Part Ii. Foreign Countries I

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Part Ii. Foreign Countries I REVIEW OF THE YEAR 5701 125 PART II. FOREIGN COUNTRIES I. BRITISH COMMONWEALTH By THEODOR H. GASTER* Let the sharp ball of fire be hurled at me; Let heaven be alive with lightning flash And scourge of angry winds; O let the earth Ail from her prime foundation tempest-tost! Crash forth, ye mighty breakers of the sea; Stars in your courses, clash and run together! Let the swift eddies of relentless Fate Sweep this poor body into darkest hell; Yet still shall life endure. Aeschylus, Prometheus Bound, 1045-1055. Great Britain British Jewry was mainly occupied during the past year with the twin problems of air raids and evacuation, both of which brought profound changes in its structure and complexion. Wholesale destruction on the one hand and the readjustment of life on the other confronted the community with a host of new problems and anxieties. It is the object of the following pages to offer a rounded picture of these developments. No attempt has been made to produce a day-by-day record. Indeed, in present circum- stances this would have been impossible, in view of the rigid censorship to which all news from Britain is subjected. It is, for example, quite impossible, in most cases, to state the precise date on which a building was bombed, nor is it by any means a simple matter to identify in every instance the "well-known structure" or "prominent synagogue" of an official dispatch. Air Raids LONDON'S Jewish quarter, where the policemen speak Yiddish and where East meets West in striking defiance of the well-worn proverb, is a sprawling jumble of mean 'Editorial Secretary, Institute of Jewish Affairs of the American Jewish Congress. 126 AMERICAN JEWISH YEAR BOOK sidestreets and alleys spreading, like rivulets from a giant stream, on either side of bustling Whitechapel and the seemingly interminable Mile End Road. Here, in the latter-day babel of Stepney and Bethnal Green, live half the Jews of the metropolis and here, in the combined squalor and magnificence of the ghetto, there has grown up, during the past fifty years, that strange cultural syncretism which marks the evolution of the immigrant masses who fled the pogroms of Russia and Poland in the '80s and '90s of last century. On the morning of September 7, 1940, a goodly part of this area lay in ruins. A fleet of German aircraft, sweeping in during the night, had marked it out, along with many less humble landmarks, as the target of its attacks. When dawn broke, entire blocks were seen to have been reduced to rubble, and there was scarcely a street which was not roped off for the clearance of debris and the extrication of the dead and wounded. A few days later, the Nazi press gleefully reported that the roads out of London were choked with the limousines of terrified Jews fleeing the havoc. This, however, was an exaggeration. What was really happening was that thousands of homeless and destitute were wandering aimlessly through the streets pushing handcarts and perambulators laden with their few salvaged belongings. The raid, which was but the prelude to further attacks (especially in December and the following April and May), served to point up once more the gross inadequacy of official provisions, for while air raid wardens, fire-fighters and rescue squads distinguished themselves by their heroic handling of the emergency, it became abundantly clear that Whitehall had no comprehensive plan for dealing with such situations or for succouring the victims of disaster. Tours of inspection conducted both by the Jewish Board of Deputies and by other competent bodies revealed that underground refuges in the East End were dangerously overcrowded and devoid, in most cases, of proper sanitary arrangements; while shortly after the blitz, the Chief Air Raid Officer of Stepney tendered his resignation in protest against the government's stubborn refusal to provide deep shelters. Especially grave was the plight of those REVIEW OF THE YEAR 5701—GREAT BRITAIN 127 bombed out of their homes, many being obliged, as the result of official muddle and confusion, to trudge for miles in search of accommodation and sustenance. Moreover, a large number of the older generation faced an additional hardship in the fact that they were Yiddish-speaking im- migrants with insufficient command of English to seek or understand directions. Mr Basil Henriques, the energetic director of the East End's leading Jewish settlement, re- ported that it was impossible to walk more than a few yards in the bombed areas without being confronted by some hapless refugee of this type. Nevertheless, if official quarters were negligent, un- official agencies strove manfully to bring relief, Jewish communal organizations taking a prominent part in these efforts. Thus, to mention but a few instances, the Brady Girls' Club became a hotel for young women who had been bombed out, while the United Synagogue, in collaboration with the London County Council, established rest and feed- ing centers in several districts, and set up a special depart- ment of its Welfare Committee to assist Jewish victims of the raids. Similarly, the London Jewish Hospital, though itself damaged by enemy action, bravely kept its doors open, while the Jews' Temporary Shelter, well-known refuge of immigrants which had closed down last year, was turned over to Stepney Borough Council as a haven for the homeless. Nor was it only the Jewish population of the East End that suffered in the aerial siege of London. Along with many of the city's more famous monuments, the premises of Jewish institutions and synagogues were seriously af- fected. Especially deplorable was the total loss, in the September attacks, of the Mocatta Library and Museum, housed at University College, and of the Great Synagogue. The former, owned by the Jewish Historical Society, in- cluded the finest collection of Anglo-Jewish books and manuscripts in the world, while the latter, built in 1722, was regarded as the cathedral synagogue of the Ashkenazim in England. Other Jewish houses of worship which were destroyed were the Central Synagogue, about to celebrate its jubilee, and the independent Western Synagogue, rich in historical associations. Among buildings damaged, but 128 AMERICAN JEWISH YEAR BOOK not demolished, in these and subsequent raids1 were 10 out of the 22 constituents of the United Synagogue, viz: — Borough, Brixton, Brondesbury, Dalston, East London, Hackney, Hampstead, New, New West End and North London. Bombs also fell on the following 7 affiliates of the Federation of Synagogues, all situated in the East End: — Bethnal Green Great, Commericial Road Great, Great Garden Street, Philpot Street, Sidney Street and Vine Court. Hits were also scored on a large number of com- munal institutions. Indeed, there were few of any impor- tance which escaped. Among the casualties were: — The Beth Din (Ecclesiastical Court), B'nai Brith hostel for refugee children, N. W., the Board of Guardians, the Jewish Chronicle, the Jewish Institute, the Jewish National Fund, the London Jewish Hos- pital, the Moses and Solomon Almshouses, the Samuel and Myer Home for Orphan Boys, the Sabbath Observance Bureau, the Spanish and Portuguese Congregational Almshouses (founded, 1703), the West Central Jewish Club, the West Central Jewish Lads' Club, and Woburn House (communal center, housing the offices of the United Synagogue, the B'nai Brith, the Board of Deputies, the Jewish Memorial Council, etc.). Even cemeteries were not spared, bombs falling, among others, on the ancient (disused) burial ground of the Sephardim, occupying a plot of land originally given to Marrano refugees by Oliver Cromwell. Provincial communities also suffered the effects of the Luftwaffe's onslaughts. In Manchester (33,000 Jews), the Victoria Memorial Jewish Hospital was put out of action for two months, while an unidentified synagogue and some Jewish schools were also hit. In Sheffield (2,175 Jews), the Great Synagogue, erected in 1790, was demolished, while in Birmingham (6,000 Jews), although the Central Syna- gogue was saved from destruction by the prompt action of "fire-spotters," the Jewish Social Club and the offices of 1 The rigors of censorship make it impossible to determine the precise dates of the several attacks. REVIEW OF THE YEAR 5701—GREAT BRITAIN 129 the Singers Hill Synagogue were damaged. In Hull, (2,000 Jews), bombs fell on the Main Synagogue and on one other, unidentified, and an adjoining beth hamidrash. In the Ports- mouth area (600 Jews) a small synagogue was blasted, and in Liverpool (7,500 Jews) it was found necessary to dyna- mite a Jewish religious building which had become a dan- gerous structure. As in London, Jewish communal organizations in the provinces rose magnificently to the new emergency, despite the fact that the exodus of their own supporters on the one hand and the arrival, on the other, of evacuees from the metropolis were already taxing their resources to the ut- most. In most centers, relief committees were at once created and hostels opened in safe areas. Thus, the Glasgow community arranged for the evacuation of children to Skelmorlie and Castle Douglas, while the Leeds and District Jewish Children's Convalescent Home was immediately turned over to evacuees. The latter community also organized a main relief center for the local homeless at Brandsby Lodge. Manchester set up an Inquiry Office to assist the destitute, while the Birmingham Jewish com- munal hall was reported, on January 3, 1941, to have been turned into a feeding center. At Liverpool, the Zionist Central Council converted its Zion House into a refuge for those bombed out, and in the Fylde and neighboring districts, which include Blackpool, Lytham St. Annes, Preston, Southport and Lancaster, an arrangement was made to pool resources in meeting the situation.
Recommended publications
  • Introduction Thinking Fascism and Populism in Terms of the Past
    Introduction Thinking Fascism and Populism in Terms of the Past Representing a historian’s inquiry into how and why fascism morphed into populism in history, this book describes the dicta- torial genealogies of modern populism. It also stresses the sig- nifi cant diff erences between populism as a form of democracy and fascism as a form of dictatorship. It rethinks the conceptual and historical experiences of fascism and populism by assessing their elective ideological affi nities and substantial political dif- ferences in history and theory. A historical approach means not subordinating lived experiences to models or ideal types but rather stressing how the actors saw themselves in contexts that were both national and transnational. It means stressing varied contingencies and manifold sources. History combines evidence with interpretation. Ideal types ignore chronology and the cen- trality of historical processes. Historical knowledge requires accounting for how the past is experienced and explained through narratives of continuities and change over time. Against an idea of populism as an exclusively European or American phenomenon, I propose a global reading of its historical 1 2 / Introduction itineraries. Disputing generic theoretical defi nitions that reduce populism to a single sentence, I stress the need to return populism to history. Distinctive, and even opposed, forms of left- and right- wing populism crisscross the world, and I agree with historians like Eric Hobsbawm that left and right forms of populism cannot be confl ated simply because they are often antithetical.1 While populists on the left present those who are opposed to their politi- cal views as enemies of the people, populists on the right connect this populist intolerance of alternative political views with a con- ception of the people formed on the basis of ethnicity and country of origin.
    [Show full text]
  • Routledge Handbook on Political Parties in the Middle East and North Africa
    iii ROUTLEDGE HANDBOOK ON POLITICAL PARTIES IN THE MIDDLE EAST AND NORTH AFRICA Edited by Francesco Cavatorta, Lise Storm and Valeria Resta First published 2021 ISBN: 978- 0- 367- 21986- 4 (hbk) ISBN: 978- 0- 429- 26921- 9 (ebk) 18 YOUTH ACTIVISM AND POLITICAL PARTIES (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) DOI: 10.4324/9780429269219 The funder for this chapter is Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) 231 1 8 YOUTH ACTIVISM AND POLITICAL PARTIES Kressen Th yen I n t r o d u c t i o n In the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), electoral turnout and party membership has been in decline over the past 50 years. The trend of disengagement from formal politics has been most acute among the younger generations. Four per cent of young people aged 18–29 are members of a political party, and only one in four voted in the most recent elections. 1 These developments have been accompanied by a relative absence of youth mobilisation in the public sphere. Until late 2010, most observers seemed to agree that large-scale youth movements were mainly a thing of the past, and that youth as a social category was alienated, divided, and frustrated, and played only a marginal role in the political arena (Meijer 2000 ; Dhillon et al. 2009 ). Consequently, the majority of youth- related studies examining the period prior to the Arab Uprisings concentrated on youth culture and identity, gender relations, religious orientation, arts and music, and generational confl ict (see, e.g. Herrera and Bayat 2010 ; Khalaf and Khalaf 2011 ). Where research focussed on youth activism, it emphasised its dispersed and fragmented engagement in form of ‘non- movements’ (Bayat 2010 ).
    [Show full text]
  • Militant Democracy and Fundamental Rights, II Author(S): Karl Loewenstein Source: the American Political Science Review, Vol
    Militant Democracy and Fundamental Rights, II Author(s): Karl Loewenstein Source: The American Political Science Review, Vol. 31, No. 4 (Aug., 1937), pp. 638-658 Published by: American Political Science Association Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1948103 Accessed: 07-08-2018 08:47 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms American Political Science Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The American Political Science Review This content downloaded from 35.176.47.6 on Tue, 07 Aug 2018 08:47:36 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms MILITANT DEMOCRACY AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS, II* KARL LOEWENSTEIN Amherst College II Some Illustrations of Militant Democracy. Before a more system- atic -account of anti-fascist legislation in Europe is undertaken, recent developments in several countries may be reviewed as illus- trating what militant democracy can achieve against subversive extremism when the will to survive is coupled with appropriate measures for combatting fascist techniques. 1. Finland: From the start, the Finnish Republic was particu- larly exposed to radicalism both from left and right. The newly established state was wholly devoid of previous experience in self- government, shaken by violent nationalism, bordered by bolshevik Russia, yet within the orbit of German imperialism; no other country seemed more predestined to go fascist.
    [Show full text]
  • Romania Redivivus
    alexander clapp ROMANIA REDIVIVUS nce the badlands of neoliberal Europe, Romania has become its bustling frontier. A post-communist mafia state that was cast to the bottom of the European heap by opinion- makers sixteen years ago is now billed as the success story Oof eu expansion.1 Its growth rate at nearly 6 per cent is the highest on the continent, albeit boosted by fiscal largesse.2 In Bucharest more politicians have been put in jail for corruption over the past decade than have been convicted in the rest of Eastern Europe put together. Romania causes Brussels and Berlin almost none of the headaches inflicted by the Visegrád Group—Czechia, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia— which in 1993 declined to accept Romania as a peer and collectively entered the European Union three years before it. Romanians con- sistently rank among the most Europhile people in the Union.3 An anti-eu party has never appeared on a Romanian ballot, much less in the parliament. Scattered political appeals to unsavoury interwar traditions—Legionnairism, Greater Romanianism—attract fewer voters than do far-right movements across most of Western Europe. The two million Magyars of Transylvania, one of Europe’s largest minorities, have become a model for inter-ethnic relations after a time when the park benches of Cluj were gilded in the Romanian tricolore to remind every- one where they were. Indeed, perhaps the aptest symbol of Romania’s place in Europe today is the man who sits in the Presidential Palace of Cotroceni in Bucharest. Klaus Iohannis—a former physics teacher at a high school in Sibiu, once Hermannstadt—is an ethnic German head- ing a state that, a generation ago, was shipping hundreds of thousands of its ‘Saxons’ ‘back’ to Bonn at 4,000–10,000 Deutschmarks a head.
    [Show full text]
  • Monopolizing Power Egypt’S Political Parties Law
    January 2007 Number 1 Monopolizing Power Egypt’s Political Parties Law I. Introduction and Recommendations...................................................................... 1 II. The Political Parties Law ......................................................................................3 III. The 2005 Amendments to the Law...................................................................... 6 IV. The Political Parties Law in Practice ................................................................... 8 V. International Law and Egypt’s Parties Law ......................................................... 14 I. Introduction and Recommendations On January 6, 2007, Abu al-`Ila Madi, a 48-year-old activist from Cairo, will plead his case before Egypt’s Supreme Administrative Court. He has appeared in the court dozens of times over the past 10 years. His purpose is to try once again to register the Wasat (Centrist) Party and begin campaigning under its name. Registering a new political party should be a transparent and apolitical bureaucratic procedure, and in many countries it is.1 In Egypt, however, in practice it is the government, and the party of government, that determine which other parties will be recognized and which will not. The result is the routine denial of applications for registration of new political parties through the use of criteria set forth in the political parties law2 that are open to subjective and arbitrary application. Madi’s struggle to gain legal recognition for the Wasat Party illustrates the deleterious effects of the law on prospective political parties, and the manner in which the government and the ruling National Democratic Party (NDP) exercise unfettered discretion to deny such parties their lawful participation in the country’s political life. If President Hosni Mubarak is to make good on his promise to “enshrine the liberties of the citizen and reinvigorate political parties,”3 the Egyptian government must reform the parties law and cease obstructing the establishment and effective participation of political parties.
    [Show full text]
  • ANTI-AUTHORITARIAN INTERVENTIONS in DEMOCRATIC THEORY by BRIAN CARL BERNHARDT B.A., James Madison University, 2005 M.A., University of Colorado at Boulder, 2010
    BEYOND THE DEMOCRATIC STATE: ANTI-AUTHORITARIAN INTERVENTIONS IN DEMOCRATIC THEORY by BRIAN CARL BERNHARDT B.A., James Madison University, 2005 M.A., University of Colorado at Boulder, 2010 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science 2014 This thesis entitled: Beyond the Democratic State: Anti-Authoritarian Interventions in Democratic Theory written by Brian Carl Bernhardt has been approved for the Department of Political Science Steven Vanderheiden, Chair Michaele Ferguson David Mapel James Martel Alison Jaggar Date The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we Find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards Of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline. Bernhardt, Brian Carl (Ph.D., Political Science) Beyond the Democratic State: Anti-Authoritarian Interventions in Democratic Theory Thesis directed by Associate Professor Steven Vanderheiden Though democracy has achieved widespread global popularity, its meaning has become increasingly vacuous and citizen confidence in democratic governments continues to erode. I respond to this tension by articulating a vision of democracy inspired by anti-authoritarian theory and social movement practice. By anti-authoritarian, I mean a commitment to individual liberty, a skepticism toward centralized power, and a belief in the capacity of self-organization. This dissertation fosters a conversation between an anti-authoritarian perspective and democratic theory: What would an account of democracy that begins from these three commitments look like? In the first two chapters, I develop an anti-authoritarian account of freedom and power.
    [Show full text]
  • Karl Loewenstein, John H. Herz, Militant Democracy and the Defense of the Democratic State
    Virginia Commonwealth University VCU Scholars Compass Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2013 Soldiers for Democracy: Karl Loewenstein, John H. Herz, Militant Democracy and the Defense of the Democratic State Ben Plache Virginia Commonwealth University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd Part of the History Commons © The Author Downloaded from https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/2995 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at VCU Scholars Compass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of VCU Scholars Compass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ©Ben Plache 2013 All Rights Reserved Soldiers for Democracy: Karl Loewenstein, John H. Herz, Militant Democracy and the Defense of the Democratic State A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts at Virginia Commonwealth University. by Ben Plache Bachelor of Arts, Virginia Commonwealth University, 2011 Director: Dr. Joseph Bendersky Professor, Department of History Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, Virginia May 2013 Acknowledgements No scholarly work is an individual effort, and without the help of countless others this thesis would never have been completed. In particular I would like to thank Dr. Joseph Bendersky, my thesis advisor, for his time, his academic generosity and his commitment to education and scholarship. Without his guidance, this thesis, and my time in graduate school, would have been considerably different and undoubtedly poorer. I would like to also thank Dr. Timothy Thurber and Dr. Robert Godwin-Jones for generously agreeing to serve on my thesis committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey's Role in Romanian's Diplomatic Struggle (1St Of
    Tarih Okulu Dergisi (TOD) Journal of History School (JOHS) Eylül 2013 September 2013 Yıl 6, Sayı XV, ss. 355-384. Year 6, Issue XV, pp. 355-384. DOI No: http://dx.doi.org/10.14225/Joh305 TURKEY’S ROLE IN ROMANIAN’S DIPLOMATIC STRUGGLE (1ST OF FEBRUARY 1943 - 23RD OF AUGUST 1944) Liliana Boscan ALTIN Ömer METİN Abstract The present study aimed to to focus on the intense diplomatic activity developed by Romania in efforts to negotiate an armistice with the Allies especially between September 1943 and August 1944. Romania which was joined into the Axis Countries upon executing an agreement with Germany would have felt the Soviet threat on its borders upon defeat of Germany in Stalingrad front. On the other hand, although Turkey had saved its neutral position from the beginning of the war, it had tried to support Romania, its ally in the Balkan Pact, in a political dimension in case the risk of Soviet expansion across the Balkans. As Turkey did not desire Romania to be partitioned, it played an active role in regard to making a fare cease-fire agreement between Romanian Government and the Allies. Starting the spring of 1943, the Romanian diplomacy, including here Ion Antonescu Marshal, the King and the opposition parties, engaging in consistent separate peace negotiations with the United Kingdom using the mediation of Turkey. The paper is based on unpublished documents found in the Romanian diplomatic and national archives. Key Words : Turkey, Romania, Second World War, Diplomacy. Romanya’nın Diplomasi Mücadelesinde Türkiye’nin Rolü (1 Şubat 1943 – 23 Ağustos 1944) Dr., The Romanian Association for Middle East Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Vichy Against Vichy: History and Memory of the Second World War in the Former Capital of the État Français from 1940 to the Present
    Vichy against Vichy: History and Memory of the Second World War in the Former Capital of the État français from 1940 to the Present Audrey Mallet A Thesis In the Department of History Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (History) at Concordia University Montreal, Quebec, Canada, and Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne December 2016 © Audrey Mallet, 2016 CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES This is to certify that the thesis prepared By: Audrey Mallet Entitled: Vichy against Vichy: History and Memory of the Second World War in the Former Capital of the État français from 1940 to the Present and submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (History) complies with the regulations of the University and meets the accepted standards with respect to originality and quality. Signed by the final examining committee: Chair Dr. G. LeBlanc External Examiner Dr. E. Jennings External to Program Dr. F. Chalk Examiner Dr. D. Peschanski Examiner Dr. C. Claveau Thesis Co-Supervisor Dr. N. Ingram Thesis Co-Supervisor Dr. H. Rousso Approved by: Dr. B. Lorenzkowski, Graduate Program Director December 5, 2016 Dr. A. Roy, Dean, Faculty of Arts & Science Abstract Vichy against Vichy: History and Memory of the Second World War in the Former Capital of the État français from 1940 to the Present Audrey Mallet, Ph.D. Concordia University & Paris I Panthéon Sorbonne, 2016 Following the June 22, 1940 armistice and the subsequent occupation of northern France by the Germans, the French government left Paris and eventually established itself in the city of Vichy.
    [Show full text]
  • Hatescape: an In-Depth Analysis of Extremism and Hate Speech On
    Hatescape: An In-Depth Analysis of Extremism and Hate Speech on TikTok Ciarán O’Connor About this paper About the Author This report aims to provide an in-depth analysis on Ciarán O’Connor is an analyst and investigator on ISD’s the state of extremism and hate on TikTok. It is the Digital Analysis Unit. He focuses on the intersection of culmination of three months of research on a sample extremism and technology and with specific expertise of 1,030 videos posted on TikTok, equivalent to just on the far-right and disinformation environment online over eight hours of content, that were used to promote and use of open-source research methodologies. hatred and glorify extremism and terrorism on the Since the start of 2021, Ciarán has led ISD’s COVID-19 platform. Vaccine Misinformation Monitor, a series of short-form reports examining the nature and scale of vaccine- ISD set out to examine the state of hate and extremism related misinformation in Ireland, Canada, MENA and on TikTok in two ways. The first objective involved the Netherlands. Before joining ISD, Ciarán worked analysing how individuals or groups promote hateful with Storyful news agency. He has an MSc in Political ideologies and target people on the platform based Communication Science from the University of on numerous protected attributes such as ethnicity, Amsterdam and is currently learning Dutch. religion, gender or others. Second, using the same framework, ISD investigated how features on TikTok Acknowledgements like profiles, hashtags, share functions, video effects This research was made possible thanks to the support, and music are used to spread hate.
    [Show full text]
  • The German Military Mission to Romania, 1940-1941 by Richard L. Dinardo
    The German Military Mission to Romania, 1940–1941 By RICHARD L. Di NARDO hen one thinks of security assistance and the train- ing of foreign troops, W Adolf Hitler’s Germany is not a country that typically comes to mind. Yet there were two instances in World War II when Germany did indeed deploy troops to other countries that were in noncombat cir- cumstances. The countries in question were Finland and Romania, and the German mili- tary mission to Romania is the subject of this article. The activities of the German mission to Romania are discussed and analyzed, and some conclusions and hopefully a few take- aways are offered that could be relevant for military professionals today. Creation of the Mission The matter of how the German military mission to Romania came into being can be covered relatively quickly. In late June 1940, the Soviet Union demanded from Romania the cession of both Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina. The only advice Germany could give to the Romanian government was to agree to surrender the territory.1 Fearful of further Soviet encroachments, the Roma- nian government made a series of pleas to Germany including a personal appeal from Wikimedia Commons King Carol II to Hitler for German military assistance in the summer of 1940. Hitler, Finnish Volunteer Battalion of German Waffen-SS return home from front in 1943 however, was not yet willing to undertake such a step. Thus, all Romanian requests were rebuffed with Hitler telling Carol that Romania brought its own problems upon itself by its prior pro-Allied policy.
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL REPORT International Commission on the Holocaust In
    FINAL REPORT of the International Commission on the Holocaust in Romania Presented to Romanian President Ion Iliescu November 11, 2004 Bucharest, Romania NOTE: The English text of this Report is currently in preparation for publication. © International Commission on the Holocaust in Romania. All rights reserved. DISTORTION, NEGATIONISM, AND MINIMALIZATION OF THE HOLOCAUST IN POSTWAR ROMANIA Introduction This chapter reviews and analyzes the different forms of Holocaust distortion, denial, and minimalization in post-World War II Romania. It must be emphasized from the start that the analysis is based on the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum’s definition of the Holocaust, which Commission members accepted as authoritative soon after the Commission was established. This definition1 does not leave room for doubt about the state-organized participation of Romania in the genocide against the Jews, since during the Second World War, Romania was among those allies and a collaborators of Nazi Germany that had a systematic plan for the persecution and annihilation of the Jewish population living on territories under their unmitigated control. In Romania’s specific case, an additional “target-population” subjected to or destined for genocide was the Romany minority. This chapter will employ an adequate conceptualization, using both updated recent studies on the Holocaust in general and new interpretations concerning this genocide in particular. Insofar as the employed conceptualization is concerned, two terminological clarifications are in order. First, “distortion” refers to attempts to use historical research on the dimensions and significance of the Holocaust either to diminish its significance or to serve political and propagandistic purposes. Although its use is not strictly confined to the Communist era, the term “distortion” is generally employed in reference to that period, during which historical research was completely subjected to controls by the Communist Party’s political censorship.
    [Show full text]