DOCSLIB.ORG

In the Supreme Court of the United States

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
In the Supreme Court of the United States No. 18-6135 In the Supreme Court of the United States JAMES K. KAHLER, Petitioner, v. KANSAS, Respondent. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE KANSAS SUPREME COURT BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE LEGAL HISTORI- ANS AND SOCIOLOGISTS IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER Allison R. McLaughlin* Theresa Wardon Benz Wheeler Trigg O’Donnell LLP 370 17th Street, Suite 4500 Denver, Colorado 80202 (303) 244-1800 [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Amici Curiae JUNE 7, 2019 *Counsel of Record TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ....................................... iii INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE ................................ 1 SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT ............................ 2 ARGUMENT ................................................................ 5 I. ISSUES OF INSANITY AND CRIMINAL LIABILITY HAVE BEEN DEBATED SINCE ANTIQUITY ...................... 5 II. MORAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR CRIMES EMERGED AS A BEDROCK PRINCIPLE OF ANGLO-AMERICAN JURISPRUDENCE ........................................... 9 A. The common law concept of mens rea sets the stage for defenses based on lack of moral culpability ....... 10 B. The insanity defense takes shape in the centuries before the M’Naghten Rules .................................. 12 C. Hadfield in 1800 extends the insanity defense to those who, because of their delusions, intended to commit crime .................... 15 D. Between 1800 and 1843, moral guilt solidifies as a necessary component to conviction ....................... 18 ii E. The M’Naghten Rules formalize the necessity of moral guilt for a crime ..................................................... 21 CONCLUSION .......................................................... 24 iii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page CASES Ball’s Case, 2 City-Hall Recorder 85 (N.Y.C. 1817) .................. 24 Commonwealth v. Miller, 1 Phrenological J. 272 (1838) ................................ 24 Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145 (1968) .................................................. 3 Holloway v. United States, 148 F.2d 665 (D.C. Cir. 1945) .................................. 5 M’Naghten’s Case, 8 Eng. Rep. 718 (1843) ........................................... 23 Montana v. Egelhoff, 518 U.S. 37 (1996) .................................................... 3 Moore v. City of East Cleveland, 431 U.S. 494 (1977) .................................................. 3 Morissette v. United States, 342 U.S. 246 (1952) .................................................. 4 Sinclair v. State, 132 So. 581 (Miss. 1931) .................................... 4, 25 State v. Herrera, 895 P.2d 359 (Utah 1995) (Stewart, J., dissenting) .......................................................................... 3, 4, 5 iv State v. Korell, 690 P.2d 992 (Mont. 1984) ..................................... 24 State v. Mahn, 25 Kan. 182 (Kan. 1881) ........................................ 23 OTHER AUTHORITIES 1 Kings 3:9 ................................................................... 6 1 Nigel D. Walker, Crime and Insanity in England, The Historical Part, 40 (1968) ......................... 11, 12 1 The Digest of Justinian 821.11 (Alan Watson trans., Univ. Pa. Press 1985) (c. 533 A.D.) ......................... 5 4 William Blackstone, Commentaries (1765–1769).. 13 Anthony Platt & Bernard Diamond, The Origins and Development of the “Wild Beast” Concept of Mental Illness and Its Relation to Theories of Criminal Responsibility, 1 J. Hist. Behav. Sci. 355 (1965) .... 3 Anthony Platt & Bernard L. Diamond, The Origins of the Right and Wrong Test of Criminal Responsibility and its Subsequent Development in the United States: An Historical Survey, 54 Cal. L. Rev. 1227 (1966) ............................................. passim Aristotle, The Nicomachean Ethics 58 (Ross transl. 1954) (c. 384 B.C.E.) ................................................ 7 Augustine, On the Forgiveness of Sins and Baptism Book I, Ch. 66–67) .................................................... 9 v B. Jones, The Law and Legal Theory of the Greeks 264 (1956) ................................................................. 3 Dante Alighieri, The Divine Comedy: Purgatorio Canto 16, 66–84 ....................................................... 7 Eugene J. Chesney, Concept of Mens Rea in the Criminal Law 29 J. Crim. L. & Crim. 627 (1939)........................................... 10, 11 Francis B. Sayre, Mens Rea, 45 Harv. L. Rev. 974 (1932) .................................................................. 9, 12 Galen On the Affected Parts 93 (Rudolph E. Siegel trans. & ed. 1976)..................................................... 8 George Horowitz, The Spirit of Jewish Law 167–70 (1933) ........................................................................ 6 Hebrews 5:14 ................................................................ 6 James Prichard, A Treatise on Insanity and Other Disorders Affecting the Mind 12, 95 (1835)........... 19 Joel P. Eigen, Mad-doctors in the Dock: Defending the Diagnosis 29–49 (2016) .......................... 8, 16, 18, 19 Joel P. Eigen, Witnessing Insanity: Madness and Mad-doctors in the English Court ................. passim John H. Langbein, Shaping the Eighteenth-Century Criminal Trial: A View from the Ryder Sources, 50 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1, 263 (1983).................................. 13 John Wigmore, Responsibility for Tortious Acts: Its History, 7 Harv. L. Rev. 315 (1894) ..................... 8, 9 vi Kathryn J. Fritz, Note, The Proposed Insanity Defense: Should the Quality of Mercy Suffer for the Sake of Safety?, 22 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 49 (1984) .. 12 Michael Dalton, The Countrey Justice 244 (1630) ... 13 Naomi Hurnard, The King’s Pardon Before A.D. 1307 (1969) ...................................................................... 12 Nigel D. Walker, The Insanity Defense Before 1800, 477 Annals Am. Acad. Pol. & Soc. Sci. 25 (1985) .. 7, 8, 11 Norman J. Finkel, Insanity on Trial (1988) ....... 11, 15 Phillipe Pinel, A Treatise on Insanity 15–56 (D.D. Davis transl. 1806) ................................................. 19 Plato, Laws Book XI, at 934 (Thomas L. Pangle trans., 1988) (c. 345 B.C.) ........................................ 6 Plato, The Republic 350 (F.M. Cornford trans., 1945)7 Richard Moran, Knowing Right from Wrong: the Insanity Defense of Daniel McNaughtan 1 (1981) 21 Richard Moran, The Origins of Insanity as a Special Verdict: The Trial for Treason of James Hadfield (1800), 19 Law & Society Rev. 487 (1985) ............ 16 Richard Moran, The Origins of Insanity as a Special Verdict: The Trial for Treason of James Hadfield (1800), 19 Law & Society Rev., 487–519 (1985)... 16, 17, 18, 19 vii Richard Moran, The Punitive Uses of the Insanity Defense: The Trial for Treason of Edward Oxford (1840), 9 Int. J. Law & Psychiatry 171–90 (1986) 20 Robert H Dreher, Origin, Development and Present Status of Insanity as a Defense to Criminal Responsibility in the Common Law, 3 J. H. Behav. Sci. 47, 49–52 (1967) ................................................ 9 Sir Matthew Hale, History of the Pleas of the Crown 14–15 (1736) ........................................................... 13 The Babylonian Talmud, Baba Kamma 501–02 (I. Epstein ed. 1935) (c. 500)......................................... 6 The Reports of Sir Edward Coke 124 (George Wilson ed. 1777) ................................................................. 12 Tr. of Daniel M’Naughten (Feb. 27, 1843), Old Bailey Proceedings Online, https://www.oldbaileyonline.org/browse.jsp?id=def1 -874-18430227&div=t18430227-874#highlight (last visited June 5, 2019) .............................................. 22 Tr. of Edward Oxford (July 6, 1840), Old Bailey Proceedings Online, https://www.oldbaileyonline.org/browse.jsp?div=t18 400706-1877 (last visited June 5, 2019) ......... 20, 21 Tr. of Francis Parr (Jan. 15, 1787), Old Bailey Proceedings Online, https://www.oldbaileyonline.org/browse.jsp?id=t178 70115-1-person10&div=t17870115-1#highlight (last visited June 5, 2019) ............................ 4, 13, 14 viii Tr. of John Hollingsworth (Sept. 14, 1840), Old Bailey Proceedings Online, https://www.oldbaileyonline.org/browse.jsp?div=t18 400914-2316 (last visited June 5, 2019) ............... 19 Tr. of Samuel Burt (July 19, 1786), Old Bailey Proceedings Online, https://www.oldbaileyonline.org/browse.jsp?div=t17 860719-31 (last visited June 5, 2019) ................... 14 William Shakespeare, Julius Caesar act 1, sc. 2, 140– 41 .............................................................................. 7 Yearbooks of Henry VII, 21 Michaelmas Term, plea 16 (1505) ................................................................. 12 1 INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE1 Amici curiae are four of the leading experts on the insanity defense and Anglo-American legal history. Joel P. Eigen, the lead contributor to this brief, is Emeritus Charles A. Dana Professor of Sociology at Franklin & Marshall College, where he focuses on mental derangement and criminal responsibility, juve- nile justice, and capital punishment. Eigen has been teaching and writing about the insanity defense and related issues throughout his career. Eigen published Witnessing Insanity: Madness and Mad-doctors in the English Court, the first systematic investigation of the evolution of medical testimony in British insanity tri- als from its beginnings in 1760 to 1843, when the in- sanity rules were formulated during the trial of Daniel M’Naghten. Thomas A. Green is John Philip Dawson Professor of Law, Emeritus, of the University of Michigan Law School, where he focuses
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Queen Victoria: a Life Free
    FREE QUEEN VICTORIA: A LIFE PDF Lytton Strachey | 256 pages | 13 Sep 2012 | I.B.Tauris & Co Ltd | 9781780760483 | English | London, United Kingdom Queen Victoria: A Life of Contradictions by Matthew Dennison Culture Trip stands with Black Lives Matter. The newlywed couple left Buckingham Palace in an open carriage and headed towards Hyde Park, but they had barely left the palace when year-old barman Edward Oxford fired two pistols at the queen on Constitution Hill before the crowd Queen Victoria: A Life him down. Oxford, meanwhile, went on to spend 24 years in the once-infamous Bethlem asylum before deportation to Australia, where Britain had established several penal colonies. Albert reported the incident to royal security, but began to think his eyes may have been deceiving him when he realised no one else in the royal convoy Queen Victoria: A Life noticed the strange occurrence. Albert dismissed his doubts regarding the events of the previous day May 29 until a Queen Victoria: A Life lad who had been in the crowd reported seeing exactly what Albert had described. It was decided that the royal couple would leave the palace in a closed carriage and set off through the parks in an attempt to lure the assailant out for a second go. Sure enough, a shot rang out as the convoy travelled through the parks and a nearby police officer pounced on the shooter. The two-time failed assassin, revealed to be an unemployed carpenter called John Francis, was sentenced to be hanged and beheaded — but fortunately for him, Victoria commuted his sentence to life in Australian exile.
    [Show full text]
  • The Young Victoria Production Notes
    THE YOUNG VICTORIA PRODUCTION NOTES GK Films Presents THE YOUNG VICTORIA Emily Blunt Rupert Friend Paul Bettany Miranda Richardson Jim Broadbent Thomas Kretschmann Mark Strong Jesper Christensen Harriet Walter Directed by Jean-Marc Vallée Screenplay By Julian Fellowes Produced by Graham King Martin Scorsese Tim Headington Sarah Ferguson, The Duchess of York 2 SHORT SYNOPSIS The Young Victoria chronicles Queen Victoria's ascension to the throne, focusing on the early turbulent years of her reign and her legendary romance and marriage to Prince Albert. SYNOPSIS 1837. VICTORIA (17) (Emily Blunt) is the object of a royal power struggle. Her uncle, KING WILLIAM (Jim Broadbent), is dying and Victoria is in line for the throne. Everyone is vying to win her favor. However Victoria is kept from the court by her overbearing mother, THE DUCHESS OF KENT (Miranda Richardson), and her ambitious advisor, CONROY (Mark Strong). Victoria hates them both. Her only friend is her doting governess, LEHZEN (Jeanette Hain), who is seemingly as untrustworthy as the rest. Victoria’s handsome cousin, ALBERT (Rupert Friend) is invited to visit by her mother. He's also the nephew of her Uncle, KING LEOPOLD OF BELGIUM (Thomas Kretschmann). It's obvious that Albert has been coached to win her hand. At first she's annoyed as she has no intention of being married. She never wants to be controlled again. However Albert is also tired of being manipulated by his relatives. Victoria and Albert talk openly and sincerely and become friends. When he returns home she grants him permission to write to her.
    [Show full text]
  • Preparatory Schools 2018 a Guide to 1500 Independent Preparatory and Junior Schools in the United Kingdom 1 Providing Education for 2 ⁄2 to 13-Year-Olds
    JOHN CATT’S Preparatory Schools 2018 A guide to 1500 independent preparatory and junior schools in the United Kingdom 1 providing education for 2 ⁄2 to 13-year-olds 21ST EDITION The UK’s Leading Supplier of School and Specialist Minibuses • Fully Type Approved 9 - 17 Seat Choose with confidence, our knowledge and School Minibuses support make the difference • All The Leading Manufacturers • D1 and B Licence Driver Options 01202 827678 • New Euro Six Engines, Low Emission redkite-minibuses.com Zone (LEZ) Compliant [email protected] • Finance Option To Suit all Budgets • Nationwide Service and Support FORD PEUGEOT VAUXHALL APPROVED SUPPLIERS JOHN CATT’S Preparatory Schools 2018 21st Edition Editor: Jonathan Barnes Published in 2018 by John Catt Educational Ltd, 12 Deben Mill Business Centre, Woodbridge, Suffolk IP12 1BL UK Tel: 01394 389850 Fax: 01394 386893 Email: [email protected] Website: www.johncatt.com © 2017 John Catt Educational Ltd All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publishers. Database right John Catt Educational Limited (maker). Extraction or reuse of the contents of this publication other than for private non-commercial purposes expressly permitted by law is strictly prohibited. Opinions expressed in this publication are those of the contributors, and are not necessarily those of the publishers or the sponsors. We cannot accept responsibility for any errors or omissions. Designed and typeset by John Catt Educational Limited. A CIP catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
    [Show full text]
  • 7Th Annual De Vere Studies Conference Shakespeare Question Debated at Smithsonian
    Vol.2:no.4 "Let me not to the marriage of true minds admit impediments..." Summer 2003 Shakespeare 7th Annual De Vere question debated Studies Conference Attendees treated to new at Smithsonian insights and breaking news By Peter Rush By Peter Rush he 2003 Edward de Vere n April 19 the Smithsonian Institution sponsored a day- Studies Conference in long debate pitting three prominent Stratfordian scholars TPortland, Oregon proved Oagainst three noted Oxfordian experts. It was one of—if not to be one of the best in its seven- the—best such debate that this reviewer is aware of. The right year history. Over the course of people were in the room, lots of important issues were raised and three days of papers and panel responded to by both sides, and each side had the opportunity to discussions, some ground- “throw its best stuff” at the other’s strongest arguments. I believe breaking research was pre- that the preponderance of strong, unrefuted arguments was made sented, and in a few cases, news by the Oxfordians, and that the Stratfordians left many crucial was made. Several of the most arguments unanswered, while the Stratfordians strongest suit was newsworthy stories involved the a number of assertions—drawn largely from Alan Nelson’s forth- authorship debate itself and in- coming biography of Oxford—for which “proof” was promised, formation of interest to all and should be demanded. The result was that—unlike some other Shakespeareans. The biggest news of the debates—we were not left standing on “square one,” but rather the Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • On Tour with the Prince
    The University of Manchester Research On Tour with the Prince DOI: 10.1093/tcbh/hwx037 Document Version Accepted author manuscript Link to publication record in Manchester Research Explorer Citation for published version (APA): Mort, F. (2017). On Tour with the Prince: Monarchy, Imperial Politics and Publicity in the Prince of Wales’s Dominion Tours 1919–20. Twentieth Century British History, 29(1), 25-57. https://doi.org/10.1093/tcbh/hwx037 Published in: Twentieth Century British History Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on Manchester Research Explorer is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Proof version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Explorer are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Takedown policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please refer to the University of Manchester’s Takedown Procedures [http://man.ac.uk/04Y6Bo] or contact [email protected] providing relevant details, so we can investigate your claim. Download date:09. Oct. 2021 Manuscripts submitted to Twentieth Century British History On Tour with the Prince. Monarchy, Imperial Politics and Publicity in the Prince of Wales’s Dominion Tours 1919- 1920. For Peer Review Journal: Twentieth Century British History Manuscript ID TCBH-2017-ART-025.R1 Manuscript Type: Article Keywords: monarchy, diplomacy, empire, media http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tcbh Page 1 of 49 Manuscripts submitted to Twentieth Century British History 1 2 3 On Tour with the Prince.
    [Show full text]
  • Sketches from the History of Psychiatry
    Psychiatric Bulletin (1990), 14, 224-227 Sketches from the history ofpsychiatry Erotomania and Queen Victoria: or love among the assassins? TREVOR TURNER, Consultant Psychiatrist, Community Psychiatry Research Unit, Hackney Hospital, London E9 6BE The issue ofcrime and insanity in Victorian Britain is In particular, there is recorded among the case­ dominated by the 1843 case ofDaniel McNaughton. notes of the plush Ticehurst House Asylum the Hounded by paranoid delusions, about which he was story of a psychotic Army captain whose details relatively unforthcoming despite detailed question­ may provide a partial explanation for the other ing, he succeeded in shooting Henry Drummond, would-be regicides. private secretary to the Prime Minister, Robert Peel. Thinking that it was Peel himself he had shot, McNaughton is quoted by the arresting policeman as The seven assaults stating "he shall break my peace ofmind no longer". Victoria's seven assailants were generally unpre­ The furore over his trial and non-execution filtered possessing young men; several were Irish, and all but down the century, via the McNaughton rules. Daniel one used pistols. The first, Edward Oxford, an 18 himself mouldered in Bethlem and Broadmoor for year old pot-boy, was "a little mean-looking the rest of his days (West & Walk, 1977, esp. p. 93). man", both "slow-witted and equally slow of foot" But much more prevalent in the public's eye were the (Weintraub, 1988, pp. 145-6). He actually fired two seven (at least) serious assaults on the Queen. Not shots at the Queen, in June 1840, as she was driving only did they bring about a new criminal charge (vide with Prince Albert along Constitution Hill.
    [Show full text]
  • University College Record December 2017
    University College Record December 2017 a Professor Glen Dudbridge (2 July 1938 – 5 February 2017) Shaw Professor of Chinese and Fellow of University College from 1989-2005. University College Record December 2017 The Record Volume XVII Number 4 December 2017 Contents Editor’s Notes 1 Master’s Notes 2 Fellows and Staff 5 The Governing Body 6 Honorary Fellows 11 Foundation Fellows 12 Newly Elected Fellows 12 Fellows’ News 14 Leaving Fellows and Staff 19 Academic Results, Awards and Achievements 21 Academic Results and Distinctions 22 University Prizes and Other Awards 26 Scholarships & Exhibitions 29 Travel Scholarships 32 2016-17 in Review 33 From the Chaplain 34 From the Librarian 36 From the Director of Music 39 From the Development Director 41 The Chalet 48 Junior Common Room 49 Weir Common Room 50 Obituaries 51 Emeritus Fellows 52 Honorary Fellows 54 Former Lecturers and Chaplain 55 Old Members 56 Univ Lost List 94 Univ Lost List 96 Univ Benefactors 2016-17 107 The 1249 Society 108 Major Benefactors 113 Principal Benefactors 115 The William of Durham Club 116 Roll of Donors 119 College Information 148 Calendar for Degree Ceremonies 150 College Contact Details 151 iv Editor’s Notes In many ways, this has been a vintage year for Univ. All our finalists achieved a 2.1 or above, plans are in place for a new site in north Oxford, and we welcomed the first group of students supported by our Opportunity Programme. And to top it all, Oxford was named the best university in the world for a second year running (Times Higher Education World University Rankings).
    [Show full text]
  • J(Gmber Sixty-Eig~T
    THE STOIC :J(gmber Sixty-eig~t DECEMBER 1945 THE STOIC VOL XII DECEMBER 1945 No. I OLD STOICS IN THE FORCES HE publication of the third and last issue of "Old Stoics ill the Forces" makes it possible to state in figures some of the achieve­ T ments and losses of the \'Var. The list does not claim to be complete, for further [information continues to come in. But the compilers have decided to delay publication no longer, reserving for a possible supplement such additions as may later be made to their records. It has been found impossible owing to lack of information to record either wounds or "mentions." But those who have been prisoners of war and those who are still "missing" are indicated by symbols, and there are separate lists of all the fatal casualties and all the decorations of which we at Stowe have knowledge. The total number recorded as having served in the Forces is 1918. Of these we know that 264 have lost their lives-a proportion of one in just over seven. The total number of decorations gained is 242-a proportion of one in just under eight of those who have served. The list includes 2 V.Cs., I II I\f.Cs., 46 D.F.Cs., 28 D.S.Os., 21 D.s.Cs., and 34 other awards. In considering these figures it is impossible not to feel pride in the distinguished services which men from this School have rendered in the \\(1 ar. But our chief feeling must be one of sorrow for the great gap which the casualty list has made in our little community.
    [Show full text]
  • Legrand-Mastersthesis-2018
    Chapter I: Introduction For many individuals, learning about a historical figure like Queen Victoria will be through viewing visual medias like film and television miniseries. With the general public using films and television miniseries to acquire historical knowledge the means to analyze and assess this form of study is impertinent. Even after her death, Queen Victoria remains a popular figure often depicted in films and television miniseries due to her long life and her paradoxical role as sovereign. Part of this film analysis is to evaluate Queen Victoria’s agency and her intentions to make a particular effect on her family and the monarchy. Queen Victoria’s agency is analyzed through films and television miniseries because of the visual representations of how filmmakers interpret Victoria’s life and how she approaches events during her reign. By using the representa- tions of Queen Victoria in films and television miniseries, I apply historical and film analysis to examine how filmmakers have communicated a specific interpretation of Queen Victoria and her agency. Films and television miniseries also depict Queen Victoria’s relationship with her family members, politicians and subjects, which can be interpreted and analyzed to understand her agency in a boarder context. The films and television miniseries have an added historical value by depicting a wider cultural, social and political context of Queen Victoria’s life and how filmmakers interpret her agency. In this thesis, agency refers to Victoria’s actions and interventions to the social, political and cultural factors that are viewed in the films and miniseries. How Victoria asserted herself throughout her life is viewed in the films and miniseries selected for this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • The Victorian Royal Nursery 1840-1865
    The Victorian Royal Nursery attempts to shed more light Mariusz Misztal on the nursery for the children of Queen Victoria. It examines the creation, organisation, and financing of the nursery, with a consideration of the most important individuals who looked after the Royal children, namely the medical staff, wet nurses, monthly nurses, permanent nurses, governesses and subgovernesses. The study is based mostly on the numerous The Victorian Royal Nursery unpublished documents from the Royal Archives at Windsor as well as the hitherto little-known or unknown sources like the journal of the royal accoucheur Dr Robert Ferguson 1840-1865 1840-1865 or the diary of head-nurse Mrs Ann Thurston. Creation, Organisation, Staff, Financing sery From the review of The Victorian Royal Nursery, 1840–1865: Nur This is an original and important research project [… ]. oyal In The Victorian Royal Nursery Mr Misztal brings a scholarly, R tightly-focussed approach to a part of the Victorian Royal Household which until now has only received passing references in the literature. This superb study gives a full, definitive account of a part of the life of Queen Victoria which has been largely neglected [… ]. Victorian No one has written in such detail about the royal nursery, and that in itself represents a vital contribution to royal scholarship. The new material which Misztal has discovered sheds new light The on the Queen’s mental and emotional state after childbirth… This gives substance to Albert’s later fears about Victoria’s mental state and the rumours that she had inherited the madness of King George III.
    [Show full text]
  • Top Pick Weeknights at 9.00Pm
    1 Top Pick Weeknights at 9.00pm Tonightly with Tom Ballard Armed with nothing but jokes and access to memes, Tonightly with Tom Ballard will investigate and explain the latest headlines and the things you missed. It's the show you didn’t know you desperately needed, until now. From the chaos in Canberra to the mildly-troubled Middle East, from the outer reaches of space to the depths of the internet, Tonightly isn’t afraid to go there and ask the big questions, like “What is Apple?”, “Should the Big Four banks lose weight?”, “Will Donald Trump nuke political correctness with climate change?” and “Popular Culture - do we need it?” Nor will it shy from giving you guaranteed advice on how to be a hit at the discotheque with all your cool facts about blockchain. Helming the desk and wrangling live interviews, sketches, infographics, reviews and the daily headlines is award-winning comedian Tom Ballard (triple j breakfast, Q&A for some reason). Joining Tom each night is a team of news, tech, culture and sports addicts who are fully across everything ever: Greta Lee-Jackson (SkitBox), Greg Larsen (Fancy Boy) and Bridie Connell (Whose Line Is It Anyway? Australia). These three are the show’s field reporters, putting their bodies on the line for the sake of truth, facts and punchlines. A wider family of contributing comedic voices from around the nation will provide insights and “fire” “content” on a regular basis. Short synopsis Award-winning comedian Tom Ballard investigates and explains the latest headlines and the things you missed.
    [Show full text]
  • Diabolical Outrages and Atrocious Attempts”: the Media, the Monarchy, and the Assassination Attempts on Queen Victoria, 1840-1882
    “DIABOLICAL OUTRAGES AND ATROCIOUS ATTEMPTS”: THE MEDIA, THE MONARCHY, AND THE ASSASSINATION ATTEMPTS ON QUEEN VICTORIA, 1840-1882 by Rachel Hamilton Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the Honours Program in History, University of Prince Edward Island April 16, 2021 ii Table of Contents Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................... iii Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 2 Part One: A Media Monarchy ........................................................................................................ 6 Part Two: Seven Assassins, Eight Attempts, and One Unshakable Queen ................................. 19 Part Three: Reporting “Diabolical Outrages and Atrocious Attempts” ........................................ 32 Reading the News...................................................................................................................... 32 Radical Threats .......................................................................................................................... 33 Gender and the Press ................................................................................................................ 41 Sensational Reportage .............................................................................................................. 60 Conclusion: It’s In All The Papers...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]