DOCSLIB.ORG

18Minskyconfproceedings2:Layout 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
18Minskyconfproceedings2:Layout 1 Conference Proceedings th ANNUAL HYMAN P. MINSKY CONFERENCE ON THE STATE OF THE U. S . AND WORLD ECONOMIES 18Meeting the Challenges of Financial Crisis April 16–17, 2009, New York City A conference organized by The Levy Economics Institute of Bard College with support from the Contents FOREWORD 1 PROGRAM 2 WELCOME AND INTRODUCTION Maya Harris 5 Dimitri B. Papadimitriou 6 SPEAKERS Bruce Kasman 10 Dennis P. Lockhart 21 James Grant 31 Janet L. Yellen 39 Robert J. Barbera 49 Norbert Walter 56 Henry Kaufman 64 Joseph E. Stiglitz 71 SESSIONS 1. Assessment of Fed/Treasury Response to Crisis 81 2. Proposals on Alternative Financial Regulation 86 3. Levy Institute–Ford Project Proposals on Reregulation of the Financial System 92 4. The Institutional Shape of the Future Financial System 98 5. Current Conditions and Forecasts 102 6. Alternative Stimulus and Bailout Proposals 106 PARTICIPANTS 114 The proceedings consist of submitted papers by the speakers and transcripts of the speakers’ remarks, and summaries of session participants’ presentations. Foreword I am delighted to welcome you to the 18th annual Hyman P. Minsky conference on “Meeting the Challenges of Financial Crisis,” organized by The Levy Economics Institute of Bard College with sup- port from the Ford Foundation. This year’s conference focuses on current conditions and forecasts; macro policy proposals by the Obama administration and others; the rehabilitation of mortgage financing and the banks; financial market reregulation; proposals to limit foreclosures and modify servicing agreements; regulation of alternative financial products (derivatives and credit default swaps); the institutional shape of the future financial system; and international responses to the crisis. The presenters are top policymakers, economists, and analysts. They will offer their insights and policy guidelines on the challenges currently facing the U.S. and global economies. I trust you will enjoy their presentations and the discussions that follow. As always, your comments and suggestions are welcome. I look forward to seeing you again at future Levy Institute events. Dimitri B. Papadimitriou President, The Levy Economics Institute, and Jerome Levy Professor of Economics, Bard College 1 18th Annual Hyman P. Minsky Conference on the State of the U.S. and World Economies Program Thursday, April 16 9:00-9:30 a.m. WELCOME AND INTRODUCTION Maya Harris, Peace and Social Justice Program, Ford Foundation Dimitri B. Papadimitriou, The Levy Economics Institute 9:30-10:30 a.m. SPEAKER Bruce Kasman, JPMorgan Chase & Co. “Unpleasant Arithmetic” 10:30 a.m.–12:15 p.m. SESSION 1 Assessment of Fed/Treasury Response to Crisis Moderator: Greg Hannsgen, The Levy Economics Institute William Kurt Black, University of Missouri–Kansas City Marshall Auerback, RAB Capital PLC “Return of the State” Jane D’Arista, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts Amherst “Setting the Agenda for Financial Reform” Thomas Ferguson, University of Massachusetts Boston “Fatal Reversal: From Single Payer to Free Markets and Back Again” 12:15-2:30 p.m. SPEAKER Dennis P. Lockhart, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta 2:30-3:15 p.m. SPEAKER James Grant, Grant’s Interest Rate Observer “Always the Same, Always Different” 3:15-5:00 p.m. SESSION 2 Proposals On Alternative Financial Regulation Moderator: Jane D’Arista, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts Amherst Alan S. Blinder, Princeton University “It’s a Long Regulatory Agenda” Christine M. Cumming, Federal Reserve Bank of New York “Thoughts about the Supervisory System Going Forward” Michael Greenberger, The University of Maryland School of Law “Will We Have Meaningful Reform or Simply the Appearance of Reform?” Martin Mayer, The Brookings Institution “Narrow Banking v. Toxic Instruments” 2 The Levy Economics Institute of Bard College 5:15-6:30 p.m. SESSION 3 Levy Institute–Ford Project Proposals on Reregulation of the Financial System Moderator: Greg Hannsgen, The Levy Economics Institute Jan Kregel, The Levy Economics Institute “Minsky and the Regulation of the Financial System” C. P. Chandrasekhar, Jawaharlal Nehru University “Structural Contagion: Some Implications of the International Transmission of Financial Fragility” Mario Tonveronachi, University of Siena “Reregulating the Financial System” Éric Tymoigne, The Levy Economics Institute “Financial Regulation and the Financial Instability Hypothesis: A Ponzi-finance Approach to Financial Reform” 6:30-7:30 p.m. RECEPTION 7:30 p.m. SPEAKER Janet L. Yellen, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco “A Minsky Meltdown: Lessons for Central Bankers?” Friday, April 17 9:00-9:45 a.m. SPEAKER Robert J. Barbera, ITG “Minsky, U.S. Policy, and the Global Economy” 9:45–10:30 a.m. SPEAKER Norbert Walter, Deutsche Bank “Financial Crisis — A Threat to European Economies” 10:45 a.m.-12:00 p.m. SESSION 4 The Institutional Shape of the Future Financial System Moderator: Jan Kregel, The Levy Economics Institute Richard Bookstaber, Author and financial economist “Four Tasks for the Market Stability Regulator” Alex J. Pollock, American Enterprise Institute “Does Changing Boxes on the Regulatory Organization Chart Alter Minsky’s Fragility?” Walker F. Todd, American Institute for Economic Research “Stress Testing the Banks and Stabilizing Household Budgets” 3 18th Annual Hyman P. Minsky Conference on the State of the U.S. and World Economies 12:00-1:15 p.m. SESSION 5 Current Conditions And Forecasts Moderator: Ajit Zacharias, The Levy Economics Institute Dean Maki, Barclays Capital “U.S. Economic Outlook” James W. Paulsen, Wells Capital Management “Economic and Financial Market Outlook” Lakshman Achuthan, Economic Cycle Research Institute “What Happens at Growth Rate Cycle Upturns?” 1:15-3:15 p.m. SPEAKER Henry Kaufman, Henry Kaufman & Company, Inc. “Who Is Primarily Responsible for the Credit Crisis?” 3:15-4:00 p.m. SPEAKER Joseph E. Stiglitz, Columbia University 4:00–6:00 p.m. SESSION 6 Alternative Stimulus and Bailout Proposals Moderator: Dimitri B. Papadimitriou, The Levy Economics Institute James K. Galbraith, The Levy Economics Institute “No Return to Normal” Warren Mosler, Valance Company, Inc. “Alternative Proposals for a U.S. Nonconvertible Currency Regime” Robert W. Parenteau, The Levy Economics Institute “Riding the Debt Deflation Guardrails” L. Randall Wray, The Levy Economics Institute “The Return of Big Government: A Minskyan New Deal” 4 The Levy Economics Institute of Bard College Welcome and Introduction MAYA HARRIS Vice President, Peace and Social Justice, Ford Foundation DIMITRI B. PAPADIMITRIOU President, The Levy Economics Institute MAYA HARRIS: Good morning. It is my great pleasure to be able to welcome you here today. Our foun- dation president, Luis Ubiñas, wanted to be here to welcome you himself, but he is currently in California on a site visit with some of our trustees. I’m actually very glad that I could be here, because this is an enormously impressive and timely gathering, and it’s one that we at the Ford Foundation are very proud to be able to support. It has always been a very important part of the Ford Foundation’s mission to bring new thinking and innovative approaches to bear on tackling some of our most pressing challenges, issues, and concerns. I think we all can agree that there are few issues more urgent than those presented by our current finan- cial crisis. We are deeply interested in those issues here at Ford—in global financial governance, in sta- bility and, particularly, how it impacts poverty reduction and social justice in the United States and around the world. It’s a very important part of our work under the terrific leadership of our program officer, Leonardo Burlamaqui, whom I think many of you know. So, for us, participation in this conference is a wonderful opportunity to learn from all of you, from the thought leaders and experts and academics and decision makers who are here. It’s also quite an opportunity for all of us, because a crisis of this magni- tude presents that rare chance to truly redefine the debate and the agenda on global financial governance. A convening of this caliber promises us the exact kind of bold thinking that we need to have as part of that debate—on policy, on regulation, and on reform. So we at Ford are very eager to hear your discus- sions over the course of the conference. We hope that, for you, those discussions are fruitful and pro- ductive, and that you enjoy your time here with us. 5 18th Annual Hyman P. Minsky Conference on the State of the U.S. and World Economies With that, I would like to invite the president of The Levy Economics Institute, Dimitri Papadimitriou, to the podium to begin the conference. Thank you. DIMITRI B. PAPADIMITRIOU: Thank you very, very much. I want to welcome you all to the 18th Annual Hyman P. Minsky Conference, which has been organized by The Levy Economics Institute. I want to express our sincere thanks to the Ford Foundation, not only for its financial support, but also for being the host of the conference. We have an excellent roster of speakers, representing the academy as well as the banking sector, the financial sector, and, above all, the Federal Reserve. I hope you will enjoy the conference…. The instability of the financial system was at the core of Hy Minsky’s work. Minsky argued that a capi- talist system’s dynamics have an inherent tendency to foster fragility. Stability encourages risky behavior. Risky behavior ultimately develops into a crisis. As he very precisely put it: stability is destabilizing. In a prescient article written in 1987, Minsky predicted the explosion of home mortgage securitiza- tion that eventually led to the subprime meltdown in 2007. He was one of the few economists who under- stood the power of securitization. Two decades later, his predictions were validated: the “Minsky moment” had arrived. Minsky’s solution to sharp downturns in financial crises was for a “big government” to main- tain income and profit flow and a “big bank,”with its lender-of-last-resort operations, to inject liquidity into the financial system.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Walter Heller Oral History Interview II, 12/21/71, by David G
    LYNDON BAINES JOHNSON LIBRARY ORAL HISTORY COLLECTION LBJ Library 2313 Red River Street Austin, Texas 78705 http://www.lbjlib.utexas.edu/johnson/archives.hom/biopage.asp WALTER HELLER ORAL HISTORY, INTERVIEW II PREFERRED CITATION For Internet Copy: Transcript, Walter Heller Oral History Interview II, 12/21/71, by David G. McComb, Internet Copy, LBJ Library. For Electronic Copy on Compact Disc from the LBJ Library: Transcript, Walter Heller Oral History Interview II, 12/21/71, by David G. McComb, Electronic Copy, LBJ Library. GENERAL SERVICES ADNINISTRATION NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS SERVICE LYNDON BAINES JOHNSON LIBRARY Legal Agreement Pertaining to the Oral History Interviews of Walter W. Heller In accordance with the provisions of Chapter 21 of Title 44, United States Code and subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter· set forth, I, Walter W. Heller of Minneapolis, Minnesota do hereby give, donate and convey to the United States of America all my rights, title and interest in the tape record- ings and transcripts of the personal interviews conducted on February 20, 1970 and December 21,1971 in Minneapolis, Minnesota and prepared for deposit in the Lyndon Baines Johnson Library. This assignment is subject to the following terms and conditions: (1) The edited transcripts shall be available for use by researchers as soon as they have been deposited in the Lyndon Baines Johnson Library. (2) The tape recordings shall not be available to researchers. (3) During my lifetime I retain all copyright in the material given to the United States by the terms of this instrument. Thereafter the copyright in the edited transcripts shall pass to the United States Government.
    [Show full text]
  • Kermit Gordon and Walter W
    Kermit Gordon and Walter W. Heller Oral History Interview –JFK #2, 9/14/1972 Administrative Information Creator: Kermit Gordon and Walter W. Heller Interviewer: Larry J. Hackman and Joseph A. Pechman Date of Interview: September 14, 1972 Place of Interview: Washington, D.C. Length: 50 pp. Biographical Note Gordon, Kermit; Economist, Member, Council of Economic Advisers (1961-1962). Heller, Walter W.; Economist, Chairman, Council of Economic Advisers (1961-1964). Gordon and Heller discuss wage-price guideposts, the steel crises in 1962 and 1963, John F. Kennedy’s [JFK] relationship with the business community, and their efforts regarding tax reform and a tax cut bill, among other issues. Access Restrictions No restrictions. Usage Restrictions Copyright of these materials have passed to the United States Government upon the death of the interviewees. Users of these materials are advised to determine the copyright status of any document from which they wish to publish. Copyright The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excesses of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Club of New York 431 Meeting 106 Year September 9, 2013 the Honorable Henry M
    The Economic Club of New York 431st Meeting 106th Year September 9, 2013 ___________________________________ The Honorable Henry M. Paulson, Jr. Former U.S. Secretary of the Treasury Chairman of the Paulson Institute ___________________________________ Questioners: Andrew Tisch Former Chair of the Economic Club of New York Co-Chair of Loews Corporation Floyd Norris Chief Financial Correspondent, The New York Times The Economic Club of New York – Henry M. Paulson, Jr., – September 9, 2013 Page 1 Roger Ferguson: Well, good afternoon everyone. I would encourage all who have not yet done so to please take your seats so that we can get started with our program. And let me start by welcoming all of you to this, the 431st meeting of the Economic Club of New York. I am Roger Ferguson. I am the chairman of the club which is now in its 106th year as the nation’s leading non-partisan forum for economic policy speeches. Throughout the long history of the Economic Club of New York, we’ve had more than 1,000 guest speakers appear before us establishing a strong tradition of excellence which we continue today. I would like to begin by recognizing the 200 members of our Centennial Society who have contributed their support to the club to ensuring its continued financial stability. Thanks to all of you for helping to ensure the club can continue to fulfill its mission well into the next century. I would also like to welcome the students who are with us and to thank our members for making their attendance possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Finance Without Financiers*
    3 Finance without Financiers* Robert C. Hockett, Cornell Law School * Thanks to Dan Alpert, Fadhel Kaboub, Stephanie Kelton, Paul McCulley, Zoltan Polszar, Nouriel Roubini and particularly my alter ego Saule Omarova. Special thanks to Fred Block and Erik Olin Wright, who have been part of this project since its inception in 2014 – as well as to the “September Group,” where it proved necessary that same year to formulate arguments whose full elaboration has issued in this Chapter. Hockett, Finance without Financiers 4 I see, therefore, the rentier aspect of capitalism as a transitional phase which will disappear when it has done its work…Thus [we] might aim in practice… at an increase in the volume of capital until it ceases to be scarce, so that the functionless investor will no longer receive a bonus; and at a scheme of direct taxation which allows the intelligence and determination and executive skill of the financiers… (who are certainly so fond of their craft that their labour could be obtained much cheaper than at present), to be harnessed to the service of the community on reasonable terms of reward.1 INTRODUCTION: MYTHS OF SCARCITY AND INTERMEDIATION A familiar belief about banks and other financial institutions is that they function primarily as “intermediaries,” managing flows of scarce funds from private sector “savers” or “surplus units” who have accumulated them to “dissevers” or “deficit units” who have need of them and can pay for their use. This view is routinely stated in treatises,2 textbooks,3 learned journals,4 and the popular media.5 It also lurks in the background each time we hear theoretical references to “loanable funds,” practical warnings about public “crowd-out” of private investment, or the like.6 This, what I shall call “intermediated scarce private capital” view of finance bears two interesting properties.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Minsky Matters: an Introduction to the Work of a Maverick Economist
    Introduction Stability— even of an expansion— is destabilizing in that the more adventuresome financing of investment pays off to the leaders and others follow. —Minsky, 1975, p. 125 1 There is no final solution to the problems of organizing economic life. —Minsky, 1975, p. 168 2 Why does the work of Hyman P. Minsky matter? Because he saw “it” (the Global Financial Crisis, or GFC) coming. Indeed, when the crisis first hit, many of those familiar with his work (and even some who knew little about it) proclaimed it a “Min- sky crisis.” That alone should spark interest in his work. The queen of England famously asked her economic advi- sors why none of them had seen it coming. Obviously the an- swer is complex, but it must include reference to the evolution of macro economic theory over the postwar period— from the “Age of Keynes,” through the rise of Milton Friedman’s monetarism and the return of neoclassical economics in the particularly ex- treme form developed by Robert Lucas, and finally on to the new monetary consensus adopted by Chairman Bernanke on the precipice of the crisis. The story cannot leave out the paral- lel developments in finance theory— with its “efficient markets 2 ■ Introduction hypothesis”— and the “hands- off” approach to regulation and supervision of financial institutions. What passed for macroeconomics on the verge of the global financial collapse had little to do with reality. The world modeled by mainstream economics bore no relation to our economy. It was based on rational expectations in which everyone bets right, at least within a random error, and maximizes anything and every- thing while living in a world without financial institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Minsky All About, Anyway?
    DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS WORKING PAPER SERIES What is Minsky All About, Anyway? Korkut Ertürk Gökcer Özgür Working Paper No: 2009-08 University of Utah Department of Economics 1645 East Central Campus Dr., Rm. 308 Salt Lake City, UT 84112-9300 Tel: (801) 581-7481 Fax: (801) 585-5649 http://www.econ.utah.edu 1 What is Minsky All About, Anyway? Korkut Ertürk Gökcer Özgür Acknowledgements: We would like to thank Ken Jameson for his helpful comments without implicating him for any possible mistakes there might be. 2 The financial crisis has been billed a “Minsky moment” in the mainstream media, turning Hyman P. Minksy into a household name. One would think that this was at long last Minsky’s moment of posthumous vindication, and in a way it was. But, oddly, a couple of post-Keynesian luminaries would have none of it. Paul Davidson, the Editor of JPKE , and Jan Kregel, senior scholar at the Levy Institute of Bard College where Minksy had spent the last of his years, were both eager to set the record straight: the current financial debacle did not qualify as a Minskyan crisis because how it unfolded differed from Minsky’s depiction of crises in his writings (Davidson 2008, Kregel 2008a). Of course, whether we think Minsky is relevant for the current crisis or not depends on what we make of him. If Minskyan work means solely his own writings and their restatement, then, Davidson and Kregel are probably right – one cannot help but focus on what is different about the current crisis. But, if instead Minksyan refers to an evolving literature that emanate from but transcend his work, their arguments miss their mark.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Moderation, the Great Panic and the Great Contraction By
    “The Great Moderation, the Great Panic and the Great Contraction” Speech given by Charles Bean, Deputy Governor for Monetary Policy and Member of the Monetary Policy Committee, Bank of England Given at the Schumpeter Lecture, Annual Congress of the European Economic Association, Barcelona 25 August 2009 I am grateful for the assistance of Adrian Penalver. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of either the Bank of England or the Monetary Policy Committee. 1 All speeches are available online at www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/Pages/speeches/default.aspx Summary Charles Bean, the Bank of England’s Deputy Governor, Monetary Policy, was invited to deliver the Schumpeter lecture at the Annual Congress of the European Economic Association. The Great Moderation, the Great Panic and the Great Contraction, looks back at the causes of the financial crisis and subsequent recession. He argues that much of what went wrong can be analysed using standard economic tools. The Great Moderation was a period of unusually stable macroeconomic activity in advanced economies. This was partly thanks to good luck, including the integration of emerging market countries into the global economy, and partly a dividend from structural economic changes and better policy frameworks. The longer this stability persisted, the more markets became convinced of its permanence and risk premia became extremely low. Real short and long term interest rates were also low due to a combination of loose monetary policy, particularly in the US, and strong savings rates in a number of surplus countries. Low interest rates and low apparent risk created strong incentives for financial institutions to become highly geared.
    [Show full text]
  • The Portfolio Optimization Performance During Malaysia's
    Modern Applied Science; Vol. 14, No. 4; 2020 ISSN 1913-1844 E-ISSN 1913-1852 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education The Portfolio Optimization Performance during Malaysia’s 2018 General Election by Using Noncooperative and Cooperative Game Theory Approach Muhammad Akram Ramadhan bin Ibrahim1, Pah Chin Hee1, Mohd Aminul Islam1 & Hafizah Bahaludin1 1Department of Computational and Theoretical Sciences Kulliyyah of Science International Islamic University Malaysia, 25200 Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia Correspondence: Pah Chin Hee, Department of Computational and Theoretical Sciences, Kulliyyah of Science, International Islamic University Malaysia, 25200 Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia. Received: February 10, 2020 Accepted: February 28, 2020 Online Published: March 4, 2020 doi:10.5539/mas.v14n4p1 URL: https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v14n4p1 Abstract Game theory approach is used in this study that involves two types of games which are noncooperative and cooperative. Noncooperative game is used to get the equilibrium solutions from each payoff matrix. From the solutions, the values then be used as characteristic functions of Shapley value solution concept in cooperative game. In this paper, the sectors are divided into three groups where each sector will have three different stocks for the game. This study used the companies that listed in Bursa Malaysia and the prices of each stock listed in this research obtained from Datastream. The rate of return of stocks are considered as an input to get the payoff from each stock and its coalition sectors. The value of game for each sector is obtained using Shapley value solution concepts formula to find the optimal increase of the returns. The Shapley optimal portfolio, naive diversification portfolio and market portfolio performances have been calculated by using Sharpe ratio.
    [Show full text]
  • The Contemporary Crisis in Globalization and Its Impact on Latin America with Special Reference to the Caribbean Region of Latin America
    The Contemporary Crisis in Globalization and its impact on Latin America with special reference to the Caribbean region of Latin America Jessica Byron Introduction This contribution evolved out of a panel discussion that was organized around a series of questions concerning the development and evolu- tion of globalization since the 1990s; the potential consequences of the current political crises for the future of globalization processes; and the major implications and lessons on the way forward for Latin American and Caribbean economies and societies. The following sections first make reference to major features of globalization and to the earlier discourse on its implications, which remain relevant to our analyses of the contemporary tendencies. Thereafter, I discuss the consequences of these new developments for countries and regions in the South. The final section examines the outlook specifically for small, developing economies in the Greater Caribbean sub-region of Latin America and the Caribbean. I. The development and evolution of globalization since the 1990s The discussion draws from three definitions and observations about globalization. Mittelman (1997:3) describes it as “a worldwide phenomenon […] a coalescence of varied transnational processes and domestic structures, allowing the economy, politics, culture and ideology of one country to penetrate another. The chain of causality runs from the spatial reorganization of production to inter- national trade, to the integration of production and to the integration of financial markets […] driven by changing modes of competition, 97 The Contemporary Crisis in Globalization and its impact on Latin America with special reference to the Caribbean region of Latin America globalization compresses the time and space aspects of social relations […] (it is) a market-induced, not policy-led process”.
    [Show full text]
  • The Socialization of Investment, from Keynes to Minsky and Beyond
    Working Paper No. 822 The Socialization of Investment, from Keynes to Minsky and Beyond by Riccardo Bellofiore* University of Bergamo December 2014 * [email protected] This paper was prepared for the project “Financing Innovation: An Application of a Keynes-Schumpeter- Minsky Synthesis,” funded in part by the Institute for New Economic Thinking, INET grant no. IN012-00036, administered through the Levy Economics Institute of Bard College. Co-principal investigators: Mariana Mazzucato (Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex) and L. Randall Wray (Levy Institute). The author thanks INET and the Levy Institute for support of this research. The Levy Economics Institute Working Paper Collection presents research in progress by Levy Institute scholars and conference participants. The purpose of the series is to disseminate ideas to and elicit comments from academics and professionals. Levy Economics Institute of Bard College, founded in 1986, is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, independently funded research organization devoted to public service. Through scholarship and economic research it generates viable, effective public policy responses to important economic problems that profoundly affect the quality of life in the United States and abroad. Levy Economics Institute P.O. Box 5000 Annandale-on-Hudson, NY 12504-5000 http://www.levyinstitute.org Copyright © Levy Economics Institute 2014 All rights reserved ISSN 1547-366X Abstract An understanding of, and an intervention into, the present capitalist reality requires that we put together the insights of Karl Marx on labor, as well as those of Hyman Minsky on finance. The best way to do this is within a longer-term perspective, looking at the different stages through which capitalism evolves.
    [Show full text]
  • The Levy Institute Generates Effective Public Policy Responses to Economic Problems That Profoundly Affect the Quality of Life in the United States and Abroad
    Biennial Report 2004–2005 The Levy Economics Institute of Bard College was founded in 1986, through the generous support of Bard College Trustee Leon Levy, as a nonprofit, nonpartisan, public policy research organization. It is independent of any political or other affiliation and encourages diversity of opinion in the examination of economic issues. The purpose of all Levy Institute research and activities is to enable scholars and leaders in business, labor, and government to work together on problems of common interest. Levy Institute findings are disseminated—via publications, conferences, workshops, seminars, congressional testimony, and other activities—to an international audience of public officials, private sector executives, academics, and the general public. Through this process of scholarship, analysis, and informed debate, the Levy Institute generates effective public policy responses to economic problems that profoundly affect the quality of life in the United States and abroad. The Levy Institute’s main conference and research facility is Blithewood Manor, on the campus of Bard College, located 90 miles north of New York City. The Levy Institute is housed in Blithewood Manor at Bard College. 2 MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT 4 NEW INITIATIVE 6 RESEARCH AND PUBLICATIONS : .. , : , - () : : : , , 26 CONFERENCES 36 THE LEVY INSTITUTE BOOK SERIES 37 BIOGRAPHIES OF INSTITUTE SCHOLARS 44 BOARD, ADMINISTRATION, AND RESEARCH STAFF MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT In the biennial reports of previous years, I described how the Levy Institute draws inspiration and guid- ance not only from its founders and scholars but from a world facing many new and daunting chal- lenges. Our efforts to redefine economics and public policy continue to attract notice and exert influ- ence, nationally and internationally.
    [Show full text]
  • Editorial IE 6 08.Indd
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Appelbaum, Eileen Article — Published Version The Obama moment Intereconomics Suggested Citation: Appelbaum, Eileen (2008) : The Obama moment, Intereconomics, ISSN 0020-5346, Springer, Heidelberg, Vol. 43, Iss. 6, pp. 314-315, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10272-008-0265-8 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/42015 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu DOI: 10.1007/s10272-008-0265-8 The Obama Moment he election of Barack Obama on November 4 to serve as the next president of the USA Twas a triumph of hope over history for America. In these perilous times we, along with millions in other lands, have pinned our hopes for the future on the intellect, inspiration and compassion of this gifted leader.
    [Show full text]