C + B
Human DevelopmentChapter Report2009 6 South 24 Parganas
HEALTH STATUS IN SOUTH 24 PARGANAS
Along with education, health is the most economies. In particular, policy makers important human development indicator. It must ensure equitable access to the health is crucial in determining the level of welfare care system, by providing cost effective of individuals and the community. Health health services (as recognized in the Alma- is important not only as a target important Ata “Health for All” initiative undertaken for its own sake, but for enabling the by the World Health Organisation in 1978) individual to access or utilize the facilities and facilities to the poor especially in rural and services available to the person. areas. Such intervention characterizes an Provisioning of health services to the effective and socially acceptable approach community is therefore crucial in any to poverty reduction. economy, and more so in developing
6.1 Healthcare Institutions in South 24 Parganas: A Stock-taking 6.1.1 Institutional Network CH6 State healthcare system in South 24 Labour Department under State Government Parganas comprises a total of 99 (SGL) and 1 by Central Government (CG) Table 6.1: No. of Healthcare Institutions . Healthcare institutions under the control of CMOH include District hospital (DH), Sub-division Hospitals (SDH), Rural Hospitals (RH), Block Source: Office of CMOH, South 24 Parganas Primary Health centers (BPHCs), Primary health healthcare institutions under the control centres (PHCs) and sub-centres (SCs). The of the Chief Medical Officer (CMOH), health sub-centers are functionally grouped 141 private healthcare institutions, 5 into government clinics and dispensaries institutions run by Local Bodies, 1 by (Table 6.2).
143
C + B C + B
South 24 Parganas Human Development Report
The three-tier referral health care system is an unwelcome trend that should be is as follows: reversed. At the lowest level we Table 6.2: Healthcare Institutions under the Control of CMOH, have Government South 24 Parganas clinics and dispensaries, which offer only out- patient treatment, PHCs providing basic in-patient facilities, Government Hospitals Source: Office of CMOH, South 24 Parganas situated at the block, sub-division and The GIS map of villages of the District district head quarters, offering full shows that there are a large number of fledged out-patient and in-patient villages without medical facilities. Further, services to the district population. these are not concentrated in the Sundarban On an average, for each SD and SG Region but also occur in the North-Eastern hospital-level healthcare facility there are part of the district and even on the periphery 3 RHs/BPHCs; each RH/BPHC has under of Kolkata.
Table 6.3: No. of Healthcare Institutions – Trends in South 24 Parganas 6.1.2 Settlement CH6 Density and Infrastructure Apart from the infrastructural set-up Source: Bureau of Applied Economics & Statistics, District Handbooks other important issues are size of the health care service sector it 2 PHCs and each PHC has 17 SCs under and the size of the population for whom they its control. extend health care coverage. Table 6.4 It can be seen from Table 6.3 that over examines the situation with respect to time there has been an increase in all different blocks in South 24 Parganas for health care facilities. There has been an some critical parameters. For analytical increase in the number of Hospitals and purposes the blocks are divided into three particularly in the number of Clinics after principal regions: 1999. While upgrading has led to a Region-I: North West (Kolkata marginal decrease in Health Centres Surroundings), between 1999 and 2004, there has been Region-II: North East and Mid West, and a some reduction in number of beds. This Region-III: South (Sundarbans) 144
C + B C + B
Human Development Report2009South 24 Parganas
Figure 6.1 Availability of medical facilities in south 24 parganas
CH6
145
C + B C + B
South 24 Parganas Human Development Report
Table 6.4: Health Care Infrastructure : Block-wise, 2006
CH6
Source: Office of CMOH; Health On the March The volume of health care services is Pharmacists and Technicians. measured in terms of the physical It can be seen that Region-I has the lowest infrastructure (consisting of the number of population, and Region-III the largest SCs, PHCs, BPHCs and RHs) Medical population. We would expect that the Officers, Nurses, Health Assistants, parameters studied would also increase 146
C + B C + B
Human Development Report2009South 24 Parganas
Figure 6.2: Indication of Hospital Performance in South 24 infrastructure – both physical and Parganas service providers. Region-III blocks like Patharpratima, Basanti, and Mathurapur I also have very high populations (second, third and fourth highest, respectively). However, while Basanti has a satisfactory number of RHs/BPHCs and Sub-Centers, the number of beds (in hospitals) and medical staff is very low. proportionately with the population. Such a Similarly in Patharpratima, the number of trend can be observed in general with two doctors and nurses is inadequate. exceptions – the increase in number of beds Mathurapur I has a satisfactory physical and technicians and pharmacists between infrastructure, but the staff strength is low. Region-I and Region-III is substantially less A contrasting picture of plenty can be seen than the increase in population between in Sagar where the population is low, but these two regions. On the other hand, the both staff and particularly the physical increase in the physical infrastructure and infrastructure are very satisfactory. CH6 manpower is significantly higher than the An interesting ratio is that of the number population increase between Region-II and of BPHCs, RHs and SDHs to the number Region-III. However, this analysis merely of Sub Centres. While the former provides examines whether the expansion in health in-patient admission facilities, the facilities infrastructure has been commensurate with extended by Sub Centres is limited to out- respect to the increase in population – it patients. This ratio does not vary does not take into account whether the substantially across blocks in each region health infrastructure is capable of – the coefficient of variation in the three supporting the population pressure or not. regions are 48%, 43% and 34% – but varies The latter analysis is undertaken significantly across all blocks in the subsequently. District (coefficient of variation is 80%). The regional perspective also hides the This variation is the highest in Region-I, considerable block-wise variations. For adjoining Kolkata, and lowest in the instance, Mandirbazar (Region-II), ranking Sundarban region. eighth according to population, has a poor
147
C + B C + B
South 24 Parganas Human Development Report
6.2 Performance of Hospitals
It can be seen that the health infrastructure to constitute the major share of admissions, in blocks is not always consistent with the particularly in a District with low average demographic pressure. This is reflected in age of marriage and long period of fertility. indicators like Bed Occupancy Rate However, the extremely low figures for (BOR), Bed Turn Over Rate (BTOR), DAR clearly indicate that institutional Emergency Admission Rate (EAR), and deliveries are relatively few. This issue has Delivery-Admission Ratio (DAR). been discussed in greater details in a The aggregative performance appears subsequent section. Data from Health on relatively satisfactory and compares the March, published by the State favourably with existing standards accepted Government, also shows that the proportion by the Health Department, Govternment of of major and even minor surgeries is West Bengal (see Figure 6.2). Thus, BOR relatively low in the public sector. – reflecting the extent to which existing It is of course possible that the proximity facilities are utilized – was within the of most of the blocks to Kolkata enables the norms in 2004. In 2005, however, it fell district population to readily access by 7 percentage points to a level that is hospitals in the latter. While this may CH6 marginally below the WHO norm. The explain why pressure on the District health BTOR indicates the load on the health facilities is low, it would also indicate a infrastructure. The performance is slightly break-down of the three-tier referral better in this regard, as BTOR level has system, lying at the core of decentralization increased from 2004 levels by 5 of health facilities. percentage points, and attained the BOR is worst in Garden Reach SGH, accepted standards of 72-96%. The followed by Bijoygarh and Bagha Jatin SGH. problem with these figures is that they may A considerable extent of under-utilisation of be interpreted as evidence that people are existing facilities – reflected in a low BOR ‘healthier’ and do not have to access health - is also seen in Diamond Harbour and services. In reality, these figures are more Vidyasagar SGH. The load on the health likely to reflect the low reliance of the infrastructure is reflected in BTOR. The population on public health services. This worst performance is by Diamond Harbour is supported by the low figures for EAR SGH, followed by Garden Reach and and DAR. While the standard for EAR is Baruipur SGH. EARs are substantially below 40-45%, the actual rates were lower in the norms indicating the inability of SGHs 2004 and just attained the standard in 2005. to address the needs of patients. On the other hand, deliveries are expected Apart from the referral institutions, the 148
C + B C + B
Human Development Report2009South 24 Parganas
situation in blocks is also worth examining. considerable block-wise variations. Only This is not an easy task as there are six blocks out of 29 have satisfied norms
Table 6.5: Indicators of Individual Hospital Performance, 2006-07
CH6
Source: CMOH (South 24 Parganas) NOTE: Since complete data not found for BTOR, the aggregate percentage for BTOR was not calculated 149
C + B C + B
South 24 Parganas Human Development Report
for BOR – Kultali, Falta, Mathurapur-II, RHs in many of the blocks indicate that the Kulpi, Namkhana and Sagar. It is worth reach of these institutions remains limited. noting that four out of these blocks are in This raises questions about PHCs and Sub- the Sundarban region where transport links Centers. Their effective functioning can to Kolkata are not so well developed, attract people to the public health facilities, thereby forcing the population to avail of and ensure effective utilization of middle local public health facilities. Thus, in level referral institutions (BPHCs/RHs) Patharpratima (also in Sundarban), the load through the operation of the referral system. has exceeded the standards significantly In contrast to data published in Health on (131, against the norm of 75-100). Under- the March: 2005 for the state (see graph utilisation of services is found in many above) it can be seen that EARs have not blocks. BOR is particularly low in even remotely approached standards in any Thakurpukur-Mahestala Block, Baruipur, of the blocks, except Diamond Harbour-I. Bishnupur-I (adjacent to Kolkata) and Except in BPHCs at Patharpratima, Bhangar- Canning-II. In all, BOR is below 50 in 11 I and Canning-II, Joynagar-I RH, and in blocks out of the 27 blocks for which data Diamond Harbour SDH, the proportion of is available. Out of these 11 blocks, six are deliveries to admissions is quite low, and located in Regions I and II. deliveries constitute less than a third of total The block-wise situation with respect to admissions. CH6 BTOR is equally concerning. The pressure Overall, the most concerning feature is on public health facilities is excessive in the low reliance of the public on the District the RH/BPHCs at Diamond Harbour-I healthcare system. In the absence of a survey (almost double the standard), Joynagar-I, of District Hospitals, it is not possible to Namkhana, Patharpratima (where BTOR identify all the causes of this phenomenon. exceeds norms by more than 70%), We would recommend that the Health Sonarpur, and Magrahat I, and Amtala. The Department undertake a regular stock taking unevenness in spatial distribution of health to identify the nature of deficiencies in infrastructure is seen from the fact that in different units – where functional machines almost one out of three blocks BTOR is are lacking, where beds are in short supply, below 50%. Levels are particularly low in where posts are lying vacant, where Magrahat-II (5.6), Canning I (13.3) and attendance of doctors are irregular – and Kultali (21.4). take steps to remedy the shortcomings. This The low rates of BOR and BTOR have would rejuvenate the District health important consequences for policy infrastructure and build trust in the system makers. The under-utilization of BPHCs/ among the public.
150
C + B C + B
Human Development Report2009South 24 Parganas
6.3 Carrying Capacity of Healthcare System
6.3.1 Infrastructure with respect to into the analysis. In this section we will first Population Pressure estimate the healthcare parameters after Absolute figures of physical infrastructure adjusting for block population. In the next and health personnel do not provide a section we will compare the block-wise meaningful picture of the extent to which situation (adjusted for population) with the infrastructure is equitable across existing national norms for the parameters. blocks. To overcome this limitation, In South 24 Parganas the number of beds population figures must be incorporated per ten thousand population is the highest
Table 6.6: Current Healthcare System Load in South 24 Parganas
CH6
151
C + B C + B
South 24 Parganas Human Development Report
in Kakdwip, followed by Mathurapur-II, situation is satisfactory in Diamond Sagar, Budge Budge-I and II, Canning-I. It Harbour-I and Joynagar-II, but lower than can be seen that four out of these six blocks 1% in Bishnupur-I, Kulpi, Mathurapur-I, are in the Sundarban region. The position Magrahat-I, Thakurpukur-Mahestala Block, is concerning in Thakurpukur-Mahestala, Mandirbazar, Baruipur and Canning-II. Falta and Mandirbazar blocks. Now it is to be expected that the existence In the case of number of doctors per of health facilities and doctors would lakh population, the situation is encourage a greater dependence on public satisfactory in Kakdwip, Canning-I, health facilities. For instance in Budge Namkhana (in Sundarban Region), Baruipur Budge-I, the number of beds per population and Sonarpur (Region-I). The number of is high and the number of doctors per lakh doctors has to be increased substantially in is also high, the percentage of patients to Basanti, Canning-II, Gosaba (Sundarban), total population is high. On the other hand, Mandirbazar and Thakurpukur-Mahestala. Kakdwip and Canning I, despite having The dependence of the population on the satisfactory beds and doctors per public health system is measured by the population, have failed to attract the proportion of patients to population. This population to the public health sector to the CH6 figure is high in Budge Budge-I and same extent. We have therefore estimated Diamond Harbour-I, but is lower than 10% a correlation matrix between these in Bishnupur-I, Kulpi, Mathurapur I, Budge parameters. This matrix shows that while Budge-II, Diamond Harbour-II, Gosaba, there is a strong association between beds and Basanti. The proportion of out-patients per 10,000 population and doctors per lakh is substantially higher than the proportion population, the correlation of both these of ward patients. The block-wise variation infrastructural parameters with the is therefore similar to that for total proportion of patients in population is fairly patients. In the case of in-patients, the weak.
Table 6.7: Correlation Matrix between Blockwise No. of Beds, No. of Doctors and No. of Patients (adjusted for Population)
Population Population
Population Population Population 152
C + B C + B
Human Development Report2009South 24 Parganas
6.3.2 Infrastructural Gaps following scope to improve the situation with respect existing National Norms to the provisioning of health infrastructure. The above analysis indicates that there is This raises the question as to the extent to
Table 6.8: Existing National Norms for Rural Primary Healthcare Facilities
Table 6.9: Infrastructural Gaps in the Healthcare system in South 24 Parganas No.of No.of No.of s No.of No.of No.of
CH6
153
C + B C + B
South 24 Parganas Human Development Report
which the existing set up must be expanded. substantially across blocks except in the In this section we attempt to estimate the case of Sub-centres. In case of the latter, number of additional Sub Centres, PHCs, Baruipur, Mandirbazar and Mathurapur-I have Community Health Centres (CHCs) and the highest deficiency. Female Health Assistants (FHA) required 6.3.3 An Overall Assessment of Carrying in the district. Capacity Based on the national norms for The correlation matrix of deficits in these provisioning of health infrastructure, the four parameters shows that blocks with number of such units required in each deficits in CHCs and FHAs also have high block has been estimated. This is then deficits in PHCs. Similarly, blocks lagging compared with the actual number of units behind national norms with respect to CHCs currently existing to measure the also lag behind in number of FHAs. Based infrastructural gap. on this analysis, we recommend that The health infrastructure in most of the investment be undertaken in all four blocks are characterised by Table 6.10: Correlation between Deficits of PHCs, SCs, CHCs and FHA varying extents of deficiency. Only in the case CH6 of Sub-centres in Sundarban blocks is there is a surplus – with the exception of Mathurapur-I, where there is a large deficit. The average level of deficit with respect parameters (PHC, SC, CHC and FHA) – it to number of PHCs, SCs, CHCs and FHAs is not enough to single out any of the four are 5, 4, 1 and 171 per block, respectively. parameters for specific attention while The actual extent of deficit does not vary making block-wise plans.
6.4 Endemicity of Diseases in the District 6.4.1 Vector Borne Diseases the Sundarban area, suffer from malnutrition Inhabitants of backward villages of South 24 and various diseases of which vector borne Parganas, specially of the riverine blocks of diseases and water & food borne diseases are 154
C + B C + B
Human Development Report2009South 24 Parganas
Table 6.11: Incidence of Several Diseases during 2001-2006
Source: Office of CMOH, South 24 Parganas of prime importance. Due to their poor socio the incidence of Filaria remains another area economic status, low level of education, of concern. inadequate sanitation, unsafe water supply A total of 1766 cases in Kala-azar were and poor housing facilities, people of this recorded in the district from 2001 to 2006. district suffer from vector borne disease like But the number of cases has decreased Kala-azar. Malaria is also on the rise, while significantly from 351 to 140 between 2005 CH6 Figure 6.3: Incidence of Vector Borne Diseases and No. of Reported Deaths
155
C + B C + B
South 24 Parganas Human Development Report
and 2006. Ten blocks have reported cases from Basanti block as follows: 2006- 86 of Kala-azar, out of which 4 blocks of cases, 2005- 331 cases, 2004- 666 cases, Canning Sub Division (Canning-I, Canning- 2003- 84 cases, 2002- 104 cases, 2001- 75 II, Gosaba, Basanti) are endemic blocks. The cases. Though endemicity of the disease is highest number of cases has been reported reported from all parts of the block, GP Phul Table 6.12: No. of Kala-Azar Cases and No. of Deaths during 2004-2006
Source: Office of CMOH Malacha and Kathalberia are the villages Kala-azar and Malaria prone areas. National CH6 most affected. There has been one death due Anti Malaria Programme (NAMP) is another to Kala-azar in the year 2006 in Gosaba attempt to eradicate Malaria. Attempts are block. A blockwise report of Kala-azar for made to sensitize residents about the benefits most affected blocks is given in Table 6.12. of using mosquito nets. Radical treatment for Another vector borne disease that recurs those who have caught either of the two with regular frequency in South 24 Parganas diseases has usually managed to avert is Malaria. In 2006 951 cases were fatalities. Advocacy workshops are also reported, mainly from Canning Sub Division conducted on a regular basis in the ten (Canning-I, Canning-II, Gosaba, Basanti), affected blocks for Kala-azar. Diamond Harbour Sub Division (Diamond The economic costs of such diseases are Harbour-II, Magrahat-I, Kulpi, Mathurapur- substantial, particularly if the bread earner is II) and Namkhana blocks. One fatality each affected by the disease. To reduce such costs, was also reported from Canning-I, Sagar the Office of the Chief Medical Officer, block and Kulpi block in 2006. South 24 Parganas, had proposed introduction Attempts to combat such diseases fall of the following package in 2007: under the National Vector Borne Disease Compensation of the daily wages of the Control Programme (NVBDCP). Regular Kala-azar patient admitted in Hospital. spraying programmes are carried out in This will entail an outlay of Rs.7.28 lakhs. 156
C + B C + B
Human Development Report2009South 24 Parganas