DOCSLIB.ORG

Submission to the Select Committee on Lending to Primary Production Customers Department of the Senate, PO Box 6100 Parliament H

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Submission to the Select Committee on Lending to Primary Production Customers Department of the Senate, PO Box 6100 Parliament H Submission to the Select Committee on Lending to Primary Production Customers Department of the Senate, PO Box 6100 Parliament House, Canberra ACT 2600 [email protected] May 19, 2017 Chairman and members of the Committee, thank you for this opportunity to submit written materials in reference to your inquiry. I am a former civil litigation attorney living in Los Angeles, California, USA, and the founder of the Public Banking Institute, a non-profit research and educational organization that promotes public-interest banking and monetary reform. I am also the author of 12 books, including Web of Debt: The Shocking Truth About Our Money System and How We Can Break Free and The Public Bank Solution. I have written over 300 articles concerning monetary matters and public banking, available at http://webofdebt.wordpress.com. I wrote a chapter in The Public Bank Solution on the Commonwealth Bank of Australia, which in its early years was a remarkable example of a national bank using the power of banks to issue credit for the benefit of the nation and the economy, a power that later got usurped by a private international banking cartel. (Excerpts from that book chapter are appended below.) It is now widely acknowledged that banks, not governments, create the majority of the money supply. It is submitted that Australia would be well served to restore its earlier ground-breaking model of a truly public central bank, one dedicated to serving the interests of the economy and the people. Provincial governments could also reclaim the power to create credit for the benefit of their local economies, by establishing publicly-owned banks on the model of the Bank of North Dakota, discussed below. Economists even at the Bank of England and the Bundesbank now acknowledge that the money banks lend is simply created as accounting entries on their books. In a widely-noticed March 2014 paper entitled Money Creation in the Modern Economy, economists at the Bank of England wrote: The reality of how money is created today differs from the description found in some economics textbooks: Rather than banks receiving deposits when households save and then lending them out, bank lending creates deposits . Whenever a bank makes a loan, it simultaneously creates a matching deposit in the borrower’s bank account, thereby creating new money.1 [emphasis added.] This was also acknowledged by the Bundesbank in an April 2017 report. The English-translation summary states: In terms of volume, the majority of the money supply is made up of book money, which is created through transactions between banks and domestic customers. [B]anks can create book money just by making an accounting entry: according to the Bundesbank's economists, “this refutes a popular misconception that banks act simply as intermediaries at the time of lending – ie that banks can only grant credit using funds placed with them previously as deposits by other customers.”2 In a January 2017 report by the New Economics Foundation (NEF) and Copenhagen Business School titled “Making Money from Making Money,” the researchers conclude that 73 percent of banks’ profits come from “seigniorage” – the profits generated through the creation of money itself. This is a huge drain on the economy. The hole could be plugged by returning the power to create money to the national government (which can issue the national currency directly) or to local governments (by forming their own banks, which can issue money on their books as all banks do). The NEF abstract states: There is now widespread acceptance that in modern economies, commercial banks, rather than the central bank or state, create the majority of the money supply. We show that in the UK, commercial bank seigniorage profits amount to a hidden annual subsidy of £23 billion, representing 73% of banks’ profits after provisions and taxes. In modern economies, such as the UK, . , money in circulation created by the state – physical cash – only represents around 3% of the total money supply. The remaining 97% is lent in to economies as the digital IOUs of commercial banks – the deposits that are entered in to our bank accounts when banks make new loans. [B]anks, unlike other financial intermediaries . , do not have to acquire funds in the first instance before making loans. This is because banks’ IOUs – bank deposits – have been privileged by the state as having the status of money which people must hold to make payments in the economy. The findings suggest that a large proportion of banks’ profits are underpinned by their control over the money supply, an essential piece of public infrastructure. A number of economists and civil society groups have argued that the central bank should create a higher proportion – or all – of the money supply. Commercial banks might argue that reductions in their seigniorage profits would lead them to contract their lending or charge higher interest rates. However, most bank lending in advanced economies flows in to commercial and domestic property and other financial assets rather than to businesses. Seigniorage profits could be seen as another form of public subsidy for the banking sector, supporting excessive pay and non-value-creating lending that contributes to rising house price and financial-asset prices.3 Recapturing the seigniorage for the benefit of the public would not only return massive profits to the government that could be used to increase services, build infrastructure, or cut taxes, but would allow lending to be channeled into those sectors of the economy where goods and services are produced and jobs are created. This could be done not just at the federal but at the local level. The stellar (and only) model of a publicly-owned depository bank that does this in the United States is the Bank of North Dakota (BND). It holds all of its home state’s revenues as deposits by law, acting as a sort of “mini-Fed” for North Dakota. According to reports, the BND is more profitable even than Goldman Sachs, has a better credit rating than J.P. Morgan Chase, and has seen solid profit growth for almost 15 years.4 The BND continued to report record profits after two years of oil bust in the state, suggesting that it is highly profitable on its own merits because of its business model.5 The BND does not pay bonuses, fees, or commissions; has no high paid executives; does not speculate on risky derivatives; does not have multiple branches; does not need to advertise; and does not have private shareholders seeking short-term profits. The profits return to the bank, which distributes them as dividends to the state. Interestingly, the goal of the BND is not actually to make a profit. It was formed in 1919 to free farmers and small businessmen from the clutches of out-of-state bankers and railroad men. Its stated mission is to deliver sound financial services that promote agriculture, commerce and industry in North Dakota. As noted in a November 2014 Wall Street Journal article: It traditionally extends credit, or invests directly, in areas other lenders shun, such as rural housing loans. [R]etail banking accounts for just 2%-3% of its business. The bank’s focus is providing loans to students and extending credit to companies in North Dakota, often in partnership with smaller community banks. Bank of North Dakota also acts as a clearinghouse for interbank transactions in the state by settling checks and distributing coins and currency. The bank’s mission is promoting economic development, not competing with private banks. “We’re a state agency and profit maximization isn’t what drives us,” President Eric Hardmeyer said.6 The BND passes its savings on to the community. In 2015, the North Dakota legislature established a BND Infrastructure Loan Fund program that made $50 million in funds available to communities with a population of less than 2000, and $100 million available to communities with a population greater than 2000. These loans have a 2 percent fixed interest rate and a term of up to 30 years.7 Compare that to a taxable rate on infrastructure bonds of 4 to 6 percent or more in other states.8 Moreover, the 2 percent interest the BND collects goes back to the state, so it’s a win-win-win for local residents. The proceeds of these 2 percent loans can be used for the new construction of water and treatment plants, sewer and water lines, transportation infrastructure and other infrastructure needs to support new growth in a community. The BND also has a loan program called Flex PACE, which allows local communities to provide assistance to borrowers in areas of jobs retention, technology creation, retail, small business, and essential community services.9 For more on all these issues, please see my website at http://WebofDebt.wordpress.com. Respectfully submitted, Ellen Brown Public Banking Institute http://PublicBankingInstitute.org _______________________________________________________________ Appendix: Excerpt from The Public Bank Solution on The Commonwealth Bank of Australia A much larger experiment in funding infrastructure and industry with “national credit” was conducted in Australia in the early 20th century. In 1912, a year before the Federal Reserve Act was passed in the US, the Australian government also established a central bank; but its bank was publicly owned and controlled. Australia, like the US, had suffered a devastating bank-induced depression in the 1890s. The private banking system having failed, the Labor Party decided that Australia needed a publicly- owned national bank backed by the assets of the government, one that could maintain the banking system in times of financial stress and guarantee that money could be found for home building and other needs.10 In 1911, the Labor government passed a bill establishing a national central bank on a radical new model: the bank would simply lend the nation’s credit, unbacked by either silver or gold.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Story of the Commonwealth Bank by D.J
    The Story of the Commonwealth Bank By D.J. AMOS, F.C.I.S. VERITAS PUBLISHING COMPANY PTY LTD Printed and Published by Veritas Publishing Company Pty., Ltd., P.O. Box 1334, Midland, DC. Western Australia, 6936. Tel/Fax +61 8 9574 6042 ISBN 0-9594631-6-X Copyright (c) D.J. AMOS, F.C.I.S. 1986 Third reprint 2009 This booklet is downloaded from www.socialcredit.com.au downloaded from www.socialcredit.com page 1 “The Commonwealth Stories” No. 1. The Story of the Commonwealth Bank. No.2. The Story of the Commonwealth Fleet (of Steamers). No.3. The Story of the Commonwealth Railway and the Note Issue. No.4. The Story of the Commonwealth Woollen Mills. No.5. The Story of the Commonwealth Oil Refineries and the Search for Oil. No.6. The Story of the Commonwealth Wireless Service. downloaded from www.socialcredit.com page 2 Lament of the Commonwealth Bank A hand-maiden, where once I ruled A Queen from sea to sea! No task too vile to set me to, Who strove to make you free. God! Did I once stand upright from My frightful servitude, And wear upon my beaten brow The crown of nationhood? As in a dream I see them pass, My deeds of long ago, My bright Homes, filled with happiness, In peace and comfort glow. My Credit flows in running streams To help you in your need; It saves you from the usurer’s grip, And private banker’s greed. When Ruin turns his grim face on Your primal industries, My ships steam swift, and carry forth Your produce overseas.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Management Plan
    CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN UNSW Cliffbrook Campus 45-51 Beach Street, Coogee Cliffbrook, eastern elevation, November 2016 Level 19 100 William Street Sydney NSW 2011 (02) 8076 5317 May 2017 0.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 0.1 Introduction This Conservation Management Plan (CMP) for the UNSW Cliffbrook Campus, No. 45-51 Beach Street, Coogee, New South Wales, has been prepared at the request of the University of New South Wales. The Campus is located within the Municipality of Randwick. Part of the Campus is listed on the State Heritage Register under the auspices of the NSW Heritage Act 1977. The same area of the Campus is listed as a heritage item by Schedule 5 Part 1 of the Randwick Local Environmental Plan 2012 (Randwick LEP 2012). This CMP is concerned with the heritage listed area of the Campus only, referred to as the Study Area. This CMP has been prepared to guide proposed new works on the site. 0.2 Objectives The brief required the preparation of a CMP for the Study Area following NSW Heritage Division guidelines. 0.3 Authorship This CMP has been prepared by Alice Fuller, B. Appl. Sc. (CCM), M.Herit.Cons. (Hons), and James Phillips, B.Sc. (Arch.), B. Arch, M.Herit.Cons. (Hons), of Weir Phillips Heritage. 0.4 Summary History At the heart of the Campus lies a building known as Cliffbrook, a dwelling erected for Sir Dennis Miller, first Governor of the Commonwealth Bank of Australia, in c.1922. This Cliffbrook was the second dwelling of this name to be erected within the immediate area.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Paper
    Working Paper Latin American Experiments in Central Banking at the Onset of the Great Depression FLORES ZENDEJAS, Juan, NODARI, Gianandrea Abstract This chapter analyzes the role of central banks during the first years of the Great Depression. The literature has focused on central banks' loss of autonomy and on the implementation of innovative, countercyclical monetary policies which fostered economic recovery but also led to higher rates of inflation and exchange rate volatility. However, we show that these kinds of policies had been foreseen by foreign advisors before and during the crisis. Policymakers had been reluctant to implement them due to the fear of a loss of credibility for the gold standard regime. Furthermore, we show that in most cases this shift was short-lived and central banks could avert, to a large extent, the problem of fiscal dominance. Central banks became effective actors, channeling credit to the real economy and also supporting the emergence of state institutions that would promote the development of local industry. Reference FLORES ZENDEJAS, Juan, NODARI, Gianandrea. Latin American Experiments in Central Banking at the Onset of the Great Depression. Geneva : Paul Bairoch Institute of Economic History, 2021, 32 p. Available at: http://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:152742 Disclaimer: layout of this document may differ from the published version. 1 / 1 FACULTÉ DES SCIENCES DE LA SOCIÉTÉ Paul Bairoch Institute of Economic History Economic History Working Papers | No. 4/2021 Latin American Experiments in Central Banking at the Onset of the Great Depression Juan Flores Zendejas Gianandrea Nodari Paul Bairoch Institute of Economic History, University of Geneva, UniMail, bd du Pont-d'Arve 40, CH- 1211 Genève 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Arthur Nelson Field (1882-1963), All These Things (1936)
    Arthur Nelson Field (1882-1963), All These Things (1936) All These Things ALL THESE Chapter 1 Chapter 2 THINGS Chapter 3 Chapter 4 By Chapter 5 Chapter 6 A. N. FIELD Chapter 7 Chapter 8 Chapter 9 Chapter 10 Chapter 11 Arthur Nelson FIELD Chapter 12 P.O. BOX 154, NELSON, NEW ZEALAND 1936 Further copies of this book can be obtained from A.N. Field, P.O. Box 154, Nelson, New Zealand; price 6s. (post free, if ordered direct); also supplied in cloth, 8s. 6d. (postage N.Z. 6d., abroad, 9d.). Other publications by the same author are :— The Truth about the Slump, 4s. Stabilised Money, 1s. 6d. The World's Conundrum, (Protocols with 27 pp. introduction), 1s. 6d. All post free if ordered direct. _______________________ This text was scanned and prepared for posting by Jamie [email protected] PREFACE http://yamaguchy.netfirms.com/field_an/field_index.html (1 of 3)5.4.2006 10:34:11 Arthur Nelson Field (1882-1963), All These Things (1936) THIS book is an assemblage of matter from many different sources exhibiting the nature and interconnection of certain world forces operating in many lands and making for the overthrow of the existing social order and the disintegration of patriotism, religion, and morality. These influences are felt almost every day by every intelligent person. It is commonly assumed that the changes in opinion, conduct, and institutions which are taking place are, on the whole, changes for the better: that they represent progress and evolution from a lower to a higher and freer form of life.
    [Show full text]
  • Keynes and Australia
    KEYNES AND AUSTRALIA Donald J Markwell Research Discussion Paper 2000-04 June 2000 Research Department, Reserve Bank of Australia, and New College, Oxford Reserve Bank of Australia A paper presented at a seminar at the Reserve Bank of Australia on 18 September 1985. Foreword This paper concerns itself with the various interactions between John Maynard Keynes and Australia. An unlikely topic perhaps, but the result is a gem – a paper that provides a fascinating insight into that period of huge economic and social turmoil from the end of World War I to just after World War II, when Keynes died. There is a broad sweep of topics here – from Keynes’s dealings with the Australian Prime Minister, William Morris Hughes, over demands for reparations against Germany after World War I, to Keynes’s opinions and influence on the handling of the Depression in Australia, to the early impact of Keynesian ideas in Australia, to Australia’s approach to the creation of the International Monetary Fund and World Bank, of which Keynes was co-founder. The paper was presented at a seminar at the Reserve Bank fifteen years ago. It is being released now as a Research Discussion Paper, after a rather longer delay than usual, to make it available to a wide readership. Happy reading. David Gruen Head of Economic Research Department May 2000 I am grateful to the Economic Research Department for their recovery of this paper, and for allowing it to see the light of day. Fifteen years on, it would be written in a different style – but I would not wish to alter any of its conclusions.
    [Show full text]
  • STOP the British Crown Plot to Crush Australia's Unions
    Letter of Transmittal Dear Fellow Citizen, Excepting the special case of World War II, when our entire nation was in mortal peril, the Australian labour movement today faces the worst threat to its existence since the fi erce onslaughts of the early 1890s, when troops were deployed to crush the shearers and dockers. Then, British fi nance caused a depression by pulling its funds out of Australia, which produced untold misery. Today, the same City of London circles have created a speculative bubble without precedent since the Lombard banks in Italy collapsed in the 1340s, and are at- tempting to keep that bubble afl oat for a few more weeks or months by savagely looting the labour force. However, that will not stop the collapse, one uniquely predicted by American statesman and physical economist Lyndon H. LaRouche, in his famous “Ninth Forecast” of June, 1994. Many scoffed at LaRouche when he forecast: “The presently existing global fi nancial and monetary system will disintegrate during the near term...That collapse into disintegration is inevitable, because it could not be stopped now by anything but the politically improbable decision by leading governments to put the relevant fi nancial and monetary institutions into bankruptcy reorganization.” After the “Asian meltdown” beginning July, 1997, very few are scoffi ng today, though many—including the Australian government—are hysterically trying to deny the much more devastating fi nancial storms still to come. On Christmas Day, December 25, 1997, LaRouche added the following to his earlier forecast: “Since late October, cascading explosions of a global systemic fi nancial crisis continue to grip this planet.
    [Show full text]
  • Communism and the Australian Labour Movement 1920-1955
    Robin Gollan RevolutionariesGollan • and ReformistsRobin Communism has played a central part in Australian political nightmares for over half a century. Yet it has received scant serious attention comparable in scope and perspec­ tive with this work. This book places the Communist Party of Australia firmly in its political context, national and international, from the 1920s to the mid-1950s. It is important in its in­ sights into the general history of Australian radicalism; its contribution to Australian history, especially labour history; and its placing of radical Australian history in a Communism and the Australian Labour world context. It is written from the per­ spective of one who joined the Communist Movement 1920-1955 Party of Australia because it seemed the only party 'committed to the struggle for socialism and against fascism' and who left it because Robin Gollan this 'no longer seemed the case'. Its breadth, perceptiveness, and understanding com­ mend it to all people concerned w ith the con­ tinuing political struggles of the Right, the Left, and the Centre. Robin Gollan RevolutionariesGollan • and ReformistsRobin Communism has played a central part in Australian political nightmares for over half a century. Yet it has received scant serious attention comparable in scope and perspec­ tive with this work. This book places the Communist Party of Australia firmly in its political context, national and international, from the 1920s to the mid-1950s. It is important in its in­ sights into the general history of Australian radicalism; its contribution to Australian history, especially labour history; and its placing of radical Australian history in a Communism and the Australian Labour world context.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Pigou- Mckenna School'?
    On Britain’s Return to the Gold Standard: was there a ‘ Pigou - McKenna School’ ? Rogério Arthmar and Michael McLure * Abstract: On 17 March 192 5, Britain’s Chancellor of the E xchequer, Winston Churchill, held what is now regarded as a famous dinner with Sir Reginald McKenna, John Maynard Keynes, Sir John Bradbury and Sir Otto Niemeyer to discuss the merits, or otherwise, of Britain returning to the gold standard . Following that dinner, it has become popular to refer to the ‘Keynes - McKenna school’, with those two men being characterised as the ‘antagonists’ to the proposal for Britain to return to gold . However, in light of A. C. Pigou’s reading of McKenna’s evidence to the 1924 - 25 Chambe rlain - Bradbury Committee, and Pigou’s September 1924 draft of that Committee’s report, it is evident that Pigou’s views on the subject largely align ed with those of McKenna. As a result, it is suggested in this paper that historical r eference to the ‘Pigou - McKenna s chool’ as a school of thought that was supportive of Britain returning to the gold standard in principle , but not supportive of doing so prematurely, is a meaningful notion – and perhaps more meaningful than reference to the ‘Keynes - McKenna schoo l’, which incorrectly implies that McKenna was opposed to Britain returning to the gold standard . For Presentation at HETSA 2015 1. Introduction In his volume of reminiscences entitled Prejudice and Judgement (1948), Sir P. J. Grigg carefully chronicled the discussion at Winston Churchill’s dinner on 17 March 1925 with Sir Reginald McKenna, John Maynard Keynes, Sir John Bradbury and Sir Otto Niemeyer .
    [Show full text]
  • The First Commonwealth Banknote
    Announcing the Auction of the first commonwealth banknote 23 march 2006 hotel intercontinental sydney australia NOBLE NUMISMATICS PTY LTD The first Commonwealth banknote Foreword We are immensely pleased to be offering Australia’s first Commonwealth banknote, Ten Shillings M000001, at our forthcoming auction 22-24 March 2006 in Sydney. The offering is unprecedented in Australian numismatic auction history and with a pre-sale estimate of $1.2 million the note is by far the most valuable of any Australian numismatic object offered at auction. For these reasons we decided to produce this special booklet in addition to our usual catalogue to explore and disseminate the history and importance of the note. For information on viewing the note or to arrange a confidential consultation please refer to the details on page 8. Thanking you for your attention, Jim Noble (Managing Director) ‘The time has arrived’ The origins of the first Commonwealth note issue can be found consultation with the banks raised unequivocal opposition. in the Australian Constitution, enacted at Westminster in 1900. It was the Labor Prime Minister, Andrew Fisher, who revived Section 51 (xii) granted parliament the power to legislate with the concept in a policy speech at Gympie, Queensland on 30 respect to ‘currency, coinage and legal tender’. March 1909 and reported in The Argus the following day. In his address Fisher declared ‘The time has arrived when the Support for Commonwealth Commonwealth should have a note issue of its own.’ paper currency began soon after federation. The existing To Fisher it was clear the young Commonwealth required a system of private bank and stable, unified federal paper currency to facilitate its economic Queensland Government growth.
    [Show full text]
  • The Official History of Australia in the War of 1914-1918 Volume Xi Australia During the War
    THE OFFICIAL HISTORY OF AUSTRALIA IN THE WAR OF 1914-1918 VOLUME XI AUSTRALIA DURING THE WAR AUSTRALIA DURING THE WAR BY ERNEST SCOTT Pmfcsor of Histow in the Vniwuty of Mdhe With 67 illustrations Sezientli Edition AUSTRALIA ANGUS AND ROBERTSON LTD. 09 CASTLEREACH STREET, SYDNEY 1941 Printed and Bcund in Australia by Halstead Press Pty Limited, 9-19 Nickson Street. Sydney. Registered at the General Post Office, Melbourne, for trana- mission through the post as a book. Obtainable in Great Britain at Australia House and from all booksellers (sole agent for wholesale distribution-The Official Secretary for the Commonwealth of Australia, Australia House, Strand, London, W C.2); in Canada from the Australian Trade Commissioner, 15 King Street West, Toronto: in the United States from the Australian Government Trade Commissioner, International Building, 630 Fifth Avenue, New York; and in New Zealand from the Australian Trade Commissioner, D.1 C. Building, Wellington. First Edtliott . , . 1936 Srroitd Edition . , 1937 Third Editioii . , . 1938 Foiirth Edition . 1939 Fifth Edition . 1939 Sixth Edition . 1940 Sewnth Edition . 1941 PREFACE THISbook is a member of a series recording the participation of the Commonwealth of Australia in the Great European War, but it differs from its companion volumes in scope and subject-matter. They are concerned with battles-in Egypt, Gallipoli, France, and Palestine; with the activities of the young Australian navy; with medical services; with the occupation of territory formerly under German government. Substantially the greater part of those works relates to what was done by Australian soldiers, sailors, medical officers, and administrators outside their own country, though on duties vitally affecting Australia and the Empire to which she belongs.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Bank Cooperation 1924-1931
    CENTRAL BANK COOPERATION 1924-31 STEPHEN V. O. CLARKE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis CENTRAL BANK COOPERATION: 1924-31 STEPHEN V. O. CLARKE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis To John Henry Williams Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Foreword HIS monograph is another in the series published by the Federal Reserve TBank of New York on monetary policy, institutions, and techniques. It deals with a segment of history that has special fascination for students of mone- tary affairs: the efforts of American, British, French, and German central bankers to reestablish and maintain international financial stability in 1924-31 and the frustration of those efforts during the financial crisis at the end of that period. This is a story whose broad outlines are familiar, but the author has used the historical records of this Bank and unpublished papers of various prominent Americans to bring new insight to his description of the dramatic events of those years. Mr. Clarke's monograph surveys central bank cooperation as it was practiced in an era when the international economy differed in many respects from that of today. In the twenties and early thirties, the world was still feeling the reper- cussions of the political and economic upheaval generated by World War I. Reparations and war debts were souring relations among the great powers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Global Agricultural Crisis and British Diplomacy in the League of Nations in 1931*
    The global agricultural crisis and British diplomacy in the League of Nations in 1931* global agricultural crisis and british diplomacy by Madeleine Lynch Dungy Abstract This article examines the genesis and ultimate failure of a lending programme sponsored by the League of Nations to help farmers in central and eastern Europe. This project had strong initial support from several different groups of British officials, for whom it advanced a policy of European engagement. Its short history reveals the complex ways in which the global agricultural crisis influenced British foreign policy during the critical watershed year of 1931. The precipitous decline in world crop prices starting in 1929 gave a strong boost to the movement for empire unity and simultaneously prompted new calls in the League for solidarity between European food producers and consumers. These competing demands decisively constrained efforts to preserve Britain’s role in European economic and security politics during the onset of the Great Depression. 1931 was a critical turning point in British policy towards Europe. During the 1920s, British leaders had used the League of Nations to promote political stabilization and economic recovery in continental Europe. Yet when a proposal for an Austro-German customs union in March 1931 unleashed a diplomatic firestorm in Europe that destabilized the League system, the British cabinet deliberately adopted a ‘passive’ stance. Tensions over the customs union unsettled already-skittish financial markets, leading to a massive banking crisis that spread across central Europe and then reached Britain in the summer of 1931. In a context of skyrocketing unemployment and general disillusionment with government inaction, divisions over the proper response to the weakening pound helped bring down the Labour government in August.
    [Show full text]