DOCSLIB.ORG

I-66 Corridor Improvements Tier 2 Environmental Assessment Fairfax and Prince William Counties, Virginia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
I-66 Corridor Improvements Tier 2 Environmental Assessment Fairfax and Prince William Counties, Virginia SURVEY OF CIVIL WAR BATTLEFIELDS FOR THE I-66 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS TIER 2 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FAIRFAX AND PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTIES, VIRGINIA VDOT Project No. 0066-96A-297; UPC 105500 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY Prepared by Stephanie A.T. Jacobe, Ph.D. and Kerry S. González Dovetail Cultural Resource Group April 2015 On behalf of the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) and VDOT’s consultant, Parsons Transportation Group, Inc. (Parsons), Dovetail Cultural Resource Group (Dovetail), conducted an assessment of the Civil War battlefields identified within the proposed Interstate 66 (I- 66) study corridor in Prince William and Fairfax Counties, Virginia. The project involves improving I-66 from its interchange with U.S. Route 15 in Prince William County to Interstate 495 (I-495) in Fairfax County (Figure 1). VDOT, in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), is preparing a Tier 2 Environmental Assessment in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act. VDOT and FHWA completed a Tier 1 Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) in November 2013 for the I-66 corridor from U.S. Route 15 to I-495. FHWA issued a Record of Decision (ROD) on November 20, 2013 concurrently with publication of the Tier 1 FEIS. VDOT, in consultation with FHWA, has determined to move forward with Tier 2 studies for widening existing I-66 to result in two express lanes and three general purpose lanes in each direction from U.S. Route 15 to I-495, a total distance of approximately 25 miles (40.2 km). The project is an undertaking subject to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (36 CFR 800). This management summary presents the findings of the Civil War battlefield assessment. Results of the Dovetail archaeological and architectural surveys on this project are detailed in separate management summaries. The purpose of the survey was to identify, within the Area of Potential Effects (APE), the boundaries of all Civil War battlefields and locate any previously undocumented battlefield features. The APE for direct and indirect effects is defined as being 500 feet (152.4 m) on either side of the VDOT right-of-way (ROW). 1 Figure 1: Overview of the Project Area (USDA 2001). 2 In January 2013, as part of the Tier 1 EIS, Dovetail completed an Architectural Assessment for the I-66 and VRE Extension Study Corridors, which comprised a similar study area in Prince William and Fairfax Counties (Dovetail 2013). Four battlefields, Chantilly (029-0162), First Manassas (076-5335), Second Manassas/Brawner’s Farm (076-5190), and Manassas Station Operations (076-5036) were located within the 500-foot (152.4-m) direct study buffer that was defined in that report. The report also identified the Manassas Battlefield Historic District and Expansion, which is listed on the National Register Historic Places (NRHP). The Manassas Battlefield Historic District encompasses much of the federally-owned land included within the American Battlefield Protection Program’s designated Study Areas of the battles of First Manassas and Second Manassas/Brawner’s Farm, as well as portions of privately-owned land located adjacent to the federally-owned land. Project Methodology The 2002 Civil War Battlefield Preservation Act directed the Secretary of the Interior through the American Battlefield Protection Program (ABPP) to update the 1992 Civil War Sites Advisory Commission Report on the Nation’s Civil War Battlefields (CWSAC). The update was required to address preservation activities at each battlefield since 1993 as well as changes in conditions and other relevant developments. As part of the update, the ABPP created a four- tiered system that included such factors as historic significance, current condition, and level of threat to determine preservation priorities among the battlefields. Draft reports for the updates are being released state-by-state on an ongoing basis. The report for Virginia’s 122 battlefields was released in July 2009 (ABPP 2009). The battlefield Study Areas described in the July 2009 report were used to re-assess which battlefields were located within the project APE. In addition changes that have been made to individual Study Areas since their release in 2009 including those made to the Study Area of the First Battle of Manassas in 2014 have also been taken into account. Since the release of the CWSAC report in 1993, the National Park Service (NPS) has enhanced its battlefield survey techniques to include research, working with site stewards, identifying and documenting lines of approach and withdrawal used by opposing forces, and applying the concepts of military terrain analysis to all battlefield landscapes (ABPP 2009). Each battlefield in the APE was assessed based on the Potential National Register (PotNR) boundaries as defined by the ABPP in their 2009 report. Only those areas of the ABPP-defined battlefields that have PotNR boundaries that fall within or partially fall within the project APE were assessed as part of the current survey. It is important to note that there was a large Civil War encampment at Centreville near State Route 28 that stretched west to the Fairfax-Prince William County border but because it is not an ABPP-defined battlefield, it and its remaining features will be assessed in the archaeology report for this project. Sections of the Study Areas of each identified battlefield located within the APE were visually inspected through a vehicular and pedestrian reconnaissance survey. Pedestrian reconnaissance survey was undertaken in PotNR areas to identify previously unrecorded battlefield features. Once identified, each potential resource was evaluated for its historic and physical integrity. The resources were documented through digital photographs, mapped using GPS, and keyed to project mapping. 3 In addition to the vehicular and pedestrian reconnaissance survey, a metal detector survey was performed as part of the archaeological survey for the project to aid in the potential identification of Civil War deposits. The archaeological survey examined selected portions of the project area. Previously surveyed areas were not resurveyed unless the previous survey did not meet the current DHR standards. In addition a metal detector survey was performed in all areas within ABPP-defined battlefield Study Areas that did not previously include metal detecting. These areas are defined as numbered survey areas on detailed figures accompanying this Management Summary. Metal detecting was conducted along transects spaced at 25-foot (7.6-meter) intervals across the entire archaeological APE. The archaeological APE is defined as being 100 feet (30.48 m) beyond the existing VDOT ROW. All testable areas within battlefield study areas except those that fall within federally-owned land of the Manassas National Battlefield Park were subjected to a thorough examination. Metal detecting was performed using Whites 9500 pro/psi and Tesoro Cibola metal detectors and was conducted in a zig-zag pattern along transects to ensure maximum coverage. Positive contacts were identified with pin flags. The locations of the pin flags were excavated to determine if the contact was positive for historic ferrous and/or non- ferrous metal artifacts. The location of historic artifacts discovered during the metal detecting were mapped and collected. Fieldwork was conducted in November and December 2014 by Stephanie A.T. Jacobe, Adriana Lesiuk, and Katy Wolford. Metal detecting was conducted by Kerry S. González, D. Brad Hatch, and Kevin McCloskey. Kerri S. Barile and Mike Carmody served as Principal Investigators. Drs. Barile and Jacobe meet or exceed the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards for history and architectural history; Dr. Barile, Kerry S. González, D. Brad Hatch, and Mike Carmody meet or exceed the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards for archaeology [48 Federal Register 44739 (September 29, 1983)]. Background Research With the refining of the APE for the Tier 2 Environmental Assessment for the I-66 Improvements Project, the Study Areas of six battlefields were identified within the APE. The Study Area of a battlefield includes the furthest extent of the historical footprint of the battle. The Study Area indicates the extent to which the historic and archaeological resources associated with the battle may be found and protected. The Study Areas were delineated regardless of the present integrity of the landscape. The six battlefields identified are listed below in Table 1 and summarized briefly in the following sections. The PotNR boundary of a battlefield, as defined by the ABPP, is that portion of the Study Area that retains sufficient integrity and cohesion to convey the significance of the engagement. It does not constitute a formal determination of eligibility by the Keeper of the National Register. This boundary takes into account the guidelines established in the NPS National Register Bulletin, How to Apply National Register Criteria (Andrus 1997). 4 Table 1: Battlefields Located Within the APE. DHR No. ABPP No. Battlefield Name(s) County Status 029-0162 VA027 Chantilly Fairfax Not eligible 030-5610/ VA025 Thoroughfare Gap Prince William Not evaluated/ NR 030-1016 and Fauquier listed/ 030-5152 VA042 Buckland Mills Prince William Determined eligible and Fauquier 076-5335/ VA005 Manassas I Prince William, Determined 076-0271 Fairfax, and potentially eligible/ Loudoun NR Listed 076-5190/ VA0026 Manassas II/ Prince William Determined 076-0271 Brawner’s Farm potentially eligible/ NR Listed 076-5036 VA024 Manassas Station Prince William Determined Operations potentially eligible The Battle of Chantilly (029-0162) The Battle of Chantilly took place on September 1, 1862, two days after the Second Battle of Manassas as Stonewall Jackson hoped to cut off the Union retreat east. He sent two of his divisions against those of Union Major Generals Stevens and Kearny. The fierce battle was stopped by a massive thunderstorm, which allowed the Union to continue to retreat east. Generals Kearny and Stevens were killed in the fight. The Federals retreated beyond Fairfax Courthouse leaving Lee to invade Maryland.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Two Plead Guilty to Heroin Distribution Richter, Shade Appear in Federal Court; Another Person Arrested
    Attention Postmaster: PRSRT STD Time-sensitive material. U.S. Postage Requested in home 1-15-09 PAID Elkton, MD Centreville ❖ Clifton ❖ Little Rocky Run PERMIT #31 SOUTHERN EDITION JAN. 15-21, 2009 "Heroin's Price" 25 CENTS Newsstand Price Volume XXIII, NO. 2 Two Plead Guilty to Heroin Distribution Richter, Shade appear in federal court; another person arrested. By Bonnie Hobbs Manor died in March 2008 of a Centre View heroin overdose, both local and by Photo federal authorities launched a full- heir cases were heard scale investigation. In November, separately, but both authorities charged 10 people — TAnna Lucille Richter almost all from Centreville — with Bonnie Hobbs and Ashleigh Lynn conspiracy to distribute heroin. Shade pleaded guilty Monday in They arrested three more in De- federal court to conspiracy to dis- cember and, on Monday, Jan. 12, tribute 100 grams or more of they also charged Matthew heroin. Afterward, however, Rich- Greenlee, 23, of the City of Fairfax, View /Centre ter, 20, of Virginia Run, was al- with distributing heroin leading to lowed to remain free on bond; the Sept. 7 death of Carmen Shade, 19, of Fairfax, was taken Somers, 20, of Falls Church. Ac- into custody. cording to the affidavit unsealed Federal authorities contend that, Monday in federal court, Greenlee Some of the cast of Chantilly High’s children’s play, “The Princess and the Porcupine,” from June 2007 to mid-November allegedly gave her the drug and written by Director Ed Monk. 2008, they were involved in a she took it at his home, the night large, heroin-distribution ring in of Sept.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War Fought for the Union Which Represent 52% of the Sons of Harvard Killed in Action During This Conflict
    Advocates for Harvard ROTC . H CRIMSON UNION ARMY VETERANS Total served Died in service Killed in action Died by disease Harvard College grads 475 73 69 26 Harvard College- non grads 114 22 Harvard Graduate schools 349 22 NA NA Total 938 117 69 26 The above total of Harvard alumni who died in the service of the Union included 5 major generals, 3 Brigadier Generals, 6 colonels, 19 LT Colonels and majors, 17 junior officers in the Army, 3 sergeants plus 3 Naval officers, including 2 Medical doctors. 72% of all Harvard alumni who served in the Civil War fought for the Union which represent 52% of the sons of Harvard killed in action during this conflict. As result among Harvard alumni, Union military losses were 10% compared with a 21% casualty rate for the Confederate Army. The battle of Gettysburg (PA) had the highest amount of Harvard alumni serving in the Union Army who were killed in action (i.e. 11), in addition 3 Harvard alumni Confederates also died in this battle. Secondly, seven Crimson warriors made the supreme sacrifice for the Union at Antietam (MD) with 5 more were killed in the battles of Cedar Mountain (VA) and Fredericksburg (VA). As expected, most of the Harvard alumni who died in the service of the Union were born and raised in the Northeastern states (e.g. 74% from Massachusetts). However, 9 Harvard alumni Union casualties were from the Mid West including one from the border state of Missouri. None of these Harvard men were from southern states. The below men who made the supreme sacrifice for their country to preserve the union which also resulted in the abolition of slavery.
    [Show full text]
  • Fairfax County History Commission Annual Report 2002
    Fairfax County History Commission Annual Report 3/ie.Armaria/ 'Hearings and Supporters of THOMAS 6™TORD TAIRJFADC as recorded at the (~o//ege of ?/ msSon don 2002 Fairfax County History Commission Fairfax City Regional Library FAIRFAX Virginia Room 3915 Chain Bridge Road COUNTY Fairfax, VA 22030 Tel: 703-246-2123 VIRGINIA December 9, 2002 Fairfax County Board of Supervisors 12055 Government Center Parkway Fairfax, Virginia 22055 Dear Madam Chairman and Members of the Board of Supervisors? Once again it is a pleasure for the Fairfax County History Commission to be able to present its Annua! Report What am exciting year this has been and I will touch on a few of our accomplishments. Publications Committee chaired by Dr. Donald Semes©? Two books have been published and a third will be available soon. The Preservation of History an Fairfax County, authored by well known historians Ross and Nairn Netherton details the development and preservation of history in our county during the past three or more decades and serves as a model for other communities. The Battle of Chantilly (Ox-Hill); Monumental Storm, by Charles Maisr© tells the story off this important Civil War battle fought during a ram sterns near the present site of the Fair Oaks Mall. This publication includes over 70 illustrations including maps and photographs making it possible to relate the events to present day locations. Stone Ground; A History of Umobb Mills, by Paula ESsey, available soon, details the fascinating story of a settlement in the western part of Fairfax County, which though it never became a town, played am important role In the comity's history.
    [Show full text]
  • The Civil War in Fairfax County, Virginia the Civil War in Fairfax County, Virginia Was the Most Divisive and Destructive Period in the County’S History
    (ANNE putting in section headings only 9/3) Confidential Draft August 31, 2020 rvsd 9/7/20 The Civil War in Fairfax County, Virginia The Civil War in Fairfax County, Virginia was the most divisive and destructive period in the county’s history. Soon after President Abraham Lincoln was elected President on November 6, 1860. local citizens began holding a series of public meetings at the courthouse to discuss whether Virginia should remain in the Union or secede and join the nascent Confederate States of America. Remain or Secede? Resolutions were adopted to expel pro-Union, anti-slavery men from the county. Several resolutions passed defending slavery. Other resolutions supported arming and funding local militia. The Fairfax Cavalry, under Captain M. D. Ball, and the Fairfax Rifles, under Captain William H. Dulany, drilled and paraded together on the courthouse yard throughout early 1861. Within ten days of Virginia’s vote to secede on May 23, 1861, the first armed conflict occurred in Fairfax County on June 1, in and around the same courthouse grounds where those public debates on secession began. Captain John Quincy Marr of the Warrenton Rifles was killed in the skirmish with Company B, Second U.S. Cavalry. He has been memorialized as the first Confederate officer to die in the Civil War. South Controls Western Half of County Through March 1862 In July, roughly 18,000 soldiers of the Army of Northeastern Virginia under the command of Union General Irvin McDowell advanced through the county. The Federals marched to the Battle of Blackburn’s Ford (July 18) and subsequently the Battle of First Manassas or Bull Run (July 21).
    [Show full text]
  • September 2012
    150 th Anniversary of the A fmerican [email protected] or [email protected] Minutes of the Business Meeting of the CMCCWRT Civil War August 2012 President Burke opened the meeting. We saluted the flag and held a moment of silence for those who stand in harm’s way to protect us. Secretary read the minutes. There being no corrections or additions, motion made to accept them as read, seconded and approved. Treasurer Marshall gave his report. Motion made to accept the report and file for audit; seconded and approved. Howard Ruhl reminded us of some Civil War anniversary dates for NJ: particularly the 150 th anniversary of Corp K and H leaving for Woodsbury NJ for training. Secretary reminded all members, especially newer members, of the availability of digital copies of the newsletter. Please email Secretary and/or Treasurer that you wish to only receive the digital newsletter, and it will be emailed to you. Cape May County Usually the digital version is emailed out several days t to the Civil War Round Table snail mail version, and is less likely to get eaten by the postal Newsletter machinery. September2012 Mrs. Ruhl pointed out that former CWRT member Sue Gibson still has our PA equipment, and someone who knows her 2012 Meeting Schedule needs to contact her to request the return of said equipment. There being no other business, President Burke adjourned the meeting so the presentation could begin. NEW MEETING LOCATION!! We are now meeting in the Jury Room at the New Respectfully submitted, Courthouse near the Public Library Patricia A.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 1862 at Fairfax Court House: Changes and Challenges
    "Preserving the Past. Protecting the Future." the Protecting Past. the "Preserving Volume 9, Issue 4 Fall 2012 Fall 1862 at Fairfax Court House: Historic Fairfax City, Inc. Changes and Challenges "Fare Fac - Say Do" by Andrea J. Loewenwarter Executive Officers The Union’s demoralizing loss at the Battle of 2nd Bull Run/ David L. Pumphrey President Manassas (August 28th-30th, 1862) and the Battle of Chantilly/Ox Sandra S. Wilbur Vice-Pres. Hill (September 1st) prompted the Union to reorganize its command Albert L. Leightley Treasurer in the greater Washington, D.C. and northern Virginia region. General Christopher Kelley Secretary George B. McClellan took command of the Defenses of Washington, Ann F. Adams Director and, on September 5th, General John Pope was relieved of his command. Thus, Hildie A. Carney Director Patricia A. Fabio Director the Army of Virginia was merged into the Army of the Potomac. Fairfax, VA 22030 VA Fairfax, Mary D. Gauthier Director D. Lee Hubbard Director With this change, Major General Franz Sigel’s Corps became the XI Army 10209 Main Street Main 10209 Hon. Wm. Page Johnson, II Director Claudia J. Lewis Director Corps and was ordered to support the Defenses of Washington, from the banks David L. Pumphrey, President Pumphrey, L. David Jenée L. Lindner Director of the Potomac out to Centreville and Manassas. The XI Army Corps moved its Wayne A. Morris Director Return Address - Historic Fairfax City, Inc. City, Fairfax Historic - Address Return th Deborah E. Mullan Director headquarters to Fairfax Court House on October 13 where its new configuration Michael A.
    [Show full text]
  • Sudha Rajput Travels to Historic Centreville Virginia
    Travel with me to Historic CENTREVILLE, VA: my hometown Sudha G. Rajput February 14, 2020 (rev: March 3, 2020*) *Incorporates review by Debbie Robison of Virginia Room, Fairfax county February 27, 2020 Sudha Rajput, February 2020 Page 1 of 13 My goal of this write-up is to preserve and cherish the heritage of this historic town of Centreville, located in the western corner of Fairfax county, within Virginia, where I have lived for 28 years. The aim is to introduce family and friends to the historic houses, churches, plantations, battle hills, trenches and hideouts that were instrumental in shaping the character of the United States, given Centreville’s strategic role during the American Civil War. The American Civil War was Centreville’s most dramatic period, when Centreville was occupied by both the Union Army and the Confederate Army, and when the battles of the First and Second Manassas were fought on its doorstep. Relics from early English settlers and Civil War are still present in Centerville. Come and explore with me the links to the past under the soil of Centreville! Challenge of preserving Centreville’s historic sites: Preserving Centreville’s historical sites poses the challenge of finding the right balance between the need to preserve history and the development responsibility needed to make room for new residents who want to make Centerville their home and send their kids to this community’s schools. Preservation needs to be accomplished in the context of compatibility with urban development and safety of the historical structures. The enthusiasm to embrace development and technology has put great pressure on the historic sites of Centreville.
    [Show full text]
  • John D. Hoptak TOPIC
    BRCWRT — Vol. XIX, Issue 7, OCTOBER 2012 Page 1 The Newsletter of the Bull Run Civil War Round Table — Vol. XIX, Issue 7, OCTOBER 2012 JOHN D. HOPTAK TO SPEAK AT OUR OCTOBER MEETING MEMBERSHIP MEETING By Mark Trbovich THURSDAY, OCTOBER 11, 2012 After the Battles of 2nd Manassas and Ox Hill, 7:00 P.M. Centreville Library Confederate General Robert E. Lee took his starving Army of Northern Virginia north to the fertile and food GUEST SPEAKER: abundant State of Maryland. The BRCWRT is honored to welcome to our October 11 meeting, a National Park Service ranger who is a lifelong student of the Civil War John D. Hoptak and one of the most renown authors on the Battles of South Mountain and Antietam. TOPIC: John Hoptak graduated magna cum laude with a The Battle of South Mountain bachelor's degree in history from Kutztown University (2000) and earned a master's degree in history from and the Antietam Campaign Lehigh University (2003). He also holds an instructional I September 1863 certificate in social studies and citizenship education, 7- 12, in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. He has a strong background in American History, with the Ameri- can Civil War being his area of expertise and is currently employed as a park ranger at the Antietam National Bat- tlefield, Sharpsburg, Maryland. His first book entitled, "First in Defense of the Union: The Civil War History of the First Defenders," was published in 2004. Other books published in 2009 in- clude, “Our Boys Did Nobly: Schuylkill County, Pennsyl- vania, Soldiers at the Battles of South Mountain and An- tietam,” “They Will Be Remembered By A Grateful Peo- IN THIS ISSUE ple: Civil War Heroes of Schuylkill County,” and “Antietam Trivia.” His most recent books include, “The Battle of South Mountain,” published by The History The President’s Column Page 3 Press (2011) as part of its Civil War Sesquicentennial Series, as well as “Antietam: September 17, 1862” by Alabama Cemetery Dedication Page 4 the Western Maryland Interpretative Association.
    [Show full text]
  • Ox Hill Battlefield Park General Management Plan and Conceptual Development Plan
    Ox Hill Battlefield Park General Management Plan and Conceptual Development Plan Fairfax County Park Authority Approved January 2005 Ox Hill Battlefield General Management Plan and Conceptual Development Plan FAIRFAX COUNTY PARK AUTHORITY BOARD Harold L. Strickland, Chairman, Sully District Joanne E. Malone, Vice Chairman, Providence District Frank S. Vajda, Treasurer, Mason District Edward R. Batten, Sr., Lee District Glenda M. Blake, Hunter Mill District Kevin J. Fay, Dranesville District Kenneth G. Feng, Springfield District Harrison A. Glasgow, At-Large Georgette Kohler, At-Large George E. Lovelace, At-Large Gilbert S. McCutcheon, Mt. Vernon District Winifred S. Shapiro, Braddock District SENIOR STAFF Michael A. Kane, Director Timothy K. White, Deputy Director Lynn S. Tadlock, Director, Planning & Development Division Charlie Bittenbring, Acting Director, Park Services Division Miriam C. Morrison, Director, Administration Division Cindy Messinger, Interim Director, Resource Management Division Brian Daly, Director, Park Operations Judith Pedersen, Public Information Officer CITIZEN’S TASK FORCE Jo Balicki John McAnaw James Burgess Wally Owen Anne Erickson Ed Wenzel Leon Hartley Richard Wright Gary Jones PROJECT TEAM Kirk Holley, Branch Manager Michael Rierson James P. ‘Irish’ Grandfield, Project Manager Diane Probus Elizabeth Crowell Richard Sacchi Matt Devor Charles Smith Heather Melchior Robert Stevenson Jenny Pate 2 Ox Hill Battlefield General Management Plan and Conceptual Development Plan Acknowledgements The Park Authority gratefully acknowledges the contribution of the Ox Hill/Union Mills Task Force - Edward Wenzel, Jo Balicki, Wally Owen, James Burgess, John McAnaw, Leon Hartley, Richard Wright, Gary Jones, and Anne Erickson. The Task Force donated many hours toward the development of the park GMP and CDP.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Records
    HISTORIC RECORDS Ol'TBB FIRST IRA BARRIS GU ARD: O:aaAlllZAfl0N, JllABcam, RA.ms, Scotrre, EN&A.&BllBNTI .um GDJDUL SDVIOBI I DVlUN& TJIII lbmBLUOl{ 0.., 1881-1865, 'WITH OBSERVATIONS OF THE AUTHOR BY THE WAY, GlVINQ Skelc~e• of l~.e 2lmiea of t~.e l)otomat anb of t~c 9~.enanboa~. INTERESTING ACCOUNTS OF PRISON LIFE A.Do:. !rlDI SECRET SERVICE. Complete Lists ot- its om.cers and Ken. BY REv. LOUIS N. BOUDRYE, OJUP.UDr o::. !rlDI D&DDlllT. tLLUSTBATBD WITH STEEL PORTBAITS AND WOOD CUTS. T.BIBD BDm01'1 DLAB&llD, ALBANY, N. Y.: J. MUNSELL, 82 STATE STREET. 1868. Entered According to Act or Congress in the Year 1865. b;y LoUIB N. BoUDBYll, In the Clerk's om.ce of the District Court or the United States 1'or the Northern District of New York. a'. XONSBLL, l"BDl'l:BB. TO THJJJ BB.AV.EC BOYS OF TH1ff OLD FIFTH, who ha'D8 so oft,e,n durplaye4 UMUrpaBBea Paflriotiam, Furtifluil6 a'llil, Valor m fM 'lrging' 'Diciuitu<la of MiUta!rg Life,· and wluJ, on ,o mam,g '/iwodg F'UJ14JI of Batas, M1D6 M'l'fllcall,g "1'- Mm fke EJt,an,,ry Ban'IU'II', fllnil MlD8 mndi«rted its ootlwritg m t1,,s yres­ encs of i't, 6'Mlll,ie,, 0/1'6 flte# His- torio Becortls of fMvr NO- BLl!J DEEDS· DEDIO.ATED by tkffle CILAPL.AIN. HBAD QuARTE:as, Fifth N. Y. CavalTy,} Near Staunton, Va., June 6th, 1866. RBv. Loms N. Bou»RYB, Chaplain, Fifth N.
    [Show full text]
  • Stone Wall Dec 11 & Jan 12
    BRCWRT — Vol. XVIII, Issue 9, DEC. 2011—JAN. 2012 Page 1 The Newsletter of the Bull Run Civil War Round Table — Vol. XVIII, Issue 9, DEC. 2011—JAN. 2012 BRCWRT PRESIDENT TO SPEAK ON THE BATTLE OF MEMBERSHIP MEETING DRANESVILLE, DECEMBER 20, 1861 DECEMBER 8, 2011 Our speaker for the December general member- 7:00 P.M. Centreville Library ship meeting is BRCWRT President Mark Trbovich. His topic is a local battle, the Battle of Dranesville. Though GUEST SPEAKER: small in comparison to other Virginia battles, it had its effect on the area. It must not be forgotten and under- standing it in more detail is our goal. Mark Trbovich Mark is a Navy veteran and attended George TOPIC: Mason University and Kennedy Western University where he graduated with a business administration degree. The Battle of Dranesville, VA, Mark resides with his family in Prince William County. For the past two years he has been working for TASC, December 20, 1861 Inc. in Indian Head, Maryland. The previous 29 years, Mark worked for Raytheon Company in Falls Church, Vir- 6:30 P.M. Come early for ginia, as the test manager for Intelligence and Informa- Christmas/Holiday tion Systems. Refreshments Around 2000, Mark voluntarily began to research and write text for the well-known Civil War Trails pro- gram. This program began in Virginia and now has erected over 800 markers in Virginia, West Virginia, Ten- In 2009, he joined the Fairfax County Sesqui- nessee, and North Carolina. Mark has helped Prince Wil- centennial Committee and worked with a team to pro- liam County and Manassas to erect 16 of their 24 mark- duce the Fairfax County Civil War Heritage Trail brochure ers.
    [Show full text]
  • MASTER LIST: FAIRFAX COUNTY INVENTORY of HISTORIC SITES Sorted by Supervisory Districts As of August 2021
    MASTER LIST: FAIRFAX COUNTY INVENTORY OF HISTORIC SITES Sorted by Supervisory Districts As of August 2021 Status codes: * Indicates demolition of primary resource: potential intact archaeological components N National Register of Historic Places V Virginia Landmarks Register H Historic Overlay District L National Historic Landmark + Added to the Inventory of Historic Sites by the History Commission, but not yet included in tables in the Comprehensive Plan. Currently, the Comprehensive Plan shows the Inventory as of February 8, 2018 Red text includes other revisions that are not yet reflected in the Comprehensive Plan Braddock District Name Status Location Parcel Number Date Church of the Good Shepherd 5070 Twinbrook Run Drive 069-3 ((23)) 4 c. 1884-1888 Fairfax Church of the Holy Spirit 8800 Braddock Road 070-3 ((1)) 5 1966 Annandale Fairfax Villa Community Park East of Shirley Gate Road 056-4 ((6)) A, 39, c. 5000 BCE – between Route 29 and Braddock 40, 41, 42, 87A; Early 20th Road 057-3 ((1)) 1, 2; century 057-3 ((7)) A1 Little Zion Baptist Church and 10018 Burke Lake Road 077-4 ((1)) 14 1891 Cemetery Burke +National Bank of Fairfax 5234 Rolling Road, Burke 0694 01 0041C 1971-1972 Headquarters Building Oak Hill N, V 4716 Wakefield Chapel Road 070-1 ((16)) 285 c. 1790 Annandale Ossian Hall* 4957/5001 Regina Drive 070-4 ((6)) 124, c. 1783 Annandale 125 Ossian Hall Cemetery 7817 Royston Street 070-4 ((7)) 63 c. 1800 Annandale Wakefield Chapel 8415 Toll House Road 070-1 ((1)) 18 1897-1899 Annandale Dranesville District Name Status Location
    [Show full text]