DOCSLIB.ORG

Death Row U.S.A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Death Row U.S.A DEATH ROW U.S.A. Fall 2012 A quarterly report by the Criminal Justice Project of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Deborah Fins, Esq. Consultant to the Criminal Justice Project NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Death Row U.S.A. Fall 2012 (As of October 1, 2012) TOTAL NUMBER OF DEATH ROW INMATES KNOWN TO LDF: 3,146 Race of Defendant: White 1,358 (43.17%) Black 1,319 (41.93%) Latino/Latina 390 (12.40%) Native American 34 (1.08%) Asian 44 (1.40%) Unknown at this issue 1 (0.03%) Gender: Male 3,083 (98.00%) Female 63 (2.00%) JURISDICTIONS WITH CURRENT DEATH PENALTY STATUTES: 35 Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, Wyoming, U.S. Government, U.S. Military. JURISDICTIONS WITHOUT DEATH PENALTY STATUTES: 18 Alaska, Connecticut [see note, below], District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico [see note, below], New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, Wisconsin. [NOTE: Connecticut and New Mexico repealed the death penalty prospectively. The men already sentenced in each state remain under sentence of death.] Death Row U.S.A. Page 1 In the United States Supreme Court Update to Summer 2012 Issue of Significant Criminal, Habeas, & Other Pending Cases for Cases to Be Decided in October Term 2012 1. CASES RAISING CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS Fourth Amendment Bailey v. United States, No. 11-770 (Detention incident to search) (decision below 652 F.3d 197 (2nd Cir. 2011)) Question Presented: Pursuant to Michigan v. Summers, 452 U.S. 692 (1981), may police officers detain an individual incident to the execution of a search warrant when the individual has left the immediate vicinity of the premises before the warrant is executed? Florida v. Harris, No. 11-817 (Dog sniff of vehicle) (decision below 71 So. 3d 756 (Fla. 2011)) Question Presented: Has the Florida Supreme Court decided an important federal question in a way that conflicts with the established 4th Amendment precedent of this Court by holding that an alert by a well-trained narcotics detection dog certified to detect illegal contraband is insufficient to establish probable cause for the search of a vehicle? Florida v. Jardines, No. 11-564 (Dog sniff outside house) (decision below 73 So. 3d 34 (Fla. 2011)) Question Presented: Is a dog sniff at the front door of a suspected grow house by a trained narcotics detection dog a 4th Amendment search requiring probable cause? Missouri v. McNeely, No. 11-1425 (Blood sample from drunk driver) (decision below 358 S.W.3d 65 (2012)) Question Presented: May a law enforcement officer obtain a nonconsensual and warrantless blood sample from a drunk driver under the exigent circumstances exception to the 4th Amendment warrant requirement based upon the natural dissipation of alcohol in the bloodstream? Fifth Amendment Smith v. United States, No. 11-8976 (Burden of persuasion on conspiracy withdrawal) (decision below 651 F.3d 30 (D.C. Cir. 2011)) Question Presented: Does withdrawing from a conspiracy prior to the statute of limitations period negate an element of a conspiracy charge such that, once a defendant meets his burden of production that he did so withdraw, the burden of persuasion rests with the government to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was a member of the conspiracy during the relevant period -- a fundamental due process question that is the subject of a well-developed circuit split? Sixth Amendment Chaidez v. United States, No. 11-820 (Retroactivity of Padilla) (decision below 655 F.3d 684 (7th Cir. 2011)) Question Presented: Does Padilla v. Kentucky, 130 S. Ct. 1473 (2010) apply to persons whose convictions became final before its announcement? Death Row U.S.A. Page 2 2. CASES RAISING HABEAS CORPUS QUESTIONS Cavazos v. Williams, No. 11-465 (State court decision not acknowledging federal claim) (decision below 646 F.3d 626 (9th Cir. 2011)) Question Presented: Has a habeas petitioner's claim been "adjudicated on the merits" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) where the state court denied relief in an explained decision but did not expressly acknowledge a federal-law basis for the claim? Descamps v. United States, No. 11-9540 (Proof of missing element of offense) (decision below 466 Fed.Appx. 563 (9th Cir. 2012)) Question Presented: Did the 9th Circuit err by applying its ruling in United States v. Aguila-Montes De Oca, 655 F.3d 915 (9th Cir. 2011), (en banc) that, where the burglary statute is missing an element of the generic crime, a state conviction may be subject to the modified categorical approach? Ryan v. Gonzales, No. 10-930 (Competency to assist counsel in capital federal habeas) (decision below 623 F.3d 1242 (9th Cir. 2010)) Question Presented: Did the 9th Circuit err when it held that 18 U.S.C. § 3599(a)(2) -- which provides that an indigent capital state inmate pursuing federal habeas relief "shall be entitled to the appointment of one or more attorneys" -- impliedly entitles a death row inmate to stay the federal habeas proceedings he initiated if he is not competent to assist counsel? Tibbals v. Carter, No. 11-218 (Competency of capital petitioners in habeas proceedings) (decision below 644 F.3d 329 (6th Cir. 2011)) Questions Presented: (1) Do capital prisoners possess a "right to competence" in federal habeas proceedings under Rees v. Peyton, 384 U.S. 312 (1966)? (2) Can a federal district court order an indefinite stay of a federal habeas proceeding under Rees? 3. CASES RAISING OTHER IMPORTANT FEDERAL QUESTIONS Henderson v. United States, No. 11-9307 (Plain error on appeal) (decision below 646 F.3d 223 (5th Cir. 2011)) Question Presented: When the governing law is unsettled at the time of trial but settled in the defendant's favor by the time of appeal, should an appellate court reviewing for "plain error" apply Johnson's time-of-appeal standard, as the 1st, 2nd, 6th, 10th, and 11th Circuits do, or should the appellate court apply the 9th Circuit’s time-of-trial standard, which the D.C. Circuit and the panel below have adopted? Millbrook v. United States, No. 11-10362 (Immunity of Prison Guards) (decision below 2012 WL 1384918 (3rd Cir. 2012)) Question Presented: Limited by the Court to the following question: Do 28 U.S.C §§1346(b) and 2680(h) waive the sovereign immunity of the United States for the intentional torts of prison guards when they are acting within the scope of their employment but are not exercising authority to “execute searches, to seize evidence, or to make arrests for violations of federal law?” Death Row U.S.A. Page 3 As of October 1, 2012 Total number of executions since the 1976 reinstatement of capital punishment: 1307 Race of defendants executed Race of victims total number 1307 total number 1920 White 735 (56.24%) White 1475 (76.82%) Black 450 (34.43%) Black 290 (15.10%) Latino/a 99 (7.57%) Latin 113 (5.89%) Native American 16 (1.22%) Native American 5 (0.26%) Asian 7 (0.54%) Asian 37 (1.93%) Gender of defendants executed Gender of victims Female 12 (0.92%) Female 937 (48.80%) Male 1295 (99.08%) Male 983 (51.20%) Defendant-victim racial combinations White Victim Black Victim Latino/a Victim Asian Victim Native American Victim White Defendant 682 52.18% 19 1.45% 17 1.30% 6 0.46% 0 0% Black Defendant 264 20.20% 147 11.25% 17 1.30% 12 0.92% 0 0% Latino/a Defendant 42 3.21% 3 0.23% 49 3.75% 2 0.15% 0 0% Asian Defendant 2 0.15% 0 0% 0 0% 5 0.38% 0 0% Native Amer. Def. 14 1.07% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 0.15% TOTAL: 1004 76.82% 169 12.93% 83 6.35% 25 1.91% 2 0.15% Note: In addition, there were 24 defendants executed for the murders of multiple victims of different races. Of those, 13 defendants were white, 8 black and 3 Latino. (1.84%) Death Row U.S.A. Page 4 Execution Breakdown by State State # % of Racial Combinations (see codes Total below) 1. TX 486 37.18 200 W/W (41%); 101 B/W (21%); 53 B/B (11%); 44 L/L 25* 13# 3^ (9%); 35 L/W (7%); 16 B/L (3%); 12 W/L, 8 B/A ( 2% each); 3 W/B (.6%); 2 L/B, 2 L/A, 2 A/A, 2 W/mix, 2 N/W, 2 W/A (.4% each); 1 L/mix, 1 B/mix (.2% each) 2. VA 109 8.34 48 W/W (44%); 37 B/W (34%); 13 B/B (12%); 4 W/B (4%); 2 9* 3# 1^ L/W, 2 W/mix (2% each); 1 W/A, 1 A/W, 1 B/mix (.9% each) 3. OK 100 7.65 57 W/W (57%); 15 B/W (15%); 10 B/B (10%); 5 N/W (5%); 3 7* 2# 3^ W/A (3%); 2 W/B, 2 A/A , 2 W/mix (2% each); 1 N/N, 1 B/A, 1 W/L, 1 B/L (1% each) 4. FL 73 5.59 43 W/W (59%); 13 B/W (18%); 7 B/B (10%); 2 L/W, 2 L/L, 2 9* 2^ W/mix (3% each); 1 N/W, 1 L/B, 1 W/L, 1 B/mix (1% each) 5.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Death Row U.S.A
    DEATH ROW U.S.A. Summer 2017 A quarterly report by the Criminal Justice Project of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Deborah Fins, Esq. Consultant to the Criminal Justice Project NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Death Row U.S.A. Summer 2017 (As of July 1, 2017) TOTAL NUMBER OF DEATH ROW INMATES KNOWN TO LDF: 2,817 Race of Defendant: White 1,196 (42.46%) Black 1,168 (41.46%) Latino/Latina 373 (13.24%) Native American 26 (0.92%) Asian 53 (1.88%) Unknown at this issue 1 (0.04%) Gender: Male 2,764 (98.12%) Female 53 (1.88%) JURISDICTIONS WITH CURRENT DEATH PENALTY STATUTES: 33 Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, Wyoming, U.S. Government, U.S. Military. JURISDICTIONS WITHOUT DEATH PENALTY STATUTES: 20 Alaska, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico [see note below], New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, Wisconsin. [NOTE: New Mexico repealed the death penalty prospectively. The men already sentenced remain under sentence of death.] Death Row U.S.A. Page 1 In the United States Supreme Court Update to Spring 2017 Issue of Significant Criminal, Habeas, & Other Pending Cases for Cases to Be Decided in October Term 2016 or 2017 1. CASES RAISING CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS First Amendment Packingham v. North Carolina, No. 15-1194 (Use of websites by sex offender) (decision below 777 S.E.2d 738 (N.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Delaware
    DELAWARE'S D E A T H P E N A L T Y The Facts EXECUTIONS The Delaware Supreme Court struck DESPITE CLAIMS OF down the death sentencing statute in INNOCENCE 2016. The first clemency in state history was granted in Robert Jackson was executed 2012. for murder in 2011, while his Delaware was the first state to abolish accomplice Anthony Lachette was released from prison in the death penalty in 1958, but in 1961 1996 after serving his sentence the legislature overrode the governor’s after pleading guilty to veto and reinstated the death penalty. burglary and conspiracy. In 1974, the Delaware legislature Directly before his execution, passed a law declaring the death Jackson implied that Lachette was the one responsible for penalty the mandatory sentencing the murder. for cases of first degree murder. In 1986, the method of execution changed from hanging to lethal injection and the gallows were disassembled in 2003, eliminating the possibility of death by hanging. LETHAL INJECTION Delaware’s Bishop Stands Against the Billy Bailey, sentenced to Reinstatement of Death Penalty death in 1980, chose to be executed by hanging rather than lethal injection because Bishop Francis Malooly of the Diocese of Wilmington, Delaware he did not want to be treated wrote the following in response to a “like a dog put to sleep.” legislative movement to reinstate the death penalty: “The true question at the heart of this issue is whether or not the death penalty is a just and necessary method of punishment. Pope Francis has called for the worldwide abolition of
    [Show full text]
  • Deatii ROW U.SA
    ! DEATiiROW U.SA Spring2000 A quarlerllJ report blJ the Capital Punishment Project 0£the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Deborah Fins, Esq. • Director of Research and Student Services, Criminal Justice Project NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund TOTAL NUMBER OF DEA TH ROW INMATES KNOWN TO LDF : . 3,670 Race of Defendant: White 1,698 (46.27%) Black 1,574 (42.89%,) Latino/Latina 321 ( 8.75%) Native American 46 ( 1.25%) Asian 31 ( .84%) Unknown at this issue 0 ( 0%) Gender: Male 3,615 (98.50%) Female 55 ( 1.50%) Juveniles: Male 69 ( 1.88%) DISPOSffiONS SINCE JANUARY 1, 1973: Executions : 625 Suicides: 54 Commutations : 90 (includingthose by the Governorof Texas resulting from favorable court decisions) Died of natural causes or killed while under death sentence: 165 Convictions/Sentences reversed : 1710 JURISDICTIONS WITH CAPITAL PUNISHMENT STA TOTES : 40 (Underlinedjurisdiction has statute but no sentencesimposed) Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland,Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania,South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington.,Wyoming, U.S. Government,U .S. Military . JURISDICTIONS WITHOUT CAPITAL PUNISHMENT STATUTES : 13 Alaska, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Iowa. Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan.,Minnesota, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont,West Virginia, Wisconsin. Death Row U.SA Page 1 In the United States Supreme Court Update to Winter 2000 Issue of October Term 1999 Cases (as of May 5, 2000) Significant Criminal, Habeas, & Other Pending Cases 1. CASES RAISING CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS Fourth Amendment Bond v.
    [Show full text]
  • Execution Ritual : Media Representations of Execution and the Social Construction of Public Opinion Regarding the Death Penalty
    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository Electronic Theses and Dissertations 5-2011 Execution ritual : media representations of execution and the social construction of public opinion regarding the death penalty. Emilie Dyer 1987- University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd Recommended Citation Dyer, Emilie 1987-, "Execution ritual : media representations of execution and the social construction of public opinion regarding the death penalty." (2011). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 388. https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/388 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EXECUTION RITUAL: MEDIA REPRESENTATIONS OF EXECUTION AND THE SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC OPINION REGARDING THE DEATH PENALTY By Emilie Dyer B.A., University of Louisville, 2009 A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of the University of Louisville in Partial Fullfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Department of Sociology University of Louisville Louisville, Kentucky May, 2011 -------------------------------------------------------------- EXECUTION RITUAL : MEDIA REPRESENTATIONS OF EXECUTION AND THE SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC OPINION REGARDING THE DEATH PENALTY By Emilie Brook Dyer B.A., University of Louisville, 2009 A Thesis Approved on April 11, 2011 by the following Thesis Committee: Thesis Director (Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Death Row U.S.A
    DEATH ROW U.S.A. Winter 2005 A quarterly report by the Criminal Justice Project of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Deborah Fins, Esq. Director of Research and Student Services, Criminal Justice Project NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Death Row U.S.A. Winter 2005 (As of January 1, 2005) TOTAL NUMBER OF DEATH ROW INMATES KNOWN TO LDF: 3,455 Race of Defendant: White 1,576 (45.62%) Black 1,444 (41.79%) Latino/Latina 356 (10.30%) Native American 39 ( 1.13%) Asian 40 ( 1.16%) Unknown at this issue 1 ( .03%) Gender: Male 3,401 (98.44%) Female 54 ( 1.56%) Juveniles: Male 79 ( 2.29%) JURISDICTIONS WITH CAPITAL PUNISHMENT STATUTES: 40 (Underlined jurisdiction has statute but no sentences imposed) Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, Wyoming, U.S. Government, U.S. Military. JURISDICTIONS WITHOUT CAPITAL PUNISHMENT STATUTES: 13 Death Row U.S.A. Page 1 Alaska, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, Wisconsin. Death Row U.S.A. Page 2 In the United States Supreme Court Update to Fall 2004 Issue of Significant Criminal, Habeas, & Other Pending Cases for Cases to Be Decided in October Term 2004 1. CASES RAISING CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS Fourth Amendment Devenpeck v. Alford, No. 03-710 (Probable cause to arrest and qualified immunity) (decision below Alford v.
    [Show full text]
  • Death Row U.S.A
    DEATH ROW U.S.A. Winter 2020 A quarterly report by the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Deborah Fins Consultant to the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Death Row U.S.A. Winter 2020 (As of January 1, 2020) TOTAL NUMBER OF DEATH ROW INMATES KNOWN TO LDF: 2620 (2,620 – 189* - 906M = 1525 enforceable sentences) Race of Defendant: White 1,103 (42.10%) Black 1,089 (41.56%) Latino/Latina 353 (13.47%) Native American 27 (1.03%) Asian 47 (1.79%) Unknown at this issue 1 (0.04%) Gender: Male 2,567 (97.98%) Female 53 (2.02%) JURISDICTIONS WITH CURRENT DEATH PENALTY STATUTES: 31 Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, CaliforniaM, ColoradoM, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, OregonM, PennsylvaniaM, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Wyoming, U.S. Government, U.S. Military. M States where a moratorium prohibiting execution has been imposed by the Governor. JURISDICTIONS WITHOUT DEATH PENALTY STATUTES: 22 Alaska, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire [see note below], New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin. [NOTE: New Hampshire repealed the death penalty prospectively. The man already sentenced remains under sentence of death.] * Designates the number of people in non-moratorium states who are not under active death sentence because of court reversal but whose sentence may be reimposed. M Designates the number of people in states where a gubernatorial moratorium on execution has been imposed.
    [Show full text]
  • Death Row U.S.A
    DEATH ROW U.S.A. Fall 2004 A quarterly report by the Criminal Justice Project of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Deborah Fins, Esq. Director of Research and Student Services, Criminal Justice Project NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. STATE LISTS OF PRISONERS ON DEATH ROW CODES FOR STATE ROSTERS: B Black A Asian W White N Native American L Latino/a U Unknown at this issue ^ Female & Sentenced to death in the state where listed, but incarcerated in another state # Juveniles [ ] Reversals: Defendants 1) awaiting a retrial or a new sentencing proceeding following a court order or 2) whose court ordered conviction or sentence reversal is not yet final. ALABAMA (Lethal Injection or Choice of Electrocution) Total = 199 B = 93 W = 103 L = 2 N = 0 A = 1 U = 0 Females = 3 (B = 2 W = 1 ) Juveniles = 14 (B = 6 W = 8 ) 1. ACKLIN, NICK (B ) 37. CENTOBIE, MARIO (W ) 2. ADAMS, RONALDO # (B ) 38. CLARK, CHARLES GREGORY (W ) 3. ADKINS, RICKY (W ) 39. CLEMONS, EUGENE (B ) 4. APICELLA, ANDREW (W ) 40. CORAL, ROBERT (B ) 5. ARTHUR, THOMAS (W ) 41. DALLAS, DONALD (W ) 6. [ BAKER, JR., BOBBY (B ) ] 42. DANIEL, RENARD MARCEL (B ) 7. BARBER, JAMES EDWARD (W ) 43. DAVIS, DAVID EUGENE (W ) 8. BARBOUR, CHRISTOPHER (W ) 44. DAVIS, JIMMY (B ) 9. BARKSDALE, TONY (B ) 45. DAVIS, MELVIN (B ) 10. BECKWORTH, REX ALLEN (W ) 46. DAVIS, TIMOTHY # (W ) 11. BELISLE, RICK (W ) 47. DEARDORF, DONALD (W ) 12. BELL, RANDY (B ) 48. DEBRUCE, DERRICK (B ) 13. BENJAMIN, BRANDYN (B ) 49. DILL, JIMMY (W ) 14. BLACKMON, PATRICIA ^ (B ) 50.
    [Show full text]
  • Cameron Todd Willingham, Texas, and the Death Penalty : the New Yorker
    Cameron Todd Willingham, Texas, and the death penalty : The New Yorker http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/09/07/090907fa_fact_grann... A REPORTER AT LARGE TRIAL BY FIRE Did Texas execute an innocent man? by David Grann SEPTEMBER 7, 2009 Cameron Todd Willingham in his cell on death row, in 1994. He insisted upon his innocence in the deaths of his children and refused an offer to plead guilty in return for a life sentence. Photograph by Ken Light. he fire moved quickly through the house, a one-story wood-frame structure in a working-class neighborhood of Corsicana, in northeast Texas. Flames spread along the walls, bursting through doorways, blistering paint and tiles and furniture. Smoke pressed against the ceiling, then banked downward, seeping into each room and through crevices in the windows, staining the morning sky. Buffie Barbee, who was eleven years old and lived two houses down, was playing in her back yard when she smelled the smoke. She ran inside and told her mother, Diane, and they hurried up the street; that’s when they saw the smoldering house and Cameron Todd Willingham standing on the front porch, wearing only a pair of jeans, his chest blackened with soot, his hair and eyelids singed. He was screaming, “My babies are burning up!” His children—Karmon and Kameron, who were one-year-old twin girls, and two-year-old Amber—were trapped inside. Willingham told the Barbees to call the Fire Department, and while Diane raced down the street to get help he found a stick and broke the children’s bedroom window.
    [Show full text]
  • The BG News February 23, 2000
    Bowling Green State University ScholarWorks@BGSU BG News (Student Newspaper) University Publications 2-23-2000 The BG News February 23, 2000 Bowling Green State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/bg-news Recommended Citation Bowling Green State University, "The BG News February 23, 2000" (2000). BG News (Student Newspaper). 6613. https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/bg-news/6613 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University Publications at ScholarWorks@BGSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in BG News (Student Newspaper) by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@BGSU. « ■M WEATHER WEDNESDAY Partly February 23, 2000 >^\ Cloudy WORLD NEWS 2 J High, 54 OPINION 4 Low, 42 CAMPUS 8 The BG News SPORTS 9 www.bgnews.com Volume 88, Issue 31 A daily mdependem srudempness USG tables budget, discusses funding requests SARA GRAZIANO Conference don't happen every day the role of the judicial branch is now STAFF WRITER on the University campus, and the played by the Student Traffic one time that it does happen, it Court." Monday nighl, USG put aside iis would be nice if USG would come The new impeachment process budget problems and began to deal out and support it," Oguejiofor said. also includes a way for USG mem- with fund requests. At-largc representative Ashley bers to appeal their impeachment to Joe Stuart, chair of the Finance Elder disagreed with USG's current their constituents. Committee, said last week's budget method of co-sponsoring events.
    [Show full text]
  • Page Left Intentionally Blank This Magazine Is Best Viewed with the Pages in Pairs, Side by Side (View Menu, Page Display, Two- Up), Zooming in to See Details
    Page left intentionally blank This magazine is best viewed with the pages in pairs, side by side (View menu, page display, two- up), zooming in to see details. Odd numbered pages should be on the right. the MindAlso, Hunter we The interview ForensicTeacher Magazine in Winter 2011 $5.952 US/$6.95 Can www.theforensicteacher.com the MindAlso, Hunter we interview 3 www.theforensicteacher.com The Forensic Teacher • Winter 2011 The Volume 6, Number 18, Winter 2011 The Forensic Teacher Magazine is published quarterly, and is owned by Wide Open Minds Educational Services, LLC. Our mailing address is P.O. Box 5263, Wilmington, DE 19808. Please see inside for more information. ForensicTeacher Magazine Articles 8 Teaching Moments By Ted Yeshion, Ph.D. What happens when good people meet bad science? 10 Interview By Mark Feil, Ed.D. John Douglas was the inspiration for one of the main characters in Silence of the Lambs, he started the FBI’s Behavioral Science Unit, and he’s made a career out of getting inside criminals’ heads. He talked to us about a lot of things, including how forensics teachers can make lessons more real. 44 Trial by Fire By David Grann. 24 Setting the stage Todd Willingham claimed he didn’t set the fire that Do you decorate your classroom to put students in a killed his family. Even before his execution experts forensic frame of mind? We’ll show you how some folks were pointing out the junk science at his trial. do it. 58 The Dark Side of the DA 26 The Work of an Innocence By Maurice Kirkwood.
    [Show full text]
  • Death Row, USA: Spring 2019
    DEATH ROW U.S.A. Spring 2019 A quarterly report by the Criminal Justice Project of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Deborah Fins Consultant to the Criminal Justice Project NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Death Row U.S.A. Spring 2019 (As of April 1, 2019) TOTAL NUMBER OF DEATH ROW INMATES KNOWN TO LDF: 2673 (2,673 - 230* - 923M = 1520 enforceable sentences) Race of Defendant: White 1,122 (41.98%) Black 1,114 (41.68%) Latino/Latina 359 (13.43%) Native American 28 (1.05%) Asian 49 (1.83%) Unknown at this issue 1 (0.04%) Gender: Male 2,619 (97.98%) Female 54 (2.02%) JURISDICTIONS WITH CURRENT DEATH PENALTY STATUTES: 32 Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, CaliforniaM, ColoradoM, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, OregonM, PennsylvaniaM, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Wyoming, U.S. Government, U.S. Military. M States where a moratorium prohibiting execution has been imposed by the Governor. JURISDICTIONS WITHOUT DEATH PENALTY STATUTES: 21 Alaska, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico [see note below], New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin. [NOTE: New Mexico repealed the death penalty prospectively. The men already sentenced remain under sentence of death.] * Designates the number of people who are not under active death sentence because of court reversal, but whose sentence may be reimposed. M Designates the number of people in states where a gubernatorial moratorium on execution has been imposed.
    [Show full text]
  • Death Row U.S.A
    DEATH ROW U.S.A. Fall 2016 A quarterly report by the Criminal Justice Project of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Deborah Fins, Esq. Consultant to the Criminal Justice Project NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Death Row U.S.A. Fall 2016 (As of October 1, 2016) TOTAL NUMBER OF DEATH ROW INMATES KNOWN TO LDF: 2,902 Race of Defendant: White 1,226 (42.25%) Black 1,215 (41.87%) Latino/Latina 380 (13.09%) Native American 27 (0.93%) Asian 53 (1.83%) Unknown at this issue 1 (0.03%) Gender: Male 2,848 (98.14%) Female 54 (1.86%) JURISDICTIONS WITH CURRENT DEATH PENALTY STATUTES: 33 Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, Wyoming, U.S. Government, U.S. Military. JURISDICTIONS WITHOUT DEATH PENALTY STATUTES: 20 Alaska, Connecticut, Delaware [see note below], District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico [see note below], New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, Wisconsin. [NOTE: The Delaware statute was found unconstitutional by the state supreme court. Retroactivity of that decision was not determined as of 10/1/16. Those previously sentenced to death remain under sentence of death. New Mexico legislatively repealed the death penalty prospectively. The men already sentenced remain under sentence of death.] Death Row U.S.A. Page 1 In the United States Supreme Court Update to Summer 2016 Issue of Significant Criminal, Habeas, & Other Pending Cases for Cases to Be Decided in October Term 2016 1.
    [Show full text]