Hadamard: Elementary Geometry

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hadamard: Elementary Geometry HADAMARD: ELEMENTARY GEOMETRY SOLUTIONS AND NOTES TO SUPPLEMENTARY PROBLEMS Mark Saul Center for Mathematical Talent Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences New York University 1 2 FOREWORD This addendum to the Reader's Companion completes the solutions and an- notations to the problems in Hadamard's elementary geometry text (Lessons in Geometry. I. Plane Geometry, Jacques Hadamard, Amer. Math. Soc. (2008)). Because of space constraints, they were not included in the printed volume con- taining solutions to most of Hadamard's problems (Hadamard's Plane Geometry: A Reader's Companion, Mark Saul, Amer. Math. Soc. (2010)). Hadamard revised his geometry textbook a dozen times during his long life, and kept adding interesting problems to the miscellany he had provided in the original edition. So this collection of problems is the result of Hadamard's lifetime love of synthetic Euclidean geometry. The textbook itself is written in an abbreviated, almost telegraphic style. The problems offered for each chapter invite the reader to unfold the compressed exposition, discovering its implications through hands-on experience with geometry. These problems have a somewhat different feel to them. Their results sometimes take us far from the main stream of the exposition in the text. Often, they require a deep, almost virtuosic control of the techniques and theorems offered in the text. Many of them generalize or build on problems mentioned earlier. While some of these problems fall more easily to advanced (i.e. analytic) methods, we have here provided solutions for the most part within the bounds of Hadamard's text and his synthetic approach. As with most large efforts, much credit must be given to others. Behzad Mehrdad patiently reviewed each piece of the manuscript, offering valuable insights, correcting errors, and in some cases providing improved solutions to the problem. Alexei Kopylov likewise suggested significant corrections to and improvements on the original manuscript. I am also indebted to the Education Development Center (EDC) and Al Cuoco in particular for significant and sustained support in this translation project. But the lion's share of the work was actually done by others. More than is the case with the problems in the textbook, these solutions are often based on those of D. I. Perepelkin and his colleagues, who prepared the Russian edition of Hadamard's book (Gosudarstvenoye Uchebno-Pedagogicheskoye Izdatelstvo Minis- terstva Prosveshcheniya RSFSR Moscow, 1957). Perepelkin's solutions are written for a professional mathematical audience, and even where his ideas are central to the solution, the exposition has been reworked significantly. Of course, I take responsibility for any errors that have crept in during this process. The work on Hadamard's Elementary Geometry was initiated under National Science Foundation grant ESI 0242476-03 to the Educational Development Center. Additional support was provided by the John Templeton Foundation through a grant to the Mathematical Sciences Research Institute, and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation through a grant to the Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences at New York University. Mark Saul New York City August 2011 3 PROBLEMS, SOLUTIONS, AND NOTES Exercises 349, 350, 353, 354,384, 386, 387, 393, 394, 400, 404, 413 are taken from the General Competition of Lyc´eesand Colleges. Exercises 365, 374, 397, 406, 409, 412, 421 were taken from the contest of the Assembly of the Mathematical Sciences. We have not felt obligated to give these problems in the form in which they were originally proposed; we have, in particular, made certain changes in their formulation to correspond to other exercises given in the rest of this work. Problem 343. If A; B; C; D are four points on a circle (in that order), and if a; b; c; d are the midpoints of arcs AB; BC; CD; DA, show that lines ac; bd are perpendicular. 1 1 1 1 Solution. We have aB= 2 AB; Bb= 2 BC; cD= 2 CD; Dd= 2 DA : 1 ◦ Thus ab + cd= 2 AB + BC + CD + DA = 180 , and since the angle be- tween lines ac and bd is measured by half this arc, it must be a right angle. Figure t344a Problem 344. We take points D; E; F on sides BC; CA; AB of a triangle, and construct circles AEF , BF D, and CDE. Prove that : 1o. These three circles are concurrent at a point O; 2o. If an arbitrary point P in the plane is joined to A; B; C, then the new points a; b; c where P A; P B; P C intersect these circles belong to a circle passing through O and P . Solution. (1◦) Suppose circles AEF and BF D intersect at point O (fig. t344a). We must show that O is on the circle through C; E, and D as well. We will do this by showing that quadrilateral CEOD is cyclic, using the criterion of 80. 4 Since quadrilateral AEOF is cyclic, we know (79) that EOF\ = 180◦ − CAB\. Since quadrilateral BF OD is cyclic, we have F\ OD = 180◦ − ABC\. By adding the angles about point O, we see that EOD\ = 360◦ − (EOF\ + F\ OD) = 360◦ − (180◦ − CAB\ + 180◦ − ABC\) = CAB\ + CBA\ = 180◦ − ACB\ (this last because the three angles involved are the angles of triangle ABC). Thus the opposite angles of CEOD are supplementary, and point O must lie on the circle through C; E, and D. Note. This is a relatively easy problem. If students need a hint, it is usually enough to suggest using cyclic quadrilaterals and the criteria of 79 and 80. Some- times students have a slight problem imagining that O is the intersection of only two of the circles, and will make some assumption in their argument equivalent to the assumption that O is on the third circle as well. This error is worth examining in detail in the classroom. In constructing a diagram with dynamic software, students may discover that the proof needs modification in certain cases. For some positions of D; E, and F , point O will end up outside the triangle, and the quadrilaterals referred to above won't lead to a solution. But other quadrilaterals will, and students can look at various such cases to convince themselves that the argument does not essentially change. Certain angles that are equal in some cases are supplementary in others, and vice versa. In more advanced work, greater unity is achieved if we consider angles as ori- ented, defining equality of angles slightly differently. See the note below. (2◦) The solution to this exercise is again straightforward, but the relationship of the elements in the figure offer many different cases for exploration. We give just one here. We will show that the quadrilateral with vertices P; a; O; b (in some order) is cyclic. The argument can be repeated for the quadrilateral with vertices P; b; c; O, which proves the theorem. In figure t344b, P[ aO is supplementary to AaO[, which in turn is supplementary to AF[ O (because these are opposite angles in cyclic quadrilateral AaOF ). Hence P[ aO = AF[ O. Similarly, using cyclic quadrilateral BbOF , we see that BbO[ is supplementary to both P[ bO and BF\ O, so these last two angles are equal. But clearly AF[ O and BF\ O are supplementary, so P[ aO and P[ bO are also supplementary, showing that P aOb is cyclic. To show that P cOb is cyclic, we note that P[ bO supplements BbO[, which is equal to BDO\ (they both intercept arc BF O). And BDO\ supplements CDO\, so P[ bO = CDO\. Finally, from cyclic quadrilateral CDOc, we see that CDO\ supplements CcO[ = P[ cO, so P[ bO also supplements P[ cO. This last statement shows that quadrilateral P cOb is cyclic, and the argument is completed as indicated above. Note. In other cases, we can make use of angles P[ aO; AaO;[ OF\ B, and so on. In each case, certain angles are equal, and others are supplementary. In advanced work, we consider oriented angles, and define `equality' so that `equal' oriented angles are either equal or supplementary, if orientation is not considered. 5 Figure t344b The solution we have presented here can motivate this step, which students and teachers can take using other references. See, for example, Roger A. Johnson, Advanced Euclidean Geometry, New York: Dover Books, 2007 (reprint of 1929 edition). See also exercise 214. Problem 345. With each side of a cyclic quadrilateral ABCD as a chord, we draw an arbitrary circular segment. The four new points A0;B0 ;C0;D0 where each of these four circles S1;S2;S3;S4 intersects the next are also the vertices of a cyclic quadrilateral. Solution. Since quadrilateral ABB0A0 (figure t345) is cyclic, we know that A\0AB+BB\0A0 = 180◦. Since quadrilateral BCC0B0 is cyclic, we know that BCC\0+ BB\0C0 = 180◦. Adding, we find that A\0AB + BB\0A0 + BCC\0 + BB\0C0 = 360◦ = BB\0A0 +A\0B0C0 +BB\0C0; or A\0AB +BCC\0 = A\0B0C0. Similarly, using other cyclic quadrilaterals, we can prove that DAA\0 + DCC\0 = A\0D0C0. Adding again, we find A\0AB + BCC\0 + DAA\0 + DCC\0 = A\0B0C0 + A\0D0C0. But the first sum is equal to DAB\ + DCB\ = 180◦, because these are the opposite angles of cyclic quadrilateral ABCD. Hence D\0A0B0 + D\0C0B0 = 180◦, so that A0B0C0D0 is cyclic. Note. The result is slightly more general than is indicated by the figure. The four points can be in any order on the circle, and the result will hold. That is, the given cyclic quadrilateral can have `sides' which intersect (we don't usually consider these true quadrilaterals), and the result will hold. 6 Figure t345 Students can be challenged to show that this is true.
Recommended publications
  • Geometry by Its History
    Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics Geometry by Its History Bearbeitet von Alexander Ostermann, Gerhard Wanner 1. Auflage 2012. Buch. xii, 440 S. Hardcover ISBN 978 3 642 29162 3 Format (B x L): 15,5 x 23,5 cm Gewicht: 836 g Weitere Fachgebiete > Mathematik > Geometrie > Elementare Geometrie: Allgemeines Zu Inhaltsverzeichnis schnell und portofrei erhältlich bei Die Online-Fachbuchhandlung beck-shop.de ist spezialisiert auf Fachbücher, insbesondere Recht, Steuern und Wirtschaft. Im Sortiment finden Sie alle Medien (Bücher, Zeitschriften, CDs, eBooks, etc.) aller Verlage. Ergänzt wird das Programm durch Services wie Neuerscheinungsdienst oder Zusammenstellungen von Büchern zu Sonderpreisen. Der Shop führt mehr als 8 Millionen Produkte. 2 The Elements of Euclid “At age eleven, I began Euclid, with my brother as my tutor. This was one of the greatest events of my life, as dazzling as first love. I had not imagined that there was anything as delicious in the world.” (B. Russell, quoted from K. Hoechsmann, Editorial, π in the Sky, Issue 9, Dec. 2005. A few paragraphs later K. H. added: An innocent look at a page of contemporary the- orems is no doubt less likely to evoke feelings of “first love”.) “At the age of 16, Abel’s genius suddenly became apparent. Mr. Holmbo¨e, then professor in his school, gave him private lessons. Having quickly absorbed the Elements, he went through the In- troductio and the Institutiones calculi differentialis and integralis of Euler. From here on, he progressed alone.” (Obituary for Abel by Crelle, J. Reine Angew. Math. 4 (1829) p. 402; transl. from the French) “The year 1868 must be characterised as [Sophus Lie’s] break- through year.
    [Show full text]
  • Six Mathematical Gems from the History of Distance Geometry
    Six mathematical gems from the history of Distance Geometry Leo Liberti1, Carlile Lavor2 1 CNRS LIX, Ecole´ Polytechnique, F-91128 Palaiseau, France Email:[email protected] 2 IMECC, University of Campinas, 13081-970, Campinas-SP, Brazil Email:[email protected] February 28, 2015 Abstract This is a partial account of the fascinating history of Distance Geometry. We make no claim to completeness, but we do promise a dazzling display of beautiful, elementary mathematics. We prove Heron’s formula, Cauchy’s theorem on the rigidity of polyhedra, Cayley’s generalization of Heron’s formula to higher dimensions, Menger’s characterization of abstract semi-metric spaces, a result of G¨odel on metric spaces on the sphere, and Schoenberg’s equivalence of distance and positive semidefinite matrices, which is at the basis of Multidimensional Scaling. Keywords: Euler’s conjecture, Cayley-Menger determinants, Multidimensional scaling, Euclidean Distance Matrix 1 Introduction Distance Geometry (DG) is the study of geometry with the basic entity being distance (instead of lines, planes, circles, polyhedra, conics, surfaces and varieties). As did much of Mathematics, it all began with the Greeks: specifically Heron, or Hero, of Alexandria, sometime between 150BC and 250AD, who showed how to compute the area of a triangle given its side lengths [36]. After a hiatus of almost two thousand years, we reach Arthur Cayley’s: the first paper of volume I of his Collected Papers, dated 1841, is about the relationships between the distances of five points in space [7]. The gist of what he showed is that a tetrahedron can only exist in a plane if it is flat (in fact, he discussed the situation in one more dimension).
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 5Morphology of Permanent Molars
    CHAPTER Morphology of Permanent Molars Topics5 covered within the four sections of this chapter B. Type traits of maxillary molars from the lingual include the following: view I. Overview of molars C. Type traits of maxillary molars from the A. General description of molars proximal views B. Functions of molars D. Type traits of maxillary molars from the C. Class traits for molars occlusal view D. Arch traits that differentiate maxillary from IV. Maxillary and mandibular third molar type traits mandibular molars A. Type traits of all third molars (different from II. Type traits that differentiate mandibular second first and second molars) molars from mandibular first molars B. Size and shape of third molars A. Type traits of mandibular molars from the buc- C. Similarities and differences of third molar cal view crowns compared with first and second molars B. Type traits of mandibular molars from the in the same arch lingual view D. Similarities and differences of third molar roots C. Type traits of mandibular molars from the compared with first and second molars in the proximal views same arch D. Type traits of mandibular molars from the V. Interesting variations and ethnic differences in occlusal view molars III. Type traits that differentiate maxillary second molars from maxillary first molars A. Type traits of the maxillary first and second molars from the buccal view hroughout this chapter, “Appendix” followed Also, remember that statistics obtained from by a number and letter (e.g., Appendix 7a) is Dr. Woelfel’s original research on teeth have been used used within the text to denote reference to to draw conclusions throughout this chapter and are the page (number 7) and item (letter a) being referenced with superscript letters like this (dataA) that Treferred to on that appendix page.
    [Show full text]
  • Students' Understanding of Axial and Central Symmetry
    Full research paper STUDENTS’ UNDERSTANDING OF Vlasta Moravcová* Jarmila Robová AXIAL AND CENTRAL SYMMETRY Jana Hromadová Zdeněk Halas Department of Mathematics ABSTRACT Education, Faculty of Mathematics The paper focuses on students’ understanding of the concepts of axial and central symmetries in and Physics, Charles University, Czech a plane. Attention is paid to whether students of various ages identify a non-model of an axially Republic symmetrical figure, know that a line segment has two axes of symmetry and a circle has an infinite number of symmetry axes, and are able to construct an image of a given figure in central symmetry. * [email protected] The results presented here were obtained by a quantitative analysis of tests given to nearly 1,500 Czech students, including pre-service mathematics teachers. The paper presents the statistics of the students’ answers, discusses the students’ thought processes and presents some of the students’ original solutions. The data obtained are also analysed with regard to gender differences and to the type of school that students attend. The results show that students have two principal misconceptions: that a rhomboid is an axially symmetrical figure and that a line segment has just one axis of symmetry. Moreover, many of the tested students confused axial and central symmetry. Finally, the possible causes of these errors are considered and recommendations for preventing these errors are given. Article history KEYWORDS Received Axial symmetry, central symmetry, circle, geometrical concepts, line segment, rhomboid October 22, 2020 Received in revised form January 19, 2021 HOW TO CITE Accepted Moravcová V., Robová J., Hromadová J., Halas Z.
    [Show full text]
  • Quadrilateral Lace Susan Happersett Beacon, NY, USA; [email protected] Abstract
    Bridges 2020 Conference Proceedings Quadrilateral Lace Susan Happersett Beacon, NY, USA; [email protected] Abstract This paper will describe the exact procedures I use to draw algorithmically generated mapping patterns in the framework of quadrilaterals. I began with a square format, then rhomboid and trapezoidal. Layering concentric self-similar shapes creates the illusion of 3-dimensional space. Shifting the self-similar shapes out of the concentric order creates the sense of movement across the plane. The development of my lace drawings has been a multi-year process. By a lace pattern, or point-to-point mapping pattern, I mean carefully laying out a collection of points in the plane according to a pattern, and then joining certain pairs of points with line segments, where the pairs to be joined are specified by a definite procedure. The first lace drawings I algorithmically generated were restricted to points on the Cartesian Coordinate system: the x-axis, the y-axis and the lines y = x and y = −x [1]. Expanding on the types of point-to-point mappings I could produce, I decided to use the perimeters of quadrilaterals to assign my points. I began by working with a square with 7 equally distant points on each side. I picked an odd number of points for aesthetic reasons. Four sides on the square, 7 points per side, produces 24 points in total. I wanted a point on the center of each side. Once the parts were defined, I needed to write a rule to define the mapping process to be carried out for each point.
    [Show full text]
  • Geometry for Drafting Section 5.1 Applied Geometry for Board Drafting Section 5.2 Applied Geometry for CAD Systems
    5 Geometry for Drafting Section 5.1 Applied Geometry for Board Drafting Section 5.2 Applied Geometry for CAD Systems Chapter Objectives • Identify geometric shapes and construc- tions used by drafters. • Construct various geometric shapes. • Solve technical and mathematical prob- lems through geomet- ric constructions using drafting instruments. • Solve technical and mathematical prob- lems through geomet- ric constructions using a CAD system. • Use geometry to reduce or enlarge a drawing or to change its proportions. Defying Convention It has been said that Zaha Hadid has built a career on defying convention—conventional ideas of architectural space, and of construction. What do you see in the building shown here that defi es convention? 132 Drafting Career Zaha Hadid, Architect Architect Zaha Hadid’s designs for the Cincinnati Contemporary Art Center were “like a rollercoaster, a little scary, but exhilarating,” says Center direc- tor Charles Desmarais. Critics said “she was a paper architect, someone who had great respect as a theo- rist and as a thinker about architecture but who hadn't had the opportunity to build.” “She totally got what we were trying to do,” said Desmarais, “which was to try and bridge that sort of gap between the inside and the outside, between the world and the museum.” She certainly did. Zaha Hadid is the fi rst woman in the world to design a museum and to win the prestigious Pritzker Architec- ture Prize. Academic Skills and Abilities • Math • Computer sciences • Business management skills • Verbal and written communication skills • Organizing and planning skills Career Pathways There is a wealth of opportunities outside the classroom for expanding your drafting knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • Geometry Revealed
    Geometry Revealed A Jacob's Ladder to Modern Higher Geometry Bearbeitet von Marcel Berger, Lester J. Senechal 1. Auflage 2010. Buch. xvi, 831 S. Hardcover ISBN 978 3 540 70996 1 Format (B x L): 15,5 x 23,5 cm Gewicht: 1430 g Weitere Fachgebiete > Mathematik > Geometrie > Elementare Geometrie: Allgemeines Zu Inhaltsverzeichnis schnell und portofrei erhältlich bei Die Online-Fachbuchhandlung beck-shop.de ist spezialisiert auf Fachbücher, insbesondere Recht, Steuern und Wirtschaft. Im Sortiment finden Sie alle Medien (Bücher, Zeitschriften, CDs, eBooks, etc.) aller Verlage. Ergänzt wird das Programm durch Services wie Neuerscheinungsdienst oder Zusammenstellungen von Büchern zu Sonderpreisen. Der Shop führt mehr als 8 Millionen Produkte. Chapter IX Lattices, packings and tilings in the plane Preliminary note. For the arrangement of Chaps. IX and X, we have adopted the following policy concerning the interplay between dimension 2 and dimensions 3 and higher. In the present chapter in spite of its title we will treat higher dimensions for those subjects that will not be treated in detail in the next chapter, either because we have chosen not to discuss them further or because we want to treat matters extremely fast. Finally, we will encounter practically no open problems in the case of the plane, contrary to the spirit of our book; this will be entirely different in Chap. X. IX.1. Lattices, a line in the standard lattice Z2 and the theory of continued fractions, an immensity of applications A lattice in the real affine plane A is a subset ƒ that can be written as the set of all a CmuCnv, where a is a point of A and having vectorized A where u, v are lineally independent vectors and where m, n range over the set Z of all integers.
    [Show full text]
  • 21. Concepts and Categories
    Concepts and Categories Lecture 21 1 Learning, Perception, and Memory Rely on Thinking • Learning – Classical Conditioning • How can I predict some event? – Instrumental Conditioning • How can I control that event? • Perception – What is out there? Where is it? What is it doing? • Memory – What happened in the past? 2 “Every act of perception is an act of categorization” Bruner (1957) [paraphrase] • Fundamental Cognitive Process – Perceptual Identification... • Of Individual Object – Categorization... • As Belonging in Same Class as Other Objects • Categorical Knowledge is Part of Semantic Memory 3 Categories and Concepts • Enumeration • Rule • Attributes – Perceptual – Functional – Relational 4 Classical View of Categorization Aristotle, Categories (in the Organon, 4th C. BCE) Categories are Proper Sets • Defining Features – Singly Necessary – Jointly Sufficient 5 Defining Features • Geometrical Figures – Triangles • 2 Dimensions, 3 Sides, and 3 Angles – Quadrilaterals • 2 Dimensions, 4 Sides, and 4 Angles • Animals – Birds • Vertebrate, Warm-Blooded, Feathers, Wings – Fish • Vertebrate, Cold-Blooded, Scales, Fins 6 Categories as Proper Sets Aristotle, On Categories, etc. • Defining Features • Vertical Arrangement into Hierarchies – Perfect Nesting • Superordinate (Supersets) • Subordinate (Subsets) 7 Geometric Figures 8 Subcategories of Triangles • Classified by Length of Sides – Equilateral – Isosceles – Scalene • Classified by Internal Angles – Right – Oblique • Obtuse • Acute 9 Subcategories of Quadrilaterals • Trapeziums • Trapezoids
    [Show full text]
  • The Apical Angle: a Mathematical Analysis of the Ellipse
    The Apical Angle: A Mathematical Analysis of the Ellipse Brent R. Moody, MD,* John E. McCarthy, PhD,† and Roberta D. Sengelmann, MD*‡ *Division of Dermatology, Washington University School of Medicine, †Washington University College of Arts and Sciences, and ‡Cutaneous Surgery Center, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri background. The elliptical excision is a common surgical sions as presented in the dermatologic literature. We analyzed procedure. The dermatologic literature predominantly describes the geometry of the excisions and defined it mathematically. an excisional geometry with a 3:1 length:width ratio and an results. The apical angle of a 3:1 elliptical excision is not 30Њ. apical angle of 30Њ. The true apical angle varies from 37Њ to 74Њ depending on exci- objective. To analyze the elliptical excision by applying sional geometry. mathematical principles and define the apical angle and its rela- conclusion. The commonly presented apical angle of 30Њ is tionship to the length:width ratio. incorrect and does not reflect the true apical angle of elliptical methods. We examined numerous examples of elliptical exci- excisions. THE APICAL ANGLE is the angle created at the ends of Therefore, for the purposes of this study, tissue characteris- an elliptical excision. The elliptical excision, more prop- tics may be discounted entirely. erly termed a fusiform excision, and its variants are com- Using the assumption that the surgeon creates the excision monly utilized for excisional surgery. Many texts have by incising two arcs from a circle of radius r, we derived the described the geometry of the ellipse.1–7 We present a de- relationship between the apical angle and the length:width ra- tailed mathematical analysis of the apical angle and de- tio.
    [Show full text]
  • Mcmorran, Ciaran (2016) Geometry and Topography in James Joyce's Ulysses and Finnegans Wake
    McMorran, Ciaran (2016) Geometry and topography in James Joyce's Ulysses and Finnegans Wake. PhD thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/7385/ Copyright and moral rights for this thesis are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Glasgow Theses Service http://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] Geometry and Topography in James Joyce’s Ulysses and Finnegans Wake Ciaran McMorran M.A., M.Litt. Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Ph.D. in English Literature School of Critical Studies College of Arts University of Glasgow Supervised by Dr. John Coyle and Dr. Matthew Creasy Examined by Prof. Finn Fordham and Dr. Maria-Daniella Dick 2016 1 Abstract Following the development of non-Euclidean geometries from the mid-nineteenth century onwards, Euclid’s system had come to be re-conceived as a language for describing reality rather than a set of transcendental laws. As Henri Poincaré famously put it, ‘[i]f several geometries are possible, is it certain that our geometry [...] is true?’. By examining Joyce’s linguistic play and conceptual engagement with ground-breaking geometric constructs in Ulysses and Finnegans Wake, this thesis explores how his topographical writing of place encapsulates a common crisis between geometric and linguistic modes of representation within the context of modernity.
    [Show full text]
  • Euclid's Definitions, Postulates, and the First 30 Propositions of Book I*
    APPENDIX A Euclid's Definitions, Postulates, and the First 30 Propositions of Book I* Definitions 1. A point is that which has no part. 2. A line is breadthless length. 3. The extremities of a line are points. 4. A straight line is a line which lies evenly with the points on itself. 5. A surface is that which has length and breadth only. 6. The extremities of a surface are lines. 7. A plane surface is a surface which lies evenly with the straight lines on itself. 8. A plane angle is the inclination to one another of two lines in a plane which meet one another and do not lie in a straight line. 9. And when the lines containing the angle are straight, the angle is called rectilineal. 10. When a straight line set up on a straight line makes the adjacent angles equal to one another, each of the equal angles is right, and the straight line standing on the other is called perpendicular to that on which it stands. 11. An obtuse angle is an angle greater than a right angle. 12. An acute angle is an angle less than a right angle. 13. A boundary is that which is an extremity of anything. 14. A figure is that which is contained by any boundary or boundaries. 15. A circle is a plane figure contained by one line such that all the straight lines falling upon it from one point among those lying within the figure are equal to one another. 16. And the point is called the centre of the circle.
    [Show full text]
  • MATH 205 [email protected] This Form Is a Review Sheet for MATH 090 Students Based Primarily Around the Teaching & Instructions of Professor V
    Created by: Jasmine E. Aue MATH 205 [email protected] This form is a review sheet for MATH 090 students based primarily around the teaching & instructions of Professor V. Smith of ESU. HELPFUL TIPS FOR COURSE CONTENT (​ie. not formulas but important​) FORMULA LIST ℉ = ((℃/5)(9)) + 32 | Lines, Arrows, Points & Planes Fahrenheit to Celsius formula This section is a review of lines, arrows, points & planes. How they are defined, look and interact with each other. ℃ = ((℉ − 32)/9)(5) ​ |​ Celsius to ❏ Collinear​: same line Fahrenheit formula ❏ 2 Coplanar​: same plane a2 + b = c2 |​ Pythagorean ❏ ● ● Closed​: a line with an endpoint on each end, kind of like this Theorem ❏ Half​: a line with only one endpoint, kind of like this ● d = (x − x ) + (y − y ) ❏ Open​: a line with no endpoints, like this √ 2 1 2 1 | ❏ → ⋃ → = ↔ Diameter of a Circle ❏ → ⋂ → = r2 = (x − h)2 + (y − k)2 |​ Radius ❏ ●● ⋃ ●→ = → Formula ❏ FE○ ⋂ ○ ○ ○ → → = a2 + b2 = c2 |​ Pythagorean ❏ Intersecting Lines​: lines that have only one point in common ❏ Intersecting Planes​: planes that have only one line in common Theorem ❏ Skew​: cannot be coplanar y = mx + b ​ |​ y is from (x,y), m ❏ Concurrent​: 3 or more intersections at the same point is the slope, x is from (x,y) & b ❏ Parallel​: same slope, non-intersecting is the y-intercept m = (y2 − y1) / (x2 − x1) |​ this is ❏ There is exactly one line containing any two distinct points the point-slope formula, use ❏ If two points are in a plane then the line of points are in a plane this to find the slope of a line ❏ If two
    [Show full text]