DOCSLIB.ORG

SCHS Study No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SCHS Study No SCHS Studies A Special Report Series by the State Center for Health Statistics 1908 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1908 North Carolina Public Health www.schs.state.nc.us/SCHS/ No. 146 December 2004 Health Risks and Conditions among American Indians in North Carolina by Ziya Gizlice, Ph.D. Sara Huston, Ph.D. ABSTRACT Objectives: North Carolina has the eighth largest American Indian population in the United States. American Indians have high death rates for a number of specific causes of death. However, North Carolina has lacked comprehensive statewide information about health risks in its American Indian populations. The objective of this study is to examine health risks and conditions among adult North Carolina American Indians, in comparison to whites and African Americans, and to provide baseline data for health indicators among American Indians. Data: The 2002-2003 North Carolina Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data. Methods: Unadjusted and age-adjusted percentages and adjusted odds ratios were calculated using weighted BRFSS data for 20 selected health indicators from five major areas: chronic conditions, risk factors, access to health care, preventive behavior, and quality of life. Results: Seventeen of the 20 age-adjusted health indicators examined in this study showed a significant health disparity between American Indians and whites: diabetes (14.1% among American Indians vs. 6.8% among whites); high blood pressure (40.2% vs. 26.6%); asthma (16.4% vs. 11.1%); arthritis (36.3% vs. 29.1%); obesity (33.2% vs. 20.9%); not getting the recommended level of physical activity (71.0% vs. 59.0%); having no leisure- time physical activity (32.4% vs. 23.7%); consuming less than 5 servings of fruits and vegetables a day (80.3% vs.74.8%); not getting a flu shot in the last year (73.0% vs. 66.1%); not having current health insurance (19.2% vs. 13.4%); not being able to see a doctor due to cost (29.4% vs. 12.4%); not having a personal doctor (21.8% vs. 16.4%); fair or poor health (25.9% vs. 17.5%); disability (38.5% vs. 24.9%); 14 or more poor mental health days a month (13.9% vs. 8.8%); 14 or more poor physical health days a month (14.2% vs. 9.7%); and 14 or more activity-limited days a month (11.6% vs. 5.7%). Many of these differences persisted even after controlling for socio-demographic characteristics. Conclusions: North Carolina American Indians adults have significantly higher rates of chronic conditions and risk factors, less access to health care, and lower quality of life compared to whites. The levels of these health problems are similar for American Indians and African Americans. To eliminate health disparities between American Indians and whites and improve the quality of life among American Indians (Healthy People 2010 goals), North Carolina needs to tailor health promotion and disease control programs to the American Indian population. The prevalence estimates provided in this study can serve as baseline information for designing and evaluating these programs. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Introduction Studies focusing on health risks at tribal levels also found that many tribes had higher health risks and North Carolina has the eighth largest American conditions than the general populations of the states Indian population in the nation. According to 2002 where these tribes lived. In Montana, more than half United States population estimates, 111,255 of American Indians were current smokers and a American Indians live in North Carolina, approx- third were using smokeless tobacco on the Black- imately 4 percent of all American Indians in the feet Reservation and in Great Falls. 13 Hopi Indian country. American Indians have higher overall death women had a higher obesity rate than other Arizona rates than whites, particularly for heart disease, adult women,14 and Catawba and Lumbee Indians, diabetes, homicide, AIDS, and motor vehicle along with upper Midwest Indians, had higher rates injuries, both in North Carolina and nationwide.1,2 of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, hypertension, Yet there has not been comprehensive North fair/poor perceived health status, and current Carolina statewide information available regarding tobacco use compared to other adults in their states, American Indian health risks, conditions, and respectively. 15,16 behaviors that are associated with these leading causes of death. North Carolina has eight organized American Indian tribes: Coharie, Eastern Band of Cherokee, A few studies have examined health risks and Haliwa-Saponi, Lumbee, Waccamaw-Siouan, behaviors of American Indians nationwide. These Meherrin Indian, Occaneechi, and Sappony tribes. studies found that American Indians were at Only the Eastern Band of the Cherokee Nation is significantly higher risk than whites for fair-to-poor federally recognized and has access to Indian general health status, lack of access to health care, Health Service facilities. Approximately 60 percent binge drinking, cigarette smoking, being diagnosed of North Carolina’s American Indians belong to the with diabetes, and obesity. 3-5 Regional differences Lumbee or Cherokee tribes and live in a few have also been reported among American Indians counties (Hoke/Robeson/Scotland and Jackson/ in prevalence estimates for health risks and Swain). Large population sizes and high con- conditions. 6 For example, the prevalence of current centrations in a few counties have made the cigarette smoking was higher among Northern Plain Lumbee and Eastern Band of Cherokee tribes more Indians (44.1%) than among American Indians attractive to public health researchers to study. A overall in the United States (21.2%). study of Lumbee Indian women in Robeson County found that the prevalence of current smokeless Some studies have examined the health behaviors tobacco use was 20.6 percent, much higher than the and conditions of American Indians only at state or 1.3 percent rate for all North Carolina women, regional levels, often with findings similar to the according to the 2003 BRFSS survey. 17 national results. American Indians had higher rates Another of health risks and conditions than the general study found that prevalence rates of cardiovascular risk factors such as diabetes, hypertension, and high population in Oklahoma,7 and drastically higher cholesterol were much higher among Lumbees, rates of smoking and other cardiovascular disease compared to the state’s adult population.16 risk factors than did non-Indians in Montana 8,9 and Women from the Eastern Band of the Cherokee Nation had in Washington State.10 In contrast, the rate of non- a smoking rate of 39 percent, compared to the state ceremonial smoking among New Mexico rural rate of 25 percent.18 American Indians was lower than among the general population of New Mexico.11 A study in More than 40 percent of North Carolina American Minnesota showed that American Indian-Alaska Indians live in the rest of the 100 North Carolina Native adolescents reported higher rates of health- counties. Comprehensive data have not been compromising behaviors and risk factors than rural available on health risks and behaviors among all white youths in that state.12 American Indians in North Carolina. Recent SCHS Study No. 146 – Health of American Indians2 State Center for Health Statistics expansion of the Behavioral Risk Factor We chose 20 health indicators covering the topics Surveillance System (BRFSS) has yielded a large of chronic disease, health and behavioral risk, enough sample size to study all American Indian preventive practices, access to health care, and adults in North Carolina. This study examines quality of life. Two indicators – high blood pressure health risks and conditions among adult American and not being able to see a doctor due to cost in the Indians in North Carolina in comparison to whites past year – were asked only during 2003. For all and African Americans, using 2002-2003 North other indicators, the two years of data were Carolina BRFSS data, and provides baseline data aggregated. for leading health indicators among North Carolina American Indians. Chronic diseases were determined by self-reports of doctor-diagnosed arthritis, asthma, diabetes, and high blood pressure. The risk factors examined were current smoking, not getting the recom- Methods mended level of physical activity (at least 30 The data used for this study were from the 2002 and minutes per day of moderate physical activity on 5 2003 North Carolina Behavioral Risk Factor or more days per week or at least 20 minutes per Surveillance System (BRFSS), a multistage, day of vigorous physical activity on three or more random-digit dialing, statewide telephone survey of days per week), no leisure-time physical activity, non-institutionalized adult residents age 18 and consumption of less than 5 servings of fruits and older. During the two-year study period, 16,203 vegetables per day, binge drinking, and obesity (a North Carolina adults were interviewed. Of these, risk condition). The two preventive behaviors 12,050 were white, 2,933 were African American, examined were not having a flu shot within the past and 434 were American Indian, based on responses year and never having a pneumonia vaccination. No to two questions about race. (Hispanic ethnicity was current health insurance coverage, not being able not considered in racial grouping.) The first to see a doctor due to cost, and having no personal question was “Which one or more of the following doctor were the measures chosen to examine access would you say is your race?” If a respondent to health care. Fair or poor general health status, reported a single race, the response from the first perceived disability, and three “healthy days” question was used as the race variable. If a measures (14 or more poor mental health days, 14 respondent reported more than one race, a second or more poor physical health days, and 14 or more question was asked: “Which one of these groups activity-limited days in the past month) were used would you say best represents your race?” and the to examine quality of life.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Colorblind Turn in Indian Country: Lumbee Indians, Civil Rights, and Tribal State Formation
    The Colorblind Turn in Indian Country: Lumbee Indians, Civil Rights, and Tribal State Formation by Harold Walker Elliott A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (History) in the University of Michigan 2019 Doctoral Committee: Professor Philip Deloria, Co-Chair, Harvard University Professor Matthew Lassiter, Co-Chair Associate Professor Matthew Countryman Professor Barbra Meek Professor Tiya Miles, Harvard University Harold Walker Elliott [email protected] ORCID iD 0000-0001-5387-3188 © Harold Walker Elliott 2019 DEDICATION To my father and mother, Hal and Lisa Elliott And for Lessie Sweatt McCloud, her ancestors, and her descendants ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This dissertation is the culmination of eight years of graduate study and nearly a decade of research, writing, and editing. The result is deeply imperfect. Its faults come from my many shortcomings as an author. For anything this project does accomplish, I owe credit to the many people who have helped me along the way. Completing this project would have been impossible without the love, support, and inspiration of my parents, Hal and Lisa Elliott. During my upbringing, they instilled the values that guided me through the moral choices that a project like this one entails. My mother and her family have always been the driving forces behind my research into Lumbee and American Indian history. My father, a reluctant physician, passed down his fondness for history and dream of writing it. In the many difficult moments over the past eight years, my parents steadied me with long hugs or reassuringly familiar, South Carolina-accented voices on the phone.
    [Show full text]
  • U Ni Ted States Departmen T of the Interior
    Uni ted States Departmen t of the Interior BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS WASHINGTON, D.C. 20245 • IN REPLY REFER TO; MAR 281984. Tribal Government ;)ervices-F A MEMORANDUM To: A!:sistant Secretary - Indian Affairs From: DE!Puty Assistant Secretary - Indian Affairs (Operations) Subject: Rc!cornmendation and Summary of Evidence for Proposed Finding Against FE!deral Acknowledgment of the United Lumbee Nation of North Carolina and America, Inc. Pursuant to 25 CFR 83. Recom mendatiol We recommend thut the United Lumbee Nation of North Carolina and America, Inc • (hereinafter "UGN") not be acknowledged as an Indian tribe entitled to a government­ to-government ]'elationship with the United States. We further recommend that a letter of the proposecl dc:!termination be forwarded to the ULN and other interested parties, • and that a notiC!e of the proposed finding that they do not exist as an Indian tribe be published in th4~ P,ederal Register. General Conclusions The ULN is a recently formed organization which did not exist prior to 1976. The organization WHS c!onceived, incorporated and promoted by one individual for personal interests and ,Ud not evolve from a tribal entity which existed on a substantially continuous bash from historical times until the present. The ULN has no relation to the Lumbees of the Robeson County area in North Carolina (hereinafter "Lumbees") historically soci.ally, genealogically, politically or organizationally. The use of the name "Lumbee" by Ule lILN appears to be an effort on the part of the founder, Malcolm L. Webber (aka Chief Thunderbird), to establish credibility in the minds of recruits and outside organiz Ilticlns.
    [Show full text]
  • Surnames Carter Through Davis
    -:2'f­ CARTER Heinegg (2002) dates the family back to freed slaves. The name may be found among White or Lumbee families in Robeson. The name does not appear in tax lists of 1763, 1769, the "Rioters" list of 1773 or the tax list of 1777 for "mixed blood." There were numerous Carters listed in Bladen tax lists between 1775 and 1789 (Henry, Isaac, James Jr. James Sr., Jesse, John, Joseph, Luke, Mark and William). In the 1776 tax list, James Sr., Isaac and Mark were listed together as Mulattoes. Carter appears in census reports of both Robeson and Sampson counties in 1790. James Carter patented 100 acres on Little Branch 3 Feb. 1779 and Mark Carter, 100 acres south of Hogg Swamp on the same date. Corroborative birth dates reported in the 1850 census date the Carters back to 1796 or earlier in Robeson. Deeds, both grantor and grantee, had Benjamin Lamb conveying 100 acres west of Hog Swamp to James Carter Sr. in 1790. Emanuel Carter [note the double Lumbee name] was listed as mulatto in the 1790 census with a family of five. Emanuel Carter had a State Grant in 1794 for 100 acres on Little Swamp. Emanuel Carter bought 150 more acres on Great Swamp from John McKay in 1797 and 50 more acres on Ashpole from James Lowery in 1797. William Carter had a State Grant for 37 acres at Burnt Island(s) in 1798. James and Luke Carter were listed as mulatoe in the 1830 census. By 1850 the name Carter was found in no less than 15 different households, some designated as White and others as Lumbee or "free persons of color." The surname Carter was listed in the 1880 census schedule for St.
    [Show full text]
  • Surnames Davis Through Groom
    the Lumbee Troy Davis of Red Springs, ran very close in Saddletree Township to that of the RFD address of White Troy Davis out of Lumberton. The name is found in the GrahamILowery family cemetery off Prospect Rd. and at Island Grove Baptist Church cemetery, on Island Grove Road, as cited by Jane Blanks Barnhill, Sacred Grounds, 2007, a listing of 162 Lumbee cemeteries of Robeson County. Some by the Davis surname are Black and some were self-identified as Indian in the 1900 Census of Robeson and were listed in the 1900 Indian Census Schedule. The surname Davis was the 6th most popular in the first federal census of America in 1790. DEAL Listed in the 1900 Indian Census Schedule of Robeson County. Death records show the Indian name of Deal in 1954 in Alfordsville township. DEESIDEESEIDEASIDEASE The Lumbee name of Dees first occurred in Bladen in 1773 and again in 1790. Wm Deese was listed in Bladen in 1784. Two Deas were listed as tax payers in Anson County in 1763 and two tax payers were listed in Sampson County in 1784. They appear to have been widely dispersed over the Settlement area. Richard Dees patented 150 acres in Chesterfield County, S.C. on Lynches Creek 8 July 1774 (Royal Land Grants, Craven, Cheraw and Chesterfield Counties, S.C.) The 1850 census of Robeson had Deas family members reporting birth in N.C. by 1780. The name was self-identified as Indian in the 1900 Census of Robeson and listed in the 1900 Indian Census. The Directory of Robeson County, 1900, has some named Dees and Deese as white in Lumberton in 1900.
    [Show full text]
  • 8 Tribes, 1 State: Native Americans in North Carolina
    8 Tribes, 1 State: North Carolina’s Native Peoples As of 2014, North Carolina has 8 state and federally recognized Native American tribes. In this lesson, students will study various Native American tribes through a variety of activities, from a PowerPoint led discussion, to a study of Native American art. The lesson culminates with students putting on a Native American Art Show about the 8 recognized tribes. Grade 8 Materials “8 Tribes, 1 State: Native Americans in North Carolina” PowerPoint, available here: o http://civics.sites.unc.edu/files/2014/06/NCNativeAmericans1.pdf o To view this PDF as a projectable presentation, save the file, click “View” in the top menu bar of the file, and select “Full Screen Mode”; upon completion of presentation, hit ESC on your keyboard to exit the file o To request an editable PPT version of this presentation, send a request to [email protected] “Native American Art Handouts #1 – 7”, attached North Carolina Native American Tribe handouts, attached o Lumbee o Eastern Band of Cherokee o Coharie o Haliwa-­­‑ Saponi o Meherrin o Occaneechi Band of the Saponi Nation o Sappony o Waccamaw Siouan “Create a Native American Art Exhibition” handout, attached “Native Americans in North Carolina Fact Sheet”, attached Brown paper or brown shopping bags (for the culminating project) Graph paper (for the culminating project) Art supplies (markers, colored pencils, crayons, etc. Essential Questions: What was life like for Native Americans before the arrival of Europeans? What happened to most Native American tribes after European arrival? What hardships have Native Americans faced throughout their history? How many state and federally recognized tribes are in North Carolina today? Duration 90 – 120 minutes Teacher Preparation A note about terminology: For this lesson, the descriptions Native American and American Indian are 1 used interchangeably when referring to more than one specific tribe.
    [Show full text]
  • American Indian Tribes in North Carolina
    Published on NCpedia (https://www.ncpedia.org) Home > American Indian Tribes in North Carolina American Indian Tribes in North Carolina [1] Share it now! Average: 3.5 (393 votes) Map of N.C. Tribal and Urban Communities, from the N.C. Commission of Indian Affairs, 2020. [2]American Indian Tribes in North Carolina Originally published as "The State and Its Tribes" by Gregory A. Richardson Reprinted with permission from the Tar Heel Junior Historian, Fall 2005. Tar Heel Junior Historian Association, NC Museum of History See also: Native American Settlement [3]; North Carolina's Native Americans (collection page) [4] North Carolina has the largest American Indian population east of the Mississippi River and the eighth-largest Indian population in the United States. As noted by the 2000 U.S. Census [5], 99,551 American Indians lived in North Carolina, making up 1.24 percent of the population. This total is for people identifying themselves as American Indian alone. The number is more than 130,000 when including American Indian in combination with other races. The State of North Carolina recognizes eight tribes: Eastern Band of Cherokee [6] (tribal reservation in the Mountains) Coharie [7] (Sampson and Harnett counties) Lumbee [8] (Robeson and surrounding counties) Haliwa-Saponi [9] (Halifax and Warren counties) Sappony [10] (Person County [11]) Meherrin [12](Hertford and surrounding counties) Occaneechi Band of Saponi Nation [13] (Alamance and surrounding counties) Waccamaw-Siouan [14] (Columbus and Bladen counties) North Carolina also has granted legal status to four organizations representing and providing services for American Indians living in urban areas: Guilford Native American Association (Guilford and surrounding counties), Cumberland County Association for Indian People (Cumberland County), Metrolina Native American Association [15] (Mecklenburg and surrounding counties), and Triangle Native American Society [16] (Wake and surrounding counties).
    [Show full text]
  • North Carolina Minority Health Facts: American Indians
    North Carolina Minority Health Facts: American Indians State Center for Health Statistics and Office of Minority Health and Health Disparities July 2010 The purpose of this report is to present basic health in 12 counties, five of which are clustered in the facts about American Indians in North Carolina in southeastern part of the state. Forty-five percent of the areas of mortality, chronic diseases, HIV and North Carolina’s American Indian population lives sexually transmitted diseases, health risk factors, in Robeson County (mostly Lumbee), accounting access to health care, quality of life, maternal and for 38 percent of that county’s total population. infant health, and child and adolescent health. But Seven percent of North Carolina’s American first we give some background information on the Indians live in Jackson and Swain counties (mostly American Indian population in the state. Cherokee), accounting for nearly 15 percent of the total population in these counties.1 Age and Geographic Characteristics of Among the American Indian tribes in North Carolina American Indians in North Carolina are eight state-recognized tribes: the Eastern Band North Carolina has the largest American Indian of Cherokee (who live primarily in Swain, Jackson, population east of the Mississippi River and the and Graham counties), Coharie Tribe (Harnett, sixth largest American Indian population in the Sampson), Haliwa Saponi Indian Tribe (Halifax, nation, according to 2008 U.S. Census Bureau Warren, Nash), Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina population estimates. According to the census, there (Robeson, Scotland, Hoke), Meherrin Indian Tribe were 108,279 American Indian/Alaskan Native (Hertford, Bertie, Gates, Northampton), Occaneechi residents of North Carolina in 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Lumbee Recognition Act” Before the House Subcommittee for Indigenous Peoples of the United States
    TESTIMONY OF PRINCIPAL CHIEF RICHARD SNEED EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS A HEARING ON H.R. 1964, THE “LUMBEE RECOGNITION ACT” BEFORE THE HOUSE SUBCOMMITTEE FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF THE UNITED STATES December 4, 2019 Chairman Gallego, Leader Cook, members of the Indigenous Peoples of the United States Subcommittee, thank you for the opportunity to testify today to provide the views of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians on H.R. 1964, the “Lumbee Recognition Act.” For over a century, the Lumbees in North Carolina have sought federal recognition as an Indian tribe, which, under federal law, should be an Indigenous people with a governing body that preexisted the founding of the United States.1 The Lumbees have falsely claimed to be a Cherokee tribe, and groups and individuals within the Lumbee continue to appropriate our Cherokee identity. But the Cherokees are not the only tribal identity that the Lumbees have sought to falsely appropriate. They have cloaked themselves in the identities of many other tribes in trying to achieve acknowledgment as a tribe from the federal government. Even since the last Congress, the Lumbees have changed from identifying themselves as the “Lumbee Tribe of Cheraw Indians” to the more general “Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina,” described as an amalgamation of tribes based on general dialects—not specific historic tribes with identifiable governing bodies. As you may know, Lumbee is not an historical tribe but a derivation of the word “Lumber” from the Lumbee location near the Lumber River. Finally, based on the research of third-party experts, we do not believe that most Lumbees today can demonstrate any Native ancestry at all, and this bill seeks to prevent a substantive review of this fact.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Funding for Non-Federally Recognized Tribes
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to the Honorable Dan Boren, GAO House of Representatives April 2012 INDIAN ISSUES Federal Funding for Non-Federally Recognized Tribes GAO-12-348 April 2012 INDIAN ISSUES Federal Funding for Non-Federally Recognized Tribes Highlights of GAO-12-348, a report to the Honorable Dan Boren, House of Representatives Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found As of January 3, 2012, the United Of the approximately 400 non-federally recognized tribes that GAO identified, States recognized 566 Indian tribes. 26 received funding from 24 federal programs during fiscal years 2007 through Federal recognition confers specific 2010. Most of the 26 non-federally recognized tribes were eligible to receive this legal status on tribes and imposes funding either because of their status as nonprofit organizations or state- certain responsibilities on the federal recognized tribes. Similarly, most of the 24 federal programs that awarded government, such as an obligation to funding to non-federally recognized tribes during the 4-year period were provide certain benefits to tribes and authorized to fund nonprofit organizations or state-recognized tribes. In addition, their members. Some tribes are not some of these programs were authorized to fund other entities, such as tribal federally recognized but have qualified communities or community development financial institutions. for and received federal funding. Some of these non-federally recognized For fiscal years 2007 through 2010, 24 federal programs awarded more than tribes are state recognized and may be $100 million to the 26 non-federally recognized tribes. Most of the funding was located on state reservations.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Calendar of Events
    N.C. Commission of Indian Affairs 2018 Calendar of Events JANUARY MARCH January 26 March 1 Indian Child Welfare Act Training Symposium NC Commission of Indian Affairs Quarterly National Indian Child Welfare Association Meeting Cape Fear Community College Held in conjunction with the NC Indian Unity Wilmington, NC Conference, Greensboro, NC CLE's and CEU's provided (919) 807-4442 Registration is required Email: [email protected] Please contact Lori McClain (919) 807-4448 [email protected] March 1-3 Held in partnership with the Administrative Office NC Indian Unity Conference of Courts and the Department of Health and 43rd Annual Conference Human Services Sheraton Greensboro Hotel Joseph S. Koury Convention Center FEBRUARY Greensboro, North Carolina http://united-tribes.org/ February 12 National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) 2018 State of Indian Nations March 25 Newseum, 555 Pennsylvania Avenue 25th Annual ECU Pow-wow Washington, DC 12:00 noon until 6:00 pm Contact: Amy Gay East Carolina University Email: [email protected] Minges Coliseum Greenville, NC February 12 – 15 Contact: Aleisha Hunt National Congress of American Indians (252) 864-7162 (NCAI) 2018 Executive Council Winter [email protected] Session (115th Session) Capital Hilton 1001 16th St. NW Washington, DC Contact: www.ncai.org February 13 –14 National Indian Education Association (NIEA) “NIEA Hill Day” Holiday Inn Washington – Capitol 550 C Street, SW Washington, DC Contact: Adrianne Elliot (202) 544-7290 [email protected] APRIL JUNE April 5 June 1 2018 NC Commission
    [Show full text]
  • Testimony of Principal Chief Michell Hicks of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians
    TESTIMONY OF PRINCIPAL CHIEF MICHELL HICKS OF THE EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS A HEARING ON S.660, THE LUMBEE RECOGNITION ACT BEFORE THE SENATE INDIAN AFFAIRS COMMITTEE July 12, 2006 Chairman McCain, Vice Chairman Dorgan, members of the Indian Affairs Committee, I am honored to be here to testify today to provide the views of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians on S. 660, the Lumbee Recognition Act. There are three federally recognized Cherokee tribes: the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians based in Cherokee, North Carolina; the Cherokee Nation based in Tahlequah, Oklahoma; and the United Keetowah Band of Cherokee Indians, also based in Tahlequah. All three Cherokee nations, the inter-tribal organization United South and Eastern Tribes (USET), as well as other tribes from across the United States strongly oppose this legislation. The Eastern Band opposes for has several specific reasons: First, the integrity of the Eastern Band and other tribes with living tribal languages and long standing government-to-government relations with the United States is undermined where politics and emotion, rather than facts about tribal identity, dictate outcomes regarding federal recognition. Consistent with the views of Eastern Cherokee leaders since at least 1910, there are very serious questions about the tribal identity of the Lumbees. Second, the Department of the Interior’s Office of Federal Acknowledgement (OFA), while imperfect, is the only federal entity equipped to make an informed, merits- based determination of Lumbee tribal identity and recognition. Congress is not equipped to make these decisions. Third, Congress should be absolutely certain that the Lumbee group meets the objective criteria at Interior before it enacts a bill that could cost more than $682 million of taxpayer dollars over four years and further decrease the funds existing tribes and Indians receive.
    [Show full text]
  • The Struggle for Civil Rights, 1930–1959
    Published on NCpedia (https://www.ncpedia.org) Home > ANCHOR > Postwar North Carolina (1945-1975) > The Struggle for Civil Rights, 1930–1959 The Struggle for Civil Rights, 1930–1959 [1] Share it now! The Civil Rights Movement on the National Stage and in North Carolina Many African Americans emerged from World War II intent on rejecting second-class citizenship once and for all. The Civil Rights Movement took shape in the years that followed. The military was desegregated. Freedom rides, bus boycotts, and strikes challenged Jim Crow laws. In North Carolina, a Senate campaign turned ugly over the issue of race, and in Robeson County, the Lumbee challenged the Ku Klux Klan — and won. In this chapter we’ll examine the origins of the Civil Rights Movement and analyze the reasons for its early successes and failures. Although the Civil Rights Movement is often associated with courageous figures like Martin Luther King, Jr., Rosa Parks and Malcolm X, many others, including a number of North Carolinians, made critical and lasting contributions to the movement. These contributions included efforts by both activists and newspaper editors. Louis Austin was an African American newspaper editor in Durham, North Carolina. He purchased the Carolina Times in the 1927 and used his editorship of the Durham paper to press for the rights of African Americans. Ella Baker was also a prominent figure in the Civil Rights Movement, but has often been overlooked by historians because she worked largely behind the scenes. Baker grew up in Virginia and North Carolina and graduated as class valedictorian from Shaw University.
    [Show full text]