Oakland County In=Depth Collision Investigation Program

Vehicle Research Institute vehicle research institute report VRI 6.1 SOCIETY OF AUTOMOTIVE ENGINEERS, INC.

OAKLAND COUNTY IN-DEPTH COLLISION INVESTIGATION PROGRAM Final Report

Robert E. Scott

Highway Safety Research Institute The University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105

Report to: Vehicle Research Institute Society of Automotive Engineers

1. RwrtMa. 2. Governant Accasrion No. 3. Racipimt's Catalog No.

IJM-HSRI ---SA 75 10 4. Title ad Subtitle 5. R.port Date Oakland County In-Depth Collision Jlme 1975 6. P-bminp Orwization Cod* Investigation Program - Final Report 8. Parforming Orgonixmion Rapart No. 7. AwLor'r) Robert E. Scott UM-HSRI-SA-75-10 9. Pubrning Orgaixation Nome adAddress 10. WorC Unit No. (TRAIS)

Highway Safety Research Institute 11. Contract or Gront NO. The University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105 l3. TIP* of Report and Period Covered 12. Sparsoring Awcy N-a rrd Addrema Final Report Vehicle Research Institute 2/1/73 to 5/31/74 - Two Pennsylvania Plaza 14. Spo'nrorjng Agency Code ' New York, New York 10001 IS. Supplnnntay Notas

16. Abstract This report covers the field accident investigations conducted in Oakland County, Michigan from February 1, 1973 to July 31, 1974. During this period a total of 258 in-depth investigations were conducted of late model . From March 1, 1974 to July 31, 1974 data were collected on 1973 axiil 1974 passenger cars for an evaluation of restraint system effectiveness. A total of 230 cars were investigated during this phase of the program.

17. Kay Words 10. Diskibution Stat.n.nt

none none

19. kcvrity Classif. (of *is m. k~ItyCIassil. loi this pqo) 21. No. of Pages 22. Price none none

A

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Introduction 1

2. In-Depth Collision Investigation 3 2.1 Project Area 2.2 Cooperating Agencies 2.3 Operating Procedures 2.4 Summary of In-depth Cases Investigated

3. Restraint Systems Effectiveness 9 3.1 Field Operations 11 3.2 Data Collection for the Restraint System Effectiveness Study 12 Appendix I - List of In-Depth Cases Investigated February 19 7 3 through January 19 74 Appendix I1 - Field Data Form Used in the Restraint System Effectiveness Study

Introduction

In July of 1971 The University of Michigan's Highway Safety Research Institute (HSRI), under the sponsorship of the Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association (MVMA), began a collision investigation program in Oakland County, Michigan. During the period from February 1, 1973 to July 31, 1974 the program was sponsored by the SAE. Since August 1, 1974 the program has continued, but again under the sponsorship of the MVMA, This report describes the pro- gram and covers the collision data collection during the period supported by the SAE. Police-reported accident data for all of Oakland County have been maintained at HSRI in digital form since 1968. The county was originally selected for several reasons: (1) The number of reported accidents per year is approximately 35,000, an appropriate quantity considering analysis cost and statistical validity; (2) the police-reported data have been augmented with geographic location data by the Traffic Improvement Association (TIA) of Oakland County; and (3) the rapid influx of current model year cars into the population in this area. By conducting off-scene, in-depth investi- gations of vehicle damage and personal injury in this area, it was expected that a valuable addition would be made to the body of data available for evaluating the effectiveness of safety features in current-model-year cars soon after their introduction. Initial expectations were that about 400 cases per year could be investigated, although the actual number achieved was about 300. Early in 1973 the project was redefined and reoriented with the objective of collecting field data for an evaluation of the efficacy of the restraint system, including the ignition interlock, of 1974 passenger cars. This latter phase of the program, which is continuing under support from the MVMA, will be referred to as the Restraint System Effectiveness Study (RSES) . This report thus covers two related but quite different field data collection efforts. The report is accordingly divided into two sections; the first covering the original in-depth Collision Investigation Program, and the second covering data collection for the Restraint System Effective- ness Study. 2. In-Depth Collision Investigation

The collision investigation program from February 1, 1973 to January 19, 1974 was a continuation of the program started in July, 1971, without any significant changes. A brief description of the program will be given here, with a summary of investigations conducted during this period. A more detailed description of the project is given in reference 1.

2.1 Project Area Oakland County contains a large number of political juris- dictions, including 40 cities and villages, and 24 townships. These communities have nearly 60 local police agencies. An accident investigation program drawing from such a large num- ber of separate agencies would be unwieldly and inefficient. For these reasons, six communities were selected for the project area. The six communities (see Figure 1) of

Bloomfield Township City of City of Royal Oak City of Southfield City of Troy Waterford Township were selected because they have their own police departments which investigate traffic accidents, are geographically com- pact, and report a large proportion of the accident experience of the county. Oakland County, which lies just north of the city of Detroit, has a population of 908,000, The population of the six project communities is 381,000, or 42 percent of the county. They also account for 46 percent of the 35,000 acci- dents reported by police each year. Figure 1. Oakland County's In-depth Accident Investigation Program. Project communities are indicated by shading. 2.2 Cooperating Agencies The success of a c~llisioninvestigation program depends on cooperation from a number of agencies involved after a crash. Early in the planning of the program, it was decided to house the field staff at a location central to the six project communities and minimize the difficulty of reaching the crash locations and agencies involved. The Traffic Improvement Association of Oakland County graciously offered to provide office space, and until the project moved into separate quarters when more space was needed, the TIA pro- vided an excellent location. Police departments were initially contacted through the auspicies of the TIA, and arrangements were made for daily contact with each department for notifi- cation of accidents meeting the project criteria. Each community includes several towing services which remove vehicles to their own location, depending on the place of the accident, The one exception is the Bloomfield Township Police Department which has its own pound and virtually every vehicle towed from the scene is taken first to this pound. In each case, cooperation was obtained from the towing service. Their cooperation was essential since the vehicle inspection is normally conducted in their storage yards. Occasionally the vehicle has been moved to a subsequent site before inspection by the field investigators, and the cooperation of the towing services allows successful follow- UP . The principle sources of injury information on individual victims are participating physicians at each of four cooperating hospitals in the area. Early in the project, it was estimated that over 80% of the victims conveyed from crashes in the project area are taken to one of these four hospitals. Thus with a relatively small number of cooperating medical facilities, medical information is available on a large majority of seriously injured victims. Data on victims taken to other facilities, or the less seriously injured, are obtained by phone or mail contact with individual victims, their physicians, or attorneys. Although the rate of success of collecting injury data is less for the non-hospital cases, the rate is high for victims with significant injury.

2.3 Operating Procedures

Selection of a vehicle for investigation was based on two sets of criteria-vehicle, and injury. The vehicle criteria is:

a. Passenger Cars Current blodel Year

Trucks - under 20,000 lbs. GVW Current model year plus last two model years

- over 20,000 lbs. GVW Current model year plus last nine model years Multipurpose Passenger Current model year Vehicles plus last two model years

Buses Current model year plus last nine model years

b. Current model is defined as the manufacturer's designated model year during the coinciding calendar year. For example, 1973 model vehicles were acceptable and desirable in 1973. Further, all reported 1974 vehicles were required beginning with the model introduction in 1973. If the above schedule did not provide a sufficient number of cases to meet the contractor work loads, 1972 vehicles were acceptable only as necessary to maintain contractor work loads until a sufficient number of cases involving 1974 or 1973 vehicles became available. In no case was an older vehicle to be covered at the expense of a newer vehicle. As a sufficient number of 1974 and 1973 vehicles became available HSRI selected a cut-off date for 1972 vehicles. Originally, the injury criteria required that at least one occupant of a candidate vehicle was hospitalized for in- patient treatment. Early in the program it became evident that this criteria would result in far less than the expected number of cases. The criteria was broadened in the Fall of 1971, and an injury hierarchy was adopted. The hierarchy, beginning with the highest priority was:

1) At least one occupant admitted 2) At least one occupant treated in an emergency room 3) At least one occupant injured, but not conveyed to a hospital Cases from the third category were only accepted when the case load would permit their inclusion without jeopardizing cases of a higher priority. After selection of a case, the vehicle was located, usually at a towing service yard, and a Collision Performance and Injury Report (CPIR) completed on the vehicle. 2,3 Photo- graphs were taken of the interior and exterior of the vehicle and of the scene of the crash. Injury information on all occupants was requested from the appropriate hospital, and if occupants were not taken to a medical facility attempts were made to contact them by phone or mail. After completion of the investigation, copies of the documentation and photographs were submitted to the MVMA and the case was placed in the digital file of all multidisciplinary and in-depth investigations sponsored by the WMA and NHTSA. This file is maintained at HSRI under separate support.

2.4 Summary of In-Depth Cases Investigated

During the period from February 1, 1973 until the investi- gation of in-depth cases terminated on January 19, '1974, a total of 258 cases were investigated. A list of these cases including the case number; case vehicle make and model; model year; Collision Deformation Classification (Formerly VDI); other vehicle make, model and year; and collision con- figuration is given in Appendix I. The number of cases by model year is given in Table I.

TABLE I IN-DEPTH INVESTIGATIONS CONDUCTED FROM FEBRUARY 1, 19 73 - JANUARY 19, 1974 BY MODEL YEAR

Model Year Number of Cases 19 70 1 1971 2 8 19 72 118 19 73 102 19 74 4

Two of the cases, OK-571 and 624, listed in the appendix were dropped because insufficient information was available. Case number OK-673 was never assigned. An additional 23 cases were not completed. Most of these cases were started late in the program, and were not completed because of pressures of the Restraint System Effectiveness Study. When the in-depth program was stopped to begin the RSES data collection, a total of 750 cases had been investigated since the inception of the program in July 1971. This number includes 26 incomplete cases mentioned above. 3. Restraint System Effectiveness Study

In late 1973 the bWMA, through the SAE Project Monitor, requested a change in the Oakland County Investigation pro- gram. Nearly all of the field accident investigative effort sponsored by the SAE and MVMA was redirected to evaluate the restraint systems of 1974 passenger cars. The previous programs were not appropriate for this task and required major revisions. Usage of full restraints, i.e., lap and upper torso restraint, was so low prior to the introduction of the ignition inter- lock and the three point harness on domestic cars that very little data on the benefits of these restraints in real acci- dents existed. The introduction of the interlock was expected to alleviate this problem through greatly increased usage. A major problem remained however. Most, if not all, of the previous in-depth and multidisciplinary accident investi- gation programs concentrated on accidents of substantial consequence - usually in the form of severe injury with under- representation of minor crashes. Thus the "failures" in the sense of casualties were represented in the data, but "successes" resulting from the benefits of vehicle safety standards and occupant restraints were underrepresented. Furthermore, previous operating procedures resulted in a sample of "convenience." If a case was difficult to investi- gate because the vehicle could not be found, or the injuries of occupants could not be determined, the case was often dropped rather than spending an inordinate amount of time on it at the risk of losing other cases and reducing the number that could be investigated. While the total number might be maximized in this manner, considerable missing data (cases) resulted. The combination of biased case selection and high missing data prevents drawing valid statistical inferences regarding questions such as the reduction in injury resulting from the use of restraints. To assure a successful data collection for the restraint study, the field program was completely restructured. A research question was defined which could be examined in the context of a hypothesis, measures of performance were selected, and the data collection program was then based on techniques of experimental design. The primary questions on which the design was based was "is the incidence of severe injury to the (outboard front seat) occupants of 1974 passenger cars less than that of 1973 cars, and how much less ?" Severe injury was chosen to mean injury of level two or greater on the Abbreviated Injury ~cale.~The objective of the design was to measure the reduction in serious injury incidence of 1974 cars compared to 1973 cars if the reduction was at least 20%. An important but secondary question is the reduction in incidence of severe injury resulting from the use of full restraints. The set of vehicles from which the cases were to be drawn was all 1973 and 1974 passenger cars towed from the scene of an accident. The mass data (police report) files from previous years indicated that the number of candidate vehicles would be greater than could be investigated with the available resources. Therefore, it was decided to use sampling tech- niques and draw a sample that would be large enough to assure meeting the design objectives, yet small enough to allow com- pletion of the selected cases with a small rate of missing data. Sampling from all tow-aways results in a large number of minor collisions with little or no injury. Both injury data and restraint usage in these cases can only be determined by occupant interview. Once a case has been selected (sampled), considerable effort is devoted to completing the case, includ- ing finding the vehicle and interviewing the occupants. The number cf cases expected to be available* in the sampl- ing frame of Oakland County and Washtenaw County was approxi- * Data collection in both counties was planned as a single unit although the effort in Washtenaw County is supported by MVMA. 10 mately 2,200 vehicles. The number that we estimated we could successfully investigate to completion with the resources available was about 1,200 of which 740 would be in Oakland County. The less-than-complete coverage indicated by these estimates lead to the selection of a sampling plan. The plan that was selected and incorporated in a modifi- cation to the contract is as follows. All candidate vehicles for which the police report indicated at least one occupant was conveyed to a hospital are sampled at 100 percent. Non- hospital cases are sampled with a fraction of 1/3 in the case of 1973Is, and 1/2 for 1974's. The latter two fractions are obtained by sampling from the last two digits of the license plate. A more detailed discussion of the design of the pro- gram is given in reference (5).

3.1 Field Operations

In order to devote enough time to each case to assure completion, and at the same time investigate a sufficient number to assure meeting the experimental objectives, only data necessary to the restraint study are collected. The principle data collected are :

1) Vehicle Identification (VIN Make and Model) 2) Collision Type and Object Struck 3) Vehicle Damage (Collision Deformation Classification and Crush) 4) Injury description using the Occupant Injury Classification (3) 5) Occupant description 6) Restraint system status and usage Little information is collected on the other vehicle, and the scene is not visited or photographed. Efficient documentation of the data with considerable emphasis on restraint system status and usage required the development of a new field data form. The form was developed in January and February of 1973 and is shown in Appendix 11. Data collection under original format was terminated on January 19. During the remainder of January and all of February effort was devoted to implementing the RSES. This included changing notification procedures, developing a system of monitoring the sampling procedure and assuring quality control, and developing new documentation. During February a pilot data collection was conducted to test the form and procedures.

3.2 Data Collection for the Restraint System Effectiveness Study

Data collection for the study began on March 1, 1974 with the objective of collecting twelve months of data for the evaluation. During the period from March 1, 1974 through July 31, 1974, a total of 230 cases were investigated. Computer generated summaries of these cases have been sent to the MVMA for distribution and the cases have been placed in a digital file generated specifically for the Restraint System Effectiveness Study. The distribution of the 230 cases among each of the sample strata is shown in Table 11.

Table I1 RESTRAINT STUDY CASES INVESTIGATED FROM MARCH THROUGH JULY

Occupant Model Year ~is~bsition 1973 1974 Total Hospital 5 8 40 98 Non-Hospital 7 2 60 132 Total 130 100 230 REFERENCES

1. Scott, R.E. Oakland County's In-Depth Collision Investigation Program. HIT LAB Reports, Vol. 2, No. 12, August, 1972.

2. "Collision Performance and Injury Report", Long Form Revision Number 3, Corporation, 1969.

3. Marsh, J C. IV, Tolkin, S.E. "Multidisciplinary Accident Investigation Data File, Vol. I, Editing Manual and Reference Information", UM-HSRI-SA- 75- 1. Highway Safety Research Institute, The University of Michigan, March 1975, Contract DOT-HS-4-00898.

4. "Rating the Severity of Tissue Damage". Committee on Medical Aspects of Automotive Safety Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 215, No. 2, January 11, 1971.

5. Scott, R.E. and O'Day, J. "A Sampling Program for Evaluation of the 1974 Restraint Systems". Auto- motive Engineering Congress and Exposition, Detroit, Michigan, February 24-28, 1975, SAE paper 750188 and HIT LAB Reports, Vol. 5, No. 8, April, 1975. Highway Safety Research Institute, The University of Michigan.

APPENDIX I

List of In-Depth Cases Investigated from February, 1973 through January, 1974

OAKLaND COUNTY CASE LIST

CASE CASE VERICLE YR PBIWARY OTHER VEHICLE YR COLLISION NU! EER Y DI CON PI G .

FEBRUARY 1973 CASES

Ca dillac DeVille 71 06RLEV Impala 72 Rear-impact 72 12FEEY Cadillac DePille 71 Rear- iapact Plymouth Puryy 72 12FDEW1 Rear-impact Chevrolet Nova 73 O1FREU1 Intersection 73 O4RPEN2 Intersect ion 73 09LPAW3 Fired object 72 06RDEU 1 Oldssobile Cutlass 70 Rear-impact GH Ope1 71 10LYEU2 Ford 63 Intersection 72 OlLDEU2 Ran-of f-road Pontiac Catalina 71 12FCLU1 Ran-off-road Me rc ur p Comet 72 O6BYEU6 Chevrolet Pickup 72 ear-impact Pontiac Catalina 71 12FREN1 Skylark 67 Intersection 72 03RBEY2 Ford Van 7 1 Rear- impact Hercury aonterey 72 12FDEY1 Ford Capri 71 Head-on Pord Capri 71 06BDEW1 Honterep 72 Head-on ANC Gremlin 72 Q6BDAW2 Bear-impact Pontiac 237 71 O1FBEU3 Chevrolet Impala Intersection Chetrolet Ispala 72 Pontiac 237 Inter sect ion 73 70 Intersection Chevrolet Impala 72 OIFREP1 Plyaouth Cricket 72 Intersection Plymouth Cricket 72 10LFEN4 Chevrolet Impala 72 Intersection 72 llPLAU4 Plymouth Fury 67 Head-on Plymouth Custom 73 12PLE W2 Oldsaobile Cutlass 69 Head-on Ford Pinto 72 OSBYEW Chevrolet 69 Rear-impact 71 11FDAH2 VY 67 Head-on AEC Gremlin 72 l2FCENl Ford Truck 70 Rear-impact Ford Country 72 llPDEY 69 Intersection Pontiac Gran Prix 71 11FLEE5 Ford Haverick 71 Side-swipe Ford Haverick 71 11FLEE3 Pontiac Gran Prix 71 Side-suipe Chevrolet Nova 71 l2PDEP 1 Chevrolet 72 Intersection Chevrolet Nora 72 OlPREEl Chewrolet 71 Intersection AMC Hornet 73 06BDEUl Ford XF 67 Rear-impact Pontiac Gran Prix 72 I2FDEUI Chevrolet Impala 73 Intersection Chevrolet Impala 73 11LPEU2 Pontiac Gran Prix 72 Intersection Chevrolet Nova 73 12PLEU1 Intersection

MARCH 1973 CASES Ford Tornio 73 01FRE01 Chetrolet 63 Intersection Pord Maverick 72 12PDEW1 Plercury 7 3 Rear- impact Ford Capri 71 llFLAN2 Fixed object Pontiac Catalina 72 OIRPEW2 71 Intersection AHC Gremlin 71 08RFEW3 Fixed object 73 1ZFDEY 1 Rear- iapac t 71 12FDEW1 Intersection AMC Gremlin 72 12PDEW2 Ford Fairlane 69 Head-on Chevrolet Nova 72 OlFRflY1 Fixed ob jec t 72 12FDEY2 Reo Trac.-Trail. 7 0 Rear- impact Mercury Narquis 71 10LYEW3 Pontiac 72 Intersection Chevrolet Pickup 71 10LFEU4 Pontiac 65 Intersection Uercnry Ccnet 71 12PDEW1 Chevrolet 67 Intersection Ford Pinto 73 12BREH6 Ford Sports 68 Bear-impact Pontiac Catalina 72 O6BLFW 1 Chrycler Newport 67 Rear-impact Plymouth Duster 73 12FDEM1 Police 7 1 Rear-impact Chevrolet Vega 73 12PLEW1 Type 11 67 Bearoilpact 73 Plymouth 63 Intersection Dodge Coronet 72 O1RYEU2 Pontiac 68 Intersection Ford Pinto 73 12FDEU3 Honda (car) 71 Head-on Cadillac CeVille 73 12FDAW2 Chevrolet Xmpala 72 Head-on Chevrolet Impala 72 03RDAU3 Cadillac DeVille 73 Intersection

APRIL 1973 CASES

OK-550 Ford Groaghaa 73 lOPDEU Buick LeSabre 72 Intersection OK-551 Enick LeSabre 72 OSRYEW3 Ford Brougham 73 Intersection OK-552 Chevrolet Vega 72 06BYEW2 Pontiac 72 Rear-impact OK-553 Chevrolet Impala 71 03RDAP3 Pontiac Catalina 72 Intersection OK-554 Pontiac Catalina 72 l2FDEWl Chetrrolet Ilnpala 71 Intersection OK-555 Chevrolet Vega 72 O1FRAM2 Pontiac Wagon 66 Intersect ion OK-556 Chevrolet flonte Carl 73 00TDA02 Rollover OK-557 Ford Pinto 72 O1FREN3 Buick Riveria 70 Rear-impact OK-558 71 12PREW1 Ford Capri 71 fear-impact OK-559 Dodge Pickup 100 7 1 l2PDEW Dodge RT 69 Rear-impact OK-560 Cbevrolet f¶onte Carl 71 11FLEW2 Pontiac Catalina 65 Intersection OK-561 Buick Skylark 72 11LDES1 Mercury Intersection OK-562 Hercnry Ccaet 72 12FLEU3 Intersect ion OK-563 Chevrolet Nova 72 12FYEW2 Chevrolet Balibu 70 Intersection OR-564 Eoatiac Gran Prix 73 07BPAW6 Buict 65 Rear-impact OK-565 Ford Maverick 72 12FZEW2 Chevrolet 67 Rear-impact OK-566 AMC Gremlin 71 O6BDEiJ3 AHC tlatador 72 Rear-impact OK-567 Ford Torino 71 02RPE%2 Pontiac Catalina 72 Intersection OK-568 Pontiac Catalina 72 12FDEY2 Ford Torino 71 Intersection OK-56 9 Ford Ha verick 72 07BLAW6 Pontiac Rear- impact OK-570 Pontiac Gran Prix 72 23FREU Fixed object OK-571 Ford 71 DROPPED THIS CASE OK-572 Euick Electra 72 11FLEN2 Buick 67 Intersect ion OK-57 3 Che vrole t Vega 72 01FBEU2 Dodge van 71 Intersection OK-574 Chevrolet Halibu 72 08LPEU3 GMC Truck 72 Intersection OK-575 Pontiac Ventura I1 72 12FLEV2 Dodge 8 Side-Swipe

HAY 1973 CASES

CK-576 Chevrolet Vega 73 01FLEW2 Pontiac Cataliaa 69 Intersection 1 OK-577 Chevrolet Vega 73 06BDEY 1 Buick LeSabre 66 Bear-impact OK-578 Buick Electra 72 11PLEE2 Fixed Object CK-579 ford Mustang 72 08LPEW2 Fixed Object 1 OK-580 Ford Pinto 71 07FREW Ford 71 Bear-iapact 1 OK- 581 C hevrolet 1 apala 71 12FREE3 Chevrolet Impala 71 Rear-irpact 1 OK-582 Ford tlastang 72 12PDEU2 Fixed Object 1 OR-583 Pontiac GranVille 72 12PCEW2 Fixed Object CK-584 Ford Mustang 71 12FCEM2 Fixed Object 1 OK-585 Fcrd Pinto 72 12FDEV3 Pontiac 67 Intersection CK-5 86 Cbevrolet Vega 73 12PBEW2 Hercury 73 Rear-impact 1 CR-587 Pontiac Graa Prix 73 11FLAS2 Ford 73 Head-on OK-588 Wagon 72 09LPAH3 Chevrolet 69 Intersection 3 GK-589 71 12FREE4 Chevrolet 67 Rear-impact OK-590 Chevrole t Nova 72 03RPEW3 Volksvagen 69 Intersection OK-591 Chevrolet Wonte Carlo 72 12FDBW1 Chevrolet 72 Intersection CK-592 Chevrolet Impala 72 02RFEu2 International 66 Intersection OK-593 Cbevrolet Chevelle 71 12FLEY2 Pontiac 69 Intersection OK-594 Plymouth Duster 72 12FDEW2 Pontiac 68 Intersection . OK-595 Dodge Demon. 72 09LFBU2 Ford 66 Intersection OK-596 Nercury Comet 72 12PDEU1 Buick 66 Head-on

JUNE 1973 CASES

OK-597 Plymouth Satellite 73 11PLE13 Fixed Object OK-598 Ciaaond Reo 7 1 Rollover OK-599 Chevrolet Pega 73 12PDEW2 Chevrolet 71 Rear-impact OK-600 Ford nustang 72 Ran-of f-road OK-601 Ford Hastang 72 00TDA03 Rollover OK-602 Ford Galaxie 72 12FZEY2 (Ambu) 72 Intersection OK-603 Chevrolet Van 30 72 12PZEW2 Fixed Object OK-604 an Gremlin 73 12PYEH2 Cadillac 72 Rear-impact OK-605 73 02LYAY3 Ford Truck 66 Intersection OK-606 Swinger 73 12LYEU1 Ford 7 1 Intersection OK-607 Neuport Roy 172 12FREN2 Pixed Object OK-608 73 Plymouth Fury XI 67 Head-on OK-609 Chrysler Neuport Boy 172 O1RZEV3 Cadillac Devil166 Intersection OK-610 Pontiac Gran Prix 72 11FYE Id2 Pontiac Bonnerille 68 Intersection OK-611 72 12FLES2 C herrolet I mpala 72 Side-swipe OK-612 Ford Pinto 73 12FLEY2 68 Head-on OK-61 3 Cbevrolet Vega 73 06BDEW2 Cadillac 73 Rear-irpact OK-61 4 Pontiac Catalina 73 10LPEU2 Ford LTD 7 3 Intersection

JULY 1973 CASES

OK-615 DODGE DART SPORT 73 0 lRZEU 3 CAEVROLET 65 IMTEBSECTIOW OK-616 PONTIAC VEUTURA 72 O1PDEY2 PONTIAC 73 IHTERSECTION OK-617 PONTIAC GRAN PRIX 73 O1FtEE1 69 BEAR-IHPACT OK-61 8 CHEVROLET CAPRICE 72 11FLEE2 FORD PIUTO 72 BEAR-IXPACT OK-619 FONTIAC GRAN VILLE 72 12PBEN2 FIXED OBJECT OK-620 CHEVROLET HCINTE CARL 73 05FZES2 CHEVBOLET CAtlABO 72 INTERSECTION OK-621 FLYMOUTH SATKLLIIE 72 02RYEY4 PONTIAC CATALINA 68 INTERSECTIOI OK-622 CHRISLER NEY YORKER 72 12FDLM2 SIDE-SWIPE OK-623 OLDSHOBILE DELTA 88 73 11FRZN1 CHEVROLET NOVA 71 HEAD-ON OK-624 CHEVROLET NOVA 73 12FLAU4 PONTIAC PIPEBIRD 69 HEAD-ON OK-625 FORD PINTO 73 02RYEW3 PONTIAC 68 INTEBSECTIOl4 OK-626 BUICK LESABRE 73 06BZER BUICK 72 REAR-IHPACT OK-627 AH GREaLIU 72 12FDEW2 BOICB 73 INTERSECTION OK-628 CLDSHOBILE COTLASS 73 12PZEW FORD PINTO 73 HEAD-ON OK-629 FORD PINTO 73 PZAYS CUTLASS 73 HEAD-ON OK-630 POWTIAC LEaARS 350 72 12FYEY1 CHRYSLEB 71 REAB-IHPACT

AUGUST 1973 CASES

OK-631 FORD PINTO 72 12FCEUl Foreign Compact 72 REAA-IMPACT OR-632 CBEVBOLET HALIBU 73 02KFEP3 CHEVROLET I8PALA 66 INTERSECTION OR-633 EONTIAC GBAN PRIX 73 09LPBE2 PONTIAC FIREBIBD 67 IliTERSECTION OK-634 PONTIAC VENTURA 73 03RZEW3 CHEVROLGT CAHARO 69 INTERSECTION OK-€35 AB GREHLIN 73 06BDEU1 FORD TRUCK BEAR-EMPACT OK-036 AH GREHLIN 12FREN4 FIXED-OBJECT OK-637 73 00XDH03 ROLLOVER OK-638 PONTIAC VENTUBA I1 73 10FDEW1 tlERCURY COUGAB 69 INTERSECTION OK-039 AM ATA AD OR 73 09LDE W2 VOLKSWAGEN 63 IITEESECTION OK-640 CHEVROLET IHPALA 72 12FYAY2 FORD 71 HEAD-ON OK-641 OLDSHOBILE 98 73 OSLPHW2 OLDS!iOBILE 73 SIDE-SWfPB OK-642 FORD PINTO 72 12FDEU 1 OLDSMOBILE 72 BEAR-IHPACT OK-643 FORD GALAXIE 560 73 12FDEW2 PLYHOUTH 69 BEAR-IMPACT OK-644 FONT1 AC GRAND VILLE 72 IOLPAW 3 PONTIAC EXECUTIVE 67 INTERSECTION

SEPTEHBER 1973 CASES

OK-645 LlERCURY COUGAR 73 02RFEW4 CHEVROLET CBEVELLE 64 IUTERSECTIOB OK-646 FORD PINTO 73 11FLEE3 FORD MUSTANG 73 SIDE SWIPE OK-647 BUICK ELECTRA 72 02RZEW3 PONTIAC GTO 68 INTERSECTION OK-648 CREVROLEP CAPRICE MA 73 06BDAV2 OK-649 CHEVROLET VEGA 73 O6BDAU2 CHBPSLEB NEWPORT 73 BEAR IMPACT OK-650 CHRYSLER NEWPORT 73 12PDEW1 CHEVBCLET VEGA 73 REAR IMPACT OK-651 FORD PIITO 72 12FDEW2 TOYOTA 71 BEAR IMPACT OK-652 CBEVROLET IMPALA 72 12FDnU2 CHEVROLET IHPBLA 68 INTERSECTION 0x0653 EUICK APOLLO 73 00XDA04 FORD IITERSBCTZOI OK-654 EUICR LESABRE 72 01FDEU2 GMC TRUCK TBAC.SEn1 BEAR IMPACT OK-655 CHEVROLET VEGA 73 12FDEY 2 PONTIAC 70 INTERSECTIOR OK-656 CHEVROLET CORVETTE OORDAO4 ROLLOVER OK-657 FORD TORINO 73 06BDEi42 PONTIAC 77 REAR IRPACT OK-658 CHEVROLET IllPALA 73 10F'L#Y2 CHEVROLET IHPALA 69 INTEBSECTION OK-659 FCNTIAC VENTUBA 11 7 2 11FDEW 2 PONTIAC CATALINA 67 INTEBSECTIOE OR-660 CHEVROLE? PICKUP 73 12FLLU3 FIXED OBJECT OK-661 FORD PINTO 73 I lLPClkJ4 OLDStlOBZLE 73 IHTERSECTIOR OK-662 CHEVROLEI PEGA 72 06BDER1 HERCURY 68 REAR IHPACT OR-663 FORD BUSTAIG 72 O1PFAY3 CHEVBOLET NOVA 7 3 INTER SECTION OK-664 CHEVBOLET NOVA 73 O1FDEW3 FORD HUSTANG 72 IlTBBSECTIOl

OCTOBER 1973 CASES

OK-665 EODGE CRESTHOOD 72 00XDA03 ROLLOVER OK-666 ARC GREHLIN 72 02PDEU3 DODGE POLARA 72 INTERSECTION 0~0667FORD PINTO 72 7 OPDEUIINTERNATIONAL SE~I 72 SIDE-SWIPE OK-668 FORD BROICO 73 00XDH02 CHEV. CANARO ROLLOVER OK-669 FORD flAVERICK 73 09LYPlW2 FORD FULL SIZE 70 INTERSECTION OK-670 PCRD MAVERICK 73 09LPAU4 FIXED OBJECT OK-671 CHEVROLET CAHARO 73 03RYEU3 CHEVROLET NOVA 70 I NTERSECTIOI OK-672 DODGE SUINGLB 72 OlFDEUI HERCUBY 66 HEAD-ON OK-673 NOT ASSIGNED OK-674 FLXHCOTH DUSTER 73 03BPEW4 CHEVBOLET 74 INTER SECTION OK-675 FORD COUUTRP SEDAN 72 09LDEU2 BUICK SKYLARK 65 INTERSECTION OK-676 FORD GALAXlE 500 72 12PDEff2 OLDSnOBILE 67 INTERSECTION OK-677 PLTPlOUTB FURY 73 12FLEE3 DODGE DART 68 HEAD-ON OK-678 ELPflOUTB CUDS 73 OlFREP2 CADILLAC COUPE DE V. 71 INTERSECTION OK-679 FONTIAC GRAN PRIX 73 01PBEW2 FIXED OBJECT OK-680 PONTIAC CATALINA 73 12PDEU2 CHBYSLER IHPEBIAL 68 REAR-IUPACT OK-681 FORD PINTO 72 03RZEU3 CHEVRCLET VEGA 73 INTERSECTION OK-682 FORD PINTO 72 12FDEW1 DATSUl 1800 SY 73 REAR-IHPACT OK-683 FORD GRAN TORN10 73 06BZEH3 FORD LfD 73 REAR-IBPACT 0K-684 FORD LTD 73 12FYEV2 FORD GBAN TOBINO 73 BEAR-IflPACT 0K-685 CHEVROLET NONTE CAfL 73 12FPEW2 BUICK ELECTRA 225 72 IUTERSECTXON 0K-686 EUICK ELECTRA 225 72 09LPEW3 CHEVROLET HOITE CARL073 IITERSBCTION 0K-687 CLDSMOBILE 98 73 11FYEY2 PONTIAC GBAl PBIX 73 INTERSECTION OK-688 FONTIAC GPAN PBIX 73 12FDEU2 OLDSflOBILE 98 73 INTERSECTION OK-689 CBEVROLET VEGA 09FLAW 2 CHEVBOLET HALIBU 65 INTERSECTION

BCVEMBER 1973 CASES

OK-690 Ply mouth Duster 72 O1FDEW2 Ford Mustang 67 Intersection OK-691 Plymouth Satellite S 73 12FDER2 Fixed Object OK-692 Cldsmobile Cutlass 73 OZRDEM 1 Ford Intermediate Intersection OK-693 Chrysler Imperial 72 02FFull Size 72 Intersection OK-694 Ford Torino 73 12FDEYl Pontiac Catalina 65 Rear-impact 0K-695 Codge Dart Swinger 72 12PBEN1 Fixed Object 0K-696 Fontiac Trans A@ 73 OlFDEW2 Fired Object 0K-697 Chevrolet Vega 72 11FLEE4 Chevrolet Full Size 73 Rear-inpact OK-698 Ford P-100 Picku~ 72 68 Intersection OK-699 Chevrolet Vega 72 12FDEW1 Rear- impact OK-700 Dodge Van 73 12FEEU At! Bornet 73 Intersection OK-701 A11 Hornet 73 12FIEU3 Dodge Van 73 Intersection OK-702 Ford na verick 73 11FLEE3 Fixed Object OK-703 An Gremlin 74 11PCHNI Chevrolet Truck 69 Intersection OK-704 Chevrolet Pickup 72 12PLEW2 Buick Special 65 Intersection OK-705 Eontiac LeHans 72 12FLEY3 Fixed Ob ject OK-706 Ford Pinto 72 OIPREU4 Intersection OK-707 Chevtolet Caprice 73 IOLPEH3 A1 Ambassador 66 Intersection OK-70 AH Ambassador 72 OlFDEUl Dodge Pickup 66 Intersection OK-709 Chevrolet Nova 73 FREN2 Fixed Object OK-710 Flpsouth Fury I 72 09LPEU2 110 73 Intersection OK-711 Ford Torino 72 10LPAY3 Fixed Object OK-712 Ford F-100 Picku~ 72 O1PDEW2 Chevrolet Eel Air 68 Intersection OK-713 Plyaouth Duster 73 10LZEU2 Ford Custon 70 Intersection OK-714 73 03BREU2 Chevrolet Pickup 72 Intersection

DECEWBER 1973 CASES

OK-715 Tord Raverick 72 OBBLEU Rear-impact 0~0716Ford Gran Torino 72 09PLEU2 Chetrolet Belair 67 Intersection OK-717 Chevrolet Corvette 73 08BYEE1 Ran-of f-road OK-718 Codge Polara 73 01FREW2 Hercury Comet Sdn 71 Bear-irpact OK-719 Dodge Dart 72 02RREH1 Ford full size 70 Intersection OK-720 Lincoln Continental 74 11PZEH1 Plymouth Interned. 71 Intersection OK-721 Ford LTD 72 12PDEWl Chevrolet SS 454 71 Head-on 0K-722 Chevrolet Vega 73 12FDEU2 Fiat Sport 73 Head-on 0K-723 Hercury Cciet 74 11PDEU1 Buick Vildcat 64 Intersection 0K-724 Ford Pinto 73 11PLEId1 Buick Fall size 67 Intersection 0K-725 Chevrolet Corvette 72 12FDLW2 Chevrolet C-30 truck 73 Intersection 0K-726 72 llFLEifl Buick Skylark 64 Intersect ion 0K-727 Ford Pinto 72 12FZEY2 Pontiac Catalina 66 Bear-impact 0K-728 72 OlFDBWl Ford Pickup 72 Intersection 0K-729 Elyrouth Duster 72 02FZEE2 Chevrolet Full size 70 Rear-impact OK-730 Chevrolet Pickup 72 llFYEE2 Pontiac Tempest 67 Head-on OK-731 Ford Pinto 73 O1RFEU2 AN Pull size 67 Intersection 0K-732 Chevrolet Nova 73 12FPEU3 Pontiac Grand Prix 69 Head-on 0K-733 Chevrolet Pickup 73 12PLEW2 Pontiac Catalina 68 Intersection OK-734 Euick LeSabre 72 12FZEW1 Hercury Hontego GT 72 Fixed Object OK-735 Hercury Hootego 72 02RPEU3 Buick LeSabre 72 Fixed Object OK-736 Chevrolet C-30 truck 70 OIFDEg1 Buick Ope1 72 Head-on OK-737 Euick Ope1 72 11PDEW2 Chevrolet C-30 truck 70 Head-on OK-73 8 Chevrolet Canaro 72 11FDEY 1 C hevrolet Full-size 68 Rear-impact 08-739 Pontiac Grand Prix 73 07BDEE5 Oldsnobile Cutlass 71 Rear-3 apact OK-740 Euick Electra 73 O1FZEW1 Plymouth Sport Sub. 73 Intersection OK-741 Cldssobile Cutlass 73 09LPAY1 Ford Thunderbird 62 Intersection OK-742 Dodge Colt 72 11PDEWl Dodge Pickup 68 Intersection OK-743 Chevrolet Vega 73 12PDEU2 VU Compact 72 Head-on OK-744 Ply~outhGold Duster 73 12PDEW 1 Fixed object

JANUAAr 1974 CASES

OK-745 Fontiac Lelans 73 O8LPEY 2 AHC Javelin 72 Intersection OK-746 Chevrolet Honte Carl 73 OlfftEW1 Chevrolet Compact 67 Rear impact OK-747 GIC Pickup 73 09LYAN3 Fixed Object OK-748 Pontiac Catalina 72 12FDER3 Pontiac Ventura 69 Intersection OK-749 Ford Pinto 72 12FDEUl Chevrolet Nova 73 Intersection OK-750 Oodqe Dart 74 09LPEW2 Pontiac Catalina 67 Intersection APPENDIX I1

Field Data Form used in the Restraint System Effectiveness Study

HIGHWAY SAFETY RESEARCH INSTITUTE FORM 7 /74- 1 THE dNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN

RESTRAINT SYSTEM USAGE -- INJURY REDUCTION STUDY

TEAM INVESTIGATOR -- 9 10 CASE NO. ------... INVESTIGATION DATE 345678

REPORTING POLICE DEPARTMENT - P. R. REPORT NO. ----- 17 18 19 20 21 22 DATE OF ACCIDENT --I----/ TIME OF ACCIDENT ---- 23 24 25 26 27 28 24 Hour Clock 29 30 31 32

Case Vehicle actually towed? -33 SELECTION CODE 1( ) YES- to: 4 " ( )1 H Hospital J( ) NO reason: i 12 G Good Case

I. Investigation Complete: U 1 a( ) Data Complete NOTE: TO BE: COMPLETED 2 b( ) Data Incomplete WHEN CASE SUBMITTED.

INVESTIGATION 11. Investigation Incomplete: TERMINATED 3 C( ) NO Data--case could not be investigated. Reason:

4 d( ) Case Did Not Meet Criteria Reason:

SAMPLE RULE/PERIOD

"01 03 KP (37-42) CASE VEHICLE SLIDES -- 02 04 43 44 SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (7/74) (1: 45-53) CASE VEHICLE DATA Automatic Air Vehi cle -ACRS Cy 1.i nders Conditioning Loading si )1 Yes 17 ) Rotary c( ) 1 Yes ( ) 1 Yes c( 14 Below 2 ( ) 2-Cyl ( 12 No >2No ( )2No ( )5 Near 4( ) 4-Cyl ( )9 Unk ( ) 9 Unk ( ) 9 Unk ( )6 Above 6( ) 6-Cyl ( )9 Unk 8( 8-Cyl 7( ) other 9( ) Unknown Road MOST SEVERE 1h;'JT.T -Paved Front Seat CRASH EVENT NUMBEd g( ) 1 Yes =( )19 Bench 0-7 = actual 0230 ( 129 Bucket - 8 = 8th + ( ) 3 Not ( 199 Unknown 53 9 = unknown ~PP ( ) 9 Unk

MICHIGAN STATE POL1 CE CODES

VEHICLE MAKE VEHICLE TYPE PASSENXR CARS 0 Full size Chevrolet 00 American Motors 1 Intermediate Diamond T 01 Buick 2 Compact: Dodge 02 Cadillac 3 Federal 03 Chevrolet 4 Station Bus, Carryall Ford 04 Chrysler 5 Jeep type GNC 05 Dodge 6 Pickup or panel International 06 Ford 7 Straight Truck, Dump, Mack 07 Imperial Van, Flat Bed, Etc. Peterbilt 08 Jeep 8 Truck Tractor (small) Re0 09 Lincoln 9 Other or not known White 10 Mercury 31 Willys 11 Oldsrcobi le 32 thru 33 12 Plymouth not assigned 13 Pontiac 39 Other Trucks 14 Volkswagen 40 Motorcycles 15 Not assigned 41 School Bus 16 Not assigned 42 Comerical Bus 17 Not assigned 43 Farm Equi2ment 18 Other foreign 19 Other domestic 1 Car & Other Trailer 44 Construction Equip. 2 Not assigned 45 Fire Equipment 3 Not assigned 46 Ambulance, Hearse 4 Not assigned 47 Police Equipment 5 Single Bottom Semi 48 Snowmobile 6 Double Botton Semi 49 Other or not known 7 House Trailer 50 Dune Buggy CARD 0 -2 - -12 Dup col3-8 CASE VEH I CLE : MAKE , Ma ke-Mode 1 Code, MODEL ----- 9 10 11 12 13 MODEL YWR 19 -- ODOMETER ----- 14 I5 16 17 18 19 20 VIN -- 21 22 T/4TT1(1721193031jlTT

BODY STYLE NO. OF DOORS Shipping Weight I u 35 OO# 1 ( ) Sedan or Coupe ( > 5 1 -- 1 2( ) --No upper B pillar 03 36 37 3 ( ) 04 4 ( ) 5 ( ) ( ) 9 Unknown 9 ( ) Unknown TRAILER BEING TOWED UPPER B PILLAR AT TIME OF COLLISION 38 2 'i-( ) NO 2( NO 1 ( ) YES 9 ( ) Unknown 9 ( ) Unknown 1 ( ) YES: Type Police Report Vehicle No. - 40

Other Vehicle Case No. - Third Vehic'le Case No. ------41 42 43 44 45 46 ------47 48 49 50 51 52 ***CAm03-- &kt******** ******************* 12

OTHER VEHICLE: PoliceRe~ort THIRDVEHICLE: Police Report Vehicle No. Vehicle No. -9 - MAKE MAKE 23 MODEL I MODEL Make-Model Code Make-Model Code MODEL YEAR 19 -- 1 MODEL YEAR 19 10 11 24 25 ---- VEHICLE TYPE VEHICLS TYPE 26 27 28 29 30 Police Body P.olice-. Bodv Code Style Estimated Weight Code styie Estimated Weight 12 I i 11.32 ( 1 00 Full size ( ) 00 Full size Intemediate 1 00#1 - ---- ( ) 01 Intermediate Compact 19 20 21 22 ( 1 02 Compact Sports car spoits car Carryall Carryall Jeep type Jeep type Pickup/panel Pickup/panel Straight truck, Straight truck, Van Van Truck-tractor Truck-tractor' Doubles Doublns ( ) 09 Other: I Other: I Not known Not known ( 1 10 Pedestrian Pedestrian ( 1 11 Motorcycle Motorcycle OBJECT CONTACTED IOTE: A vehicZe may contact an object mare than once. 01 No object or vehicle--None

CARS : OBJECTS 11 Full size, Standard 54 Fallen Objects 12 Intermediate 55 Traffic Cones, Barrels, 13 Compact and Mini Construction Barriers 14 Sports Car 56 Construction or Emergency Equip. 15 Jeep type 57 Large Posts/Trees, Utility Pole, 19 Unknown automobile Large Sign Posts 58 Ditch--Embankment, S.;owbank TRUCKS & BUS: 60 Ground (Rollover onlv) Curb (Damage producing Pick-up/Panel Impacts Only) Van (Econoline type) Culvert Van (Step Van type) Fence Straight Truck (Gurnp, Hydrants, Stumps, Etc. Seni Tractor-Trailer Small Posts/Trees, Rural Double Bottom Mail Boxes, Delineators Eus (Passeriger) Building Bus (School) Pier, Pillar Unknown Truck Abutment, Retainins- Wall 7 0 Bridge r ail OTHER VEHICLE: 7 1 Guard Rail Bicycle 72 Cable, Fence Barrier Xotorcycle 7 3 Concrete Barrier (Median) Snow.obile 74 Impact Attenuator ATV 7 5 Breakaway Fixtures Farm Vehicle (Tractor, etc.) 78 Other: Construction Vehicle Train (cars) 79 Unknown Object Locomotive () Trailer: 99 Unknown vehicle or object Pedestrian Pedestrian Conveyance Unknown other vehicle Other car, truck or vehicle:

49 Unknown motor vehicle

COLLISION TYPE -- CASE VEHICLE See also the scene schematic. VEHICLE TO OTHER VEHICLE TO VEHICLE (Moving or Parked) 01 Vehicle to Object 11 Head on (F to F 02 Rollover 12 Rear end (F to R) 03 Other: 13 Side swipe--same direction 14 Side swipe--opposite direction 99 Unknown 15 Intersection Type L 16 Intersection Type T 17 Intersection Type Unknown 18 Other: 19 Configuration Unknown VEHICLE DAMAGE INDEX--VDI @OR THE CASE VEHICLE)

LIST IN ORDER OF DAMAGE SEVERITY.

r 1 I COLLISION OBJECT I ------r - TYPE -- CONTACTED-- 17 38 39 40 41 41 43 44 45 46 47 m COLLISION -- in. EVENT: so:( ) 1 First; ( ) 2 Second; ( ) 3 Third 48 49

1 COLLISION OBJECT - - TYPE CONTACTED ------51 51 I 54 55 56 57 --58 59 --60 61 COLLISION CRUSH in. EVENT: *4:( 1 1 First; ( 2 Second; ( ) 3 Third 61 61

4

COLLISION OBJECT - - TYPE CONTACTED ------65 66 67 41 b9 70 71 -71 --74 75 COLLISION CRUSH -- in. EVENT: 7*( ) 1 First; ( ) 2 Second; ( ) 3 Third 76 77

OCCUPANT SEAT POSITION NUMBER

Mark an x to locate the position of ALL occupants in the vehicle. Use this number to identify the occupants in the subsequent occupant sections.

If 2 people occupy the same seat (i.e. sitting on a lap, etc.) replace the 0 in the seat number with a 2 to identify the person sitting on the lap of the other occupant. TOTAL NUMBER OF OCCUPANTS IN VEHICLE 79 80

SKETCH CASE VEHICLE DAMAGE

ORIGINAL DIMENSIONS 4 *m CI 0 11 [I

ATTACH POLAROID OF CASE VEHICLE

Picture should depict major damage to vehicle (corresponding to Praimary WI),

CASE NO. CAR;) 0 4 12 8 OCCUPANT SECT1 OM Dup CO~3-8 or ------145678

OCCUPANT SEAT C POSITION NUMBER ,o I CRASH OCCUPANT MEDICAL See Page 5 for Treat!nent/XIortality Code Values. zJ.lb( )00 None ( )01 First Aid at Scene OCCUPANT POSTURE Consulted Physican: U. ( )10 Unknown, butVStsted wouldt' ( )11 Unknown, butt'Directed to" ( )1 Normal Seated Position ( )12 Did Consult Physician ( )9 Unknown ( )02 Treated at Hospitnl/Clinic ( )2 Other,Describe: but Not Admitted ( )03 Hospitalized (observation less than 24 hours) ( )04 Hospitalized for Over 24 Hours or Significant Treatment ( )05 Fatal - Dead at Scene ( )06 Fatal - DOA ( )07 Fatal Dead within 24 IIours 12 - SEX - ( )08 Fatal - Dead 24 Hours - 1 Year ( )1 hlnle ( )09 Fatal - Period to Death Unknown Female : ( )99 Unknown ( )2 Pregnancy Unknown ( )3 Pregnant ( )4 Not Pregnant Overall Police Injury Severity (YJ.5C) ( )9 Unknown 27 NOTE: Rc"PG.??FFOLiCS ;i/XZa',.5,'/T. ( O NO Injury OCCUPANT IS A: ( ) C Possible Izjury 13 ( ) B Nonincapacitatin~Injury ( ) Adult - over 12 years. ( ) A Incapacitating Injury ( ) 2 Child - 2 to 12 years. ( ) K Fatal Injury ( ) 3 Infant - under 2 years. ( ) U Unknown ( ) 9 Unknown

OVERALL SEVERITY OF INJURIES AG E 2E9 (00,01, ( 00 None -- Years 02-98) i j 01 Minor 14 15 .u. ( ) 02 Non-Dangeroas, :kderate --Months if infant ( 9 03 Non-Dangerocs, Severe 16 17 (to 24 months) ( ) 04 Dangerous, Serious ( ) 05 Cangerous, Critical ( ) Unknown code appropriate ( ) 06 Fatal Lesiocs in 1 Region age-- ( ) 07 Facal Lesiozs i?. 1 Resion line 99 t 4 or 5 above ( ) 08 Fatal Lesions in 2 Reqions iI ( ) 09 Fatal Lesiors in 3 or WEIGHT Yore Regions ( ) 10 Fatal, Details Ci-.kno;,m Pounds ( ) 98 Injury br.known ---18 19 20 ( ) 99 Injured, SelPe:ity Unknown I ( ) Unknown weight-- code 999 Occupant Eject ion,/Ent rapment J,o HEIGHT ( 19 Unknown if Ejected or Trapped Feet, -Inches = - - In. - 21 22 %%%?known Entrapment) ( ) Unknown Height-- code 1 i ne 99 ( )1 None ( 12 Partial Describe ( 13 Complete OCCUPANT SECTION SEQUENCE ( )#I Extent Unknown No. Trapped with : --23 24 ( 15 No Ejection ( )6 Partial Ejection ( 17 Unknown Ejection 31 I( ) NO INJURIES INDICP.TE LOCATION OF INJURIES, INCLUDING MAJOR BRUISES t( ) INJURED

-z= ' J -J I w -

x '. \ \

SOFTTISSUE INJURIES1 ft tt SKELETAL INJURIES

X Rays:

Other Tests: B INJURY INFORMATION

BEST SOURCE OF INJURY INFORM~~TION 32 ( ) 1 Hospital/Doctor ( ) 2 Personal interview with occupant ( ) 3 Personal interview with other occupant ( ) 4 Other:

OCCUPANT INJURY CLASSIFICATION

1 - POSSIBLE 9 - UNKNOWN -- I Xcsgonse I Judqc-,erit Pesponse JUG~~;-entRfsc lt::3., Jzcyi! Response ~dlqe.-entl

VEHICLE I INJURY DATA . 31 ' 32 !It34 45 -38 39 40.41 42 4x44 IBTERVIE:' 10Y I 1ou11ox IOY, 1 2ON I 20N120 v 20N, oCCUPART (7)~: *( ) ?;R I 6( ) NR 6( 1 XR' p( ) [; 6( ) NR1

'45 '4f( ) y ,4748 INTERVIEPI- 2( ) (7)L' 1 2(6( ) NR 61,62 INTERVICii: (1)Y (2 s 2( ) N (7'Li 6( ) NR 6( ) NR -

YES NO Y = YES Response 3 L~teralrespor.ss of intcrviewee. +3 DEFI>!ITE -3 N = NO Judgement = Interviewer's best judgement of and +2 PRO3ASLE -2 U = WIKXOWN confidence in interviewees res'pnse +I POSSIBLE -1 NR = NO RESPONSE to question of restraint usage. 00 UNKSOh31 UA = UNAVAILABLE 99 KOT APPLICABLE

@ specify & describe device: Describe irrespective of source. Source of Information

@sunmarire status of ACRS: D OCCUPANT SUPPLEMENT Occupant Seat Posit ion Sumber m L I

Restraint alaladjustment 11-11 ( Yes ( )992 No ( )993 Not Applicable,Not Worn ( )999 Unknown

Factors Cstemini ng Fostraict Usace Classification

Contribution to Etialuation Choose one of the following code values for each factor: (1) Supported evaluation (2) Contradicted evai uazion (3) !lei ther suz~crredn2r concradi ctea evaluation (4) !io res;;ns?* (5) riot appl icabl ef*

Factor Avai labi l i - ND Na t Colunn 2nd Factcr Sup. Cont. Neitner Peso.* k;pli~.*~ 20 Be1 t or Fi ttincs Darnaged 10 20 30 40 50 by Occupant Loading 21 Location or Condition 10' 20 30 40 50 of Belts 22 System Defeated 10 20 30 40 50 23 Exterior Vehici e Damage or Occupant Conijct Points 10 20 30 40 50 24 Pol ice Repgrt 10 20 30 40 50 25 Pol ice or kiitness Observation 26 Subject Interview 10 20 30 40 50 27 Other Interview 10 20 30 40 50 28 Occupant Injury Pattern 10 20 30 40 50 29 Be1 t Caused Injury 10 20 30 40 50 30 Occupant Ejected 10 20 30 40 50

* No Response - Vehicle ins~ected,report obtained or interview conducted , but factor undeterninable or interviewee refused to respond. *+ Not P,pplicaSle - -No vehicle inspection, report or interview, or other not applicable.

CASE NO. CARD 0 4 12 OCCUPANT SECT I OM

OCCUPANT SEAT POSITION NUMBER ,, CRASH OCCUPAllT MEDICAL See Page 5 for Treatment/Blortality Code Values. 2J.1(( 100 None ( )01 First Aid at Scene OCCUPANT POSTURE Consulted Physican: ll ( )10 Unknown, butMStatedwould" )1 ( )11 Unknown, butl'Directed to" ( Normal Seated Position ( )12 Did Consult Physician ( )9 Unknown ( )02 Treated at Hospital/Clinic ( )2 Other,Describe: but Not Admitted ( 103 Hospitalized (observation less than 24 hours) ( )04 Hospitalized for Over 24 Hours or Significant Treatment ( )05 Fatal - Dead at Scene ( 106 Fatal - DOA ( 107 Fatal Dead within 24 Hours SEX -12 - ( 108 Fatal - Dead 24 Hours - 1 Year ( )1 hIale ( 109 Fatal - Period to Death Unknown Female : ( 199 Unknown ( )2 Pregnancy Unknown ( )3 Pregnant ( )4 Not Pregnant Overall Police Injar!: Severity (?J.EC) I ( )9 Unknown ,-., EnE: .?.T?5.=7 P-7LiC.T Z'>2.'.T47T. I ( 1 O NO Injcry OCCUPANT IS A: ( 1 C Possible Izjcry 13 ( 1 B Nonincapacitatinq Injury ( ) 1 Adult - over 12 years. . ( 1 A Incepacitatinq Injsry ( ) 2 Child - 2 to 12 years. ( 1 K Fatal Injury ( ) 3 Infant - under 2 years. I ( 1 U Unknown ( ) 9 Unknown I

OVE9ALL SEVERITY OF ItiJURI ES AGE 28,19 Years (00,01, 02-98) ( 1 00 one * c ( 1 01 Xinor --14 15 * * rU. ( 1 02 Non-Dangero-sf Kcderate --Months if infant ( j 03 Xon-Dang~rous, Severe * * 16 17 (to 24 months) ~an~erous,Serious Canqerous, Critical ( ) Unknown age-- code appropriate Fatal ~esiocsin I Region c c . Fatal Lesions in 1 Region line 99 + 4 or 5 aboyre * * Fatzl Lesions In 2 Regions .k C Fatal Lesicns in 3 or WEIGHT Hore Regiocs C C Fatal, Details C..'F~n~:h~ * * Pounds Injury Cr,:.:r.o;;n ---18 19 20 Injured, Severity Ucknokn c c ( ) Unknown weight-- code 999 -C C I Occupant Ejection/Entrapn~ent 30 HEIGHT I (-19 Unknown if Ejected or Trapped * c -Feet, -Inches = -- In. Elect ion. 21 22 I -known Entrapment) ( ) Unknown Height-- code 1 ine 99 ( 12 Partial Describe C C ( 13 Complete a"" a OCCUPANT SECTION SEQUENCE ( 1.1 ~xtentUnknown D C * No. -- Trapped with : 23 24 ( )5 No Ejection ( 16 Partial Ejection ( 17 Unknown Ejection 3 I(1 ) NO INJURIES INDICP.TE iOCATlON OF INJURIES, INCLUDlNG MAJOR BRUISES 2( ) INJURED

SOFT TISSUE INJURIES SKELETAL INJURIES

X Rays:

Other Tests: B INJURY INFORMATION

BEST SOURCE OF INJURY INFORMATION a1 ( ) 1 Mospital/Doctor ( ) 2 Personal interview with occupant ( ) 3 Personal interview with other occupant ( ) 4 Other: OCCUPANT INJURY CLASSIFICATION

* * NITE ,, ABLE * * 1 - POSS IBLaE occupant seat RESTRAINT DEVICE 8 USAGE CARD 2 0 12 position number Dup -- DEVICE STATUS col3-10

ha * 2'2 LAP BELT 3 SHOULDER BELT OTHER DEVICE@ CHILD SEAT o aW a >

Original I Oriqinal Original 1, Equipment y / Erirm~nt Equipncn t ) y Mfg: EQUIPPED 12 I( ) '( ) y 16 I( / Z( N I( ) Y 2( ) N' I() Y 2( ) N I() Y for this 1 2( ) N Model: 0 90U/ ION 9() U 2()N 90U )ON 9() U i POSITION 9( U 9( u 9( 1 u H // 1 I I4 ' I I4 1 :.la1 function Malfunction >lalfunction 0 I19 20 21 22 23 U BELTS 10 10.Y I( 10 y )@ ~r OPEWBLE Defeat '( ) N Defeat 0

H E-C I5alfunction Yalfunction

If ACRS --@

CARD 2 1 12 DEVICE USAGE D'dp ~013-10 I' j ?.cscoase ~~6~c~entj ~es~onse Juace~ent Resp ;:::,, Z-dgc Response J~c~erent

VEHICLE

22.23 INJURY DATA 4 32 i33.34 35 38 39 40,41 42 43,44 i,jl INTERVIE\: >liY l( ) Y 1OY 10Y' I( ) y 1(2) 1 2( N 1 - 20N 20NI 2()N I OCCUPANT l(71k7 6( 1 NR' 9( ) U 6( ) NR 1 6( 1 FIR I 6; ) ?!R1 49 52 5 3 5435 5b 67,58 1NTERVIET.J- 1( ) Y I5Ot5l ~OY1Oy 1( y ?ON 20N 2( N 6( ) :JR 6( 1 hR 9( 1 L' 6( 1 NRI - - '5' '63 161162 64,65 '66 67 loullo Y INTERVIi\*l: ;) I( ) Y 1 1 20N12() N L' (7)Eh 6 ) SR / 6( 1 NR 6( 1 KR' 9( )

CONCLUSI?" 1 g/h 1 72'73 t;v//470'71 L I -I YES NO Y = YES Response = Llteral response of lntervlebee. t3 DEFINITE -3 N = NO Judgement = Intervlewar's ~sst]~Zgernent of and t2 PROBABLE -2 U = RJKNOWN confidence in lntervlswees response t1 POSSIBLE -1 NR = NO RESPONSE to question of restraint usage. 00 UNKSOW UA UNAVAI LABLE 99 NOT APPLICABLE

specify h describe device: Describe irrespective of source. Source of Information @bialfunction : @ Defeat: Q~ummarize status of ACRS: Occupant Seat OCCUPANT SUPPLEMENT .I Position Number - -

Restraint hlaladjustment 11-13 ( Im Yes ( j992 NO ( )993 Not Applicable,Not Worn ( )999 Unknown

Factors C2temini no hstraint Usace Cl assifi cstion-

Contribution to Evaluation Choose one of the following code values for each factor:

(1 ) Supported eval u~tion (2) Contradi ctea evai ua~ien (3) Cei thsr sti;zorteo ncr coniradi cteo evaluation (4) No resrs7ser (5) Not appi ica~1 e**

- Factor Avai l zbi 1; s:/ t4 o Not Column and Fzctcr SUP. Cont. Neitner E?SD.* Applic.** , ZD BeltorFirtincsDarnaged 10 20 30 40 50 by Occupant Loadin: 21 Location or Condition of Belts 22 System Defeated 10 20 30 40 50 23 Exterior Vehicle Damaae or Occupant Contact Points 10 20 30 40 50 24 Pol ice !?e?3rt 10 20 30 40 50 25 Police 9r :li tness Observation 26 Subject Interview 10 20 30 40 50 * * 10 * * 27 Other Interview 20 30 40 50 * * 28 Occupant Injury Pattern 10 20 30 40 50 * * 29 Belt Caused Injury 10 20 30 40 50 * *

30 Occupant Ejected 10 20 30 40 50 * r~ * * * No Response - Vehicle insoected, report obtained or interview coniucte3 * * but factor undeterri nab1 e or interviesee refused to res~zn3. * Not P.pplicable - -No vehicle inspection, report or interview, or other not applicable.