DOCSLIB.ORG

Quantum Weirdness Quantum Mechanics Part 4 What Does It Mean?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Quantum Weirdness Quantum Mechanics Part 4 What Does It Mean? 08/10/2019 Interpretations of Quantum Weirdness Quantum Mechanics Part 4 What does it mean? Interpretations Of Quantum Mechanics Quantum Tunnelling 1 2 • A wavefunction describes the quantum The Copenhagen Interpretation system completely, in a probabilistic manner • Any act of observation of the system causes the wavefunction to collapse into a definite state • There must be unanswerable questions as to the quantum state before the measurement This contradicts the classical view of Niels Bohr 1885-1962 Danish Physicist physics: that it is always possible to know everything, if you measure it precisely enough 3 4 Who Invented the Term? Correspondence Principle • The name appears to have been invented by • Quantum mechanics must produce the same results as Werner Heisenberg in the 1950s, when classical physics, if there are enough particles. • Bohr was first to originate this in 1913, in his hydrogen alternative interpretations appeared atom model • Special relativity (particles moving fast) reduces to Newtonian physics when the particles move slowly • General relativity reduces to Newtonian gravity, when dealing with weak gravitational systems • Inheritance from chromosomes reduces to Mendelian inheritance in organisms 5 6 1 08/10/2019 Pilot Wave Theory/Bohm • There are real Interpretation particles, which ride on pilot-waves • de Broglie which govern where • Bohm they go • Particle can only go David Bohm, FRS 1917-1992 where there is a wave If there is no wave, then the Sometimes called a particle can’t go to that position “hidden variable” theorem – not a good name! 7 8 • The Pilot Wave model got a boost in 2006, when • Very recent experiments (2015-2016) have cast doubt on this Couder and Fort noticed that bouncing droplets, could be “walked” along the wave that they The experiments were done generated by Tomas Bohr – the grandson https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmC0ygr08tE&feature=youtu.be of Nils Bohr https://www.youtube.com/w atch?v=5TypwAwmPew&feat ure=youtu.be https://www.quantamagazine.org/fa mous-experiment-dooms-pilot-wave- Stationary Bouncing Particles Walking particles alternative-to-quantum-weirdness- 20181011/ 9 10 Many Worlds Interpretation • Hugh Everett III (1930-1982) A new parallel universe is created after each quantum event • Popularized by Bryce Seligman Dewitt We can see the results from our own timeline But we must be able to https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/the-difficult- see the results of other birth-of-the-many-worlds-interpretation-of-quantum-mechanics/ timelines Everett did not believe that the underpinnings of quantum mechanics lead naturally to the correspondence principle. 11 12 2 08/10/2019 Which is the original Monty? In our universe the particle must only go through one slit. BUT we Is there any such thing as “I”? can see the result of an alternate universe, where the particle goes Are the various Montys connected? through the other slit, because we observe the interference pattern. 13 14 Some systems which we measure, strongly interact with the surroundings, and we may not be able to make repeated Chad Orzel’s Interpretation measurements • https://www.forbes.com/sites/chadorzel/2019/09/ 17/many-worlds-but-too-much- metaphor/#50a5e5db625d Some systems do not interact strongly with the • The universe exists as one huge (exceptionally surroundings, and can be complicated) wavefunction, and we can only ever considered to be an sample a small part of that wavefunction approximately “stand alone” system 15 16 Still No Agreement on Interpretation! • We can use Schrodinger’s Equation to calculate many things, even if we don’t understand the interpretation Special Relativity • The physicist David Mermin describes his attitude to the When things move very fast Copenhagen Interpretation as “Shut up, and calculate” https://www.quantamagazine.org/why-the-many-worlds-interpretation-of-quantum- mechanics-has-many-problems-20181018/ 17 18 3 08/10/2019 The Speed of Light The Ether Wind Ether wind • Maxwells equations predict that the speed of light Tailwind c+v in a vacuum is c = 3.00 x 108 m/s • The earth was not expected to • This was confirmed in many experiments be stationary in the ether • The speed of light measured on • Most waves seen at this time (1880s) were earth should vary depending on mechanical waves. They needed a propagation the relative speed of the earth Su medium with respect to the ether n • e.g. sound needs air to propagate through • Headwinds and Tailwinds Headwind • Physicists assumed that EM waves must have some c-v propagation medium – the luminiferous ether 19 20 The Michelson-Morley Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity (1905) Experiment • The laws of physics must be the same for all non- • Albert Michelson and Edward accelerating observers Morley • The speed of light in a Light from behind • Measured the speed of light Speed = c using a 35 km long vacuum has the same interferometer at various points value regardless of the Light from in front in the year (different places on velocity of the observer Speed = c the orbital path of the earth) and the velocity of the • A NULL RESULT source • There is no unique • No difference in the speed of v light at any time of the year inertial frame • NO LUMINIFEROUS ETHER (everything is relative!) 21 22 • At high speeds, near to the speed of light, the • When an object moves very quickly, time appears familiar equations in classical mechanics need to be to move at a different rate according to an outside modified by an extra factor 훾 observer • A clock travelling with the moving object does not 1 • The Lorentz factor 훾 = change speed 푣2 1− 푐2 Momentum = 푚푣 (Newton) Momentum = 훾푚푣 (Relativistic) To the stationary observer, the moving clock has moved more quickly. Hendrik Antoon Lorentz Less time elapses for the moving clock than the Nobel Prize 1902 stationary clock 23 24 4 08/10/2019 The Twin Paradox Quantum Mechanics and Special Relativity Quantum Particles Moving Very Quickly Scott Kelly (left) and his twin Scott spent a year on the brother Mark Kelly (right). International Space Station, moving Both astronauts at 27,000 km/h with respect to the Earth. His body clock slowed down very slightly compared to his twin Mark Mark aged slightly more than Scott (a few microseconds per day) 25 26 • Dirac used matrices to modify Schrödinger’s P.A.M. Dirac Equation to handle Special Relativity • Paul Adrien Maurice Dirac • British mathematician, physicist and engineer • Combined the Schrödinger Equation with Special The Dirac Equation Relativity to deal with quantum systems with • He noticed that it was possible to get negative particles moving at high speeds. energy solutions from the equation. • This was the first prediction of anti-matter 27 28 Antimatter Matter-Antimatter Annihilation • Solutions to the Dirac Equation predicted that for • If a matter particle meets the antimatter every particle of matter, there must be an counterpart they annihilate each other antiparticle (antimatter). • For the electron-positron reaction, the matter - disappears and is replaced by two gamma ray • The antimatter counterpart of the electron is the photons. (This conserves momentum and energy) positron • A free positron never has to go far in order to meet • It has exactly the same mass as the electron, but an electron. has a positive charge instead of negative + 29 30 5 08/10/2019 • When the positron and the electron annihilate each other, energy and momentum must still be • We use this pair production to localize the site of conserved cancer tumour • Tumours have a fast metabolism, so take up sugars • A pair of gamma ray photons, moving in faster then normal tissue opposite directions are produced • Fluorodeoxyglucose (18F) is a Electron - glucose analogue with a radioactive fluorine-18 Annihilation substituted instead of an –OH Positron + 09:09 31 31 32 • It concentrates at the site of the tumour • More positrons are produced in the tumour than in the surrounding normal tissue • They annihilate with electrons giving off gamma • It decays with a half-life of 110 minutes into rays oxygen, a positron and a neutrino • More gamma rays produced at the tumour than elsewhere 18 18 + 9퐹 → 8푂 + 푒 + 휈 Beta+ decay: Proton becomes a neutron, a positron and a neutrino 33 34 Dr Heather Williams (Medical Physicist at the Christie Hospital in Positron Emission Tomography Manchester) • An imaging technique using the production of the gamma rays to determine the site of the emission Normal Brain scan: false colour image 35 36 6 08/10/2019 Pair Production – Mass From Energy Creating Matter Out of • Pair Production, the reverse process to pair annihilation is possible Energy • A highly energetic photon, passing close to a nucleus can transform itself into a pair of particles, an More Quantum Weirdness electron and a positron • Mass is created during this process, since the photon has no mass 09:09 38 37 38 • Charged particles follow a spiral path in a magnetic field. • Opposite charges spiral in opposite directions Quantum Tunnelling Positron spirals this way How to get out of a box by quantum cheating Electron “Knock-on” electron from the target atom spirals this way 09:09 39 39 40 • Physicist talk about objects in “Potential Wells” Quantum Tunnelling • In classical physics, a particle trapped inside a potential well (the particle in the box) can never get out, unless extra energy is supplied, so it can “climb over” the wall. • Quantum physics allows us to cheat! Gravity Well • Minute Physics • Objects trapped in the well caused by the • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTodS8hkSDg
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Quantum Biology: an Update and Perspective
    quantum reports Review Quantum Biology: An Update and Perspective Youngchan Kim 1,2,3 , Federico Bertagna 1,4, Edeline M. D’Souza 1,2, Derren J. Heyes 5 , Linus O. Johannissen 5 , Eveliny T. Nery 1,2 , Antonio Pantelias 1,2 , Alejandro Sanchez-Pedreño Jimenez 1,2 , Louie Slocombe 1,6 , Michael G. Spencer 1,3 , Jim Al-Khalili 1,6 , Gregory S. Engel 7 , Sam Hay 5 , Suzanne M. Hingley-Wilson 2, Kamalan Jeevaratnam 4, Alex R. Jones 8 , Daniel R. Kattnig 9 , Rebecca Lewis 4 , Marco Sacchi 10 , Nigel S. Scrutton 5 , S. Ravi P. Silva 3 and Johnjoe McFadden 1,2,* 1 Leverhulme Quantum Biology Doctoral Training Centre, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK; [email protected] (Y.K.); [email protected] (F.B.); e.d’[email protected] (E.M.D.); [email protected] (E.T.N.); [email protected] (A.P.); [email protected] (A.S.-P.J.); [email protected] (L.S.); [email protected] (M.G.S.); [email protected] (J.A.-K.) 2 Department of Microbial and Cellular Sciences, School of Bioscience and Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK; [email protected] 3 Advanced Technology Institute, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK; [email protected] 4 School of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK; [email protected] (K.J.); [email protected] (R.L.) 5 Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, Department of Chemistry, The University of Manchester,
    [Show full text]
  • Origin of Probability in Quantum Mechanics and the Physical Interpretation of the Wave Function
    Origin of Probability in Quantum Mechanics and the Physical Interpretation of the Wave Function Shuming Wen ( [email protected] ) Faculty of Land and Resources Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology. Research Article Keywords: probability origin, wave-function collapse, uncertainty principle, quantum tunnelling, double-slit and single-slit experiments Posted Date: November 16th, 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-95171/v2 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Origin of Probability in Quantum Mechanics and the Physical Interpretation of the Wave Function Shuming Wen Faculty of Land and Resources Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093 Abstract The theoretical calculation of quantum mechanics has been accurately verified by experiments, but Copenhagen interpretation with probability is still controversial. To find the source of the probability, we revised the definition of the energy quantum and reconstructed the wave function of the physical particle. Here, we found that the energy quantum ê is 6.62606896 ×10-34J instead of hν as proposed by Planck. Additionally, the value of the quality quantum ô is 7.372496 × 10-51 kg. This discontinuity of energy leads to a periodic non-uniform spatial distribution of the particles that transmit energy. A quantum objective system (QOS) consists of many physical particles whose wave function is the superposition of the wave functions of all physical particles. The probability of quantum mechanics originates from the distribution rate of the particles in the QOS per unit volume at time t and near position r. Based on the revision of the energy quantum assumption and the origin of the probability, we proposed new certainty and uncertainty relationships, explained the physical mechanism of wave-function collapse and the quantum tunnelling effect, derived the quantum theoretical expression of double-slit and single-slit experiments.
    [Show full text]
  • On Quantum Tunnelling with and Without Decoherence and the Direction of Time
    On the effect of decoherence on quantum tunnelling. By A.Y. Klimenko † The University of Queensland, SoMME, QLD 4072, Australia (SN Applied Sciences, 2021, 3:710) Abstract This work proposes a series of quantum experiments that can, at least in principle, allow for examining microscopic mechanisms associated with decoherence. These experiments can be interpreted as a quantum-mechanical version of non-equilibrium mixing between two volumes separated by a thin interface. One of the principal goals of such experiments is in identifying non-equilibrium conditions when time-symmetric laws give way to time-directional, irreversible processes, which are represented by decoher- ence at the quantum level. The rate of decoherence is suggested to be examined indirectly, with minimal intrusions | this can be achieved by measuring tunnelling rates that, in turn, are affected by decoherence. Decoherence is understood here as a general process that does not involve any significant exchanges of energy and governed by a particular class of the Kraus operators. The present work analyses different regimes of tunnelling in the presence of decoherence and obtains formulae that link the corresponding rates of tunnelling and decoherence under different conditions. It is shown that the effects on tunnelling of intrinsic decoherence and of decoherence due to unitary interactions with the environment are similar but not the same and can be distinguished in experiments. Keywords: decoherence, quantum tunnelling, non-equilibrium dynamics 1. Introduction The goal of this work is to consider experiments that can, at least in principle, examine time-directional quantum effects in an effectively isolated system. Such experiments need to be conducted somewhere at the notional boundary between the microscopic quantum and macroscopic thermodynamic worlds, that is we need to deal with quantum systems that can exhibit some degree of thermodynamic behaviour.
    [Show full text]
  • LETTER Doi:10.1038/Nature11653
    LETTER doi:10.1038/nature11653 Revealing the quantum regime in tunnelling plasmonics Kevin J. Savage1, Matthew M. Hawkeye1, Rube´n Esteban2, Andrei G. Borisov2,3, Javier Aizpurua2 & Jeremy J. Baumberg1 When two metal nanostructures are placed nanometres apart, their probe dynamically controlled plasmonic cavities and reveal the onset of optically driven free electrons couple electrically across the gap. The quantum-tunnelling-induced plasmonics in the subnanometre regime. resulting plasmons have enhanced optical fields of a specific colour Two gold-nanoparticle-terminated atomic force microscope (AFM) tightly confined inside the gap. Many emerging nanophotonic tech- tips are oriented tip-to-tip (Fig. 1a). The tip apices define a cavity nologies depend on the careful control of this plasmonic coupling, supporting plasmonic resonances created via strong coupling between including optical nanoantennas for high-sensitivity chemical and localized plasmons on each tip7,27. This dual AFM tip configuration biological sensors1, nanoscale control of active devices2–4, and provides multiple advantages. First, independent nanometre-precision improved photovoltaic devices5. But for subnanometre gaps, co- movement of both tips is possible with three-axis piezoelectric stages. herent quantum tunnelling becomes possible and the system enters Second, conductive AFM probes provide direct electrical connection a regime of extreme non-locality in which previous classical treat- to the tips, enabling simultaneous optical and electrical measurements. ments6–14 fail. Electron correlations across the gap that are driven Third, the tips are in free space and illuminated from the side in a by quantum tunnelling require a new description of non-local dark-field configuration (Fig. 1b, c and Supplementary Information).
    [Show full text]
  • What Can Bouncing Oil Droplets Tell Us About Quantum Mechanics?
    What can bouncing oil droplets tell us about quantum mechanics? Peter W. Evans∗1 and Karim P. Y. Th´ebault†2 1School of Historical and Philosophical Inquiry, University of Queensland 2Department of Philosophy, University of Bristol June 16, 2020 Abstract A recent series of experiments have demonstrated that a classical fluid mechanical system, constituted by an oil droplet bouncing on a vibrating fluid surface, can be in- duced to display a number of behaviours previously considered to be distinctly quantum. To explain this correspondence it has been suggested that the fluid mechanical system provides a single-particle classical model of de Broglie’s idiosyncratic ‘double solution’ pilot wave theory of quantum mechanics. In this paper we assess the epistemic function of the bouncing oil droplet experiments in relation to quantum mechanics. We find that the bouncing oil droplets are best conceived as an analogue illustration of quantum phe- nomena, rather than an analogue simulation, and, furthermore, that their epistemic value should be understood in terms of how-possibly explanation, rather than confirmation. Analogue illustration, unlike analogue simulation, is not a form of ‘material surrogacy’, in which source empirical phenomena in a system of one kind can be understood as ‘stand- ing in for’ target phenomena in a system of another kind. Rather, analogue illustration leverages a correspondence between certain empirical phenomena displayed by a source system and aspects of the ontology of a target system. On the one hand, this limits the potential inferential power of analogue illustrations, but, on the other, it widens their potential inferential scope. In particular, through analogue illustration we can learn, in the sense of gaining how-possibly understanding, about the putative ontology of a target system via an experiment.
    [Show full text]
  • Adressing Student Models of Energy Loss in Quantum Tunnelling
    Addressing student models of energy loss in quantum tunnelling1 Michael C. Wittmann,1,* Jeffrey T. Morgan,1 and Lei Bao2,* 1 University of Maine, Orono ME 04469-5709, USA email: [email protected], tel: 207 – 581 – 1237 2 The Ohio State University, Columbus OH 43210, USA Abstract We report on a multi-year, multi-institution study to investigate student reasoning about energy in the context of quantum tunnelling. We use ungraded surveys, graded examination questions, individual clinical interviews, and multiple-choice exams to build a picture of the types of responses that students typically give. We find that two descriptions of tunnelling through a square barrier are particularly common. Students often state that tunnelling particles lose energy while tunnelling. When sketching wave functions, students also show a shift in the axis of oscillation, as if the height of the axis of oscillation indicated the energy of the particle. We find inconsistencies between students’ conceptual, mathematical, and graphical models of quantum tunnelling. As part of a curriculum in quantum physics, we have developed instructional materials designed to help students develop a more robust and less inconsistent picture of tunnelling, and present data suggesting that we have succeeded in doing so. PACS 01.40.Fk (Physics education research), 01.40.Di (Course design and evaluation), 03.65.Xp (Quantum mechanics, Tunneling) 1 Paper submitted for publication to the European Journal of Physics. * These authors were at the University of Maryland when the work described in this paper was carried out. Addressing student models of energy loss in quantum tunnelling I. Introduction In a multi-year study at several institutions, we have been studying student understanding of energy in the context of quantum tunnelling.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Energy Nuclear Fusion Reactions: Quantum Tunnelling
    LOW ENERGY NUCLEAR FUSION REACTIONS: QUANTUM TUNNELLING . • by M. W. Evans, H. Eckardt and D. W. Lindstrom, Civil List and A. I. A. S. (www.webarchive.org.uk. www.aias.us. www.atomicprecision.com. www.upitec.org, www.et3m.net) ABSTRACT A new linear equation is developed of relativistic quantum mechanics and the equation is applied to the theory of quantum tunnelling based on the Schroedinger equation in the non relativistic limit. Using a square barrier model in the first approximation, it is shown that low energy nuclear fusion occurs as a result of the Schroedinger equation, which is a limit of the ECE fermion equation. It is shown that for a thin sample and a given barrier height, 100% transmission occurs by quantum tunnelling even when the energy of the incoming particle approaches zero. This is therefore a plausible model of low energy nuclear reaction. The new relativistic equation is used to study relativistic corrections. Absorption of quanta of spacetime may result in enhancement of the quantum tunnelling process. Keywords: Limits ofECE theory, linear relativistic quantum mechanics, low energy nuclear reaction, quantum tunnelling -I f<- , 1. INTRODUCTION Recently in this series of papers { 1 - 10} the ECE fermion equation has been used to give an explanation of low energy nuclear reaction (LENR { 11} ), which has been observed experimentally to be reproducible and repeatable, and which has been developed into a new source of energy. In this paper the plausibility of LENR is examined with a new linear type of relativistic quantum mechanics which can be derived straightforwardly from classical special relativity, a well defined limit ofECE theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Macroscopic Quantum Tunnelling and Coherence: the Early Days
    MACROSCOPIC QUANTUM TUNNELLING AND COHERENCE: THE EARLY DAYS A. J. Leggett Department of Physics University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign Quantum Superconducting Circuits and Beyond A symposium on the occasion of Michel Devoret’s 60th birthday New Haven, CT 13 December 2013 Support: John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation MRD‐2 Some 60’s pre-history: Is there a quantum measurement problem? “In our opinion, our theory [of the measurement process] constitutes an indispensable completion and a natural crowning of the basic structure of present-day quantum mechanics. We are firmly convinced that further progress in this field of research will consist essentially in refinements of our approach.” (Daneri et al., 1966) “The current interest in [questions concerning the quantum measurement problem] is small. The typical physicist feels that they have long been answered and that he will fully understand just how if ever he can spare twenty minutes to think about it.” (Bell and Nauenberg, 1966) “Is “decoherence” the answer?” (Ludwig, Feyerabend, Jauch, Daneri et al…) NO! Then, can we get any experimental input to the problem? i.e. Can we build Schrödinger’s cat in the lab? MRD‐3 Some early reactions: 1) Unnecessary, because “we already knew that QM works on the macroscopic scale” (superfluid He, superconductivity, lasers) 2) Ridiculous, because “decoherence will always prevent macroscopic superpositions” (“electron-on- Sirius” argument) What kind of system could constitute a “Schrödinger’s cat”? 1) Must have macroscopically distinct states,
    [Show full text]
  • 1 De Broglie – Bohm Theorem in an Underlying Structure of Space And
    De Broglie – Bohm Theorem in an underlying structure of Space and Spacetime Salim Yasmineh ( [email protected] ) Brevalex https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9078-3306 Original Research Keywords: simultaneity, non-locality, Hilbert space, conguration space, measurement, entanglement Posted Date: February 9th, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-160859/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License 1 De Broglie – Bohm Theorem in an underlying structure of Space and Spacetime Salim YASMINEH PhD University of Paris Email: [email protected] 2 De Broglie – Bohm Theorem in an underlying structure of Space and Spacetime Abstract The concept of simultaneity is relative in special relativity whereas, it seems to have a definite meaning in quantum mechanics. On the other hand, theory and experiments in quantum mechanics have revealed the existence of non-local causal relations. We propose to use the invariant space-time interval introduced by special relativity as a benchmark for constructing a spacetime framework presenting a notion of an invariant time. We suggest that a physical system creates a non-local field within the spacetime framework and that the wavefunction of the physical system is an ontological entity that represents this non-local field. We propose to explain measurement and entanglement by using de Broglie Bohm theory in the context of the constructed spacetime framework. Key words: simultaneity, non-locality, Hilbert space, configuration space, measurement, and entanglement. 1.Introduction A quantum system for example made up of a pair of entangled particles behaves in such a manner that the quantum state of one particle cannot be described independently of the state of the other.
    [Show full text]
  • Wanted Dead Or Alive, Or Both
    books & arts Wanted dead or alive, or both The Quantum would look (don’t even try to imagine superpositions. On the way they introduce Divide: Why entangled states), it might be better to think complementarity, quantum tunnelling, Schrödinger’s Cat is of a dead and alive cat. This image is neither delayed‑choice experiments and quantum Either Dead or Alive particularly illuminating nor beautiful — teleportation. The physics behind these perhaps even disturbing for cat‑lovers — but quantum phenomena is explained in detail, By Christopher at least it feels tangible. from the workings of beam‑splitters and C. Gerry and Kimberley Writing about quantum mechanics in polarizers to more complex arrangements, M. Bruno scientifically accurate and yet intuitive terms such as the Mach–Zehnder and Hong– is hard. There are countless books on the Ou–Mandel interferometers. And although OXFORD UNIV. PRESS: subject, approaching it from every possible the authors touch on such varied topics, 2013. 197PP. $44.95. angle (for example, How to Teach Quantum they manage to maintain a steady flow Physics to your Dog, Quantum Theory and an overall sense of coherence (no Cannot Hurt You, Quantum: A Guide for the pun intended). uantum mechanics and quantum Perplexed and Who’s Afraid of Schrödinger’s All the discussions eventually lead to the information feature many eccentric Cat?), and it is amazing how many of central theme of The Quantum Divide: the Qcharacters, from the personality‑split these have cats on their covers. But The question of where to draw the line between photon to the omnipresent Alice and Quantum Divide: Why Schrödinger’s Cat is the quantum and classical worlds — if Bob.
    [Show full text]
  • PHY140Y 25 Quantum Tunnelling
    PHY140Y 25 Quantum Tunnelling 25.1 Overview • Quantum Tunnelling • Example: One Dimensional Barrier • Example: Scanning Tunnelling Microscopy 25.2 Quantum Tunnelling We have already seen in the case of the quantum mechanical oscillator an example of a purely quantum phenomenon known as “tunnelling” – the prediction that one can find a particle in configurations that by conservation of energy in classical mechanics are not allowed. The case we saw last lecture was that of a quantum oscillator. There, the total energy for a given quantum state would be En =(n +1/2)¯hω. This means that the maximum value of the displacement |x|, xmax, would occur when all the particle’s energy was in the form of potential energy. Thus 1 1 kx2 = n + ¯hω (1) 2 max 2 ¯hω ⇒ x2 =(2n +1) (2) max k ¯h =(2n +1) (3) mω ¯h ⇒|x | = (2n +1) . (4) max mω We find, as seen in Figs. 2 and 3 of the last lecture, that wave function is non-zero for values of |x| greater than this value. This is the “classical” example of a quantum tunnelling phenomena. 25.3 Example: One Dimensional Barrier Let’s look at another tunnelling example to better understand what is going on. I turn back to the single particle of mass m in a 1-D box, but now at one end of the box (x ≥ L), the potential energy rises to U0 instead of ∞. The potential for this problem is shown in Fig. 1. Let’s solve the Schr¨odinger equation for this system. The way to tackle this problem is recognize that the Schr¨odinger equation has two different forms, one for x ∈ (0,L) and the other for x ≥ L.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2006.06003V1 [Hep-Th] 10 Jun 2020 Tum Annealer, and Show That It Allows One to Implement Matter Systems Where Such Effects Have Been Observed2
    IPPP/20/22 Observing the fate of the false vacuum with a quantum laboratory Steven Abel∗ and Michael Spannowskyy Institute for Particle Physics Phenomenology, Department of Physics, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, U.K. Abstract We design and implement a quantum laboratory to experimentally observe and study dynamical processes of quantum field theories. Our approach encodes the field theory as an Ising model, which is then solved by a quantum annealer. As a proof-of- concept, we encode a scalar field theory and measure the probability for it to tunnel from the false to the true vacuum for various tunnelling times, vacuum displacements and potential profiles. The results are in accord with those predicted theoretically, showing that a quantum annealer is a genuine quantum system that can be used as a quantum laboratory. This is the first time it has been possible to experimentally measure instanton processes in a freely chosen quantum field theory. This novel and flexible method to study the dynamics of quantum systems can be applied to any field theory of interest. Experimental measurements of the dynamical behaviour of field theories are independent of theoretical calculations and can be used to infer their properties without being limited by the availability of suitable perturbative or nonperturbative computational methods. In the near future, measurements in such a quantum laboratory could therefore be used to improve theoretical and computational methods conceptually and may enable the measurement and detailed study of previously unobserved quantum phenomena. I. INTRODUCTION time-dependent quantum mechanical wave function as it attempts to reach the ground state of the system.
    [Show full text]