Book of Abstracts

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Book of Abstracts Current Ornithological Research in Ireland 5th Ornithological Research Conference University College Cork November 2008 It is five years since the fourth Conference on Ornithological Research in Ireland was held at University College Cork in November 2003. Since then a number of projects have been completed, others started and some long- term studies are ongoing. It is now appropriate to provide an up-to-date summary of our ornithological research activities. And so the fifth conference is being held at University College Cork on 15 November 2008. As before, all known workers in Irish ornithology, at the universities, institutes of technology, Government departments, conservation organisations, other NGOs and ecological/environment consultants were invited to submit abstracts ahead of this conference detailing their current research activities. This year the keynote address will be delivered by Dr. John Quinn from the Department of Zoology at the University of Oxford, England. The title of his presentation is "Predation Risk and Individual Behavioural Variation in Birds”. A total of 135 abstracts were received for this conference compared with 115 in 2003, 159 in 1997, 120 in 1992 and 98 in 1985. There has been a shift in the numbers and types of projects, with a growing trend of inter- university collaborations, and joint studies between universities and conservation organizations. There is also evidence of increased international collaboration with the universities and other groups in Europe. The studies have also changed from those describing occurrence and distribution to more detailed ecological studies of single species, in particular those under threat or of conservation concern, and studies of those species that interact with humans and their structures. A further point of note is the number of studies that link their work in a global context, reflecting the international importance of research in both Irish habitats and their birds. Organising Committee John O’Halloran, UCC Stephen Newton, BirdWatch Ireland Tom Kelly, UCC Sandra Irwin, UCC RESEARCH ABSTRACTS Peril in the uplands – will biodiversity dwindle as undergrazing increases? Anderson, R.M.,1 O’Halloran, J.2 & Emmerson, M.C.1,2 1 Environmental Research Institute, Lee Road, University College Cork, Cork 2 Department of Zoology, Ecology and Plant Science, University College Cork, Distillery Fields, North Mall, Cork Through changes in the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) a new threat to the uplands has emerged – undergrazing. Here we integrate empirical and theoretical approaches to study biodiversity change in upland ecosystems. We investigate biodiversity change among plants, invertebrates and birds across a range of farmland management regimes. Focusing on the birds, this study asks whether bird diversity, density, species richness and evenness differ between management states. Testing the effectiveness of agri-environment options for Yellowhammer Emberiza citronella in Northern Ireland Barnett, C.,1 McDevitt, A-M.,1 Morris, T.,2 Colhoun, K.,1 & Robinson, J.1 1 RSPB, Belvoir Park Forest, Belfast BT8 7QT 2 RSPB, The Lodge, Sandy, Bedfordshire SG19 2DL, UK The Yellowhammer was one of the most common birds in Britain and Ireland in the 19th century. The NI population is estimated at 5,000 pairs and is declining. In recognition of its unfavourable conservation status, the Yellowhammer is the subject of a Species Action Plan (SAP) in NI, published under the auspices of the NI Biodiversity Strategy, the target of which is to maintain the breeding population at 5000 pairs and by 2015 increase the population size to 11,400 breeding pairs. This project is the only Yellowhammer recovery project in the UK and Ireland. As agri-environment schemes in the wider countryside are seen as the primary mechanism for maintenance of the population, this project aims to investigate the effects of a good uptake of the ‘arable options’ available through the Department of Agricultural and Rural Development (DARD) Countryside Management Scheme (CMS), combined with good management advice, on the breeding Yellowhammer population. Since 2006 Yellowhammers have been monitored at 40 sites in their stronghold in east County Down. The approach compares bird occupancy at experimental (arable/mixed systems have added arable options to their CMS agreements and are being given continual advice by the Yellowhammer Project Officer; n=18) and control sites (arable/mixed farms not in CMS and are not implementing any management prescriptions for Yellowhammer, through the course of the project they will receive no advisory visits from the Project Officer; n=22). A baseline survey was carried out on all 40 farms in spring/summer 2006 a final follow up survey will be carried out in spring /summer 2010. All 18 experimental farms have added ‘summer insect-rich’ arable options to their agreements in 2006 and receive continued advice on the uptake and management of these and other seed-rich arable options available to them through CMS. Results from research carried out by RSPB on rough grass margins (RGMs; CMS arable option) in January 2007 showed that Yellowhammers and other seed-eaters were not using RGMs. It is thought that the margins are too dense for Yellowhammers and other passerines to forage in. We are testing the effectiveness of sward management (cutting/grazing) in opening up the swards in RGMs and increasing accessibility. Fifth Irish Ornithological Research Conference - 1 - Analyses of seabird and marine mammal monitoring for the Arklow Bank Offshore Wind Farm Barton, C.,1 Pollock, C.,1 & Harding, N.2 1 Cork Ecology, Long Strand, Castlefreke, Clonakilty, County Cork 2 Craigton Ecological Services, 48 Craigend Drive West, Milngavie, Glasgow, Scotland In August 2003, Airtricity and GE began the construction of an offshore wind farm on the Arklow Bank off County Wicklow. The Arklow Bank is a shallow undersea sand bank, approximately 26 km in length, between 8 and 13 km offshore. The first seven turbines were installed in 2003, and became operational in June 2004. Seabirds and marine mammal surveys commenced in 2000 using an adaptation of the standard Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) Seabirds at Sea survey method. Birds were counted using a 300m transect, and the snapshot method to assess densities for flying birds. The estimated height of flying birds was also recorded. Surveys were conducted along pre-determined transects at various distances from and parallel to the Arklow Bank, with the majority of birds recorded on the two transects on each side of the Bank. Surveys found that species such as Little Gull Hydrocoloeus minutus, Kittiwake Rissa tridactyla, Guillemot Uria aalge, Razorbill Alca torda and Common Gull Larus canus can occur in large numbers, while Red-throated Divers Gavia stellata occurred mainly during winter and spring. Highest bird densities occurred on the two survey legs nearest the Arklow Bank. Statistical analyses were conducted on all seven years of survey data, covering three years pre-construction baseline data, one year construction phase data, and three years of post-construction data, with 7 operational turbines. The analyses aimed to assess the impact of the installation of the turbines on the distribution and abundance of 12 key species. These were Red-throated Diver, Fulmar, Manx Shearwater Puffinus puffinus, Gannet Morus bassanus, Shag Phalacrocorax aristotelis, Little Gull, Kittiwake, Arctic Tern Sterna paradisaea, Common Tern Sterna hirundo, Guillemot, Razorbill and Harbour Porpoise Phoca vitulina. All statistical analyses were carried out using non-parametric permutation and bootstrapping techniques within the R statistical package. The main finding was that a strongly statistically significant decline (P=0.005) occurred in the numbers of Red- throated Divers on the outer Bank leg. This decline appeared to be strongly associated with the proximity of turbines. However, on the inner Bank leg, there was no evidence of a decline in Red-throated Divers numbers. The statistical analysis also found a weakly statistically significant decline (P=0.03) in Harbour Porpoise numbers on the inner Bank leg. However, there was no evidence that this decline was related to the proximity of the turbines. All the other key species showed no statistically significant declines following construction of the turbines. Interactions between Northern Gannets Morus bassanus and fisheries in the Celtic Sea: a multi-tool approach combining GIS, vessel monitoring data and stable isotopes Bearhop, S.,1 Votier, S.,2 Witt, M.,1 Inger, R.,1 Thompson, D.3 & Newton, J.4 1 Centre for Ecology and Conservation, School of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus. Penryn, Cornwall TR10 9EZ, UK 2 School of Biological Sciences, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, Devon PL4 8AA, UK 3 National Institute Water & Atmospheric Research, 301 Evans Bay Parade, Kilbirnie, Wellington, New Zealand 4 NERC Life Sciences Mass Spectrometry Facility, Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre, Rankine Avenue, East Kilbride G75 0QF, UK The Celtic sea is one of the most productive regions in Europe supporting several important fisheries. The region also supports some very large seabird communities and the large Gannet colony at Grassholm probably the most striking visual evidence of these. In conjunction with Gannet colonies in other parts of the North Atlantic, the numbers of birds at Grassholm have increased by over 70% in the last 40 years and this is at least in part thought
Recommended publications
  • Tymon Park Intergenerational Centre Development, Co. Dublin
    Tymon Park Intergenerational Centre Development, Co. Dublin Ecological Impact Assessment (Final) April 21 2021s0272 South Dublin County Council JBA Project Manager Patricia Byrne Block 660 Unit 8 The Plaza Greenogue Business Park Rathcoole, Dublin Revision History Revision Ref / Date Issued Amendments Issued to S3-P01 / 02-04-2021 Draft Report South Dublin County Council A3-C01 / 14-04-2021 Final Report South Dublin County Council A3-C02 / 16-04-2021 Amendments following South Dublin County Council review Contract This report describes work commissioned by South Dublin County Council, by an email dated 19/02/2021. William Mulville, Malin Lundberg and Mark Desmond of JBA Consulting carried out this work. Prepared by .................................................. Malin Lundberg BSc (Hons), MSc Ecologist William Mulville BSc (Hons), MSc, ACIEEM Ecologist Mark Desmond BSc (Hons) MSc Assistant Ecologist Reviewed by ................................................. Patricia Byrne BSc (Hons), PhD, MCIEEM Senior Ecologist Purpose This document has been prepared as a Final Report for South Dublin County Council. JBA Consulting accepts no responsibility or liability for any use that is made of this document other than by the Client for the purposes for which it was originally commissioned and prepared. JBA Consulting has no liability regarding the use of this report except to South Dublin County Council. Copyright © JBA Consulting Engineers and Scientists Limited 2021 Carbon Footprint A printed copy of the main text in this document will result in a carbon footprint of 247g if 100% post- consumer recycled paper is used and 315g if primary-source paper is used. These figures assume the report is printed in black and white on A4 paper and in duplex.
    [Show full text]
  • Information on Areas of Scientific Interest in an Foras Forbartha Files
    J Information on Areas of Scientific Interest in An Foras Forbartha files A Catalogue Prepared for National Parks & Wildlife Service Office of Public Works Roger Goodwillie 1992 A -, C, = p = ci INTRODUCTION This report is written under the terms of a contract(K/4/2/28) with the National Parks & Wildlife Service to catalogue theold I files of An Foras Forbartha and extract information relevant to ASI's. Some more recent documents are also included. Notes on format: 1. Counties are dealt with in alphabetical order 2. As far as possible entries are arranged chronologically though the actual files are not always so organised. 3. Reports are underlined and referred to by month/year, I 4. Letters by day/month/year, 5. Miscellaneous pages by year if possible. I 6. CAAS (Environmental Services) Ltd and other work from 1989 onwards by file no.(e.g. 56/91) or month/year 7. Existing *ASI's have an asterisk where mentioned 8. Maps or other data bound with this report areindicated # and are placed in county order at the back 9. Content or other comments are [enclosed in brackets] 1 Location of material: I All items mentioned are in the ERU, St Martin's House,in 11 <8 Merrion Square> or in IKilkennyl I 1 L 0 CARLOW Nothing seems to exist about this county that is anywayrelevant to ASI's except one letter to Evelyn Booth. There aremany town planning studies about shopfronts, villages, planning applications 11 but nothing about how the list of sites was establishedor about problems related to any of them since.
    [Show full text]
  • South Dublin Bay and River Tolka Estuary Special Protection Area (Site Code 4024)
    North Bull Island Special Protection Area (Site Code 4006) & South Dublin Bay and River Tolka Estuary Special Protection Area (Site Code 4024) ≡ Conservation Objectives Supporting Document VERSION 1 National Parks & Wildlife Service October 2014 T AB L E O F C O N T E N T S SUMMARY PART ONE - INTRODUCTION ..................................................................... 1 1.1 Introductiion to the desiignatiion of Speciiall Protectiion Areas ........................................... 1 1.2 Introductiion to North Bullll Islland and South Dublliin Bay and Riiver Tollka Estuary Speciiall Protectiion Areas .................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Introductiion to Conservatiion Objjectiives........................................................................ 3 PART TWO – SITE DESIGNATION INFORMATION .................................................................... 5 2.1 Speciiall Conservatiion Interests of North Bullll Islland Speciiall Protectiion Area.................. 5 2.2 Speciiall Conservatiion Interests of South Dublliin Bay and Riiver Tollka Estuary Speciiall Protectiion Area .................................................................................................................. 8 PART THREE – CONSERVATION OBJECTIVES FOR NORTH BULL ISLAND SPA AND SOUTH DUBLIN BAY AND RIVER TOLKA ESTUARY SPA ....................................................... 11 3.1 Conservatiion Objjectiives for the non-breediing Speciiall Conservatiion Interests of North Bullll
    [Show full text]
  • 5.2 Flora and Fauna
    PROPOSED CRUISE BERTH FACILITY, DUN LAOGHAIRE HARBOUR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR DUN LAOGHAIRE HARBOUR COMPANY 5.2 Flora and Fauna 5.2.1 Marine Ecology 5.2.1.1 Introduction BEC Consultants Ltd was commissioned by Scott Cawley to carry out a marine Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA) in relation to the construction and operation of a proposed berth for cruise liners in Dún Laoghaire Harbour, Co. Dublin. The aim of this section is to describe the existing environment in Dún Laoghaire Harbour and surrounds in terms of its marine ecology, as well as describe the potential impacts of the proposed projects along with recommended mitigation measures. A separate Natura Impact Statement was prepared to inform the Appropriate Assessment process and to fulfil the requirements of Article 6(3) of the Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC). 5.2.1.2 Methodology 5.2.1.2.1 Study area The study area was Dún Laoghaire Harbour, Co. Dublin and the surrounding waters. The location of the benthic sample stations are illustrated in Figure 5.2.1.1 STEPHEN LITTLE AND ASSOCIATES JUNE 2015 5.2.1 PROPOSED CRUISE BERTH FACILITY, DUN LAOGHAIRE HARBOUR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR DUN LAOGHAIRE HARBOUR COMPANY Figure 5.2.1.1 Study Area showing location of Dún Laoghaire Harbour and benthic sample stations. 5.2.1.2.2 Desk study A desk study was carried out to gather existing information on the marine ecology of the study areas, including benthic ecology, fish and marine mammals. This desk study included a review of the National Parks & Wildlife Service (NPWS) mapping tool, a review of reports and data published by the NPWS, a review of data held on the Irish Whale and Dolphin Group (IWDG) website, and a general literature review of the scientific literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents Executive Summary
    Dublin Bay Birds Project, 2013-2016 Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 2 1. Purpose ........................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Core work programme .................................................................................................................. 3 2. Dublin Bay ....................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Site importance and protection .................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Regional importance of Dublin Bay .............................................................................................. 9 2.2.1 North Bull Island and Dollymount Strand .............................................................................. 9 2.2.2 Tolka Estuary, Liffey Channel and Dublin Port ..................................................................... 14 2.2.3 Sandymount Strand and Booterstown Marsh ..................................................................... 24 2.2.4 Coastal grasslands ................................................................................................................ 29 3. Selected species and species research ......................................................................................... 32
    [Show full text]
  • Booterstown Marsh and Beach
    Booterstown Marsh and Beach Biodiversity Education Programme An action of Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown Biodiversity Plan 2009-2013 Copyright: Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown County Council All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilised in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording or otherwise without prior written permission. Design and production: Concept 2 Print Illustrations: Naomi Mc Bride Content: Irish Widlife Trust Editing: Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown County Council Proofreading: Therese Carrick Foreward Contents Biodiversity includes all living things from the tiniest micro-organisms to the largest whales in the sea. The relationship between plants and animals and their surroundings create the environment in which we live, and they are an essential component of our daily lives. With the dazzling technology and busy nature of modern life it is easy to become disconnected from nature and to lose sight of how heavily we rely on our natural environment. We forget that trees and other plants provide us with oxygen, food, fuel, medicines and much, much more! 1 Introduction 4 Playing and relaxing in natural surroundings benefits our health and contributes to a greater sense of wellbeing. 2 Map of Booterstown Marsh 5 Our parks and wild areas provide us with the space to play and have fun. These areas also provide 3 Booterstown Marsh and Beach nature trail 6 homes and habitats for biodiversity. It is important that we share these places with biodiversity 4 Biodiversity information sheet 11 and allow space for wild plants and animals to live and thrive. 5 Teachers’ instructions 12 The Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown Biodiversity Education Programme is intended to increase 6 Student activity sheets 22 children’s awareness of the local environment, encouraging them to learn about and experience nature in stimulating and creative ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Fa-File-Pdf 160819 AA-Screen-Castletymon
    South Dublin County Habitats Directive Assessment Screening of the Draft Castletymon Library Project for Appropriate Assessment in accordance with the requirements of Article 6(3) of the EU Habitats Directive August 2016 CONTENTS SECTION 1 CONTEXT 1.1 Introduction . 4 1.2 Methodology . 4 SECTION 2 SCREENING MATRIX 2.1 Description of Plan . 7 2.1.1 Context . 7 2.1.2 Location of Project lands . 8 2.1.3 Structure and Content of the Project Report. 10 2.1.4 Vision and Rationale for the Plan Lands . 11 2.2 Assessment of Relevance of Proposed Plan to Natura 2000 Sites . 12 2.3 Avoidance of Impacts . 14 2.4 Other Instruments Considered . 15 SECTION 3 DESCRIPTIONS OF NATURA 2000 SITES . 16 SECTION 4 ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL IMPACTS 4.1 Assessment of proposed LAP . 20 4.2 Cumulative Effects . 20 SECTION 5 CONCLUSIONS . 21 Appendix 1 Descriptions of Relevant Natura 2000 sites . Appendix 2 Relevance of Natura 2000 to the Castletymon Library Project lands . Appendix 3 Relevant County Development Plan Objectives . 3 SECTION 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION This document represents South Dublin County Council’s Appropriate Assessment (AA) Screening Report for the Castletymon Library Project in South Dublin County. This report has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Article 6(3) of the Habitats Directive (Directive 92/43/EEC). Council directive 92/43/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild flora and fauna – ‘The Habitats Directive’ was transposed into Irish law by the European Community (Natural Habitats) Regulations 1997 (S.I. No. 94/1997). Article 6 (3) of the ‘Habitats’ Directive 92/43/EEC states that; Any plan or project not directly connected with or necessary to the management of the site but likely to have a significant effect thereon, either individually or in combination with other plans or projects, shall be subject to appropriate assessment of its implications for the site in view of the sites conservation objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Sutton to Sandycove Promenade and Cycleway – Phase 2
    Dublin City Council and Dun Laoghaire Rathdown County Council Sutton to Sandycove Promenade and Cycleway – Phase 2 Preliminary Design Report Appendices March 2010 Dublin City Council and Dun Laoghaire Rathdown County Council S2S – Sutton to Sandycove Contents APPENDICES Appendix A – List of Consultations Appendix B – Preliminary Health and Safety Plan Appendix C – Ecology Report Appendix D – Site Investigations Appendix E – Photomontages Appendix F – Costs Appendix G – Sutton to Sandycove Merrion Gate – Feasibility Study January 2009 Dublin City Council and Dun Laoghaire Rathdown County Council S2S – Sutton to Sandycove Appendix A List of Consultations January 2009 LIST OF CONSULTATIONS Type Organisation Contact Address Phone/Fax/email Requirements Emergency Services Irish Coast Guard Claire O'Gorman Coast Guard Headquarters, Tel: 01 678 2000 Access information, safety requirements Dept of Transport, Fax: 01 678 3459 Leeson Lane, Dublin 2 Emergency Services Marine Rescue Captain Geoff Livingstone Marine Rescue Co-ordination Ctr. tel: 01 6783441 Access information, safety requirements Coast Guard Headquarters, Dept of Transport, Lesson Lane, Dublin 2 Emergency Services Harbour Police Gary Kelly, Superintendent of Ferry Terminal, Tel: 01 2808074 Access information, safety requirements Harbour Police Dun Laoghaire Harbour Company, Fax: 01 2808062 Dub Laoghaire. Emergency Services Irish Water Safety John Leech Irish Water Safety Tel: 091 534973 Edge treatments, emergency access, railings, wall Organisation The Long Walk [email protected] www.iws.ie
    [Show full text]
  • A Second Report on Areas of Scientific Interest in County Dublin
    A SECOND REPORT ON AREAS OFSCIENTIFIC INTEREST IN COUNTY DUBLIN Prepared for Dublin County Council NOVEMBER 1988 Roger Goodwillie Eanna Ni Lamhna R Webb i 1 1 1 1 Page No t A Preface 1 1 B Introduction - Conservation in County Dublin 2 C Vulnerability of Natural Areas 7 1 D Rating of Areas of Scientific Importance 9 1 E Detailed Reports on Areas 11 1 Ballybetagh Bog 12 I 2 Dublin Bay 15 Dublin Bay A - Bull Island 17 Dublin Bay B - Sandymount Strand 25 I Dublin Bay C - Booterstown Marsh 27 3 Dalkey Coastal Zone 31 4 Howth and Ireland's Eye 36 5 Lambay Island 44 6 Malahide A - Malahide Island 48 Malahide B - Malahide/Swords Estuary 52 7 Portmarnock - Malahide Coast 56 8 Rockabill Island 59 9 Shanaganah 62 10 Skerries - Rush Coast Skerries - Loughshinny 65 Rush 68 11 ClondalkinQuarries 71 12 Curkeen Quarry 74 13 Glenasmole Valley 77 14 Killiney Hill and Shore 82 15 Newlands Cross 88 16 Portmarnock Dunes/Baldoyle Estate 90 17 Portraine Inlier 94 18 Rogerstown Estuary 98 19 Royal and Grand Canals 104 20 The Scalp 108 21 Skerries Islands Shenicks, St Patrick's, Colt 110 22 Balrothery Lake 113 23 Bog of the Ring 116 24 The Dingle Glen 120 25 Dodder Valley 123 26 Feltrim Hill 126 27 Loughlinstown Woods 129 28 Lucan Outcrop 132 29 Lugmore Glen 134 30 Luttrelstown Woodlands 135 31 Saggart Slade 141 32 Rush Sandhills 144 33 St Catherine's Wood 147 APPENDIX I 149 APPENDIX 11 155 1 FOREWORD This report is a revision of the original 'Preliminary Report 1 on Areas of Scientific Interest in County Dublin' (January 1973).
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Environmental Assessment Final Environmental Report
    A vibrant community offering a new way of living CLONBURRIS SDZ PLANNING SCHEME STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT June 2018 __________________________________________________________________________________ Contents 1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Scale, nature and location of development ..................................................................................... 1 1.3 SEA Environmental Report ............................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Report Preparation .......................................................................................................................... 5 2.0 Methodology ........................................................................................................................................ 6 2.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Stages in the SEA Process ................................................................................................................. 6 2.2.2 Scoping .......................................................................................................................................... 7 2.3 Baseline Data ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • City of Dublin and Necessary for Our Health and Survival
    Dublin City Biodiversity Action Plan 2008 – 2012 An Action of the Dublin City Heritage Plan 2002 – 2006 and an Objective of the Dublin City Development Plan 2005 – 2011 Dublin City Biodiversity Action Plan 2008 – 2012 An Action of the Dublin City Heritage Plan 2002 – 2006 and an Objective of the Dublin City Development Plan 2005 – 2011 Funding partners Dublin City Council wishes to acknowledge the role of the Heritage Council in initiating the Dublin City Biodiversity Action Plan in association with Dublin City Council. In particular, Dublin City Council acknowledges the support of the Heritage Council through its joint funding of the Biodiversity Officer post, and the provision of 37,500 for the implementation of the Biodiversity Action Plan in 2007. Publication compiled and edited by Dublin City Biodiversity Officer, Mairéad Stack and Siobhán Egan (ex-Biodiversity Officer), Donncha Ó Dúlaing, Dublin City Heritage Officer and steering group members. Publication designed and produced by Environmental Publications. For more information contact [email protected] or visit Biodiversity on the Dublin City Council website at www.dublincity.ie. This document is available in Irish. © Dublin City Council, 2008 Right: Brent Geese feeding on Sandymount sand and mud flats. (Photo: Anthony Woods) Page 4: Overview of Dublin City. (Photo: Dublin City Parks Department) Table of Contents Page 1 Lord Mayor’s address 5 2 The City Manager’s address 7 3 Introduction – Biodiversity: the variety of life 9 What is biodiversity? 9 Why is biodiversity
    [Show full text]
  • Human Beings: Socio-Economics
    Human Beings: Socio-economics Human Beings: Human Beings: 11 Socio-economics 11.1 Introduction 11.2 Baseline categorisation methodology 11.2.1 Introduction 11.2.2 Study area 11.2.3 Baseline data 11.2.4 Baseline categorisation criteria 11.3 Description of the existing environment 11.3.1 Primary study area 11.3.2 Primary study area summary 11.3.3 Secondary study area 11.4 Do minimum scenario Human Beings: Socio-economics Human Beings: Section 39(2)(b) of the Railway Infrastructure Act, 2001 specifies that an environmental impact statement must contain a description of the aspects of the environment that are likely to be significantly affected by the proposed scheme. This chapter of the EIS has been prepared in order to fulfil this requirement with respect to socio-economic factors affecting human beings. 11.1 Introduction 11.2 Baseline categorisation methodologY This chapter describes and evaluates the existing socio-economic environment in the area of the proposed scheme. 11.2.1 Introduction Prior to preparing this chapter, a review of relevant According to the EPA‘s Guidelines on the planning and policy documents was undertaken Information to be contained in Environmental in order to identify relevant objectives relating to Impact Statements (2002), economic activity, the socio-economic environment affecting human social patterns and employment should be beings in the area of the proposed scheme. This task assessed in the Environmental Impact Assessment included a review of the following policy documents: (EIA) under the heading of ‘Human Beings’: This chapter addresses all of these issues. - National Development Plan 2007 – 2013; - National Action Plan for Social Inclusion 11.2.2 Study area 2007-2016: Building an Inclusive Society (NAP); The impacts of the proposed scheme will be felt - Regional Planning Guidelines for the over a wide area.
    [Show full text]