DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annual Report The ATTORNEY-GENERAL’S CHAMBERS of Singapore ANNUAL REPORT 2013/2014 Contents 02 Foreword by the Attorney-General 06 Our Mission, Vision & Core Values 07 Our Roles 08 Our Corporate Structure 10 Our Appreciation & Congratulations 14 Our People 26 The Attorney-General’s Roles A. As the Government’s Chief Legal Adviser and Counsel B. As Public Prosecutor C. In Performing Other Assigned Duties of a Legal Character 47 Our Outreach & New Initiatives 59 Our Training & Capabilities Development 63 The Ties that Bind Us 68 Key Figures - Expenditure Indicators - Performance Indicators ATTORNEY-GENERAL’S CHAMBERS Annual Report 2013/2014 1 Foreword By In the first Annual Report published after Outside of AGC, I have strengthened our ties my appointment, I had highlighted the key with other stakeholders of the criminal justice initiatives undertaken by AGC in the pursuit system through our common purpose of The Attorney-General of transparency, modernisation, cooperation maintaining a fair, efficient and enduring and development of our resources. In this criminal justice system. To my mind, a report card highlighting the matters which collegial relationship between AGC and other occupied AGC during my second year in stakeholders of the criminal justice system The Office of the Attorney-General office, you will observe that these are recurring will necessarily be in the public interest is undoubtedly one that wields great themes which permeate our work ethos in as it will continually spur us to work together power and consequently immense AGC. Given my firm commitment that I for the good of our society. To this end, responsibilities. After all, this Office should build upon and strengthen the my officers have, in the past year, consistently provides direction for and exercises foundations laid before me, I have sought to collaborated with enforcement agencies and independent control of all criminal introduce initiatives which will institutionalise the Criminal Bar to improve the administration proceedings in Singapore, and acts as stability and continuity to the work of AGC of criminal justice. the Government’s principal legal adviser. that is independent of my term in office. As AG Chan Sek Keong (as he then was) By way of an example, the Embedment aptly observed at the inaugural Legal The need for continuity and stability is greater Project involves experienced Deputy Public Branch Conference in 1996, this Office now than ever before, in a changing society Prosecutors stationed for fixed terms in may also be viewed as “a public where, for example, my officers have had to enforcement agencies, such as specialised responsibility held in trust for the swiftly respond on multiple fronts (be it divisions of the Police, the Corrupt Practices public to be discharged in the public advising the Government, assisting the Investigation Bureau and the Central Narcotics interest”. To put it another way, the Committee of Inquiry, prosecuting the Bureau. These officers act as the first point of exacting standards to which this Office offenders or effecting legislative reforms) consultation for investigation officers at an is rightly held to, mandate that its in the wake of a violent and unprecedented early stage in the investigation process. In turn, responsibilities and duties should be riot in Little India that took Singapore by this has served the interests of justice – the discharged with integrity, impartiality, storm. It is from this perspective that this quality of investigations has improved; the time competence and professionalism at all Annual Report presents the highlights of taken for a case to be prosecuted or withdrawn times, regardless of the office bearer AGC’s past year. has reduced; and precious resources have been of the day. saved. As Public Prosecutor When I assumed this Office in 2012, In my role as the Public Prosecutor, I have The launch of the groundbreaking Code of I emphasised the importance of set in place various internal best practices to Practice for the Conduct of Criminal consistency, continuity and stability. To guide the work of my officers in the Crime Proceedings in March 2013 also bore me, these were the touchstones of my Divisions of AGC. Their work in the testimony to the close working relationship term in office that would be critical administration of criminal justice directly that has developed between my officers and to the Attorney-General’s Chambers’ impacts the lives of victims, witnesses, the Criminal Bar. This Code is a joint (AGC) mission to further the rule of suspects, accused persons, their families, and commitment by the Prosecution and the law and constitutional government in the general public. It is therefore vital for Criminal Bar to tap on our collective best Singapore; enhance good public prosecutorial discretion to be exercised in practices so as to align and enhance the administration; and protect the interests a clear and consistent manner, while being standards for advocacy and ethics in criminal of the State and of the people. mindful of the specific and unique facts of proceedings at the pre-trial, trial and post-trial each case. The constant updating of our stages. It is a clarion call to the Prosecution It is therefore not surprising that my internal prosecutorial guidelines, the and Defence alike as to the professional first year in office marked a time of consolidation of our internal sentencing standards that they should continually and consolidation of the policies and reforms databases and the formation of specialist consistently uphold in the criminal justice introduced by my predecessor, the teams to handle particularly sensitive cases process. We will continue to review and revise present Chief Justice, which I aligned are examples of such best practices that will this Code as appropriate and look forward to with my own vision for AGC. take us yet another step forward in meeting more collaborative opportunities with the these goals. Criminal Bar in time to come. 2 ATTORNEY-GENERAL’S CHAMBERS Annual Report 2013/2014 ATTORNEY-GENERAL’S CHAMBERS Annual Report 2013/2014 3 Apart from my best endeavours to cement are well aware of the need to continually Under my watch, the Legislation and Law Reform In Parting AGC’s ties with partner agencies and other advance their legal knowledge and skills, and Division (LLRD) remains unrelenting in its It is only fitting that I record my gratitude to stakeholders of the criminal justice system, to specialise in areas that are beneficial to worthy pursuit of continued accessibility to Mrs Koh Juat Jong SC who retired as the I have been steadfast in promoting our their work and professional development. our laws through its Plain Laws Understandable Solicitor-General on 1 February 2014. During engagement with the public. Over time, I Together with the Solicitor-General, the by Singaporeans (PLUS) Project. This formidable her years in office, her mentorship and tireless demystified the Office of the Public Deputy Solicitor-General and my Heads of Project will incorporate survey feedback dedication to public service was a constant Prosecutor by delivering a number of Departments, I have made sure that local and collected from stakeholders of the legislative source of support and inspiration for us all. addresses relating to my role as the overseas training opportunities are made process, in a bid by LLRD to modernise and That we are an institution with top quality Public Prosecutor and issuing press available throughout the organisation to simplify the manner by which legislation is officers and resources is, in no small part, due statements to explain AGC’s position in cater for my officers’ wide-ranging training presented and drafted by AGC. The PLUS to her immeasurable contributions. Mrs Koh’s certain cases. needs. Project will further ensure that the laws successor, Mr Lionel Yee SC, is no stranger of Singapore continue to be readily to AGC. He shares in the vision for AGC to Given the particular interest which the I am delighted that Civil Division has understandable by all for a long time to maintain its sterling reputation as an institution public has in criminal cases, and the speed embarked, during my term in office, on a come. I understand that AG Chan had, as far of excellence and will continue to provide and abundance at which information (and considerable expansion of its role by taking back as 17 years ago, propounded a similar stalwart leadership in the face of change. misinformation) is disseminated through social on all judicial review cases against statutory vision for the legislative department of the day, media, I set up a dedicated Media Relations boards and civil penalty cases enforced by and I am heartened that the PLUS Project is Even as I close this chapter of my term in Unit within AGC and staffed it with the Monetary Authority of Singapore under another key initiative that will foster continuity office, there is still more to be done; indeed, professionals of high calibre to ensure Part XII of the Securities and Futures Act. for AGC’s work across the passage of time. there will always be more we can aspire to that AGC is equipped with the resources This is a move which I had championed as achieve as AGC continues to deliver diverse to appropriately engage and educate the it will enable Civil Division to build up its Knowledge Management (KM) but consistent legal services of the highest public. I also gave my full support to the significant expertise in public law and At my first AGC Workplan seminar in 2012, quality. Notwithstanding the ever-increasing launch of the inaugural Public Prosecution securities regulation on a holistic basis, as I emphasised the need to maintain public demands made of my officers to deal with Outreach Programme in October 2013.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annual Report 2010 - 2011 Contents
    Annual Report 2010 - 2011 Contents 2 Foreword by the Attorney-General 6 Remembrance and Congratulations 10 Our Mission, Vision and Core Values 13 Our Roles 15 Our Corporate Structure A. AGC’s Management Team B. Six Legal Divisions and Two Non-Legal Divisions 29 Our Key Milestones A. As The Government’s Chief Legal Adviser and Counsel i. AGC’s Advisory Work ii. AGC’s Involvement in Litigation iii. AGC in Negotiations iv. AGC as Legislative Draftsman B. As Public Prosecutor C. In Performing Other Assigned Duties of a Legal Character D. Our Corporate Resources 61 Our Training, Development and Outreach 67 The Ties that Bind Us 71 Key Figures for 2010-2011 A. Corporate Awards B. Performance Indicators C. Financial Indicators for FY2010-FY2011 Attorney-General’s Chambers ANNUAL REPORT 2010 - 2011 1 FOREWORD BY THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL As we look back on these past years, the taxation policies and policies concerning adjust to these changes so that we can function perceptible increase in the complexity of our casino regulation. Cross-Divisional teams effectively. work is particularly striking. This growing were also engaged to deal with cases before complexity has in turn given rise to two the Singapore Courts when we were required With this in mind, I have intensified the consequences, which I elaborate on below. to address constitutional challenges and also commitment of my Chambers to the training, to defend Singapore’s judiciary in the face of development and specialisation of our officers contempt. so that we are well placed to support the THE NEED FOR Government with the highest level of legal iNTER-dIVISIONAL This is perhaps a reality that is ultimately to be services.
    [Show full text]
  • The Criminal Procedure Code 2010
    (2011) 23 SAcLJ Modernising the Criminal Justice Framework 23 MODERNISING THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE FRAMEWORK The Criminal Procedure Code 2010 The concept of “balancing” prevalent in criminal justice discourse is premised on a paradigm where “state” and “individual” interests are perpetually in conflict. This article outlines the key components of the new Criminal Procedure Code 2010 and discusses another dimension of the state- individual relationship. Rather than being inherently incompatible, synergistic common goals can, on occasion, be pursued between the State and an accused. The article will also consider areas in the Criminal Procedure Code 2010 where conflicts between “state” and “individual” interests have in fact arisen, and will outline the pragmatic approach that has been adopted towards their resolution. Melanie CHNG* LLB (Hons) (National University of Singapore), LLM (Harvard); Advocate & Solicitor (Singapore); Assistant Director, Ministry of Law. The criminal process is at the heart of the criminal justice system. It is not only a subject of great practical importance; it is also a reflection of our ideals and values as to the way in which we can accord justice to both the guilty and to the innocent.[1] I. Introduction 1 The recent legislative amendments to Singapore’s Criminal Procedure Code (“CPC”) signify a new chapter in the continuing evolution of Singapore’s criminal justice process. The new Criminal Procedure Code 2010 (“New CPC”),2 which came into force on * The opinions expressed in this article are those of its author and are not representative of the official position or policies of the Singapore government. The author is grateful to Mr Amarjeet Singh SC, Ms Jennifer Marie SC, Mr Bala Reddy, Professor Michael Hor, Mr Subhas Anandan, Ms Valerie Thean and Mr Desmond Lee for their invaluable comments on an earlier draft of this article.
    [Show full text]
  • Minlaw) Invited Applications for the Second Round of Qualifying Foreign Law Practice (QFLP) Licences on 1 July 2012
    PRESS RELEASE AWARD OF THE SECOND ROUND OF QUALIFYING FOREIGN LAW PRACTICE LICENCES The Ministry of Law (MinLaw) invited applications for the second round of Qualifying Foreign Law Practice (QFLP) licences on 1 July 2012. Twenty-three applications were received by the closing date of 31 August 2012. 2 QFLP licences will be awarded to the following four firms (listed in alphabetical order): Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher; Jones Day; Linklaters, and Sidley Austin. 3 The firms will have up to six months from 1 April 2013 to commence their operations as QFLPs, and their licences will be valid for an initial period of five years from the respective start dates. Background 4 The QFLP scheme was introduced in 2008 following the recommendations of the Committee to Develop the Legal Sector chaired by Justice V K Rajah. The Committee, which included senior lawyers from top local firms, assessed that local firms and local lawyers would benefit from the increased foreign presence and competition over time. 5 The QFLP licences allow Foreign Law Practices (FLPs) to practise in permitted areas of Singapore law1. The scheme seeks to support the growth of key economic sectors, grow the legal sector, as well as to offer additional 1 Permitted areas are all areas except domestic areas of litigation and general practice, for example, criminal law, retail conveyancing, family law and administrative law. The QFLPs can practise the permitted areas through Singapore-qualified lawyers with practising certificates or foreign lawyers holding the foreign practitioner certificate. 1 opportunities for our lawyers. A total of six FLPs2 were awarded QFLP licences in the first round in 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • This Story Was Printed from Todayonline
    This story was printed from TODAYonline S'pore gets first female Solicitor-General Koh Juat Jong takes over from Walter Woon, who is new AG Thursday • April 10, 2008 Leong Wee Keat [email protected] A PRESIDENT'S Scholar has become the first woman to be appointed the Solicitor-General (SG) in the Attorney-General's Chambers here. Ms Koh Juat Jong (picture), 48, will leave her role as the Registrar of the Supreme Court,and assume her new post tomorrow. As SG, she will work closely with the new Attorney-General (AG), Professor Walter Woon, 52, in advising ministries and departments on questions of law. Prof Woon, the current SG, has been appointed to the post of AG for two years, said a statement from the Prime Minister's Office (PMO) yesterday. Mr Chao Hick Tin, 65, the current AG, ends his two-year term today. He returns to the judiciary as a Judge of Appeal at the Supreme Court tomorrow, said the PMO statement. As SG, Ms Koh will also help the AG oversee the drafting of legislation, and represent the Government in legal proceedings. "I am honoured to be entrusted with the responsibilities of the new appointment as Solicitor-General," she said. "My last four years as the Registrar of the Supreme Court has been a rewarding and memorable experience." Ms Koh joined the Legal Service in 1989 when she was posted to the AG's Chambers as state counsel. She was then posted to the Supreme Court in 1994 as senior assistant registrar before becoming a district judge in 1995, and later the Principal District Judge in the Family and Juvenile Justice Division.
    [Show full text]
  • Tan Hwee Lee V Tan Cheng Guan and Another Appeal and Another
    Tan Hwee Lee v Tan Cheng Guan and another appeal and another matter [2012] SGCA 50 Case Number : Civil Appeals Nos 135 and 136 of 2011, and Summons No 266 of 2012 Decision Date : 30 August 2012 Tribunal/Court : Court of Appeal Coram : Chao Hick Tin JA; Andrew Phang Boon Leong JA; V K Rajah JA Counsel Name(s) : Lim Puay Chong Vincent and Sim Chong (JLC Advisors LLP) for the appellant in Civil Appeal No 135 of 2011 and the respondent in Civil Appeal No 136 of 2011; Bernice Loo and Magdelene Sim (Allen & Gledhill LLP) for the respondent in Civil Appeal No 135 of 2011 and the appellant in Civil Appeal No 136 of 2011. Parties : Tan Hwee Lee — Tan Cheng Guan Family Law – Division of Matrimonial Assets Family Law – Maintenance [LawNet Editorial Note: The decision from which this appeal arose is reported at [2011] 4 SLR 1148.] 30 August 2012 Judgment reserved. Andrew Phang Boon Leong JA (delivering the judgment of the court): Introduction 1 These are two related appeals filed by the husband, Tan Cheng Guan (“the Husband”) and the wife, Tan Hwee Lee (“the Wife”) against the decision of the High Court judge (“the Judge”) in Tan Cheng Guan v Tan Hwee Lee [2011] 4 SLR 1148 (“the Judgment”) with regard to the division of matrimonial assets and the order of maintenance. Civil Appeal No 135 of 2011 (“CA 135/2011”) is filed by the Wife, and Civil Appeal No 136 of 2011 (“CA 136/2011”) is filed by the Husband. Summons No 266 of 2012 (“SUM 266/2012”) is an application taken out by the Wife in relation to CA 135/2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Statements
    GARDENS BY THE BAY ANNUAL REPORT 2018/19 CONTENTS 5 Corporate Overview 19 Enchanting Moments 31 Wondrous Memories 41 Delightful Discoveries 53 Illuminating Communities 65 Narrating Wonder 75 Dazzling Talents 81 Corporate Governance 91 Financial Statements Image credit: @dotzsoh CORPORATE OVERVIEW VISION Our world of gardens for all to own, enjoy and cherish MISSION We make our Gardens the leisure destination of choice for all We delight our guests with an enthralling experience, excellent service and enriching programmes We inspire pride of ownership of our Gardens in every Singaporean We aim to be a model of sustainable development and conservation 4 GARDENS BY THE BAY | ANNUAL REPORT 2018/19 CORPORATE OVERVIEW 5 CHAIRMAN’S MESSAGE When the idea of Gardens by the Bay was first Gardens by the Bay also deeply appreciates the mooted, the intent was for this to be a garden for the strong support our corporate partners and people – a world-class horticultural wonder serving volunteers have generously given to our cause, the leisure needs of Singaporeans, and a familiar and will continue to engage with them actively to Singapore icon that our people will be proud of. realise our vision as a People’s Garden. We will press Hence, it is uplifting to see the steady progress made on to forge closer partnerships with community in the Gardens over the years, especially with our groups so that more residents can enjoy this special public programmes and attraction offerings. green space, foster community bonding and create shared memories as they participate in the various The 2018 financial year (FY) was another outstanding programmes and events held at the Gardens.
    [Show full text]
  • AY2020-2021 Class Timetable
    ACADEMIC YEAR 2020/2021 ‐ SEMESTER 1 Page 1: Semester 1 AY2020‐2021 Timetable (ver 23 July 2020) Version 23 July 2020 MONDAY 9:00 9:30 10:00 10:30 11:00 11:30 12:00 12:30 13:00 13:30 14:00 14:30 15:00 15:30 16:00 16:30 17:00 17:30 18:00 18:30 19:00 19:30 20:00 20:30 21:00 LC1016 LARC LECTURE LC1003 LAW OF CONTRACT LECTURE {Yale 2} CORE LC1016 LARC TUTORIAL 1 {Yale 2} LC1016 LARC TUTORIAL BURTON ONG, WAYNE COURTNEY, DORA NEO, KELRY LC1016 LARC TUTORIAL {Yale 2} ELEANOR WONG LOI, TIMOTHY LIAU, ALLEN SNG, BENJAMIN WONG Weekly YEAR LC2004 PRINCIPLES OF PROPERTY LAW CORE LECTURE {Yale 3} LC2008A,D & E COMPANY LAW [SECTIONS A, D & E] LC2008C & F COMPANY LAW [SECT C & F] {Yale 4} 2 TEO KEANG SOOD, CHEN WEITSENG, TARA DAVENPORT, KENNETH KHOO, ERNEST LIM, MICHAEL EWING‐CHOW UMAKANTH VAROTTIL, WALTER WOON Weekly HU YING, DARYL YONG, WILLIAM RICQUIER, ELAINE CHEW YEAR LC3001A EVIDENCE (A) LECTURE {Yale 5} CORE JEFFREY PINSLER, CHIN TET YUNG, HO HOCK LAI, MATTHEW SEET UPPER Weekly YR LC6378 DOCTORAL WORKSHOP LC5337 SINGAPORE COMMON LAW OF CONTRACT DAMIAN CHALMERS CORE [Week 1 ‐ 6] Non‐IBL Group 1 LC5405A LAW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (A) Weekly HELENA WHALEN‐BRIDGE GD NG‐LOY WEE LOON LL4177V/LL5177V/LL6177V ENTERTAINMENT LAW: POP ICONOGRAPHY & CELEBRITY LL4405A/LL5405A/LC5405A/LL6405A LAW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY A LL4033V/LL5033V/LL6033V INTERNATIONAL LEGAL PROCESS DAVID TAN NG‐LOY WEE LOON ELEANOR WONG, CHEN ZHIDA , TIONG TECK WEE LL4029BV/LL5029BV/LL6029BV INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION LL4317V/LL5317V/LL6317V INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION IN
    [Show full text]
  • Smubrochure.Pdf
    SMU LAW SCHOOL The Singapore Government, in a major review of the domestic supply of lawyers, confirmed a shortage of lawyers in Singapore. 2007 hence marked a major milestone in the development of legal education in Singapore – the setting up of the nation’s second law school. SMU is honoured to be entrusted with this important responsibility. As Singapore’s first private university and the only university here with a city campus purpose-built to its pedagogy of small class size and interactive learning, SMU will be extending its unique approach to its School of Law. SMU’s undergraduate law programme aims to mould students into excellent lawyers who will contribute significantly to society. The objective is to produce law graduates who have contextualised legal expertise and the ability to think across disciplines and geographical borders. In terms of pedagogy, SMU’s seminar-style learning will be put to good effect to nurture students who are confident, articulate and analytically agile. CONTENTS 03 Dean’s Message 04 Investing In The Fundamentals // Rigorous and Challenging Curriculum // Holistic Pedagogy & Course Assessment // Optional Second Major // Wide Range of Double Degree Options // Beneficial Internship & Community Service // Internship Partners 09 Commitment To Excellence // Scholarships & Awards // National & International Competitions // International Exchange 12 Career Prospects // Raising The Bar 13 Visionary Campus // City Campus // Facilities 15 Strengthening Our Relevance // Centre for Dispute Resolution // International Islamic Law and Finance Centre // Pro Bono Centre // Asian Peace-building and Rule of Law Programme 18 Heeding The Best // Advisory Board Members 19 Top Notch Faculty // Deanery // Faculty 24 The Fun Stuff // Beyond The Classroom Dean’s Message The School of Law was started in 2007 after a major review of legal education in Singapore concluded that it was timely to have a second law school in Singapore.
    [Show full text]
  • The Road to New Asia Media
    The Road to New Asia Media Having trouble viewing? Experience our Annual Report 09/10 using Augmented Reality! Just follow these simple steps: Just follow these simple steps: 1. Ensure that the black MDA marker , and not the front of the driving licence, is placed parallel 1. Remove the driving licence from the inner cover to the webcam. of this booklet (on your left). You’ll find ablack MDA marker on the back. Also ensure your PC has a 2. Do not block any part of the MDA marker’s black functioning webcam. square with your fingers. 3. Make sure the driving licence is not bent or 2. Insert the Annual Report DVD found above the folded. Markers with creases can impair detection. driving licence. Once the DVD flash menu has loaded, click on “Launch AR Application”. 4. Ensure your camera can detect the driving licence clearly. Markers that are further away are more 3. If this is the first time you are running the application, difficult to detect. you will be prompted to install the programme. 5. If you are still experiencing any issues with Follow the instructions on the screen. detection, please close and restart the application. Also, make sure your PC meets the minimum 4. The programme will then launch automatically. Your operating system requirements. LCD monitor acts as a “magic mirror”. Using the driving licence, face the MDA marker towards the webcam. Hold it within the selection circle for three seconds and watch the magic unfold! Having trouble viewing? Open the flap for more information. CONTENTS Mission and Vision 2 Chairman’s Message
    [Show full text]
  • January 2016
    January 2016 No. Topic Presenter Date Time Venue Organiser Level Category Remarks 1 A Roundtable on Equipping for Court Panellists: 5-Jan-16 5.00 - 6.00 PM The Conference SJC All JOs Court Leadership Leadership Mr Vincent Hoong, Registrar, Room, State Courts Supreme Court (Refreshments Ms Jennifer Marie, Deputy Presiding provided) Judge / Registrar, State Courts Mr Chia Wee Kiat, Deputy Presiding Judge / Registrar, Family Justice Courts 2 Judgment Writing Workshop Emeritus Professor Edward Berry 12-Jan-16 8.30 AM - 5.00 Viewing Gallery, SJC All JOs Bench Skills University of Victoria, British PM Supreme Court Columbia (Refreshments provided) 3 Forensic Document Examination: Handwriting Ms Nellie Cheng 25-Jan-16 5.00 - 6.00 PM Viewing Gallery, SJC All JOs Technology & Sciences Examination is Only the Tip of the Ice-berg Senior Forensic Scientist, Health Supreme Court • Presentation by HSA Sciences Authority (Refreshments Mr Yap Bei Sing provided) Consultant Forensic Scientist, Health Sciences Authority 4 Family Violence - Sharing by the Police Mr She Zhaozuo 26-Jan-16 Lunch-time Auditorium, State FJC All JOs Social Awareness 2 Operations Officer, Operations Courts Department / Community (Refreshments Involvement Division, Singapore provided) Police Force 5 Recent Trends in Judicial Review: New Zealand The Honourable Justice Matthew 26-Jan-16 5.00 - 6.00 PM Viewing Gallery, SJC All JOs Legal Development Experience Palmer, Wellington QC Supreme Court High Court of New Zealand (Refreshments provided) February 2016 No. Topic Presenter Date
    [Show full text]
  • FORUM on PUBLIC PROSECUTION 2013: PROSECUTING in the PUBLIC INTEREST 6 March 2013
    FORUM ON PUBLIC PROSECUTION 2013: PROSECUTING IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST 6 March 2013 WELCOME REMARKS BY THE SOLICITOR-GENERAL KOH JUAT JONG 1. Good morning Attorney-General, colleagues and friends. I would like to extend a warm welcome to all of you to this inaugural Forum on Public Prosecution. 2. This Forum was first mooted in July 2012 by the Crime Cluster Divisions of the Attorney-General’s Chambers. The purpose is to underline and reinforce the importance of maintaining high standards in the prosecution service. Prosecution is conducted not only by prosecutors in the AGC but also by many of you who are here as prosecuting officers in the various prosecuting agencies, Ministries and Statutory Boards. 3. The forum is necessary especially in the light of greater public scrutiny over criminal prosecutions. It is also timely because of the changing legal landscape which has posed new challenges for our Prosecutors. The new Criminal Procedure Code came into force in January 2011 brought about many changes in the criminal process. The Court of Appeal’s landmark decision on disclosure in the Kadar case also created a huge impact on prosecutorial pre-trial discovery. 4. A series of highly relevant topics have been planned for the next 2 days. These include discussions on the Conduct of a Prosecutor, the exercise of Prosecutorial Discretion in a Changing Landscape, Training for Prosecutors, Important Considerations for PG hearings as well as the Conduct of a Trial and of course, a session on Prosecution Disclosure which is expected to generate lively exchanges. There will also be a panel discussion dealing with issues relating to the setting up of a Prosecution Department, as well as a session on the Media and Accountability in Public Prosecutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Judicial Decision-Making and Explainable Artificial Intelligence
    (2021) 33 SAcLJ 280 JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING AND EXPLAINABLE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE A Reckoning from First Principles In light of rapid developments in legal technology, it is timely to begin considering whether, and if so how, artificial intelligence (“AI”) can replace judges. However, given that law plays a crucial role in maintaining societal order, that judges are a crucial part of ensuring the continued well-functioning of the law, and also that there are still many unknowns in the use and deployment of AI, it would be prudent to examine and understand exactly what roles judges play in the legal system, and how they do so, before we make any bold steps towards replacing judges with AI. This article examines the current and reasonably foreseeable state of AI to consider its capabilities, as well as the process by which judges make decisions and the duties they are subject to. This article will then consider whether or how AI, given its current and foreseeable state of development, may be used in judicial decision-making, and what safeguards may be required to ensure continued confidence in a well-functioning justice system. Shaun LIM1 LLB (Hons) (National University of Singapore); Advocate and Solicitor (Singapore); Research Assistant, Centre for Technology, Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & the Law, Faculty of Law, National University of Singapore I. Introduction 1 Advancements in artificial intelligence (“AI”) techniques with demonstrable results have led to a boom in AI research, development and marketing, especially in fields dominated by specialist professionals whose knowledge was thought to be impossible for AI to replicate, such as in medicine and law.2 In law itself, AI solutions are being 1 This article expands upon a prior research paper for credit in the course of the author’s LLB degree.
    [Show full text]