Wisconsin Word Processor Format (1331D) (Approved 3/87)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Josephus Daniels House: Additional Information Regarding the Site
JOSEPHUS DANIELS HOUSE: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE SITE PREPARED BY EDWARDS-PITMAN ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. Post Office Box 1171 Durham, North Carolina 27702 919-682-2211 www.edwards-pitman.com FOR THE RALEIGH HISTORIC DISTRICTS COMMISSION Post Office Box 829 Century Station Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 919-832-7238 JULY 29, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................................1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................1 National Historic Landmark Designation, 1976 ........................................................................................2 Local Historic Landmark Designation, 1990 .............................................................................................2 Inclusion in National Register of Historic Places Historic District, 2002...................................................3 Summary of Significance ..............................................................................................................................4 Significant under NRHP Criterion B and NHL Criterion 2.........................................................................4 Other Properties Associated with Josephus Daniels ....................................................................................5 Historic Integrity under NRHP Criterion B and NHL Criterion 2 ..............................................................6 -
Description of the Study Area
Chapter II DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY AREA INTRODUCTION The water-resource and water-resource-related problems of a watershed, as well as the ultimate solutions to those problems, are a function of the human activities within the watershed and of the ability of the underlying natural resource base to sustain those activities. Regional water quality management planning seeks to rationally direct the future course of human actions within the watershed so as to promote the conservation and wise use of the natural resource base. Accordingly, the purpose of this chapter is to describe the natural resource base and the man-made features of the greater Milwaukee watersheds, thereby establishing a factual base upon which the regional water quality management planning process may proceed. This description of the study area is presented in two major sections: the first describes the man-made features; the second describes the natural resource base of the watersheds. REGIONAL AND WATERSHED SETTING OF THE PLANNING AREA The planning area encompasses the greater Milwaukee watersheds within Southeastern Wisconsin, which, as shown on Map 1 in Chapter I of this report, cover approximately 1,127 square miles. About 861 square miles of these watersheds are located within the seven-county Southeastern Wisconsin Region, representing about 32 per- cent of the Region. Within the region, these watersheds include all of the Kinnickinnic River, Menomonee River, Oak Creek, and Root River watersheds, portions of the Milwaukee River watershed, and lands directly tributary to Lake Michigan. In addition, approximately 266 square miles of the greater Milwaukee watersheds, or about 23.6 percent of the study area, are located outside of the Region. -
Chapter III EXISTING PARK and OPEN SPACE SITES INTRODUCTION a Comprehensive Areawide Inventory of Park and Open Space Sites
Chapter III EXISTING PARK AND OPEN SPACE SITES INTRODUCTION three parks smaller than 100 acres and two special-use sites, together encompassing 61 acres; and one major park site, A comprehensive areawide inventory of park and open space encompassing 283 acres. In all, these 11 sites encompass sites was conducted in 1973 under the initial regional park and 1,230 acres, or about 0.4 percent of the total area of the open space planning program1 and updated in 1985 for use in County. preparing the year 2000 County park and open space plan. The inventory of park and open space sites in the County was The five existing major County parks are Glacier Hills Park in updated again in 1995 for use in preparing this new County the Town of Richfield, Heritage Trails Park in the Town of park and open space plan. The findings of the 1995 inventory Polk, Homestead Hollow Park in the Village of Germantown, are presented in this chapter. Ridge Run Park in the City and Town of West Bend, and Sandy Knoll Park in the Town of Trenton. In addition, in The 1995 inventory identifies all park and open space sites 1995 the County owned a site in the Town of Hartford, which owned by a public agency or a public-interest organization, is being developed as the Washington County Golf Course including State, County, or local units of government, school and Family Park, scheduled to open in 1997. districts, lake protection districts, and such private nonprofit conservancy organizations as The Nature Conservancy and the The three Washington County parks which are smaller than Cedar Lakes Conservation Foundation. -
Existing Park and Open Space Sites
Chapter III EXISTING PARK AND OPEN SPACE SITES INTRODUCTION A comprehensive areawide inventory of park and open space sites was conducted in 1973 under the initial regional park and open space planning program,1 and updated in 1985 for use in preparing the year 2000 County park and open space plan. The inventory of park and open space sites in the County was updated again in 1995 for use in preparing the year 2010 County park and open space plan and then in 2002 for use in preparing this new County park and open space plan. The findings of the 2002 inventory are presented in this chapter. The 2002 inventory identified all park and open space sites owned by a public agency, including State, County, or local units of government and school districts. Also identified in the inventory were lands held in conservation easements by organizations such as the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Cedar Lakes Conservation Foundation, and The Ozaukee Washington Land Trust. The inventory also included privately owned resource- oriented outdoor recreation sites such as golf courses, campgrounds, ski hills, boating access sites, swimming beaches, hunting clubs, retreat centers, open space areas, and group camps such as Scout or YMCA camps, and special use outdoor recreation sites of regional significance. The inventory of private outdoor recreation sites focused on resource-oriented sites because the County park and open space plan is most directly concerned with the provision of sites and facilities for such activities. The inventory also identified such other resources of recreational significance as existing trails and bicycle ways and historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places. -
Josephus Daniels House, 1520 Caswell Street
TO: Marchell Adams-David, City Manager FROM: Tania Georgiou Tully, Senior Preservation Planner CC: City Clerk DEPARTMENT: Planning and Development DATE: December 15, 2020 SUBJECT: Raleigh Historic Landmark Designation Public Hearing Introduction The Raleigh Historic Development Commission (RHDC) has received one request to rename an existing Raleigh Historic Landmark: • Hubert & Marguerite Haywood House, 634 N Blount Street and an application to remove Raleigh Historic Landmark designation: • Josephus Daniels House, 1520 Caswell Street The RHDC reviewed the applications on October 20, 2020. The Commission voted to recommend approval of the Haywood House name change and to defer a recommendation on the Daniels House until after the public hearing. At its meeting on November 17, 2020 the City Council authorized this joint public hearing with the RHDC and referred the applications to the Department of Natural and Cultural Resources, Office of Archives and History, as provided under the provisions of G.S. 160A-400.6 and Unified Development Ordinance section 10.2.16.C.2. A copy of the state’s analysis and recommendations for each of the properties will be provided at the hearing. Recommendation Refer the applications back to the RHDC to consider the state’s recommendations and any additional information received during the public hearing. If referred, the RHDC will return to the February 2 City Council meeting to make Municipal Building final recommendations on the proposed designation changes. Draft ordinances 222 West Hargett Street consistent with their recommendations will be presented at that time. In the Raleigh, North Carolina 27601 past, the Council has voted immediately thereafter to take action on the One Exchange Plaza 1 Exchange Plaza, ordinances.