BOARD OF DIRECTORS Board Meeting Packet

February 5, 2019 Clerk of the Board YOLANDE BARIAL KNIGHT (510) 544-2020 PH MEMO to the BOARD OF DIRECTORS (510) 569-1417 FAX EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT

East Bay Regional Park District Board of Directors

AYN WIESKAMP The Regular Session of the FEBRUARY 5, 2019 President - Ward 5 Board Meeting is scheduled to commence at 1:00 p.m. at the EBRPD Administration Building, ELLEN CORBETT 2950 Peralta Oaks Court, Oakland Vice-President - Ward 4 DEE ROSARIO Treasurer - Ward 2 COLIN COFFEY Secretary - Ward 7 Respectfully submitted, WHITNEY DOTSON Ward 1 DENNIS WAESPI Ward 3 BEVERLY LANE Ward 6 ROBERT E. DOYLE ROBERT E. DOYLE General Manager General Manager

2950 Peralta Oaks Court Oakland, CA 94605-0381 (888) 327-2757 MAIN (510) 633-0460 TDD (510) 635-5502 FAX ebparks.org AGENDA

REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 5, 2019 BOARD OF DIRECTORS EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT The Board of Directors of the East Bay Regional Park 11:00 a.m. ROLL CALL (Board Conference Room) District will hold a regular meeting at District’s PUBLIC COMMENTS Administration Building, 2950 Peralta Oaks Court, Oakland, CLOSED SESSION CA, commencing at 11:00 a.m. for Closed Session and 1:00 p.m. for Open Session on Tuesday, A. Conference with Labor Negotiator: Government Code Section 54957.6 February 5, 2019. Agency Negotiator: Robert E. Doyle, Ana M. Alvarez, Agenda for the meeting is Kip Walsh listed adjacent. Times for agenda items are approximate only and are subject to change during the Employee Organizations: AFSCME Local 2428, meeting. If you wish to speak on Police Association matters not on the agenda, you may do so under Public Unrepresented Employees: Managers and Confidentials Comments at the beginning of the agenda. If you wish to testify on an item on the agenda, please B. Conference with Real Property Negotiator Regarding Price and/or complete a speaker’s form and Terms of Payment – Government Code Section 54956.8 submit it to the Clerk of the Board. 1) Agency Negotiator: Kristina Kelchner, Mike Reeves A copy of the background materials concerning these APN/ADDRESS PROPERTY OWNERS PARK/TRAIL agenda items, including any Alameda County material that may have been submitted less than 72 hours before the meeting, is available 048-5658-001-06; Oakland Unity High District-wide for inspection on the District’s 2955 Peralta Oaks Court, School website (www.ebparks.org), Oakland the Administrative Building reception desk, and at the meeting.

1:00 p.m. OPEN SESSION (Board Room) Agendas for Board Committee Meetings are available to the PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE public upon request. If you wish to be placed on the mailing list to receive future agendas for a A. APPROVAL OF AGENDA specific Board Committee, please call the Clerk of the B. PUBLIC COMMENTS Board’s Office at (510) 544- If you wish to comment on an item not on the agenda, 2020. please complete a speaker’s form and submit it to the District facilities and meetings Clerk. comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act. If special accommodations are needed for you to participate, please contact the Clerk of the Board as soon as possible, but preferably at least three working days prior to the 3 meeting. 1:15 p.m. C. BUSINESS BEFORE THE BOARD

1. CONSENT CALENDAR

a. Approval of District Check Listing for the Period of November 19, 2018 Through December 2, 2018 (Auker/Doyle) (Resolution) (No Cost) b. Resolution to Oppose H.R. 179 (Griffith R-VA) – No Increase in Parks (Pfuehler/Doyle) (Resolution) (No Cost) c. Resolution to Support ACA 1 (Aguiar-Curry D-Winters) – Lower Voter Threshold (55%) for Local Revenue (Pfuehler/Doyle) (Resolution) (No Cost) d. Approval of Appointments to the Park Advisory Committee (Pfuehler) (Resolution) (No Cost) e. Approval of Out-of-State Travel for Directors Beverly Lane, Dennis Waespi, Dee Rosario, Ellen Corbett, Colin Coffey and General Manager Robert E. Doyle to attend the Hike the Hill Conference and Meetings on Capitol Hill: Washington, DC (Barial Knight) (Resolution) (Budgeted Funds) f. Authorization to Enter into a License Agreement with the County of Alameda for an At-Grade Public Trail Crossing of the Niles Canyon Railway: Bay Area Ridge Trail – Vargas Plateau to Garin (Dougan/Reeves/Kelchner) (Resolution) (Budgeted Funds) g. Approval of Amendment to Employment Agreement of the General Manager of the East Bay Regional Park District – Oral Report Required (Wieskamp) (Resolution) (Budgeted Funds) h. Authorization to Purchase Replacement Computers from Dell Computer Corporation (Tallerico/Auker) (Resolution) (Budgeted Funds) i. Approval of the District’s 2019 Investment Policy (Spaulding/Auker) (Resolution) (No Cost)

1:30 p.m. 2. ACQUISITION, STEWARDSHIP & DEVELOPMENT DIVISION

a. Authorization to Transfer Funds and Execute a Contract with Questa Engineering Corporation for the Restore Stream Corridor Project: Huckleberry Botanic Regional Preserve (Goorjian/Kelchner) (Resolution) (Budget Change/ Budgeted Funds) 1:45 p.m. 3. GENERAL MANAGER

a. Review of Park District Legislative Priorities for 2019 in Preparation of the Partnership with the National Trail System/Hike the Hill Conference and Meetings on Capitol Hill: Washington, DC (Pfuehler/Doyle)

2:00 p.m. 4. BOARD AND STAFF REPORTS

a. Actions Taken by Other Jurisdictions Affecting the Park District (Doyle) 4 2:15 p.m. 5. GENERAL MANAGER’S COMMENTS

a. Presentation from Public Affairs on Community Outreach

2:30 p.m. 6. ANNOUNCEMENTS FROM CLOSED SESSION

2:35 p.m. 7. BOARD COMMITTEE REPORTS

a. Legislative Committee (01/18/19) (Waespi) b. Operations Committee (10/18/18) (Wieskamp)

2:45 p.m. 8. PUBLIC COMMENTS If you wish to comment on an item not on the agenda, please complete a speaker’s form and submit it to the Clerk.

2:50 p.m. 9. BOARD COMMENTS

3:30 p.m. D. ADJOURNMENT

5 CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS

EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT

Tuesday, February 5, 2019

C. BUSINESS BEFORE THE BOARD

1. CONSENT CALENDAR

a. Approval of District Check Listing for the Period November 19, 2018 Through December 2, 2018 (Auker/Doyle)

RECOMMENDATION

It is recommended that the Board of Directors approve the Check Listing for the period of November 19, 2018 through December 2, 2018.

Per Resolution No. 1992-1-40, adopted by the Board on January 21, 1992, a copy of the Check Listing has been provided to the Board Treasurer for review. A copy of the Check Listing has also been provided to the Clerk of the Board and will become a part of the Official District Records.

6 EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT

RESOLUTION NO.: 2019 – 002 -

February 5, 2019

APPROVAL OF DISTRICT CHECK LISTING FOR THE PERIOD OF NOVEMBER 19, 2018 THROUGH DECEMBER 2, 2018

WHEREAS, District Resolution No. 1992 - 1 - 40, adopted by the Board of Directors on January 21, 1992, requires that a listing of District checks be provided to the Board Treasurer for review;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of the East Bay Regional Park District hereby approves the check listing for the period of November 19, 2018 through December 2, 2018;

Moved by Director , seconded by Director , and adopted this 5th of February 2019 by the following vote:

FOR:

AGAINST: ABSTAIN: ABSENT:

7 AGENDA REGULAR MEETINGS BOARD OF DIRECTORS

EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT

Tuesday, February 5, 2019

C. BUSINESS BEFORE THE BOARD

1. CONSENT CALENDAR

b. Resolution to Oppose H.R. 179 (Griffith R-VA) – No Increase in Parks (Pfuehler/Doyle)

RECOMMENDATION

The Legislative Committee of the Board and General Manager recommend the Board of Directors adopt a resolution to oppose H.R. 179 (Griffith R-VA) – No Increase in Parks.

REVENUE/COST

There would be no cost impact as a result of this action.

BACKGROUND

Representative Morgan Griffith (R-VA) has introduced legislation for no net increase in the total acreage of Federal land under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management, the National Park Service, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service or the Forest Service. This notion is fundamentally opposed to the Park District’s principals.

ALTERNATIVES

None recommended.

8 EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT

RESOLUTION NO.: 2019 - 002 -

February 5, 2019

OPPOSE H.R. 179 (GRIFFITH R-VA) – NO INCREASE IN PARKS

WHEREAS, the Mission of the Park District is that “The East Bay Regional Park District preserves a rich heritage of natural and cultural resources and provides open space, parks, trails, safe and healthful recreation and environmental education. An environmental ethic guides the District in all of its activities.”; and

WHEREAS, Representative Morgan Griffith (R-VA) has introduced legislation for no net increase in the total acreage of Federal land under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management, the National Park Service, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service or the Forest Service; and

WHEREAS, this notion is fundamentally opposed to the District’s principals; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the Board of Directors of the East Bay Regional Park District hereby oppose H.R. 179 (Griffith R-VA) – No Increase in Parks; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the General Manager is hereby authorized and directed, on behalf of the District and in its name, to execute and deliver such documents, and to do such acts as may be deemed necessary or appropriate to accomplish the intentions of this resolution.

Moved by Director , seconded by Director , and adopted this 5th day of February, 2019 by the following vote:

FOR:

AGAINST: ABSTAIN: ABSENT:

9 AGENDA REGULAR MEETINGS BOARD OF DIRECTORS

EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT

Tuesday, February 5, 2019

C. BUSINESS BEFORE THE BOARD

1. CONSENT CALENDAR

c. Resolution to Support ACA 1 (Aguiar-Curry D-Winters) – Lower Voter Threshold (55%) for Local Revenue (Pfuehler/Doyle)

RECOMMENDATION

The Legislative Committee of the Board and General Manager recommend the Board of Directors adopt a resolution to support ACA 1 (Aguiar-Curry D-Winters) – Lower Voter Threshold (55%) for Local Revenue.

REVENUE/COST

There would be no cost impact as a result of this action.

BACKGROUND

This Assembly Constitutional Amendment would lower the voter threshold to 55% for “the construction, rehabilitation or replacement of public infrastructure or affordable housing.” Under the legislation, “parks, open space and recreation facilities” are considered “public infrastructure.” The proposed Amendment, however, seems to specify only “a city, county, or city and county” can incur bonded indebtedness by a vote of 55%. Thus, special districts would still be required to meet the 2/3rds voter threshold. The 55% voter threshold is a concept the District is on record of supporting. Staff and advocates will work to see if “special districts” can be included as eligible.

ALTERNATIVES

None recommended.

10 EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT

RESOLUTION NO.: 2019 - 002 -

February 5, 2019

RESOLUTION TO SUPPORT ACA 1 (AGUIAR-CURRY D-WINTERS) – LOWER VOTER THRESHOLD (55%) FOR LOCAL REVENUE

WHEREAS, the East Bay Regional Park District is a system of regional parks providing open space and public access to the public, and from time to time the Park District seeks voter approval for local revenue to fund construction, rehabilitation or replacement of public infrastructure; and

WHEREAS, this Assembly Constitutional Amendment would lower the voter threshold to 55% for “the construction, rehabilitation or replacement of public infrastructure or affordable housing”; and

WHEREAS, under the legislation, “parks, open space and recreation facilities” are considered “public infrastructure”; and

WHEREAS, the 55% voter threshold is a concept the District is on record of supporting and this sets a positive precedent; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the Board of Directors of the East Bay Regional Park District hereby support ACA 1 (Aguiar-Curry D-Winters) – Lower Voter Threshold (55%) for Local Revenue; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the General Manager is hereby authorized and directed, on behalf of the District and in its name, to execute and deliver such documents, and to do such acts as may be deemed necessary or appropriate to accomplish the intentions of this resolution.

Moved by Director , seconded by Director , and adopted this 5th day of February, 2019 by the following vote:

FOR:

AGAINST: ABSTAIN: ABSENT:

11 AGENDA REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS

EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT

Tuesday, February 5, 2019

C. BUSINESS BEFORE THE BOARD

1. CONSENT CALENDAR

d. Approval of Appointments to the Park Advisory Committee (Pfuehler/Doyle)

RECOMMENDATION

The General Manager recommends the Board of Directors approve the appointment of Louis Andrade, an appointee of Boardmember Dennis Waespi; Lynda Deschambault, an appointee of Boardmember Dee Rosario; Michelle Lacy, an appointee of Boardmember Beverly Lane; Rochelle Nason, an appointee of the Alameda County Mayors’ Conference; Carlyn Obringer, an appointee of the Contra Costa Mayors’ Conference; and Roland Williams, an appointee of the Alameda County Special District Association for terms commencing on January 1, 2019 and ending on December 31, 2020.

REVENUE/COST

There is no cost associated with this action.

BACKGROUND

Per the Park District Board Operating Guidelines, Appendix C, the twenty-one-member Park Advisory Committee (PAC) is established by and for the Board of Directors to provide citizen input into policy matters of the District. PAC members typically serve a two-year term ending December 31.

Board approval of this action would authorize Louis Andrade, Michelle Lacy, Lynda Deschambault, Rochelle Nason, Carlyn Obringer and Roland Williams to serve their first two-year term on the Park Advisory Committee from January 1, 2019 until December 31, 2020.

ALTERNATIVE

No alternatives are recommended.

12 EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT

RESOLUTION NO.: 2019 – 002 -

February 5, 2019

APPROVAL OF APPOINTMENTS TO THE PARK ADVISORY COMMITTEE

WHEREAS, the twenty-one-member Park Advisory Committee (PAC) is established by and for the Board of Directors to provide citizen input into policy matters of the District; and

WHEREAS, Louis Andrade an appointee of Boardmember Dennis Waespi has been nominated to serve his first two-year term; and

WHEREAS, Lynda Deschambault, an appointee of Boardmember Dee Rosario, has been nominated to serve her first two-year term; and

WHEREAS, Michelle Lacy, an appointee of Boardmember Beverly Lane, Ward has been nominated to serve her first two-year term; and

WHEREAS, Rochelle Nason, an appointee of the Alameda County Mayors’ Conference has been nominated to serve her first two-year term; and

WHEREAS, Carlyn Obringer, an appointee of the Contra Costa County Mayors’ Conference has been nominated to serve her first two-year term; and

WHEREAS, Roland Williams an appointee of the Alameda County Special Districts Association has been nominated to serve his first two-year term.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the Board of Directors of the East Bay Regional Park District hereby appoint Louis Andrade, Michelle Lacy, Lynda Deschambault, Rochelle Nason, Carlyn Obringer and Roland Williams for terms which will begin on January 1, 2019 and expire on December 31, 2020; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the General Manager is hereby directed, on behalf of the District and in its name, to execute and deliver such documents and to do such acts as may be deemed necessary or appropriate to accomplish the intentions of this resolution.

Moved by Director , seconded by Director , and adopted this 5th day of February, 2019 by the following vote:

FOR:

AGAINST: ABSTAIN: ABSENT:

13 AGENDA REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS

EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT

Tuesday, February 5, 2019

C. BUSINESS BEFORE THE BOARD

1. CONSENT CALENDAR

e. Approval of Out-of-State Travel for Directors Beverly Lane, Dennis Waespi, Dee Rosario, Ellen Corbett, Colin Coffey and General Manager Robert E. Doyle to attend the Hike the Hill Conference and Meetings on Capitol Hill: Washington, DC (Barial Knight)

RECOMMENDATION

It is recommended that the Board of Directors approve out-of-state travel for Directors Beverly Lane, Dennis Waespi, Dee Rosario, Ellen Corbett, Colin Coffey, and General Manager Robert E. Doyle to attend the Hike the Hill Conference and meet with Congressional representatives on Capitol Hill, Washington, DC from February 9-14, 2019.

REVENUE/COST

Funding for travel and attendance at this conference is available in existing departmental budgets.

BACKGROUND

This request to approve out-of-state travel is in accordance with the Board Operating Guidelines Section IX. C. 10: “Out of State Travel. Travel for conferences or seminars beyond the State’s boundaries by the Board of Directors, General Manager, Assistant General Manager of Finance & Management Services/CFO and Clerk of the Board requires specific prior authorization by the Board of Directors.”

Park District representatives will be meeting with its Washington legislative advocates and Congressional representatives to discuss various issues of interest to the Park District and attend the Hike the Hill Conference.

ALTERNATIVES

No alternatives are recommended.

14 EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT

RESOLUTION NO.: 2019 - 002 -

February 5, 2019

APPROVAL OF OUT-OF-STATE TRAVEL FOR DIRECTORS BEVERLY LANE, DENNIS WAESPI, DEE ROSARIO, ELLEN CORBETT, COLIN COFFEY, AND GENERAL MANAGER ROBERT E. DOYLE TO ATTEND THE HIKE THE HILL CONFERENCE AND MEETINGS ON CAPITOL HILL: WASHINGTON, DC

WHEREAS, Park District representatives will be attending the Hike the Hill Conference in Washington, DC and meet with the District’s Washington legislative advocates and various Congressional representatives to discuss issues of interest to the Park District; and

WHEREAS, these meetings have proven to be very productive and a significant opportunity for staff to have keep District issues, priorities and initiatives represented on the national level;

WHEREAS, the Hike the Hill Conference is a joint effort between the Partnership for the National Trail System and the American Hiking Society aimed at increasing congressional and federal agency leader awareness of funding and other needs that sustain the National Trails System. Each February, trail partners and organizations from across the nation meet in Washington, D.C. to discuss current initiatives, legislation, and goals for the future with federal partners, congressmen or their staff, and fellow trail organizations.

WHEREAS, the Board Operating Guidelines require specific prior authorization by the Board of Directors for travel to conferences or seminars beyond the State’s boundaries by members of the Board of Directors, General Manager, Assistant General Manager of Finance & Management Services/CFO or Clerk of the Board;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Directors of the East Bay Regional Park District hereby approve out-of-state travel for Directors Beverly Lane, Dennis Waespi, Dee Rosario, Ellen Corbett, Colin Coffey, and General Manager Robert E. Doyle to attend the Hike The Hill Conference and meetings on Capitol Hill, Washington, DC; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the General Manager is hereby authorized and directed, on behalf of the District and in its name, to execute and deliver such documents and to do such acts as may be deemed necessary or appropriate to accomplish the intentions of this resolution.

Moved by Director , seconded by Director , and approved this 5th day of February, 2019, by the following vote:

FOR:

AGAINST: ABSTAIN: ABSENT:

15 AGENDA REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS

EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT

Tuesday, February 5, 2019

C. BUSINESS BEFORE THE BOARD

1. CONSENT CALENDAR

f. Authorization to Enter into a License Agreement with the County of Alameda for an At-Grade Public Trail Crossing of the Niles Canyon Railway: Bay Area Ridge Trail – Vargas Plateau to Garin (Dougan/Reeves/Kelchner)

RECOMMENDATION

The General Manager recommends that the Board of Directors authorize entering into a license agreement with the County of Alameda (County) for the construction of an at-grade public trail crossing of the Niles Canyon Railway near the intersection of Mission Boulevard and Niles Canyon Road in Fremont. This crossing is needed to connect the Park District’s planned extension of the Bay Area Ridge Trail (Ridge Trail) from Garin Regional Park to the north with the Alameda Creek Trail to the south.

REVENUE/COST

Other than staff time, there will be a $2,500 one-time application fee for this license agreement.

BACKGROUND

The East Bay Regional Park District’s 2013 Master Plan map identifies a potential segment of the Ridge Trail connecting Garin Regional Park to Vargas Plateau Regional Park. In 2014, the Park District acquired recreational trail and emergency vehicle and maintenance access (EVMA) easements across the Louie property to connect Garin Regional Park to the City of Fremont’s Vallejo Mill Historical Park at the west end of Niles Canyon. In November of 2018, the Board of Directors (Board) approved a project to construct roughly five miles of new Ridge Trail from Garin Regional Park to Vallejo Mill Historical Park utilizing the trail and EVMA easements acquired in 2014. Included in the project is a proposed at-grade crossing of the Niles Canyon Railway right-of-way owned by the County and leased to the Pacific Locomotive Association.

The railway separates the Park District’s trail easement on the Louie property from Vallejo Mill Historical Park and the Alameda Creek Trail. Obtaining the right-of-way needed to allow an at- grade crossing of the railway is critical to the trail project and closing this gap in the Ridge Trail.

16 County and Park District staff have agreed on the draft terms of the license agreement. The initial 25-year term of the license may be extended for additional 10-year term by mutual consent of the County and Park District. Following this Board action, the license agreement will be signed by the Park District and sent to the County to be approved by the County Board of Supervisors at a regularly scheduled public meeting in the next few months.

Concurrently with obtaining the trail crossing license from the County, staff is working to obtain the right-of-way needed from the City of Fremont to construct and operate the portion of the Ridge Trail within the City’s Vallejo Mill Historical Park. Once the County and City licenses are finalized, the Park District will seek approval of the crossing from the California Public Utilities Commission that regulates all railroads in California. Completion of this trail project will help hikers, bikers and equestrians access over 50 miles of continuous Ridge Trail from Niles Canyon in Fremont to Kennedy Grove Regional Recreation Area in Richmond.

ALTERNATIVES

No alternatives are recommended.

17 EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT

RESOLUTION NO.: 2019 – 002 -

February 5, 2019

AUTHORIZATION TO ENTER INTO A LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA FOR AN AT-GRADE PUBLIC TRAIL CROSSING OF THE NILES CANYON RAILWAY: BAY AREA RIDGE TRAIL – VARGAS PLATEAU TO GARIN

WHEREAS, the East Bay Regional Park District’s (Park District) 2013 Master Plan map identifies a potential segment of the Bay Area Ridge Trail (Ridge Trail) connecting Garin Regional Park to Vargas Plateau Regional Park; and

WHEREAS, in 2014 the Park District acquired recreational trail and emergency vehicle and maintenance access easements across the Louie property to provide the right-of-way necessary to construct an extension of the Ridge Trail connecting Garin Regional Park to Alameda Creek Trail and the City of Fremont’s Vallejo Mill Historical Park at the west end of Niles Canyon; and

WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2018-11-274, adopted November 6, 2018, the Park District Board of Directors approved a project to construct roughly five miles of new Ridge Trail from Garin Regional Park to Vallejo Mill Historical Park, including a proposed at-grade public trail crossing of the Niles Canyon Railway right-of-way owned by the County of Alameda (County) and leased to the Pacific Locomotive Association; and

WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2012-07-151, adopted July 3, 2012, the Park District Board of Directors authorized negotiations with the County to acquire the right-of-way necessary to construct the proposed trail crossing of the railway; and

WHEREAS, Park District staff has negotiated a 25-year public trail crossing license with the County, said license extendable for additional 10-year term thereafter by mutual consent of the County and Park District; and

WHEREAS, following this Board action, the license agreement will be signed by the District and sent to the County to be approved by the County Board of Supervisors at a regularly scheduled public meeting; and

WHEREAS, obtaining the right-of-way needed to allow an at-grade trail crossing of the railway is critical to the trail project and closing this gap in the Ridge Trail; and

WHEREAS, completion of the planned Ridge Trail project will open access to over 50 miles of continuous Ridge Trail from Niles Canyon to Kennedy Grove Regional Recreation Area;

18 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of the East Bay Regional Park District hereby authorizes the General Manager, on its behalf, to enter into a twenty-five (25) year License Agreement with the County of Alameda for an at-grade public trail crossing of the Niles Canyon Railway; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the General Manager is hereby authorized and directed, on behalf of the District and in its name, to execute and deliver such documents and to do such acts as may be deemed necessary or appropriate to accomplish the intentions of this resolution.

Moved by Director , seconded by Director , and adopted this 5th day of February, 2019, by the following vote:

FOR:

AGAINST: ABSTAIN: ABSENT:

19 LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH ALAMEDA COUNTY East Bay Bay Area Ridge Trail - Vargas Plateau to Garin Regional Park District Fremont, CA Feet [ 0 50 100

Planned Trail Connection APN# 507-480-14-2 Existing EVMA Alameda County Existing Regional Trail

Vallejo Mill 4 W D R o a d Historical Park (City of Fremont)

M is sio n Rd Bl O on vd AT-GRADE ld Cany S ta TRAIL CROSSING OVER te H NILES CANYON RAILWAY wy 2 38 4 8 y w H te ta Pl S ay an s s E

Sycamore St

Essanay Ave

VICINITY MAP

Garin Dry Creek Pleasanton Pioneer Ridge

V Alameda Creek Regional Trail

a

l l e j ACFC&WCD o

Vargas S Quarry d Plateau t lv Lakes B Nil e s 20 O:\GIS\CMcKaskey\Projects_2019\ASD\Trails_Development\BART_VargasCrossing\BART_VargasGD_RR_Crossing.mxd1/23/2019 Date: Page Left Blank Intentionally

21 AGENDA REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS

EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT

Tuesday, February 5, 2019

C. BUSINESS BEFORE THE BOARD

1. CONSENT CALENDAR

g. Approval of Amendment to Employment Agreement of the General Manager of the East Bay Regional Park District (Wieskamp)

RECOMMENDATION

The Board President recommends that the Board of Directors approve an amendment to the Employment Agreement of the General Manager, Robert E. Doyle, of the East Bay Regional Park District to provide for a step increase to his salary based on performance. The amendment will be retroactive to January 1, 2019. Pursuant to the Brown Act, an oral report is required prior to taking action.

BACKGROUND

Effective January 1, 2018, the Park District and Robert E. Doyle entered into an Employment Agreement (Agreement) for a term of three years through December 31, 2020. The Agreement provides that the Board shall conduct an annual review of the General Manager’s performance. Adjustments to the General Manager’s salary are the discretion of the Board of Directors.

The Board recently completed its annual evaluation of Mr. Doyle and has determined that he has had exemplary performance and met and exceeded his annual goals and objectives. As such, the Board has determined that Mr. Doyle shall receive a step increase from Step E to Step F on the District’s Management Salary Schedule, salary range MG 11, as the schedule may be amended from time to time by the Board of Directors.

The Park District and Mr. Doyle have mutually agreed to amend the Agreement as set forth above retroactive to January 1, 2019. The amendment has been reviewed and approved by District Counsel and is attached as Exhibit A. With this amendment, the General Manager’s annual salary as of January 1, 2019 will be $317,928. The General Manager receives the same across-the-board adjustments as the Board of Directors approves for unrepresented management employees as reflected on the applicable salary schedule.

ALTERNATIVES

No alternatives are recommended.

22 EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT

RESOLUTION NO.: 2019 – 002 –

February 5, 2019

APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER OF THE EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT

WHEREAS, effective January 1, 2018, the East Bay Regional Park District and General Manager Robert E. Doyle entered into an Employment Agreement; and

WHEREAS, the terms of the Employment Agreement provide that the Board of Directors (Board) shall conduct an annual performance review of the General Manager; and

WHEREAS, the Board has recently completed its 2018 performance evaluation of Mr. Doyle and has determined that he has had exemplary performance and met and exceeded his annual goals and objectives; and

WHEREAS, as a result of Mr. Doyle’s performance, the Board has determined that the General Manager shall receive a step increase from Step E to Step F on the District’s Management Salary Schedule, salary range MG 11, as said schedule may be amended from time to time; and

WHEREAS, the Park District and Mr. Doyle have mutually agreed to amend the Employment Agreement as set forth above retroactive to January 1, 2019, which amendment has been reviewed by District Counsel; and

WHEREAS, all other terms and conditions of the General Manager’s Employment Agreement shall remain the same; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Brown Act, an oral report was given, as required prior to taking action at the Board meeting;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of the East Bay Regional Park District does hereby approve the attached Amendment No. 1 to the Employment Agreement of Robert E. Doyle, General Manager, East Bay Regional Park District, as presented this day to the Board and authorizes the President and the Clerk of the Board to execute and conclude such agreement on behalf of the District.

Moved by Director , seconded by Director , and adopted this 5th day of February 2019 by the following vote:

FOR:

AGAINST: ABSTAIN: ABSENT:

23 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

This Amendment No. 1 to the Employment Agreement is entered into as of February ____, 2019, by and between the East Bay Regional Park District (hereinafter “District”) and Robert E. Doyle (hereinafter “General Manager”).

RECITALS

WHEREAS, the District and General Manager entered into an Employment Agreement effective as of January 1, 2018; and WHEREAS, Section 5 of the Employment Agreement provides that the Board of Directors shall review the General Manager’s performance on an annual basis and that any salary increases shall be in the discretion of the Board of Directors; and WHEREAS, on December 18, 2018, the District’s Board of Directors conducted an annual performance appraisal of the General Manager and determined that the General Manager has had exemplary performance and has met and exceeded his annual goals and objectives. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties agree to amend Section 5 of the Employment Agreement as follows:

AGREEMENT

5. Compensation. 5.1 Salary. Effective retroactive to January 1, 2019, the General Manager shall receive the base gross salary specified in the District’s Management Salary Schedule, salary range MG11, Step F, as amended by the Board from time to time, and which salary is $317,928/year as of the date of execution of this Agreement.

Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement Page 1 of 2 24 All other terms and conditions set forth in Section 5.1 and in the Employment Agreement shall remain the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed by their respective officers, duly authorized as of the day, month, and year first written below.

APPROVED BY BOARD RESOLUTION NO. ______

EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT ROBERT E. DOYLE

By: ______By: ______Ayn Wieskamp, President General Manager Dated: ______Dated: ______

By: ______Yolande Barial Knight, Clerk of the Board Dated: ______

APPROVED AS TO FORM

By: ______Carol R. Victor, District Counsel Dated: ______

Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement Page 2 of 2 25 AGENDA REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS

EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT

Tuesday, February 5, 2019

C. BUSINESS BEFORE THE BOARD

1. CONSENT CALENDAR

h. Authorization to Purchase Replacement Computers from Dell Computer Corporation (Tallerico/Auker)

RECOMMENDATION

The General Manager recommends that the Board of Directors authorize the expenditure of up to $181,000 for the annual purchase of replacement desktop and laptop computers from Dell Computer Corporation (Dell).

REVENUE/COST

These funds are budgeted and available in the 2019 Information Services Equipment Account No. 101-4150-000-5372. This action would authorize an encumbrance of these funds not to exceed the remaining budget amount of $181,000, for this purpose.

BACKGROUND

Each year, approximately 185 of the Park District computer fleet is replaced as the warranties expire and the equipment becomes obsolete. Staff plans to replace approximately 185 desktop and laptop computers in the District. The estimated replacement cost allows the District to stagger the delivery of equipment, take advantage of extended warranty periods, and reduce the warehousing of equipment.

The Park District uses Dell computers as the standard for desktop use. These purchases are made under the Western States Contracting Alliance (WSCA) Contract No. B27160 pricing; this complies with the State law requirement to bid for equipment purchases. Although bidding is not required, Board authorization is necessary since the total purchase amount exceeds $50,000.

ALTERNATIVES

Should the Board not approve this purchase, the older computers in the District’s inventory would not be replaced in 2019. This action is not recommended.

26 EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT

RESOLUTION NO.: 2019 – 002 -

February 5, 2019

AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE REPLACEMENT COMPUTERS FROM DELL COMPUTER CORPORATION

WHEREAS, the East Bay Regional Park District utilizes desktop and laptop computers to support Park District business and activities; and

WHEREAS, the Park District has standardized purchases equipment from one vendor, Dell Computer Corporation (Dell), to minimize equipment, training and service conflicts; and

WHEREAS, purchases from Dell qualify for Western States Contracting Alliance (WSCA) pricing which satisfies State law requiring bidding for equipment purchases; and

WHEREAS, staff plans to purchase desktop and laptop computers at the cost not to exceed the current 2019 budget balance of $181,000 as part of its annual desktop replacement program; and

WHEREAS, all purchases in excess of $50,000 require approval by the Board of Directors;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of the East Bay Regional Park District hereby authorizes the purchase of desktop and laptop computers from Dell Computer Corporation not to exceed the current budget amount of $181,000, to be funded from the Information Services Equipment Account No.101-4150-000-5372; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the General Manager is hereby authorized and directed, on behalf of the District and in its name, to execute and deliver such documents and to do such acts as may be deemed necessary or appropriate to accomplish the intentions of this resolution.

Moved by Director , seconded by Director , and adopted this 5th day of February, 2019, by the following vote:

FOR:

AGAINST: ABSENT: ABSTAIN:

27 AGENDA REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS

EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT

Tuesday, February 5, 2019

C. BUSINESS BEFORE THE BOARD

1. CONSENT CALENDAR

i. Approval of the Park District’s 2019 Investment Policy (Spaulding/Auker)

RECOMMENDATION

The General Manager and the Board Finance Committee, by unanimous vote on January 23, 2019, recommend that the Board of Directors approve the 2019 Investment Policy for Park District funds.

REVENUE/COST

There is no cost associated with this item.

BACKGROUND

The Board Operating Guidelines specify that the Board Finance Committee monitors the Park District’s investment policies and portfolios, and that in January of each year, the Investment Policy will be reviewed by the Finance Committee and recommended to the full Board of Directors for approval. Investment of District funds is also governed by Section 53600 of the California Government Code and Section VIII (K) of the Board Operating Guidelines.

The Investment Policy was last reviewed by the Board Finance Committee in January 2018 and was approved by the Board of Directors on February 6, 2018.

Last year, the Park District Investment Policy received a California Municipal Treasurers Association (CMTA) Investment Policy Certification. The CMTA Certification Program provides guidance in improving existing investment policies and awards a certificate to those policies that achieve the CMTA standards.

The following edits are suggested for the Park District’s 2019 Investment Policy based upon CMTA review, as well as in response to a change in the California Government Code:

1) SECTION 9: AUTHORIZED AND SUITABLE INVESTMENTS: The Investment Policy previously specified that investments should not exceed 5% per issuer per investment type. The CMTA reviewers suggest that this 5% limit should apply to all

28 securities of a single issuer (e.g. combined investments in Toyota Motor Company corporate notes and asset backed securities should not exceed 5%).

2) SECTION 9.13: ASSET BACKED SECURITIES A California Government Code change went into effect on January 1, 2019 to clarify requirements for investments in asset-backed securities. The changes recommended in the attached Policy are in line with the Code changes.

3) SECTION 13: SELECTION OF DEPOSITORIES CMTA recommended strengthening the language regarding requirements for collateralization of assets. The following sentence has been added: “Under provisions of the Government Code, California banks and savings and loan associations are required to secure the District’s deposits by pledging government securities with a value of 110% of principal and accrued interest.”

4) SECTION 16: REPORTING The CMTA reviewers suggested that the length of time between the end of the quarter and review by the District’s board should be shortened. This has been changed from 6 months to 3 months.

5) SECTION 17: INTERNAL CONTROLS The CMTA suggests that internal controls should be audited by an independent external auditor annually. The District already achieves this standard, so this change codifies a practice already in place.

“Environmental, Social and Governance” (ESG) Investing Criteria The Finance Committee has previously expressed interest in approaches to socially responsible investing. During 2019, staff will investigate whether it might be possible to incorporate ESG investing criteria into the District’s current investment framework. ESG Investing uses a strategy of measuring factors of the environment, human rights, and overall governance. During the year, staff will work with its investment advisors to investigate this concept for possible incorporation into the 2020 Investment Policy.

ALTERNATIVES

There are none recommended.

ATTACHMENTS

A. Resolution B. 2019 Investment Policy with proposed changes in “track changes”

29 EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT

RESOLUTION NO.: 2019 – 002 -

February 5, 2019

APPROVAL OF THE PARK DISTRICT’S 2019 INVESTMENT POLICY

WHEREAS, pursuant to Board Operating Guidelines the Board of Directors shall annually review and approve all changes to the Park District’s Investment Policy, as recommended by the Board Finance Committee; and

WHEREAS, the Board Finance Committee reviewed this item at their meeting on January 23, 2019, and unanimously recommended favorable consideration of this item by the Board of Directors; and

WHEREAS, management responsibility for the District’s investment program is delegated annually by the Board of Directors to the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to the Investment Policy; and

WHEREAS, the Investment Policy is in compliance with Government Code requirements.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of the East Bay Regional Park District hereby delegates responsibility for the District’s investment program to the Chief Financial Officer and approves the attached 2019 Investment Policy, which is effective for the 2019 Fiscal Year and until amended, and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the General Manager and the Chief Financial Officer are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the District and in its name, to execute and deliver such documents and to do such acts as may be deemed necessary or appropriate to accomplish the intentions of the resolution.

Moved by Director , seconded by Director , and adopted this 5th day of February, 2019, by the following vote:

FOR:

AGAINST: ABSTAIN: ABSENT:

30 EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT 20189 INVESTMENT POLICY

1. PURPOSE & POLICY

1.1 The purpose of this Investment Policy for the East Bay Regional Park District (the District) is to provide guidance and direction for the prudent investment of District funds, and to foster the creation of a systematic and controlled investment process. The ultimate goal is to maximize the efficiency of the District’s cash management system, and to enhance the economic status of the District while protecting its pooled cash. The initial step toward a prudent investment policy is to set out a clear statement of fundamental investment direction.

1.2 The District policy is to invest public funds in a prudent manner, providing the highest yield with the maximum security of principal invested, while also meeting the daily cash flow requirements of the District. Also, the District’s policy is to conform to all applicable federal, state and local statutes governing the investment of public funds.

2. SCOPE

This Investment Policy applies to all financial assets of the District excluding: (a) retirement funds held by trustees, but accounted for in the District’s general ledger as a trust fund; (b) OPEB funds held by trustees, but accounted for in the District’s general ledger as a trust fund, (c) employee deferred compensation funds held in a trust and not considered financial assets of the District, and; (d) bond proceeds, the investment of which shall be governed by the provisions of the related bond indentures or resolutions. Financial assets are reported in the District’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, and are accounted for in the following funds:

General Fund Special Revenue Funds Capital Project Funds Debt Service Funds Internal Service Funds Permanent Funds Any new fund created by the District unless specifically exempted.

3. PRUDENCE

The standard of prudence to be used for managing the District’s investment program is California Government Code Section 53600.3, the prudent investor standard which states, “When investing, reinvesting, purchasing, acquiring, exchanging, selling, or managing public funds, a trustee shall act with care, skill, prudence, and diligence under the circumstances then prevailing, including, but not limited to, the general economic conditions and the anticipated needs of the agency, that a prudent person acting in a like capacity and familiarity with those matters would use in the conduct of funds of a like character and with like aims, to safeguard the principal and maintain the liquidity needs of the agency.”

20189 Investment Policy Page 1

31 Investment officers acting in accordance with written procedures and this Investment Policy and exercising due diligence shall be relieved of personal responsibility for an individual security’s credit risk or market risk, provided deviations from expectations are reported in a timely fashion and appropriate action is taken to control adverse developments.

4. RISK TOLERANCE

The District recognizes that investment risks can result from issuer defaults, or various technical complications leading to temporary illiquidity.

4.1 Credit risk, defined as the risk of loss due to failure of the issuer of a security, shall be mitigated by investing in high grade securities and diversification.

4.2 Market risk, defined as market value fluctuations due to overall changes in market price and rate, shall be mitigated by maintaining appropriate diversification of assets.

4.3 Interest rate risk, defined as market value fluctuations due to changes in interest rates, interest rate spreads, or the shape of the yield curve, shall be mitigated by maintaining an appropriate duration strategy and diversification of maturities.

4.4 Custodial credit risk, defined as the risk of loss due to the failure of the custodian, shall be mitigated by prudent custodian selection procedures and requirements, as described in section 14 of this Policy.

5. Objectives

The District strives to maintain in its investment portfolio 100% of all idle funds, given daily and projected cash flow needs. The District’s funds shall be invested in accordance with all applicable District policies and codes, State statutes, and Federal regulations, and in a manner designed to accomplish the following objectives, which are listed in priority order:

5.1 SAFETY. The safety and risk associated with an investment refers to the potential loss of principal, interest or a combination of those amounts. Safety of principal is the foremost objective of the District’s investment program, followed by liquidity and yield. Investments of the District shall be undertaken in a manner that seeks to ensure the preservation of capital in the overall portfolio. The District only operates in those investments that are considered very safe. Also, safety is ensured by diversification, which is required in order that potential losses on individual securities do not exceed income from the remainder of the portfolio.

5.2 LIQUIDITY. Liquidity refers to the ability to sell an investment at any given moment with a minimal chance of losing some portion of principal or interest. The District’s investment portfolio shall remain sufficiently liquid to meet all operating requirements that might be reasonably anticipated. The District will maintain an adequate percentage of the portfolio in liquid short-term securities that can be converted to cash, if necessary, to meet disbursement requirements. This need for investment liquidity may be tempered to the extent the District is able to issue short-term notes to meet its operating requirements. However, in the absence of

20189 Investment Policy Page 2 32 a Debt Issuance Policy approved by the Board of Directors, there should not be a reliance on short-term borrowing to provide liquidity.

5.3 YIELD/RETURN. The portfolio shall be designed to attain a market rate of return throughout budgetary and economic cycles, taking into account the investment risk constraints and the cash flow characteristics of the portfolio, and state and local laws, regulations and resolutions that restrict the placement of short-term funds.

5.4 ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY. The District will not knowingly invest in firms that engage in activities deleterious to the environment.

5.5 PUBLIC TRUST. All participants in the investment process shall act reasonably as custodians of the public trust. Investment officials shall recognize that the investment portfolio is subject and open to public scrutiny and evaluation. The overall program shall be designed and managed with the degree of professionalism required to be worthy of the public trust.

6. DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY

Management responsibility for the District’s investment program is delegated annually by the District’s Board of Directors to the Chief Financial Officer, who shall establish procedures for the operation of the investment program, consistent with this Investment Policy. Such procedures will include appropriate delegation of authority to persons responsible for investment transactions. No person may engage in investment transactions except as provided under the terms of this Investment Policy, and the procedures established by the Chief Financial Officer. The Chief Financial Officer is hereby delegated the authority from the Board of Directors to:

6.1 Enter into agreements with the District’s depository in order to enable the Chief Financial Officer, or his/her designee to execute investment transactions that will involve charges and credits to the District’s bank accounts.

6.2 Enter into banking arrangements with a third party bank trust department to facilitate the third-party safekeeping of District investments.

6.3 Establish operating procedures as deemed appropriate to operate an investment program consistent with this Investment Policy.

Upon the recommendation of the Chief Financial Officer, the Board of Directors may engage the support services of outside investment advisors with respect to the District’s investment program, so long as it can be demonstrated that these services produce a net financial advantage or necessary financial protection of the District’s financial resources.

7. ETHICS AND CONFLICT OF INTEREST

7.1 The Chief Financial Officer and all personnel responsible for authorizing the purchase of investments shall refrain from personal business activities that could conflict with proper execution of the investment program and/or which could impair their ability to make impartial investment decisions. The Chief Financial Officer and all responsible personnel shall disclose to the Board of Directors and the General Manager any material financial interests in any financial institutions that conduct

20189 Investment Policy Page 3 33 business with the District that could be related in a conflicting manner to the performance of the District’s investment portfolio.

7.2 The Chief Financial Officer and all investment personnel, designated by the Chief Financial Officer shall file a Statement of Economic Interests each year as required by California Government Code Section 87203 and regulations of the Fair Political Practices Commission.

8. AUTHORIZED BROKER/DEALERS

8.1 The Chief Financial Officer shall maintain a list of broker/dealers approved for investment purposes, and it shall be the policy of the District to purchase securities only from those brokers and the firms they represent. Each approved broker/dealer must possess an authorizing certificate from the California Commissioner of Corporations as required by Section 25210 of the California Corporations Code. The firms they represent must:

a. be recognized as a Primary Dealer by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or have a primary dealer within its holding company structure, or

b. report voluntarily to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, or

c. qualify under Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Rule 15c3-1 (Uniform Net Capital Rule).

8.2 When purchasing investments, broker/dealers located in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties will be considered when possible provided that their offerings are competitive and meet the criteria established by this Investment Policy.

8.3 Each authorized broker/dealer shall be required to submit and annually update a District approved Broker/Dealer Information Request form that includes the firm's most recent audited financial statements. The registration status and standing of all brokers/dealers shall be verified with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) or other applicable regulatory organizations.

8.4 If the District has an investment advisor, the investment advisor may use its own list of authorized broker/dealers to conduct transactions on behalf of the District.

9. AUTHORIZED AND SUITABLE INVESTMENTS

All investments and deposits of the District shall be made in accordance with California Government Code Sections 16429.1, 53600-53609 and 53630-53686. Although the following includes authorized investments, the Chief Financial Officer shall determine the extent to which they are suitable based upon this Investment Policy and the resources used by the Chief Financial Officer in implementing it.

Limitations identified in the following sections shall be adhered to and the percentage limits and credit criteria shall be measured against portfolio value on the date the investment is purchased. In the event of a credit downgrade below the minimum acceptable credit rating, the District shall require investment advisors engaged in the investing of District

20189 Investment Policy Page 4 34 funds to notify District staff of the downgrade, and provide a plan of action to address the downgrade:

9.1.a. United States Treasury bills, notes, bonds, or strips with a final maturity not exceeding five years from the date of trade settlement. There is no limit on the percentage of U.S. Treasury obligations that may be held in the District's portfolio.

9.1.b. Federal Agency or U.S. government-sponsored enterprise obligations, participations, or other instruments, including those issued by or fully guaranteed as to principal and interest by federal agencies or U.S. government-sponsored enterprises with maturities not exceeding five years from the date of trade settlement. The aggregate investment in securities authorized in this section shall not exceed 75% of the District’s portfolio.

9.2 Eligible Banker’s Acceptances with a maturity not exceeding 180 days from the date of trade settlement, drawn on or accepted by a FDIC insured commercial bank with combined capital and surplus of at least $250 million, rated in a rating category of A-1, its equivalent, or higher by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization (NRSRO) at the time of purchase and whose senior long-term debt is rated in a rating category of “A” its equivalent, or higher by a NRSRO at the time of purchase. No more than 5% of the District’s total portfolio shall be invested in banker’s acceptances of any one issuer, and the The aggregate investment in banker’s acceptances shall not exceed 40% of the District’s total portfolio.

9.3 Prime Commercial Paper with a maturity not exceeding 270 days from the date of trade settlement with the highest ranking or of the highest letter and number rating as provided for by a NRSRO. The entity that issues the commercial paper shall meet all of the following conditions in either sub-paragraph A. or sub-paragraph B. below: A. The entity shall (1) be organized and operating in the United States as a general corporation, (2) have total assets in excess of $500,000,000 and (3) have debt other than commercial paper, if any, that is rated in a rating category of “A”, its equivalent, or higher by a NRSRO. B. The entity shall (1) be organized within the United States as a special purpose corporation, trust, or limited liability company, (2) have program wide credit enhancements, including, but not limited to, over collateralization, letters of credit or surety bond and (3) have commercial paper that is rated in a rating category of A-1, its equivalent, or higher, by a NRSRO. No more than 5% of the District’s total portfolio shall be invested in the commercial paper of any one issuer, and the The aggregate investment in commercial paper shall not exceed 25% of the District’s total portfolio. Moreover, the District shall not purchase more than 10% of the outstanding commercial paper of any single issuer.

9.4 Non-negotiable certificates of deposit with a final maturity not exceeding five years and shall meet the conditions in either paragraph (a) or paragraph (b) below:

(a) Certificates of deposit shall meet the requirements for deposit under California Government Code Section 53630 et. seq. To be eligible to receive District deposits, the financial institution must meet the

20189 Investment Policy Page 5 35 requirements of California Government Code Section 53635.2. Deposits are required to be collateralized as specified under California Government Code Section 53630 et. seq. The Chief Financial Officer, at his or her discretion, may waive the collateralization requirements for any portion that is covered by federal deposit insurance. The District shall also have a signed agreement with the depository per California Government Code Section 53649.

(b) Certificates of deposit placed through a deposit placement service shall meet the requirements of Government Code Section 53601.8. The full amount of the principal and the interest that may be accrued during the maximum term of each certificate of deposit shall at all times be insured by federal deposit insurance.

No more than 5% of the portfolio shall be held in any one deposit or allocated to any one issuer, and the tThe aggregate investment in non-negotiable certificates of deposit and negotiable certificates of deposit shall not exceed 30% of the District’s total portfolio.

9.5 Negotiable Certificates of Deposit with a final maturity not exceeding five years issued by a nationally or state-chartered bank, a savings association or a federal association (as defined by Section 5102 of the Financial Code), a state or federal credit union, or by a federally- or state-licensed branch of a foreign bank. Negotiable CD issuers must be rated in a rating category of “A”, its equivalent, or higher by two NRSROs.

No more than 5% of the portfolio shall be held in any one deposit or allocated to any one issuer, and the tThe aggregate investment in non-negotiable certificates of deposit and negotiable certificates of deposit shall not exceed 30% of the District’s total portfolio.

9.6 Repurchase Agreements with a final termination date not exceeding 30 days collateralized by U.S. Treasury obligations, Federal Agency securities, or Federal Instrumentality securities listed in Section 9.1 above with the maturity of the collateral not exceeding ten years. For the purpose of this section, the term collateral shall mean purchased securities under the terms of the District’s approved Master Repurchase Agreement. The purchased securities shall have a minimum market value including accrued interest of 102% of the dollar value of the funds borrowed. Collateral shall be held in the District’s custodian bank, as safekeeping agent, and the market value of the collateral securities shall be marked-to-the-market daily.

Repurchase Agreements shall be entered into only with broker/dealers who are recognized as Primary Dealers with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or with firms that have a primary dealer within their holding company structure. Repurchase agreement counterparties shall execute a District approved Master Repurchase Agreement with the District. The Chief Financial Officer shall maintain a copy of the District’s approved Master Repurchase Agreement along with a list of the broker/dealers who have executed same.

20189 Investment Policy Page 6 36 9.7 State of California’s Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF), pursuant to California Government Code Section 16429.1. There is no limit on the percentage of LAIF that may be held in the District's portfolio. LAIF investments are subject to statutory limits.

9.8 California Asset Management Trust (CAMP), as long as the portfolio is rated among the top two rating categories by a NRSRO. There is no limit on the percentage of CAMP that may be held in the District's portfolio.

9.9 Medium Term Notes issued by corporations organized and operating within the United States or by depository institutions licensed by the United States or any state and operating within the United States with a final maturity not exceeding five years from the date of trade settlement. These notes must have a rating in a rating category of “A” its equivalent, or higher by a NRSRO. No more than 5% of the District’s total portfolio shall be invested in medium term notes of any one issuer, and ttThe aggregate investment in medium term notes shall not exceed 30% of the District’s total portfolio.

9.10 Money Market Funds registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 that (1) are “no-load” (meaning no commission or fee shall be charged on purchases or sales of shares); (2) have a constant net asset value per share of $1.00; (3) invest only in the securities and obligations authorized by state statute and (4) have attained the highest ranking or the highest letter and numerical rating provided by at least two NRSROs, or retained an investment advisor registered or exempt from registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission with not less than five year’s experience managing money market mutual funds with assets under management in excess of $500 million dollars. No more than 10% of the District’s total portfolio shall be invested in money market funds of any one issuer, and the aggregate investment in money market funds shall not exceed 20% of the District’s total portfolio.

9.11 Municipal bonds that are listed below with a final maturity not exceeding five years from the date of trade settlement and that must be rated in a rating category of “A,” its equivalent, or higher by a NRSRO at the time of purchase. No more than 5% of the District’s total portfolio shall be invested in any single issuer, and ttThe aggregate investment in municipal bonds shall not exceed 30% of the District’s total portfolio.

(a) Bonds issued by the District, including bonds payable solely out of the revenues from a revenue-producing property owned, controlled, or operated by the District or by a department, board, agency, or authority of the District.

(b) Registered state warrants or treasury notes or bonds of the state of California, including bonds payable solely out of the revenues from a revenue-producing property owned, controlled, or operated by the state or by a department, board, agency, or authority of the state.

(c) Bonds, notes, warrants, or other evidences of indebtedness of a local agency within California, including bonds payable solely out of the revenues from a revenue-producing property owned, controlled, or operated by the local agency, or by a department, board, agency, or authority of the local agency.

(d) Registered treasury notes or bonds of any of the other 49 states in addition to

20189 Investment Policy Page 7 37 California, including bonds payable solely out of the revenues from a revenue- producing property owned, controlled, or operated by a state or by a department, board, agency, or authority of any of the other 49 states, in addition to California.

9.12 Supranationals which are United States dollar denominated senior unsecured unsubordinated obligations issued or unconditionally guaranteed by the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), International Finance Corporation (IFC), or Inter-American Development Bank (IADB), with a maximum remaining maturity of five years or less, and eligible for purchase and sale within the United States. Investments under this subdivision shall be rated in the rating category of "AA," its equivalent, or better by at least one NRSRO. Purchases of supranationals shall not exceed 30 percent of the investment portfolio of the District.

9.13 Asset-Backed Securities including equipment lease-backed certificates, consumer receivable passthrough certificates, or consumer receivable-backed bonds of a maximum remaining maturity of five years' maturity. Securities eligible for investment under this subdivision shall be issued by an issuerrated in a rating category of "AA,” its equivalent or better for the issuer's debt as provided and rated in a rating category of "AA," its equivalent or better by at least one NRSRO. Purchase of securities authorized by this subdivision may not exceed 20 percent of the District's total portfolio.

With the exception of US Government securities, including its agencies and instrumentalities, repurchase agreements, money market funds, LAIF, and CAMP, no more than 5% of the investment portfolio may be invested in securities of a single issuer.

10. PROHIBITED INVESTMENTS

In accordance with Section 53601.6 of the California Government Code, the District shall not invest any funds in inverse floaters, range notes or interest-only strips that are derived from a pool of mortgages (Collateralized Mortgage Obligations) or in any security that could result in zero-interest accrual if held to maturity.

11. INVESTMENT POOLS

The District allows investments in two public agency investment pools: LAIF and CAMP (per sections 9.7 and 9.8). Although these pools are long-standing, the Chief Financial Officer will periodically require from each pool, information which will demonstrate operating information and may include the following information:

▪ A written statement of investment policies and objectives. ▪ A description of interest calculations, how they are distributed, and how gains and losses are treated. ▪ A description of how securities are safeguarded (including the settlement process), and how often the securities are priced and the program audited. ▪ A schedule for receiving statements and portfolio listings. ▪ A statement regarding whether and how reserves or retained earnings are used by the pool.

20189 Investment Policy Page 8 38 ▪ A description of who may invest in the program, how often, and what are the sizes and timing of deposits and withdrawals. ▪ A fee schedule and how and when fees are assessed. ▪ A statement of whether the pool is available for bond proceeds, and will it accept such proceeds.

12. MATURITY

The District will not invest in instruments whose maturities exceed five years at the time of trade settlement unless the Board of Directors has provided approval for a specific purpose at least three months before the investment is made.

On February 6, 2018, the Board of Directors granted the District authorization to invest in instruments whose maturities exceed five years. Effective June 1, 2018 instruments whose maturities exceed five years may be purchased. Authorization to purchase instruments whose maturities exceed five years will continue until the Board explicitly revokes the authorization.

The Chief Financial Officer shall be responsible for determining and monitoring an average maturity which meets the District projected cash flow requirements and shall be reported to the Board of Directors as required under State Law.

13. SELECTION OF DEPOSITORIES

The Chief Financial Officer shall maintain a list of be responsible for ensuring that only FDIC insured banks are utilized approved to provide depository and other banking services for the District. To be eligible, a bank must qualify as a depository of public funds in the State of California as defined in California Government Code Section 53630.5 and shall secure deposits in excess of FDIC insurance coverage in accordance with California Government Code Section 53652.

Under provisions of the Government Code, California banks and savings and loan associations are required to secure the District’s deposits by pledging government securities with a value of 110% of principal and accrued interest.

14. SAFEKEEPING & CUSTODY

The Chief Financial Officer shall select one or more banks to provide third- party safekeeping and custodial services for the District, in accordance with the provisions of Section 53608 of the California Government Code. A Safekeeping Agreement approved by the District shall be executed with each custodian bank prior to utilizing that bank's safekeeping services. Custodian banks will be selected on the basis of their ability to provide services for the District's account and the competitive pricing of their safekeeping related services.

The purchase and sale of securities and repurchase agreement transactions shall be settled on a delivery versus payment basis. All securities shall be perfected in the name

20189 Investment Policy Page 9 39 of the District. Sufficient evidence to title shall be consistent with modern investment, banking and commercial practices.

All investment securities , except non-negotiable certificates of deposit, money market funds, LAIF and CAMP, purchased by the District will be delivered by book entry and will be held in third-party safekeeping by a District approved custodian bank or its Depository Trust Company (DTC) participant account.

All Fed wireable book entry securities owned by the District shall be held in the Federal Reserve System in a customer account for the custodian bank which will name the District as “customer.”

All DTC eligible securities shall be held in the custodian bank’s DTC participant account and the custodian bank shall provide evidence that the securities are held for the District as “customer.”

15. DIVERSIFICATION

The District shall diversify its investments to avoid incurring unreasonable risks inherent in over investing in specific instruments, individual financial institutions or maturities. Nevertheless, the asset allocation in the portfolio should be flexible depending upon the outlook for the economy, the securities markets, and the District's anticipated cash flow needs.

16. REPORTING

Periodically, but within six three months of the close of each quarter, the Chief Financial Officer shall submit to the Finance Committee, Board of Directors and the General Manager a report of the investment earnings and performance results of the District’s investment portfolio. The report shall include the following information: 1. Investment type, issuer, date of maturity, par value and dollar amount invested in all securities, and investments and monies held by the District; 2. A description of the funds, investments and programs; 3. A market value as of the date of the report (or the most recent valuation as to assets not valued monthly) and the source of the valuation; 4. Current period earnings and rates of return for short-term and mid-term investments, including comparison to established benchmarks. 5. A statement of compliance with this Investment Policy or an explanation for non- compliance; and 6. A statement of the District’s ability to meet expenditure requirements for six months, and an explanation of why money will not be available if that is the case.

17. INTERNAL CONTROLS

The Chief Financial Officer shall establish a system of internal controls, which shall be documented in writing. The controls shall be designed to prevent loss of public funds arising from fraud, employee error, misrepresentation by third parties, unanticipated changes in financial markets or imprudent actions by employees and officers of the District. Controls deemed most important include: control of collusion, segregation of

20189 Investment Policy Page 10 40 duties, separating transaction authority from accounting and record keeping, custodial safekeeping, clear delegation of authority, written (email or faxed allowable) confirmation of telephone transactions, documentation of transactions and strategies and code of ethical standards. These controls will be audited by an independent external auditor and reviewed on an annual basis by the General Manager.

If an external investment advisor is used by the District, the name of the advisor and the custodial bank used shall be listed as an Addendum to this Policy. The District shall review the internal controls implemented by its Advisor on an annual basis.

18. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS

The investment portfolio shall be designed to attain a market rate of return throughout budgetary and economic cycles, taking into account prevailing market conditions, risk constraints for eligible securities, and cash flow requirements. The performance of the District’s investments shall be compared to an appropriate benchmark.

19. REVIEW, ADOPTION & AMENDMENTS

This Investment Policy shall be reviewed and adopted annually by resolution of the Board of Directors. It may not be altered, amended or changed in any particular way, except by formal resolution of the Board of Directors.

20189 Investment Policy Page 11 41 GLOSSARY OF INVESTMENT TERMS AND INSTRUMENTS

Term Description Asset-Backed Securities An asset-backed security (ABS) is a security whose income (“ABS”) payments and hence value is derived from and collateralized (or "backed") by a specified pool of underlying assets which are receivables. Pooling the assets into financial instruments allows them to be sold to general investors, a process called securitization, and allows the risk of investing in the underlying assets to be diversified because each security will represent a fraction of the total value of the diverse pool of underlying assets. The pools of underlying assets can comprise common payments credit cards, auto loans, mortgage loans, and other types of assets. Interest and principal is paid to investors from borrowers who are paying down their debt. Banker’s Acceptance Normally, a short-term bill of exchange that is accepted as payment by banks engaged in financing trade of physical assets or merchandise. Benchmark A passive index used to compare the performance, relative to risk and return, of an investor’s portfolio. Bond A debt obligation of a firm or public entity. A bond represents the agreement to repay the debt in principal and, typically, in interest on the principal. Broker/Dealer A person or a firm who can act as a broker or a dealer depending on the transaction. A broker brings buyers and sellers together for a commission. They do not take a position. A dealer acts as a principal in all transactions, buying and selling for his own account.

20189 Investment Policy Page 12 42 Term Description CAMP California Asset Management Program (CAMP) provides California public agencies, together with any bond trustee acting on behalf of such public agency, assistance with the investment of and accounting for bond proceeds and surplus funds. For bond proceeds, the objective of CAMP is to invest and account of such proceeds in compliance with arbitrage management and rebate requirements of the Internal Revenue Service. The program includes the California Asset Management Trust, a California common law trust organized in 1989. The Trust currently offers a professionally managed money market investment portfolio, the Cash Reserve Portfolio, to provide public agencies with a convenient method of pooling funds for temporary investment pending their expenditure. The Trust also provides record keeping, custodial and arbitrage rebate calculation services for bond proceeds. As part of the program, public agencies may also establish individual, professionally managed investment accounts. The Pool seeks to attain as high a level of current income as is consistent with the preservation of principal. The Pool purchases only investments of the type in which public agencies are permitted by statute to invest surplus funds and proceeds of their own bonds. Cash Flow A comparison of cash receipts (revenues) to required payments (debt service, operating expenses, etc.). Certificate of Deposit A short-term, secured deposit in a financial institution that usually returns principal and interest to the lender at the end of the loan period. Certificates of Deposits (CDs) differ in terms of collateralization and marketability. Those appropriate to public agency investing include: Negotiable Certificates of Deposit, Non- Negotiable Certificates of Deposit. Commercial Paper A short-term, unsecured promissory note issued by a large corporation. Corporate Notes & Debt instruments, typically unsecured, issued by corporations, Bonds with original maturities in most cases greater than one year and less than ten years. Credit Risk The chance that an issuer will be unable to make scheduled payments of interest and principal on an outstanding obligation. Another concern for investors is that the market’s perception of a corporation’s credit will cause the market value of a security to fall, even if default is not expected. Credit Rating Various alphabetical and numerical designations used by institutional investors, Wall Street underwriters, and commercial rating companies to give relative indications of bond and note creditworthiness. Standard & Poor’s and Fitch Ratings use the same system, starting with their highest of “AAA, AA, A, BBB, BB, B, CCC, CC, C, and D” for default. Moody’s Investor Services uses “Aaa, Aa, A, Baa, Ba, B, Caa, Ca, C, and D”. Each of the services use pluses (+), minuses (-), or numerical modifiers to

20189 Investment Policy Page 13 43 Term Description indicate steps within each category. The top four letter categories are considered investment grade ratings. Duration A fixed-income metric that measures the sensitivity of a bond or portfolio to changes in interest rates. A portfolio or security with a higher duration will experience larger changes in market value as interest rates change. Federal Agency and Obligations issued by a government sponsored entity or a Instrumentality federally regulated institution. Obligations Issuer Any corporation, governmental unit, or financial institution that borrows money through the sale of securities. LAIF The Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF), a voluntary program created by statute, began in 1977 as an investment alternative for California’s local governments and special districts and continues today under the State of California Treasurer’s office. The enabling legislation for the LAIF is Section 16429.1,2,3 of the California Government Code.

This program offers participating agencies the opportunity to participate in a major portfolio which daily invests hundreds of millions of dollars, using the investment expertise of the Treasurer’s Office Investment staff at no additional cost to the taxpayer.

All securities are purchased under the authority of the Government Code Section 16430 and 16480.4. The State Treasurer’s Office takes delivery of all securities purchased on a delivery versus payment basis using a third party custodian. All investments are purchased at market, and market valuation is conducted monthly.

It has been determined that the State of California cannot declare bankruptcy under Federal regulations, thereby allowing the Government Code Section 16429.3 to stand. This Section states “money placed with the State Treasurer for deposit in the LAIF shall not be subject to impoundment or seizure by any State official or State agency.”

Deposits are subject to statutory limits. Liquidity The ease with which an investment may be converted to cash, either by selling it in the secondary market or by demanding its repurchase pursuant to a put or other prearranged agreement with the issuer or another party. Market Risk The chance that the value of a security will decline as interest rates rise. In general, as interest rates fall, prices of fixed income securities rise. Similarly, as interest rates rise, prices fall. Market risk also is referred to as systematic risk or risk that affects all securities within an asset class similarly.

20189 Investment Policy Page 14 44 Term Description Maturity The stated date on which all or a stated portion of the principal amount of a security becomes due and payable. Money Market Fund A type of investment comprising a variety of short-term securities with high quality and high liquidity. The fund provides interest to shareholders and must strive to maintain a stable net asset value (NAV) of $1 per share. Nationally Recognized The formal term to describe credit rating agencies that provide Statistical Rating credit ratings that are used by the U.S. government in several Organization (NRSRO) regulatory areas. Ratings provided by Nationally Recognized Statistical Ratings Organizations (NRSRO) are used frequently by investors and are used as benchmarks by federal and state agencies. Generally, to be considered an NRSRO, the agency has to be “nationally recognized” in the U.S. and provide reliable and credible ratings. Also taken into consideration is the size of the credit rating agency, operational capability and its credit rating process. Some examples of NRSRO’s include Moody’s Investors Service Inc, Standard and Poor’s Inc, Fitch Inc, Dominion Bond Rating Services Limited (DBRS) and A.M. Best Company Inc. Notes Debt obligations of a firm or public entity, usually maturing in less than ten years. Portfolio The combined holdings of all investment assets held by an investor. Repurchase Agreement From the perspective of a local agency, the short-term, often overnight, purchase of securities with an agreement to resell the securities at an agreed upon price. Return The principal gains or losses (realized and unrealized)plus interest on an investment or portfolio of investments. In certain unfavorable market environments or due to risk factors, income derived from principal and interest may be less than the original amount invested. Risk The uncertainty of maintaining the principal or interest associated with an investment due to a variety of factors. State & Local The combined deposits of state and local agencies organized and Investment Pools operated by the state treasurer or a Joint Powers Agreement between local agencies. Deposits of various participating local agencies are pooled and invested. Each agency’s returns are based upon their share of the amount invested in the pool. This increases investment efficiencies, decreases costs, provides liquidity, and utilizes investment expertise of the pool managers. Supranational A supranational entity is formed by two or more central governments with the purpose of promoting economic development for the member countries. Supranational institutions finance their activities by issuing debt, such as supranational bonds. Examples of supranational institutions include the European Investment Bank and the World Bank. Similarly to the government bonds, the bonds issued by these institutions are considered direct obligations of the issuing nations and have a high credit rating.

20189 Investment Policy Page 15 45 Term Description Yield to Maturity The rate of income return on an investment, minus any premium above par or plus any discount with the adjustment spread over the period from the date of the purchase to the date of maturity of the bond.

20189 Investment Policy Page 16 46 ADDENDUM A– ADVISOR AND CUSTODY

The District has engaged PFM Asset Management LLC to provide investment advisory services. The District is aware the ongoing review and analysis of its investment advisor is just as important as the due diligence implemented during the manager selection process. The performance of the investment manager will be monitored on an ongoing basis and the District will review the internal controls of its advisor on an annual basis.

The District has engaged U.S. Bank National Association and Union Bank to provide custodial services. The District will review the internal controls of its custodian on an annual basis.

2018 Investment Policy Addendum A-1 47 ACQUISITION STEWARDSHIP DEVELOPMENT AGENDA REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS

EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT

Tuesday, February 5, 2019

C. BUSINESS BEFORE THE BOARD

2. ACQUISITION, STEWARDSHIP & DEVELOPMENT DIVISION

a. Authorization to Transfer Funds and Execute a Contract with Questa Engineering Corporation for the Restore Stream Corridor Project: Huckleberry Botanic Regional Preserve (Goorjian/Kelchner)

RECOMMENDATION

The General Manager recommends that the Board of Directors:

1. Authorize the transfer of funds from the Mitigate Routine Maintenance Project into the Restore Stream Corridor Project at Huckleberry Botanic Regional Preserve; and

2. Authorize executing a contract not to exceed $75,000 with Questa Engineering Corporation (Questa) of Richmond, California, for design and supporting services for the Restore Stream Corridor Project.

REVENUE/COST

The Mitigate Routine Maintenance Project budget was approved by Resolution No. 2018-12-313, established for implementing projects which mitigate the East Bay Regional Park District’s (Park District) impacts to U.S. waters, as required by the San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board for the Park District’s Routine Maintenance Permit.

Park District staff has identified a portion of the San Leandro Creek corridor as a restoration site that provides habitat values appropriate for mitigation. This action requests the transfer of funds from the Mitigate Routine Maintenance Project (#573100) into the Restore Stream Corridor Project at Huckleberry Botanic Regional Preserve, as shown below, as well as use of a portion of these funds to execute a contract with Questa for project design and support.

TRANSFER FROM Mitigate Routine Maintenance Project (No. 573100) $ 100,000 Encumbrances and Expenditures to Date 0 TOTAL AVAILABLE FOR TRANSFER $ 100,000

48 TRANSFER TO Restore Stream Corridor Project (No. 159000) $ 0

TOTAL AVAILABLE BALANCE $ 0

USE OF FUNDS Consulting services contract with Questa $ 75,000 Other project costs including project management and staff time 25,000 BALANCE REMAINING $ 0

BACKGROUND

This Project will restore a portion of the San Leandro Creek corridor, which flows through a 30- foot long by 3-foot diameter corrugated metal pipe culvert beneath the Pinehurst Trail, located 0.15 miles west of the Lower Pinehurst Trailhead in Huckleberry Botanic Regional Preserve. During the winter storms of 2016-2017, debris and sediment brought down by the heavy runoff blocked the culvert, causing storm water to overtop and erode the trail.

In addition to being inadequately sized to protect the trail, the culvert is a significant fish passage barrier during certain flows. This Project will remove the culvert, restore the stream corridor, and provide a trail crossing that does not restrict the channel flow or fish passage. The restoration design would address sediment transport, fish passage, climate change resiliency, and riparian habitat.

In November 2018, the Park District solicited proposals for environmental consulting services for the Restore Stream Corridor Project (Project) by posting a Request for Proposals to its public online Plan Room. Five proposals were submitted, and a selection committee comprised of Park District staff received presentations from the two most responsive firms. Questa was selected by the committee as the most qualified firm.

Questa’s scope of services for the Project will include topographic surveying, geotechnical investigation, hydrologic and hydraulic analysis, design, developing a habitat mitigation monitoring plan, and providing bidding and construction support.

ALTERNATIVES

No alternatives are recommended.

49 EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT

RESOLUTION NO.: 2019 – 002 -

February 5, 2019

AUTHORIZATION TO TRANSFER FUNDS AND EXECUTE A CONTRACT WITH QUESTA ENGINEERING CORPORATION FOR THE RESTORE STREAM CORRIDOR PROJECT: HUCKLEBERRY BOTANIC REGIONAL PRESERVE

WHEREAS, the corrugated metal pipe culvert that allows the San Leandro Creek to pass below Pinehurst Trail in Huckleberry Botanic Regional Preserve is inadequately sized and is a fish passage barrier during certain flows; and

WHEREAS, the East Bay Regional Park District (Park District) desires to remove the culvert, restore the stream corridor, and provide a trail crossing that does not restrict the channel flow or fish passage; and

WHEREAS, the restoration design would address sediment transport, fish passage, climate change resiliency, and riparian habitat; and

WHEREAS, restoration of the stream corridor (Project) is being proposed as mitigation, required by the San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board for the Park District’s Routine Maintenance Permit (Permit) for Park District impacts to U.S. waters; and

WHEREAS, the Park District advertised a Request for Proposals on November 26, 2018, for consulting services for the Project including topographic surveying, geotechnical investigation, hydrologic and hydraulic analysis, design, developing a habitat mitigation monitoring plan, and providing bidding and construction support; and

WHEREAS, five (5) firms submitted responses and two (2) firms provided presentations to a selection committee comprised of Park District staff; and

WHEREAS, after evaluating the firms, the Park District determined Questa Engineering Corporation of Richmond, California, to be the most qualified firm, with a contract amount not to exceed $75,000; and

WHEREAS, funds were established by Resolution No. 2018-12-313 within the Mitigate Routine Maintenance Project (No. 573100) for permit mitigation purposes, and are available for transfer into a new Project account, Restore Stream Corridor Project (No. 159000);

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of the East Bay Regional Park District authorizes the transfer of $100,000 from the Mitigate Routine Maintenance Project (No. 573100) into the Restore Stream Corridor Project (No. 159000) at Huckleberry Botanic Regional Preserve, as noted in the Budget Change Form attached hereto; and

50 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors hereby authorizes staff to execute a consulting services contract with Questa Engineering Corporation for an amount not to exceed $75,000, to be paid out of the Restore Stream Corridor Project (No. 159000); and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the General Manager is hereby authorized and directed, on behalf of the Park District and in its name, to execute and deliver such documents and such acts as may be deemed necessary or appropriate to accomplish the intentions of this resolution.

Moved by Director , seconded by Director , and adopted this 5th day of February, 2019 by the following vote:

FOR:

AGAINST: ABSTAIN: ABSENT:

51 Restore Stream Corridor Project Huckleberry Botanic Regional Preserve East Bay Feet Regional Park District Contra Costa County [ 0 500 1,000

E Park Entrance Exit 7B SA Staging Area

WI Walk in Entrance/Gate

Sibley District Roads & Trails Fi sh Volcanic Ra n 24 ch } Rd

Grizzly Peak Blvd SA

Sibley Volcanic

WI r

Te y WI a RESTORE w Sibley d STREAM a Volcanic o CORRIDOR r B E PROJECT

Huckleberry Botanic

SA Sibley Volcanic WI

S ky P line in Blvd ehur st R d

Rd Snake

Location Map SA

¨¦§13

T r a f a Redwood lg a r Dr SA P ot l As c O:\GIS\CMcKaskey\Projects_2019\ASD\DesignConstruction\BoardMaps\HP_CreekRestoration\HP_CreekRestoration.mxd 1/17/2019 Date: 52 SA Page Left Blank Intentionally

53 EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT BUDGET CHANGE FORM

NEW APPROPRIATIONS BUDGET TRANSFERS New Appropriations X Between Funds From New Revenues X Between Projects DECREASE BUDGET ACCOUNT AMOUNT INCREASE BUDGET ACCOUNT AMOUNT Account Name: Other Than Asset Fund- Account Name: Capital Fund-Design Stewardship Department-District Wide- Department-Sibley Claremont Mitigate Routine Maintenance-General Huckleberry-Restore Stream Corridor- Fund-Construction Contract General Fund-Design/Project Management Account: 336-7420-000-6191/ 573100 Account: 333-7120-134-7020/ 159000 DS10-009 $ 100,000 DS10-004 $ 25,000 Account Name: Capital Fund-Design Department-Sibley Claremont Huckleberry-Restore Stream Corridor- General Fund-Consultants

Account: 333-7120-134-7020/ 159000 DS10-005 $ 75,000 TRANSFERS BETWEEN FUNDS Account Name: TRANSFER OUT: Account Name: TRANSFER IN: Capital Other Than Asset Fund-Non Fund-Non Departmental-District Wide- Departmental-District Wide-Transfer Out Transfer In

336-9110-000-9980 $ 100,000 333-9110-000-3980 $ 100,000 As being presented at the Board of Directors meeting on February 5, 2019 the General Manager recommends that the Board of Directors approve the transfer between projects 573100 to 159000 in the amount of $100,000.

As approved at the Board of Directors Meeting on date: 2/5/2019 Board of Directors Resolution Number: 2019-2- Posted By: Posted date: Signature:

T:\FINANCE\BUDGET\2019\Changes\573100 to 159000 ASD Huckleberry Restore Stream Corridor

54 GENERAL MANAGER AGENDA REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS

EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT

Tuesday, February 5, 2019

C. BUSINESS BEFORE THE BOARD

3. GENERAL MANAGER

a. Review of Park District Legislative Priorities for 2019 in Preparation of the Partnership with the National Trail System/Hike the Hill Conference and Meetings on Capitol Hill: Washington, DC (Pfuehler/Doyle)

RECOMMENDATION

The General Manager recommends that the Board of Directors review Park District Legislative Priorities for 2019, and priority topics for discussion during the Partnership for the National Trail System’s visit to be held in Washington, D.C. from February 9 – 14, 2019.

REVENUE/COST

All related costs are included in the 2019 Adopted Budget.

BACKGROUND

The Board annually meets to discuss legislative priorities and priority topics for discussion during the Partnership for the National Trail System’s visit to be held in Washington, D.C. in February 2019.

The Board Legislative Committee reviewed and commented on theses priorities at their January 18, 2019 meeting.

55 BOARD AND STAFF REPORTS AGENDA REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS

EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT

Tuesday, February 5, 2019

C. BUSINESS BEFORE THE BOARD

4. BOARD AND STAFF REPORTS

a. Actions Taken By Other Jurisdictions Affecting the Park District (Doyle)

Contra Costa County – Marsh Creek Corridor Multi-Use Trail Study

On January 22, 2019, the Contra Costa Board of Supervisors approved and authorized a nearly $300,000 contract with Fehr & Peers to assist the Contra Costa County Conservation and Development Department in developing and studying the feasibility of multi-use trail concepts for the Marsh Creek Road Corridor. The study will explore opportunities to develop a 13- mile-long multi-use trail through the corridor aligned with Marsh Creek Road, between Clayton and Brentwood. This study will seek to develop a project that closes the gap in the multi-use trail between Round Valley Regional Preserve and the City of Clayton.

City of Pittsburg – Regional Trails Cooperative Funding Agreement

On January 22, 2019, the Pittsburg City Council adopted a resolution approving a cooperative funding agreement between the East Bay Regional Park District and the Pittsburg Redevelopment Agency successor agency to ensure the completion of trail projects located in the city. The Park District and former Redevelopment Agency entered into a fiscal agreement in connection with an amendment to the Los Medanos Community Development Project in 1993. The former Redevelopment Agency agreed to provide $500,000 (with approximately $50,000 in accrued interest) in financial assistance to the Park District for improvements of regional facilities. In California, all redevelopment agencies were dissolved effective February 1, 2012. Since the 1993 fiscal agreement is an enforceable obligation, the successor agency, the City of Pittsburg, is responsible to fund the Park District’s improvements to the regional facilities, including the Delta De Anza Trail and the trails within Black Diamond Mines and Sky Ranch.

56

Page Left Blank Intentionally

57 Event Calendar February 2019 Board Meeting Date: February 5, 2019

Date Day Time Event Location Sponsoring Organization February 9 Saturday 10:30 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. Love the Bay Beach Clean-up Crab Cove Visitor EBRPD Center February 16 Saturday 8:00 a.m. - 10:30 a.m. Wildlife Volunteers - Martin Luther King Jr: EBRPD Shorebird Sanctuary Swan Way Park Entrance February 16 Saturday 1:00 p.m. - 3:30 p.m. Wildlife Volunteers - CA Black Point Pinole: Giant Road EBRPD 58 Rail Habitat Helper Staging Area February 17 Sunday 9:00 a.m. - 11:00 a.m. The Great Backyard Bird Shadow Cliffs, Lakeside EBRPD Count picnic area February 23 Saturday 9:00 a.m. - 12:30 p.m. Multi-Cultural Wellness Walk Quarry Lakes EBRPD GM COMMENTS AGENDA REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS

EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT

Tuesday, February 5, 2019

C. BUSINESS BEFORE THE BOARD

5. GENERAL MANAGER’S COMMENTS

STAFF PRESENTATION Public Affairs Assistant General Manager Carol Johnson will present on 2019 Community Relations and the Park District’s 85th Anniversary.

GM COMMENTS OPERATIONS DIVISION Interpretive and Recreation Services Department Community Outreach: On December 18, staff led the final outreach program of 2018, for a total of 91 programs, serving 4,348 participants, held in 2018.

Cultural Services: On January 2, staff conducted a Vasco Caves pictograph site monitoring training for the Black Diamond, Big Break, and Sunol interpretive staff.

Northwest Region Crab Cove: On December 15, staff was recognized, along with Maintenance and Skilled Trades and Roberts park staff, for their contributions to the development of the Old Growth Redwood Heritage Viewing Deck and Interpretive exhibit at the deck’s unveiling at Roberts Park.

On December 22, the Holiday Traditions Open House and Holiday Storytime events attracted nearly 120 visitors to the Visitor Center.

Mobile Education: On December 15, staff led the Adventure Crew/Richmond Rangers to Tilden Park and conducted a service project to remove invasive plants.

Outdoor Recreation: On January 3 and 4, ten participants attended the 2019 Youth Employment Workshop. Staff collaborated on this special event designed for returning participants from past teen programs.

Tilden Nature Area: On December 31, staff completed a year-long study of park use, using pedestrian counters to measure visitation for the Environmental Education Center (EEC), Little Farm, and surrounding trails.

59 Southeast Region Ardenwood: On January 1, a total of 221 visitors attended the New Year’s Day Butterfly Discovery program. Though the Monarchs returned in much smaller numbers, possibly due to broad issues of habitat loss and climate related stressors, visitors remained enthusiastic and motivated to learn about what they can do to help.

During the month of December, the farm also welcomed eight new Suffolk lambs.

Big Break: On January 2, Eagle Scout candidate Joshua Gamez and colleagues installed seven bat boxes around the shoreline and provided an additional box to be used for interpretive purposes.

On January 5, staff hosted 40 guests at the Visitor Center’s first Family Game Night Campfire program. Staff held a successful night indoors despite the rain.

Black Diamond: From December 30 through January 1, staff served 238 people at the historic Sidney Flat Visitor Center, and 217 people through roving and interpretive programs.

Community Services & Volunteers: On December 15, staff hosted Salesforce employees for a Redwood tree planting project at Sibley. Twelve volunteers planted 16 redwood trees as part of a reforesting and fuels hazard abatement project. In 2018, a total of 11,669 volunteers contributed 91,770 hours of service to the Park District.

Sunol: From December 18 through 21, and on December 30, staff were trained and certified as Certified Interpretive Guides (CIG) through the National Association for Interpretation (NAI).

Park Operations Department Delta Unit Contra Costa Trails, Lafayette-Moraga Trail: During the month of December, staff and a Civicorps crew maintained trails through extensive vegetation management which included raking and bagging leaves, and pruning and chipping branches. A grand total of 7,460 pounds of green waste was trimmed and pruned during the project, with 6,260 pounds chipped and composted along the trail, and 1,200 pounds of raked leaves taken to the green waste recycling center for processing.

Interpretive Parklands Unit Black Diamond Mines: On December 4 and 5, staff installed rock anchor and ascension rope which enabled engineers to access areas of the new coal seam exhibit. Staff removed a wooden rockfall barrier and shoveled five yards of material out of the area for the exhibit pillar box installation.

Parkland Unit Huckleberry: In December, staff completed the installation of decorative boulders, an irrigation line, and planting of native seedlings. The work was funded through Measure CC.

60 Botanic Garden: In December, a fence and five water tanks were installed for supplemental water storage. Funding was provided by climate contingency funds and the Regional Parks Foundation. The project added approximately 7,500-gallon capacity of untreated water storage to irrigate portions of the western side of the garden, which include the Sierra, Redwood, and Temperate Rain Forest sections. The increased water storage will aid the garden during drought conditions.

Shoreline Unit Hayward Shoreline: In late December, a portion of the San Francisco Bay Trail was closed to provide necessary repairs to two bridges in Cogswell Marsh. Ten support pilings were reinforced to stabilize the bridges.

Lakes Unit Quarry Lakes: On December 30, the Annual Brazen New Year’s Eve Half Marathon took place with 1,164 attendees for a 10K and 5K run. The youngest participants were three-year old twins, and the oldest participant was 91 years old.

Recreation Areas Alternative Work Program - Del Valle: During the month of December, staff continued the trail repair and widening along Oak Grove Trail and completed the first 350-feet of the trail from the trailhead at Cedar Camp.

Roberts: During the month of December, staff installed 300-feet of split-rail fencing along the forest as part of resource protection efforts.

Maintenance and Skilled Trades Department Pavement Maintenance Preservation Program District-wide: Staff began scopes and prepared bid documents for the Park District’s prioritized 2019 paving projects.

Roads and Trails District-wide: Staff focused on Storm Water Pollution Prevention (SWPP) tasks from recently completed projects. Staff is also scoping the 2019 Trails Creeks Ponds (TCP) projects.

Sanitation and Recycling District-wide: Staff selected a consultant to implement the Park District’s Solid Waste Reduction Program (SWRP).

South County: In response to the recent rain events, staff inspected the Corporation Yard for SWPP compliance and entered information into the Mapistry software program. Work included general cleaning of drop inlet filters and visual inspections to prohibit potential sources of runoff.

North County Trades Contra Loma: Staff completed the installation of new lockers at the Public Safety Substation.

61 Miller/Knox: Trades and Water Utilities staff replaced the Bernardi House lift station check valves.

Tilden Nature Area: Staff refurbished and painted the rusting restroom doors at the Little Farm.

South County Trades Anthony Chabot: Staff installed three new backflow devices at the campgrounds to replace the defective units that could not pass annual testing and inspection.

Las Trampas: The Little Hills Ranch main gates were replaced with newly built gates.

Quarry Lakes: A new porch cover was installed at the park office to prevent water damage at the entry.

Water Utilities Del Valle: Staff completed installation of the solar powered tank mixer on the west side water storage tank. Water quality has greatly improved.

District-wide: Staff worked with Sanitation technicians to perform the annual cleaning and service of the Park District’s wastewater pumping systems.

Las Trampas: Staff performed a complete overhaul of the swimming pool pump, chemical feed, and filtration system at Little Hills.

62 BOARD COMMITTEE REPORTS AGENDA REGULAR MEETINGS BOARD OF DIRECTORS

EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT

Tuesday, February 5, 2019

C. BUSINESS BEFORE THE BOARD

7. BOARD COMMITTEE REPORTS

a. Board Legislative Committee (1.18.2019) (Waespi)

Present

Board: Dennis Waespi, Colin Coffey, Ellen Corbett

Staff: Robert E. Doyle, Erich Pfuehler, Lisa Baldinger, Debra Auker, Jeff Rasmussen, Rachel Sater, Yulie Padmore, Nika Hoffman

Consultants: Doug Houston

Public: Eric Holmes, Rick Rickard

This meeting was called to order at 12:46 pm.

I. STATE LEGISLATION / OTHER MATTERS A. NEW LEGISLATION 1. ACA 1 – Lower Voter Threshold (55%) for Local Revenue (Aguiar-Curry D- Winters) Advocate Doug Houston stated this bill is constitutional amendment. There have been many versions over the last several years. It seeks to alter voter threshold on bonded indebtedness to 55% and decrease threshold on special taxes for cities and counties. Special Districts are currently excluded from the bill. The Park District staff proposes working with the California Special Districts Association to amend the bill to include Special Districts as it moves forward.

The Board Legislative Committee voted unanimously to SUPPORT.

2. Other Matters

B. OTHER STATE MATTERS 1. Newsom Appointments and State Budget Houston stated Governor Gavin Newsom was sworn into office earlier this month and has been proactive in appointing key positions as they relate to the Park District, including Secretary of Resources. General Manager Robert E. Doyle mentioned many of the new appointees are from Oakland and familiar with the Park District. Houston continued the state budget is higher than anticipated. Newsom’s proposal is a 4% increase over the previous Governor’s. The new Governor is

63 also likely to continue Rainy Day Fund investments.

Still under consideration, AB 2126 would create four new fire crews in the State of California. District Staff and Houston have been working with Senator Nancy Skinner and the East Bay delegation to encourage East Bay crews. Director Colin Coffey wondered why only $3 million is going toward the California Coastal Commission and Bay Conservation and Development Commission. Houston responded this is the third year of this appropriation level. Government Affairs Manager Erich Pfuehler confirmed it is specific funding for the Bay Area and worth celebrating. Director Dennis Waespi asked when the budget would pass. Houston said June 15th. Director Ellen Corbett wondered how the Water Districts are taking the potential surcharge. Houston said some support, and some oppose.

2. Wildfire Legislation and Funding Houston continued PG&E filed Chapter 11 and he expects more wildfire legislation to move forward. The Governor recently held a press conference on wildfire. Pfuehler provided an overview draft of wildfire protection efforts for which the District would benefit from funding or policy change. Legislative Assistant Lisa Baldinger shared there have been initial conversations with state legislative staff on these funding areas which have been well received.

3. 2020 Resources Bond Houston began, in light of California State Proposition 3 failing in November 2018 by a small percent, there is anticipation for a water bond to be introduced through the legislature. A meeting occurred with Assembly Member Eduardo Garcia to discuss this possibility. The Assembly Member indicated the Speaker has requested he work on a surcharge for clean water infrastructure, which will be his priority in 2019. However, on the Senate side, SB 45 has been introduced as a skeletal resources bond. A handout containing an overview of the legislation was shared.

4. Cap-and-Trade Investment Plan Government Affairs Cap-and-Trade Analyst Intern Nika Hoffman provided an overview of the Cap- and-Trade program and its three investment plans since 2012.

5. Other Matters

II. FEDERAL LEGISLATION / OTHER MATTERS A. NEW LEGISLATION 1. H.R. 179 – No Increase in Parks (Griffith R-VA) Pfuehler shared this piece of legislation would eliminate future acquisitions for the National Park Service, as well as other Department of Interior agencies. This is fundamentally the antithesis of the District’s principals.

The Board Legislative Committee voted unanimously to OPPOSE.

2. Other Matters

B. OTHER MATTERS 1. Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) – Lands Bill Update Pfuehler commented there is a lands package that has been drafted, including the renewal of the Land and Water Conservation Fund, but due to the government shutdown is not currently able to move forward. This package also includes the Transcontinental Railroad bill, which has potential to assist in funding for Niles Canyon. It also includes the Contra Costa Canal and Contra Loma transfer bill. The

64 District will continue to monitor and work with Peter Umhofer in Washington, D.C. The District has also been working with other land agencies in the Bay Area to draw collaborative support in the region. Pfuehler noted since the LWCF expired on September 30, 2018, no additional royalties have been collected for the fund.

2. Other Items

III. SACRAMENTO DAY MEMBER ASKS Baldinger presented an overview of projects and issues as they relate to State Assembly and Senate Districts. Director Coffey requested the opportunity to provide input on the suggest projects and programs.

IV. WASHINGTON D.C. ISSUES / HIKE THE HILL Pfuehler provided an overview of the Park District’s Federal Priorities in preparation for the February 2019 Washington, D.C. advocacy week. Director Corbett questioned when a presentation would be provided to the full Board. Pfuehler confirmed February 5, 2019.

V. ARTICLES

VI. OPEN FORUM PUBLIC COMMENT

VII. BOARD COMMENTS

This meeting adjourned at 3:45 PM.

Respectfully Submitted:

Lisa Baldinger Legislative Assistant

65 Page Left Blank Intentionally

66 AGENDA REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS

EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT

Tuesday, February 5, 2019

C. BUSINESS BEFORE THE BOARD

7. BOARD COMMITTEE REPORTS

b. Operations (Thursday, October 18, 2018) (Wieskamp) Present

Board: Directors Ayn Wieskamp (Chair), Dennis Waespi, Ellen Corbett

Staff: Jim O’Connor, Ruby Tumber, Mimi Waluch, Renee Patterson, Steve Castile, Debra Auker, Kathryn Daskal, Jeff Manley, Joe Sullivan, Cliff Rocha, Kelly Barrington, Lance Brede, Noah Dort, Anne Kassebaum, Denise Valentine

Guests: Kelly Abreu, Ed Stevenson, Evan Buckland

Agenda Item 1: Fish Passage Project Updates with Alameda County Water District (ACWD): Alameda Creek Trail

Lakes Unit Manager Jeff Manley and Park Supervisor Cliff Rocha provided an update on the Fish Passage Project through a PowerPoint presentation. Items in the presentation included an overview of the Alameda Creek Watershed, partnership with ACWD, fish passage projects in progress and future, Fish Ladder Installation at Rubber Dam #3, 2019 Fish Ladder Project at Rubber Dam #1, and direction of fish travel in the creek.

ACWD Manager of Engineering and Technology Services Ed Stevenson commented on the good partnership with Park District staff.

Director Waespi inquired on the cost of the projects. Stevenson replied approximately ten million dollars were exhausted for the improvements for the small project and approximately forty million dollars for the 2019 project. Grant funding for the projects is being sought.

Rocha commented that ACWD staff has been very responsive to Park District staff.

AGM Jim O’Connor inquired on how far the fish will be able to travel once the larger project is completed. ACWD Water Supply Supervisor Evan Buckland replied fish will be able to reach Sunol and the San Francisco Public Utilities (SFPUC) area.

Public Speaker on item 1

67 Kelly Abreu distributed handouts of a water utility section located in the Niles Canyon area and commented on fish not being able to cross the rubber barrier, members of the public trespassing on private property to travel to a off-limits walk site, and the attention created around proposed destruction of the site.

Agenda Item 2: Review Extension of the State of California, California Department of Transportation, Office of Radio Communications License Agreements: Vollmer Peak, Tilden Regional Park

Administrative Analyst Renee Patterson provided an overview of communication license agreements through a PowerPoint presentation. Items reviewed in the presentation included site location, statistics of the primary statewide system, and the Park District staff recommendation.

Director Corbett inquired on how Park District fees compare with market rates. Patterson replied that the Park District is slightly less than average.

Corbett moved to approve the staff recommendation for the extension of the Licensee’s existing two License Agreements with a ten-year term beginning on the “Effective Date” January 1, 2019 with payments of $641.25 per month for one equipment rack and $745.27 for the Base Project radio transmitters, both fees increasing 1.5% each year and an additional annual payment of $350.00 to cover road maintenance. The Park District can expect annual revenue of approximately $7,695.00 and $8,943.24 respectively for these agreements. Waespi seconded. The motion passed unanimously.

Agenda Item 3: Review 2019 Consolidated Fee Schedule: District-wide

Administrative Analyst Noah Dort presented the Committee members with both a comparison and a detailed document that captured proposed changes to the 2019 fee schedule, followed by a detailed review of the items listed.

Director Corbett requested that materials be mailed to the Committee ahead of the meeting for the 2020 schedule review.

Concessionaire Fee Requests Item 2. Del Valle – Outback Adventures Waespi inquired if companies used in the comparison were private or public companies. Dort replied affirmatively. Waespi suggested at some point staff should consider lowering fees, as concessions are already taxed by the Park District. Dort replied the Park District is currently at the lower end (of market fees) for the kayak rentals at Del Valle. O’Connor commented this Park District concession is a supplemental baseline service and have not raised fees since 2015.

Wieskamp inquired if staff has ability to find how each category is progressing throughout the year. Business Services Manager Mimi Waluch commented that Outback Adventures submits a monthly sales reports to staff that displays items line-by-line. Staff has the capability to compare usership from year-to-year.

68 Item 3. Lake Chabot – Redwood Canyon Public Golf Course Wieskamp inquired if the price increase was requested by the concession. Dort replied affirmatively.

Public Use Fee Recommendations Item 9. Del Valle – Cabin Camping Corbett inquired on the cost per night. Dort replied $100.

Item 10. Cull Canyon & Don Castro O’Connor mentioned that although the increase appears significant, it allows groups to pay fees upfront. This has been a significant issue at Don Castro, where some members of reserved groups arrive early, but because the swim area reaches capacity fairly early in the day, additional members of the group who arrive later are often not allowed into the beach area.

Item 11. District-wide – Parks Express Transportation Program Corbett inquired if there are schools who are not able to afford the fees for the bus. Interpretive & Recreation Services Chief Anne Kassebaum explained that there are schools who cannot afford bus fees, however, the Kids Health Outdoor Challenge (KHOC) program allows qualifying schools to receive a free bus. O’Connor commented that the Park District is significantly supplementing this bus service. The Park District seeks to only make minor changes to the program.

Assistant General Manager of Finance Debra Auker commented that the Consolidated Fee Schedule is created in coordination with the Finance and Management Service Department. A survey was conducted, resulting in no request for changes, moving forward the current CFS with no requested changes.

Public Speaker on Agenda Item 3 Kelly Abreu commented on parking fees, cement speed bumps at Coyote Hills, and parking fees at Mission Peak.

Corbett moved the staff recommendation that the Board Operations Committee approve and recommend to the full Board the proposed changes to the Consolidated Fee Schedule, as outlined below. If approved, the requested Consolidated Fee Schedule changes for 2019 should result in an increase of $20,000 in concessionaire fees and an increase of $39,560 in Public Use Fees to the District. Waespi seconded. The motion passed unanimously.

Agenda Item 4: Dumbarton Quarry Update

Assistant General Manager Jim O’Connor provided an update on the status of the Phase I development and operation at the Dumbarton Quarry Campground. Items reviewed in the update included the potential opening date change, code requirements/enforcements, required sprinklers and charging stations, electrical capacity, and staffing needs.

Wieskamp requested to keep the Committee informed on the progress.

69 Corbett inquired if the Committee members can offer assistance by discussing items with colleagues on the City Council. O’Connor replied staff will work through the issues and will seek out the Committee members, if needed.

Corbett inquired if a decision has been made on a concession. O’Connor replied not at this time. Waespi inquired clarification if 10 percent of charging stations are required for the parking lot or campground. O’Connor replied yes. Waespi inquired if that could be appealed. O’Connor replied staff is working through the current process and gaining an understanding of the requirements.

Public Comments There were no public comments.

AGM Comments • Reminder the November meeting date has been changed to November 29, 2018.

Board Comments There were no Board comments.

Meeting adjourned at 2:17 p.m.

Respectfully submitted,

Denise Valentine

70 NEWSCLIPS

Community News Park It: Tilden Fungal Fair coming soon near Berkeley Mushroom varieties from the edible to poisonous spring up every rainy season By NED MACKAY | East Bay Regional Park District PUBLISHED: January 27, 2019 at 5:00 am | UPDATED: January 28, 2019 at 4:31 am

Bernadette Milan/BANG archives Visitors can view hundreds of local mushroom specimens Feb. 3 during the Tilden Fungal Fair at Tilden’s Environmental Education Center near Berkeley. Mushroom varieties ranging from the edible to the poisonous spring up under oak trees and elsewhere every rainy season in the East Bay Regional Park District.

The rainy season is mushroom time in the woods and fields. Mushroom varieties ranging from edible to poisonous spring up under the oaks and elsewhere in the East Bay Regional Park District.

Collecting mushrooms is against the rules in the parklands in addition to being dangerous unless you’re an expert at identifying the edible varieties. However, you can view hundreds of local mushroom specimens during the Tilden Fungal Fair, which is from 10 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Feb. 3 at Tilden’s Environmental Education Center near Berkeley. It’s a chance to meet mushroom experts and attend presentations by guest speakers.

The center is at the north end of Tilden’s Central Park Drive, accessible via Canon Drive from Grizzly Peak Boulevard in Berkeley. Admission to the fair is free, and all ages are welcome. For information, call 510-544-2233.

Oakley: Feb. 2 is World Wetland Day, and the naturalists at Big Break Regional Shoreline in Oakley plan to celebrate it with a walk down the Marsh Creek Trail to see the wetland restoration project at Dutch Slough. It’s an easy stroll of just more than 2 miles. Bring water and a snack. The walk is free, but registration is required. For registration and directions, call 888-327-2757. Select option 2 and refer to program number 23827.

Antioch: It’s “Superb Owl Sunday” on Feb. 3 at Black Diamond Mines Regional Preserve in Antioch. Naturalist Kevin Dixon will lead a walk in search of the wide-eyed wonders from 4:45 to 6:45 p.m. The program is for ages 8 and older. Meet Kevin in the parking lot at the end of Somersville Road, 3½ miles south of Highway 4. For information, call 888-327-2757, ext. 2750.

A plant that’s prolific in the rainy season is Indian Warrior, a pretty, magenta-colored flower with fernlike leaves that springs up under manzanita bushes. Indian Warrior is hemiparasitic; it parasitizes the roots of its host plant, but also can produce its own energy through photosynthesis. You can see it at Black Diamond Mines at the top of the Ridge Trail, up the hill from its junction with the Chaparral Loop Trail. Another location with lots of it is the Manzanita Loop at Sobrante Ridge Regional Preserve in El Sobrante.

San Ramon: This is also the season for newts: those brown-gold salamanders that mate in the streams and ponds this time of year. Naturalist Ashley Adams will lead a newt safari from 10 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. Feb. 3 at Las Trampas Regional Wilderness in San Ramon. Meet Ashley at the north end of

71 Bollinger Canyon Road off Crow Canyon Road for a 1½-mile walk along Bollinger Creek in search of the amorous critters. For information, call 510-544-3249.

Richmond: Naturalist Anthony Fisher leads bird walks on Mondays at various regional parks. His next is from 9 a.m. to noon Feb. 4 at Miller-Knox Regional Shoreline in Point Richmond. Meet Anthony at the first parking lot after the tunnel on Dornan Drive. Call 544-2233 for information.

Alameda: You’ll see a seal colony and other wildlife during a 3-mile walk from 10 a.m. to noon Feb. 3 starting at Crab Cove Visitor Center in Alameda, led by naturalist Michael Charnofsky. Michael will discuss conservation issues and show where to look for the unexpected. Binoculars will be available to loan. Crab Cove is at the end of McKay Avenue off Alameda’s Central Avenue. Call 510-544-3187.

Healthy Parks: World Wetland Day, the newt walk, and the Crab Cove seal viewing are all Healthy Parks/Healthy People activities — a program of outings that provide safe, low-impact physical activity to improve Bay Area residents’ health and well-being through enjoyment of the regional parks. For information, visit the East Bay Regional Park District’s website at www.ebparks.org.

72 Home • Community News EBRPD Seeking Docents Posted: Thursday, January 24, 2019 12:00 am

The East Bay Regional Park District is looking for docents.

Those who enjoy working with children and teaching others about natural and cultural history are invited to apply. The district is looking for people to assist with school programs at Del Valle Regional Park and Shadow Cliffs Regional Recreation Area. Special events, like the spring Wildflower Festival, and other public programming at Sunol Regional Wilderness are also a part of being a docent. For more information or to apply call Naturalist Ashley Grenier at (510) 544-3243 or email [email protected].

The upcoming training highlights Native American cultural history, geology, ecology, and presentation skills. These are the dates and various locations:

Wednesday, February 20 at Sunol Regional Wilderness

Tuesday, February 26 at Shadow Cliffs Regional Recreation Area

Wednesday, February 27 at Del Valle Visitor Center

Sunday, March 3 at Del Valle Campground Amphitheater

Wednesday, March 6 optional enrichment day at MLK Shoreline, Oakland

Monday, March 11 Graduation and Celebration at Sunol Regional Wilderness

Time would be 9 am to 1 p.m. for each.

73 HOME HIKE 10 BEST HIKES IN THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA LIZ DENGLER//JANUARY 22, 2019 Whether you’re looking for an excursion along coastal bluffs or hoping to head to the hills, the Bay Area has a trail for you. With hundreds of hiking opportunities within striking distance of San Francisco, tourists and locals alike will love the variety of trails to choose from.

Offering a unique variety of terrain, the Bay Area is a hiker's dream. An exploration in close proximity to the coast makes for remarkable views of the ocean, hikes through the lush redwood forests offer shade and enchantment, and a trip to the hills provides a mix of open grasslands and forest with far-reaching views of the surrounding area.

This list represents a fraction of the best community-rated options on Hiking Project to get you exploring the Bay Area. With the handy mobile Hiking Project app to help you navigate, all you need to do is to pack a bag for your hike. Just remember to check a park's website for any trail closures and fire restrictions before heading out.

Eagle Peak Out and Back

o Location: Alamo, CA, in Las Trampas Regional Wilderness, 30 miles east of San Francisco o Length: 4.2-miles out and back o Difficulty Rating: Difficult o Best For: A tough hike to outstanding views from Eagle Peak o Dogs: Leashed Las Trampas Regional Wilderness is part of the East Bay Regional Park District. Given its size and location in the hills on the east side of the Bay, the park can feel much more remote and less crowded than other places nearby. There is a great hiking, horse-riding and biking trail system throughout the park, with remarkable views and nature viewing opportunities. If you’re a rock nerd, you'll find that the park holds a rich geological history, including faults, ancient beaches and even fossils.

To begin this hike, park on Camille Avenue near the junction with Camille Lane. From here, look for the Las Trampas to Mt. Diablo Regional Trail and take it heading southeast along Camille Lane. You’ll follow this through the fragrant eucalyptus trees common in the area's neighborhoods. Once you leave the residential areas and start to ascend into the hills, the grade of the trail increases significantly.

You’ll reach the only gate on the hike shortly after passing into Las Trampas Regional Wilderness and shortly before the trail ends at the Madrone Trail. Take a right to follow the wide multiuse Madrone Trail west out of the woods and into a meadow dotted with trees. In less than half a mile, take the Corduroy Hills Trail which branches off to the left. The steep grade of the wide track is significant and sustained, though you shouldn’t encounter too much loose footing along the way.

The trail winds up the ridgeline through open meadow, skirts the edges of the oak woods and passes through more shrubby landscapes as it climbs. The views get better and better, including

74 glimpses of nearby Mount Diablo. About 1.3 miles into the hike, the wide dirt track makes a small loop back on itself, while the Corduroy Hills Trail turns to narrow singletrack which you will continue on to ascend the ridge.

From here, the grade mellows for a bit, giving your legs and lungs a nice respite. However, it steepens again as it makes its last climb to the ridge, dipping in and out of the the trees. When you near the top of Eagle Peak, there is a short spur trail to the left that takes you out to explore the summit, where you can enjoy the views. This hike is especially beautiful near sunrise or sunset when the golden-hour sunlight filters through the trees. After enjoying the scenery, return the way you came.

Hiking Project is a community-built resource with more miles of trail being added every day by members just like you! Sign up to join our ever-growing community and to find your next hike, comment on and rate other trails and share your own hiking adventures.

75

Opinion > Letters to the Editor Letter: Many federal, state and local entities sidestepping wildfire safety measures The team at East Bay Regional Parks' Point Pinole is the exception in forest management. By Letters To The Editor | Bay Area News Group PUBLISHED: January 22, 2019 at 1:10 pm | UPDATED: January 23, 2019 at 4:39 am

Point Pinole Regional Shoreline taken from the San Francisco Bay Trail by Kurt Schwabe, who spent every day last June walking the 330 miles of the shoreline trail. His photos from the trail are at the Bay Model in Sausalito through March 31.Photo by Kurt Schwabe

East Bay Parks’ Point Pinole forest management superior

Many federal, state and local representatives sidestep effective forest management for wildfire safety.

In a notable exception for 40 years, the East Bay Regional Park District’s Point Pinole Park Team has effectively inspected and thinned or cleared brush and trees for wildfire safety.

Charlie Middleton San Pablo

76 Community News Park It: Castle Rocks near Walnut Creek to close for falcon mating season Area to be off-limits Feb. 1 to July 31 for birds to produce new generation By NED MACKAY | East Bay Regional Park District PUBLISHED: January 20, 2019 at 5:00 am | UPDATED: January 20, 2019 at 6:13 am

It’s time again for closure of the Castle Rock formations that overlook Diablo Foothills Regional Park in Walnut Creek, to protect the resident peregrine falcons during their mating season. A peregrine Falcon flies over sandstone rocks at the foot of Mount Diablo State Park in Walnut Creek. The Castle Rock formations that overlook Diablo Foothills Regional Park in Walnut Creek will be closed again to the public Feb. 1 to protect the resident peregrine falcons during their mating season. (Dan Rosenstrauch/staff archives)

The rocks will be off-limits to human visitors from Feb. 1 to July 31 so that the birds can nest, lay eggs, fledge their young and produce another generation of peregrines. The Castle Rock formation is in Mount Diablo State Park, but protecting the birds is in partnership with the East Bay Regional Park District. Visitors are excluded from the entire area across Pine Creek from the Old Stage Road Trail. Signs are posted at all trailheads; volunteer birdwatchers alert authorities to intruders. Trespassing can lead to a ticket and expensive fine.

Peregrine falcons are amazing birds. About the size of crows, they prey mostly on smaller birds but also mammals and reptiles. A peregrine can dive at up to 200 miles per hour, making it the fastest animal in the world. Castle Rock is one of only three active peregrine territories in the Mount Diablo area, and a nesting pair of falcons lives there.

Peregrines are no longer on the federal endangered species list. However, the birds are still protected under the state’s migratory bird act. So please abide by the closure and don’t climb up into the Castle Rocks during the peregrines’ nesting period. Give these beautiful birds a chance to reproduce.

Oakley: Speaking of birds, especially raptors, naturalist Mike Moran will lead a program on the last Thursday of each month to count the population of hawks, falcons and eagles at regional parks in East Contra Costa County. No experience is necessary; Mike teaches how to identify the various birds. The next session is from 9 to 11:30 a.m. Jan. 31 at Big Break Regional Shoreline on Big Break Road in Oakley. It’s free, but registration is required. To register, call 888-327-2757, select option 2, and refer to program number 23912.

Antioch: Mining and geology are the themes of a program from 10 a.m. to noon Jan. 27 at Black Diamond Mines Regional Preserve in Antioch. Naturalist Eddie Willis will lead a hike for ages 8 and older along two steep, mud-free miles of the park’s Chaparral Loop Trail to discover the ancient and modern history of the park. Meet Eddie in the parking lot at the end of Somersville Road, 3½ miles south of Highway 4. For information, call 888-327-2757, ext. 2750.

77 Martinez: Another mud-free pathway is the George Miller Trail at Carquinez Strait Regional Shoreline between Martinez and Port Costa. It’s a paved trail open to hikers, cyclists and equestrians but closed to motor vehicles except for park rangers and emergency traffic. There are beautiful panoramic views of Carquinez Strait and the town of Benicia across the way.

Naturalist Virginia Delgado will lead an easy walk there from 10:30 a.m. to noon Jan. 26 for ages 5 and older. The trail is wheelchair-accessible. Meet at the parking lot on the Port Costa side. To get there, take the McEwen Road exit from Highway 4. Follow McEwen Road to the bottom of the hill, turn right on Carquinez Scenic Drive, and proceed to the lot and the gate barring further vehicle traffic. For information, call 888-327-2757, ext. 2750.

Berkeley: At Tilden Nature Area near Berkeley, there’s a nature ramble from 2 to 3 p.m. every Sunday in January with naturalist “Trail Gail” Broesder. Meet Gail at the Environmental Education Center for an easy walk to Jewel Lake in search of wildlife. The center is at the north end of Tilden’s Central Park Drive. Call 510-544-2233.

Alameda: Family Nature Fun is in session from 2 to 3 p.m. every Saturday and Sunday at Crab Cove Visitor Center in Alameda. The theme Jan. 26-27 is “Move It!” — how animals hop, crawl, fly and run to survive. Crab Cove is at 1252 McKay Ave. off Alameda’s Central Avenue. Call 510-544-3187.

Fremont: “Sleep in and take a hike” is the plan for a program from 1 to 3:30 p.m. Jan. 27 with naturalist Francis Mendoza at Coyote Hills Regional Park in Fremont. It’s an easy, 2½ - mile hike around the hills for ages 15 and older. Meet Francis at the visitor center, wear layers and bring water. Heavy rain would cancel it. Coyote Hills is at the end of Patterson Ranch Road off Paseo Padre Parkway. The program is free, but there’s a parking fee of $5 per vehicle. Call 510-544-3220.

Online: This is just a sampler. There are lots of other programs on the calendar as January turns to February. Check out the park district’s website at www.ebparks.org.

Ned MacKay writes a regular column about East Bay Regional Park District sites and activities. Email him at [email protected].

78 79 Climate change puts Richmond’s plant and animal populations in a state of flux Faster-than-average warming is bringing changes to Richmond’s ecosystems. Temperatures and sea levels are rising. Fog patterns are shifting. Richmond’s plants and animals are facing a future of altered habitats.

Anna’s hummingbird feeding on pallid manzanita nectar in a stand of maritime chaparral at Sobrante Ridge Regional Preserve

To the west lies 32 miles of shoreline, the longest of any city in the Bay Area. To the east lie the hills: Sobrante Ridge and Wildcat Canyon. These open spaces contain salt marshes, subtidal zones, evergreen forests, coastal prairie and chaparral. Shorebirds, raptors, mammals, fish, and invertebrates call Richmond home.

As part of a comprehensive study on human-caused climate change at National Parks published this fall, Patrick Gonzalez, a climate change scientist and forest ecologist at the University of California, Berkeley, looked at historical and future climate data at Rosie the Riveter WWII Home Front National Historic Park in Richmond.

Gonzalez said he found, “significant warming in Richmond, greater than the national rate and greater than the global rate.” Over the last century, from 1895-2010, the temperature has increased by 1.2 degrees Celsius, or 2.2 degrees Fahrenheit.

“If we don’t reduce our carbon production from cars, power plants and other human sources,” he said, temperatures at the Rosie the Riveter WWII Home Front could by 2100 increase by three times what it has already risen during the past century. “That would mean a rise of another 3.8 degrees Celsius, or 6.8 degrees Fahrenheit,” Gonzalez said.

Shorebirds feeding at the Dotson Family Marsh

Along the Shoreline

Point San Pablo shoreline

On a recent Saturday morning, bird watchers from all over the bay gathered at the Albany mudflats for a Golden Gate Audubon Society field trip. By ten minutes before 9 o’clock, nearly everyone had already arrived, quietly lined up on the viewing platform and aimed their spotting scopes toward the water. A “list keeper” was designated and Birders began calling out what they spotted: one long billed curlew, two American wigeons, one American avocet, 500 western sandpipers, two brown pelicans. Intact intertidal zones in the East Bay support some of the richest bird habitats in the world.

80 The San Francisco estuary is the largest on the west coast of North America. Although the Bay Area has already lost 80 percent of its tidal marsh, it is still home to the majority of tidal wetlands in the state.

“Tidal marshes are a lot like a sponge. They soak up water and help protect against sea level rise and they filter pollutants. They are super diverse productive systems,” said Julian Wood, the San Francisco Bay Program Leader at Point Blue.

The northern part of the Richmond shoreline is undeveloped and home to marsh habitat that thrives at Point Pinole and Point Molate. Michele Hammond, a botanist at the East Bay Regional Park District, said Whittell Marsh is home to the federally endangered soft bird’s-beak, a salt tolerant annual herb with spike shaped clusters of flowers. Salt marshes provide habitat for hundreds of species of migrating and year-round shorebirds and are home to pickleweed and the endangered salt marsh harvest mouse. They also help to filter runoff, keeping the bay healthier.

But Bay Area salt marshes like these could soon be forced up slope or disappear. Gonzalez and his team used data from a tidal gauge located offshore near Crissy Field in Golden Gate Park to gather historic sea level data, noting we could expect the trends in Richmond to be similar. “Human caused climate change has raised sea levels by an amount that would come halfway up to your knee, about 22 centimeters,” or nine inches, Gonzalez said.

Future sea level projections indicate it could rise by an amount that would come between your knees and your hips. “If we don’t reduce our carbon pollution, then continued climate change could raise sea levels another 75 centimeters,” or about 30 inches, by 2100, under the highest envisioned scenario, Gonzalez said.

“Any continued sea level rise threatens inundation of coastal areas,” he said.

Federally endangered soft bird’s-beak Sunset at Point Molate (Photo by Lech Naumovich) (Photo by Lech Naumovich)

As sea levels rise there are two ways for marsh habitats to adapt. “They can increase their elevation vertically through sediment accretion or move landward and shift upslope,” Wood said. The newly restored Dotson Marsh at Point Pinole was designed to accommodate these processes.

Lech Naumovich, executive director of Golden Hour Restoration, a non-profit focused on restoring native plants and habitats, said that many intact marsh habitats like at Point Molate are up against concrete so there is no room to move upslope.

In some coastal areas, “you have intact marsh and then, ‘Boom! Development,’” Naumovich said. “If sea levels rise, the marsh habitat could disappear underwater, becoming subtidal, and there would be no way for the replacement marsh habitat to move upslope,” he said.

81 According to V. Thomas Parker, a biologist at San Francisco State University, at the current rates of sea level rise and sediment accretion, marsh habitat can keep up but if sea level rise accelerates and sedimentation declines, “there is a threshold projected to be around 2050 where they will become mud slabs. They will drown,” Parker said.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has created maps for visualizing sea level rise. To view which areas of Richmond could end up submerged under Gonzalez’s scenarios, drag the sliders between two and three feet. American Avocet at the Albany Mudflats. This species is listed as climate endangered by the Audubon’s Bird’s and Climate Change Report.

Long-billed Curlew at the Albany Mudflats. This species is listed as climate endangered by the Audubon’s Bird’s and Climate Change Report. Sounds of shorebirds feeding at the Dotson Family Marsh at Point Pinole Regional Shoreline.

Dotson Family Marsh Pickleweed Saltmarsh Sparrow

Fog at Sobrante Ridge Regional Preserve

Shifting Fog Patterns

The Bay Area’s climate is characterized by fog, and many plants have evolved to depend on it. Understanding how climate change is impacting fog patterns is complex and is an area of active study. Several recent studies have indicated that there is a trend toward fewer fog days in the Bay Area, according to the California Climate Assessment, released in August of 2018.

The first significant rain of the season landed softly on the leathery green-gray leaves of the pallid manzanita. The plant’s twisted dark maroon bark glistened with water droplets. Fresh milky- white flowers covered two of the manzanita plants. Lichens and moss turned bright green from the moisture. Anna’s hummingbirds had appeared in full force congruently with the manzanita blooms: they chirped and chattered and swooped down to drink pallid manzanita nectar. The Pallid manzanita is the defining species of a plant community called maritime chaparral.

“Maritime chaparral,” named because it thrives in marine influenced climates, is a California plant community that depends on fog. The plant community is a rare ecological type and can only be found in a handful of places in the East Bay, one of which is at Sobrante Ridge Regional Preserve just beyond Richmond’s borders. The Sobrante Ridge maritime chaparral plant community is also home to brittleleaf manzanita, shreve oak, interior live oak, madrone, western bracken fern and sticky monkeyflower.

The pallid manzanita is a “classic fog species,” said Parker. It has a lobe shaped leaf base called “auriculate” because it looks like an earlobe. “You have a super rare plant with similar morphology to other rare plant species only found in fog,” said Parker.

82 Hammond, the botanist at the East Bay Regional Park District, said that the few remaining stands of maritime chaparral are fragmented and highly degraded. “As we lose the fog, we lose our maritime chaparral,” Hammond said.

Decreasing fog is just one of the challenges this plant community is facing. It is also declining because fire suppression activities are preventing the plant from successfully reproducing and because a soil borne pathogen is weakening the remaining populations.

Naumovich, who is working with the park district to restore pallid manzanitas, said “maritime Chaparral in the East Bay could be gone in the next 30 years. Healthy juvenile populations of pallid manzanita can be found in fewer than five locations across the range of this plant.”

Bark of a Pallid Manzanita Anna’s hummingbird rests Pallid manzanita flowers plant at Sobrante Ridge in a stand of maritime chaparral at Sobrante Ridge Regional Preserve

Lichens at Sobrante Ridge Regional Preserve. Lichens tend to grow in areas that receive summer fog.

Urban Wildlife Corridors

“Some wildlife species may need to shift locations as the vegetation they inhabit moves with a changing climate. Barriers to movement are substantial due to habitat fragmentation and urbanization,” according to the August publication of the Fourth California Climate Change Assessment.

Diana Benner, vegetation ecologist at the Watershed Nursery, a Richmond-based plant nursery specializing in growing California native plants, said, “our philosophy at the nursery is that having healthy plant communities with diverse genetics will increase the chance that plant species will be able to either adapt or disperse to climate change conditions. Having as much connectivity as possible in the form of urban wildlife corridors, like the Richmond Greenway or even individual gardens, can contribute.” Plantings along the Richmond Greenway

Changes in Seasonal Timing

Doug Bell, wildlife program manager at the East Bay Regional Park District, said that the park district is working to better understand how climate change is impacting wildlife. Bell has been

83 studying the impacts of drought on golden eagles in the Diablo range. He said, “we are looking at responses of wildlife populations to wide swings in weather patterns, such as the swings from wet to drought conditions.” If we do have more incidences of high variability as we move into the future, he said this could have impacts on wildlife.

“The timing of seasonal events, such as flowering or insect emergence, is highly sensitive to climate and offers important opportunities for monitoring biotic responses and engaging citizen science,” according the California Climate Assessment.

Tom Kelly, co-director of Greens at Work, a native plant revegetation project at Point Isabel, said he sees lots of different birds that are stopping over at Hoffman Marsh to feed and rest during their migratory route on the Pacific Flyway. Kelly said he has observed anecdotally that some plants and native grasses are flowering earlier. “If plants are flowering, going to seed and producing food for birds at a time that is not synced up with the time birds are coming through, then there could be a reduction in bird populations. The timing is really important. They could go hungry,” Kelly said.

A Great Egret catching and eating a fish at Point Isabel

Gonzalez said there is still time to alter the course of this trajectory. “The good news is with renewable energy, energy conservation and other available practices to reduce carbon pollution, if we meet the Paris Agreement goals, we can limit the projected temperature increase to 1.4 degrees Celsius, or 2.5 degrees Fahrenheit, half of the heating under the highest scenario,” he said.

“We could also limit sea level rise to 50 centimeters,” or about 30 inches,” Gonzalez said.

84 Martin Luther King Jr. Day 2019: Here’s what is happening in Bay Area By JIM HARRINGTON | [email protected] | Bay Area News Group PUBLISHED: January 8, 2019 at 3:34 pm | UPDATED: January 18, 2019 at 1:13 pm

Jose Carlos Fajardo/staff archives Billie Nichols, of El Cerrito, marches in the 29th annual El Cerrito Martin Luther King Jr. Day Celebration in El Cerrito, Calif., on Monday, Jan. 15, 2018. (Jose Carlos Fajardo/Bay Area News Group)

People in the San Francisco Bay Area will join together to celebrate Martin Luther King Jr. Day on Jan. 21. Here’s a look at some of the top events going on:

East Bay

30th Annual El Cerrito Martin Luther King Jr. Day Celebration: The two-day event, featuring a theme of “Moving the Wisdom of our Past Forward Towards Justice,” takes place Jan. 20-21. It kicks off with a free screening of “Cracking the Codes,” a documentary film addressing the systemic causes and potential responses to racial inequity at 4 p.m. Jan. 20 at the El Cerrito High School Performing Arts Theater. On Jan. 21, people will gather at 8:30 a.m. at City Hall Plaza and at 9:30 a.m. begin marching to El Cerrito High School, where a rally and program starts at 11 a.m. For details, and to RSVP for the film screening, visit http://ca-elcerrito.civicplus.com

Piedmont MLK Day celebration: The theme for this 22nd annual celebration is “Beyond the Dream: King Speaks Out Against Poverty.” The event runs 12-2:30 p.m. Jan. 21 at Piedmont Veterans Memorial Hall and features performances by the Black Sheroes, a division of the youth ensemble Young Gifted and Black; Oakland Jazz Workshops; Together We Slam of Piedmont High School; and Oakland Interfaith Youth Choir. Invited speakers include congresswoman Barbara Lee, D-Oakland; State Assemblywoman Buffy Wicks; Oakland’s Youth Poet Laureate Leila Mottley, and more. Visit www.padc.info.

Hayward Martin Luther King Day Celebration and March: The event, with the theme of “Lack of Shelter — Homes for Everyone,” begins at 9:30 a.m. at City Hall Plaza in Hayward. It is organized by the South Hayward Parish, a collection of area church congregations addressing issues of homelessness, poverty and social justice. The event will include music, readings of Dr. King’s works, a march along the main streets of downtown Hayward and more. For more information, visit southhaywardparish.org.

In the Name of Love: The 17th annual MLK tribute concert features Jeanie Tracy, Kev Choice, Faye Carol, Terrie Odabi, Alvon Johnson, Scott Thompson and Daria Johnson; 7 p.m. Jan. 20 at Scottish Rite Center, Oakland; $25-$65 (proceeds benefit Living Jazz Children’s Project); www.livingjazz.org.

Martin Luther King, Jr. Film Festival: The African American Museum & Library at Oakland presents its annual film festival in honor of the great civil rights leader. Festival runs 11 a.m.-5:30 p.m. Details can be found at www.oaklandlibrary.org.

Martin Luther King, Jr. Day of Service: There are a number of Day of Service events going on in the Bay Area, including one at the Martin Luther King Jr. Regional Shoreline in Oakland. Volunteers are asked to come out and help clean and restore the shoreline. Event runs 8:30 a.m.- 12 noon. For more information, visit www.ebparks.org.

85 Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Oratorical Festival & Poetry Slam: Students will gather to perform/read an essay, speech, or poem honoring King and celebrating his message of peace, tolerance and social justice, starting at at 10:30 a.m. at the Senior Community Center at 13909 E. 14th St. in San Leandro. For details, visit sanleandro.org/depts/rec/special_events.

The Peoples March — Reclaim King’s Radical Legacy: The fifth annual march is hosted by the Anti-Terror Project and is at 11 a.m. Jan. 21 at Oscar Grant Park in Oakland. For more information, visit www.facebook.com/events/306880009918687.

South Bay/Peninsula

The Caltrain NorCalMLK Celebration Train: Caltrain is once again providing free transportation for those wishing to attend the NorCalMLK events in San Francisco on Jan. 21. The train departs San Jose’s Diridon Station at 9:45 a.m. on Jan. 21, making stops in Palo Alto at 10:05 a.m. and San Mateo at 10:25 a.m., before reaching San Francisco at 10:50 a.m. It’s a free, ticketed service, which means you must register in advance to receive a free commemorative ticket (which is good for a southbound Caltrain trip as well, after 1 p.m. on Jan. 21). Tickets are limited due to train capacity, http://www.caltrain.com/riderinfo/specialevents/CelebrationTrain.html.

MLK Day of Service and East Palo Alto Mayor’s Tree Planting: At this fourth annual event, volunteers will work with Canopy, Grassroots Ecology and the San Francisquito Joint Powers Authority to “create new habitat for local pollinators and bird species at several of the recently reopened entry points of the Bay Trail in East Palo Alto.” Volunteers will be planting trees and plants in order to create “inviting gateways to the Bay Trail and other urban green space.” Event runs 9-a.m.-12:30 p.m. at Martin Luther King Park, 435 Daisy Lane, East Palo Alto. For more information, visit http://canopy.org/event-calendar/.

MLK Youth Leadership Training: Middle and high school youth are taught how to originate, plan and execute service projects. After a one-hour training, participants meet with civic leaders and business professionals at the Martin Luther King Jr. VIP Reception and Stop the Violence event. Event runs 1-2 p.m. Includes luncheon. Jan. 19 at Mayfair Community Center, 2039 Kammerer Ave., San Jose; $50; www.eventbrite.com.

San Francisco

The Northern California Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Community Foundation (NorcalMLK): The organization is hosting its annual MLK celebrations in San Francisco. The theme for MLK2019 is “We Are In This Together.” Events are free and open to the public (unless otherwise noted) and include a 1.5-mile march/parade beginning at 11 a.m. Jan. 21 from the Caltrain Station in downtown San Francisco, honoring the famed Selma-to-Montgomery marches and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. There will be live music following the march/parade’s conclusion at Yerba Buena Gardens. MLK events also include lectures, films, an arts festival, a health fair and other events Jan. 19-21. More information can be found at sfmlkday.org.

The Museum of the African Diaspora: MoAD is offering free admission on Jan. 21 and has plenty of events planned, including screenings of “Martin Luther King, Jr. in India” documentary and performances by Dimensions Dance Company and Prescott Circus. Hours are 11 a.m.-5 p.m. Visit www.moadsf.org for more information.

86 Turret spiders build tiny towers for hunting unsuspecting prey These minuscule relatives of tarantulas pack a powerful punch. JAYMI HEIMBUCH January 17, 2019, 1:38 p.m.

The eyes of a turret spider reflect camera light. Turret spiders have pretty poor vision and instead rely on their ability to sense vibrations in order to know if prey has come close enough to ambush. (Photo: Josh Cassidy/KQED)

If you look closely at the forest floors in central and northern California, you may notice what look like little tubes rising up from the leaf litter or the bark of a fallen log. You'll have to look carefully because the tubes are only about an inch high. With a soft-looking white lining, and an exterior of moss, mud or leaves that match the surroundings, those tubes are the comfy castles of the California turret spider.

The sun sets behind the trees at Briones Regional Park in California. Soon the turret spiders will rise up from their burrows and ascent to the mouth of their turrets to hunt prey. (Photo: Josh Cassidy/KQED)

A relative of trapdoor spiders and tarantulas, this species is so named because of the structures they build and skulk in, waiting for prey to pass by. They use the vibrations made near their turret walls to figure out in which direction to come out and pounce, dragging their prey into the turret, which can extend up to six inches underground.

While males venture away from their turrets to find mates, females don't leave their well- crafted homes. They might live in the same structure for as long as 16 years!

An article in Bay Nature Magazine describes these creatures in elegant detail:

Turret spiders are part of an ancient lineage of arachnids called mygalomorphs, which swing their fangs down like pickaxes rather than pinching them in from the sides like most modern spiders. Tarantulas and trapdoor spiders are also part of this group, and California turns out to be one of the world's epicenters for mygalomorph diversity. It takes a trained eye to spot turret spiders because they're only three quarters of an inch long and they hide in the ground. But once you learn to spot their burrows you might notice they are astonishingly abundant.

"To me, the turrets look just like the rook in a chess set," Trent Pearce, a naturalist for the East Bay Regional Park District, tells KQED's Deep Look. "The spiders themselves are super-burly — like a tiny tarantula the size of your pinky nail."

Watching a turret spider in action is something that startles and delights naturalists and researchers alike. Anyone who has a thing for horror movies will enjoy seeing the spider's

87 lightning fast attack. This video from KQED Deep Look gives a whole new perspective to the danger facing any small insect moving about across a seemingly empty forest floor.

These incredible arachnids are found only in California. Next time you stroll through a Bay Area park, keep an eye out for a little structure standing out amongst the leaf litter. Then look very closely and see if there are eight tiny legs perched near the entrance waiting to pounce...

Turret spiders usually don’t stray from their turrets. Some female turret spiders may dwell in one place for 16 years or more. (Photo: Josh Cassidy/KQED)

88 DeSaulnier Urges Trump Administration to Include the East Bay in Wildfire Prevention Efforts By ECT - Jan 16, 2019 Washington, DC – Congressman Mark DeSaulnier (CA-11) sent a letter to the Trump Administration urging the Department of Agriculture and U.S. Forest Service to include the East Bay of San Francisco, and communities like it, when undertaking wildfire planning and prevention in California.

“At a time when the President is hostile to the State of California and threatened to pull federal emergency funding meant for wildfire victims, we need a concrete understanding of what specific steps the Trump Administration is taking to ensure the Bay Area is included in wildfire planning efforts,” said Congressman DeSaulnier.

Last year, Congress gave new authority to federal agencies to address wildfire risks and better manage forests (Division O, Title II of P.L. 115-141). While many of these pertain to federal forest lands, agencies are also directed to undertake wildfire hazard severity mapping for communities for areas that are “adjacent to National Forest System lands” or “affected by wildland fire, as determined by the Secretary.” Depending on how agencies interpret these guidelines, it could leave areas like parts of Contra Costa County – which are classified as having medium to high risk of wildfires – un-helped.

“Part of what is so special about the Bay Area is that it is home to both 7 million people and large areas of natural open spaces. With wildfires now a threat statewide and year-round, and with climate change adding to their impacts, we cannot lose sight of the need to do prevention and risk mitigation on lands close to our population centers, including in many areas of Contra Costa County,” DeSaulnier concluded.

“The East Bay Regional Park District’s professional firefighters and operational staff are on- guard as dramatic weather-related events have extended the threat of wildfire. Rep. DeSaulnier should be applauded for his tireless efforts to address the wildfire risk in our suburban and urban communities,” said East Bay Regional Park District General Manager Robert Doyle.

“We are grateful for the important work of the U.S. Forest Service wildfire teams working with state and local firefighters to halt the wildfires in California this past year. As proactive, preventative work is critical to these ongoing efforts focused on wildfires, it will be important that the U.S. Forest Service, state and local wildfire teams also work together to look at the communities of Contra Costa County and the East Bay of the San Francisco Bay Area, even though this area does not contain lands under the National Forest System, because this area is densely populated and next to large open space areas rich in conservation values,” said Ted Clement, Executive Director of Save Mount Diablo.

89 Community Corner Shared from San Ramon, CA Mountain Lion Sighting Prompts Reminder From San Ramon Police A trail camera posted in a rural area near San Ramon captured a clear photo of the big cat in December, according to police. By Autumn Johnson, Patch National Staff | Jan 15, 2019 2:35 pm ET

SAN RAMON, CA — Police this week alerted residents to a mountain lion spotted in the Thomas Ranch area along Norris Canyon Road near San Ramon. On Dec. 23, a trail camera captured a clear photo of the big cat at about 8:30 p.m.

Authorities acknowledge that mountain lions live in the rural areas but sightings and photos of the big cats are fairly rare. Police said they alerted the Contra Costa County Animal Control and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife of the male mountain lion.

In October, a wayward mountain lion made national headlines after he was found hunkered down in the bushes of a commercial business park in Pleasanton. Authorities safely captured the young animal and released it several hours later in the Sunol Regional Wilderness area.

While it would be rare for a mountain lion to approach humans, you can follow a few simple rules to keep you and your family safe:

• Do not feed deer. It is illegal in California and it will attract mountain lions. • If you see a mountain lion DO NOT APPROACH IT, especially one that is feeding or with offspring. Most mountain lions will try to avoid confrontation. • Avoid hiking or jogging through wooded areas when mountain lions are most active—dawn, dusk, or at night. • Keep a close watch on small children when hiking or traveling in or about wooded areas. • If you encounter a mountain lion, do not run; instead, face the animal, make noise and try to look bigger by waving your arms; throw rocks or other objects. Pick up small children. • For more information about mountain lions click here www.keepmewild.org

90 OPINION Opinion: Albany Beach should be dog-free two weekends a month The rules state that dogs need to be on leashes the whole time, but the law is routinely ignored making the beach an unwelcoming place for many. There needs to be a compromise. By James B. Smith Jan. 14, 2019, 9 a.m. Albany Beach. Photo: Lance Knobel

On Dec. 29, Berkeleyside posted a photo to Instagram of Albany Beach. It showed the San Francisco skyline, the Golden Gate Bridge, and numerous dogs running around off leash.

What’s wrong with this picture? The dogs. Rules established by the East Bay Regional Park District clearly state that Albany Beach is a “developed area” in which dogs must be on-leash.

The East Bay Regional Park District and the city of Albany have turned a blind eye to the fact that Albany Beach is overrun with a huge number of off-leash dogs — many of which are brought by Berkeley residents. This situation denies public access to many members of the public such as the dog-phobic, disabled people with service animals and certain mobility disabilities, families with small children, and dog owners who want to avoid off- leash dogs.

Dog phobia is much more prevalent than most people would think. A 2001 Gallup Poll states that 21% of adults aged 65 or older — that’s more than one-fifth of seniors — as well as 14% of women, and 11% of people, in general, are scared of dogs.

Allowing off-leash dogs prevents disabled people with service dogs and with certain mobility disabilities from accessing Albany Beach. There is extensive documentation that off-leash dogs prevent service dogs from doing their job and that their very presence can traumatize service dogs and require them to be retrained or replaced, and attacks on service dogs by off-leash dogs are common. Here is some documentation:

Contributing to denying disable people free access to public places seems to be against California law.

“(a) Individuals with disabilities or medical conditions have the same right as the general public to the full and free use of the streets, highways, sidewalks…and other public places.”

“(a) Any person or persons, firm or corporation who…interferes with the rights of an individual with a disability under Sections 54…is liable for each offense for the actual damages and any amount as may be determined…Interfere,” for purposes of this section, includes, but is not limited to, preventing or causing the prevention of a guide dog, signal dog, or service dog from carrying out its functions in assisting a disabled person.”

91 For those who think that off-leash dogs at Albany Beach don’t pose a threat to anyone, there is a well-documented history of dog attacks at Albany Beach:

Here is a flyer describing a vicious ppit bullattack on another dog, causing severe injuries at Albany Beach in 2018:

Families with small children and have found it impossible to enjoy a day at Albany Beach, for example, see the official comment submitted to the Albany Beach restoration plan:

“My own experience provides one example of how the culture of an off- leash dog park that EBRPD has allowed to develop at Albany Beach is incompatible with other activities that members of the general public ordinarily expect to enjoy at a beach”

As to equitable solutions, at a bare minimum, two weekends a month should be dog- prohibited at Albany Beach. Dog owners could still access the beach with their dogs the vast majority (87%) of days in the month.

And there are plenty of places to let dogs run. Dogs are allowed off-leash on the entirety of Albany Bulb except for the plateau area right next to Albany Beach, on all of Point Isabel two miles away, on the beach areas next to Frontage Road between Berkeley and Emeryville, on parts of the Berkeley Marina, etc.–while the closest decent-sized beach area just for humans is at Crown Beach, all the way in Alameda.

For more supporting documentation, ideas and suggestions, including building separate official off-leash dog beaches on parts of Albany Beach and Point Isabelle, please read a vastly expanded version of this op-ed.

I hope that we can come up with solutions to let dog-lovers, the dog-phobic, disabled with service animals, families with small children, and everyone in our communities to be able to fully and freely enjoy our public spaces.

James B. Smith has lived in the Bay Area for 20 years — in Berkeley, Oakland, and now Albany — and is a horticulturalist.

92

DeSaulnier and Feinstein Introduce Legislation to Upgrade Contra Costa’s Water Infrastructure Press Release By ECT - Jan 11, 2019 Washington, DC – Today, Congressman Mark DeSaulnier (CA-11) and Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) introduced legislation to improve the safety and upkeep of important water supply infrastructure. The Contra Costa Canal Transfer Act (H.R. 432/S. 93) would transfer the title of the Contra Costa Canal System from the Bureau of Reclamation to the Contra Costa Water District (CCWD), enabling the CCWD to undertake necessary upgrades to the system.

“The aging Contra Costa Canal is in need of critical safety and structural improvements to prevent accidents, water leaks, and water quality degradation,” said Congressman Mark DeSaulnier. “By transferring ownership of the canal from the federal government to the Contra Costa Water District, we can help streamline these improvements and revitalize the land surrounding the canal for the enjoyment of local residents. I thank Senator Feinstein for her partnership on this legislation, which promises to benefit our local communities.”

“This is commonsense legislation to facilitate much-needed safety improvements to the Contra Costa Canal,” said Senator Feinstein. “If the water district is willing and ready to make these improvements, there’s no reason the federal government should stand in the way. Transferring the title will help save lives and modernize the Contra Costa Canal system.”

Built between 1937 and 1948, the Contra Costa Canal delivers water both to homes and businesses throughout Contra Costa County, and also to the Sacramento and San Joaquin Valleys for irrigation. The 48-mile canal system is currently exposed, but following the transfer the CCWD will work to enclose it in a surface tunnel. Since the Contra Costa Canal has been operational, 81 people have drowned in the canal. H.R. 432/S. 93 would help eliminate safety risks while maintaining recreation opportunities, including restoring land located in the Concord Naval Weapons Station.

“Gaining title of the Contra Costa Canal is so very important as we look at the future of this critical facility,” said Lisa Borba, President of the Contra Costa Water District’s Board of Directors. “We thank Congressman DeSaulnier and Senator Dianne Feinstein for all the work they are doing to move this bill to a successful outcome.”

93 “The Contra Costa Canal Transfer Act has the Park District’s support and ensures the existing recreation agreement for Contra Loma Regional Park and Contra Costa Canal Trail continues and is recognized in the legislation. We thank Rep. Desaulnier and Sen. Feinstein for their leadership to pass the Contra Costa Canal Transfer Act and continued support for the East Bay Regional Parks,” said Robert Doyle, General Manager, East Bay Regional Park District.

During the 115th Congress, both Congressman DeSaulnier and Senator Feinstein introduced similar legislation. The House version of the bill unanimously passed in the U.S. House of Representatives.

94 East Bay Regional Park District to host youth job fairs

Jan 10, 2019 Updated Jan 10, 2019

Courtesy of www.ebrpd.org.

For the fifth consecutive year, the East Bay Regional Park District (EBRPD) will host two youth job fairs designed to raise awareness of employment opportunities for youth in the East Bay.

The fairs are scheduled in Oakley, Saturday, Jan. 26, at Big Break Visitor Center, 69 Big Break Road, 10 a.m. to noon; and in Union City, Saturday, Feb. 2. Both events offer attendees an opportunity to learn about the specific jobs available and interact with current employees to get insight into what it’s like to work for the park district. Highlighted 2019 positions include interpretive student aides, public safety student aides, recreation leaders, lifeguards, gate attendants, park services attendants, student laborers, field interns, interns and volunteers.

The fairs also include general information sessions on resume writing, application submittal and job interviewing for youth looking to enter the workforce, whether at the park district or elsewhere.

“The park district’s annual youth job fairs are an important way for the district to engage with local youth looking for jobs,” said EBRPD Ward 5 Director Ayn Wieskamp. “The park district works very hard to ensure youth in the district are aware of the jobs the district has to offer. These events are great for area youth looking for full-time work or seasonal jobs.”

The youth job fairs are key to filling seasonal summer positions, especially recreation leaders and lifeguards.

“The park district is interested in attracting qualified and energetic job candidates who care about parks, nature learning and enjoy outdoor recreation,” said EBRPD Chief Human Resources Officer Kip Walsh. “The Youth Job Fairs are a great way for the park district to connect directly with interested job candidates.”

For more information, visit www.ebparks.org.

95

Home

• Community News EBRPD to Host Youth Job Fairs

Posted: Thursday, January 10, 2019 12:00 am

For the 5th consecutive year, the East Bay Regional Park District will host two Youth Job Fairs, designed to raise awareness of employment opportunities for youth in the East Bay. The fairs are scheduled in Oakley on Saturday, January 26, 2019, and in Union City on Saturday, February 2, 2019. Both events offer attendees an opportunity to learn about the specific Park District jobs available and interact with current employees to get insight into what it’s like to work for the Park District. Highlighted 2019 positions include: Interpretive Student Aides, Public Safety Student Aides, Recreation Leaders, Lifeguards, Gate Attendants, Park Services Attendants, Student Laborers, Field Interns, Interns, and Volunteers.

The Youth Job Fairs also include general information sessions on resume writing, application submittal, and job interviewing for youth looking to enter the workforce, whether at the Park District or elsewhere.

“The Park District’s Annual Youth Job Fairs are an important way for the District to engage with local youth looking for jobs,” said East Bay Regional Park District Ward 5 Director Ayn Wieskamp. “The Park District works very hard to ensure youth in the district are aware of the jobs the District has to offer.”

“These events are great for area youth looking for full-time work or seasonal jobs,” added Wieskamp.

2018’s youth job fairs were the biggest so far. Over 500 attendees learned about working for the District and the positions available. The East Bay Regional Park District is the largest employer of youth in the East Bay, hiring over 400 Bay Area youth each year to work in the District's 73 regional parks and ten visitor centers. The Youth Job Fairs are key to filling seasonal summer positions, especially Recreation Leaders and Lifeguards.

“The Park District is interested in attracting qualified and energetic job candidates who care about parks, nature learning, and enjoy outdoor recreation,” said East Bay Regional Park District Chief Human Resources Officer Kip Walsh. “The Youth Job Fairs are a great way for the Park District to connect directly with interested job candidates.”

2019 Youth Job Fair Details: Saturday, January 26, 2019 Big Break Visitor Center, 10 a.m. to noon, 69 Big Break Road, Oakley, CA 94561; Saturday, February 2, 2019, Ruggieri Senior Center, 10 a.m. to noon. 33997 Alvarado-Niles Road, Union City, CA 94587. (In partnership with City of Union City).

96 http://www.independentnews.com/

Jobs Shared From Union City, CA Youth Job Fairs For Parks District Planned The East Bay Regional Park District is the largest employer of youth in the East Bay, hiring over 400 youth each year. By Bea Karnes, Patch Staff | Jan 10, 2019 5:57 pm ET

UNION CITY, CA —The East Bay Regional Park District will host two Youth Job Fairs. The first will be in Oakley on Saturday, Jan. 26, and the second will be in Union City on Saturday, Feb. 2.

Highlighted 2019 positions include: Interpretive Student Aides, Public Safety Student Aides, Recreation Leaders, Lifeguards, Gate Attendants, Park Services Attendants, Student Laborers, Field Interns, Interns, and Volunteers.

The Youth Job Fairs also include information sessions on resume writing, application submittal, and job interviewing for youth looking to enter the workforce, whether at the Park District or elsewhere.

"The Park District's Annual Youth Job Fairs are an important way for the District to engage with local youth looking for jobs," said East Bay Regional Park District Ward 5 Director Ayn Wieskamp. "The Park District works very hard to ensure youth in the district are aware of the jobs the District has to offer."

"These events are great for area youth looking for full-time work or seasonal jobs," added Wieskamp.

Last year over 500 attendees learned about working for the District and the positions available.

The East Bay Regional Park District is the largest employer of youth in the East Bay, hiring over 400 Bay Area youth each year to work in the District's 73 regional parks and ten visitor centers.

"The Park District is interested in attracting qualified and energetic job candidates who care about parks, nature learning, and enjoy outdoor recreation," said East Bay Regional Park District Chief Human Resources Officer Kip Walsh. "The Youth Job Fairs are a great way for the Park District to connect directly with interested job candidates."

Jan. 26, 10 a.m. to noon: Big Break Visitor Center, 69 Big Break Road, Oakley, 94561

Feb. 2, 10 a.m. to noon: Ruggieri Senior Center, 33997 Alvarado-Niles Road, Union City, 94587

97 Costly Alameda special election set for April January 7, 2019 By Stephen Frank Leave a Comment

Why is the cost of housing and development so expensive in California? Just look at this special election to determine if the City of Alameda can use Federal funds to help the elderly! Instead of saying this is great and we get Federal money to help our local citizens, a group has decided to use a special election—costing taxpayers about $700,000 to make the final decision.

“The Alameda City Council voted, 4-1, Wednesday to call a special election on April 9 after certification of a ballot measure petition circulated last year opposing the use of a waterfront property near Crab Cove for a $40 million federal and state-funded senior wellness center and services for the homeless.

Alameda’s special election will be expensive, costing taxpayers somewhere between $580,000 and $730,000, and feature a competing ballot measure approved by the council Wednesday asking voters to confirm the council’s zoning decision. Choosing to place the ballot measure on the city’s next consolidated election in November 2020, would have instead cost an estimated $25,000.”

Maybe if Alameda said the money would go to help illegal aliens, instead of American elderly, it would not be controversial? The folks that created the special election have every right to do it. The people of the community have every right to stop supporting this group that is costing them so much money and harming senior citizens.

Costly Alameda special election set for April

Steve Tavares, East Bay Citizen, 1/4/19

The Alameda City Council voted, 4-1, Wednesday to call a special election on April 9 after certification of a ballot measure petition circulated last year opposing the use of a waterfront property near Crab Cove for a $40 million federal and state-funded senior wellness center and services for the homeless.

Alameda’s special election will be expensive, costing taxpayers somewhere between $580,000 and $730,000, and feature a competing ballot measure approved by the council Wednesday asking voters to confirm the council’s zoning decision. Choosing to place the ballot measure on the city’s next consolidated election in November 2020, would have instead cost an estimated $25,000.

Last year, proponents of the ballot measure, a group named Friends of Crab Cove, circulated a petition calling for the city to set aside a parcel of land, formerly owned by the federal government, but now slated for use by the Alameda Point Collaborative, a well-known non-profit offering services for the needy. But Friends of Crab Cove, instead, believe the parcel was already accounted for when East Bay voters approved

98 Measure WW, a $500 million bond extension brought on by the East Bay Regional Park District in 2008.

“Many have called us heartless, soulless and horrible people.”-Friends of Crab Cove member Angela Fawcett.

Detractors question whether the parcel in question is part of Measure WW. The list of benefits listed for Alameda at the time, included $6.5 million for improvements to the Crab Cove visitors center, restoring the beach, and expanding the park boundary. The East Bay Regional Park District, though, says it has no interest in the property on McKay Avenue.

The spring initiative is bound to be another fault line between progressives and conservatives in Alameda, following contentious ballot measures on rent issues, a city manager scandal, in part, involving public safety unions, and a recent hard-fought municipal election last November. For weeks, various Alameda social media sites contain visceral responses to the Friends of Crab Cove initiative and to its members, saying their intent is discriminatory.

Angela Fawcett, a member of Friends of Crab Cove, referenced the vitriol Wednesday night, while describing the group as a “grassroots movement for justice.” “Many have called us heartless, soulless and horrible people,” Fawcett told the council. “The America I grew up in, we have rights, we have a voice, opportunities for input, and to be heard.”

Fawcett added the promises in Measure WW have been broken. “Instead we’re getting a parking lot and a maintenance yard.” The parcel is too high-density for what Alameda Point Collaborative Executive Director Doug Biggs is prescribing for the property, while also citing traffic concerns.

The surplus property on McKay Avenue was lawfully gained, Biggs told the council. “I want the same safe community my neighbors want and I also want a place where elderly and the medically fragile homeless can stay with dignity, get medical health services that improve their life and saves millions in health care costs.”

Furthermore, putting the project on hold until a November 2020 election will be costly for the Alameda Point Collaborative, in terms of project overruns and penalties included in its lease, he told the council. It’s a sentiment the council ultimately shared Wednesday night, as they argued the prohibitive cost of an April 2019 special election is actually much less than the alternative than the “tens of millions of dollars” that could be lost by waiting almost two years.

Special election are prohibitively expensive as opposed to primary and general elections because local cities are not able to defray the registrar’s costs of running the election across multiple jurisdictions.

The tenacity of Alameda voters will certainly be tested just five months after a November election in which more than 70 percent of registered voters cast a ballot. Voter fatigue and low voter-turnout is often a hallmark of special elections, especially those held so soon after contentious elections. Additionally problematic for turnout next April is the fact Alameda voters will not be allowed the convenience of casting a Vote- By-Mail ballot. Alameda City Clerk Lara Weisinger told the council Wednesday it was

99 determined the initiative did not reach certain parameters to qualify as a Vote-By-Mail- only election. Some estimate voter turnout on April 9 could be somewhere in the teens.

But the council’s approval of an expensive special elections could also be used as cudgel to frame the initiative’s proponents as wasting taxpayers’ money. It’s a scenario Friends of Crab Cove appear cognizant about, telling the council they preferred a less expensive spot on the November 2020 ballot. “It’s on you” Fawcett told the council if they choose to hold the election this April. Councilmember Tony Daysog, the lone vote against the April special election, also preferred waiting until November 2020, saying he was not convince Alameda Point Collaborative will indeed be financially hurt by the wait.

Alameda Councilmember John Knox White believes language in the ballot measure is false and urged the council to legally challenge some of the assertions, primarily the framing of the initiative as “open space.” He also told the measure’s proponents that the initiative is a “lost cause” and urged them to withdraw it. “Don’t do this to our community. It’s time for healing,” he said. A new law allows proponents to withdraw an initiative within 88 days of the election.

The McKay Avenue property is not open space as the initiative’s proponents contend, said Councilmember Malia Vella, “It’s just not being used. It could also be urban blight and this is what this parcel has become.” If the measure is approved, she added, it will put other city funds at risk and jeopardize funding for other parks in Alameda.

Several councilmembers rebutted a repeated claim by Friend of Crab Cove that the property was already spoken for through voter approval of the park district’s Measure WW a decade ago. “We can’t be held responsible for what they told us to vote for is truth or untruth,” said Councilmember Jim Oddie.

Although voters approved Measure WW in 2008, Alameda Assistant City Attorney Celena Chen said the federal government’s plan for classifying the property as surplus was determined three years earlier. “The intent was clear to both the federal government and park district before it was placed before voters in 2008,” said Chen. The parcel was divided in 2015, she added.

100 101