CSIRO PUBLISHING International Journal of Wildland Fire 2013, 22, 527–536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/WF12041 How historic and current wildfire experiences in an Aboriginal community influence mitigation preferences Amy ChristiansonA,C, Tara K. McGeeA and Lorne L’HirondelleB ADepartment of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, 1–26 Earth Sciences Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E3, Canada. Email:
[email protected];
[email protected] BPeavine Me´tis Settlement, Bag #4, High Prairie, AB, T0G 1E0, Canada. Email:
[email protected] CCorresponding author. Present address: Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Centre, 5320 122 Street, Edmonton, AB, T6H 3S5, Canada. Email:
[email protected] Abstract. Peavine Me´tis Settlement is located in the boreal forest in Northern Alberta, Canada. The objective of this paper was to explore how different wildfire experiences in an Aboriginal community influence wildfire mitigation preferences at the residential and community levels. Residents of Peavine had varying experiences with wildfire over an extended period of time including traditional burning, firefighting employment and bystanders. Despite these different experiences, participants still implemented or supported wildfire mitigation activities, although for differing reasons depending on experience type. Participants were found to have implemented or supported wildfire mitigation activities on the settlement, including their own properties and public land. Experience type influenced why wildfire mitigation had been implemented or supported: primarily wildfire risk reduction (firefighters), primarily aesthetic benefits (bystanders) and for both aesthetic benefits and wildfire risk reduction (historic traditional burners). The extensive fire experiences of residents at Peavine Me´tis Settlement have provided insights into how experience influences mitigation preferences.