Maryland in National Politics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Maryland in National Politics Class Book. COPYRIGHT DEPOSIT. JOHN HANSON 'president of the united states in congress ASSEMBLED' (OriyiiKil portrait otciicd hij Douglas U. Thomas) Maryland In National Politics BY J. FRED'K ESSARY Sun Editor the Waahington Correspondent of The Baltimore ; of Addresses and Essays of Isidor Rayner ir JOHN MURPHY COMPANY Publishers Baltimore Maryland Copyright, 1915, by J. FRED'K ESSARY PtOSS Ot JOHN MURPHT COMPANY, BaUorC. Md. MAY 25 iyi5 ^ . This Volume Is Affectionately Dedicated To My Wife, HELEN K. ESSARY. INTROpUCTION This book was written with the idea of re- cording in some permanent form the splendid achievements of that group of Maryland pa- triots, statesmen, diplomatists and jurists who have contributed most to the greatness of the Republic, men whose public services estab- lished them as national characters, as contra- distinguished from purely State figures. In no sense is this a history of Maryland, nor is it a history of the United States. It is, however, a faithful presentation of the parts played in the nation's history by those distin- guished Marylanders of the past century who helped lay the foundation of this government, who have builded upon that foundation, who have made their country's laws and have had a potential influence in shaping its destiny. In dealing with the careers of these men the hard-and-fast lines of stereotyped biography have, in a measure, been abandoned. The places and dates of birth, the early education, the eccentricities of old schoolmasters, boy- hood pastimes and youthful love affairs are, of course, affecting details, but they are not the circumstances in the lives of strong men that arrest attention and sustain the interest of those vi Introduction. who study success and honor greatness. It is the design of these sketches to comprehend the big vital facts concerning these illustrious Marylanders, facts that give them their true historical setting. No other work has come to my notice that treats, in this fashion, of Maryland's share in national politics. Biographies of a few of her individual statesmen have been written. Brief reviews of others are extant, but no previous efiPort has been made, so far as I am aware, to assemble all the members of this famous com- pany in one volume, preserving in it a register oi their service to the nation. I wish to take this opportunity to acknowl- edge my appreciation for the valuable assist- ance and advice given me in the preparation of these sketches by Judge Ashley M. Gould, Senator William E. Borah, Mr. Gist Blair, Dr. Samuel E. Forman, Mr. Arthur Peter, Mr. Douglas H. Thomas, Mr. William B. Rayner, Mr. Philip Francis Trippe, Mr. F. Julian Bailey, Mr. J. Henry Baker, General Thomas J. Shryock and many others. I may also add that I have consulted freely the published works of Bernard C. Steiner, J. A. J. Creswell, Frank Richardson Kent, Charles Francis Adams, Louis E. McComas, J.Thomas Scharf, Thomas Jefferson and Mad- Introduction. vii ison Davis. The memoirs of Thomas H. Ben- ton, Gideon Welles, James G.Blaine, "Sunset'' Cox, Shelby M. Cullom, Ben Perley Poore; the biography of Roger B. Taney, by Samuel Tyler, and that of William Wirt, by John P. Kennedy; the American histories of Henry Cabot Lodge, Woodrow Wilson, John Bach McMaster, James Schouler, Julian Haw- thorne, James Ford Rhodes and E. Benjamin Andrews; the Journals of the Continental Con- gress and the Debates of the Constitutional Convention have been referrd to for the ac- curacy of many of the historical circumstances outlined in this book. J. Fred'k Essary. Washington, 1915. —— CONTENTS CHAPTER I. John Hanson : First President of the United States in Congress Assembled—Author of plan under which Articles of Confederation were ratified and Crown Lands were dedi- cated to the general government 1-17 CHAPTER n. Charles Carroll of Carrollton : Commis- sioner to Canada during the Revolution Last surviving Signer of the Declaration of Independence—First Senator and father of The Assumption Act 18-37 CHAPTER HL James McHenry: Secretary to General Wash- ington—Major in the Revolutionary Army Chairman of the Maryland delegation in the Constitutional Convention and Secretary of War under Washington and Adams 3^-57 CHAPTER IV. Luther Martin : Member of the Constitutional Convention and of the Continental Congress —Counsel for Associate Justice Chase—De- fender of Aaron Burr in the trial for high treason 58-76 CHAPTER V. Samuel Chase: Delegate in the Continental Congress—Federalist leader in the State Associate Justice of the United States Su- preme Court and impeached by political enemies before the Senate 77-95 — X Contents. CHAPTER VL General Samuel Smith : Hero of the War of 1 812—Forty years a member of the Federal House and Senate—Insurgent against the Madison administration — President Pro Tempore of the Senate 96-1 11 CHAPTER Vn. William Pinkney: Diplomatic agent of the government at London, St. Petersburg and the Court of Naples—Twice a member of Congress—United States Senator—Attorney- General and leading advocate of his day. 1 12-133 CHAPTER Vni. William Wirt : Prosecutor of Aaron Burr—At- torney-General through three administrations —Candidate for the Presidency against Jack- son and Clay on the anti-Masonic ticket. 134-154 CHAPTER IX. Roger B. Taney : Attorney-General and Secre- tary of the Treasury under Jackson—Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court Author of the Dred Scott decision and of the first anti-trust opinion of the highest court 155-174 CHAPTER X. Reverdy Johnson: Counsel in the Garland, Dred Scott, Cummings and Surratt cases Attorney-General—United States Senator Defender of Andrew Johnson and Minister to the Court of St. James 175-193 ——A Contents. xi CHAPTER XL Henry Winter Davis : Founder of the Ameri- can party—A Representative in Congress Uncompromising Unionist — Opponent of Lincoln—Greatest' orator of his time. 194-219 CHAPTER ML Montgomery Blair: Organizer of the Republi- can party—Postmaster-General in Lincoln's Cabinet—Counsel in Scott and Cummings cases—Friend and counsel of Samuel J. Tilden—Defender of Belknap 220-242 CHAPTER XHL Arthur P. Gorman : Chairman of the Demo- cratic National Committee that elected Cleve- land — Democratic minority and majority leader in the Senate—Leader of the oppo- sition to the Force Bill—Joint Author of the Wilson-Gorman Tariff Act 243-263 CHAPTER XIV. IsiDOR Rayner: Congressman and Senator Counsel for Admiral Schley in the Naval Court of Inquiry—Leading authority in Con- gress upon Constitutional and International Law issues 264-286 CHAPTER XV. Conclusion : Maryland's representation in twenty Cabinets, in the Diplomatic Corps, upon the United States Supreme Court— century's record of leadership in the House and Senate of the United States—Figures in various Presidential contests 287-303 JOHN HANSON 1715— 1783 Civilization accords no rarer privilege to the men who make history than the privilege of founding orderly government. Thousands there may be who have builded upon an order, once established; other thousands who have been privileged to defend it and to enjoy its usufructs, but there are only a few men whom all mankind honor as pathfinders, as bold pio- neers in the development of a system of human authority. And this is just as true of the American Re- public as it is of any of the governments that have gone before it or any that have come after it. A mere handful of figures stand out pre- eminently in the great struggle that gave this country its equality before the world and its people their right to "life, liberty and the pur- suit of happiness." A vast multitude of men made sacrifices of their property, their blood and their lives that this end might be achieved, but oblivion has claimed all but that small group of giants who complemented the work of the sword by welding the colonies into a confederation and the confederation into an indissoluble union. 2 Maryland in National Politics. And as the revolutionary period recedes, as the perspective grows, interest in its dramatic events and in its dynamic personalities be- comes more and more absorbing. The men who made this republic possible ; the men who laid its foundation upon deep and enduring lines; the men whose brain brought into be- ing the organic law of the United States are more and more profoundly venerated by each succeeding generation. John Hanson, the first President of the "United States of America in Congress As- sembled," that is, the first President under the Articles of Confederation, stood among the strongest of these nation-builders as a peer. It was his leadership that brought the last of the insurging colonies together under a com- mon bond; that united their fortunes and their fate forever, and that gave them their first perfected plan of centralized government. It was the leadership of John Hanson that di- vorced the colonies from the Northwest Ter- ritory and paved the way for the ultimate for- mation of the group of great States beyond the Allegheny Mountains. For all this Hanson was rewarded with the Presidency of the re-formed Continental Con- gress the day his second term in that body be- gan. By his election Hanson, already recog- Maryland in National Politics. 3 nized as the first Marylander of his day, as- sumed the rank and prerogatives of the First Citizen of the Colonies. Washington the sol- dier, and Hanson the civilian, typified the spirit of this new nation. During three sessions Hanson presided over the deliberations of the Continental Congress. In that period he saw the American arms tri- umph over Great Britain. He saw the arri- val of the French allies and, with victory at Yorktown, the liberty for which he and his fellow-countrymen had warred for eight long years, established on this continent.
Recommended publications
  • Vice President in the U.S
    The Vice President in the U.S. Senate: Examining the Consequences of Institutional Design Michael S. Lynch Anthony J. Madonna Asssistant Professor Assistant Professor University of Kansas University of Georgia [email protected] [email protected] September 3, 2010∗ ∗The authors would like to thank Scott H. Ainsworth, Stanley Bach, Richard A. Baker, Ryan Bakker, Richard S. Beth, Sarah A. Binder, Jamie L. Carson, Michael H. Crespin, Keith L. Dougherty, Trey Hood, Scott C. James, Andrew D. Martin, Ryan J. Owens, and Steven S. Smith for comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript. Madonna also thanks the University of Georgia American Political Development working group for support and comments, and Rachel Snyder for helpful research assistance. All errors remain the authors. Abstract The constitutional placement of the vice president as the president of the Senate is a unique feature of the chamber. It places control over the Senate's rules and precedents under an individual who is not elected by the chamber and receives no direct benefits from the maintenance of its institutions. We argue that this feature has played an important role in the Senate's development. The vice president has frequently acted in a manner that conflicted with the wishes of chamber majorities. Consequently, senators have been reluctant to allow cham- ber power to be centralized under their largely unaccountable presiding officer. This fear has prevented the Senate from allowing its chair to reduce dilatory action, as the House has done. Accordingly, delay via the filibuster, has become commonplace in the Senate. Such delay has reduced the Senate's efficiency, but has largely freed it from the potential influence of the executive branch.
    [Show full text]
  • Calculated for the Use of the State Of
    3i'R 317.3M31 H41 A Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2009 with funding from University of IVIassachusetts, Boston http://www.archive.org/details/pocketalmanackfo1839amer MASSACHUSETTS REGISTER, AND mmwo states ©alrntiar, 1839. ALSO CITY OFFICERS IN BOSTON, AND OTHER USEFUL INFORMATION. BOSTON: PUBLISHED BY JAMES LORING, 13 2 Washington Street. ECLIPSES IN 1839. 1. The first will be a great and total eclipse, on Friday March 15th, at 9h. 28m. morning, but by reason of the moon's south latitude, her shadow will not touch any part of North America. The course of the general eclipse will be from southwest to north- east, from the Pacific Ocean a little west of Chili to the Arabian Gulf and southeastern part of the Mediterranean Sea. The termination of this grand and sublime phenomenon will probably be witnessed from the summit of some of those stupendous monuments of ancient industry and folly, the vast and lofty pyramids on the banks of the Nile in lower Egypt. The principal cities and places that will be to- tally shadowed in this eclipse, are Valparaiso, Mendoza, Cordova, Assumption, St. Salvador and Pernambuco, in South America, and Sierra Leone, Teemboo, Tombucto and Fezzan, in Africa. At each of these places the duration of total darkness will be from one to six minutes, and several of the planets and fixed stars will probably be visible. 2. The other will also be a grand and beautiful eclipse, on Satur- day, September 7th, at 5h. 35m. evening, but on account of the Mnon's low latitude, and happening so late in the afternoon, no part of it will be visible in North America.
    [Show full text]
  • United States V. Hodges: Treason, Jury Trials, and the War of 1812
    FOREWORD: Title United States v. Hodges: Treason, Jury Trials, and the War of 1812 Author Jennifer Elisa Smith Document Type Article Publication Date 2016 Keywords Legal history, treason, jury, Justice Gabriel Duvall, War of 1812 Abstract In August 1814 a number of British soldiers were arrested as stragglers or deserters in the town of Upper Marlboro, Maryland. Upon learning of the soldiers’ absences the British military took local physician, Dr. William Beanes, and two other residents into custody and threatened to burn Upper Marlboro if the British soldiers were not returned. John Hodges, a local attorney, arranged the soldiers’ return to the British military. For this, Hodges was charged with high treason for “adhering to [the] enemies, giving them aid and comfort.” The resulting jury trial was presided over by Justice Gabriel Duvall, a Supreme Court Justice and Prince Georges County native, and highlights how the crime of treason was viewed in early American culture and the role of the jury as deciders of the facts and the law in early American jurisprudence. Contextually, Hodges’ trial took place against the backdrop of the War of 1812 and was informed by the 1807 treason trial of Aaron Burr. Disciplines Law, constitutional history, legal history 1 UNITED STATES V. HODGES:1 TREASON, JURY TRIALS, AND THE WAR OF 1812 Jennifer Elisa Smith INTRODUCTION In August 1814 as British forces left a burned and ravaged Washington, D.C. a number of British soldiers were arrested as stragglers or deserters in the town of Upper Marlboro in Prince Georges County Maryland.2 Upon learning of the soldiers’ absences the British military took local physician, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Signers of the United States Declaration of Independence Table of Contents
    SIGNERS OF THE UNITED STATES DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE 56 Men Who Risked It All Life, Family, Fortune, Health, Future Compiled by Bob Hampton First Edition - 2014 1 SIGNERS OF THE UNITED STATES DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTON Page Table of Contents………………………………………………………………...………………2 Overview………………………………………………………………………………...………..5 Painting by John Trumbull……………………………………………………………………...7 Summary of Aftermath……………………………………………….………………...……….8 Independence Day Quiz…………………………………………………….……...………...…11 NEW HAMPSHIRE Josiah Bartlett………………………………………………………………………………..…12 William Whipple..........................................................................................................................15 Matthew Thornton……………………………………………………………………...…........18 MASSACHUSETTS Samuel Adams………………………………………………………………………………..…21 John Adams………………………………………………………………………………..……25 John Hancock………………………………………………………………………………..….29 Robert Treat Paine………………………………………………………………………….….32 Elbridge Gerry……………………………………………………………………....…….……35 RHODE ISLAND Stephen Hopkins………………………………………………………………………….…….38 William Ellery……………………………………………………………………………….….41 CONNECTICUT Roger Sherman…………………………………………………………………………..……...45 Samuel Huntington…………………………………………………………………….……….48 William Williams……………………………………………………………………………….51 Oliver Wolcott…………………………………………………………………………….…….54 NEW YORK William Floyd………………………………………………………………………….………..57 Philip Livingston…………………………………………………………………………….….60 Francis Lewis…………………………………………………………………………....…..…..64 Lewis Morris………………………………………………………………………………….…67
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to the Ratification of the Constitution in Maryland
    Introduction to the Ratification of the Constitution in Maryland Founding the Proprietary Colony The founding and establishment of the propriety government of Maryland was the product of competing factors—political, commercial, social, and religious. It was intertwined with the history of one family, the Calverts, who were well established among the Yorkshire gentry and whose Catholic sympathies were widely known. George Calvert had been a favorite of the Stuart king, James I. In 1625, following a noteworthy career in politics, including periods as clerk of the Privy Council, member of Parliament, special emissary abroad of the king, and a principal secretary of state, Calvert openly declared his Catholicism. This declaration closed any future possibility of public office for him. Shortly thereafter, James elevated Calvert to the Irish peerage as the baron of Baltimore. Calvert’s absence from public office afforded him an opportunity to pursue his interests in overseas colonization. Calvert appealed to Charles I, son of James, for a land grant.1 Calvert’s appeal was honored, but he did not live to see a charter issued. In 1632, Charles granted a proprietary charter to Cecil Calvert, George’s son and the second baron of Baltimore, making him Maryland’s first proprietor. Maryland’s charter was the first long-lasting one of its kind to be issued among the thirteen mainland British American colonies. Proprietorships represented a real share in the king’s authority. They extended unusual power. Maryland’s charter, which constituted Calvert and his heirs as “the true and absolute Lords and Proprietaries of the Region,” might have been “the best example of a sweeping grant of power to a proprietor.” Proprietors could award land grants, confer titles, and establish courts, which included the prerogative of hearing appeals.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to the Records of the Mayor and City Council at the Baltimore City Archives
    Governing Baltimore: A Guide to the Records of the Mayor and City Council at the Baltimore City Archives William G. LeFurgy, Susan Wertheimer David, and Richard J. Cox Baltimore City Archives and Records Management Office Department of Legislative Reference 1981 Table of Contents Preface i History of the Mayor and City Council 1 Scope and Content 3 Series Descriptions 5 Bibliography 18 Appendix: Mayors of Baltimore 19 Index 20 1 Preface Sweeping changes occurred in Baltimore society, commerce, and government during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. From incorporation in 1796 the municipal government's evolution has been indicative of this process. From its inception the city government has been dominated by the mayor and city council. The records of these chief administrative units, spanning nearly the entire history of Baltimore, are among the most significant sources for this city's history. This guide is the product of a two year effort in arranging and describing the mayor and city council records funded by the National Historical Publications and Records Commission. These records are the backbone of the historical records of the municipal government which now total over three thousand cubic feet and are available for researchers. The publication of this guide, and three others available on other records, is preliminary to a guide to the complete holdings of the Baltimore City Archives scheduled for publication in 1983. During the last two years many debts to individuals were accumulated. First and foremost is my gratitude to the staff of the NHPRC, most especially William Fraley and Larry Hackman, who made numerous suggestions regarding the original proposal and assisted with problems that appeared during the project.
    [Show full text]
  • The Maryland State House Maryland State House Facts
    The 20th & 21st Centuries The Maryland State House Maryland State House Facts As you cross into the newer, 20th century part of the Four Centuries of History ♦ Capitol of the United States, November 1783– State House, be sure to look up the grand staircase at August 1784 The Maryland State House was the first peacetime capitol the monumental painting of Washington Resigning His ♦ America’s first peacetime capitol of the United States and is the only state house ever to Commission by Edwin White, painted for the Maryland ♦ Oldest state house in America still in continuous Welcome have served as the nation’s capitol. Congress met in the General Assembly in 1858. legislative use to the Old Senate Chamber from November 26, 1783, to ♦ Declared a National Historic Landmark in 1960, the August 13, 1784. During that time, General George You will know you have left the 18th century part of the first state house in the nation to win such designation Maryland State House Washington came before Congress to resign his State House when you cross the black line in the floor. commission as commander-in-chief of the Continental Notice the fossils embedded in the black limestone. Once 18th Century Building Army and the Treaty of Paris was ratified, marking the A Self-Guided Tour for Visitors you cross that line, you are in the “new” section of the Date of construction: 1772–1779 official end of the Revolutionary War. In May 1784, building, built between 1902 – 1905, often called the Architect: Joseph Horatio Anderson Congress appointed Thomas Jefferson minister to France, “Annex.” It is in this section of the State House that the Builder: Charles Wallace the first diplomatic appointment by the new nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Historical Magazine, 1976, Volume 71, Issue No. 3
    AKfLAND •AZIN Published Quarterly by the Maryland Historical Society FALL 1976 Vol. 71, No. 3 BOARD OF EDITORS JOSEPH L. ARNOLD, University of Maryland, Baltimore County JEAN BAKER, Goucher College GARY BROWNE, Wayne State University JOSEPH W. COX, Towson State College CURTIS CARROLL DAVIS, Baltimore RICHARD R. DUNCAN, Georgetown University RONALD HOFFMAN, University of Maryland, College Park H. H. WALKER LEWIS, Baltimore EDWARD C. PAPENFUSE, Hall of Records BENJAMIN QUARLES, Morgan State College JOHN B. BOLES, Editor, Towson State College NANCY G. BOLES, Assistant Editor RICHARD J. COX, Manuscripts MARY K. MEYER, Genealogy MARY KATHLEEN THOMSEN, Graphics FORMER EDITORS WILLIAM HAND BROWNE, 1906-1909 LOUIS H. DIELMAN, 1910-1937 JAMES W. FOSTER, 1938-1949, 1950-1951 HARRY AMMON, 1950 FRED SHELLEY, 1951-1955 FRANCIS C. HABER 1955-1958 RICHARD WALSH, 1958-1967 RICHARD R. DUNCAN, 1967-1974 P. WILLIAM FILBY, Director ROMAINE S. SOMERVILLE, Assistant Director The Maryland Historical Magazine is published quarterly by the Maryland Historical Society, 201 W. Monument Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21201. Contributions and correspondence relating to articles, book reviews, and any other editorial matters should be addressed to the Editor in care of the Society. All contributions should be submitted in duplicate, double-spaced, and consistent with the form out- lined in A Manual of Style (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969). The Maryland Historical Society disclaims responsibility for statements made by contributors. Composed and printed at Waverly Press, Inc., Baltimore, Maryland 21202,. Second-class postage paid at Baltimore, Maryland. © 1976, Maryland Historical Society. 6 0F ^ ^^^f^i"^^lARYLA/ i ^ RECORDS LIBRARY \9T6 00^ 26 HIST NAPOLIS, M^tl^ND Fall 1976 #.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vice President in the U.S. Senate: Examining the Consequences of Institutional Design
    The Vice President in the U.S. Senate: Examining the Consequences of Institutional Design. Michael S. Lynch Tony Madonna Asssistant Professor Assistant Professor University of Kansas University of Georgia [email protected] [email protected] January 25, 2010∗ ∗The authors would like to thank Scott H. Ainsworth, Stanley Bach, Ryan Bakker, Sarah A. Binder, Jamie L. Carson, Michael H. Crespin, Keith L. Dougherty, Trey Hood, Andrew Martin, Ryan J. Owens and Steven S. Smith for comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript. Madonna also thanks the University of Georgia American Political Development working group for support and comments, and Rachel Snyder for helpful research assistance. All errors remain the authors. Abstract The constitutional designation of the vice president as the president of the United States Senate is a unique feature of the chamber. It places control over the Senate's rules and precedents under an individual who is not elected by the chamber and receives no direct benefits from the maintenance of its institutions. We argue that this feature of the Senate has played an important, recurring role in its development. The vice president has frequently acted in a manner that conflicted with the wishes chamber majorities. Consequently, the Senate has developed rules and precedents that insulate the chamber from its presiding officer. These actions have made the Senate a less efficient chamber, but have largely freed it from the potential influence of the executive branch. We examine these arguments using a mix of historical and contemporary case studies, as well as empirical data on contentious rulings on questions of order.
    [Show full text]
  • The Republican
    mercenary element to effect and con- success of those who formerly were OUR WASHINGTON LETTER. Conk ling’s nomination to the Su- men ofthe same character. The fol- the government of our lair o|,j Whyte’s outspoken opponents preme Court was discussed here it THE REPUBLICAN. lowing Senators are said to hnvi uni .Mayor [From llegirktrCorrespor dent.] was urged that lie would never to rejeei Stale? slid whose elevation was ilie contin- our ac- -igned a written contract taking OAKLAND, : in power, the in office of men whom the peo- cept a position which would force MARYLAND- any nominee on the objection ot The party uance Washington. I). C., March 20,1882. of its own men, lias failed ple turned down when they elected him to walk behind all Hie "tilers of -ingle member of their syndicate; judgement Nothing appears more certain to lias failed to The work was dune, ibe same class on all occasions of Wells, Winfield, to fulfil its duty, eon. Mayor Whyte. of events than JAS. A. HAYDEN, . Messrs. Williams. Hie observers political that the greatest the was that the Mayor ceremony. Till* most recently ap- Hepron, Bians, Bond, Cooper; Gill. trol public affairs so and result that the Democratic politicians can Editor and Proprietor. number enini- poii tad Justice of Hie Supreme Court Getty, Vanderford, Parsons, Farrow, good of the greatest shall be incurred Governor Hamilton’* not, or will mt, learn anything—not become ty without gaming the friendship ol always walk behind the others Lancaster, Allston and Magruder. accomplished, has unsatisfac- even by experience.
    [Show full text]
  • The World Almanac
    • 181~ the prloee and force the aale 118 for the Treuur7 with the 1 t lldatratlOD of powen dlatrlbuted by potute, e ouet In &II. State of .w.YoJUt, where a Democratic majorltr of 110,000 WOR. The Democratic Hooae of eto of a BepubIlean te aDd a ~... the power to ne&ore proeperlty 01 the 01 for a peat party. To dlaeern a the !e8ODJ'CeII 01 a eompeteut and y to eep the tro t of a people' THEVWORLD ALMANAC FOR l!rbc'¥rar ISiS. TUB year,187S i~ the latter part of the s635t.h and t.he begillnln of the ~636th since the creation of the world. accordmg to the Jews. It answers to the 6588th ot9 the Julian Period, the 2628th from the foundation of Rome, the 2651Ht yem' of the Olympiads, and the yea.r 7383-84 of the Byzantine era. The looth year of Amedc;lJ~ Indcpenuence beginl! Jllly 4. ~be .fiour ';::'casons. D. H. M. D. H. M. Winter bewns, 1874. Decembcr 21. 6 14 el"f andJasts 89 0 S9 Spring , 1875, MarcIl 20, 7 13 ev., 92 20 26 Summer·" 1875, June' 21,339 ev., 93 1428 Autumn" 1875, September 23, 6 7 mo., 89 18 I Winter ".. "'IB75, December 22, 0 8 mo., Trop. year, ,365 5 54 Clt:onfunctfon of ~lanetst anlJ otb~ ~bcnomt1ta. -----------------_.__._------_._------------.,.-_._---;--'------ IMonth. Alpect. apart. I' Month.! Aspect. Washington Distance apart. I Wfts1~lnr;to.TIme. ! Dlstan~e , I Tim•• -------- D n X I G' 1--1 D.H.X.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Historical Magazine, 1963, Volume 58, Issue No. 2
    MARYLAND HISTORICAL MAGAZINE VOL. 58, No. 2 JUNE, 1963 CONTENTS PAGE The Autobiographical Writings of Senator Arthur Pue Gorman John R. Lambert, Jr. 93 Jonathan Boucher: The Mind of an American Loyalist Philip Evanson 123 Civil War Memoirs of the First Maryland Cavalry, C. S.A Edited hy Samuel H. Miller 137 Sidelights 173 Dr. James B. Stansbury Frank F. White, Jr. Reviews of Recent Books 175 Bohner, John Pendleton Kennedy, by J. Gilman D'Arcy Paul Keefer, Baltimore's Music, by Lester S. Levy Miner, William Goddard, Newspaperman, by David C. Skaggs Pease, ed.. The Progressive Years, by J. Joseph Huthmacher Osborne, ed., Swallow Barn, by Cecil D. Eby Carroll, Joseph Nichols and the Nicholites, by Theodore H. Mattheis Turner, William Plumer of New Hampshire, by Frank Otto Gatell Timberlake, Prohibition and the Progressive Movement, by Dorothy M. Brown Brewington, Chesapeake Bay Log Canoes and Bugeyes, by Richard H. Randall Higginbotham, Daniel Morgan, Revolutionary Rifleman, by Frank F. White, Jr. de Valinger, ed., and comp., A Calendar of Ridgely Family Letters, by George Valentine Massey, II Klein, ed.. Just South of Gettysburg, by Harold R. Manakee Notes and Queries 190 Contributors 192 Annual Subscription to the Magazine, t'f.OO. Each issue $1.00. The Magazine assumes no responsibility for statements or opinions expressed in its pages. Richard Walsh, Editor C. A. Porter Hopkins, Asst. Editor Published quarterly by the Maryland Historical Society, 201 W. Monument Street, Baltimore 1, Md. Second-class postage paid at Baltimore, Md. > AAA;) 1 -i4.J,J.A.l,J..I.AJ.J.J LJ.XAJ.AJ;4.J..<.4.AJ.J.*4.A4.AA4.4..tJ.AA4.AA.<.4.44-4" - "*" ' ^O^ SALE HISTORICAL MAP OF ST.
    [Show full text]