ASSESSING THE HETEROGENEITY OF THE TISSINT SHERGOTTITE STREWN FIELD USING RB-SR, SM-ND AND LU-HF ISOTOPE SYSTEMATICS
------
A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the
Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences
University of Houston
------
In Partial Fulfillment
of the Requirements for the Degree
Master of Science
------
By
Stephanie Elaine Suarez
August 2019
ASSESSING THE HETEROGENEITY OF THE TISSINT SHERGOTTITE STREWN FIELD USING RB-SR, SM-ND AND LU-HF ISOTOPE SYSTEMATICS
______Stephanie Elaine Suarez
APPROVED:
______Dr. Thomas Lapen, Advisor
______Dr. Alexander Robinson
______Dr. Brian Beard
______Dr. Dan E. Wells, Dean, College of Natural Sciences and Mathematics
ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would first like to acknowledge my advisor Dr. Tom Lapen for the opportunity to work on this amazing project. Thank you for your patience and guidance throughout this entire process.
Next, I would like to thank my committee members Dr. Brian Beard for his assistance operating the TIMS and Dr. Alexander Robinson for his input and assistance.
Thank you to Dr. Minako Righter, for her assistance operating the MC-ICP-MS, training me in the clean lab, and instilling the importance of having work-life balance. Our collaborator Anthony ‘Tony’ Irving for his wisdom on Martian geology. I would also like to thank our other collaborators for insightful conversations.
My mother Cecelia 'Cece' Suarez, my reason for striving for a career that will one day give us a better life. Our numerous dogs that we have rescued and cared for during the course of this thesis. Your tiny paws will always have a special place in my heart.
Thank you to the supportive faculty, staff and students I have come across at the Earth and Atmospheric Science department. I treasure the daily conversations we have had on our best and worst days. Thank you to my former undergraduate research advisor Dr.
Elizabeth Catlos for giving me the opportunity to become a researcher as well as our collaborator Dr. Michael Brookfield for his continued guidance.
And lastly, anyone who I may have overlooked that has mentored me over the years or inspired me to keep going.
iii ASSESSING THE HETEROGENEITY OF THE TISSINT SHERGOTTITE STREWN FIELD USING RB-SR, SM-ND AND LU-HF ISOTOPE SYSTEMATICS
------
An Abstract of a Thesis
Presented to the Faculty of the
Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences
University of Houston
------
In Partial Fulfillment
of the Requirements for the Degree
Master of Science
------
By
Stephanie Elaine Suarez
August 2019
iv Abstract
Tissint, the 5th witnessed Martian meteorite fall, occurred on July 18, 2011 east of
Tata, Morocco. While most studies of Tissint classify it as a shergottite relatively depleted in lithophile incompatible trace elements (e.g., light REE), crystallization age determinations have been variable. Currently, there is a discrepancy in crystallization age determination amongst three separate labs (UH: University of Houston; LLNL: Lawrence
Livermore National Labs; and NASA-JSC: NASA Johnson Space Center) using combinations of Lu-Hf, Sm-Nd, and Rb-Sr analyses. Each lab tested one single fragment from the entire Tissint meteorite strewn field, which included samples (UWB1),
(ASU#1744), (UNM#645). Sm-Nd analyses were performed at all three labs and produced two different dates. Analyses from two of the three labs, UH and LLNL, are in agreement and give a combined Sm-Nd age of 593±25 Ma for samples UWB1 and
ASU#1744. Analysis at NASA-JSC provided a date of 472±36 Ma (sample UNM#645).
This is approximately a 120 Ma difference in crystallization ages for separate samples analyzed from the strewn field.
To confirm whether materials of different isotopic compositions and ages were co-mingled resulting in a heterogeneous strewn field, eight separately-collected fragments from the Tissint strewn field, including the sample analyzed at JSC
(UNM#645) were examined using Rb-Sr, Sm-Nd and Lu-Hf isotopic systems. Mineral and leached bulk rocks analyzed at UH and LLNL define isochrons of 571±84 Ma,
559±39 Ma and 590±49 Ma, respectively. In all three isotopic systems, the analyses performed at UH and LLNL plot along the same isochron with slopes consistent with a
v ~590 Ma igneous crystallization age, including UNM#645 dated at 495±35 Ma by
NASA-JSC. While the Lu-Hf isotopic system indicates no evidence of contamination or element mobility, the Rb-Sr and Sm-Nd isotopic systems show evidence for element mobility and potential mixing with an isotopic component not in equilibrium with the igneous phases. Despite these issues, there is no evidence for multiple igneous sources.
Fragments identified so far are cogenetic and the Tissint strewn field appears to be homogeneous.
vi Table of Contents
Introduction ...... 1
Sample Descriptions ...... 10
Methods ...... 12
3.1 Sample Preparation ...... 12
3.2 Sample Digestion ...... 12
3.3 Ion-exchange chromatography ...... 13 3.3.1 Rb-Sr ...... 13 3.3.2 Lu-Hf and Sm-Nd ...... 14
3.4 Mass Spectrometry ...... 15 3.4.1 Multi-collector Inductively Coupled Mass Spectrometry (MC-ICPMS) ...... 15 3.4.1.1 Lu ...... 15 3.4.1.2 Hf ...... 16 3.4.1.3 Sm ...... 17 3.4.1.4 Nd ...... 17 3.4.2 Thermal Ionization Mass Spectrometry (TIMS) ...... 18
Results ...... 19
4.1 Lu-Hf ...... 19
4.2 Rb-Sr ...... 22
4.3 Sm-Nd ...... 24
Discussion ...... 26
5.1 Crystallization Age Comparison ...... 26
5.2 Isotope systematics of leachates and residues ...... 28
Conclusions ...... 32
References ...... 34
vii List of Figures, Tables and Equations
Figures 1. Mixing curves for calculated source compositions for Martian meteorites 4 2. Hand specimens of Tissint collected in Morroco in 2011 5 3. Proposed mechanism for a heterogenous strewn field 9 4. Hand specimens of Tissint used in this study 11 5. Lu-Hf isochron 21 6. Rb-Sr isochron 23 7. Sm-Nd isochron 25 8. All internal isochron ages 27 9. Rb-Sr Leachate of Tissint and other 1.1Ma ejected Martian meteorites 31
Tables 1. Compilation of Tissint ages from LLNL, JSC, and UH 7 2. Lu-Hf Data for Tissint 20 3. Rb-Sr Data for Tissint 22 4. Sm-Nd Data for Tissint 24 5. Ages determined for Tissint from previously published data and this study 27
Equations 1. Isochron Age 19
viii
Chapter 1
Introduction
Martian meteorites are rocks that were once a part of Mars and have since landed on Earth. Meteoroids that impact Mars’ surface have the potential to eject materials into space; some of which crosses Earth's orbit and fall as meteorites. (Melosh, 1984; Head and Melosh, 2000). Analysis of these Martian meteorites, our only available physical material from Mars, can provide valuable information about the timing and nature of the planet’s ongoing magmatism. (Nyquist et al., 2001).
Martian meteorites are currently categorized into groups by mineralogy and include Shergottites, Nakhlites, Chassignites, Orthopyroxenite, and polymict breccias.
Shergottites, the most abundant class of Martian meteorites, are mafic to ultramafic igneous rocks that have a wide array of crystallization ages, mineralogy, textures, trace element and radiogenic isotope compositions. Isotopic and petrologic analyses of shergottites can provide information on Martian mantle source reservoir interactions and timing of large-scale planetary differentiation.
We have little to no spatial context of where these meteorites originated, there have been attempts to identify particular source regions by utilizing remote sensing data and the Crater Size Frequency Distribution (CSFD). We can pair chronology of meteorites with these data to hypothesize the spatial relationships between Martian meteorites of differing geochemical imprints and ultimately identify potential source craters. Partial melting in Mars’ mantle has produced large volcanic centers that characterize a large portion of Mars’ surface (Robbins et al., 2011). These major volcanic
1 plains are Elysium, Hellas Region, Syrtis Major, Tharsis, and on average consist of thick
40-60 m (Mouginis-Mark and Yoshioka 1998) piles of lava flows and intrusions. There are multiple generations of craters visible on the surface of Mars, some of which are located in these vast, and relatively young volcanic fields that contain inter-fingering lava flows.
It has been speculated the Tharsis region contains potential source craters of shergottites in comparison to nahklites and chassignites that are hypothesized to be derived from the Elysium region (Cohen et al., 2017). Relative ages determined by crater counting of the calderas in some of the prominent volcanoes in the Tharsus region indicates that volcanism in the area ceased approximately 150 Ma (Robins et al., 2011).
This is complemented by absolute ages of shergottites through radiometric dating that show a range 165-2403 Ma (Jones, 1986; Nyquist et al., 2001, 2009; Borg and Drake,
2005; Bouvier 2005, 2008; Shih et al., 2009; Lapen et al., 2017).
Ejection ages can also assist Martian meteorites. For example, samples with the same ejection ages and similar trace element and isotopic compositions are likely to be ejected from the same crater. A meteorite’s crystallization age determines when a sample was formed on Mars from magma. The ejection age, the summation of a meteorite’s cosmic ray exposure age and terrestrial resident age, determines when the meteorite was ejected from Mars’ surface (Nyquist et al., 2001). By examining both the ejection and crystallization ages we can then propose potential ejection sites (Nyquist et al., 2001;
Christen et al., 2005; Herzog and Caffee, 2014; Wieler et al., 2016; Lapen et al., 2017).
Because Martian meteorites are derived from rare impact events, Martian meteorites provide a bias sampling of the Martian surface. Major element analyses of
2 Shergotties plot as subalkaline while data collected by MSL ChemCam and MER APXS onboard Mars exploration rovers reveal that the surface of Mars contains alkaline-rich basaltic rocks as well as sedimentary rocks. An impact regolith breccia NWA 7034, and its paired meteorites are comparable to Martian crust. (Edwards et al. 2017). Despite not having representative samples from the Martian crust, shergottites are still highly valuable in determining igneous processes and sources.
3 A.
B.
B.
Fig. 1. Tissint is categorized as a depleted shergottite for all three isotopic systems. Analyses of shergottites show interactions between Enriched, and two depleted reservoirs. 1a. 3 component mixing model for shergottite Lu-Hf and Sm-Nd source compositions calculated using equations of Nyquist et al. (2001) and mantle end-member compositions of Debaille et al. (2008). 1b. Inset from Fig. 1a shows a best-fit mixing hyperbola for source Rb/Sr and Sm/Nd compositions of shergottites. (Lapen et al. 2017).
4 Shergottites have been classified based on their textures into subgroups; basaltic, olivine-phyric, gabbroic, poikilitic (Filiberto 2014, Bridges and Warren 2006).
Geochemically, shergottites are sorted into enriched, intermediate, and depleted groups based on their rare earth element (REE) compositions and initial radiogenic isotopic compositions (Borg and Draper, 2003). Shergottites are interpreted to be sourced from mixtures of three mantle end member compositions; one enriched and two depleted in incompatible trace elements (Fig.1) (Borg et al., 2003; and Draper, 2003; Debaille et al.,
2008; Lapen et al., 2010; 2017). Absolute ages of shergottites through radiometric dating show a range of 165-2403 Ma (Jones, 1986; Nyquist et al., 2001 and references therein,
2009; Borg and Drake, 2005; Shih et al., 2009; Lapen et al., 2017).
A. B.
Fig. 2. Hand and thin section specimen of Tissint. 2a.1.1kg specimen with black fusion crust and exposed interior. Melt is present in the form of glass veins. Scale is in centimeters (Chennaoui Aoudjehane et al., 2012). 2b. BSE image of a thin section of Tissint with zoned olivine macrocryst. Scale is in millimeters (Balta et al. 2013).
5 A particular olivine-phyric depleted shergottite, Tissint, was an observed fall that occurred on July 18, 2011 near Oued Drâa valley, east of Tata, Morocco. Tissint is the
5th witnessed Martian meteorite fall; others include Chassigny, Shergotty, Nakhla, and
Zagami (Brenecka 2014). Fig. 2a shows a hand sample of Tissint with a fusion crust that formed upon entry into Earth’s atmosphere, as well as the melt veins that formed during ejection from Mars’ surface. A backscattered electron (BSE) image of a Tissint specimen
(Fig. 2b) shows a porphyritic texture with olivine macrocrysts that display chemical zoning, and other fine-grained minerals such as olivine, pyroxenes and maskelynite.
Tissint is classified as an olivine-phyric shergottite composed of olivine, plagioclase
(maskelynite), pyroxene (pigeonite and augite), oxides (chromite, ilmenite, magnetite, ulvöspinel), sulfide (pyrrhotite), and phosphate (merrillite) (Chennaoui Aoudjehane et al.,
2012; Irving et al. 2012). Tissint has a Mars ejection age of 1.10 ± 0.15 Ma (Nishiizumi et al., 2011; Wieler et al., 2016) and shares this ejection age with at least 11 other depleted shergottites (Lapen et al., 2017).
Previous studies that aimed to determine the igneous crystallization age of Tissint
(Brennecka et al. 2014, Grosshans et al. 2013, Shih et al. 2014) indicate conflicting results. There is a discrepancy in the crystallization age amongst three separate institutions University of Houston (UH), Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
(LLNL) and NASA-JSC using combinations of Lu-Hf, Sm-Nd and Rb-Sr analyses (Table
1). Sm-Nd isotope analyses were performed by all three institutions and produced two different dates. Analytical results from UH (Grosshans, 2013) and LLNL (Brennecka et al., 2014) are in agreement and give a Sm-Nd date of 593 ± 25 Ma (all uncertainties are reported at the 2σ level) when all data are regressed together (Irving and Lapen 2016).
6 Sm-Nd isotopic analysis of Tissint at NASA-JSC provided a date of 472 ± 36 Ma (Shih et al. 2014). This is about a 120 Ma difference in age between three separate fragments of
Tissint from the strewn field. Each study tested one single fragment from the entire
Tissint meteorite strewn field, which included samples UWB1, ASU#1744, UNM#645.
Analyses yield initial 143Nd/144Nd ratios converted to epsilon values (ε143Nd =
([((143Nd/144Nd sample) / (143Nd/144NdCHUR)) – 1] × 10,000) relative to a chondritic uniform reservoir at the measured age of ε143Nd of +42.1 +/- 0.4 for UH and LLNL, while the value determined at NASA-JSC is ε143Nd +44.4 +/- 1.0.
UH1 LLNL2 NASA-JSC3 Sm-Nd 616 ± 67 Ma 587 ± 28 Ma 472 ± 36 Ma Rb-Sr - 560 ± 30 Ma 495 ± 35 Ma Lu-Hf 583 ± 86 Ma - - Aliquot UWB1 ASU #1744 UNM #645
Table 1. Summary of Sm-Nd, Rb-Sr and Lu-Hf ages from 1. (Grosshans et al. 2013) 2. (Brennecka et al. 2014). 3. (Shih et al. 2014)
Analyses at all three laboratories seem robust given that they have intra- laboratory concordance and the three Tissint fragments used were verified to be from the strewn field. Therefore, analytical errors and initial sampling can be ruled out as explanations of the age and geochemical distinctions between the groups of data.
The hypothesis to explain the different isotopic results is that the Tissint meteorite strewn field is heterogeneous and composed of launch-paired volcanic strata that fell to
Earth at the same time. Tissint, along with at least 11 other depleted olivine-phyric shergottites, have an ejection age of 1.1 Ma and exhibit a progression of crystallization ages from 347 Ma to 2403 Ma. These 12 depleted shergottites are believed to be from the same impact crater on Mars surface (Lapen et al. 2017). 7 This suite of meteorites was a large succession of volcanic strata from the same provenance that was ejected from Mars’ surface by a large impact. The current age discrepancy for Tissint could, in theory, represent two of these lava flows of differing ages that became comingled during the ejection. These proposed fragments of different flows or sills would have been launch-paired during the initial ejection and travel-paired as they fell during one observed fall (Fig 3.).
This hypothesis can be applied to a terrestrial analog, the Columbia River Basalt
Group (CRBG). The CRBG is composed of continental flood basalts that range in age 6-
16 Ma. If a modern-day impact were to occur in Washington, it would create a chaotic collision and possibly mix some of the layered basalt flows. Two or more of these layers can become travel-paired. We are proposing this hypothetical situation could have occurred on Mars surface 1.1 Ma. In summary, the isotopic data suggests that the Tissint strewn field could be heterogeneous.
The focus of this project is to investigate potential heterogeneity of the Tissint strewn field. In previous studies a single fragment was analyzed for isotopic compositions. This study analyzed several fragments of Tissint to provide a more comprehensive and representative sampling of the strewn field.
8
Fig. 3. Cartoon (not to scale) of purposed launching mechanism of launch and travel paired depleted shergottites resulting in a heterogenous strewn field.
9 Chapter 2
Sample Descriptions
Tissint was recovered at its landing site near Oued Drâa valley, east of Tata,
Morocco (Chennaoui Aoudjehane et al., 2012). Over 20kg of olivine-phyric shergottite fragments, many of which are partially fusion crusted, have been recovered from the strewn field (Chennaoui Aoudjehane et al., 2012). These individual fragments are ideal for petrologic and isotopic analyses as they were quickly retrieved after landing, reducing the chances of terrestrial weathering and other potential terrestrial contamination. Tissint is an olivine-phyric porphyritic shergottite that contains subhedral to euhedral olivine macrocrysts (up to 2.0 mm), with a fine-grained groundmass consisting of olivine, pyroxene (pigeonite and augite), maskelynite, and minor phases such as oxides (Ti- chromite, ulvöspinel, ilmenite), sulfides (pyrrhotite), and phosphate (merrillite). Both olivine and pyroxene show Mg rich cores that progress to Fe rich rims. Shock features formed upon impact ejection from the Martian surface are present in the form of amorphous phases such as maskelyinte and black-green-brown glass melt pockets and veins. Based on petrographic analysis by Balta et al. (2013), Baziotis et al. (2013), and
Chennaoui Aoudjehane et al. (2012), modal abundances in Tissint are 16-30% olivine, pyroxene 50-60%, plagioclase 14-22%, 1-5% oxides.
Eight individual specimens from the Tissint strewn field were analyzed in this study and consisted of 7 solid fragments (TS1-TS6, ET), and a fine-grained powder aliquot from another individual fragment (UNM#645) (Fig. 4).
10 a. b. Fig. 4. Hand specimen of Tissint used in analysis. a.TS1 b.TS2 c.TS3 d.TS4 e.TS5 f.TS6 g,UNM #645 h. Tissint ET .647 g 1 cm .683 g 1 cm c. d.
.853 g 1 cm .563 g 1 cm e. f.
.563 g 1 cm 2.18 g 1 cm
g.
1.00 g 1 cm h.h.
.063 g 1 cm
11 Chapter 3
Methods
3.1 Sample Preparation
In total, 8 pieces of Tissint were processed for isotopic analyses, 7 solid fragments of Tissint (TS1-TS6, Tissint ET) and a fine-grained powder (UNM#645). 180 milligrams from each of the 7 solid fragments were coarsely crushed using an agate mortar and pestle and glass and fusion crust fragments were removed using tweezers under a binocular microscope. This material was then crushed into a finer powder. The overall crushing occurred in two sessions, during the first session (session 1) 80 milligrams were crushed for Rb-Sr analyses and in the second session (session 2) 100 milligrams were crushed for Lu-Hf and Sm-Nd analyses. Samples in the first crushing session included
TS1-TS6, UNM #645 while session two included TS1-TS6, UNM#645, and Tissint ET.
The 80 mg powder was leached with 2ml of 1.0 N HCl solution at room temperature for
10 minutes. The liquid from this solution was then pipetted into a separate beaker; care was taken not to pipette any solid residue. The residues were rinsed with 1ml of ultrapure milliQ water to rinse off remnant acid and were combined with the leachate. The 100 mg samples comprising the second sample crushing session were not leached.
3.2 Sample Digestion
Residues in session 1, and whole rock aliquots in session 2 were digested using a
Milestone UltraWAVE high-pressure microwave digestion instrument at the University of Houston (UH). The digestion process converts the solid sample into a solution in preparation for column chemistry. Each sample was weighed and put in a Savillex®
12 beaker. In preparation, the samples were pre-digested in 0.5 ml twice distilled (2x) HNO3 and 2 ml 2x 29M HF for 24 hours at 100°C on a hotplate. The samples were dried on a hotplate, brought back up in 3 ml 2x ~15M HNO, then transferred to the PTFE Teflon microwave inserts. Samples were loaded along with 1 ml 2x ~29M HF, and 1ml 1x ~12M
HCl. Samples were digested for 2 hours and 30 minutes at 250 ° C. After microwave digestion, the samples were transferred back into their original Savillex® beakers and dried on a hotplate. The samples were further dissolved in 4 ml 2x ~8M HNO3 and dried followed by dissolutions and drying in 3 ml once distilled (1x) ~6M HCl until the entire solution was clear of any fluoride salts after centrifuging. One percent of the solution was analyzed for Sm, Nd, Lu, and Hf concentrations with an Agilent 8800 QQQ-ICPMS at UH in order to determine the ideal amount of 87Rb-87Sr, 149Sm-150Nd, and 176Lu-178Hf mixed spikes to add.
3.3 Ion-exchange chromatography
3.3.1 Rb-Sr
Samples analyzed for Rb-Sr isotopes underwent four sets of column chemistry to isolate Rb and Sr as outlined in Beard et al. (2013). The first set of columns uses
DOWEX 1x8-200 mesh resin and 6M HCl to remove Fe from the samples. The second set of columns uses AG 50Wx8 200-400 mesh resin and HCl to produce a Rb-rich fraction, a Sr-rich fraction, and a REE fraction. The Rb-rich and Sr-rich cuts were further purified: Rb cuts were processed using BioRad AG MP-50 resin using 2.2 HCl and the
Sr-rich cuts were purified with Eichrom Sr-spec resin with 4M and 2% HNO3. After the purified samples were dried, 3 microliters of 1M H3PO4 was added to each Sr cut and the
13 Sr was dried down in preparation for isotopic analysis by thermal ionization mass spectrometry (TIMS). Ten microliters of 0.01M H3PO4 was added to each Rb cut. The
Rb was dried down in preparation for Rb isotope analysis by (TIMS). In addition to the samples, a total procedural blank and USGS rock standard BCR-2 were prepared and processed in parallel with the samples.
3.3.2 Lu-Hf and Sm-Nd
The digested samples were run through five sets of ion-exchange columns to isolate
Lu, Hf, Sm, Nd following procedures outlined in Lapen et al. (2004; 2010). The first set of columns uses DOWEX 1x8-200 mesh resin and 6M HCl to remove Fe from the samples. The second set of columns uses cation Eichrom Ln-spec resin. REE and major elements are collected after the samples are loaded on the resin by passing 6M HCl.
Hafnium was separated from other high field strength elements (Ti, Zr, Ta, and W) using combinations of H2O2, citric acid, HCl, and dilute HF (Munker et al. 2001). The REE and major element cuts are loaded into the third set of columns. These columns use Eichrom
RE-spec resin and 4.5M HCl to separate the REEs from other cations in the solution. The third set of columns used pre filter resin to remove organics by passing 2% HNO3
+ through samples. The final set of columns use a cation resin converted to NH4 form along with α-hydroxy-isobutaic (HIBA) acid. Lu, Sm, and Nd are collected from this set of columns using 0.15M α-HIBA and 0.21M α-HIBA acid. Lu cuts underwent an additional set of pre filter resin columns after HIBA columns. After the samples are dried,
50 μl 2x 14M HNO3 is added to each sample and dried. This step prepares the sample for isotope analysis by converting the acid in the sample to HNO3.
14 3.4 Mass Spectrometry
3.4.1 Multi-collector Inductively Coupled Mass Spectrometry (MC- ICPMS)
The Nu-Plasma II multi collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer
(MC-ICP-MS) at the University of Houston was used for analyzing Hf, Lu, Hf, and Sm fractions from each sample. Prior to analyses samples underwent a concentration check to determine the best method for running all samples and standards at comparable concentrations. The procedure starts by bringing Lu, Sm, and Nd samples up in 800 ml
2% HNO3 and Hf samples up in 1 ml in 2% HNO3-1% HF. Samples are visibly inspected to ensure that they were dissolved completely. 10 µL is pipetted into an auto sampler vial containing 490 µL of 2% HNO3 (or 2% HNO3-1% HF when working with Hf) and were analyzed on the MC-ICP-MS. Based on the pre-concentration test, each sample was diluted to a desired concentration.
3.4.1.1 Lu
Luetitum samples and standards were introduced into the mass spectrometer via a micro-concentric desolvating nebulizer (Cetac Aridus II) in a 2% HNO3 matrix at 5 and
10 ppb. Prior to introduction of sample, 60 seconds on-peak zero measurements were made using the same blank acid that was used during sample preparation. The masses monitored during analysis were 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, and 177 (cups L5, L4, L3,
L2, L1, Ax, and H1 respectively). Isobaric interference of 176Hf on 176Lu was monitored with 177Hf and a 176Hf/177Hf ratio of 0.283. Hf isobar corrections on Lu are negligible.
Because it is difficult to separate Yb from Lu and isobaric corrections of 176Yb on 176Lu
15 are large, we employed the isobaric interference and mass bias corrections for 175Lu/176Lu ratios of Vervoort et al. (2004).
3.4.1.2 Hf
Hafnium isotope analysis is similar to the Lu analysis, except that Hf samples were brought up using a 2% HNO3-1% HF solution before being introduced into the
MC-ICPMS. The masses monitored during analysis were 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178,
179, 180, 181, and 182 (cups L3, L2, L1, Ax, H1, H2, H3, H4, H5, and H6 respectively.
Prior to introduction of sample, 60 seconds on-peak zero measurements were made using the same blank acid that was used during sample preparation. During analysis, the masses
173, 175, 181, and 182 were monitored to remove the 176Lu and 176Yb isobaric interferences on 176Hf, 180W + 180Ta interference on 180Hf, as well as 181Ta interference on
181Hf. The isobaric interferences were corrected using the following isotopic compositions: 176Lu/175Lu = 0.02656, 180Ta/181Ta = 0.000123, 176Yb/172Yb = 0.5845, and
180W/182W = 0.004521. The instrumental mass fractionation on the isobaric interference correcting isotope ratios were compensated for by normalizing to 179Hf/177Hf = 0.7325 using an exponential law prior to adjustment of 176Hf and 180Hf ion intensities.
Instrumental mass bias and spike subtraction methods followed those in Lapen et al.
(2004). The 176Hf/177Hf operating values for the UW JMC-475 standard used during the analyses were; 20 ppb = 0.282161 ± 0.000012 (2σ, n = 8). The 176Hf/177Hf operating values for the in-house standards used during analyses were; UH AMES 20 ppb =
0.282359 ± 0.000018 (2σ, n = 9). The 176Hf/177Hf operating values for USGS standard
BHVO-2 were 0.283085 ± 0.0041% (n = 2).
16 3.4.1.3 Sm
Samarium isotope analysis method is similar to the Lu and Nd methods. Sm samples were ran at 40 ppb. The masses monitored during analysis were 144, 145, 146,
147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 15 154, 155, and 156 (cups L5, L4, L3, L2, L1, Ax,
H1, H2, H3, H4, H5, H6, and H7 respectively). Masses 146 and 155 were monitored for
146Nd and 155Gd in order to calculate the isobar intensities of 144Nd, 148Nd, 150Nd, and
154Gd. These intensities were then used to remove the 144Nd isobaric interference on
144Sm, the 148Nd isobaric interference on 148Sm, the 150Nd isobaric interference on 150Sm, the 152Gd isobaric interference on 152Sm, and the 154Gd interference on 154Sm. The isobaric interferences were corrected using the following isotopic compositions;
152Gd/155Gd = 0.013686, 154Gd/155Gd = 0.147335, 144Nd/146Nd = 1.38523, 148Nd/146Nd =
0.334642, 150Nd/146Nd = 0.327534, and 147Sm/152Sm = 0.560825.
3.4.1.4 Nd
Neodymium isotope analysis method is similar to the Lu and Sm methods. The masses monitored during analysis were 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, and 150 (cups L5, L4, L3, L2, L1, Ax, H1, H2, H3, H4, and H5 respectively). The masses
140 and 147 were monitored for 140Ce and 147Sm in order to calculate the isobar intensities of 142Ce, 144Sm, 148Sm, and 150Sm. These intensities were then used to remove the 142Ce isobaric interference on 142Nd, the 144Sm isobaric interference on 144Nd, the
148Sm isobaric interference on 148Nd, and the 150Sm interference on 150Nd. The isobaric interferences were corrected using the following isotopic compositions; 142Ce/140Ce =
0.7219, 144Sm/147Sm = 0.205023, 148Sm/147Sm = 0.749697, and 150Sm/147Sm = 0.4921.
17 Instrumental mass bias and spike subtraction methods followed those in Lapen et al.
(2004). The 143Nd/144Nd operating values for the JNdi (Nu) standard used during the analyses were; 40 ppb = 0.512120 ± 0.000012 (2σ, n = 7). The 143Nd/144Nd operating values for the in-house standard, UH AMES used during the analyses were; 40 ppb =
0.511990 ± 0.000017 (2σ, n = 6). The 143Nd/144Nd operating values for USGS standard
BHVO-2 were 0.512981 ± 0.0024% (n = 4).
3.4.2 Thermal Ionization Mass Spectrometry (TIMS)
87Rb/86Sr and 87Sr/86Sr isotope ratios of the samples were measured using a
Micromass Sector 54 thermal ionization mass spectrometer at the University of
Wisconsin-Madison following methods of Beard et al. (2013). For Sr analysis of residues, outgassed Ta filaments were loaded with H3PO4 and for Sr leachates, Re filaments were loaded with a TaF activator and H3PO4. Rubidium was loaded onto Ta filaments with H3PO4.
Strontium isotope analyses were done using a multi-collector three-jump dynamic analysis with internal exponential normalization to an 86Sr/88Sr value of 0.1194. The reported uncertainties for the 86Sr/88Sr ratio are the 2-SE determined by in-run statistics.
Repeat analysis of 10ng Sr loads of NIST SRM-987 Sr isotope standard ran during the same period as the samples were analyzed yielded an average 87Sr/86Sr value of 0.710276
± 0.000012 (2 SD, n = 7). Analyses of Rb were done using a multi-Faraday collector static routine. The weighted average 87Rb/85Rb ratio of 5 analyses of 10 ng of NIST
SRM-984 was 0.38535 ± 0.00091 (2 SD; n=5).
18 Chapter 4
Results
This study’s data was compiled with data from Brennecka et al. (2014) and
Grosshans et al. (2013) to create isochrons. The crystallization ages for the sample were calculated from the internal isochron lines formed by the compositions of the mineral separates. The equation to calculate the crystallization age (T) is as follows:
(Equation 1)