DOCSLIB.ORG

PDF Download Euthyphro 1St Edition Ebook

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PDF Download Euthyphro 1St Edition Ebook EUTHYPHRO 1ST EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Plato | 9781605977409 | | | | | Euthyphro 1st edition PDF Book Eschatological verification Language game Logical positivism Apophatic theology Verificationism. Categories : Philosophy of religion Religious ethics Theodicy Dilemmas. Part of a series on. Thus Euthyphro's theory does not give us the very nature of the pious, but at most a quality of the pious 11ab. Indeed, Plato's approach in this dialogue is anachronistic , because it is unlikely that Socrates was a master metaphysician; nonetheless, Aristotle 's expositional treatment of metaphysics [ citation needed ] is rooted in the Platonic dialogues, especially in the Euthyphro. Yet Socrates argues that disputes would still arise — over just how much justification actually existed; hence, the same action could be pious and impious; again, Euthyphro's definition cannot be a definition of "piety". Euthyphro's first definition of piety is what he is doing now, that is, prosecuting his father for manslaughter 5d. Socrates asked whose bias do y'all seek. This means that a given action, disputed by the gods, would be both pious and impious at the same time — a logical impossibility. Make sure your voice is heard. Philosophy portal. As philosopher and Anselm scholar Katherin A. Halcyon Socratic Letters. At that juncture of their dialogue, Euthyphro does not understand what makes his definition of "piety" a circular argument; he agrees with Socrates that the gods like an action because it is pious. Richard Swinburne and T. Again, the Euthyphro dilemma is a false one; the third option that it fails to consider is that what is morally obligatory is what God commands in accordance with a non-arbitrary and unchanging standard of goodness that is not independent of Him Socrates wonders what Euthyphro means by "looking after the gods. First, there are some divine commands that can directly create moral obligations: e. Socrates then argues that the unanimous approval of the gods is merely an attribute of "piety", that divine approval is not a defining characteristic of "piety". Given the knowledge that evolution has given us tendencies to be xenophobic and sexist it is mistaken to claim that evolution has only selected for objective morality as evidently it did not. By using ThoughtCo, you accept our. Oxford University Press. Thus the second horn of the Euthyphro dilemma, divine command theory, is also disposed of. One problem remains for such views: if God's own essential goodness does not depend on divine commands, then on what does it depend? Quinn , [87] and William P. Apology Memorabilia Oeconomicus Symposium. Euthyphro 1st edition Writer Yet, Socrates later says that the information provided in his question to Euthyphro is insufficient for a clear definition of "piety", because piety belongs to those actions we call just , that is, morally good; however, there are actions, other than pious actions, which we call just 12d ; for example, bravery and concern for others. On this definition, these things will be both pious and impious, which makes no sense. Take a Study Break. He persuades Euthyphro to agree that when we call a thing "carried", it is simply because it is being carried by someone and not because it possesses an inherent characteristic, which could be called "carried". Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file. Although Socrates generally gets the better of Euthyphro, some of what Euthyphro says makes a certain amount of sense. But we can't improve the gods. Ethical egoism Euthyphro dilemma Logical positivism Religious language Verificationism eschatological Problem of evil Theodicy Augustinian Irenaean Best of all possible worlds Inconsistent triad Natural evil. That means that what is objectively good and what God wills for us as morally obligatory are really the same thing considered under different descriptions, and that neither could have been other than they are. Moral nihilism challenges that assumption by rejecting the concept of morality entirely. Subsequently, in United States v. Updated February 10, But Euthyphro can't say what that goal is. By using ThoughtCo, you accept our. Socrates flatters Euthyphro, suggesting that Euthyphro must be a great expert in religious matters if he is willing to prosecute his own father on so questionable a charge. Euthyphro's most important attempt to define holiness comes with his suggestion that what is holy is what is approved of by all the gods. Socratic problem Socratici viri. This is the kind of thing he understands and the ordinary Athenian does not. In the context of religious pluralism , strong relativism it also opens the possibility that different gods and different belief systems produce different but equally valid moral systems, which may apply only to adherents of those faiths. Moral relativism accepts the idea of morality, but asserts that there are multiple potential arbiters of moral truth. Mawson [19] though see below for complications. Mazdakism Mithraism Zoroastrianism Zurvanism. Given the knowledge that evolution has given us tendencies to be xenophobic and sexist it is mistaken to claim that evolution has only selected for objective morality as evidently it did not. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. This eliminates the need to decide whether God is either non-omniscient or arbitrary, and also eliminates the possibility of God as the source of morality. One problem remains for such views: if God's own essential goodness does not depend on divine commands, then on what does it depend? Rather, they create obligations only because of God's role as creator and sustainer and indeed owner of the universe, together with the necessary moral truth that we owe some limited consideration to benefactors and owners. ThoughtCo uses cookies to provide you with a great user experience. These competing resolutions represent different answers to a question similar to the original dilemma: "Is something inherently ethical or unethical, or is something ethical or unethical because a person or society says it is so? Here the restricted divine command theory is commonly combined with a view reminiscent of Plato: God is identical to the ultimate standard for goodness. His criticism is subtle but powerful. Yet Socrates argues that disputes would still arise — over just how much justification actually existed; hence, the same action could be pious and impious; again, Euthyphro's definition cannot be a definition of "piety". Ethik 3rd edition. At that juncture of their dialogue, Euthyphro does not understand what makes his definition of "piety" a circular argument; he agrees with Socrates that the gods like an action because it is pious. Philosophers of religion. But there remains the question whether it is good and just because God wills it or whether God wills it because it is good and just; in other words, whether justice and Goodness are arbitrary or whether they belong to the necessary and eternal truths about the nature of things. Part of a series on the. Impiety is failing to do this. De Veritate 24,3 ad 2. Socrates seeks a definition of "piety" that is a universal universally true , against which all actions can be measured to determine whether or not the actions are pious. It seems therefore that Euthyphro's third argument is flawed. As it will turn out, his life is on the line. Euthyphro's second definition: Piety is what is pleasing to the gods. If we say it's funny because people laugh at it, we're saying something rather strange. Socrates asks Euthyphro to offer him a definition of piety or holiness. Euthyphro 1st edition Reviews Download as PDF Printable version. That God is approved of by God? Leibniz stated, in Reflections on the Common Concept of Justice circa : "It is generally agreed that whatever God wills is good and just. Socrates' Objection : When pressed, this definition turns out to be just the third definition in disguise. Snaith , "is recognized by all as marking a considerable advance on all previous ideas," [] not least in its "special consideration for the poor and down-trodden. As Rogers puts it, "Anselm, like Augustine before him and Aquinas later, rejects both horns of the Euthyphro dilemma. Again, the Euthyphro dilemma is a false one; the third option that it fails to consider is that what is morally obligatory is what God commands in accordance with a non-arbitrary and unchanging standard of goodness that is not independent of Him By the time of Amos, however, such "primitive and immature notions" are a thing of the past Snaith , p. At that juncture of their dialogue, Euthyphro does not understand what makes his definition of "piety" a circular argument; he agrees with Socrates that the gods like an action because it is pious. He poses this question: Do the gods love piety because it is pious, or is it pious because the gods love it? If we say it's funny because people laugh at it, we're saying something rather strange. Quodlibeta 3. As philosopher and Anselm scholar Katherin A. Metaphysics Epistemology Logic Ethics Aesthetics. Rogers observes, many contemporary philosophers of religion suppose that there are true propositions which exist as platonic abstracta independently of God. Euthyphro dismisses the astonishment of Socrates, which confirms his overconfidence in his own critical judgment of matters religious and ethical. Rather, the gods love pious actions such as helping a stranger in need, because such actions have a certain intrinsic property, the property of being pious. What the Greeks thought of as ideas or abstractions, the Hebrews thought of as activities. Euthyphro concurs that he does indeed know all there is to be known about what is holy. Namespaces Article Talk. It can't be the sort of care a dog owner gives to its dog since that aims at improving the dog.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PLATO's SYMPOSIUM J
    50 ccn~ PLATO'S SYMPOSIUM j - - -- ________j e Library of Liberal Arts PLATO'S SYMPOSIUM Tran lated by BENJAMIN JOWETT With an Introduction by FULTON H. ANDERSON Professor of Philosophy, University of Toronto THE LIBERAL ARTS PRESS NEW YORK CONTENTS SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY .. .... ................................... ......... ... ........... 6 EDITOR'S INTRODUCTION ................... ............................................. 7 SYMPOSIUM APOLLODORUS 13 THE SPEECH OF PHAEDRUS ...... .......................... .......................... .. 19 THE SPEECH OF PAU ANIAS ................. ... ................................. ... .. 21 THE SPEECH OF ERYXIMACHUS 27 THE SPEECH OF ARISTOPHAN E .. ............................... .................. 30 THE SPEECH OF AGATHON ............ .............................................. .. 35 THE SPEECH OF SocRATES ................................ .. ................... ..... .. 39 THE SPEECH OF ALCIBIADES ................. ............... ... ........... ...... .... .. 55 8 PLATO INTROD CTION 9 crescendo, and culminates in the report by Socrates on wi dom and epistemology, upon all of which the Symposium ha bearing, learned from the "wi e" woman Diotima. are intertwined, we m ay set down briefly a few of the more general The dialogue i a "reported" one. Plato himself could not have principles which are to be found in it author's many-sided thought. been present at the original party. (What went on there was told The human soul, a cording to Plato, is es entially in motion. time and time again about Athens.) He was a mere boy when it It is li fe and the integration of living functions. A dead soul is a con­ took place. Nor could the narrator Apollodorus have been a guest; _lladiction in terms. Man throughout his whole nature is erotically he was too young at the time. The latter got his report from motivated. His "love" or desire i manifest in three mutually in­ Aristodemus, a guest at the banquet.
    [Show full text]
  • In Dialogue with the Greeks 1St Edition Kindle
    IN DIALOGUE WITH THE GREEKS 1ST EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Rush Rhees | 9781351964586 | | | | | In Dialogue with the Greeks 1st edition PDF Book Become an author Sign up as a reader Sign in. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Worlds Apart. This article needs additional citations for verification. Consequentialism Deontology Virtue. Ancient Philosophy. Notify us with 7 days of receiving, and we will offer a full refund without reservation! Kenklies, Karsten Minor wear and tears to head and foot of spine and some slight wear to spine edges. More information about this seller Contact this seller 8. Nabu Press, All Plato's writing, except for The Apology and the Letters, is in dialogue form. Social gadfly Socratic dialogue Socratic intellectualism Socratic irony Socratic method Socratic paradox Socratic questioning. Subjects; Plato. More information about this seller Contact this seller 1. I [69], , [1] o Vol. Plato wrote approximately 30 dialogues, in most of which Socrates is the main character. The translations of Meno, Laches and Euthydemus are included here for the first time. First Edition Thus. Wright, M. First Edition in this Format. Recco, Gregory and Eric Sanday eds. Socratic dialogue remained a popular format for expressing arguments and drawing literary portraits of those who espouse them. In some dialogues Plato's main character is not Socrates but someone from outside of Athens. Plato's Laws : Force and Truth in Politics. It is also said to be the longest day of the year, allowing for the densely packed twelve chapters. Details: Collation: Complete with all pages; 2 volumes o Vol. Cooper in Plato, Complete Works.
    [Show full text]
  • Agorapicbk-17.Pdf
    Excavations of the Athenian Agora Picture Book No. 17 Prepared by Mabel L. Lang Dedicated to Eugene Vanderpool o American School of Classical Studies at Athens ISBN 87661-617-1 Produced by the Meriden Gravure Company Meriden, Connecticut COVER: Bone figure of Socrates TITLE PAGE: Hemlock SOCRATES IN THE AGORA AMERICAN SCHOOL OF CLASSICAL STUDIES AT ATHENS PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY 1978 ‘Everything combines to make our knowledge of Socrates himself a subject of Socratic irony. The only thing we know definitely about him is that we know nothing.’ -L. Brunschvicg As FAR AS we know Socrates himselfwrote nothing, yet not only were his life and words given dramatic attention in his own time in the Clouds of Ar- istophanes, but they have also become the subject of many others’ writing in the centuries since his death. Fourth-century B.C. writers who had first-hand knowledge of him composed either dialogues in which he was the dominant figure (Plato and Aeschines) or memories of his teaching and activities (Xe- nophon). Later authors down even to the present day have written numerous biographies based on these early sources and considering this most protean of philosophers from every possible point of view except perhaps the topograph- ical one which is attempted here. Instead of putting Socrates in the context of 5th-century B.C. philosophy, politics, ethics or rhetoric, we shall look to find him in the material world and physical surroundings of his favorite stamping- grounds, the Athenian Agora. Just as ‘agora’ in its original sense meant ‘gathering place’ but came in time to mean ‘market place’, so the agora itself was originally a gathering place I.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historicity of Plato's Apology of Socrates
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Master's Theses Theses and Dissertations 1946 The Historicity of Plato's Apology of Socrates David J. Bowman Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses Part of the Classical Literature and Philology Commons Recommended Citation Bowman, David J., "The Historicity of Plato's Apology of Socrates" (1946). Master's Theses. 61. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/61 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1946 David J. Bowman !HE HISTORICITY OP PLATO'S APOLOGY OF SOCRATES BY DA.VID J. BOWJWf~ S.J• .l. !BESIS SUBMITTED Ilf PARTIAL FULFILIJIE.NT OF THB: R}gQUIRE'IIENTS POR THE DEGREE OF IIA.STER OF ARTS Ill LOYOLA UlfiVERSITY JULY 1946 -VI'fA. David J. Bowman; S.J•• was born in Oak Park, Ill1no1a, on Ma7 20, 1919. Atter b!a eleaentar7 education at Ascension School# in Oak Park, he attended LoJola AcademJ ot Chicago, graduat1DS .from. there in June, 1937. On September 1, 1937# he entered the Sacred Heart Novitiate ot the SocietJ ot Jesus at Milford~ Ohio. Por the tour Jear• he spent there, he was aoademicallJ connected with Xavier Univeraitr, Cincinnati, Ohio. In August ot 1941 he tranaterred to West Baden College o.f Lorol& Universit7, Obicago, and received the degree ot Bachelor o.f Arts with a major in Greek in Deo.aber, 1941.
    [Show full text]
  • The Prosecutors of Socrates and the Political Motive Theory
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 2-1981 The prosecutors of Socrates and the political motive theory Thomas Patrick Kelly Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Intellectual History Commons, and the Political History Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Kelly, Thomas Patrick, "The prosecutors of Socrates and the political motive theory" (1981). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 2692. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.2689 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Thomas Patrick Kelly for the Master of Arts in History presented February 26, 1981. Title: The Prosecutors of Socrates and The Political Motive Theory. APPROVED BY MEMBERS OF THE THESIS CO~rnITTEE: ~~varnos, Cha1rman Charles A. Le Guin Roderlc D1man This thesis presents a critical analysis of the histor- ical roles assigned to the prosecutors of Socrates by modern historians. Ancient sources relating to the trial and the principles involved, and modern renditions, especially those of John Burnet and A. E. Taylor, originators of the theory that the trial of Socrates was politically motivated, are critically 2 analyzed and examined. The thesis concludes that the political motive theory is not supported by the evidence on which it relies. THE PROSECUTORS OF SOCRATES AND THE POLITICAL MOTIVE THEORY by THOMAS PATRICK KELLY A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in HISTORY Portland State University 1981 TO THE OFFICE OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH: The members of the Committee approve the thesis of Thomas Patrick Kelly presented February 26, 1981.
    [Show full text]
  • Plato's Symposium: the Ethics of Desire
    Plato’s Symposium: The Ethics of Desire FRISBEE C. C. SHEFFIELD 1 Contents Introduction 1 1. Ero¯s and the Good Life 8 2. Socrates’ Speech: The Nature of Ero¯s 40 3. Socrates’ Speech: The Aim of Ero¯s 75 4. Socrates’ Speech: The Activity of Ero¯s 112 5. Socrates’ Speech: Concern for Others? 154 6. ‘Nothing to do with Human AVairs?’: Alcibiades’ Response to Socrates 183 7. Shadow Lovers: The Symposiasts and Socrates 207 Conclusion 225 Appendix : Socratic Psychology or Tripartition in the Symposium? 227 References 240 Index 249 Introduction In the Symposium Plato invites us to imagine the following scene: A pair of lovers are locked in an embrace and Hephaestus stands over them with his mending tools asking: ‘What is it that you human beings really want from each other?’ The lovers are puzzled, and he asks them again: ‘Is this your heart’s desire, for the two of you to become parts of the same whole, and never to separate, day or night? If that is your desire, I’d like to weld you together and join you into something whole, so that the two of you are made into one. Look at your love and see if this is what you desire: wouldn’t this be all that you want?’ No one, apparently, would think that mere sex is the reason each lover takes such deep joy in being with the other. The soul of each lover apparently longs for something else, but cannot say what it is. The beloved holds out the promise of something beyond itself, but that something lovers are unable to name.1 Hephaestus’ question is a pressing one.
    [Show full text]
  • Applying the Socratic Method to the Problem Solving Process
    American Journal of Business Education – August 2009 Volume 2, Number 5 Socratic Problem-Solving In The Business World Evan Peterson, University Of Detroit Mercy, USA ABSTRACT Accurate and effective decision-making is one of the most essential skills necessary for organizational success. The problem-solving process provides a systematic means of effectively recognizing, analyzing, and solving a dilemma. The key element in this process is critical analysis of the situation, which can be executed by a taking a Socratic approach to the situation. Applying the Socratic Method to the problem-solving model ensures a well-rounded and versatile analysis. Keywords: Problem-solving process, decision- making, critical analysis, Socratic Method INTRODUCTION he sheer complexity of today’s business organization is rivaled only by the complexity of the business environment in which it operates. The permutation of complexity and exacting time constraints companies and individuals face in making vital decisions involving thousands of people Tand millions of dollars can seem more daunting than storming the beaches of Normandy. However, all hope is not lost. The anxiety, along with the blood, sweat, and tears that come along with difficult decision-making can be reduced by having a clear, time-tested plan of attack that can be applied to the problem situation. The problem-solving model is one such plan of attack, for it provides a framework that an individual decision-maker or group of decision-makers can follow to reach a feasible solution to the problem. Situational analysis is the bread and butter of the problem-solving model, for it goes hand-in-hand with each step of the model.
    [Show full text]
  • Plato and Xenophon on the Different Reasons That Socrates Always Obeys the Law
    Plato and Xenophon on the Different Reasons that Socrates Always Obeys the Law Louis-André Dorion Plato and Xenophon agree that Socrates always obeys the law. In the Crito and the Memorabilia (4.4 and 4.6), we see that they also agree that Socrates gives reasons for his obedience to the law. Despite this common ground, Plato and Xenophon disagree about the reasons that justify obedience to the law, as can be shown by a comparative analysis of Plato and Xenophon on the important Socratic theme of obedience to the law. I intend to show, as I have done for other Socratic positions shared by Plato and Xenophon, that the Crito and the Memorabilia provide different reasons for holding the same Socratic position on obedience to the law. Although Plato’s Crito has been the subject of numer- ous studies and greater attention is now being paid to Xenophon’s Memorabilia 4.4,1 it appears that no one has yet attempted a comparative analysis of these two texts. However, I will not provide a new interpretation of the Crito. My aim is to compare the Memorabilia with the Crito in order to highlight what is unique to the argument of the Memorabilia and, consequently, to the argu- ment of the Crito as well. I will limit myself to the most noteworthy differences. The Context of the Discussion It is probably not a coincidence that Plato and Xenophon situate their respec- tive discussions of obedience to the law in an apologetic context. In the Crito, the immediate context is the prison where Socrates awaits the day of his execu- tion after his trial.
    [Show full text]
  • |||GET||| Euthyphro 1St Edition
    EUTHYPHRO 1ST EDITION DOWNLOAD FREE Plato | 9781605977409 | | | | | Euthyphro dilemma Tsedeq is something that happens here, and can be seen, and recognized, and known. Practical Ethics 3d ed. Related topics Criticism of religion Ethics in religion Exegesis Faith and rationality History of religions Religion and science Religious philosophy Theology. Roughly, it is the view that there are independent moral standards: some actions are right or wrong in themselves, independent of God's commands. Euthyphro's final suggestion is that holiness is a kind of trading with Euthyphro 1st edition gods, where we give them sacrifices and they grant our prayers. Socrates points out that if both options were true, they together would yield a vicious circle, with the gods loving the pious because it is the Euthyphro 1st edition, and the pious being the pious because the gods love it. Positions Aesthetics Formalism Institutionalism Aesthetic response. At this point the dilemma surfaces. Early life. Euthyphro's first definition of piety is what he is doing now, that is, prosecuting his father for manslaughter 5d. Clearly, the answer is again the latter, something becomes beloved when it is loved. Something is a meter long inasmuch as it is the same length as the standard meter bar, and likewise, something is good inasmuch as it approximates God. Essentialists apply labels to things because they possess certain essential qualities that make them what they are. Is something "beloved" in and of itself like being big or redor does it become beloved when it is loved by someone? Emrys Westacott is a professor Euthyphro 1st edition philosophy at Alfred University.
    [Show full text]
  • Participation and Predication in Plato's Middle Dialogues Author(S): R
    Participation and Predication in Plato's Middle Dialogues Author(s): R. E. Allen Source: The Philosophical Review, Vol. 69, No. 2, (Apr., 1960), pp. 147-164 Published by: Duke University Press on behalf of Philosophical Review Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2183501 Accessed: 10/08/2008 14:32 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=duke. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. http://www.jstor.org PARTICIPATION AND PREDICATION IN PLATO'S MIDDLE DIALOGUES* I PROPOSE in this paper to examine three closely related issues in the interpretation of Plato's middle dialogues: the nature of Forms, of participation, and of predication.
    [Show full text]
  • The Philosophic Life and Socratic Fatherhood in the Apology, the Crito, and the Phaedo
    Gib´on vol. IX (2011) pp. 35{50 c 2012 Ateneo de Naga University Regular Research Article ISSN 1655-7247 The Philosophic Life and Socratic Fatherhood in the Apology, the Crito, and the Phaedo Federico Jos´eT. Lagdameo Department of Philosophy Ateneo de Naga University Abstract Plato's depiction and defense of philosophy were linked to his de- piction and defense of Socrates' own life. Notably in the Early Dialogues which gave accounts of Socrates' trial and execution, Plato portrayed his mentor's life as the philosophic life which one ought to aspire for. Yet, Socrates' admission in the Apology and the Crito's reproof that the former had neglected his oikon or his household presented an image of Socrates that suggested that the paradigm of the philosophic life had been in fact remiss by being an absent father who failed to care for his own children. I indicate that this image of Socrates engendered questions and criticisms against the life devoted to philosophy, especially from those belonging to a family-centered cultural milieu such as the Philippines. I show that Socrates's fatherhood is one that prioritizes the care of the political community over that of his own family. Keywords: Plato, trial of Socrates, Early Dialogues, fatherhood, philo- sophic life From Plato we receive the notion that philosophy is not merely an activity, that it is not merely something that a man does. Philos- ophy is an ethos in which one's actions are derived ultimately from the soul's virtue. Philosophy, in other words, is a kind of life that is lived.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Did Xenophon Write a Symposium? Erotica Paideia and Logos Sokratikos*
    JOSÉ VELA TEJADA Why did Xenophon write a Symposium? Erotica paideia and logos Sokratikos* 1. Xenophon, Socrates and the logos Sokratikos Xenophon bequeathed a collection of works, with philosophical con- tent, grouped under the title of Socratica, whose composing was mainly in- spired by the leading role of Socrates, or, actually, by Xenophon’s under- standing of the Athenian master’s ideas. Therefore, the Socrates’ lifetime until his condemn, and his intellectual activity – matters that are less focused in his historical works – find a proper narrative vehicle in the Socratica, ac- cording to Xenophontean tendency to thematic specialization. The topic of this essay is the effect of Socratic spirit1, also ascertained in the pedagogic aim and in the ultimate search of the individual paradigm of the Xenophon’s historical works. Nevertheless, we should not insist – as in previous analyses – in estab- lishing the epistemological superiority that results from comparison with * This article was made under the general frame of the Research-Team Byblíon H 52 (Dirección General de Investigación, Innovación y Desarrollo, Consejería de Ciencia y Tec- nología, DGA, Spain). 1 We say spirit or influence because, although Xenophon informs us of personal rela- tionship with Socrates in Anabasis (III, 1, 5), this does not mean that he was member of the closest circle of Socrates’ disciples. In relation to that, WATERFIELD 2004, 79, considers Xe- nophon as a true Socratic for “he followed Socrates’ philosophy to the best of his ability”. H istorikαv I 2011 ISSN 2240-774X e-ISSN 2039-4985 81 José Vela Tejada Plato2. Sometimes it has been suggested that the Xenophontean profile of Socrates has a more accurate historical reliability than the Platonic one; however, we cannot prove any hypothesis neither in the historian nor in the philosopher3.
    [Show full text]