DOCSLIB.ORG

Workshop Report DISASTER PREPAREDNESS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Workshop Report DISASTER PREPAREDNESS Regional Workshop: DISASTER PREPAREDNESS MAKES THE DIFFERENCE 18th & 19th June, 2018 Workshop Report Funded by European Union Civil Protecon and Humanitarian Aid 1. Report - Regional Workshop: Disaster Preparation makes the Difference: Contributions from ECHO and its partners to strategies for the Latin America and Caribbean region June 2018 We would like to express our deepest appreciation to all those who participated to the Disaster Preparedness Makes the Difference Regional workshop. This is the first time a DIPECHO disaster preparedness workshop is held jointly with the 3 sub regions together and this has been an enriching experience. We would like to acknowledge the crucial role of the organizing committee, who invested full effort in guiding the facilitation team in achieving the goal. Last but not least, many thanks to the ECHO partners for their commitments in demonstrating that disaster preparedness saves lives. Compiled by: UNISDR Photos: Upper-left photo shared by CEPREDENAC Center photos shared by the International Federation of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Bottom-right photo shared by UNISDR This document has been made possible by the support of the United Nations Disaster Risk Reduction Strategy (UNISDR) and with a financial contribution by the Directorate-General for European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations (DG-ECHO). These organizations are not responsible for the opinions contained in this document given that they do not reflect their official positions. It is prohibited to reproduce all or part of this document, either digitally or in any other format, without the vision of the owners of the intellectual property rights. DG-ECHO UNISDR Directorate-General for European Civil Protection United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction and Humanitarian Aid Operations Regional Office for the Americas and the ECHO Regional Office for Latin America and the Caribbean Caribbean City of Knowledge (Clayton) Panama. Managua, Nicaragua http://www.eird.org/americas/index.html Website: http://ec.europa.eu/echo 2 1. Table of Contents 1. Acronyms .............................................................................................................. 4 2. Executive Summary ............................................................................................... 6 3. Introduction ........................................................................................................ 10 a. Workshop Objective ................................................................................................... 11 b. Expected results ......................................................................................................... 11 c. Methodology .............................................................................................................. 12 4. Regional contribution to disaster preparation ..................................................... 13 a. Central America .......................................................................................................... 13 b. South America ............................................................................................................ 14 c. Caribbean ................................................................................................................... 16 5. Success stories at the local, regional and national levels ...................................... 17 a. Colombia: Strengthening resilience of the Wayúu indigenous community .................... 17 b. Guatemala: INFORM, an instrument to understand risk ............................................... 18 c. "EWS Verification List" in the Caribbean. ..................................................................... 18 6. Early Warning Systems: An unfinished challenge ................................................. 20 a. Bolivia: EWS and the DEWETRA Platform .................................................................... 20 b. Cuba: Risk reduction management centers and Early Warning Units. ........................... 21 c. Honduras: The tsunami recognition program ............................................................... 22 7. Collected Evidence .............................................................................................. 23 8. Recommendations for Implementation................................................................ 26 a. Recommendations for Central America ....................................................................... 26 b. Recommendations for South America ......................................................................... 29 c. Recommendations for the Caribbean .......................................................................... 36 9. Conclusions ......................................................................................................... 39 10. Attachments ....................................................................................................... 40 a. Attachment I: Agenda ................................................................................................. 40 b. Annex II: List of Participants ........................................................................................ 43 3 1. 1. Acronyms ACF Action Against Hunger CAPRADE Andean Committee for Disaster Prevention and Assistance CARICOM Caribbean Community CDEMA Caribbean Disaster Emergency Management Agency CDM Comprehensive Disaster Management CEPREDENAC Coordinator Center for the Prevention of Natural Disasters in Central America CGRR Management Centers for Risk Reduction (Cuba) CIMA Research and Environmental Monitoring Centre COLRED Local Disaster Reduction Coordinators (Guatemala) CONIDA Peruvian Space Agency CONRED National Disaster Reduction Coordinator (Guatemala) CRM Comprehensive Risk Management DIPECHO European Commission Disaster Preparation Program ECHO European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations DRM Disaster Risk Management FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations FICR International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies GTANGRD Group of High Level Authorities for Comprehensive Disaster Risk Management from (UNASUR) INTECAP Technical Training and Productivity Institute (Guatemala) IOC UNESCO Inter-Governmental Coordination Group MADR Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (Colombia) PAHO/WHO Pan-American Health Organization PAT Early Warning Points (Cuba) PCGIR Central American Policy for Comprehensive Disaster Risk Management UNDP United Nations Development Program PREDECAN Andean Community Disaster Prevention PRRD Regional Disaster Risk Reduction Plan PTWC Tsunami Alert Center in the Pacific Ocean DRR Disaster Risk Management EWS Early Warning Systems SENAMHI National Meteorology and Hydrology Service (Bolivia) 4 1. SICA Central American Integration System TAC CDEMA Technical Advice Committee UNASUR Union of South American Nations UNFPA United Nations Population Fund UNGRD National Unit for Disaster Risk Management (Colombia) UNISDR United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction VIDECI Vice Ministry of Civil Defense (Bolivia) 5 1. 2. Executive Summary Over the last two decades, the DIPECHO program has made an impact in determining financing priorities for disaster preparation throughout the region, by holding consultation workshops with key actors involved in this area both at national and sub-regional levels in Central America, South America and the Caribbean. Guidelines, recommendations and strategies are created during each workshop, all of which facilitate and complement sub-regional events. In 2018, actors from the three sub-regions, Central America, South America and the Caribbean, met for the first time to share visions, experiences, knowledge and ideas about how investments in disaster preparation make a difference. This event was a preliminary activity for the Regional Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction in the Americas, which took place in Cartagena de Indias, Colombia from June 20 – 22, 2018. The workshop sought to illustrate how certain degree of preparation (with or without ECHO financing) can make a difference in disaster response and early recovery. This is a strategically important point, especially because limited resources require the optimization of resource allocation for disaster preparation. Of equal importance is showing how these actions are integrated into disaster risk management strategies and how disaster preparation is aligned with national and regional risk reduction actions. 130 key actors participated in the workshop, including representatives that work in the areas of disaster preparation and response in Latin America and the Caribbean, staff from national disaster risk management systems in the region, managers of intergovernmental disaster risk management organizations, current partners from the European Commission and other strategic partners including international, regional and sub-regional entities, United Nations agencies, the International Federation of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement, multilateral agencies and bilateral cooperation agencies working on this issue.1 The workshop was not focused on a generic presentation of projects financed by ECHO, but rather a presentation of experiences and achievements expected over the next 18 months. Altogether, 31 experiences were systematized; 7 from Central America, 13 from South America and 11 from the Caribbean. These were 1 See Annex II: Participant List 6 1. key inputs that helped structure the agenda of the workshop
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Conversation from the Public Forum: 20 Years Since The
    Conversation from the public forum Minutes from the public forum “20 years since the signing of the Peace Accords: the situation of human rights defenders” that took place on October 5, 2016 in Guatemala City. Design and layout: Pedro Ferrigno - [email protected] Photographs: James Rodríguez, PBI. The transcript from the dialogue session “20 years since the signing of the Peace Accords, the situation of human rights defenders”, is a publication elaborated and edited by PBI Guatemala. PBI Guatemala does not assume responsibility for the statements issued by third parties in this publication. The public forum and this document were funded by: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License. You can remix, tweak, and build upon it non-commercially, as long as you credit PBI (coordinacion@pbi- guatemala.org) and license your new creations under the identical terms. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. You may not use the material for commercial purposes. FOREWORD On the twentieth anniversary of the signing of the Peace Accords in Guatemala, with support from Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung, we host a public forum to discuss the current situation of human rights defenders. The event covered topics like the advances made in recent years, to challenges of the past, present and future.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change in Central America | Potential Impacts and Public Policy Options
    1 Climate Change in Central America | Potential Impacts and Public Policy Options Thank you for your interest in this ECLAC publication ECLAC Publications Please register if you would like to receive information on our editorial products and activities. When you register, you may specify your particular areas of interest and you will gain access to our products in other formats. www.cepal.org/en/suscripciones Climate Change in Central America: Potential Impacts and Public Policy Options ALICIA BÁRCENA Executive Secretary MARIO CIMOLI Deputy Executive Secretary HUGO EDUARDO BETETA Director ECLAC Subregional Headquarters in Mexico JOSELUIS SAMANIEGO Director Sustainable Development and Human Settlements Division LUIS MIGUEL GALINDO Chief of the Climate Change Unit Sustainable Development and Human Settlements Division JULIE LENNOX Focal Point of Climate Change and Chief of the Agricultural Development Unit DIANA RAMÍREZ AND JAIME OLIVARES Researchers of the Agricultural Development and Economics of Climate Change Unit ECLAC Subregional Headquarters in Mexico This publication was based on analysis between 2008 and 2015 within the framework of “The Economics of Climate Change in Central America Initiative”, coordinated between the Ministries of Environment, Treasury or Finance, their Ministerial Councils and Executive Secretariats of the Central American Commission for Environment and Development (CCAD) and the Council of Ministers of Finance/Treasury of Central America and Dominic Republic (COSEFIN), and the Secretariat for Central American Economic Integration (SIECA), as bodies of the Central American Integration System (SICA) and the ECLAC Subregional Headquarters in Mexico; with financial support from UKAID/DFID and DANIDA. The agricultural series was coordinated with the Ministries of Agriculture of SICA, their Ministerial Council (CAC), its Executive Secretariat and Technical Group on Climate Change and Integrated Risk Management (GTCCGIR).
    [Show full text]
  • Childhood and Migration in Central and North America: Causes, Policies, Practices and Challenges
    Childhood and Migration in Central and North America: Causes, Policies, Practices and Challenges Copyright © 2015 Coordinated and edited by Karen Musalo, Director Pablo Ceriani Cernadas, Coordinator Lisa Frydman, Associate Director Migration & Asylum Program Center for Gender & Refugee Studies Justice and Human Rights Center University of California Hastings College National University of Lanús, Argentina of the Law 29 de Septiembre 3901 CP (1826) 200 McAllister Street Remedios de Escalada, Lanús San Francisco, CA 94102 Buenos Aires, Argentina cgrs.uchastings.edu 011-54-11-5533-5600 001-415-565-4877 Contents Acknowledgments Executive Summary Preface Introduction Chapter 1 Children on the Run: Unaccompanied Children Leaving El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, and Mexico and International Protection United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees Children in the Context of Migration in Central America’s Northern Triangle Chapter 2 Honduras Casa Alianza Chapter 3 Guatemala Asociación Pop No’j and Pastoral de la Movilidad Humana Chapter 4 El Salvador Universidad Centroamericana “José Simeón Cañas” Chapter 5 Introduction to Chapters on Children in the Context of Migration in Mexico—Two Borders: One Childhood Centro de Derechos Humanos Fray Matías de Córdova Chapter 6 Southern Mexico Centro de Derechos Humanos Fray Matías de Córdova Chapter 7 Northern Mexico Programa de Defensa e Incidencia Binacional: Casas YMCA de Menores Migrantes and Coalición Pro-Defensa del Migrante, A.C. Chapter 8 Introduction to Chapters on Children in the Context of Migration
    [Show full text]
  • An Integrated Structural and GPS Study of the Jalpatagua Fault, Southeastern Guatemala
    Research Paper GEOSPHERE An integrated structural and GPS study of the Jalpatagua fault, southeastern Guatemala 1 1 2 1 1 1,3 4 4 GEOSPHERE, v. 17, no. 1 Bridget Garnier , Basil Tikoff , Omar Flores , Brian Jicha , Charles DeMets , Beatriz Cosenza-Muralles , Douglas Hernandez , Griselda Marroquin , Luis Mixco4, and Walter Hernandez4 https://doi.org/10.1130/GES02243.1 1Department of Geoscience, University of Wisconsin–Madison, 1215 West Dayton St., Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA 2Centro de Estudios Superiores de Energías y Minas–Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de San Carlos, Ciudad Universitaria, Zona 12, Edificio T-1, tercer nivel, Ciudad de Guatemala 01012, Guatemala 3Instuto de Invesgación en Ciencias Físicas y Matemácas, Escuela de Ciencias Físicas y Matemácas, Universidad de San Carlos, Ciudad Universitaria, Zona 12, Edificio T-1, segundo nivel, Ciudad 13 figures; 6 tables; 1 supplemental file de Guatemala, Guatemala 4Dirección del Observatorio, Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales, Km. 5½ carretera a Santa Tecla, colonio y calle Las Mercedes, San Salvador, El Salvador CORRESPONDENCE: [email protected] ABSTRACT ■ INTRODUCTION Guzmán-Speziale et al., 2005; Lyon-Caen et al., 2006; CITATION: Garnier, B., Tikoff, B., Flores, O., Jicha, B., DeMets, C., Cosenza-Muralles, B., Hernandez, D., Franco et al., 2012). The dextral forearc fault system Marroquin, G., Mixco, L., and Hernandez, W., 2021, An The Jalpatagua fault in Guatemala accommodates Moving forearc slivers typically result from is the widest in Nicaragua, with NE-oriented sinistral integrated structural and GPS study of the Jalpatagua dextral movement of the Central America forearc. We strain partitioning due to oblique convergence faults that suggest bookshelf faulting may accom- fault, south eastern Guatemala: Geosphere, v.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2016
    CHAPTER III ACTIVITIES OF THE RAPPORTEURSHIPS, COUNTRY AND THEMATIC REPORTS AND PROMOTION A. Activities of the Rapporteurships 1. As of 1990, the Inter-American Commission began to create Thematic Rapporteurships for the purpose of focusing attention on certain persons, groups, and communities that are especially exposed to human rights violations in light of their situation of vulnerability and due to the historical discrimination to which they have been subjected. The aim in establishing a Thematic Rapporteurship is to strengthen, give impetus to, and systematize the work of the Inter-American Commission itself on specific issues. In this regard, the Rapporteurships encourage awareness of human rights among the peoples of the Americas.1 The Rapporteurships also support the work of the IACHR in developing legal standards; they contribute to the knowledge of the mechanisms of the inter-American system; and they further access to national and international justice for the persons, groups, and communities related to this thematic approach. At the same time, the Rapporteurships of the IACHR engage in sustained cooperation with various sectors working on the issues they focus on, including the Rapporteurships of the United Nations and other universal mechanisms, civil society organizations, the states, and academia, among others. 2. The Thematic Rapporteurships of the IACHR are governed by provisions established in Article 15 of its Rules of Procedure and in the practices established by the plenary of the Commission. The Commission approves the reports and work plans of each Rapporteurship and supervises the day-to-day implementation of their mandates. Given their status as thematic offices created by the IACHR itself, the Rules of Procedure of the IACHR define with precision the procedure for establishing them and for choosing the thematic rapporteurs.
    [Show full text]
  • Zika Virus, Microcephaly and Guillain
    SITUATION REPORT ZIKA VIRUS MICROCEPHALY GUILLAIN-BARRÉ SYNDROME 3 NOVEMBER 2016 DATA AS OF 2 NOVEMBER 2016 KEY UPDATES . Countries and territories reporting mosquito-borne Zika virus infections for the first time in the past week: o None . Countries and territories reporting microcephaly and other central nervous system (CNS) malformations potentially associated with Zika virus infection for the first time in the past week: o Bolivia, Trinidad and Tobago, and Viet Nam . Countries and territories reporting Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) cases associated with Zika virus infection for the first time in the past week: o None . The Ministry of Health and Sport of Myanmar reported a confirmed case of Zika virus. The case is under investigation as to determine if this is an autochthonous (locally- acquired) or imported case. ANALYSIS . Overall, the global risk assessment has not changed since last week. Viet Nam is the second county in South-East Asia to report microcephaly cases potentially linked with Zika virus. This follows the two microcephaly cases reported in Thailand in the 6 October Zika situation report. Similar to the cases reported in Thailand, genetic sequencing of the virus was not possible therefore it is not known whether the mother was infected with a virus related to the same lineage as previously isolated in South-East Asia, or if there has instead been transmission of a virus imported from another location. The mother of the baby with microcephaly reported in Viet Nam had no history of travel outside of the country. To date, there have been no imported Zika virus cases reported in Viet Nam.
    [Show full text]
  • UNESCO Condemns Killing of Journalists Assassinated Journalists in 2016
    UNESCO Condemns Killing of Journalists Assassinated Journalists in 2016 Mohammed al-Absi (Yemeni) Led investigative reports in Yemen for several news outlets Killed on 20 December 2016 in Yemen [UNESCO Statement] Larry Que (Filipino) Journalist for Catanduanes News Now Killed on 20 December 2016 in the Philippines [UNESCO Statement] [Response from Member State 2017] Mohammad Nasir Mudasir (Afghan) Manager and editor-in-chief of the Paigham Meli Logar radio station Killed on 15 December 2016 in Afghanistan [UNESCO Statement] [Response from Member State 2017] Soe Moe Tun (Myanmarese) Reporter for local newspaper Daily Eleven Killed on 13 December 2016 in Myanmar [UNESCO Statement] Jesús Adrián Rodríguez Samaniego (Mexican) Journalist for a radio local current affairs programme on Antena 102.5FM radio Killed on 10 December 2016 in Mexico [UNESCO Statement] [Response of Member State 2017] Mohammed Thabet al-Obeidi (Iraqi) Director of local radio station Baba Gurgur, part of the Iraqiya Media Network Killed on 6 December 2016 in Iraq [UNESCO Statement] [Response from Member State 2017] Katri Ikävalko (Finnish) Journalist for the local daily newspaper Uutisvuoksi Killed on 4 December 2016 in Finland [UNESCO Statement] [Response from Member State 2017] Anne Vihavainen (Finnish) Journalist for the regional daily newspaper Etelä-Saimaa Killed on 4 December 2016 in Finland [UNESCO Statement] [Response from Member State 2017] 1 UNESCO Condemns Killing of Journalists Assassinated Journalists in 2016 Hernán Choquepata Ordoñez (Peruvian) Presenter
    [Show full text]
  • UNESCO Condemns Killing of Journalists Assassinated Journalists in Guatemala
    UNESCO Condemns Killing of Journalists Assassinated Journalists in Guatemala Luis Alfredo de Leon Miranda (Guatemala) Journalist Killed on 1 February 2018 [UNESCO Statement] Laurent Angel Castillo Fuentes (Guatemala) Journalist Killed on 1 February 2018 [UNESCO Statement] Manuel Salvador Villagrán Trujillo (Guatemalan) Reporter for several news media Killed on 19 January 2017 in Guatemala [UNESCO Statement] Hamilton Hernández Vásquez (Guatemalan) Journalist and presenter with Guatemala’s Channel 5 television Killed on 5 November 2016 in Guatemala [UNESCO Statement] Felipe David Munguía Jiménez (Guatemalan) Cameraman for Canal 21 television Killed on 4 September 2016 in Guatemala [UNESCO Statement] Winston Leonardo Cano Túnchez (Guatemalan) Presenter on local radio La Jefa Killed on 8 April 2016 in Guatemala [UNESCO Statement] 1 UNESCO Condemns Killing of Journalists Assassinated Journalists in Guatemala Álvaro Alfredo Aceituno López (Guatemalan) Director and broadcaster of Radio Ilusión Killed on 25 June 2016 in Guatemala [UNESCO Statement] Víctor Hugo Valdez Cardona (Guatemalan) Broadcast journalist Killed on 7 June 2016 in Guatemala [UNESCO Statement] Diego Salomón Esteban Gaspar (Guatemalan) Presenter on local broadcaster Radio Sembrador Killed on 30 April 2016 in Guatemala [UNESCO Statement] Mario Roberto Salazar Barahona (Guatemalan) Journalist and the director of radio Estéreo Azúcar Killed on 17 March 2016 in Guatemala [UNESCO Statement] Guido Armando Giovanni Villatoro Ramos (Guatemalan) Television cameraman Killed on 13 March
    [Show full text]
  • 8875/1/16 REV 1 JV/Np 1 DGD 2C Delegations Will Find Annexed The
    Council of the European Union Brussels, 15 June 2016 (OR. en) 8875/1/16 REV 1 CORDROGUE 23 COLAC 30 NOTE From: EU co-Presidency To: Delegations No. prev. doc.: 8875/16 Subject: EU-CELAC Coordination and Cooperation Mechanism on Drugs - Annual Report June 2015 - June 2016 Delegations will find annexed the above-mentioned document to be adopted at the forthcoming XVIII High Level Meeting of the EU-CELAC Coordination and Cooperation Mechanism on Drugs to be held from 16 to 17 June 2016 in the Netherlands. 8875/1/16 REV 1 JV/np 1 DGD 2C EN ANNEX This report is the result of a regular analysis of the activities carried out and results of the Coordination and Cooperation Mechanism on Drugs between the European Union (EU) and the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC) from June 2015 to June 2016. The information contained in this report is limited to inter-regional programmes and does not contain information on other funded EU programmes at the regional and bilateral levels in the field of drugs. 1. EU-CELAC Technical Committee Meetings Three meetings of the EU-CELAC Technical Committee on Drugs took place during this period: on 10 July 2015 under the co-presidency of Luxembourg and Mexico, and on 12 May 2016 and 9 June 2016 under the co-presidency of the Netherlands and Mexico. The meeting of 10 July 2015 was dedicated to discussing the results of the High Level Meeting in Montevideo, Uruguay. The delegations reported on the drug situation and policy developments in the EU and CELAC and were updated on the EU-CELAC cooperation activities, developed under the Cooperation Programme on drugs policies between Latin America and the European Union (COPOLAD), as well as on EU cooperation activities with certain CELAC countries under the Cocaine Route Programme.
    [Show full text]
  • Childhood and Migration in Central and North America: Causes, Policies, Practices and Challenges
    Childhood and Migration in Central and North America: Causes, Policies, Practices and Challenges Copyright © 2015 Coordinated and edited by Karen Musalo, Director Pablo Ceriani Cernadas, Coordinator Lisa Frydman, Associate Director Migration & Asylum Program Center for Gender & Refugee Studies Justice and Human Rights Center University of California Hastings College National University of Lanús, Argentina of the Law 29 de Septiembre 3901 CP (1826) 200 McAllister Street Remedios de Escalada, Lanús San Francisco, CA 94102 Buenos Aires, Argentina cgrs.uchastings.edu 011-54-11-5533-5600 001-415-565-4877 Contents Acknowledgments Executive Summary Preface Introduction Chapter 1 Children on the Run: Unaccompanied Children Leaving El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, and Mexico and International Protection United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees Children in the Context of Migration in Central America’s Northern Triangle Chapter 2 Honduras Casa Alianza Chapter 3 Guatemala Asociación Pop No’j and Pastoral de la Movilidad Humana Chapter 4 El Salvador Universidad Centroamericana “José Simeón Cañas” Chapter 5 Introduction to Chapters on Children in the Context of Migration in Mexico—Two Borders: One Childhood Centro de Derechos Humanos Fray Matías de Córdova Chapter 6 Southern Mexico Centro de Derechos Humanos Fray Matías de Córdova Chapter 7 Northern Mexico Programa de Defensa e Incidencia Binacional: Casas YMCA de Menores Migrantes and Coalición Pro-Defensa del Migrante, A.C. Chapter 8 Introduction to Chapters on Children in the Context of Migration
    [Show full text]
  • Cop17 Prop. 55
    Original language: English, French and Spanish1 CoP17 Prop. 55 CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA ____________________ Seventeenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties Johannesburg (South Africa), 24 September – 5 October 2016 CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS FOR AMENDMENT OF APPENDICES I AND II A. Proposal Inclusion of the genus Dalbergia in CITES Appendix II with exception to the species included in Appendix I. The UNEP-WCMC assessed the Dalbergia species of Latin America and concluded: “… all populations of Dalbergia spp. from South and Central America appear to meet the criteria for listing in CITES Appendix II” (UNEP-WCMC, 2015). Including the whole genus in Appendix II will be essential for the control of international trade by eliminating the arduous task of enforcement and customs officers of differentiating between the hundreds of Dalbergia species listed and not listed in CITES. The inclusion will help ensure that legal trade does not become a direct cause of the extinction of these highly threatened species and will help curb illegal trade. Considering that CITES Appendix II must include all species, which although not necessarily now threatened with extinction may become so unless trade in specimens of such species is subject to strict regulation in order to avoid utilization incompatible with their survival, it is important to include the genus Dalbergia in CITES Appendix II. a) Resolution Conf. 9.24, Annex 2 a, Criterion A - ”It is known, or can be inferred or projected, that the regulation of trade in the species is necessary to avoid it becoming eligible for inclusion in Appendix I in the near future”.
    [Show full text]
  • 8875/1/16 REV 1 JV/Np 1 DGD 2C Delegations Will Find
    Council of the European Union Brussels, 15 June 2016 (OR. en) 8875/1/16 REV 1 CORDROGUE 23 COLAC 30 NOTE From: EU co-Presidency To: Delegations No. prev. doc.: 8875/16 Subject: EU-CELAC Coordination and Cooperation Mechanism on Drugs - Annual Report June 2015 - June 2016 Delegations will find annexed the above-mentioned document to be adopted at the forthcoming XVIII High Level Meeting of the EU-CELAC Coordination and Cooperation Mechanism on Drugs to be held from 16 to 17 June 2016 in the Netherlands. 8875/1/16 REV 1 JV/np 1 DGD 2C EN ANNEX This report is the result of a regular analysis of the activities carried out and results of the Coordination and Cooperation Mechanism on Drugs between the European Union (EU) and the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC) from June 2015 to June 2016. The information contained in this report is limited to inter-regional programmes and does not contain information on other funded EU programmes at the regional and bilateral levels in the field of drugs. 1. EU-CELAC Technical Committee Meetings Three meetings of the EU-CELAC Technical Committee on Drugs took place during this period: on 10 July 2015 under the co-presidency of Luxembourg and Mexico, and on 12 May 2016 and 9 June 2016 under the co-presidency of the Netherlands and Mexico. The meeting of 10 July 2015 was dedicated to discussing the results of the High Level Meeting in Montevideo, Uruguay. The delegations reported on the drug situation and policy developments in the EU and CELAC and were updated on the EU-CELAC cooperation activities, developed under the Cooperation Programme on drugs policies between Latin America and the European Union (COPOLAD), as well as on EU cooperation activities with certain CELAC countries under the Cocaine Route Programme.
    [Show full text]