DOCSLIB.ORG

Myr 2006 Burundi.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Myr 2006 Burundi.Pdf FAO/Gitega/2004 Consolidated Appeals Process (CAP) The CAP is much more than an appeal for money. It is an inclusive and coordinated programme cycle of: • strategic planning leading to a Common Humanitarian Action Plan (CHAP); • resource mobilisation (leading to a Consolidated Appeal or a Flash Appeal); • coordinated programme implementation; • joint monitoring and evaluation; • revision, if necessary; and • reporting on results. The CHAP is a strategic plan for humanitarian re sponse in a given country or region and includes the following elements: • a common analysis of the context in which humanitarian action takes place; • an assessment of needs; • best, worst, and most likely scenarios; • stakeholder analysis, i.e. who does what and where; • a clear statement of longer-term objectives and goals; • prioritised response plans; and • a framework for monitoring the strategy and revising it if necessary. The CHAP is the foundation for developing a Consolidated Appeal or, when crises break or natural disasters strike, a Flash Appeal. Under the leadership of the Humanitarian Coordinator, the CHAP is developed at the field level by the Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC) Country Team. This team mirrors the IASC structure at headquarters and includes UN agencies and standing invitees, i.e. the International Organization for Migration, the Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement, and NGOs that belong to ICVA, Interaction, or SCHR. Non-IASC members, such as national NGOs, can be includ ed, and other key stakeholders in humanitarian action, in particular host governments and donors, should be consulted. The Humanitarian Coordinator is responsible for the annual preparation of the consolidated appeal document . The document is launched globally each November to enhance advocacy and resource mobilisation. An update, known as the Mid-Year Review , is to be presented to donors in July 2006. Donors provide resources to appealing agencies directly in response to project proposals. The Financial Tracking Service (FTS) , managed by the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), is a database of donor contributions and can be found on www.reliefweb.int/fts In sum, the CAP works to provide people in need the best available protection and assistance, on time. ORGANISATIONS PARTICIPATING IN CONSOLIDATED APPEALS DURING 2006: AARREC CESVI GSLG OCHA UNAIDS AASAA CHFI HDO OCPH UNDP ABS CINS HI ODAG UNDSS Abt Associates CIRID HISAN - WEPA OHCHR UNESCO ACF/ACH/AAH CISV Horn Relief PARACOM UNFPA ACTED CL INTERSOS PARC UN-HABITAT ADRA CONCERN IOM PHG UNHCR Africare COOPI IRC PMRS UNICEF AGROSPHERE CORD IRD PRCS UNIFEM AHA CPAR IRIN PSI UNMAS ANERA CRS JVSF PU UNODC ARCI CUAMM MALAO RFEP UNRWA ARM CW MCI SADO UPHB AVSI DCA MDA SC-UK VETAID CADI DRC MDM SECADEV VIA CAM EMSF MENTOR SFCG VT CARE ERM MERLIN SNNC WFP CARITAS EQUIP NA SOCADIDO WHO CCF FAO NNA Solidarités WVI CCIJD GAA (DWH) NRC SP WR CEMIR Int’l GH OA STF ZOARC CENAP TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary....................................................................................................................... 1 2. Changes in the Context and Humanitarian Consequences ...................................................... 2 2.1 Consolidation of the Peace...................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Unexpected Humanitarian Developments ............................................................................... 2 2.3 Transition Towards Development ............................................................................................ 4 3. Review of the Common Humanitarian Action Plan (Chap)........................................................ 5 3.1 Common Humanitarian Action Plan .................................................................................... 5 3.2 Scenarios................................................................................................................................ 6 3.3 Strategic Priorities ................................................................................................................. 6 3.4 Sectoral Analysis and Projections....................................................................................... 7 3.4.1. Food Security, Emergency Agriculture and Nutrition..................................................... 7 3.4.2. Access to Basic Services (Education and Health)......................................................... 7 3.4.3. Shelter, Non-Food Items and Water and Sanitation...................................................... 8 3.4.4. Population Movements .................................................................................................. 8 3.4.5. Mine Action .................................................................................................................... 9 3.4.6. Protection and Human Rights........................................................................................ 9 3.4.7. Coordination Mechanisms and Information Management........................................... 10 4. Funding and Projects .................................................................................................................. 11 New and Revised Projects Table .................................................................................................. 12 5. Conclusion ................................................................................................................................... 14 6. New and Revised Projects .......................................................................................................... 15 7. Requirements, Commitments, Contributions and Pledges Per Sector and Per Appealing Organisations............................................................................................................................... 42 8. Acronyms and Abbreviations..................................................................................................... 44 iii iv BURUNDI 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In the midst of post-conflict recovery and an improving political and security landscape despite isolated attacks by the last remaining rebel group, the key challenge for humanitarian actors has been to ensure a gradual and effective transition from humanitarian response to establishing sustainable solutions to meet the basic needs of vulnerable persons. The launch of a governmental Emergency Program in February 2006 with a focus on provision of basic services, food security, and reintegration support, has been an important landmark in this effort. However, the need for continued humanitarian assistance is highlighted by weak national structures and delivery capacity; food insecurity triggered by consecutive poor harvests in 2005 and 2006; constant population movement in the region due to insecurity and food shortages; and seasonal floods. Key achievements in the first six months of 2006 include the response to poor harvests and high levels of food insecurity through the distribution of 45,000 MT of food aid and the provision of seeds and tools to over 450,000 households. Agencies and NGOs also provided critical support to the local and national authorities in implementing key decisions on free health care for mothers and children and free primary education: As such, Essential Care Packages (ECP) were distributed to 210 health centres in ten provinces and temporary and permanent learning spaces were provided to help absorb a record 494,448 first grade pupils. Further, agencies responded to the influx of nearly 20,000 Rwandan asylum-seekers and the return of 13,000 rejected Burundian asylum-seekers, assuring their protection and assistance in line with international conventions. The humanitarian community is also preparing for scenarios regarding population movements including the possible influx of Congolese refugees during the electoral process in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and the prospect of a massive return of Burundian refugees from the United Republic of Tanzania following the shift from facilitation to promotion of voluntary repatriation. Crucially, the Mid-year Review was for the first time conducted jointly with the Government of Burundi, which meant a significant revision of existing humanitarian coordination mechanisms to match the changed institutional setting. It is of utmost importance for the humanitarian community to support the Government’s overall capacity for coordination, planning, resource mobilisation and response. Humanitarian response still represents an important component of the global peace consolidation process by stabilising populations and mitigating their exposure to humanitarian needs such as sudden food insecurity and epidemics. The priorities for the remainder of 2006 are: Strengthen and support early warning and response mechanisms to populations at risk; Support Government policies in basic services provision with an emphasis on life saving activities; Support process of transition from relief to development with an emphasis on short-term programmes on reinsertion and community recovery in anticipation of Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP) implementation; Continuous monitoring and promotion of human rights and strengthening of institutional accountability of the governmental security bodies. The Mid-Year Review of the 2006 Consolidated Appeal has a revised requirement of US$ 1123,012,389. A total of $30,729,677, which represents approximately 25% of the requested funds, has been committed to
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Situation Report #2, Fiscal Year (FY) 2003 March 25, 2003 Note: the Last Situation Report Was Dated November 18, 2002
    U.S. AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT BUREAU FOR DEMOCRACY, CONFLICT, AND HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE (DCHA) OFFICE OF U.S. FOREIGN DISASTER ASSISTANCE (OFDA) BURUNDI – Complex Emergency Situation Report #2, Fiscal Year (FY) 2003 March 25, 2003 Note: The last situation report was dated November 18, 2002. BACKGROUND The Tutsi minority, which represents 14 percent of Burundi’s 6.85 million people, has dominated the country politically, militarily, and economically since national independence in 1962. Approximately 85 percent of Burundi’s population is Hutu, and approximately one percent is Twa (Batwa). The current cycle of violence began in October 1993 when members within the Tutsi-dominated army assassinated the first freely elected President, Melchoir Ndadaye (Hutu), sparking Hutu-Tutsi fighting. Ndadaye’s successor, Cyprien Ntariyama (Hutu), was killed in a plane crash on April 6, 1994, alongside Rwandan President Habyarimana. Sylvestre Ntibantunganya (Hutu) took power and served as President until July 1996, when a military coup d’etat brought current President Pierre Buyoya (Tutsi) to power. Since 1993, an estimated 300,000 Burundians have been killed. In August 2000, nineteen Burundian political parties signed the Peace and Reconciliation Agreement in Arusha, Tanzania, overseen by peace process facilitator, former South African President Nelson Mandela. The Arusha Peace Accords include provisions for an ethnically balanced army and legislature, and for democratic elections to take place after three years of transitional government. The three-year transition period began on November 1, 2001. President Pierre Buyoya is serving as president for the first 18 months of the transition period, to be followed in May 2003 by a Hutu president for the final 18 months.
    [Show full text]
  • Enabling Poor Rural People to Overcome Poverty in Burundi
    ©IFAD Enabling poor rural people to overcome poverty in Burundi Rural poverty in Burundi Located at the heart of the African Great Lakes region, Burundi has weathered nearly two decades of conflict and troubles, which have contributed to widespread poverty. Burundi is ranked 185th out of 187 countries on the 2011 United Nations Development Programme’s human development index, and eight out of ten Burundians live below the poverty line. Per capita gross national income (GNI) in 2010 was US$170, about half its pre-war level some 20 years ago. The country is now rebuilding itself after emerging from recurrent conflict and ethnic and political rivalry. Between 1993 and 2000, an estimated 300,000 civilians were killed and 1.2 million people fled from their homes to live in refugee camps or in exile. During tha t period, life expectancy declined from 51 to 44 years, the poverty rate doubled from 33 to 67 per cent and economic recession pushed the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita down by more than 27 per cent. The long period of fighting was extremely disruptive to agriculture, which is the main source of livelihood for nine out of ten Burundians. The destruction and looting of crops and livestock, as well as general insecurity, has put rural Burundians under serious strains. Burundi was traditionally self-sufficient in food production, but because of conflict and recurrent droughts, the country has had to rely on food imports and international food aid in some regions. The vast majority of Burundi’s poor people are small-scale subsistence farmers trying to recover from the conflict and its aftermath.
    [Show full text]
  • Decentralized Evaluation
    based decision making decision based - d evaluation for evidence d evaluation Decentralize Decentralized Evaluation Evaluation of the Intervention for the Treatment of Moderate Acute Malnutrition in Ngozi, Kirundo, Cankuzo and Rutana 2016–2019 Prepared EvaluationFinal Report, 22 Report May 2020 WFP Burundi Evaluation Manager: Gabrielle Tremblay i | P a g e Prepared by Eric Kouam, Team Leader Aziz Goza, Quantitative Research Expert ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The evaluation team would like to thank Gabrielle Tremblay for facilitating the evaluation process, particularly the inception and data collection mission to Burundi. The team would also like to thank Patricia Papinutti, Michael Ohiarlaithe, Séverine Giroud, Gaston Nkeshimana, Jean Baptiste Niyongabo, Barihuta Leonidas, the entire nutrition team and other departments of the World Food Programme (WFP) country office in Bujumbura and the provinces of Cankuzo, Kirundo, Ngozi, Rutana and Gitega for their precious time, the documents, the data and the information made available to facilitate the development of this report. The evaluation team would also like to thank the government authorities, United Nations (UN) agencies, non-governmental organizations and donors, as well as the health officials and workers, Mentor Mothers, pregnant and breastfeeding women, and parents of children under five who agreed to meet with us. Our gratitude also goes to the evaluation reference group and the evaluation committee for the relevant comments that helped improve the quality of this report, which we hope will be useful in guiding the next planning cycles of the MAM treatment program in Burundi. DISCLAIMER The views expressed in this report are those of the evaluation team and do not necessarily reflect those of the WFP.
    [Show full text]
  • World Vision Burundi Annual Report
    World Vision Burundi 2010 – 2011 Annual Report ------------------------------------------------------- World Vision Burundi 2010 - 2011 ------------------------------------------------------ - 1 - Our vision for every child, life in all its fullness; Our prayer for every heart, the will to make it so. Who we are World Vision is a Christian humanitarian organization dedicated to working with children, families, and their communities worldwide to reach their full potential by tackling the causes of poverty and injustice. We serve close to 100 million people in nearly 100 countries around the world. Motivated by our faith in Jesus Christ, we serve alongside the poor and oppressed as a demonstration of God’s unconditional love for all people – regardless of religion, race, ethnicity or gender. Mission statement World Vision is an international partnership of Christians whose mission is to follow our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ in working with the poor and oppressed to promote human transformation, seek justice, and bear witness to the good news of the Kingdom of God. We pursue this mission through integrated, holistic commitment to: • Transformational Development that is community-based and sustainable, focused especially on the needs of children: • Emergency Relief that assist people affected by conflict or natural disaster; • Promotion of Justice that seeks to change unjust structures affecting the poor among whom we work; • Partnership with Churches to contribute to spiritual and social transformation; • Public Awareness that leads to informed understanding, giving, involvement and prayer; • Witness to Jesus Christ by life, deed word and sign that encourages people to respond to the Gospel. Inspired by our Christian values, we are dedicated to working with the world’s most vulnerable people.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS MAP OF BURUNDI I INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1 II THE DEVELOPMENT OF REGROUPMENT CAMPS ...................................... 2 III OTHER CAMPS FOR DISPLACED POPULATIONS ........................................ 4 IV HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS DURING REGROUPMENT ......................... 6 Extrajudicial executions ......................................................................................... 6 Property destruction ............................................................................................... 8 Possible prisoners of conscience............................................................................ 8 V HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN THE CAMPS ........................................... 8 Undue restrictions on freedom of movement ......................................................... 8 "Disappearances" ................................................................................................... 9 Life-threatening conditions .................................................................................. 10 Insecurity in the context of armed conflict .......................................................... 11 VI HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS DISGUISED AS PROTECTION ................ 12 VII CONCLUSION.................................................................................................... 14 VIII RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................................... 15
    [Show full text]
  • Health Food Security HIGHLIGHTS/KEY PRIORITIES
    Burundi • Humanitarian Bi-Monthly report Situation Report #04 Date/Time 28 May 2009 This report was issued by Burundi office. It covers the period from 11 to 24 May 2009. The next report will be issued on or around 9 June 2009. HIGHLIGHTS/KEY PRIORITIES - MSF prepares the phase out of its emergency nutritional operation in Kirundo Province - Repatriation from last Burundian camp in Rwanda - New refugee camp in Bwagiriza I. Situation Overview The President of Burundi has officially requested the support (logistical, technical, financial and moral) of the United Nations for the preparation and the organisation of the 2010 elections. Since March, doctors have been strike over their salaries. Developments in South Kivu and the forthcoming operation Kimia II against FDLR, are not expected to have a major impact on Burundi. The IACP contingency plan remains valid and will be updated in September. II. Humanitarian Needs and Response Health MSF is preparing to phase out its emergency nutrition programme in the Kirundo province as it expects the situation to improve as the harvests ongoing. MSF has also noted that children being referred to its nutritional centres are not as severely malnourished as when it started its emergency programme. Since February 9th, 2009; over 480 children were admitted to the nutritional stabilisation centre because of acute severe malnutrition with medical complications; some 28 children were lost because their situation was too critical when they arrived at the stabilisation centre. During this emergency nutrition programme, MSF found that 58% of the children admitted had oedemas and systematic testing of incoming patients also showed that 53.2% also had malaria.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Burundi Fiscal Decentralization and Local Governance
    94638 Republic of Burundi Fiscal Decentralization and Local Governance Managing Trade-Offs to Promote Sustainable Reforms Burundi Public Expenditure Review OCTOBER 2014 B Republic of Burundi Fiscal Decentralization and Local Governance: Managing Trade-Offs to Promote Sustainable Reforms OCTOBER 2014 WORLD BANK Republic of Burundi Fiscal Decentralization and Local Governance: Cover Design and Text Layout:Duina ReyesManaging Bakovic Trade-Offs to Promote Sustainable Reforms i Standard Disclaimer: This volume is a product of the staff of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/ The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The endorsementboundaries, colors, or acceptance denominations, of such boundaries.and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the Copyright Statement: The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/ The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. This translation was not created by The World Bank and should not be considered an official World BankIf you translation.create a translation The World of thisBank work, shall please not be add liable the for following any content disclaimer or error along in this with translation.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic and Social Council
    UNITED NATIONS E Distr. Economic and Social GENERAL Council E/CN.4/1997/12/Add.1 7 March 1997 ENGLISH Original: FRENCH COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS Fifty­third session Item 3 of the provisional agenda ORGANIZATION OF THE WORK OF THE SESSION Second report on the human rights situation in Burundi submitted by the Special Rapporteur, Mr. Paulo Sérgio Pinheiro, in accordance with Commission resolution 1996/1 Addendum Introduction 1. This document is an addendum to the second report by the Special Rapporteur on the human rights situation in Burundi to the Commission on Human Rights at its fifty­third session. 2. Section A of this addendum contains a number of observations by the Special Rapporteur on the most recent developments in the crisis in Burundi and section B a list of the most significant allegations made to him concerning violations of the right to life and to physical integrity during the past year. A. Observations on the most recent developments in the crisis in Burundi 3. The serious violations of the right to life and to physical integrity listed in this addendum are closely linked to the further developments in the crisis in Burundi caused by the interruption of the transition to democracy following the assassination of President Ndadaye on 21 October 1993, the acts of genocide perpetrated against the Tutsis and the subsequent massacres of Hutus. Nevertheless, the current situation in Burundi and its influence on the human rights situation are closely linked to the resurgence of rebel movements in eastern Zaire and to the return of Burundi and Rwandan refugees to their countries of origin.
    [Show full text]
  • Conform Or Flee Repression and Insecurity Pushing Burundians Into Exile
    CONFORM OR FLEE REPRESSION AND INSECURITY PUSHING BURUNDIANS INTO EXILE Amnesty International is a global movement of more than 7 million people who campaign for a world where human rights are enjoyed by all. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. s © Amnesty International 2017 Except wHere otherwise noted, content in this document is licensed under a Creative Commons Cover photo: A CNDD-FDD (National Council for the Defense of Democracy - Forces for the Defense of (attribution, non-commercial, no derivatives, international 4.0) licence. Democracy) party supporter speaks to Burundian servicemen before the arrival of the Burundian Https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode president at a ruling CNDD-FDD rally in Cibitoke Province on July 17, 2015. For more information please visit the permissions page on our website: www.amnesty.org © Carl De Souza/AFP/Getty Images WHere material is attributed to a copyrigHt owner other than Amnesty International this material is not subject to the Creative Commons licence. First publisHed in 2017 by Amnesty International Ltd Peter Benenson House, 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW, UK Index: AFR 16/7139/2017 Original language: English amnesty.org CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 1.1 METHODOLOGY 6 2. VIOLATIONS AND ABUSES IN BURUNDI 8 2.1 ROLE OF THE IMBONERAKURE 8 2.2 CONSTANT THREAT OF DETENTION AND OTHER HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS 9 2.3 UNLAWFUL ARREST AND DETENTION AND UNNECESSARY USE OF FORCE 10 2.4 TORTURE AND INHUMAN, CRUEL AND DEGRADING TREATMENT IN DETENTION 10 2.5 RANSOMS 11 2.6 UNLAWFUL KILLINGS AND SEXUAL VIOLENCE 12 2.7 GENERALISED HARASSMENT AND INSECURITY 13 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Security Council Distr
    UNITED NATIONS S Security Council Distr. GENERAL S/1995/157 24 February 1995 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH LETTER DATED 23 FEBRUARY 1995 FROM THE SECRETARY-GENERAL ADDRESSED TO THE PRESIDENT OF THE SECURITY COUNCIL In response to the request by the Council, I have the honour to forward herewith the report of the preparatory fact-finding mission to Burundi by Ambassador Martin Huslid (Norway) and Ambassador Simeon Aké (Côte d’Ivoire), dated 20 May 1994. (Signed) Boutros BOUTROS-GHALI 95-05359 (E) 020395 /... S/1995/157 English Page 2 Annex [Original: French] REPORT OF THE PREPARATORY FACT-FINDING MISSION TO BURUNDI TO THE SECRETARY-GENERAL CONTENTS Paragraphs Page I. INTRODUCTION ......................................... 1 - 30 4 II. THE COUP D’ETAT OF 21 OCTOBER 1993 ................... 31 - 102 10 A. Historical background to the coup d’état ......... 31 - 45 10 B. Events of the coup d’état ........................ 46 - 77 13 C. The perpetrators of the failed coup d’etat ....... 78 - 83 17 D. The management of the crisis ..................... 84 - 102 17 III. THE MASSACRES ........................................ 103 - 133 19 A. The massacres .................................... 103 - 114 19 B. The causes of the massacres ...................... 115 - 130 21 C. The role of provincial administrators and the army 131 - 133 23 IV. EVENTS AFTER THE COUP D’ETAT AND THE MASSACRES - PRESENT SITUATION .................................... 134 - 148 23 V. CHALLENGES AND STEPS TO BE TAKEN ..................... 149 - 151 25 VI. ROLE OF THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM AND THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY .............................. 152 - 179 27 A. Presence of United Nations bodies in Burundi ..... 152 - 154 27 B. The Special Representative of the Secretary- General for Burundi .............................. 155 - 163 28 C.
    [Show full text]
  • BACKGROUND of BENEFICIALS SCHOOLS the Burundi Government Has Just Set up a Project to Create Five Schools of Excellence (Year 2016- 2017) Throughout the Country
    BACKGROUND OF BENEFICIALS SCHOOLS The Burundi Government has just set up a project to create five schools of excellence (Year 2016- 2017) throughout the country. The goal is to prepare the future leaders of the country who will serve in the public and private administration, scientific research centers and digital innovations. The schools are implemented throughout the country, the selection criteria of students are based on national test for the first students of 6 grades in all elementary schools of Burundi. They do a test of French and Mathematics that will determine the best Burundian students among those classified - 1st class - at the end of their curriculum of the basic school. The excellence schools are: • Lycée MUSENYI in Ngozi Province (for students from Ngozi, Kayanza, Kirundo and Muyinga provinces); • Lycée NOTRE DAME DE LA SAGESSE of Gitega province (for students from Gitega, Karuzi, Muramvya and Mwaro provinces); • Lycée KIREMBA Bururi Province (for student form Rumonge, Bururi and Makamba Provinces); • Lycée RUSENGO in Ruyigi Province (for students of Ruyigi, Cankuzo and Rutana provinces); • E.N NGAGARA in Bujumbura province (for students from Bujumbura Provinces, Bujumbura Town Hall, Bubanza and Cibitoke). The project goal is to equipping the schools of excellence with an ICT Labs and to train teachers in ICT, who will later facilitate the Education of ICT and Innovation, Creativity and digital Entrepreneurship for those students from all sections of the society. The project will then be an inspiration for the Government and all the secondary schools in Burundi. During the school holidays, the students and youths community from around the beneficial schools will also use the computers labs to benefit to the opportunity that ICT is offering in this digital age.
    [Show full text]
  • Repression and Insecurity Pushing Burundians Into Exile
    CONFORM OR FLEE REPRESSION AND INSECURITY PUSHING BURUNDIANS INTO EXILE Amnesty International is a global movement of more than 7 million people who campaign for a world where human rights are enjoyed by all. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. © Amnesty International 2017 Except where otherwise noted, content in this document is licensed under a Creative Commons Cover photo: A CNDD-FDD (National Council for the Defense of Democracy - Forces for the Defense of (attribution, non-commercial, no derivatives, international 4.0) licence. Democracy) party supporter speaks to Burundian police before the arrival of the Burundian https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode president at a ruling CNDD-FDD rally in Cibitoke Province on July 17, 2015. For more information please visit the permissions page on our website: www.amnesty.org © Carl De Souza/AFP/Getty Images Where material is attributed to a copyright owner other than Amnesty International this material is not subject to the Creative Commons licence. First published in 2017 by Amnesty International Ltd Peter Benenson House, 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW, UK Index: AFR 16/7139/2017 Original language: English amnesty.org CONTENTS CONTENTS 3 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 1.1 METHODOLOGY 6 2. VIOLATIONS AND ABUSES IN BURUNDI 8 2.1 ROLE OF THE IMBONERAKURE 8 2.2 CONSTANT THREAT OF DETENTION AND OTHER HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS 9 2.3 UNLAWFUL ARREST AND DETENTION AND UNNECESSARY USE OF FORCE 10 2.4 TORTURE AND INHUMAN, CRUEL AND DEGRADING TREATMENT IN DETENTION 10 2.5 RANSOMS 11 2.6 UNLAWFUL KILLINGS AND SEXUAL VIOLENCE 12 2.7 GENERALISED HARASSMENT AND INSECURITY 13 2.7.1 PRESSURE TO JOIN CNDD-FDD OR IMBONERAKURE 13 2.7.2 FINE LINE BETWEEN TAXATION AND EXTORTION 14 2.7.3 CURFEWS AND IMBONERAKURE PATROLS 15 3.
    [Show full text]