DOCSLIB.ORG

Rumster Community Wind Energy Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Rumster Community Wind Energy Project Technical Potential and Feasibility Study Report OSE/2824 Volume 1 Orkney Sustainable Energy Ltd 6 North End Road Stromness Orkney KW16 3AG Final Report Rumster Community Wind Energy Project October 2007 Rumster Community Wind Energy Project Technical Potential and Feasibility Study Report OSE/2824: Final October 2007 Project Developer: Latheron, Lybster and Clyth Community Development Company Project Coordination: Eric Larnach Telephone 01593 731455 Email [email protected] Project design: Richard Gauld BSc(Hons) IEng MInstMC Dip.Design&Innovation Orkney Sustainable Energy Ltd 6 North End Road Stromness Orkney KW16 3AG Telephone 01856 850054 Facsimile 01856 851239 Email [email protected] Richard Gauld is a Member of the Institute of Measurement and Control, is a professional design engineer, and is registered as an Incorporated Engineer with the Engineering Council of Great Britain. OSE/2824 3 Final Report Rumster Community Wind Energy Project October 2007 Rumster Community Wind Energy Project Report OSE/2824 Technical Potential and Feasibility Study This report is a study into the technical potential and feasibility of a community- owned wind energy project proposed for part of Rumster Forest, to the north-west of Lybster in Caithness. The report is divided into two volumes; Volume One identifies the possible location, planning constraints, ecological constraints, geomorphology, the wind regime, land use, grid issues, forestry and MoD constraints, visual impact assessment, and community ownership issues, with an appendix on potential archaeological impacts,. Volume Two contains preliminary site plans, zone of theoretical visibility maps, and photomontage images. Volume 1: Section 1 Location identification, grid issues, and planning constraints Section 2 Land use, geomorphology, hydrology and forestry constraints Section 3 Ecological constraints Section 4 Landscape and visual impact assessment Section 5 Socio-economics and community governance Appendix A Archaeology desk-based assessment Volume 2: Preliminary Site Drawings, Maps and Photomontage Images OSE/2824 4 Final Report Rumster Community Wind Energy Project October 2007 CONTENTS SUMMARY 7 INTRODUCTION 8 1 SITE DESCRIPTION, GRID AND PLANNING CONSTRAINTS 9 1.1 PROPOSED LOCATION 9 1.2 WIND ASSESSMENT 10 1.3 CARBON EMISSION AVOIDANCE 10 1.4 ALTERNATIVE LOCATIONS 11 1.5 PROVISIONAL DESIGN STATEMENT 13 1.6 WIND TURBINE SELECTION 14 1.7 EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATION 15 1.8 NATIONAL PLANNING CONTEXT 16 1.9 LOCAL PLAN CONTEXT 16 1.10 STRUCTURE PLAN CONTEXT 17 1.11 HIGHLAND RENEWABLE ENERGY STRATEGY 18 1.12 GRID ISSUES 18 1.13 POTENTIAL DISTURBANCE FROM NOISE 19 1.14 POTENTIAL DISTURBANCE FROM SHADOW FLICKER 20 1.15 POTENTIAL RADIOCOMMUNICATIONS INTERFERENCE 21 2 LAND USE, GEOMORPHOLOGY, HYDROLOGY AND FORESTRY 22 2.1 GEOLOGY 22 2.2 HYDROLOGY 23 2.3 GEOMORPHOLOGY – RISK OF PEAT SLIDE 24 2.4 LAND USE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS 25 2.5 FORESTRY ISSUES 26 3 ECOLOGICAL CONSTRAINTS 27 3.1 BACKGROUND 27 3.2 SHIELTON PEATLANDS SSSI 27 OSE/2824 5 Final Report Rumster Community Wind Energy Project October 2007 3.3 EAST CAITHNESS CLIFFS SPA 28 3.4 REISGILL BURN SSSI 29 3.5 PROPOSED BIRD STUDIES 29 BROWN & SHEPHERD SURVEY – METHOD 29 VANTAGE POINT SURVEY - METHOD 30 SWAN AND GOOSE CHECKS – METHOD 30 WADER CHECKS – METHOD 30 BREEDING RAPTORS – METHOD 30 ECOLOGICAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 30 3.6 PROPOSED MAMMAL SURVEY 32 4 LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 33 4.1 VISUAL IMPACT UPON THE LANDSCAPE 33 4.2 ZONE OF THEORETICAL VISIBILITY 33 4.3 IMPACT ON VISUAL RESOURCE 34 4.4 VISUAL ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY 34 4.5 CUMULATIVE IMPACT 37 5 SOCIO-ECONOMICS AND COMMUNITY GOVERNANCE 38 5.1 COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT 38 5.2 GOVERNANCE AND SUSTAINABILITY 38 5.3 SOCIO-ECONOMIC BENEFITS 39 5.4 GRANT FUNDING 39 5.5 CONCLUSIONS 40 REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY 41 APPENDIX A: DESK-BASED ARCHAEOLOGY ASSESSMENT OSE/2824 6 Final Report Rumster Community Wind Energy Project October 2007 Summary The Rumster Community Wind Energy Project is a locally owned community windfarm being developed by the Latheron, Lybster and Clyth Community Development Company, with co-ordination by Mr Eric Larnach. Orkney Sustainable Energy have been contracted to complete a technical potential and feasibility study. It is proposed that up to three wind turbines be installed on land belonging to the community, on part of Rumster Forest, north-west of Lybster. The preliminary turbine chosen for the development is the REPower MM70 2MW. The turbine model may change, subject to availability, however for the purposes of this report the REPower MM70 has been used to show a typical machine for the development. The electricity generated will be traded to meet the requirements of the Renewables Order (Scotland) 2002. The concept of a locally owned, community wind energy development was initiated by the Community Development Company. Consultation has taken place with the Forestry Commission, Forest Enterprise, SEERAD, the Crofters Commission, Latheron, Lybster and Clyth Community Council, Highland Council Planning and Development, Historic Scotland, the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Scottish Natural Heritage, the Scottish Environment Protection Agency, the Ministry of Defence, Wick Airport, the Civil Aviation Authority, National Air Traffic Services and OFCOM, the radiocommunications agency. No objections have been raised by these agencies, although OFCOM did indicate that there were concerns with the radiocommunications links that traverse the area, and the project was subsequently redesigned to avoid a radio link to Orkney. As a result of the desk-based design studies, the project has been designed around three 100m tall turbines to give a maximum output of 6MW, with the project designed to fit within the landscape and to have minimal impact upon neighbours. Preliminary landscape and visual impact studies have been completed, and it was determined that the turbines present a simple, clear relationship to the landform and other existing features, and have largely a negligible significance. Potential ecological impacts have been considered, including recommendations for a habitat survey, a mammal survey, a breeding bird survey, and an assessment of any protected species near the site. Initial assessment on the archaeology of the site and surrounding area has been completed and analysis includes a geological and hydrogeological survey, photomontage modelling, a description of the wind turbines, and detailed maps of the development. It was concluded that a small wind energy project is feasible for this part of Caithness, with low impacts upon ecology and the local community. Strong social and economic benefits can be achieved by constructing the Rumster project, along with the associated climate change benefits resulting from renewable energy production. OSE/2824 7 Final Report Rumster Community Wind Energy Project October 2007 Introduction Caithness has the potential to become an important area for wind energy development; a number of projects have been proposed for the county, primarily as large scale windfarms on hilltop and moorland locations. The Rumster project is an alternative to this pattern of development, and has been designed as a small-scale community-owned cluster of wind turbines to avoid dominating the landscape, while providing strong economic benefits. Orkney Sustainable Energy have completed preliminary environmental, financial and social impact studies, resulting in an initial design and development of a three wind turbine project. The Latheron Lybster and Clyth Community Development Company has been leading the development. The Rumster project has been designed around the RE Power 2MW wind turbine, however the actual turbine model may alter nearer the time of construction; the site layout and all modelling has used a 65m turbine tower height and a maximum of 35m blade length. The nearest 33 kV electricity transmission line is located in the A9 corridor to the west of the development site, with underground cabling proposed throughout. The average wind speed on the Rumster site is predicted to be around 9.2 metres per second (ms-1), compared with 9.6 ms-1 predicted at the summits of nearby hills. This lower windspeed is due to the slightly lower elevation of the site, chosen with the aim of reducing visual impact. Based on the manufacturers predictions, three 2MW wind turbines on Rumster will produce around 16.5 GWh of electricity per annum, equivalent to the annual domestic requirements of 3500 households(DUKES). Electricity produced from renewable resources avoids the emission of pollution, and the production of 16,500 MWh is projected to avert the production of around 2000 tonnes of carbon per annum(Carbon Trust). Per head of population, the Rumster project provides a very good contribution towards the Scottish Executive annual targets: This report is presented in seven sections: Section 1 is a description of the location and includes a summary of planning constraints and grid issues, Section 2 is a summary of existing landuse and possible geomorphology and hydrology constraints, Section 3 contains an assessment of ecological impacts, Section 4 is a preliminary landscape and visual impact assessment, Section 5 is a socio-economics study and an assessment of the implications of community ownership, and Appendix A contains a preliminary archaeology survey. Volume 2 of the report contains initial plans, drawings, maps, wireframe images and photomontages. OSE/2824 8 Final
Recommended publications
  • Optimizing the Visual Impact of Onshore Wind Farms Upon the Landscapes – Comparing Recent Planning Approaches in China and Germany

    Optimizing the Visual Impact of Onshore Wind Farms Upon the Landscapes – Comparing Recent Planning Approaches in China and Germany

    Ruhr-Universität Bochum Dissertation Submission to the Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Faculty of Geosciences For the degree of Doctor of natural sciences (Dr. rer. nat) Submitted by: Jinjin Guan. MLA Date of the oral examination: 16.07.2020 Examiners Dr. Thomas Held Prof. Dr. Harald Zepp Prof. Dr. Guotai Yan Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Friederich Prof. Dr. Harro Stolpe Keywords Onshore wind farm planning; landscape; landscape visual impact evaluation; energy transition; landscape visual perception; GIS; Germany; China. I Abstract In this thesis, an interdisciplinary Landscape Visual Impact Evaluation (LVIE) model has been established in order to solve the conflicts between onshore wind energy development and landscape protection. It aims to recognize, analyze, and evaluate the visual impact of onshore wind farms upon landscapes and put forward effective mitigation measures in planning procedures. Based on literature research and expert interviews, wind farm planning regimes, legislation, policies, planning procedures, and permission in Germany and China were compared with each other and evaluated concerning their respective advantages and disadvantages. Relevant theories of landscape evaluation have been researched and integrated into the LVIE model, including the landscape connotation, landscape aesthetics, visual perception, landscape functions, and existing evaluation methods. The evaluation principles, criteria, and quantitative indicators are appropriately organized in this model with a hierarchy structure. The potential factors that may influence the visual impact have been collected and categorized into three dimensions: landscape sensitivity, the visual impact of WTs, and viewer exposure. Detailed sub-indicators are also designed under these three topics for delicate evaluation. Required data are collected from official platforms and databases to ensure the reliability and repeatability of the evaluation process.
  • Offers Over £220,000 Greystones, Leodebest, Latheron, KW5

    Offers Over £220,000 Greystones, Leodebest, Latheron, KW5

    Greystones, Leodebest, Latheron, KW5 6DQ This generous detached home enjoys a superb position affording unrivalled views and is offered for sale with approximately 3 acres of ground ensuring it to be an ideal family home/holiday home or for those seeking a "lifestyle" opportunity. • Entrance/Dining Hall • Music Room • Lounge • Upper Landing • Kitchen/Family Room • 5 Bedrooms (1 En-Suite) • Utility Room • Family Bathroom • Cloakroom • Garage Offers over £220,000 DESCRIPTION "Greystones" is an impressive 5 bedroom detached dwellinghouse, situated just off the famous North Coast 500 route and is set amidst some of the most spectacular scenery in the Highlands. The property, which was built in 2007, sits in generous grounds extending to approximately 3 acres, with the house site having been decrofted and the remainder of the ground is Owner Occupied croftland. In excellent order throughout, the property benefits from oil fired central heating and UPVC replacement double glazed windows. Viewing is a must of this beautiful home to fully appreciate the elevated location with stunning views and thoughtful layout of the accommodation which provides bright and airy rooms throughout. This delightful home will appeal to a spectrum of buyers to include those seeking a spacious family home, those with an equestrian interest or for other livestock, those seeking a "lifestyle" change or equally those looking for a holiday home as the property is well placed to take full advantage of a number of outdoor pursuits to include walking, shooting, fishing and is close to the beaches and harbour. LOCATION The property is situated at Latheron which is south west of Lybster on the A9 road and is part of the famous North Coast 500 route.
  • Caithness County Council

    Caithness County Council

    Caithness County Council RECORDS’ IDENTITY STATEMENT Reference number: CC Alternative reference number: Title: Caithness County Council Dates of creation: 1720-1975 Level of description: Fonds Extent: 10 bays of shelving Format: Mainly paper RECORDS’ CONTEXT Name of creators: Caithness County Council Administrative history: 1889-1930 County Councils were established under the Local Government (Scotland) Act 1889. They assumed the powers of the Commissioners of Supply, and of Parochial Boards, excluding those in Burghs, under the Public Health Acts. The County Councils also assumed the powers of the County Road Trusts, and as a consequence were obliged to appoint County Road Boards. Powers of the former Police Committees of the Commissioners were transferred to Standing Joint Committees, composed of County Councillors, Commissioners and the Sheriff of the county. They acted as the police committee of the counties - the executive bodies for the administration of police. The Act thus entrusted to the new County Councils most existing local government functions outwith the burghs except the poor law, education, mental health and licensing. Each county was divided into districts administered by a District Committee of County Councillors. Funded directly by the County Councils, the District Committees were responsible for roads, housing, water supply and public health. Nucleus: The Nuclear and Caithness Archive 1 Provision was also made for the creation of Special Districts to be responsible for the provision of services including water supply, drainage, lighting and scavenging. 1930-1975 The Local Government Act (Scotland) 1929 abolished the District Committees and Parish Councils and transferred their powers and duties to the County Councils and District Councils (see CC/6).
  • RSPB Scotland

    RSPB Scotland

    RSPB Scotland Letter Writing Briefing Last Chance for Scotland’s Seabirds Our seabirds are the fastest declining group of bird species globally. In Scotland, coastal cliff-tops that were once immense seabird 'cities' have been left like eerily silent ghost towns. The problem will continue to worsen unless the Scottish Government takes action now. The Government is proposing 33 Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) that will protect some of Scotland’s most amazing marine wildlife, but unfortunately they ignore those most in need of protection - Scotland’s seabirds. MPAs have been proposed in different locations around Scotland’s coast and out at sea. These areas will protect important species and habitats from marine activities that could harm them. MPAs will do a lot to help Scotland’s seas, and the many creatures within them, but unfortunately, they will do nothing for the majority of Scotland’s seabirds. The Scottish Government argue that seabirds are already adequately protected, but this is not the case. We have seen terrible declines in many seabird populations over the last ten years and scientists predict that we could see seabirds go extinct from some parts of the country within the next ten years. We need MPAs that protect areas of national importance for our iconic seabirds, not just areas of European importance, which is currently the case. The proposals for MPAs must be improved. The Scottish Government must designate all the proposed MPAs but also add seabirds to the list of species to be protected. In addition, the Firth of Forth Banks Complex proposed MPA must have sandeels added to the list of species to be protected.
  • Planning for Wind Energy

    Planning for Wind Energy

    Planning for Wind Energy Suzanne Rynne, AICP , Larry Flowers, Eric Lantz, and Erica Heller, AICP , Editors American Planning Association Planning Advisory Service Report Number 566 Planning for Wind Energy is the result of a collaborative part- search intern at APA; Kirstin Kuenzi is a research intern at nership among the American Planning Association (APA), APA; Joe MacDonald, aicp, was program development se- the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), the nior associate at APA; Ann F. Dillemuth, aicp, is a research American Wind Energy Association (AWEA), and Clarion associate and co-editor of PAS Memo at APA. Associates. Funding was provided by the U.S. Department The authors thank the many other individuals who con- of Energy under award number DE-EE0000717, as part of tributed to or supported this project, particularly the plan- the 20% Wind by 2030: Overcoming the Challenges funding ners, elected officials, and other stakeholders from case- opportunity. study communities who participated in interviews, shared The report was developed under the auspices of the Green documents and images, and reviewed drafts of the case Communities Research Center, one of APA’s National studies. Special thanks also goes to the project partners Centers for Planning. The Center engages in research, policy, who reviewed the entire report and provided thoughtful outreach, and education that advance green communities edits and comments, as well as the scoping symposium through planning. For more information, visit www.plan- participants who worked with APA and project partners to ning.org/nationalcenters/green/index.htm. APA’s National develop the outline for the report: James Andrews, utilities Centers for Planning conduct policy-relevant research and specialist at the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission; education involving community health, natural and man- Jennifer Banks, offshore wind and siting specialist at AWEA; made hazards, and green communities.
  • Caithness and Sutherland Proposed Local Development Plan Committee Version November, 2015

    Caithness and Sutherland Proposed Local Development Plan Committee Version November, 2015

    Caithness and Sutherland Proposed Local Development Plan Committee Version November, 2015 Proposed CaSPlan The Highland Council Foreword Foreword Foreword to be added after PDI committee meeting The Highland Council Proposed CaSPlan About this Proposed Plan About this Proposed Plan The Caithness and Sutherland Local Development Plan (CaSPlan) is the second of three new area local development plans that, along with the Highland-wide Local Development Plan (HwLDP) and Supplementary Guidance, will form the Highland Council’s Development Plan that guides future development in Highland. The Plan covers the area shown on the Strategy Map on page 3). CaSPlan focuses on where development should and should not occur in the Caithness and Sutherland area over the next 10-20 years. Along the north coast the Pilot Marine Spatial Plan for the Pentland Firth and Orkney Waters will also influence what happens in the area. This Proposed Plan is the third stage in the plan preparation process. It has been approved by the Council as its settled view on where and how growth should be delivered in Caithness and Sutherland. However, it is a consultation document which means you can tell us what you think about it. It will be of particular interest to people who live, work or invest in the Caithness and Sutherland area. In preparing this Proposed Plan, the Highland Council have held various consultations. These included the development of a North Highland Onshore Vision to support growth of the marine renewables sector, Charrettes in Wick and Thurso to prepare whole-town visions and a Call for Sites and Ideas, all followed by a Main Issues Report and Additional Sites and Issues consultation.
  • Factors Affecting the Community Acceptance of Onshore

    Factors Affecting the Community Acceptance of Onshore

    sustainability Article Factors Affecting the Community Acceptance of Onshore Wind Farms: A Case Study of the Zhongying Wind Farm in Eastern China Jinjin Guan * and Harald Zepp Institute of Geography, Ruhr University Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 5 August 2020; Accepted: 21 August 2020; Published: 25 August 2020 Abstract: The conflict between wind energy expansion and local environmental protection has attracted attention from society and initiated a fierce discussion about the community acceptance of wind farms. There are various empirical studies on factors affecting the public acceptance of wind farms, but little concerning the correlation and significance of factors, especially in a close distance to the wind farms. This paper aims to identify, classify, and analyze the factors affecting community acceptance through literature review, questionnaire, variance analysis, and linear regression analysis. A total of 169 questionnaires was conducted in 17 villages around the Zhongying Wind Farm in Zhejiang Province, China. The factors are categorized into four groups: Location-related factors, demographic factors, environmental impact factors, and public participation factors. Through the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and linear regression analysis, the outcome shows the universal rule of community acceptance under the Chinese social background. Finally, recommendations for improving wind farm planning procedures are put forward. Keywords: onshore wind farm; community acceptance; wind energy planning; environmental impact; public participation; analysis of variance (ANOVA); regression analysis 1. Introduction Wind energy is recognized as a major renewable energy source alternative. It helps reducing CO2 emission and mitigating climate change due to its high performance, wide resource distribution, and competitive prices.
  • Family of Donald Bremner and Margaret Gunn. Latheron, CAI December 2Nd, 2015

    Family of Donald Bremner and Margaret Gunn. Latheron, CAI December 2Nd, 2015

    Family of Donald Bremner and Margaret Gunn. Latheron, CAI December 2nd, 2015 Generation One 1. Donald Bremner #14801, b. c 1750? in Latheron?, CAI, SCT, occupation Weaver. He married Margaret Gunn #14802, 01 February 1774 in Latheron, CAI, SCT.1 Children: 2. i. George Bremner #14796 b. 1776. 3. ii. Ann Bremner #14810 b. April 1778. 4. iii. Mary Bremner #14803 b. 1780. 5. iv. Elizabeth Bremner #14838 b. 1784. 6. v. John Bremner #14839 b. 1786. 7. vi. James Bremner #14840 b. 1788. 8. vii. Margaret Bremner #14827 b. 1791. 9. viii. Donald Bremner #14806 b. 1795. Generation Two 2. George Bremner #14796, b. 1776 in Latheron, CAI, SCT,2 baptized 12 March 1776 in Latheron, CAI, SCT,3 d. 29 March 1862 in Achsinegar Swiney, Latheron, CAI,4 occupation 1851 Farmer of 3 acres. 1851-1861: At Achsinegar, Latheron. 1861: Farmed 12 acres. Noted as "Ground Officer" at time of death; parents names verified from death certificate. He married (1) Ann Henderson #14797, 08 June 1797 in Latheron, CAI, SCT,1 b. c 1775 in Latheron, CAI, SCT,2 (daughter of John Henderson #14799 [Blacksmith] and Margaret Sinclair #14800), d. 23 August 1857 in Achsinegar, Latheron, CAI, SCT.5 Ann: Ann is shown as blind in the 1851 census. Children: 10. i. John Bremner #14771 b. 1798. 11. ii. Donald Bremner #14833 b. 1799. 12. iii. Alexander McLean Bremner #14834 b. 1802. 13. iv. Margaret Bremner #14835 b. 1804. 14. v. Donald Bremner #14836 b. 1807. 15. vi. George Bremner #15931 b. c 1809. 16. vii. James Bremner #14846 b.
  • Parish Profile Parish of Latheron Caithness SC034424

    Parish Profile Parish of Latheron Caithness SC034424

    Parish Profile Parish of Latheron Caithness SC034424 Parish of Latheron Manse Lybster Parish of Latheron Introduction The friendly and committed members of the Parish of Latheron are seeking a dedicated minister, who will provide leadership to the congregation; to encourage the membership of the congregation; to be active in pastoral care and visitation to the elderly, along with families who do not see the church as relevant to their spiritual needs; and to enable the congregation to be the people of God. The congregation will support the minister in his/her passion for ministry. There is a wide diversity of people within the Parish. Clearly there is a real opportunity and challenge for a minister to identify with the people. Our vision is to have a congregation united in love and prayer, living in charity with our neighbours and encouraging participation in worship by all age groups. Could this be what you as a minister feels called to? Our central vision is to have: · A congregation made up of people of all ages · Everyone feeling welcome and able to be involved · A fellowship characterised by love · We see prayer as key to what we do together · We seek more use of our church buildings · We need to extend our outreach to non-church attenders Current Situation The Church is on the Model Constitution. The Parish of Latheron stretches from Bruan in the north to Berriedale in the south with places of worship in Lybster and Dunbeath which are about eight miles apart. We are one congregation with two centres of worship.
  • Caithness and Sutherland Local Development Plan Report by Director of Development and Infrastructure

    Caithness and Sutherland Local Development Plan Report by Director of Development and Infrastructure

    1 The Highland Council Agenda 9. Item Sutherland County Committee Report CC/ Caithness Committee No 16/16 30 August 2016 31 August 2016 Caithness and Sutherland Local Development Plan Report by Director of Development and Infrastructure Summary This report presents a summary of issues raised in comments received on the Proposed Caithness and Sutherland Local Development Plan (CaSPlan) and seeks approval for the Council’s response to these issues and next steps. In accordance with the Council’s Scheme of Delegation, the two Local Committees are asked to consider the report and decide on these matters. The recommended Council position is to defend the Proposed Plan, subject to only minor modifications, which would mean that the next stage would be submission to Ministers and progression to Examination. Other options would involve further consultation on a Modified Plan. The report explains the implications of each way forward. 1. Background 1.1 The Caithness and Sutherland Local Development Plan (CaSPlan) is the second of three area local development plans to be prepared by the Highland Council. Together with the Highland-wide Local Development Plan (HwLDP) and more detailed Supplementary Guidance, CaSPlan will form part of the Council’s Development Plan against which planning decisions will be made in the Caithness and Sutherland area. 1.2 The Proposed Plan consultation for CaSPlan ran from 22 January to 18 March 2016. Around 201 organisations or individuals responded, raising around 636 comments. This includes a few comments received on the associated Proposed Action Programme. All these comments have been published on the development plans consultation portal consult.highland.gov.uk.
  • Related Black Guillemot Surveys 2014

    Related Black Guillemot Surveys 2014

    Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 792 Marine Protected Area - related black guillemot surveys 2014 COMMISSIONED REPORT Commissioned Report No. 792 Marine Protected Area - related black guillemot surveys 2014 For further information on this report please contact: Laura Steel Scottish Natural Heritage Great Glen House INVERNESS IV3 8NW Telephone: 01463 725236 E-mail: [email protected] This report should be quoted as: Swann, R. 2014. Marine Protected Area – related black guillemot surveys 2014. Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 792. This report, or any part of it, should not be reproduced without the permission of Scottish Natural Heritage. This permission will not be withheld unreasonably. The views expressed by the author(s) of this report should not be taken as the views and policies of Scottish Natural Heritage. © Scottish Natural Heritage 2014. COMMISSIONED REPORT Summary Marine Protected Area – related black guillemot surveys 2014 Commissioned Report No. 792 Project No: 15115 Contractor: Bob Swann, North of Scotland Ornithological Services Year of publication: 2014 Keywords Marine Protected Areas; MPA; black guillemots; East Caithness Cliffs; Clyde Sea Sill; Sanda; tysties. Background In order to obtain information to support work on Marine Protected Areas (MPAs), black guillemots were surveyed at two sites in Scotland, East Caithness Cliffs and Clyde Sea Sill MPAs, from late March to April 2014. The data from these counts was then compared with counts collected in a similar manner for Seabird 2000. Main findings 1,589 birds were counted in the East Caithness Cliffs MPA. Of these 1,569 birds were in summer plumage, this was a 67% increase on the 939 counted in the same sections for Seabird 2000.
  • Wind Powering America Fy08 Activities Summary

    Wind Powering America Fy08 Activities Summary

    WIND POWERING AMERICA FY08 ACTIVITIES SUMMARY Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Dear Wind Powering America Colleague, We are pleased to present the Wind Powering America FY08 Activities Summary, which reflects the accomplishments of our state Wind Working Groups, our programs at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and our partner organizations. The national WPA team remains a leading force for moving wind energy forward in the United States. At the beginning of 2008, there were more than 16,500 megawatts (MW) of wind power installed across the United States, with an additional 7,000 MW projected by year end, bringing the U.S. installed capacity to more than 23,000 MW by the end of 2008. When our partnership was launched in 2000, there were 2,500 MW of installed wind capacity in the United States. At that time, only four states had more than 100 MW of installed wind capacity. Twenty-two states now have more than 100 MW installed, compared to 17 at the end of 2007. We anticipate that four or five additional states will join the 100-MW club in 2009, and by the end of the decade, more than 30 states will have passed the 100-MW milestone. WPA celebrates the 100-MW milestones because the first 100 megawatts are always the most difficult and lead to significant experience, recognition of the wind energy’s benefits, and expansion of the vision of a more economically and environmentally secure and sustainable future. Of course, the 20% Wind Energy by 2030 report (developed by AWEA, the U.S. Department of Energy, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and other stakeholders) indicates that 44 states may be in the 100-MW club by 2030, and 33 states will have more than 1,000 MW installed (at the end of 2008, there were six states in that category).