DOCSLIB.ORG

Sand Hill River Watershed Total Maximum Daily Load Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sand Hill River Watershed Total Maximum Daily Load Study MapsAdd Sand Hill River Watershed Total Maximum Daily Load Study April 2017 wq-iw5-10e Authors and contributors: Mr. Timothy Erickson, PE and Mr. Mark Deutschman, PhD, PE Houston Engineering, Inc. 6901 East Fish Lake Road, Suite 140 Maple Grove, Minnesota 55369 Mr. Cary Hernandez Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 714 Lake Avenue, Suite 220 Detroit Lakes, Minnesota 56501 Acknowledgements: Mr. Dan Wilkins Sand Hill River Watershed District P.O. Box 584 Fertile, Minnesota 56540 Mr. Gary Lee East Polk Soil and Water Conservation District P.O. Box 57 240 Cleveland Avenue Southwest McIntosh, Minnesota 56556 Ms. Lisa Newton East Polk Soil and Water Conservation District P.O. Box 57 240 Cleveland Avenue Southwest McIntosh, Minnesota 56556 The MPCA is reducing printing and mailing costs by using the Internet to distribute reports and information to a wider audience. Visit our website for more information. The MPCA reports are printed on 100% post-consumer recycled paper manufactured without chlorine or chlorine derivatives. Cover Photo Credit: "Sand Hill River Climax Minnesota" by Mathieu Nicklay - Own work. Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 via Wikimedia Commons - http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sand_Hill_River_Climax_Minnesota.jpg#mediaviewer/File:San d_Hill_River_Climax_Minnesota.jpg 2 Contents List of Tables ......................................................................................................................................5 List of Figures .....................................................................................................................................6 TMDL Summary Table ........................................................................................................................8 Acronyms ........................................................................................................................................12 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 14 1. Project Overview ...................................................................................................................... 15 1.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 15 1.2 Identification of Waterbodies ................................................................................................................. 16 1.3 Priority Ranking ....................................................................................................................................... 19 2. Applicable Water Quality Classification and Numeric Standards ................................................. 19 2.1 Lakes ....................................................................................................................................................... 19 2.2 Streams ................................................................................................................................................... 20 3. Watershed and Waterbody Characterization ............................................................................. 22 3.1 Lakes ....................................................................................................................................................... 24 3.2 Streams ................................................................................................................................................... 24 3.3 Subwatersheds ........................................................................................................................................ 25 3.3.1 Upper Sand Hill River Subwatershed (HUC 0902030103) ................................................... 25 3.3.2 Lower Sand Hill River Subwatershed (HUC 0902030104) ................................................... 25 3.4 Land Use ................................................................................................................................................. 38 3.5 Current/Historical Water Quality ............................................................................................................ 40 3.5.1 Lakes .................................................................................................................................... 42 3.5.2 Streams ............................................................................................................................... 42 3.6 Pollutant Source Summary ...................................................................................................................... 45 3.6.1 Phosphorus ......................................................................................................................... 45 3.6.2 Escherichia coli .................................................................................................................... 53 3.6.3 Total Suspended Solids ....................................................................................................... 62 4 TMDL Development .................................................................................................................. 69 4.1 Phosphorus ............................................................................................................................................. 69 4.1.1 Loading Capacity Methodology .......................................................................................... 69 4.1.2 Load Allocation Methodology ............................................................................................. 71 4.1.3 Wasteload Allocation Methodology ................................................................................... 71 4.1.4 Margin of Safety .................................................................................................................. 72 4.1.5 Critical Conditions and Seasonal Variation ......................................................................... 72 4.1.6 Future Growth/Reserve Capacity........................................................................................ 72 4.1.7 TMDL Summary ................................................................................................................... 73 SHRW Watershed TMDL Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 3 4.2 Escherichia coli ........................................................................................................................................ 75 4.2.1 Loading Capacity Methodology .......................................................................................... 75 4.2.2 Load Allocation Methodology ............................................................................................. 77 4.2.3 Wasteload Allocation Methodology ................................................................................... 77 4.2.4 Margin of Safety .................................................................................................................. 78 4.2.5 Critical Conditions and Seasonal Variation ......................................................................... 78 4.2.6 Future Growth/Reserve Capacity........................................................................................ 79 4.2.7 TMDL Summary ................................................................................................................... 79 4.3 Total Suspended Solids ........................................................................................................................... 81 4.3.1 Loading Capacity ................................................................................................................. 81 4.3.2 Load Allocation Methodology ............................................................................................. 83 4.3.3 Wasteload Allocation Methodology ................................................................................... 83 4.3.4 Margin of Safety .................................................................................................................. 84 4.3.5 Critical Conditions and Seasonal Variation ......................................................................... 84 4.3.6 Future Growth Consideration/Reserve Capacity ................................................................ 85 4.3.7 TMDL Summary ................................................................................................................... 85 5 Reasonable Assurance .............................................................................................................. 86 6 Monitoring Plan ........................................................................................................................ 88 7 Implementation Strategy Summary ........................................................................................... 89 7.1 Permitted Sources ................................................................................................................................... 89 7.1.1 MS4 ..................................................................................................................................... 89 7.1.2 Construction Stormwater ................................................................................................... 90 7.1.3 Industrial Stormwater ......................................................................................................... 90 7.1.4 Wastewater ........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • IRRB) for the Period October 01, 2017 - September 30, 2018, Which Succeeds the 2017 Water Year
    PREFACE This report documents water quality trends and exceedances of objectives, effluent releases, and control measures for the Red River basin for the 2016 Water Year (October 01, 2016 through September 30, 2017). In addition, this report describes the activities of the International Red River Board during the reporting period October 01, 2017 to September 30, 2018 and identifies several current and future water quality and water quantity issues in the basin. The units of measure presented in this report are those of the respective agencies contributing to this report. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Summary 1 1.01 Water Quantity And Water Quality 1 1.02 International Red River Board Activities 3 1.03 International Red River Board Three Year Work Plan (2018-2021) 4 2.0 Introduction 5 3.0 International Red River Board Membership 7 4.0 International Red River Board Activities 9 4.01 Interim And Annual Board Meetings 9 4.02 IJC International Watersheds Initiative 9 4.03 Improving The Information Base To Address Transboundary Issues 10 4.03-1 Water Quality Monitoring At The International Boundary And Red River Basin 10 4.03-2 Aquatic Ecosystem Committee 11 4.03-3 Water Quality Committee - Nutrient Management Strategy for the Red 15 River Watershed 4.03-4 Water Quantity Apportionment 17 4.04 Comprehensive Flood Mitigation Strategy 19 4.05 Invasive Species – Zebra Mussels 22 4.06 Lower Pembina River Flooding 23 5.0 Water Quality At The International Boundary 27 5.01 Water Quality Objectives 27 5.02 Alert Levels 28 6.0 Water Quality Surveillance Programs
    [Show full text]
  • Red River of the North Fisheries Management Plan
    Red River of the North Fisheries Management Plan Minnesota Department of Natural Resources North Dakota Game and Fish Department Manitoba Water Stewardship South Dakota Department of Game, Fish and Parks April 2008 - 2012 Red River of the North Fisheries Management Plan I. Red River of the North Description The hydrologic headwaters of Red River of the North (Red River) originate in the upper portions of the Otter Tail River watershed. Red River of the North, by name, begins at the confluence of the Bois de Sioux and Otter Tail rivers and flows northward approximately 545 miles through the bed of glacial Lake Agassiz where it empties into Lake Winnipeg (Figure 1). The upstream 400 miles of Red River forms the Minnesota-North Dakota border and the downstream 145 miles flow through southern Manitoba, Canada. Red River has a watershed area of approximately 45,000 square miles excluding the Assiniboine River basin, which joins Red River at Winnipeg. Twenty-one primary subwatersheds located in North Dakota, Minnesota, and Manitoba empty into Red River (Figure 1). Approximately 46.6% of the Red River watershed (21,000 mi 2) lies in North Dakota, 38.9% (17,500 mi 2) in Minnesota, 12.7% (5,700 mi 2) in Manitoba and 1.8% (810 mi 2) in South Dakota (Eddy et al. 1972). Land use throughout the basin is dominated by agricultural practices. Red River is a highly sinuous, low gradient warmwater river with an extensive floodplain. Stream sinuosity through the U.S. portion of Red River averages 2.0, ranging from 1.6 to 2.6 through the different segments.
    [Show full text]
  • Map 2 of Red River of the North State Water Trail
    RED RIVER OF THE NORTH A State Water Trail Guide Section 2 of 3 48 ' ' ' ˚055 ' ' 55 50 CONTINUED ON NEXT PANEL 10 CONTINUED ON NEXT MAP 00 ˚ ˚ ED RIVER ROUTE DESCRIPTION ˚ 22 ˚ 969 96 R 97 97 Except during fl oods, the Red River of the North is slow- 290 64 41 moving and picturesque with its tree-covered banks and 48˚ 3404 frequent wildlife sightings. It is serene and quiet even as the Grand Maraisarr 05 ' 4 220 Red passes through cities. Reminders of the past are found in Creek outtletl 23 the muddy banks where bison bones occasionally are Bridge Climax 21 exposed. These muddy banks may make access diffi cult. 29 There are no rapids except at some of the dams. Low fl ows expose rocks and snags creating hazards for motors and occasionally block the channel. C Rivere outleto e 81 Direcctction of flow . 47 Note: River miles are counted beginning at the mouth of the RKS 7˚35 ' O Red River at Lake Winnipeg, Manitoba, and ending at FO K C Breckenridge, Minn., according to a system developed by the D 47˚35 MaraisMa River outleut t 67 ' ND U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Right (R) and left (L) refer to POLPO right and left bank, respectively, when facing downstream. A ' GRA 45 R ˚ 345 iv 409.9 County Road 39 bridge. e 96 48 r ˚00 ' 392.8 County Roads 1/25 bridges. 64 392.7 Norman County Highway 25 Boat Ramp (R). Water Access. Located north of bridge. Parking. Shore ' 10 fi shing.
    [Show full text]
  • Fertile Sand Hills Master Plan a Planning Framework for the Fertile Sand Hills
    FERTILE SAND HILLS MASTER PLAN A PLANNING FRAMEWORK FOR THE FERTILE SAND HILLS CITY OF FERTILE October 2019 FERTILE SAND HILLS MASTER PLAN 1 PLANNING TEAM Wayne Goeken, NRSDP Natural Resources Work Group member Dan Wilkens, Mayor of Fertile; AELC Board Member Danielle Spiten, Agassiz ELC Education Program Director Wendell Johnson, Agassiz ELC Board member Lisa Liden - City Administrator Craig Engelstad, Agassiz ELC Board member Stanton Wang, Agassiz ELC Board member Reid Jesrud, Agassiz ELC Board member Nicole Bernd, District Manager for West Polk SWCD, Agassiz ELC Board member Kirsten Fagerlund, Polk County Public Health Gary Kiefert, Agassiz ELC Board member Al Pierson, Agassiz ELC Board member Laurie Fairchild, Agassiz ELC Board member Linda Kingery, Northwest Regional Sustainable Development Partnership Executive Director Jacob Mans, Assistant Professor School of Architecture Thomas Fisher, Director of Minnesota Design Center Alejandra Cervantes Enriquez, Master of Science in Architecture - Research Practices candidate ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project is supported in part through student research assistance provided by the Community Assistantship Program (CAP), a program of the University of Minnesota’s Center for Urban and Regional Affairs (CURA). Funding for this project also includes the Northwest Regional Sustainable Development Partnership and the Northwest Minnesota Foundation. The planning team would like to thank Agassiz ELC Board and staff, as well community members from in and around the City of Fertile who participated in this
    [Show full text]
  • Red River of the North State Water Trail Map 2
    RED RIVER OF THE NORTH A State Water Trail Guide Section 2 of 3 48 ' ' ' ' ˚05 ' ' 55 50 10 05 00 ˚ ˚ CONTINUED ON NEXT PANEL CONTINUED ON NEXT MAP ED RIVER ROUTE DESCRIPTION ˚ ˚ 22 ˚ 96 2 96 R 97 97 97 Except during floods, the Red River of the North is slow 290 R 64 moving and picturesque with its tree-covered banks and e 340 41 d 48˚05 Grand Marais ' frequent wildlife sightings. It is serene and quiet even as the 4 220 Red passes through cities. Reminders of the past are found in R Creek outlet 23 iv Bridge the muddy banks where bison bones occasionally are er 21 Climax exposed. These muddy banks may make access difficult 29 There are no rapids except at some of the dams. Low flow S a expose rocks and snags creating hazards for motors and n Sand Hill d occasionally block the channel. River outlet 81 Direction of flow 47˚35 ' Note: River miles are counted beginning at the mouth of the H Red River at Lake Winnipeg, Manitoba, and ending at i l l Breckenridge, Minn., according to a system developed by the Marais River outlet 47 ˚35 ' 67 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Right (R) and left (L) refer to POLK CO. ' right and left bank, respectively, when facing downstream. GRAND FORKS CO. 45 R ˚ 345 iv 409.9 County Road 39 bridge. e 96 48 51 r ˚00 ' 392.8 County Roads 1/25 bridges. 64 21 392.7 Norman County Highway 25 Boat Ramp (R).
    [Show full text]
  • The Delta of the Sand Hill River
    University of North Dakota UND Scholarly Commons Theses and Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects 8-1-1958 The eltD a of the Sand Hill River Kenneth C. Haraldson Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/theses Recommended Citation Haraldson, Kenneth C., "The eD lta of the Sand Hill River" (1958). Theses and Dissertations. 516. https://commons.und.edu/theses/516 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects at UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE DELTA 0 THE SAND HILL RIVER by Kennelth 0. Haraldson B#A., State Teachers College, Valley City, North Dakota, 19U0 A Thesis Submittjeji to the faculty of the Graduate School of the Univers3tjy of North Dakota in partial fulfillm ent of lihe requirements fo r Degree of m. C» of Arte Grand ^opks, Nortlji Dakota August 1958 A CRN OWLEDGME S TS The writer wishes to acknowl edge his indebtedness, and express his appreci aft ion to Dr. Bernt L. W ills, head of the Geography Departure ntj and to Dr. Melvin E. Kazeck, Associate Professor of Gjeography University of North Dakota, fo r their frie n dly advise ajnd encouragment in the preparation of this the sis, The writer also wi&hes to es]press his gratitude to the many people in Fe rtile, Minn esota, who have gen- erously given of their t irtte and infiormation that has been of invaluable service in the writin g of this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Norman County Local Water Management Plan
    Norman County 2017-2026 Local Water Management Plan Prepared by the NORMAN COUNTY SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT and the LOCAL WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE Contents Acknowledgements……….………………………………………………………………………………2 Executive Summary………………....……………………………………………………………………3 Introduction……………………....……………………………………………………………..3 Purpose of plan…………………………………………..……………………………..3 History of Norman County…………………………………………………………….3 Geology/Geography…………...………………………………………………………3 Dominant Land Use of Norman County and Projected Trends………………....….6 One Watershed One Plan………………………………………………………………7 Major Watersheds of Norman County………………………………………………..8 Water Plan Process………………………….…………………………………………………12 Responsible Units of Government…………………………..……………………….12 Updates and Adoptions……………………………………...……………………….12 Expiration of Current Plan…………………………………………...………………12 Purpose of the Local Water Management Plan……………………………….....………….12 Priority Concerns Addressed by the Plan…………………………………….………………13 Consistency of the Plan………………………………………………………………………..13 Ongoing Activities and Services………………………………………...…………………….14 Assessment of Priority Concerns………………………………………………………………………15 PC 1- Control Water Movement………………………………………………………………15 Goals……………………………………………………………………………………15 PC 2- Reduce Soil Movement……………………………………………………...………….16 Goals……………………………………………………………………………………17 PC 3- Maintain or Improve Water Quality……………………………………………………18 Goals…………………………………………………………………………………….19 PC 4- Appropriate Use of Natural Resources……………………………………………...….24 Goals…………………………………………………………………………………….25
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Purpose Trails
    Multi-purpose Trails Major Route Pine to Prairie Birding Trail Major Routes Red Lake River Corridor 1-800-433-1888 www.redlakerivercorridor.org http://www.mnbirdtrail.com/ Because of its unique setting and character, the Red Lake River Throughout all of region is one of a few officially designated DNR canoe and small boat 43 stops available. Kittson county part of trail goes through the routes in the region. Twin Lakes Wildlife Area. The Red Lake River originates in the marshes of the Lower Red A unique collection of habitats in Northwestern Minnesota which Lake and meanders west almost 200 miles before emptying into the provide homes for a tremendous variety of birds. Pine forests, Red River at East Grand Forks. It passes through three continental deciduous woodlands, native tallgrass prairie, aspen parkland, sand biomes, farmland, prairie, riparian forests and bluffs. Fish dunes (remnants of Glacial Lake Agassiz), calcareous fens, bogs, populations include channel catfish, northern pike and walleye. marshes, large and small lakes and rivers make up the transition Campsites are designated along the route. Public rest areas are zone that offers over 275 species of birds. Most of the sites are on available along the route to picnic, rest and explore. public land or private reserves open to the public. Map of area is included on the website or call 800-328-4455 for a birding guide. Major Routes Red River Corridor http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/watertrails/index.html Major Route Red River/Pembina Oxcart Trail The Red River of the North is designated as an official canoe The trail does not follow current highways but runs diagonally and boating route.
    [Show full text]