Jappy, Tony. "References." Peirce’s Twenty-Eight Classes of Signs and the Philosophy of Representation: Rhetoric, Interpretation and Hexadic Semiosis. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2017. 202–206. Bloomsbury Advances in Semiotics. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 1 Oct. 2021. <>.
Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 1 October 2021, 01:50 UTC.
Copyright © Tony Jappy 2017. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. References
Primary Sources
Peirce, Charles S. (1931–1958), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 8 Volumes, Hartshorne, Charles, Paul Weiss and Arthur W. Burks (eds.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Peirce Charles S. ([1940] 2011), Philosophical Writings of Peirce, Buchler, J. (ed.), New York: Dover. Peirce, Charles S. (1976), The New Elements of Mathematics, Volume Four: Mathematical Philosophy, Eisele, C. (ed.), The Hague: Mouton. Peirce, Charles S. and V. Welby-Gregory (1977), Semiotic and Significs: The Correspondence between C. S. Peirce and Victoria Lady Welby, Hardwick, C.S. (ed.), Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Peirce, Charles S. (1982), Fisch, M., C. Kloesel, E. Moore, and D. Roberts (eds), The Writings of Charles S. Peirce, Volume 1: 1857–1866, Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Peirce Charles S. (1992), The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, Volume One: 1867–1893, Houser, N. and C. Kloesel (eds.), Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Peirce, Charles S. (1998), The Essential Peirce, Volume Two, Peirce Edition Project (eds.), Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Secondary Sources and References
Anderson, D. (1984), ‘Peirce and Metaphor’, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, XXI (4), pp. 453–68. Anderson, D. (1995), Strands of System: The Philosophy of Charles Peirce, West Lafayette: Purdue University Press. Anderson, D. and C. R. Haussman (2012), Conversations on Peirce: Reals and Ideals, New York: Fordham University Press. Atkin, A. (2010), ‘Peirce’s Theory of Signs’http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/peirce- semiotics/ Accessed March 2016. Barthes, R. (1964), ‘Éléments de sémiologie’, Communications, 4, pp. 91–134. Barthes, R. (1970), Mythologies, Paris: Seuil. Barthes, R. (1977), ‘Rhetoric of the Image’, in Heath (1977), pp. 32–51. References 203
Baudrillard, J., (1988), ‘Simulacra and Simulations’, in Selected Writings, Poster, Mark (ed.), Stanford: Stanford University Press. Benedict, G. (1985), “What Are Representamens?’ , Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, XXI (2), pp. 241–270 Bergman, M. (2009), Peirce’s Philosophy of Communication, London: Continuum. Colapietro V. M. and T. M. Olshewsky (eds.), (1996), Peirce’s Doctrine of Signs: Theory, Applications, and Connections, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Danaher, D. (1998), ‘Peirce’s Semiotic and Conceptual Metaphor Theory’,Semiotica , 119, pp. 171–207. Deely, J. (2014), ‘85 Definitions of “Sign” in Peirce and Their Correlations with the Term “Representamen”’, Paper delivered at the Charles S. Peirce International Centennial Congress, 2014. Deledalle, G. (1987), Charles S. Peirce, phénoménologue et sémioticien, Foundations of Semiotics, 14, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Deledalle, G. (2000), Charles S. Peirce’s Philosophy of Signs: Essays in Comparative Semiotics, Bloomington: Indianan University Press. Derrida, J. (1970), ‘Structure, Sign, and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences’ in The Languages of Criticism and the Sciences of Man: The Structuralist Controversy, Macksey, R. and E. Donato (eds.), Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 247–265. Diversey, A. (2014), ‘The Correct Order of Peirce’s Ten Trichotomies’, Paper delivered at the Charles S. Peirce International Centennial Congress, 2014. Factor, R. L. (1996), ‘Peirce’s definition of metaphor and its consequences’ in Colapietro and Olshewsky (1996), pp. 229–235. Fisch, M. (1982), ‘Introduction’, The Writings of Charles S. Peirce, Volume 1: 1857–1866, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. xv–xxxv. Fisch, M. (1983), ‘Peirce as Scientist, Mathematician, Historian, Logician and Philosopher’, in ‘Studies in Logic’ by Members of the Johns Hopkins University (1883), Fisch, M. and A. Eschbach (eds.), Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. vii-xxviii. (Also in Fisch 1986, pp. 376–400). Fisch, M. (1986), Peirce, Semeiotic and Pragmatism: Essays by Max Fisch, Ketner, K. L. and Ch. Kloesel (eds.), Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Freadman, A. (1996), ‘Peirce’s second classification of signs’, in Colapietro and Olshewsky, (1996), pp. 143–159. Haley, M. C. (1988), The Semeiosis of Poetic Metaphor, Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Hariman, R. and J. L. Lucaites (2007), No Caption Needed: Iconic Photographs, Public Culture, and Liberal Democracy, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Haussman, C. R. (1996), ‘Peirce and the interaction view of metaphor’, in Colapietro and Olshewsky (1996), pp. 193–203. Haussman, C. R. (2012), ‘‘Peirce’s Dynamical Object: Realism as Process Philosophy’, in Anderson and Haussman (2012), pp. 75–99. 204 References
Heath, S. (ed.), (1977), Image, Music, Text, London: Fontana. Herzberger, H. H. (1981) ‘Peirce’s remarkable theorem’, in Pragmatism and Purpose: Essays Presented to Thomas A. Gouge, Sumner, L. W., J. G. Slater and F. Wilson, (eds), Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 41–58. Houser, N. (1992), ‘Introduction’ to Peirce (1992), pp. xix–xli. Houser, N. (2005), ‘The Scent of Truth’,Semiotica , 153 (1/4), pp. 455–466. Jakobson, R. ([1965]1971), ‘Quest for the Essence of Language’, in Selected Writings, Volume Two: Word and Language, The Hague: Mouton, pp. 345–59. Jappy, T. (1985), ‘“Beauty”: Sign-Systems that work’, Kodikas/Code: Ars Semeiotica, 8(1/2), pp. 111–120. Jappy, T. (1999), ‘Iconicity and Inference: Peirce’s Logic and Language Research’, in Peirce Seminar Papers, Vol. 4, Shapiro, M. and M. Haley (eds.), Providence and Oxford: Berghahn Books, pp. 41–76. Jappy, T. (2013), Introduction to Peircean Visual Semiotics, London: Bloomsbury Academic. Jappy, T. (2015), ‘“It Really Represents …’: Reflexions on the Object in Peirce’s Hexadic Sign-System’, Language and Semiotic Studies, 1 (4), pp. 1–18. Kant, E. ([1787] 1974), Critique of Pure Reason, trans. by J. M. D. Meiklejohn with an introduction by A. D. Lindsay. Everyman’s Library, London: Dent. Kent, B. (1987), Charles S. Peirce: Logic and the Classification of the Sciences, Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press. Krauss, R. (1977), “Notes on the Index: Seventies Art in America.” (Part 1) October, 3, pp. 68–81. Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson (1980),Metaphors We Live by, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Lalor, B. (1997), ‘The Classification of Peirce’s Interpretants’, Semiotica, 114 (1/2), pp. 31–40. Lattmann, C. (2012), ‘Icons of Novel Thought: A New Perspective on Peirce’s Definition of Metaphor’, Semiotica, 192 (1/4), pp. 535–556. Liszka, J. (1996), A General Introduction to the Semeiotic of Charles Sanders Peirce, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. Liszka, J. (2000), ‘Peirce’s New Rhetoric’, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, XXXVI (4), pp. 439–476. Locke, J. (1964), An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, abridged and edited with an introduction by A. D. Woozley. Fontana Library, London: Collins. Marty, R. (nd.) ‘76 Definitions of The Sign by C. S. Peirce’, plus an analysis of the 76 definitions, nd.,http://www.iupui.edu/~arisbe/rsources/76DEFS/76defs.HTM Accessed March 2016. Merrell, F. (2001), Charles Sanders Peirce’s Conception of the Sign, in The Routledge Companion to Semiotics and Linguistics, Cobley, P. (ed.), London: Routledge, 28–39. Millett, K. (1972), ‘The Debate over Women: Ruskin vs. Mill’, in Vicinus (1972), pp. 121–139. References 205
Morand, B. (2004), Logique de la conception: figures de sémiotique générale d’après Charles S. Peirce, Paris: L’Harmattan. Müller, R. (1994), ‘On the Principles of Construction and the Order of Peirce’s Trichotomies of Signs’, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, XXX (1), pp. 135–153. Murphey, M. (1993), The Development of Peirce’s Philosophy. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Co. Ogden, C. K. and I. A. Richards ([1923] 1972), The Meaning of Meaning: A Study of the Influence of Language Upon Thought and the Science of Symbolism. London: Routledge and Keegan Paul. O’Sullivan, J. L. (Nov. 1839.) ‘The Great Nation of Futurity’,The United States Democratic Review, 6 (23), pp. 426–430, http://cdl.library.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/moa/ moa-cgi?notisid=AGD1642-0006-46 Accessed March 2016. Pharies, D. (1985), Charles S. Peirce and the Linguistic Sign, Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Reid, T. (1863), The Works of Thomas Reid, D.., D (ed. Hamilton), 6th edn., Edinburgh: Maclachlan and Stewart. Roberts, H. F. (1972), ‘Marriage, Redundancy and Sin: The Painter’s View of Women in the First Twenty-Five Years of Victoria’s Reign’, in Vicinus (1972), pp. 45–76. Savan, D. (1988), An Introduction to C. S. Peirce’s Full System of Semeiotic, Toronto Semiotic Circle. Schapiro, M. (1994), Theory and Philosophy of Art: Style, Artist, and Society, New York: Brazillier. Shapiro, M. (1983), The Sense of Grammar: Language as Semeiotic, Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Shapiro, M. (1998), ‘Sound and Meaning in Shakespeare’s Sonnets, Language, 74, pp. 81–103. Shapiro, M. and M. Shapiro (1988), Figuration in Verbal Art, Princeton: Princeton University Press. Short, T. (2004), ‘The Development of Peirce’s Theory of Sign’s’, inThe Cambridge Companion to Peirce, Misak, C. (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 214–240. Short, T. (2007), Peirce’s Theory of Signs, London and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Sontag, S. (1977), On Photography, London: Penguin books. Spinks, C. W. (1991), Peirce and Triadomania: A Walk in the Semiotic Wilderness, The Hague: Mouton. Stjernfelt, F. (2014), Natural Propositions: The Actuality of Peirce’s Doctrine of Dicisigns, Boston, MA: Docent Press. Turner, F. J. (1893), ‘The Significance of the Frontier in American History’, (PDF), Excerpted, and images and numbered footnotes added, by the National Humanities 206 References
Center, Research Triangle Park, NC. 2005. http://nationalhumanitiescenter.org/pds/ gilded/empire/text1/turner.pdf. Accessed March 2016. Uelsmann, J. M. Taylor, M. Joo and W. Kang (2013), All 4 You, Seoul: The Museum of Photography. Vicinus, M. (ed.) (1972), Suffer and Be Still: Women in the Victorian Age, London: Routledge. Weiss, P. and A. Burks (1945), ‘Peirce’s Sixty-Six Signs’, The Journal of Philosophy, 42 (14), pp. 383–388.