Rosalba Odoguardi Phd Thesis 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rosalba Odoguardi Phd Thesis 1 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of contents...................................................................................................................... 1 Acknowledgments.................................................................................................................... 3 Riassunto ................................................................................................................................. 4 Abstract .................................................................................................................................... 8 1. GENERAL INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 12 1.1 Adephaga..................................................................................................................... 12 1.2 Carabid Beetles ........................................................................................................... 12 1.2.a Breeding and survival ........................................................................................... 14 1.2.b Carabid “life form” and diet ................................................................................... 15 1.2.c Carabid digestion .................................................................................................. 18 1.2.d Carabid Foraging Behaviour................................................................................. 19 1.2.e Carabid as pest antagonist ................................................................................... 19 1.3 Olive groves ................................................................................................................. 20 1.3.a Olive Pests............................................................................................................ 22 1.3.b The Olive fly Bactrocera (Dacus ) oleae (Rossi 1790) .......................................... 22 1.3.c Carabids/olive fly interaction ................................................................................. 25 RESEARCH GOAL ................................................................................................................ 28 2. INTRODUCTION TO THE PHASES OF THE STUDY...................................................... 29 2.1 Preliminary test ............................................................................................................ 29 2.2 Quantitative test ........................................................................................................... 29 2.3 Microscopical gut content analysis .............................................................................. 30 2.4 Molecular gut content analysis..................................................................................... 30 2.5 Carabid daily rhythm .................................................................................................... 31 2.6 Carabid density in olive grove...................................................................................... 32 2.7 Simulation of carabid predation on B. oleae ................................................................ 32 3. MATERIALS AND METHODS........................................................................................... 33 3.1 Sampled olive grove .................................................................................................... 33 3.2 Laboratory rearing conditions ...................................................................................... 34 Grafic 3.1- Climogram recorded by the thermopluviometric station of Mirto during the period 1999-2005 ........................................................................................................................................ 34 3.2.a Predator carabid beetles studied .......................................................................... 34 3.3 Prey used and food preparation................................................................................... 38 _____________________________________________________________________________________ Rosalba Odoguardi PhD thesis 1 Table of Contents 3.4 Preliminary tests .......................................................................................................... 38 3.5 Quantitative tests ......................................................................................................... 39 3.5.b Experimental conditions........................................................................................ 39 3.5.c Behavioural analysis ............................................................................................. 40 3.5.d Food preferences.................................................................................................. 40 3.6 Microscopical gut content analysis .............................................................................. 41 3.7 Molecular gut content analysis..................................................................................... 41 3.7.a Primer design........................................................................................................ 41 3.7.b Insects and primary predation feeding trial........................................................... 42 3.7.c Species specificity................................................................................................. 42 3.7.d DNA Protocols ...................................................................................................... 42 3.8 Carabid daily rhythms .................................................................................................. 43 3.9 Carabid density in olive grove...................................................................................... 44 3.10 Simulation of carabid predation on B. oleae pupae and larvae................................. 44 4. RESULTS........................................................................................................................... 45 4.1 Preliminary test ............................................................................................................ 45 4.2 Quantitative tests ......................................................................................................... 52 4.2.a Behavioural analysis ............................................................................................. 52 4.2.b Food preferences.................................................................................................. 54 4.3 Microscopical gut content analysis .............................................................................. 60 4.4 Molecular gut content analysis..................................................................................... 61 4.5 Carabid daily rhythms .................................................................................................. 63 4.6 Carabid density in olive grove...................................................................................... 67 4.7 Simulation of carabid predation on B. oleae pupae and larvae................................... 69 5. DISCUSSION..................................................................................................................... 70 5.1 Preliminary test ............................................................................................................ 70 6.2 Quantitative tests ......................................................................................................... 71 6.3 Microscopical gut content analysis .............................................................................. 74 6.4 Molecular gut content analysis..................................................................................... 75 6.5 Carabid daily rhythms .................................................................................................. 75 6.6 Carabid density in olive grove...................................................................................... 76 6.7 Simulation of carabid predation on B. oleae pupae into the soil.................................. 78 7. CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................... 80 References............................................................................................................................. 83 _____________________________________________________________________________________ Rosalba Odoguardi PhD thesis 2 Acknowledgments ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I warmly thank my tutor, Prof. Tullia Zetto, for her essential support and consideration during my period of study, for her invaluable suggestions on manuscript organization, for linguistic revision and human prop; Prof. Pietro Brandamayr for structuring my research program and for many ideas; Dr. Teresa Bonacci for field and laboratory help and numerous other forms of entomological supports, for encouraging me to continue my work on behavioural research, Dr. Antonio Mazzei for helping me during sampling in experimental sites and carabid beetles identification, Dr. Anita Giglio and Dr. Federica F. Talarico for their suggestions during histological preparations and photographical acquisitions; Dr. Alessandro Massolo, for his useful support in statistical analyses. I am particularly grateful to Prof. Beatrice Bitonti, Dr. Leonardo Bruno for taking time to teach me DNA analysis laboratory methods. I thank Dr. Nino Iannotta, C.R.A, and his co-worker, in particular Dr. Stefano Scalercio, for research facilities, and all the other
Recommended publications
  • Abusi Edilizi Per Comune
    52 Tavola 1.9 - Abusi edilizi per comune. - Anni 2009-2012 SEGUE Tavola 1.9 - Abusi edilizi per comune. - Anni 2009-2012 Comuni 2009 2010 2011 2012 Comuni 2009 2010 2011 2012 Acquaformosa 0 1 0 1 Colosimi 3 4 4 2 Acquappesa 1 12 4 8 Corigliano Calabro 73 36 37 25 Acri 41 n.d. 27 17 Cosenza 0 n.d. 21 70 Aiello Calabro 0 1 2 1 Cropalati 0 1 n.d. 0 Aieta 3 2 n.d. 1 Crosia 7 8 8 1 Albidona 0 0 0 0 Diamante 33 14 28 21 Alessandria del Carretto 2 0 0 0 Dipignano 0 1 2 5 Altilia 0 0 0 1 Domanico 0 0 0 1 Altomonte 9 5 5 9 Fagnano Castello 4 4 3 0 Amantea 12 5 6 4 Falconara Albanese 0 1 3 5 Amendolara 4 5 6 5 Figline Vegliaturo 0 0 0 0 Aprigliano 7 5 0 3 Firmo 0 0 0 0 Belmonte Calabro 3 3 4 0 Fiumefreddo Bruzio 9 13 6 5 Belsito 0 2 0 1 Francavilla Marittima 0 0 0 1 Belvedere Marittimo 48 39 27 14 Frascineto 0 1 0 2 Bianchi 3 0 3 0 Fuscaldo 8 7 6 8 Bisignano 6 4 8 1 Grimaldi 8 0 1 0 Bocchigliero 0 0 1 0 Grisolia 7 9 4 1 Bonifati 12 15 10 5 Guardia Piemontese 2 0 5 2 Buonvicino 1 4 2 2 Lago 1 2 0 2 Calopezzati 2 1 5 2 Laino Borgo 1 4 7 1 Caloveto 5 1 0 0 Laino Castello 1 0 0 0 Campana 0 0 0 0 Lappano 0 0 6 1 Canna 0 0 0 0 Lattarico 1 3 2 2 Cariati 13 n.d.
    [Show full text]
  • The Compositional and Configurational Heterogeneity of Matrix Habitats Shape Woodland Carabid Communities in Wooded-Agricultural Landscapes
    The compositional and configurational heterogeneity of matrix habitats shape woodland carabid communities in wooded-agricultural landscapes Article Accepted Version Neumann, J. L., Griffiths, G. H., Hoodless, A. and Holloway, G. J. (2016) The compositional and configurational heterogeneity of matrix habitats shape woodland carabid communities in wooded-agricultural landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 31 (2). pp. 301-315. ISSN 0921-2973 doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-015-0244-y Available at http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/46912/ It is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from the work. See Guidance on citing . To link to this article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10980-015-0244-y Publisher: Springer All outputs in CentAUR are protected by Intellectual Property Rights law, including copyright law. Copyright and IPR is retained by the creators or other copyright holders. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the End User Agreement . www.reading.ac.uk/centaur CentAUR Central Archive at the University of Reading Reading’s research outputs online The compositional and configurational heterogeneity of matrix habitats shape woodland carabid communities in wooded- agricultural landscapes. Jessica L. Neumann1,3*, Geoffrey H. Griffiths1, Andrew Hoodless2 and Graham J. Holloway3 1 Department of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Reading, Reading, UK 2 Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust, Fordingbridge, Hampshire, UK 3 Centre for Wildlife Assessment and Conservation, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK Abstract Context Landscape heterogeneity (the composition and configuration of matrix habitats) plays a major role in shaping species communities in wooded-agricultural landscapes.
    [Show full text]
  • Esami Di Stato 2020 Commissioni CS
    SISTEMA INFORMATIVO DEL MINISTERO DELL'ISTRUZIONE ESAMI DI STATO CONCLUSIVI DEI CORSI DI ISTRUZIONE SECONDARIA SUPERIORE ELENCO COMMISSIONI COMPLETE ANNO SCOLASTICO 2019/2020 UFFICIO SCOLASTICO REGIONE CALABRIA A.S. 2019/2020 PROVINCIA DI COSENZA CSEA03001 - I COMMISSIONE: LS "E. MATTEI" CASTROVILLARI ** DATI RELATIVI ALLE CLASSI DELLA CONFIGURAZIONE ** ISTITUTO PRIMA SEDE: CASTROVILLARI - LICEO SCIENTIFICO LS "E.MATTEI" CASTROVILLARI, VIALE DELLE QUERCE (CS) *--------*------------*-------------------------------------------------------*---------------------*-----------------------* * CLASSE * ISTITUTO * SEZIONE * INDIRIZZO *I.F.P.* CANDIDATI * L. STRANIERE * * * * * * *INT.*EST.*MER.* II PROVA SCR. COMM. * * * * * * * * * * LIN. 1 LIN. 3 ESTERNO.* *--------*------------*-------------------------------------------------------*---------------------*-----------------------* * 1 * CSPS07901D * LA * EA03 - ESABAC - LICEO LINGUISTICO * * 21 * * * * * * * 2 * CSPS07901D * LB * LI04 - LINGUISTICO * * 19 * * * I S * *--------*------------*-------------------------------------------------------*---------------------*-----------------------* TOTALI * 40 * * * *----*----*----* PROGR. PAG. 1 PAG. 1/I (SPERIMENTALE /CS) ** DATI RELATIVI AL PRESIDENTE ** CSEA03001 - I COMMISSIONE: LS "E. MATTEI" CASTROVILLARI *----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------* * PRESIDENTE: PIZZUTI STELLA N. IL 05/08/1969 (CZ) * * CORIGLIANO-ROSSANO - ISTITUTO SUPERIORE IIS ROSSANO "LS-LC-LA",
    [Show full text]
  • The 17Th International Colloquium on Amphipoda
    Biodiversity Journal, 2017, 8 (2): 391–394 MONOGRAPH The 17th International Colloquium on Amphipoda Sabrina Lo Brutto1,2,*, Eugenia Schimmenti1 & Davide Iaciofano1 1Dept. STEBICEF, Section of Animal Biology, via Archirafi 18, Palermo, University of Palermo, Italy 2Museum of Zoology “Doderlein”, SIMUA, via Archirafi 16, University of Palermo, Italy *Corresponding author, email: [email protected] th th ABSTRACT The 17 International Colloquium on Amphipoda (17 ICA) has been organized by the University of Palermo (Sicily, Italy), and took place in Trapani, 4-7 September 2017. All the contributions have been published in the present monograph and include a wide range of topics. KEY WORDS International Colloquium on Amphipoda; ICA; Amphipoda. Received 30.04.2017; accepted 31.05.2017; printed 30.06.2017 Proceedings of the 17th International Colloquium on Amphipoda (17th ICA), September 4th-7th 2017, Trapani (Italy) The first International Colloquium on Amphi- Poland, Turkey, Norway, Brazil and Canada within poda was held in Verona in 1969, as a simple meet- the Scientific Committee: ing of specialists interested in the Systematics of Sabrina Lo Brutto (Coordinator) - University of Gammarus and Niphargus. Palermo, Italy Now, after 48 years, the Colloquium reached the Elvira De Matthaeis - University La Sapienza, 17th edition, held at the “Polo Territoriale della Italy Provincia di Trapani”, a site of the University of Felicita Scapini - University of Firenze, Italy Palermo, in Italy; and for the second time in Sicily Alberto Ugolini - University of Firenze, Italy (Lo Brutto et al., 2013). Maria Beatrice Scipione - Stazione Zoologica The Organizing and Scientific Committees were Anton Dohrn, Italy composed by people from different countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Urbanisation and Urban Areas on Biodiversity
    From genes to habitats – effects of urbanisation and urban areas on biodiversity Inauguraldissertation zur Erlangung der Würde eines Doktors der Philosophie vorgelegt der Philosophisch-Naturwissenschaflichen Fakultät der Universität Basel von Gwendoline (Wendy) Altherr aus Trogen, Appenzell-Ausserrhoden Basel, 2007 Genehmigt von der Philosophisch–Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät auf Antrag von Prof. Dr. Peter Nagel, Prof. Dr. Patricia Holm, Prof. (em.) Dr. Bernhard Klausnitzer Basel, den 18. September 2007 Prof. Dr. Hans-Peter Hauri Dekan TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary 1 General introduction – biodiversity in the city 3 Chapter I – genetic diversity 21 Population genetic structure of the wall lizard (Podarcis muralis) in an urban environment Manuscript Chapter II – species diversity 47 How do small urban forest patches contribute to the biodiversity 47 of the arthropod fauna? Manuscript Leistus fulvibarbis Dejean – Wiederfund einer verschollenen 79 Laufkäferart (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in der Schweiz Veröffentlicht in den Mitteilungen der Entomologischen Gesellschaft Basel 56(4), 2006 Chapter III – habitat diversity 89 How do stakeholders and the legislation influence the allocation of green space on brownfield redevelopment projects? Five case studies from Switzerland, Germany and the UK Published in Business Strategy and the Environment 16, 2007 General discussion and conclusions 109 Acknowledgements 117 Curriculum Vitae 119 SUMMARY Urban areas are landscapes dominated by built-up structures for human use. Nevertheless, nature can still be found within these areas. Urban ecosystems can offer ecological niches, sometimes only found in cities. This biodiversity in the form of genetic diversity, species diversity and habitat diversity provided the structure of this thesis. First, we studied the effects of urbanisation on genetic diversity. We analysed the population structure of the wall lizard with highly variable genetic markers.
    [Show full text]
  • (Crustacea : Amphipoda) of the Lower Chesapeake Estuaries
    W&M ScholarWorks Reports 1971 The distribution and ecology of the Gammaridea (Crustacea : Amphipoda) of the lower Chesapeake estuaries James Feely Virginia Institute of Marine Science Marvin L. Wass Virginia Institute of Marine Science Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/reports Part of the Marine Biology Commons, Oceanography Commons, Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Feely, J., & Wass, M. L. (1971) The distribution and ecology of the Gammaridea (Crustacea : Amphipoda) of the lower Chesapeake estuaries. Special papers in marine science No.2. Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary. http://doi.org/10.21220/V5H01D This Report is brought to you for free and open access by W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Reports by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE DISTRIBUTION AND ECOLOGY OF THE GAMMARIDEA (CRUSTACEA: AMPHIPODA) OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE ESTUARIES James B. Feeley and Marvin L. Wass SPECIAL PAPERS IN MARINE SCIENCE NO. 2 VIRGIN IA INSTITUTE OF MARINE SC IE NCE Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062 1971 THE DISTRIBUTION AND ECOLOGY OF THE GAMMARIDEA (CRUSTACEA: AMPHIPODA) OF THE LOWER 1 CHESAPEAKE ESTUARIES James B. Feeley and Marvin L. Wass SPECIAL PAPERS IN MARINE SCIENCE NO. 2 1971 VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF MARINE SCIENCE Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062 This document is in part a thesis by James B. Feeley presented to the School of Marine Science of the College of William and Mary in Virginia in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts.
    [Show full text]
  • Cladistic Revision of Talitroidean Amphipods (Crustacea, Gammaridea), with a Proposal of a New Classification
    CladisticBlackwell Publishing, Ltd. revision of talitroidean amphipods (Crustacea, Gammaridea), with a proposal of a new classification CRISTIANA S. SEREJO Accepted: 8 December 2003 Serejo, C. S. (2004). Cladistic revision of talitroidean amphipods (Crustacea, Gammaridea), with a proposal of a new classification. — Zoologica Scripta, 33, 551–586. This paper reports the results of a cladistic analysis of the Talitroidea s.l., which includes about 400 species, in 96 genera distributed in 10 families. The analysis was performed using PAUP and was based on a character matrix of 34 terminal taxa and 43 morphological characters. Four most parsimonious trees were obtained with 175 steps (CI = 0.617, RI = 0.736). A strict consensus tree was calculated and the following general conclusions were reached. The superfamily Talitroidea is elevated herein as infraorder Talitrida, which is subdivided into three main branches: a small clade formed by Kuria and Micropythia (the Kurioidea), and two larger groups maintained as distinct superfamilies (Phliantoidea, including six families, and Talitroidea s.s., including four). Within the Talitroidea s.s., the following taxonomic changes are proposed: Hyalellidae and Najnidae are synonymized with Dogielinotidae, and treated as subfamilies; a new family rank is proposed for the Chiltoniinae. Cristiana S. Serejo, Museu Nacional/UFRJ, Quinta da Boa Vista s/n, 20940–040, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected] Introduction Table 1 Talitroidean classification following Barnard & Karaman The talitroideans include amphipods ranging in length from 1991), Bousfield (1996) and Bousfield & Hendrycks (2002) 3 to 30 mm, and are widely distributed in the tropics and subtropics. In marine and estuarine environments, they are Superfamily Talitroidea Rafinesque, 1815 Family Ceinidae Barnard, 1972 usually found in shallow water, intertidally or even in the supra- Family Dogielinotidae Gurjanova, 1953 littoral zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Univerzita Palackého V Olomouci PÍrodov Decká Fakulta Katedra Zoologie a Ornitologická Laborato 
    UNIVERZITA PALACKÉHO V OLOMOUCI PÍRODOV DECKÁ FAKULTA KATEDRA ZOOLOGIE A ORNITOLOGICKÁ LABORATO Význam a ochrana bezlesí Hrubého Jeseníku z hlediska biodiverzity brouk (Coleoptera) DOKTORSKÁ DISERTA NÍ PRÁCE Josef Kašák Vedoucí práce: doc. RNDr. Jaroslav Starý, Ph.D. Konzultant: RNDr. Tomáš Kuras, Ph.D. Olomouc 2015 Bibliografická identifikace: Jméno a p íjmení autora: Josef Kašák Název práce: Význam a ochrana bezlesí Hrubého Jeseníku z hlediska biodiverzity brouk (Coleoptera) Typ práce: doktorská diserta ní práce Pracovišt : Katedra zoologie a ornitologická laborato , P írodov decká fakulta, Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci Vedoucí práce: doc. RNDr. Jaroslav Starý, Ph.D. Konzultant: RNDr. Tomáš Kuras, Ph.D. Studijní program: P1527 Biologie Studijní obor: Zoologie Rok obhajoby práce: 2015 Abstrakt: Biodiverzita jako variabilita života poskytuje lidské spole nosti adu nezbytných zdroj , ekosystémových služeb a p edstavuje také významnou kulturní hodnotu. Na druhé stran však dochází sou asn k jejímu ochuzování v souvislosti s rozvojem lidské spole nosti. Z pohledu ochrany p írody se proto horské ekosystémy adí mezi jedno z nejcenn jších a nejohrožen jších prost edí v globálním m ítku. V rámci p edložené doktorské práce byly studovány vybrané potenciáln významné antropické vlivy na biodiverzitu horských bezlesí Hrubého Jeseníku prost ednictvím modelové bioindika ní skupiny brouk (Coleoptera). V prostoru primárního bezlesí arkto- alpinní tundry byl studován vliv sjezdových tratí a invazivní d eviny borovice kle e ( Pinus mugo ) na spole enstva brouk . Na území sekundárních bezlesí podhorských luk a pastvin byl hodnocen vliv zem dlského hospoda ení na brouky a další bezobratlé. Studium vlivu lyža ského areálu prokázalo, že p estože jsou sjezdové trat v alpínské zón zájmového území provozovány zp sobem šetrným k vegetaci, tak pr kazn m ní pvodní spole enstva epigeických brouk .
    [Show full text]
  • Opportunities for Biodiversity Enhancement in Plantation Forests
    Opportunities for biodiversity enhancement in plantation forests Proceedings of the COFORD seminar, 24 October 2002, Cork edited by Lauren MacLennan1 1 COFORD, Technology Transfer Co-ordinator, Agriculture Building, Belfield, Dublin 4. Email: [email protected] COFORD, National Council for Forest Research and Development Agriculture Building Belfield, Dublin 4 Ireland Tel: + 353 1 7167700 Fax: + 353 1 7161180 © COFORD 2004 First published in 2004 by COFORD, National Council for Forest Research and Development, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, or stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, electrostatic, magnetic tape, mechanical, photocopying recording or otherwise, without prior permission in writing from COFORD. The views and opinions expressed in this publication belong to the authors alone and do not necessarily reflect those of COFORD. ISBN 1 902696 35 2 Title: Opportunities for biodiversity enhancement in plantation forests. Editor: Lauren MacLennan Citation: MacLennan, L. (editor) 2004. Opportunities for biodiversity enhancement in plantation forests. Proceedings of the COFORD Seminar, 24 October 2002, Cork. COFORD, Dublin. iv Biodiversity opportunities in plantations managed for wood supply Biodiversity opportunities in plantations managed for wood supply Orla Fahy2 and Noel Foley3 INTRODUCTION Afforestation Programme (Forest Service 2000a) where the primary objective is wood The Forest Service of the Department of
    [Show full text]
  • Crveni Popis Trčaka Hrvatske (Coleoptera, Carabidae) Naručitelj: Državni Zavod Za Zaštitu Prirode
    CRVENI POPIS TRČAKA HRVATSKE (COLEOPTERA, CARABIDAE) NARUČITELJ: DRŽAVNI ZAVOD ZA ZAŠTITU PRIRODE 2007. CRVENI POPIS TRČAKA (CARABIDAE) HRVATSKE Crveni popis trčaka (Carabidae) izrađen je na prijedlog Državnog zavoda za zaštitu prirode. Crveni popisi raznih skupina su jedna od temeljnih stručnih podloga u zaštiti prirode (Radović 2004). Njihova je zadaća prikazati koje vrste su u opasnosti od izumiranja i koliko brzo se to može očekivati. Za izradu takvih popisa postoje određeni preduvjeti, odnosno količina znanja proizašla iz istraživanja određene skupine mora biti dostatna. ŠTO SU SVE TRČCI ? Trčci (Carabidae) su jedna od najvećih porodica kornjaša (Coleoptera). Kako je sistematika ove porodice predmet stalnih istraživanja i promjena, procjena ukupnog broja vrsta u svijetu, ali i u Europi varira kod različitih autora. Osim toga, usprkos dva stoljeća intenzivnih istraživanja, autori se još ne slažu oko toga koje sve vrste pripadaju porodici Carabidae, niti kako je ona podijeljena na niže sistematske kategorije. U najstarijim katalozima porodica Carabidae je podijeljena, većinom, samo na dvije do tri potporodice. Ti katalozi (Dejean 1831, Ganglbauer 1892, Junk & Shlenking 1926, Latreille 1802, 1810, Schaum 1850, Winkler 1924-1932) napravljeni su na temelju ondašnjih znanja, a to je u najvećoj mjeri bilo samo poznavanje i uspoređivanje morfologije odraslih jedinki. U radovima nešto novijeg datuma (Basilewski 1973, Jeannel 1941-1942) porodica trčaka promatrana je također s aspekta morfologije imaga, ali je podijeljena na veći broj, često i preko 50 potporodica. Lindroth (1961-1962) je broj potporodica smanjio na 8, ali ih je podijelio na nekoliko desetaka tribusa koji međusobno nisu ujedinjeni. Te tribuse je u supertribuse ujedinio Kryzhanovskij (1983), a tu podjelu prihvaćao je veliki broj autora.
    [Show full text]
  • Acta Universitatis Cibiniensis
    UNIVERSITATEA „LUCIAN BLAGA” DIN SIBIU FACULTATEA DE ŞTIINłE AGRICOLE, INDUSTRIE ALIMENTARĂ ŞI PROTECłIA MEDIULUI ACTA UNIVERSITATIS CIBINIENSIS Seria ŞtiinŃe Agricole Vol. 1, nr. 1 (3) 2003 ISSN 1582-8549 EDITURA UNIVERSITĂłII „LUCIAN BLAGA” DIN SIBIU ACTA UNIVERSITATIS CIBINIENSIS , AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES Vol. 1, nr. 1 (6) / 2006 SUMMARY CUPRINS TABLE OF CONTENTS No. Authors Title of paper Pag. 1 Antonie-Vlad Iuliana, Lucian Teodor The Rhynchitidae and Attelabidae families (Coleoptera, 5 Curculionoidea) from a historic perspective 2 Bahcivangi Ştefan, Stancă-Moise Improvement of management methods of grassland by 16 Cristina, Rusu Mariana, Popa Doina, sheep Simtion Daniela, Moise George, Iancu Ramona 3 Blaga V., Trifa F.S., Bara V., Ungur The mathematical modeling of the electromagnetic 21 P., Cătaş Adriana injection 4 Blaga V., Trifa F.S., Bara V., Ungur The theory from calculation gasoline injection for the 28 P., Cătaş Adriana model suggested by authors 5 Blindu Rodica, Holobiuc Irina Armeria Maritima ssp. Alpina – Ex situ conservation 36 using in vitro techniques 6 Ciobanu Rodica Correlations between the main geological and 44 geographical units of Romania 7 Cristea Alexandru Slot sprayers used for washing agricultural products 55 8 Culea C., Neagu Iuliana, Marmandiu Researches regarding the values of some selection index 62 A., Tăpăloagă Dana in a lying-hen line 9 Fleancu Monica, Chiş I.O., GhiŃă Anca Researches regarding the influence of environmental 68 Florina, Butac Ionela, Gîlcă Mihaela factors on relative water content in apple leafs 10 Iuga Ana-Maria Linguistic Resources in Understanding and Creating 76 Spoken Discourse 11 Mărculescu Angela, Hanganu Daniela, Study on some vegetable oils rich in essential fatty acids- 83 Pintea Adela, Văduva M., Dumitru Omega 3, Omega 6 Mariana, Crăciun Isabela 12 Marmandiu A., RăducuŃă I., The embryo transfer (MOET) and the bulls selection on 90 Marmandiu Carmina, Pîrvu Monica, collaterals favors factors of genetic progress Custură I., Stanciu Mirela, Vlad I.
    [Show full text]
  • Bollettino Della Società Entomologica Italiana
    Poste Italiane S.p.A. ISSN 0373-3491 Spedizione in Abbonamento Postale - 70% DCB Genova BOLLETTINO DELLA SOCIETÀ ENTOMOLOGICA ITALIANA Volume 152 Fascicolo II maggio - agosto 2020 31 agosto 2020 SOCIETÀ ENTOMOLOGICA ITALIANA via Brigata Liguria 9 Genova SOCIETÀ ENTOMOLOGICA ITALIANA Sede di Genova, via Brigata Liguria, 9 presso il Museo Civico di Storia Naturale n Consiglio Direttivo 2018-2020 Presidente: Francesco Pennacchio Vice Presidente: Roberto Poggi Segretario: Davide Badano Amministratore/Tesoriere: Giulio Gardini Bibliotecario: Antonio Rey Direttore delle Pubblicazioni: Pier Mauro Giachino Consiglieri: Alberto Alma, Alberto Ballerio, Andrea Battisti, Marco A. Bologna, Achille Casale, Marco Dellacasa, Loris Galli, Gianfranco Liberti, Bruno Massa, Massimo Meregalli, Luciana Tavella, Stefano Zoia Revisori dei Conti: Enrico Gallo, Giuliano Lo Pinto Revisori dei Conti supplenti: Giovanni Tognon, Marco Terrile n Consulenti Editoriali PAOLO AUDISIO (Roma) - EMILIO BALLETTO (Torino) - MAURIZIO BIONDI (L’Aquila) - MARCO A. BOLOGNA (Roma) PIETRO BRANDMAYR (Cosenza) - ROMANO DALLAI (Siena) - MARCO DELLACASA (Calci, Pisa) - ERNST HEISS (Innsbruck) - MANFRED JÄCH (Wien) - FRANCO MASON (Verona) - LUIGI MASUTTI (Padova) - ALESSANDRO MINELLI (Padova) - JOSÉ M. SALGADO COSTAS (Leon) - VALERIO SBORDONI (Roma) - BARBARA KNOFLACH-THALER (Innsbruck) STEFANO TURILLAZZI (Firenze) - ALBERTO ZILLI (Londra) - PETER ZWICK (Schlitz). ISSN 0373-3491 BOLLETTINO DELLA SOCIETÀ ENTOMOLOGICA ITALIANA Fondata nel 1869 - Eretta a Ente Morale con R. Decreto 28 Maggio 1936 Volume 152 Fascicolo II maggio - agosto 2020 31 agosto 2020 REGISTRATO PRESSO IL TRIBUNALE DI GENOVA AL N. 76 (4 LUGLIO 1949) Prof. Achille Casale - Direttore Responsabile Spedizione in Abbonamento Postale 70% - Quadrimestrale Pubblicazione a cura di PAGEPress - Via A. Cavagna Sangiuliani 5, 27100 Pavia Stampa: Press Up s.r.l., via E.Q.
    [Show full text]