DOCSLIB.ORG

Semantic Web Services-A Survey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Semantic Web Services-A Survey International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 6, June-2013 76 ISSN 2229-5518 Semantic Web Services-A Survey Gayathridevi.M and Manikandan.R Abstract-- The technology where the meaning of the information and the service of the web is defined by making the web to understand and satisfies the request of the people is called Semantic Web Services. That is the idea of having data on the web defined and linked in a way that it can be used by machines not just for display purpose, but for automation, integration and reuse of data across various application .The idea of the semantic is raised to overcome the limitation of the Web services such as Average WWW searches examines only about 25% of potentially relevant sites and return a lot of unwanted information, Information on web is not suitable for software agent and Doubling of size. It is built on top of the Web Services extended with rich semantic representations along with capabilities for automatic reasoning developed in the field of artificial intelligence. This survey attempts to give an overview of the underlying concepts and technologies along with the categorization, selection and discovery of services based on semantic. 1 INTRODUCTION Web Services are self-contained application that is used for the communication between electronic devices over internet. It uses XML- based interfaces for communication Service Publish which includes the operation like publish, bind, find of the Provider services by the service role. Bind The Semantic web used to categories the services and WSDL WSDL retrieves those services from UDDI based on meaning that enable dynamic, execution-time discovery, composition, and invocation of Services[1] and machine to use the web Service Service content. Supplier WSDL Reques The goal of Semantic Web Services is to satisfy the user by providing services from web. [1] Basically, Web services Find structure a service oriented architecture where the service register (UDDI) has predefinedIJSER categories (syntactic) that are specified by the service provider. As a result, similar Figure 1: Architecture of Web Service services may be listed under different categories in existing UDDI infrastructure. This may involve searching a large Service Requester is a person or organization that number of categorize to find appropriate services. requests the provider to their entity’s web service. The Therefore, need of categorize web service based on their provider gives appropriate agent to implement particular semantic rather than classification of service provider. service. Service Requester locates the desired service; its A Web Service is an application component accessible client binds with the service at the service provider and over open protocols which are intended to solve three main then invokes the services. problems such as Interoperability, Firewall traversal, Web Services uses four protocol stacks that used to Complexity. define, locate, implement, and make web service to interact An application component that Communicates via open with each other. They are: Transport Protocol – Responsible protocols (HTTP, SMTP, etc.) ,Processes XML messages to transporting message between network application and framed using SOAP ,Describes its messages using XML it include protocol such as HTTP, SMTP, and FTP. Schema , Provides an endpoint description using WSDL Messaging Protocol -Encode the message in XML format and can be discovered using UDDI. and include the protocol such as XML RPC, WS addressing, and SOAP. Description protocol –Used to describing the The Web Services architecture (fig:1) is based upon the public interface to specific web service by using WSDL. interactions between three roles [2]: Service provider, Discovery protocol –Centralizes services into common Service registry, Service requestor. The interactions involve registry by using UDDI. with the help of three main operations such as Publish, Find, and Bind. A SOAP message is an ordinary XML document containing the following elements: A required Envelope element that identifies the XML document as a SOAP IJSER © 2013 http://www.ijser.org International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 6, June-2013 77 ISSN 2229-5518 message. An optional Header element that contains header Web Service Description Language [1] is an XML information. A required Body element that contains call vocabulary for describing Web services that allows and response information. An optional Fault element that developers to describe Web Services and their capabilities, provides information about errors that occurred while in a standard manner. processing the message. Ontology is the language used to define vocabularies UDDI is platform independent, Extensible Markup and establish the word and this is constructing by RDF Language based registry by which different services listed Schema. Logic is used to establish the consistency and on internet [3]. This is provided by Organization for correctness of data set and proof is used to explain the steps advancement of structured information standards. Core of for reasoning [1].The top layer the trust which provides the web services standards designed to be interrogated by authentication and trustworthiness of services, agent and SOAP message and provide access to WSDL describing the agent [1]. protocol bindings. The message formats required to interact with web service listed in the directory. UDDI nodes are 3 SEMANTIC WEB SERVICES servers that support UDDI specification and UDDI registry The development of Semantic Web Services is to enrich the has one or more nodes. underlying Web Services [5].Since all the web resources have one or more themes along with some number of concepts .If these concepts can be discovered and matched 2 THE SEMANTIC WEB with the concept contained in a query then this will be the best method of retrieval of information from web and this The Semantic Web provides a common framework that can be achieved by Semantic Web Services [13]. allows data to be shared and reused across application, enterprise, and community boundaries [12]. It is an effort to Categorization of services based on semantic from a enhance current web so that computers can process the hierarchical by using Association rule and register in UDDI. information presented on World Wide Web, interpret and Selection can be done in two steps 1) Parameters-Based connect it, to help humans to find required knowledge service refinement 2) Semantic similarity-based matching. [4].semantic web is intended to form a huge distributed Let we discuss about the techniques to Coordination, knowledge based system. Matching, Discovery of services. 3.1 Framework Representation Of Semantic Web In the architecture (fig:2), URI and Unicode, follows the Services important features of the existing World Wide Web. Unicode is a standard of encoding international character To work with Semantic Web Services there needs to define sets and it allows that all human languages can be used the relevant information reasoning problems and solutions (written and read) on the web using one standardized form. to the problems in a consistent manner. Three large Uniform Resource Identifier is a string of a standardized proposals for such representation frameworks have been form that allows to uniquelyIJSER identifying resources. A presented: OWL-S, WSMO, and SWSF. subset of URI is Uniform Resource Locator, which contains OWL-S uses description logic (OWL) as the basic access mechanism and a network location of a document. language for service ontology. WSMO stresses the loose Another subset of URI is URN that allows identifying a coupling between services and attempts to achieve this resource without implying its location and means of with separate goal and service ontologies and advanced dereferencing it. mediator architecture. SWSF is based on OWL-S but improves its process model by incorporating an existing TRUST ontology, Process Specification Language (PSL). LOGIC AND PROOF 3.2 Semantic Web Service Coordination ONTOLOGY The coordination of web services includes the matching of RDF AND RDF SCHEMA services and discovery. Semantic service matching XML AND XML SCHEMA determines whether the semantics of a desired service conform to that of an established service. A current Figure 2: Architecture Of Semantic Web approach to semantic service matching depends on non- The layer of the semantic web as follows(fig:1.2): The logic-based or logic based reasoning or a hybrid lowest layer is XML and XML schema responsible common combination of both, within or outside the respective schema, data type and structures [1].RDF and RDF schema service description framework. describes the resource type and metadata that uses the Table 1. Supported semantic web service description XML notation to represent pieces of information as formats propositions and that can form general graph-like structures. Propositions are represented in the form of Name of the Features subject predicate-object -triplets and terms used are Techniques uniquely identified with URIs. IJSER © 2013 http://www.ijser.org International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 6, June-2013 78 ISSN 2229-5518 OWL-S 1) Logic based non- Matchmakers semantic functional.[16] Matchmakers for OWL-S service are the OWLSM and Based on the above mentioned description formats OWLS-UDDI different techniques is framed for service matching [8]. As focusing on follows service IO matching. 2)PCEM that converts Table 2. Different
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Towards Ontology Based BPMN Implementation. Sophea Chhun, Néjib Moalla, Yacine Ouzrout
    Towards ontology based BPMN Implementation. Sophea Chhun, Néjib Moalla, Yacine Ouzrout To cite this version: Sophea Chhun, Néjib Moalla, Yacine Ouzrout. Towards ontology based BPMN Implementation.. SKIMA, 6th Conference on Software Knowledge Information Management and Applications., Jan 2012, Chengdu, China. 8 p. hal-01551452 HAL Id: hal-01551452 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01551452 Submitted on 6 Nov 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 1 Towards ontology based BPMN implementation CHHUN Sophea, MOALLA Néjib and OUZROUT Yacine University of Lumiere Lyon2, laboratory DISP, France Natural language is understandable by human and not machine. None technical persons can only use natural language to specify their business requirements. However, the current version of Business process management and notation (BPMN) tools do not allow business analysts to implement their business processes without having technical skills. BPMN tool is a tool that allows users to design and implement the business processes by connecting different business tasks and rules together. The tools do not provide automatic implementation of business tasks from users’ specifications in natural language (NL). Therefore, this research aims to propose a framework to automatically implement the business processes that are expressed in NL requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Semantic Description of Web Services
    Semantic Description of Web Services Thabet Slimani CS Department, Taif University, P.O.Box 888, 21974, KSA Abstract syntaxes) and in terms of the paradigms proposed for The tasks of semantic web service (discovery, selection, employing these in practice. composition, and execution) are supposed to enable seamless interoperation between systems, whereby human intervention is This paper is dedicated to provide an overview of these kept at a minimum. In the field of Web service description approaches, expressing their classification in terms of research, the exploitation of descriptions of services through commonalities and differences. It provides an semantics is a better support for the life-cycle of Web services. understanding of the technical foundation on which they The large number of developed ontologies, languages of are built. These techniques are classified from a range of representations, and integrated frameworks supporting the research areas including Top-down, Bottom-up and Restful discovery, composition and invocation of services is a good Approaches. indicator that research in the field of Semantic Web Services (SWS) has been considerably active. We provide in this paper a This paper does also provide some grounding that could detailed classification of the approaches and solutions, indicating help the reader perform a more detailed analysis of the their core characteristics and objectives required and provide different approaches which relies on the required indicators for the interested reader to follow up further insights objectives. We provide a little detailed comparison and details about these solutions and related software. between some approaches because this would require Keywords: SWS, SWS description, top-down approaches, addressing them from the perspective of some tasks bottom-up approaches, RESTful services.
    [Show full text]
  • Semantic Web Services
    The Semantic Web Semantic Web Services Sheila A. McIlraith, Tran Cao Son, and Honglei Zeng, Stanford University he Web, once solely a repository for text and images, is evolving into a provider Tof services—information-providing services, such as flight information providers, temperature sensors, and cameras, and world-altering services, such as flight-booking programs, sensor controllers, and a variety of e-commerce and business-to-business applications. Web-accessible programs, databases, damental component of the Semantic Web will be the sensors, and a variety of other physical devices real- markup of Web services to make them computer-inter- The authors propose the ize these services. In the next decade, computers will pretable, use-apparent, and agent-ready. This article most likely be ubiquitous, and most devices will have addresses precisely this component. markup of Web services some sort of computer inside them. Vint Cerf, one We present an approach to Web service markup that of the fathers of the Internet, views the population provides an agent-independent declarative API cap- in the DAML family of of the Internet by smart devices as the harbinger of turing the data and metadata associated with a service a new revolution in Internet technology. together with specifications of its properties and capa- Semantic Web markup Today’s Web was designed primarily for human bilities, the interface for its execution, and the prereq- interpretation and use. Nevertheless, we are seeing uisites and consequences of its use. Markup exploits languages. This markup increased automation of Web service interoperation, ontologies to facilitate sharing, reuse, composition, primarily in B2B and e-commerce applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Semantic Web Tools: an Overview 7Th International CALIBER 2009 Semantic Web Tools: an Overview
    Semantic Web Tools: An Overview 7th International CALIBER 2009 Semantic Web Tools: An Overview D Shivalingaiah Umesha Naik Abstract The WWW is the largest single information resource humanity. Unfortunately, despite its dependence on computers to operate at all, most of the information is only understandable by humans and not by computers. While computers can use the syntax of HTML documents to display in a web browser, Web computers can’t understand the content the semantics. Human beings are capable of using the Web to carry out tasks such as finding the information. However, a computer cannot accomplish the same tasks without human direction because web pages are designed to be read by public, not machines. The semantic web is a vision of information that is understandable by computers, so that public can perform more of the tedious work involved in finding, sharing and combining information on the web. The paper emphasizes the semantic tools available. Keywords: Semantic Web, Ontology, Resource Description Framework, Web Ontology Language, Web Service Modeling Language, Web Service Modeling Framework, DARPA 1. Introduction the resulting network of Linked Data the Giant Global Graph, in contrast to the HTML-based The Semantic Web takes the solution further. The WWW. Semantic Web is not a separate entity from the WWW. It is an extension to the Web that adds new Web 2.0 is focused on people the Semantic Web is data and metadata to existing Web documents, focused on machines. The Web requires a human extending those documents into data. This operator, using computer systems to perform the extension of Web documents to data is what will tasks required to find, search and aggregate its enable the Web to be processed automatically by information.
    [Show full text]
  • The Resource Description Framework and Its Schema Fabien Gandon, Reto Krummenacher, Sung-Kook Han, Ioan Toma
    The Resource Description Framework and its Schema Fabien Gandon, Reto Krummenacher, Sung-Kook Han, Ioan Toma To cite this version: Fabien Gandon, Reto Krummenacher, Sung-Kook Han, Ioan Toma. The Resource Description Frame- work and its Schema. Handbook of Semantic Web Technologies, 2011, 978-3-540-92912-3. hal- 01171045 HAL Id: hal-01171045 https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01171045 Submitted on 2 Jul 2015 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. The Resource Description Framework and its Schema Fabien L. Gandon, INRIA Sophia Antipolis Reto Krummenacher, STI Innsbruck Sung-Kook Han, STI Innsbruck Ioan Toma, STI Innsbruck 1. Abstract RDF is a framework to publish statements on the web about anything. It allows anyone to describe resources, in particular Web resources, such as the author, creation date, subject, and copyright of an image. Any information portal or data-based web site can be interested in using the graph model of RDF to open its silos of data about persons, documents, events, products, services, places etc. RDF reuses the web approach to identify resources (URI) and to allow one to explicitly represent any relationship between two resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Service Oriented Architectures and Semantic Web Processes
    Wright State University CORE Scholar The Ohio Center of Excellence in Knowledge- Kno.e.sis Publications Enabled Computing (Kno.e.sis) 2004 Service Oriented Architectures and Semantic Web Processes Francisco Cubera Kunal Verma Amit P. Sheth Wright State University - Main Campus, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/knoesis Part of the Bioinformatics Commons, Communication Technology and New Media Commons, Databases and Information Systems Commons, OS and Networks Commons, and the Science and Technology Studies Commons Repository Citation Cubera, F., Verma, K., & Sheth, A. P. (2004). Service Oriented Architectures and Semantic Web Processes. https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/knoesis/62 This Tutorial is brought to you for free and open access by the The Ohio Center of Excellence in Knowledge-Enabled Computing (Kno.e.sis) at CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Kno.e.sis Publications by an authorized administrator of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Service Oriented Architectures and Semantic Web Processes Jorge Cardoso1, Francisco Curbera2, Amit Sheth3 1University of Madeira (Portugal) 2IBM T.J. Watson Research Center (USA) 3 LSDIS Lab, University of Georgia and Semagix, Inc (USA) 2 Service Oriented Architectures and Web Services Semantic Web Processes 2 3 Semantic Web Processes Part 3 Service Oriented Architectures and Web Services 5 Overview z IT for a new business model z Service Oriented Architectures (SOAs). z Web services as an XML based instantiation of SOA. z Protocols. z Metadata. z Discovery. z Composition. z Summary. 5 6 A New Business Environment z Business outsource every non-essential function.
    [Show full text]
  • Semantic Query Languages for Knowledge-Based Web Services in a Construction Context
    Extended Abstract - Semantic query languages for knowledge-based web services in a construction context Jeroen Werbrouck a,b , Madhumitha Senthilvel a, Jakob Beetz a, Pierre Bourreau c, Léon van Berlo d a RWTH Aachen University, Germany b Ghent University, Belgium c Institut pour la Transition Energétique Nobatek/Inef4, France d Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research TNO, the Netherlands [email protected] 1. Introduction Building Information Modelling (BIM) has proven itself an extremely valuable asset for the construction industry, in terms of design, planning, rule checking and collaboration. However, a lot of fragmentation persists; each of the many stakeholders involved in a project has different methods and different software tools that need to exchange information. Conversion to standard exchange formats such as the Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) enables such cross-domain communication only partly. Over recent years, the use of web technologies in the building industry has been gaining momentum, considered promising mechanisms for reaching a more interoperable BIM practice. Specifically, this relates to (1) cloud-based applications, and (2) Linked Data and Semantic Web technologies. Cloud-based initiatives for streamlining collaboration in building projects have known a long history. Spanning nearly two decades, they go from the (discontinued) frameworks in the early 2000s IMSvr (Hietanen, 2002) and BLIS/SABLE (BLIS-project, 2002; Kiviniemi et al., 2005) to the more recent and popular model server BIMserver (Beetz et al., 2010), and the recently introduced concept of “BIM bots” (van Berlo, n.d.). These projects are all based on collaboration and exchange through IFC. However, IFC only spans certain disciplines and offers limited interoperability with domains that are not covered in the schema.
    [Show full text]
  • Lander Noterman Discovering and Using Functions Via Semantic
    Discovering and Using Functions via Semantic Querying Lander Noterman Supervisor: Prof. dr. ir. Ruben Verborgh Counsellors: Ben De Meester, Anastasia Dimou Master's dissertation submitted in order to obtain the academic degree of Master of Science in Computer Science Engineering Department of Electronics and Information Systems Chair: Prof. dr. ir. Koen De Bosschere Faculty of Engineering and Architecture Academic year 2017-2018 Discovering and Using Functions via Semantic Querying Lander Noterman Supervisor: Prof. dr. ir. Ruben Verborgh Counsellors: Ben De Meester, Anastasia Dimou Master's dissertation submitted in order to obtain the academic degree of Master of Science in Computer Science Engineering Department of Electronics and Information Systems Chair: Prof. dr. ir. Koen De Bosschere Faculty of Engineering and Architecture Academic year 2017-2018 Preface The author(s) gives (give) permission to make this master dissertation available for consultation and to copy parts of this master dissertation for personal use. In the case of any other use, the copyright terms have to be respected, in particular with regard to the obligation to state expressly the source when quoting results from this master dissertation. June 1, 2018 Word of thanks Firstly, I would like to thank Ben De Meester and Anastasia Dimou for acting as counsellors for this work. Ben’s supervision especially was tremendously helpful during the process of writing this thesis. His knowledge about the subject helped me learn a lot about the Semantic Web and its technologies, and his feedback and advice was immensely valuable for the successful completion of this work. I would also like to thank Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Service Models and Architectures to Include Semantics and Social Networking
    Building Service Models and Architectures to include Semantics and Social Networking Nikolaos Loutas1, 2 1 University of Macedonia, Business Administration Department, 156 Egnatia str, Thessaloniki, 54006, Greece, [email protected] 2 National University of Ireland, Galway, Digital Enterprise Research Institute, IDA Business Park, Lower Dangan, Galway, Ireland, [email protected] Abstract. Currently thousands of services are available on the Web but the more services become available the harder it becomes to find and use them. Most of those services lack basic metadata that would improve their accessibility and discovery. In this work, we present a two-step approach for discovering services in the Web 2.0 environment. First, a formalized representation of the user’s need is created and then based on that the services that match this need are discovered. The approach tries to make the most out of the available state of the art Semantic Web technologies. We use SA-REST as the annotation mechanisms and try to harvest the knowledge that can be extracted from social tagging. Keywords: service model, web2.0, semantic web, portal, SA-REST, discovery 1 Introduction Since the 90’s when Web Services (WS) were first introduced, research in this field has always been particularly active. The Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) paradigm [1, 2] is until today the prevalent way of building enterprise Information Systems (IS). SOA has become throughout the years both a very attractive research domain and a profitable business. Therefore, many major IT vendors such as IBM, Microsoft and SAP can be found among the key players. The main idea behind SOA is the ability to use, reuse and share services.
    [Show full text]
  • Semantic Web Services SS 2018
    4/23/2018 Semantic Web Services SS 2018 Semantic Web Anna Fensel 23.04.2018 © Copyright 2010‐2018 Dieter Fensel, Ioan Toma, and Anna Fensel 1 Where are we? # Title 1 Introduction 2 Web Science + Cathy O’Neil’s talk: “Weapons of Math Destruction” 3 Service Science 4 Web services 5 Web2.0 services + ONLIM APIs (separate slideset) 6 Semantic Web 7 Semantic Web Service Stack (WSMO, WSML, WSMX) 8 OWL-S and the others 9 Semantic Services as a Part of the Future Internet and Big Data Technology 10 Lightweight Annotations 11 Linked Services 12 Applications 13 Mobile Services 2 1 4/23/2018 Agenda 1. Motivation 1. Development of the Web 1. Internet 2. Web 1.0 3. Web2.0 2. Limitations of the current Web 2. Technical solution 1. Introduction to Semantic Web 2. Architecture and languages 3. Semantic Web - Data 4. Extensions 1. Linked (Open) Data 2. Schema.org 3. LOV 5. Summary 6. References 3 MOTIVATION 4 2 4/23/2018 DEVELOPMENT OF THE WEB 5 Development of the Web 1. Internet 2. Web 1.0 3. Web 2.0 6 3 4/23/2018 INTERNET 7 Internet • “The Internet is a global system of interconnected computer networks that use the standard Internet Protocol Suite (TCP/IP) to serve billions of users worldwide. It is a network of networks that consists of millions of private and public, academic, business, and government networks of local to global scope that are linked by a broad array of electronic and optical networking technologies.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet 8 4 4/23/2018 A brief summary of Internet evolution Age of eCommerce Mosaic Begins WWW Internet Created 1995 Created 1993 Named 1989 and Goes TCP/IP TCP/IP Created 1984 ARPANET 1972 1969 Hypertext Invented Packet 1965 Switching First Vast Invented Computer 1964 Network Silicon Envisioned A Chip 1962 Mathematical 1958 Theory of Memex Communication Conceived 1948 1945 1945 1995 Source: http://slidewiki.org/slide/24721 9 WEB 1.0 10 5 4/23/2018 Web 1.0 • “The World Wide Web ("WWW" or simply the "Web") is a system of interlinked, hypertext documents that runs over the Internet.
    [Show full text]
  • Discovering Resume Information Using Linked Data
    International Journal of Web & Semantic Technology (IJWesT) Vol.3, No.2, April 2012 DISCOVERING RESUME INFORMATION USING LINKED DATA Ujjal Marjit 1, Kumar Sharma 2 and Utpal Biswas 3 1C.I.R.M, University Kalyani, Kalyani (West Bengal) India [email protected] 2Department of Computer Sc. & Engg, University Kalyani, Kalyani (West Bengal) India [email protected] 3Department of Computer Sc. & Engg, University Kalyani, Kalyani (West Bengal) India [email protected] ABSTRACT In spite of having different web applications to create and collect resumes, these web applications suffer mainly from a common standard data model, data sharing, and data reusing. Though, different web applications provide same quality of resume information, but internally there are many differences in terms of data structure and storage which makes computer difficult to process and analyse the information from different sources. The concept of Linked Data has enabled the web to share data among different data sources and to discover any kind of information while resolving the issues like heterogeneity, interoperability, and data reusing between different data sources and allowing machine process-able data on the web. In this paper we present Linked Data approach to discover resume information enabling the task aggregation, sharing and reusing the information among different resume information providers and organizations. We also demonstrate experimental results on semantically rich resume information. KEYWORDS Semantic Web, Linked Data, Resume, Provenance 1. INTRODUCTION In the present day, the Web 2.0 mainly suffers from data sharing and reusing between two data sources. The Web 2.0 is basically a web of documents which is well formatted and presented inside the HTML documents but the semantic of data is missing due to which computer is unaware of what data or information is being presented inside the HTML documents.
    [Show full text]
  • Semantic Web Service Description
    Chapter 3 Semantic Web Service Description Matthias Klusch 3.1 Introduction The convergence of semantic Web with service oriented computing is manifested by Semantic Web Services (SWS) technology. It addresses the major challenge of automated, interoperable and meaningful coordination of Web Services to be carried out by intelligent software agents. In this chapter, we briefly discuss promi- nent SWS description frameworks, that are the standard SAWSDL, OWL-S and WSML1. This is complemented by main critics of Semantic Web Services, and selected references to further readings on the subject. 3.2 Issues of Semantic Service Description Each semantic service description framework can be characterised with respect to (a) what kind of service semantics are described, (b) in what language or formal- ism, (c) allowing for what kind of reasoning upon the abstract service descriptions? Further, we distinguish between an abstract Web Service, that is the description of the computational entity of the service, and a concrete service as one of its instances or invocations that provide the actual value to the user [21]. In this sense, abstract service descriptions are considered complete but not necessarily correct: There might be concrete service instances that are models of the capa- bility description of the abstract service but can actually not be delivered by the provider. 1Due to space limitations other description frameworks like SWSL (Semantic Web Service Language) and the DIANE service description language are excluded. 42 Chapter 3. Semantic Web Service Description 3.2.1 Functional and Non-Functional Service Semantics In general, the functionality of a service can be described in terms of what it does, and how it actually works.
    [Show full text]