Policy-Making Processes and the European Constitution

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Policy-Making Processes and the European Constitution Policy-making Processes and the European Constitution This new book presents a wealth of new data documenting and analyzing the different positions taken by European governments in the develop- ment of the European constitution. Understanding how constitutional decisions are taken in the EU is of great societal and scientific relevance. This volume examines how these decisions have substantial effects on the sovereignty of nation states and on the lives of citizens, independent of the ratification of a constitution. Few efforts have been made to document constitution building in a sys- tematic and comparative manner, including the different steps and stages of the process. This book examines European constitution building by tracing the two-level policy formation process from the draft proposal of the European Convention until the Intergovernmental Conference, which finally adopted the document on the constitution in June 2004. Following a tight comparative framework, it sheds light on reactions to the proposed constitution in the domestic arena of all the actors involved. The volume includes a chapter on each of the original 15 member states and the ten accession states, plus chapters on the European Commission and Euro- pean Parliament. Building a clear understanding of the affects of constitutional decisions, the book will be of strong interest to scholars and researchers of European Union politics, comparative politics and policy making. Thomas König is Professor of Political Science at the German University of Administrative Sciences, Speyer. Simon Hug is Professor of Political Science at the University of Zurich, Switzerland. Routledge/ECPR studies in European political science Edited by Thomas Poguntke University of Birmingham, UK, on behalf of the European Consortium for Political Research [~ The Routledge/ECPR Studies in European Political Science series is pub- lished in association with the European Consortium for Political Research – the leading organization concerned with the growth and development of political science in Europe. The series presents high-quality edited volumes on topics at the leading edge of current interest in political science and related fields, with contributions from European scholars and others who have presented work at ECPR workshops or research groups. 1 Regionalist Parties in Western 7 Party Elites in Divided Europe Societies Edited by Lieven de Winter and Edited by Kurt Richard Luther and Huri Türsan Kris Deschouwer 2 Comparing Party System 8 Citizenship and Welfare State Change Reform in Europe Edited by Jan-Erik Lane and Edited by Jet Bussemaker Paul Pennings 9 Democratic Governance and 3 Political Theory and European New Technology Union Technologically mediated Edited by Albert Weale and innovations in political practice Michael Nentwich in Western Europe 4 Politics of Sexuality Edited by Ivan Horrocks, Jens Hoff Edited by Terrell Carver and and Pieter Tops Véronique Mottier 10 Democracy without Borders 5 Autonomous Policy Making by Transnationalization and International Organizations conditionality in new Edited by Bob Reinalda and democracies Bertjan Verbeek Edited by Jean Grugel 6 Social Capital and European 11 Cultural Theory as Political Democracy Science Edited by Jan van Deth, Edited by Michael Thompson, Marco Maraffi, Ken Newton and Gunnar Grendstad and Paul Whiteley Per Selle 12 The Transformation of 21 Democracy and Political Governance in the European Change in the “Third World” Union Edited by Jeff Haynes Edited by Beate Kohler-Koch and Rainer Eising 22 Politicians, Bureaucrats and Administrative Reform 13 Parliamentary Party Groups in Edited by B. Guy Peters and European Democracies Jon Pierre Political parties behind closed doors 23 Social Capital and Participation Edited by Knut Heidar and in Everyday Life Ruud Koole Edited by Paul Dekker and Eric M. Uslaner 14 Survival of the European Welfare State 24 Development and Democracy Edited by Stein Kuhnle What do we know and how? Edited by Ole Elgström and 15 Private Organizations in Global Goran Hyden Politics Edited by Karsten Ronit and 25 Do Political Campaigns Volker Schneider Matter? Campaign effects in elections 16 Federalism and Political and referendums Performance Edited by David M. Farrell and Edited by Ute Wachendorfer-Schmidt Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck 17 Democratic Innovation 26 Political Journalism Deliberation, representation New challenges, new practices and association Edited by Raymond Kuhn and Edited by Michael Saward Erik Neveu 18 Public Opinion and the 27 Economic Voting International Use of Force Edited by Han Dorussen and Edited by Philip Everts and Michael Taylor Pierangelo Isernia 28 Organized Crime and the 19 Religion and Mass Electoral Challenge to Democracy Behaviour in Europe Edited by Felia Allum and Edited by David Broughton and Renate Siebert Hans-Martien ten Napel 29 Understanding the European 20 Estimating the Policy Position Union’s External Relations of Political Actors Edited by Michèle Knodt and Edited by Michael Laver Sebastiaan Princen 30 Social Democratic Party Policies 38 Democracy and the Role of in Contemporary Europe Associations Edited by Giuliano Bonoli and Political, organizational and Martin Powell social contexts Edited by Sigrid Roßteutscher 31 Decision Making within International Organisations 39 The Territorial Politics of Edited by Bob Reinalda and Welfare Bertjan Verbeek Edited by Nicola McEwen and Luis Moreno 32 Comparative Biomedical Policy Governing assisted reproductive 40 Health Governance in Europe technologies Issues, challenges and Edited by Ivar Bleiklie, theories Malcolm L. Goggin and Edited by Monika Steffen Christine Rothmayr 33 Electronic Democracy 41 Republicanism in Theory and Mobilization, organization and Practice participation via new ICTs Edited by Iseult Honohan and Edited by Rachel K. Gibson, Andrea Jeremy Jennings Römmele and Stephen J. Ward 42 Mass Media and Political 34 Liberal Democracy and Communication in New Environmentalism Democracies The end of environmentalism? Edited by Katrin Voltmer Edited by Marcel Wissenburg and Yoram Levy 43 Delegation in Contemporary Democracies 35 Political Theory and the Edited by Dietmar Braun and European Constitution Fabrizio Gilardi Edited by Lynn Dobson and Andreas Follesdal 44 Governance and Democracy 36 Politics and the European Comparing national, Commission European and international Actors, interdependence, experiences legitimacy Edited by Yannis Papadopoulos Edited by Andy Smith and Arthur Benz 37 Metropolitan Governance 45 The European Union’s Roles in Capacity, democracy and the International Politics dynamics of place Concepts and analysis Edited by Hubert Heinelt and Edited by Ole Elgström and Daniel Kübler Michael Smith 46 Policy-making Processes and the 48 Participatory Democracy and European Constitution Political Participation A comparative study of member Can participatory engineering states and accession countries bring citizens back in? Edited by Thomas König and Edited by Thomas Zittel and Simon Hug Dieter Fuchs 47 Democratic Politics and Party Competition Edited by Judith Bara and Albert Weale Also available from Routledge in association with the ECPR: Sex Equality Policy in Western Europe, Edited by Frances Gardiner; Demo- cracy and Green Political Thought, Edited by Brian Doherty and Marius de Geus; The New Politics of Unemployment, Edited by Hugh Compston; Cit- izenship, Democracy and Justice in the New Europe, Edited by Percy B. Lehning and Albert Weale; Private Groups and Public Life, Edited by Jan W. van Deth; The Political Context of Collective Action, Edited by Ricca Edmondson; Theories of Secession, Edited by Percy Lehning; Regionalism across the North/South Divide, Edited by Jean Grugel and Wil Hout. Policy-making Processes and the European Constitution A comparative study of member states and accession countries Edited by Thomas König and Simon Hug I~ ~~o~f~;n~~:up LONDON AND NEW YORK First published 2006 by Routledge Published 2017 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017, USA Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business Copyright © 2006 Thomas König and Simon Hug for selection and editorial matter; individual contributors, their contributions Typeset in Baskerville by Wearset Ltd, Boldon, Tyne and Wear The Open Access version of this book, available at www.tandfebooks.com, has been made available under a Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial - No Derivatives 4.0 license. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data A catalog record for this book has been requested ISBN13: 978-0-415-38507-7 (hbk) Contents List of figures xiii List of tables xv About the contributors xvii Series editor’s preface xix List of abbreviations xxi Introduction 1 THOMAS KÖNIG AND SIMON HUG 1 The European Convention and the Rome and Brussels IGCs: a veto players analysis 9 GEORGE TSEBELIS 2 The European Convention: consensus without unity? 23 THOMAS KÖNIG, ANDREAS WARNTJEN AND SIMONE BURKHART 3 Austria: the coordination of the national position regarding the constitution 35 CHRISTINE ARNOLD AND ANNEMIEKE BURMEISTER 4 Belgium, the Convention and the IGC: consensus and coalition politics 43 CHRISTOPHE CROMBEZ AND JAN LEBBE 5 Cyprus: under the shadow of the inter-communal conflict 51 SPYROS BLAVOUKOS AND GEORGE PAGOULATOS 6 The Czech Republic: sitting on the fence 60 TOBIAS SCHULZ AND MARTINA
Recommended publications
  • The Voting Systems in the Council of the EU and the Bundesrat – What Do They Tell Us About European Federalism? by Jacek Czaputowicz and Marcin Kleinowski
    ISSN: 2036-5438 The voting systems in the Council of the EU and the Bundesrat – What do they tell us about European Federalism? by Jacek Czaputowicz and Marcin Kleinowski Perspectives on Federalism, Vol. 10, issue 1, 2018 Except where otherwise noted content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons 2.5 Italy License E -174 Abstract The Treaty of Lisbon introduced a new system of weighted votes in the Council, which radically departs from the principles on which the distribution of votes between the Member States of the EU was based for more than half a century. At the same time, the system of double majority is fundamentally different from the assumptions on which voting systems in federal states are based, including in the Bundesrat. Systems used in federal states are usually based on a compromise between the equality of states, and the equality of citizens. Consequently, in the Nice system, smaller Member States in the EU had relatively greater power compared to their populations than smaller federal units in the German Bundesrat. The results presented in this paper indicate that the Lisbon system of voting in the Council differs significantly from voting systems in federal states. Key-words Council of the European Union, Bundesrat, voting power, Nice voting system, double majority voting system Except where otherwise noted content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons 2.5 Italy License E -175 1. Introduction Is the European Union evolving towards a federal system? Evidence speaking for the European Union being similar to a federation includes: EU institutions taking over competences previously held by states; the principle of supremacy of European law and its direct effect in national law; and cooperation between federal institutions and the constituent units in executing various tasks.I What speaks against this thesis is: the lack of a European constitution; of the right to impose taxes; as well as the fact that states retain their membership in international organisations, such as the UN.
    [Show full text]
  • European Commission Press Release on the Adoption of Its Plan for the Consolidation of Its Services in Luxembourg (11 February 2003)
    European Commission press release on the adoption of its plan for the consolidation of its services in Luxembourg (11 February 2003) Caption: On 11 February 2003, the European Commission adopts a plan for the consolidation of its services in Luxembourg and empowers Neil Kinnock, Commission Vice-President for Administrative Reform, to sign the final agreement with Luxembourg’s Foreign Affairs Minister, Lydie Polfer. Source: RAPID. The Press and Communication Service of the European Commission. [ON-LINE]. [Brussels]: European Commission, [18.02.2003]. IP/03/2003. Disponible sur http://europa.eu.int/rapid/start/cgi/guestfr.ksh?p_action.gettxt=gt&doc=IP/03/216|0|RAPID&lg=EN&display=. Copyright: (c) European Union, 1995-2012 URL: http://www.cvce.eu/obj/european_commission_press_release_on_the_adoption_of_its_plan_for_the_consolidation_of_it s_services_in_luxembourg_11_february_2003-en-3aee6ba0-1e2d-4865-9cf6-6a1149edddbb.html Publication date: 23/10/2012 1 / 2 23/10/2012 Commission adopts its plan for the consolidation of its presence in Luxembourg The Commission has today adopted the definitive plan for the consolidation of its services in Luxembourg, and empowered Vice-President Neil Kinnock to formalise the agreement with the Luxembourg authorities. The plan will enable the Commission to ensure that its services in Luxembourg have sufficient size to enable them to operate with a high degree of autonomy and therefore higher efficiency. As the Commission made clear, this was the main objective of the process for consolidating the Institution's presence in Luxembourg launched in 2000. Consolidation will also entail an increase in the number of staff based in Luxembourg, from almost 3000 to 3400 by 2010. Neil Kinnock, Vice-President for Administrative Reform said: "The plan adopted today fulfils the objectives that the Commission set itself when we launched the process of consolidating services in Luxembourg.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Resolution of 12 December 2013 on Constitutional Problems of a Multitier Governance in the European Union (2012/2078(INI)) (2016/C 468/25)
    C 468/176 EN Official Journal of the European Union 15.12.2016 Thursday 12 December 2013 P7_TA(2013)0598 Constitutional problems of a multitier governance in the EU European Parliament resolution of 12 December 2013 on constitutional problems of a multitier governance in the European Union (2012/2078(INI)) (2016/C 468/25) The European Parliament, — having regard to the Treaty on the European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, — having regard to the Treaty on the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) (1), — having regard to the Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance in the Economic and Monetary Union (TSCG) (2), — having regard to the ‘six-pack’ (3), — having regard to the ‘two-pack’ (4), — having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 (5), — having regard to its position of 12 September 2013 on the proposal for a Council regulation conferring specific tasks on the European Central Bank concerning policies relating to the prudential supervision of credit institutions (6), — having regard to the report of 5 December 2012 of the Presidents of the European Council, the European Commission, the European Central Bank and the Eurogroup entitled ‘Towards a genuine Economic and Monetary Union’ (7), — having regard to the Commission communication of 28 November 2012 entitled ‘A blueprint for a deep and genuine economic
    [Show full text]
  • Spotlight Europe Reforming Economic and Monetary Union: Legislation and Treaty Change
    spotlight europe spotlight europe #2017/01 Reforming Economic and Monetary Union: Legislation and Treaty Change This paper examines the legal mechanisms for reforming EMU — EU legislation, amendments to intergovernmental treaties concluded outside EU law, and EU treaty changes. It provides guidance on how to introduce several needed changes to EMU, suggesting that many reforms can be accomplished à traité constant, but that improving the EU institutional system ultimately requires changing the EU treaties. to strengthen the Eurozone economy and its insti- Federico Fabbrini * tutional set-up. This effort acquires a new meaning since it coincides with the likely trigger that month by th e United Kingdom (UK) of negotiations to leave 1. Introduction the ­­EU. Brexit has already prompted soul-searching The reform of Europe’s Economic and Monetary Union wit­­h in the EU and created the need to think anew (EMU) remains on the agenda of the institutions about Europe’s strategic future. The purpose of this and the member states of the European Union (EU). paper is to contribute to this debate, by analyzing the Several high-level institutional reports on deepening legal wa ys and means to reform EMU — on the un- and completing EMU have been published in the last derstanding that the success of the European integra- few years, and the European Commission is expected tion project also depends on the successful resolution to deliver by March 2017 a white paper mapping how of the Euro-crisis and consolidation of EMU. * Full Professor of European Law, School of Law & Government, Dublin City University spotlight europe #2017/01 There are three legal avenues to reform EMU, complet- National leaders have also endorsed the goal of ing and deepening Europe’s architecture of economic stabilizing EMU.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Union in Transition: the Treaty of Nice in Effect; Enlargement in Sight; a Constitution in Doubt
    Fordham International Law Journal Volume 27, Issue 2 2003 Article 1 The European Union in Transition: The Treaty of Nice in Effect; Enlargement in Sight; A Constitution in Doubt Roger J. Goebel∗ ∗ Copyright c 2003 by the authors. Fordham International Law Journal is produced by The Berke- ley Electronic Press (bepress). http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ilj The European Union in Transition: The Treaty of Nice in Effect; Enlargement in Sight; A Constitution in Doubt Roger J. Goebel Abstract This Article is intended to provide an overview of this transitional moment in the history of the European Union. Initially, the Article will briefly review the background of the Treaty of Nice, and the institutional structure modifications for which it provides, which paves the way for enlargement. Next it will describe the final stages of the enlargement process. Finally, the Article will set out the principal institutional innovations and certain other key aspects of the draft Constitution, the most important issues concerning them, and the current impasse. THE EUROPEAN UNION IN TRANSITION: THE TREATY OF NICE IN EFFECT; ENLARGEMENT IN SIGHT; A CONSTITUTION IN DOUBT Rogerj Goebel* INTRODUCTION Once again the European Union' (the "EU" or the "Union") is in a stage of radical evolution. Since the early 1990's, the EU has anticipated an extraordinary increase in its constituent Member States2 through the absorption of a large number of Central European and Mediterranean nations. Since the late 1990's, the Union has been negotiating the precise terms for their entry with a dozen applicant nations and has been providing cooperative assistance to them to prepare for their accession to the Union and in particular, its principal con- stituent part, the European Community.3 As this enlargement of the Union came more clearly in sight, the political leadership and the present Member States, joined by the Commission, con- * Professor and Director of the Center on European Union Law, Fordham Univer- sity School of Law.
    [Show full text]
  • The London School of Economics and Political Science Making EU
    The London School of Economics and Political Science Making EU Foreign Policy towards a ‘Pariah’ State: Consensus on Sanctions in EU Foreign Policy towards Myanmar Arthur Minsat A thesis submitted to the Department of International Relations of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, June 2012 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of the author. I warrant that this authorization does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 97,547 words. Statement of use of third party for editorial help I can confirm that my thesis was copy edited for conventions of language, spelling and grammar by Dr. Joe Hoover. 2 Abstract This thesis seeks to explain why the European Union ratcheted up restrictive measures on Myanmar from 1991 until 2010, despite divergent interests of EU member states and the apparent inability of sanctions to quickly achieve the primary objectives of EU policy. This empirical puzzle applies the ‘sanctions paradox’ to the issue of joint action in the EU.
    [Show full text]
  • Majority Voting in the EU: Beneficial Or Just Equally Harmful Elizabeth Degori Scripps College
    Claremont-UC Undergraduate Research Conference on the European Union Volume 2008 Article 7 February 2012 Majority Voting in the EU: Beneficial or Just Equally Harmful Elizabeth DeGori Scripps College Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/urceu Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Election Law Commons, European Law Commons, and the Legislation Commons Recommended Citation DeGori, Elizabeth (2008) "Majority Voting in the EU: Beneficial or Just Equally Harmful," Claremont-UC Undergraduate Research Conference on the European Union: Vol. 2008, Article 7. DOI: 10.5642/urceu.200801.07 Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/urceu/vol2008/iss1/7 This Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Claremont at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in Claremont-UC Undergraduate Research Conference on the European Union by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Claremont-UC Undergraduate Research Conference on the European Union 55 5 MAJORITY VOTING IN THE EU: BENEFICIAL OR JUST EQUALLY HARMFUL Elizabeth OeGori ABSTRACT Passing legislation on the basis of unanimity in the Council of Ministers has become increasingly difficult, but creating a fair voting system for a qualified majority is arguably even harder. After providing a small amount of background on the system of Qualified MajorityVoting (QMV) itself, I discuss the desired qualities in a just decision rule; the effects of enlargem ent on such a system; and the current debate between small and large states. In order to do so, I consider the differential effects of using voting weights directly proportional to the populations of member states as opposed to alternative bases.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 15 Mr Jean-Claude Juncker President European Commission Cc
    Mr Jean-Claude Juncker President European Commission cc: Frans Timmermans, First Vice-President, in charge of Better Regulation, Inter-Institutional Relations, the Rule of Law and the Charter of Fundamental Rights Andrus Ansip, Vice-President for the Digital Single Market Jyrki Katainen, Vice-President for Jobs, Growth, Investment and Competitiveness Maroš Šefčovič, Vice-President for the Energy Union Vytenis Andriukaitis, Commissioner for Health and Food Safety Elžbieta Bieńkowska, Commissioner for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs Violeta Bulc, Commissioner for Transport Miguel Arias Cañete, Commissioner for Climate Action and Energy Corina Creţu, Commissioner for Regional Policy Carlos Moedas, Commissioner for Research, Science and Innovation Cecilia Malmström, Commissioner for Trade Pierre Moscovici, Commissioner for Economic and Financial Affairs, Taxation and Customs Tibor Navracsics, Commissioner for Education, Culture, Youth and Sport Günther Öttinger, Commissioner for Budget and Human Resources Marianne Thyssen, Commissioner for Employment, Social Affairs, Skills and Labour Mobility Karmenu Vella, Commissioner for Environment, Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Margrethe Vestager, Commissioner for Competition Brussels, 16 June 2017 Re: Contribute to economic growth and climate change mitigation through a EU Cycling Strategy Dear President Juncker, With this letter, signed by leaders from businesses, public authorities and civil society, we call upon the European Commission to unlock the potential for creating jobs
    [Show full text]
  • The European Parliament and Environmental Legislation: the Case of Chemicals
    European Journal of Political Research 36: 119–154, 1999. 119 © 1999 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. The European Parliament and environmental legislation: The case of chemicals GEORGE TSEBELIS & ANASTASSIOS KALANDRAKIS University of California, Los Angeles, USA Abstract. The paper studies the impact of the EP on legislation on chemical pollutants in- troduced under the Cooperation procedure. A series of formal and informal analyses have predicted from significant impact of the EP, to limited impact (only in the second round) to no impact at all. Through the analysis of Parliamentary debates as well as Commission and Parliamentary committee documents, we are able to assess the significance of different amendments, as well as the degree to which they were introduced in the final decision of the Council. Our analysis indicates first that less than 30% of EP amendments are insignificant, while 15% are important or very important; second, that the probability of acceptance of an amendment is the same regardless of its significance. Further analysis indicates two sources of bias of aggregate EP statistics: several amendments are complementary (deal with the same issue in different places of the legal document), and a series of amendments that are rejected as inadmissible (because they violate the legal basis of the document or the germainess require- ment) are included in subsequent pieces of legislation. We calculate the effect of these biases in our sample, and find that official statistics underestimate Parliamentary influence by more than 6 percentage points (49% instead of 56% in our sample). Finally, we compare a series of observed strategic behaviors of different actors (rapporteurs, committees, floor, Commission) to different expectations generated by the literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Citizenship, Structural Inequality and the Political Elite
    Citizenship, Structural Inequality and The Political Elite Michael S. Merry (University of Amsterdam) The class that is the ruling material force of society is at the same time the ruling intellectual force. Karl Marx Wherever there is an ascendant class, a large portion of the morality of the country emanates from its class interests and its feelings of class superiority. John Stuart Mill For a long time now, liberal theorists have championed the belied by the conditions of deep structural inequality idea that citizenship is the task of the school. endemic to most schools, and indeed to entire school Notwithstanding substantive disagreement among these systems. It is also belied by the ways in which most schools theorists, all liberal accounts share the same basic faith are designed to promote and reward competition, rule concerning both the duty and the ability of schools to do compliance, deference to authority and nationalist loyalty. what their theories require. Matthew Clayton’s highly These problems are further exacerbated by the un- idealized philosophical account is representative; he preparedness and unwillingness of most teachers to confidently asserts that civic education in schools ought to facilitate ‘deliberative interactions’ in classrooms of diverse prepare background and opinion, not to mention parents who do not want their child’s education ‘politicized’. “deliberative citizens [to] display a set of skills and Of course, this empirical state of affairs does not virtues related to deliberative interaction: skills related foreclose possibilities for normative argument, nor does it to articulating a position and the reasons for its prevent us from imagining incremental improvements.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Irish Referendum on Lisbon Treaty, June 2008
    Evaluation of the Irish Referendum on Lisbon Treaty, June 2008 Markus Schmidgen democracy international is a network promoting direct democracy. Our basic goal is the establishment of direct democracy (initiative and referendum) as a complement to representative democracy within the European Union and in the nation states. We also work on the general democratisation of the European Union, democratic reform and more direct and participatory democracy worldwide. http://www.democracy-international.org Written by Markus Schmidgen Layout: Ronald Pabst Proof-reading (contents):, Gayle Kinkead, Ronald Pabst, Thomas Rupp Proof-reading (language): Sheena A. Finley, Warren P. Mayr Advice: Dr. Klaus Hofmann, Bruno Kaufmann, Frank Rehmet Please refer all questions to: [email protected] Published by democracy international V 0.9 (4.9.2008) Evaluation of the Irish Referendum on Lisbon Treaty, June 2008 I Introduction This report examines the process of the Irish CONTENT referendum on the Treaty of Lisbon. The referendum was held on June 12, 2008 and was the only referendum on this treaty. The evaluation is I INTRODUCTION .......................................... 3 based on the criteria set by the Initiative and Referendum Institute Europe (IRIE). These criteria are internationally recognized as standards to II SETTING...................................................... 4 measure how free and fair a referendum process is conducted. This enables the reader to compare the II.1 Background ................................................... 4 Irish Lisbon referendum to other referendums and to identify the points that could be improved as well II.2 Actors ............................................................. 4 as those that are an example to other nations. II.3 Evaluation...................................................... 7 We at Democracy International and our European partners have already published a series of reports on the EU constitutional referenda of 2005: Juan III CONCLUSION.........................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical Development of Irish Euroscepticism to 2001
    The Historical Development of Irish Euroscepticism to 2001 Troy James Piechnick Thesis submitted as part of the Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) program at Flinders University on the 1st of September 2016 Social and Behavioural Sciences School of History and International Relations Flinders University 2016 Supervisors Professor Peter Monteath (PhD) Dr Evan Smith (PhD) Associate Professor Matt Fitzpatrick (PhD) Contents GLOSSARY III ABSTRACT IV ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS V CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 DEFINITIONS 2 PARAMETERS 13 LITERATURE REVIEW 14 MORE RECENT DEVELOPMENTS 20 THESIS AND METHODOLOGY 24 STRUCTURE 28 CHAPTER 2 EARLY ANTECEDENTS OF IRISH EUROSCEPTICISM: 1886–1949 30 IRISH REPUBLICANISM, 1780–1886 34 FIRST HOME RULE BILL (1886) AND SECOND HOME RULE BILL (1893) 36 THE BOER WAR, 1899–1902 39 SINN FÉIN 40 WORLD WAR I AND EASTER RISING 42 IRISH DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE 46 IRISH WAR OF INDEPENDENCE 1919 AND CIVIL WAR 1921 47 BALFOUR DECLARATION OF 1926 AND THE STATUTE OF WESTMINSTER IN 1931 52 EAMON DE VALERA AND WORLD WAR II 54 REPUBLIC OF IRELAND ACT 1948 AND OTHER IMPLICATIONS 61 CONCLUSION 62 CHAPTER 3 THE TREATY OF ROME AND FAILED APPLICATIONS FOR MEMBERSHIP IN 1961 AND 1967 64 THE TREATY OF ROME 67 IRELAND IN THE 1950S 67 DEVELOPING IRISH EUROSCEPTICISM IN THE 1950S 68 FAILED APPLICATIONS FOR MEMBERSHIP IN 1961 AND 1967 71 IDEOLOGICAL MAKINGS: FURTHER DEVELOPMENTS OF A EUROSCEPTIC NATURE (1960S) 75 Communist forms of Irish euroscepticism 75 Irish eurosceptics and republicanism 78 Irish euroscepticism accommodating democratic socialism 85
    [Show full text]