval Upper of Lease production estimated production estimated production estimated Order No. and limits based on DMG Data for based on IBM Data for based on DMG Data for Date From - Iron Iron (MT) Manganese (MT 1 To (MT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 8 l'vljs Shah J - 60000 09/07/2002 1993-04 00 1993-04 00 Brothers 1 iOI5/24/2006 100000 2004-05 232061 2004-2005 - 23206 I Kararnpada IA.II(M) dt. 2005-06 115810 2005-2006- 1287006 Iron Ore 23/01/2007 2006-13 00 2006-2007 - 00 Mines, Total MLA- Total "= 347871 2007-2008 451490 Karampada 233.99 Ha 2008-2009 619576 RF, , 2009-2010 - 621199 Manoharpur 2010-2011 886673 (233.89) 2011-2013- 00 Total :- 4098005 9 "!VI L Jain And J - a 26/0"/2003 1993-95 00 1993-90- 00 I-' Sons. 11015/318/200 90000 1995-96 53947 1995-96 53947 o Karampada 6 lA. II(M) dt. 1996-97 42446 1996-97 42446 ...:r RF, ]5/12/2008 1997-98 21416 1997-98 00 Noamundi Total IVILA - 1998-99 26403 1998-99 26403 (202.35) 202.03 Ha 1999-00 38777 1999-2000 38777 2000-0 I 28361 2000-2001- 28361 2001-02 1806 2001-2002- 1806 2002-03 7754 2002-2003- 7754 2003-04 117187 2003-2004- 117187 2004-05 35121 2004-2005 - 35121 2005-07 00 2005-2007 00 2007-08 3984.565 2007-2008 3985 2008-09 203090.700 2008-2009 203091 2009-10 126264460 2009-2010 - 126265 2010-11 86123 2010-2013 00 2011-12 96890.240 Total : 685143 2012-13 00 Total 889570.965 Sr Name of the Quantity Approved (MT) Date of Expire Unlawful I Illegal Unlawful / Illegal Unlawful J Illegal No Lessee & lease EC Approval Upper of Lease production estimated production estimated production estimated Order No. and limits based on DMG Data for based on IBM Data for based on DMG Data for Date From - Iron Iron (MT) Manganese (MT ) To (MT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 Mis Devkabai J - Iron 03/08j1983 1993-0 i 00 1993-07 00 J993-99 00 Velji 1]015/377/200 2007-08 300787.008 2007-2008 317937 1999-0011838.237 Ghatkuri Iron 7 Ii\. !lIM) dt. 600000° 2008-13 00 2008-2013 00 2000-07 00 Ore Mines, 16/01/2009 Manganes Total 300787.008 Total ; 317937 2007-08 7561.009 Ajitaburu Total MLA - e 2008-09 11141 Ghatkuri RF, 4662 Ha 4275 ° 2009-10 625 Noamundi 2010-13 00 (46.62) Total 31165.246 11 Mis Usha J - 0 17/08/20221 1993-0(- 00 Martin 11015/48/2001 650000 I 200'7-2008- 239932 Ghatkuri Iron [A, IT(Mj elt I 2008-2013 00 .... Ore Mines. 19/04/2005 Total : 239932 o Ghatkuri RF. Total Mi.A - 00 Noamundi 155.078 Ha &. (155.078) Corrigendum Dt.. 29,/05/2006 J - 6;:,0000 11015/507.'2007 2500000 lA.Il(:I,·T] J - 2500000 11015/306/2009 4000000 IA. JJ(M) dt. 17 / ]2/2009 Total MLA 155.078 Ha -