Introduction
Notes INTRODUCTION 1. W. Bagehot, The English Constitution, R. Crossman (ed.) (London, 1963) p. 158. 2. G. Kitson Clark, The Making of Victorian England (London, 1965) p.208. 3. Gladstone memo, n.d. (? 12 April 1855) Gladstone Mss. 44745, fol. 203. 4. Kitson Clark, Making of Victorian England, pp. 210-11. 5. See G. H. L. LeMay, The Victorian Constitution (London, 1979) pp. 17-39; L. B. Namier, 'Monarchy and the Party System', in Per sonalities and Power (London, 1955); J.P. Mackintosh, The British Cabinet (London, 1962); A. S. Foord, 'The Waning of the Influence of the Crown', EHR, 62 (1947) pp. 484-526. 6. Bagehot, The English Constitution, p. 158. 7. See A. Mitchell, The Whigs in Opposition 1815-30 (Oxford, 1967); A. Aspinall, Lord Brougham and the Whig Party (London, 1972); J. Cannon, Parliamentary Reform (Cambridge, 1972); J. Derry, Charles James Fox (London, 1972); E. Smith, Whig Principles and Party Politics (Manchester, 1976); N. Gash, Reaction and Reconstruction in English Politics 1832-52 (Oxford, 1965); A. D. Kriegel (ed.) The Holland House Diaries (London, 1977); and L. Mitchell, Holland House (London, 1980). 8. See N. Gash, Mr. Secretary Peel (London, 1961) p. 9; and J. C. D. Clark, 'A General Theory of Party, Opposition and Government, 1688-1832', HJ, 23:2 (1980) pp. 307-11. 9. In I. D. C. Newbould, 'Whiggery and the Dilemma of Reform: Liberals, Radicals, and the Melbourne Administration, 1835-9', BIHR, 53 (1980) pp. 229-41, the Whigs' embarrassment of purpose is kindly interpreted as an attempt at compromise. The translation of an opposition tradition into government policy, however, was an obligation calculated to distress.
[Show full text]