ISSN 2664-4002 (Print) & ISSN 2664-6714 (Online) South Asian Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Abbreviated Key Title: South Asian Res J Human Soc Sci | Volume-2 | Issue-1| Jan-Feb -2020 | DOI: 10.36346/sarjhss.2020.v02i01.011 Review Article Princess Di (e): Illuminati Ritual Sacrifice by Cainite Royals Timothy Spearman* Toronto International College *Corresponding Author Timothy Spearman Article History Received: 03.02.2020 Accepted: 11.02.2020 Published: 29.02.2020 Abstract: Many people are unaware of the fact that we are ruled over by overarching global elite of interbreeding bloodline families, who have been referred to be various names. World Bank whistleblower Karen Hudes refers to these interbreeding bloodline families as a separate species of human she calls homo capensis. Secret societies like Freemasonry and Rosicrucianism allow these elites to keep their objectives secret, while initiating their bloodlines to the highest degrees within their aristocratic societies, ruling over us with an iron fist. The Royal Family of the United Kingdom is the Saxe-Coburg-Gotha German Royal Family in disguise. Their bloodline is the Cainite bloodline from antiquity. Their blood type as with all of the ascendant aristocracy of the world features the RH-negative blood type. Human mothers often reject the fetuses in the womb if the father is of the homo capensis bloodline. These bloodlines worship the dark forces and conduct Satanic rituals the world over. Fritz Springmeier's Bloodlines of the Illuminati has exposed the 13 bloodline families of the ruling Illuminati elite. This essay exposes the fact that the Satanic British Royals sacrificed Princess Di(e) in a Satanic ritual in a Parisian tunnel beneath a hill, where for centuries children were sacrificed to the moon goddess Diana. This paper exposes the machinations surrounding the death of a princess. Keywords: Illuminati, Cainite, satanic, Satanist, ritual sacrifice, bloodlines. Keywords: Illuminati, Cainite, satanic, Satanist, ritual sacrifice, bloodlines. INTRODUCTION The final, haunting photo of Princess Diana, taken on the night she died, shows her sitting with her boyfriend Dodi Fayed in the back of a Mercedes car as it roars away from the rear entrance of the Paris Ritz Hotel, heading for the couple‘s secret love-nest near the Champs-Elysees. Diana is looking intently out the back window of the Mercedes, as someone might if they worried that they were being tailed. The commonly provided explanation is that she was anxiously looking to see if her car was being chased by the paparazzi, who had been tracking her and Dodi since their arrival in Paris from a Mediterranean holiday eight hours earlier. Chauffeur Henri Paul was at the wheel. His eyes look transfixed, resembling a man possessed. His blood alcohol level is said to have been excessively high in numerous reports, but this smacks of a cover story. Dodi‘s bodyguard Trevor Rees-Jones is in the front passenger seat. Rees-Jones is seen in the picture below raising his hand in an apparent effort to shield his eyes from a bright light, most likely from a laser, since it was the testimony of MI6 agent Tomlinson that a laser had purportedly been deployed in an MI6-directed operation to blind the driver, Henry Paul. Copyright @ 2020: This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non commercial use (NonCommercial, or CC-BY-NC) provided the original author and source are credited. © South Asian Research Publication, Bangladesh Journal Homepage: www.sarpublication.com/sarjhss 51 Timothy Spearman., South Asian Res J Human Soc Sci; Vol-2, Iss- 1 (Jan-Feb, 2020): 51-105 The haunting last picture taken of Diana shows her peering out the rear window to look for paparazzi. Trevor Ress-Jones and chauffeur Henri Paul are also pictured What happened next is central to a probe by Scotland Yard into an astonishing claim from an SAS sniper, known as Soldier N, that members of his elite regiment assassinated Diana seconds after the Mercedes sped at 63mph into the notoriously dangerous Pont de l‘Alma road tunnel. Many will dismiss Soldier N‘s claims as yet another conspiracy theory related to Princess Diana‘s fatal car accident, August 31, 1997. Two inquiries, by Scotland Yard and the French police, determined the deaths were the result of a tragic accident. An official inquest reached the same conclusion. The world had been led to believe the blame lay with the grossly negligent driving of an intoxicated driver, Henri Paul, and the pursuing paparazzi. However, Soldier N‘s claims may be credible, especially in the light of the most recent death bed confession by an assassin employed by the British government, who targeted those who posed a perceived threat to British national security. There may be good reasons for the continued suspicions related to the case. For instance, the parents of the 41- year-old chauffeur Henri Paul insist that their son was not a heavy drinker, usually contenting himself with a bottle of beer or an occasional shot of Ricard, a liquorice-flavoured aperitif. Diana in the Ritz hotel lift with Dodi Fayed. According to investigative reporter Sue Reid, the paparazzi who are accused of pursuing and harassing Diana to her death were not even in the Pont de l‘Alma tunnel at the time of the car crash. It has also been revealed that a high- powered black motorbike, which did not belong to any of the paparazzi, raced past Diana‘s Mercedes in the tunnel. Eyewitnesses say its rider and pillion passenger deliberately caused the car to crash. In addition, Sue Reid‘s inquiries unearthed the existence of a shadowy SAS unit that answers to MI6, as well as the names of two MI6 officers who were linked by a number of sources to Diana‘s death. © South Asian Research Publication, Bangladesh Journal Homepage: www.sarpublication.com/sarjhss 52 Timothy Spearman., South Asian Res J Human Soc Sci; Vol-2, Iss- 1 (Jan-Feb, 2020): 51-105 Were Henri Paul and the paparazzi being used as patsies and scapegoats in the usual manner of a whitewash and cover-up? Has there been a skillful effort to cover-up what is actually an assassination? In fact, it has been revealed that Henri Paul was working for MI6. It is known, for instance, that he received a total of 349,800 French Francs from an undisclosed source in his bank account. Why didn‘t the Inquiry investigate the source? The payments came in the form of individual cheques to the tune of 40,000 F.F. Why didn‘t the inquiry make a more concerted effort to establish who was writing these cheques? Why did Henri Paul go missing for 7 minutes at 10:36 at the Ritz Hotel in Paris, the night of the fatal car accident? Why did Paul appear to be signalling to someone moments before driving off in the Mercedes [1]?an enigma And there was another strange anomaly revealed by the ITV documentary in 1998. The Haemoglobin in Henri Paul‘s blood was found to contain 20.7% carbon monoxide and this would have been at a much higher level earlier because the carbon monoxide content halves every four to five hours once exposure to it has stopped. Haemoglobin carries the oxygen. Debbie Davis of the Carbon Monoxide Support Group said that with these levels in his blood, Henri Paul would not have known his left hand from his right, because of the reduced oxygen reaching the brain. Dr Alastair Hay, an expert on carbon monoxide poisoning, agreed and could not explain why Paul showed no signs of the considerable symptoms that should have been evident: ―I find it difficult to rationalise everything. A blood-carbon monoxide level of 20% and (a high blood-alcohol level) suggests this would be someone with a much slower reaction time, someone who would be badly impaired, but none of those things appear to be evident from the pictures that we see of him. It is a bit of an enigma [2].‖ There is a lot more to know about Henri Paul. His best friend, Claude Garrec, told the ITV documentary that Paul had contacts within the French and foreign intelligence services and maintained them throughout his time at the Ritz. This is no surprise because the intelligence agencies recruit the security men at the top hotels and the Ritz, with its VIP clientele and reputation for espionage and arms dealing, would have been a prime target. Paul certainly had unexplained sources of income. He earned about £20- 25,000 a year at the Ritz and yet he was a keen pilot with 605 hours of flying time at about £300 an hour. He had a string of bank accounts. There were two in a bank outside Paris and three accounts, plus a safe deposit box, at the Banque Nationale de Paris near the Ritz. He had three accounts at the nearby branch of Barclays and one current and four deposit accounts at the Caisse D‘Epargne de Paris. In the eight months before the crash, sums of £4,000 were paid into an account here on five separate occasions. In total he had £122,000 (1.2 million francs) and no-one knows where it came from. Then there is the question of where Paul was in the three hours between 7:00 pm when he went off duty and 10:00 pm when Dodi called him on his mobile phone and told him to return to the Ritz. There is little doubt that Diana, who had recently divorced from Prince Charles, had become something of a thorn in the side of the Royal Family.